blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => Poker Hand Analysis => Topic started by: The Camel on June 09, 2010, 04:17:46 PM



Title: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: The Camel on June 09, 2010, 04:17:46 PM
First hand of the $10,000 Main Event. (30k in chips 50-100 blinds)

Everyone passes to the button who makes it 300 to play.

You have AKo in the sb and decide to reraise to 1000.

The bb folds and the button goes into the tank.

As he rechecks his cards you see he has AQ suited.

He decides to shove allin.

Call or Pass?



Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: The Camel on June 09, 2010, 04:18:28 PM
Another question.

In this spot should Phil Ivey call or pass?


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:22:49 PM
First hand of the $10,000 Main Event. (30k in chips 50-100 blinds)

Everyone passes to the button who makes it 300 to play.

You have AKo in the sb and decide to reraise to 1000.

The bb folds and the button goes into the tank.

As he rechecks his cards you see he has AQ suited.

He decides to shove allin.

Call or Pass?



insta super snappy fist pump snap roll on the floor cant believe my luck call

noone is good enough to pass up a 70/30 equity shot................................ except phil  ivey (he would call too though)


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: Bongo on June 09, 2010, 04:24:05 PM
I remember a similar question on Paul Phillips blog, someone said he was good player so he should pass he replied he was a good player because he called with hands like this.

I'd call.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: kukushkin88 on June 09, 2010, 04:26:25 PM
It's a clear call, no one has anywhere near a big enough edge to fold here.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: pleno1 on June 09, 2010, 04:36:51 PM
i cawllllllll


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: The Camel on June 09, 2010, 04:58:44 PM
So many players claim to have a 300%+ edge in the main event, is taking a 70/30 worth it when they think they have an even bigger edge than this.

FWIW I would instacall.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: DaveShoelace on June 09, 2010, 05:05:48 PM
Not if it was suited, that always wins


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: pleno1 on June 09, 2010, 05:18:51 PM
although the play suggests the btn is a retard. if it was the first hand how would ivey be able to calculate his edge over villain or does he just do it against the field?


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: ChipRich on June 09, 2010, 05:33:48 PM
calllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: GreekStein on June 09, 2010, 05:59:48 PM
Obv call.

Should Ivey call is a tad more interesting because he prob has biggest edge ever but would he, yes.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: The Camel on June 09, 2010, 06:13:00 PM
I heard a funny story last year at the WSOP.

Allen Cunningham was at the ft of one the circuit events just before the series started.

An old guy said to him "I know you're a great player Allenn, but just how much do you think your ticket for the main event of the wsop is worth?"

AC thought for a few seconds and said, "hard to say, but I reckon about $80,000"

The old guy said nothing and all was forgotten until when sitting down after the dinner break the old guy tossed a huge brick of money to Cunningham.

"Here's $50,000, I want to buy 50% of you at the wsop".

Cunningham laughed and tossed it straight back.

Surely if he thinks he's got a 1000% expected ROI Cunningham would turn down a 70/30 shot in the first hand.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: Dubai on June 09, 2010, 06:22:27 PM
Camel on a fishing expedition here.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: Royal Flush on June 09, 2010, 06:24:46 PM
Keith dont you think your confusing his ITM% with ROI?


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: Dubai on June 09, 2010, 06:28:19 PM
Come on, he was about to land a few


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: The Camel on June 09, 2010, 06:33:34 PM
Bracelet winners itt.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: Rupert on June 10, 2010, 07:19:34 AM
the reason ROIs get so high is because you can repeatedly take large edges, not because you take one large (even huge) edge early on.  edges are huge late on in the WSOP because the mugs make such massive errors and thats where lots of the ROI comes from and obviously in order to get to these edges you need chips


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: LeKnave on June 10, 2010, 07:54:17 AM
flat pre


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: Girgy85 on June 10, 2010, 11:50:45 AM
flat pre

This



Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: The Camel on June 10, 2010, 12:02:49 PM
the reason ROIs get so high is because you can repeatedly take large edges, not because you take one large (even huge) edge early on.  edges are huge late on in the WSOP because the mugs make such massive errors and thats where lots of the ROI comes from and obviously in order to get to these edges you need chips

Ding ding ding.

We have the correct answer.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: Bongo on June 10, 2010, 01:41:48 PM
Is the correct answer call or fold?

I can't tell which Rupert is advocating!


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: keilan303 on June 10, 2010, 03:38:15 PM
What would Joe Cada do? He was the world champ afterall :P


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: The Camel on June 10, 2010, 05:41:42 PM
Is the correct answer call or fold?

I can't tell which Rupert is advocating!

Call. (I think)


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: MC on June 10, 2010, 06:23:59 PM
Would be a better question if you said he had 89s or something, obv a fistpump call here...


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: Rupert on June 11, 2010, 05:38:06 PM
yes bite his arm off.  doubt i'm good enough to fold 88


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: The Camel on June 11, 2010, 06:16:38 PM
yes bite his arm off.  doubt i'm good enough to fold 88

On my table in the 25k at Bellagio I instacall. (Amak, Haxton, Zee Justin, Mizrachi, USCPhildo etc)

In the wsop main event I prolly pass.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: Karabiner on June 11, 2010, 06:39:54 PM
flat pre

That's no good, you don't get to see his hand then...


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: DMorgan on June 15, 2010, 02:47:21 PM
obv call, and call with 22+ aswell.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: pleno1 on June 15, 2010, 05:27:41 PM
obv call, and call with 22+ aswell.

ak is obv call, 22 though, really?


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: thetank on June 16, 2010, 06:59:13 AM
I heard a funny story last year at the WSOP.

Allen Cunningham was at the ft of one the circuit events just before the series started.

An old guy said to him "I know you're a great player Allenn, but just how much do you think your ticket for the main event of the wsop is worth?"

AC thought for a few seconds and said, "hard to say, but I reckon about $80,000"

The old guy said nothing and all was forgotten until when sitting down after the dinner break the old guy tossed a huge brick of money to Cunningham.

"Here's $50,000, I want to buy 50% of you at the wsop".

Cunningham laughed and tossed it straight back.

Surely if he thinks he's got a 1000% expected ROI Cunningham would turn down a 70/30 shot in the first hand.

Maybe he didn't want arbboy to think he was a beggar


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: DMorgan on June 16, 2010, 02:46:59 PM
Well you're getting 1.15 to 1 to make the call with 22 and you've got 49.79% equity against AQs so its a +EV call.

Some people will probably say how thin an edge this is and that we'd want to 'wait for a better spot'

Most people don't understand how big an edge over the field you have to have to be able to pass up edges such as these


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: pleno1 on June 16, 2010, 02:49:46 PM
Well you're getting 1.15 to 1 to make the call with 22 and you've got 49.79% equity against AQs so its a +EV call.

Some people will probably say how thin an edge this is and that we'd want to 'wait for a better spot'

Most people don't understand how big an edge over the field you have to have to be able to pass up edges such as these

against a guy who has played the hand in this way, 4bet shoving 30k at 50/100 w/AQs I think we have a big enough edge to fold.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: GreekStein on June 16, 2010, 05:45:45 PM
people who say they call 22 here are crazy.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: DMorgan on June 16, 2010, 05:58:14 PM
But he's only one player at a 9 handed table, and in a field of over 7000 players.

Having a look at pokerstove maybe 22 is a bit of a stretch, so lets say 66. I assume that everyone in the folding 22 camp is also folding 66.

66 vs AQs you're 52% to win if you call.

For simplicities sake we'll say that there is a field of of 4096 (which is 2^12). So to have all of the chips in the tournament you have to double up 13 times. An average player in the field has a 1/4096 chance of winning, so wins 0.024% of the time they play the tournament. If you take your 52% to win every time (0.52^12) you win the tournament 0.039%

You've increased your chances of winning the tournament by 62.5% which obviously is huge.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: outragous76 on June 16, 2010, 06:07:20 PM
But he's only one player at a 9 handed table, and in a field of over 7000 players.

Having a look at pokerstove maybe 22 is a bit of a stretch, so lets say 66. I assume that everyone in the folding 22 camp is also folding 66.

66 vs AQs you're 52% to win if you call.

For simplicities sake we'll say that there is a field of of 4096 (which is 2^12). So to have all of the chips in the tournament you have to double up 13 times. An average player in the field has a 1/4096 chance of winning, so wins 0.024% of the time they play the tournament. If you take your 52% to win every time (0.52^12) you win the tournament 0.039%

You've increased your chances of winning the tournament by 62.5% which obviously is huge.

would you call yourself a "math guy"  :D


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: thetank on June 16, 2010, 06:26:19 PM
I've printed out Rupert's post and put it on my bedroom wall.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: DMorgan on June 16, 2010, 08:07:47 PM
But he's only one player at a 9 handed table, and in a field of over 7000 players.

Having a look at pokerstove maybe 22 is a bit of a stretch, so lets say 66. I assume that everyone in the folding 22 camp is also folding 66.

66 vs AQs you're 52% to win if you call.

For simplicities sake we'll say that there is a field of of 4096 (which is 2^12). So to have all of the chips in the tournament you have to double up 13 times. An average player in the field has a 1/4096 chance of winning, so wins 0.024% of the time they play the tournament. If you take your 52% to win every time (0.52^12) you win the tournament 0.039%

You've increased your chances of winning the tournament by 62.5% which obviously is huge.

would you call yourself a "math guy"  :D

Well, only in the sense that imo its essential to being as profitable as you possibly can be as a player. obv none of this maths is actually appplicable while you're sitting at the table, its just a reasonably simple way of showing how huge a gain you're passing up by folding in these spots.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: DMorgan on June 16, 2010, 08:10:45 PM
the correct answer is here:

http://www.cardplayer.com/cardplayer-magazines/65576-18-22/articles/15093-to-flip-or-not-to-flip


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: BAM on June 18, 2010, 01:28:43 AM
2005


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: pleno1 on June 18, 2010, 02:11:48 AM
Agree with everything skolsuper sais (put this in your signature quoted by me LDO) especially about the calling range. I think our equity being double in a 1500 tournament is totally different as its a harsher clock and the main event is much easier to obtain chips by winning hands at non showdown/non all in pots as the 3bet shove stack sizes come in far earlier.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: DMorgan on June 18, 2010, 03:42:45 AM
I guess the main event is a different tournament to most, but do you fold the QQ pre vs AK in a regular tournament? (Stars 100r as an example)

Not really 100% convinced that these huge ROIs are attainable. Obviously we'll never have a relevant sample size as it only happens once a year but from watching the final tables over the last 10 years it really hasn't been the case that really deep structure has resulted in the best players getting all the money, or at least to any lesser extent than a regular tournament


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: NoflopsHomer on June 18, 2010, 11:57:32 AM
Sure ever fold 57/43 edge under regular conditions.


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: Jon MW on June 18, 2010, 12:19:22 PM
But he's only one player at a 9 handed table, and in a field of over 7000 players.

Having a look at pokerstove maybe 22 is a bit of a stretch, so lets say 66. I assume that everyone in the folding 22 camp is also folding 66.

66 vs AQs you're 52% to win if you call.

For simplicities sake we'll say that there is a field of of 4096 (which is 2^12). So to have all of the chips in the tournament you have to double up 13 times. An average player in the field has a 1/4096 chance of winning, so wins 0.024% of the time they play the tournament. If you take your 52% to win every time (0.52^12) you win the tournament 0.039%

You've increased your chances of winning the tournament by 62.5% which obviously is huge.

would you call yourself a "math guy"  :D

Well, only in the sense that imo its essential to being as profitable as you possibly can be as a player. obv none of this maths is actually appplicable while you're sitting at the table, its just a reasonably simple way of showing how huge a gain you're passing up by folding in these spots.


Quote
You've increased your chances of winning the tournament by 62.5% which obviously is huge.

lol sure is a good use of proportion


Quote
An average player in the field  ... so wins 0.024% of the time they play the tournament. If you take your 52% to win every time ... you win the tournament 0.039%

These are the %'s you should be concentrating on


Title: Re: Another Theoretical WSOP Question
Post by: thetank on June 19, 2010, 10:29:09 AM
To be fair to writer of article, it was 2005 and he said call. In 2010 we're still saying call.