|
Title: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: pleno1 on March 30, 2011, 10:05:03 PM Full Tilt Poker Game #29480670244: Table Swiftly Tilting (6 max) - $1/$2 - No Limit Hold'em - 15:38:58 ET - 2011/03/30
Seat 1: captainsepp ($606.60) Seat 2: Hans Vogl ($200) Seat 3: pads1161 ($273.80) Seat 4: mightypirate ($200) Seat 5: Scroovel ($200) Seat 6: treeoflife ($326.70) mightypirate posts the small blind of $1 Scroovel posts the big blind of $2 The button is in seat #3 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to pads1161 [Ks Kc] treeoflife raises to $6 captainsepp folds Hans Vogl folds pads1161 raises to $21 mightypirate folds Scroovel folds treeoflife calls $15 *** FLOP *** [4s Qh 9h] treeoflife checks pads1161 bets $23 treeoflife calls $23 *** TURN *** [4s Qh 9h] [3s] treeoflife checks pads1161 has 15 seconds left to act pads1161 bets $47 treeoflife calls $47 *** RIVER *** [4s Qh 9h 3s] [Tc] treeoflife checks pads1161 has 15 seconds left to act pads1161 bets $182.80, and is all in treeoflife calls $182.80 *** SHOW DOWN *** pads1161 shows [Ks Kc] a pair of Kings treeoflife shows [Ts Th] three of a kind, Tens treeoflife wins the pot ($547.60) with three of a kind, Tens *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $550.60 | Rake $3 Board: [4s Qh 9h 3s c] Seat 1: captainsepp didn't bet (folded) Seat 2: Hans Vogl didn't bet (folded) Seat 3: pads1161 (button) showed [Ks Kc] and lost with a pair of Kings Seat 4: mightypirate (small blind) folded before the Flop Seat 5: Scroovel (big blind) folded before the Flop Seat 6: treeoflife showed [Ts Th] and won ($547.60) with three of a kind, Tens Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: outragous76 on March 30, 2011, 11:01:01 PM yes - he never calls worse - see ur AT hand
Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: Sack it off on March 30, 2011, 11:08:13 PM c/c river
Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: TheFallen on March 31, 2011, 12:35:55 AM half pot, half pot, pot on this board seems like bad sizing.
bet smaller on the river and increase the calling range. doesn't look like a spot where shoving will induce wider calls. Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: Rupert on March 31, 2011, 02:37:12 AM yeah bet bigger on flop, triple barrel is good with better sizing
Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: pleno1 on March 31, 2011, 07:44:10 AM Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: pleno1 on March 31, 2011, 07:45:10 AM if we bet half pot and he jams we?
Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: Sack it off on March 31, 2011, 01:03:58 PM Then no its not too thin. He never has better than a one pair hand unless its TT fyl Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: pleno1 on March 31, 2011, 01:10:04 PM Then no its not too thin. He never has better than a one pair hand unless its TT fyl You think its better to set up a pot sized shove here? I thought he will see hearts, see spades, see missed straight draws and talk himself into calling with AQ. Or do you prefer to bet bigger on turn and have a less polarised range? I also agree the only thing that beats us is 1010. Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: Rupert on March 31, 2011, 02:29:25 PM a half pot cbet on this board is a mistake anyway unless for some reason you intend to cbet this board an absolute ton despite it hitting his calling range pretty damn well
Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: pleno1 on March 31, 2011, 02:54:24 PM Yeah I think I should have bet 28-32 on flop.
Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: SuuPRlim on April 03, 2011, 05:46:44 PM a half pot cbet on this board is a mistake anyway unless for some reason you intend to cbet this board an absolute ton despite it hitting his calling range pretty damn well +1 Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: UpTheMariners on April 04, 2011, 02:50:59 AM cbet of half pot is fine in a 3bp. standard shove on river and if your not getting called enough then you really should be bluffing more and being more aggressive.
Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 02:56:41 AM cbet of half pot is fine in a 3bp. standard shove on river and if your not getting called enough then you really should be bluffing more and being more aggressive. Welcome back. Post more pls!!! Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: Meister on April 04, 2011, 11:31:56 PM Shud chck fold river
Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 11:33:25 PM Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: Meister on April 04, 2011, 11:35:47 PM Could try. It'll work. Trust me
Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 11:37:03 PM Could try. It'll work. Trust me Trust me when I say it's impossible for him to check fold river. Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: Meister on April 04, 2011, 11:39:32 PM Just mash around on checks and folds buttons and it'll all be fine.
Title: Re: NL200 RUSH Potsized river shove.. Too thin? Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 11:39:58 PM Read the hand history again
|