|
Title: $3.50+r Post by: polerization on December 12, 2013, 03:57:54 AM PokerStars Hand #108396126828: Tournament #831856415, $3.19+$0.31 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level IV (50/100) - 2013/12/12 3:39:18 UTC [2013/12/11 22:39:18 ET]
Table '831856415 10' 9-max Seat #7 is the button Seat 1: polerization (2910 in chips) Seat 2: ASUS04 (1620 in chips) Seat 3: AAcer_RN (4630 in chips) Seat 4: Vykostovac (6039 in chips) Seat 6: maggoozoo (4959 in chips) Seat 7: marcelr0x (4690 in chips) Seat 8: mel2387 (1877 in chips) Seat 9: PokFoxx (3150 in chips) mel2387: posts small blind 50 PokFoxx: posts big blind 100 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to polerization [Kd Ks] polerization: raises 150 to 250 ASUS04: folds AAcer_RN: folds Vykostovac: folds maggoozoo: calls 250 marcelr0x: calls 250 mel2387: folds PokFoxx: folds *** FLOP *** [4h 8d 8c] polerization: bets 424 maggoozoo: folds marcelr0x: calls 424 *** TURN *** [4h 8d 8c] [3d] polerization: bets 836 marcelr0x: calls 836 *** RIVER *** [4h 8d 8c 3d]
Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: verndog158 on December 12, 2013, 05:42:02 AM what was the river?
Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: polerization on December 12, 2013, 05:47:59 AM what was the river? Td didn't think he had many FD though Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: verndog158 on December 12, 2013, 06:28:06 AM possibly not, still affects the way you played the hand though!
Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: polerization on December 12, 2013, 07:08:34 AM possibly not, still affects the way you played the hand though! Didn't get why this guy will not be thinking about the backdoor, i just think his range is so narrow 33-99 (obv some of these are sets) 8x 4x and some spazzy AJ/AQ high could be like A10/AJdd obv Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: Ragz on December 12, 2013, 01:46:38 PM Extremely standard.
Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: MC on December 12, 2013, 02:09:56 PM Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: theprawnidentity on December 12, 2013, 02:12:56 PM KINGZZZZ!!!!!! decent
Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: polerization on December 12, 2013, 02:59:25 PM sorry wasn't meant to be the guy turned up with 33 here yeah he got lucky on turn but i was thinking is it realistic I'm going to get 3 streets of value or is he going to keep turning up with better hands? Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: MC on December 12, 2013, 03:31:17 PM And the answer is yes, very realistic
Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: theprawnidentity on December 12, 2013, 03:32:57 PM You're probably getting 3 streets on a 2, 6 run out vs 33. Your also getting 3 streets vs most pairs and you will get 2 streets from A high sometimes too. Bro's play bad in 180's, often worse in rebuy periods.
Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: Ragz on December 12, 2013, 03:53:10 PM I can see any pp at all calling, 22 whatever, and sometimes also Ace high. A Ten river is pretty good for it.
Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: polerization on December 12, 2013, 06:06:15 PM You're probably getting 3 streets on a 2, 6 run out vs 33. Your also getting 3 streets vs most pairs and you will get 2 streets from A high sometimes too. Bro's play bad in 180's, often worse in rebuy periods. Okay thanks guys was just general question Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: muckthenuts on December 12, 2013, 07:20:47 PM Hand is wp. Partic in a $3 people will call with all sorts, so even though you lost the hand you made the best long term play for sure.
Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: Nico29 on December 13, 2013, 05:08:56 PM Sounds like you are being far too results based because you lost.
Hand is totally standard and you beat loads of stuff. Just a gg he got there on turn job. Don't beat yourself up over it, if you don't go broke here you've most likely played it wrong. Title: Re: $3.50+r Post by: polerization on December 13, 2013, 05:27:27 PM Sounds like you are being far too results based because you lost. Hand is totally standard and you beat loads of stuff. Just a gg he got there on turn job. Don't beat yourself up over it, if you don't go broke here you've most likely played it wrong. Okay thanks:) |