Title: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 10:16:36 PM playing in a super sat top 25 all get same prize 37 players left playing hand for hand on 4 tables
boring or what? the fact your trying to maintain a stack not build one means a totally different type of poker Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: owner on June 22, 2005, 10:53:02 PM why are they Hand 4 Hand so early ?
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 10:55:16 PM dont ask me but with 30 left its grinding to a halt
not getting many hands per level Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: jonthomson on June 22, 2005, 11:03:48 PM why are they Hand 4 Hand so early ? I can only assume they're paying out a minor prize down to 36 (which would be 4 tables at 9/table) or something... but if it's 25 paid the same and nothing else it makes no sense whatsoever... Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 11:05:16 PM 25 player get into the late night poker ace semi no other prize
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 11:10:11 PM i smell an iron bubble coming up 27 left
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 11:11:51 PM and now they end the hand for hand
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Bongo on June 22, 2005, 11:13:13 PM with 27 left? or did you make it?
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 11:15:28 PM 26 left
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 11:15:57 PM and they stopped playing hand for hand
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Bongo on June 22, 2005, 11:16:31 PM That makes no sense ???
Best of luck to you. Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 11:16:46 PM average stack is 6k i have 7.4k
i smell a bubble Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 11:24:31 PM wohoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: owner on June 22, 2005, 11:33:17 PM congrats in order Ironside ?
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: snoopy1239 on June 22, 2005, 11:35:22 PM Hand for hand is probably better than having almost every stack stall each hand. Argh! Mind-numbing...
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Bongo on June 22, 2005, 11:35:54 PM Congratulations.
Are there more comps to win or are you on TV? Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 11:36:36 PM into semi
now need to get into top 42 taking part next week to get onto a tv table and a trip to cardiff Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Bongo on June 22, 2005, 11:37:16 PM Do you know how many are taking part?
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 22, 2005, 11:41:41 PM 150
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Robert HM on June 23, 2005, 12:02:44 AM Congratulations ;D
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 23, 2005, 12:04:10 AM 150 next week 42 get thru to the tv stage so they are going hand for hand when we get down to 100
Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Bongo on June 23, 2005, 12:05:37 AM then normal play when 44 left?
Is it to make it more of a crap shoot? Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: Ironside on June 23, 2005, 12:07:06 AM thats my guess
no idea when they are going hand for hand next week but nothing will surprise me Title: Re: super sats boring or what? Post by: redsimon on June 23, 2005, 09:31:13 AM I think Party made this strict h4h up because there is no "time bank" ala PokerStars so people just maximum timed every hand as it got close to the $, in other words players who cheated spolit it for everyone. Certainly stops it being poker.
|