blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => Poker Hand Analysis => Topic started by: Eso Kral on November 10, 2013, 03:11:37 PM



Title: This ok?
Post by: Eso Kral on November 10, 2013, 03:11:37 PM
Not sure this needs a thread but Milli asked me to to see responses from the good folk of Blonde

DTD Tourney
15000
9000
5500
3500

We are button 900k  villain is CambridgeAlex SB 5M, JGill BB 2.25M  UTG Villain who folds has 2m
Blinds 30/60/10k and go 40/80 in 3mins

folds to us  we shove Q9o into Alex and Jon  cool?


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: Rexas on November 10, 2013, 03:12:47 PM
So we have 15bbs? Seems totally fine mate :)


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: millidonk on November 10, 2013, 03:42:39 PM
Lolz, always blame me.. As I said its abs fine and the majority of online kidz don't give it a seconds thought. Some older generation will open fold which is probs too nitty 4 handed. But I would be interested to see if there are any live pros that ever r/f here. Raising looks so strong and obv they won't think we have a r/f in us with our stack so its pretty unexploitable.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: Tal on November 10, 2013, 03:47:15 PM
Assuming you've played reasonably normally up to now (so this doesn't look completely alarming), shoving seems the most reasonable option to this live rec.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: theprawnidentity on November 10, 2013, 04:16:56 PM
As I said via PM.  Close between shoving and folding (doing more shoving than folding depending on the other stack sizes / dynamics).  Really dislike raise folding or raise calling.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: cambridgealex on November 10, 2013, 04:25:29 PM
As I said via PM.  Close between shoving and folding (doing more shoving than folding depending on the other stack sizes / dynamics).  Really dislike raise folding or raise calling.

If he had a similar stack to anyone else I think there's a good argument for folding. But he had less than half of the next biggest stack, so think he really has to take this spot and jam.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: theprawnidentity on November 10, 2013, 04:46:39 PM
Indeed.  I'm pretty sure I said that in the PM I sent Eso, but nice to know that you know what you're talking about and aren't just a haircut.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: millidonk on November 10, 2013, 05:03:04 PM
meh, r/c upper and r/f bottom end of your range is fine. I think I am just ahead of the trend as per. ;) In a few years time everyone will be doing it..


Alex, fwiw what would be your general impression had Eso opted to 2 to 3x it in this spot? Surely it would set alarm bells off as opposed to thinking "lol, this fish. i'm jamming"





Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: cambridgealex on November 10, 2013, 05:06:01 PM
I also sent Eso a pm about this hand. And apparently lots of people also did but didn't want to post itt.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: cambridgealex on November 10, 2013, 05:11:20 PM

Alex, fwiw what would be your general impression had Eso opted to 2 to 3x it in this spot? Surely it would set alarm bells off as opposed to thinking "lol, this fish. i'm jamming"


I'd think Eso still had a r/f range but I wouldn't jam T3s or anything...


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: theprawnidentity on November 10, 2013, 05:25:25 PM
Alright I promised Eso I would do some sums ITT.

Nash suggests, based on the payouts that:

We should shove:  22+,A2s+,A8o+,K7s+,KTo+,Q8s+,QTo+,J8s+,JTo,T8s+,98s
Alex should iso:     55+,A8s+,A9o+
Gill should call:       55+,A8s+,ATo+,KJs+,KQo

As Alex suggested, the reason I like shoving here is for reasons that Nash fails to take into account; our position in the tournament with 4 left is about as bad as it can be.  We have fewer than half as many chips as 3rd and the blinds are about to go up.  In the next couple of hands the blinds will have gone up and through us thus potentially leaving us with 8 or 9bb's.

The reason I don't like raise calling is that Q9o isn't really a hand that we want to induce action with.  If we go just based on the Nash calling ranges, you can see that we get so much that we want to fold just by shoving.  The last thing I want is for either of them to eyeball me with with something like Kxs or some weak Ax hands when I would have otherwise got a fold.

I don't like raise folding for a couple of reasons.  Firstly for it to be profitable we would have to be getting a good portion of folds from the blinds and given the reputation of all 3 bro's involved I don't see this getting through all that often.  Secondly if were in a bad position in the tournament before this, then raise folding here will only make things worse.  Assuming we're going to min raise and make it 160k, then fold, we will be left with 700k by the time the blinds go up and then through us.  So in 4 hands time, were going to have paid another 80k + 40k + 40k in antes and be sitting on around 550k (6.8bb).  And now were going to have to shove the button / co with very little fold equity into 3 players who can all comfortably call it off.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: celtic on November 10, 2013, 05:40:23 PM
Think in this situation, raise folding would be tragic v Alex.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: cambridgealex on November 10, 2013, 05:45:23 PM
Think in this situation, raise folding would be tragic v Alex.

Like his moustache


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: celtic on November 10, 2013, 05:49:12 PM
:)

Poor old wooden spoon. He does look a bit strange though, to be fair.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: millidonk on November 10, 2013, 05:50:34 PM
Bit of a disjointed reply as saw Tomsom's reply half way through..

Nash also fails to take into account the pure value of us remaining in the tournament.

I think we would have been unfortunate that it was Alex in the BB. A lot of people either wont give him much of a r/f range at all and loads will be folding hands they shouldn't. IMO the vast majority of people are only really jamming when we are in pretty bad shape and would have called our jam anyway.

Jamming = 1. Fold out marginal hands 2. Fold out weak hands
R/F = 1. Fold out marginal hands 2. Fold out weak hands 3. Fold out some strong hands  (I've seen people fold A10/66 and below) 4. Fold to a 3b and remain in the comp (which is impossible to put a price on)

Obv they could call a jam and we get a sexy double, but they could call our open and we get a sexy flop anyway.

Tom, you say you don't want to r/c as Q9 isn't a hand you want to induce with but my whole theory is based on the fact that if we raise they think we are inducing thus play badly against us.. Obv not everyone is a Goulder with a new haircut so they won't know we have a fold in us. :)

Obv I realise I am the only person who has spoken out that is on this side of the fence but If we all played exactly the same then not many people would make much money and I know firsthand that this play can be profitable all be it over a small sample. Just trying to provide options.

Anyway, Eso; Nash says it's a fold you fish. Get your ranges down!


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: millidonk on November 10, 2013, 05:52:43 PM
Think in this situation, raise folding would be tragic v Alex.

Meh results orientated.. Even if Alex jams we fold and get a JGILL run of hands AA, AA, KK and win it.

Think in this situation, raise folding would be tragic v Alex.

Like his moustache

No chance is it anywhere near that bad!!!


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: celtic on November 10, 2013, 05:55:56 PM
Nowt to do with results millifish. I just think Alex is capable of making us fold worse, and probably did to Eso during the final, as he probably did to others during the comp. and if he couldnt male them fold, he just got there :)


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: cambridgealex on November 10, 2013, 06:00:31 PM
and if he couldnt male them fold, he just got there :)

not wrong!


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: millidonk on November 10, 2013, 06:01:46 PM
Vinny disagrees with me. I am feeling even more happy with my play.  ;whistle;

Yeah, as I said this hand he is just ul that Alex is in the bb (although I still don't see many making us fold worse in this spot tbh).

The exact dynamics of this hand aside I think r/f has some merit. I might be the only one who thinks this.. Ahead of the curve yo.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: scotty77 on November 10, 2013, 06:02:02 PM
thoughts on limping button?


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: cambridgealex on November 10, 2013, 06:05:56 PM
im  in sb milli!


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: scotty77 on November 10, 2013, 06:08:14 PM
FWIW I think Jam > Limp > Fold > Raise Fold

Have been trying the odd limping button when this effective stack online and no one knows how to deal with it so mostly just get checks then can just min bet flop.

Fairly sure Jamie Burland wrote a blog about it.  Know he's the reason why I started doing it


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: millidonk on November 10, 2013, 06:10:42 PM
im  in sb milli!

lolz, my bad. That's even better for a r/f then.

thoughts on limping button?

Pioneers itt.

FWIW I think Jam > Limp > Fold > Raise Fold

Have been trying the odd limping button when this effective stack online and no one knows how to deal with it so mostly just get checks then can just min bet flop.

Have you tried r/f? I have been doing it with decent results.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: scotty77 on November 10, 2013, 06:14:46 PM
I wouldn't really wanna raise fold because of stack distribution and also 2 very good players in the blinds who are gonna be able to make very correct jams.  If this was 6/7 handed then I think raise fold has more merit.

If the blinds are 2 random players then raise>fold becomes a more attractive line


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: pleno1 on November 10, 2013, 08:29:39 PM
Id raise fold. If we think people are not going to fold much at all ba mr then I Want a wide minrc range and need to have some bluffs, q9 seems as decent as any to throw on there.

My next favourite option is fold

Next jam

Next limp


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: Royal Flush on November 11, 2013, 03:17:59 AM
We can min raise this for sure, this many years on and still people don't want to r/f 15bb :(


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: pleno1 on November 11, 2013, 03:38:33 AM
We can min raise this for sure, this many years on and still people don't want to r/f 15bb :(

Yeh also find this really weird in the thread.

If min raise fold is so bad min raise c must be amazing? Therefore raise fold is necessary.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: stato_1 on November 11, 2013, 06:12:30 AM
Yeah I'm in the raise fold camp here as well. THe fact that you have the shortest stack means you're the least appealing for Alex to try and put any pressure on because you have the least to lose by busting. Similarly for Jonathan plus he isnt going to want to play any big pot as he wants to consolidate his 2nd place stack. I've basically just written out ICM in words lol but u actually have a good stack size to attack this spot. Pleno's order of options is spot on here imo


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: millidonk on November 11, 2013, 06:26:37 AM
Gotta love poker. Winning players thinking the polar opposite of each other.. Nice to know I wasn't completely losing my mind tho.


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: theprawnidentity on November 11, 2013, 09:26:40 AM
Gotta love poker. Winning players thinking the polar opposite of each other.. Nice to know I wasn't completely losing my mind tho.

#lovethegame


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: TL900 on November 11, 2013, 10:41:12 AM
r/f >>> jam >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fold > limp imo


Title: Re: This ok?
Post by: The Squid on November 11, 2013, 12:03:21 PM
Just to be clear there is no way we can fold. Jamming and limping definitely have a positive expectation. This is a big hand on the button