|
Title: PLO wrap Post by: Royal Flush on April 25, 2007, 06:12:29 PM Opponent is the action player in the game, bringing most hands in for $15. His standard CB seems to be about 80% of pot. Seat 1: Psychatog ($477 in chips) Seat 2: polli ($477.50 in chips) Seat 3: Balina ($465 in chips) Seat 4: ___BAY___ ($1087.50 in chips) Seat 5: lundgren1 ($784.38 in chips) Seat 6: Flushy ($1243.50 in chips) polli: posts small blind $2.50 Balina: posts big blind $5 ----- HOLE CARDS ----- dealt to Flushy [7c 5h 6c Tc] ___BAY___: folds lundgren1: raises to $17.50 Flushy: calls $17.50 Psychatog: folds polli: folds Balina: folds ----- FLOP ----- [4d 3d Ts] lundgren1: bets $35 Flushy: calls $35 ----- TURN ----- [4d 3d Ts][As] lundgren1: bets $105 Flushy: calls $105 ----- RIVER ----- [4d 3d Ts As][4h] lundgren1: checks Flushy: bets $150 lundgren1: raises to $490 Flushy: folds Returned uncalled bets $340 to lundgren1 lundgren1: doesn't show hand lundgren1 collected $619.50 from Main pot Discuss. Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: boldie on April 25, 2007, 06:43:31 PM Opponent is the action player in the game, bringing most hands in for $15. His standard CB seems to be about 80% of pot. Seat 1: Psychatog ($477 in chips) Seat 2: polli ($477.50 in chips) Seat 3: Balina ($465 in chips) Seat 4: ___BAY___ ($1087.50 in chips) Seat 5: lundgren1 ($784.38 in chips) Seat 6: Flushy ($1243.50 in chips) polli: posts small blind $2.50 Balina: posts big blind $5 ----- HOLE CARDS ----- dealt to Flushy [7c 5h 6c Tc] ___BAY___: folds lundgren1: raises to $17.50 Flushy: calls $17.50 Psychatog: folds polli: folds Balina: folds ----- FLOP ----- [4d 3d Ts] lundgren1: bets $35 Flushy: calls $35 ----- TURN ----- [4d 3d Ts][As] lundgren1: bets $105 Flushy: calls $105 ----- RIVER ----- [4d 3d Ts As][4h] lundgren1: checks Flushy: bets $150 lundgren1: raises to $490 Flushy: folds Returned uncalled bets $340 to lundgren1 lundgren1: doesn't show hand lundgren1 collected $619.50 from Main pot Discuss. I would but I'd get a ban or seomthing. Damn Flushy, what were you thinking here? Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: doubleup on April 25, 2007, 06:52:58 PM Presumably you call the turn, to bluff the river if the flush hit? If not it's a fold on the turn. River is understandable and I've fallen for this one myself, it appears to be a scandie special - induce a bluff from a hand that is screaming missed draw. Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: boldie on April 25, 2007, 06:56:00 PM Presumably you call the turn, to bluff the river if the flush hit? If not it's a fold on the turn. River is understandable and I've fallen for this one myself, it appears to be a scandie special - induce a bluff from a hand that is screaming missed draw. I'm personally not too keen on bluffing in Omaha and that's why I don't like the call on the turn. Bluffing in Omaha gets you in trouble a lot of the time, especially against someone who's consistantly betting into you. Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: GlasgowBandit on April 25, 2007, 07:02:22 PM Personally I'd probably have re-raised on the flop and passed to a bet on the turn if he calls. in PLO I find it doesn't5 generally cost me as much to have a stab at the pot on the flop as it does on turn and river.
Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: NoflopsHomer on April 25, 2007, 07:16:20 PM Hate the river bet.
Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: turny on April 26, 2007, 01:55:31 AM Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: JungleCat03 on April 26, 2007, 09:27:13 AM Hate the river bet. Me too... You're just not representing a real hand here. All draws have missed and you have looked like a (big) draw all through the hand. Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: NoflopsHomer on April 26, 2007, 01:57:08 PM Hate the river bet. Me too... You're just not representing a real hand here. All draws have missed and you have looked like a (big) draw all through the hand. You can even argue passing the turn. Half your outs might not even be outs anymore. Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: UpTheMariners on April 26, 2007, 02:13:03 PM Presumably you call the turn, to bluff the river if the flush hit? If not it's a fold on the turn. River is understandable and I've fallen for this one myself, it appears to be a scandie special - induce a bluff from a hand that is screaming missed draw. I'm personally not too keen on bluffing in Omaha and that's why I don't like the call on the turn. Bluffing in Omaha gets you in trouble a lot of the time, especially against someone who's consistantly betting into you. i thought omaha was the best game for bluffs? Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: boldie on April 26, 2007, 02:36:49 PM Presumably you call the turn, to bluff the river if the flush hit? If not it's a fold on the turn. River is understandable and I've fallen for this one myself, it appears to be a scandie special - induce a bluff from a hand that is screaming missed draw. I'm personally not too keen on bluffing in Omaha and that's why I don't like the call on the turn. Bluffing in Omaha gets you in trouble a lot of the time, especially against someone who's consistantly betting into you. i thought omaha was the best game for bluffs? not on the river after someone's constantly betting into you, it's not. I don't like it in Omaha, too many people will call you with anything anyways as they don't know when to lay down the second or even the third nuts, but after someones been betting into you on every street I never do it Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: Dubai on April 26, 2007, 11:41:31 PM Call the river. You are winning.
Title: Re: PLO wrap Post by: Ironside on April 27, 2007, 12:28:36 AM personally if i am going to play this hand after the flop i reraise the flop with the hope of getting it all in or getting him to fold
but as much as i like the flop it aint that great and i might actually fold it a flush draw is favourite via your hand most hansd your nothing more than coin flipping with it looks better than it is the rereaise on flop is the only way you can get him to fold and this is your best hope of winning the hand if you do fill your straigh you could also fill his with him freerolling to flush not a great hand infact marginal at best |