|
Title: re-jam spot. Post by: pleno1 on March 10, 2013, 10:07:01 PM what do we jam pre here?
sunday million, 3.5k left, 1600 itm Table '710020010 92' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Dhr. Awesome (10804 in chips) Seat 2: pads1161 (58110 in chips) Seat 3: hopezACE (37104 in chips) Seat 4: lermonad (13026 in chips) Seat 5: mst jun. (11486 in chips) Seat 6: RodrigoFP (31935 in chips) Seat 7: NutPopper (11974 in chips) Seat 8: Samboha (6958 in chips) Seat 9: SUPER00TILT (10396 in chips) Dhr. Awesome: posts the ante 80 pads1161: posts the ante 80 hopezACE: posts the ante 80 lermonad: posts the ante 80 mst jun.: posts the ante 80 RodrigoFP: posts the ante 80 NutPopper: posts the ante 80 Samboha: posts the ante 80 SUPER00TILT: posts the ante 80 NutPopper: posts small blind 400 Samboha: posts big blind 800 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to pads1161 [X X] SUPER00TILT: folds Dhr. Awesome: raises 9924 to 10724 and is all-in pads1161: readless. Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:14:06 PM call with ATs AJo KQo 77 or summat, fold the bottom to the 30k stacks if they reshove Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:15:31 PM call with ATs AJo KQo 77 or summat, fold the bottom to the 30k stacks if they reshove changed my mind actually, AJs AQo KQs 88 Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: LonOhRay on March 11, 2013, 04:16:36 AM call with ATs AJo KQo 77 or summat, fold the bottom to the 30k stacks if they reshove changed my mind actually, AJs AQo KQs 88 This and throw in an occasional J5o for miss click balance purposes Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: PathFinder on March 11, 2013, 03:42:16 PM There's only 2 stacks behind us that we should worry about as the rest are similar to initial jammer. He is however shoving UTG+1 so my range to re-jam is a little tighter:
AQ+ 1010+ Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: dreenie on March 12, 2013, 03:13:40 AM Think he at best has AK, so would jam AK and JJ+ think my range in this spot is gonna be super tight from his shove utg
Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: rfgqqabc on March 12, 2013, 03:48:40 AM call with ATs AJo KQo 77 or summat, fold the bottom to the 30k stacks if they reshove changed my mind actually, AJs AQo KQs 88 This and throw in an occasional J5o for miss click balance purposes Really this loose? I'm not sure how much tighter I am, probably AQ+ and TT+, surely we are too early here? Readless= search his tables too. I guess Toms range is spot on vs any grinder but think the mil might be a touch too tight vs a readless utg jam. <3 to J5o Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: TL900 on March 12, 2013, 04:20:26 AM I did tighten it, didn't you see? :p
Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: Rupert on March 12, 2013, 07:51:53 AM flat entire range, TT+ AQs AK, 99 is close don't think anything else is
Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: pleno1 on March 12, 2013, 08:30:56 AM meh :P
Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: LonOhRay on March 12, 2013, 05:06:59 PM I read it as 5/1k for some reason
Would go with Rupert's range wouldn't fold 99, stack isn't damaged if we lose Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: ashj22 on March 18, 2013, 11:09:35 PM i think i re jam 99+ AQ+
Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: mondatoo on March 18, 2013, 11:42:38 PM Calling KQs readless is definitely a mistake.
Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: TL900 on March 18, 2013, 11:49:03 PM Calling KQs readless is definitely a mistake. I agree, duno what I was smoking the day I wrote this Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: pleno1 on March 19, 2013, 09:37:54 AM guy had 65o.
Title: Re: re-jam spot. Post by: buffyslayer1 on March 19, 2013, 11:28:54 AM guy had 65o. seems solid :p +1 on ruperts flat entire range, though I might even nit fold AQs/99 sometimes |