Title: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: Ironside on December 23, 2010, 08:37:24 PM i havent seen any on bbs hands and i have only shown one hand when i open in lp and got to river with the nut straight and my 75o for a complete dbl up
how do i play flop? PokerStars Game #54731542742: Tournament #342663584, $4.00+$0.40 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XI (125/250) - 2010/12/23 20:27:44 WET [2010/12/23 15:27:44 ET] Table '342663584 193' 9-max Seat #9 is the button Seat 1: Ironside (6095 in chips) Seat 2: Bravro (6735 in chips) Seat 3: bms71 (3000 in chips) Seat 4: Toyzione (9805 in chips) Seat 5: Universo34 (3000 in chips) Seat 6: beyens (10942 in chips) Seat 7: cobodeguzman (7860 in chips) Seat 8: jonge84 (9300 in chips) Seat 9: Denvin2009 (1410 in chips) Ironside: posts the ante 30 Bravro: posts the ante 30 bms71: posts the ante 30 Toyzione: posts the ante 30 Universo34: posts the ante 30 beyens: posts the ante 30 cobodeguzman: posts the ante 30 jonge84: posts the ante 30 Denvin2009: posts the ante 30 Ironside: posts small blind 125 Bravro: posts big blind 250 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Ironside [9d 9c] bms71: folds Toyzione: folds Universo34: folds beyens: folds cobodeguzman: folds jonge84: folds Denvin2009: folds Ironside: raises 350 to 600 Bravro: calls 350 *** FLOP *** [4h Jd 5c] Ironside: bets 1000 Bravro: raises 1500 to 2500 Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: SuuPRlim on December 23, 2010, 08:52:03 PM In the real world people shouldn't really be rasiing this flop at all, should be 3betting AJ pre BvB 20ish bbs affective and shouldn't ever be raise calling KJ or worse, and raising sets is pretty silly as well because your ACTUAL value range is pretty thin + not that vulnerable.
So i'd be bet calling. But its a $4 tourney and I wouldnt be in the slightest bit suprised if he shows up with Js 8s or Ahrt 6s. So meh bet call seems about right imo Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: NigDawG on December 23, 2010, 09:53:08 PM i tend to click the call button in blind vs blind battles a lot
Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: silverslick on December 23, 2010, 11:59:49 PM Without any history on the guy I would be inclined to fold. You have plenty of chips to re-group. He might have a set, a pair of jacks or a straight draw. It is frustrating but let it go and wait for a better spot.
Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: Ironside on December 25, 2010, 04:42:23 AM i folded didnt like it though
Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: SuuPRlim on December 25, 2010, 11:46:03 AM Im sure bet folding is the worst play "technically"
but i wouldnt be suprised if it was the right move on this specific occassion Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: GarethW on December 25, 2010, 12:59:50 PM at this level check flop is pretty standard. bluff catching at least one bullet is a better line here.
bet folding a hand like 99 is effectively turning it into a bluff Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: Ironside on December 25, 2010, 01:55:41 PM Im sure bet folding is the worst play "technically" more than likely was, check fold seemed so week and bet calling seemed like a spew, posted to see if jamming was an option but i figure not as no-one mentioned it yet Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: SuuPRlim on December 25, 2010, 09:07:26 PM Im sure bet folding is the worst play "technically" more than likely was, check fold seemed so week and bet calling seemed like a spew, posted to see if jamming was an option but i figure not as no-one mentioned it yet No I think jamming is an option. and most liekly the right one Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: Rupert on December 25, 2010, 09:29:05 PM Quote bet folding a hand like 99 is effectively turning it into a bluff no Quote check fold seemed so week and bet calling seemed like a spew consider check calling we could talk about villain raising polarised or merged ranges on dry boards all day but the fact of the matter is it's a $4 tournament and a ton of worse hands are going to call you when you bet the flop and very few are likely to raise you so bet/folding is absolutely fine even if he is repping a very narrow range some rando in a $4 probs has enough jacks that calling or jamming isn't going to be profitable. i'd say b/f>c/c>b/c vs unknown $4 reg Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: GarethW on December 26, 2010, 06:03:32 AM No I think jamming is an option. and most liekly the right one is this a level? i'd say b/f>c/c>b/c vs unknown $4 reg i'd say "such a waste". Good luck with that buddy Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: railtard1 on December 26, 2010, 02:55:16 PM like, its allways going to be an unknown in a 100000 runner $4 turbo on stars. Its not a hand to talk about ranges and how his value range is polarised etc etc etc, i think u either need to bet/call or even c/jam this flop, dont think i hate that too much. C/C flop i actually dislike unless we know exactly what were doing on all turn cards.
Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: Rupert on December 26, 2010, 04:24:09 PM Quote i'd say "such a waste". Good luck with that buddy you seem to be under the impression that villains options on the flop are fold or raise when raise is actually by far the option he chooses least... unless i've grossly misunderstood your interpretation of this hand? someone explain to me why b/f here is a waste! Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: SuuPRlim on December 26, 2010, 06:07:33 PM No I think jamming is an option. and most liekly the right one is this a level? lol, no. lets not forget that understand all this we're in a $4 tournament 16bb effective on the flop with wat is basically the nut-low top pair. I fail to see how bet/getting it in can possibly not be considered *1 option. Quote i'd say "such a waste". Good luck with that buddy as opposed to what exactly? chk/fold or chk/call chk/call? I can defo see the argument for bet folding - I prolly wudnt be able to bring myself to do it lol Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: GarethW on December 27, 2010, 10:21:27 AM lol, no. lets not forget that understand all this we're in a $4 tournament 16bb effective on the flop effective BB's should only be used to determine if a pre flop shove is +EV or not. As soon as the pot is opened or a flop seen we revert back to regualr BB's and eff BB's no longer applies. So effective stacks for both players are 20+bb's on the flop. Agree I'm not saying bet get it in isn't an option, just an option to bin off pretty easily vs rando $4 donk fishs. It allows him to play more perfectly and fold weaker and call better. c/c bluff catching at least 1 bullet is a pretty standard line here and it easily outweighs b/f and b/ai imo. In my experience not many fish would CR that flop as a naked bluff most of the time and I suspect 99 is no good so I'm folding without reads. If you lead out you allow vil to fold worse inc his bluffs and call with better (not great for a 99 on that flop). If you bet fold and vil is bluffing its a huge error. If you c/c you keep this OOP pot smaller & keep vills range widest. Bare in mind any scary turn or overcards should also slow him down, if it doesn't then you can ask yourself if he's FOS and if his flop bet makes sense given the run out of the board and the action?? If he barrels twice on the turn he likely has it but I expect most $4 fish to be checking turn through. Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: NigDawG on December 27, 2010, 01:04:39 PM you are missing quite a bit of value by checking, fully expect to get called by Ax 5x 4x as well as some other fruity things on a dry board like this
Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: SuuPRlim on December 27, 2010, 07:15:59 PM effective BB's should only be used to determine if a pre flop shove is +EV or not.. ? This makes no sense - Effective stack in a HU situation = the value of the smaller stack /topic Quote Agree I'm not saying bet get it in isn't an option, just an option to bin off pretty easily vs rando $4 donk fishs I said this and you asked me if it was a level? Wat you were actually saying is you think bet folding is better? Basically the discussion ITT is wats best, bet/folding or bet/calling and its impossible for us to say which is right with the current information we have I would never check as I expect the $4 rando's to make bad calls more often than bad bets Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: poonjoe on December 28, 2010, 02:04:53 AM seems like an EZ bet-fold. I thought the idea of $4 comps was you can keep your value range wide and fold when you get heat, without having to worry about being 'bluffed off the best hand' when the board is dry and his value range is narrow.
Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: GarethW on December 28, 2010, 10:00:08 AM first off the question was "how do I play flop". Bet/x suck as lines given information. So if someones asking for advice point out what you would do differently, don't validate a mistake and say you'd bet/x....
16bb effective on the flop effective BB's should only be used to determine if a pre flop shove is +EV or not.. ? This makes no sense - Effective stack ???? in a HU situation = the value of the smaller stack /topic you do realise there is a difference between effective STACKS and effective BIG BLINDS right? Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: SuuPRlim on December 28, 2010, 01:11:06 PM you do realise there is a difference between effective STACKS and effective BIG BLINDS right? I do not. please educate :) Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: NigDawG on December 28, 2010, 03:41:23 PM I'm with lil dave on this one, I always just say 16bb eff as a shorthand way of saying effective stacks of 16bb...
Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: titaniumbean on December 28, 2010, 04:19:28 PM (http://www.funnypictureblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/NotSureIfSerious.jpg)
Wait say wut I have 1 mirrion big blinds, ickle dave is ickle and only has 4. that's 4 bbs effective or effective stacks are 4 big blinds. Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: SuuPRlim on December 28, 2010, 05:10:05 PM I have 1 mirrion big blinds, ickle dave is ickle and only has 4. auto top up buddy, Iv got 15 Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: titaniumbean on December 28, 2010, 06:11:47 PM I have 1 mirrion big blinds, ickle dave is ickle and only has 4. auto top up buddy, Iv got 15 erm for auto top up to work you need maneys in your account innit. I'm on form innit (http://www.ukgameshows.com/atoz/programmes/c/crystal_maze/richard%20obrien.gif) Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: SuuPRlim on December 28, 2010, 09:24:07 PM thats why it never works.
SPent all my money on toothpaste innit Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: GarethW on December 30, 2010, 11:36:40 PM you do realise there is a difference between effective STACKS and effective BIG BLINDS right? I do not. please educate :) Effective stacks are as you said. Effective big blinds are used pre flop in push/fold mode to decide if a shove is +EV or not. They are different from normal BB's in that they factor in the ante. Say you have 3000 chips (15 actual BB's) at 100/200 + ante, when you factor in the antes the true big blind might be more like 150/300 giving you an effective 10BB stack instead of 15BB's. Adjust your push/fold range accordingly. In this hand on the flop both players were 20BB deep when OP decided to lead out Title: Re: 99 sb in a turbo Post by: SuuPRlim on December 30, 2010, 11:48:25 PM you do realise there is a difference between effective STACKS and effective BIG BLINDS right? I do not. please educate :) Effective stacks are as you said. Effective big blinds are used pre flop in push/fold mode to decide if a shove is +EV or not. They are different from normal BB's in that they factor in the ante. Say you have 3000 chips (15 actual BB's) at 100/200 + ante, when you factor in the antes the true big blind might be more like 150/300 giving you an effective 10BB stack instead of 15BB's. Adjust your push/fold range accordingly. In this hand on the flop both players were 20BB deep when OP decided to lead out Im open to fact I may be wrong, given that im not really a tourney player exclusivley. But I think you're confusing the saying "15 BB effective" with the forst step of the M claclulation. Anyway this is all irrelevant because when i said with have 16bbs effective wat I meant (clearly) was that the effective stack on the flop is 16bb you may well be right about ^^^ but I've certainly never heard of it. |