|
Title: Too thin? $200 zoom river spot. Post by: Nit Tendencies on September 04, 2013, 06:21:05 PM PokerStars Zoom Hand #103659533820: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2013/09/04 18:00:01 WET [2013/09/04 13:00:01 ET]
Table 'Aenna' 6-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: abo13 ($52.38 in chips) Seat 2: mradon ($469.15 in chips) Seat 3: 0701Janus ($251.20 in chips) Seat 4: FantonMojah ($289.36 in chips) Seat 5: Svekke83 ($578.15 in chips) Seat 6: Bear4rms ($291.80 in chips) mradon: posts small blind $1 0701Janus: posts big blind $2 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Bear4rms [Kc Tc] FantonMojah: folds Svekke83: folds Bear4rms: raises $3 to $5 abo13: folds mradon: folds 0701Janus: raises $13 to $18 Bear4rms: calls $13 *** FLOP *** [Kd 5s Js] 0701Janus: bets $19 Bear4rms: calls $19 *** TURN *** [Kd 5s Js] [2c] 0701Janus: bets $39 Bear4rms: calls $39 *** RIVER *** [Kd 5s Js 2c] [6c] 0701Janus: checks Bear4rms: ? The villain has my "reg, no info" tag, and has been reasonably tagish so far over the small sample I have, playing a 3bet of about 9%. By the river there is $150~ in there and he has $170 back so here are the options, does anybody: A) Bet a medium size for value B) Jam for value, in order to look polarised and hope to get a hero from ace high and queens (if they have played this way) C) Bet tiny for curious value and to induce spew vs bluffs which have given up D) Check with the thought that may not have bet Jx/QQ twice and could feasibly be c/calling AA/AK/KQ because all of the draws have bricked. Title: Re: Too thin? $200 zoom river spot. Post by: pleno1 on September 04, 2013, 06:26:54 PM 29.86
but stu wont like it Title: Re: Too thin? $200 zoom river spot. Post by: Nit Tendencies on September 05, 2013, 01:37:15 PM And call a jam I assume Pleno?
Title: Re: Too thin? $200 zoom river spot. Post by: pleno1 on September 05, 2013, 02:33:32 PM Title: Re: Too thin? $200 zoom river spot. Post by: Honeybadger on September 06, 2013, 04:42:34 AM Title: Re: Too thin? $200 zoom river spot. Post by: titaniumbean on September 06, 2013, 01:05:49 PM not sure if serious. where's the wall of text :) |