Title: AA on awful board Post by: TL900 on July 18, 2012, 09:22:32 AM PokerStars Hand #83456018290: Tournament #586788308, $10+$1 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (60/120) - 2012/07/17 17:16:23 WET [2012/07/17 12:16:23 ET]
Table '586788308 27' 9-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: Cranky<3 (2020 in chips) Seat 2: mckinney1986 (3395 in chips) Seat 3: juwaitut (3138 in chips) Seat 4: cristyo1 (11819 in chips) Seat 5: pa4enko (3566 in chips) Seat 6: Nikita L. (5760 in chips) Seat 7: Peanut172 (4349 in chips) Seat 8: Mt.Spewmore (3620 in chips) Seat 9: owainkk (6601 in chips) Cranky<3: posts the ante 15 mckinney1986: posts the ante 15 juwaitut: posts the ante 15 cristyo1: posts the ante 15 pa4enko: posts the ante 15 Nikita L.: posts the ante 15 Peanut172: posts the ante 15 Mt.Spewmore: posts the ante 15 owainkk: posts the ante 15 cristyo1: posts small blind 60 pa4enko: posts big blind 120 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Mt.Spewmore [Ad Ah] Nikita L.: folds Peanut172: folds Mt.Spewmore: raises 120 to 240 owainkk: folds Cranky<3: folds mckinney1986: folds juwaitut: calls 240 cristyo1: folds pa4enko: folds *** FLOP *** [Qc 5c Jc] Mt.Spewmore: bets 420 juwaitut: calls 420 *** TURN *** [Qc 5c Jc] [Ks] villian is 28/15 over 35 hands, so kinda splashy. No other reads. Optimal play and why? plan for rest of the hand? All thoughts welcome. Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: cambridgealex on July 18, 2012, 10:02:32 AM check flop for sure, check fold now
Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: Crotale on July 18, 2012, 10:20:03 AM I would have bet 3/4 of the pot on the flop to price out a draw, and if that was called I'd check fold the turn.
Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: david3103 on July 18, 2012, 11:40:03 AM check flop for sure, check fold now Can you expand on that a bit Alex please Why do you check flop? Have to check call presumably? Seems to be putting opp on a pretty tight range if it's check flop and check fold turn. Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: redarmi on July 18, 2012, 11:43:09 AM check flop for sure, check fold now Seems to be putting opp on a pretty tight range if it's check flop and check fold turn. Not really a tight range. What range do you put him on that you beat on turn? Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: david3103 on July 18, 2012, 12:02:31 PM check flop for sure, check fold now Seems to be putting opp on a pretty tight range if it's check flop and check fold turn. Not really a tight range. What range do you put him on that you beat on turn? not beating any two clubs, not beating QQ KK JJ not beating KQ KJ KQ not beating A10 nor 55 hmmm ok, there's a fair few hands we're losing to, especially by the turn, but I'm still not clear as to why Alex thinks we should check the flop? Oppo is potentialy 'splashy' and can he not have AK AQ AJ most of the pairs we're beating a lot of the hands we are potentially ahead of call a flop bet and some of the hands we're behind to OTT raise the flop some of the time? I'm usually quiet on these threads, but the original post from Alex looked very sure in action, but was short of reasons why. Now I've expanded on why I thought it worth asking I'll shut up and go back to worrying about having to drive in Central London next Monday morning after a late night at DTD Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: redarmi on July 18, 2012, 12:27:18 PM Not at all....I don't post on pha very often either.
He does have AK, AQ, AJ sometimes of course but we have two aces so his combos are much less likely and he reraises pre or on this flop a lot with those hands too. Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: pleno1 on July 18, 2012, 12:29:51 PM Hey guys,
flop looks like a clear value bet and alot better can call, if we get raised them probably just fold, but definitely missing value from checking imo. on the turn, I think we are just behind his range and have no equity vs a bunch of it. I think check/folding here is going to be the optimal play, even if we are ahead he often will have redraws and always at least a 2 pair draw which is not in horrific shape. Usually with Aces you may find yourself in a way ahead/way behind spot, but in this spot its either way behind or just ahead, so just c/folding the turns makes most sense imo. Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: DMorgan on July 18, 2012, 12:44:03 PM Definitely bet flop, we are only behind to QJ, 55 and flopped flushes. Its a $10 MTT, we're getting called by tonnnnnn of stuff on this board.
This is obviously a pretty bad turn but I'd expect a random player in a $10 MTT to play pretty honest, meaning he'll bet all of the hands that beat us and check most of the hands that we're still good against because they all have showdown value. Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: 34sooted5betshove on July 18, 2012, 02:46:27 PM i would fold because it looks like a scary board.
but then again. im a rock Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: mapp888 on July 18, 2012, 06:07:54 PM bet flop and i probably get it in.
turn is tougher. i probably check fold Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: cambridgealex on July 18, 2012, 06:43:05 PM I'd sometimes check this flop for pot control, we're never comfortable getting raised, but I guess that's more of a tactic for higher stakes mtts or vs regs for balance.
I meant check/fold the turn as played. Not checking flop then folding turn, checking flop to call/call most non c runouts. Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: Killerkilsby on July 19, 2012, 06:54:51 AM I think i prob raise more pre in these comps because the bb peeps min raises a high % of the time to a min so you can't asign a range.
Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: TL900 on July 19, 2012, 08:46:37 AM I think i prob raise more pre in these comps because the bb peeps min raises a high % of the time to a min so you can't asign a range. good job it was the button who peeled so you can assign him a range then Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: Killerkilsby on July 19, 2012, 09:04:09 AM Ok, fair enough you can assign the button a bit of a range, but it is very wide especially at these levels.
Although it didn't happen this time my point was that the BB peels so much of the time to a min that id 2.5x it. Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: shedboymuff on July 19, 2012, 09:40:04 AM I think if you check the flop you will eventually lose the pot unless the villian is ultra passive and continues to check back, cbet is only way we can win here without our hand improving, cbet fold to re raise/cbet check fold turn and river if cbet gets called imo.
Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: youthnkzR on July 19, 2012, 11:08:08 AM think pleno post sums this 1 up... we can deffinatly bet the flop for value and assume we are ahead when he flats, turn is one of the most disgusting cards for us which isnt a club, therefore c/f is probably best.
Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: Nit Tendencies on July 20, 2012, 09:47:15 AM Raise more pre, bet 50-60% pot on the flop (bet/folding since our overall equity vs a splashy pre flop peeler's flop raising range isnt great) and check fold turn.
Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: TL900 on July 20, 2012, 09:54:00 AM Raise more pre, bet 50-60% pot on the flop (bet/folding since our overall equity vs a splashy pre flop peeler's flop raising range isnt great) and check fold turn. minning is fine imo, and the bet on the flop is >50% pot Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: AlexMartin on July 20, 2012, 05:12:34 PM I'd sometimes check this flop for pot control, we're never comfortable getting raised, but I guess that's more of a tactic for higher stakes mtts or vs regs for balance. I meant check/fold the turn as played. Not checking flop then folding turn, checking flop to call/call most non c runouts. been thinking a lot about the use of this line lately; it seems the standard for huge chunks of the midstakes 6max community. Given that i never see someone balance the nutflush or top set with that line, best exploitive adjustment? i.e we open btn with 56s/99/JTs 120bb eff, tag 22/19/9 sb 3b, we defend. He check/calls J89ss oop. was thinking of bet flop, checkback turn, overbet river (assuming they check all 3 streets) and do this with entire range given:- a) they never/rarely cr flop, b) we can rep a tonne of bad runouts for a 1pair hand c) they need to be good a much higher % of the time facing a river ob. Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: kinboshi on July 20, 2012, 05:28:05 PM I'd sometimes check this flop for pot control, we're never comfortable getting raised, but I guess that's more of a tactic for higher stakes mtts or vs regs for balance. I meant check/fold the turn as played. Not checking flop then folding turn, checking flop to call/call most non c runouts. been thinking a lot about the use of this line lately; it seems the standard for huge chunks of the midstakes 6max community. Given that i never see someone balance the nutflush or top set with that line, best exploitive adjustment? i.e we open btn with 56s/99/JTs 120bb eff, tag 22/19/9 sb 3b, we defend. He check/calls J89ss oop. was thinking of bet flop, checkback turn, overbet river (assuming they check all 3 streets) and do this with entire range given:- a) they never/rarely cr flop, b) we can rep a tonne of bad runouts for a 1pair hand c) they need to be good a much higher % of the time facing a river ob. Post moarrrr Title: Re: AA on awful board Post by: cambridgealex on July 20, 2012, 07:02:21 PM Yeh I was thinking more on those lines. Don't think its appropriate here in this comp but yeh as a midstakes grinder I see/use this a lot.
@almartin merits of yr line over the old bb overbet jam? |