|
Title: Should've been Jailed for Longer... Post by: jjandellis on September 07, 2010, 10:20:03 PM Been following this story in the papers for some time.
The background to this case is horrifying; what shocks me is how lenient and weakly Wiltshire Constabulary have commented on this. Furthermore the sentence hand down is disgraceful. Minimums 3 years IMO. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-11214026 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-11214026) Title: Re: Should've been Jailed for Longer... Post by: LeedsRhodesy on September 07, 2010, 10:21:49 PM Been following this story in the papers for some time. The background to this case is horrifying; what shocks me is how lenient and weakly Wiltshire Constabulary have commented on this. Furthermore the sentence hand down is disgraceful. Minimums 3 years IMO. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-11214026 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-11214026) he will be out in 6 weeks Title: Re: Should've been Jailed for Longer... Post by: acc2020 on September 14, 2010, 04:20:50 PM Out after serving 6 days inside !!!!
He is allowed to appeal in the sentance. Nepotism or what !! Title: Re: Should've been Jailed for Longer... Post by: acc2020 on September 14, 2010, 04:30:25 PM George Michael given 8 weeks today , whats the odds he won't serve 8 weeks .
Title: Re: Should've been Jailed for Longer... Post by: TightPaulFolds on September 14, 2010, 05:24:15 PM George Michael given 8 weeks today , whats the odds he won't serve 8 weeks . Apparently he has lodged an appeal requesting a slightly longer sentence. Title: Re: Should've been Jailed for Longer... Post by: the sicilian on September 15, 2010, 04:33:43 AM Abs max 4 weeks.. was it a magistrates? if so surprised he even went as he could appeal and go to crown court without having to go inside then get it reduced to say community service on appeal...
dont ask me how i know all this... it was a long time ago and he can still walk with a limp |