|
Title: River decision vs Annette Post by: MC on January 18, 2014, 01:16:25 PM No history with her, about 5 hands into a satellite final table with 1 $10k seat, 2nd-4th get $1400, 5th gets $700
I struggled to put her on a value hand that makes much sense. I thought 55 made sense, but figured she might bet flop with that. A5, A8 maybe? QT would bet flop a lot I thought. But does she really check back flop and then bet turn/bomb river as a bluff? Going for thin value with Ax seems unlikely. PokerStars Hand #110331856181: Tournament #848014014, $665+$35 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XII (150/300) - 2014/01/18 12:54:18 WET [2014/01/18 7:54:18 ET] Table '848014014 2' 9-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: Annette_15 (8480 in chips) Seat 2: music1991 (3478 in chips) Seat 3: samsam81 (6985 in chips) Seat 4: epitomised (9070 in chips) Seat 5: Sydney St@r (10904 in chips) Seat 6: sexyhedgehog (8677 in chips) Seat 7: mrdv8 (17221 in chips) Seat 8: Engineer757 (45900 in chips) Seat 9: springy_mel (4285 in chips) Annette_15: posts the ante 40 music1991: posts the ante 40 samsam81: posts the ante 40 epitomised: posts the ante 40 Sydney St@r: posts the ante 40 sexyhedgehog: posts the ante 40 mrdv8: posts the ante 40 Engineer757: posts the ante 40 springy_mel: posts the ante 40 samsam81: posts small blind 150 epitomised: posts big blind 300 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to epitomised [Ks Jc] Sydney St@r: folds sexyhedgehog: folds mrdv8: folds Engineer757: folds springy_mel: folds Annette_15: raises 300 to 600 music1991: folds samsam81: folds epitomised: calls 300 *** FLOP *** [9s Ad Jd] epitomised: checks Annette_15: checks *** TURN *** [9s Ad Jd] [5c] epitomised: checks Annette_15: bets 900 epitomised: calls 900 *** RIVER *** [9s Ad Jd 5c] [8c] epitomised: checks Annette_15: bets 1950 epitomised: Title: Re: River decision vs Annette Post by: youthnkzR on January 18, 2014, 01:26:23 PM Expect her to bet flop with Ax for protection and value as your bb peel range is comprised heavily of Broadway's. Your also very capped when you Check turn (as you bet any Ax the vast vast majority), which also means our hand is very face up to mid pairs when we call (assuming you lead draws a good % on the turn). 55 makes sense although think she can also have hands such as KK QQ and bombs in an attempt to be 'hero called'. I think we should probably fold as doubt she bets this size with bluffs (1950 into 3810) isn't huge and we have a v good price to flick it in with our capped range).
Title: Re: River decision vs Annette Post by: action man on January 18, 2014, 01:34:21 PM trivial fold if playing well, your hand looks exactly what it is when you are so face up vs a good player you get exploited too much to call in these spots
Title: Re: River decision vs Annette Post by: pleno1 on January 18, 2014, 02:59:16 PM would expect her to check back Ax a decent amount of the time otf.
as played, i wonder how bad shoving would be, slightly more attractive with qj i guess. Title: Re: River decision vs Annette Post by: AlexMartin on January 18, 2014, 03:47:18 PM would expect her to check back Ax a decent amount of the time otf. as played, i wonder how bad shoving would be, slightly more attractive with qj i guess. shoving is good once in a while i think, depends how she views you Title: Re: River decision vs Annette Post by: SuuPRlim on January 19, 2014, 01:14:50 AM don't try out-lag laggy people imo.
Never ends well. Title: Re: River decision vs Annette Post by: action man on January 19, 2014, 02:30:26 AM don't try out-lag laggy people imo. Never ends well. +1 have learnt this recently |