|
Title: Standard hand, plan on turn Post by: MC on July 20, 2012, 06:58:47 AM 18-man SNG.
Villain is a bad fish. Stack size a little tricky on the turn. Do we... Bet/call Bet/fold Check? Plan for river if we get there? PokerStars Hand #83580133286: Tournament #589784871, $55.56+$4.44 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level II (15/30) - 2012/07/20 6:49:33 WET [2012/07/20 1:49:33 ET] Table '589784871 2' 9-max Seat #4 is the button Seat 1: wellnobre (2850 in chips) Seat 2: davin4a (1495 in chips) Seat 4: geoserp (2615 in chips) Seat 5: ambaal84 (920 in chips) Seat 6: Marko586 (1110 in chips) Seat 7: epitomised (1470 in chips) Seat 8: bukithepro (1470 in chips) Seat 9: OverTheTop43 (1570 in chips) ambaal84: posts small blind 15 Marko586: posts big blind 30 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to epitomised [Ad Kc] epitomised: raises 60 to 90 bukithepro: folds OverTheTop43: folds wellnobre: folds davin4a: folds geoserp: folds ambaal84: calls 75 Marko586: folds *** FLOP *** [Ts 5h Kh] ambaal84: checks epitomised: bets 120 ambaal84: calls 120 *** TURN *** [Ts 5h Kh] [9s] ambaal84: checks epitomised: Title: Re: Standard hand, plan on turn Post by: George2Loose on July 20, 2012, 09:03:40 AM Think this early I check back. Bet/folding being option 2
Title: Re: Standard hand, plan on turn Post by: pleno1 on July 20, 2012, 09:30:36 AM 199/fold
Title: Re: Standard hand, plan on turn Post by: TL900 on July 20, 2012, 09:42:37 AM think i prefer b/f to checking back just because I think when he c/shoves were always behind. We can get called by worse while charging alot of draws and valuebet certain rivers.
Think bet/calling is pretty bad. Title: Re: Standard hand, plan on turn Post by: mondatoo on July 20, 2012, 05:18:49 PM B/c, he's a fish, unless he's a nitty bad fish then we lose to K9/T9 and QJ, lolz if he has 99. Ton of 1pr + draw hands he will over play on turn.
Title: Re: Standard hand, plan on turn Post by: mondatoo on July 20, 2012, 05:28:23 PM Obv not loving it btw, but it's a sng, fish in these spaz off loads as you know, you're going to be wrong a lot b/f here.
Not sure how different 18's play to 180's early on but think it's a mistake to b/f vs fish if they're the same. Title: Re: Standard hand, plan on turn Post by: muckthenuts on July 20, 2012, 06:00:47 PM B/c, he's a fish, unless he's a nitty bad fish then we lose to K9/T9 and QJ, lolz if he has 99. Ton of 1pr + draw hands he will over play on turn. Yeah this is actually what i was thinking and would be the line i take. I think it just comes from my own experience really, the postflop plays of fish in sngs are just terrible and would expect you can safely profitably b/c AK here. Title: Re: Standard hand, plan on turn Post by: MC on July 20, 2012, 06:47:57 PM B/c, he's a fish, unless he's a nitty bad fish then we lose to K9/T9 and QJ, lolz if he has 99. Ton of 1pr + draw hands he will over play on turn. Obv not loving it btw, but it's a sng, fish in these spaz off loads as you know, you're going to be wrong a lot b/f here. Not sure how different 18's play to 180's early on but think it's a mistake to b/f vs fish if they're the same. B/c, he's a fish, unless he's a nitty bad fish then we lose to K9/T9 and QJ, lolz if he has 99. Ton of 1pr + draw hands he will over play on turn. Yeah this is actually what i was thinking and would be the line i take. I think it just comes from my own experience really, the postflop plays of fish in sngs are just terrible and would expect you can safely profitably b/c AK here. Yeah, this was my thinking as I was playing the hand. I nearly checked back, then I decided to bet/call, as I thought he might rejam as light as J9/Q9 or hands like that. I think his stack size helped dictate this decision though, would have a harder time doing it if he was full stacked I think. I just wasn't sure of the line. Sort of glad to see a dispute between all 3 options, thought I might have been posting up a really basic hand but it did feel like a tricky decision at the time. |