|
Title: Two Interesting Hands from Tonights $2/$4 Table Post by: Smart Money on March 02, 2007, 05:07:10 AM Two Interesting Hands from Tonights $2/$4 Table
Well, the first one isn't really that interesting but I wanted to set the scene with a thinly disguised bad beat. (I've never actually posted a bad beat in nearly 2 and a half years of playing by the way. :) ) Full Tilt Poker Game #1901378515: Table Hedge Top - $2/$4 - No Limit Hold'em - 22:12:03 ET - 2007/03/01 Seat 1: Samadhi ($501) Seat 2: mystikol ($406) Seat 3: fba-1001 ($278.70) Seat 4: PuddingMan ($357.60) Seat 5: mobiusV ($527.30) Seat 6: tae2718 ($397.60) Seat 7: Mikechike ($394) Seat 8: Narena ($385) Seat 9: ck schmdit ($374.50) . . . *** FLOP *** [Ahrt 2c 6c] mobiusV bets $30 Narena raises to $90 ck schmdit folds mobiusV raises to $150 Narena raises to $371, and is all in mobiusV calls $221 Narena shows [6s 6d] mobiusV shows [Ks Ac] *** TURN *** [Ahrt 2c 6c] [7c] *** RIVER *** [Ahrt 2c 6c 7c] [4c] Narena shows three of a kind, Sixes mobiusV shows a flush, Ace high mobiusV wins the pot ($785) with a flush, Ace high Narena is sitting out because he’s fucked off that his 94% favourite lost. Anyway, onto the main event for this evening.... (a thinly disguised "I Won a Big Pot" post.) Full Tilt Poker Game #1901986043: Table Hedge Top - $2/$4 - No Limit Hold'em - 23:29:08 ET - 2007/03/01 Seat 1: Samadhi ($399.20) Seat 2: mystikol ($612.90) Seat 3: fba-1001 ($405.90) Seat 4: Sick_Rick06 ($235.80) Seat 5: m1l2n ($219.60) Seat 6: tae2718 ($607.65) Seat 7: LawmakerDonk ($199.30) Seat 8: Narena ($428.85) Seat 9: Larrykin ($307) m1l2n posts the small blind of $2 tae2718 posts the big blind of $4 The button is in seat #4 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Narena [Aspades Qh] LawmakerDonk calls $4 Narena calls $4 Larrykin folds Samadhi folds mystikol folds fba-1001 raises to $12 Sick_Rick06 folds m1l2n calls $10 tae2718 folds LawmakerDonk calls $8 Narena has 15 seconds left to act Narena calls $8 *** FLOP *** [Jh Tc Ks] m1l2n checks LawmakerDonk checks Narena checks fba-1001 bets $35 m1l2n calls $35 LawmakerDonk calls $35 Narena has 15 seconds left to act Narena raises to $416.85, and is all in fba-1001 calls $358.90, and is all in m1l2n calls $172.60, and is all in LawmakerDonk has 15 seconds left to act LawmakerDonk calls $152.30, and is all in Narena shows [ Aspades Qh] <---------- 55% to win, 12% to tie fba-1001 shows [Ad Ahrt] <---------- 0% to win, 12% to tie m1l2n shows [Td Ac] <---------- 0.1% to win, 12% to tie LawmakerDonk shows [Kc Kd] <---------- 33% to win, 12% to tie Uncalled bet of $22.95 returned to Narena *** TURN *** [Jh Tc Ks] [7s] *** RIVER *** [Jh Tc Ks 7s] [3s] Narena shows a straight, Ace high fba-1001 shows a pair of Aces Narena wins side pot #2 ($372.60) with a straight, Ace high m1l2n shows a pair of Tens Narena wins side pot #1 ($60.90) with a straight, Ace high LawmakerDonk shows three of a kind, Kings Narena wins the main pot ($798.20) with a straight, Ace high fba-1001 is sitting out m1l2n is sitting out LawmakerDonk is sitting out *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $1,234.70 Main pot $801.20. Side pot 1 $60.90. Side pot 2 $372.60. | Rake $3 Board: [Jh Tc Ks 7s 3s] Seat 1: Samadhi didn't bet (folded) Seat 2: mystikol didn't bet (folded) Seat 3: fba-1001 showed [Ad Ahrt] and lost with a pair of Aces Seat 4: Sick_Rick06 (button) didn't bet (folded) Seat 5: m1l2n (small blind) showed [Td Ac] and lost with a pair of Tens Seat 6: tae2718 (big blind) folded before the Flop Seat 7: LawmakerDonk showed [Kc Kd] and lost with three of a kind, Kings Seat 8: Narena showed [Aspades Qh] and won ($1,231.70) with a straight, Ace high Seat 9: Larrykin didn't bet (folded) The pre-flop play of fba-1001 and LawmakerDonk is questionable at best. fba-1001's call of the all-in after all three players have called/raised his flop bet is abysmal. Both of m1l2n's calls on the flop are terrible. LawmakerDonk's flat call on the flop is terrible given the texture of the flop. This hand is a great example of how profitable cash tables can be. After the bad beat an hour earlier, I temporarily stopped being an atheist for the duration of the turn and river cards. It seemed to work. Amen Title: Re: Two Interesting Hands from Tonights $2/$4 Table Post by: AlexMartin on March 02, 2007, 05:38:02 AM LOL. In the 1st hand i thought he had AcKc till i saw you type 94% fav. What a mug.
Title: Re: Two Interesting Hands from Tonights $2/$4 Table Post by: Horneris on March 02, 2007, 05:41:49 AM Why did you just shoot all in with the nuts in the second one for $380 more when theyd only bet $35 each.
Im not criticising coz youre very good with cash game hands, just wondered. Id have thought a raise to around 110/120 wouldve been better? V Unlucky on the first one. Title: Re: Two Interesting Hands from Tonights $2/$4 Table Post by: Smart Money on March 02, 2007, 06:01:46 AM Why did you just shoot all in with the nuts in the second one for $380 more when theyd only bet $35 each. Im not criticising coz youre very good with cash game hands, just wondered. Id have thought a raise to around 110/120 wouldve been better? V Unlucky on the first one. Because the pot is already just shy of $200 (with my $35 flop call) so if I only charge $75-$85 more then that's pretty cheap for anyone on a draw or with a set to try and pair the board. And once one person calls, then it's even better value for the next potential caller. Also there are 19 scare cards that could hit! Most importantly though, I was pretty certain that at least one player had hit a set, maybe two- and there are 10 scare cards for them (any 9, Q or A) and no-one will fold a set here if I push all-in. Title: Re: Two Interesting Hands from Tonights $2/$4 Table Post by: Horneris on March 02, 2007, 06:08:47 AM Good Reply, cheers.
Title: Re: Two Interesting Hands from Tonights $2/$4 Table Post by: M3boy on March 02, 2007, 09:10:10 AM LOL. In the 1st hand i thought he had AcKc till i saw you type 94% fav. What a mug. I thought the same!! Title: Re: Two Interesting Hands from Tonights $2/$4 Table Post by: AlexMartin on March 02, 2007, 11:51:30 AM Why did you just shoot all in with the nuts in the second one for $380 more when theyd only bet $35 each. Im not criticising coz youre very good with cash game hands, just wondered. Id have thought a raise to around 110/120 wouldve been better? V Unlucky on the first one. Because the pot is already just shy of $200 (with my $35 flop call) so if I only charge $75-$85 more then that's pretty cheap for anyone on a draw or with a set to try and pair the board. And once one person calls, then it's even better value for the next potential caller. Also there are 19 scare cards that could hit! Most importantly though, I was pretty certain that at least one player had hit a set, maybe two- and there are 10 scare cards for them (any 9, Q or A) and no-one will fold a set here if I push all-in. :goodpost: |