Title: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: ruud on January 16, 2013, 07:56:54 PM On the back of an argument with a mate, I am intrigued as to people's opinion on the following. I have promised I will just post the hand details with no embellishment or opinion from me, so here it is:
Live Satellite to Big(gish) Tournament. A tournament that we wouldn't normally be rolled to play. 12 left, 10 seats guaranteed. We had a great table but it broke and we're new to this table. Blinds are 1500/3000/400 UTG 10k UTG+1 12k CO 28k HERO (Button) 80k SB 35k BB 85K Average is about 45k Folds to Hero on the button with Ac Jd We open to 7.5k SB folds BB thinks then flat calls Flop is Ks Td Qs BB leads for 10k We raise to 23k He insta-shoves We? Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: outragous76 on January 16, 2013, 08:10:37 PM well
1. we have the nuts 2. im not raising flop to fold 3. his peel range starts at 72o vs you 4. his shove range still starts at 72o 5. 50p 6. fold pre (you probably can fold here, but just dont play it so terrible in the first place - go get a cuppa tea and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Honeybadger on January 16, 2013, 08:12:32 PM Fold preflop.
Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: NigDawG on January 16, 2013, 08:12:58 PM clear fold pre if the stacks are accurate
Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Longy on January 16, 2013, 08:29:54 PM Go and make a cup of tea, absoutely no need to get involved.
Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Eso Kral on January 16, 2013, 08:31:50 PM clear fold pre if the stacks are accurate Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: david3103 on January 16, 2013, 08:50:30 PM It's BB in the hand with us? Playing 85k?
Fold pre and don't get involved postflop with someone who covers us without the stone cold nuts and no chance of being outdrawn. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: ruud on January 16, 2013, 08:55:38 PM Is killing me that I am still not allowed to offer an opinion on my own hand, but assuming we have played the hand as we have (whether this good or bad), what should we do NOW?
Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Eso Kral on January 16, 2013, 09:06:37 PM Is killing me that I am still not allowed to offer an opinion on my own hand, but assuming we have played the hand as we have (whether this good or bad), what should we do NOW? ok as played and for all the reasons in the op by you I now fold as you still cover at least 3 of the stacks left (as they are at ur table) but after folding would not tell anyone or post in pha ;)Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Eso Kral on January 16, 2013, 09:07:29 PM Obv irl I call it off and lose to the spade otr
Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Ironside on January 16, 2013, 09:12:17 PM if bb is out of hand we call iff bb is still in hand we fold
fold pre and go for smoke imho Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: david3103 on January 16, 2013, 10:42:54 PM Is killing me that I am still not allowed to offer an opinion on my own hand, but assuming we have played the hand as we have (whether this good or bad), what should we do NOW? If he shows us 9c Jd, or 9d Jc call. Otherwise fold seems good. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Oxford_HRV on January 17, 2013, 01:17:44 AM I will never ever ever fold in this spot unless the tourney I'm sattin' into meant the absolute world to me.
Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: smashedagain on January 17, 2013, 09:52:22 AM It's fine everyone saying fold pre but the reality is that its folded round to your button, you are 6 handed, costing you nearly 7k/ round and its a live situation with nowhere to hide. You are expecting to pick up the blinds & antes cheap. Granted the 10k and 12k are on life support but I'm guessing in the last few orbits they have opened jammed and picked up the blinds and antes as no one has looked them up. Have to be honest and leave myself open to abuse and say that most people open this to take down the blinds. You ain't getting many better positions to be in.
You can't go off and make a cup of tea or just sit there folding irl, it just does not happen and you still have to lose 2 players. These sat bubbles can go on for ages were the short stacks are jamming once an orbit and everyone folds, correctly IMO. Now that the bb has called and led out 10k on the flop I would not bother raising the 23k but instead just move all in. Put the decision back on him for his tourney. If he calls it off you are happy that you have got all your chips in with the nuts, if he folds you are happy to add 25% to your stack and put the bb in a position where on his button or SB he is tempted to take out the 10k n 12k. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: SuuPRlim on January 17, 2013, 11:28:32 AM Obviously dont raise fold the flop when you have a straight.
Pre-flop is the mistake here, now you have to take your medicine. You could also consider just calling the flop 10k and then shipping the turn if it isn't a spade of a pair. IDK what the fuck this guy is doing either lol Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Honeybadger on January 17, 2013, 12:34:06 PM well 1. we have the nuts 2. im not raising flop to fold 3. his peel range starts at 72o vs you 4. his shove range still starts at 72o 5. 50p 6. fold pre (you probably can fold here, but just dont play it so terrible in the first place - go get a cuppa tea and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) Guy, I'm honestly not 'picking on you' even though I'm also pulling you up on something you said in another thread right now too. But why on earth would you say that villain's peeling range (and flop jamming range) includes 72o??!! You do de crazy talk man ;) Nobody plays like this! And quite rightly too. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Honeybadger on January 17, 2013, 12:41:54 PM Jamming the flop vs the donk MUST be better than raise/calling in a satellite.
Most important thing though is that if you win this pot you should not play a single hand from now on. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: outragous76 on January 17, 2013, 12:45:17 PM well 1. we have the nuts 2. im not raising flop to fold 3. his peel range starts at 72o vs you 4. his shove range still starts at 72o 5. 50p 6. fold pre (you probably can fold here, but just dont play it so terrible in the first place - go get a cuppa tea and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) Guy, I'm honestly not 'picking on you' even though I'm also pulling you up on something you said in another thread right now too. But why on earth would you say that villain's peeling range (and flop jamming range) includes 72o??!! You do de crazy talk man ;) Nobody plays like this! And quite rightly too. Because the big stack villain knows if he gets HU vs us he wins the pot. Op is thinking of folding having flopped the nuts Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: EvilPie on January 17, 2013, 12:53:19 PM Stacks on the other table are very important here. We know the average but that's pretty irrelevant this close to a satellite seat.
Most obvious point raised by a few is to fold pre. Assuming there's a couple of other short stacks on the other table you really have no need whatsoever to get involved. I understand what Jason's saying about picking up the blinds and not being able to fold to a seat in real life but given these stacks you 100% can. It's when you go getting yourself in these sort of spots and doing 4 orbits worth of chips that you start to drag yourself back in to realms of having to nick a few blinds. As played you have to fold unfortunately. You're still pretty much locked and at least you're giving chips away to someone, who now that he's on 120k is going to apply even more pressure to the others. In satellites you really have to pay attention to the seating positions of the big stacks. You're in a bad spot. You have a similar stack 2 to your left which means you need an uber premium and should only ever be shoving. You don't ever want to see a flop. The other big stack is the guy who can apply pressure as he has 3 short stacks to his left. Leave it with him to do your work for you. Obviously if he's not applying any pressure then you may have to step it up but given that he's peeled here I think that's unlikely. 50p. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: EvilPie on January 17, 2013, 12:54:25 PM Jamming the flop vs the donk MUST be better than raise/calling in a satellite. Most important thing though is that Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Honeybadger on January 17, 2013, 01:01:12 PM Jamming the flop vs the donk MUST be better than raise/calling in a satellite. Most important thing though is that Yeh true... I did say to fold preflop earlier ITT too! Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Honeybadger on January 17, 2013, 01:02:04 PM well 1. we have the nuts 2. im not raising flop to fold 3. his peel range starts at 72o vs you 4. his shove range still starts at 72o 5. 50p 6. fold pre (you probably can fold here, but just dont play it so terrible in the first place - go get a cuppa tea and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) Guy, I'm honestly not 'picking on you' even though I'm also pulling you up on something you said in another thread right now too. But why on earth would you say that villain's peeling range (and flop jamming range) includes 72o??!! You do de crazy talk man ;) Nobody plays like this! And quite rightly too. Because the big stack villain knows if he gets HU vs us he wins the pot. Op is thinking of folding having flopped the nuts But noone actually plays like this IRL! And they are right not to as well. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: outragous76 on January 17, 2013, 02:03:40 PM well 1. we have the nuts 2. im not raising flop to fold 3. his peel range starts at 72o vs you 4. his shove range still starts at 72o 5. 50p 6. fold pre (you probably can fold here, but just dont play it so terrible in the first place - go get a cuppa tea and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) Guy, I'm honestly not 'picking on you' even though I'm also pulling you up on something you said in another thread right now too. But why on earth would you say that villain's peeling range (and flop jamming range) includes 72o??!! You do de crazy talk man ;) Nobody plays like this! And quite rightly too. Because the big stack villain knows if he gets HU vs us he wins the pot. Op is thinking of folding having flopped the nuts But noone actually plays like this IRL! And they are right not to as well. you dont play enough sattelites if you think big stacks dont expolit 2nd place in chips on satty bubbles! Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: kinboshi on January 17, 2013, 02:12:41 PM Yeah, definitely fold pre here. To win you need to finish Top 10, not have the biggest stack when there are ten left.
If you are raising pre, then check/flat the flop, and the same on the turn, and then jam the river if it's a non-paired and non-flush board. Really don't see any need to get involved or to voluntarily put any chips in the middle. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: david3103 on January 17, 2013, 02:14:39 PM well 1. we have the nuts 2. im not raising flop to fold 3. his peel range starts at 72o vs you 4. his shove range still starts at 72o 5. 50p 6. fold pre (you probably can fold here, but just dont play it so terrible in the first place - go get a cuppa tea and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) Guy, I'm honestly not 'picking on you' even though I'm also pulling you up on something you said in another thread right now too. But why on earth would you say that villain's peeling range (and flop jamming range) includes 72o??!! You do de crazy talk man ;) Nobody plays like this! And quite rightly too. Because the big stack villain knows if he gets HU vs us he wins the pot. Op is thinking of folding having flopped the nuts But noone actually plays like this IRL! And they are right not to as well. you dont play enough sattelites if you think big stacks dont expolit 2nd place in chips on satty bubbles! They Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: kinboshi on January 17, 2013, 02:14:50 PM well 1. we have the nuts 2. im not raising flop to fold 3. his peel range starts at 72o vs you 4. his shove range still starts at 72o 5. 50p 6. fold pre (you probably can fold here, but just dont play it so terrible in the first place - go get a cuppa tea and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) Guy, I'm honestly not 'picking on you' even though I'm also pulling you up on something you said in another thread right now too. But why on earth would you say that villain's peeling range (and flop jamming range) includes 72o??!! You do de crazy talk man ;) Nobody plays like this! And quite rightly too. Because the big stack villain knows if he gets HU vs us he wins the pot. Op is thinking of folding having flopped the nuts But noone actually plays like this IRL! And they are right not to as well. you dont play enough sattelites if you think big stacks dont expolit 2nd place in chips on satty bubbles! You can't really be exploited if you simply fold every hand and win a seat. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: outragous76 on January 17, 2013, 02:17:52 PM well 1. we have the nuts 2. im not raising flop to fold 3. his peel range starts at 72o vs you 4. his shove range still starts at 72o 5. 50p 6. fold pre (you probably can fold here, but just dont play it so terrible in the first place - go get a cuppa tea and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) Guy, I'm honestly not 'picking on you' even though I'm also pulling you up on something you said in another thread right now too. But why on earth would you say that villain's peeling range (and flop jamming range) includes 72o??!! You do de crazy talk man ;) Nobody plays like this! And quite rightly too. Because the big stack villain knows if he gets HU vs us he wins the pot. Op is thinking of folding having flopped the nuts But noone actually plays like this IRL! And they are right not to as well. you dont play enough sattelites if you think big stacks dont expolit 2nd place in chips on satty bubbles! They your getting it wrong! What hand can hero proceed with? He wants to fold the nuts! If villain WANTS to exploit someone its the guy who is locked up! There arent too mnay stacks locked up on this table except heroes Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: SuuPRlim on January 17, 2013, 02:32:14 PM This is all very silly.
If the big stack has Ks Kh then he should just fold preflop surely? If we get JJ surely we should just fold it OTB as well? I guess we should go 6k/call with AA/KK/(?QQ?) against the 35k stack and 6k/fold EVERYTHING against the 85k, even aces? Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: outragous76 on January 17, 2013, 02:34:12 PM This hand doesnt warrant discussion - its a trivial fold pre
The ONLY reason it warrants discussion is because we flopped the bojangles and I assume OP wants to fold Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: david3103 on January 17, 2013, 02:38:11 PM well 1. we have the nuts 2. im not raising flop to fold 3. his peel range starts at 72o vs you 4. his shove range still starts at 72o 5. 50p 6. fold pre (you probably can fold here, but just dont play it so terrible in the first place - go get a cuppa tea and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) Guy, I'm honestly not 'picking on you' even though I'm also pulling you up on something you said in another thread right now too. But why on earth would you say that villain's peeling range (and flop jamming range) includes 72o??!! You do de crazy talk man ;) Nobody plays like this! And quite rightly too. Because the big stack villain knows if he gets HU vs us he wins the pot. Op is thinking of folding having flopped the nuts But noone actually plays like this IRL! And they are right not to as well. you dont play enough sattelites if you think big stacks dont expolit 2nd place in chips on satty bubbles! They your getting it wrong! What hand can hero proceed with? He wants to fold the nuts! If villain WANTS to exploit someone its the guy who is locked up! There arent too mnay stacks locked up on this table except heroes But if villain was going to exploit his stack size with a range from 72+ surely he'd have done it preflop not now when he's already seen that hero has some sort of hand? We're giving villain a huge amount of credit here if we think he's capable of making this move with anything other than a hand that could be the same as ours (possibly freerolling a spade draw) or a hand that could beat ours with a spade or a paired board. First rule of satellites this close to the seats is don't put yourself in a spot like this. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: outragous76 on January 17, 2013, 02:59:34 PM well 1. we have the nuts 2. im not raising flop to fold 3. his peel range starts at 72o vs you 4. his shove range still starts at 72o 5. 50p 6. fold pre (you probably can fold here, but just dont play it so terrible in the first place - go get a cuppa tea and wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii) Guy, I'm honestly not 'picking on you' even though I'm also pulling you up on something you said in another thread right now too. But why on earth would you say that villain's peeling range (and flop jamming range) includes 72o??!! You do de crazy talk man ;) Nobody plays like this! And quite rightly too. Because the big stack villain knows if he gets HU vs us he wins the pot. Op is thinking of folding having flopped the nuts But noone actually plays like this IRL! And they are right not to as well. you dont play enough sattelites if you think big stacks dont expolit 2nd place in chips on satty bubbles! They your getting it wrong! What hand can hero proceed with? He wants to fold the nuts! If villain WANTS to exploit someone its the guy who is locked up! There arent too mnay stacks locked up on this table except heroes But if villain was going to exploit his stack size with a range from 72+ surely he'd have done it preflop not now when he's already seen that hero has some sort of hand? We're giving villain a huge amount of credit here if we think he's capable of making this move with anything other than a hand that could be the same as ours (possibly freerolling a spade draw) or a hand that could beat ours with a spade or a paired board. First rule of satellites this close to the seats is don't put yourself in a spot like this. no no no! difficult to get people off AA pre flop Not so difficult on a 9TJssx board on the bubble of a satty whe the guy has a seat locked Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: outragous76 on January 17, 2013, 03:03:21 PM Oh and please let the villain have AJss in this hand for roffles
Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: Honeybadger on January 17, 2013, 04:15:52 PM Why on earth would a big stack who has pretty much got a seat locked up want to exploit anyone? Let alone to try doing this with 72o vs a player with a stack size that can actually jeapordise his almost guaranteed seat. He has no need to do anything like this. To think that he has 100% of hands here is just weird.
Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: EvilPie on January 17, 2013, 04:18:05 PM Why on earth would a big stack who has pretty much got a seat locked up want to exploit anyone? Let alone to try doing this with 72o vs a player with a stack size that can actually jeapordise his almost guaranteed seat. He has no need to do anything like this. To think that he has 100% of hands here is just weird. Just for rofls? Pretty sure Guy would do it. I've seen him raising or calling pretty much 100% when he's got loads of chips. You could ask the same question or the hero as well. Why on earth is he trying to steal the blinds with AJo? Makes no sense. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: outragous76 on January 17, 2013, 04:18:41 PM Why on earth would a big stack who has pretty much got a seat locked up want to exploit anyone? Let alone to try doing this with 72o vs a player with a stack size that can actually jeapordise his almost guaranteed seat. He has no need to do anything like this. To think that he has 100% of hands here is just weird. Stu Have you never watched billy big bollocks play every hand? It's is good strategy to not play hands, but I could load up 3 random sattys tonight and I guarantee someone will be bashing it up Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: outragous76 on January 17, 2013, 04:20:10 PM Why on earth would a big stack who has pretty much got a seat locked up want to exploit anyone? Let alone to try doing this with 72o vs a player with a stack size that can actually jeapordise his almost guaranteed seat. He has no need to do anything like this. To think that he has 100% of hands here is just weird. Just for rofls? Pretty sure Guy would do it. I've seen him raising or calling pretty much 100% when he's got loads of chips. You could ask the same question or the hero as well. Why on earth is he trying to steal the blinds with AJo? Makes no sense. Shhhhhhh ;0) Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: EvilPie on January 17, 2013, 04:20:16 PM This is all very silly. If the big stack has Ks Kh then he should just fold preflop surely? If we get JJ surely we should just fold it OTB as well? I guess we should go 6k/call with AA/KK/(?QQ?) against the 35k stack and 6k/fold EVERYTHING against the 85k, even aces? He should but he won't. I'm glad he won't because that would mean he's good and then the value would disappear from these lovely sats. Everything you say looks spot on to me. That's what we should do because it'd be correct. Hopefully plenty of others won't though. Title: Re: Maybe not as obvious as it looks? Post by: kinboshi on January 17, 2013, 04:22:49 PM ...and they certainly don't in the DTD deepstack sats!
|