Title: Nits gonna Nit Post by: rfgqqabc on February 03, 2015, 12:20:08 AM PokerStars Hand #129750559365: Tournament #1118960372, $50+$5 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level III (25/50) - 2015/02/01 22:40:42 WET [2015/02/01 17:40:42 ET]
Table '1118960372 15' 9-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: Vigilanty (2771 in chips) Seat 2: Zareta (1996 in chips) Seat 3: Mortan23 (3115 in chips) Seat 4: Chojjasd (3522 in chips) Seat 5: billy pow! (2900 in chips) Seat 6: 5typesofmeat (3535 in chips) Seat 7: Demonic16 (2442 in chips) Seat 8: LuisFigo1014 (2216 in chips) Seat 9: gerikov (3453 in chips) Mortan23: posts small blind 25 Chojjasd: posts big blind 50 HOLE CARDS Dealt to Demonic16 [Jd Ad] billy pow!: folds 5typesofmeat: folds Demonic16: raises 50 to 100 LuisFigo1014 has timed out LuisFigo1014: folds LuisFigo1014 is sitting out gerikov: calls 100 Vigilanty: folds LuisFigo1014 has returned Zareta: folds Mortan23: folds Chojjasd: folds FLOP [td 8d Jc] Demonic16: checks gerikov: bets 156 Demonic16: calls 156 TURN [td 8d Jc] [Js] Demonic16: checks gerikov: bets 334 Demonic16: calls 334 RIVER [td 8d Jc Js] [3d] Demonic16: checks gerikov: bets 715 Demonic16 said, "this might be nitroll" Demonic16 said, "sorry" got 550 hands on him, hes 17/14 5% 3b don't really know much about him, seems fairly solid, no spectacularly spewy hand histories. So we beat KQdd, KQo combos that go for bet/bet/bet, seems kinda fair on this runout, especially if he has the Kd/Qd. 99/T9/J9 would probably check somewhere before the river but I'm not too sure where, I'd check the flop with T9/J9, but I'm not sure if the standard reg would, I think J9 would be a fairly optimistic river bet from our opponent, especially as he can't have the Jack of diamonds. I'd expect KJ/QJo to largely fold preflop at this point on a sunday. AK/AQ make some sense but might 3bet pre and would probably go a touch bigger on the turn if they decided I wasn't Jx heavy in order to get some folds. 88/TT/JT all seem to make perfect sense, especially with the turn bet size being so small that it felt very strong, any sort of Jx hand should be wanting a bit of protection, but we have one of these. When the diamond came and he still bet I was somewhat surprised. Pretty sick spot imo, had some discussion on skype about it but not really got an answer I like, it feels particularly absurd to fold, because if we do what on earth are we calling with. We block houses and have the nuttest of flushes and are getting a price. Is it enough though? Title: Re: Nits gonna Nit Post by: TL900 on February 03, 2015, 01:29:21 PM ye i can't fold especially when weve played our hand like this, he should be bluffing this runout enough vs our range imo.
Title: Re: Nits gonna Nit Post by: SuuPRlim on February 03, 2015, 01:37:47 PM surely he can defo value bet worse?
Title: Re: Nits gonna Nit Post by: Doobs on February 03, 2015, 02:04:33 PM Need to shove after that chat. His head will explode, and he will be unable to continue the game.
I am always calling tho, as you can probably guess. Title: Re: Nits gonna Nit Post by: Oxford_HRV on February 03, 2015, 02:25:56 PM Need to shove after that chat. His head will explode, and he will be unable to continue the game. too aggressive, let him keep his head. Title: Re: Nits gonna Nit Post by: rfgqqabc on February 03, 2015, 05:06:39 PM surely he can defo value bet worse? 76 dd Kq dd Kj hh Aj hh Qj hh 3x 88 3x tt 1x jt Fairly suspect on the jx stuff with all the sizing worries. Funnily enough Doobs one guy did think I was debating raise/call and not folding. |