Title: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: simonjjj on April 19, 2006, 01:47:20 PM Party poker has, over the last few years been widely quoted as being the most softest site with the most fish. However, because people like us know this is there not a danger of the site becoming 'shark infested'? I play regularly at Party and i 'get to know' many of the other regulars. Sometimes you can sit at a table with several familiar names. In addiction, i know of a few other players who play at different sites like poker metro for example and who claim that the poker is awful. Could it become more profitable to play at less well known sites??????
Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: stallyon on April 19, 2006, 04:47:35 PM I'd say the software known as BlondePoker I downloaded earlier this month has as many fish :D
Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: Karabiner on April 19, 2006, 06:09:34 PM Gambler's Anonymous is said to be good for addiction.
Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: Nem on April 19, 2006, 06:13:36 PM Boss Media is a great network for fish.
Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: totalise on April 19, 2006, 06:24:22 PM Simon,
people have been saying for years that party is the softest place, and despite the fears of "shark overload".. it continues to be the softest place... so I wouldn't have too much fear of that changing any time in the immediate future. Nemesis, those turks on boss media sure know how to give action! one of the funniest sessions I ever had was playing on the turkish currency (lira?) tables and trying to bluff these boys out of pots. .. after about 3 buyins I quickly learnt my lesson! I dont like the sluggish nature of the software though, runs too slow for my need for speed. Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: thetank on April 19, 2006, 07:55:43 PM Are Freudian slips possible while typing too?
In addiction....... rotflmfao rotflmfao Party are still the the fishiest site IMO. They spend the most millions on aggressive advertising, when most laypeople around the world think internet poker, they think Party. Not too dangerous of them becoming too Shark infested, perhaps in part due to them treating their customers like dog poo. I have a controversial theory that this a deliberate buisness strategy on their part, but I get laughed at whenever I mention it so will not bang on too much. Page 5 of this thread (http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=2404.60) if you're interested. Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: Dingdell on April 19, 2006, 10:40:19 PM I followed tightys advice on which site to play on and turned $100 cash into $1400 in one night, then turned into a fish myself and the sharks got me. It was if the software turned against me and I got every bad beat available. I know thats not true - I think I became too blase and thought I was unbeatable - which wasn't true either!
Now I base my chosen site for fish on a woman in Luton who plays internet poker. When she tells me she has changed sites as there is a better one I move to it too, she is an ok player and once she gets beat on one site too much she moves. So my theory is she is a fish and when there are too many sharks she moves to get an easier game. Today she is playing on ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. PARADISE Go get em boys! ;D Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: Blackbeard on April 20, 2006, 12:07:09 AM 80,000 plus online at the mo...going to be a few! (myself included)
Any you guys read the 2 plus 2 forum? If you do have a look at the Single table tournaments section and a post from indiana, its a "gift to the forum" Cannot post link on here (not to sure if I can)......Well its a whole stt tourney on party with comments from all thetop 8/12 tablers giving advice etc on the party replayer.....Totally frigging awesome I have watched it 3 times so far and cringe at how bad MY stt play has been at times. Definately be PUSHING a lot more than I should after watching that ! Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: TightEnd on April 20, 2006, 12:21:27 AM Party players all look like Phil Ivey compared to the standard on one network, the one mentioned by Dingdell, Nemesis and totalise
Now this is public knowledge though I'll be moving on to fresher fishing waters, which will remain my secret 8) Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: TightEnd on April 20, 2006, 12:22:51 AM Cannot post link on here (not to sure if I can Please PM it to me I'll decide whether its ok clue(it won't be but I get to read it without searching) Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: Blackbeard on April 20, 2006, 08:37:13 AM ok tight end I have posted the replayer link to you.
Its the best stt advice I have ever watched, the amount of times I have sat and not pushed when according to these guys i would have had major pushing hands ! Reccommend all to watch this replayer and listen to these guys and what they are saying. Have a nice day all. Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: simonjjj on April 20, 2006, 10:54:06 AM Are Freudian slips possible while typing too? In addiction....... rotflmfao rotflmfao Party are still the the fishiest site IMO. They spend the most millions on aggressive advertising, when most laypeople around the world think internet poker, they think Party. Not too dangerous of them becoming too Shark infested, perhaps in part due to them treating their customers like dog poo. I have a controversial theory that this a deliberate buisness strategy on their part, but I get laughed at whenever I mention it so will not bang on too much. Page 5 of this thread (http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=2404.60) if you're interested. Ahahahahahahhahaha. Yeah i saw my mistake as soon as i'd submitted my post. I think i have a problem :D Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: snoopy1239 on April 20, 2006, 02:44:56 PM .........BUT NO RAKEBACK
ARGH!!! Title: Re: Is Party still the weaskest site in terms of fish? Post by: stallyon on April 21, 2006, 02:50:15 PM this week I have been mostly playing 8 - 4 off suit
|