|
Title: Satellite bubble Post by: TL900 on September 21, 2012, 05:49:06 PM ***** Hand History for Game 4289551981 ***** (IPoker)
Tourney Hand NL Texas Hold'em - Wednesday, September 19, 11:44:53 ET 2012 Table GUKPT 150 Freezeout Qualifier 759696601 (Real Money) Seat 4 is the button Seat 3: Walwyn1 ( $20145.00 USD ) Seat 4: oldQP_Jonhooks1986 ( $9517.50 USD ) Seat 5: HERO ( $8917.50 USD ) Seat 10: superbyrney1010 ( $76420.00 USD ) hero posts ante of [$50.00 USD]. superbyrney1010 posts ante of [$50.00 USD]. Walwyn1 posts ante of [$50.00 USD]. oldQP_Jonhooks1986 posts ante of [$50.00 USD]. hero posts small blind [$250.00 USD]. superbyrney1010 posts big blind [$500.00 USD]. ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to HERO [ ] Walwyn1 folds oldQP_Jonhooks1986 folds HERO : this was the hand from a GUKPT satellite, 4 left with 3 seats. We are 4/4 atm and it folds to us with the huge stack in the bb. The guy in 3/4 was playing very bad satellite strategy and peeling the big stacks opens alot from the bb. Whats our shoving range here? (assuming we dont have a raising range in this spot which i think is a fair assumption) Do you shove tighter and hope the guy in 3rd does something spazzy at the risk of us blinding down? Whats our range? Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: Ironside on September 21, 2012, 06:38:39 PM 89s+ 22+
Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: Doobs on September 21, 2012, 07:00:00 PM 89s+ 22+ This is a terrible range. Huge stacks tend to call way more than they should. If he just calls 10%, you'd be knocking yourself out 7% of the time. I'd far rather wait for the other fella to knock himself out. if that doesn't happen I widen, until then range is tiny. Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: Ironside on September 21, 2012, 09:05:01 PM 89s+ 22+ This is a terrible range. Huge stacks tend to call way more than they should. If he just calls 10%, you'd be knocking yourself out 7% of the time. I'd far rather wait for the other fella to knock himself out. if that doesn't happen I widen, until then range is tiny. sorry miss read though he had 7k not 70k Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: skolsuper on September 22, 2012, 12:20:22 AM JJ+?
Although, as I always post on these threads, this stuff is solved, get SNGWiz. Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: pleno1 on September 22, 2012, 12:27:04 AM I'd shove 10s and aq but aq
May be a little light just think a lot of the hands he ahhhhhh go on then with we dominate so much. Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: OverTheBorder on September 22, 2012, 12:45:54 AM Any money in 4th? or is it just 3 seats! errrrm in this spot into more than half the chips in play blind on blind he is going to be calling wide with equity I will be all in with pairs and only pairs with paint!
Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: JK on September 22, 2012, 01:57:55 AM Snap reaction was JJ/AQ so gonna say that. I'm shit at satties though
Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: skolsuper on September 22, 2012, 03:31:20 AM Snap reaction was JJ/AQ so gonna say that. I'm shit at satties though Because youre expecting to get called v wide, JJ and AQ are so far apart in this situation it's not even funny. 88 is better than AQ here. Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: JustinSayne on September 22, 2012, 04:13:21 AM Im inclined to jam pretty damn tight here considering how bad 3/4 is playing apparently.
Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: rfgqqabc on September 22, 2012, 06:01:12 AM JJ+? Although, as I always post on these threads, this stuff is solved, get SNGWiz. Whilst i completely agree, sometimes these need to be posted as the weakness of the 3/4 opponent is significant. Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: JK on September 22, 2012, 11:43:29 AM Snap reaction was JJ/AQ so gonna say that. I'm shit at satties though Because youre expecting to get called v wide, JJ and AQ are so far apart in this situation it's not even funny. 88 is better than AQ here. You're right, ofc. Didnt take that into account. Was very tired :P Title: Re: Satellite bubble Post by: discomonkey on September 22, 2012, 11:56:13 PM pretty tight bc of the guy playing bad, hes gonna peel/spaz himself out vs such a huge stack, jj ak i guess??
agree with keys tho... sngwiz should answer this question better than any of us |