|
Title: stupid one Post by: pleno1 on July 13, 2014, 04:28:34 PM the brawl, 2 hands in. cant reenter
Full Tilt Poker Game #34436036347: The Sunday Brawl (268208557), Table 1 - NL Hold'em - 10/20 - 17:04:30 CET - 2014/07/13 [11:04:30 ET - 2014/07/13] Seat 1: Sentimento_do_2 (4,990) Seat 2: RuDyBoY X (4,980) Seat 4: pads1161 (5,000) Seat 5: strflushtome (5,000) Seat 6: carpediem123 (5,000) Seat 7: Spades113 (5,940) Seat 8: Antonz87 (5,000) Seat 9: fatchampion (4,090) RuDyBoY X posts the small blind of 10 pads1161 posts the big blind of 20 The button is in seat #1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to pads1161 [Kc Ks] strflushtome folds carpediem123 has 15 seconds left to act carpediem123 raises to 600 Spades113 folds Antonz87 folds fatchampion folds Sentimento_do_2 folds RuDyBoY X has 15 seconds left to act DeuceBabyDeuce sits down RuDyBoY X folds DeuceBabyDeuce is feeling confused pads1161 has 15 seconds left to act pads1161 has requested TIME pads1161: sigh lol pads1161 folds Title: Re: stupid one Post by: George2Loose on July 13, 2014, 04:34:05 PM It's a misclick surely?
Title: Re: stupid one Post by: TL900 on July 13, 2014, 04:41:43 PM fake misclick i would guess, as u just click on the bar to go to 3x, no-one ever types in 60 afaik. title is right, stupid one
Title: Re: stupid one Post by: titaniumbean on July 13, 2014, 04:43:47 PM fake misclick i would guess, as u just click on the bar to go to 3x, no-one ever types in 60 afaik. title is right, stupid one dis 100% Title: Re: stupid one Post by: Doobs on July 13, 2014, 04:45:57 PM It's a misclick surely? Certainly looks like one. Need an estimate of fake Misclicks to genuine Misclicks though. If only half are genuine Misclicks it is a clear fold. He could be very shrewd and balancing his fake Misclicks by fake misclicking A6 too. If he fakemisclicks only A6 with 2 red cards is he balancing them enough? Is it better to go with AQ than KK because ateady we have a blocker to his fake Misclicks? But I tend to just go for it though. Title: Re: stupid one Post by: pleno1 on July 13, 2014, 04:49:19 PM i really thought there was a 2-5% chance he was misclicking, just making sure im not over folding.
Title: Re: stupid one Post by: titaniumbean on July 13, 2014, 04:54:40 PM i really thought there was a 2-5% chance he was misclicking, just making sure im not over folding. maybe some % if he bets 555 or w/e but 600 flat no chance Title: Re: stupid one Post by: Doobs on July 13, 2014, 05:07:46 PM fake misclick i would guess, as u just click on the bar to go to 3x, no-one ever types in 60 afaik. title is right, stupid one dis 100% I don't have 3x on my bar, it is set for the bets I make most often. Assuming everybody is set up the same way seems a mistake. ;) Title: Re: stupid one Post by: pleno1 on July 13, 2014, 05:20:02 PM i really thought there was a 2-5% chance he was misclicking, just making sure im not over folding. maybe some % if he bets 555 or w/e but 600 flat no chance but then again if he was going to f/misclick why would he use this stupid sizing? Title: Re: stupid one Post by: titaniumbean on July 13, 2014, 05:37:26 PM i really thought there was a 2-5% chance he was misclicking, just making sure im not over folding. maybe some % if he bets 555 or w/e but 600 flat no chance but then again if he was going to f/misclick why would he use this stupid sizing? levels upon levels Title: Re: stupid one Post by: Rexas on July 13, 2014, 05:46:02 PM i really thought there was a 2-5% chance he was misclicking, just making sure im not over folding. maybe some % if he bets 555 or w/e but 600 flat no chance but then again if he was going to f/misclick why would he use this stupid sizing? Surely if someone is stupid enough to start playing around with fake misclicks, they aren't clever enough to understand bet sizing? :p Title: Re: stupid one Post by: George2Loose on July 13, 2014, 09:04:11 PM If he's "clever" enough to mis click why not misclick an amount that looks like one rather than one he can click on the slider?
Title: Re: stupid one Post by: Boba Fett on July 14, 2014, 12:52:41 PM Surely we OPR/sharkscope and get it in V sat winners/low volume+low buyin players etc?
Title: Re: stupid one Post by: Pinchop73 on July 14, 2014, 02:51:49 PM This is a high volume tricky UK reg, think fold is ok, considering the timeout, especially so
Don't understand why can't we re enter btw? Title: Re: stupid one Post by: SuuPRlim on July 14, 2014, 02:59:24 PM just making sure im not over folding. I had a huge argument on 2+2 about this a yr ago lol such a com statement, over-folding :P Title: Re: stupid one Post by: lucky_scrote on July 15, 2014, 01:28:04 AM I think it's impossible for a reg to type 600 since nobody types 60 anyway. Only possibility is his computer has lagged and he's trying to open and his mouse has jammed.
Vs anyone that isn't a reg this is obviously a gii scenario but vs someone that is a decent reg and plays a lot seems like a 2009 level. Title: Re: stupid one Post by: AlexMartin on July 15, 2014, 11:03:29 AM If he's "clever" enough to mis click why not misclick an amount that looks like one rather than one he can click on the slider? Ahrt |