|
Title: Broadway on double paired board Post by: cambridgealex on April 04, 2011, 04:30:07 AM The first of many I imagine...50NL HU Cash.
Early doors, but seems solid so far. PokerStars Game #60298177062: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50 USD) - 2011/04/04 3:41:46 WET [2011/04/03 22:41:46 ET] Table 'Adeona' 2-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: marcoregoluf ($63.95 in chips) Seat 2: 20alex430 ($50 in chips) marcoregoluf: posts small blind $0.25 20alex430: posts big blind $0.50 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to 20alex430 [Ks Ah] marcoregoluf: raises $1 to $1.50 20alex430: raises $3.50 to $5 marcoregoluf: calls $3.50 *** FLOP *** [td Th Js] 20alex430: bets $5.70 marcoregoluf: calls $5.70 *** TURN *** [td Th Js] [Jd] 20alex430: checks marcoregoluf: checks *** RIVER *** [td Th Js Jd] [Qc] 20alex430: checks marcoregoluf: bets $15 Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: pleno1 on April 04, 2011, 11:12:06 AM fold.
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: MC on April 04, 2011, 11:12:52 AM Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: cambridgealex on April 04, 2011, 12:11:27 PM ok
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: Meister on April 04, 2011, 11:28:35 PM Call.
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: buzzharvey22 on April 04, 2011, 11:30:39 PM im no cash/heads up genius but isnt cbetting 5.70 into 10 considerred a little small?
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: Meister on April 04, 2011, 11:33:25 PM Agree with buzz Harvey.
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: cambridgealex on April 05, 2011, 03:53:44 PM yeh ive adjusted this now to 70%
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: pleno1 on April 05, 2011, 04:12:12 PM 60% is cool. 70 is perhaps a litttttle big, 63.5% may be optimal but obv takes time :P
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: cambridgealex on April 05, 2011, 04:17:35 PM 60% is cool. 70 is perhaps a litttttle big, 63.5% may be optimal but obv takes time :P but u said 60% was too small on the other thread. (I cbet 1.70 into 3 - stars does 60% of the raked pot so 60% of 2.85 not 3) 5.7 is 60% here but yeh i feel its on the small side. Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: Rupert on April 05, 2011, 04:23:26 PM bet the river i think
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: pleno1 on April 05, 2011, 04:40:28 PM 60% is cool. 70 is perhaps a litttttle big, 63.5% may be optimal but obv takes time :P but u said 60% was too small on the other thread. (I cbet 1.70 into 3 - stars does 60% of the raked pot so 60% of 2.85 not 3) 5.7 is 60% here but yeh i feel its on the small side. this is 3bet pot tho and other one was normal innit? Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: cambridgealex on April 05, 2011, 05:00:06 PM 60% is cool. 70 is perhaps a litttttle big, 63.5% may be optimal but obv takes time :P but u said 60% was too small on the other thread. (I cbet 1.70 into 3 - stars does 60% of the raked pot so 60% of 2.85 not 3) 5.7 is 60% here but yeh i feel its on the small side. this is 3bet pot tho and other one was normal innit? yeh. so 70% normal, 60% 3bet pots? Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: pleno1 on April 05, 2011, 05:03:35 PM I think so yeah, obv it changes depending on villains flop/turn tendancies, everything in HU is about adjusting.
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: redarmi on April 05, 2011, 05:06:20 PM I am no great heads up player butvillain hasn't shown any strength at all in the hand so by the river I am starting to think I am good but checking the river is too weak imo. I would bet something like $12 on river and fold if he raised I suppose but as it is his range is pretty wide and we haven't done much to narrow it. Surely 89/KQ are distinct possibilities and could he have a pair that got counterfeited and is now turning into a bluff?? By checking river you have put yourself in a very difficult spot but I think I probably call now if we think he is solid enough here to have a lot of air.
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: pokerfan on April 05, 2011, 09:03:08 PM 60% is cool. 70 is perhaps a litttttle big, 63.5% may be optimal but obv takes time :P but u said 60% was too small on the other thread. (I cbet 1.70 into 3 - stars does 60% of the raked pot so 60% of 2.85 not 3) 5.7 is 60% here but yeh i feel its on the small side. Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: cambridgealex on April 05, 2011, 09:07:26 PM 60% is cool. 70 is perhaps a litttttle big, 63.5% may be optimal but obv takes time :P but u said 60% was too small on the other thread. (I cbet 1.70 into 3 - stars does 60% of the raked pot so 60% of 2.85 not 3) 5.7 is 60% here but yeh i feel its on the small side. yup. have mine at 60/70 and pot, what do you use? Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: Rupert on April 05, 2011, 10:23:37 PM cbet sizes should depend mostly on texture, for example on wet texture you are more likely to check so you should bet more since your range is stronger and on dry boards you are betting your whole range so you can bet a lot smaller.
Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: skolsuper on April 05, 2011, 11:50:33 PM cbet sizes should depend mostly on texture, for example on wet texture you are more likely to check so you should bet more since your range is stronger and on dry boards you are betting your whole range so you can bet a lot smaller. +1 Regards, James Keys, PHA poster of the year nominee 2009, 2010 Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: pleno1 on April 06, 2011, 12:05:24 AM cbet sizes should depend mostly on texture, for example on wet texture you are more likely to check so you should bet more since your range is stronger and on dry boards you are betting your whole range so you can bet a lot smaller. I agree in 3bet pots, but if you are always raising to $1.50 pre its fine to have all cbet sizes as $2 imo. Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: TheFallen on April 06, 2011, 12:56:00 AM cbet sizes should depend mostly on texture, for example on wet texture you are more likely to check so you should bet more since your range is stronger and on dry boards you are betting your whole range so you can bet a lot smaller. I agree in 3bet pots, but if you are always raising to $1.50 pre its fine to have all cbet sizes as $2 imo. i tend to agree as far as flop cbets go in hu matches Title: Re: Broadway on double paired board Post by: SuuPRlim on April 06, 2011, 11:31:35 AM cbet sizes should depend mostly on texture, for example on wet texture you are more likely to check so you should bet more since your range is stronger and on dry boards you are betting your whole range so you can bet a lot smaller. I agree in 3bet pots, but if you are always raising to $1.50 pre its fine to have all cbet sizes as $2 imo. i tend to agree as far as flop cbets go in hu matches my "standard" in HU (plo admitedly) games is, 50% pot on the dry boards and 80% on the wet textures, Cbets in general have a much higher % success on very dry texture's as our villains have a much narrower range of hands they can continue with for value, so could be smaller even than 50% imo |