|
Title: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: Blatch on June 11, 2010, 10:18:18 PM Tonights T20 match between Hampshire and Somerset was on a bowler friendly pitch.
Chasing 104, Hampshire were 93 for 5, then 18 balls later were 97 all out. Sadly for someone they managed to get £185k to back Hampshire @ 1.01 to win £1,850. Ouch Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: George2Loose on June 11, 2010, 10:20:03 PM gg blonde bank roll. U had a good run.
Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: AndrewT on June 11, 2010, 10:48:23 PM Solid.
Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: outragous76 on June 11, 2010, 11:10:39 PM omg
that makes me feel sick! if i remember rightly some Norwegian bloke put 100k on ac Milan at half time when they were 3-0 against liverpool to win 1k! Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: Hairydude on June 11, 2010, 11:12:04 PM UL Blatch (+your stakers)
Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: Nem on June 11, 2010, 11:34:45 PM haha
Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: ripple11 on June 12, 2010, 12:02:38 AM Tonights T20 match between Hampshire and Somerset was on a bowler friendly pitch. Chasing 104, Hampshire were 93 for 5, then 18 balls later were 97 all out. Sadly for someone they managed to get £185k to back Hampshire @ 1.01 to win £1,850. Ouch Then they were clueless about cricket. It was a nightmare of a pitch.Almost certainly going to be reported. Besides that Hants were always needing 5 ish runs an over, and given that pitch, and seeing how difficult Somerset found batting, .....Hants were never better than 1/2 at any stage, even with 4/5 wickets in hand with 2/3 overs to go. Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: Blatch on June 12, 2010, 04:51:52 AM Tonights T20 match between Hampshire and Somerset was on a bowler friendly pitch. Chasing 104, Hampshire were 93 for 5, then 18 balls later were 97 all out. Sadly for someone they managed to get £185k to back Hampshire @ 1.01 to win £1,850. Ouch Then they were clueless about cricket. It was a nightmare of a pitch.Almost certainly going to be reported. Besides that Hants were always needing 5 ish runs an over, and given that pitch, and seeing how difficult Somerset found batting, .....Hants were never better than 1/2 at any stage, even with 4/5 wickets in hand with 2/3 overs to go. They needed 11 runs from 33 balls with 5 wickets left. Trust me that is around a 1.01 on virtually any wicket. Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: Nico29 on June 12, 2010, 10:11:59 AM Tonights T20 match between Hampshire and Somerset was on a bowler friendly pitch. Chasing 104, Hampshire were 93 for 5, then 18 balls later were 97 all out. Sadly for someone they managed to get £185k to back Hampshire @ 1.01 to win £1,850. Ouch Then they were clueless about cricket. It was a nightmare of a pitch.Almost certainly going to be reported. Besides that Hants were always needing 5 ish runs an over, and given that pitch, and seeing how difficult Somerset found batting, .....Hants were never better than 1/2 at any stage, even with 4/5 wickets in hand with 2/3 overs to go. Wow, I'd certainly enjoy being offered that price in that situation. Totally agree with blatch, that is a 1.01 chance all day. Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: ripple11 on June 12, 2010, 06:05:45 PM Tonights T20 match between Hampshire and Somerset was on a bowler friendly pitch. Chasing 104, Hampshire were 93 for 5, then 18 balls later were 97 all out. Sadly for someone they managed to get £185k to back Hampshire @ 1.01 to win £1,850. Ouch Then they were clueless about cricket. It was a nightmare of a pitch.Almost certainly going to be reported. Besides that Hants were always needing 5 ish runs an over, and given that pitch, and seeing how difficult Somerset found batting, .....Hants were never better than 1/2 at any stage, even with 4/5 wickets in hand with 2/3 overs to go. They needed 11 runs from 33 balls with 5 wickets left. Trust me that is around a 1.01 on virtually any wicket. Razzaq was out at 16.3 overs....so I make that 11 off 22 balls. Watching batsman get hit on the body and head, as balls flew up from all parts of the pitch, as well as the ball deviating left and right, it was never going be a straight forward run chase of 104 from 20 overs.The low scores of both sides( and look at the batting quality of Somerset) tells you this was not a normal 20/20. Granted they still should have got over the line, but never a 1.01 shot at any stage. Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: Karabiner on June 12, 2010, 11:10:58 PM Harry Findlay misclick?
Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: chezzboy on June 19, 2010, 01:49:21 PM I have to laugh otherwise I'd cry.
Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: The Baron on June 19, 2010, 06:13:52 PM So so sick
Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: dik9 on June 20, 2010, 02:17:05 AM Is this an apt title?
Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: Murph1984 on June 20, 2010, 02:33:58 AM This and several posts of his on the original thread make it clear he was having several jokes between himself and himself,jokingly posting about scamming,grimming and even sleeping in ffs.
He must have been pissing himself laughing while doing so,it certainly doesn't seem like he was being weighed down by it. Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: The Camel on June 20, 2010, 02:37:04 AM I think the geezer needs medical help.
He obviously has zero conscience or empathy for others. Title: Re: Suicide Watch for Someone Post by: Matt.NFFC. on June 20, 2010, 05:37:27 PM Sever all ties IMO, frankly, I'm amazed he's still walking.
|