|
Title: QQ in the small blind. Post by: celtic on September 04, 2011, 05:11:13 PM 100 f/o, 100/200. UTG limps, as does UTG+1, the cut off and the button. I raise to 1350. The BB calls playing around 19k. UTG then goes all in for 11.2k, UTG+2 throws his last 5k in and the cut off snap shoves his 9k.
Button folds. We have 20k back. We? Reads are, UTG is tight, not sure if he is capable of limp jamming worse hands. the other two are just terrible, and have lost most of their starting stack either limp calling, or refusing to give up top pair, regardless of the board. BB doesn't concern me too much. Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: George2Loose on September 04, 2011, 05:14:30 PM Jam. UTG can easily have AK or something as retarded as 77
Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: nirvana on September 04, 2011, 05:16:11 PM I've looked into it and it's a fold 83.8 % of the time
Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: George2Loose on September 04, 2011, 05:26:42 PM I've looked into it and it's a fold 83.8 % of the time You'd have done a deal by now Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: nirvana on September 04, 2011, 05:29:45 PM I've looked into it and it's a fold 83.8 % of the time You'd have done a deal by now lol, I'm still spite folding as I hate limp jammers so much BTW, about 18 months ago.. you were right about Anderson.. he's turning out to be as good as you thought Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: pleno1 on September 04, 2011, 05:48:41 PM fold.
Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: the sicilian on September 04, 2011, 06:11:14 PM Easy fold
Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: mondatoo on September 04, 2011, 07:50:40 PM Fold, expect UTG to have AA/KK a lot.
Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: Nico29 on September 04, 2011, 11:13:45 PM horrible spot, online i call live i puke fold
Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: cambridgealex on September 04, 2011, 11:24:06 PM I call. Unless have read on utg or he does the aces tell.
The other guys as you described hardly ever have kk or AA. If they all folded and jt was just you and utg you'd call right? So call now, just be happier about it cos of the extra juice and hold ffs! Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: muckthenuts on September 04, 2011, 11:28:53 PM Haha I once laid down QQ live at a £25 at Broadway in an incredibly similar spot to this! In the 2nd tournament level i 3bet large from the SB after UTG had limped and UTG+1 had raised. When UTG shoved and UTG+1 tank reshipped i made a pretty quick (and what i felt standard) fold, then proceeded to feel like a proper fucking moron when they turned over A5 and KJ lol.
Value yeah innit. As for your hand QQ is a get it in. I'd imagine UTG to be limp raising to ~4kish with AA-KK rather than shoving a decent % of the time, and all the dead money in there from the other droolers with ranges way behind pocket queens should seal it. Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: Pinchop73 on September 05, 2011, 12:10:37 AM With a fair bit of experience playing donkaments at Luton, this is an insta fold, the majority of regs take no greater pleasure than slow playing the nuts.
Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: GreekStein on September 05, 2011, 12:14:49 AM lol, I'm still spite folding as I hate limp jammers so much I'm spite folding this too. He gets the lot if he plays the hand properly. Limp-raising is so gay Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: cambridgealex on September 05, 2011, 12:37:47 AM It's so gay I'm calling to outdraw him
Title: Re: QQ in the small blind. Post by: robslimswift on September 20, 2011, 03:26:07 AM it's a tricky one,i think utg could have a few hands worse than you like 1010,jj,ak he was probably hoping one of the tards would raise him so he could jam it in and your bet on the button may look like a steal attempt to him,he could even have some shat like medium pocket pair i would go on read here on just the utg guy,and consider that you have the rest beat,would also be mega stacked if you won the hand......................ok so what actually happened???
|