Title: Scoop -31 Low Post by: dreenie on May 22, 2013, 11:20:58 PM Scoop L :
Not much in the way of reads, OPR'd him and played hardly anything all year. He literally snap shoves when I put the 4th bet in. What range of hand should I be calling with if I think something's not right? What do you think his range will be? PokerStars Hand #98966144181: Tournament #2013050311, $20+$5+$2 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XIV (250/500) - 2013/05/22 22:53:46 WET [2013/05/22 17:53:46 ET] Table '2013050311 1263' 9-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: dreeniee82 (22743 in chips) Seat 2: Fuxxored (3748 in chips) Seat 3: ExMaxwell (16789 in chips) Seat 4: BornSurvivor (9031 in chips) Seat 5: $corpion11 (34450 in chips) Seat 6: PokerPete04 (21833 in chips) Seat 7: martinkaa68 (8580 in chips) Seat 8: WierdMe (36212 in chips) Seat 9: fishgirl19y (13744 in chips) dreeniee82: posts the ante 60 Fuxxored: posts the ante 60 ExMaxwell: posts the ante 60 BornSurvivor: posts the ante 60 $corpion11: posts the ante 60 PokerPete04: posts the ante 60 martinkaa68: posts the ante 60 WierdMe: posts the ante 60 fishgirl19y: posts the ante 60 BornSurvivor: posts small blind 250 $corpion11: posts big blind 500 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to dreeniee82 : XX PokerPete04: folds martinkaa68: folds WierdMe: raises 500 to 1000 fishgirl19y: calls 1000 dreeniee82: raises 1841 to 2841 Fuxxored: folds ExMaxwell: folds BornSurvivor: folds $corpion11: folds WierdMe: raises 2281 to 5122 fishgirl19y: folds dreeniee82: raises 2728 to 7850 WierdMe: raises 28302 to 36152 and is all-in Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: wazz on May 23, 2013, 02:21:16 AM He's taking the line that he doesn't expect you to fold having put in more than a third of your stack, so he has a value hand. You're getting better than 3-1 I think (someone check my maths please?) so barring funky ICM situations you're gonna have to call here. You don't have room to 5b/fold any sizing so I would jam or flat unless I had AA or KK (yes, obviously very exploitable, but we don't expect a rando @ $27 bi scoop to be able to exploit us by folding JJ/QQ/AK more than 1 time in a billion).
Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: pleno1 on May 23, 2013, 02:34:58 AM I know he had some shit here.
But we really should t be looking to get it in wih tens and unlikely with aq. Stack is so good and with structure of this scoop we can just churn lots of small and. Erin pots. It's a myth that you have to be aggressive or a warrior pre flop. Just lots of small aggression, 3betting in position, raising flops, double barrelIng etc. Trying to ever 5 or 6 bet light in a 27 is just going to be spew unless super good reads. If we have aa or kk I may even just flat call the 4bet so probably just ak I'm playing like this and even that it's more a fml than a wiiiii Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: dreenie on May 23, 2013, 03:16:47 AM I'll give u a list of hands what I might have had and if u can tell me what u think I had, and also whether u think I called? I will reveal results tomorrow ..
9d 9s Aspades Ks Kc Kh Ahrt Td 8c 5c Jd Qd Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: wazz on May 24, 2013, 02:50:14 AM I'd say you had As Ks or Kc Kh
but not Kc Kd Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: Doobs on May 24, 2013, 11:20:59 AM Dreenie loves the game, so this is inevitably 8c5c vs 7s6s.
Did we hold? Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: youthnkzR on May 24, 2013, 01:47:12 PM Don't know results but would guess you had Ahrt Td. Think in general villain has a super strong range as we don't really look like we're folding too often. But then again it is a KO and randoms really do overvalue the $5 for the KO so I suppose it's not totally out of the question that he could be fos and have like 89s/A3s...etc.
we have 45bbs in a turbo, think we can be slightly more selective about the spots we get in then this if we don't have a good hand. As played with A10 (if that's what we have we can fold) Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: dreenie on May 24, 2013, 03:14:35 PM Dreenie loves the game, so this is inevitably 8c5c vs 7s6s. Did we hold? loooooool Doobs, made me chuckle :) Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: dreenie on May 24, 2013, 03:17:03 PM OK, get ready for the flames dweeenieeeeee :
PokerStars Hand #98966144181: Tournament #2013050311, $20+$5+$2 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XIV (250/500) - 2013/05/22 22:53:46 WET [2013/05/22 17:53:46 ET] Table '2013050311 1263' 9-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: dreeniee82 (22743 in chips) Seat 2: Fuxxored (3748 in chips) Seat 3: ExMaxwell (16789 in chips) Seat 4: BornSurvivor (9031 in chips) Seat 5: $corpion11 (34450 in chips) Seat 6: PokerPete04 (21833 in chips) Seat 7: martinkaa68 (8580 in chips) Seat 8: WierdMe (36212 in chips) Seat 9: fishgirl19y (13744 in chips) dreeniee82: posts the ante 60 Fuxxored: posts the ante 60 ExMaxwell: posts the ante 60 BornSurvivor: posts the ante 60 $corpion11: posts the ante 60 PokerPete04: posts the ante 60 martinkaa68: posts the ante 60 WierdMe: posts the ante 60 fishgirl19y: posts the ante 60 BornSurvivor: posts small blind 250 $corpion11: posts big blind 500 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to dreeniee82 [td Ah] PokerPete04: folds ri$h [observer] said, "good play" martinkaa68: folds ri$h [observer] said, "JQ OFF THE NUTS" WierdMe: raises 500 to 1000 ri$h [observer] said, "<'))><" fishgirl19y: calls 1000 dreeniee82: raises 1841 to 2841 Fuxxored: folds ExMaxwell: folds BornSurvivor: folds $corpion11: folds WierdMe: raises 2281 to 5122 fishgirl19y: folds dreeniee82: raises 2728 to 7850 WierdMe: raises 28302 to 36152 and is all-in dreeniee82: calls 14833 and is all-in Uncalled bet (13469) returned to WierdMe *** FLOP *** [5c 3d Jd] *** TURN *** [5c 3d Jd] [6c] *** RIVER *** [5c 3d Jd 6c] [Qc] *** SHOW DOWN *** WierdMe: shows [Jh 3h] (two pair, Jacks and Threes) dreeniee82: shows [td Ah] (high card Ace) WierdMe collected 47656 from pot WierdMe wins the $5 bounty for eliminating dreeniee82 dreeniee82 finished the tournament in 3477th place *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 47656 | Rake 0 Board [5c 3d Jd 6c Qc] Seat 1: dreeniee82 showed [td Ah] and lost with high card Ace Seat 2: Fuxxored folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 3: ExMaxwell (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: BornSurvivor (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 5: $corpion11 (big blind) folded before Flop Seat 6: PokerPete04 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 7: martinkaa68 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 8: WierdMe showed [Jh 3h] and won (47656) with two pair, Jacks and Threes Seat 9: fishgirl19y folded before Flop Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: dreenie on May 24, 2013, 03:23:51 PM I actually strongly agree with all of Pleno's comments about structure, sometimes passing up on aggro spots due to the 'softness' of the tournament.
However, maybe I got stubborn who knows, but I just felt something really weird was going on. On paper it looks a clear fold, and most will probably just fold pre or fold after he's put the 4th bet in at least. A lot of my instinct came down to not being at the table that long, sounds weird, but it's the truth. Surely if you have some strong holding here you take a bit of time and think about things, and try and induce me to call it off light? He's not played many games this year so highly unlikely we have history. As pleno said, even if we think we are winning, and our instinct smells a rat, logically we are still up against 2 random cards that can easily flop well, and with structure & softness of tournament, I would not do this over and over. Just half the time with me it's a case of instinct which clouds all the other stuff and I end up clicking call :/ Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: outragous76 on May 24, 2013, 03:26:13 PM Always be the shover in these spots not the sigh caller
Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: wazz on May 24, 2013, 05:04:42 PM I've seen a few threads by you with this sort of theme - unjustified elaborate play that works out best against the exact hand you're facing. It's possible you've got some form of timing tell that you're not sharing or reason beyond what you've told us to believe he's shoving uberlight, in which case this is good, but on the basis of the information you've provided, it's definitely a mistake to get it in with ATo here.
Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: dreenie on May 24, 2013, 05:21:23 PM I've seen a few threads by you with this sort of theme - unjustified elaborate play that works out best against the exact hand you're facing. It's possible you've got some form of timing tell that you're not sharing or reason beyond what you've told us to believe he's shoving uberlight, in which case this is good, but on the basis of the information you've provided, it's definitely a mistake to get it in with ATo here. Basically it's Instinct, deep down it can't carry you Imo, there is more you need to know such as ranges and maths etc, but at times I go with my read, there is not a real way how I can describe Instinct, I can't write it down that's for sure, 90% of the time I don't post here is because I can't explain myself properly, and it comes across badly in terms of 'poker lingo'. It just felt really weird in words I can't describe or express. The outcome is irrelevant as to why I was posting tho, it's genuinely to try and get more experience on terminology, ranges and just improve as a player. Thanks for the comments, taken on board. Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: pleno1 on May 24, 2013, 05:33:36 PM the instinct should also be from the first bet.
For example, button opens and I have KJo in the sb, I may knwo the btn is an absolute loon and i say ok you know what, its 2am on Sunday and my hand is strong and I feel like he will 4bet jam bluff a lot because of the recent dynamic. So I decide to go with my instinct and make a decision to 3b with the intention of calling all in vs his J3 or whatever he jams. This logic is fine, but just 3betting and then going with your instinct once he 4b all in makes no sense at all and is just clikcing buttons and punting. Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: wazz on May 24, 2013, 07:51:59 PM I've seen a few threads by you with this sort of theme - unjustified elaborate play that works out best against the exact hand you're facing. It's possible you've got some form of timing tell that you're not sharing or reason beyond what you've told us to believe he's shoving uberlight, in which case this is good, but on the basis of the information you've provided, it's definitely a mistake to get it in with ATo here. Basically it's Instinct, deep down it can't carry you Imo, there is more you need to know such as ranges and maths etc, but at times I go with my read, there is not a real way how I can describe Instinct, I can't write it down that's for sure, 90% of the time I don't post here is because I can't explain myself properly, and it comes across badly in terms of 'poker lingo'. It just felt really weird in words I can't describe or express. The outcome is irrelevant as to why I was posting tho, it's genuinely to try and get more experience on terminology, ranges and just improve as a player. Thanks for the comments, taken on board. Again that's all fine but there's not a huge amount that any of us can learn from this - instinct is not teachable. Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: MANTIS01 on May 25, 2013, 12:42:44 AM I read this book once about psychology where it said as people when an idea flashes into our head we immediately put absolute faith in it. Like having a 'feeling' a horse is going to win a race and getting convinced it's a truth. Overall in this situation dreenie you haven't played with this guy so don't really know what he's up to and this use of instinct is just latching onto an idea that's flashed into your head. Only some of the time you will be right. You cover half the people at the table but gamble all your eggs on one feeling against a bigger stack in a pre flop call with A-10. You are a good card player so relax and play some poker, build some ranges, change down gears sometime and use your skills. This guy had the heart to jam with J3 here so it's ok for him to win this pot, random villain wins this pot a lot vs A-10 imo.
Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: dreenie on May 25, 2013, 12:58:05 AM the instinct should also be from the first bet. For example, button opens and I have KJo in the sb, I may knwo the btn is an absolute loon and i say ok you know what, its 2am on Sunday and my hand is strong and I feel like he will 4bet jam bluff a lot because of the recent dynamic. So I decide to go with my instinct and make a decision to 3b with the intention of calling all in vs his J3 or whatever he jams. This logic is fine, but just 3betting and then going with your instinct once he 4b all in makes no sense at all and is just clikcing buttons and punting. Great answer thanks. Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: dreenie on May 25, 2013, 01:02:32 AM I read this book once about psychology where it said as people when an idea flashes into our head we immediately put absolute faith in it. Like having a 'feeling' a horse is going to win a race and getting convinced it's a truth. Overall in this situation dreenie you haven't played with this guy so don't really know what he's up to and this use of instinct is just latching onto an idea that's flashed into your head. Only some of the time you will be right. You cover half the people at the table but gamble all your eggs on one feeling against a bigger stack in a pre flop call with A-10. You are a good card player so relax and play some poker, build some ranges, change down gears sometime and use your skills. This guy had the heart to jam with J3 here so it's ok for him to win this pot, random villain wins this pot a lot vs A-10 imo. Yep agree, ty. I obviously think overall it's terrible, hence why posting it, don't see the point of always posting hands that have been played perfect. This way I hope to learn a bit more and try and keep improving as a player. I don't get scared of someone else giving me critiscsim on how I've played a hand, I can debate it sure, but above anything else I want the critiscsim so that I can improve my poker. Thanks guys. Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: Bertpup on May 25, 2013, 11:35:36 AM How can you be readless looking at that players OPR? Villain has had a Pokerstars account for 6 years averaging less than 50 MTT a year. Looking at his cashes he seems to only play big buyin MTT's with no particularly deep runs. He is a rec fish who obviously has no real passion or knowledge of the game hence why hes played 300 tournaments lifetime.
You could also have got reads from players location to work out what timezone they were in and if there was a possibility of drunkenness/national stereotyping. . Title: Re: Scoop -31 Low Post by: Oxford_HRV on May 25, 2013, 04:47:56 PM i make this move with J3 all the time. it flops freakishly well ^_^
|