Title: feeder Post by: kong69 on September 10, 2010, 06:28:41 PM Me and my friend seem to be on a different opinion on hand i played which i actually run, but he believes i made the incorrect play. I was on the button with one player left to the seats to a £100 comp. I had Aspades Qd i raised to 2222.00 the blind where 500-1000 my stack was 16000 and the average 8500. The small blind's stack was 2400 and the big 7300. my friend seems to think that a pass or all in is the right play. My decision was based on attacking the small blind and possibly passing to a reraise from the BB.
Title: Re: feeder Post by: Longy on September 10, 2010, 06:32:24 PM Shove pre easy game.
Never passing to a raise, if I happened to die at the table, I have written in to my will never to raise/fold less than 10bb effective, so i would call anyway. Why is this thread called feeder? Title: Re: feeder Post by: gatso on September 10, 2010, 06:36:26 PM don't particularly mind the raise size as long as we're calling the bb's shove. much better to just shove ourselves though
shove>>>>raise/call>>>>>hollyoaks>>>>>>>raise/fold Title: Re: feeder Post by: kong69 on September 10, 2010, 06:40:35 PM because it's thats what tourney it was. A satellite basically.. So you agree with me or my friend sorry my friend is adamant that he is correct, but i disagree and he is sure that he is correct and that i played the hand badly.
Title: Re: feeder Post by: Longy on September 10, 2010, 06:43:59 PM because it's thats what tourney it was. A satellite basically.. So you agree with me or my friend sorry my friend is adamant that he is correct, but i disagree and he is sure that he is correct and that i played the hand badly. If you raise/folded i would say that is pretty terrible to be honest. I agree with your friend and with aq it is deffo a shove it all in spot. If this is a bubble of a satellite that might change things but only to the point in extreme circumstances you could consider just passing. Title: Re: feeder Post by: titaniumbean on September 10, 2010, 06:44:22 PM don't particularly mind the raise size as long as we're calling the bb's shove. much better to just shove ourselves though shove>>>>raise/call>>>>>hollyoaks>>>>>>>raise/fold where hollyoaks comes in I have no idea, but I like it's inclusion :)up Title: Re: feeder Post by: kong69 on September 10, 2010, 07:07:13 PM Not trying to sway anyone, but it was actually on the bubble 25 seats 26 players left. 4000 was the next up from the short stacked SB.
Title: Re: feeder Post by: kinboshi on September 10, 2010, 07:08:15 PM Not trying to sway anyone, but it was actually on the bubble 25 seats 26 players left. 4000 was the next up from the short stacked SB. Shove or fold. Never raise and then fold. Title: Re: feeder Post by: outragous76 on September 10, 2010, 07:08:35 PM In a normal mtt ship this all in (and as already mentioned never raise fold).
Given that this is a satty bubble, and the shorty is to your left, I'm more inclined to raise to 2400 (his stack size). Reason being that if shorty calls, the bb should flick in the rest and you go 2 way to knock him out. Title: Re: feeder Post by: SuuPRlim on September 11, 2010, 12:15:50 PM In a normal mtt ship this all in (and as already mentioned never raise fold). Given that this is a satty bubble, and the shorty is to your left, I'm more inclined to raise to 2400 (his stack size). Reason being that if shorty calls, the bb should flick in the rest and you go 2 way to knock him out. Very Shrewd! This is the line in this vacuum im sure, what we do if BB shoves though, call yeah? Title: Re: feeder Post by: outragous76 on September 11, 2010, 01:07:56 PM In a normal mtt ship this all in (and as already mentioned never raise fold). Given that this is a satty bubble, and the shorty is to your left, I'm more inclined to raise to 2400 (his stack size). Reason being that if shorty calls, the bb should flick in the rest and you go 2 way to knock him out. Very Shrewd! This is the line in this vacuum im sure, what we do if BB shoves though, call yeah? Snap call! If you take the view you were shoving anyway. Also you are not at risk nor close to being so if you loose, and you has an A Title: Re: feeder Post by: SuuPRlim on September 11, 2010, 01:13:58 PM In a normal mtt ship this all in (and as already mentioned never raise fold). Given that this is a satty bubble, and the shorty is to your left, I'm more inclined to raise to 2400 (his stack size). Reason being that if shorty calls, the bb should flick in the rest and you go 2 way to knock him out. Very Shrewd! This is the line in this vacuum im sure, what we do if BB shoves though, call yeah? Snap call! If you take the view you were shoving anyway. Also you are not at risk nor close to being so if you loose, and you has an A Im sold. NUT LINE imo Title: Re: feeder Post by: Longy on September 11, 2010, 01:52:21 PM I am not sold at all, why would you risk even 1 chip of your stack in this spot.
With 26 ppl left in the sat and 25 to go through, the chance of getting into the money by just folding must be 99.999999999999999999999% with our stack and less than that with every extra chip we put in the pot. Just go and make a cup of tea imo. Title: Re: feeder Post by: AlexMartin on September 11, 2010, 07:19:19 PM Me and my friend seem to be on a different opinion on hand i played which i actually run, but he believes i made the incorrect play. I was on the button with one player left to the seats to a £100 comp. I had Aspades Qd i raised to 2222.00 the blind where 500-1000 my stack was 16000 and the average 8500. The small blind's stack was 2400 and the big 7300. my friend seems to think that a pass or all in is the right play. My decision was based on attacking the small blind and possibly passing to a reraise from the BB. too tilted now Title: Re: feeder Post by: gatso on September 11, 2010, 07:50:06 PM sigh, the bit about 26 left and 25 seats was kinda vital to the situation. now
fold>>>>>>shove>>>>raise/call>>>>>hollyoaks>>>>>>>raise/fold maybe timebank it too if we're not h4h/making tea Title: Re: feeder Post by: mondatoo on September 12, 2010, 12:42:47 AM sigh, the bit about 26 left and 25 seats was kinda vital to the situation. now fold>>>>>>shove>>>>raise/call>>>>>hollyoaks>>>>>>>raise/fold maybe timebank it too if we're not h4h/making tea Wrong Hollyoaks>>>>>>>>>fold>>>>>>>>>>>>>>shove>>>>>>>>>>raise/call>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>raise/fold Title: Re: feeder Post by: gatso on September 12, 2010, 01:00:38 AM sigh, it's bad enough that I have to read bopkin's fb updates about hollyoaks without people liking it on here too
Title: Re: feeder Post by: DMorgan on September 12, 2010, 05:23:50 AM Anything besides fold is terrible here imo with twice average stack on a satellite bubble
Title: Re: feeder Post by: StuartHopkin on September 22, 2010, 01:00:26 PM sigh, it's bad enough that I have to read bopkin's fb updates about hollyoaks without people liking it on here too Stuart Hopkin likes this and Hollyoaks. |