Title: boring math? Post by: pleno1 on April 05, 2014, 07:35:35 PM hey, could somebody show me what i should rejam here pls.
PokerStars Hand #114348720062: Tournament #887464591, $50+$5 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XI (400/800) - 2014/04/05 20:16:15 CET [2014/04/05 14:16:15 ET] Table '887464591 13' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: silverzone (19565 in chips) Seat 2: eze88888 (2775 in chips) Seat 3: giadze1 (3244 in chips) Seat 4: dragonwarior (1474 in chips) Seat 5: genghissun (26037 in chips) Seat 6: bparis (19063 in chips) Seat 7: pads1161 (17301 in chips) Seat 8: Stammdogg (18343 in chips) Seat 9: amor1 (2816 in chips) silverzone: posts the ante 75 eze88888: posts the ante 75 giadze1: posts the ante 75 dragonwarior: posts the ante 75 genghissun: posts the ante 75 bparis: posts the ante 75 pads1161: posts the ante 75 Stammdogg: posts the ante 75 amor1: posts the ante 75 pads1161: posts small blind 400 Stammdogg: posts big blind 800 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to pads1161 [x x] amor1: folds silverzone: folds eze88888: folds giadze1: folds dragonwarior: raises 599 to 1399 and is all-in genghissun: folds bparis: raises 17589 to 18988 and is all-in pads1161: calls 16826 and is all-in Title: Re: boring math? Post by: lucky_scrote on April 05, 2014, 09:52:53 PM It's gonna be profitable for him to go extremely wide for value but people tend to be too tight in his spot.
I am not folding 55 KTs KJo A7o+ and suited aces off the top of my head. I don't imagine the maths to be too far from this. Title: Re: boring math? Post by: pleno1 on April 05, 2014, 09:59:22 PM interesting, i would in game definitely fold low suited ax.
Title: Re: boring math? Post by: lucky_scrote on April 05, 2014, 10:15:00 PM interesting, i would in game definitely fold low suited ax. It's going to depend wildly on bparis's jamming range but given he's a decent winner then I think folding low suited aces might be throwing away too much value. I should also take more time reading hh's as I thought you were BB so tighten up the ranges slightly. I just cheated and ICMizer said with perfect ranges get it in with A7s, A9o, 55, KJs, KQo but I doubt that the BTN has a perfect range, probably too tight as we can expect him to perhaps just min raise a ton of his weaker hands (it's what I do a lot here but don't tell anyone otherwise I'll get exploited to hell) Title: Re: boring math? Post by: wazz on April 06, 2014, 10:59:25 PM Just eyeballing it I'd say 77+ A9o+ KJs+ KQo
Title: Re: boring math? Post by: pleno1 on April 06, 2014, 11:13:45 PM yeh had a9s but was wondering how wide we go. i would have folded a5
|