|
Title: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: roscopiko on February 23, 2011, 11:08:35 AM Ship or fold? or other??
Were 6/28 PokerStars Game #58140174827: Tournament #367889712, $6.00+$0.50 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2011/02/23 11:02:24 WET [2011/02/23 6:02:24 ET] Table '367889712 3' 9-max Seat #7 is the button Seat 1: FEKETE47 (2045 in chips) Seat 2: roscopiko (5970 in chips) Seat 3: brad352 (440 in chips) Seat 4: DuRR99 (1669 in chips) Seat 7: arminallin (1983 in chips) Seat 8: joshproctor (2990 in chips) is sitting out Seat 9: kobraprophet (2705 in chips) joshproctor: posts small blind 100 kobraprophet: posts big blind 200 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to roscopiko [5d 5s] FEKETE47: folds roscopiko: ? Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: StuartHopkin on February 23, 2011, 11:17:10 AM Fold for me I think
Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: outragous76 on February 23, 2011, 11:30:56 AM Its close (14bb effective) but i probs fold
Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: MC on February 23, 2011, 11:34:32 AM fold or min-raise/fold (except to short-stack obv)
fwiw it's not that close to a shove, shoving would be pretty bad with our chip stack Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: TheRaise on February 23, 2011, 11:53:04 AM Pass. Too early position to play 55 and we really dont want to be calling a reshove with it.
Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: mondatoo on February 23, 2011, 12:03:26 PM fold or min-raise/fold (except to short-stack obv) fwiw it's not that close to a shove, shoving would be pretty bad with our chip stack Obv not suggesting min raise/fold to anyone other than the BB surely ? Not that I like it even vs BB but against the rest it would be terrible. I agree this is a fold though, I'd say 88+ AQs+ Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: MC on February 23, 2011, 12:12:21 PM Obv not suggesting min raise/fold to anyone other than the BB surely ? Not that I like it even vs BB but against the rest it would be terrible. I agree this is a fold though, I'd say 88+ AQs+ I'm suggesting min-raise/fold is an option and we would only call the 440 stack. Personally I'm shoving 0% of my range in this spot. Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: Longy on February 23, 2011, 01:23:24 PM Snap fold.
I am not shoving anything here fwiw, I know a lot of regs would. Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: roscopiko on February 23, 2011, 01:27:42 PM cheers for the replys
obv I snap shipped just based on the stacks behind me to act then realised it was prolly pretty shit. Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: Rupert on February 23, 2011, 03:38:23 PM Snap fold. I am not shoving anything here fwiw, I know a lot of regs would. are u raise folding anything here out of interest Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: Longy on February 23, 2011, 03:47:18 PM Snap fold. I am not shoving anything here fwiw, I know a lot of regs would. are u raise folding anything here out of interest Not much possibly the bottom of my range if I have a read*. * I normally have a reasonable hud sample on 50%+ of the field in 45's Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: mondatoo on February 23, 2011, 05:08:02 PM Obv not suggesting min raise/fold to anyone other than the BB surely ? Not that I like it even vs BB but against the rest it would be terrible. I agree this is a fold though, I'd say 88+ AQs+ I'm suggesting min-raise/fold is an option and we would only call the 440 stack. Personally I'm shoving 0% of my range in this spot. I hate min-raise folding 8-9bbs effective. I'd shove AK :) Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: MC on February 23, 2011, 06:11:55 PM Obv not suggesting min raise/fold to anyone other than the BB surely ? Not that I like it even vs BB but against the rest it would be terrible. I agree this is a fold though, I'd say 88+ AQs+ I'm suggesting min-raise/fold is an option and we would only call the 440 stack. Personally I'm shoving 0% of my range in this spot. I hate min-raise folding 8-9bbs effective. I'd shove AK :) [ ] this is 8-9bbs effective Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: mondatoo on February 23, 2011, 06:30:47 PM Obv not suggesting min raise/fold to anyone other than the BB surely ? Not that I like it even vs BB but against the rest it would be terrible. I agree this is a fold though, I'd say 88+ AQs+ I'm suggesting min-raise/fold is an option and we would only call the 440 stack. Personally I'm shoving 0% of my range in this spot. I hate min-raise folding 8-9bbs effective. I'd shove AK :) [ ] this is 8-9bbs effective So when you say only call the 440 stack are you not including Seat 4: DuRR99 (1669 in chips) ?? Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: MC on February 23, 2011, 07:21:47 PM Sigh, just fold pre, it's easier
Title: Re: $6 45 man ship/fold Post by: mondatoo on February 23, 2011, 07:22:16 PM |