blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => The Rail => Topic started by: Tal on April 01, 2014, 07:39:53 PM



Title: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: Tal on April 01, 2014, 07:39:53 PM
What software can/should/must I download to get the hand histories like I see in PHA?

Never tried it before.

Would want it compatible with non-holdem games, too, mainly playing on 'Stars. Might even occasionally post the odd hand up for everyone's amusement.



Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: KarmaDope on April 01, 2014, 07:40:55 PM
PokerTracker 4 but you have to pay extra for the 4 card version.

There is no software AFAIK for other variations.

This could be the stupidest answer ever if I have got the type of software you mean completely wrong.


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: Tal on April 01, 2014, 07:42:43 PM
PokerTracker 4 but you have to pay extra for the 4 card version.

There is no software AFAIK for other variations.

That sounds annoying! So there would be no way of getting a Razz hand, say,  posted in PHA without noting down the discarded cards manually?


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: KarmaDope on April 01, 2014, 07:50:07 PM
PokerTracker 4 but you have to pay extra for the 4 card version.

There is no software AFAIK for other variations.

That sounds annoying! So there would be no way of getting a Razz hand, say,  posted in PHA without noting down the discarded cards manually?

In a basic Stars HH it shows you the face up cards. Just use this: http://www.handconverter.com/


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: mondatoo on April 01, 2014, 07:51:03 PM
You can go to Request>Hand histories which will be emailed to you like you see them in PHA.



Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: Tal on April 01, 2014, 07:56:09 PM
Thanks, chaps.

Recs gotta rec, see?


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: RED-DOG on April 01, 2014, 09:06:05 PM
Forgive me if I have the wrong end of the stick, but can't you just click the HH button then copy & paste?




PokerStars Hand #114166019218:  Hold'em No Limit (5/10) - 2014/04/01 20:48:28 WET [2014/04/01 15:48:28 ET]
Table 'Boyce VI' 9-max (Play Money) Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: RED D0G (1000 in chips)
Seat 4: bombeusz (970 in chips)
Seat 5: sonjaenwim (2695 in chips)
Seat 6: PACOCHOA (1000 in chips)
Seat 7: rickey4048 (817 in chips)
Seat 9: oliver miami (1000 in chips)
sonjaenwim: posts small blind 5
PACOCHOA: posts big blind 10
oliver miami: posts big blind 10
RED D0G: posts big blind 10
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to RED D0G [5s 2c]
rickey4048: raises 807 to 817 and is all-in
oliver miami: folds
RED D0G: raises 183 to 1000 and is all-in
bombeusz: calls 970 and is all-in
sonjaenwim: folds
PACOCHOA: folds
Uncalled bet (30) returned to RED D0G
*** FLOP *** [Qh 7s 9d]
bombeusz said, "go"
*** TURN *** [Qh 7s 9d] [5d]
*** RIVER *** [Qh 7s 9d 5d] [2h]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
RED D0G: shows [5s 2c] (two pair, Fives and Deuces)
bombeusz: mucks hand
RED D0G collected 292 from side pot
rickey4048: mucks hand
RED D0G collected 2365 from main pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2782 Main pot 2365. Side pot 292. | Rake 125
Board [Qh 7s 9d 5d 2h]
Seat 1: RED D0G showed [5s 2c] and won (2657) with two pair, Fives and Deuces
Seat 4: bombeusz (button) mucked [4c 4s]
Seat 5: sonjaenwim (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: PACOCHOA (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: rickey4048 mucked [Ac Ah]
Seat 9: oliver miami folded before Flop


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: RED-DOG on April 01, 2014, 09:07:35 PM
I do offer coaching BTW....


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: Tal on April 01, 2014, 09:11:29 PM
Not been online for months. Don't recall a HH button, but if you say it's there, Mr Dog, I'm happy to follow.

Thread title made the situation abundantly clear. There can be no apologies from that point on.

Just lol btw


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: mondatoo on April 01, 2014, 09:13:44 PM
The mention of knowing discarded cards suggested Tal wanted to do it after playing.

Sighs at play money run good.


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: Tal on April 01, 2014, 09:16:03 PM
The mention of knowing discarded cards suggested Tal wanted to do it after playing.

Sighs at play money run good.

Exactly this.

Until now, I've just followed the three Rs of online poker:

Rock up
Rangemerge
Reload.


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: RED-DOG on April 01, 2014, 09:23:03 PM
Hence my "wrong end of the stick" comment. (I hate communicating by text sometimes).

Hope I didn't offend anyone.

Mind you, you can always copy & paste interesting hh's into a word document during play and use them later.




Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: Tal on April 01, 2014, 09:28:32 PM
Hence my "wrong end of the stick" comment. (I hate communicating by text sometimes).

Hope I didn't offend anyone.

Mind you, you can always copy & paste interesting hh's into a word document during play and use them later.




Offence?! Even I'm not that precious.

Have a new laptop as of today, which I can do some casual clicking on, when the mood takes. Looking forward to getting a roasting when I post a HH I'm curious enough to get views on...


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: titaniumbean on April 01, 2014, 09:35:53 PM
The mention of knowing discarded cards suggested Tal wanted to do it after playing.

Sighs at play money run good.

Exactly this.

Until now, I've just followed the three Rs of online poker:

Rock up
Rangemerge
Reload.


lol v good


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: mondatoo on April 01, 2014, 09:41:34 PM
Hence my "wrong end of the stick" comment. (I hate communicating by text sometimes).

Hope I didn't offend anyone.

Mind you, you can always copy & paste interesting hh's into a word document during play and use them later.




I'm offended at the idea of being offended at your post...  :P


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: doubleup on April 01, 2014, 10:19:13 PM



PokerStars Hand #114166019218:  Hold'em No Limit (5/10) - 2014/04/01 20:48:28 WET [2014/04/01 15:48:28 ET]
Table 'Boyce VI' 9-max (Play Money) Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: RED D0G (1000 in chips)


how the mighty etc


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: TL900 on April 02, 2014, 12:43:30 PM
As red dog said, you can copy/paste the hand history into word etc and use it later while you remember. The long numbers in the top left hand corner of a table on pokerstars, click those and it will bring up an instant hh box where u can scroll through all the hands played at that table etc.

With mixed game hand histories i.e razz/stud games it will also show everyones up cards i believe, so while it may take a little time reading they would be fine to post into pha or something if so desired.


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: Tal on April 02, 2014, 01:01:07 PM
(http://gifrific.gifrific.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Mr-Burns-Saying-Excellent.gif)


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: RED-DOG on April 02, 2014, 02:45:55 PM
My turn for a stupid online question.



For PokerStars tournaments, the ones with a 15 minute clock have blinds of 300 / 600 at level 10, but for the ones on a 10 minute clock, the blinds are 100 / 200 at level 10.

Which is the slower structure?


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: Doobs on April 02, 2014, 02:50:41 PM
My turn for a stupid online question.



For PokerStars tournaments, the ones with a 15 minute clock have blinds of 300 / 600 at level 10, but for the ones on a 10 minute clock, the blinds are 100 / 200 at level 10.

Which is the slower structure?

I am guessing 15, but it us going to be far better to look at the size of the big blind after an hour/2 hours etc.   This number can then be compared with the starting stack.


Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: RED-DOG on April 02, 2014, 02:57:08 PM
My turn for a stupid online question.



For PokerStars tournaments, the ones with a 15 minute clock have blinds of 300 / 600 at level 10, but for the ones on a 10 minute clock, the blinds are 100 / 200 at level 10.

Which is the slower structure?

I am guessing 15, but it us going to be far better to look at the size of the big blind after an hour/2 hours etc.   This number can then be compared with the starting stack.


What I really want to know is what the average stack is likely to be at the 'pinch points'.

I played a "Deepstack" at Luton last week. 25k starting stack and 40 min clock, but on the last three tables the average stack was 20bb.



Title: Re: world's stupidest online poker question
Post by: RED-DOG on April 02, 2014, 03:14:31 PM
After 90 minutes on the 15 minute clock the blinds are 100 / 200. On the 10 minute clock they are 75 / 150.

At 180 minutes they are both 500 / 1000.