blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => Poker Hand Analysis => Topic started by: pleno1 on May 24, 2012, 11:56:57 PM



Title: potential luxury problem
Post by: pleno1 on May 24, 2012, 11:56:57 PM
copied chat off skype. hope its not too ugly, u cant get hhs off mg :( additional info is he had 19% fold to 4bet from 3k hands


theres a guy known to be the biggest bumhunter on micrgogaming
[00:53:01] Patrick Leonard: and he thinks im a fish
[00:53:09] Patrick Leonard: and he is blatantly 3betting me like nearly 100%
[00:53:15] Patrick Leonard: from any position
[00:53:18] Patrick Leonard: he thinks im hugely ool
[00:53:24] Patrick Leonard: he 3bet my last 2 utg opens
[00:53:31] Patrick Leonard: and iuve 4bet him a couple times
[00:53:36] Patrick Leonard: and hes cxlale dhtem in position
[00:53:51] Patrick Leonard: i riase to 12 utg
[00:53:55] Patrick Leonard: he 3bets to 36 utg+1
[00:54:03] Patrick Leonard: i 4bet to 96
[00:54:07] Patrick Leonard: he makes it 170
[00:54:10] Patrick Leonard: i make it 250
[00:54:16] Patrick Leonard: he falts
[00:54:21] Patrick Leonard: 500 in middle pre
[00:54:26] Patrick Leonard: 600 left otf
[00:54:28] Patrick Leonard: flop is 972
[00:54:29] Patrick Leonard: we?


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: pleno1 on May 24, 2012, 11:57:39 PM
we have dem bitchez,  Qs Qh


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: Ironside on May 25, 2012, 12:06:58 AM
All in faster than me going down a 1:4 hill with no brakes


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: pleno1 on May 25, 2012, 12:21:30 AM
really? i dont personally think all in is optimal here, but open to be persuaded otherwise.


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: pleno1 on May 25, 2012, 12:40:41 AM
i think you can consider almost anything but folding.


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: DMorgan on May 25, 2012, 12:47:15 AM
155/call I think

If you don't think that this is going to be profitable vs his flatting your 6b range then don't 4b but with the dynamic I can't really see any other play? You bet 155 he jams you're getting 2.8 to 1 so if he can have JJ its a call.



Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: cambridgealex on May 25, 2012, 12:56:54 AM
155/call I think


This


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: Mondeoman on May 25, 2012, 12:59:55 AM
78/call


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: pleno1 on May 25, 2012, 01:15:47 AM
Interesting, I had either c/shove or 62/call as my two options, shoving obviously deleting all of his value combos. If we c/shove I think he b/calls any pair and bluffs a chunk whilst of we bet small and he peels flop the action can often die on certain cards.

I do think 155 may be a little big and provoke too many folds, small almost makes our future bluffs alot cheaper and with stp there's no real need to bet as big.

If we have AK what would be your preferred line?


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: GreekStein on May 25, 2012, 01:19:02 AM
78/call

i prefer 76/call


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: pleno1 on May 25, 2012, 01:22:11 AM
Lol greekstein, it's genuinely hilar you say that. My one nailed on read on my regs has something exactly to do with 76/78


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: pleno1 on May 25, 2012, 01:22:48 AM
And if Keith is a microgaming regular which I think he is then the read is abs cemented.


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: cambridgealex on May 25, 2012, 01:24:30 AM
And if Keith is a microgaming regular which I think he is then the read is abs cemented.

So so delussional mate!


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: Ironside on May 25, 2012, 01:25:34 AM
i think putting less than half pot in on flop screams monster well it does at lower levels

the shove looks so much weaker imho


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: skolsuper on May 25, 2012, 01:26:38 AM
I would actually be happier to get it in on this flop if I'd just called the 5b pre. Think your image needs to be joke bad to make this 200+bb stack off profitable from utg. Obv having got here, 98/sigh-call


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: WotRTheChances on May 25, 2012, 01:31:40 AM
I would actually be happier to get it in on this flop if I'd just called the 5b pre. Think your image needs to be joke bad to make this 200+bb stack off profitable from utg. Obv having got here, 98/sigh-call

+1.

Reasons for not flatting the 5b? You are really in a dynamic where getting in 200bb stacks UTG vs UTG+1 is profitable?

I'm betting 80-140 and calling it off if so. Seems v.unlikely to be the nut line (massively overestimating how light he can be here imo, this is 400NL)


Title: Re: potential luxury problem
Post by: AlexMartin on May 26, 2012, 01:34:41 PM
pre is insane, are u playing 50/40/20 or summat?