Title: Bangorrhea! Post by: Redsgirl on August 21, 2013, 03:12:00 PM Apparently I am not alone, this is a recognised affliction.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23781044 Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: outragous76 on August 21, 2013, 03:45:18 PM so much better than a full stop yo!
Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Tal on August 21, 2013, 05:34:54 PM The pedants, they must ped
Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: technolog on August 21, 2013, 09:58:15 PM I met the interrobang for the first this week and I'm embarrassed to say I quite like it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang) Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Tal on August 21, 2013, 10:01:48 PM Head to Chess Thread. We love interrobangs there.
Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Redsgirl on August 22, 2013, 02:12:51 PM I met the interrobang for the first this week and I'm embarrassed to say I quite like it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang) Noooooo technolog! They can't do that! You can't combine the two and make it all tidy and acceptable. Where's the freedom of expression?? What good is it if I don't get to choose the ratio of exclamation points to question marks?!?! Or the order!??! Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Tal on August 22, 2013, 02:14:41 PM That's all well and good, but what does !??! actually mean?
Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Redsgirl on August 22, 2013, 02:50:59 PM That's all well and good, but what does !??! actually mean? Well, it all depends on the context, but as a general guide ? before ! in any number usually conveys 'are you sh***ing me?' where as ! before ? usually means more like 'you have got to be sh***ting me' Kinda obvious, I thought. ;whistle; Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: kinboshi on August 22, 2013, 07:04:00 PM Let's not mention 'Literally' on this thread. Tal might literally implode...
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=define:+literally Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Redsgirl on August 22, 2013, 08:20:22 PM Let's not mention 'Literally' on this thread. Tal might literally implode... https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=define:+literally Whoaa there Kinboshi, I'm all for mashing up the rules a bit but how can this be? 2.Used to acknowledge that something is not literally true but is used for emphasis or to express strong feeling. You can use literally to describe something that is not literally? There aren't enough exclamation marks or question marks for me to express how this feels. Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: kinboshi on August 22, 2013, 08:31:00 PM It's a bad one, isn't it!?
Apparently, there are examples of 'literally' being used figuratively going back over 100 years (e.g. http://www.dickensfellowship.org/content/literally ). Not happy about an incorrect usage becoming accepted as a correct use though. It's a similar thing to 'factoid'. Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Claw75 on August 22, 2013, 08:40:35 PM awesome‽
Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Redsgirl on August 22, 2013, 09:46:16 PM It's a bad one, isn't it!? Apparently, there are examples of 'literally' being used figuratively going back over 100 years (e.g. http://www.dickensfellowship.org/content/literally ). Not happy about an incorrect usage becoming accepted as a correct use though. It's a similar thing to 'factoid'. I was reading Stephen Kings latest the other day and he used 'factoid' in the context of a small fact. I stifled the urge to contact his publishers. This also reminds me of a girl I knew who had apparently only ever heard the phrase 'that's original' said sarcastically, so genuinely thought 'original' meant something that had been done many times before. She refused to be told otherwise ;grr; Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Redsgirl on August 22, 2013, 09:47:38 PM awesome‽ Have you got that on your pc keyboard Claw?Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Claw75 on August 22, 2013, 09:52:21 PM awesome‽ Have you got that on your pc keyboard Claw?sadly not! I was thinking it should become standard, but actually I hope it doesn't as I too, like to express myself through my chosen order and number of punctuation marks. I generally go for question mark first, then alternating, sometimes with an additional couple of exclamation points at the end if I feel that part of the emotion needs a little more weight. Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Redsgirl on August 22, 2013, 10:18:49 PM My biggest problem is in real life, what I lack in vocabulary I make up for with eyebrows. I need some kind of software that can incorporate my gurning into my posts. Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: Tal on August 23, 2013, 08:56:05 AM The runner up in the Apprentice, Luisa Zissman, has launched her new brand without an apostrophe. It is now called Bakers Toolkit.
I don't like it, but it was a conscious decision for what she says is brand identity (Waterstones has done the same), so fair enough. Then I read this quote from her: "I was never very good at nouns, verbs and proverbs". I might actually cry. The BBC cheekily adds that she got an A in English A Level. Title: Re: Bangorrhea! Post by: tikay on August 23, 2013, 09:01:27 AM awesome‽ That is SO good, I'm actually jealous. If only I knew how to type that. Great name, too - interrobang LOVE that name. |