|
Title: cooler? Post by: Flash92 on December 23, 2013, 02:37:14 PM http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-hands/Boom/6560146_CDF13A01D5
urg, guy seems laggy. thoughts/help? ever getting away? better line? Title: Re: cooler? Post by: Rexas on December 23, 2013, 02:55:56 PM Seems Ok, liked your sizing throught, although I almost certainly don't lead the river. Unlucky pal :)
Title: Re: cooler? Post by: Flash92 on December 23, 2013, 02:59:18 PM Seems Ok, liked your sizing throught, although I almost certainly don't lead the river. Unlucky pal :) Thank you for input :) yeah I'm sure why I thought lead would be good here. Title: Re: cooler? Post by: polerization on December 23, 2013, 05:21:50 PM like the hand in general think he may do the same with AJ/A10 etc.... maybe even worse plus some bluffs didn't even think about leading the river but i liked it to be honest means if he was OOL with KQ on turn seeing if you had an ace he could still call and not just check behind.
Title: Re: cooler? Post by: pleno1 on December 24, 2013, 04:11:00 PM Seems Ok, liked your sizing throught, although I almost certainly don't lead the river. Unlucky pal :) Firmlyy disagree here and not sure how this one has basically been left as trivial. Pre- would just call, not just because of position but because of stack sizes it looks like the big blind is a fish and happy to go three way. Flop/ fine/std Turn/ seems good River is where we've gone mainly wrong though. If we lead its because wemthinkmhe has a hand he min raised ott to get free showdown on the river. Perhaps a weak ax or perhaps qx. If he has ax he will likely bet the river so I would check and if he bet less than third pot go all in for value and if he bet anything bigger just call. Bet calling here is going to be a disaster and he is 99.99999% going to fold or call all hands that we beat so if bet call isn't good I either like check/decide or bet bigger for value. Title: Re: cooler? Post by: polerization on December 24, 2013, 08:40:52 PM Seems Ok, liked your sizing throught, although I almost certainly don't lead the river. Unlucky pal :) Firmlyy disagree here and not sure how this one has basically been left as trivial. Pre- would just call, not just because of position but because of stack sizes it looks like the big blind is a fish and happy to go three way. Flop/ fine/std Turn/ seems good River is where we've gone mainly wrong though. If we lead its because wemthinkmhe has a hand he min raised ott to get free showdown on the river. Perhaps a weak ax or perhaps qx. If he has ax he will likely bet the river so I would check and if he bet less than third pot go all in for value and if he bet anything bigger just call. Bet calling here is going to be a disaster and he is 99.99999% going to fold or call all hands that we beat so if bet call isn't good I either like check/decide or bet bigger for value. do you not think he is checking back all Qx hands and worse Ax hand some of the time on the river? maybe we should think about b/f if we think he has a better hand whenever he raises but if we think he raises worse e.g AJ then we can b/c for value like you said if on the turn he's mining it for a cheap showdown is he not going to check behind a lot? Title: Re: cooler? Post by: pleno1 on December 25, 2013, 12:12:27 AM He won't raise weak aces in the river for value.
Title: Re: cooler? Post by: pleno1 on December 25, 2013, 12:13:10 AM In fact check folding may be better than bet calling. 99% sure it is
Title: Re: cooler? Post by: polerization on December 25, 2013, 12:23:29 AM He won't raise weak aces in the river for value. may not have typed right i know he wont do this but he will also check behind all Qx and maybe even check behind some Ax whereas he will call with these so much of the time. |