|
Title: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: pleno1 on January 25, 2011, 01:02:47 AM Stacked this guy previous hand with KKvQJ on jxx in 3bet pot. He cbets 77% of the time and 100% of the time in 3bet pots, he 3bets 22% of the time. over 250 hands.
Do we bet this river? Full Tilt Poker Game #27576864233: Table Cedar Rae (heads up) - $0.50/$1 - No Limit Hold'em - 19:59:19 ET - 2011/01/24 Seat 1: pads1161 ($244.50) Seat 2: pilviverho ($100) pads1161 posts the small blind of $0.50 pilviverho posts the big blind of $1 The button is in seat #1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to pads1161 [Jh 8h] pads1161 raises to $3 pilviverho raises to $9 pads1161 calls $6 *** FLOP *** [4d 8s 2d] pilviverho checks pads1161 checks *** TURN *** [4d 8s 2d] [7d] pilviverho checks pads1161 bets $12 pilviverho calls $12 *** RIVER *** [4d 8s 2d 7d] [6c] pilviverho checks pads1161 ? Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: Ironside on January 25, 2011, 01:21:21 AM check behind not sure what he will call with that you beat he has more than likely missed a diamond draw but doubt he will call
Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: AlexMartin on January 25, 2011, 02:32:54 AM wtds/won$ sd/fold river cbet. doesnt look like it, his calling range>J8 with this little history.
Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: pleno1 on January 25, 2011, 10:18:04 AM I just think he 100% has worse than me here, so even betting so that he doesnt see what I'm peeling 3bets with/sometimes getting retarded value from Ad high, also could have 3bet hand like a2/a4 and then just gone checky because I'd started to get aggro and he didn't want to bet.
Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: SuuPRlim on January 25, 2011, 12:01:33 PM I just think he 100% has worse than me here, so even betting so that he doesnt see what I'm peeling 3bets with +1 Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: toddswain on January 25, 2011, 12:39:54 PM If he 100% has worse then bet. I prefer betting like 22 here myself, I doubt ur ever behind here, and like u say, either get hero'd by worse or get pot without showdown
Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: DMorgan on January 25, 2011, 11:24:05 PM Clear value bet imo, $28
Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: GreekStein on January 25, 2011, 11:29:32 PM ya, bet
Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: Dubai on January 25, 2011, 11:37:33 PM Iid bet either $12 or $62
Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: AlexMartin on January 26, 2011, 09:04:16 AM really disagree, we open ourselves up to being jammed on, any half decent villain simply wont call on the end here w worse, but will jam. Fine if u got some timing tell/read, horrible without it.
Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: Dubai on January 26, 2011, 09:15:28 AM no-one has said bet fold??????????
The only reason id bet $12 is if I thought he could jam Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: AlexMartin on January 26, 2011, 09:33:57 AM no-one has said bet fold?????????? The only reason id bet $12 is if I thought he could jam yer ofc u were advocating a b/c, pretty sure a lot of other posts were not though. Title: Re: 100NLHU debating river value. Post by: Bubbba82 on February 18, 2011, 06:24:33 PM |