Title: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 07:34:55 PM Anyone watch the Man U-Liverpool game today? Thoughts?
Are Man Utd better then everyone else or is it just a poor PL this season? Will they win a record 19th title this season? Who do we need to buy to replace an ageing Giggs/Scholes? Is Berba the real deal or should he go SAF replacement? Mourinho or Guardiola? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 07:37:02 PM nh sir.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: ForthThistle on January 09, 2011, 07:39:00 PM Anyone watch the Man U-Liverpool game today? Thoughts? No Are Man Utd better then everyone else or is it just a poor PL this season? No and Yes Will they win a record 19th title this season? No Who do we need to buy to replace an ageing Giggs/Scholes? Charlton Bro's Is Berba the real deal or should he go No and Go SAF replacement? Mourinho or Guardiola? Ricky Sbragia... ;) End Thread Please Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 07:40:41 PM Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool.
But I really, really, really hate Man United. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on January 09, 2011, 07:43:58 PM Anyone watch the Man U-Liverpool game today? Thoughts? ]Are Man Utd better then everyone else or is it just a poor PL this season? Will they win a record 19th title this season? Who do we need to buy to replace an ageing Giggs/Scholes? Is Berba the real deal or should he go SAF replacement? Mourinho or Guardiola? being chinese i kind of have to support man yoo yes will win the league after chelsea spuffed up get zezinho or jovetic as they are sick on football manager i dunno about scholes gtfo berba he doesnt even start ahead of small p for me in football manager buy akinfeev and mour-in-ho ftw Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 07:48:36 PM Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. no trolling. Start your own "I hate Man U thread" TY Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on January 09, 2011, 08:25:01 PM Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate QPR, Newcastle or Liverpool.
But I really, really, really hate Man United. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Linux on January 09, 2011, 08:27:48 PM Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate QPR, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mickyp on January 09, 2011, 08:32:16 PM Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Graham C on January 09, 2011, 08:35:07 PM Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United and Tottenham. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on January 09, 2011, 08:37:51 PM ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United ... why? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 08:39:06 PM Damn trolls
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 09, 2011, 08:49:54 PM I agree with all the haters. nice to have a united hate thread on the forum imo
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Longy on January 09, 2011, 09:04:16 PM Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United and gtfo with your yellow and green scarves. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 09:06:53 PM ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United ... why? The list is long and detailed. Paul Ince. Norman Whiteside. Mark Hughes. Teddy Sheringham. Roy Keane. Gary Neville. Peter Red Nose. Mark Hughes. Bryan Robson. The ridiculous feeling of entitlement of their supporters. Alex Ferguson's tapping his wristwatch. But most of all, the 12 minutes of injury time they got in our relegation season which gave Cantona enough time to equalise and ultimately send us down. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on January 09, 2011, 09:08:49 PM y u hate mark hughes so much?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 09:14:30 PM y u hate mark hughes so much? One of the dirtiest strikers in my years watching football. And never ever stopped whining. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 09:15:08 PM God, how did I forget Paul Scoles in my list?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Robert HM on January 09, 2011, 09:15:28 PM The list is long and detailed. Paul Ince. I am in a moral dilemma but I still Hate Man Ure, really really quite a lot. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 09:18:03 PM Waiting for Greeky to start a Chelsea thread, so I can see if my Chelsea list is longer than my Man U list...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on January 09, 2011, 09:23:23 PM ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United ... why? Roy Keane, disgusting player/manager/human being. Gary Neville, funnily enough actually like Phil. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: AndrewT on January 09, 2011, 09:24:07 PM Eamonn Holmes.
Mick Hucknall. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 09:24:50 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Robert HM on January 09, 2011, 09:25:43 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: AndrewT on January 09, 2011, 09:26:12 PM Make a wish you two.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Robert HM on January 09, 2011, 09:26:19 PM Too slow
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Longy on January 09, 2011, 09:31:49 PM Nani has all the worst charcteristics of Cristano Ronaldo, without the talent.
Rio Ferdinand seems to think he is some crazy funny guy, going around merking people. Whereas in fact he is just a twat. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 09:35:10 PM When QPR got promoted in 1982, my Dad took me to Old Trafford for the first game of the season.
It was my first "proper" away trip (obv been to the other London clubs). It was a fantastic game and tremendous party atmosphere and we trailed 2-1 with 2 minutes to go when Clive Allen hit the post when it would have been easier to score and Utd came straight down our end and made it 3-1. Then we were kept in the stadium for over an hour. Apparently their supporters wanted to do some damage to the cockney upstarts. I mean, really, wtf? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 09:40:18 PM Mods pls. All this trolling. Delete some posts
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: celtic on January 09, 2011, 09:42:04 PM I don't mind Man U.
I also dont mind Liverpool. Must be unique. Not keen on Rangers though tbh. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on January 09, 2011, 09:43:08 PM Mods pls. All this trolling. Delete some posts Although perhaps it would be in order to let them know you have deleted their posts Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 09, 2011, 09:45:54 PM my little brother, born and raised in kent supports man ure. seriously, wtf is that all about, it's an embarrassment to me
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Robert HM on January 09, 2011, 09:49:28 PM Mods pls. All this trolling. Delete some posts http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=51379.msg1290351#msg1290351Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on January 09, 2011, 09:51:11 PM my little brother, born and raised in kent supports man ure. seriously, wtf is that all about, it's an embarrassment to me my brothers and cousins, born and raised in beijing supporst man yoo. seriously,wtf is that all about, its an embarrassment to me Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 09:52:56 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over
Why care so much? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Robert HM on January 09, 2011, 09:53:21 PM my little brother, born and raised in kent supports man ure. seriously, wtf is that all about, it's an embarrassment to me my brothers and cousins, born and raised in beijing supporst man yoo. seriously,wtf is that all about, its an embarrassment to me Aged about 10 my oldest thought he better follow the fashion and take an interest in football, I had already bought him a Notts County shirt, his uncle bought him a Barnsley shirt (I tried to hide it). He picked Man Utd out of the air. I packed him a bag and put it by the door, he changed to Aresenal, fml. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: celtic on January 09, 2011, 09:53:36 PM Mods pls. All this trolling. Delete some posts Although perhaps it would be in order to let them know you have deleted their posts I saw what you wrote, do you really think you needed to be informed that it had been deleted? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on January 09, 2011, 09:58:27 PM Mods pls. All this trolling. Delete some posts Although perhaps it would be in order to let them know you have deleted their posts I saw what you wrote, do you really think you needed to be informed that it had been deleted? Absolutely Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: celtic on January 09, 2011, 10:00:57 PM Mods pls. All this trolling. Delete some posts Although perhaps it would be in order to let them know you have deleted their posts I saw what you wrote, do you really think you needed to be informed that it had been deleted? Absolutely lolz Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on January 09, 2011, 10:02:47 PM I want to play. Will try not to swear.
I hate that half their fans are prawn sandwich business sorts loads of which are Chinese/Japanese, (Paul Houk will call me racist again now no doubt) and the other half are Londoners. When i went to the fa cup game last year at Old Trafford (which we won 1-0 fwiw) i saw lots of Asian fans with scarves on that were half Man Utd half Leeds designs. How ridiciolous is that! We have hated each other for 40 years. Its just a business now, more so than any other club. I hate the fact they never go to the games/mention their games all season yet never stfu when they win a trophy. I hate that they think they have fanatical, fantastic support but when you watch 17/19 home league games on TV the place is always like a graveyard. (I will concede their away support is v good but that is no doubt the 3,000 or so old school hardcore). I hate all the scummy people on Camel's list. I hate Alex Ferguson and his moaning and cheating. The only thing i remotely like about them is that the only time i've been to Old Trafford for an away game we did them 1-0 when we were in League One! (duno if i've mentioned that yet) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: maldini32 on January 09, 2011, 10:04:22 PM Nani has all the worst charcteristics of Cristano Ronaldo, without the talent. Rio Ferdinand seems to think he is some crazy funny guy, going around merking people. Whereas in fact he is just a twat. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on January 09, 2011, 10:05:03 PM Nani has all the worst charcteristics of Cristano Ronaldo, without the talent. Rio Ferdinand seems to think he is some crazy funny guy, going around merking people. Whereas in fact he is just a twat. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 09, 2011, 10:06:38 PM I want to play. Will try not to swear. I hate that half their fans are prawn sandwich business sorts loads of which are Chinese/Japanese, (Paul Houk will call me racist again now no doubt) and the other half are Londoners. When i went to the fa cup game last year at Old Trafford (which we won 1-0 fwiw) i saw lots of Asian fans with scarves on that were half Man Utd half Leeds designs. How ridiciolous is that! We have hated each other for 40 years. Its just a business now, more so than any other club. I hate the fact they never go to the games/mention their games all season yet never stfu when they win a trophy. I hate that they think they have fanatical, fantastic support but when you watch 17/19 home league games on TV the place is always like a graveyard. (I will concede their away support is v good but that is no doubt the 3,000 or so old school hardcore). I hate all the scummy people on Camel's list. I hate Alex Ferguson and his moaning and cheating. The only thing i remotely like about them is that the only time i've been to Old Trafford for an away game we did them 1-0 when we were in League One! (duno if i've mentioned that yet) potw imo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dewi_cool on January 09, 2011, 10:09:40 PM When QPR got promoted in 1982, my Dad took me to Old Trafford for the first game of the season. It was my first "proper" away trip (obv been to the other London clubs). It was a fantastic game and tremendous party atmosphere and we trailed 2-1 with 2 minutes to go when Clive Allen hit the post when it would have been easier to score and Utd came straight down our end and made it 3-1. Then we were kept in the stadium for over an hour. Apparently their supporters wanted to do some damage to the cockney upstarts. I mean, really, wtf? Keith, that happened at most grounds in the 80's, so it's not a utd thing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: maldini32 on January 09, 2011, 10:10:59 PM Haha love it brent.
Also whats it with the special fans you have at OT wearing the green and yellow scarves kinda defeats the purpose of hating the Glazers. Thanks for the moneyzz And Gary Neville what a ***** Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on January 09, 2011, 10:11:30 PM ... I hate that half their fans are prawn sandwich business sorts loads of which are Chinese/Japanese, (Paul Houk will call me racist again now no doubt) and the other half are Londoners. ... I hate the fact they never go to the games/mention their games all season yet never stfu when they win a trophy. I hate that they think they have fanatical, fantastic support but when you watch 17/19 home league games on TV the place is always like a graveyard. (I will concede their away support is v good but that is no doubt the 3,000 or so old school hardcore). I hate all the scummy people on Camel's list. I hate Alex Ferguson and his moaning and cheating. ... so? it's only a game Don't you think hate is an irrationally strong emotion to ascribe to things which might more reasonably be qualified as mildly irritating? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: AndrewT on January 09, 2011, 10:13:27 PM I'm sensing you're not really into football that much Jon.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 09, 2011, 10:16:05 PM wow jon, really? you think there's no place for extremes of emotion in football?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: ChipRich on January 09, 2011, 10:18:09 PM ... I hate that half their fans are prawn sandwich business sorts loads of which are Chinese/Japanese, (Paul Houk will call me racist again now no doubt) and the other half are Londoners. ... I hate the fact they never go to the games/mention their games all season yet never stfu when they win a trophy. I hate that they think they have fanatical, fantastic support but when you watch 17/19 home league games on TV the place is always like a graveyard. (I will concede their away support is v good but that is no doubt the 3,000 or so old school hardcore). I hate all the scummy people on Camel's list. I hate Alex Ferguson and his moaning and cheating. ... so? it's only a game Don't you think hate is an irrationally strong emotion to ascribe to things which might more reasonably be qualified as mildly irritating? Its not only a game though fwiw, i hate them too. Jones is a tool too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 10:21:49 PM I want to play. Will try not to swear. I hate that half their fans are prawn sandwich business sorts loads of which are Chinese/Japanese, (Paul Houk will call me racist again now no doubt) and the other half are Londoners. When i went to the fa cup game last year at Old Trafford (which we won 1-0 fwiw) i saw lots of Asian fans with scarves on that were half Man Utd half Leeds designs. How ridiciolous is that! We have hated each other for 40 years. Its just a business now, more so than any other club. I hate the fact they never go to the games/mention their games all season yet never stfu when they win a trophy. I hate that they think they have fanatical, fantastic support but when you watch 17/19 home league games on TV the place is always like a graveyard. (I will concede their away support is v good but that is no doubt the 3,000 or so old school hardcore). I hate all the scummy people on Camel's list. I hate Alex Ferguson and his moaning and cheating. The only thing i remotely like about them is that the only time i've been to Old Trafford for an away game we did them 1-0 when we were in League One! (duno if i've mentioned that yet) Love this stuff. Makes me smile Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on January 09, 2011, 10:22:48 PM wow jon, really? you think there's no place for extremes of emotion in football? Yes in Football Winning a match after being a long way behind, winning a league, winning a trophy Losing in the final minutes, losing a big points lead, losing in general but most of what is on most people's hate lists isn't about playing football and hate is still a bit strong imo Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 10:28:06 PM wow jon, really? you think there's no place for extremes of emotion in football? Yes in Football Winning a match after being a long way behind, winning a league, winning a trophy Losing in the final minutes, losing a big points lead, losing in general but most of what is on most people's hate lists isn't about playing football and hate is still a bit strong imo Your argument is very strong and the passion involved in supporting a football club really isn't logical. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on January 09, 2011, 10:32:59 PM Why the hate for Paul Scholes? Someone who doesn't talk to the press, trys very very hard, puts extra time in the training ground and has expressed his want to play for his hometown team (Oldham) before he dies.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 09, 2011, 10:36:24 PM Why the hate for Paul Scholes? Someone who doesn't talk to the press, trys very very hard, puts extra time in the training ground and has expressed his want to play for his hometown team (Oldham) before he dies. Possibly to do with the nasty side to his game where he goes round leaving his foot in constantly, getting an unreal amount of yellow cards in his career then we have to listen to comms saying he just can't tackle. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 09, 2011, 10:37:57 PM Oh and hes ginger ldo.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on January 09, 2011, 10:41:23 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: ChipRich on January 09, 2011, 10:42:02 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Robert HM on January 09, 2011, 10:43:00 PM Emotion and a footbal fan.
Years ago I had a discussion with a Sheff Utd follower, he concluded that as a fan you sign up to misery that is entrenched in the system. You have times of pleasure when you win, come back from behind etc etc but the close season is the time of the real emotion. You look back on the previous season and you have a few short months of extreme pleasure if won that trophy that you craved for the team but there is more likely to be months of misery because you didn't. After all there can only be one ultimate winner and a large number of also ran. Is it not surprising that there manifests a feeling of extreme dislike, bordering on hate, of any other team that made your months of summer a misery. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 09, 2011, 10:43:10 PM What did we all think of Fergie taking back the players he had loaned to Preston when his son got the chop?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Matt.NFFC. on January 09, 2011, 10:43:32 PM ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United. ... But I really, really, really hate Man United ... why? The list is long and detailed. Paul Ince. Norman Whiteside. Mark Hughes. Teddy Sheringham. Roy Keane. Gary Neville. Peter Red Nose. Mark Hughes. Bryan Robson. The ridiculous feeling of entitlement of their supporters. Alex Ferguson's tapping his wristwatch. But most of all, the 12 minutes of injury time they got in our relegation season which gave Cantona enough time to equalise and ultimately send us down. Near perfect post........I'd also like to add the name of Brian "miserable face" Mcclair. God I hate Man Utd almost as much as Derby.....vile! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on January 09, 2011, 10:43:43 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 09, 2011, 10:44:12 PM scholes is ginger manure. he's like a cross between rich and jones
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: ChipRich on January 09, 2011, 10:44:18 PM What did we all think of Fergie taking back the players he had loaned to Preston when his son got the chop? tosser Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 10:47:33 PM Why the hate for Paul Scholes? Someone who doesn't talk to the press, trys very very hard, puts extra time in the training ground and has expressed his want to play for his hometown team (Oldham) before he dies. He is one the dirtiest players I have ever seen. If he played for someone else he would have a record number of red cards. And honestly he isn't as good as everyone cracks him up to be. There are a few Utd players I don't mind: Giggs, Andy Cole, Neil Webb, Paul Parker obv. Basically the non dirty, non moaning types.. It is unfortunately quite a short list. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on January 09, 2011, 10:47:56 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. This a cracking post Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Matt.NFFC. on January 09, 2011, 10:48:14 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. This.......and that's why football generates so much passion. I feel I have to do my bit to keep the family tradition going......it's in your blood and it aint gonna go away! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on January 09, 2011, 10:48:30 PM OTOH, George Best, Bobby Charlton, Paul McGrath, Martin Buchan, Bryan Robson and managers like Tommy Docherty
I just detest them since they got good, it's been quite a long hate. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 10:48:49 PM Great thread thx guys
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 10:49:40 PM What did we all think of Fergie taking back the players he had loaned to Preston when his son got the chop? The only thing I am surprised about is that people are surprised about this. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 09, 2011, 10:50:52 PM Thread of year candidate here
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 10:54:57 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. This a cracking post It is one of the best things about living in the North East. When you walk around Darlo town centre the kids actually wear Darlo shirts (and Darlo are complete tez), you see the odd Middlesbrough or Toon shirt, but Utd, Lolerpool or Chelski are completely absent. Pompey is the only other town I've spent any time in that has similar attribute. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 10:55:32 PM Emotion and a footbal fan. Years ago I had a discussion with a Sheff Utd follower, he concluded that as a fan you sign up to misery that is entrenched in the system. You have times of pleasure when you win, come back from behind etc etc but the close season is the time of the real emotion. You look back on the previous season and you have a few short months of extreme pleasure if won that trophy that you craved for the team but there is more likely to be months of misery because you didn't. After all there can only be one ultimate winner and a large number of also ran. Is it not surprising that there manifests a feeling of extreme dislike, bordering on hate, of any other team that made your months of summer a misery. Very good post. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on January 09, 2011, 10:56:05 PM .
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 11:06:48 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. Where does it say your supposed to support the team where your from? Surely it's up to the individual. I get tarnished for being glory boy. I do not give a shite. I am from Leicester and I support United. There's reasons for it that have nothing to do with their success. Success came many years after following them. I have also been to games. It also probably significantly difficult to get tickets to Man U games than any other clubs I don't like other clubs but more to do with rivalry than anything else. Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: CelticGeezeer on January 09, 2011, 11:07:03 PM “Jealousy is no more than feeling alone against smiling enemies”
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 09, 2011, 11:17:47 PM What did we all think of Fergie taking back the players he had loaned to Preston when his son got the chop? What did ye make of this yourself George? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 09, 2011, 11:19:18 PM Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? yes thanks, so does that mean I can judge? I'd actually say most people who've posted on here up to now also have STs or attend games regularly Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 11:24:18 PM Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? yes thanks, so does that mean I can judge? I'd actually say most people who've posted on here up to now also have STs or attend games regularly Did say most. Depends how you would define regularly. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 11:24:39 PM What did we all think of Fergie taking back the players he had loaned to Preston when his son got the chop? What did ye make of this yourself George? Wouldn't expect anything less from the great man Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 11:24:58 PM Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? yes thanks, so does that mean I can judge? I'd actually say most people who've posted on here up to now also have STs or attend games regularly I've lived in the North East for 7 years now, and this is the first season I've let my season ticket lapse. FML that this is this the most successful season for nearly 30 years! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on January 09, 2011, 11:27:57 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. Where does it say your supposed to support the team where your from? Surely it's up to the individual. There probably some perfectly logical reasons to supporting a club from a different place to the one that you were born, grew up in or live in. I'd probably find it hard not to support Man U if "Lee Sharpe was the first Merlin sticker I ever got" or "when I was holding a fork one dinner time my Dad said I looked like the Man U mascot" or I had a red lunch box at school etc It's never the trophies though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 09, 2011, 11:29:55 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. Where does it say your supposed to support the team where your from? Surely it's up to the individual. There probably some perfectly logical reasons to supporting a club from a different place to the one that you were born, grew up in or live in. I'd probably find it hard not to support Man U if "Lee Sharpe was the first Merlin sticker I ever got" or "when I was holding a fork one dinner time my Dad said I looked like the Man U mascot" or I had a red lunch box at school etc It's never the trophies though. So what if people wanna follow a successful team? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Robert HM on January 09, 2011, 11:30:34 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. Where does it say your supposed to support the team where your from? Surely it's up to the individual. I get tarnished for being glory boy. I do not give a shite. I am from Leicester and I support United. There's reasons for it that have nothing to do with their success. Success came many years after following them. I have also been to games. It also probably significantly difficult to get tickets to Man U games than any other clubs I don't like other clubs but more to do with rivalry than anything else. Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? I hardly get to Nottingham ever to watch a game. But when living there I would go to every home game, at one stage I was also going to every home reserve game. In that city, you would have hardly been called a glory hunter if supporting Notts County, though I did start supporting them when they took the old fourth division by storm. Can you imagine the feeling of a County supporter whilst Forest were getting their annual open bus tour of the City with the league cup of other trophy. I supported County as I lived in the City, it was the nearest club and my next door neighbour was a County fan and took me to the home games when I was a kid. I still support them, after a 1/3rd of a century, even now I live in the South, you can't pick and choose you team and change with the wind. I am in a position to judge the obvious. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 09, 2011, 11:33:43 PM Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? yes thanks, so does that mean I can judge? I'd actually say most people who've posted on here up to now also have STs or attend games regularly I've lived in the North East for 7 years now, and this is the first season I've let my season ticket lapse. FML that this is this the most successful season for nearly 30 years! I had a season ticket while living in poland. we were still shit though Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on January 09, 2011, 11:38:46 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. fk off im not gonna be supporting fanling united. If i try hard I probs coulda made the team or even buy them out. I support Man yoo because they wear a red shirt (lucky) and david beckham Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on January 09, 2011, 11:38:48 PM The footy club you support is not about the team, the stadium or who owns it, its about the supporters, the local area and the history of that club.
If I supported a club 200 miles always from where I grew up then I wouldn't get it either. So we have two sets of fans, those that are true to their local club however shit they are and those that aint. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on January 09, 2011, 11:41:07 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. Where does it say your supposed to support the team where your from? Surely it's up to the individual. There probably some perfectly logical reasons to supporting a club from a different place to the one that you were born, grew up in or live in. I'd probably find it hard not to support Man U if "Lee Sharpe was the first Merlin sticker I ever got" or "when I was holding a fork one dinner time my Dad said I looked like the Man U mascot" or I had a red lunch box at school etc It's never the trophies though. So what if people wanna follow a successful team? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 11:47:03 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. Where does it say your supposed to support the team where your from? Surely it's up to the individual. There probably some perfectly logical reasons to supporting a club from a different place to the one that you were born, grew up in or live in. I'd probably find it hard not to support Man U if "Lee Sharpe was the first Merlin sticker I ever got" or "when I was holding a fork one dinner time my Dad said I looked like the Man U mascot" or I had a red lunch box at school etc It's never the trophies though. So what if people wanna follow a successful team? To truly appreciate success you must have suffered failure, disappointment and heartache. I admire the way Arsenal play football, but the complete outrage of some of their supporters because they haven't won a trophy since 2005 is pathetic. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 09, 2011, 11:48:38 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. fk off im not gonna be supporting fanling united. If i try hard I probs coulda made the team or even buy them out. I support Man yoo because they wear a red shirt (lucky) and david beckham Barnsley and York City wear red too. Keith Houchen used to play for York, he's as much of an icon as Beckham surely? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on January 09, 2011, 11:52:46 PM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. fk off im not gonna be supporting fanling united. If i try hard I probs coulda made the team or even buy them out. I support Man yoo because they wear a red shirt (lucky) and david beckham Barnsley and York City wear red too. Keith Houchen used to play for York, he's as much of an icon as Beckham surely? barnsley and york city were not on the tv in fanling also who is houchen btw i was born in the 1986 :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on January 09, 2011, 11:57:44 PM I want to play. Will try not to swear. racistI hate that half their fans are prawn sandwich business sorts loads of which are Chinese/Japanese, (Paul Houk will call me racist again now no doubt) and the other half are Londoners. When i went to the fa cup game last year at Old Trafford (which we won 1-0 fwiw) i saw lots of Asian fans with scarves on that were half Man Utd half Leeds designs. How ridiciolous is that! We have hated each other for 40 years. Its just a business now, more so than any other club. I hate the fact they never go to the games/mention their games all season yet never stfu when they win a trophy. I hate that they think they have fanatical, fantastic support but when you watch 17/19 home league games on TV the place is always like a graveyard. (I will concede their away support is v good but that is no doubt the 3,000 or so old school hardcore). I hate all the scummy people on Camel's list. I hate Alex Ferguson and his moaning and cheating. The only thing i remotely like about them is that the only time i've been to Old Trafford for an away game we did them 1-0 when we were in League One! (duno if i've mentioned that yet) we eat prawn sandwichs cos its the most expensive thing that you can get for free if you are over their on business its like in buffets u eat all the prawns and mussels coz they are more expensive then chips. I dont give a shit which ones taste nice as long as its expensive. same with louis vuitton we like it coz its expensive Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 10, 2011, 12:05:56 AM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. fk off im not gonna be supporting fanling united. If i try hard I probs coulda made the team or even buy them out. I support Man yoo because they wear a red shirt (lucky) and david beckham Barnsley and York City wear red too. Keith Houchen used to play for York, he's as much of an icon as Beckham surely? barnsley and york city were not on the tv in fanling also who is houchen btw i was born in the 1986 :) Keith Houchen: YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Q5-ANGlhuM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on January 10, 2011, 12:16:16 AM Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? yes thanks, so does that mean I can judge? I'd actually say most people who've posted on here up to now also have STs or attend games regularly I've lived in the North East for 7 years now, and this is the first season I've let my season ticket lapse. FML that this is this the most successful season for nearly 30 years! How much of this do you attribute to you changing your 'stars avatar? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 10, 2011, 12:22:44 AM Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? yes thanks, so does that mean I can judge? I'd actually say most people who've posted on here up to now also have STs or attend games regularly I've lived in the North East for 7 years now, and this is the first season I've let my season ticket lapse. FML that this is this the most successful season for nearly 30 years! How much of this do you attribute to your changing your 'stars avatar? Almost completly. Shouldn't you being watching the NFL? Exciting finish! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on January 10, 2011, 12:27:46 AM Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? yes thanks, so does that mean I can judge? I'd actually say most people who've posted on here up to now also have STs or attend games regularly I've lived in the North East for 7 years now, and this is the first season I've let my season ticket lapse. FML that this is this the most successful season for nearly 30 years! How much of this do you attribute to your changing your 'stars avatar? Almost completly. Shouldn't you being watching the NFL? Exciting finish! 7.5 pts. should be enough, although it should really be all over. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 10, 2011, 12:29:16 AM Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? yes thanks, so does that mean I can judge? I'd actually say most people who've posted on here up to now also have STs or attend games regularly I've lived in the North East for 7 years now, and this is the first season I've let my season ticket lapse. FML that this is this the most successful season for nearly 30 years! How much of this do you attribute to your changing your 'stars avatar? Almost completly. Shouldn't you being watching the NFL? Exciting finish! 7.5 pts. should be enough, although it should really be all over. Philly will go for 2 if they happen to score, so it isn't all over quite yet... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on January 10, 2011, 12:33:57 AM Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? yes thanks, so does that mean I can judge? I'd actually say most people who've posted on here up to now also have STs or attend games regularly I've lived in the North East for 7 years now, and this is the first season I've let my season ticket lapse. FML that this is this the most successful season for nearly 30 years! How much of this do you attribute to your changing your 'stars avatar? Almost completly. Shouldn't you being watching the NFL? Exciting finish! 7.5 pts. should be enough, although it should really be all over. Philly will go for 2 if they happen to score, so it isn't all over quite yet... I realize that, I meant that GB should really have had it totally wrapped up by now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on January 10, 2011, 12:35:22 AM I support my local team. My son will support either my team or if we dont live in Leeds the local team where we live. Its all been said.
I'm a supporter. George/Paul Ho etc are fans and have a favourite club. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on January 10, 2011, 12:37:35 AM I dont want to hear about 'I lived there for 17 mins in 1981' Stupid question as they would support citeh Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 10, 2011, 12:48:32 AM (http://i333.photobucket.com/albums/m389/_gatso_/george.jpg?t=1294620389)
made me lol. george has only supported them for 8 minutes Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on January 10, 2011, 12:50:06 AM (http://i333.photobucket.com/albums/m389/_gatso_/george.jpg?t=1294620389) made me lol. george has only supported them for 8 minutes im actually a barca fan, always have been even when they were sh*t. my dad went to see them play once and i just always supported them. Dont get to many games, tickets are hard to come by and its quite a long way to go. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dino1980 on January 10, 2011, 12:56:42 AM Quote I admire the way Arsenal play football, but the complete outrage of some of their supporters because they haven't won a trophy since 2005 is pathetic. QFT if anyone's read Why England Lose - also released as Soccernomics - (http://tinyurl.com/22qmo9a) then it shows that it's quite normal that Arsenal haven't won anything since 2005. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 10, 2011, 01:10:59 AM (http://i333.photobucket.com/albums/m389/_gatso_/george.jpg?t=1294620389) made me lol. george has only supported them for 8 minutes lol. Rumbled Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 10, 2011, 02:03:08 AM Quote I admire the way Arsenal play football, but the complete outrage of some of their supporters because they haven't won a trophy since 2005 is pathetic. QFT if anyone's read Why England Lose - also released as Soccernomics - (http://tinyurl.com/22qmo9a) then it shows that it's quite normal that Arsenal haven't won anything since 2005. Good post. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 10, 2011, 02:05:04 AM What do Utd fans think of the debt and long term situation?
More medium term how do you think you'll cope when financial fair play kicks in? What do you think of Fergie's tactics in Euope, especially away from home? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 10, 2011, 02:07:31 AM If you can't replace Fergie with an all time great manager what do you think of the director of football/coach approach which seems to be the future for clubs who can't all have a 10 year plus great manger?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on January 10, 2011, 04:33:58 AM TBH i dont really support man yooo
i did when i was a kid but i dont support anyone know foot ball bores me slightly not as exciting as it used to be. i went to old trafford once thought it was shit never wanna go again unless its a super big game Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on January 10, 2011, 06:26:12 AM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. This.......and that's why football generates so much passion. I feel I have to do my bit to keep the family tradition going......it's in your blood and it aint gonna go away! So if you don't come from Manchester, and your parents don't come from Manchester but they do support Manchester United - then it's allowed for you to support them because you're following the family tradition? And Man U have only been super successful for about 20 years - so anyone supporting them for longer than that isn't doing it for glory hunting presumably? Are they let off not living in Manchester, or is that not allowed - even if they weren't just following the trophies to start with? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on January 10, 2011, 06:39:22 AM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. Where does it say your supposed to support the team where your from? Surely it's up to the individual. There probably some perfectly logical reasons to supporting a club from a different place to the one that you were born, grew up in or live in. I'd probably find it hard not to support Man U if "Lee Sharpe was the first Merlin sticker I ever got" or "when I was holding a fork one dinner time my Dad said I looked like the Man U mascot" or I had a red lunch box at school etc It's never the trophies though. So what if people wanna follow a successful team? To truly appreciate success you must have suffered failure, disappointment and heartache. I admire the way Arsenal play football, but the complete outrage of some of their supporters because they haven't won a trophy since 2005 is pathetic. Have to say that having watched Arsenal through the 70's I like the current situation I enjoyed the invincibles time too as we stuck it right in United's eye but overall I like tht we don't win every week - it does develop the feeling of entitlement and a wrong kind of disappointment when you dont win that is very far from being a terrce supporter. The way we play, the reltively sound financial situation are great triumphs in a terribly cynical time and personally, since the Champs league went 4 places and the cups became devalued I'm pretty content if we look good, retain great players, finish in the top4 and win fk all else Most exciting recent season was when Spurs nearly pipped us to 4th place Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Longy on January 10, 2011, 08:55:03 AM I am actually grateful I don't support one of the mega clubs. Any little bit of success my club achieves means the world to me, I can't imagine that it would mean as much if my club won a trophy every year or expected to. The highs supporting a smaller club are massive as most of it is mediocre or worse.
I think I am bit of a sadist tbh, even when I got to have my pick of the crop when it came to US sports teams. I ended supporting one that hasn't made the Superbowl in the 25 years I have followed them and one that hasn't won the World series in over a century. It is going to be fking sweet when they do win something! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Somerled on January 10, 2011, 09:36:14 AM More medium term how do you think you'll cope when financial fair play kicks in? This is an interesting question. And deserves some thought imo. As far as I can make out Man Utd don't have any debt - it's the owners who have the debt and use Man Utd's profits to finance their borrowings. The exact reverse to Man City & Chelski who have enormous mounds of debts which are just paid off by their rich owners. Whilst this is a huge problem for Man Utd in terms of buying players and strengthening the squad i don't think they would fall foul of the proposed regulations as they make a profit each year and have a very low wages/turnover ratio. I haven't studied it in much depth though so could be completely wrong. And no I'm not a Man Utd fan but I don't hate them either. I save my vitriol for more worthy targets. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on January 10, 2011, 09:50:06 AM How does it feel to be out the cup in the 4th round?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Matt.NFFC. on January 10, 2011, 09:55:00 AM In all seriousness have no idea why people get wound up by United fans being from all over Because you should support where you come from. That's the whole point. The club is representing your city/town/village etc. I know people move around a lot more these days but there is a disproportionate amount of scum fans everywhere just because sad individuals need to support the best team. Why care so much? Support your local team or the team passed on to you from generation to generation. If you want to support winners just look at the results at 5 then watch match of the day and cheer on the teams you know go on to win. This.......and that's why football generates so much passion. I feel I have to do my bit to keep the family tradition going......it's in your blood and it aint gonna go away! So if you don't come from Manchester, and your parents don't come from Manchester but they do support Manchester United - then it's allowed for you to support them because you're following the family tradition? And Man U have only been super successful for about 20 years - so anyone supporting them for longer than that isn't doing it for glory hunting presumably? Are they let off not living in Manchester, or is that not allowed - even if they weren't just following the trophies to start with? They can do what they like, and fair play for following the family tradition, but in these types of cases, I just can't see where the passion comes from for the individual. I suppose it's different for me as I was born in Nottingham, still live in Notts, and the whole family follow Forest. When we lose it bloody hurts....I can't help it...it just does. I just can't relate to the Man Utd fans who live all over, and have never been to the games. When they lose, does it really pain these fans, probably not, they just go "oh well" but most fans suffer many many lows and you just can't buy supporting your local, lowly team for which you "feel" is a real part of you. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Matt.NFFC. on January 10, 2011, 09:57:17 AM How does it feel to be out the cup in the 4th round? Not applicable :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 10, 2011, 12:25:13 PM According to the Premier League's Fan Survey for 2007/2008 (the most recent I could find with this specific measure) the distance lived from the ground has been steadily increasing
Quote Distance lived from the ground On average, supporters live 49 miles from the club stadium, compared to a 47-mile average last year and 45 the year before that – supporting your favourite football club would appear to be becoming more of a long-distance occupation for some. Indeed, one in five supporters (18%) now lives over 100 miles away from their club – reinforcing this idea of the strong pull of Premier League clubs. Manchester United fans, according to this survey, lived, on average 78 miles from Old Trafford. Manchester City fans travel just over the average at 50 miles, and Arsenal just under at 48. You'd think that 78 miles would put United at the top of the league in this respect, but one club has fans who, on average, come from further afield... P32 Figure 5.4 if you want to know which club that is. http://www.premierleague.com/staticFiles/67/f8/0,,12306~129127,00.pdf You may be surprised Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on January 10, 2011, 12:31:20 PM According to the Premier League's Fan Survey for 2007/2008 (the most recent I could find with this specific measure) the distance lived from the ground has been steadily increasing Quote Distance lived from the ground On average, supporters live 49 miles from the club stadium, compared to a 47-mile average last year and 45 the year before that – supporting your favourite football club would appear to be becoming more of a long-distance occupation for some. Indeed, one in five supporters (18%) now lives over 100 miles away from their club – reinforcing this idea of the strong pull of Premier League clubs. Manchester United fans, according to this survey, lived, on average 78 miles from Old Trafford. Manchester City fans travel just over the average at 50 miles, and Arsenal just under at 48. You'd think that 78 miles would put United at the top of the league in this respect, but one club has fans who, on average, come from further afield... P32 Figure 5.4 if you want to know which club that is. http://www.premierleague.com/staticFiles/67/f8/0,,12306~129127,00.pdf You may be surprised I think there was another survey which showed that there were a larger number of Man U season ticket holders who lived in the Manchester area than there was of of Man City season ticket holders. I was going to post something about that earlier when somebody suggested something along the lines of actual Mancunians supporting City but I still can't find the actual report to back it up. But basically if you happen to meet a football fan from Manchester - they're most likely to be a Man U supporter Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Matt.NFFC. on January 10, 2011, 01:02:00 PM According to the Premier League's Fan Survey for 2007/2008 (the most recent I could find with this specific measure) the distance lived from the ground has been steadily increasing Quote Distance lived from the ground On average, supporters live 49 miles from the club stadium, compared to a 47-mile average last year and 45 the year before that – supporting your favourite football club would appear to be becoming more of a long-distance occupation for some. Indeed, one in five supporters (18%) now lives over 100 miles away from their club – reinforcing this idea of the strong pull of Premier League clubs. Manchester United fans, according to this survey, lived, on average 78 miles from Old Trafford. Manchester City fans travel just over the average at 50 miles, and Arsenal just under at 48. You'd think that 78 miles would put United at the top of the league in this respect, but one club has fans who, on average, come from further afield... P32 Figure 5.4 if you want to know which club that is. http://www.premierleague.com/staticFiles/67/f8/0,,12306~129127,00.pdf You may be surprised Not suprised at all.....my money was on either Liverpoo or Chelski Good article that one. I like the bit which states "this reinforces the strong pull of Premier League teams" made me lol. I'm glad I support my home town club where I was born. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 10, 2011, 01:06:46 PM +1 to not surprised. I assumed it'd be liverpool so tuned in for the surprise and was disappointed to be correct
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on January 10, 2011, 05:45:50 PM Also don't think there's many people on here who are in a position to judge- u all have season tickets do you? yes thanks, so does that mean I can judge? I'd actually say most people who've posted on here up to now also have STs or attend games regularly I've lived in the North East for 7 years now, and this is the first season I've let my season ticket lapse. FML that this is this the most successful season for nearly 30 years! How much of this do you attribute to your changing your 'stars avatar? Almost completly. Shouldn't you being watching the NFL? Exciting finish! 7.5 pts. should be enough, although it should really be all over. Philly will go for 2 if they happen to score, so it isn't all over quite yet... I'm still puzzled over why they would have gone for two if they'd have scored. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 10, 2011, 06:27:01 PM Pretty sure it's against the club. I'll read up later.
More medium term how do you think you'll cope when financial fair play kicks in? This is an interesting question. And deserves some thought imo. As far as I can make out Man Utd don't have any debt - it's the owners who have the debt and use Man Utd's profits to finance their borrowings. The exact reverse to Man City & Chelski who have enormous mounds of debts which are just paid off by their rich owners. Whilst this is a huge problem for Man Utd in terms of buying players and strengthening the squad i don't think they would fall foul of the proposed regulations as they make a profit each year and have a very low wages/turnover ratio. I haven't studied it in much depth though so could be completely wrong. And no I'm not a Man Utd fan but I don't hate them either. I save my vitriol for more worthy targets. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 10, 2011, 06:45:36 PM I'm still puzzled over why they would have gone for two if they'd have scored. you posted at 21-16 presumably? a td makes it 21-22 which in the last few seconds is effectively the same as 21-23 as the chances of scoring a safety are basically zero. a 2 pointer though makes it a 3 point game so they can give up a fg and still go to ot. then a philly td screws your spread Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 10, 2011, 06:46:50 PM in the interests of balance it should be noted that I heart eric cantona
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on January 10, 2011, 06:48:27 PM This thread has tilted me so hard. I'm no less of a supporter of my club, just cos I don't live or grew up next door to the ground. I know its aimed more at Man u fans, but hate this fcking argument.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 10, 2011, 06:53:03 PM This thread has tilted me so hard. I'm no less of a supporter of my club, just cos I don't live or grew up next door to the ground. I know its aimed more at Man u fans, but hate this fcking argument. Im sure there's some die hard fans who support clubs nowhere near them. Haterz gonna hate cos United are one of the biggest clubs in the world. But as you've pointed out this does apply to others Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: relaedgc on January 10, 2011, 07:08:32 PM (http://bigfourza.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/howard_webb.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 10, 2011, 07:12:54 PM 1 Man Utd 20 24 44
2 Man City 22 17 42 3 Arsenal 21 20 40 4 Tottenham 21 6 36 5 Chelsea 21 17 35 6 Sunderland 22 3 33 7 Bolton 22 5 30 8 Newcastle 21 3 28 9 Blackburn 22 -6 28 10 Stoke 21 0 27 11 Everton 21 -2 25 12 Liverpool 20 -3 25 13 Blackpool 19 -5 25 14 Fulham 21 -2 22 15 Birmingham 20 -5 22 16 West Brom 21 -13 22 17 Wolves 21 -13 21 18 Aston Villa 21 -15 21 19 Wigan 21 -15 21 20 West Ham 22 -16 20 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 10, 2011, 07:21:45 PM (http://bigfourza.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/howard_webb.jpg) As if he'd be seen in last year's shirt! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on January 10, 2011, 07:27:31 PM 1 Man Utd 20 24 44 2 Man City 22 17 42 3 Arsenal 21 20 40 4 Tottenham 21 6 36 5 Chelsea 21 17 35 6 Sunderland 22 3 33 7 Bolton 22 5 30 8 Newcastle 21 3 28 9 Blackburn 22 -6 28 10 Stoke 21 0 27 11 Everton 21 -2 25 12 Liverpool 20 -3 25 13 Blackpool 19 -5 25 14 Fulham 21 -2 22 15 Birmingham 20 -5 22 16 West Brom 21 -13 22 17 Wolves 21 -13 21 18 Aston Villa 21 -15 21 19 Wigan 21 -15 21 20 West Ham 22 -16 20 ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on January 10, 2011, 07:36:40 PM 1 Man Utd 20 24 44 2 Man City 22 17 42 3 Arsenal 21 20 40 4 Tottenham 21 6 36 5 Chelsea 21 17 35 6 Sunderland 22 3 33 7 Bolton 22 5 30 8 Newcastle 21 3 28 9 Blackburn 22 -6 28 10 Stoke 21 0 27 11 Everton 21 -2 25 12 Liverpool 20 -3 25 13 Blackpool 19 -5 25 14 Fulham 21 -2 22 15 Birmingham 20 -5 22 16 West Brom 21 -13 22 17 Wolves 21 -13 21 18 Aston Villa 21 -15 21 19 Wigan 21 -15 21 20 West Ham 22 -16 20 2pts clear with 2 games in hand looks so pretty Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sledge13 on January 10, 2011, 07:58:28 PM A sight to make you smile...
http://www.yorkcityfc.com/history/manua.php GG Giggs, Beckham etc... (pity York sold all their players and ended up toss) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: KarmaDope on January 10, 2011, 07:59:42 PM That post of the league table above simplifies why I hate (for lack of a better word) Man Yoo/Chelsea gloryhunters.
I just don't get the point in doing that? I wouldn't do it if roles were reversed. I'd be more likely to laugh at Chelsea in George's position, as it's been known from the start that Liverpool would be lucky to hit Europa League. Liverpool are where they should be. Chelsea, on the other hand...should be up with MU, not 9 points below. Would someone please explain the need for posts like that relating to a football team. Just makes the poster(s) look childish. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 10, 2011, 08:06:03 PM That post of the league table above simplifies why I hate (for lack of a better word) Man Yoo/Chelsea gloryhunters. I just don't get the point in doing that? I wouldn't do it if roles were reversed. I'd be more likely to laugh at Chelsea in George's position, as it's been known from the start that Liverpool would be lucky to hit Europa League. Liverpool are where they should be. Chelsea, on the other hand...should be up with MU, not 9 points below. Would someone please explain the need for posts like that relating to a football team. Just makes the poster(s) look childish. and posting the image of a Howard Webb in a man u shirt is ok? Plus all the haters posting? I started this thread at the request of a few sensitive Liverpool fans and all its been used as a I hate man u thread. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 10, 2011, 08:07:49 PM I started this thread at the request of a few sensitive Liverpool fans and all its been used as a I hate man u thread. I consider it abs genius that the liverpool fans got you to start a utd hate thread Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: KarmaDope on January 10, 2011, 08:10:05 PM That post of the league table above simplifies why I hate (for lack of a better word) Man Yoo/Chelsea gloryhunters. I just don't get the point in doing that? I wouldn't do it if roles were reversed. I'd be more likely to laugh at Chelsea in George's position, as it's been known from the start that Liverpool would be lucky to hit Europa League. Liverpool are where they should be. Chelsea, on the other hand...should be up with MU, not 9 points below. Would someone please explain the need for posts like that relating to a football team. Just makes the poster(s) look childish. and posting the image of a Howard Webb in a man u shirt is ok? Plus all the haters posting? I started this thread at the request of a few sensitive Liverpool fans and all its been used as a I hate man u thread. The Howard Webb thing is stupid. He's a ref, he can make mistakes. FYI, I agreed with the Gerrard red and thought the pen was ridic soft. As people have said, we'd have prob got the same had it been Anfield. Just looks petty and juvenile from both sides. It's 2 football clubs ffs, not life and death. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on January 10, 2011, 08:28:50 PM That post of the league table above simplifies why I hate (for lack of a better word) Man Yoo/Chelsea gloryhunters. I just don't get the point in doing that? I wouldn't do it if roles were reversed. I'd be more likely to laugh at Chelsea in George's position, as it's been known from the start that Liverpool would be lucky to hit Europa League. Liverpool are where they should be. Chelsea, on the other hand...should be up with MU, not 9 points below. Would someone please explain the need for posts like that relating to a football team. Just makes the poster(s) look childish. and posting the image of a Howard Webb in a man u shirt is ok? Plus all the haters posting? I started this thread at the request of a few sensitive Liverpool fans and all its been used as a I hate man u thread. The Howard Webb thing is stupid. He's a ref, he can make mistakes. FYI, I agreed with the Gerrard red and thought the pen was ridic soft. As people have said, we'd have prob got the same had it been Anfield. Just looks petty and juvenile from both sides. It's 2 football clubs ffs, not life and death. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Robert HM on January 10, 2011, 08:30:07 PM That post of the league table above simplifies why I hate (for lack of a better word) Man Yoo/Chelsea gloryhunters. I just don't get the point in doing that? I wouldn't do it if roles were reversed. I'd be more likely to laugh at Chelsea in George's position, as it's been known from the start that Liverpool would be lucky to hit Europa League. Liverpool are where they should be. Chelsea, on the other hand...should be up with MU, not 9 points below. Would someone please explain the need for posts like that relating to a football team. Just makes the poster(s) look childish. and posting the image of a Howard Webb in a man u shirt is ok? Plus all the haters posting? I started this thread at the request of a few sensitive Liverpool fans and all its been used as a I hate man u thread. The Howard Webb thing is stupid. He's a ref, he can make mistakes. FYI, I agreed with the Gerrard red and thought the pen was ridic soft. As people have said, we'd have prob got the same had it been Anfield. Just looks petty and juvenile from both sides. It's 2 football clubs ffs, not life and death. He said it was more important than that. ( I misread quoted passage, making my post, this one, useless, I could delete but left it as a warning against speed/sleep reading) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Longy on January 10, 2011, 08:56:00 PM I started this thread at the request of a few sensitive Liverpool fans and all its been used as a I hate man u thread. What you need to start doing is posting 7 billion paragraphs worth of text from some biased journalist in this thread. That only supporters of that team could be arsed reading. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on January 10, 2011, 10:03:21 PM I started this thread at the request of a few sensitive Liverpool fans and all its been used as a I hate man u thread. What you need to start doing is posting 7 billion paragraphs worth of text from some biased journalist in this thread. That only supporters of that team could be arsed reading. rotflmfao rotflmfao Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 10, 2011, 11:34:07 PM I started this thread at the request of a few sensitive Liverpool fans and all its been used as a I hate man u thread. I consider it abs genius that the liverpool fans got you to start a utd hate thread Lol exactly Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 10, 2011, 11:35:31 PM I started this thread at the request of a few sensitive Liverpool fans and all its been used as a I hate man u thread. What you need to start doing is posting 7 billion paragraphs worth of text from some biased journalist in this thread. That only supporters of that team could be arsed reading. Keeps most of the trolls away except the really bitters. ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on January 11, 2011, 12:18:09 AM I find no reason to hate man yoo as my team doesn't compete with them.One thing that I can 100% gte is I'm in no way jealous of Man yoo fans who get to celebrate a trophy pretty much every year as Newcastle winning one trophy in my lifetime will feel 10x better than 99% of Man yoo's fans feel about there continued success.
I'd also say it's not just about going to games and having a season ticket.I used to go to every home game and most away games but now I hardly go but I still have that desire inside me of wishing my team to do well.I feel sorry for those who are glory supporters and will never get that feeling. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 11, 2011, 09:46:40 AM The Baron wants to know United fans views on Financial Fair Play - will it affect Manchester United?
The club says 'no' - but then they would say that wouldn't they... The early analysis in May suggested that United only acheved a profit in the last accounts because of the sale of Ronaldo and that they might struggle to mee the criteria in future years. I'm sure this brought a smile for many supporters of ther clubs. More considered analysis now suggests that we are aongst the better managed clubs - The Times Financial Fair Play League which attributes a weighting to points gained in the league based on a number of financial well-being factors had United in 6th at the 29th November (I won't pay a subscription and can't find a more up to date table). Chelsea were a surprising 10th and two of the bottom three spots were occupied by Citeh and Liverpool. Arsenal and THFC were 3rd and 5th respectively. This table doesn't necessarily show that we will be safe under the new rules, but it does show that our administrative management is as on the ball as SAF's team and I certainly have no fears about our ability to meet these requirements without reducing our effectiveness as a football team. I'd be seriously surprised if either Chelsea or Liverpool failed the test when the time comes - I'd be less surprised if Citeh failed, but I'd still be surprised. It would be an act of suicidal folly to allow your club to miss out on the benefits of CL or even Europa League football and all clubs will be looking at ways of converting loans to 'investment' and rebalancig their wages/income equation. The rules will remove the benefits of mega-wealthy ownership - not something that United have ever had the benefit from Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on January 11, 2011, 05:51:01 PM "I hear a lot about the fans - that most of the people from Manchester are City fans." - Dzeko
He'll fit in well I reckon. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 12, 2011, 12:07:19 AM The Baron wants to know United fans views on Financial Fair Play - will it affect Manchester United? The club says 'no' - but then they would say that wouldn't they... The early analysis in May suggested that United only acheved a profit in the last accounts because of the sale of Ronaldo and that they might struggle to mee the criteria in future years. I'm sure this brought a smile for many supporters of ther clubs. More considered analysis now suggests that we are aongst the better managed clubs - The Times Financial Fair Play League which attributes a weighting to points gained in the league based on a number of financial well-being factors had United in 6th at the 29th November (I won't pay a subscription and can't find a more up to date table). Chelsea were a surprising 10th and two of the bottom three spots were occupied by Citeh and Liverpool. Arsenal and THFC were 3rd and 5th respectively. This table doesn't necessarily show that we will be safe under the new rules, but it does show that our administrative management is as on the ball as SAF's team and I certainly have no fears about our ability to meet these requirements without reducing our effectiveness as a football team. I'd be seriously surprised if either Chelsea or Liverpool failed the test when the time comes - I'd be less surprised if Citeh failed, but I'd still be surprised. It would be an act of suicidal folly to allow your club to miss out on the benefits of CL or even Europa League football and all clubs will be looking at ways of converting loans to 'investment' and rebalancig their wages/income equation. The rules will remove the benefits of mega-wealthy ownership - not something that United have ever had the benefit from Maybe I have it wrong then I thought it was much more than wages vs income etc. I thought it was created so that if you were a club in debt (and Utds is very long term debt) then you couldn't compete in European competition and the sanctions may be as severe as transfer embargos. In fact I cant find one link that tells us exactly what it does. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 12, 2011, 01:13:38 AM Clubs could be banned from European competition from the 2014/15 season onwards if they do not comply with new financial rules.
The rules state clubs must break even over a three-year period. Club owners will be allowed to put in up to €15million a year but only as equity, not a loan. This figure will then drop to €10million annually. Clubs will be able to spend as much as they want on stadiums, training facilities and youth football. UEFA will have a range of sanctions from warnings to a transfer ban to exclusion from European tournaments. Across Europe, total club income in 2009 rose 4.8% to €11.7billion, but expenditure was a 9.3% increase to €12.9billion, making a €1.2billion deficit. Most of the expenditure goes on player wages and one in three European clubs spent 70% or more of their income on salaries. 56% of European clubs ended 2009 in the red. One in four clubs spent €6 for every €5 they earned. A drop in transfer activity has reduced income by 5% to clubs in Scotland, France, Portugal and Holland. English top-flight clubs are comfortably the richest in Europe with average revenue of €122million - five times higher than Holland and Russia. Germany is second with average earnings of €86million. Scottish top-flight clubs' average revenue in 2009 was €16m, the League of Ireland €1.3m, Northern Ireland 0.7m and Wales 0.3m . Clubs will be monitored if there are warning signs such as: recording a loss in any year; spending more than 70% of revenue on wages; having overdue football-related payments or tax debts; high level of debts. As with a tax declaration, the onus is on the clubs to provide the correct information to UEFA and they will be subject to spot-checks and face sanctions if they do not do so. National associations will initially grant the licences but UEFA will have spot-checks to make sure that the rules are being applied correctly. From my understanding this makes interest on your debt a huge problem. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on January 12, 2011, 06:23:06 AM Notionally the high level of debt for Man U sounds like it could be a problem, but as suggested before the exact definition of who holds the debt could be the simple way that it isn't.
More generally, as far as I'm aware, the club is run very well financially - huge operating profit, less than 50% of turnover spent on wages etc - so even if they get flagged with warning signs, they probably wouldn't face sanctions (as long as it's looked at by accountants and not done politically) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2011, 10:30:22 AM Fans who have just turned up in the last 5 years and think Chelsea are a big club this more so than any ever club lol bullshit, quantify this. Look at Man United, any of their fans actually live in Manc? errmmm Yes? 7,808 of them with season tickets according to the last (only?) study of where season ticket holders for the two Manchester clubs live (2001) found that there were more Manchester Postcodes on the Old Traffod list than there were on the Maine Rd list. Yet Citeh continue to claim the 'local' tag. Loads more in the peripheral postcodes too. Do Chelsea fans all live in Chelsea? What's this as a proportion of the stadia? Rather than clog the celery thread I'll respond to this here - Capacity in those years was around 65,000 so it's about 12%. There were another 3500 or so that lived in the surrounding postcodes too - making c18% The data is all rather old now, but it does rather kill the myth about MUFC supporters all living in Surrey... (which of course is actually a hotbed of Chelsea support) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on January 12, 2011, 11:25:56 AM "I hear a lot about the fans - that most of the people from Manchester are City fans." - Dzeko He'll fit in well I reckon. Yeah I giggled when he said that Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on January 12, 2011, 11:29:37 AM Clubs will be able to spend as much as they want on stadiums, training facilities and youth football. so just pay £25mill for a youngster then, job done Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on January 12, 2011, 12:42:36 PM I'm still puzzled over why they would have gone for two if they'd have scored. you posted at 21-16 presumably? a td makes it 21-22 which in the last few seconds is effectively the same as 21-23 as the chances of scoring a safety are basically zero. a 2 pointer though makes it a 3 point game so they can give up a fg and still go to ot. then a philly td screws your spread Ahh, I get it now. Cheers. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Robert HM on January 12, 2011, 06:37:29 PM http://newsthump.com/2010/12/31/referee-howard-webb-awarded-mbe-for-services-to-manchester-united/
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2011, 06:47:10 PM rotflmfao rotflmfao rotflmfao
new site for me liked this too http://newsthump.com/2011/01/10/psychiatrists-warn-of-the-mental-health-risks-associated-with-managing-liverpool/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 12, 2011, 07:16:14 PM If the % of city's stadium is higher they have a good shout for being the club of the city though?
Fans who have just turned up in the last 5 years and think Chelsea are a big club this more so than any ever club lol bullshit, quantify this. Look at Man United, any of their fans actually live in Manc? errmmm Yes? 7,808 of them with season tickets according to the last (only?) study of where season ticket holders for the two Manchester clubs live (2001) found that there were more Manchester Postcodes on the Old Traffod list than there were on the Maine Rd list. Yet Citeh continue to claim the 'local' tag. Loads more in the peripheral postcodes too. Do Chelsea fans all live in Chelsea? What's this as a proportion of the stadia? Rather than clog the celery thread I'll respond to this here - Capacity in those years was around 65,000 so it's about 12%. There were another 3500 or so that lived in the surrounding postcodes too - making c18% The data is all rather old now, but it does rather kill the myth about MUFC supporters all living in Surrey... (which of course is actually a hotbed of Chelsea support) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2011, 08:30:11 PM If the % of city's stadium is higher they have a good shout for being the club of the city though? TBH the whole analysis of this is so open to abusive interpretaion that it's barely worth arguing about But - if you can sell 78,000 tickets each game then you buiild a stadium that can accomodate that number - you then choose how many season ticket holders you want. If you select a manchester resident at random and ask if they have a season ticket for United or City then it is more likely that they will support United than City. Does that give United a shout at being the 'club of the city'? The study is pretty flawed if you're trying to prove one or the other so the answer to both your question and mine is probably no btw Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on January 12, 2011, 08:48:03 PM If the % of city's stadium is higher they have a good shout for being the club of the city though? .... If you select a manchester resident at random and ask if they have a season ticket for United or City then it is more likely that they will support United than City. Does that give United a shout at being the 'club of the city'? ... I don't think what proportion of a clubs support can possibly be used. If you have a club with a million fans and 900,000 of them are local - is that not the 'club of the city' just because another club has 10 season ticket holders and all 10 of them are local? The only basic measurement that makes any sense statistically and logically is what proportion of the city itself supports the club. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 12, 2011, 10:47:03 PM If the % of city's stadium is higher they have a good shout for being the club of the city though? TBH the whole analysis of this is so open to abusive interpretaion that it's barely worth arguing about But - if you can sell 78,000 tickets each game then you buiild a stadium that can accomodate that number - you then choose how many season ticket holders you want. If you select a manchester resident at random and ask if they have a season ticket for United or City then it is more likely that they will support United than City. Does that give United a shout at being the 'club of the city'? The study is pretty flawed if you're trying to prove one or the other so the answer to both your question and mine is probably no btw So we're agreed this 'evidence' is pants for any statistical analysis? City club of the city imo ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 13, 2011, 07:00:40 AM If the % of city's stadium is higher they have a good shout for being the club of the city though? TBH the whole analysis of this is so open to abusive interpretaion that it's barely worth arguing about But - if you can sell 78,000 tickets each game then you buiild a stadium that can accomodate that number - you then choose how many season ticket holders you want. If you select a manchester resident at random and ask if they have a season ticket for United or City then it is more likely that they will support United than City. Does that give United a shout at being the 'club of the city'? The study is pretty flawed if you're trying to prove one or the other so the answer to both your question and mine is probably no btw So we're agreed this 'evidence' is pants for any statistical analysis? City club of the city imo ;) Lol it seemed to be your opinion that replacing Hodgson with Dalglish would bring immediate impact .... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 13, 2011, 12:40:32 PM Nearly as funny as Utd as the club of Manchester!
If the % of city's stadium is higher they have a good shout for being the club of the city though? TBH the whole analysis of this is so open to abusive interpretaion that it's barely worth arguing about But - if you can sell 78,000 tickets each game then you buiild a stadium that can accomodate that number - you then choose how many season ticket holders you want. If you select a manchester resident at random and ask if they have a season ticket for United or City then it is more likely that they will support United than City. Does that give United a shout at being the 'club of the city'? The study is pretty flawed if you're trying to prove one or the other so the answer to both your question and mine is probably no btw So we're agreed this 'evidence' is pants for any statistical analysis? City club of the city imo ;) Lol it seemed to be your opinion that replacing Hodgson with Dalglish would bring immediate impact .... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 13, 2011, 02:14:45 PM anyone know how many of fc united's st holders are from the manc area? they're probs the club of the city even though they don't play in it
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on January 14, 2011, 08:56:39 AM anyone know how many of fc united's st holders are from the manc area? they're probs the club of the city even though they don't play in it bout 350 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 16, 2011, 05:04:38 PM Rafael has really slotted in to the Gary Neville complete twat role at utd.
Two footed jump in against Liverpool last week, Stevie G style lunge against Spurs that only gets a yellow.Also waving imaginary cards will endear you to most fans. For the record does anyone know if its a rule or not to get booked if you wave an imaginary card I though i had read that somewhere before but not too sure, I would have loved the ref to say to Rafael there you go theres your yellow card and hit the showers while you're at it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on January 16, 2011, 05:06:31 PM Rafael has really slotted in to the Gary Neville complete twat role at utd. Two footed jump in against Liverpool last week, Stevie G style lunge against Spurs that only gets a yellow.Also waving imaginary cards will endear you to most fans. For the record does anyone know if its a rule or not to get booked if you wave an imaginary card I though i had read that somewhere before but not too sure, I would have loved the ref to say to Rafael there you go theres your yellow card and hit the showers while you're at it. I thought that asking for a card like that also meant you got one but am not sure whether that rule actually came in to effect. I can't believe Andy Gray thought Crouch challenge was the same as Rafael's....I hate Andy Gray's commentary during a match (he's OK after it as I can switch it off then) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 16, 2011, 05:07:25 PM Rafael has really slotted in to the Gary Neville complete twat role at utd. Two footed jump in against Liverpool last week, Stevie G style lunge against Spurs that only gets a yellow.Also waving imaginary cards will endear you to most fans. For the record does anyone know if its a rule or not to get booked if you wave an imaginary card I though i had read that somewhere before but not too sure, I would have loved the ref to say to Rafael there you go theres your yellow card and hit the showers while you're at it. I agree. Reckon Rafael will follow in Neville's footsteps and become one of the best ever PL right backs Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 16, 2011, 05:08:44 PM Rafael has really slotted in to the Gary Neville complete twat role at utd. Two footed jump in against Liverpool last week, Stevie G style lunge against Spurs that only gets a yellow.Also waving imaginary cards will endear you to most fans. For the record does anyone know if its a rule or not to get booked if you wave an imaginary card I though i had read that somewhere before but not too sure, I would have loved the ref to say to Rafael there you go theres your yellow card and hit the showers while you're at it. I agree. Reckon Rafael will follow in Neville's footsteps and become one of the best ever PL right backs yea he's handling Bale well atm. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on January 16, 2011, 05:42:57 PM cya
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 16, 2011, 05:44:59 PM Rafael has really slotted in to the Gary Neville complete twat role at utd. Two footed jump in against Liverpool last week, Stevie G style lunge against Spurs that only gets a yellow.Also waving imaginary cards will endear you to most fans. For the record does anyone know if its a rule or not to get booked if you wave an imaginary card I though i had read that somewhere before but not too sure, I would have loved the ref to say to Rafael there you go theres your yellow card and hit the showers while you're at it. I thought that asking for a card like that also meant you got one but am not sure whether that rule actually came in to effect. I can't believe Andy Gray thought Crouch challenge was the same as Rafael's....I hate Andy Gray's commentary during a match (he's OK after it as I can switch it off then) This Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 16, 2011, 05:46:39 PM pretty sure imaginary cards still come under unsporting behaviour rather than specifically being a cautionable offence so it's down to the ref's discretion
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: maldini32 on January 16, 2011, 06:20:57 PM vidic was immense today (apart from getting away with pulling van de vaart's shirt in the box) and rafael is a ***** for doing the imaginary card thingy
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 16, 2011, 08:01:11 PM Still not playing anything like we know we can - too many misplaced passes too much possession conceded to think otherwise
Vidic was immense though and a very bright attacking side like Tottenham rarely threatened to score Still top of the League Still unbeaten Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 16, 2011, 08:17:05 PM Still not playing anything like we know we can - too many misplaced passes too much possession conceded to think otherwise Vidic was immense though and a very bright attacking side like Tottenham rarely threatened to score Still top of the League Still unbeaten Genuine Q - chances of the CL this season? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on January 16, 2011, 09:02:20 PM Still not playing anything like we know we can - too many misplaced passes too much possession conceded to think otherwise Vidic was immense though and a very bright attacking side like Tottenham rarely threatened to score Still top of the League Still unbeaten Genuine Q - chances of the CL this season? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 16, 2011, 10:01:53 PM Agree. I am shocked we are top tbh. We have been mediocre at best this year. Shows how shite everyone else is
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 16, 2011, 11:13:12 PM Pretty fair comment but can't see other great European sides smashing it up either tbh. Barca again?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on January 17, 2011, 07:51:00 AM Pretty fair comment but can't see other great European sides smashing it up either tbh. Barca again? It has to be Barca, the way they are going. and PSV for the Europa League obv :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 17, 2011, 08:30:14 AM There's obviously a strong case for taking Barca to win again but ...
In early 50 yrs of supporting United I've always been an optimist about their chances - even in the dark days of the 70s when Alex Stepney was our joint top goalscorer at Christmas and the original King scored that goal at Maine Rd I couldn't be miserable about our chances. We're playing badly by all measures - our top man is struggling, the midfield is short of class and the team isn't functioning as it should but we're still in the KO stages of the CL and the FA Cup and we're top of the league. Why shouldn't I believe? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on January 17, 2011, 09:24:54 AM Why shouldn't I believe? (http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/7402/xavilionelmessiandresin.jpg) I know you mentioned it, but there is no but Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Matt.NFFC. on January 17, 2011, 09:54:29 AM I just can't see how any other team can win the CL. It would take Barcelona having an off day and Rooney and Co. to come up with a spot of genius. Although this is possible, neither of those things has happened yet.
Barcelona unstoppable this season IMO. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 17, 2011, 10:05:31 AM Why shouldn't I believe? (http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/7402/xavilionelmessiandresin.jpg) I know you mentioned it, but there is no but Sigh... but the Leeds fans believed last season at OT Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheChipPrince on January 17, 2011, 10:08:15 AM v v difficult to beat Barca over 2 legs, but can certainly happen, although they would have to underperform in 2 legs and the other team be on top form.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on January 17, 2011, 10:08:53 AM Why shouldn't I believe? (http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/7402/xavilionelmessiandresin.jpg) I know you mentioned it, but there is no but Is it ghey to get a semi when looking at that picture? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 17, 2011, 04:29:59 PM Found this article interesting and thought it would be rude not to share here.
'What is it about Howard Webb and Old Trafford' asked the front-page blurb of F365 after Sunday's rather controversial FA Cup clash. Well now you can judge for yourself with our guide to his last ten matches at OT... Man United 1 Man City 2, February 10, 2008 City's victory is more comfortable than the scoreline suggests - United score their goal in injury-time - and Webb enjoys a relatively easy day at the office. The game marks the last time that United fail to win a game at Old Trafford officiated by the Yorkshireman. Man 2 United Arsenal 1, April 19, 2008 There is little argument from the Arsenal players - five of whom are booked during the 90 minutes - when William Gallas handles in the area and Webb awards a penalty that sees Cristiano Ronaldo equalise from the spot. Ten minutes later, Owen Hargreaves - remember him? - scores United's winner direct from a free-kick. "You could give or not give the penalty. For the free-kick, Gilberto did not touch him," complains Arsene Wenger. Man United 3 Chelsea 0, January 11, 2009 Less than 48 hours after Rafa Benitez advises Luiz Felipe Scolari to "man-mark" Ferguson and his coaching staff at half-time so that the referee is protected from interference, Webb cautions four Chelsea players within half an hour before a Nemanja Vidic header on the stroke of half-time sets United on their way to an emphatic victory. Just moments before the Vidic goal, Webb had ruled out a Wayne Rooney 'goal' after United had taken a short corner that went unnoticed by most spectators inside Old Trafford. Man United 2 Blackburn 1, February 21, 2009 Webb disallows a Jonny Evans header and cautions Cristiano Ronaldo for diving shortly before the forward scores the game's winning goal. Rovers complain afterwards that Ronaldo should have also been booked for flicking out - it hardly amounts to a kick - at David Dunn but the game's most controversial moment occurs in the final seconds when a clear shirt-pull inside the area by Rafael on Morten Gamst Pedersen goes unpunished. "It would have to be pretty blatant to get a penalty at Old Trafford. We all know that," rages an angry Sam Allardyce. "You'd have to ask Howard Webb if Ronaldo should have been on the pitch. Those things come and go when you're playing at Old Trafford, don't they?" Man United 5 Tottenham 2, April 24, 2009 In the words of the Daily Telegraph, 'it could have been the decision that secured United the championship'. United are trailing 2-0 with barely half an hour left to play when Webb - 'who was almost 35 yards away, and behind play' - awards a penalty when Heurelho Gomes tangles with Michael Carrick. Replays clearly show the goalkeeper took ball before man. "The players can't believe it," says Harry Redknapp. "It changed the game." Momentum shifted, Spurs collapse and United never looked back. "I think it was a case of a referee crumbling under the pressure at Old Trafford really," complains Jermaine Jenas. "The atmosphere, the occasion, the importance of the match, a lot of factors take their toll when making decisions. One thing which struck me about it was that he didn't even think. It was like he'd already made his mind up when he came out for the second half that he was going to give something. It was a very important moment in the season." Man United 3 Man City 1, January 27, 2010 Webb makes his first return to Old Trafford since the Gomes controversy for the second-leg Carling Cup semi-final. United eventually progress to Wembley courtesy of an injury-time aggregate winner from Wayne Rooney, but the outcome could have been very different had Rio Ferdinand justifiably received his marching orders after 24 minutes of play after a clash with Carlos Tevez. In the words of the BBC match report, 'Ferdinand was fortunate to escape punishment from referee Howard Webb when he caught the Argentine in the face with a swinging arm as they tussled for possession.' Man United 2 Liverpool 1, March 21, 2010 Sir Alex Ferguson and Rafa Benitez clash on the touchline after Webb awards the home side a controversial 19th-minute penalty that enables the champions to draw level after Fernando Torres' early opener. With replays also showing that the initial contact between Javier Mascherano and Antonio Valencia occurred outside of the box, Benitez accuses the United player of diving to win the penalty. Ferguson responds by applauding Webb's decision and arguing Mascherano should have been dismissed. "Refs are professional but we know about the influence of Sir Alex in everything," counters Benitez. Man United 3 Liverpool 2, September 19, 2010 Though Liverpool claw their way back into the match through two disputed decisions, neither call is made by Webb. "They didn't offer anything and depended on decisions from the linesman to get back in the game," notes Sir Alex. With Darren Cann flagging for both infringements, and replays offering no evidence that Webb would have awarded either the free-kick or the penalty from which Steven Gerrard scores, the referee's big decision of the day is whether or not to dismiss last man John O'Shea for pulling back Fernando Torres. As F365 argued at the time: 'The decision was taken quickly and apparently made without any consultation between Webb and Darren Cann, his long-time assistant whose flag-waving prompted the award of a free-kick. Ref365 argues in support of Webb on the basis that replays 'suggest' Torres would not have reached the ball. Denied the use of a replay, it must have been a 50-50 call from the officials and it's certainly debatable whether a defender making such a cynical foul in the full knowledge that he was the last man deserved the benefit of any doubt.' Man United 1 Arsenal 0, December 13, 2010 Cann is not on duty and it is Webb's new assistant Dave Bryan who awards United a second-half penalty for a non-existent handball by Gael Clichy. Webb rubber-stamps the award and justice - or something close to it - is only served when Rooney blazes over the ball. Four of the visitors are cautioned over the course of the game, while Rio Ferdinand escapes punishment for a hip-high, studs-up challenge on Bacary Sagna and Darren Fletcher isn't even cautioned for chasing after Webb before pushing the official. Man United 1 Liverpool 0, January 9, 2011 In sharp contrast to events six months previously, it is Webb, from a distance of around 25 yards, who awards United their match-winning penalty for an alleged offence that occurs on almost exactly the same part of the pitch that saw Cann award Liverpool their penalty at Old Trafford in September. Replays indicate that Berbatov falls to the ground in an exaggerated fashion and show that Webb linesman did not signal that any foul took place. "The penalty is a joke," says new Pool boss Kenny Dalglish. The Scot is further aggrieved by Webb's decision to dismiss Steven Gerrard but there is little sympathy for the Liverpool captain after his reckless lunge. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on January 17, 2011, 04:36:01 PM So he only made mistakes in Utd's favour in the last 8 out of the last 10 matches? That's not too bad.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 17, 2011, 05:05:28 PM Apparently he was biassed towards Spain too
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/worldcup2010/article-1293917/WORLD-CUP-2010-Holland-0-Spain-1--Dirty-Dutch-whine-Webb-bias.html Seriously though, 'we wuz robbed' is the oldest cry in football Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on January 17, 2011, 05:13:52 PM Apparently he was biassed towards Spain too http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/worldcup2010/article-1293917/WORLD-CUP-2010-Holland-0-Spain-1--Dirty-Dutch-whine-Webb-bias.html Seriously though, 'we wuz robbed' is the oldest cry in football lol, that might just have been V Marwijk in the heat of the moment. Noone in Holland actually said this. (mainly because we missed most of the match as our heads were in our hands with shame at some of the challenges) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 17, 2011, 07:28:31 PM Interestingly, and the whole thing is probably ripe for a tl;dr, Howard Webb is statistically prioven to 'favour' Liverpool almost as much as United
If you're researching from a Gooner perspective that is... http://blog.emiratesstadium.info/archives/8938 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on January 17, 2011, 07:33:45 PM Why shouldn't I believe? (http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/7402/xavilionelmessiandresin.jpg) I know you mentioned it, but there is no but Is it ghey to get a semi when looking at that picture? Probably but only a semi? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 17, 2011, 09:33:29 PM Apparently he was biassed towards Spain too http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/worldcup2010/article-1293917/WORLD-CUP-2010-Holland-0-Spain-1--Dirty-Dutch-whine-Webb-bias.html Seriously though, 'we wuz robbed' is the oldest cry in football Biased no. Bottler yes. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 21, 2011, 12:21:53 PM Doesn't look like we're adding to the squad this month - no real surprise there. Valencia is on his way back and there's plenty of decent cover available unless both Ferdinand and Vidic get injured/suspended at the same time.
Next four league games, Birmingham (H), Blackpool (A), Villa (H), Wolves (A) with a nice trip to the south coast for the Cup game in the middle. Our unbeaten start in the League should be extended to 25 games by the time the City game comes round Will Mancini be going for the away win that day? Or will it be the standard 4-5-1 away formation? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on January 21, 2011, 12:28:40 PM Doesn't look like we're adding to the squad this month - no real surprise there. Valencia is on his way back and there's plenty of decent cover available unless both Ferdinand and Vidic get injured/suspended at the same time. Next four league games, Birmingham (H), Blackpool (A), Villa (H), Wolves (A) with a nice trip to the south coast for the Cup game in the middle. Our unbeaten start in the League should be extended to 25 games by the time the City game comes round Will Mancini be going for the away win that day? Or will it be the standard 4-5-1 away formation? Standard 4-5-1 would be my guess. Mancini only cares about getting top 4, he really doesn't seem to care about anything other than that Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 21, 2011, 02:30:40 PM Doesn't look like we're adding to the squad this month - no real surprise there. Valencia is on his way back and there's plenty of decent cover available unless both Ferdinand and Vidic get injured/suspended at the same time. Next four league games, Birmingham (H), Blackpool (A), Villa (H), Wolves (A) with a nice trip to the south coast for the Cup game in the middle. Our unbeaten start in the League should be extended to 25 games by the time the City game comes round Will Mancini be going for the away win that day? Or will it be the standard 4-5-1 away formation? Standard 4-5-1 would be my guess. Mancini only cares about getting top 4, he really doesn't seem to care about anything other than that He probably won't be there to see the plan through then. City fans won't settle for pragmatism in the derby - another 0-0 with them showing no great ambition to put one over on us by ending the unbeaten run won't count for much even if it helps them to 4th or even 3rd or 2nd Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on January 21, 2011, 02:33:29 PM Doesn't look like we're adding to the squad this month - no real surprise there. Valencia is on his way back and there's plenty of decent cover available unless both Ferdinand and Vidic get injured/suspended at the same time. Next four league games, Birmingham (H), Blackpool (A), Villa (H), Wolves (A) with a nice trip to the south coast for the Cup game in the middle. Our unbeaten start in the League should be extended to 25 games by the time the City game comes round Will Mancini be going for the away win that day? Or will it be the standard 4-5-1 away formation? Standard 4-5-1 would be my guess. Mancini only cares about getting top 4, he really doesn't seem to care about anything other than that He probably won't be there to see the plan through then. City fans won't settle for pragmatism in the derby - another 0-0 with them showing no great ambition to put one over on us by ending the unbeaten run won't count for much even if it helps them to 4th or even 3rd or 2nd I hope he isn't, he's a boring manager that seems to prefer the standard catanachio of the old school Italian clubs. I hate watching City play, they have all the talent in the world and then decide to settle for the draw in the big games. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sledge13 on January 21, 2011, 02:49:34 PM Its the most boring uninspiring Man Utd team since the start of the Premiership, yet they are unbeaten and top of the league... ;carlocitrone;
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 21, 2011, 03:46:40 PM Its the most boring uninspiring Man Utd team since the start of the Premiership, yet they are unbeaten and top of the league... ;carlocitrone; It's really hard to argue with that - and it's so frustrating because we could be so much better. The Blackburn game should have been the kickstart we needed but it isn't happening. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 23, 2011, 12:18:53 PM 5-0 false dawn or United kicking into gear?
Still can't make my mind up about Berba. 3rd hat trick of the season but still haven't quite got the faith that he's gonna continue firing on all cylinders. What I do know is if Rooney rediscovers his form of last season we're gonna take some stopping Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 23, 2011, 12:43:24 PM 5-0 false dawn or United kicking into gear? Still can't make my mind up about Berba. 3rd hat trick of the season but still haven't quite got the faith that he's gonna continue firing on all cylinders. What I do know is if Rooney rediscovers his form of last season we're gonna take some stopping Haven't seen any of it 'cos I was a bit busy with the pokerz yesterday, but this is already Berba's most proflific premier league season and there's nearly half of it to go. Three hat-tricks against poor sides distorts the figures a little, but as someone posted in another context, form is temporary, class is permanent. According to the Telegraph write-up Rooney was a key factor in the performance? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on January 25, 2011, 09:30:53 PM Congratulations on winning the title.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 25, 2011, 09:33:47 PM Sigh at the stone wall pen not gave when it was 2-0, bottle job
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 26, 2011, 03:58:25 PM Disappointed at the lack of flaming when United were 2-0 down
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 26, 2011, 03:59:52 PM George if you have seen footage of the match , was that a stonewaller or what?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 26, 2011, 04:22:13 PM Not seen it yet unfort (not doing a Wenger). Was at a mates playing the pokers. Will report back. Maybe it was and tbh when I saw we were 2-0 even I said "well there goes the unbeaten record"
Somehow, as bad as we at the moment, we pull the rabbit out of the hat. SAF- hate him or love him (most of you hate him obv)- LEGEND! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sledge13 on January 26, 2011, 04:30:27 PM Not seen it yet unfort (not doing a Wenger). Was at a mates playing the pokers. Will report back. Maybe it was and tbh when I saw we were 2-0 even I said "well there goes the unbeaten record" Somehow, as bad as we at the moment, we pull the rabbit out of the hat. SAF- hate him or love him (most of you hate him obv)- LEGEND! Best manager of the last 30 years no doubt, pulls off terrible Rooney and they score 3 goals...deffo penalty tho! good effort Blackpool... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on January 26, 2011, 05:28:15 PM I agree unfortunately. Spent the last 15 years waiting for him to retire/die and hes slowrolled me a few times. Hopefully only a few more years now.
Sledge you forgot to mention the York v Manchester result. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sledge13 on January 26, 2011, 05:51:52 PM I agree unfortunately. Spent the last 15 years waiting for him to retire/die and hes slowrolled me a few times. Hopefully only a few more years now. Sledge you forgot to mention the York v Manchester result. Dammit so I did John! BUT get it right fella, it was Manchester V York, 0-3 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 26, 2011, 07:43:11 PM Just viewed it
Penalty obv Not given though... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 26, 2011, 09:31:46 PM I'm a heretic but agree. FMMFCOAL!
I a 2dgree unfortunately. Spent the last 15 years waiting for him to retire/die and hes slowrolled me a few times. Hopefully only a few more years now. Sledge you forgot to mention the York v Manchester result. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 26, 2011, 09:59:21 PM Theres you successor bet too Horner dont forget
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on January 27, 2011, 12:25:39 AM hahahahaha nh forgot about that for like the 15th time in 6 years.
Hes doing a good job at Leicester tbf. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on February 02, 2011, 09:05:23 PM Neville retires.
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,,12040_6718989,0.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 02, 2011, 10:19:37 PM GG Gary Neville. Legend
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on February 02, 2011, 10:33:17 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on February 02, 2011, 11:44:57 PM lolz Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 03, 2011, 03:59:54 PM lolz Never understood the hate... 602 games for his one club, 85 caps, a few trophies along the way... Is it envy? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on February 03, 2011, 04:05:33 PM I dislike him. He wrote (or someone else did for him) in his autobiography the he hated all Leeds fans and thought they were all muppets.
I really hope he wont be on Sky as some of the papers have hinted at. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 03, 2011, 06:19:32 PM lolz Never understood the hate... 602 games for his one club, 85 caps, a few trophies along the way... Is it envy? No probs saying he's a very good RB. Less problems saying he's a twat. If I was ever jealous of that face I'd have to shoot myself. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 04, 2011, 10:20:25 PM lolz Never understood the hate... 602 games for his one club, 85 caps, a few trophies along the way... Is it envy? No probs saying he's a very good RB. Less problems saying he's a twat. If I was ever jealous of that face I'd have to shoot myself. sounds like envy to me Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: kinboshi on February 06, 2011, 10:22:16 AM RIP those who died in the Munich disaster 53 years ago today.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: booder on February 06, 2011, 11:44:13 AM RIP those who died in the Munich disaster 53 years ago today. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: ItsMrAlex2u on February 06, 2011, 12:49:43 PM lolz Never understood the hate... 602 games for his one club, 85 caps, a few trophies along the way... Is it envy? No probs saying he's a very good RB. Less problems saying he's a twat. If I was ever jealous of that face I'd have to shoot myself. sounds like envy to me Neville thrives on the wind up and hating citeh, leeds and liverpool. Not just professional rivalry, he makes no secret of the hate, so no shock when he is hated back. I am a Liverpool fan but respect the likes of Ryan Giggs for being the ultimate professional and an excellent role model for aspiring footballers. Gary Neville though.... grease fire is too good for him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 06, 2011, 02:27:20 PM lolz Never understood the hate... 602 games for his one club, 85 caps, a few trophies along the way... Is it envy? No probs saying he's a very good RB. Less problems saying he's a twat. If I was ever jealous of that face I'd have to shoot myself. sounds like envy to me Yeah sigh, I wish I was that good looking. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 06, 2011, 02:39:05 PM RIP those who died in the Munich disaster 53 years ago today. My father knew his football and said that Duncan Edwards was the best he ever saw... YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pr75rgusNJU Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on February 12, 2011, 03:34:18 PM Incred Rooney !! Not since Trevor Sinclair have i seen such a perfectly executed overhaed kick.
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_YgCH-qwaM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on February 12, 2011, 11:52:35 PM Shins it doesn't he?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on February 13, 2011, 10:10:33 AM Incred Rooney !! Not since Trevor Sinclair have i seen such a perfectly executed overhaed kick. YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_YgCH-qwaM lol Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on February 13, 2011, 12:21:33 PM Incred Rooney !! Not since Trevor Sinclair have i seen such a perfectly executed overhaed kick. lol Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on February 13, 2011, 10:13:41 PM Incred Rooney !! Not since Trevor Sinclair have i seen such a perfectly executed overhaed kick. lol lol..fair point and I couldn't do it but it's not perfectly executed...great goal but a bit overhyped. Hell, it's not even Rooney's best goal ever IMO. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on February 14, 2011, 06:17:02 AM Incred Rooney !! Not since Trevor Sinclair have i seen such a perfectly executed overhaed kick. lol lol..fair point and I couldn't do it but it's not perfectly executed...great goal but a bit overhyped. Hell, it's not even Rooney's best goal ever IMO. imo they're a bit like goalkeepers saving penalties - there is skill involved, but with just as much luck as well - looks good when they pull it off though and they get a disproportionate amount of praise for them. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 14, 2011, 05:28:15 PM Incred Rooney !! Not since Trevor Sinclair have i seen such a perfectly executed overhaed kick. lol lol..fair point and I couldn't do it but it's not perfectly executed...great goal but a bit overhyped. Hell, it's not even Rooney's best goal ever IMO. imo they're a bit like goalkeepers saving penalties - there is skill involved, but with just as much luck as well - looks good when they pull it off though and they get a disproportionate amount of praise for them. Usually from armchair journos who've never tried an overhead kick in their life! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on February 19, 2011, 10:42:17 PM Obertan and Bebe, worst ever Man UTD players?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheChipPrince on February 19, 2011, 11:02:05 PM Obertan and Bebe, worst ever Man UTD players? I call your Beborbertan, and raise you David Bellion!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on February 19, 2011, 11:56:36 PM Bebe was abs terrible I will be shocked if this goes the other way, he was ridic bad
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on February 20, 2011, 08:43:44 AM Djemba Djemba?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 22, 2011, 10:35:30 AM Djemba Djemba? so bad they named him twice - arrived at the club in the same summer as Kleberson, also a contender to be at the head of any list of SAF's bad buys. Kleberson was supposed to replace Juan Sebastian Veron which in a sense he did The current crop of second string players includes too many who lack substance. Obertan has had his chances, seems unlikely he's got anything more to show. Bebe? Can't see theres much there to deserve too many opportunities. Gibson - an enigma, i think he suffers, as does Carrick, from just 'not being Paul Scholes'. All that being said, we have Park, Hernandez, Smalling, Valencia when fit, Owen, Carrick, Brown, O'Shea and errmmmmm ;carlocitrone; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on February 28, 2011, 02:18:25 PM How did Shrek manage to get away with that elbow the other day? Its an absolute joke system the FA have.
MOTD shows that twattenburg clearly wasnt even looking at the incident and yet he's now coming out saying he saw it and was happy with his decision, so apparently you must be allowed go round throwing stray elbows. Then you have to listen to Fergie whinging that there will be a witchhunt because It's Rooney and there was nothing in it. Fck off Fergie, such bullshit. It was hard to ban Rooney with Chelsea and Liverpool on the horizon I guess. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 28, 2011, 03:42:09 PM How did Shrek manage to get away with that elbow the other day? Its an absolute joke system the FA have. MOTD shows that twattenburg clearly wasnt even looking at the incident and yet he's now coming out saying he saw it and was happy with his decision, so apparently you must be allowed go round throwing stray elbows. Then you have to listen to Fergie whinging that there will be a witchhunt because It's Rooney and there was nothing in it. Fck off Fergie, such bullshit. It was hard to ban Rooney with Chelsea and Liverpool on the horizon I guess. It's shocking isn't it compare and contrast two similar incidents http://soccertvlive.blogspot.com/2011/02/video-rooney-elbow-wigan-wayne-rooney.html (http://soccertvlive.blogspot.com/2011/02/video-rooney-elbow-wigan-wayne-rooney.html) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on February 28, 2011, 03:59:22 PM They look similar at first but if you look closely you will see that one is against Michael Brown.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on February 28, 2011, 03:59:56 PM I think theres an obvious difference Brown and Gerrard are running towards the ball and Brown is turning round looking for stevie with his arm already raised he was just bet to it thats all that happened there. Where as Rooney was totally unprovoked and then you have the ref lying that he saw it when MOTD shows that he wasnt looking.
Whats your own summation of the two incidents? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 28, 2011, 04:26:45 PM I think theres an obvious difference Brown and Gerrard are running towards the ball and Brown is turning round looking for stevie with his arm already raised he was just bet to it thats all that happened there. Where as Rooney was totally unprovoked and then you have the ref lying that he saw it when MOTD shows that he wasnt looking. Whats your own summation of the two incidents? They look similar at first but if you look closely you will see that one is against Michael Brown. /\/\/\/\/\/\This is a fair point. My view is that United supporters will rationalise it in the same way that LFC supporters rationalised Gerrard's. You say "Brown and Gerrard are running towards the ball and Brown is turning round looking for stevie with his arm already raised he was just bet to it thats all that happened there" I say "McCartjy moves into Rooney's path to block his run towards the ball, Rooney defends himself against a bodycheck." Both should be punished, Gerrard wasn't, I doubt that Rooney will be. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on March 01, 2011, 03:03:01 PM Quote I say "McCartjy moves into Rooney's path to block his run towards the ball, Rooney defends himself against a bodycheck." this is a beautiful line. Chelsea fans can say; Ashley Cole was protecting himself from the intern's falling piece of paper so he shot him. Rooney should have gotten a massive ban for his action there, there is no excuse....other than that he's Wayne Rooney, plays for ManU, the ref is a complete and utter spanner and the FA have no balls whatsoever. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 01, 2011, 03:11:21 PM Quote I say "McCartjy moves into Rooney's path to block his run towards the ball, Rooney defends himself against a bodycheck." this is a beautiful line. Chelsea fans can say; Ashley Cole was protecting himself from the intern's falling piece of paper so he shot him. Rooney should have gotten a massive ban for his action there, there is no excuse....other than that he's Wayne Rooney, plays for ManU, the ref is a complete and utter spanner and the FA have no balls whatsoever. Did you read all of the post that you have selectively quoted from? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on March 01, 2011, 04:24:15 PM Quote I say "McCartjy moves into Rooney's path to block his run towards the ball, Rooney defends himself against a bodycheck." this is a beautiful line. Chelsea fans can say; Ashley Cole was protecting himself from the intern's falling piece of paper so he shot him. Rooney should have gotten a massive ban for his action there, there is no excuse....other than that he's Wayne Rooney, plays for ManU, the ref is a complete and utter spanner and the FA have no balls whatsoever. Did you read all of the post that you have selectively quoted from? Yeah, and I see you agree that he should be banned and were only saying it in response to the Gerrard thing...I just thought it was a beautiful, almost Ancelotti like line. "Our players are not out of control at all, they are all professionals and who hasn't made a mistake in the past?" is roughly what he said yesterday. You're right Carl baby, except that we never shot anyone at work, you ball-less plonker. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on March 01, 2011, 10:32:32 PM (http://i454.photobucket.com/albums/qq267/ppokerfan/elbow.gif)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 02, 2011, 09:22:14 AM Referee Mr. Martin Atkinson's record for Chelsea: P-16 W-15 D-1 L-0 For-38 Against-2. 12th men for Chelsea, surely not!?
(http://a323.yahoofs.com/ymg/ept_sports_sow_experts__17/ept_sports_sow_experts-560011527-1299023829.jpg?ymVvxoEDp9TbRDUG) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on March 02, 2011, 09:40:25 AM It's a nice stat but won't most refs have similar records for the big teams? Before this season Chelsea had lost 26 times in the last 228 games Pretty obvious that the loss collumn is never going to be that high.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 02, 2011, 10:40:54 AM It's a nice stat but won't most refs have similar records for the big teams? Before this season Chelsea had lost 26 times in the last 228 games Pretty obvious that the loss collumn is never going to be that high. shhhhh these threads aren't supposed to feature reasoned debate! Otherwise people wouldn't be able to whinge about the number of penalties awarded to United at OT (a factor of the amount of time United spend in the opposition penalty area) At least the picture appears to be genuine on this occasion - no Babel-style photoshoppery there Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on March 02, 2011, 01:26:49 PM "We cant dispute a referees decision" Mike Phelan 26th Feb 2011
QFT Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on March 02, 2011, 01:47:05 PM "We cant dispute a referees decision" Mike Phelan 26th Feb 2011 QFT VWP Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 06, 2011, 02:24:13 PM caragher is pure filth
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MC on March 06, 2011, 02:26:35 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MC on March 06, 2011, 02:31:57 PM caragher is pure filth just seen replay, pretty lucky to still be on the pitch Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 06, 2011, 02:32:31 PM for every bad rafael challenge you post ill post 10 disgusting filtt ridden carragher ones that guy is as spiteful and disgusting as a professional footballer gets. the day someone snaps his leg in a challenge and ends his career is maybe a day when he looks back at his conduct on the pitch Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2011, 03:12:27 PM Today feels a lot like last season- we were challenging on all fronts then our season fizzled out.
Ive maintained all season we are below par and somehow still top of the league. Just hope Arsenal do their usual bottle job otherwise I think we will struggle again close season. I would love us to buy another striker in the summer and a box to box player in midfield who can contribute with goals- Scholes/Carrick/Anderson and Fletcher all prefer to sit deep. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on March 06, 2011, 03:36:40 PM Alright lads , hows it going in here? Having a good day?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: maldini32 on March 06, 2011, 03:38:17 PM Highlight of the day Nani crying like a bitch
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on March 06, 2011, 04:01:14 PM lol
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: ItsMrAlex2u on March 06, 2011, 04:09:35 PM for every bad rafael challenge you post ill post 10 disgusting filtt ridden carragher ones that guy is as spiteful and disgusting as a professional footballer gets. the day someone snaps his leg in a challenge and ends his career is maybe a day when he looks back at his conduct on the pitch *Cough* Gary Neville *Cough* Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2011, 06:13:28 PM for every bad rafael challenge you post ill post 10 disgusting filtt ridden carragher ones that guy is as spiteful and disgusting as a professional footballer gets. the day someone snaps his leg in a challenge and ends his career is maybe a day when he looks back at his conduct on the pitch *Cough* Gary Neville *Cough* gtfo Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on March 07, 2011, 09:10:36 AM What do Man U fans think of Fergies tactics in the last couple of games?
For ages now United have been a 451 team in big games. Playing not to lose and hoping that they can nick one at the other end. This week he went 442 twice and lost twice. I know decisions went against you and 2 points wouldn't have been amazing results either but psycologically it would have been a lot better. I get the feeling he started to believe they had already won the title and went out to try and embarrass both Chelsea and Liverpool to stop people saying it was the worst United team for ages. It backfired and we might now actually have a title race. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 07, 2011, 09:27:48 AM Great performance. I'm not having "manu were poor, Liverpool weren't good". Manu are top of the league and this was a Liverpool side embarrassed by West Ham last week. Today Liverpool wanted it, and were too much for an underperforming manu side, but one that underperformed under the tempo and pressure from Liverpool. Suarez, Kuyt and Mereiles exceptional. SAF is arguably (almost unarguably) the best manager in Premier League history - he's delivered trophies for over two decades so I'm not going to start questioning his tactics and team selection in two games, played away from home against two teams with a huge incentive to beat us. Two more big games this week - ask the question again next Monday after Marseille and Arsenal. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on March 07, 2011, 12:01:41 PM What do Man U fans think of Fergies tactics in the last couple of games? Also meant to mention this point - Fletcher. He's the ultimate big game player. He breaks down so many of the oppositions attacks that you are much less likely to lose with him in the team. Doesn't offer a lot going forward but I think he has scored some headers to decide big games in the past. Overlooked yesterday, I believe, because Fergie wanted/tried to show that it wasn't a tough game anymore and that they didn't have to play negatively as there was little threat from Liverpool.For ages now United have been a 451 team in big games. Playing not to lose and hoping that they can nick one at the other end. This week he went 442 twice and lost twice. I know decisions went against you and 2 points wouldn't have been amazing results either but psycologically it would have been a lot better. I get the feeling he started to believe they had already won the title and went out to try and embarrass both Chelsea and Liverpool to stop people saying it was the worst United team for ages. It backfired and we might now actually have a title race. Then came accross this "Last 7 games vs. Liverpool: 3 wins and 4 defeats. Every time we've won, Fletcher has started; every time we've lost he hasn't" Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 07, 2011, 01:01:13 PM What do Man U fans think of Fergies tactics in the last couple of games? Also meant to mention this point - Fletcher. He's the ultimate big game player. He breaks down so many of the oppositions attacks that you are much less likely to lose with him in the team. Doesn't offer a lot going forward but I think he has scored some headers to decide big games in the past. Overlooked yesterday, I believe, because Fergie wanted/tried to show that it wasn't a tough game anymore and that they didn't have to play negatively as there was little threat from Liverpool.For ages now United have been a 451 team in big games. Playing not to lose and hoping that they can nick one at the other end. This week he went 442 twice and lost twice. I know decisions went against you and 2 points wouldn't have been amazing results either but psycologically it would have been a lot better. I get the feeling he started to believe they had already won the title and went out to try and embarrass both Chelsea and Liverpool to stop people saying it was the worst United team for ages. It backfired and we might now actually have a title race. Then came accross this "Last 7 games vs. Liverpool: 3 wins and 4 defeats. Every time we've won, Fletcher has started; every time we've lost he hasn't" The point about Fletcher is a good one, and well made. I just don't believe that SAF leaving him out can be put down to the motives you're implying. That being said, I'm not sure why Carrick started and Fletcher didn't. But then, I can't even get a winning team going on Championship Manager. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: kinboshi on March 07, 2011, 01:14:05 PM I thought Fletcher was unwell?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on March 07, 2011, 02:52:05 PM [ ] The game against Arsenal in the FA Cup is a big game.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 07, 2011, 04:44:55 PM [ ] The game against Arsenal in the FA Cup is a big game. You think trophy-starved Arsenal think this? Seriously? Will they still think this if they don't progress in the CL this week? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on March 07, 2011, 05:32:21 PM [ ] The game against Arsenal in the FA Cup is a big game. You think trophy-starved Arsenal think this? Seriously? Will they still think this if they don't progress in the CL this week? I certainly think that the FA Cup is a distant third when it comes to our present priorities. We'll only know how important is is to AW when we see the team-sheet, but I expect a team at least half-full of squad-players, hopefully more than half-full if we progress in the CL tomorrow. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 07, 2011, 09:32:15 PM can we get the spam off this thread please?
In fergie we trust altho I do agree seems strange he has abandoned his 451 policy against the bigger teams Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 09, 2011, 11:03:42 AM http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12676378
David Gill questioned by Commons Committee - 'comfortable' with finances although obviously would prefer not to be paying £45m interest... Net debt falling, slowly. Revenues up 150% since 2006. There's also a comment about not tlalking to MUST, because they are 'at war' with the club. Seems somewhat harsh and potentially counter-productive. Feels like it comes from the Glazers. In passing, is Saturday's game now a big one for Arsenal? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 09, 2011, 11:05:01 AM its a huge game for us - nevermind arsenal
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 09, 2011, 12:16:23 PM its a huge game for us - nevermind arsenal I agree, Ralph didn't... [ ] The game against Arsenal in the FA Cup is a big game. You think trophy-starved Arsenal think this? Seriously? Will they still think this if they don't progress in the CL this week? I certainly think that the FA Cup is a distant third when it comes to our present priorities. We'll only know how important is is to AW when we see the team-sheet, but I expect a team at least half-full of squad-players, hopefully more than half-full if we progress in the CL tomorrow. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 09, 2011, 12:23:05 PM i would say that all things considered this is as important a game as the '99 FA cup semi final - in terms of the remainder of our season
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 09, 2011, 07:56:32 PM Highlight of the day Nani crying like a bitch Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 09, 2011, 07:58:18 PM He is but he's gotten it wrong so much in Europe. Do you think 2 champions leagues is enough with the sides he's built?
Great performance. I'm not having "manu were poor, Liverpool weren't good". Manu are top of the league and this was a Liverpool side embarrassed by West Ham last week. Today Liverpool wanted it, and were too much for an underperforming manu side, but one that underperformed under the tempo and pressure from Liverpool. Suarez, Kuyt and Mereiles exceptional. SAF is arguably (almost unarguably) the best manager in Premier League history - he's delivered trophies for over two decades so I'm not going to start questioning his tactics and team selection in two games, played away from home against two teams with a huge incentive to beat us. Two more big games this week - ask the question again next Monday after Marseille and Arsenal. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 10, 2011, 10:34:21 AM He is but he's gotten it wrong so much in Europe. Do you think 2 champions leagues is enough with the sides he's built? to be fair, that's not a bad point - we've struggled in Europe at times, but so have a lot of other clubs with a similar pedigree. Forest were the last team to win back to back European Cups and that was in the old KO days. We've won it twice in SAFs reign, and were (well-)beaten finalists once. Barcelona have three in modern times, as do Real and AC Milan, but that's about it for multiple winners, so maybe 2 is enough, maybe not. We've won a fair amount of other stuff during his reign though Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on March 10, 2011, 01:47:50 PM http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12676378 David Gill questioned by Commons Committee - 'comfortable' with finances although obviously would prefer not to be paying £45m interest... Net debt falling, slowly. Revenues up 150% since 2006. There's also a comment about not tlalking to MUST, because they are 'at war' with the club. Seems somewhat harsh and potentially counter-productive. Feels like it comes from the Glazers. In passing, is Saturday's game now a big one for Arsenal? It is of course a much bigger game for us now that we are out of the CL. It'll be interesting to see how strong a team fergie puts out with Tuesday in mind. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 11, 2011, 10:58:20 AM http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/9421980.stm
like i said............................. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: CHIPPYMAN on March 11, 2011, 10:36:01 PM WHY MY POST WERE ALL CANCELLED??????????/
CANT I HAVE MY SAY??/?? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on March 11, 2011, 10:41:35 PM WHY MY POST WERE ALL CANCELLED??????????/ Obv not, pretty harsh imo. V,funny.CANT I HAVE MY SAY??/?? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 12, 2011, 02:27:26 PM He is but he's gotten it wrong so much in Europe. Do you think 2 champions leagues is enough with the sides he's built? to be fair, that's not a bad point - we've struggled in Europe at times, but so have a lot of other clubs with a similar pedigree. Forest were the last team to win back to back European Cups and that was in the old KO days. We've won it twice in SAFs reign, and were (well-)beaten finalists once. Barcelona have three in modern times, as do Real and AC Milan, but that's about it for multiple winners, so maybe 2 is enough, maybe not. We've won a fair amount of other stuff during his reign though 1999 and 2008? It's not like the same team has won it more than once. I'm not saying it's a poor record but with teams he's built it should be more. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 13, 2011, 12:01:09 PM He is but he's gotten it wrong so much in Europe. Do you think 2 champions leagues is enough with the sides he's built? to be fair, that's not a bad point - we've struggled in Europe at times, but so have a lot of other clubs with a similar pedigree. Forest were the last team to win back to back European Cups and that was in the old KO days. We've won it twice in SAFs reign, and were (well-)beaten finalists once. Barcelona have three in modern times, as do Real and AC Milan, but that's about it for multiple winners, so maybe 2 is enough, maybe not. We've won a fair amount of other stuff during his reign though 1999 and 2008? It's not like the same team has won it more than once. I'm not saying it's a poor record but with teams he's built it should be more. you obviously have an agenda that is against acknowledging SAFs achievements, but consider this - he's built three Premiere League dominating teams, and two CL winning teams with the potential to make that three this year (if Barcelona FC is stricken by ebola virus) and as said before - the days when Paisly could win three with the same team are gone, it's not just 5 matches, four home and away and a Final nowadays Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: ItsMrAlex2u on March 13, 2011, 12:28:00 PM http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/9421980.stm like i said............................. But its ok for Rooney to elbow someone in the face which SAF brushes off and accuses the press of singling Rooney out? Not excusing the tackle, it was poor, but the double standards are just rediculous. Hoping for an all Manchester final now to keep the comp interesting Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on March 13, 2011, 12:37:17 PM He is but he's gotten it wrong so much in Europe. Do you think 2 champions leagues is enough with the sides he's built? to be fair, that's not a bad point - we've struggled in Europe at times, but so have a lot of other clubs with a similar pedigree. Forest were the last team to win back to back European Cups and that was in the old KO days. We've won it twice in SAFs reign, and were (well-)beaten finalists once. Barcelona have three in modern times, as do Real and AC Milan, but that's about it for multiple winners, so maybe 2 is enough, maybe not. We've won a fair amount of other stuff during his reign though 1999 and 2008? It's not like the same team has won it more than once. I'm not saying it's a poor record but with teams he's built it should be more. you obviously have an agenda that is against acknowledging SAFs achievements, but consider this - he's built three Premiere League dominating teams, and two CL winning teams with the potential to make that three this year (if Barcelona FC is stricken by ebola virus) and as said before - the days when Paisly could win three with the same team are gone, it's not just 5 matches, four home and away and a Final nowadays Essentially it is just 7 matches: last 16, last 8, last 4 and final. The group stage of the CL is a meaningless money making vehicle for the big clubs. All the fancied teams sail through woth no problems and usually play second or third stringers in the last 2 group games. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 13, 2011, 12:49:19 PM He is but he's gotten it wrong so much in Europe. Do you think 2 champions leagues is enough with the sides he's built? to be fair, that's not a bad point - we've struggled in Europe at times, but so have a lot of other clubs with a similar pedigree. Forest were the last team to win back to back European Cups and that was in the old KO days. We've won it twice in SAFs reign, and were (well-)beaten finalists once. Barcelona have three in modern times, as do Real and AC Milan, but that's about it for multiple winners, so maybe 2 is enough, maybe not. We've won a fair amount of other stuff during his reign though 1999 and 2008? It's not like the same team has won it more than once. I'm not saying it's a poor record but with teams he's built it should be more. you obviously have an agenda that is against acknowledging SAFs achievements, but consider this - he's built three Premiere League dominating teams, and two CL winning teams with the potential to make that three this year (if Barcelona FC is stricken by ebola virus) and as said before - the days when Paisly could win three with the same team are gone, it's not just 5 matches, four home and away and a Final nowadays As much as I'm sure you'd love it to be, it's not personal. Knowledgeable Utd fans I know think you should have won at least one more European Cup, maybe two. I'm amazed you think two is all you should have achieved in 20 odd years. Where I differ with Utd fans is on SAF's tactics. In 2008 no only did he have the best side but he went and shut up shop when he needed to. If this had been done mroe I'm sure some of the shockers away from home over the years could have been avoided. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 14, 2011, 09:43:25 AM ...so maybe 2 is enough, maybe not. I'm amazed you think two is all you should have achieved in 20 odd years. sure said that Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 14, 2011, 12:00:43 PM ...so maybe 2 is enough, maybe not. I'm amazed you think two is all you should have achieved in 20 odd years. sure said that Ah so you agree then. Glad that's settled. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 14, 2011, 01:44:38 PM ...so maybe 2 is enough, maybe not. I'm amazed you think two is all you should have achieved in 20 odd years. sure said that Ah so you agree then. Glad that's settled. sure said that too Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 14, 2011, 07:52:51 PM ...so maybe 2 is enough, maybe not. I'm amazed you think two is all you should have achieved in 20 odd years. sure said that Ah so you agree then. Glad that's settled. sure said that too Easier to dodge I guess. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on March 17, 2011, 07:56:22 AM Best utd squad of all time
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 17, 2011, 12:01:51 PM Best utd squad of all time That played together as a squad? Or cross-generation? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on March 17, 2011, 01:39:31 PM Best utd squad of all time That played together as a squad? Or cross-generation? both Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on March 17, 2011, 02:53:49 PM Poor effort Ho. Not even Level 1 fishing.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on March 17, 2011, 05:11:57 PM Sigh I'm such a noob
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on March 18, 2011, 11:21:36 AM Chelsea in the cl, possible semi v Inter. Barc/Madrid most likely other semi. Can be done imo.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 18, 2011, 12:20:13 PM Chelsea in the cl, possible semi v Inter. Barc/Madrid most likely other semi. Can be done imo. Reaching Final - possible, verging on probable beating Barca in a one-off game? Dreamlike Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 02, 2011, 05:59:07 PM Could be a big turning point if Arsenal do their usual and bottle it
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on April 03, 2011, 02:50:26 PM Whats Rooneys deal btw? The twat cant be happy even after a hattrick? still has to foam at the mouth and scream obscenities at a camera, fking enjoy urself, jeez.
I guess i should'nt be surprised the mr potata head should have a chip on his shoulder.... Also the ref had a decent game yday, very soft pen for Utd and Vidic somehow dosent get sent off.Wp Ref you had a stormer apart from that. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 03, 2011, 03:09:00 PM Whats Rooneys deal btw? The twat cant be happy even after a hattrick? still has to foam at the mouth and scream obscenities at a camera, fking enjoy urself, jeez. I guess i should'nt be surprised the mr potata head should have a chip on his shoulder.... Also the ref had a decent game yday, very soft pen for Utd and Vidic somehow dosent get sent off.Wp Ref you had a stormer apart from that. Totally disagree, he's had about a year of the papers and everybody saying he's shit etc and the pressure on him is huge, he hasn't had a good period but to doubt his abilities is just crazy. His first 2 goals where total class, yeah he shouldn't swear but I can totally see why he'd be like that. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 03, 2011, 06:52:46 PM Personally don't give a shit. We need a performance from him and we got one. If he's coming into form it couldn't be at a more opportune time. If we can somehow wrap the PL up soon by keeping up the pressure on Wenger's bottlers than we might just sneak past Chelsea and Inter.....
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on April 04, 2011, 01:06:13 AM Yes poor Rooney he's had a horrid time, fuking some dirty prostitutes, throwing out his dummy and handing in a transfer request, playing like shit at the world cup and start of the season. How dare people say question him.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on April 04, 2011, 01:21:11 AM rooney what a chav
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 04, 2011, 11:57:58 AM rooney what a chav This is exactly what Mercedes thought when they took his car off him for promoting the wrong corporate image. LOL! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 04, 2011, 12:25:32 PM rooney what a chav This is exactly what Mercedes thought when they took his car off him for promoting the wrong corporate image. LOL! Pot-supporter calling kettle-supporters off-white? YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_mQQWt_oA4 It was a bad thing that Roonet did, but nobody died, nobody got punched... Good results all round at the weekend - looking forward to Wednesday with great antcipation now Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 04, 2011, 02:45:06 PM Lol so bitter. Haven't seen Bugatti recall their car from Gerrard have we?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on April 04, 2011, 03:12:25 PM Yes poor Rooney he's had a horrid time, fuking some dirty prostitutes, throwing out his dummy and handing in a transfer request, playing like shit at the world cup and start of the season. How dare people say question him. gd post Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 04, 2011, 03:45:08 PM Lol so bitter. Haven't seen Bugatti recall their car from Gerrard have we? LMAO not bitter, just pointing out the irony of a Liverpool fan commenting on stuff like this. Oh and Rooney's MB deal went two years ago in the credit crunch surely? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 03:49:19 PM Yeh footballers whiter than white obv. Guy is young, the greatest player of his generation why wouldn't he have some faults like all genius's?
25 million for Ronney or 30 million for Andy Carroll with a drink problem hmmmmmmm? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 04, 2011, 04:15:48 PM I wasn't saying poor Rooney, my point was I can understand his reaction after the frustrations of playing poorly for so long. I also don't get offended by the use of bad language as I am guilty of using it a lot myself so maybe it seems less of an issue to me.
George, Carroll was 35 million :) Also not sure how he has a drink problem because he likes to have a drink now and then, it never once got mentioned as an issue all the time he was here. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 04:19:01 PM Heard a rumour that the injury he sustained was due to a night out in newcastle
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 04, 2011, 04:21:18 PM Heard a rumour that the injury he sustained was due to a night out in newcastle Pretty sure it would be all over every single newspaper if there is any truth to it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 04, 2011, 05:10:57 PM Lol so bitter. Haven't seen Bugatti recall their car from Gerrard have we? LMAO not bitter, just pointing out the irony of a Liverpool fan commenting on stuff like this. Oh and Rooney's MB deal went two years ago in the credit crunch surely? Obv bitter, nice video innit. Surely that same irony would apply to every fan who has had a player who hasn't behaved (ie all clubs)? lol Nope - it went due to his the fact that he didn't fit in with their corporate image. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on April 04, 2011, 05:26:05 PM I wasn't saying poor Rooney, my point was I can understand his reaction after the frustrations of playing poorly for so long. I also don't get offended by the use of bad language as I am guilty of using it a lot myself so maybe it seems less of an issue to me. George, Carroll was 35 million :) Also not sure how he has a drink problem because he likes to have a drink now and then, it never once got mentioned as an issue all the time he was here. FWIW I'm also not offended by the use of foul language, It's more Rooney that offends me. Hes raking it in , doing something most people can only dream of, and does he ever smile when hes on the pitch? No, he goes round like the world is against him, he cant even celebrate a goal without having a temper tantrum. IMO hes just a complete and utter bellend. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on April 04, 2011, 05:26:57 PM Yeh footballers whiter than white obv. Guy is young, the greatest player of his generation why wouldn't he have some faults like all genius's? 25 million for Ronney or 30 million for Andy Carroll with a drink problem hmmmmmmm? Hahahahaha Levelaments Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Longines on April 04, 2011, 05:38:56 PM Pretty sure it would be all over every single newspaper if there is any truth to it. Google carroll bar stool. At least one newspaper ran with it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 05:42:28 PM Yeh footballers whiter than white obv. Guy is young, the greatest player of his generation why wouldn't he have some faults like all genius's? 25 million for Ronney or 30 million for Andy Carroll with a drink problem hmmmmmmm? Hahahahaha Levelaments Nope not a level Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 05:43:22 PM I wasn't saying poor Rooney, my point was I can understand his reaction after the frustrations of playing poorly for so long. I also don't get offended by the use of bad language as I am guilty of using it a lot myself so maybe it seems less of an issue to me. George, Carroll was 35 million :) Also not sure how he has a drink problem because he likes to have a drink now and then, it never once got mentioned as an issue all the time he was here. FWIW I'm also not offended by the use of foul language, It's more Rooney that offends me. Hes raking it in , doing something most people can only dream of, and does he ever smile when hes on the pitch? No, he goes round like the world is against him, he cant even celebrate a goal without having a temper tantrum. IMO hes just a complete and utter bellend. This is BS. Your a Liverpool fan therefore you don't like Rooney just as much as I'm a United fan and love him. It's the way things work. I'm sure if Gerrard has behaved in this way you'd be keeping your gob shut. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on April 04, 2011, 05:53:41 PM Rooney is a dick how can you like someone like him even if u support man u?
Tbh most star football players are all cockheads Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 05:54:39 PM Rooney is a dick how can you like someone like him even if u support man u? Tbh most star football players are all cockheads As a Man u Fan I really couldnt care less what he's like off the pitch as long as he produces on it Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on April 04, 2011, 06:01:14 PM rooney what a chav You can take the chav out of Liverpool .....Been charged, facing a 2 match ban. http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11667_6852910,00.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MANTIS01 on April 04, 2011, 06:10:36 PM Thought Rooney was immense. He swore, oh ok.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on April 04, 2011, 06:19:22 PM Yeh footballers whiter than white obv. Guy is young, the greatest player of his generation why wouldn't he have some faults like all genius's? 25 million for Ronney or 30 million for Andy Carroll with a drink problem hmmmmmmm? Hahahahaha Levelaments Nope not a level Delusional if you're being serious Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Somerled on April 04, 2011, 06:20:00 PM Thought Rooney was immense. He swore, oh ok. +1 Not a Man U fan, but if we're going to start doing players for this the game's just getting stoopid. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on April 04, 2011, 06:28:19 PM I wasn't saying poor Rooney, my point was I can understand his reaction after the frustrations of playing poorly for so long. I also don't get offended by the use of bad language as I am guilty of using it a lot myself so maybe it seems less of an issue to me. George, Carroll was 35 million :) Also not sure how he has a drink problem because he likes to have a drink now and then, it never once got mentioned as an issue all the time he was here. FWIW I'm also not offended by the use of foul language, It's more Rooney that offends me. Hes raking it in , doing something most people can only dream of, and does he ever smile when hes on the pitch? No, he goes round like the world is against him, he cant even celebrate a goal without having a temper tantrum. IMO hes just a complete and utter bellend. This is BS. Your a Liverpool fan therefore you don't like Rooney just as much as I'm a United fan and love him. It's the way things work. I'm sure if Gerrard has behaved in this way you'd be keeping your gob shut. I think most people dont like Rooney regardless of who they support Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 04, 2011, 06:53:10 PM Fair comment but I used to say Mascherano would be the sort of player I hate had he not played for Liverpool. Pretty sure some must think like this about Rooney.
I wasn't saying poor Rooney, my point was I can understand his reaction after the frustrations of playing poorly for so long. I also don't get offended by the use of bad language as I am guilty of using it a lot myself so maybe it seems less of an issue to me. George, Carroll was 35 million :) Also not sure how he has a drink problem because he likes to have a drink now and then, it never once got mentioned as an issue all the time he was here. FWIW I'm also not offended by the use of foul language, It's more Rooney that offends me. Hes raking it in , doing something most people can only dream of, and does he ever smile when hes on the pitch? No, he goes round like the world is against him, he cant even celebrate a goal without having a temper tantrum. IMO hes just a complete and utter bellend. This is BS. Your a Liverpool fan therefore you don't like Rooney just as much as I'm a United fan and love him. It's the way things work. I'm sure if Gerrard has behaved in this way you'd be keeping your gob shut. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 07:00:11 PM Yep but ultimately u didnt hate him did you? Even tho he was a cock
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on April 04, 2011, 07:00:18 PM I'm not doubting rooneys ability just think he is a twat
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dan on April 04, 2011, 08:23:02 PM I thought this whole thread was a joke tbh but after reading this.
Yeh footballers whiter than white obv. Guy is young, the greatest player of his generation why wouldn't he have some faults like all genius's? 25 million for Ronney or 30 million for Andy Carroll with a drink problem hmmmmmmm? It just about sums man utd fans up. I havent really read this thread or the liverpool one but on the few bits I have looked at in that thread at some of the liverpool fans make some good points like the direction of the club/team for example. All Utd fans do is say yeah we are the greatest blah blah blah. I can only think the highlighted statement is a wind up. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 04, 2011, 08:47:37 PM George has to be on the level, I'm a Rooney fanboy but that is stretching it a bit far. Quite clearly Collicini is the best player of our generation.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Linux on April 04, 2011, 09:06:29 PM Sir Geoff Hurst says if you swear directly at a camera it should be a 5 game ban. I have to say i agree
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 04, 2011, 09:12:03 PM Sir Geoff Hurst says if you swear directly at a camera it should be a 5 game ban. I have to say i agree If that's the case then someone who deliberately dives in with 2 feet and breaks someones leg must get a life ban. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 04, 2011, 10:29:18 PM Boring debate - Rooney transgressed and gets punished. Shame he couldn't have opted for a jury trial eh...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 11:18:37 PM More fuel for Fergie to feed our great team with. Siege mentality and all that. WP the FA
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on April 04, 2011, 11:41:02 PM More fuel for Fergie to feed our great team with. Siege mentality and all that. WP the FA The league is over you've won that. Don't see how banning the greatest player of his generation from an FA cup Semi Final against your rivals can be good news, siege mentality or not.Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 04, 2011, 11:42:36 PM I'd expect him to get a one match ban. I think saying the title is won is a little premature too
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Somerled on April 04, 2011, 11:58:03 PM Sir Geoff Hurst says if you swear directly at a camera it should be a 5 game ban. I have to say i agree Presumably just a level? After what Gatusso got up to vs Spurs he only got a (I think, can't be arsed checking) 4 game ban. And swearing at an inanimate object should get more than headbutting a coach?? For me, swearing at a match official is far far worse and other players do it in every single game. Yes Rooney is a chav and many other things and yes man U fans are very smug at times, doesn't make the punishment correct. Get Paul McBride on the case IMO. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheChipPrince on April 05, 2011, 10:54:26 AM Good/great player, not the best of his generation, but v good.
Idiot of a man, awful piece of work. 2 game ban is harsh. Partly blame Man U for not coming out and condeming him, fining him 2 weeks wages on the spot, FA would probably not have needed to act. Could back fire on the FA, Rooney turns up for every friendly, will make him think twice. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 06, 2011, 01:32:14 PM Seems part of the appeal will focus on the intrusion onto the pitch by the cameraman. That in itself doesn't excuse the response, but if the rumour that the cameraman was asking Rooney to 'kiss the camera' then I'd say his response was pretty close to being appropriate and demonstrates a desire to rise above his chavvy image.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 06, 2011, 06:36:25 PM Yep but ultimately u didnt hate him did you? Even tho he was a cock I feckin do now! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 06, 2011, 06:38:33 PM More fuel for Fergie to feed our great team with. Siege mentality and all that. WP the FA He's doing well to create a siege mentality at the most favoured club in Britain. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 06, 2011, 08:11:04 PM Just sheer class - Giggs take, and the pull back... and a perfect finish from Rooney
Sheer class Do the morons who are booing Rooney's every touch think that's +EV? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2011, 11:36:17 AM Rooney misses 2 games. The greatest player of his generation will miss the FA cup semi final against rivals Man City.
You're Man United, You'll do what you're told. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on April 07, 2011, 11:38:54 AM Rooney misses 2 games. The greatest player of his generation will miss the FA cup semi final against rivals Man City. You're Man United, You'll do what you're told. abs joke im going to write to teh FA everytime i see a footballer swear nea a tv camera Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 07, 2011, 11:41:33 AM Rooney misses 2 games. The greatest player of his generation will miss the FA cup semi final against rivals Man City. You're Man United, You'll do what you're told. lol [ ] result changing [ x ] will be playing on May 14 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2011, 11:50:38 AM Rooney misses 2 games. The greatest player of his generation will miss the FA cup semi final against rivals Man City. You're Man United, You'll do what you're told. abs joke im going to write to teh FA everytime i see a footballer swear nea a tv camera Rooney misses 2 games. The greatest player of his generation will miss the FA cup semi final against rivals Man City. You're Man United, You'll do what you're told. lol [ ] result changing [ x ] will be playing on May 14 [ ] Disagree Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 07, 2011, 12:16:37 PM Obv a blow but still think we have enough to best city. Lol at the haters. Gtfo
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 08, 2011, 10:30:47 AM From http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/davidbond/2011/04/having_made_gigantic_losses_la.html
....Manchester United would comfortably comply with Uefa's regulations were they in force today. Despite making a £79m pre tax loss in 2010, that was mainly down to one off debt charges relating to the £500m bond refinancing and currency exchange rate swaps. And the vast sums of money United generate as a football club (£300m according to Uefa's criteria and far more than any rival club) ensures that the regular debt repayments - totalling about £45m - are easily met. Chelsea and Citeh will find it harder to comply apparently... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on April 08, 2011, 11:10:10 AM G.Nev signed to ss as common tater.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 08, 2011, 12:01:52 PM G.Nev signed to ss as common tater. [ ] surprised It will be interesting to see how he does, and whether the committed haters can be won over by him. I'd expect him to be far better as an analyst than most of the current crop. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on April 08, 2011, 12:05:13 PM G.Nev signed to ss as common tater. [ ] surprised It will be interesting to see how he does, and whether the committed haters can be won over by him. I'd expect him to be far better as an analyst than most of the current crop. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Indestructable on April 08, 2011, 09:51:22 PM I am cancelling Sky Sports, can't believe they have done this. ;frustrated;
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 08, 2011, 10:19:41 PM I am cancelling Sky Sports, can't believe they have done this. ;frustrated; Was probably wasted on you anyway Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 09, 2011, 09:10:13 AM G.Nev signed to ss as common tater. [ ] surprised It will be interesting to see how he does, and whether the committed haters can be won over by him. I'd expect him to be far better as an analyst than most of the current crop. Agree. Don't care if you know where his loyalties lie as long as he's good and I'm fairly sure he will be. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 09, 2011, 09:11:33 AM From http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/davidbond/2011/04/having_made_gigantic_losses_la.html ....Manchester United would comfortably comply with Uefa's regulations were they in force today. Despite making a £79m pre tax loss in 2010, that was mainly down to one off debt charges relating to the £500m bond refinancing and currency exchange rate swaps. And the vast sums of money United generate as a football club (£300m according to Uefa's criteria and far more than any rival club) ensures that the regular debt repayments - totalling about £45m - are easily met. Chelsea and Citeh will find it harder to comply apparently... Interesting. So it's going to be turnover vs debt? Pretty soft IMO. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on April 09, 2011, 09:58:08 AM From http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/davidbond/2011/04/having_made_gigantic_losses_la.html ....Manchester United would comfortably comply with Uefa's regulations were they in force today. Despite making a £79m pre tax loss in 2010, that was mainly down to one off debt charges relating to the £500m bond refinancing and currency exchange rate swaps. And the vast sums of money United generate as a football club (£300m according to Uefa's criteria and far more than any rival club) ensures that the regular debt repayments - totalling about £45m - are easily met. Chelsea and Citeh will find it harder to comply apparently... Interesting. So it's going to be turnover vs debt? Pretty soft IMO. I think it's a bit more complicated than that - I can't see anything wrong with the principle though; if you earn a lot of money through football you can have a higher level of debt; if your debt is currently being paid for by other sources - like your commercial side or from an owners pocket, you're going to have a harder time. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Indestructable on April 09, 2011, 11:24:14 AM G.Nev signed to ss as common tater. [ ] surprised It will be interesting to see how he does, and whether the committed haters can be won over by him. I'd expect him to be far better as an analyst than most of the current crop. Agree. Don't care if you know where his loyalties lie as long as he's good and I'm fairly sure he will be. It's not just about loyalties as there are United players that i would have no problems with such as Giggs, Van de Sar, Carrick to name a few but Gary Neville is unbearable. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 09, 2011, 12:19:19 PM Obv it's more complicated than that. I just think if you can operate at a loss Coz you have good turnover then the rule is pointless. It should be based around profit.
From http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/davidbond/2011/04/having_made_gigantic_losses_la.html ....Manchester United would comfortably comply with Uefa's regulations were they in force today. Despite making a £79m pre tax loss in 2010, that was mainly down to one off debt charges relating to the £500m bond refinancing and currency exchange rate swaps. And the vast sums of money United generate as a football club (£300m according to Uefa's criteria and far more than any rival club) ensures that the regular debt repayments - totalling about £45m - are easily met. Chelsea and Citeh will find it harder to comply apparently... Interesting. So it's going to be turnover vs debt? Pretty soft IMO. I think it's a bit more complicated than that - I can't see anything wrong with the principle though; if you earn a lot of money through football you can have a higher level of debt; if your debt is currently being paid for by other sources - like your commercial side or from an owners pocket, you're going to have a harder time. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on April 09, 2011, 12:58:23 PM For a normal company then I'd agree, I just think how they've arranged things is an acceptance that football isn't 'normal' business.
It also might just be a first step, although I doubt it, I think these regulations are just intended to provide a core stability to the finances - as long as a club has fundamentally sound finances then it doesn't matter too much if they take a bit of a loss. Football is a fundamentally unprofitable 'business', so if an out and out profit were required there would be hardly any football clubs who would 'pass' the regulations. Obv it's more complicated than that. I just think if you can operate at a loss Coz you have good turnover then the rule is pointless. It should be based around profit. From http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/davidbond/2011/04/having_made_gigantic_losses_la.html ....Manchester United would comfortably comply with Uefa's regulations were they in force today. Despite making a £79m pre tax loss in 2010, that was mainly down to one off debt charges relating to the £500m bond refinancing and currency exchange rate swaps. And the vast sums of money United generate as a football club (£300m according to Uefa's criteria and far more than any rival club) ensures that the regular debt repayments - totalling about £45m - are easily met. Chelsea and Citeh will find it harder to comply apparently... Interesting. So it's going to be turnover vs debt? Pretty soft IMO. I think it's a bit more complicated than that - I can't see anything wrong with the principle though; if you earn a lot of money through football you can have a higher level of debt; if your debt is currently being paid for by other sources - like your commercial side or from an owners pocket, you're going to have a harder time. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on April 16, 2011, 10:20:39 PM Siege mentality FTW well done the FA.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on April 17, 2011, 03:17:22 AM Siege mentality FTW well done the FA. :) I see Scholes still hasnt mastered the art of tackling yet Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 17, 2011, 10:48:42 AM Good losers imo
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 18, 2011, 12:07:30 AM ty Liverpool
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeKnave on April 18, 2011, 03:05:40 AM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on April 18, 2011, 04:12:35 AM From http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/davidbond/2011/04/having_made_gigantic_losses_la.html ....Manchester United would comfortably comply with Uefa's regulations were they in force today. Despite making a £79m pre tax loss in 2010, that was mainly down to one off debt charges relating to the £500m bond refinancing and currency exchange rate swaps. And the vast sums of money United generate as a football club (£300m according to Uefa's criteria and far more than any rival club) ensures that the regular debt repayments - totalling about £45m - are easily met. Chelsea and Citeh will find it harder to comply apparently... Interesting. So it's going to be turnover vs debt? Pretty soft IMO. I think it's a bit more complicated than that - I can't see anything wrong with the principle though; if you earn a lot of money through football you can have a higher level of debt; if your debt is currently being paid for by other sources - like your commercial side or from an owners pocket, you're going to have a harder time. Isnt this worse? Surely the fact a team earns more money from football shouldn't mean they then have more money to spend as this will just perpetuate the gap between the haves and have nots in football or am I missing your point?? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 19, 2011, 09:42:29 PM Never easy
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 23, 2011, 12:52:35 AM God no....
Barcelona midfielder Javier Mascherano, formerly of Liverpool, is in the sights of Manchester United boss Sir Alex Ferguson. Full story: Caught Offside Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: scotty2hatty on April 23, 2011, 09:59:01 AM Heard Hamsik of Brescia was on the radar too. And Sneijder still.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: maldini32 on April 23, 2011, 10:41:11 AM Heard Hamsik of Napoli was on the radar too. And Sneijder still. Fyp Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: scotty2hatty on April 23, 2011, 11:17:13 AM Heard Hamsik of Napoli was on the radar too. And Sneijder still. Fyp Sigh, what was I thinking. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on April 26, 2011, 10:35:18 PM How can a team in a champions league semi, playing infront of a boisterous (sp) crowd, not go out and least run around like crazed animals, fair enough they might not be good enough but that was almost criminal how they just stood and admired utd .
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 27, 2011, 10:34:22 AM I believe we may have found the man to replace Scholes in the playmaker role...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on April 27, 2011, 12:42:32 PM I believe we may have found the man to replace Scholes in the playmaker role... go on then , who? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 27, 2011, 01:01:23 PM Anderson innit....
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on April 27, 2011, 01:59:00 PM Never seen a semi so one sided..
It would be good to see Utd in the final :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 27, 2011, 03:24:25 PM I think the worrying thing is that the final could be very similar to last night, the only difference being United are Schalke that night v Barca.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on April 27, 2011, 03:37:46 PM I think the worrying thing is that the final could be very similar to last night, the only difference being United are Schalke that night v Barca. never again! Fergie learns! - Besides a fergie mourhinio clash coould be interesting too! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 27, 2011, 03:55:06 PM I believe we may have found the man to replace Scholes in the playmaker role... go on then , who? Anderson innit.... Rooney ldo - gets better and better in the deeper position, plus he tackles better than Scholes ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 28, 2011, 06:46:59 AM Disgusting scenes at the Bernabeu last night with players feigning injury, disputing decisions and getting involved in scuffles.
Only correct thing to do is to ban both clubs from the tournament imo Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 28, 2011, 12:48:37 PM never again! Fergie learns! - Besides a fergie mourhinio clash coould be interesting too! Yeah I hope you're right, Fergie would never approach the final the same way he did last time and hopefully we will come out of it much better this time around. I'm just not sure that there is anything that anyone can do against Barca really, they just seem to carve people open for fun. That said United did look as good as I've seen for a while and hopefully that form will be repeated in the next 2 matches!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 28, 2011, 02:13:13 PM never again! Fergie learns! - Besides a fergie mourhinio clash coould be interesting too! Yeah I hope you're right, Fergie would never approach the final the same way he did last time and hopefully we will come out of it much better this time around. I'm just not sure that there is anything that anyone can do against Barca really, they just seem to carve people open for fun. That said United did look as good as I've seen for a while and hopefully that form will be repeated in the next 2 matches!! Maureen has shown how to stop Barca. Whether Fergie will do it or not is another matter. Trying to out play them is folly. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on May 04, 2011, 09:42:23 PM gonna be a huge game a wembley
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 04, 2011, 09:45:28 PM gonna be a huge game a wembley Get us some tickets Guy! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on May 04, 2011, 09:56:01 PM gonna be a huge game a wembley Get us some tickets Guy! see what i can do - you prepared to pay more than face value? - not talking stupid money - cause i cant afford that - but if you are ill keep you posted Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on May 04, 2011, 10:02:12 PM gonna be a huge game a wembley Get us some tickets Guy! see what i can do - you prepared to pay more than face value? - not talking stupid money - cause i cant afford that - but if you are ill keep you posted you a utd fan from leeds? oy vey Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on May 04, 2011, 10:04:48 PM gonna be a huge game a wembley Get us some tickets Guy! see what i can do - you prepared to pay more than face value? - not talking stupid money - cause i cant afford that - but if you are ill keep you posted you a utd fan from leeds? oy vey im a utd fan living in leeds but from the north west Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 04, 2011, 10:22:06 PM gonna be a huge game a wembley Get us some tickets Guy! see what i can do - you prepared to pay more than face value? - not talking stupid money - cause i cant afford that - but if you are ill keep you posted you a utd fan from leeds? oy vey im a utd fan living in leeds but from the north west Same as you- not stupid money but willing to paiiiiiii obv. Wouldn't wanna pay 2 grand to see us get thrashed by Barca tbh Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 05, 2011, 10:19:19 AM Good night last night - thought Gibson and Anderson both showed more than glimpses of their talents and Valencia just gets better and better.
Smalling reminds me of the young Rio, his anticipation and ability to steal the ball without needing to make a tackle, but also the occasional lapse of concentration. Hopefully the lapses will be developed out of him. Third CL Final in four seasons, not bad for a manager that was accused of having a poor record in Europe earlier in this thread. Can we win it? Possibly, but Barca will obviously be favourites and it's going to take something special Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Amatay on May 06, 2011, 12:11:06 AM This made me chuckle...
http://newsthump.com/2011/05/03/man-united-set-to-recall-howard-webb-for-crucial-chelsea-clash/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 06, 2011, 02:25:13 PM Third CL Final in four seasons, not bad for a manager that was accused of having a poor record in Europe earlier in this thread. When you lose it'll be two CLs in 23 years? Pretty poor imo. Finals mean nothing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on May 06, 2011, 02:28:17 PM Third CL Final in four seasons, not bad for a manager that was accused of having a poor record in Europe earlier in this thread. When you lose it'll be two CLs in 23 years? Pretty poor imo. Finals mean nothing. so liverpool have had over a generation of meaningless league football? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 06, 2011, 05:00:53 PM Third CL Final in four seasons, not bad for a manager that was accused of having a poor record in Europe earlier in this thread. When you lose it'll be two CLs in 23 years? Pretty poor imo. Finals mean nothing. Bitter at all? so liverpool have had over a generation of meaningless league football? Harsh, but fair comment Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 07, 2011, 02:58:51 PM Third CL Final in four seasons, not bad for a manager that was accused of having a poor record in Europe earlier in this thread. When you lose it'll be two CLs in 23 years? Pretty poor imo. Finals mean nothing. so liverpool have had over a generation of meaningless league football? True but we're talking about your team. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 07, 2011, 03:00:21 PM Don't give a shit what you say. Fergie is a fkin legend. To take this current team to a final and still be top of the league is nothing short of amazing. Even if we end up with sweet FA we've overachieved with this squad.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 07, 2011, 03:01:45 PM Third CL Final in four seasons, not bad for a manager that was accused of having a poor record in Europe earlier in this thread. When you lose it'll be two CLs in 23 years? Pretty poor imo. Finals mean nothing. Bitter at all? so liverpool have had over a generation of meaningless league football? Harsh, but fair comment How is it bitter to have an opinion that you should have won more CL titles? IMHO you've been the best side in Europe more than twice in the period we're discussing. Possibly as many as 5 times. It's a compliment to the sides Ferguson has built I just don't think he's been tactically brilliant in your past. In 2008 his tactics were bang on. If you want to play that off as bitter than ok, pretty pointless trying to discuss this with you. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 07, 2011, 03:02:07 PM Don't give a shit what you say. Fergie is a fkin legend. To take this current team to a final and still be top of the league is nothing short of amazing. Even if we end up with sweet FA we've overachieved with this squad. 100% agree. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 08, 2011, 06:46:43 PM Not mathematically done but 19 on the way. Who'd have thought that 20 years ago. SAF is truly a legend/genius. What a manager.
And yes Barca are massive faves but who know's. Hernandez late winner mayhaps? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on May 08, 2011, 06:51:07 PM ;karabiner; ;sexybanana; ;sexybanana; ;karabiner; ;karabiner;
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on May 08, 2011, 07:04:53 PM Ji Sung Park is ridiculous. What an engine he has.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: KarmaDope on May 08, 2011, 08:54:21 PM Not mathematically done but 19 on the way. Who'd have thought that 20 years ago. SAF is truly a legend/genius. What a manager. And yes Barca are massive faves but who know's. Hernandez late winner mayhaps? Agreed. And I'm a Liverpool fan ffs ;) Looking forward to the CL final. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on May 08, 2011, 11:58:39 PM And yes Barca are massive faves but who know's. Hernandez late winner mayhaps? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 14, 2011, 03:01:57 PM (http://im.in.com/connect/images/profile/b_profile3/Jim_Laker_300.jpg)
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3LdMAqUMnM 'nuff said Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on May 14, 2011, 03:16:30 PM (http://i371.photobucket.com/albums/oo151/outragous76/19.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 14, 2011, 03:22:06 PM Champions!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on May 14, 2011, 04:48:54 PM WD, especially since you never got a decision going your way this entire season :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 02:02:27 AM Just seen Liverpool are 7/1 to make the top 4 and a champions league place next year. For anyone struggling with the maths this means if you bet £10 on this then you stand to lose £10
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on May 15, 2011, 12:12:11 PM I agree as far is the CL goes, it's qutie an achievement but I don't think you've overachieved in the prem.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 15, 2011, 02:09:45 PM WD, especially since you never got a decision going your way this entire season :) rotflmfao We got some that went our way - most highlighted by Hansen on MotD last night we got some that went against us - [ ] also mentioned on MotD Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on May 15, 2011, 03:47:49 PM WD, especially since you never got a decision going your way this entire season :) rotflmfao We got some that went our way - most highlighted by Hansen on MotD last night we got some that went against us - [ ] also mentioned on MotD [ ] There were decisons to be found which went against u, so MOTD could highlight them.. ;whistle; [X] Can of worms opened, which people will never agree on. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 16, 2011, 11:32:47 AM WD, especially since you never got a decision going your way this entire season :) rotflmfao We got some that went our way - most highlighted by Hansen on MotD last night we got some that went against us - [ ] also mentioned on MotD [ X ] There were decisons to be found which went against u, so MOTD could highlight them.. ;whistle; [X] Can of worms opened, which people will never agree on. YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeFYMVqlLz0 Very much along the lines of the ones that Hansen chose to highlight Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 24, 2011, 09:29:52 AM The conveyor belt keeps turning...
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5xFTyBHrjo http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13513703.stm Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rod on May 24, 2011, 09:50:38 AM Question for United fans. Sorry if it has already been asked but I was having a argument with some Utd fans about it last night.
What do you think will happen when Ferguson retires. There does not seem to be a plan for somebody to take over. Should he be training somebody (Giggs?) for the job over the next few years or would you rather see Mourinho or somebody similar brought in. Manchester United have only really been successful under Ferguson, but he has had to rebuild the team a few times and stay ahead of the game and the effect he has on the club is pretty clear. Before him they were really just another upper mid table side, although a well supported one. More than two thirds of their titles have been won with him as manager. Do you believe that it can continue without him or will the team slip back below the likes of Arsenal and Liverpool, who have both traditionally been more successful. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 24, 2011, 10:57:45 AM Manchester United have only really been successful under Ferguson, If your view of history starts in 1970 But three league titles in the 50's, which would almost certainly have been more bar the events of 6 February 1958, Two titles in the 60's oh and the first English Club to win the European Cup which was in 1968, We've been more successful under SAF, but 'only really successful' under him? As for the future - speculation abounds, but at a personal level I'd rather see a Brit than a foreigner, rather see someone with United connections than someone without, and definitely not Mourinho. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on May 24, 2011, 01:28:27 PM Manchester United have only really been successful under Ferguson, If your view of history starts in 1970 But three league titles in the 50's, which would almost certainly have been more bar the events of 6 February 1958, Two titles in the 60's oh and the first English Club to win the European Cup which was in 1968, We've been more successful under SAF, but 'only really successful' under him? As for the future - speculation abounds, but at a personal level I'd rather see a Brit than a foreigner, rather see someone with United connections than someone without, and definitely not Mourinho. I agreed with everything right up till Mourinho! You cannot deny him his record. He is an amazing man manager and has the personailty to handle a job like manager at OT. The only reason he hasnt scooped everything in spain is that he faces the worlds best team, but give him a few years in the job he will get there. You just cant knock Jose - the an is too good! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on May 24, 2011, 01:41:25 PM Manchester United have only really been successful under Ferguson, If your view of history starts in 1970 But three league titles in the 50's, which would almost certainly have been more bar the events of 6 February 1958, Two titles in the 60's oh and the first English Club to win the European Cup which was in 1968, We've been more successful under SAF, but 'only really successful' under him? As for the future - speculation abounds, but at a personal level I'd rather see a Brit than a foreigner, rather see someone with United connections than someone without, and definitely not Mourinho. I agreed with everything right up till Mourinho! You cannot deny him his record. He is an amazing man manager and has the personailty to handle a job like manager at OT. The only reason he hasnt scooped everything in spain is that he faces the worlds best team, but give him a few years in the job he will get there. You just cant knock Jose - the an is too good! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 24, 2011, 04:11:55 PM I was a fan of Mourinho during the better part of his tenure at Chelsea - not keen on the style of football he had them playing, but he brought something to the English game with his personality.
However, in the later days at Chelsea and subsequently he doesn't seem to me to be of the right 'stuff' for us. SAF plays mindgames, but Mourinho goes too far, and seems to be losing the plot - the fuss around the game against Barca is a case in point http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/apr/28/jose-mourinho-real-madrid-barcelona Not Officer Material On a more pressing issue, the news that Giggs hasn't trained today is a real concern. All this bolox about super-injunctions and welsh tarts can't help his mental state. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 24, 2011, 06:26:50 PM Good last post. I just don't think UTD fans could accept his style of football and unlike at Chelsea, at UTD no one is bigger than the club.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on May 24, 2011, 07:21:08 PM I'm one of the few people that don't support Man U but likes Neville so will watch the testimonial tonight.
Also nice to see Beckham wearing 7. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 26, 2011, 11:02:19 AM Happy Anniversary everyone
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 29, 2011, 12:51:55 PM So wasn't to be. To be fair I don't think any team in the world, including international teams, would be able to cope with the passing/movement of Barca. Simply unplayable. We could have turned it into a dirtier affair but that would mean getting near them. I know people were purring about Messi but for man of the match was Xavi. Incred.
All in all though, considering the team, we have had a great season. Now we need to spend to rebuild. Berba out. Need a striker imo and a couple of centre mids and obv a keeper. Ashley Young would be a decent signing imo. Wouldn't mind seeing Modric at United either. Whatever happens should be an interesting summer for a lot of clubs- Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, Man City and Spurs will all be spending I imagine. Will we get 20 next year? Will be a lot tougher than this year methinks. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MANTIS01 on May 29, 2011, 05:17:55 PM Would have been nice to sub Michael Carrick after 20 mins and bring on Roy Keane. Unfortunately that wasn't one of Fergie's options.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 29, 2011, 05:52:02 PM Would have been nice to sub Michael Carrick after 20 mins and bring on Bobby Charlton. Unfortunately that wasn't one of Fergie's options. fyp Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: epljay on May 30, 2011, 01:31:53 AM Crazy game. I expected Barcelona to have the edge obviously but to dominate like they did was incredible. It's a shame for Man U..
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on May 30, 2011, 01:49:01 AM Question for United fans. Sorry if it has already been asked but I was having a argument with some Utd fans about it last night. What do you think will happen when Ferguson retires. There does not seem to be a plan for somebody to take over. Should he be training somebody (Giggs?) for the job over the next few years or would you rather see Mourinho or somebody similar brought in. Manchester United have only really been successful under Ferguson, but he has had to rebuild the team a few times and stay ahead of the game and the effect he has on the club is pretty clear. Before him they were really just another upper mid table side, although a well supported one. More than two thirds of their titles have been won with him as manager. Do you believe that it can continue without him or will the team slip back below the likes of Arsenal and Liverpool, who have both traditionally been more successful. ON 606 this evening a United fan called in and suggested that MU needed Fergie to step aside to let someone else take over and, I kid you not, "take them to the next level". I am pretty sure the next manager in charge will take them to the next level alright....but I doubt it will be a higher level!!!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 30, 2011, 05:01:42 AM Question for United fans. Sorry if it has already been asked but I was having a argument with some Utd fans about it last night. What do you think will happen when Ferguson retires. There does not seem to be a plan for somebody to take over. Should he be training somebody (Giggs?) for the job over the next few years or would you rather see Mourinho or somebody similar brought in. Manchester United have only really been successful under Ferguson, but he has had to rebuild the team a few times and stay ahead of the game and the effect he has on the club is pretty clear. Before him they were really just another upper mid table side, although a well supported one. More than two thirds of their titles have been won with him as manager. Do you believe that it can continue without him or will the team slip back below the likes of Arsenal and Liverpool, who have both traditionally been more successful. LOL some people are idiots ON 606 this evening a United fan called in and suggested that MU needed Fergie to step aside to let someone else take over and, I kid you not, "take them to the next level". I am pretty sure the next manager in charge will take them to the next level alright....but I doubt it will be a higher level!!!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 31, 2011, 09:19:14 AM http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13600395.stm
Scholes retires. Legend. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on May 31, 2011, 09:20:50 AM http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13600395.stm Scholes retires. Legend. True legend Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: millidonk on May 31, 2011, 09:26:22 AM http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13600395.stm Scholes retires. Legend. True legend Have always hated Man U, but i can't do anything but admire Scholesie. Legend Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: AndrewT on May 31, 2011, 09:41:55 AM Scholes was always the footballer who GIQ.
To have been so instrumental in one of the top teams for so long and yet not get too big for his boots seems like quite an achievement now any clogger who scores a goal in the Premiership thinks they are the best thing ever. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: millidonk on May 31, 2011, 09:44:47 AM Don't know how true this is as i haven't seen it for myself. My mate text me and said he was watching tele and they said Iniesta went up to Scholes after the game and asked for his top and he told Scholes that the barca team thought he was the best midfielder of the last decade!? Massive compliment if that is true.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: AndrewT on May 31, 2011, 09:48:11 AM Don't know how true this is as i haven't seen it for myself. My mate text me and said he was watching tele and they said Iniesta went up to Scholes after the game and asked for his top and he told Scholes that the barca team thought he was the best midfielder of the last decade!? Massive compliment if that is true. Scholes was always hugely rated on the continent - Zinedine Zidane said he was the best player he ever played against. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on May 31, 2011, 09:59:14 AM 6 Barca players asked to swap shirts with him I think.
Xavi and Iniesta both rate him hugely. They said if he was Spanish he would have received a lot more praise. Was a great player and a top pro. Loved his tackling too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 31, 2011, 12:23:19 PM One of the greats. Flawed as all greats are, but his ability to pick out and deliver passes over distance set him apart.
As did his goals in his heyday. YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJF3j_5Ms24 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on May 31, 2011, 02:06:55 PM flawed and ginger
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: millidonk on May 31, 2011, 02:20:34 PM flawed and ginger Makes me laugh, everyday at the same time the Herbatron begins his trolling. Looking forward to the afternoon's entertainment. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on May 31, 2011, 02:34:39 PM flawed and ginger Makes me laugh, everyday at the same time the Herbatron begins his trolling. Looking forward to the afternoon's entertainment. and i think you may be missing some stuff, i'm up at 6am most days but usually bantering with red dog at that time of day or checking the fall out from the posts at 1am whilst in bed the previous night Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: millidonk on May 31, 2011, 02:36:17 PM flawed and ginger Makes me laugh, everyday at the same time the Herbatron begins his trolling. Looking forward to the afternoon's entertainment. and i think you may be missing some stuff, i'm up at 6am most days but usually bantering with red dog at that time of day or checking the fall out from the posts at 1am whilst in bed the previous night Nah, i see it. but its usually just boring sensible stuff. You don't get burning til after lunch. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on May 31, 2011, 03:40:47 PM flawed and ginger Makes me laugh, everyday at the same time the Herbatron begins his trolling. Looking forward to the afternoon's entertainment. and i think you may be missing some stuff, i'm up at 6am most days but usually bantering with red dog at that time of day or checking the fall out from the posts at 1am whilst in bed the previous night Nah, i see it. but its usually just boring sensible stuff. You don't get burning til after lunch. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on May 31, 2011, 03:42:44 PM flawed and ginger meant to be funny? meant to be an insult? either way, pretty daft. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on May 31, 2011, 06:36:08 PM Watched Scholes at Elland road in 91 or 92 when he was with the Man Utd youth team in the cup final against us. He was well up for it, gestures at the crowd, putting himself around the pitch some reet tackles if i remember rightly. He was head and shoulders the best player on the pitch which was saying something as both teams produced some excellent players.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on May 31, 2011, 07:08:38 PM flawed and ginger meant to be funny? meant to be an insult? either way, pretty daft. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on May 31, 2011, 07:46:20 PM flawed and ginger meant to be funny? meant to be an insult? either way, pretty daft. 1750 posts :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on June 01, 2011, 10:53:38 AM owens stays
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13594839.stm Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on June 01, 2011, 11:32:18 AM owens stays http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13594839.stm (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-3K_zuzJbGrQ/TaYVGbwG7zI/AAAAAAAABWU/a3q6H4AoFmQ/s400/whoopdeedoo%255B1%255D.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on June 01, 2011, 06:55:26 PM Baffled by signing Owen for another year
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on June 01, 2011, 07:13:44 PM Baffled by signing Owen for another year He runs so so good, bizarre. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on June 01, 2011, 07:17:37 PM Baffled by both sides , why would Fergie want to keep him? And does he not actually want to play some football before he retires or does he want to make about ten 5 min cameos in a season and hope to get another PL medal?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on June 01, 2011, 07:19:37 PM Baffled by signing Owen for another year Good bench warmer IMO, we were going to start looking really lightweight Men down: Van der Saar Hargreaves Scholesy Gary Neville Maybe berba Not many squads could take those hits We need to be buying abs min of 3 quality players this summer Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on June 01, 2011, 07:19:58 PM Baffled by both sides , why would Fergie want to keep him? And does he not actually want to play some football before he retires or does he want to make about ten 5 min cameos in a season and hope to get another PL medal? I guess you haven't followed his career much for the last 5-6 years and more ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on June 01, 2011, 07:23:30 PM Baffled by both sides , why would Fergie want to keep him? And does he not actually want to play some football before he retires or does he want to make about ten 5 min cameos in a season and hope to get another PL medal? I guess you haven't followed his career much for the last 5-6 years and more ? Yeah It's injuries that stopped him playing through his career , but he's just not good enough to play for ManU so he knows he never gonna get starts whether hes injured or not, but still wants to stay. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on June 01, 2011, 07:25:27 PM Baffled by signing Owen for another year Fairly average 4th forward, to make 10 5 min apperances over a season. Experience maybe a help in the squad. Berbatov leaving? So instead of needing to get 2 new strikers brought in, keep Owen for fairly cheap. And Owen can keep boasting on Twitter about winning medals. Not great by any means but understandable, imo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on June 01, 2011, 07:27:06 PM Baffled by signing Owen for another year Good bench warmer IMO, we were going to start looking really lightweight Men down: Van der Saar- fair enough Hargreaves- lol come on, not a big loss he hasnt been about in years Scholesy- has been a spent force the last couple of years, not a 1st teamer by any means, no big loss. Gary Neville- just lol Maybe berba- Cant make the champions lge final squad , cant be that big a loss. Not many squads could take those hits We need to be buying abs min of 3 quality players this summer Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on June 01, 2011, 10:47:44 PM I think Owen is quite content. He earns good money. He trains daily with good players. Has lots of interest/business outside of football. I honestly feel he contributes to the squad and hasn't had a season as a guaranteed name in the XI since his Liverpool days so has probably go used to playing when needed. He believes when he is playing he is playing at the top level. He's not too far from "home"
England/Fabio don't want him. If he left i don't think he'd be playing European football unless he went abroad again. Goalkeeper needs replacing but other than that I think you're only short in CM unless other players are sold. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on June 01, 2011, 11:35:51 PM I think Owen is quite content. He earns good money. He trains daily with good players. Has lots of interest/business outside of football. I honestly feel he contributes to the squad and hasn't had a season as a guaranteed name in the XI since his Liverpool days so has probably go used to playing when needed. He believes when he is playing he is playing at the top level. He's not too far from "home" England/Fabio don't want him. If he left i don't think he'd be playing European football unless he went abroad again. Goalkeeper needs replacing but other than that I think you're only short in CM unless other players are sold. keeper cm x2 and a striker imo Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on June 05, 2011, 10:24:46 PM Thoughts on Nasri?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on June 06, 2011, 12:34:45 AM Thoughts on Nasri? He'd be your best midfielder. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on June 06, 2011, 10:45:32 AM http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com//06062011/58/premier-league-giggs-flees-uk-affair-sister-law.html
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on June 06, 2011, 10:49:22 AM Thoughts on Nasri? He'd be your best midfielder. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on July 07, 2011, 03:08:22 PM wtf
why have we sold Wes Brown? John O shea going too Gary Neville gone I hope we have several purchases due Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on July 07, 2011, 03:09:43 PM Good bump, I remember this thread.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on July 07, 2011, 04:25:25 PM wtf why have we sold Wes Brown? John O shea going too Gary Neville gone I hope we have several purchases due cos they're shite Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on July 07, 2011, 07:58:41 PM Thoughts on your new signings ?
Think De Gea will be a good buy but not sure on Ashley Young having the quality that you should be going for, he's good but he's not World Class, pretty similar to Valencia imo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on July 07, 2011, 08:14:07 PM £50m spent by the Champions and CL runner's up. Rumours of more interest in big signings like Nasri. What debt?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on July 07, 2011, 11:46:05 PM Thoughts on your new signings ? Think De Gea will be a good buy but not sure on Ashley Young having the quality that you should be going for, he's good but he's not World Class, pretty similar to Valencia imo. I didnt even play him on my football manager team when i was atletico but he is ment to be the shizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzles! hopefully we will get a solid central midfielder Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on July 08, 2011, 04:16:03 PM wtf why have we sold Wes Brown? John O shea going too Gary Neville gone I hope we have several purchases due cos they're shite They had their moments though YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUsb82jxpuQ YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJqs4OFsiKA YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QubF5Afcuek Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on July 08, 2011, 04:27:38 PM Jones, Smalling, Rafael, Evans all not first choice at the end of last season. Probably underrated but getting on a bit and no real need for them was there?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on August 06, 2011, 11:32:43 AM We signed Obertran today.. Deece?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: toddswain on August 06, 2011, 10:51:54 PM We signed Obertran today.. Deece? Mate, hes fkin appalling, makes Ranger look ' deece ' Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on August 06, 2011, 11:41:38 PM Danny Welbeck over Bent for England squad lol.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on August 07, 2011, 10:40:06 AM Danny Welbeck over Bent for England squad lol. Bent will never get the recognition he deserves Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on August 07, 2011, 10:50:09 AM Danny Welbeck over Bent for England squad lol. Bent will never get the recognition he deserves Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on August 07, 2011, 11:13:21 AM Danny Welbeck over Bent for England squad lol. bent has a shoulder injury apparently Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on August 07, 2011, 11:33:16 AM Danny Welbeck over Bent for England squad lol. bent has a shoulder injury apparently Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on August 07, 2011, 11:40:37 AM Danny Welbeck over Bent for England squad lol. bent has a shoulder injury apparently Yeah, Skysports just reported that. Ah well, we'll still beat you on Wednesday...in a meaningless game. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on August 07, 2011, 12:11:53 PM Danny Welbeck over Bent for England squad lol. bent has a shoulder injury apparently Yeah, Skysports just reported that. Ah well, we'll still beat you on Wednesday...in a meaningless game. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on August 07, 2011, 03:19:43 PM New united keeper looks pretty good
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 07, 2011, 03:55:07 PM New united keeper looks pretty good So does City's defence Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on August 07, 2011, 04:00:36 PM New united keeper looks pretty good So does City's defence solid :-) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on August 07, 2011, 04:45:05 PM Obviously shouldn't get carried away on the form of a friendly but that was pretty amazing from United especially the young kids.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on August 07, 2011, 04:49:52 PM Obviously shouldn't get carried away on the form of a friendly but that was pretty amazing from United especially the young kids. i would allow myself to fist pump slightly. its not like you are looneypool still expecting a top 4 place or leeds expecting to be playing top flight next season. utd give a title contender 2 goals head start and won. mbnTitle: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 14, 2011, 04:42:11 PM De Gea looks short of confidence already. Stick or twist?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on August 14, 2011, 04:52:36 PM De Gea will be able to sell a compilation bloopers video come christmas if he keeps this up !!!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: action man on August 14, 2011, 04:57:59 PM fabio is having a nightmare
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on August 15, 2011, 11:12:56 AM De Gea looks short of confidence already. Stick or twist? Stick - he needs a couple of clean sheets to boost his confidence and to get an understanding going with the defenders in front of him. [ ] This is helped by Vidic and Ferdinand not finishing games. [ ] Four easy games coming up [ ] we have lots of options
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: neeko on August 16, 2011, 01:25:36 PM Looks like the Glasers are going to flog manu on the Singapore stock exchange
[ ] money will go back into the club Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on August 16, 2011, 01:39:13 PM tiote 14m we hear..
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Amatay on August 22, 2011, 09:46:08 PM fk me United looked gd tonight.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 22, 2011, 09:50:33 PM Phil Jones is gonna be a fkin supastar
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on August 22, 2011, 09:55:14 PM always loved anderson, cant wait to play man yoo though, will be a great game, our athletic midfield will give their inexperienced midfield someting to worry about.
howay the lads! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 22, 2011, 09:58:28 PM always loved anderson, cant wait to play man yoo though, will be a great game, our athletic midfield will give their inexperienced midfield someting to worry about. howay the lads! I've always rated Anderson too. When he first came I thought he was going to be on par with Fabregas but for some reason never quite happened Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on August 22, 2011, 10:01:18 PM Was genuinely a good game of football. Could be so many shouts for MOTM. Welbeck got it but I thought he was poor until the goal. Friedel played well and conceded 3.
Modric for the most unfit/lazy Kranjcar I've ever seen would have made it more even. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on August 22, 2011, 11:25:43 PM Looks like Fergie's going to put faith in the kids again, don't see them letting him down, wp Wellbeck esp.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on August 23, 2011, 06:48:09 AM Pretty irksome that they played so well, looked much better than most times I saw them last season.
Reckon they must be a good bet to put a hatful past us on Sunday. Not sure I can watch Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: ACE2M on August 23, 2011, 09:32:07 AM always loved anderson, cant wait to play man yoo though, will be a great game, our athletic midfield will give their inexperienced midfield someting to worry about. howay the lads! I've always rated Anderson too. When he first came I thought he was going to be on par with Fabregas but for some reason never quite happened he's rubbish, always has been. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on August 23, 2011, 09:38:09 AM btw, jake livermore was incred
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 28, 2011, 05:28:22 PM :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on August 28, 2011, 05:30:11 PM rotflmfao 6 now. Arsenal are soo poor it's unreal.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on August 28, 2011, 05:32:06 PM just take the title now
how must it feel to be 5-1 down and then the opposition throw on giggs and park? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on August 28, 2011, 05:46:41 PM will wenger get the sack?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on August 28, 2011, 06:45:58 PM I tweeted pre game that I thought it was Arsenals worst premiership team. Results helps my theory!
Wenger is gonna get bummed buying any player on Monday/Tuesday. Everyone just went up 20% to an arsenal buyer! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on August 28, 2011, 08:37:11 PM just take the title now how must it feel to be 5-1 down and then the opposition throw on giggs and park? Man City might have something to say about that, they weren't too shabby either. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on August 28, 2011, 08:59:38 PM Wenger is gonna get bummed buying any player on Monday/Tuesday. Everyone just went up 20% to an arsenal buyer! Quite right as well. I think there should be a massive premium on every team that leaves it till the last minute to buy players. You either have a vision for the next few years or you don't...Wenger clearly doesn't. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on August 28, 2011, 09:46:41 PM Quote Manchester-based England XI Not a bad team there.Continue reading the main story * GK - Joe Hart (City) * RB - Micah Richards (City) * LB - Joleon Lescott (City) * CB - Phil Jones (United) * CB - Chris Smalling (United) * CM - James Milner (City) * CM - Gareth Barry (City) * CM - Tom Cleverley (United) * RW - Adam Johnson (City) * LW - Ashley Young (United) * CF - Wayne Rooney (United) Looking forward to seeing Andersons antics on MOTD. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on August 28, 2011, 10:33:19 PM Wenger is gonna get bummed buying any player on Monday/Tuesday. Everyone just went up 20% to an arsenal buyer! Quite right as well. I think there should be a massive premium on every team that leaves it till the last minute to buy players. You either have a vision for the next few years or you don't...Wenger clearly doesn't. Do you not think it's pretty shrewd leaving your bid for a player who leaves on a free in a years time till the last minute? Take the offer on the table now or wait till Jan when he's worth at least 50% less (and I think can talk to foreign clubs about a free at the end of the year) or wait till summer and get F'all. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on August 28, 2011, 11:32:02 PM Wenger is gonna get bummed buying any player on Monday/Tuesday. Everyone just went up 20% to an arsenal buyer! Quite right as well. I think there should be a massive premium on every team that leaves it till the last minute to buy players. You either have a vision for the next few years or you don't...Wenger clearly doesn't. Do you not think it's pretty shrewd leaving your bid for a player who leaves on a free in a years time till the last minute? Take the offer on the table now or wait till Jan when he's worth at least 50% less (and I think can talk to foreign clubs about a free at the end of the year) or wait till summer and get F'all. If City's offer for Nasri was rejected they still have a big enough squad to cope (presuming you meant that transfer). Wenger surely knew a long while ago who he was losing. They have some injuries/suspensions but obviously need defenders/striker! Get your deals done early on imo, give them a full preseason to settle in and work on anything that the manager feels needs improving. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on August 28, 2011, 11:58:11 PM Sorry was referring to Arsenal's bid for Cahill. Bolton are obviously desperate to sell. Coyle's been talking about interest all Summer but nobody else has. They're £93mil in debt. Doubt Bolton can let him go for free.
I think it's smart to give them a take it or leave it offer on Wednesday rather than signed him for ~5mil more at the start of the summer. I don't think Wenger expected Nasri to go but he would take Fabregas's position and Gervinho would play wide where Nasri did. They need to find a midfielder that they hadn't planned on but I think they've just been pretty unlucky with injuries. You can argue that Arsenal can't attract the top talent anymore but think it's unfair to say he hasn't tried to strengthen he was after Smalling, Jones and Mata who have all turned them down. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on August 29, 2011, 12:14:13 AM Unreal from Man U but Man City will challenge until the end and could well win the title.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: craigbetts on August 29, 2011, 12:37:09 AM Unreal from Man U but Man City will challenge until the end and could well win the title. This is a 2 horse race, a la Rangers v Celtic and Barca v Real Madrid. Both teams buzzing at this stage of the season, WTF! On history I would say Man U hands down, but what has impressed me about Citeh is their total dominance across the park. Chelski simply do not have the energy and its possible Liverpool may chase them hard for third! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on August 29, 2011, 07:18:44 AM Sorry was referring to Arsenal's bid for Cahill. Bolton are obviously desperate to sell. Coyle's been talking about interest all Summer but nobody else has. They're £93mil in debt. Doubt Bolton can let him go for free. I think it's smart to give them a take it or leave it offer on Wednesday rather than signed him for ~5mil more at the start of the summer. I doubt very much that Cahill will go to Arsenal for 6-7mill. Obv if they sign him for approx 12mill they will have him for 8mill less than they could have signed him in January (when Bolton wanted approx 20mill). Yes, very shrewd...he might have saved you £8mill...WP Wenger. Oh, but hang on a minute..how did you do in the second part of last season? How much do you think that cost you? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 15, 2011, 10:09:28 AM Giggs scores again ;)
All in all a decent performance and the point away from home that SAF looks for to go with nine from winning the home matches to pretty much guarantee a quarter final place. Good run out for Fletcher and Valencia and a good showing from Lindegaard. One up front isn't our most free flowing system, but it does the job. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on September 15, 2011, 10:21:26 AM Going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say you meant 2nd round.
Got to be pretty confident to think a point away means that you'll sail through your first knockout game when you could easily play Bayern or Milan Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 15, 2011, 10:29:18 AM Going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say you meant 2nd round. Got to be pretty confident to think a point away means that you'll sail through your first knockout game when you could easily play Bayern or Milan You're correct of course - although confidence is high Really looking forward to Sunday now, this fels like a good time to be playing Chelsea Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on September 15, 2011, 10:30:35 AM where was young? injrued?
who will play when young/nani/valencia are all back? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 15, 2011, 10:53:17 AM where was young? injrued? who will play when young/nani/valencia are all back? SAF said after the game that he gave Young a rest. Perm any two from three of Young/Nani/Valencia atm I don't think there's much between them. I think Nani may not react quite as well as the other two to being 'rested'/used as a sub though. Does that mean he starts more to get more from him? Maybe. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 19, 2011, 12:37:08 PM Carlsberg don't do weekend football results, but if they did...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 20, 2011, 07:52:18 PM lol at the line up against Leeds. 1-3-6 by the looks of it
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 21, 2011, 01:16:54 PM Life in the old dogs yet?
Combined age of last night's scorers = 99 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on September 21, 2011, 01:31:03 PM is it right that owen's now scored 11 in his last 12 starts or is that a made up stat?
Life in the old dogs yet? Combined age of last night's scorers = 99 that's def a made up stat Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 21, 2011, 01:32:16 PM is it right that owen's now scored 11 in his last 12 starts or is that a made up stat? Life in the old dogs yet? Combined age of last night's scorers = 99 that's def a made up stat From BBC Scoring twice against Leeds took his goal streak to 11 goals in 12 starts, but he has been in the starting line-up so rarely that the run dates back to October 2009. {2 x 31) + 37... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on September 22, 2011, 11:03:43 AM is it right that owen's now scored 11 in his last 12 starts or is that a made up stat? like ninja mod is made up too... i believed you but tighty could not believe i was so stupid :)Life in the old dogs yet? Combined age of last night's scorers = 99 that's def a made up stat Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on September 22, 2011, 11:44:13 AM fans singing about istanbul supposedly.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 22, 2011, 05:04:45 PM fans singing about istanbul supposedly. fans also singing about Munich... neither are acceptable Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on September 22, 2011, 06:00:24 PM fans singing about istanbul supposedly. fans also singing about Munich... neither are acceptable Neither are new. A lot been made of this when I heard about 20 people on each side doing it on Tues, in like 2002 the whole of our stand was doing aeroplane arms and you had about 10 banners saying Istanbul and nothing was made of it then. Not saying its acceptable, just don't understand why its more of a big deal now with 20 people doing it then 7 years ago with 2,000 doing it. Didn't realise society had changed that much in 7 years. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 23, 2011, 09:28:35 AM Gtfo Owen hargreaves
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 23, 2011, 09:55:37 AM Gtfo Owen hargreaves nah - good luck to him, we had our chance to keep him and opted not to. Obviously I may revise this view if he stays fit [ ] This seems likely Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on September 23, 2011, 10:47:38 AM Don't think the invterview comes across too badly to be honest. Obvious United didn't treat him as well as possible and he accepts as much blame as them for the Wolves game.
How he goes on the pitch thinking "I'll try and get through it without sprinting" is beyond me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 23, 2011, 11:54:24 AM Should keep his gob shut. Basically paid him to sit on his arse for 3 years
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on September 23, 2011, 11:57:38 AM Should keep his gob shut. Basically paid him to sit on his arse for 3 years Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on September 23, 2011, 12:19:37 PM u crocked him mate with ur dodgy injections.
#oncescumalwaysscum Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on September 23, 2011, 07:28:51 PM fergie backing his medical staff 100%. pretty much reckons that that utd would not have been as successful without them. good luck to owen but wtf you moaning for, just look bitter
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on September 26, 2011, 09:59:32 PM http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15064028.stm
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on September 27, 2011, 09:47:04 PM Is the Phil Jones myth over? I think he's a decent youngster but was shocked he was in the last England squad and all the hype around him.
Reckon it will die down after a couple of really shaky games. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 27, 2011, 10:04:20 PM Is the Phil Jones myth over? I think he's a decent youngster but was shocked he was in the last England squad and all the hype around him. Reckon it will die down after a couple of really shaky games. Just lol Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on September 27, 2011, 10:42:26 PM Jones, Ferdinand, Smalling, Evans, Fabiom Rafaek, all suspect and dodgy. YOU CANT WIN NOWT WITH KIDS
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on September 27, 2011, 10:43:47 PM Jones, Ferdinand, Smalling, Evans, Fabiom Rafaek, all suspect and dodgy. YOU CANT WIN NOWT WITH KIDS just lol Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on September 27, 2011, 10:54:46 PM Krul
Simpson Taylor Collocini Santon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> De Gay Rafael Jones Ferdinana Evra tiote cabaye >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anderson cleverly Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 28, 2011, 04:19:49 AM Krul Simpson Taylor Collocini Santon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> De Gay Rafael Jones Ferdinana Evra tiote cabaye >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anderson cleverly GTFO Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: action man on September 28, 2011, 04:59:04 AM Is the Phil Jones myth over? I think he's a decent youngster but was shocked he was in the last England squad and all the hype around him. Reckon it will die down after a couple of really shaky games. i think he will go down as englands best ever centre half infront of bobby moore Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on September 28, 2011, 07:54:52 AM You obviously rate him very highly. I'm more of a Smalling fan. Do you not think he has been shaky in the last couple of games? He was marking Crouch at set pieces on Saturday and let him go for the goal and I seem to remember Crouch having another simple chance too.
He seems to go on a lot of really penetrating runs but often have no end product and leave him miles out of position. I think he has potential but everybody seems to be talking as if he is playing out of his skin. This got a lol response from the Man U fans but at least one of the nationals has picked up on it even though it is an article full of praise despite being a criticism. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2011/sep/28/phil-jones-defending-paul-hayward?CMP=twt_gu (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2011/sep/28/phil-jones-defending-paul-hayward?CMP=twt_gu) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on September 28, 2011, 10:21:50 AM Is the Phil Jones myth over? I think he's a decent youngster but was shocked he was in the last England squad and all the hype around him. Reckon it will die down after a couple of really shaky games. i think he will go down as englands best ever centre half infront of bobby moore I like Jones for 19 he's showing so much skill and potential but to have a long career at the top for both club and country he needs alot of luck..avoid injury, maintain form.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on November 04, 2011, 01:44:55 PM 25 years of Fergie (well on Sunday anyways).
Remarkable, and still the best manager in the league. WP Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on November 04, 2011, 01:53:13 PM 25 years of Fergie (well on Sunday anyways). Remarkable, and still the best manager in the league. WP pards? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on November 04, 2011, 01:54:32 PM 25 years of Fergie (well on Sunday anyways). Remarkable, and still the best manager in the league. WP pards? Fluke? (He might be a genius all of a sudden..I don't know. I watched "Limitless" last night and it could well be that Pads got his hands on some NZT...but I doubt it somehow.) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on November 04, 2011, 02:04:39 PM 25 years of Fergie (well on Sunday anyways). Remarkable, and still the best manager in the league. WP pards? Fluke? (He might be a genius all of a sudden..I don't know. I watched "Limitless" last night and it could well be that Pads got his hands on some NZT...but I doubt it somehow.) The maddest thing is, he probably isn't levelling. <3 PeeLeno Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 04, 2011, 02:42:32 PM 25 years of Fergie (well on Sunday anyways). Remarkable, and still the best manager in the league. WP Arguably. There have been seasons when other managers with more limited resources have achieved above expectations (see Pardew @NUFC in the opening part of this season, or Moyes @Everton for the past 5 or 6 seasons amongst others) Not a clue who will replace him if indeed he's replaceable. The Phil Neville interview on the R5 tribute including him saying something along the lines of it having to be someone with a United history. Phil's suggestions were Brian Robson, Mark Hughes, Ryan Giggs and Gary Neville. I honestly don't have words to express my fear that one of those could be the next manager of Manchester United. I'd rather have Mourinho, and I don't want him either. Maybe Guardiola would fancy the job? dreams... Hopefully SAF has another 10 years in him. My dad's 85 and is still Chairman and non-playing captain of his Bowls Team so you never know. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on November 04, 2011, 03:00:29 PM 25 years of Fergie (well on Sunday anyways). Remarkable, and still the best manager in the league. WP Arguably. There have been seasons when other managers with more limited resources have achieved above expectations (see Pardew @NUFC in the opening part of this season, or Moyes @Everton for the past 5 or 6 seasons amongst others) Not a clue who will replace him if indeed he's replaceable. The Phil Neville interview on the R5 tribute including him saying something along the lines of it having to be someone with a United history. Phil's suggestions were Brian Robson, Mark Hughes, Ryan Giggs and Gary Neville. I honestly don't have words to express my fear that one of those could be the next manager of Manchester United. I'd rather have Mourinho, and I don't want him either. Maybe Guardiola would fancy the job? dreams... Hopefully SAF has another 10 years in him. My dad's 85 and is still Chairman and non-playing captain of his Bowls Team so you never know. Would be stunned of Neville or Giggs would get the job (Or Robson for that matter and think hughes would be a mistake). Mourinho has gotten too big for his boots now IMO. When he came to Chelsea he was funny, slightly arrogant but he knew what was decent and what not. He's just a whiny little b*tch now (if still a good manager obv). Guardiola would be a good shout. Young up and coming manager who has shown he can handle life at a big club and he is by no means tied to Barca for the rest of his life. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on November 04, 2011, 04:41:19 PM i fucking hate it that you and the rest of the country label yourself United.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on November 04, 2011, 04:45:55 PM i fucking hate it that you and the rest of the country label yourself United. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on November 04, 2011, 05:17:29 PM i fucking hate it that you and the rest of the country label yourself United. Who labels who United? Or is this just a "There is only one Utd and that's NUFC?" Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 04, 2011, 09:17:30 PM i fucking hate it that you and the rest of the country label yourself United. Who labels who United? Or is this just a "There is only one Utd and that's NUFC?" I make an effort not to do this. Although I reckon most people know which team is being referred to when the short form is used. Do you hate it when people refer to the two Midlands clubs as The Albion, or Villa? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on November 04, 2011, 09:24:15 PM i fucking hate it that you and the rest of the country label yourself United. Who labels who United? Or is this just a "There is only one Utd and that's NUFC?" I make an effort not to do this. Although I reckon most people know which team is being referred to when the short form is used. Do you hate it when people refer to the two Midlands clubs as The Albion, or Villa? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 05, 2011, 07:50:17 AM i fucking hate it that you and the rest of the country label yourself United. Who labels who United? Or is this just a "There is only one Utd and that's NUFC?" I make an effort not to do this. Although I reckon most people know which team is being referred to when the short form is used. Do you hate it when people refer to the two Midlands clubs as The Albion, or Villa? No? Really? Gosh! More seriously, I do get rather tired of seeing Manchester United Footbakll Club referred to as 'manure' And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 05, 2011, 09:39:55 AM i fucking hate it that you and the rest of the country label yourself United. Who labels who United? Or is this just a "There is only one Utd and that's NUFC?" I make an effort not to do this. Although I reckon most people know which team is being referred to when the short form is used. Do you hate it when people refer to the two Midlands clubs as The Albion, or Villa? No? Really? Gosh! More seriously, I do get rather tired of seeing Manchester United Footbakll Club referred to as 'manure' And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. ;applause; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on November 06, 2011, 12:10:44 AM Nice to name the stand after Fergie and do it as a suprise, obv much deserved.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on November 06, 2011, 04:04:58 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 06, 2011, 07:26:12 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. Yawn Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 06, 2011, 08:22:07 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. So London Reds were born in Plymouth or Exeter? Do they not teach anything in school these days? More to the point, and more seriously. Your family sounds really pleasant, do they still use all the other offensive descriptors for people or is it just Manchester United Football Club? Anyway, I'm sure Sunday afternoon tea with the Hornerises must be a delight. My dad supports Manchester United Football Club btw, and has done for nearly 60 yrs, my attachment just goes back to 1963 Unlike yours, my Dad didn't force me to support any club, and brought me up to have respect for others and especially not to refer to any group of people by any sort of offensive term. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 06, 2011, 08:37:28 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. So London Reds were born in Plymouth or Exeter? Do they not teach anything in school these days? More to the point, and more seriously. Your family sounds really pleasant, do they still use all the other offensive descriptors for people or is it just Manchester United Football Club? Anyway, I'm sure Sunday afternoon tea with the Hornerises must be a delight. My dad supports Manchester United Football Club btw, and has done for nearly 60 yrs, my attachment just goes back to 1963 Unlike yours, my Dad didn't force me to support any club, and brought me up to have respect for others and especially not to refer to any group of people by any sort of offensive term. ;applause; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on November 06, 2011, 09:00:37 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. So London Reds were born in Plymouth or Exeter? Do they not teach anything in school these days? More to the point, and more seriously. Your family sounds really pleasant, do they still use all the other offensive descriptors for people or is it just Manchester United Football Club? Anyway, I'm sure Sunday afternoon tea with the Hornerises must be a delight. My dad supports Manchester United Football Club btw, and has done for nearly 60 yrs, my attachment just goes back to 1963 Unlike yours, my Dad didn't force me to support any club, and brought me up to have respect for others and especially not to refer to any group of people by any sort of offensive term. the problem is with fans like you the football league will die and we will end up with 3 or 4 clubs with all the "supporters". Your dad not explaining the importance of supporting your local club is the problem here, you make out like its a good thing getting everybody to support Man Utd/Arsenal/Liverpool etc whereas it breaks my heart as I know what its like to have a real affiliation with my club and I would hate to see a league of 20... how much fun is the scottish league? I'm from Leeds, I love Leeds and I support my local club. I go to games because my team is local to me. Lots of Man Utd "fans" don't go because they live 100 miles away. You struggle to understand what it is like to support a team, not because they are doing well or will win all the trophies but because they are YOUR team. When Leeds lose it hurts, when we win I'm delighted. I'm pretty sure you don't care as much as proper fans as you simply picked your team. It would be like me picking to support a different country... if I started wearing a Spanish shirt and got the pencil case and lunch box telling everybody that my dad took me to Spain when I was 3 and that I've supported them for 25 years would that make it ok? No because its ridiculous. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 06, 2011, 09:20:10 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. So London Reds were born in Plymouth or Exeter? Do they not teach anything in school these days? More to the point, and more seriously. Your family sounds really pleasant, do they still use all the other offensive descriptors for people or is it just Manchester United Football Club? Anyway, I'm sure Sunday afternoon tea with the Hornerises must be a delight. My dad supports Manchester United Football Club btw, and has done for nearly 60 yrs, my attachment just goes back to 1963 Unlike yours, my Dad didn't force me to support any club, and brought me up to have respect for others and especially not to refer to any group of people by any sort of offensive term. the problem is with fans like you the football league will die and we will end up with 3 or 4 clubs with all the "supporters". Your dad not explaining the importance of supporting your local club is the problem here, you make out like its a good thing getting everybody to support Man Utd/Arsenal/Liverpool etc whereas it breaks my heart as I know what its like to have a real affiliation with my club and I would hate to see a league of 20... how much fun is the scottish league? I'm from Leeds, I love Leeds and I support my local club. I go to games because my team is local to me. Lots of Man Utd "fans" don't go because they live 100 miles away. You struggle to understand what it is like to support a team, not because they are doing well or will win all the trophies but because they are YOUR team. When Leeds lose it hurts, when we win I'm delighted. I'm pretty sure you don't care as much as proper fans as you simply picked your team. It would be like me picking to support a different country... if I started wearing a Spanish shirt and got the pencil case and lunch box telling everybody that my dad took me to Spain when I was 3 and that I've supported them for 25 years would that make it ok? No because its ridiculous. Sov with all respect you know fuck all about what he does/does not feel about United. Just cos your team is shit doesn't mean you support them anymore then Man U fans do Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on November 06, 2011, 09:22:12 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. So London Reds were born in Plymouth or Exeter? Do they not teach anything in school these days? More to the point, and more seriously. Your family sounds really pleasant, do they still use all the other offensive descriptors for people or is it just Manchester United Football Club? Anyway, I'm sure Sunday afternoon tea with the Hornerises must be a delight. My dad supports Manchester United Football Club btw, and has done for nearly 60 yrs, my attachment just goes back to 1963 Unlike yours, my Dad didn't force me to support any club, and brought me up to have respect for others and especially not to refer to any group of people by any sort of offensive term. the problem is with fans like you the football league will die and we will end up with 3 or 4 clubs with all the "supporters". Your dad not explaining the importance of supporting your local club is the problem here, you make out like its a good thing getting everybody to support Man Utd/Arsenal/Liverpool etc whereas it breaks my heart as I know what its like to have a real affiliation with my club and I would hate to see a league of 20... how much fun is the scottish league? I'm from Leeds, I love Leeds and I support my local club. I go to games because my team is local to me. Lots of Man Utd "fans" don't go because they live 100 miles away. You struggle to understand what it is like to support a team, not because they are doing well or will win all the trophies but because they are YOUR team. When Leeds lose it hurts, when we win I'm delighted. I'm pretty sure you don't care as much as proper fans as you simply picked your team. It would be like me picking to support a different country... if I started wearing a Spanish shirt and got the pencil case and lunch box telling everybody that my dad took me to Spain when I was 3 and that I've supported them for 25 years would that make it ok? No because its ridiculous. Sov with all respect you know fuck all about what he does/does not feel about United. Just cos your team is shit doesn't mean you support them anymore then Man U fans do you have missed my point G2L. it is impossible to have the same connection with a club you support from 100 miles away. When leeds won the title I was in the city centre with my fellow people of leeds. You havent even been to old trafford have you? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 06, 2011, 09:23:31 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. So London Reds were born in Plymouth or Exeter? Do they not teach anything in school these days? More to the point, and more seriously. Your family sounds really pleasant, do they still use all the other offensive descriptors for people or is it just Manchester United Football Club? Anyway, I'm sure Sunday afternoon tea with the Hornerises must be a delight. My dad supports Manchester United Football Club btw, and has done for nearly 60 yrs, my attachment just goes back to 1963 Unlike yours, my Dad didn't force me to support any club, and brought me up to have respect for others and especially not to refer to any group of people by any sort of offensive term. the problem is with fans like you the football league will die and we will end up with 3 or 4 clubs with all the "supporters". Your dad not explaining the importance of supporting your local club is the problem here, you make out like its a good thing getting everybody to support Man Utd/Arsenal/Liverpool etc whereas it breaks my heart as I know what its like to have a real affiliation with my club and I would hate to see a league of 20... how much fun is the scottish league? I'm from Leeds, I love Leeds and I support my local club. I go to games because my team is local to me. Lots of Man Utd "fans" don't go because they live 100 miles away. You struggle to understand what it is like to support a team, not because they are doing well or will win all the trophies but because they are YOUR team. When Leeds lose it hurts, when we win I'm delighted. I'm pretty sure you don't care as much as proper fans as you simply picked your team. It would be like me picking to support a different country... if I started wearing a Spanish shirt and got the pencil case and lunch box telling everybody that my dad took me to Spain when I was 3 and that I've supported them for 25 years would that make it ok? No because its ridiculous. Sov with all respect you know fuck all about what he does/does not feel about United. Just cos your team is shit doesn't mean you support them anymore then Man U fans do you have missed my point G2L. it is impossible to have the same connection with a club you support from 100 miles away. When leeds won the title I was in the city centre with my fellow people of leeds. You havent even been to old trafford have you? Not getting into this again as you're obv just trying to wind me up. Glad u enjoyed your title win many moons ago. What was it like in the city centre when you when down to league 2? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on November 06, 2011, 09:28:11 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. So London Reds were born in Plymouth or Exeter? Do they not teach anything in school these days? More to the point, and more seriously. Your family sounds really pleasant, do they still use all the other offensive descriptors for people or is it just Manchester United Football Club? Anyway, I'm sure Sunday afternoon tea with the Hornerises must be a delight. My dad supports Manchester United Football Club btw, and has done for nearly 60 yrs, my attachment just goes back to 1963 Unlike yours, my Dad didn't force me to support any club, and brought me up to have respect for others and especially not to refer to any group of people by any sort of offensive term. the problem is with fans like you the football league will die and we will end up with 3 or 4 clubs with all the "supporters". Your dad not explaining the importance of supporting your local club is the problem here, you make out like its a good thing getting everybody to support Man Utd/Arsenal/Liverpool etc whereas it breaks my heart as I know what its like to have a real affiliation with my club and I would hate to see a league of 20... how much fun is the scottish league? I'm from Leeds, I love Leeds and I support my local club. I go to games because my team is local to me. Lots of Man Utd "fans" don't go because they live 100 miles away. You struggle to understand what it is like to support a team, not because they are doing well or will win all the trophies but because they are YOUR team. When Leeds lose it hurts, when we win I'm delighted. I'm pretty sure you don't care as much as proper fans as you simply picked your team. It would be like me picking to support a different country... if I started wearing a Spanish shirt and got the pencil case and lunch box telling everybody that my dad took me to Spain when I was 3 and that I've supported them for 25 years would that make it ok? No because its ridiculous. Sov with all respect you know fuck all about what he does/does not feel about United. Just cos your team is shit doesn't mean you support them anymore then Man U fans do you have missed my point G2L. it is impossible to have the same connection with a club you support from 100 miles away. When leeds won the title I was in the city centre with my fellow people of leeds. You havent even been to old trafford have you? Not getting into this again as you're obv just trying to wind me up. Glad u enjoyed your title win many moons ago. What was it like in the city centre when you when down to league 2? you fail to understand that by digging my team it just shows you up for the glory supporter you are. you picked your team based on previous success and its all you've got. I will follow leeds regardless of league position because I'm a loyal supporter. Glory supporters pick a team then spend there lives explaining why they are a real supporter. The thing they miss is they will never be, no matter how many shirts you buy or how many times you tell us that your uncle/brother/dad/neighbour supported them so you did too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 06, 2011, 09:47:38 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. So London Reds were born in Plymouth or Exeter? Do they not teach anything in school these days? More to the point, and more seriously. Your family sounds really pleasant, do they still use all the other offensive descriptors for people or is it just Manchester United Football Club? Anyway, I'm sure Sunday afternoon tea with the Hornerises must be a delight. My dad supports Manchester United Football Club btw, and has done for nearly 60 yrs, my attachment just goes back to 1963 Unlike yours, my Dad didn't force me to support any club, and brought me up to have respect for others and especially not to refer to any group of people by any sort of offensive term. the problem is with fans like you the football league will die and we will end up with 3 or 4 clubs with all the "supporters". Your dad not explaining the importance of supporting your local club is the problem here, you make out like its a good thing getting everybody to support Man Utd/Arsenal/Liverpool etc whereas it breaks my heart as I know what its like to have a real affiliation with my club and I would hate to see a league of 20... how much fun is the scottish league? I'm from Leeds, I love Leeds and I support my local club. I go to games because my team is local to me. Lots of Man Utd "fans" don't go because they live 100 miles away. You struggle to understand what it is like to support a team, not because they are doing well or will win all the trophies but because they are YOUR team. When Leeds lose it hurts, when we win I'm delighted. I'm pretty sure you don't care as much as proper fans as you simply picked your team. It would be like me picking to support a different country... if I started wearing a Spanish shirt and got the pencil case and lunch box telling everybody that my dad took me to Spain when I was 3 and that I've supported them for 25 years would that make it ok? No because its ridiculous. Sov with all respect you know fuck all about what he does/does not feel about United. Just cos your team is shit doesn't mean you support them anymore then Man U fans do you have missed my point G2L. it is impossible to have the same connection with a club you support from 100 miles away. When leeds won the title I was in the city centre with my fellow people of leeds. You havent even been to old trafford have you? Not getting into this again as you're obv just trying to wind me up. Glad u enjoyed your title win many moons ago. What was it like in the city centre when you when down to league 2? you fail to understand that by digging my team it just shows you up for the glory supporter you are. you picked your team based on previous success and its all you've got. I will follow leeds regardless of league position because I'm a loyal supporter. Glory supporters pick a team then spend there lives explaining why they are a real supporter. The thing they miss is they will never be, no matter how many shirts you buy or how many times you tell us that your uncle/brother/dad/neighbour supported them so you did too. Yup I'm a glory hunter. Now fuck off to another thread and make your worthless point. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 06, 2011, 09:49:44 AM No digs, I have some sympathy for the view that football may be polarised by the trend towards supporting only the TV friendly, big audience ratings clubs.
How did you choose which of your local clubs to support though? What stops you from being a Leeds City supporter? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on November 06, 2011, 09:50:22 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. So London Reds were born in Plymouth or Exeter? Do they not teach anything in school these days? More to the point, and more seriously. Your family sounds really pleasant, do they still use all the other offensive descriptors for people or is it just Manchester United Football Club? Anyway, I'm sure Sunday afternoon tea with the Hornerises must be a delight. My dad supports Manchester United Football Club btw, and has done for nearly 60 yrs, my attachment just goes back to 1963 Unlike yours, my Dad didn't force me to support any club, and brought me up to have respect for others and especially not to refer to any group of people by any sort of offensive term. the problem is with fans like you the football league will die and we will end up with 3 or 4 clubs with all the "supporters". Your dad not explaining the importance of supporting your local club is the problem here, you make out like its a good thing getting everybody to support Man Utd/Arsenal/Liverpool etc whereas it breaks my heart as I know what its like to have a real affiliation with my club and I would hate to see a league of 20... how much fun is the scottish league? I'm from Leeds, I love Leeds and I support my local club. I go to games because my team is local to me. Lots of Man Utd "fans" don't go because they live 100 miles away. You struggle to understand what it is like to support a team, not because they are doing well or will win all the trophies but because they are YOUR team. When Leeds lose it hurts, when we win I'm delighted. I'm pretty sure you don't care as much as proper fans as you simply picked your team. It would be like me picking to support a different country... if I started wearing a Spanish shirt and got the pencil case and lunch box telling everybody that my dad took me to Spain when I was 3 and that I've supported them for 25 years would that make it ok? No because its ridiculous. Sov with all respect you know fuck all about what he does/does not feel about United. Just cos your team is shit doesn't mean you support them anymore then Man U fans do you have missed my point G2L. it is impossible to have the same connection with a club you support from 100 miles away. When leeds won the title I was in the city centre with my fellow people of leeds. You havent even been to old trafford have you? Not getting into this again as you're obv just trying to wind me up. Glad u enjoyed your title win many moons ago. What was it like in the city centre when you when down to league 2? you fail to understand that by digging my team it just shows you up for the glory supporter you are. you picked your team based on previous success and its all you've got. I will follow leeds regardless of league position because I'm a loyal supporter. Glory supporters pick a team then spend there lives explaining why they are a real supporter. The thing they miss is they will never be, no matter how many shirts you buy or how many times you tell us that your uncle/brother/dad/neighbour supported them so you did too. Yup I'm a glory hunter. Now fuck off to another thread and make your worthless point. Thats a bit aggressive George, if I didnt like you so much I would report this aggressive abuse. I only posted in response to some silly comments... I will be on my way now George Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on November 06, 2011, 09:52:21 AM No digs, I have some sympathy for the view that football may be polarised by the trend towards supporting only the TV friendly, big audience ratings clubs. How did you choose which of your local clubs to support though? What stops you from being a Leeds City supporter? The fact they didnt exist. Obviously you can take it to the Nth degree like why didnt i support the under 9's team etc. I just personally believe that football would be much more competitive if everybody supported there local league team. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 06, 2011, 10:30:28 AM No digs, I have some sympathy for the view that football may be polarised by the trend towards supporting only the TV friendly, big audience ratings clubs. How did you choose which of your local clubs to support though? What stops you from being a Leeds City supporter? The fact they didnt exist. Obviously you can take it to the Nth degree like why didnt i support the under 9's team etc. I just personally believe that football would be much more competitive if everybody supported there local league team. You may well be right, and I do support Northampton Town, as much as I can from a home in the North East, But whoever I support, I don't refer to others as scum, which was where this flurry of posts began. Where do you stand on that? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on November 06, 2011, 10:37:34 AM No digs, I have some sympathy for the view that football may be polarised by the trend towards supporting only the TV friendly, big audience ratings clubs. How did you choose which of your local clubs to support though? What stops you from being a Leeds City supporter? The fact they didnt exist. Obviously you can take it to the Nth degree like why didnt i support the under 9's team etc. I just personally believe that football would be much more competitive if everybody supported there local league team. You may well be right, and I do support Northampton Town, as much as I can from a home in the North East, But whoever I support, I don't refer to others as scum, which was where this flurry of posts began. Where do you stand on that? I was trying not to post on this thread as I have upset George and it wasnt really my intention. The scum thing is a funny debate really, i think most fans call each other scum, whilst its not a very nice word I dont think that its worth getting upset about. Leeds fans are called scum by man utd fans more than the other way round pretty much because through every single game played at old trafford and also most away games Man Utd fans sing "we all hate leeds scum", its non-stop for many games even champions league games. From time to time I have referred to Man Utd as scum but its not something I do that often really. I guess its one of those things and in my opinion not really that bad. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on November 06, 2011, 10:53:11 AM And at an even higher level of seriousness. I am aware enough of the prejudices of certain posters not to have to seek for contextual reference when any football team is referrred to as 'the scum'. I know that that is intended to indicate Manchester United Football Club, I know it stems from feelings of envy and insecurity, and i know it indicates a certain lack of balance and maturity in the poster. But it is annoying just the same. But you London Reds fans chant "we all hate Leeds scum" no? Anyway, my Grandad calls you Scum, my Dad calls you Scum and I will teach my son Luke to call you Scum. Because thats the way its always been. Because you are (not you personally, I'm sure your a tremendous bloke). Its probably difficult for you to understand, your Grandad/Dad probably support their local clubs, Stevenage or Plymouth or Exeter or whom ever. And thats fine. So London Reds were born in Plymouth or Exeter? Do they not teach anything in school these days? More to the point, and more seriously. Your family sounds really pleasant, do they still use all the other offensive descriptors for people or is it just Manchester United Football Club? Anyway, I'm sure Sunday afternoon tea with the Hornerises must be a delight. My dad supports Manchester United Football Club btw, and has done for nearly 60 yrs, my attachment just goes back to 1963 Unlike yours, my Dad didn't force me to support any club, and brought me up to have respect for others and especially not to refer to any group of people by any sort of offensive term. the problem is with fans like you the football league will die and we will end up with 3 or 4 clubs with all the "supporters". Your dad not explaining the importance of supporting your local club is the problem here, you make out like its a good thing getting everybody to support Man Utd/Arsenal/Liverpool etc whereas it breaks my heart as I know what its like to have a real affiliation with my club and I would hate to see a league of 20... how much fun is the scottish league? I'm from Leeds, I love Leeds and I support my local club. I go to games because my team is local to me. Lots of Man Utd "fans" don't go because they live 100 miles away. You struggle to understand what it is like to support a team, not because they are doing well or will win all the trophies but because they are YOUR team. When Leeds lose it hurts, when we win I'm delighted. I'm pretty sure you don't care as much as proper fans as you simply picked your team. It would be like me picking to support a different country... if I started wearing a Spanish shirt and got the pencil case and lunch box telling everybody that my dad took me to Spain when I was 3 and that I've supported them for 25 years would that make it ok? No because its ridiculous. ;applause; ;applause; ;applause; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on November 06, 2011, 12:41:26 PM No digs, I have some sympathy for the view that football may be polarised by the trend towards supporting only the TV friendly, big audience ratings clubs. How did you choose which of your local clubs to support though? What stops you from being a Leeds City supporter? This is why we have such good support, it's not because the Geordies love there football, although a lot do, we are a 1 team city, Newcastle is they only local club to support for quite a distance, and so most of us do. This isn't trolling but Man U's away following is well known for bringing good support, they are up there with the best away supporters in the Premier Lge for sure, this may be bullshit but I was under the impression that a lot of them are Man U fans from Manchester that refuse to go to the home games ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on November 06, 2011, 01:38:45 PM No digs, I have some sympathy for the view that football may be polarised by the trend towards supporting only the TV friendly, big audience ratings clubs. How did you choose which of your local clubs to support though? What stops you from being a Leeds City supporter? The fact they didnt exist. Obviously you can take it to the Nth degree like why didnt i support the under 9's team etc. I just personally believe that football would be much more competitive if everybody supported there local league team. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on November 06, 2011, 01:58:59 PM No digs, I have some sympathy for the view that football may be polarised by the trend towards supporting only the TV friendly, big audience ratings clubs. How did you choose which of your local clubs to support though? What stops you from being a Leeds City supporter? The fact they didnt exist. Obviously you can take it to the Nth degree like why didnt i support the under 9's team etc. I just personally believe that football would be much more competitive if everybody supported there local league team. ouch that cuts deep. I was born and bred in Leeds. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on November 06, 2011, 02:25:49 PM No digs, I have some sympathy for the view that football may be polarised by the trend towards supporting only the TV friendly, big audience ratings clubs. How did you choose which of your local clubs to support though? What stops you from being a Leeds City supporter? The fact they didnt exist. Obviously you can take it to the Nth degree like why didnt i support the under 9's team etc. I just personally believe that football would be much more competitive if everybody supported there local league team. ouch that cuts deep. I was born and bred in Leeds. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 22, 2011, 12:18:12 PM Next United manager?
(http://www.amazing-planet.net/slike/vijesti/sport/solskjaer_retires.jpg) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/8897844/Jim-White-Ole-Gunnar-Solskjaer-reveals-why-Manchester-United-hot-seat-is-his-burning-ambition.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on November 22, 2011, 12:23:22 PM one time
ive often wondered how easy it would be to get right behind the next manager from day 1 - this would be the easiest around! Not tarnished like hughes/bruce either Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 22, 2011, 12:52:25 PM one time ive often wondered how easy it would be to get right behind the next manager from day 1 - this would be the easiest around! Not tarnished like hughes/bruce either ticks all the boxes doesn't he? apparently available at 14/1 with a couple of bookmakers too Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 22, 2011, 01:02:42 PM lest we forget...
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQ0KdbDVtlQ YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-JmsODpjNQ Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 22, 2011, 01:15:05 PM Won't happen
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on November 22, 2011, 01:26:33 PM Won't happen I thought this, surely he'd have to do more to get the job ? How are Hughes/Bruce tainted ? Surely you wouldn't just want to give the job to ex player with no exp, not that I think either of them are good enough to do the job. You should want Guardiola imo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on November 22, 2011, 01:34:14 PM Won't happen I thought this, surely he'd have to do more to get the job ? How are Hughes/Bruce tainted ? Surely you wouldn't just want to give the job to ex player with no exp, not that I think either of them are good enough to do the job. You should want Guardiola imo. Solskjaer is Guardiola - DUCY? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on November 22, 2011, 01:51:14 PM Won't happen I thought this, surely he'd have to do more to get the job ? How are Hughes/Bruce tainted ? Surely you wouldn't just want to give the job to ex player with no exp, not that I think either of them are good enough to do the job. You should want Guardiola imo. Solskjaer is Guardiola - DUCY? Well yeah, but no :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on November 22, 2011, 01:58:04 PM Thought that article was really interesting especiall Fergies view that Solskjaer was a really good sub because he could pick apart the opponents weaknesses from the bench. Never thought of it that way. Makes you wonder why David fairclough was never a better manager though...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 22, 2011, 02:02:59 PM Won't happen Why do you say that George? Another couple of seasons learning his trade and maybe a season alongside SAF... he has MUFC running through him Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on November 22, 2011, 03:44:26 PM Didn't he protest against the Glazers? Not a question about his ability but Fergie keeping him/giving him a job is one thing but the blokes you protested against?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 23, 2011, 11:29:49 AM Didn't he protest against the Glazers? Not a question about his ability but Fergie keeping him/giving him a job is one thing but the blokes you protested against? That was six years ago... doesn't time fly? It just seems that his background and the love the fans have for him give him a great start and add in the fact that he's already demonstrating that he has some talent for the job. On more pressing matters - not looking forward to the draw for the next round of the CL (but looking forward to it more than the noisy neighbours are) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on November 23, 2011, 02:49:28 PM Didn't he protest against the Glazers? Not a question about his ability but Fergie keeping him/giving him a job is one thing but the blokes you protested against? That was six years ago... doesn't time fly? It just seems that his background and the love the fans have for him give him a great start and add in the fact that he's already demonstrating that he has some talent for the job. On more pressing matters - not looking forward to the draw for the next round of the CL (but looking forward to it more than the noisy neighbours are) David mate Man United have not made it into the draw for the next round yet , thats even more pressing than who you might draw in the last 16 innit. Also Ole Gunnar Solksjaer is a Liverpool supporter is he not? ;nanana;, It might be his dream to manage Liverpool not ManU ;snoopy'sguns; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on November 23, 2011, 03:18:36 PM Fergie feeling the strain?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15853955.stm Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on November 23, 2011, 08:26:27 PM Fergie feeling the strain? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15853955.stm question got the response it deserved Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on November 23, 2011, 08:34:02 PM Fergie feeling the strain? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15853955.stm question got the response it deserved You drew at home with Benfica and needed a last minute equaliser to draw at home with Basle, Man City have crushed the Prem Lge but have been pretty poor in CL, how was it not a fair question ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on November 23, 2011, 09:17:56 PM Fergie feeling the strain? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15853955.stm question got the response it deserved You drew at home with Benfica and needed a last minute equaliser to draw at home with Basle, Man City have crushed the Prem Lge but have been pretty poor in CL, how was it not a fair question ? He said we were "struggling in europe", we are 2nd with our destiny in our own hands - not struggling! if he mentioned the game then fair enough - guy asking the question quite clearly trying to be provocative - this is fergie not ian holloway Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 24, 2011, 01:01:16 AM Think it's a reasonable question. We are struggling in an easy group that we should already have topped. Having said that I trust SAF. Siege mentality and all that. Gwan SAF!!!!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on November 24, 2011, 11:28:36 AM Think it's a reasonable question. We are struggling in an easy group that we should already have topped. Having said that I trust SAF. Siege mentality and all that. Gwan SAF!!!! Yeah I'm sure you'll get through, but having to go to Basle and get a result wasn't expected, I'd be shocked if you didn't though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 24, 2011, 12:03:31 PM Think it's a reasonable question. We are struggling in an easy group that we should already have topped. Having said that I trust SAF. Siege mentality and all that. Gwan SAF!!!! Yeah I'm sure you'll get through, but having to go to Basle and get a result wasn't expected, I'd be shocked if you didn't though. We're not playing well - the rotation of the squad isn't helping that but a lot of the changes are being forced on us by injury/illness/suspension. Newcastle have shown how vital it is to have a settled back four/five in their start to the season - we seem to have a different defense every match... As for the midfield... but - it's still only November, we're second in the league and need a point in Basle to make the KO stages of the CL. I don't thinki it's time for gloom and despondency. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on November 24, 2011, 11:29:17 PM Fergie feeling the strain? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15853955.stm question got the response it deserved Cracking up/lost the plot IMO Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 25, 2011, 11:47:52 AM Fergie feeling the strain? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15853955.stm question got the response it deserved Cracking up/lost the plot IMO Nah - this is how it looks when the plot is lost... YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXpUdBlRZe8 #Invalid YouTube Link# Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on November 25, 2011, 03:54:05 PM Just kidding btw. But any other manager in England would have had this type of headline bar maybe Redknapp and Hodgson.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 25, 2011, 04:49:20 PM Nah this is losing it:
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOaZYhTd2BU We were nervous cos they were top. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 25, 2011, 08:46:53 PM Nah this is losing it: YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOaZYhTd2BU We were nervous cos they were top. I tried to post this with the Keegan moment but the link failed (or did an LFC supporting mod sabotage it?) :-) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on November 25, 2011, 09:39:19 PM A trip to Basle needing a point will not be easy at all.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 26, 2011, 08:17:15 AM A trip to Basle needing a point will not be easy at all. Thnak you for your insight. What price would you give on Manchester United getting that point? And what price the win? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on November 26, 2011, 10:39:37 AM Of course one is cracking up and the other "giving the journo the response the question deserved".
Never mind that one of them was impromptu.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 26, 2011, 11:16:59 AM Of course one is cracking up and the other "giving the journo the response the question deserved". Never mind that one of them was impromptu.... So cringe when he pulls the piece of paper out lol Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on November 30, 2011, 11:48:46 PM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMrdFIa5oIE&feature=player_embedded
ahahaha. why wasn't that a pen? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 01, 2011, 06:58:52 AM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMrdFIa5oIE&feature=player_embedded ahahaha. why wasn't that a pen? LMAO - I feel as though I've been rick-rolled... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 07, 2011, 06:55:25 PM Squeaky bum time tonight.
But on the bright side, if it all goes horribly wrong, at least the kids will get some European experience... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on December 07, 2011, 09:30:01 PM HAHAHAHAA
fuck manchester. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on December 07, 2011, 09:32:53 PM real squeaky bum time now!!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 07, 2011, 09:37:10 PM Not even geeg
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on December 07, 2011, 09:37:55 PM Oh my! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on December 07, 2011, 09:39:30 PM HAHAHAHAA fuck manchester. feel free to post here more often Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on December 07, 2011, 09:43:58 PM HAHAHAHAA fuck manchester. feel free to post here more often Gotta love that sort of stuff, eh? Just ignore it, Guy. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 07, 2011, 09:45:04 PM HAHAHAHAA fuck manchester. feel free to post here more often Especially if you have more of the same well thought through stuff to contribute Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on December 07, 2011, 09:45:32 PM Unlucky gents
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on December 07, 2011, 09:46:47 PM Football's weird isn't it? Seems it's a disaster for Man U and not bad for City and Arsenal fans think everyone would swap places with them a couple of months after being suicidal.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on December 07, 2011, 09:47:48 PM Football's weird isn't it? Seems it's a disaster for Man U and not bad for City and Arsenal fans think everyone would swap places with them a couple of months after being suicidal. Very true, some of the fans & media are so short-sighted, & fickle. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on December 07, 2011, 09:48:03 PM HAHAHAHAA fuck manchester. feel free to post here more often will do. from my couch like every man u fan! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 07, 2011, 09:53:06 PM HAHAHAHAA fuck manchester. feel free to post here more often will do. from my couch like every man u fan! Yawn. Do one. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on December 07, 2011, 09:56:09 PM Does this mean only 3 champions league places for England next year?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 07, 2011, 09:56:54 PM Does this mean only 3 champions league places for England next year? That'd make things interesting! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on December 07, 2011, 09:57:28 PM A trip to Basle needing a point will not be easy at all. Thnak you for your insight. What price would you give on Manchester United getting that point? And what price the win? I price both at absolute fucking million. hahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on December 07, 2011, 09:58:14 PM A trip to Basle needing a point will not be easy at all. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on December 07, 2011, 09:58:50 PM Does this mean only 3 champions league places for England next year? That'd make things interesting! I think that's what is going to happen. Which is pretty com as all the Chelsea/Liverpool/arsenal fans giving it the big one now will be fuming in may!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 07, 2011, 09:59:31 PM Does this mean only 3 champions league places for England next year? That'd make things interesting! I think that's what is going to happen. Which is pretty com as all the Chelsea/Liverpool/arsenal fans giving it the big one now will be fuming in may!! Would be funny if Liverpool esp finished 4th behind United, City and Chelsea Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on December 07, 2011, 09:59:40 PM A trip to Basle needing a point will not be easy at all. Thnak you for your insight. What price would you give on Manchester United getting that point? And what price the win? I price both at absolute fucking million. hahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha Lol Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on December 07, 2011, 10:21:00 PM Does this mean only 3 champions league places for England next year? That'd make things interesting! I think that's what is going to happen. Which is pretty com as all the Chelsea/Liverpool/arsenal fans giving it the big one now will be fuming in may!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 07, 2011, 10:22:31 PM Does this mean only 3 champions league places for England next year? That'd make things interesting! I think that's what is going to happen. Which is pretty com as all the Chelsea/Liverpool/arsenal fans giving it the big one now will be fuming in may!! Would have been ironic but bad for the PL overall plus who knows? At this rate and on current form United may need that 4th spot. #buysomemidfieldersinjanuaryplsFergie Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on December 07, 2011, 10:24:56 PM Enjoy the thursday night/sunday 3pm games lads.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on December 07, 2011, 10:37:10 PM Does this mean only 3 champions league places for England next year? That'd make things interesting! I think that's what is going to happen. Which is pretty com as all the Chelsea/Liverpool/arsenal fans giving it the big one now will be fuming in may!! Would have been ironic but bad for the PL overall plus who knows? At this rate and on current form United may need that 4th spot. #buysomemidfieldersinjanuaryplsFergie [ ] Going to be able to buy the same standard of midfielders in Jan as u would've done in the summer. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: AndrewT on December 07, 2011, 11:25:00 PM England still top of the rankings - them, Spain and Germany are quite a bit clear of Italy in 4th so no danger of losing the 4th CL spot any time soon.
Even if England had dropped, next season's places are already locked in. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Longy on December 08, 2011, 03:16:21 AM Spain and Germany only got 2 teams through to the last 16 as well, it is just very unlike England not to get all 4 teams through.
I would be very surprised under the current system that any time soon, that England won't have 4 champions league spots. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 08, 2011, 06:45:58 AM Kh
A trip to Basle needing a point will not be easy at all. Thnak you for your insight. What price would you give on Manchester United getting that point? And what price the win? I price both at absolute fucking million. hahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha didn't have the balls to offer any price at all before the event though didya? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on December 09, 2011, 12:45:13 PM terrible news on vidic!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 09, 2011, 01:19:46 PM terrible news on vidic! awful - none of the others have anything like the impact he has. But we have to deal with it. What's needed is stability now, a consistent centreback pairing. Every game, including the ones where the rest of the team may be rotated. Which two though? Taking Ferdinand out of the picture because he doesn't seem capable of playing every week that leaves Smalling & Evans or Jones & Evans sigh Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on December 09, 2011, 01:30:47 PM Buy Alex from Chelski?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on December 09, 2011, 01:31:35 PM Buy Alex from Chelski? but we dont need a striker? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: boldie on December 09, 2011, 01:34:11 PM Buy Alex from Chelski? but we dont need a striker? You need a defender, a midfielder (Wesley obv..how did this not happen in the summer?) and a striker.....don't know who the striker would be TBH. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on December 09, 2011, 02:16:19 PM terrible news on vidic! looked nasty and now its confirmed poor sod. His pain has only just begun :( Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on December 09, 2011, 04:03:09 PM Kh A trip to Basle needing a point will not be easy at all. Thnak you for your insight. What price would you give on Manchester United getting that point? And what price the win? I price both at absolute fucking million. hahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha didn't have the balls to offer any price at all before the event though didya? Well there was no point because the price was 1/5 and 1/2 and I doubted you wanted to get involved at those sort of odds. But siddddddddddddddddddddddaaawwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 10, 2011, 09:15:30 AM Kh A trip to Basle needing a point will not be easy at all. Thnak you for your insight. What price would you give on Manchester United getting that point? And what price the win? I price both at absolute fucking million. hahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha didn't have the balls to offer any price at all before the event though didya? Well there was no point because the price was 1/5 and 1/2 and I doubted you wanted to get involved at those sort of odds. But siddddddddddddddddddddddaaawwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn ahhh, so your original comment was just you blowing smoke out of your *rse. No surprise there Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: AdamM on December 10, 2011, 10:39:42 AM Off to Old Traffordforthe Wolves game.
Two free tickets from friend of a friend :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on December 13, 2011, 03:49:29 PM Fletcher got to take a break from the game. Not looked the same since his illness last year. Hopefully comes back as good as ever.
I really rate what he does for Man U after years thinking he could never be a footballer and there was no position he could play. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Hairydude on December 13, 2011, 04:00:19 PM Fletcher got to take a break from the game. Not looked the same since his illness last year. Hopefully comes back as good as ever. I really rate what he does for Man U after years thinking he could never be a footballer and there was no position he could play. I'm torn between thinking he is utter dross and good!!! for example he does well for man utd but he has absolute superstars next to him in the team.... for Scotland he is utter dross but again doesnt have same quality next to him.... BUT surely if he is a good player he should improve the team nonetheless; I think he makes Scotland worse when he plays. Still hope he gets fit again; must be horrible having something like that when you should be in the prime of your playing career.... at least an injury is just one of the risks of the job! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 13, 2011, 04:38:47 PM Fletcher got to take a break from the game. Not looked the same since his illness last year. Hopefully comes back as good as ever. I really rate what he does for Man U after years thinking he could never be a footballer and there was no position he could play. I'm torn between thinking he is utter dross and good!!! for example he does well for man utd but he has absolute superstars next to him in the team.... for Scotland he is utter dross but again doesnt have same quality next to him.... BUT surely if he is a good player he should improve the team nonetheless; I think he makes Scotland worse when he plays. Still hope he gets fit again; must be horrible having something like that when you should be in the prime of your playing career.... at least an injury is just one of the risks of the job! with the obvious exception of Rooney I don't think we currently have any 'absolute superstars' Fletcher had a great sense of position and generally a good eye for reading the game - he's not been back long enough to have fully recovered that sense of where to be and who's doing what. I'm sure he will soon. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on December 13, 2011, 05:00:20 PM I'm a Fletcher fanboy.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Eso Kral on December 13, 2011, 05:42:08 PM I'm a Fletcher fanboy. Me to!!Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 18, 2011, 02:11:51 PM Somehow, this poor team that needs a centre back, a playmaking midfielder and a striker is top of the league and an Arsenal win away from holding that position going into Christmas week...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 18, 2011, 02:13:40 PM We looked good today. OK it was against QPR but haven't seen us play that well for a while. Hopefully a sign of things to come
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on December 18, 2011, 02:47:43 PM Jones is an absolute beast. Power, pace, and stamina.
Evans could have had a hatrick, but he did OK at defending today. Passing looked like it was back to what it was for the first 10 games but defo missing something alongside Jones. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 02, 2012, 08:34:52 AM After the performance on Saturday lunchtime I was prepared for it to be a pretty bad weekend. We were poor and the only bright spot was Berbatov's involvement in the game - a season ago he wouldn't have been anywhere near our penalty area
The Tottenham and Chelsea results lightened my mood a little - ok the Chelsea result lightened my mood quite a lot, and then, yesterday afternoon, I was happy at 0-0 with seconds to go and laughing uncontrollably when Ji popped up at the end to win it for Sunderland. Can we win the title playing as we did on Saturday? Emphatically no. Can we improve? Of course we can, the lack of cover in central defence is worrying as is the lack of a genuine midfield playmaker, but SAF is The Man and I'm not about lose faith in his judgement of who or what we need. Next weekend will be fun... especially if the Scousers can get a result at City on Tuesday (and we manage a win at Newcastle - not at all to be taken for granted) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on January 02, 2012, 08:59:36 AM It's quite funny. Everyone was talking this weekend about nobody wanting to win the title this year. Before yesterday's games Chelsea and Arsenal are on the same points as they were at this point last season. Man U are +4 and Man City +13.
I think it will be close between the Manchester clubs. Man U have the tougher away games left but City had a difficult festive period and are struggling to break teams down at the moment. City also can't write off the Europa League like Man U as they need to do well to improve their seeding for future seasons in the CL. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 08, 2012, 01:02:00 PM Retrograde step?
maybe, maybe not but we'll be happy if he delivers some of this... YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0BI-1sGbAI or even better some of this YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3WIYxvQq9k Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on January 08, 2012, 01:23:08 PM Chris Foy ruins a massive cup tie for the neutrals within 10 mins. gg.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 08, 2012, 01:46:48 PM Chris Foy ruins a massive cup tie for the neutrals within 10 mins. gg. Neutrals? There are neutrals watching this? GTFO Red card may be harsh, but life is tough and the first goal came against 11men Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 08, 2012, 02:00:10 PM Chris Foy ruins a massive cup tie for the neutrals within 10 mins. gg. +1 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on January 08, 2012, 02:01:41 PM Chris Foy ruins a massive cup tie for the neutrals within 10 mins. gg. Neutrals? There are neutrals watching this? GTFO Red card may be harsh, but life is tough and the first goal came against 11men ? I'm watching it, why wouldnt I watch the top 2 clubs in a cup tie? Holy shit the outcry and hissy fits if this was the other way around. First goal did come when they have 11men, but counting Man city out when ur only 0-1 is silly. Anyways Ive turned over to the golf now, as u'know for neutrals the games over. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: millidonk on January 08, 2012, 02:04:33 PM As a neutral i obv wanted man city. but its 10 vs 12 out there. I thought i saw some poor referee performances last year but this is horrendous.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 08, 2012, 02:09:12 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on January 08, 2012, 02:11:17 PM lol I was going to say - an awful lot of 'neutrals' don't seem in the slightest bit neutral. If I'm a neutral in any game I want to see lots of goals and action - I'd have thought this game would fit the bill pretty well Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 08, 2012, 02:20:02 PM lol I was going to say - an awful lot of 'neutrals' don't seem in the slightest bit neutral. If I'm a neutral in any game I want to see lots of goals and action - I'd have thought this game would fit the bill pretty well As a neutral I want uncertaintly of outcome. Unfortunately after 10 minutes this was never possible. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on January 08, 2012, 02:28:16 PM Quite surprised by how many people were writing off Man City's chance once they went a man down - it seemed a lot less likely when they'd conceded 3 as well; but most people seemed to be writing off their chances after 12 minutes
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 08, 2012, 02:35:21 PM lol I was going to say - an awful lot of 'neutrals' don't seem in the slightest bit neutral. If I'm a neutral in any game I want to see lots of goals and action - I'd have thought this game would fit the bill pretty well As a neutral I want uncertaintly of outcome. Unfortunately after 10 minutes this was never possible. [ ] very prescient of you did you see uncertainty of outcome at half time in Istanbul? (A night when I cheered on Liverpool for probably the last time ever) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on January 08, 2012, 03:03:40 PM Probably also in the (un)neutral camp and I thought the red was fine. Annoying it possibly spoilt some entertainment but the ref's not there to make it entertaining.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: RickBFA on January 08, 2012, 03:06:34 PM Chris Foy ruins a massive cup tie for the neutrals within 10 mins. gg. Yep. Joke decision. The guy took the ball. Perhaps we should just make football a non contact sport and have done with it. Man Utd had a blantant penalty in second half too that he didn't give. Foy is an embarassment. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on January 08, 2012, 03:17:35 PM Good game in the end, thanks to the 2nd half. Congrats Utd. Fwiw as a neutral to these two sides I couldnt careless who won, just wanted to enjoy the match, which I did in the end. Still a ridiculous straight red, imo.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on January 08, 2012, 03:31:33 PM Probably also in the (un)neutral camp and I thought the red was fine. Annoying it possibly spoilt some entertainment but the ref's not there to make it entertaining. Really? It was about bad a decision as I've ever seen Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 08, 2012, 03:43:31 PM Probably also in the (un)neutral camp and I thought the red was fine. Annoying it possibly spoilt some entertainment but the ref's not there to make it entertaining. Really? It was about bad a decision as I've ever seen Usually your job this, but I think i'll call bs on that Poor decision maybe, but we've seen plenty worse Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on January 08, 2012, 03:50:27 PM Probably also in the (un)neutral camp and I thought the red was fine. Annoying it possibly spoilt some entertainment but the ref's not there to make it entertaining. Really? It was about bad a decision as I've ever seen Goes in with both feet. Not really jumped in or studs up but he looked like he was covering whichever way Nani went. Meant nani was getting nailed whatever he did. He got the ball but I think it was wreckless. Can understand why Foy's given him a red there. I think any challenge made with 2 feet that could have been made with one is always running the risk of being classed as excessive force. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 08, 2012, 05:44:00 PM lol I was going to say - an awful lot of 'neutrals' don't seem in the slightest bit neutral. If I'm a neutral in any game I want to see lots of goals and action - I'd have thought this game would fit the bill pretty well As a neutral I want uncertaintly of outcome. Unfortunately after 10 minutes this was never possible. [ ] very prescient of you did you see uncertainty of outcome at half time in Istanbul? (A night when I cheered on Liverpool for probably the last time ever) Ultimately I was correct. Of course not. The point which you seem to have missed is that the ref wasn't brilliant today. Although just looking at it again I can see why he gave a red. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 08, 2012, 06:06:46 PM l [/quote] I acknowledged as much in an earlier post, and up till now haven't mentioned the penalty we didn't get. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Solaris on January 08, 2012, 06:11:46 PM I acknowledged as much in an earlier post, and up till now haven't mentioned the penalty we didn't get. Which incident happened first? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on January 08, 2012, 07:55:44 PM Still who ever changed the rules are idiots as how can you win the ball an not touch the other player an get sent off? Non contact sport for football ? lol I was going to say - an awful lot of 'neutrals' don't seem in the slightest bit neutral. If I'm a neutral in any game I want to see lots of goals and action - I'd have thought this game would fit the bill pretty well As a neutral I want uncertaintly of outcome. Unfortunately after 10 minutes this was never possible. [ ] very prescient of you did you see uncertainty of outcome at half time in Istanbul? (A night when I cheered on Liverpool for probably the last time ever) Ultimately I was correct. Of course not. The point which you seem to have missed is that the ref wasn't brilliant today. Although just looking at it again I can see why he gave a red. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on January 08, 2012, 08:08:20 PM It wasn't a red, was still a good game though.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on January 09, 2012, 12:08:32 AM Since when is a head on 2 footed lunging tackle with feet off the ground not a red card?
I've just watched it, only reason people don't think it's red is because foy didn't insta blow his whistle Good ref ing IMO Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Indestructable on January 09, 2012, 06:57:05 AM Happened right in front of me at the match and fairly obvious it wasn't a Red (or even a foul) but ref missed an obvious penalty for United in the 2nd half so no complaints on the result from me. Great game and may help City in the long run getting knocked out, although a ban for Kompany is going to hurt. :(
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 09, 2012, 08:22:06 AM Nice of the FA to give us a bye to the 5th round as reward
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 11, 2012, 01:54:28 PM Cmon!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 12, 2012, 08:40:01 PM Pretty tired of the Suarez thing and the constant repetition of unfounded references to Evra being a 'known liar' with history for unfounded allegations of racism.
This comes from an article in The Guardian, but similar articles appeared elsewhere if you care to look. But Evra never cited racism in the Chelsea case, contrary to what you may have read elsewhere. Liverpool's extraordinary statement referred to Evra having no credibility and used as an example his "prior unfounded accusations". Except it was Mike Phelan, United's assistant manager, and Richard Hartis, the goalkeeping coach, who purported to hear the word "immigrant" used at Stamford Bridge. The story that it was Evra has gathered so much momentum now that even the usually reliable Press Association presented it as fact. Liverpool, they said, were referring to "racism allegations Evra made against Chelsea groundsman Sam Bethell, which were not proven". The truth is something completely different. Likewise, Evra kept his distance when two deaf United fans complained they had lip‑read Steve Finnan making a racist remark to him during a Liverpool-United game in 2006. The simple truth is that Evra has complained of being racially abused only once before, and that was the 1-1 draw at Anfield on 15 October. Posted here, rather than there, because the Liverpool fans have much bigger things to worry about. We have a title to win, we're second, playing below par. Finish the season playing as we should and who knows. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: amcgrath1uk on February 13, 2012, 12:27:49 AM Wayne Rooney showing his class and intelligence on Twitter again tonight:
"@tomclevz23 @rioferdy5 zzzzzzzzzzz pga golf is on. Come on boys. Funny that 2 toures was there all the way and lost. Haha." Very classy ! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 13, 2012, 12:53:53 AM Wayne Rooney showing his class and intelligence on Twitter again tonight: "@tomclevz23 @rioferdy5 zzzzzzzzzzz pga golf is on. Come on boys. Funny that 2 toures was there all the way and lost. Haha." Very classy ! He's a chav. What do you expect? Is funny tho Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 13, 2012, 07:38:06 AM Wayne Rooney showing his class and intelligence on Twitter again tonight: "@tomclevz23 @rioferdy5 zzzzzzzzzzz pga golf is on. Come on boys. Funny that 2 toures was there all the way and lost. Haha." Very classy ! He's a chav. What do you expect? Is funny tho Take issue there George, he's no Chav. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on February 13, 2012, 06:11:17 PM Wayne Rooney showing his class and intelligence on Twitter again tonight: "@tomclevz23 @rioferdy5 zzzzzzzzzzz pga golf is on. Come on boys. Funny that 2 toures was there all the way and lost. Haha." Very classy ! He's a chav. What do you expect? Is funny tho Take issue there George, he's no Chav. You are correct sir, he managed to find a level below a Chav. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 13, 2012, 08:04:04 PM Pretty tired of the Suarez thing and the constant repetition of unfounded references to Evra being a 'known liar' with history for unfounded allegations of racism. This comes from an article in The Guardian, but similar articles appeared elsewhere if you care to look. But Evra never cited racism in the Chelsea case, contrary to what you may have read elsewhere. Liverpool's extraordinary statement referred to Evra having no credibility and used as an example his "prior unfounded accusations". Except it was Mike Phelan, United's assistant manager, and Richard Hartis, the goalkeeping coach, who purported to hear the word "immigrant" used at Stamford Bridge. The story that it was Evra has gathered so much momentum now that even the usually reliable Press Association presented it as fact. Liverpool, they said, were referring to "racism allegations Evra made against Chelsea groundsman Sam Bethell, which were not proven". The truth is something completely different. Likewise, Evra kept his distance when two deaf United fans complained they had lip‑read Steve Finnan making a racist remark to him during a Liverpool-United game in 2006. The simple truth is that Evra has complained of being racially abused only once before, and that was the 1-1 draw at Anfield on 15 October. Posted here, rather than there, because the Liverpool fans have much bigger things to worry about. We have a title to win, we're second, playing below par. Finish the season playing as we should and who knows. Evra gave evidence in Phelan's favour which the FA called exaggerated and unreliable, even though he was closer to the apparent "racist" than Phelan. So he lied. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 13, 2012, 08:18:19 PM Tbf to Evra one FA report means nothing to me. I can't hammer them for the Suarez verdict then say their "opinion" on Evra is correct. But this isn't the only incident where he's lied or not been honest. Even the day he was "racially abused" he ran around after the red for ten mins saying he'd won the toss claiming to have picked yellow instead of blue.
One player getting stick today unfairly IMO is Rio Ferdinand. He's fought against racism his whole career and his non handshake was him sticking to his beliefs. I actually think he carried himself very well. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on February 13, 2012, 08:40:51 PM evra is french
there fore he is a nob Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 13, 2012, 08:53:14 PM Tbf to Evra one FA report means nothing to me. I can't hammer them for the Suarez verdict then say their "opinion" on Evra is correct. But this isn't the only incident where he's lied or not been honest. Even the day he was "racially abused" he ran around after the red for ten mins saying he'd won the toss claiming to have picked yellow instead of blue. One player getting stick today unfairly IMO is Rio Ferdinand. He's fought against racism his whole career and his non handshake was him sticking to his beliefs. I actually think he carried himself very well. Links to other incidents where he lied? This bit about the toss for instance, is it in the same vein as the Kuyt allegations from the day? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 13, 2012, 10:24:21 PM Tbf to Evra one FA report means nothing to me. I can't hammer them for the Suarez verdict then say their "opinion" on Evra is correct. But this isn't the only incident where he's lied or not been honest. Even the day he was "racially abused" he ran around after the red for ten mins saying he'd won the toss claiming to have picked yellow instead of blue. One player getting stick today unfairly IMO is Rio Ferdinand. He's fought against racism his whole career and his non handshake was him sticking to his beliefs. I actually think he carried himself very well. Links to other incidents where he lied? This bit about the toss for instance, is it in the same vein as the Kuyt allegations from the day? Errr no it's from the ref's report, included in the FA's transcript you obviously read. Sigh. Try doing your own research maybe? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 17, 2012, 01:04:43 PM Tbf to Evra one FA report means nothing to me. I can't hammer them for the Suarez verdict then say their "opinion" on Evra is correct. But this isn't the only incident where he's lied or not been honest. Even the day he was "racially abused" he ran around after the red for ten mins saying he'd won the toss claiming to have picked yellow instead of blue. One player getting stick today unfairly IMO is Rio Ferdinand. He's fought against racism his whole career and his non handshake was him sticking to his beliefs. I actually think he carried himself very well. Links to other incidents where he lied? This bit about the toss for instance, is it in the same vein as the Kuyt allegations from the day? Errr no it's from the ref's report, included in the FA's transcript you obviously read. Sigh. Try doing your own research maybe? Err 'ran around after the ref for 10 minutes'? Para 329 is the only reference to the coin toss issue and makes no mention of it going on beyond the initial comment/complaint. No evidence about the previous incidents where 'he's lied or not been honest' then? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 18, 2012, 09:45:53 AM Plenty. Most of which has already been mentioned so won't be hard to find.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 18, 2012, 10:12:27 AM Plenty. Most of which has already been mentioned so won't be hard to find. Ahh you mean all the vague allegations and half-truths that have been exposed elsewhere. Thought you'd come up with something fresh. Should've known better Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 18, 2012, 02:14:48 PM Plenty. Most of which has already been mentioned so won't be hard to find. Ahh you mean all the vague allegations and half-truths that have been exposed elsewhere. Thought you'd come up with something fresh. Should've known better How are they vague allegations and half truths? Still not reading up on things you're arguing about? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 18, 2012, 05:32:22 PM Cba to go back through the 'everbody's against us' thread, but pretty sure that every allegation against Evra in there was covered and shown to be guff, or exaggeration.
If you have specifics that you're sure of post them [ ] I'll then waste a few more posts saying they've been dealt with and the answers shouldn't be hard to find Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 05, 2012, 03:23:57 PM So, the worst Manchester United team in living memory fields players aged from 19 to 99, allows Tottenham to harrass them from fron to back for 44 minutes and then score somewhat against the run of play.
Victory never in doubt really after that. We've struggled in recent years against teams who can find the energy and commitment to get in our faces all over the pitch. 'Arry knew this and had his players well up for it. Press the back line; press in midfield; get bodies around and behind the ball in your own half and we've had problems. Yesterday we dealt with them better than for ages. Encouraging signs as we enter the final quarter of the season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on March 05, 2012, 05:24:15 PM In fairness you ran into a depleted Spurs team.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 05, 2012, 08:18:26 PM In fairness you ran into a depleted Spurs team. Fair point. Bale, and Parker, missing makes a big difference to them. We have a few on the injured list too though Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on March 05, 2012, 09:37:02 PM Certainly not giving up, title could hinge on the Manchester derby.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 06, 2012, 07:49:44 AM Certainly not giving up, title could hinge on the Manchester derby. Fk I hope not... ;scarymoment; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on March 06, 2012, 09:15:00 AM Certainly not giving up, title could hinge on the Manchester derby. Fk I hope not... ;scarymoment; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 06, 2012, 01:01:05 PM Certainly not giving up, title could hinge on the Manchester derby. Fk I hope not... ;scarymoment; Remember this? (http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/slides/photos/000/226/582/1968EuropeanCupFinalShirt_display_image.jpg?1273928635) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on March 06, 2012, 01:33:13 PM Lol. Ok. Do you have green and yellow cushions and do you remember then days :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 06, 2012, 04:30:33 PM Lol. Ok. Do you have green and yellow cushions and do you remember then days :) Of course. Come on you Newton Heath !! (http://www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=isch&hl=en&source=hp&q=newton+heath&gbv=2&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&biw=1024&bih=690&sei=FjtWT9-6IKiw0QXeisHUCQ) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 08, 2012, 09:49:17 PM United look pretty shoddy in Europe. Just shows what you can get away against the dross in the premiership you can't against the technical teams in Europe
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 08, 2012, 09:51:15 PM Premiership really has been shown to be second rate this year as we have discussed previously
This is one of the worst, if not the worst, United teams in 25 years and yet they still might win the domnestic league Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on March 08, 2012, 09:55:10 PM Premiership really has been shown to be second rate this year as we have discussed previously This is one of the worst, if not the worst, United teams in 25 years and yet they still might win the domnestic league They are incredibly lucky to still be in the title race. Without thinking deeply I can remember 5 matches they should have failed to win and somehow snatched all 3 points. They simply are not in City's class. They will get marmalised at the Etihad. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 08, 2012, 09:56:35 PM Premiership really has been shown to be second rate this year as we have discussed previously This is one of the worst, if not the worst, United teams in 25 years and yet they still might win the domnestic league They are incredibly lucky to still be in the title race. Without thinking deeply I can remember 5 matches they should have failed to win and somehow snatched all 3 points. They simply are not in City's class. They will get marmalised at the Etihad. Agree. The issue the league has is that all the top teams are in decline/stagnant (I'd give you Spurs) , and no one is going to compete wirth City on a 3-5 year view Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on March 08, 2012, 09:58:52 PM Premiership really has been shown to be second rate this year as we have discussed previously This is one of the worst, if not the worst, United teams in 25 years and yet they still might win the domnestic league They are incredibly lucky to still be in the title race. Without thinking deeply I can remember 5 matches they should have failed to win and somehow snatched all 3 points. They simply are not in City's class. They will get marmalised at the Etihad. Play like we just did and your definitely not wrong. Third Athletic goal Rafael has no excuses pretty sure he had 5+ yards on the goalscorer. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 08, 2012, 09:59:33 PM Premiership really has been shown to be second rate this year as we have discussed previously This is one of the worst, if not the worst, United teams in 25 years and yet they still might win the domnestic league They are incredibly lucky to still be in the title race. Without thinking deeply I can remember 5 matches they should have failed to win and somehow snatched all 3 points. They simply are not in City's class. They will get marmalised at the Etihad. Agree. The issue the league has is that all the top teams are in decline/stagnant (I'd give you Spurs) , and no one is going to compete wirth City on a 3-5 year view U see I don't think City are as good as everyone else thinks they are either. They are better than United but to say they're a class apart is a bit exaggerated. I am biased tho :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: craigbetts on March 08, 2012, 10:02:22 PM Any credit to Bilbao? They turned up and did not roll over like the majority of teams do at OldTrafford.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 08, 2012, 10:03:02 PM Any credit to Bilbao? They turned up and did not roll over like the majority of teams do at OldTrafford. Played superbly, great to watch. That pass for the second goal. wow. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 08, 2012, 10:03:11 PM Any credit to Bilbao? They turned up and did not roll over like the majority of teams do at OldTrafford. Yeh obviously they were good. Played very good footie Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on March 08, 2012, 10:03:48 PM Premiership really has been shown to be second rate this year as we have discussed previously This is one of the worst, if not the worst, United teams in 25 years and yet they still might win the domnestic league They are incredibly lucky to still be in the title race. Without thinking deeply I can remember 5 matches they should have failed to win and somehow snatched all 3 points. They simply are not in City's class. They will get marmalised at the Etihad. Man City have got lucky a lot this season too. Both teams got lucky V spurs in the games this year for example. Hope Tevez scores the goal V Utd to give Man City the title though! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on March 08, 2012, 10:07:10 PM Premiership really has been shown to be second rate this year as we have discussed previously This is one of the worst, if not the worst, United teams in 25 years and yet they still might win the domnestic league They are incredibly lucky to still be in the title race. Without thinking deeply I can remember 5 matches they should have failed to win and somehow snatched all 3 points. They simply are not in City's class. They will get marmalised at the Etihad. Agree. The issue the league has is that all the top teams are in decline/stagnant (I'd give you Spurs) , and no one is going to compete wirth City on a 3-5 year view U see I don't think City are as good as everyone else thinks they are either. They are better than United but to say they're a class apart is a bit exaggerated. I am biased tho :D City have, imo, the best 3 players in the Premiership. How many Utd players could get in the city team? Rooney, probably. Young at an absolute stretch. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 08, 2012, 10:09:23 PM Aguero, Silva, Hart?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on March 08, 2012, 10:12:32 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on March 08, 2012, 10:14:59 PM Man City have also been terrible in Europe this season. Thought Bilbao where excellent.
Rofls at neither of the CH5 commentators knowing the offside rule, really ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on March 08, 2012, 10:15:36 PM so they have the 4 best players in Prem :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on March 08, 2012, 10:32:13 PM so they have the 4 best players in Prem :) Could be argued that Richards and Kompany round out the top 6 players in the Prem! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on March 08, 2012, 10:35:01 PM Prem best 11 isn't that good IMO
Still will lose to barcelona Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on March 08, 2012, 10:36:56 PM Prem best 11 isn't that good IMO Still will lose to barcelona World best XI would lose to Barcelona obv Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on March 09, 2012, 12:19:15 AM Prem best 11 isn't that good IMO Still will lose to barcelona World best XI would lose to Barcelona obv Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 11, 2012, 01:36:23 PM seems we may be holding onto Pogba after all. Good news if he's really signed a contract.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on March 11, 2012, 03:41:10 PM wiiiiiiiiiiii
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on March 11, 2012, 03:55:26 PM squeeky bumtime indeed :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rivertony on March 15, 2012, 06:27:00 PM Get out united!! Great goal from llorente
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 16, 2012, 06:37:41 AM Get out united!! Great goal from llorente Read the BBC and someone compared it to van basten's classic. Saw it. Not in same league. We've been poor in Europe this season. Found out basically. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rivertony on March 16, 2012, 12:11:03 PM Get out united!! Great goal from llorente Read the BBC and someone compared it to van basten's classic. Saw it. Not in same league. We've been poor in Europe this season. Found out basically. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 16, 2012, 12:23:49 PM Get out united!! Great goal from llorente Read the BBC and someone compared it to van basten's classic. Saw it. Not in same league. We've been poor in Europe this season. Found out basically. You celebrated it as though you were a Bilbaoan, although I'm guessing you're not.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rivertony on March 16, 2012, 12:26:55 PM Get out united!! Great goal from llorente Read the BBC and someone compared it to van basten's classic. Saw it. Not in same league. We've been poor in Europe this season. Found out basically. You celebrated it as though you were a Bilbaoan, although I'm guessing you're not.. I was last night, on offence but I hate united with a passion Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 16, 2012, 12:38:52 PM Get out united!! Great goal from llorente Read the BBC and someone compared it to van basten's classic. Saw it. Not in same league. We've been poor in Europe this season. Found out basically. You celebrated it as though you were a Bilbaoan, although I'm guessing you're not.. I was last night, on offence but I hate united with a passion Sad I don't even hate Manchester City or Liverpool with a passion. I wouldn't have been disappointed to see Chelsea go out of the CL, but nor would I have celebrated it if it had happened. (it will when they come up against Barca or Milan, assuming they get past Benfica) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rivertony on March 16, 2012, 01:53:37 PM But do you hate arsenal with a passion?? :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 16, 2012, 02:22:18 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rivertony on March 16, 2012, 03:34:43 PM I'm sure they have the best outright center forward in the world, I might be a little bias tho Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 18, 2012, 02:50:41 PM This could be 9!
Need to maximise to get that gd back in order Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rivertony on March 18, 2012, 03:00:12 PM This could be 9! How bad are wolves playing its unreal, I know they have 10 men but this performance is ridicNeed to maximise to get that gd back in order Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on March 18, 2012, 03:06:28 PM The gd could get wiped out here.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rivertony on March 18, 2012, 03:09:24 PM I want to see at least one more from united
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 24, 2012, 08:15:30 PM Gotta hate the fact that city are getting all these last minute rescues! 97th minute today!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: amcgrath1uk on March 24, 2012, 08:20:02 PM Gotta hate the fact that city are getting all these last minute rescues! 97th minute today! Errr? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 24, 2012, 08:58:38 PM Gotta hate the fact that city are getting all these last minute rescues! 97th minute today! Errr? roffle where is that laser eye surgery thread Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on March 24, 2012, 09:49:23 PM Congrats on the title. Personnel don't look as good as previous years and still think a class CM is lacking so make it's more impressive (and a little irritating)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rivertony on March 24, 2012, 09:58:13 PM Modric will be a united player next season, class CM!!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on March 24, 2012, 10:03:24 PM love how city have bottled it big style...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 24, 2012, 10:23:50 PM love how city have bottled it big style... easy tiger, long way to go yet Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 30, 2012, 01:02:31 PM http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17562222
that works Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rivertony on March 30, 2012, 08:31:02 PM http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17562222 that works City can't score ATM either and now their best striker is out lol united have one hand on the cup! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 31, 2012, 03:51:14 PM http://www.firstrowsports.eu/watch/116318/1/watch-manchester-city-vs-sunderland.html
man u reserves doing a job here gonna be a good 2nd half Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 31, 2012, 04:18:18 PM ;karabiner; ;sexybanana; ;sexybanana; ;karabiner; :dd: :dd:
;sexybanana; ;letsparty; ;letsparty; ;mexicanwave; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 31, 2012, 04:38:55 PM (http://i371.photobucket.com/albums/oo151/outragous76/choke.png)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on March 31, 2012, 04:57:31 PM knew i shouldnt have posted that!
sigh Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on March 31, 2012, 06:24:39 PM love how city have bottled it big style... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 31, 2012, 06:29:11 PM Let's not celebrate too early
City got one point v Sunderland, let's see if we can do better v Blackburn... Remember the home game? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: FUN4FRASER on April 01, 2012, 01:31:54 PM Hi Guys
Looking for some help /advice My son has always wanted to visit Old Trafford and watch a good game rather than the standard Sheffield Wednesday games I take him to . I was thinking about taking him & 3 friends to the QPR game next Sunday but after ringing the tickect office I was told that everybody has to become members first @£20 adults + 4 x juniors at £14 which I think is ridiculous , I explained I only wanted that match but they insisted , so basically Im wanting to know if there is anybody that can get me 1 adult and 4 kid tickets without the charges or another solution. Thanks in Advance Fraser Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on April 01, 2012, 01:34:17 PM Hi Guys Looking for some help /advice My son has always wanted to visit Old Trafford and watch a good game rather than the standard Sheffield Wednesday games I take him to . I was thinking about taking him & 3 friends to the QPR game next Sunday but after ringing the tickect office I was told that everybody has to become members first @£20 adults + 4 x juniors at £14 which I think is ridiculous , I explained I only wanted that match but they insisted , so basically Im wanting to know if there is anybody that can get me 1 adult and 4 kid tickets without the charges or another solution. Thanks in Advance Fraser Put your foot down, he's Wednesday and until you draw them in the cup he has to wait. Or bring him to Roland road :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: FUN4FRASER on April 01, 2012, 01:35:38 PM Hi Guys Looking for some help /advice My son has always wanted to visit Old Trafford and watch a good game rather than the standard Sheffield Wednesday games I take him to . I was thinking about taking him & 3 friends to the QPR game next Sunday but after ringing the tickect office I was told that everybody has to become members first @£20 adults + 4 x juniors at £14 which I think is ridiculous , I explained I only wanted that match but they insisted , so basically Im wanting to know if there is anybody that can get me 1 adult and 4 kid tickets without the charges or another solution. Thanks in Advance Fraser Put your foot down, he's Wednesday and until you draw them in the cup he has to wait. Or bring him to Roland road :) Hehe :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on April 01, 2012, 01:36:51 PM Hi Fraser.
Yeah the membership thing is a pain for 1 offs. You should be able to pick up tickets thou, your problem will be getting 4 together last minute. Not sure how old the kids are but 2 lots of 2 will be more likely. I gave up my membership this year so can't help directly for tickets I'm afraid Hope you get sorted Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: FUN4FRASER on April 01, 2012, 01:39:35 PM Hi Fraser. Yeah the membership thing is a pain for 1 offs. You should be able to pick up tickets thou, your problem will be getting 4 together last minute. Not sure how old the kids are but 2 lots of 2 will be more likely. I gave up my membership this year so can't help directly for tickets I'm afraid Hope you get sorted Cheers Guy...I was hoping the demand would be lower with it been QPR hence more spaces together Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on April 01, 2012, 01:41:59 PM When is the game? Give the ticket office a call and ask when they go on open sale. You won't need to be a member then
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dewi_cool on April 01, 2012, 01:42:29 PM According to the website there are no tickets available at this moment, only an option to reg interest if some become available.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: FUN4FRASER on April 01, 2012, 01:44:42 PM Next Sunday..she said no open sales for the rest of the season when I rang the ticket office( in the last hour )
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dewi_cool on April 01, 2012, 01:50:52 PM I purchase my tickets online having paid the £25 fee, but there is no option to purchase it's too late, you really need to order a month in advance.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on April 01, 2012, 01:53:20 PM Fraser, I'd plan for next season in that case. Midweek European tickets early on are always good for getting tickets
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 02, 2012, 09:59:10 PM :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on April 02, 2012, 09:59:40 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: millidonk on April 02, 2012, 10:10:06 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: JK on April 02, 2012, 10:38:42 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on April 02, 2012, 10:48:48 PM hope man u buy balotelli
under fergies guidance he should be awesome. i Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on April 03, 2012, 12:20:47 AM hope man u buy balotelli Or put all his team mates on the physio's table :)under fergies guidance he should be awesome. i Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on April 03, 2012, 12:36:37 AM who you going to sign next year? Centre mid?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 03, 2012, 01:14:11 AM who you going to sign next year? Centre mid? I'd say 2 centre mids are probs a must. Although Scholes has been immense since his return. Was pretty sceptical but he has been the key for us. Also would like to see Man U buy another striker. Don't think Welbeck is good enough. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 03, 2012, 01:36:32 AM Schneider FTW.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on April 03, 2012, 01:43:26 AM managers love players like welbeck, he iis an abs handful and is more than happy to go 'in behind' would be v.surprised if he left.
Berbatov, macheda to leave i assume. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on April 04, 2012, 08:32:56 AM Welbeck is class. Just buy Gylfi
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 06, 2012, 12:37:21 PM So - a win at home on Sunday, and North London's Maestroes getting a win at home as well and we're eight points clear.
Maybe April 30th won't turn out to be the title decider that Sky would dearly love it to be... However... many a slip 'twixt cup and lip as they say - QPR may just bite us. SAF could be tempted to rest a few with a trip to a revitalised Wigan coing up on Wednesday. 7/1 available for the draw and 16/1 the win but that doesn't look like 'value' given that Blackburn were far longer odds and in a similar run of form on New Year's Eve. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on April 08, 2012, 05:51:16 PM <3 arsenal - just for today!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: NoflopsHomer on April 08, 2012, 10:37:04 PM This isn't meant as an insult but Chelsea/Arsenal/Man City all contributed to their own downfalls. I can't remember too many 'great' Man U performances but what they've done better (perhaps more so than any other season) is 'just enough'. So many games where Man U squeezed out results and when we played you in January and it looked (and I would say still looks) as though you have no midfield and are miles off the pace in European terms but the mentality has never wavered and is what got you through.
I guess what I'm saying is that all the title contenders have gone backwards this year (with the exception of City, who've moved forward obviously, but still with numerous and fatal flaws) so it's a case of Man U as being the best of a bad lot (in relative terms - it's a very weak Premiership this year imo). I hope no-one takes that as a dig, but when you compare the top teams to Barca etc...no-one looks good enough. But congrats and everything, coming back from that 6-1 defeat to City and the big points deficit obvious means you deserve it. You definitely need new central midfielder(s) and a striker though, maybe even a new central defender to go with Vidic. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 08, 2012, 10:51:17 PM Chris. Agree. We are a one man team
SAF take a bow Sir Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on April 08, 2012, 11:40:06 PM Chris. Agree. We are a one man team ;applause;SAF take a bow Sir Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: amcgrath1uk on April 08, 2012, 11:51:23 PM Chris. Agree. We are a one man team SAF take a bow Sir The referee? ;) I must be honest, I can't quite believe just how many games you lot have managed to win since xmas. Title well n truly deserved. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 08, 2012, 11:59:37 PM It really does just show how unreal Fergie is, this is by far his greatest achievement for me. If he was City manager they'd have pissed the league this season ainec. I really am not a fan of Mancini and have said so many times before, his tactics are terrible in so many games. I'm not even sure they went for the win today, I really think they didn't but that just seems absurd. At no point in the 2nd half did he show any real intention of going for the win, just joke bad.
City lost the title not Man U won it, congrats and everything but City have really fucked it up. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: AndrewT on April 09, 2012, 12:08:17 AM Overall a pretty poor Premiership offering this year. The Champions League has shown up how good the English clubs are.
Well done Man U - your 13 men were just too good for our 10 today. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on April 09, 2012, 03:01:42 AM This isn't meant as an insult but Chelsea/Arsenal/Man City all contributed to their own downfalls. I can't remember too many 'great' Man U performances but what they've done better (perhaps more so than any other season) is 'just enough'. So many games where Man U squeezed out results and when we played you in January and it looked (and I would say still looks) as though you have no midfield and are miles off the pace in European terms but the mentality has never wavered and is what got you through. I guess what I'm saying is that all the title contenders have gone backwards this year (with the exception of City, who've moved forward obviously, but still with numerous and fatal flaws) so it's a case of Man U as being the best of a bad lot (in relative terms - it's a very weak Premiership this year imo). I hope no-one takes that as a dig, but when you compare the top teams to Barca etc...no-one looks good enough. But congrats and everything, coming back from that 6-1 defeat to City and the big points deficit obvious means you deserve it. You definitely need new central midfielder(s) and a striker though, maybe even a new central defender to go with Vidic. Love this thread, but then again I would. Quick point, you seem to forget what we did to Arsenal, ok it's a while back, and kinda overshadowed by what the bitters did to us a while later but hey, don't forget it please. I'll add now that i haven't been to Old Trafford since the glaziers too over and started asset stripping our club in a very sneaky way. So to get my fix of live football, it's off to gigg lane and the wonderful team that is FC United Of Manchester. I'll always be a United fan, just not giving my money to the glaziers, never. I miss Old trafford, but won't go back for that reason alone, not till the robbing yanks are gone (however that might happen). The glaziers are the reason we are not up there with Barca and Madrid, we've spent less money than the majority of premier league clubs over the last few years, why because they've robbed us of more money than the bitters have spent on players. The premier league has suffered as a whole too, but that's a long and twisting argument, that has no clear answer, and I'm not going to go into all the ins and outs of it. What has shone through is Sir Alex, the backbone he rebuilt after we got rid of that piss head Atkinson and his squads love a beer or two, or ten. The team spirit, the never give up attitude, and the seemingly endless flow of new talent coming through. Of course this has been a MUFC trait since before I was born, and with players like Ole and Scholes moving into the reserve and youth team set ups it's a reason the club have survived and continued to florish in such tough conditions (in comparison to other top clubs around Europe with the spending power). We've not won number 20 yet, and I'll never do a Keegan and start celebrating too soon. Facebook today has pissed me off, so any plastic reds jumping about like we've won it, great day for the red side of Manchester, not lighting the victory blunt just yet. To those that said Citeh lost it, they didn't lose it, they've got 15 more points than they had at this time last year, they've just shown they're not good enough to win it, and hopefully that won't change in the next six games. We never do it the easy way, and knowing that I'll not be celebrating till it's in the bag, but will say we've done everything right so far since xmas and that is why we are winning, not so much that citeh have fuct it up, you cant win the premier league in December, April maybe. :-) On all the poker forums I've been on this is the first I've seen a decent football thread on MUFC, haven't got the time to read it all, but read some comments that are clearly from true football fans. blonde delivers. Top thread. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 09, 2012, 03:09:11 AM I said about City losing it not Man U winning which is a little unfair since you've only dropped 2 points since we beat you in January, again congrats and wp. It was Citys to lose though and there form has been terrible for a while. If Mourinho goes to City next year they win the title for certain.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on April 09, 2012, 04:50:50 AM de gea, fabio,rafael, evans, ferdinand, evra, giggs, scholes, carrick, nani to an extent, barry, milner, kolo toure, ballotelli, aguero, tevez, berbatov, welbeck.
All of the above and im sure there is more are players who i either 1/ wouldnt be frightened about and think we could handle or 2/players that are vunerable and that we could exploit. If you look at the arsenal team who were undefeated, the chelsea team who ruled for years, the man united team of the 90s, you would really sturggle to name even a handful that could be compared to the above. There are so many different sides from premiership history who would have won the league this year. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 09, 2012, 07:56:48 AM This poor Manchester United team have the very real chance of setting a new points record for the Premier League. I don't see what point is being made here - but I do know that a Newcastle fan should understand that the whole being greater than the sum of the parts is what lifts a team above the pack. e de gea, fabio,rafael, evans, ferdinand, evra, giggs, scholes, carrick, nani to an extent, barry, milner, kolo toure, ballotelli, aguero, tevez, berbatov, welbeck. All of the above and im sure there is more are players who i either 1/ wouldnt be frightened about and think we could handle or 2/players that are vunerable and that we could exploit. If you look at the arsenal team who were undefeated, the chelsea team who ruled for years, the man united team of the 90s, you would really sturggle to name even a handful that could be compared to the above. There are so many different sides from premiership history who would have won the league this year. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on April 09, 2012, 09:14:29 AM Record points tally is a measure of the league strength as well as the strength of the team.
You can only win the league you are in, city losing it or a poor man u team doesn't really matter. So congrats. Still some title races hotting up - Championship (west ham have tough game and top 2 meet later this week) - La Liga (real 10 point lead cut to 4 with a classico still to play) so plenty of other football to get excited about. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 09, 2012, 09:58:28 AM de gea, fabio,rafael, evans, ferdinand, evra, giggs, scholes, carrick, nani to an extent, barry, milner, kolo toure, ballotelli, aguero, tevez, berbatov, welbeck. All of the above and im sure there is more are players who i either 1/ wouldnt be frightened about and think we could handle or 2/players that are vunerable and that we could exploit. If you look at the arsenal team who were undefeated, the chelsea team who ruled for years, the man united team of the 90s, you would really sturggle to name even a handful that could be compared to the above. There are so many different sides from premiership history who would have won the league this year. PS - "the chelsea team who ruled for years"?? really? Like Blackburn before them, and City after them, the influx of megacash at Chelsea created an illusion and a fleeting period of success. Say what you like about Manchester United, but our success hasn't been bought by external money. Quite the contrary in recent years with the Glazers taking money out of the club. PPS - "There are so many different sides from premiership history who would have won the league this year." True. Most of them were Manchester United sides too though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on April 09, 2012, 10:12:58 AM de gea, fabio,rafael, evans, ferdinand, evra, giggs, scholes, carrick, nani to an extent, barry, milner, kolo toure, ballotelli, aguero, tevez, berbatov, welbeck. All of the above and im sure there is more are players who i either 1/ wouldnt be frightened about and think we could handle or 2/players that are vunerable and that we could exploit. If you look at the arsenal team who were undefeated, the chelsea team who ruled for years, the man united team of the 90s, you would really sturggle to name even a handful that could be compared to the above. There are so many different sides from premiership history who would have won the league this year. Chelsea team that ruled for years, wtf, when was this? lol. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on April 09, 2012, 10:14:41 AM de gea, fabio,rafael, evans, ferdinand, evra, giggs, scholes, carrick, nani to an extent, barry, milner, kolo toure, ballotelli, aguero, tevez, berbatov, welbeck. All of the above and im sure there is more are players who i either 1/ wouldnt be frightened about and think we could handle or 2/players that are vunerable and that we could exploit. If you look at the arsenal team who were undefeated, the chelsea team who ruled for years, the man united team of the 90s, you would really sturggle to name even a handful that could be compared to the above. There are so many different sides from premiership history who would have won the league this year. PS - "the chelsea team who ruled for years"?? really? Like Blackburn before them, and City after them, the influx of megacash at Chelsea created an illusion and a fleeting period of success. Say what you like about Manchester United, but our success hasn't been bought by external money. Quite the contrary in recent years with the Glazers taking money out of the club. PPS - "There are so many different sides from premiership history who would have won the league this year." True. Most of them were Manchester United sides too though. Well said. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 09, 2012, 01:30:09 PM This isn't meant as an insult but Chelsea/Arsenal/Man City all contributed to their own downfalls. I can't remember too many 'great' Man U performances but what they've done better (perhaps more so than any other season) is 'just enough'. So many games where Man U squeezed out results and when we played you in January and it looked (and I would say still looks) as though you have no midfield and are miles off the pace in European terms but the mentality has never wavered and is what got you through. I guess what I'm saying is that all the title contenders have gone backwards this year (with the exception of City, who've moved forward obviously, but still with numerous and fatal flaws) so it's a case of Man U as being the best of a bad lot (in relative terms - it's a very weak Premiership this year imo). I hope no-one takes that as a dig, but when you compare the top teams to Barca etc...no-one looks good enough. But congrats and everything, coming back from that 6-1 defeat to City and the big points deficit obvious means you deserve it. You definitely need new central midfielder(s) and a striker though, maybe even a new central defender to go with Vidic. Love this thread, but then again I would. Quick point, you seem to forget what we did to Arsenal, ok it's a while back, and kinda overshadowed by what the bitters did to us a while later but hey, don't forget it please. I'll add now that i haven't been to Old Trafford since the glaziers too over and started asset stripping our club in a very sneaky way. So to get my fix of live football, it's off to gigg lane and the wonderful team that is FC United Of Manchester. I'll always be a United fan, just not giving my money to the glaziers, never. I miss Old trafford, but won't go back for that reason alone, not till the robbing yanks are gone (however that might happen). The glaziers are the reason we are not up there with Barca and Madrid, we've spent less money than the majority of premier league clubs over the last few years, why because they've robbed us of more money than the bitters have spent on players. The premier league has suffered as a whole too, but that's a long and twisting argument, that has no clear answer, and I'm not going to go into all the ins and outs of it. What has shone through is Sir Alex, the backbone he rebuilt after we got rid of that piss head Atkinson and his squads love a beer or two, or ten. The team spirit, the never give up attitude, and the seemingly endless flow of new talent coming through. Of course this has been a MUFC trait since before I was born, and with players like Ole and Scholes moving into the reserve and youth team set ups it's a reason the club have survived and continued to florish in such tough conditions (in comparison to other top clubs around Europe with the spending power). We've not won number 20 yet, and I'll never do a Keegan and start celebrating too soon. Facebook today has pissed me off, so any plastic reds jumping about like we've won it, great day for the red side of Manchester, not lighting the victory blunt just yet. To those that said Citeh lost it, they didn't lose it, they've got 15 more points than they had at this time last year, they've just shown they're not good enough to win it, and hopefully that won't change in the next six games. We never do it the easy way, and knowing that I'll not be celebrating till it's in the bag, but will say we've done everything right so far since xmas and that is why we are winning, not so much that citeh have fuct it up, you cant win the premier league in December, April maybe. :-) On all the poker forums I've been on this is the first I've seen a decent football thread on MUFC, haven't got the time to read it all, but read some comments that are clearly from true football fans. blonde delivers. Top thread. Great post. Post more please. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on April 09, 2012, 01:41:43 PM the comments about man u not spending money is such a myth?
Almost everyone in your team cost ovr 10m and alot of players over 20m. When was the last time you sold a player for over 10m? Last time you sold a player over 20m? Also probably have top 3 wage budget in the league. Give pards 10x your net spend and im sure the gap woyld be alotttttttt closer. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on April 09, 2012, 01:52:22 PM the comments about man u not spending money is such a myth? Almost everyone in your team cost ovr 10m and alot of players over 20m. When was the last time you sold a player for over 10m? Last time you sold a player over 20m? Also probably have top 3 wage budget in the league. Give pards 10x your net spend and im sure the gap woyld be alotttttttt closer. found this http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/2006-2011.html (http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/2006-2011.html) net transfer spend would put Manchester Utd 8th but even gross spend would put them in 5th Obviously it shows they have money available (ldo) I think the case is more that they can make good use of their resources, as opposed to some others who have just tried to solve a problem by spending more. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 09, 2012, 02:58:01 PM the comments about man u not spending money is such a myth? Almost everyone in your team cost ovr 10m and alot of players over 20m. When was the last time you sold a player for over 10m? Last time you sold a player over 20m? Also probably have top 3 wage budget in the league. Give pards 10x your net spend and im sure the gap woyld be alotttttttt closer. I've never said we don't spend money. But the money we spend is self-generated. Not funds from a rich owner. Give pards 10x our net spend in one go? That hasn't worked out well for Mancini has it? Nor the half dozen who followed the Special One at Chelsea. Manchester United have built their way to their current position, just as Liverpool did back in the day. Other teams have flirted with success, NUFC in the Keegan era for one but none have had the keystone that is SAF to get them through the next step. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on April 09, 2012, 03:19:25 PM Manchester United, regrettably, are genuinely awesome. In terms of a narrow focus on the Prem League, they are peerless.
Team strength reduces, fk it, we'll win it anyway. Other teams launching big coups, buying incred players, fk it, we'll bring back Scholes and win it again. American owners in, mortgaging the future, don't understand the game, so fkn what, we'll win it again. I hope Ferguson retires soon Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on April 09, 2012, 03:28:34 PM Sometimes the hardest thing in the world is to cross over the winning line. It happens so much in all sports and it's the amazing achievent by fergie that since they blew the league to Leeds in 91-92 they have always finished the season well an punished other teams dithering. Fergie winning the league this season would be incredible really, city were flying and they have ground them down and made them twitch with fear. Playing mind games with fergie was the final notice that they really were up shut creek! Fergie has proved he is too shrewd to not have plan B or C if needed unlike Mancini or AVB. The way he has used the older players and used his squad this season without ever been great (arsenal game apart) is the thing that separates goods managers to great ones. If CIty hadn't exploded then I really believe man utd would have found even a higher gear, but they haven't and they will still piss the league. Much prefer a team like man utd this season to win the league than city who I me have blown up because of the managers blind faith in certain players and the lack of ability to change tactics when needed.
I mean how much shit did utd defence get at the start of the season? Now look at their record? Without vidic, it's been solid, evens and Ferdinand if they keep fit should see utd bring home the bacon with 2-3 games left to play. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 09, 2012, 03:29:44 PM Lol pleno sums up fickle fans. Give pardew 500 mill. U still wouldn't win anything. 2 seasons of relative success does not mean ur gonna rule the world.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on April 09, 2012, 05:04:36 PM Lol pleno sums up fickle fans. Give pardew 500 mill. U still wouldn't win anything. 2 seasons of relative success does not mean ur gonna rule the world. You have to give credit to the team, Pardew and the toon army. Like Swansea and Stoke they have brightened up the premirship this season and despite wanting to see utd win every season i like the under dogs giving Chelsea and Arsenal a run for their money.I would like to see a return to former glory of Liverpool but what with King Kenny's management and the whole Suarez situation the are becoming a joke. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: booder on April 09, 2012, 05:07:51 PM Lol pleno sums up fickle fans. Give pardew 500 mill. U still wouldn't win anything. 2 seasons of relative success does not mean ur gonna rule the world. You have to give credit to the team, Pardew and the toon army. Like Swansea and I would like to see a return to former glory of Liverpool but what with King Kenny's management and the whole Suarez situation the are becoming a joke. FYP Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on April 09, 2012, 05:22:24 PM Lol pleno sums up fickle fans. Give pardew 500 mill. U still wouldn't win anything. 2 seasons of relative success does not mean ur gonna rule the world. You have to give credit to the team, Pardew and the toon army. Like Swansea and I would like to see a return to former glory of Liverpool but what with King Kenny's management and the whole Suarez situation the are becoming a joke. FYP Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: booder on April 09, 2012, 05:26:28 PM Lol pleno sums up fickle fans. Give pardew 500 mill. U still wouldn't win anything. 2 seasons of relative success does not mean ur gonna rule the world. You have to give credit to the team, Pardew and the toon army. Like Swansea and I would like to see a return to former glory of Liverpool but what with King Kenny's management and the whole Suarez situation the are becoming a joke. FYP No. Stoke are Premiership regulars , don't think they can be classed as underdogs anymore. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 09, 2012, 05:45:18 PM Pardew has done well. But he did great at West Ham the first 2-3 seasons......
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 09, 2012, 06:04:35 PM 6 November 1986 -- 17 May 1990 the time it took to win anything. It was another three years before the first Premier League title. (Anyone remember who came seconf that season?) What chance anyone getting that long nowadays? Stability is so important. Player power doesn't feature at OT because all the players know that SAF is the power. But it takes time to develop that level of authoirty. Chelsea have had Grant, Scolari, Hiddink, Ancelotti, AVB and DiMatteo since Mourinho left. Arsenal may not have won anything for a while, but they have been consistent and it feels more likely that they will challenge for the league next year than it does Chelsea or indeed Man City (who may well be under new management by then). Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on April 09, 2012, 06:20:22 PM Don't think Fergie would get that time now. He joined before premier league era and before champions league got as big. So much money involved now that people don't want to risk what they have now (top 4 position for example) in favour of more long term success. There is no guarantee that the success comes long term so they hope a change sorts the problem short term.
I agree with what you say but I don't know how it changes unless it becomes a more level playing field or the money properly dries up. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on April 09, 2012, 06:23:14 PM I thought Rooney player powered his way to a bumper pay rise?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on April 11, 2012, 01:29:16 AM I thought Rooney player powered his way to a bumper pay rise? As far as I know he didn't get all he wanted, could be wrong, but the MIB ensured he didn't leave, lol. Player power does not exist at United, well not in comparison to some other clubs. Makes me think of something that's always slightly concerned me with SAF, and that's his seeming lack of tolerance for some, and not for others, wonder if he picks his favourites sometimes, players like Gillespie for example, we'll never really know just how far he pushed SAF before he was expelled. It's come up again recently with Raval Morrison, an amazing talent, who clearly is a very messed up kid, but have we let some players go to easily, when a bit more patience could have turned them round. Giggs wasn't exactly the model teenager, and what came out later clearly showed he's far from perfect, but Fergie kept him. Ok I know Giggs is a legend, but players with immense raw talent like Morrison get shipped out to lesser clubs, where they seem to stop developing at the same rate they did at United. Maybe it's because they're not at the United, or more likely SAF knows best, and they were never going to be that great. Giggs brother played for FC United, he was shit, but what if you'd had him in the United set up, he#d surely be a much better player. Not sure I'm really making that much sense, it's late and I should be sleeping, anyone have any other examples or thoughts about this? There are other examples, I'll get onto those when I've more time. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 11, 2012, 02:00:19 AM I thought Rooney player powered his way to a bumper pay rise? As far as I know he didn't get all he wanted, could be wrong, but the MIB ensured he didn't leave, lol. Player power does not exist at United, well not in comparison to some other clubs. Makes me think of something that's always slightly concerned me with SAF, and that's his seeming lack of tolerance for some, and not for others, wonder if he picks his favourites sometimes, players like Gillespie for example, we'll never really know just how far he pushed SAF before he was expelled. It's come up again recently with Raval Morrison, an amazing talent, who clearly is a very messed up kid, but have we let some players go to easily, when a bit more patience could have turned them round. Giggs wasn't exactly the model teenager, and what came out later clearly showed he's far from perfect, but Fergie kept him. Ok I know Giggs is a legend, but players with immense raw talent like Morrison get shipped out to lesser clubs, where they seem to stop developing at the same rate they did at United. Maybe it's because they're not at the United, or more likely SAF knows best, and they were never going to be that great. Giggs brother played for FC United, he was shit, but what if you'd had him in the United set up, he#d surely be a much better player. Not sure I'm really making that much sense, it's late and I should be sleeping, anyone have any other examples or thoughts about this? There are other examples, I'll get onto those when I've more time. Know what you mean but can't think of too many players who have left who have gone on to bigger and better things. Perhaps Forlan, Pique and Rossi (although not sure how he's doing atm) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on April 11, 2012, 03:00:03 AM I thought Rooney player powered his way to a bumper pay rise? As far as I know he didn't get all he wanted, could be wrong, but the MIB ensured he didn't leave, lol. Player power does not exist at United, well not in comparison to some other clubs. Makes me think of something that's always slightly concerned me with SAF, and that's his seeming lack of tolerance for some, and not for others, wonder if he picks his favourites sometimes, players like Gillespie for example, we'll never really know just how far he pushed SAF before he was expelled. It's come up again recently with Raval Morrison, an amazing talent, who clearly is a very messed up kid, but have we let some players go to easily, when a bit more patience could have turned them round. Giggs wasn't exactly the model teenager, and what came out later clearly showed he's far from perfect, but Fergie kept him. Ok I know Giggs is a legend, but players with immense raw talent like Morrison get shipped out to lesser clubs, where they seem to stop developing at the same rate they did at United. Maybe it's because they're not at the United, or more likely SAF knows best, and they were never going to be that great. Giggs brother played for FC United, he was shit, but what if you'd had him in the United set up, he#d surely be a much better player. Not sure I'm really making that much sense, it's late and I should be sleeping, anyone have any other examples or thoughts about this? There are other examples, I'll get onto those when I've more time. Know what you mean but can't think of too many players who have left who have gone on to bigger and better things. Perhaps Forlan, Pique and Rossi (although not sure how he's doing atm) Agreed, some good examples there, Van Nistelrooy is another, we also let David Platt go, although that might have been pre SAF. That's my point though, players at a top club develop quicker, could go into outliers here, but won't for now. Those that got the boot, Gillespie for his gambling as an example, would they have been much better if they'd not been sold. I doubt we will hear that much from Raval Morrsion now he's at West Ham, no disrespect to West Ham, they've developed some great players, but what could he have become at United compared to what he might become at West Ham. Not sure where I'm really going with this, it's something that keeps cropping up though. SAF is someone I rarely question on football matters, even if he turned down Joe Hart, just interested to know others views. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 11, 2012, 06:39:36 AM I thought Rooney player powered his way to a bumper pay rise? I believe the word you were looking for here was negotiated. He's not the first to take that sort of stance - some players even threaten to leave their hometown club to go and play in West London... The point I was making, as well you know, was that nobody exerts influence over tactics or selection at OT. The last to try it was Roy Keane. A legend of a player for us but out in days when he effectively questioned SAF's authority. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on April 11, 2012, 10:30:05 PM well well welll
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 11, 2012, 10:33:35 PM Just like showdowns- never ever easy
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on April 11, 2012, 11:01:45 PM wow.
watch sir alexs interview. 'we haven't got one decision today' - erm Wigan had a perfect goal disallowed, and Evans should have been sent off! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on April 12, 2012, 11:38:52 AM wow. watch sir alexs interview. 'we haven't got one decision today' - erm Wigan had a perfect goal disallowed, and Evans should have been sent off! at least he said Wigan deserved to win and were the best team :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on April 12, 2012, 07:18:26 PM wow. watch sir alexs interview. 'we haven't got one decision today' - erm Wigan had a perfect goal disallowed, and Evans should have been sent off! at least he said Wigan deserved to win and were the best team :) Yup, outplayed, and owned by the Wigan fans, who, when a few of our lot kicked off after the penalty that wasn't given, resulting in the five 0 wading in and dragging them off, started chanting, 'you're man united and you do what your told', owned on the pitch and the terraces. sigh. One of the noisiest games for a while, not like the bin dippers who clearly only sing when they're winning! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on April 22, 2012, 01:56:51 PM No idea how we have 3 goals here. Worst twitchy bum game of season! And we are 2 best by a long way
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on April 22, 2012, 02:14:09 PM Hang your head in shame boys!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 22, 2012, 02:57:06 PM Sick game. The derby is going to be unbelievable.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 22, 2012, 10:38:52 PM Rigged.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on April 22, 2012, 10:45:46 PM City will murder United next week.
Then QPR will cost me a fortune by luckboxing a draw at the Etihad on the last day of the season. You heard it here first. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 22, 2012, 10:57:12 PM City will murder United next week. Then QPR will cost me a fortune by luckboxing a draw at the Etihad on the last day of the season. You heard it here first. Disagree. Think it'll be closer than you think Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on April 22, 2012, 11:06:47 PM City will murder United next week. Then QPR will cost me a fortune by luckboxing a draw at the Etihad on the last day of the season. You heard it here first. Disagree. Think it'll be closer than you think United are a shadow of the team which have mulitiple championships in the last 15 years. If the defend like they did today Silva, Aguero and Tevez will rip them apart. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on April 22, 2012, 11:09:53 PM City will murder United next week. Then QPR will cost me a fortune by luckboxing a draw at the Etihad on the last day of the season. You heard it here first. Disagree. Think it'll be closer than you think United are a shadow of the team which have mulitiple championships in the last 15 years. If the defend like they did today Silva, Aguero and Tevez will rip them apart. im inclined to agree with george The difference is that city MUST win. If we play valencia and young there will be times when they expose themselves enough. Not many teams have had a go at city this year, and we wont defend like that 2 games running Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: amcgrath1uk on April 22, 2012, 11:10:31 PM City will murder United next week. Then QPR will cost me a fortune by luckboxing a draw at the Etihad on the last day of the season. You heard it here first. With Barton, Wright-Phillips et al playing for QPR?? I'll assume QPR will be safe before the game. Even if City do beat United next week ( which I obviously hope like hell they do), Newcastle away will be ridiculously difficult. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on April 22, 2012, 11:18:22 PM i agree with camel
i think city will destroy united man u team is the weakest its been for a long long long long long long time hope we get some good midfielders next season and an out and out striker Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 22, 2012, 11:28:49 PM Any United team, shit or not, rarely gets destroyed.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: amcgrath1uk on April 22, 2012, 11:30:38 PM Really think the derby is going to be tight as anything and tense as anything. Too much at stake for it to be anything but...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on April 22, 2012, 11:38:03 PM What I cant get my head round is how we seem to have no ability to hold onto/defend a lead.
A creative midfielder would go down a treat but I also liked Cleverly at the start of the season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on April 22, 2012, 11:39:12 PM Any United team, shit or not, rarely gets destroyed. rarelyTitle: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on April 22, 2012, 11:39:20 PM Any United team, shit or not, rarely gets destroyed. 6-1 ring any bells? City are back playing to that level. United are playing worse than then. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 22, 2012, 11:41:42 PM Any United team, shit or not, rarely gets destroyed. 6-1 ring any bells? City are back playing to that level. United are playing worse than then. One freak result. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on April 22, 2012, 11:42:10 PM Vidic is badly missed.
Ferdinand is nearing the end of his Utd career. Raphael is not good enough at defending. Evans has been better recently, but still no Vidic. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on April 22, 2012, 11:50:50 PM But Rooney has an inbuilt brain..
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeeMcshane on April 23, 2012, 04:26:01 AM Reallly hoping that united win the league esp as im a man u fan. but i have this strange feeling with everything that has been going on with the results and after todays games. Also the way the whole Carlos Teves saga has gone on and the form they hit since they brought him back the last few games, I wont be suprised if it setting something up for a special occasion for him to shine in this game and and score the winning goal for city! That could win them the league!! Really have a bad feeling about it. Big twitchy bum times for UTD fans.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 23, 2012, 10:34:06 AM Twice in recent seasons we've let a two goal lead slip vs Everton and it could prove very expensive.
Do we need to buy? The old guard defence is on it's way out and Evans/Smalling/Jones will grow into their roles next season. Hopefully with Vidic adding experience and ability when fit. Rio's time is close to the end as, I fear, is Evra's but the twins should step up and with Valencia and Young doing their share of tracking back and Jones/Smalling/Evra all there as options it may be that one extra fullback is enough. Maybe two. Midfield - the eternal problem. SAF has a track record of expensive failures in this area and all we can do is hope that he finds the right buy if we make one. Or that the monkey gland treatement keeps working on Scholes and Giggs. Wingers - apparently we're looking at two or three to add to the three dozen we already seem to have... Strikers - see above in a week and a day we could be celebrating having effectively secured another title, or getting out the prediction kits and signing up as Toon Army affiliates. PS - Lay the nil-nil scoreline Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on April 23, 2012, 03:40:25 PM Rio is shot, can't see him playing if Vidic was fit.
Would like to see Clint Dempsey there next season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on April 23, 2012, 06:11:06 PM Rio is shot, can't see him playing if Vidic was fit. Would like to see Clint Dempsey there next season. what for? all he will be doing is sitting on the bench then play 20 mins of a match occasionally Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on April 23, 2012, 06:19:38 PM Rio is shot, can't see him playing if Vidic was fit. Would like to see Clint Dempsey there next season. what for? all he will be doing is sitting on the bench then play 20 mins of a match occasionally Nah, Dempsey is incred. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on April 23, 2012, 07:48:56 PM 5 points wins Man U the title. Could lose it with 6.
I thought it was (fairly) interesting Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 23, 2012, 08:50:51 PM 5 points wins Man U the title. Could lose it with 6. I thought it was (fairly) interesting It's all about winning the right five points... This time next week Rodney... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on April 23, 2012, 10:28:37 PM Fergie has kept faith with the old guard defensive team in the second half of the season and the results are there to see for yourself, rio for someone who looked so bad and injury prone has excelled without vidic to hold fort. It's telling Smalling and jones are benched and apart from the odd blip look at the goals against in the last 10 league games it's championship stats.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 24, 2012, 08:56:10 AM Fergie has kept faith with the old guard defensive team in the second half of the season and the results are there to see for yourself, rio for someone who looked so bad and injury prone has excelled without vidic to hold fort. It's telling Smalling and jones are benched and apart from the odd blip look at the goals against in the last 10 league games it's championship stats. We kept clean sheets against Villa, Fulham, Blackburn, West Brom n Wolves... We conceded vs Bilbao, Tottenham, Wigan, Everton and Chelsea, and apart from Tottenham all those goals conceded cost us dearly. The link seems to be that these teams attacked us harder and competed with us in midfield - Scholes has been brilliant but he inevitably needs a little more space these days and we need to be able to man up in games when the oppostion have a proper go (and the talent to go with the effort) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on April 27, 2012, 08:35:55 AM Twice in recent seasons we've let a two goal lead slip vs Everton and it could prove very expensive. Do we need to buy? The old guard defence is on it's way out and Evans/Smalling/Jones will grow into their roles next season. Hopefully with Vidic adding experience and ability when fit. Rio's time is close to the end as, I fear, is Evra's but the twins should step up and with Valencia and Young doing their share of tracking back and Jones/Smalling/Evra all there as options it may be that one extra fullback is enough. Maybe two. Midfield - the eternal problem. SAF has a track record of expensive failures in this area and all we can do is hope that he finds the right buy if we make one. Or that the monkey gland treatement keeps working on Scholes and Giggs. Wingers - apparently we're looking at two or three to add to the three dozen we already seem to have... Strikers - see above in a week and a day we could be celebrating having effectively secured another title, or getting out the prediction kits and signing up as Toon Army affiliates. PS - Lay the nil-nil scoreline Top post, will add some thoughts soon, remember we've got some real talent emerging still! Two Keane's for starters. Loving this season, just hope I still am after Monday night. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 30, 2012, 04:06:27 PM In first with this...
Scene: The Away Dressing Room at The Etihad Stadium, 15 minutes before kick off tonight "Right lads we should have had this title wrapped up but we've been sloppy. We can't let this lot snatch it now because they'll never let us live it down. They stung us on the Munich Anniversary and stuffed us 6-1 at ours. I don't care what you do. Push, pull, elbow kick or dive. Get the fuck out there and get it done!" At this point Sir Alex Ferguson steps forward and says "OK ref, I'll take it from here" Seriously though - this is so big tonight. I don't know if I can cope with watching it. May leave it to halftime and see how it looks. Wouldn't want to miss seeing a win, would loathe being in a room full of haters as we lose. The positive note for us is that a loss tonight is a lot less final for us than it is for them. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on April 30, 2012, 05:13:45 PM In first with this... U r freeroliing m8, even if they loose which is highly unlikey as utd are 1/2 ish to get a draw or a win can you honestly see city getting result at newcastle !Scene: The Away Dressing Room at The Etihad Stadium, 15 minutes before kick off tonight "Right lads we should have had this title wrapped up but we've been sloppy. We can't let this lot snatch it now because they'll never let us live it down. They stung us on the Munich Anniversary and stuffed us 6-1 at ours. I don't care what you do. Push, pull, elbow kick or dive. Get the fuck out there and get it done!" At this point Sir Alex Ferguson steps forward and says "OK ref, I'll take it from here" Seriously though - this is so big tonight. I don't know if I can cope with watching it. May leave it to halftime and see how it looks. Wouldn't want to miss seeing a win, would loathe being in a room full of haters as we lose. The positive note for us is that a loss tonight is a lot less final for us than it is for them. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on April 30, 2012, 05:23:29 PM In first with this... U r freeroliing m8, even if they loose which is highly unlikey as utd are 1/2 ish to get a draw or a win can you honestly see city getting result at newcastle !Scene: The Away Dressing Room at The Etihad Stadium, 15 minutes before kick off tonight "Right lads we should have had this title wrapped up but we've been sloppy. We can't let this lot snatch it now because they'll never let us live it down. They stung us on the Munich Anniversary and stuffed us 6-1 at ours. I don't care what you do. Push, pull, elbow kick or dive. Get the fuck out there and get it done!" At this point Sir Alex Ferguson steps forward and says "OK ref, I'll take it from here" Seriously though - this is so big tonight. I don't know if I can cope with watching it. May leave it to halftime and see how it looks. Wouldn't want to miss seeing a win, would loathe being in a room full of haters as we lose. The positive note for us is that a loss tonight is a lot less final for us than it is for them. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on April 30, 2012, 10:28:40 PM Very tame from the mancs tonight, City thoroughly deserved winners, poor team selection imo from Fergie.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 30, 2012, 10:42:24 PM Nothing, not even losing to City can take the edge off my mood this week.
Off to bed to polish my Golden Chip Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on April 30, 2012, 11:17:44 PM Any man u supporters think Rooney is over rated
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeeMcshane on April 30, 2012, 11:23:40 PM Any man u supporters think Rooney is over rated Na never is. One of the best around. I think tonight just showed his frustration on having no supply to him. If he gets the supply like he usually does he is easily one of the best forwards in the game he has the whole package to his game Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on April 30, 2012, 11:26:49 PM City will murder United next week. Then QPR will cost me a fortune by luckboxing a draw at the Etihad on the last day of the season. You heard it here first. Disagree. Think it'll be closer than you think Does zero shots on target count as a murdering? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 30, 2012, 11:33:22 PM City will murder United next week. Then QPR will cost me a fortune by luckboxing a draw at the Etihad on the last day of the season. You heard it here first. Disagree. Think it'll be closer than you think Does zero shots on target count as a murdering? Did a pretty good job of killing off our title chances... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 30, 2012, 11:39:45 PM I was really suprised he picked Nani>>>>Valencia, didn't understand that at all. Valencia is by far your best midfielder and Nani is so inconsistent.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeeMcshane on April 30, 2012, 11:51:26 PM I was really suprised he picked Nani>>>>Valencia, didn't understand that at all. Valencia is by far your best midfielder and Nani is so inconsistent. Didnt understand why on earth he waited until the 80th minute to take him off he had a shocking game.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 30, 2012, 11:55:58 PM Yeh Nani was terrible but then no one performed aside from Rio.
Was right about it being a tight game tho. Mon the Geordies! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Hairydude on May 01, 2012, 12:16:11 AM I was really suprised he picked Nani>>>>Valencia, didn't understand that at all. Valencia is by far your best midfielder and Nani is so inconsistent. Also thought this was strange Valencia has been a standout player for man utd this season Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on May 01, 2012, 12:50:09 AM Nano had nobody to cross too, pretty harsh to slate him IMO. Valencia right back would have worked well as city play narrow and Barry is on the left of the city midfield three.. Jones defends well but was absolutely shocking on the ball today. Carrick impressed me today and I'd take him to the euros. Yaya and kompany were abs beasts today, zabeta defends ridiculously well too..
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on May 01, 2012, 09:28:22 AM Anyone else feel Park isnt good enough?
I feel like he lacks in the final 1/3 of the pitch. I understand the final 1/3 of the pitch isnt really his job but when he gets the ball in the oppositions half I just dont expect him to do anything with it, which to me doesnt seem right. In todays game I think you need to be able to defend/work your socks off/be able to attack or be creative in some way. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Hairydude on May 01, 2012, 10:37:43 AM A 6-0 for Man Utd and 1-0 for City this weekend would make things really interesting!
I know Swansea are playing well but Utd could feasibly score 4+goals in both their final games. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 01, 2012, 11:08:34 AM A 6-0 for Man Utd and 1-0 for City this weekend would make things really interesting! I know Swansea are playing well but Utd could feasibly score 4+goals in both their final games. (http://www.stockphotopro.com/photo-thumbs-2/APRD65.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on May 01, 2012, 12:06:31 PM I was really suprised he picked Nani>>>>Valencia, didn't understand that at all. Valencia is by far your best midfielder and Nani is so inconsistent. He picked Nani because he's owned Clichy in the past. Clearly not last night though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on May 01, 2012, 04:14:05 PM A 6-0 for Man Utd and 1-0 for City this weekend would make things really interesting! City beating Newcastle full stop would be an achievment with their away form an Newcastle having everything to play for while swansea are terrible away with nothing to play for! contrasting opponents some may say.I know Swansea are playing well but Utd could feasibly score 4+goals in both their final games. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Doobs on May 04, 2012, 11:59:08 PM Congrats on the title. Football doesn't follow the rules. Fair point Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 13, 2012, 04:29:50 PM Oh my!
Hope springs eternal Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on May 13, 2012, 07:07:19 PM Oh my! Hope springs eternal That was the beauty of it! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on May 14, 2012, 12:53:51 AM Brilliant season an Man Utd worthy runners up ,an justice has prevailed! Man city were an are the best team an showed courage an eventually there class seperated them from the rest by 8 goals in the end!
Bring on next season ! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 14, 2012, 06:51:02 AM Oh my! Hope springs eternal That was the beauty of it! Indeed. Imagine the meeting when a writer pitches that script to a film producer. Football eh? Bloody Hell #lovethegame Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 14, 2012, 01:54:08 PM Ruud Van Nistelrooy retires from the game. Probably up there with one of my fave players for United.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 14, 2012, 01:56:45 PM Ruud Van Nistelrooy retires from the game. Probably up there with one of my fave players for United. which one? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 14, 2012, 02:00:18 PM Ruud Van Nistelrooy retires from the game. Probably up there with one of my fave players for United. which one? Sorry poor phrasing. I would say, in no particular order: Robson Ronaldo Van Nistelrooy Keane Cantona Was a big fan of Hughes and loved Paul Ince but when they sign/manage your rivals in ruins the affection you can have for a player Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on May 14, 2012, 02:05:54 PM Ruud Van Nistelrooy retires from the game. Probably up there with one of my fave players for United. which one? Sorry poor phrasing. I would say, in no particular order: Robson Ronaldo Van Nistelrooy Keane Cantona Was a big fan of Hughes and loved Paul Ince but when they sign/manage your rivals in ruins the affection you can have for a player Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 14, 2012, 02:23:38 PM lol george, couldn't resist after all those 'fold pre's
Top 5? bearing in mind that I'm older than you... Best Charlton Giggs Cantona Scholes Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 14, 2012, 02:30:54 PM In times of disappointment it's good to turn back and look at moments of pure pleasure
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYiO7PoCZyY YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnqM1fIarCo #Invalid YouTube Link# and of course... YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93tQzIhKMUw YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh6vgkgQ2Ww and YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhtnytPvd_w Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 14, 2012, 02:52:55 PM It was a bittersweet pill to swallow yesterday but as many have pointed out- we've done it to teams time and time again. It was almost surreal watching it. I mean I'd completely written us off. Thought Man City would beat them 6-0 and we wouldn't have a shot but to lose it in that way was like getting your money in bad, only to get there on the turn then get redraw on the river.
In a way, I'm glad we've lost. I cannot believe this team has 89 points. Maybe I'm doing the team a dis-service but we've not anywhere near as good as the Red Machine in the 90's early 00's. Let's buy a couple of decent midfielders and still think we need a striker. Postives, despite his start to the season, De Gea looks the real deal. Vidic will be back next year and hopefully Jones and Smalling will continue to flourish. For me Nani can go- much prefer Valencia and Young Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 14, 2012, 03:04:49 PM It was a bittersweet pill to swallow yesterday but as many have pointed out- we've done it to teams time and time again. It was almost surreal watching it. I mean I'd completely written us off. Thought Man City would beat them 6-0 and we wouldn't have a shot but to lose it in that way was like getting your money in bad, only to get there on the turn then get redraw on the river. In a way, I'm glad we've lost. I cannot believe this team has 89 points. Maybe I'm doing the team a dis-service but we've not anywhere near as good as the Red Machine in the 90's early 00's. Let's buy a couple of decent midfielders and still think we need a striker. Postives, despite his start to the season, De Gea looks the real deal. Vidic will be back next year and hopefully Jones and Smalling will continue to flourish. For me Nani can go- much prefer Valencia and Young best post you've ever written on this thread George We got 89 points by being Manchester United. We won games that we played poorly in and we won some with some great football. It seems a long time ago, but the 8-2 vs Arsenal will live on in the memory for a long time. We lost the League through some very un-Manchester United slip-ups. Losing to Blackburn at home for one. Conceding a 2 goal lead to Everton at home. Obviously no single event results in the final position, but that single dropped point ... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: RedFox on May 14, 2012, 05:18:05 PM Fantastic end to the season, good job to city and their fans.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on May 15, 2012, 01:23:49 AM Couple of good vids here too David:
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnzbVS61boQ YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEuBHXFPT_E Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 15, 2012, 01:33:44 AM How was Leeds's last day Brent? Full of incident and excitement? :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on May 15, 2012, 03:15:29 AM How was Leeds's last day Brent? Full of incident and excitement? :) :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Amatay on May 15, 2012, 07:52:05 AM Couple of good vids here too David: YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnzbVS61boQ YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEuBHXFPT_E hsahahahhaahhaha incred Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 15, 2012, 09:03:49 AM (http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6094/6238526550_cb7eef348c_z.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on May 15, 2012, 06:14:05 PM who do u think man u will buy this summer?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 15, 2012, 06:24:30 PM It was a bittersweet pill to swallow yesterday but as many have pointed out- we've done it to teams time and time again. It was almost surreal watching it. I mean I'd completely written us off. Thought Man City would beat them 6-0 and we wouldn't have a shot but to lose it in that way was like getting your money in bad, only to get there on the turn then get redraw on the river. In a way, I'm glad we've lost. I cannot believe this team has 89 points. Maybe I'm doing the team a dis-service but we've not anywhere near as good as the Red Machine in the 90's early 00's. Let's buy a couple of decent midfielders and still think we need a striker. Postives, despite his start to the season, De Gea looks the real deal. Vidic will be back next year and hopefully Jones and Smalling will continue to flourish. For me Nani can go- much prefer Valencia and Young best post you've ever written on this thread George We got 89 points by being Manchester United. We won games that we played poorly in and we won some with some great football. It seems a long time ago, but the 8-2 vs Arsenal will live on in the memory for a long time. We lost the League through some very un-Manchester United slip-ups. Losing to Blackburn at home for one. Conceding a 2 goal lead to Everton at home. Obviously no single event results in the final position, but that single dropped point ... Tbf losing the league with 89 points is pretty damn unlucky. I don't think the side needs changing much at all. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on May 15, 2012, 06:56:42 PM what scum tevez is
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 15, 2012, 08:04:38 PM what scum tevez is Not scum, just very very stupid Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on May 15, 2012, 08:25:32 PM what scum tevez is Not scum, just very very stupid Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on May 15, 2012, 08:34:47 PM It was a bittersweet pill to swallow yesterday but as many have pointed out- we've done it to teams time and time again. It was almost surreal watching it. I mean I'd completely written us off. Thought Man City would beat them 6-0 and we wouldn't have a shot but to lose it in that way was like getting your money in bad, only to get there on the turn then get redraw on the river. In a way, I'm glad we've lost. I cannot believe this team has 89 points. Maybe I'm doing the team a dis-service but we've not anywhere near as good as the Red Machine in the 90's early 00's. Let's buy a couple of decent midfielders and still think we need a striker. Postives, despite his start to the season, De Gea looks the real deal. Vidic will be back next year and hopefully Jones and Smalling will continue to flourish. For me Nani can go- much prefer Valencia and Young best post you've ever written on this thread George We got 89 points by being Manchester United. We won games that we played poorly in and we won some with some great football. It seems a long time ago, but the 8-2 vs Arsenal will live on in the memory for a long time. We lost the League through some very un-Manchester United slip-ups. Losing to Blackburn at home for one. Conceding a 2 goal lead to Everton at home. Obviously no single event results in the final position, but that single dropped point ... Tbf losing the league with 89 points is pretty damn unlucky. I don't think the side needs changing much at all. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: CHIPPYMAN on May 16, 2012, 11:42:06 AM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on May 26, 2012, 09:50:02 AM who do u think man u will buy this summer? Please, please it's Man United, Manchester United, United, etc, etc, not Man U, ok rant over. We'll but no one of any real significance, because since 2006 we've been asset stripped, slowly and surely by the Scum bag Glaziers. ps, please let me be wrong. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on May 26, 2012, 09:55:23 AM who do u think man u will buy this summer? Please, please it's Man United, Manchester United, United, etc, etc, not Man U, ok rant over. We'll but no one of any real significance, because since 2006 we've been asset stripped, slowly and surely by the Scum bag Glaziers. ps, please let me be wrong. Looks like they got Hazard. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on May 26, 2012, 10:08:30 AM What's wrong with man u?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on May 26, 2012, 10:12:55 AM Bid for Shinji Kagawa too.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on May 26, 2012, 02:04:32 PM ManYoo or ManUre ok pokerfan!?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on May 26, 2012, 02:14:31 PM What's wrong with man u? Man .U. is not a term United fans refer to themselves as. The term is only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult to our club. The "u" is meant to be "you" by the rival fans. An early example of its usage is this chant by West Brom fans: "Duncan Edwards is manure, rotting in his grave, man you are manure- rotting in your grave". The origin of "Man .u." is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards. Liverpool and Leeds fans copied this with their own man you /u versions to insult all of the lads who died at munich. "Man .U. Man .U. went on a plane Man .U. Man .U. never came back again" and.. "Man .U. Never Intended Coming Home" (if you combine the first letter of each word you get the word "munich"). I hope this makes it clearer that saying man .u. is an insult, particularly to the older supporters and to see United fans using it now is shameful. I hope a few might read this, understand and spread the word. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on May 26, 2012, 02:55:51 PM What's wrong with man u? Man .U. is not a term United fans refer to themselves as. The term is only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult to our club. The "u" is meant to be "you" by the rival fans. An early example of its usage is this chant by West Brom fans: "Duncan Edwards is manure, rotting in his grave, man you are manure- rotting in your grave". The origin of "Man .u." is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards. Liverpool and Leeds fans copied this with their own man you /u versions to insult all of the lads who died at munich. "Man .U. Man .U. went on a plane Man .U. Man .U. never came back again" and.. "Man .U. Never Intended Coming Home" (if you combine the first letter of each word you get the word "munich"). I hope this makes it clearer that saying man .u. is an insult, particularly to the older supporters and to see United fans using it now is shameful. I hope a few might read this, understand and spread the word. Its the same when rival fans call my club Arse - they are definitely mugging us off and it makes me so furious. Often they play with the whole you/u thing as well whether in written or spoken form with things often thrown at me like 'you arse', 'u arse'. Fks me right off Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on May 26, 2012, 04:48:09 PM Sorry didn't know that
I thought man u is for the Chinese fans who cant say united very well Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on May 26, 2012, 05:10:43 PM The term is only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult to our club
Not true, I've often used it but was oblivious to how much it insults until you posted it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 26, 2012, 05:33:44 PM The term is only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult to our club Not true, I've often used it but was oblivious to how much it insults until you posted it. I know loads of Utd fans over 30 who use it totally innocently. Several are season ticket holders too. I think it may be more of a generational thing? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on May 27, 2012, 08:45:01 AM The term is only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult to our club Not true, I've often used it but was oblivious to how much it insults until you posted it. I know loads of Utd fans over 30 who use it totally innocently. Several are season ticket holders too. I think it may be more of a generational thing? I'm only 40, lol. We've clearly got loads of fans who started supporting in the 90's, nothing wrong with that, I love that we are the most supported club worldwide (and in Manchester), just know your history, don't want this to come across the wrong way, but if you didn't know fair enough, you do now ;-). Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on May 27, 2012, 08:53:10 AM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 27, 2012, 10:26:58 AM The term is only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult to our club Not true, I've often used it but was oblivious to how much it insults until you posted it. I know loads of Utd fans over 30 who use it totally innocently. Several are season ticket holders too. I think it may be more of a generational thing? I'm only 40, lol. We've clearly got loads of fans who started supporting in the 90's, nothing wrong with that, I love that we are the most supported club worldwide (and in Manchester), just know your history, don't want this to come across the wrong way, but if you didn't know fair enough, you do now ;-). ;yellowcard; and :redcard: Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 27, 2012, 10:51:54 AM very much doubt most fans that refer to manchester united as Man U are doing it as an insult. We normally call you scum but on here we cant use that word without getting in bother.
Happy to use scum if manu is too offensive? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 27, 2012, 01:26:30 PM very much doubt most fans that refer to manchester united as Man U are doing it as an insult. We normally call you scum but on here we cant use that word without getting in bother. Happy to use scum if manu is too offensive? Personally, I'm happy with Man U on that basis I got stick for referring to 'United' with no geographical indicator, so tend to refer to Manchester United unless the context makes it clear. Those who refer to any team as 'sc*m' should probably do likewise. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on May 27, 2012, 01:41:08 PM My bad, a case of mistaken identity, I thought it was you that started the whole ManU is offensive thing! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on May 27, 2012, 01:45:05 PM My bad, a case of mistaken identity, I thought it was you that started the whole ManU is offensive thing! K, don't get it myself, paranoid Mancs obv. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on May 27, 2012, 05:31:03 PM going to be a special one
18yo Nick Powell of Crewe, going to OT this summer it seems YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JKRr605voU Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 27, 2012, 05:37:07 PM Twitter was full of speculation yesterday that the Hazard deal was more or less done.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on May 28, 2012, 07:44:26 AM The term is only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult to our club Not true, I've often used it but was oblivious to how much it insults until you posted it. I know loads of Utd fans over 30 who use it totally innocently. Several are season ticket holders too. I think it may be more of a generational thing? I'm only 40, lol. We've clearly got loads of fans who started supporting in the 90's, nothing wrong with that, I love that we are the most supported club worldwide (and in Manchester), just know your history, don't want this to come across the wrong way, but if you didn't know fair enough, you do now ;-). ;yellowcard; and :redcard: I'm considering doing a Barton, taking out all the posters not respecting my club on my way off. Then I remembered, I don't support (buy home tickets, shirts, scarfs etc) MUFC while the glaziers are owners, FCUM all the way. One quick question, why is a biindipper so involved in a MUFC thread? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on May 28, 2012, 07:50:54 AM The term is only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult to our club Not true, I've often used it but was oblivious to how much it insults until you posted it. I know loads of Utd fans over 30 who use it totally innocently. Several are season ticket holders too. I think it may be more of a generational thing? I'm only 40, lol. We've clearly got loads of fans who started supporting in the 90's, nothing wrong with that, I love that we are the most supported club worldwide (and in Manchester), just know your history, don't want this to come across the wrong way, but if you didn't know fair enough, you do now ;-). ;yellowcard; and :redcard: My bad we're the most supported 'SPORTS' team, you're not suggesting the bindippers are anywhere near us are you? ;-) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 28, 2012, 08:51:28 AM I would prefer it if you replace support with favourite team. Since most of your "supporters" have never been to Manchester nevermind old trafford.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on May 28, 2012, 12:40:54 PM I would prefer it if you replace support with favourite team. Since most of your "supporters" have never been to Manchester nevermind old trafford. Why would I do that, I grew up there, and don't care where supporters are from, why would anyone really? They buy a top, it's supports the club. United's support worldwide goes back long before I was born. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on May 28, 2012, 12:53:09 PM I would prefer it if you replace support with favourite team. Since most of your "supporters" have never been to Manchester nevermind old trafford. Why would I do that, I grew up there, and don't care where supporters are from, why would anyone really? They buy a top, it's supports the club. United's support worldwide goes back long before I was born. Follow might be the most accurate - I agree that whether you've been to Manchester or Old Trafford doesn't suggest you haven't supported them. But I expect to include all the fans around the world there are probably a lot who haven't ever paid out any money in the process (I've followed Manchester United since the 80's and I've never spent any money on it apart from buying pints in a pub to watch a game) Most followed club/most followers in the World then? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 28, 2012, 04:26:43 PM I would prefer it if you replace support with favourite team. Since most of your "supporters" have never been to Manchester nevermind old trafford. Why would I do that, I grew up there, and don't care where supporters are from, why would anyone really? They buy a top, it's supports the club. United's support worldwide goes back long before I was born. Don't worry Jack. These haters have nothing better to do cos they're own teams are so poor :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 28, 2012, 06:51:45 PM The term is only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult to our club Not true, I've often used it but was oblivious to how much it insults until you posted it. I know loads of Utd fans over 30 who use it totally innocently. Several are season ticket holders too. I think it may be more of a generational thing? I'm only 40, lol. We've clearly got loads of fans who started supporting in the 90's, nothing wrong with that, I love that we are the most supported club worldwide (and in Manchester), just know your history, don't want this to come across the wrong way, but if you didn't know fair enough, you do now ;-). ;yellowcard; and :redcard: I'm considering doing a Barton, taking out all the posters not respecting my club on my way off. Then I remembered, I don't support (buy home tickets, shirts, scarfs etc) MUFC while the glaziers are owners, FCUM all the way. One quick question, why is a biindipper so involved in a MUFC thread? Pretty com you use an offensive term like bindipper then worry about the questionably offensive 'Man Yoo' being used? I'm just a footy fan. I've read lots of autobigraphies of Utd players (and your manager) too would you believe. Fair play on the Glaziers. Obv scumbags. After what happened at our gaff I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Even yoos lot. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 28, 2012, 06:52:55 PM The term is only used by other supporters as a complete and utter insult to our club Not true, I've often used it but was oblivious to how much it insults until you posted it. I know loads of Utd fans over 30 who use it totally innocently. Several are season ticket holders too. I think it may be more of a generational thing? I'm only 40, lol. We've clearly got loads of fans who started supporting in the 90's, nothing wrong with that, I love that we are the most supported club worldwide (and in Manchester), just know your history, don't want this to come across the wrong way, but if you didn't know fair enough, you do now ;-). ;yellowcard; and :redcard: My bad we're the most supported 'SPORTS' team, you're not suggesting the bindippers are anywhere near us are you? ;-) Actually, we're not that far away, but no I wasn't suggesting we are ahead of you. Others are though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on May 28, 2012, 08:48:59 PM Hazard just tweeted he's signing for Chelsea.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on May 28, 2012, 08:52:26 PM Hazard just tweeted he's signing for Chelsea. Says a lot about how Chelsea are run when they don't even have a manager. If I was a footballer I wouldn't be signing for a club without having spoken to the current manager, unless the next man has already been decided and he has done so. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on May 28, 2012, 09:04:59 PM Hazard just tweeted he's signing for Chelsea. Says a lot about how Chelsea are run when they don't even have a manager. If I was a footballer I wouldn't be signing for a club without having spoken to the current manager, unless the next man has already been decided and he has done so. Yeah all a bit bizarre. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 28, 2012, 09:15:50 PM Two weeks ago he was joining a club from Manchester in his own words. That CL win for Chelsea may end up more important to the future of their club than they realised. Great signing.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 28, 2012, 09:21:05 PM I would prefer it if you replace support with favourite team. Since most of your "supporters" have never been to Manchester nevermind old trafford. Why would I do that, I grew up there, and don't care where supporters are from, why would anyone really? They buy a top, it's supports the club. United's support worldwide goes back long before I was born. Don't worry Jack. These haters have nothing better to do cos they're own teams are so poor :) Hey George, we havent crossed paths for a while. Hope all is well with you and yours xx Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on May 28, 2012, 09:25:01 PM Two weeks ago he was joining a club from Manchester in his own words. That CL win for Chelsea may end up more important to the future of their club than they realised. Great signing. Other than money, which I'd guess is the reason, I can't think of one reason he'd choose Chelsea over Manchester United ( no idea what abv of that is acceptable now, totally unaware of the implications). Unless Abromovich has told him he plans to spend £100m+ I'd definitely have taken them over Chelsea in a LL for the CL next season. Then again maybe I'm underestimating the London factor. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 28, 2012, 10:25:22 PM Two weeks ago he was joining a club from Manchester in his own words. That CL win for Chelsea may end up more important to the future of their club than they realised. Great signing. Other than money, which I'd guess is the reason, I can't think of one reason he'd choose Chelsea over Manchester United ( no idea what abv of that is acceptable now, totally unaware of the implications). Unless Abromovich has told him he plans to spend £100m+ I'd definitely have taken them over Chelsea in a LL for the CL next season. Then again maybe I'm underestimating the London factor. prob wants to join a club with a trophy this year & loyal local supporters... well its that or money Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ricardov83 on May 28, 2012, 10:36:31 PM Two weeks ago he was joining a club from Manchester in his own words. That CL win for Chelsea may end up more important to the future of their club than they realised. Great signing. Other than money, which I'd guess is the reason, I can't think of one reason he'd choose Chelsea over Manchester United ( no idea what abv of that is acceptable now, totally unaware of the implications). Unless Abromovich has told him he plans to spend £100m+ I'd definitely have taken them over Chelsea in a LL for the CL next season. Then again maybe I'm underestimating the London factor. Don't want to start anything but I find this particular abbreviation of abbreviation pretty offensive. Please only use the shortened version 'abbv' in the future as the other one has offensive historical connotations for me. Thanks for being so understanding. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 28, 2012, 10:38:27 PM rotflmfao
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on May 28, 2012, 10:42:26 PM Just popped in to say Man U on the off chance some sensitive type will cry a lot
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 28, 2012, 10:44:59 PM Just popped in to say Man U on the off chance some sensitive type will cry a lot we've been told to call them scum now, and liverpool fans are to be known as bindippers. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on May 28, 2012, 10:48:50 PM Just popped in to say Man U on the off chance some sensitive type will cry a lot we've been told to call them scum now, and liverpool fans are to be known as bindippers. But I admire Man U, and those Tarbyesque scousers, oho ! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ricardov83 on May 28, 2012, 10:52:18 PM Man Ushited is good but probably a bit offensive too.
I'm only writing this because i'm jealous of their huge success mind. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on May 28, 2012, 10:57:05 PM The origin of "Man .u." is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards. so when the club and media used it pre-munich they knew he was going to die and decided to do it to insult him? and when they continued to use it after munich they were just being real bastards? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on May 28, 2012, 10:57:37 PM http://therepublikofmancunia.com/why-saying-man-u-isnt-so-bad/
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on May 28, 2012, 11:00:02 PM oooh look, a badge made by man u of geoff bent before his death in the munich disaster using an abbreviation for the club name that didn't yet exist
(http://i126.photobucket.com/albums/p118/decorativeedison/GeoffBentBadgeC1957.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 28, 2012, 11:05:29 PM http://therepublikofmancunia.com/why-saying-man-u-isnt-so-bad/ why did i read that? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on May 28, 2012, 11:08:57 PM http://therepublikofmancunia.com/why-saying-man-u-isnt-so-bad/ why did i read that? cos you've got no electricity in your new castle so you're a bit bored? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on May 28, 2012, 11:10:32 PM The origin of "Man .u." is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards. so when the club and media used it pre-munich they knew he was going to die and decided to do it to insult him? and when they continued to use it after munich they were just being real bastards? TBF, the whole explanation of the offense caused by Man You/ Man U was like listening to Ted Rogers giving solutions on 3-2-1. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 28, 2012, 11:10:49 PM http://therepublikofmancunia.com/why-saying-man-u-isnt-so-bad/ why did i read that? cos you've got no electricity in your new castle so you're a bit bored? you tricked me, it was very long winded but I thought "gatso only posts good stuff" so i soldered on.... you owe me 10 to 15mins Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on May 28, 2012, 11:25:28 PM http://therepublikofmancunia.com/why-saying-man-u-isnt-so-bad/ why did i read that? cos you've got no electricity in your new castle so you're a bit bored? you tricked me, it was very long winded but I thought "gatso only posts good stuff" so i soldered on.... you owe me 10 to 15mins if I promise not to post part 2 can we call it quits? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 28, 2012, 11:27:39 PM http://therepublikofmancunia.com/why-saying-man-u-isnt-so-bad/ why did i read that? cos you've got no electricity in your new castle so you're a bit bored? you tricked me, it was very long winded but I thought "gatso only posts good stuff" so i soldered on.... you owe me 10 to 15mins if I promise not to post part 2 can we call it quits? I really want to read part 2 now. That's how much love you get from me... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 28, 2012, 11:33:43 PM Massive blow not getting hazard. Think he's pretty much gtd a starting spot which will also have made his mind up
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: gatso on May 28, 2012, 11:36:54 PM apparently it's here but not working for me
http://manutdnetwork.com/forum/topics/rom-article-why-saying-man-u-isn-t-so-bad-part-2 I've not read it yet so caveat emptor or summat Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 28, 2012, 11:45:19 PM Funny how football can be. If man city don't score two united are champs. If bayern hold on for 6 more mins Chelsea are a club in obscurity and hazard probs nailed on to come to united.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on May 28, 2012, 11:57:14 PM Massive blow not getting hazard. Think he's pretty much gtd a starting spot which will also have made his mind up You don't think he was also gtd a spot at that red team you support ? Never seen him play but from the clamour for his signing I'd expect he'd instantly be your best midfielder. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 29, 2012, 07:45:08 AM Funny how football can be. If man city don't score two united are champs. If bayern hold on for 6 more mins Chelsea are a club in obscurity and hazard probs nailed on to come to united. Very true, if mark robins hadnt bagged the winner vs notts Forrest in 1989 fergie prob would have been sacked! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on May 29, 2012, 08:06:31 AM The origin of "Man .u." is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards. so when the club and media used it pre-munich they knew he was going to die and decided to do it to insult him? and when they continued to use it after munich they were just being real bastards? I know it's no where near the same level. But you could say the same about the Nazi symbol, look what happened to that. It became offensive, just like the term Man U, it became something offensive, just thought United fans should know their history, that is all. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on May 29, 2012, 08:30:41 AM The origin of "Man .u." is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards. so when the club and media used it pre-munich they knew he was going to die and decided to do it to insult him? and when they continued to use it after munich they were just being real bastards? I know it's no where near the same level. But you could say the same about the Nazi symbol, look what happened to that. It became offensive, just like the term Man U, it became something offensive, just thought United fans should know their history, that is all. Rofl http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 29, 2012, 10:13:10 AM Funny how football can be. If man city don't score two united are champs. If bayern hold on for 6 more mins Chelsea are a club in obscurity and hazard probs nailed on to come to united. Very true, if mark robins hadnt bagged the winner vs notts Forrest in 1989 fergie prob would have been sacked! That's often quoted, and equally often denied. Football,as poker, as life, is full of 'Sliding Door' moments. That's what keeps it interesting. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on May 29, 2012, 12:21:16 PM The origin of "Man .u." is a song to insult the dead Duncan Edwards. so when the club and media used it pre-munich they knew he was going to die and decided to do it to insult him? and when they continued to use it after munich they were just being real bastards? I know it's no where near the same level. But you could say the same about the Nazi symbol, look what happened to that. It became offensive, just like the term Man U, it became something offensive, just thought United fans should know their history, that is all. Rofl http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law I like to give these law setters some ammo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 15, 2012, 08:18:14 PM Thoughts on RVP signing? Think we needed a striker but will he fit in? Form a partnership with Rooney? 24m too much for a 29 yo?
What about our midfield? Is it string enough to compete and winboth at home and in Europe? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on August 15, 2012, 08:43:16 PM Thoughts on RVP signing? Think we needed a striker but will he fit in? Form a partnership with Rooney? 24m too much for a 29 yo? What about our midfield? Is it string enough to compete and winboth at home and in Europe? I'm sure he'll fit in fine for the fifteen or so games that he normally plays in an average season. How long is a piece of strong? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on August 15, 2012, 08:45:05 PM A 29yr old that has only once played over 30 games in a season.....that was last season. Fingers crossed as he has got older his injuries have left him behind.
I am definitely excited at the prospect of going to watch him. Big seasons for Anderson and Cleverly I reckon but have we being saying that for the past few seasons about Anderson? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 15, 2012, 08:45:49 PM Love how all ur arsenal fans are so bitter :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on August 15, 2012, 09:04:30 PM Love how all ur arsenal fans are so bitter :) Well the thing is that we made you pay over the odds for a 29 year-old player who is in the last year of his contract and has a history of being injury-prone over six years. Hopefully he's put his injury problems behind him but realistically players tend to become more rather than less injury-prone as they get older, you only have to check out your aging defenders to see that. Arsenal fans are bitter as we stood by Robin through all of those injury-ridden seasons and a scandal or two as well like AW did. We thought he would have a little more loyalty but whatever, £24M seems reasonable enough to me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: JK on August 15, 2012, 09:05:43 PM Doesnt matter now anyway. Failed his medical at United due to a bad back from carrying 10 men for a whole season.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on August 15, 2012, 09:08:10 PM Good deal for Arsenal but a good player for Man Utd. Doesn't seem to fit a plan but maybe a bit similar to Nasri last season. Wasn't necessary but it's important he didn't go to the other Manchester club.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on August 16, 2012, 07:42:51 AM I'm disappointed, van Persil seems pretty easy to dislike and I'm inclined to take the easy option here.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on August 20, 2012, 03:07:39 AM I'm happy, Sheringham was 31 when we bought him, 3 PL, 1 CL and an FA Cup was a decent return to say the least. Think he gives us the extra depth and experience for Europe, and a clear statement that we can still compete (have you seen his bonus package) in the transfer market.
I'm equally excited by Kagawa, and doubt he'll have any issues settling in. New wing back, and now talk of Kaka, which I doubt will happen, but I said that the night before RVP signed. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: youthnkzR on August 20, 2012, 03:13:00 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeeMcshane on September 04, 2012, 09:53:56 PM What a signing RVP is making out to be atm.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 04, 2012, 10:39:49 PM if he keeps fit he will be one of the best signings off the past few years! Im still so excited when i see him play im like a kid at crisstmas!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeeMcshane on September 04, 2012, 10:57:24 PM if he keeps fit he will be one of the best signings off the past few years! Im still so excited when i see him play im like a kid at crisstmas! So far signing of the season and glad to have him now especially as rooney is out!Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 04, 2012, 11:01:58 PM if he keeps fit he will be one of the best signings off the past few years! Im still so excited when i see him play im like a kid at crisstmas! So far signing of the season and glad to have him now especially as rooney is out!and if them two can gel hopefully it wont matter how bad our defence or midfield is! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on September 04, 2012, 11:23:10 PM if he keeps fit he will be one of the best signings off the past few years! Im still so excited when i see him play im like a kid at crisstmas! So far signing of the season and glad to have him now especially as rooney is out!this statements crazy I was £22million cheaper consider me maybe? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeeMcshane on September 04, 2012, 11:44:50 PM But is he gonna give them a chance to win the league... Or be top goalscorer?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Horneris on September 05, 2012, 02:05:38 AM if he keeps fit he will be one of the best signings off the past few years! Im still so excited when i see him play im like a kid at crisstmas! So far signing of the season and glad to have him now especially as rooney is out!this statements crazy I was £22million cheaper consider me maybe? lol Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheChipPrince on September 05, 2012, 02:39:40 PM But is he gonna give them a chance to win the league... Or be top goalscorer? So a player can only be considered as signing of the season if he plays for one of the top 3 clubs or is a striker capable of scoring 25 Prem goals? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on September 05, 2012, 04:21:59 PM Michu
Cazorla Hazard All impressive so far for players who are new to the league. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on September 05, 2012, 04:23:37 PM if he keeps fit he will be one of the best signings off the past few years! Im still so excited when i see him play im like a kid at crisstmas! So far signing of the season and glad to have him now especially as rooney is out!this statements crazy I was £22million cheaper consider me maybe? BoB Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeeMcshane on September 05, 2012, 10:13:18 PM But is he gonna give them a chance to win the league... Or be top goalscorer? So a player can only be considered as signing of the season if he plays for one of the top 3 clubs or is a striker capable of scoring 25 Prem goals? nope but he inspired results more then the others so far in 4 games Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on September 05, 2012, 10:16:57 PM if he keeps fit he will be one of the best signings off the past few years! Im still so excited when i see him play im like a kid at crisstmas! So far signing of the season and glad to have him now especially as rooney is out!this statements crazy I was £22million cheaper consider me maybe? BoB so good Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 05, 2012, 10:51:08 PM But is he gonna give them a chance to win the league... Or be top goalscorer? So a player can only be considered as signing of the season if he plays for one of the top 3 clubs or is a striker capable of scoring 25 Prem goals? nope but he inspired results more then the others so far in 4 games its close Hazard has been ruleing for chelsea and they llook pretty good at the minute Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 23, 2012, 02:44:34 PM RAFAAAAAAAAEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLL!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 23, 2012, 03:24:25 PM RVP. Love that man
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 23, 2012, 03:27:55 PM RVP. Love that man Can't take that step yet. Pretty anonymous today but it was a well taken penalty. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 23, 2012, 03:30:27 PM Still love him
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on September 23, 2012, 04:42:41 PM Can we please get rid of nani?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 23, 2012, 05:46:50 PM Bad day at the office for United. Can we win the league? I just can't see it. The team that's impressed me the most this season has been Arsenal
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 23, 2012, 06:20:56 PM Bad day at the office for United. Can we win the league? I just can't see it. The team that's impressed me the most this season has been Arsenal We did a win though. City dropped points, as did Arsenal. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Micko on September 23, 2012, 08:40:19 PM Nani has to be on his way out now!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 24, 2012, 09:33:45 AM A great club shamed by the actions of a mindless minority who seem to have no regard for the feelings of others.
I hope that the cctv cameras were on them and that the culprits will be identified and banned. I find the vitriolic nature of our relationship with Liverpool hard to understand. Why the antagonism? It's worse between us and LFC than it is with City. It seems more than just a sporting rivalry. Perhaps some of those who are closer to the scene could explain? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: AdamM on September 24, 2012, 01:47:30 PM Mancs chant about Hillsorough, Scoucers chant about Munich.
both pretty sick round and round it goes Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on September 24, 2012, 03:28:19 PM So it took one Liverpool fan to set all the **** fans chanting...erm please please ban anyone who was caught on Camera singing. People should not use any excuse for singing vile crap. I think everyone in football has now had enough.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 24, 2012, 07:04:49 PM So it took one Liverpool fan to set all the **** fans chanting...erm please please ban anyone who was caught on Camera singing. People should not use any excuse for singing vile crap. I think everyone in football has now had enough. Agreed Bans for those who sent the abusive tweets to Halsey too? The line was crossed there in a way that is far more targeted and personal. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 29, 2012, 06:51:27 PM The comeback is on, then off, then on again
I backed United at 0-2 when they were 7.8 on bf. mildly tempted to take the effective 1.8 return right now, but I can see us doing this. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on October 01, 2012, 07:38:40 PM Norwood is 16-1 tomorrow night. Home v Leicester.
(If you can get on with 365, the shrewd punters are restricted there) Not sure if Beckford being listed is affecting the price, but he can't play against them due to the loan deal. Saturday's goal was a 30 yard free kick, tried to find it but no joy. Football manager Tekkers though ;tightend; YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xI3wytMcFEs Worth an ew punt. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 03, 2012, 12:07:40 PM Rooney will stick to centre mid now? Best position?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 03, 2012, 01:14:03 PM Hope so- we need him in there. Midfield is really poor
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on October 03, 2012, 01:25:24 PM Rooney will stick to centre mid now? Best position? Like him as a person or not, he has incredible work-rate, & seems to be wholly unselfish on the pitch. I thought he was amazingly good, & effective, last night, & it does not seem to trouble his ego to feed chances to RVP. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 06, 2012, 11:48:47 AM Rooney will stick to centre mid now? Best position? Like him as a person or not, he has incredible work-rate, & seems to be wholly unselfish on the pitch. I thought he was amazingly good, & effective, last night, & it does not seem to trouble his ego to feed chances to RVP. He gets a lot of stick and some of it he deserves, but mocking him for his appearance is mostly a symptom of the mockers insecurities. He does a lot of work out of the camera's eye which goes unreported. He's a better man than any that call him 'shrek'. Have felt, and said, for some time that Rooney is the longterm successor to Scholes. He can tackle better too. Like the look of the new scots lad that played this week also. Could be a valuable acquisition if he stays healthy. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on October 06, 2012, 01:00:03 PM Define being "better" than Rooney? I know loads of people who have called him Shrek and managed to not cheat on their pregnant wives for example.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on October 08, 2012, 02:57:34 AM Define being "better" than Rooney? I know loads of people who have called him Shrek and managed to not cheat on their pregnant wives for example. beat me to this :(Used to cheat regular in the icon suite in 235. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 08, 2012, 10:47:34 AM Rooney was incred yesterday, should play CM for England for the forseeable future, he is perfect for the position and if hes in the game for 100% he will keep his composure, when he feeds on scraps from a defense minded team then he will try to express himself too much and get in trouble. He can also help the younger mdifielders next to him such as Cleverly.
Very impressed. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 08, 2012, 01:07:36 PM Define being "better" than Rooney? I know loads of people who have called him Shrek and managed to not cheat on their pregnant wives for example. beat me to this :(Used to cheat regular in the icon suite in 235. Rooney will stick to centre mid now? Best position? Like him as a person or not, he has incredible work-rate, & seems to be wholly unselfish on the pitch. I thought he was amazingly good, & effective, last night, & it does not seem to trouble his ego to feed chances to RVP. He gets a lot of stick and some of it he deserves, but mocking him for his appearance is mostly a symptom of the mockers insecurities. He does a lot of work out of the camera's eye which goes unreported. He's a better man than many that call him 'shrek'. a small amendment to my original point which allows for the moral indignation to be valid and I take your point our footballing 'heroes' are rarely heroes in real life though are they? So many indiscretions, so many column inches, so much hypocrisy. It's almost enough to make you want to just support true heroes like Marathin Running, Charity Supporting, Sir Jimmy Saville. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 28, 2012, 04:54:02 PM Planting studs in an opponent's chest is just a yellow card eh?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 28, 2012, 06:15:31 PM It wasn't even a yellow in the Tyne wear derby last week when Sebastian larsson went neck high.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ricardov83 on October 28, 2012, 06:30:39 PM Thought clattenburg had an excellent game.
Good to see refs coming down hard on simulation. My only concern is that they react too aggressively to the FA directive and become over zealous in trying To find a dive in every tackle. Torres shafted my fantasy football team but I was glad to see him walk. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on October 28, 2012, 06:35:59 PM Clattenburg, as usual, was determined to be star of the show.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on October 28, 2012, 06:47:49 PM Looking foward to MOTD tonight!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on October 28, 2012, 10:41:25 PM Looking foward to MOTD tonight! If anyone is going to cost United the title, then it's going to be De gea. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 28, 2012, 11:04:51 PM Whole backline is poor
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on October 28, 2012, 11:09:59 PM I wouldn't say it's poor, but doesn't help when you have De Gea in the net.
Chelsea defence looks a bit dodgy at times, but Cech is in another league to De Gea, although Cech nowhere near as good as he was a couple of years ago. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 28, 2012, 11:39:01 PM best keeper in prem? krul?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on October 28, 2012, 11:42:22 PM best keeper in prem? krul? Hart?Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 28, 2012, 11:48:42 PM yeh you're right
hart Cole collocini kompany bale yaya shelvey suso hazard ben arfa carroll best team in prem? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 28, 2012, 11:49:41 PM maybe rooney for shelvey and rvp for carroll, first is my fave team though.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 28, 2012, 11:50:49 PM yeh you're right hart Cole collocini kompany bale yaya shelvey suso hazard ben arfa carroll best team in prem? Was going to take that seriously till I saw the striker... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 28, 2012, 11:53:14 PM i literally couldnt think of a striker then afterwards thought ohhh rooney+rvp
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 28, 2012, 11:53:31 PM lol pleno wtf?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: toddswain on October 28, 2012, 11:55:54 PM Lol pads, people dont fall for your levels anymore
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 28, 2012, 11:59:45 PM im serious. obv rvp > carroll though, like i said i ttly forgot. rest is relatively std.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 29, 2012, 12:01:09 AM Whole backline is poor Having Jones, Smalling and Vidic back would help... Buttner looks promising and a combination of Valencia and Rafael on the right is better than most alternative selections. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on October 29, 2012, 09:17:09 AM im serious. obv rvp > carroll though, like i said i ttly forgot. rest is relatively std. shelvey suso? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on October 29, 2012, 01:23:08 PM Any team without Fellaini in it is just wrong.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on October 29, 2012, 01:28:45 PM shelvey
suso carroll have to be mickey takes Bale left back in the team and A Cole at rb in the team too, nooooooooooo! Collocini, better judges than me rate highly, so won't reprise that debate! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TL900 on October 29, 2012, 01:35:52 PM im serious. obv rvp > carroll though, like i said i ttly forgot. rest is relatively std. shelvey suso? i lol'd too Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on October 29, 2012, 01:36:36 PM shelvey suso carroll have to be mickey takes Bale left back in the team and A Cole at rb in the team too, nooooooooooo! Collocini, better judges than me rate highly, so won't reprise that debate! Half the team is out of position! Agree with 4 of those. Maybe. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dubai on October 29, 2012, 01:40:02 PM I'd take Cazorla with one foot, you can choose which, on crutches over Shelvey
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on October 29, 2012, 04:57:18 PM Any team without Fellaini in it is just wrong. All of this. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 04, 2012, 10:15:32 AM I'm disappointed, van Persil seems pretty easy to dislike and I'm inclined to take the easy option here. I was, not perhaps for the first time, very very very wrong. this is all Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on November 04, 2012, 12:02:39 PM Were Fergie's comments mind games yday ?
I thought you played incred and should've won by 5 or 6. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 04, 2012, 12:33:09 PM Were Fergie's comments mind games yday ? I thought you played incred and should've won by 5 or 6. Wasn't that what he said? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on November 04, 2012, 02:00:51 PM Any team without Fellaini in it is just wrong. All of this. I feel a bit dirty saying it but Fellaini is my favourite foootballer right now. Surely Utd have to be tempted? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 07, 2012, 10:36:05 PM Oh my word
How do we get away with that? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Josedinho on December 23, 2012, 05:39:16 PM if he keeps fit he will be one of the best signings off the past few years! Im still so excited when i see him play im like a kid at crisstmas! So far signing of the season and glad to have him now especially as rooney is out!this statements crazy I was £22million cheaper consider me maybe? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on December 23, 2012, 05:51:13 PM Hope they throw the book at fergie
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 23, 2012, 05:52:01 PM For what?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on December 23, 2012, 05:55:18 PM For what? being scottishTitle: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on December 23, 2012, 06:00:35 PM For what? Old Trafford chief Ferguson claims the Dutchman could have been killed during the incident. “The referee has had one of those days where we’re not going to get anything off him," he told Sky Sports. "He had a shocking performance today. "I know he’s a young referee but I was disappointed in his performance. The Robin van Persie situation is crazy, the referee clearly sees it and van Persie could have been killed. "I think the FA have got to look into it, irrespective of the yellow card. He should be banned for a long time because that is the most dangerous thing I have ever seen on a football field for many, many years. "It was deliberate, the whistle has gone, the game has stopped and he’s done that right in front of the referee, he could have killed the lad. It’s a disgraceful act and he should be banned for a long time.” Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: maldini32 on December 23, 2012, 06:04:13 PM #PrayForRvp
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeedsRhodesy on December 23, 2012, 06:11:53 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on December 23, 2012, 06:14:14 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 23, 2012, 06:22:58 PM #inFergiewetrust
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on December 23, 2012, 06:27:06 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 23, 2012, 06:31:05 PM #gtfo haters.
#midtablelolpool fans #championshipleedsfans Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on December 23, 2012, 06:32:36 PM I guess that's why Nasri was ducking out of the wall the other week.
He could have been killed.. I reckon Fergies little grey cells are finally turning the same colour as his hooter. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on December 23, 2012, 06:44:41 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on December 23, 2012, 07:03:59 PM When the ball hits your head and you could have been dead, it's Van Persie
#prayforRVP Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 23, 2012, 07:19:31 PM Fergie drops a smokescreen comment into post-match interview and all the usual suspects surface like pavlov's dogs salivating at the sound.
Top of the league at Christmas :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on December 23, 2012, 07:22:18 PM Fergie looked to be almost salivating to me! Steam coming from his ears, I thought his head might explode, can confirm nose was still red!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on December 23, 2012, 07:32:00 PM Fergie drops a smokescreen comment into post-match interview and all the usual suspects surface like pavlov's dogs salivating at the sound. Top of the league at Christmas :) You're obviously smoking what he's smoking David. x Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on December 23, 2012, 10:24:04 PM He came back from the dead, came back from the dead, not from a gun shot, but a ball in the head #PrayForRVP
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: JK on December 28, 2012, 11:11:07 AM Heard rumors that we've completed a deal to sign Lewandowski from Dortmund for £18m.
First of all, why? Secondly, where does this leave Hernandez? Surely he wont stick around to be second string sub. Danny Welbeck HAS to go too surely. We have 10001 problems with the team, and Fergie tries to fix the one thing we dont have a problem with?! Quote http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2253593/Robert-Lewandowski-set-sign-Manchester-United.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 28, 2012, 11:17:44 AM Seems like one for the future and might
Mean Rooney gets pulled back into midfield. Agree With other priorities: Keeper Centre back Left back 2 quality midfielders (one box to box enforcer) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 28, 2012, 11:22:45 AM Priorities
keep Vidic, Ferdinand, Evans, Smalling and Jones fully fit. keep RvP fit Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 28, 2012, 11:39:03 AM Gottalove the SAF mindgames, describing NUFC as a "wee club in the North East" in a rant about Pardew this morning
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 28, 2012, 11:52:47 AM Vidic- seems injury prone
Ferdinand- has been our best defender but not as good as he once was Smalling/jones- shown potential but nothing to write home about I would actually prefer saf to stick jones at cb alongside rio or vidic and get rid of Evans. Never rated him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 28, 2012, 12:11:48 PM Vidic- seems injury prone Ferdinand- has been our best defender but not as good as he once was Smalling/jones- shown potential but nothing to write home about I would actually prefer saf to stick jones at cb alongside rio or vidic and get rid of Evans. Never rated him. Vidic was pretty consistently present from joining us up to the knee injury half way through the 2011/12 season and has had a slow and complicated recovery since then. Be happy to get 30+ games from him Evans? I'd keep him, he's versatile and capable enough. Smalling/Jones - both suffered from being out for long spells and should progress now they are fit and playing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 28, 2012, 12:21:49 PM I don't have the same confidence as you I'm afraid. Think sheer spirit and guts has got is through with very little quality.
Play like this much longer and real with murder us and man city will catch us. Hope he invests in a keeper at least Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 10, 2013, 10:45:34 AM Now this would be interesting!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20930630 Lampard has at least two seasons left in him but I suspect that the story is more about persuading CFC into making an offer. Looking forward to Sunday like this ;scarymoment; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on January 10, 2013, 10:57:35 AM Got tickets again this season for the Liverpool game, although we are row 17 out of 19 in the third tier :P
Last season was buzzing given the Suarez situation etc so fingers crossed it is just as good this season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on January 10, 2013, 07:16:56 PM Got tickets again this season for the Liverpool game, although we are row 17 out of 19 in the third tier :P can get noisey back there in big games!Last season was buzzing given the Suarez situation etc so fingers crossed it is just as good this season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 10, 2013, 07:43:20 PM Gottalove the SAF mindgames, describing NUFC as a "wee club in the North East" in a rant about Pardew this morning Just saw this now, you might be leveling, so excuse me if I'm taking the bait, but you don't really buy into that whole mind games malarky do you? If yes, please explain how calling Newcastle a Wee club was anything other than a bitter and hypocritical rant? Or what where the 'mind games' gonna achieve by saying what he did? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 10, 2013, 07:47:53 PM Sweet sweet potato. U a Liverpool fan right? Did u not see rafas fact speech? Or keegans rant? They don't exist tho these mind games
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 10, 2013, 07:48:56 PM In fact Mancini pulled a blinder in the mind game dept last year when he kept describing united as favourites
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 10, 2013, 07:50:59 PM Sweet sweet potato. U a Liverpool fan right? Did u not see rafas fact speech? Or keegans rant? They don't exist tho these mind games Yeh, Liverpool fan, I saw both Rafas and Keegans speeches, don't really understand the last part of your post. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on January 10, 2013, 07:57:13 PM Ah I geddit now
Keegan lost the plot because he felt insulted by something Fergie said which was bang out of order IIRC, but I doubt if affected KK's team or him as a manager, so yeah he got under KK's skin with a snidey remark, not mind games IMO! Same goes for Rafa, although all he did was say things that all the PL managers that pander to Fergie would loved to have had the bottle to say themselves, Liverpool coincidentally went on a bad run after it, but if you wanna believe that the players were thinking about what Rafa said or anything that Fergie says and it put them off their game then go ahead, balderdash imo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 10, 2013, 08:13:39 PM Yup all coincidence. Ofc. Coincidentally united have won 19 titles
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on January 10, 2013, 08:29:30 PM Fergie is a master at these mind games! He knows what he is doing every time he speaks to the press yes he has overstepped the mark sometimes but it's all part of the game! When you have been doing a job for as long as him you know all the tricks in the book people are naive if they think they achieve nothing!
Sadly that Italian fella that wears the blue scarf he is pretty good at the also! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on January 10, 2013, 09:24:17 PM Got tickets again this season for the Liverpool game, although we are row 17 out of 19 in the third tier :P can get noisey back there in big games!Last season was buzzing given the Suarez situation etc so fingers crossed it is just as good this season. :) Sat on row 19 for a the 8-2 win vs Arsenal. Do you go often Bubble? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on January 10, 2013, 09:52:15 PM Got tickets again this season for the Liverpool game, although we are row 17 out of 19 in the third tier :P can get noisey back there in big games!Last season was buzzing given the Suarez situation etc so fingers crossed it is just as good this season. :) Sat on row 19 for a the 8-2 win vs Arsenal. Do you go often Bubble? Sadly not as much anymore since i have moved away from home looked at getting a season ticket this year with my bro but couldnt justify the costs. £1000 for the ticket and probably another £1000 in travel costs for me. Will have to wait till i live back in manchester. about 5 years ago i used to get to about 10-20 games a season not to shabby without a season ticket! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 13, 2013, 02:01:07 PM OK OK
The time has come for me to declare my position. I had my doubts, I tarred him with the Arsenal & Dutch labels so must be a douche like Bergkamp, but I was wrong, I admit it. I <3 RvP Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: ruud on January 13, 2013, 02:20:12 PM What's going on with the state of the pitch?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 13, 2013, 02:24:52 PM How is it only 1-0?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on January 13, 2013, 02:31:59 PM Hate that backheel. Surely a smash from that range?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 13, 2013, 02:51:19 PM Hate that backheel. Surely a smash from that range? Back to goal, beat the keeper, and he is RvP, Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 13, 2013, 02:56:11 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 13, 2013, 04:25:41 PM C'mon Arsenal!!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 20, 2013, 04:36:59 PM RvP!!!
Timing was bad though, I was just in the process of seeing how the odds had shifted given Tottingham's decent start when the goal went in. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on January 20, 2013, 05:46:28 PM He is world class but the way he hit the ground running with Utd is remarkable.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on January 20, 2013, 06:06:59 PM I'm sick of the shitty goal keepers united buy
Alway been a problem Van der sar and schmichael are the only exceptions De gea was incred on champ manager also!!!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 20, 2013, 08:40:42 PM I'm sick of the shitty goal keepers united buy Alway been a problem Van der sar and schmichael are the only exceptions De gea was incred on champ manager also!!!! Stepney was pretty useful De gea will get there Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 20, 2013, 09:09:38 PM Baffles me why they just don't buy proven keepers. Spurs got Lloris for 10 mill. Even Fridel for free last summer along with De Gea would have been a good signing
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 21, 2013, 09:38:50 PM Tim Howard also.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 22, 2013, 04:32:20 AM I'm sick of the shitty goal keepers united buy Alway been a problem Van der sar and schmichael are the only exceptions De gea was incred on champ manager also!!!! Stepney was pretty useful De gea will get there This^^ Oh and Gary Bailey knew how to save penalties. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 22, 2013, 04:34:15 AM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 22, 2013, 07:15:23 AM Baffles me why they just don't buy proven keepers. Spurs got Lloris for 10 mill. Even Fridel for free last summer along with De Gea would have been a good signing Maybe someone who has a Euro and World Cup Winners medal? Fabien Barthez for example? Clubs don't buy many goalkeepers, and you and Ho seem to think that life began with Schmeichel. He, by the way, had very little on his cv when we bought him whilst Barthez was a Euro and WC winner. We had a couple of mis-steps between Schmeichel and van der Saar, but we won titles along the way and SAF is a far shrewder judge of talent than any of us. DeGea made some good saves on Sunday and keeps improving. Keep the faith guys. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on January 22, 2013, 07:26:32 AM Baffles me why they just don't buy proven keepers. Spurs got Lloris for 10 mill. Even Fridel for free last summer along with De Gea would have been a good signing Maybe someone who has a Euro and World Cup Winners medal? Fabien Barthez for example? Clubs don't buy many goalkeepers, and you and Ho seem to think that life began with Schmeichel. He, by the way, had very little on his cv when we bought him whilst Barthez was a Euro and WC winner. We had a couple of mis-steps between Schmeichel and van der Saar, but we won titles along the way and SAF is a far shrewder judge of talent than any of us. DeGea made some good saves on Sunday and keeps improving. Keep the faith guys. He should be getting there now though, after 18 months? He makes too many clangers in games and I would go as far as saying at least 1 goal in 2 or 3 is the keepers fault. Gomes at Spurs was a great example of a goalkeeper who could make great saves, but the clangers was too often & a change in goalkeeper for them and massive improvement really. Although goalkeeping standard in this league is poor. Cech nowhere near as good as 4 years ago, Hart is very sloppy, Reina also getting sloppy, not seen enough of Arsenal keeper to say that much! Spurs & Everton are the only teams up there who are reliable who are up there. I also said earlier about Madrid/United game saying United would be favourites considering being group winners, league leaders & Madrid the exact opposite. I have to go back on that & say defence and goalkeeper are in for a long game in Madrid now, every team has so many chances against them now Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 22, 2013, 12:26:00 PM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years.
Barcelona seem to think so too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on January 22, 2013, 12:58:59 PM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years. Barcelona seem to think so too. Can you afford to wait a couple more years. A good shot stopper yes, but makes so many errors. I said it previously look at the difference replacing Gomes did for Spurs. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MahoganyVic on January 22, 2013, 01:22:02 PM Don't really understand all the hate for De Gea. At games he tends to get a load of stick from the home crowd too. He has made some amazing saves, and his mistakes recently havent been absolute howlers. He is clearly improving and will only get better
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Supernova on January 22, 2013, 01:29:33 PM I think the lad will get there, he's only 22 for goodness sake!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 22, 2013, 01:31:27 PM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years. Barcelona seem to think so too. Can you afford to wait a couple more years. A good shot stopper yes, but makes so many errors. I said it previously look at the difference replacing Gomes did for Spurs. Most of this is from his first season... YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_suVWoXQ34 as for mistakes - I've watched United since I was 9 yrs old and trust me, Schmeichel had his dodgy moments like the cup game against Barnsley in 98 as did Van der Saar YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu-cKqqU3Vk Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on January 22, 2013, 01:46:24 PM Don't understand the hate for DeGea. A season as Van der sar understudy would have done him the world of good. Nevertheless has, and will continue to improve, on top of being one of the best keepers in the PL already. Also has had to contend with a Lolbad ever changing back four compared to Utd defences gone by.
In the history books, sun result should go down as a 1-1 draw away to the 4th place team in the PL, on the same wkend as ur nearest rival beat a bottom half team at home. Not De Gea shitbvcnjjhfdsshnmjhgdssdwqnmkk. Seriously you got it this year. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on January 22, 2013, 01:54:27 PM There is nothing wrong with De Gea
He took a hammering from the press when he first arrived - and obv made 2-3 howlers in his first 10 games. Just look at the GA column in the league table - we'll be ok. If the kid could just fill out a little and then learn to thrown his arms around he could be fearsome. A bit of bulk and giving some strikers what they give to him would improve his game no end! Oh - and maybe learning to catch instead of punch, but i know this arguement goes both ways! I fall on the English side of the fence, no the Euro Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on January 22, 2013, 03:11:46 PM There is nothing wrong with De Gea He took a hammering from the press when he first arrived - and obv made 2-3 howlers in his first 10 games. Just look at the GA column in the league table - we'll be ok. If the kid could just fill out a little and then learn to thrown his arms around he could be fearsome. A bit of bulk and giving some strikers what they give to him would improve his game no end! Oh - and maybe learning to catch instead of punch, but i know this arguement goes both ways! I fall on the English side of the fence, no the Euro +1 to this. If he is coming for a cross I just want him to mow down anything in his path. Just doesn't appear to have the confidence to do it or maybe the strength to do it? Is a shame he made a few mistakes early on as this is what everyone remembers. I heard at the weekend if Torres bagged 20 goals for Chelsea this season or next it would be to late and wouldn't change how the fans feel. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 22, 2013, 03:27:10 PM Valdes for a season or two, hear he's not signed a new contract, that would be good for the team and De Gea.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 22, 2013, 03:59:09 PM My point is that he's not a number 1 yet. I don't think it would have done any harm to get someone with more experience to help him transition.
I agree that he is an unbelievable shot stopper but you have to command your area to be a great keeper and at the moment he doesn't have that presence or authority. Personally I'm not convinced he ever will. Like others have said tho he is a glint in his dads eye in terms of a goalkeepers age so only time will tell. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 22, 2013, 05:36:40 PM Is Zaha good? Not seen him play
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on January 22, 2013, 05:44:58 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on January 22, 2013, 06:09:14 PM Probably not a good idea if you want an impartial view........ Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 22, 2013, 06:21:12 PM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years. Barcelona seem to think so too. Shot stopping is a pretty standard talent for any keeper and terrible keepers have been great shot stoppers. I like De Gea but he'll never, ever be a great goalkeeper. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 22, 2013, 07:13:32 PM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years. Barcelona seem to think so too. Shot stopping is a pretty standard talent for any keeper and terrible keepers have been great shot stoppers. I like De Gea but he'll never, ever be a great goalkeeper. debate over guys, The Baron has spoken. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 22, 2013, 07:30:23 PM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years. Barcelona seem to think so too. Shot stopping is a pretty standard talent for any keeper and terrible keepers have been great shot stoppers. I like De Gea but he'll never, ever be a great goalkeeper. debate over guys, The Baron has spoken. Miaow! It's only footy debate no need for the bitters innit. :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 22, 2013, 07:31:11 PM Actually agree with baron. Hope I'm wrong. Whatever the case he wasn't worth 18 million
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 23, 2013, 11:11:41 AM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years. Barcelona seem to think so too. Shot stopping is a pretty standard talent for any keeper and terrible keepers have been great shot stoppers. I like De Gea but he'll never, ever be a great goalkeeper. Lol, shot stopping is part of it, a big part, and as for standard shot stoppers, that's a pretty ridiculous statement, there's no doubt De Gea is one of the best in that department, as for the other areas of goalkeeping, distribution is good, and clearly he needs to work on his presence in the box at corners, but apart from that there's no way we will know for a few years. Goalkeepers reach their prime later, he's only 22, plenty of time to develop into a great keeper. With whispers that Valdes is coming our way that development will if it happens help with his development too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 23, 2013, 11:16:39 AM The impatience of the modern football fan is often proven premature.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MANTIS01 on January 23, 2013, 11:26:12 AM That presence attribute is a pretty big deal though. The whole back four can start struggling with confidence and communication if the keeper's presence isn't assured. If you think back to the great Arsenal defence an integral part of that was the surity of Seaman. I think £17m to find out in a few years if he can command his area is an expensive gamble for one of the world's top sides. Not being able to collect the ball in his own 6-yard box is a big problem. Continental keepers always seem to struggle with this fundamental and perhaps SAF rues letting Ben Foster go. Think he would like De Gea and Nani for Ronaldo swapsy now.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 23, 2013, 11:52:31 AM That presence attribute is a pretty big deal though. The whole back four can start struggling with confidence and communication if the keeper's presence isn't assured. If you think back to the great Arsenal defence an integral part of that was the surity of Seaman. I think £17m to find out in a few years if he can command his area is an expensive gamble for one of the world's top sides. Not being able to collect the ball in his own 6-yard box is a big problem. Continental keepers always seem to struggle with this fundamental and perhaps SAF rues letting Ben Foster go. Think he would like De Gea and Nani for Ronaldo swapsy now. Agreed paying that much was a bit of a gamble, adn at first I wasn't a fan, now though he's improved, is working hard, and is improving in this area, he's going to be the finished article imho. I think the only thing SAF regrets when it comes to keepers is not signing Joe Hart for £200k ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 23, 2013, 12:31:49 PM While i think of it, can his save last season from Mata's free kick ever be described as standard. Just involved in a discussion elsewhere where some stats http://soccerlens.com/david-de-gea-joe-hart/76849/ (http://soccerlens.com/david-de-gea-joe-hart/76849/) comparing his mistakes to Joe Harts, have been posted, interesting..
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on January 23, 2013, 11:30:06 PM Probably not a good idea if you want an impartial view........ You wouldn't give that warning for another supporter of their team, so what is it about me that makes you think I am overly biased? Put my points across with gusto, but I am as impartial as any other fan for their team imo. I think it is probably because I have said that Zaha has been absolutely sensational at times and I have likened him to a young Christiano Ronaldo on the Palace and Championship thread. Both players bought for similar amounts, both were raw young talents, and both had the propensity to take the piss out of Championship backlines a la Ronaldo in the FA cup final against Millwall. You may think I am being a bit OTT, but why would Ferguson be spending this much on him if he doesn't think he is special? Latest news ---- http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2013/jan/23/wilfried-zaha-manchester-united Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on January 23, 2013, 11:42:52 PM Probably not a good idea if you want an impartial view........ You wouldn't give that warning for another supporter of their team, so what is it about me that makes you think I am overly biased? Put my points across with gusto, but I am as impartial as any other fan for their team imo. I'd say that there isn't a member here as overtly passionate in their posting about their club, but you are definitely not impartial m8. Your posts are great reading, but you have got those glasses on,... Have to say it was com to see you put up Palace as value every game for a month on TfT though <3 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on January 23, 2013, 11:59:36 PM lol, yeh i know i am not impartial haven't claimed that I am, but no one is impartial about the team they support.
In TfT I think i must have backed palace to win about 6 times and I think only one didn't come in. That never gets said, but the amount of times I put them up to be backed does! Ha. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on January 24, 2013, 02:44:21 AM lol, yeh i know i am not impartial haven't claimed that I am, but no one is impartial about the team they support. In TfT I think i must have backed palace to win about 6 times and I think only one didn't come in. That never gets said, but the amount of times I put them up to be backed does! Ha. What I meant to say was that I think you're definitely less impartial than many other fans here, but I know no fans are impartial. Regardless, this is obviously just my opinion and means squat :D I remember you put them up every game for a while saying you thought they were value at whatever the price and great that they came in of course. Kind of moot that they did win though, because for TfT it's about value in the price and iirc most of the time there wasn't perceived to be any. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on January 24, 2013, 03:12:16 AM lol, yeh i know i am not impartial haven't claimed that I am, but no one is impartial about the team they support. In TfT I think i must have backed palace to win about 6 times and I think only one didn't come in. That never gets said, but the amount of times I put them up to be backed does! Ha. What I meant to say was that I think you're definitely less impartial than many other fans here, but I know no fans are impartial. Regardless, this is obviously just my opinion and means squat :D I remember you put them up every game for a while saying you thought they were value at whatever the price and great that they came in of course. Kind of moot that they did win though, because for TfT it's about value in the price and iirc most of the time there wasn't perceived to be any. Ok I agree. Would say Derby, Wolves and Ipswich suggestions were value and the others probably not! But I wasn't to be trusted as I wasn't set out as a value hunter was I! :) Gonna just take the hit as the mad Palace fan on here and feel good about it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on January 24, 2013, 10:41:41 AM It's great that you show passion for Palace in the same way Patrick does with Newcastle. It brings a smile to people's faces Ant so that's gotta be a good thing.
Keep up the passion Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 24, 2013, 11:29:01 AM Zaha having a medical at OT in the next 48 hours. Kinda the end Of Crystal Palace's remote dreams of Premiership football I'd say.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Royal Flush on January 24, 2013, 11:30:41 AM Zaha having a medical at OT in the next 48 hours. Kinda the end Of Crystal Palace's remote dreams of Premiership football I'd say. He's staying at the club on loan so it makes no real difference. The problem is the expectancy for Palace to be in the Prem has been blown way out of proportion. They had a good start, there are teams that do that every year, then dont make the playoffs. Brighton last year for example. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: AdamM on January 24, 2013, 11:36:25 AM The answer to the goal keeping issue
http://newsthump.com/2013/01/24/sir-alex-ferguson-to-replace-de-gea-with-swansea-city-ball-boy/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on January 24, 2013, 11:49:27 AM Ok I agree. Would say Derby, Wolves and Ipswich suggestions were value and the others probably not! But I wasn't to be trusted as I wasn't set out as a value hunter was I! :) Gonna just take the hit as the mad Palace fan on here and feel good about it. Don't get me wrong I think you're a hero, it's plain to see how much you love Palace and I enjoy reading the posts :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 24, 2013, 12:03:22 PM Zaha having a medical at OT in the next 48 hours. Kinda the end Of Crystal Palace's remote dreams of Premiership football I'd say. He's staying at the club on loan so it makes no real difference. The problem is the expectancy for Palace to be in the Prem has been blown way out of proportion. They had a good start, there are teams that do that every year, then dont make the playoffs. Brighton last year for example. hehe, did i miss out that fact, sorry Palace fans. It's a painful thought but Millwall probably have more chance than Palace of seeing premiership football. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 24, 2013, 06:34:18 PM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years. Barcelona seem to think so too. Shot stopping is a pretty standard talent for any keeper and terrible keepers have been great shot stoppers. I like De Gea but he'll never, ever be a great goalkeeper. Lol, shot stopping is part of it, a big part, and as for standard shot stoppers, that's a pretty ridiculous statement, there's no doubt De Gea is one of the best in that department, as for the other areas of goalkeeping, distribution is good, and clearly he needs to work on his presence in the box at corners, but apart from that there's no way we will know for a few years. Goalkeepers reach their prime later, he's only 22, plenty of time to develop into a great keeper. With whispers that Valdes is coming our way that development will if it happens help with his development too. It's not a lol statement. If you've been a keeper 15+ years your shot stopping should be exceptional in a top league. Using the most fundamental attribute needed to be a keeper as a reason for potential greatness is a bit thin as an argument. I do rate him as a keeper FWIW. But great keepers are rarely suddenly great at 30. They're usually ridic good by their early 20s. Their decision making and coolness will improve, undoubtedly. I just can't seem him being a Utd keeper in 5 years. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on January 24, 2013, 06:36:30 PM Reina to Man Utd ?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 25, 2013, 12:39:35 AM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years. Barcelona seem to think so too. Shot stopping is a pretty standard talent for any keeper and terrible keepers have been great shot stoppers. I like De Gea but he'll never, ever be a great goalkeeper. Lol, shot stopping is part of it, a big part, and as for standard shot stoppers, that's a pretty ridiculous statement, there's no doubt De Gea is one of the best in that department, as for the other areas of goalkeeping, distribution is good, and clearly he needs to work on his presence in the box at corners, but apart from that there's no way we will know for a few years. Goalkeepers reach their prime later, he's only 22, plenty of time to develop into a great keeper. With whispers that Valdes is coming our way that development will if it happens help with his development too. It's not a lol statement. If you've been a keeper 15+ years your shot stopping should be exceptional in a top league. Using the most fundamental attribute needed to be a keeper as a reason for potential greatness is a bit thin as an argument. I do rate him as a keeper FWIW. But great keepers are rarely suddenly great at 30. They're usually ridic good by their early 20s. Their decision making and coolness will improve, undoubtedly. I just can't seem him being a Utd keeper in 5 years. You contradict yourself, I remember now there's a reason I stopped discussing football with Scouse lovers. And there are many keepers not amazing at his age who went on to become greats. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on January 25, 2013, 01:14:50 AM Will add my two cents and agree with most of what the Baron is saying. I just don't see it in him, but I would love to be wrong.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 26, 2013, 02:57:14 AM Here is a list of the top 10 keepers in Europe this season based save success rate.
1. Manuel Neuer (Bayern Munich) – 18 apps – 85.1% 2. Salvatore Sirigu (PSG) – 19 caps – 83.3% 3. Gerhard Tremmel (Swansea) – 10 apps – 81.5% 4. David De Gea (Manchester United) – 15 apps – 78.7% 5. Wilfredo Caballero (Malaga) – 20 apps – 78.7% 6. Ali Ahamada (Toulouse) – 20 apps – 77.2% 7. Petr Cech (Chelsea) – 22 apps – 77.2% 8. Cedric Carrasso (Bordeaux) – 21 apps – 76.5% 9. Tono (Granada) – 15 apps – 76.4% 10. Fabian Giefer (Dusseldorf) – 18 apps – 76% Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 26, 2013, 10:33:33 AM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years. Barcelona seem to think so too. Shot stopping is a pretty standard talent for any keeper and terrible keepers have been great shot stoppers. I like De Gea but he'll never, ever be a great goalkeeper. Lol, shot stopping is part of it, a big part, and as for standard shot stoppers, that's a pretty ridiculous statement, there's no doubt De Gea is one of the best in that department, as for the other areas of goalkeeping, distribution is good, and clearly he needs to work on his presence in the box at corners, but apart from that there's no way we will know for a few years. Goalkeepers reach their prime later, he's only 22, plenty of time to develop into a great keeper. With whispers that Valdes is coming our way that development will if it happens help with his development too. It's not a lol statement. If you've been a keeper 15+ years your shot stopping should be exceptional in a top league. Using the most fundamental attribute needed to be a keeper as a reason for potential greatness is a bit thin as an argument. I do rate him as a keeper FWIW. But great keepers are rarely suddenly great at 30. They're usually ridic good by their early 20s. Their decision making and coolness will improve, undoubtedly. I just can't seem him being a Utd keeper in 5 years. You contradict yourself, I remember now there's a reason I stopped discussing football with Scouse lovers. And there are many keepers not amazing at his age who went on to become greats. In the modern game? Like who? Happy to argue footy with anyone regardless of tribe. :-) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 26, 2013, 01:34:55 PM Why should De Gea be 'getting there' after 18 months, I think he has improved a lot, in the areas he needed too. No keeper gets it right all the time, expecially one who had has to sit behind our defence for the last 18 months. He's simply on of the best shot stoppers in the world, needs a ronaldo type gym routine to bulk up, but apart form that, and a couple more years (yes at least that long), I can see him being with us for years. Barcelona seem to think so too. Shot stopping is a pretty standard talent for any keeper and terrible keepers have been great shot stoppers. I like De Gea but he'll never, ever be a great goalkeeper. Lol, shot stopping is part of it, a big part, and as for standard shot stoppers, that's a pretty ridiculous statement, there's no doubt De Gea is one of the best in that department, as for the other areas of goalkeeping, distribution is good, and clearly he needs to work on his presence in the box at corners, but apart from that there's no way we will know for a few years. Goalkeepers reach their prime later, he's only 22, plenty of time to develop into a great keeper. With whispers that Valdes is coming our way that development will if it happens help with his development too. It's not a lol statement. If you've been a keeper 15+ years your shot stopping should be exceptional in a top league. Using the most fundamental attribute needed to be a keeper as a reason for potential greatness is a bit thin as an argument. I do rate him as a keeper FWIW. But great keepers are rarely suddenly great at 30. They're usually ridic good by their early 20s. Their decision making and coolness will improve, undoubtedly. I just can't seem him being a Utd keeper in 5 years. You contradict yourself, I remember now there's a reason I stopped discussing football with Scouse lovers. And there are many keepers not amazing at his age who went on to become greats. In the modern game? Like who? Happy to argue footy with anyone regardless of tribe. :-) Well we didn't sign Schmeichel until he was about 28. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 26, 2013, 03:30:12 PM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 26, 2013, 07:34:36 PM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. There's an even longer list of keepers who came into their prime later in life, if you picked out the above names (and I don't agree with them all), then you clearly don't need me to type them all. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on January 26, 2013, 07:59:20 PM I'm a United fan but imo the deal Palace have got for Zaha is brilliant business, £10m upfront for potential with £5 extra in add-ons.... he's scored 14 goals in 78 games in the last 2 seasons which given he's described as a winger/striker seems pretty low productivity wise? He may improve etc but it's a hefty upfront fee. As a comparion, the lad Countinho who Liverpool have just signed is costing £8.5m, bought from Inter with more proven pedigree (scored 5 in 16 from midfield for Espanyol in La Liga, a team who were battling relegation)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on January 27, 2013, 05:17:22 PM I mean Oldham is technically Manchester! ;D
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on January 28, 2013, 08:47:36 AM I'm a United fan but imo the deal Palace have got for Zaha is brilliant business, £10m upfront for potential with £5 extra in add-ons.... he's scored 14 goals in 78 games in the last 2 seasons which given he's described as a winger/striker seems pretty low productivity wise? He may improve etc but it's a hefty upfront fee. As a comparion, the lad Countinho who Liverpool have just signed is costing £8.5m, bought from Inter with more proven pedigree (scored 5 in 16 from midfield for Espanyol in La Liga, a team who were battling relegation) I have likened him to a young Christiano Ronaldo, in his flair. His finishing is woeful and if it was at just an average level he would have so many more goals. His final ball for assisting too, needs more work. However, I haven't seen anyone like him, at full pelt, get past players with as much ease as he does and that is what Ferguson sees in him and that is why he is forking out that much. I think you have a fair deal at the very least on your hands, and should you take the fact, that you are paying so much for a 20 year old, means that his potential can be enriched at one of the best clubs in the world, to a level of being world class. I am gutted to see him go and can't see him ever failing at Man U. He is so young and if he develops a final ball and finish, then it's just not right what he could go on to achieve. Consider too his flair and strength should get better in time too, scary. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 28, 2013, 08:53:55 AM I'm a United fan but imo the deal Palace have got for Zaha is brilliant business, £10m upfront for potential with £5 extra in add-ons.... he's scored 14 goals in 78 games in the last 2 seasons which given he's described as a winger/striker seems pretty low productivity wise? He may improve etc but it's a hefty upfront fee. As a comparion, the lad Countinho who Liverpool have just signed is costing £8.5m, bought from Inter with more proven pedigree (scored 5 in 16 from midfield for Espanyol in La Liga, a team who were battling relegation) I have likened him to a young Christiano Ronaldo, in his flair. His finishing is woeful and if it was at just an average level he would have so many more goals. His final ball for assisting too, needs more work. However, I haven't seen anyone like him, at full pelt, get past players with as much ease as he does and that is what Ferguson sees in him and that is why he is forking out that much. I think you have a fair deal at the very least on your hands, and should you take the fact, that you are paying so much for a 20 year old, means that his potential can be enriched at one of the best clubs in the world, to a level of being world class. I am gutted to see him go and can't see him ever failing at Man U. He is so young and if he develops a final ball and finish, then it's just not right what he could go on to achieve. Consider too his flair and strength should get better in time too, scary. hmmm there's a pretty long list of players who didn't 'train on' at Old Trafford. Ronaldo is almost an exception... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 28, 2013, 06:16:08 PM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. There's an even longer list of keepers who came into their prime later in life, if you picked out the above names (and I don't agree with them all), then you clearly don't need me to type them all. Of course keepers peak later - that wasn't the argument. The point is in the modern game that the best rarely become great later if they weren't already excellent by the early/mid 20's. You cant change the criteria to "peaked later" half way through an argument to suit. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 28, 2013, 11:20:02 PM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. There's an even longer list of keepers who came into their prime later in life, if you picked out the above names (and I don't agree with them all), then you clearly don't need me to type them all. Of course keepers peak later - that wasn't the argument. The point is in the modern game that the best rarely become great later if they weren't already excellent by the early/mid 20's. You cant change the criteria to "peaked later" half way through an argument to suit. I'm hardly changing my argument, peak, become great, already one of the top keeps in the world in some departments, however you want to try and win this argument, you can't, as I said look at all keepers, the greats made mistakes, and as for not ever being great, have you actually seen anything but those sad little videos made by bindippers who have very little to say now they've been made to eat all the words the used to brag with in the 80's. Pointless to argue with you when the blinkers are so clearly fixed on,, Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 28, 2013, 11:36:30 PM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. There's an even longer list of keepers who came into their prime later in life, if you picked out the above names (and I don't agree with them all), then you clearly don't need me to type them all. Of course keepers peak later - that wasn't the argument. The point is in the modern game that the best rarely become great later if they weren't already excellent by the early/mid 20's. You cant change the criteria to "peaked later" half way through an argument to suit. I'm hardly changing my argument, peak, become great, already one of the top keeps in the world in some departments, however you want to try and win this argument, you can't, as I said look at all keepers, the greats made mistakes, and as for not ever being great, have you actually seen anything but those sad little videos made by bindippers who have very little to say now they've been made to eat all the words the used to brag with in the 80's. Pointless to argue with you when the blinkers are so clearly fixed on,, Keepers who were ridiculously good in their 20s include Mervin Day, Ben Foster, Chris Wood(s?), the aussie one we bought who got above himself whose name escapes me, Taibi (oh how I wish I could forget him) De Gea is already a pretty good keeper and is only just 22 yrs old. Can we return to this debate in May 2014?? Make a note in our diaries? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on January 28, 2013, 11:41:32 PM bosnich?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 29, 2013, 07:10:37 AM bosnich? of course age affected memory failure or comedic device? you decide :-) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 30, 2013, 09:21:20 PM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. There's an even longer list of keepers who came into their prime later in life, if you picked out the above names (and I don't agree with them all), then you clearly don't need me to type them all. Of course keepers peak later - that wasn't the argument. The point is in the modern game that the best rarely become great later if they weren't already excellent by the early/mid 20's. You cant change the criteria to "peaked later" half way through an argument to suit. I'm hardly changing my argument, peak, become great, already one of the top keeps in the world in some departments, however you want to try and win this argument, you can't, as I said look at all keepers, the greats made mistakes, and as for not ever being great, have you actually seen anything but those sad little videos made by bindippers who have very little to say now they've been made to eat all the words the used to brag with in the 80's. Pointless to argue with you when the blinkers are so clearly fixed on,, No, you are I'm afraid. He's not a "great" keeper. He's good. One of the better ones in the league. But never, ever great. Perhaps our definitions of "great" are miles apart. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on January 30, 2013, 09:22:24 PM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. There's an even longer list of keepers who came into their prime later in life, if you picked out the above names (and I don't agree with them all), then you clearly don't need me to type them all. Of course keepers peak later - that wasn't the argument. The point is in the modern game that the best rarely become great later if they weren't already excellent by the early/mid 20's. You cant change the criteria to "peaked later" half way through an argument to suit. I'm hardly changing my argument, peak, become great, already one of the top keeps in the world in some departments, however you want to try and win this argument, you can't, as I said look at all keepers, the greats made mistakes, and as for not ever being great, have you actually seen anything but those sad little videos made by bindippers who have very little to say now they've been made to eat all the words the used to brag with in the 80's. Pointless to argue with you when the blinkers are so clearly fixed on,, Keepers who were ridiculously good in their 20s include Mervin Day, Ben Foster, Chris Wood(s?), the aussie one we bought who got above himself whose name escapes me, Taibi (oh how I wish I could forget him) De Gea is already a pretty good keeper and is only just 22 yrs old. Can we return to this debate in May 2014?? Make a note in our diaries? Fair enough looking at the other side of the coin. Plenty of Richard Wrights out there. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 30, 2013, 11:40:57 PM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. There's an even longer list of keepers who came into their prime later in life, if you picked out the above names (and I don't agree with them all), then you clearly don't need me to type them all. Of course keepers peak later - that wasn't the argument. The point is in the modern game that the best rarely become great later if they weren't already excellent by the early/mid 20's. You cant change the criteria to "peaked later" half way through an argument to suit. I'm hardly changing my argument, peak, become great, already one of the top keeps in the world in some departments, however you want to try and win this argument, you can't, as I said look at all keepers, the greats made mistakes, and as for not ever being great, have you actually seen anything but those sad little videos made by bindippers who have very little to say now they've been made to eat all the words the used to brag with in the 80's. Pointless to argue with you when the blinkers are so clearly fixed on,, No, you are I'm afraid. He's not a "great" keeper. He's good. One of the better ones in the league. But never, ever great. Perhaps our definitions of "great" are miles apart. Lol, what are you on about, he's a GREAT shot stopper, and has other attributes that suggest he will become world class, if he isn't already. Seeing as you now support a small club, i'ts clear you get a kick from trying to pick at others, whilst you have some knowledge that's clear, it's not clear whether that knowledge is actually based on any facts other than your growing bitterness to a team and sport that's sucker punched you, I'd guess you are not from Liverpool, and would possibly have become a |Liverpool fan in the 80's? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 31, 2013, 08:09:57 AM he didn't strengthen our argument much last night...
#keepthefaith Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MANTIS01 on January 31, 2013, 08:58:24 AM De Gea with no conviction and just a little girlie skip as the ball goes past. He wants to be charging out and clattering somebody there.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on January 31, 2013, 09:14:44 AM He stays on his line and the angle Rodriguez had to score there was tight and it would have been very unlikely. Poor decision making.
Just looks like a Goalkeeper lacking a fight, complete opposite of the temperament needed as a keeper. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 31, 2013, 09:42:21 AM De Gea with no conviction and just a little girlie skip as the ball goes past. He wants to be charging out and clattering somebody there. Obviously clattering Rodrigues was an option, but that's a penalty and a red card... He stays on his line and the angle Rodriguez had to score there was tight and it would have been very unlikely. Poor decision making. Just looks like a Goalkeeper lacking a fight, complete opposite of the temperament needed as a keeper. No defence in this instance - although coming for it and getting it, is the better option. Doesn't help him to be behind a different central two again, and to then get that attempt at a back pass in the first few minutes of the game. I'm still looking to close this debate some time next year Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on January 31, 2013, 10:22:28 AM Nice problem to have. United the best team in the prem this year and your keeper is a bit meh. I can't see them being overhauled this time.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MANTIS01 on January 31, 2013, 12:07:08 PM De Gea with no conviction and just a little girlie skip as the ball goes past. He wants to be charging out and clattering somebody there. Obviously clattering Rodrigues was an option, but that's a penalty and a red card... Kinda joking, but the point was when he makes a decision he's gotta have 100% conviction. Last night he decides to come for a marginal ball in the box but pulls out and does a little girlie skip instead. Jamie Redknapp highlighted Mertersacker doing a girlie jump with twizzle to try and block the Suarez goal last night. Tony Adams never girlie jump twizzled.Top players need conviction so if he decides to come De Gea should clatter ball and player there and lol at the very idea of red card and pen at old trafford. At the very least pull out a schmeichel star fish rather than little skip pls. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 31, 2013, 12:14:20 PM De Gea with no conviction and just a little girlie skip as the ball goes past. He wants to be charging out and clattering somebody there. Obviously clattering Rodrigues was an option, but that's a penalty and a red card... Kinda joking, but the point was when he makes a decision he's gotta have 100% conviction. Last night he decides to come for a marginal ball in the box but pulls out and does a little girlie skip instead. Jamie Redknapp highlighted Mertersacker doing a girlie jump with twizzle to try and block the Suarez goal last night. Tony Adams never girlie jump twizzled.Top players need conviction so if he decides to come De Gea should clatter ball and player there and lol at the very idea of red card and pen at old trafford. At the very least pull out a schmeichel star fish rather than little skip pls. There's a high frequency of penalties and red cards at Old Trafford. Some to the detriment of the home team Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 31, 2013, 12:37:56 PM haha, last nights little blooper, and no one has mentioned Carrick basically leaving him fooked, the girly little skip as it's been reported here was clearly an attempt to block an expected chip, which I think the Southampton player was actually trying to do, big fail all round, but hardly a hanging offence being beaten 1 on 1. No ones mentioned the few saves he made to keep us in the lead later, but meh, that would be actually giving a fair report on his performance, which it's clear there's a few (smashed, ant..oh where is the Milton Keynes bindipper, Baraon, Baraon, you seem to be all quiet..).
Easy target Goalkeepers, some would suggest there's those that never make a mistake, Reina had me in stitches with his incompetence at times, but that doesn't make him a bad keeper. All in all as David said, best we come back in a few years and finish this conversation then.. Now how about a Celtic Midfielder, looks like it's not going to happen, we need someone in midfield like them. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on January 31, 2013, 12:42:37 PM Hey, jackinbeat, no need to make these discussions include personal insults please. People are entitled to their views howevermuch you disagree with them, and can argue them how they wish
Keep it civil Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 31, 2013, 12:43:48 PM Hey, jackinbeat, no need to make these discussions include personal insults please. People are entitled to their views howevermuch you disagree with them, and can argue them how they wish Keep it civil Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on January 31, 2013, 12:55:57 PM Hey jackinbeat no idea who you are but my point was only that whilst all the other prem threads seem to be moaning about managers, lack of fire power, consistency or spending its a nice problem for united to solve.
If you wanna call me a bin dipper feel free :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 31, 2013, 01:06:29 PM Slow down all, this is football banter right?
I called the Baron a bindipper, no one else, and I call all my close friends who are Liverpool fans bindippers, it's a football thing. Smashed and Ant were not supposed to be included in that. Apologies for not being civil, but it's football banter, when has that ever been civil ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on January 31, 2013, 01:08:11 PM Slow down all, this is football banter right? I called the Baron a bindipper, no one else, and I call all my close friends who are Liverpool fans bindippers, it's a football thing. Smashed and Ant were not supposed to be included in that. Apologies for not being civil, but it's football banter, when has that ever been civil ;) It's civil on here. bindipper is derogatory, and not banter. On here cheers Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 31, 2013, 01:08:31 PM Hey, jackinbeat, no need to make these discussions include personal insults please. People are entitled to their views howevermuch you disagree with them, and can argue them how they wish Keep it civil I'm sorry, where are the personal insults, or is Baron really out searching bins for his lunch, really come on, this is football banter, please show me where I have got personal? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 31, 2013, 01:10:24 PM Slow down all, this is football banter right? I called the Baron a bindipper, no one else, and I call all my close friends who are Liverpool fans bindippers, it's a football thing. Smashed and Ant were not supposed to be included in that. Apologies for not being civil, but it's football banter, when has that ever been civil ;) It's civil on here. bindipper is derogatory, and not banter. On here cheers Ok, civil it is, but Liverpool fans are and will always be the bindippers, well in Manchester anyway. :P Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 31, 2013, 01:13:02 PM Hey jackinbeat no idea who you are but my point was only that whilst all the other prem threads seem to be moaning about managers, lack of fire power, consistency or spending its a nice problem for united to solve. If you wanna call me a bin dipper feel free :) I didn't call you a bindipper!!! I will be a civil Mancunian football fan from now, but damn, that will be difficult! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on January 31, 2013, 02:05:21 PM Hey jackinbeat no idea who you are but my point was only that whilst all the other prem threads seem to be moaning about managers, lack of fire power, consistency or spending its a nice problem for united to solve. If you wanna call me a bin dipper feel free :) I didn't call you a bindipper!!! I will be a civil Mancunian football fan from now, but damn, that will be difficult! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 31, 2013, 02:17:09 PM Hey jackinbeat no idea who you are but my point was only that whilst all the other prem threads seem to be moaning about managers, lack of fire power, consistency or spending its a nice problem for united to solve. If you wanna call me a bin dipper feel free :) I didn't call you a bindipper!!! I will be a civil Mancunian football fan from now, but damn, that will be difficult! Didn't know one way or the other to be fair i hadn't even thought of it, just enjoying the De Gea banter. I lived in Spain and met some of his friends, he's really a lot more of a keeper than it seems from the reviews he gets. He's clearly had to dive in the deep end and try and swim and United, wouuld have loved him to have a few years as a understudy to Van de Sar, but that's life. Hopefully Valdes will fill this role :/ then again prob not! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 31, 2013, 02:23:08 PM Hey jackinbeat no idea who you are but my point was only that whilst all the other prem threads seem to be moaning about managers, lack of fire power, consistency or spending its a nice problem for united to solve. If you wanna call me a bin dipper feel free :) I didn't call you a bindipper!!! I will be a civil Mancunian football fan from now, but damn, that will be difficult! Didn't know one way or the other to be fair i hadn't even thought of it, just enjoying the De Gea banter. I lived in Spain and met some of his friends, he's really a lot more of a keeper than it seems from the reviews he gets. He's clearly had to dive in the deep end and try and swim and United, wouuld have loved him to have a few years as a understudy to Van de Sar, but that's life. Hopefully Valdes will fill this role :/ then again prob not! Imagine how good he might have been had he played behind Neville, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra for his first season Instead he's spent pretty much his entire United career behind a back four that changes every week and has included some makeshift centre backs including Carrick more than once. Jason - our league position is all well and good but if we give Real a goal start next week I won't be piling in to back the win Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on January 31, 2013, 02:27:56 PM Hey jackinbeat no idea who you are but my point was only that whilst all the other prem threads seem to be moaning about managers, lack of fire power, consistency or spending its a nice problem for united to solve. If you wanna call me a bin dipper feel free :) I didn't call you a bindipper!!! I will be a civil Mancunian football fan from now, but damn, that will be difficult! Didn't know one way or the other to be fair i hadn't even thought of it, just enjoying the De Gea banter. I lived in Spain and met some of his friends, he's really a lot more of a keeper than it seems from the reviews he gets. He's clearly had to dive in the deep end and try and swim and United, wouuld have loved him to have a few years as a understudy to Van de Sar, but that's life. Hopefully Valdes will fill this role :/ then again prob not! Imagine how good he might have been had he played behind Neville, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra for his first season Instead he's spent pretty much his entire United career behind a back four that changes every week and has included some makeshift centre backs including Carrick more than once. Jason - our league position is all well and good but if we give Real a goal start next week I won't be piling in to back the win Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 31, 2013, 02:28:46 PM Agree with herbie
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 31, 2013, 02:30:11 PM #keepingthefaith
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on January 31, 2013, 02:32:57 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 31, 2013, 05:10:35 PM Hey jackinbeat no idea who you are but my point was only that whilst all the other prem threads seem to be moaning about managers, lack of fire power, consistency or spending its a nice problem for united to solve. If you wanna call me a bin dipper feel free :) I didn't call you a bindipper!!! I will be a civil Mancunian football fan from now, but damn, that will be difficult! Didn't know one way or the other to be fair i hadn't even thought of it, just enjoying the De Gea banter. I lived in Spain and met some of his friends, he's really a lot more of a keeper than it seems from the reviews he gets. He's clearly had to dive in the deep end and try and swim and United, wouuld have loved him to have a few years as a understudy to Van de Sar, but that's life. Hopefully Valdes will fill this role :/ then again prob not! Imagine how good he might have been had he played behind Neville, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra for his first season Instead he's spent pretty much his entire United career behind a back four that changes every week and has included some makeshift centre backs including Carrick more than once. Jason - our league position is all well and good but if we give Real a goal start next week I won't be piling in to back the win Agreed David, once we get some form of settled defence again, we might just find out. :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on January 31, 2013, 05:31:28 PM Hey jackinbeat no idea who you are but my point was only that whilst all the other prem threads seem to be moaning about managers, lack of fire power, consistency or spending its a nice problem for united to solve. If you wanna call me a bin dipper feel free :) I didn't call you a bindipper!!! I will be a civil Mancunian football fan from now, but damn, that will be difficult! Didn't know one way or the other to be fair i hadn't even thought of it, just enjoying the De Gea banter. I lived in Spain and met some of his friends, he's really a lot more of a keeper than it seems from the reviews he gets. He's clearly had to dive in the deep end and try and swim and United, wouuld have loved him to have a few years as a understudy to Van de Sar, but that's life. Hopefully Valdes will fill this role :/ then again prob not! Imagine how good he might have been had he played behind Neville, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra for his first season Instead he's spent pretty much his entire United career behind a back four that changes every week and has included some makeshift centre backs including Carrick more than once. Jason - our league position is all well and good but if we give Real a goal start next week I won't be piling in to back the win Agreed David, once we get some form of settled defence again, we might just find out. :) Since when does any teams backline dictate how well a goalkeeper should be performing. If anything a poor backline would make a keeper look better, with more saves. It just means the keeper is exposed more, so we get to see his true colours more. I think what you are claiming is the other way round to be honest. If you have a keeper that is completely in command of his box, and crosses and is a great talker, then you ease the back line into playing a lot better as they have confidence in you. It definitely doesn't manifest itself the other way to anywhere near the same degree. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on January 31, 2013, 05:47:24 PM Hey jackinbeat no idea who you are but my point was only that whilst all the other prem threads seem to be moaning about managers, lack of fire power, consistency or spending its a nice problem for united to solve. If you wanna call me a bin dipper feel free :) I didn't call you a bindipper!!! I will be a civil Mancunian football fan from now, but damn, that will be difficult! Didn't know one way or the other to be fair i hadn't even thought of it, just enjoying the De Gea banter. I lived in Spain and met some of his friends, he's really a lot more of a keeper than it seems from the reviews he gets. He's clearly had to dive in the deep end and try and swim and United, wouuld have loved him to have a few years as a understudy to Van de Sar, but that's life. Hopefully Valdes will fill this role :/ then again prob not! Imagine how good he might have been had he played behind Neville, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra for his first season Instead he's spent pretty much his entire United career behind a back four that changes every week and has included some makeshift centre backs including Carrick more than once. Jason - our league position is all well and good but if we give Real a goal start next week I won't be piling in to back the win Agreed David, once we get some form of settled defence again, we might just find out. :) Since when does any teams backline dictate how well a goalkeeper should be performing. If anything a poor backline would make a keeper look better, with more saves. It just means the keeper is exposed more, so we get to see his true colours more. I think what you are claiming is the other way round to be honest. If you have a keeper that is completely in command of his box, and crosses and is a great talker, then you ease the back line into playing a lot better as they have confidence in you. It definitely doesn't manifest itself the other way to anywhere near the same degree. Ant you got this wrong, a keeper is clearly going to look better in front of a strong back four, and have a better understanding if that back four are the same week in week out. The last part I agree with :P Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 31, 2013, 06:41:10 PM Hey jackinbeat no idea who you are but my point was only that whilst all the other prem threads seem to be moaning about managers, lack of fire power, consistency or spending its a nice problem for united to solve. If you wanna call me a bin dipper feel free :) I didn't call you a bindipper!!! I will be a civil Mancunian football fan from now, but damn, that will be difficult! Didn't know one way or the other to be fair i hadn't even thought of it, just enjoying the De Gea banter. I lived in Spain and met some of his friends, he's really a lot more of a keeper than it seems from the reviews he gets. He's clearly had to dive in the deep end and try and swim and United, wouuld have loved him to have a few years as a understudy to Van de Sar, but that's life. Hopefully Valdes will fill this role :/ then again prob not! Imagine how good he might have been had he played behind Neville, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra for his first season Instead he's spent pretty much his entire United career behind a back four that changes every week and has included some makeshift centre backs including Carrick more than once. Jason - our league position is all well and good but if we give Real a goal start next week I won't be piling in to back the win Agreed David, once we get some form of settled defence again, we might just find out. :) Since when does any teams backline dictate how well a goalkeeper should be performing. If anything a poor backline would make a keeper look better, with more saves. It just means the keeper is exposed more, so we get to see his true colours more. I think what you are claiming is the other way round to be honest. If you have a keeper that is completely in command of his box, and crosses and is a great talker, then you ease the back line into playing a lot better as they have confidence in you. It definitely doesn't manifest itself the other way to anywhere near the same degree. David Seaman looked good behind Dixon, Adams, Bould, Winterburn. Even with the ponytail. My point was, however, that is much easier for a goalkeeper to settle in behind a good, established back line than it is when he doesn't know what the players in front of him are likely to do, or what they are capable of doing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 01, 2013, 03:01:14 AM Nayim made Seaman look terrible with that lob.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on February 01, 2013, 08:28:44 AM Right, got you lads.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 01, 2013, 08:30:06 AM Nayim made Seaman look terrible with that lob. Would never have been surprised to see Seaman playing with a lob Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 01, 2013, 09:53:45 AM Nayim made Seaman look terrible with that lob. Would never have been surprised to see Seaman playing with a lob Never knew Nayim was a hairdresser, or heard this lob style cut, take it wasn't like a flattop? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 01, 2013, 09:59:59 AM Nayim made Seaman look terrible with that lob. Would never have been surprised to see Seaman playing with a lob Never knew Nayim was a hairdresser, or heard this lob style cut, take it wasn't like a flattop? For the record YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiYt3iNWau0 oh and this, which was a lot less funny YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oq974EmpBo Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 01, 2013, 08:26:39 PM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. There's an even longer list of keepers who came into their prime later in life, if you picked out the above names (and I don't agree with them all), then you clearly don't need me to type them all. Of course keepers peak later - that wasn't the argument. The point is in the modern game that the best rarely become great later if they weren't already excellent by the early/mid 20's. You cant change the criteria to "peaked later" half way through an argument to suit. I'm hardly changing my argument, peak, become great, already one of the top keeps in the world in some departments, however you want to try and win this argument, you can't, as I said look at all keepers, the greats made mistakes, and as for not ever being great, have you actually seen anything but those sad little videos made by bindippers who have very little to say now they've been made to eat all the words the used to brag with in the 80's. Pointless to argue with you when the blinkers are so clearly fixed on,, No, you are I'm afraid. He's not a "great" keeper. He's good. One of the better ones in the league. But never, ever great. Perhaps our definitions of "great" are miles apart. Lol, what are you on about, he's a GREAT shot stopper, and has other attributes that suggest he will become world class, if he isn't already. Seeing as you now support a small club, i'ts clear you get a kick from trying to pick at others, whilst you have some knowledge that's clear, it's not clear whether that knowledge is actually based on any facts other than your growing bitterness to a team and sport that's sucker punched you, I'd guess you are not from Liverpool, and would possibly have become a |Liverpool fan in the 80's? Why so bitter? We're discussing a keeper you think is world class and I don't. Not really cause to lower the tone is it? A Utd fan talking about fans from outside of Liverpool? Give me strength. For about the 8th time I rate him as a keeper. He's very good. For me, not world class, never going to be. It's only a opinion - although one shared by some of your own fans which obviously completely invalidates your point that I'm only trying to wind you up. Untwist those knickers and move on? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 02, 2013, 12:34:12 AM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. There's an even longer list of keepers who came into their prime later in life, if you picked out the above names (and I don't agree with them all), then you clearly don't need me to type them all. Of course keepers peak later - that wasn't the argument. The point is in the modern game that the best rarely become great later if they weren't already excellent by the early/mid 20's. You cant change the criteria to "peaked later" half way through an argument to suit. I'm hardly changing my argument, peak, become great, already one of the top keeps in the world in some departments, however you want to try and win this argument, you can't, as I said look at all keepers, the greats made mistakes, and as for not ever being great, have you actually seen anything but those sad little videos made by bindippers who have very little to say now they've been made to eat all the words the used to brag with in the 80's. Pointless to argue with you when the blinkers are so clearly fixed on,, No, you are I'm afraid. He's not a "great" keeper. He's good. One of the better ones in the league. But never, ever great. Perhaps our definitions of "great" are miles apart. Lol, what are you on about, he's a GREAT shot stopper, and has other attributes that suggest he will become world class, if he isn't already. Seeing as you now support a small club, i'ts clear you get a kick from trying to pick at others, whilst you have some knowledge that's clear, it's not clear whether that knowledge is actually based on any facts other than your growing bitterness to a team and sport that's sucker punched you, I'd guess you are not from Liverpool, and would possibly have become a |Liverpool fan in the 80's? Why so bitter? We're discussing a keeper you think is world class and I don't. Not really cause to lower the tone is it? A Utd fan talking about fans from outside of Liverpool? Give me strength. For about the 8th time I rate him as a keeper. He's very good. For me, not world class, never going to be. It's only a opinion - although one shared by some of your own fans which obviously completely invalidates your point that I'm only trying to wind you up. Untwist those knickers and move on? Who is bitter, who said he was world class, I said he was (and it's a fact) a world class shot stopper. And now you say he's very good, now who is changing their view, like I've said maybe 20 times, I think he will be world class, whatever other United fans may say is not really relevant to our argument, I don't agree with lots of fellow reds regarding what players, managers or the club does. I'm a Mancunian, supported my local team since I 1977, glory hunters, especially Liverpool fans, just piss me off, sorry deal with it. So as I said before Liverpool fans are impossible (and boring) to argue with, and the ones not from Liverpool aren't even funny with it, so, far from winding me up, it just make me sigh. You've got a local team now, why don't you support them?? Now stop trying to put words in my mouth and make a valid argument, be the first time I've heard one from a glory hunter, so I won't hold my breath. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on February 02, 2013, 12:42:28 AM Jackinbeat, r you real ?
Everyone of your posts to The Baron has been aggressive bordering on extremely aggressive, everyone's entitled to an opinion, even in a thread titled Manchester United FC. Get a grip! I find it interesting that recently it's been the Man U fans on here that've been trolling other teams threads and just generally being way ott, very interesting. Before you start I'm not a bin dipper, I'm a sad Geordie bastard :( Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on February 02, 2013, 12:52:32 AM Before you start I'm not a bin dipper, I'm a sad Geordie bastard :( Not sure which is worse ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on February 02, 2013, 12:55:47 AM Before you start I'm not a bin dipper, I'm a sad Geordie bastard :( Not sure which is worse ;) Your keepers shit mate, gtfo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on February 02, 2013, 12:56:52 AM Before you start I'm not a bin dipper, I'm a sad Geordie bastard :( Not sure which is worse ;) Your keepers shit mate, gtfo. LEEDS UNITED HAVING A PARTY, SELL OUR BEST PLAYERS KEEP LUKE VARNEY Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 02, 2013, 01:05:12 AM Jackinbeat, r you real ? Everyone of your posts to The Baron has been aggressive bordering on extremely aggressive, everyone's entitled to an opinion, even in a thread titled Manchester United FC. Get a grip! I find it interesting that recently it's been the Man U fans on here that've been trolling other teams threads and just generally being way ott, very interesting. Before you start I'm not a bin dipper, I'm a sad Geordie bastard :( Lol, every time I've been to Anfield it's ended up with piss filled bottles, and even shit filled burger boxes being thrown all over us, so when a Liverpool fan starts abusing my team I get a little defensive, which can sound aggressive I agree, although he's admitted to being on the wind up, so basically trolling, for which makes aggressive words as you call them ok, now to be fair though telling him to go and support his local team or calling him a bindipper is hardly aggressive, well maybe in the leafy suburbs of Milton Keynes, or where ever. As for mentioning trolling other threads, why? Not something I've done, or would do. I'll try to be a little less aggressive sounding, but come on it's a football discussion, they're kinda aggressive by nature no? A lot of people have met me on here, and yes I can be a loud mouthy Manc, but aggressive that's a little harsh.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on February 02, 2013, 01:11:44 AM No one has abused your team
Your posts on here are way OTT Its a little different on the blonde sports discussions than a lot of sports forums. Aggression and rudeness is not encouraged. It tends to put people off posting. Granted that can be tricky as passions run high, but its something we aspire to. Check any other thread on here. None of this attitude whatsoever Just cool it, cool it a lot, please Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 02, 2013, 01:14:57 AM No one has abused your team Your posts on here are way OTT Its a little different on the blonde sports discussions than a lot of sports forums. Aggression and rudeness is not encouraged. It tends to put people off posting. Granted that can be tricky as passions run high, but its something we aspire to. Check any other thread on here. None of this attitude whatsoever Just cool it, cool it a lot, please Yeah, no worries, just my reflex reaction to scousers, will hold it down here in future, or atleast try to ;P Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 02, 2013, 08:21:44 AM No one has abused your team what have I done now.Your posts on here are way OTT Its a little different on the blonde sports discussions than a lot of sports forums. Aggression and rudeness is not encouraged. It tends to put people off posting. Granted that can be tricky as passions run high, but its something we aspire to. Check any other thread on here. None of this attitude whatsoever Just cool it, cool it a lot, please Sorry. Thought I was reading my pm's Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 02, 2013, 12:09:37 PM No one has abused your team what have I done now.Your posts on here are way OTT Its a little different on the blonde sports discussions than a lot of sports forums. Aggression and rudeness is not encouraged. It tends to put people off posting. Granted that can be tricky as passions run high, but its something we aspire to. Check any other thread on here. None of this attitude whatsoever Just cool it, cool it a lot, please Sorry. Thought I was reading my pm's So next time I just say smashedagain told me to say it ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 02, 2013, 12:15:10 PM No one has abused your team what have I done now.Your posts on here are way OTT Its a little different on the blonde sports discussions than a lot of sports forums. Aggression and rudeness is not encouraged. It tends to put people off posting. Granted that can be tricky as passions run high, but its something we aspire to. Check any other thread on here. None of this attitude whatsoever Just cool it, cool it a lot, please Sorry. Thought I was reading my pm's So next time I just say smashedagain told me to say it ;) Banter is good fun and trolling ain't. If you can find out where the line is then I'd appreciate if you could tell me where it is too :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 02, 2013, 12:50:16 PM No one has abused your team what have I done now.Your posts on here are way OTT Its a little different on the blonde sports discussions than a lot of sports forums. Aggression and rudeness is not encouraged. It tends to put people off posting. Granted that can be tricky as passions run high, but its something we aspire to. Check any other thread on here. None of this attitude whatsoever Just cool it, cool it a lot, please Sorry. Thought I was reading my pm's So next time I just say smashedagain told me to say it ;) Banter is good fun and trolling ain't. If you can find out where the line is then I'd appreciate if you could tell me where it is too :) Banter, football, line, there is one, It only stops short of physical violence or tragedies imho, blonde is a little less tolerant which is fair, as without it I see it would cause issues. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 02, 2013, 05:56:30 PM United fans displaying a banner that says 'In David we trust'
Already two good saves and a very confident take from the resultant corner after saving Risse's shot Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on February 02, 2013, 06:26:07 PM Just to weigh in on De Gea, he's a good shot stopper but has far too many clangers in him, he's weak as a kitten too and skinny as a rake, unless he hits the weights and grows a set of cajones, he will be shipped out of Manchester soon enough, Begovic in the summer?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 02, 2013, 06:45:38 PM Just to weigh in on De Gea, he's a good shot stopper but has far too many clangers in him, he's weak as a kitten too and skinny as a rake, unless he hits the weights and grows a set of cajones, he will be shipped out of Manchester soon enough, Begovic in the summer? Agreed, remember when Ronaldo got to OT, he was the same, but emerged a year later looking like a lion (to continue the feline analogies), I dare say that's been noted and is being worked on. He's making great/world class saves again today, and I'm sure I even saw him catch a cross. The 'In David We Trust' banners been around a while hasn't it, but clear to all he's already won the true fans over. Baron, where are you! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 03, 2013, 05:56:34 PM Done replying Jack. Impossible to talk football with you. Never heard such contradictory nonsense and not into getting personal, so gg you.
To the rest, how much would you love a Suarez winner now? :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on February 03, 2013, 07:14:55 PM ... I'll try to be a little less aggressive sounding, but come on it's a football discussion, they're kinda aggressive by nature no?... There's nothing naturally aggressive about talking about football, just as there's nothing naturally aggressive about talking about rugby, or golf, or snooker or any other game or sport. Just because so many football fans make it aggressive - doesn't make it natural. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 03, 2013, 07:28:53 PM Baron and Jon, I hear and understand what you are both saying, but you're mistaking aggression for mindless violence. Football always has been tribal, tribal rituals can be aggressive sounding, banging drums, etc, like the all blacks and their haka, it might seem aggressive to some, but at heart it's just a display of manliness, and the aggression doesn't necessarily develop to violence.
Baron, ok, I wasn't getting personal as such, just commenting on the fact that football teams need local football fans to support their local teams. Being a United fan, I have some good friends from Liverpool who I enjoy some great football discussions with, and we all sigh at fans from out of town, sorry if you think it's personal, but it's not. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on February 03, 2013, 07:37:40 PM Baron and Jon, I hear and understand what you are both saying, but you're mistaking aggression for mindless violence. Football always has been tribal, tribal rituals can be aggressive sounding, banging drums, etc, like the all blacks and their haka, it might seem aggressive to some, but at heart it's just a display of manliness, and the aggression doesn't necessarily develop to violence. Baron, ok, I wasn't getting personal as such, just commenting on the fact that football teams need local football fans to support their local teams. Being a United fan, I have some good friends from Liverpool who I enjoy some great football discussions with, and we all sigh at fans from out of town, sorry if you think it's personal, but it's not. Do you know where Baron is from? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 03, 2013, 08:55:11 PM Baron and Jon, I hear and understand what you are both saying, but you're mistaking aggression for mindless violence. Football always has been tribal, tribal rituals can be aggressive sounding, banging drums, etc, like the all blacks and their haka, it might seem aggressive to some, but at heart it's just a display of manliness, and the aggression doesn't necessarily develop to violence. Baron, ok, I wasn't getting personal as such, just commenting on the fact that football teams need local football fans to support their local teams. Being a United fan, I have some good friends from Liverpool who I enjoy some great football discussions with, and we all sigh at fans from out of town, sorry if you think it's personal, but it's not. Do you know where Baron is from? Milton Keynes unless his profile is wrong, i see the 52off on your posts, gutshot old boy by any chance? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 04, 2013, 09:38:52 AM 9 points clear in Feb and Mankini already conceding that City will need to win every game. Still wont be enough will it ?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 04, 2013, 03:17:25 PM 9 points clear in Feb and Mankini already conceding that City will need to win every game. Still wont be enough will it ? He'll never out mind game Fergie, way too early to start thinking this way, give it a month, maybe we'll start playing some half decent football by then. ;carlocitrone; ;carlocitrone; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 04, 2013, 03:25:46 PM He out minded him last year
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on February 04, 2013, 03:29:36 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 04, 2013, 03:58:21 PM debatable Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 04, 2013, 04:18:21 PM He out minded him last year Really, last year the mind games didn't really factor imho, although SAF is not as sharp as he once was. Liked his one hand on the trophy bit last week though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 04, 2013, 04:21:17 PM debatable Would be good to debate, sometimes there's a lot a bold statements here without any facts or even thoughts to back them up, realise i'm guilty of that too, well occasionally. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 04, 2013, 04:25:58 PM Mancini was saying we were favourites even going into the last game. Think it took a lot of pressure off city
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeKnave on February 04, 2013, 04:41:39 PM Mancini was saying we were favourites even going into the last game. Think it took a lot of pressure off city lol gimme a break mate Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 04, 2013, 04:55:57 PM Mancini was saying we were favourites even going into the last game. Think it took a lot of pressure off city lol gimme a break mate Fergie has been the master when it comes to mind games. Can't dismiss the same when another manager finds a way to motivate his side. In the grand scheme of things they probably don't have a huge impact but to ignore the impact would be wrong IMO. Think united will clinch it now- probably gonna be a twist somewhere down the line tho Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 04, 2013, 05:19:24 PM Mancini was saying we were favourites even going into the last game. Think it took a lot of pressure off city Nothing to do with QPR hearing they were safe, and just deciding to stop playing then. You a United fan George? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 04, 2013, 05:30:59 PM Yes
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 04, 2013, 05:31:51 PM Mancini was saying we were favourites even going into the last game. Think it took a lot of pressure off city Nothing to do with QPR hearing they were safe, and just deciding to stop playing then. You a United fan George? If it was it was our fault for throwing it away with 4 games to go. Even I was chirping. It's usually United running teams down Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 04, 2013, 06:49:42 PM Mind games are overrated as a factor imho. When they work it's all the manager. When they don't it's forgotten that the manager tried to psyche out his opposite number. Although I can think of a few times over the years there has been a direct impact, generally the best side wins over a season. Fergie is the master of mind games because he has had the best team more often than not and the side in the lead can't sustain their above average results over a season. "Mind games" sells papers though innit.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 04, 2013, 07:13:28 PM Mancini was saying we were favourites even going into the last game. Think it took a lot of pressure off city Nothing to do with QPR hearing they were safe, and just deciding to stop playing then. You a United fan George? If it was it was our fault for throwing it away with 4 games to go. Even I was chirping. It's usually United running teams down Two goals up vs Everton at home, pegged back to one, back to two up and still drooped two absolutely vital points... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on February 04, 2013, 08:43:21 PM Mancini was saying we were favourites even going into the last game. Think it took a lot of pressure off city Nothing to do with QPR hearing they were safe, and just deciding to stop playing then. You a United fan George? If it was it was our fault for throwing it away with 4 games to go. Even I was chirping. It's usually United running teams down Two goals up vs Everton at home, pegged back to one, back to two up and still drooped two absolutely vital points... ive seen that game on an advert somewhere.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 04, 2013, 09:07:03 PM Mancini was saying we were favourites even going into the last game. Think it took a lot of pressure off city Nothing to do with QPR hearing they were safe, and just deciding to stop playing then. You a United fan George? If it was it was our fault for throwing it away with 4 games to go. Even I was chirping. It's usually United running teams down So true. No one but ourselves, to blame. For once I didn't chirp, coming from a half red half blue family, I just had a horrible feeling, and even when our game finished before I switched streams (I was living in Spain) I still couldn't celebrate, then I saw QPR were still up on the bbc, but by the time the stream started City were ahead, and my phone was buzzing, and I sat in shock not quite believing what had happened, canstill picture the moment, makes me feel sick now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 04, 2013, 09:17:24 PM Yes Ok time for me to grow up a little and put my old prejudices to one side, for the sake of staying on this forum I promise to put location bias aside, and just discuss football. I apologise to anyone I've offended, or been aggressive to with my words here, even the baron. At the end of the day I love football more than having a go at people loyalties for where they live and having read a few threads, and seen the knowledge displayed hope you'll forgive my attacks, never meant them to be personal or aggressive, passion for my team can override my usual manners, passion for my team and football is all you'll see from now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on February 04, 2013, 11:32:50 PM Seemed to me City were feeling the pressure, crushed everyone at home but in the decider found themselves 2-1 down vs a team staring relegation in the face.
Mancini just abs golden. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 05, 2013, 07:10:11 AM Seemed to me City were feeling the pressure, crushed everyone at home but in the decider found themselves 2-1 down vs a team staring relegation in the face. Mancini just abs golden last season fyp Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 05, 2013, 02:17:42 PM Done replying Jack. Impossible to talk football with you. Never heard such contradictory nonsense and not into getting personal, so gg you. To the rest, how much would you love a Suarez winner now? :) Peace (http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k58/jackinbeat/busbyandpaisley_zps29652b53.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: kinboshi on February 05, 2013, 10:51:27 PM RIP
55 years ago. A sad day for football. http://www.thebusbybabes.com/victims/victims.htm Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on February 05, 2013, 11:24:18 PM 23 people went to watch/play in football match in belgrade and never returned home.
The flowers of Manchester. Never forgotten. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 05, 2013, 11:35:29 PM The Flowers of Manchester will be sung under the Munich Plaque to remember those who lost their lives in The Munich Air crash. 6th February at 3pm and 10th February at 3pm (an hour before the Everton game)
Download the songsheet here:http://munich58.co.uk/downloads/flowers_and_50years_lyrics.zip (http://munich58.co.uk/downloads/flowers_and_50years_lyrics.zip) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: JK on February 06, 2013, 12:24:26 AM A Broken Plane
A Broken Dream A Broken Heart A Broken Team No Word Said A Silent Vow We Loved You Then.. We Love You Now RIP the Busby Babes.. Gone but never forgotten Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 06, 2013, 07:21:50 AM [youtube]http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=f3f6T5bsM10&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Df3f6T5bsM10&gl=GB /[youtube]
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on February 06, 2013, 07:45:44 AM YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3f6T5bsM10 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 06, 2013, 08:04:33 AM YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3f6T5bsM10 Thanks Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 07, 2013, 01:42:58 PM This was posted in the Liverpool FC thread...
Really good to see Liverpool getting there. Not just for the fact that they took points off City today, but also because I'd rather have a genuine rivalry with Liverpool than the sheikhdom or the oilgarch's playthings Lol - cos Man United never buy success do they? I get a bit tired of this debate, with ill-informed folks accusing United of 'buying success' as though they've never built a team, nor developed a following or a stadium that generates a level of income that means that we can spend some money on bringing players in. We earned the right to spend on players, we didn't wake up one morning and discover that the local millionaire steelworks owner had decided to spend his millions on us; nor that some dodgy russian businessman wanted somewhere to spend his cash; and don't get me started on the club that went from being owned by a disgraced foreign politico to becoming a sheikhdom. So yes, we use our money to acquire players - but, to use a poker analogy, we can use our big stack to bully the rest because we won those chips earlier in the game. We didn't just turn up at the final table with a load of chips that someone else decided to give us. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 07, 2013, 01:48:47 PM This was posted in the Liverpool FC thread... Really good to see Liverpool getting there. Not just for the fact that they took points off City today, but also because I'd rather have a genuine rivalry with Liverpool than the sheikhdom or the oilgarch's playthings Lol - cos Man United never buy success do they? I get a bit tired of this debate, with ill-informed folks accusing United of 'buying success' as though they've never built a team, nor developed a following or a stadium that generates a level of income that means that we can spend some money on bringing players in. We earned the right to spend on players, we didn't wake up one morning and discover that the local millionaire steelworks owner had decided to spend his millions on us; nor that some dodgy russian businessman wanted somewhere to spend his cash; and don't get me started on the club that went from being owned by a disgraced foreign politico to becoming a sheikhdom. So yes, we use our money to acquire players - but, to use a poker analogy, we can use our big stack to bully the rest because we won those chips earlier in the game. We didn't just turn up at the final table with a load of chips that someone else decided to give us. +1 Very well put. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on February 07, 2013, 01:50:17 PM So you're good at marketing and get lots of people who have never been to Manchester to support you for no other reason than they like to cheer a winning team. And for that reason you should be able to buy whoever you like but City/Chelsea can't.
I bet you are a big advocate of FFP. What an exciting league it will be when only Man United can buy the best players. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on February 07, 2013, 01:55:17 PM I really don't like Chelsea or Man City for that matter, so I'm not getting into an argument on their behalf, and have a lot of respect for Ferguson.
But it is mildy irritating when Man Utd fans come over all virtuous about how their team is built, especially when the reasoning is that it is built on the revenue received from fans who live hundreds of miles from Old Trafford. These fans are figures of pure comedy. Just be honest that your club buys success just like City, Chelsea, Barca and Madrid and people might take you a bit more seriously. That is all I'll say on the topic. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 07, 2013, 02:02:23 PM So you're good at marketing and get lots of people who have never been to Manchester to support you for no other reason than they like to cheer a winning team. And for that reason you should be able to buy whoever you like but City/Chelsea can't. I bet you are a big advocate of FFP. What an exciting league it will be when only Man United can buy the best players. Never seen a Liverpool shirt on a Norwegian? Or someone from Essex? It's not about marketing. As Ralph Waldo Emerson once said "If you build a better mousetrap the world will beat a path to your door". By the way, it's not about the glory-hunters either. The global respect and support for Manchester United pre-dates the Ferguson years. We marked just one of the reasons for that yesterday. EDIT - I wrote this before I read your most recent post. I'll just add, having read that... Did we buy Giggs, Scholes, Butt, Neville G and Neville P? Cleverley, Wellbeck, Evans? 96 ex-MUFC Academy players have full international caps, the academy is demonstrably the best in the country and has been for decades. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 07, 2013, 04:12:12 PM I wish the owners of Tata Steel would hurry up and buy out Scunthorpe Utd. Would love to see Real Madrid and Barcelona playing champions league in Scunny
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 07, 2013, 04:37:30 PM I wish the owners of Tata Steel would hurry up and buy out Scunthorpe Utd. Would love to see Real Madrid and Barcelona playing champions league in Scunny If only Ian Botham had shown you some love, maybe a tour and a game against FC Catalunya would have happneded! :P Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 07, 2013, 04:39:57 PM I wish the owners of Tata Steel would hurry up and buy out Scunthorpe Utd. Would love to see Real Madrid and Barcelona playing champions league in Scunny If only Ian Botham had shown you some love, maybe a tour and a game against FC Catalunya would have happneded! :P Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 07, 2013, 04:59:28 PM I wish the owners of Tata Steel would hurry up and buy out Scunthorpe Utd. Would love to see Real Madrid and Barcelona playing champions league in Scunny If only Ian Botham had shown you some love, maybe a tour and a game against FC Catalunya would have happneded! :P But no walk for Scunthorpe, now that would be love ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on February 07, 2013, 05:32:58 PM "I wrote this before I read your most recent post. I'll just add, having read that... Did we buy Giggs, Scholes, Butt, Neville G and Neville P?
Cleverley, Wellbeck, Evans? 96 ex-MUFC Academy players have full international caps, the academy is demonstrably the best in the country and has been for decades." Yes you have youth players. You also steal other clubs youth prospects like Giggs I believe. And you stole Eagles from Watford. And don't hold up Wellbeck as a shining light. In 2 years time he'll struggle to get into West Brom's team once Ferguson realises he is bobbins. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 07, 2013, 07:02:52 PM "I wrote this before I read your most recent post. I'll just add, having read that... Did we buy Giggs, Scholes, Butt, Neville G and Neville P? Cleverley, Wellbeck, Evans? 96 ex-MUFC Academy players have full international caps, the academy is demonstrably the best in the country and has been for decades." Yes you have youth players. You also steal other clubs youth prospects like Giggs I believe. And you stole Eagles from Watford. And don't hold up Wellbeck as a shining light. In 2 years time he'll struggle to get into West Brom's team once Ferguson realises he is bobbins. sigh... selective memory dungbeetle. i won't trawl for examples but it's a million that LFC don't have form for similar acts. the sad truth here is that you opened a debate based on me saying something positive about Liverpool in an attempt to score points against us. it went the same way that your team's attempts did this season.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 07, 2013, 10:46:07 PM "I wrote this before I read your most recent post. I'll just add, having read that... Did we buy Giggs, Scholes, Butt, Neville G and Neville P? Cleverley, Wellbeck, Evans? 96 ex-MUFC Academy players have full international caps, the academy is demonstrably the best in the country and has been for decades." Yes you have youth players. You also steal other clubs youth prospects like Giggs I believe. And you stole Eagles from Watford. And don't hold up Wellbeck as a shining light. In 2 years time he'll struggle to get into West Brom's team once Ferguson realises he is bobbins. Only Giggs, but we didn't really steal him, it's what he wanted.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 07, 2013, 10:46:52 PM We lost a few too, David Platt, to name one.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on February 08, 2013, 10:02:01 AM "I wrote this before I read your most recent post. I'll just add, having read that... Did we buy Giggs, Scholes, Butt, Neville G and Neville P? Cleverley, Wellbeck, Evans? 96 ex-MUFC Academy players have full international caps, the academy is demonstrably the best in the country and has been for decades." Yes you have youth players. You also steal other clubs youth prospects like Giggs I believe. And you stole Eagles from Watford. And don't hold up Wellbeck as a shining light. In 2 years time he'll struggle to get into West Brom's team once Ferguson realises he is bobbins. sigh... selective memory dungbeetle. i won't trawl for examples but it's a million that LFC don't have form for similar acts. the sad truth here is that you opened a debate based on me saying something positive about Liverpool in an attempt to score points against us. it went the same way that your team's attempts did this season.... Not sure who you think I support but I have a general distaste for the attitudes of all "big" teams, and in fact grudgingly respect Man Utd more than the others due to the fact they at least attempt to develop their own players, and the longetivity of the Ferguson project. I am merely saying that we shouldn't pretend that Man Utd don't blow most other teams away in terms of spending cash. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on February 08, 2013, 10:02:47 AM Man Utd gave David Platt a free transfer. Not the same as poaching another club's rising talent!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 08, 2013, 10:09:58 AM "I wrote this before I read your most recent post. I'll just add, having read that... Did we buy Giggs, Scholes, Butt, Neville G and Neville P? Cleverley, Wellbeck, Evans? 96 ex-MUFC Academy players have full international caps, the academy is demonstrably the best in the country and has been for decades." Yes you have youth players. You also steal other clubs youth prospects like Giggs I believe. And you stole Eagles from Watford. And don't hold up Wellbeck as a shining light. In 2 years time he'll struggle to get into West Brom's team once Ferguson realises he is bobbins. sigh... selective memory dungbeetle. i won't trawl for examples but it's a million that LFC don't have form for similar acts. the sad truth here is that you opened a debate based on me saying something positive about Liverpool in an attempt to score points against us. it went the same way that your team's attempts did this season.... Not sure who you think I support but I have a general distaste for the attitudes of all "big" teams, and in fact grudgingly respect Man Utd more than the others due to the fact they at least attempt to develop their own players, and the longetivity of the Ferguson project. I am merely saying that we shouldn't pretend that Man Utd don't blow most other teams away in terms of spending cash. Apologies if I'm wrong, I had taken your post on the Liverpool thread as being indicative of support for them. I can see that that may have been wrong and withdraw the rubs about pointscoring. All other aspects of my case remain unchanged. The 'United buy success' accusation is one of the more irritating wrongly held views in football. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 08, 2013, 10:28:12 AM David, why do you think RvP left Arsenal to go to Utd. Is it financial or to win stuff or a combination of both. Do you think he would have gone if Utd were only prepared to pay him half the salary he earned with the Gunners?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on February 08, 2013, 10:30:38 AM David, why do you think RvP left Arsenal to go to Utd. Is it financial or to win stuff or a combination of both. Do you think he would have gone if Utd were only prepared to pay him half the salary he earned with the Gunners? I think you answered your own question here Jason. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 08, 2013, 10:33:17 AM David, why do you think RvP left Arsenal to go to Utd. Is it financial or to win stuff or a combination of both. Do you think he would have gone if Utd were only prepared to pay him half the salary he earned with the Gunners? It's both - and it's the lure of playing for United too. Seems likely that if it was just the money he'd be at City where he'd have had a fair chance of the odd trophy. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on February 08, 2013, 10:44:54 AM David - the fact that Man Utd buy success is not debatable. When Ferguson built his first winning team he bought the best domestic player in each position - Pallister, Bruce, Irwin, Ince, Keane, Phehan, Hughes etc. And subsequently they were in the market for all the best players that came available Van Nistelrooy, Cole, Yorke, Veron, Staam, Ferdinand, Van Persie etc. The fact that they had one golden generation of home grown players does not alter this fact.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 08, 2013, 10:58:41 AM David - the fact that Man Utd buy success is not debatable. When Ferguson built his first winning team he bought the best domestic player in each position - Pallister, Bruce, Irwin, Ince, Keane, Phehan, Hughes etc. And subsequently they were in the market for all the best players that came available Van Nistelrooy, Cole, Yorke, Veron, Staam, Ferdinand, Van Persie etc. The fact that they had one golden generation of home grown players does not alter this fact. Yes, some top players were acquired over time. But, and this is always my major point here, they bought them with money that the club had generated. Interesting to look at the wiki page for that first season of the Premier League - 22 clubs, 4 managed by Scots, 1 by a Welshman, 1 Irish and the rest? All English... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 08, 2013, 01:03:42 PM "I wrote this before I read your most recent post. I'll just add, having read that... Did we buy Giggs, Scholes, Butt, Neville G and Neville P? Cleverley, Wellbeck, Evans? 96 ex-MUFC Academy players have full international caps, the academy is demonstrably the best in the country and has been for decades." Yes you have youth players. You also steal other clubs youth prospects like Giggs I believe. And you stole Eagles from Watford. And don't hold up Wellbeck as a shining light. In 2 years time he'll struggle to get into West Brom's team once Ferguson realises he is bobbins. sigh... selective memory dungbeetle. i won't trawl for examples but it's a million that LFC don't have form for similar acts. the sad truth here is that you opened a debate based on me saying something positive about Liverpool in an attempt to score points against us. it went the same way that your team's attempts did this season.... Not sure who you think I support but I have a general distaste for the attitudes of all "big" teams, and in fact grudgingly respect Man Utd more than the others due to the fact they at least attempt to develop their own players, and the longetivity of the Ferguson project. I am merely saying that we shouldn't pretend that Man Utd don't blow most other teams away in terms of spending cash. Not in the last 5 years or more, even Stoke spent more net on players than we have.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on February 08, 2013, 01:07:17 PM Transfer spend league table for the past 5 years
http://transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/transfer-league-table-last-five-seasons.html It's ordered by net spend (which is how you get Stoke spending more) Man Utd are 7th on net spend, but even on gross spend a fleeting glance means I think they'd still only be 6th Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 08, 2013, 01:24:55 PM Transfer spend league table for the past 5 years http://transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/transfer-league-table-last-five-seasons.html It's ordered by net spend (which is how you get Stoke spending more) Man Utd are 7th on net spend, but even on gross spend a fleeting glance means I think they'd still only be 6th No surprises that the oligarchy and the sheikhdom are top, but the scale of their net spend is staggering. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 08, 2013, 01:27:27 PM Transfer spend league table for the past 5 years http://transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/transfer-league-table-last-five-seasons.html It's ordered by net spend (which is how you get Stoke spending more) Man Utd are 7th on net spend, but even on gross spend a fleeting glance means I think they'd still only be 6th Was just looking for that, thanks. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on February 08, 2013, 01:51:30 PM id like to see the same table but for wages.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 08, 2013, 01:56:26 PM id like to see the same table but for wages. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/9514149/Graphic-Premier-League-transfer-and-wage-spending-from-the-200001-season-to-201112.html deep in two small online comps so no time to do much commentary Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 08, 2013, 02:01:32 PM id like to see the same table but for wages. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/9514149/Graphic-Premier-League-transfer-and-wage-spending-from-the-200001-season-to-201112.html deep in two small online comps so no time to do much commentary glgl, sn for a rail? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 08, 2013, 02:09:34 PM id like to see the same table but for wages. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/9514149/Graphic-Premier-League-transfer-and-wage-spending-from-the-200001-season-to-201112.html deep in two small online comps so no time to do much commentary glgl, sn for a rail? Too late - 3rd in a €1 rb on DTD for not much and 15th in $3 rb on 888 for a bit more Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 09, 2013, 01:47:29 PM Transfer spend league table for the past 5 years http://transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/transfer-league-table-last-five-seasons.html It's ordered by net spend (which is how you get Stoke spending more) Man Utd are 7th on net spend, but even on gross spend a fleeting glance means I think they'd still only be 6th On the whole I agree with David's view on this Utd earn, Utd spend - fair dos really. But this link is cobblers. Minus a world record sale Utd are third on net spend. And the last 5 years is irrelevant if you have 30m players bought more than 5 years ago still playing for you. Even moreso as their transfer fee + transfer price inflation would actually make them even more expensive if bought in the last 5 years. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 09, 2013, 01:53:12 PM id like to see the same table but for wages. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/9514149/Graphic-Premier-League-transfer-and-wage-spending-from-the-200001-season-to-201112.html deep in two small online comps so no time to do much commentary Be interested to hear your thoughts here. Surely a directly correlation between spend & success? I know that wasn't your argument (you earn it, why shouldn't you spend it?) but I think this does support the theory that you spend to win. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 09, 2013, 03:03:30 PM @Baron not sure why the league table is necessarily cobblers. Excluding Ronaldo's sale is only appropriate if you then exclude the other 'exceptionals' like £50mm for Torres coming in to Liverpool, and do you then exclude that purchase from Chelsea's spend?
Net spend is what it is, pick a different time period if you want to include Rooney, Ferdinand, Veron etc The 'buy success' argument, of course if you throw money at the game you can buy success. Chelsea and City have shown that recently, Blackburn showed it in an earlier time as did Leeds. But look what happened to Blackburn and Leeds.... United's current policy of consistently investing in both organic and non-organic improvement seems to me to be the model for other clubs to follow. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on February 09, 2013, 03:19:23 PM @Baron not sure why the league table is necessarily cobblers. Excluding Ronaldo's sale is only appropriate if you then exclude the other 'exceptionals' like £50mm for Torres coming in to Liverpool, and do you then exclude that purchase from Chelsea's spend? Net spend is what it is, pick a different time period if you want to include Rooney, Ferdinand, Veron etc The 'buy success' argument, of course if you throw money at the game you can buy success. Chelsea and City have shown that recently, Blackburn showed it in an earlier time as did Leeds. But look what happened to Blackburn and Leeds.... United's current policy of consistently investing in both organic and non-organic improvement seems to me to be the model for other clubs to follow. can you say your happy with what has come through the utd academy in the last 10 years? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 09, 2013, 03:31:17 PM Yeh pretty funny that Liverpool fans constantly defend their net spend with torres yet united should exclude the sale of ronaldo
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on February 09, 2013, 03:35:32 PM Yeh pretty funny that Liverpool fans constantly defend their net spend with torres yet united should exclude the sale of ronaldo The way i remember the 2 transfers, Liverpool immediately reinvested (be it badly) the Torres money. Where as the Ronaldo money went into the Glazers pockets. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 09, 2013, 03:47:47 PM Yeh pretty funny that Liverpool fans constantly defend their net spend with torres yet united should exclude the sale of ronaldo The way i remember the 2 transfers, Liverpool immediately reinvested (be it badly) the Torres money. Where as the Ronaldo money went into the Glazers pockets. You'd have been better advised to use it to build a bigger ground... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on February 09, 2013, 03:51:36 PM Yeh pretty funny that Liverpool fans constantly defend their net spend with torres yet united should exclude the sale of ronaldo The way i remember the 2 transfers, Liverpool immediately reinvested (be it badly) the Torres money. Where as the Ronaldo money went into the Glazers pockets. You'd have been better advised to use it to build a bigger ground... lots of things we could of done that would of been better than Carroll for £35m Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 09, 2013, 03:53:48 PM @Baron not sure why the league table is necessarily cobblers. Excluding Ronaldo's sale is only appropriate if you then exclude the other 'exceptionals' like £50mm for Torres coming in to Liverpool, and do you then exclude that purchase from Chelsea's spend? Net spend is what it is, pick a different time period if you want to include Rooney, Ferdinand, Veron etc The 'buy success' argument, of course if you throw money at the game you can buy success. Chelsea and City have shown that recently, Blackburn showed it in an earlier time as did Leeds. But look what happened to Blackburn and Leeds.... United's current policy of consistently investing in both organic and non-organic improvement seems to me to be the model for other clubs to follow. Our spend is terrible whatever. So taking away the Torres sale is irrelevant on the whole. The situation with Utd and Ronaldo is not the same. It puts a totally different report on your spend. To your second line.... This is my point exactly. You can't simply pick a point in time and look at net spend as you suggest. If Utd's net spend in say, 2008 was zero would that negate the £100 million they spent in 2007 and therefore prove you can win by spending nothing within that period? It's a ridiculous argument. You can't pick a 5 year period (when a world record sale happened) and say "oh our spending isn't so bad". It just doesn't add up. The second link posted on here is much more telling. Spending = success, however you earn it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 09, 2013, 04:16:08 PM The fact is, united have been hugely succesful for arguably the longest period in English football. To try and put this down to spending is naive at best and jealousy at its worst. We are successful because of many factors mainly having the best footballing manager in a generation.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on February 09, 2013, 04:18:34 PM @Baron not sure why the league table is necessarily cobblers. Excluding Ronaldo's sale is only appropriate if you then exclude the other 'exceptionals' like £50mm for Torres coming in to Liverpool, and do you then exclude that purchase from Chelsea's spend? Net spend is what it is, pick a different time period if you want to include Rooney, Ferdinand, Veron etc The 'buy success' argument, of course if you throw money at the game you can buy success. Chelsea and City have shown that recently, Blackburn showed it in an earlier time as did Leeds. But look what happened to Blackburn and Leeds.... United's current policy of consistently investing in both organic and non-organic improvement seems to me to be the model for other clubs to follow. can you say your happy with what has come through the utd academy in the last 10 years? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 09, 2013, 04:32:21 PM @Baron not sure why the league table is necessarily cobblers. Excluding Ronaldo's sale is only appropriate if you then exclude the other 'exceptionals' like £50mm for Torres coming in to Liverpool, and do you then exclude that purchase from Chelsea's spend? Net spend is what it is, pick a different time period if you want to include Rooney, Ferdinand, Veron etc The 'buy success' argument, of course if you throw money at the game you can buy success. Chelsea and City have shown that recently, Blackburn showed it in an earlier time as did Leeds. But look what happened to Blackburn and Leeds.... United's current policy of consistently investing in both organic and non-organic improvement seems to me to be the model for other clubs to follow. can you say your happy with what has come through the utd academy in the last 10 years? I could be happier, we've had a few that should have made it, but lost their way. But Evans, Cleverley, Wellbeck isn't too bad a showing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 09, 2013, 04:51:33 PM The fact is, united have been hugely succesful for arguably the longest period in English football. To try and put this down to spending is naive at best and jealousy at its worst. We are successful because of many factors mainly having the best footballing manager in a generation. No one has put it down to spending by itself so your comment doesn't really make any sense to be honest, it seems you are getting defensive for no real reason. This isn't a Liverpool Vs Man Utd debate as much as you're trying to turn it into one. The fact is there's a direct correlation between success and spending (although not the other way around as some clubs have proved you can spend and not win a lot). In other words, great manager or not, it is unlikely you, or any team for that matter, would win much without spending a lot of money. The only exception I can think of in the modern era is Arsenal but I think it's fair to say that is very unlikely to happen again to any club with the current rules. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 09, 2013, 04:53:56 PM Ok I'll bite and turn it into united vs Liverpool. Other exceptions can think of is Liverpool who have spent by the truckload and still lie mid table
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 10, 2013, 01:35:43 PM What's with all these Liverpool fans coming on a United thread and trying to argue points that are on the whole pretty irrelevant in top flight football as it stands, basically beacuse the best ever English team, which is clearly United, have not only set the standard in bringing through young talent, but no other team has come close to matching it.
We have also nurtured and developed other young talent (Ronaldo for example), and your arguments amount to nothing less than troll like behaviour at best, middle table obscurity is tough, but deal with it, and keep buying tickets to protest at ticket prices, you know your club will spend it wisely. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on February 10, 2013, 01:52:01 PM Always enjoy watching Sir Alex interviews like on Football Focus yday, loved the fact he said the mind games were overrated after the discussion about on here, haha.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 10, 2013, 01:56:28 PM Always enjoy watching Sir Alex interviews like on Football Focus yday, loved the fact he said the mind games were overrated after the discussion about on here, haha. I did ask if he would. :P Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 10, 2013, 04:25:02 PM We appear to be very up for this game...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on February 10, 2013, 08:12:06 PM 20!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 10, 2013, 09:10:34 PM Let's wait and celebrate on April 6th when it's confirmed Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 10, 2013, 09:33:36 PM Let's wait and celebrate on April 6th when it's confirmed Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on February 11, 2013, 12:24:25 AM Let's wait and celebrate on April 6th when it's confirmed Seem to remember thinking something similar last year... I'd backed City no trophies at a decent price and had a bullseye on QPR in the last game at 20/1 too... I was rofling around my living room for most of the afternoon, right up until the part where I was about to start counting my money and winding up a couple mates who are City ST holders >:( Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 11, 2013, 12:38:10 AM Mathmatics please Gentleman, did last season, or many other seasons not put celebrating early to bed forever!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: JK on February 11, 2013, 01:17:22 AM Got a new Vincent Kompany drinks holder in my car. It carries 10 mugs.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on February 11, 2013, 09:32:01 AM City will be lucky to come 2nd imo. Really are a shadow of last year's team and Mancini is all over the place.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 11, 2013, 09:34:21 AM Wouldn't it be sweet to be 16 points clear come April 6th and to seal the title with a win?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 11, 2013, 12:29:28 PM just going back to the goalkeeper debate for a moment,
Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. ??? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on February 11, 2013, 12:34:46 PM Let's wait and celebrate on April 6th when it's confirmed Seem to remember thinking something similar last year... I'd backed City no trophies at a decent price and had a bullseye on QPR in the last game at 20/1 too... I was rofling around my living room for most of the afternoon, right up until the part where I was about to start counting my money and winding up a couple mates who are City ST holders >:( Bookies paid out!,, Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 11, 2013, 02:17:01 PM Wouldn't it be sweet to be 16 points clear come April 6th and to seal the title with a win? This. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on February 11, 2013, 05:18:01 PM just going back to the goalkeeper debate for a moment, Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. ??? Hart is having an absolute mare at the minute and is one of the reasons city are doing so badly! I think hart is a class keeper but it shows what can happen when you start to have a bit of a bad patch with a dodgy defence etc! United have had a dodgy defence all year an this has been one contributing factor to de gea poor form if we got tighter at the back guaranteed people would start saying de gea is going to be the beat keeper in 5 years time etc Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on February 11, 2013, 08:59:10 PM (http://i454.photobucket.com/albums/qq267/ppokerfan/ADEB1610-FEEB-4E92-A102-0D03EF4E866A-14989-00000B2296B6EC28_zpsdc9671bf.jpg)
(http://i454.photobucket.com/albums/qq267/ppokerfan/EBB2257C-3F1C-4405-A58A-BADA696BBA54-14989-00000B229A9A099F_zps16a04d0a.jpg) (http://i454.photobucket.com/albums/qq267/ppokerfan/254A7CF9-8FC2-424B-8CE1-ABCAC2DED80E-14989-00000B229FBBF281_zps3b7fcfa7.jpg) (http://i454.photobucket.com/albums/qq267/ppokerfan/7D8357C3-2BB4-43C8-9357-3C847D95B8D8-14989-00000B22A500BF85_zps572cb12b.jpg) From Talksport. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 11, 2013, 10:56:38 PM Not at all sure what those stats prove
Nothing probably. But the 'World Class' tag was applied to Joe Hart prematurely, IMO, as was the 'not World Class' tag to De Gea. By the end of the season they'll probably both be level for PL medals. but i'd bet De Gea gets more World Cup and Euro medals than Hart does. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on February 12, 2013, 10:37:48 AM Hart has been well below par this season. In the bottom half of Premier League keepers at the moment.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on February 12, 2013, 11:28:35 AM Would be interested in De Gea's short passing completion %. He seems to prefer going for the shorter option instead of sometimes just hoofing it up field.
Although for a GK I guess it should be as close to 100% as possible. What is classed as a long kick distribution? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on February 13, 2013, 06:51:11 PM Wish i was a neutral tonight. So i could enjoy the game. But im not and its going to be 90 minutes of hell to be put through! COMMON UNITED
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 13, 2013, 07:00:20 PM Wish i was a neutral tonight. So i could enjoy the game. But im not and its going to be 90 minutes of hell to be put through! C'MON UNITED fyp I share the feeling, used to enjoy Liverpool games in the European Cup back in the day. could be neutral with a hint of support for the English team. Nowadays all the ABU sentiment will surface Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on February 13, 2013, 08:04:32 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BDAkOE2CUAA6vdN.jpg:large)
DeGea, early on, from Coentrao Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on February 13, 2013, 08:07:40 PM You follow some weird people Rich.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on February 13, 2013, 08:09:15 PM goalkeepers list, footballers list....
yes, sad. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on February 13, 2013, 08:19:06 PM BBBBBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on February 13, 2013, 09:48:41 PM Can we put the De Gea stuff to bed now! MOTM for me! wp fella!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on February 13, 2013, 09:50:14 PM RVP useless ;grr;
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on February 13, 2013, 09:53:10 PM De Gea was brilliant tonight
Tactically brilliant in the second half from SAF, I thought. Closed the space around CR7, bottled up the channels and deserved a result Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on February 13, 2013, 09:54:37 PM De Gea was brilliant tonight Tactically brilliant in the second half from SAF, I thought. Closed the space around CR7, bottled up the channels and deserved a result Yeah, Fergie often roundly criticised for his tactics in Europe def got it right today Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MANTIS01 on February 14, 2013, 01:07:23 AM De Gea was in his back yard playing spanish football again so looked quality (apart from one weird save where he used spaghetti legs instead of hands). Don't think there's any question he's a good goalie, the potential issue is his physicality in the english game.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 14, 2013, 08:07:44 AM Casillas, Buffon, Reina, cech, hart, Neuer to name but a few. World beaters from very early on. There's an even longer list of keepers who came into their prime later in life, if you picked out the above names (and I don't agree with them all), then you clearly don't need me to type them all. Of course keepers peak later - that wasn't the argument. The point is in the modern game that the best rarely become great later if they weren't already excellent by the early/mid 20's. You cant change the criteria to "peaked later" half way through an argument to suit. I'm hardly changing my argument, peak, become great, already one of the top keeps in the world in some departments, however you want to try and win this argument, you can't, as I said look at all keepers, the greats made mistakes, and as for not ever being great, have you actually seen anything but those sad little videos made by bindippers who have very little to say now they've been made to eat all the words the used to brag with in the 80's. Pointless to argue with you when the blinkers are so clearly fixed on,, No, you are I'm afraid. He's not a "great" keeper. He's good. One of the better ones in the league. But never, ever great. Perhaps our definitions of "great" are miles apart. Lol, what are you on about, he's a GREAT shot stopper, and has other attributes that suggest he will become world class, if he isn't already. Seeing as you now support a small club, i'ts clear you get a kick from trying to pick at others, whilst you have some knowledge that's clear, it's not clear whether that knowledge is actually based on any facts other than your growing bitterness to a team and sport that's sucker punched you, I'd guess you are not from Liverpool, and would possibly have become a |Liverpool fan in the 80's? Why so bitter? We're discussing a keeper you think is world class and I don't. Not really cause to lower the tone is it? A Utd fan talking about fans from outside of Liverpool? Give me strength. For about the 8th time I rate him as a keeper. He's very good. For me, not world class, never going to be. It's only a opinion - although one shared by some of your own fans which obviously completely invalidates your point that I'm only trying to wind you up. Untwist those knickers and move on? Last nights performance should now end this debate, De Gea is world class, in fact after a bit of research he's better at his age statictically than any of the so called young world class keepers mentioned in this thread. The keepers you mentioned as world class, also did not play in the premier league, well except from Hart, but we know he's shit now. Last night also proved we can compete at the highest level, and that Fergie has not lost it. Not a bad nights work ;) Also the best banner ever. Manchester MUFC MDMA Both Magic! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 14, 2013, 08:14:55 AM As good a result as the majority of supporters could have hoped for. I still think that Madrid must be slight favs but we forget they are only 3rd in their league so are not to be feared. Really excited about the home leg
Thought Ronaldo showed some class with the lack of celebration from as good a headed goal as you will see. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 14, 2013, 04:13:11 PM As good a result as the majority of supporters could have hoped for. I still think that Madrid must be slight favs but we forget they are only 3rd in their league so are not to be feared. Really excited about the home leg Thought Ronaldo showed some class with the lack of celebration from as good a headed goal as you will see. 2-2 would have been better, or 3-3 and it could easily have been either of those. De Gea did all that was asked of him, the instinctive save with his foot at the near post was reminiscent of Scmeichel. The Ronaldo goal brought back memories... He used to play for us you know. We were privileged to have had him and I expect him to get a warm reception at OT before and after the second leg. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on February 14, 2013, 04:32:47 PM As good a result as the majority of supporters could have hoped for. I still think that Madrid must be slight favs but we forget they are only 3rd in their league so are not to be feared. Really excited about the home leg Thought Ronaldo showed some class with the lack of celebration from as good a headed goal as you will see. 2-2 would have been better, or 3-3 and it could easily have been either of those. De Gea did all that was asked of him, the instinctive save with his foot at the near post was reminiscent of Scmeichel. The Ronaldo goal brought back memories... He used to play for us you know. We were privileged to have had him and I expect him to get a warm reception at OT before and after the second leg. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on February 14, 2013, 04:38:30 PM I don't think one performance, however good or bad it is, really proves all that much. I still think De Gea is a good keeper with a lot of promise and I still think Hart is a good keeper who's very overrated. Shay Given was as good a shot stopper as you'll ever see, he was never a World Class keeper though.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on February 14, 2013, 04:47:28 PM I don't think one performance, however good or bad it is, really proves all that much. I still think De Gea is a good keeper with a lot of promise and I still think Hart is a good keeper who's very overrated. Shay Given was as good a shot stopper as you'll ever see, he was never a World Class keeper though. both good goal keepers ! Hart at the moment still better but not by much but time can change things as de gea still a spring chicken ! Think Hart is rated exactly where he is as the best English goalkeeper England have ! As to say he is overrated is a bit baffling as Mancini nor Hart himself have ever expressed being the best goalkeeper in the world?If anything Mancini as been highly critical of him in the past an yet to hear rumours of any of the big clubs abroad ever showing any interest in buying him ! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on February 14, 2013, 04:59:58 PM I don't think one performance, however good or bad it is, really proves all that much. I still think De Gea is a good keeper with a lot of promise and I still think Hart is a good keeper who's very overrated. Shay Given was as good a shot stopper as you'll ever see, he was never a World Class keeper though. both good goal keepers ! Hart at the moment still better but not by much but time can change things as de gea still a spring chicken ! Think Hart is rated exactly where he is as the best English goalkeeper England have ! As to say he is overrated is a bit baffling as Mancini nor Hart himself have ever expressed being the best goalkeeper in the world?If anything Mancini as been highly critical of him in the past an yet to hear rumours of any of the big clubs abroad ever showing any interest in buying him ! I was more referring to fans and pundits, a lot of who say he's World Class when he's just not, I've said this for a long time and not just due to recent poor form. He's regularly talked about in the same group as the very best by the media and pundits which is pretty ridic. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Skgv on February 14, 2013, 05:47:47 PM I don't think one performance, however good or bad it is, really proves all that much. I still think De Gea is a good keeper with a lot of promise and I still think Hart is a good keeper who's very overrated. Shay Given was as good a shot stopper as you'll ever see, he was never a World Class keeper though. both good goal keepers ! Hart at the moment still better but not by much but time can change things as de gea still a spring chicken ! Think Hart is rated exactly where he is as the best English goalkeeper England have ! As to say he is overrated is a bit baffling as Mancini nor Hart himself have ever expressed being the best goalkeeper in the world?If anything Mancini as been highly critical of him in the past an yet to hear rumours of any of the big clubs abroad ever showing any interest in buying him ! I was more referring to fans and pundits, a lot of who say he's World Class when he's just not, I've said this for a long time and not just due to recent poor form. He's regularly talked about in the same group as the very best by the media and pundits which is pretty ridic. I am an admirer of Joe hart an isn't this sport great as everyone opinion is different so maybe let's give these young goalkeepers another 5 years then judge on what they have achieved! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 15, 2013, 01:06:51 PM One of the best ever
see how many he catches... particularly the second one on the vid YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9fp4aD3X-E Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on February 15, 2013, 02:55:33 PM Does he really mean "I want to see what Fergies doing, maybe a year off before I start at OT"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21473409 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on February 18, 2013, 09:57:50 PM Prediction:
Welbeck, Young and Cleverley will have been sold by Man United before the start of 2014-15 season. Simply not good enough to play for United. RVP and Carrick are papering over an awful lot this season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on February 18, 2013, 10:00:01 PM Welbeck is really great all round striker, plays so well away from home too. Don't think he will go anywhere.
Pretty sad about young, last season he was amazing in spells. Cleverly I'm not so sure about, think its close. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on February 18, 2013, 10:09:48 PM The idea that this United team is as good (or better!) than the team of 99 is an absolute joke and an insult to a great line up
RVP is the only certainty to get in the team, Vidic might have a chance while Rooney and Carrick (that midfield was one of the best ever though) would have a small squeak of getting in. That's it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: corkeye on February 18, 2013, 10:19:50 PM Quote RVP and Carrick are papering over an awful lot this season. Love how people love to pick faults at utd at every opportunity, even when they are getting the results, Ur forgetting about evra, giggs, Valencia, and wellbeck is class Squads very good ATM and pivotal players are in good form. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on February 18, 2013, 10:20:33 PM I really dont rate rooney at all
he is good but he isnt amazing i hope he hasnt peaked yet agree with camel tho RE 99 squad maybe the current squad is better in terms of depth but the 99 first 11 was v gooooood Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on February 18, 2013, 10:22:04 PM Quote RVP and Carrick are papering over an awful lot this season. Love how people love to pick faults at utd at every opportunity, even when they are getting the results, Ur forgetting about evra, giggs, Valencia, and wellbeck is class Squads very good ATM and pivotal players are in good form. really? personally I think the prem being in a pretty bad state has helped man utd alot Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 18, 2013, 10:27:48 PM Prediction: Welbeck, Young and Cleverley will have been sold by Man United before the start of 2014-15 season. Simply not good enough to play for United. RVP and Carrick are papering over an awful lot this season. Last year a lot of people considered Carrick 'simply not good enough to play for United' I disagree on Cleverley and Welbeck for sure, and reserve judgement on Young. Comparisons with 99 are ridiculous, but bear in mind that the 99 season saw a lot less rotation. 8 players started 40 games plus and the squad was definitely shallower than it is now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 18, 2013, 11:32:22 PM I don't think one performance, however good or bad it is, really proves all that much. I still think De Gea is a good keeper with a lot of promise and I still think Hart is a good keeper who's very overrated. Shay Given was as good a shot stopper as you'll ever see, he was never a World Class keeper though. both good goal keepers ! Hart at the moment still better but not by much but time can change things as de gea still a spring chicken ! Think Hart is rated exactly where he is as the best English goalkeeper England have ! As to say he is overrated is a bit baffling as Mancini nor Hart himself have ever expressed being the best goalkeeper in the world?If anything Mancini as been highly critical of him in the past an yet to hear rumours of any of the big clubs abroad ever showing any interest in buying him ! I was more referring to fans and pundits, a lot of who say he's World Class when he's just not, I've said this for a long time and not just due to recent poor form. He's regularly talked about in the same group as the very best by the media and pundits which is pretty ridic. Talking about Hart not De Gea ok, can we please remove any further discussion of مدينة citeh this is a MUFC thread is it not. TY Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 18, 2013, 11:53:16 PM The squad we have now, i comparison to the squad in 99 does IMHO have a fair few simmilarities, both in the depth and the blend of youth and experience. Going to try and avaoid too many mentions of the Gazier scumbags, but it's clear we don't have the buying power to match what we could compared to other teams back in 99.
With regards to the youngsters (Cleverly, Wellback, Jones, Smalling, De Gea to name a few), they have amazing potential, and are already good enough to compete at the highest level in the UK, and developing beyond expectations. In Rafael we have one of the most exciting right backs in the world, Hernandez, clinical, and a real team player, Nick Powell another, and some real talent developing below them. Anyone who dismisses what Rooney can do on a football pitch as anything but world class needs their head wobbling, and I could go on. This squad has the potential to eclipse anything any other United squad has achieved, and that's all whilst we have to contine to fear how much money the Glaziers will continue to basically steal from our club. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on February 18, 2013, 11:56:22 PM The squad we have now, i comparison to the squad in 99 does IMHO have a fair few simmilarities, both in the depth and the blend of youth and experience. Going to try and avaoid too many mentions of the Gazier scumbags, but it's clear we don't have the buying power to match what we could compared to other teams back in 99. With regards to the youngsters (Cleverly, Wellback, Jones, Smalling, De Gea to name a few), they have amazing potential, and are already good enough to compete at the highest level in the UK, and developing beyond expectations. In Rafael we have one of the most exciting right backs in the world, Hernandez, clinical, and a real team player, Nick Powell another, and some real talent developing below them. Anyone who dismisses what Rooney can do on a football pitch as anything but world class needs their head wobbling, and I could go on. This squad has the potential to eclipse anything any other United squad has achieved, and that's all whilst we have to contine to fear how much money the Glaziers will continue to basically steal from our club. LOL It's their club, not yours. They aren't stealing what's theirs. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on February 19, 2013, 12:05:16 AM The squad we have now, i comparison to the squad in 99 does IMHO have a fair few simmilarities, both in the depth and the blend of youth and experience. Going to try and avaoid too many mentions of the Gazier scumbags, but it's clear we don't have the buying power to match what we could compared to other teams back in 99. With regards to the youngsters (Cleverly, Wellback, Jones, Smalling, De Gea to name a few), they have amazing potential, and are already good enough to compete at the highest level in the UK, and developing beyond expectations. In Rafael we have one of the most exciting right backs in the world, Hernandez, clinical, and a real team player, Nick Powell another, and some real talent developing below them. Anyone who dismisses what Rooney can do on a football pitch as anything but world class needs their head wobbling, and I could go on. This squad has the potential to eclipse anything any other United squad has achieved, and that's all whilst we have to contine to fear how much money the Glaziers will continue to basically steal from our club. LOL It's their club, not yours. They aren't stealing what's theirs. You are a client. A customer. Welcome to football in the 2010's Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 19, 2013, 12:09:00 AM The squad we have now, i comparison to the squad in 99 does IMHO have a fair few simmilarities, both in the depth and the blend of youth and experience. Going to try and avaoid too many mentions of the Gazier scumbags, but it's clear we don't have the buying power to match what we could compared to other teams back in 99. With regards to the youngsters (Cleverly, Wellback, Jones, Smalling, De Gea to name a few), they have amazing potential, and are already good enough to compete at the highest level in the UK, and developing beyond expectations. In Rafael we have one of the most exciting right backs in the world, Hernandez, clinical, and a real team player, Nick Powell another, and some real talent developing below them. Anyone who dismisses what Rooney can do on a football pitch as anything but world class needs their head wobbling, and I could go on. This squad has the potential to eclipse anything any other United squad has achieved, and that's all whilst we have to contine to fear how much money the Glaziers will continue to basically steal from our club. LOL It's their club, not yours. They aren't stealing what's theirs. OBV. Doesn't mean we have to lie down and take it, lol. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 19, 2013, 12:12:30 AM The squad we have now, i comparison to the squad in 99 does IMHO have a fair few simmilarities, both in the depth and the blend of youth and experience. Going to try and avaoid too many mentions of the Gazier scumbags, but it's clear we don't have the buying power to match what we could compared to other teams back in 99. With regards to the youngsters (Cleverly, Wellback, Jones, Smalling, De Gea to name a few), they have amazing potential, and are already good enough to compete at the highest level in the UK, and developing beyond expectations. In Rafael we have one of the most exciting right backs in the world, Hernandez, clinical, and a real team player, Nick Powell another, and some real talent developing below them. Anyone who dismisses what Rooney can do on a football pitch as anything but world class needs their head wobbling, and I could go on. This squad has the potential to eclipse anything any other United squad has achieved, and that's all whilst we have to contine to fear how much money the Glaziers will continue to basically steal from our club. LOL It's their club, not yours. They aren't stealing what's theirs. You are a client. A customer. Welcome to football in the 2010's Wrong, not paid a dime since they 'bought' or borrowed us with others money, and yeah football's a differnet game clearly, but you should get to some Non league games and see it's still our as in the peoples game. Money will come and go, football fans the world over know that. Not going to argue on a forum where betting is more important than the game, but you're wroong, that's all. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on February 19, 2013, 12:16:20 AM The squad we have now, i comparison to the squad in 99 does IMHO have a fair few simmilarities, both in the depth and the blend of youth and experience. Going to try and avaoid too many mentions of the Gazier scumbags, but it's clear we don't have the buying power to match what we could compared to other teams back in 99. With regards to the youngsters (Cleverly, Wellback, Jones, Smalling, De Gea to name a few), they have amazing potential, and are already good enough to compete at the highest level in the UK, and developing beyond expectations. In Rafael we have one of the most exciting right backs in the world, Hernandez, clinical, and a real team player, Nick Powell another, and some real talent developing below them. Anyone who dismisses what Rooney can do on a football pitch as anything but world class needs their head wobbling, and I could go on. This squad has the potential to eclipse anything any other United squad has achieved, and that's all whilst we have to contine to fear how much money the Glaziers will continue to basically steal from our club. LOL It's their club, not yours. They aren't stealing what's theirs. You are a client. A customer. Welcome to football in the 2010's Wrong, not paid a dime since they 'bought' or borrowed us with others money, and yeah football's a differnet game clearly, but you should get to some Non league games and see it's still our as in the peoples game. Money will come and go, football fans the world over know that. Not going to argue on a forum where betting is more important than the game, but you're wroong, that's all. I go to plenty of lower league and non league games every season tyvm. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on February 19, 2013, 04:45:30 AM I worry that I will start to like the glazers it's wierd I dislike the way they have gone about things but they are very savvy business men and I don't think we would have spent much more if it was still a club in the fans hands. Since they have come in the club has almost doubled in value. We are still winning trophies and still the best team in England. It's hard to catch barca and the minute but they have this guy called messi and players like that don't come around to often. We have still spent money on players. It hard for me to say I like the glaziers but I sure do feel comfortable at the minute I would rather the glaziers then some rich guy using our club as a play thing!
We have squad stability, we are financially stable and we are the best team England and definitely top 4 in Europe. Apart from the ticket prices going sky high the glaziers are doing ok at the minute. I've mentally prepared to be flamed! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 19, 2013, 08:10:01 AM Lest we forget...
Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 19, 2013, 09:15:02 AM Lest we forget... Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. That makes sense, what a sad man. So filled with hate we have no idea if he actually loves anything or anyone.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on February 19, 2013, 09:20:00 AM One of the best ever see how many he catches... particularly the second one on the vid YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9fp4aD3X-E Absolutely awesome goalkeeper, completely agree. But he's not catching as much as the standard goalkeeper now with the new age footballs. They move in the air, bounce from your hands before you have much of a chance to clasp if its hit with pace and the balls back then were slower and heavier. I do think today though, gk's are pre programmed to palm away and make mistakes doing so to shots that should hav been held onto. And btw, I am probably going to go to most of Palace's run in until the end of the season. Zaha is really coming into his own again and has got over his post England debut blues by the looks of it. He is only 20. The mind boggles. Watch the first match on the football league show on iplayer if u wanna see what he has been about. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 19, 2013, 09:46:48 AM Lest we forget... Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. That makes sense, what a sad man. So filled with hate we have no idea if he actually loves anything or anyone.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 19, 2013, 10:06:40 AM Lest we forget... Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. That makes sense, what a sad man. So filled with hate we have no idea if he actually loves anything or anyone.. I agree Jase, and I have a lot of respect for Keith too. I posted the quote because it amused me and because it does give some sense of perspective to Keith's critique of the current United squad. Probably a good thing that jackinbeat wasn't around to post on the early pages in this thread eh? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 19, 2013, 12:52:30 PM Lest we forget... Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. That makes sense, what a sad man. So filled with hate we have no idea if he actually loves anything or anyone.. It was a comment in jest about his hate of United, that's all. WHy is it personal from me, but when other give it it's fine, confused.com Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 19, 2013, 01:01:27 PM Lest we forget... Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. That makes sense, what a sad man. So filled with hate we have no idea if he actually loves anything or anyone.. It was a comment in jest about his hate of United, that's all. WHy is it personal from me, but when other give it it's fine, confused.com Trouble is it didn't read at all like it was banter or 'in jest'. It's been a struggle to get this thread onto a plane where we have reasoned debate about the qualities or otherwise of the team and the issues facing it. But generally it stays away from personal comments and vitriolic remarks and I accept my portion of blame for having reposted Keith's avowed dislike of our team but I trust that everyone appreciates that it was posted as a gentle dig and nothing more. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on February 19, 2013, 01:22:39 PM Lest we forget... Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. That makes sense, what a sad man. So filled with hate we have no idea if he actually loves anything or anyone.. It was a comment in jest about his hate of United, that's all. WHy is it personal from me, but when other give it it's fine, confused.com Trouble is it didn't read at all like it was banter or 'in jest'. It's been a struggle to get this thread onto a plane where we have reasoned debate about the qualities or otherwise of the team and the issues facing it. But generally it stays away from personal comments and vitriolic remarks and I accept my portion of blame for having reposted Keith's avowed dislike of our team but I trust that everyone appreciates that it was posted as a gentle dig and nothing more. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on February 19, 2013, 06:48:24 PM Lest we forget... Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. That makes sense, what a sad man. So filled with hate we have no idea if he actually loves anything or anyone.. It was a comment in jest about his hate of United, that's all. WHy is it personal from me, but when other give it it's fine, confused.com Trouble is it didn't read at all like it was banter or 'in jest'. It's been a struggle to get this thread onto a plane where we have reasoned debate about the qualities or otherwise of the team and the issues facing it. But generally it stays away from personal comments and vitriolic remarks and I accept my portion of blame for having reposted Keith's avowed dislike of our team but I trust that everyone appreciates that it was posted as a gentle dig and nothing more. Sigh. I thought it was quite obvious that those comments were a joke. From now on, I'll put a little smiley next to my jokes. To make it clear, I don't hate any football team or football player. Except Chelsea and John Terry. Obviously. ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on February 19, 2013, 07:51:00 PM Lest we forget... Before I start commenting on this thread, I'd like to let it be known that despite some sarcastic posts on their respective threads, I don't actually hate Leeds, Newcastle or Liverpool. But I really, really, really hate Man United. That makes sense, what a sad man. So filled with hate we have no idea if he actually loves anything or anyone.. It was a comment in jest about his hate of United, that's all. WHy is it personal from me, but when other give it it's fine, confused.com Trouble is it didn't read at all like it was banter or 'in jest'. It's been a struggle to get this thread onto a plane where we have reasoned debate about the qualities or otherwise of the team and the issues facing it. But generally it stays away from personal comments and vitriolic remarks and I accept my portion of blame for having reposted Keith's avowed dislike of our team but I trust that everyone appreciates that it was posted as a gentle dig and nothing more. Sigh. I thought it was quite obvious that those comments were a joke. From now on, I'll put a little smiley next to my jokes. To make it clear, I don't hate any football team or football player. Except Chelsea and John Terry. Obviously. ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on February 21, 2013, 12:51:12 AM Quote from: The Camel on February 18, 2013, 09:57:50 PM
Prediction: Welbeck, Young and Cleverley will have been sold by Man United before the start of 2014-15 season. Simply not good enough to play for United. RVP and Carrick are papering over an awful lot this season. Bold prediction... i'd be highly surprised if any of them will be sold in the next 2-3 years! It goes against United's ethos of building around a base of young-mid 20's English players. Young has had injuries this season but when he plays regularly is productive - he scored 8 goals last season from the wing. I agree he's never going to be top level but would view him as a good-very good Premier League player. He can play on either wing/behind the striker and is ideal for squad rotation. Cleverley and Welbeck are already decent players with high potential. Again, they're not going to reach the level of a Scholes/Rooney but are ideal for squad rotation, won't kick up a fuss if they're benched for a few games, and can play in various positions. Part of the reason for United's consistency this year is that they have a lot of players of this type in the good-very good range who are rotated, keeping the squad fresh, who don't mind playing 25-30 games per season... maintaining squad harmony. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on March 05, 2013, 03:29:22 PM Viva ronaldo. Running down the wing hear united sing viva ronaldo!
Bricking myself for tonight should be a great game but I will enjoy 0 minutes of it while in the pub tonight. Will be far to nervous and united will never ever make things easy! I hope ronaldo does not hurt u My prediction 2-1 united Rvp ronaldo and then the little pea in the 5th minute of fergie time! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on March 05, 2013, 08:00:15 PM The squad we have now, i comparison to the squad in 99 does IMHO have a fair few simmilarities, both in the depth and the blend of youth and experience. Going to try and avaoid too many mentions of the Gazier scumbags, but it's clear we don't have the buying power to match what we could compared to other teams back in 99. With regards to the youngsters (Cleverly, Wellback, Jones, Smalling, De Gea to name a few), they have amazing potential, and are already good enough to compete at the highest level in the UK, and developing beyond expectations. In Rafael we have one of the most exciting right backs in the world, Hernandez, clinical, and a real team player, Nick Powell another, and some real talent developing below them. Anyone who dismisses what Rooney can do on a football pitch as anything but world class needs their head wobbling, and I could go on. This squad has the potential to eclipse anything any other United squad has achieved, and that's all whilst we have to contine to fear how much money the Glaziers will continue to basically steal from our club. Rooney is good but only on occasions I don't think he has ever had an amazing season just good ones that's why I think he has never been world class Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 05, 2013, 08:58:36 PM Welbeck and Cleverley making light of Keith's assessment of their potential thus far tonight.
Rooney is good but only on occasions I don't think he has ever had an amazing season just good ones that's why I think he has never been world class rofl Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 05, 2013, 09:10:53 PM Joke decision
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 05, 2013, 09:20:36 PM Ref has ruined the most glamourous tie in England in years.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 05, 2013, 09:28:52 PM There's always one...
Dangerous foot but bananas decision. 35 minute sweat ahead... Clearly has eyes only on the ball. Ridic but pleasing decision Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: JK on March 05, 2013, 09:29:10 PM Ref has ruined the most glamourous tie in England in years. Exactly this. Spoilt the tie of the decade Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on March 05, 2013, 09:33:06 PM Obv not rubbing it in but that is one of the worst decisions I've ever seen, so unfair. Such a shame, totally ruined what was setup to be a great game.
Edit : After watching it again twenty times guess it wasn't that bad but think it certainly wasn't a red. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on March 05, 2013, 09:34:09 PM There's always one... probs more tbfDangerous foot but bananas decision. 35 minute sweat ahead... Clearly has eyes only on the ball. Ridic but pleasing decision Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Graham C on March 05, 2013, 09:36:04 PM :hello:
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on March 05, 2013, 09:38:58 PM This is potentially a great consolation after getting stuffed by Spurs.
Love that RM can bring on Modric and ManU get to bring on world class huffer puffer and Young. In fairness, I'm a true footie fan and I just want the best teams with the classiest players to win Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Graham C on March 05, 2013, 09:44:23 PM Real goalie has made some cracking saves
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 05, 2013, 09:49:17 PM #prayforarbeloa
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 05, 2013, 09:50:46 PM Fair do's Real were the better side
Once the referee evened it up Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: WPIL on March 05, 2013, 09:56:46 PM Jose, the best team did no win
One day I will be managing that team Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: WPIL on March 05, 2013, 09:57:50 PM And old Trafford was loud tonight, fair play
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: celtic on March 05, 2013, 09:58:24 PM Man utd fans seriously can't be disappointed with the red card.
Ferdinand was a disgrace at the end. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 05, 2013, 09:59:54 PM Jesus - Roy Keane going mental saying it was a red. wtf is going on?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Cf on March 05, 2013, 10:02:09 PM Don't think there can really be any complaints about the red. His studs have hit someone at chest height.
Ferdinand should face some sort of punishment for his display towards the ref at the end. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on March 05, 2013, 10:04:03 PM Jesus - Roy Keane going mental saying it was a red. wtf is going on? He's like a United version of Tony Adams - seem to enjoy problems at, and rarely seem to have good things to say about, their old clubs. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: rfgqqabc on March 05, 2013, 10:04:51 PM Mourinho's next english job is the united one? 5/2 when Chelsea are 5/6. Can't be having that.
He loves the club. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on March 05, 2013, 10:06:18 PM Thought it was a red.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on March 05, 2013, 10:07:03 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on March 05, 2013, 10:08:42 PM Th
I didn't think it was, but agreeing with Keane after. Gutted for Man Utd. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2013, 12:02:40 AM Robbed. United were the best I've seen for a while in Europe. Good signs for
The future Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: GreekStein on March 06, 2013, 06:18:52 AM Lol man united fans, how does it feel to have the first bit of unfair reffing go against you in the last gazillion years?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2013, 08:36:12 AM Lol man united fans, how does it feel to have the first bit of unfair reffing go against you in the last gazillion years? Not good Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: GreekStein on March 06, 2013, 08:39:16 AM Lol man united fans, how does it feel to have the first bit of unfair reffing go against you in the last gazillion years? Not good i was asking united fans. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: smashedagain on March 06, 2013, 10:20:18 AM Lol man united fans, how does it feel to have the first bit of unfair reffing go against you in the last gazillion years? Not good i was asking united fans. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on March 06, 2013, 10:27:45 AM (http://i45.tinypic.com/34oqxhy.gif)
found this hilarious. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2013, 11:40:43 AM Lol man united fans, how does it feel to have the first bit of unfair reffing go against you in the last gazillion years? Not good i was asking united fans. U must be one now you're in Asia Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 06, 2013, 11:45:37 AM Lol man united fans, how does it feel to have the first bit of unfair reffing go against you in the last gazillion years? Not good i was asking united fans. Didn't see any intent. If he gets the ball down, as he can there, he looks a star. But Arbeloa managed to make a lot of ground and to arrive at the wrong moment. Would we win if Nani isn't sent off? Possibly. RM were always likely to score at least one and even with eleven vs eleven it's squeaky bum time. Could we win once Nani was sent off? Almost certainly not. Should he have been sent off? Probably not. Keane seems to be a pretty lone voice in saying yes. We move on. Chelsea on Sunday and the league to secure, hopefully that can be confirmed on April 6th or in the week before. Would soften the blow to have City there when we're crowned. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on March 06, 2013, 12:00:58 PM The amount of fuss over what is a 50/50 decision is absurd. God forbid if they actually got cheated blatantly out of something..
i.e the ref was so bent he was then banned for life after the Champions league final aka Leeds vs B Munich :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MANTIS01 on March 06, 2013, 12:08:47 PM What Roy Keane said was a joke. Think the other pundits thought so to but were too afraid to say. Nani goes up to control the ball and Arbeloa runs into his outstrectched leg from the blind side causing a collision. Nani's boot contacts the underside of Arbeloa's arm who unsurprisingly goes down clutching his chest like he's having a heart attack. This is just normal football where two players challenge for the ball and there is a collision. Far too much ambiguity for any firm conclusions to be drawn. So during one of the most finely poised glamour ties in European football in recent years under the floodlights and cauldron of noise at Old Trafford one guy gets to waddle over and spoil the game for everyone due to letter of the law. Please fuck off letter of the law.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Jon MW on March 06, 2013, 12:22:59 PM The amount of fuss over what is a 50/50 decision is absurd. God forbid if they actually got cheated blatantly out of something.. i.e the ref was so bent he was then banned for life after the Champions league final aka Leeds vs B Munich :) I'm pretty sure it's exactly the same amount of fuss that normally occurs from football people over dodgy decisions. Absurd yes, but not unusual. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on March 06, 2013, 12:36:06 PM Must admit I didnt have Nanny down as a dirty player till that
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2013, 01:05:20 PM Distinctly average Glenn. 24/100
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bobby1 on March 06, 2013, 01:37:52 PM according to the radio station I was listening to on my way back from the Huddersfield game they were making out it was some kind of huge mistake by the ref, one that was so bad Fergie was 'distraught'.
Got to see the pics and Nani kicked a guy in the chest and Fergie had the face on.....soap opera for big boys all round imo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 06, 2013, 01:46:18 PM according to the radio station I was listening to on my way back from the Huddersfield game they were making out it was some kind of huge mistake by the ref, one that was so bad Fergie was 'distraught'. Got to see the pics and a guy ran into Nani's foot and Fergie had the face on.....soap opera for big boys all round imo. fyp Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bobby1 on March 06, 2013, 01:56:46 PM it's either a yellow or red card, on this occasion the ref chose red. Happens somewhere every week David. Manager is miffed by decision, standard happening almost every game. It will even out, if they play to about the year 2215 that is and get one of those decisions against them every game..... the Man Utd fans acting like its a travesty are way ool, bad refereeing decisions happen to most of their opponents when Man Utd play them, get a supposed one against them and its ridic/bent/unfair.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2013, 02:00:58 PM Thing is it shouldn't be a yellow or a red. That's never a sending off. Would be saying the same had it been any team.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 06, 2013, 02:03:06 PM Don't think so George, definitely a card. Yellow for most, red ocasionally. Foot very high, and he has connected
Seen reds given for very similar. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bobby1 on March 06, 2013, 02:21:45 PM Don't think so George, definitely a card. Yellow for most, red ocasionally. Foot very high, and he has connected Seen reds given for very similar. this really. it has to be a card for dangerous play. It's either yellow or red, on this occasion it was red. That decision is made in numerous games every week. The thinking that he isn't looking at the guy so it isn't a foul is madness, if you swing your elbow around jumping for a header and hit a guy you cannot see square on the nose it is a foul and a card. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2013, 02:22:28 PM Sorry yeh Deffo a yellow never a red
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BigAdz on March 06, 2013, 02:25:00 PM Even Eamonn Holmes agreed it was a red, and he is as red as Fergies nose.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MANTIS01 on March 06, 2013, 03:08:19 PM How is an overhead bicycle kick a legal part of the game then? In the box there will be plenty of players around and your high flying boot could endanger opponents. If you try and score but catch your oppo on the arm it's a red?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bobby1 on March 06, 2013, 03:21:57 PM didnt peter crouch knock a guy out in a recent Stoke game attempting one?
The oppos were all pointing at him on the floor and I dont think he even got a card. So i cant really argue with your point tbh other than its a daft anomoly that you can kick a guy attempting an ovethead kick and not get done for dangerous play but its football innit. They are still playing by rules/ officiating/ using the same technology as they were in the year dot. Two anomolies that annoy me are when a team have a free kick near the box and one of their playets stands on the end of the wall and the just pushes/ pulls the guy on the end of the wall away to create a gap for the free kick taker to shoot thru. I remember seeing bryan robson do thst a number if times for both wba and man utd years ago. Would be a foul everywhere on the pitch except for when it helps create a goalscoring chance. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 06, 2013, 03:27:25 PM these were both given as reds "in game" , rescinded afterwards
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BErs6rvCEAAR8Np.jpg:large) Eboue at Old Trafford in 08 was another one, not rescinded (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BErwZiDCQAA33Wm.jpg:large) I think yellow was correct, but its not the terrible mistake some imply imo Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheChipPrince on March 06, 2013, 03:31:45 PM Thoughts on fergie not reacting to the sending off with a quick sub?
Was simply dropping Welbeck deeper enough? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MPOWER on March 06, 2013, 03:35:58 PM Made me chuckle
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-21687292 Regards M Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on March 06, 2013, 03:36:33 PM Thoughts on fergie not reacting to the sending off with a quick sub? Was simply dropping Welbeck deeper enough? I don't think there is much he could have done. Sending on a sub would have probably brought on just as much pressure. He had tactics spot on until the sending off Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 06, 2013, 03:37:52 PM Agree that SAF had it tactically right last night. Defensively very solid, Welbeck was terrific when put on Alonso when Madrid had possession
Very unlucky result all round really. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheChipPrince on March 06, 2013, 03:42:01 PM FWIW I would have hooked RVP off straight after it, get Rooney running around like a maniac deeper, even making a 4-5-0, anything to stop Alonso and then Modric getting on the ball.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 06, 2013, 03:55:59 PM FWIW I would have hooked RVP off straight after it, get Rooney running around like a maniac deeper, even making a 4-5-0, anything to stop Alonso and then Modric getting on the ball. It was 1-1 on agg so if they had done this they had roughly 65 minutes (to full time and extra time) to hold without an outlet ball playing no one up? You might be right, but I reckon SAF realised that most likely he would have to score again Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on March 06, 2013, 04:01:09 PM FWIW I would have hooked RVP off straight after it, get Rooney running around like a maniac deeper, even making a 4-5-0, anything to stop Alonso and then Modric getting on the ball. It was 1-1 on agg so if they had done this they had roughly 65 minutes (to full time and extra time) to hold without an outlet ball playing no one up? You might be right, but I reckon SAF realised that most likely he would have to score again It was 2-1 ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on March 06, 2013, 04:15:14 PM The sending off happened when it was 1-0.
SAF knew he was in deep trouble if Madrid did get back in the game so quickly, which they did. No way he could play with out attacking intent. They looked so comfortable at 1-0 too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 06, 2013, 04:45:08 PM Roy Keane
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/9912777/Roy-Keanes-compelling-critique-of-Nanis-red-card-shows-he-has-finally-come-of-age-as-a-pundit.html#disqus_thread Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 07, 2013, 09:31:13 AM Apparently, the fact that SAF preferred vanPersie to Rooney up front on Wednesday, and Nani on the left wing is a sign that he's for sale this summer.
Nothing to do with vanPersie being the better option and Nani being way faster and sharper as a winger There may be truth in the stories though. Rooney isn't the first name on the teamsheet these days and isn't producing with the consistency he used to. Not training well either apparently, plus SAF does have history for moving players on whem he deems it appropriate. Think he'd go back to Everton and we could get Leighton Baines? :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dry em on March 07, 2013, 01:15:54 PM Roy Keane http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/9912777/Roy-Keanes-compelling-critique-of-Nanis-red-card-shows-he-has-finally-come-of-age-as-a-pundit.html#disqus_thread I actually found that part of the broadcast quite uncomfortable viewing. Came over as a bully who wouldn't let anyone else have their say. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: GreekStein on March 07, 2013, 01:25:59 PM Roy Keane http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/9912777/Roy-Keanes-compelling-critique-of-Nanis-red-card-shows-he-has-finally-come-of-age-as-a-pundit.html#disqus_thread I actually found that part of the broadcast quite uncomfortable viewing. Came over as a bully who wouldn't let anyone else have their say. there are several people like that ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on March 10, 2013, 12:31:53 PM We lost a coin flip basically, apologies i'm so late into this one, but Africa moves slowly..
Can't really say much more, the ref made a snap judgement, and on review it was the wrong one, it did ruin the game as a fair contest, and SAF is right to be angry, he's the manager ffs. Keano actually made some good points, and whovever said he acted like a bully is wrong, he's having to argue against 3 or 4 other people. No complaints about the performance of United, everyone gave their all and we were all robbed of a fair result, well robbed is a bit unfair on the ref, who had to make a decision on the spot. Let's see how much mettle we have today, Chelsea could be in for a major backlash, that's if they don't park the bus and actually try and play some entertaining football. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 19, 2013, 11:57:45 AM Sadly the dream scenario of securing the title at home vs City on April 8th can't happen now.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on March 21, 2013, 12:35:15 AM Hi guys
What's everyone's thoughts on the way Paul Pogba left? Could/should we have done more to keep him pre-emptively by playing him more? 5 goals in 21 league games for Juventus so far this season, getting games in what is clearly a strong Juventus midfield. Given our central midfield has been one of our weaker areas for the last couple of years it's so frustrating to watch a just turned 20 year old midfielder with as much potential for anyone in his age group going to a major European rival on a free. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on March 21, 2013, 06:19:17 PM Hi guys What's everyone's thoughts on the way Paul Pogba left? Could/should we have done more to keep him pre-emptively by playing him more? 5 goals in 21 league games for Juventus so far this season, getting games in what is clearly a strong Juventus midfield. Given our central midfield has been one of our weaker areas for the last couple of years it's so frustrating to watch a just turned 20 year old midfielder with as much potential for anyone in his age group going to a major European rival on a free. Never really rated him, but at his age he could still turn in to the kind of player we are crying out for, trust SAF knew what he was doing though, time will tell. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on March 21, 2013, 06:53:16 PM Hi guys What's everyone's thoughts on the way Paul Pogba left? Could/should we have done more to keep him pre-emptively by playing him more? 5 goals in 21 league games for Juventus so far this season, getting games in what is clearly a strong Juventus midfield. Given our central midfield has been one of our weaker areas for the last couple of years it's so frustrating to watch a just turned 20 year old midfielder with as much potential for anyone in his age group going to a major European rival on a free. Never really rated him, but at his age he could still turn in to the kind of player we are crying out for, trust SAF knew what he was doing though, time will tell. Had itchy feet and wanted to play regular. Saf didn't think he was ready yet time will tell Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on March 21, 2013, 06:54:11 PM really hope woy never selects rio again
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 21, 2013, 07:03:29 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on March 21, 2013, 07:36:12 PM Hi guys What's everyone's thoughts on the way Paul Pogba left? Could/should we have done more to keep him pre-emptively by playing him more? 5 goals in 21 league games for Juventus so far this season, getting games in what is clearly a strong Juventus midfield. Given our central midfield has been one of our weaker areas for the last couple of years it's so frustrating to watch a just turned 20 year old midfielder with as much potential for anyone in his age group going to a major European rival on a free. i still found it a bit bizarre how easily he was allowed to leave considering the lengths (ahem) you went to sign him in the first place no signs of any attitude issues so far at juve and he has done well to break into that midfield Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on March 21, 2013, 09:52:15 PM It may be the case they signed him at exactly the right point as he's developed rapidly over the past 6 months, probably wasn't quite ready last year, etc. It is ironic given the lengths we went to poach him to lose him in a similar way, can't have any gripes really!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on March 21, 2013, 09:57:18 PM It may be the case they signed him at exactly the right point as he's developed rapidly over the past 6 months, probably wasn't quite ready last year, etc. It is ironic given the lengths we went to poach him to lose him in a similar way, can't have any gripes really! glad you said that saw a lot of griping when he left saying juve stole him e.t.c not sure those people were aware of how he was "signed" in the first place Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on March 21, 2013, 10:19:07 PM football fans are notorious for their short/selective memories, lol. In a way I have respect for him, quite ballsy to turn SAF down and move to a new country, acclimatise, learn a new language, etc. Just wish he'd shown more patience as with Scholes being out for so long he'd have surely got his chance this season.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 21, 2013, 10:42:34 PM Michael Keane is going to be a really good player for you. Give it 18 months, just as Rio and Vidic are declining, and he'll be ready alongside Smalling or Phil Jones
Got real class. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on March 21, 2013, 10:58:07 PM Yes, apparently he's doing really well for Leicester this season. His brother Will seems a good prospect too, though he's had a bad injury. Would be great if they both make the grade.... I think the impact of having quality homegrown players coming through is still underestimated, mus be so much easier to build the right squad mentality and retain quality players long-term.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on March 26, 2013, 11:11:10 PM Prediction: Welbeck, Young and Cleverley will have been sold by Man United before the start of 2014-15 season. Simply not good enough to play for United. RVP and Carrick are papering over an awful lot this season. @stevefreeth65 Cleverley still sitting in my over-rated file along with Miranda and Mrs Browns Boys. The judges keep telling me he won't be there for long @nickgoff79 Welbeck must be the most improved player in England in the past six months. He's almost average now. The first guy is Bet365s chief football odds compiler, the second one does the same job for Coral. Not bad judges. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 26, 2013, 11:28:24 PM Prediction: Welbeck, Young and Cleverley will have been sold by Man United before the start of 2014-15 season. Simply not good enough to play for United. RVP and Carrick are papering over an awful lot this season. @stevefreeth65 Cleverley still sitting in my over-rated file along with Miranda and Mrs Browns Boys. The judges keep telling me he won't be there for long @nickgoff79 Welbeck must be the most improved player in England in the past six months. He's almost average now. The first guy is Bet365s chief football odds compiler, the second one does the same job for Coral. Not bad judges. Probably both good mathematicians anyway. edit: Wednesday, http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1579799-manchester-united-transfer-rumors-tom-cleverley-deserves-new-contract Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on March 28, 2013, 09:38:17 PM No doubt they're both good judges & in the know on these things, but SAF & Roy Hodgson aren't bad either. SAF has given both plenty of game time this season (Cleverley 27 total appearances, Wellbeck 33). Cleverley, arguably the player who needs to develop more, has already nearly doubled his previous season's appearances.
They're young, English, can play in several positions to a competent-good-occasionally very good level and never moan... I don't see any reason why we'd want to sell either of em, particularly given considerations like 'homegrown' player requirements with Champions League. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on April 23, 2013, 11:52:25 AM Love the fact that there's not been a single post on here for nearly a month. It's that sense of inevitability
20 English League Titles 13 Premier League Titles Not a vintage year by any stretch of the imagination for United, but job done, and the younger players in the squad will grow with the experiences of the past two seasons. I'm sure Man City, Chelsea and Arsenal will spend in the summer, Liverpool will continue to develop, and Spurs will need to hold onto Bale. I've got a feeling next season will be a cracker. Two welsh teams in the Prem League aswell, what is the world coming to ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 23, 2013, 02:24:38 PM Four more wins to secure the points record for a Premier League season; won 25 of their first 30 games (a record in itself) and title wrapped up with a month to spare.
Not bad for a side that many people dismiss as being 'sub-standard' Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeaveItYeah on April 27, 2013, 02:43:59 PM Love the fact that there's not been a single post on here for nearly a month. It's that sense of inevitability 20 English League Titles 13 Premier League Titles Couldn't put it better myself. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 29, 2013, 01:37:24 AM David de Gea chosen as goalkeeper in PFA Team of the Year...
No doubt those who were doubting him a few short months ago will be over shortly.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on April 29, 2013, 03:00:39 AM David de Gea chosen as goalkeeper in PFA Team of the Year... No doubt those who were doubting him a few short months ago will be over shortly.... Not really as if the Premier League is blessed with world class goalies... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 29, 2013, 10:46:52 AM David de Gea chosen as goalkeeper in PFA Team of the Year... No doubt those who were doubting him a few short months ago will be over shortly.... Not really as if the Premier League is blessed with world class goalies... Aaron, that's not a bad point in isolation, although the doubters all had Hart up there, but as a rebuff to the hordes who had it that de Gea would never amount to much his inclusion in a list voted for by his peers is pretty good Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 08, 2013, 07:12:47 AM Could we be at the end of an era?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/22444088 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 08, 2013, 08:19:05 AM End of an era doesn't even do it justice
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 08, 2013, 09:50:49 AM Jose pls
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on May 08, 2013, 09:52:17 AM Director of football tho
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on May 08, 2013, 10:14:48 AM Hopefully he has foregone another spin at the Champions League because Jose can be gotten at, and if they left it another year who knows what would be about...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 08, 2013, 11:28:25 AM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MANTIS01 on May 08, 2013, 11:37:27 AM Wow feels strange, like the queen dying. Amazing run in the modern game.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 08, 2013, 12:39:49 PM Only man for the job in my eyes Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on May 08, 2013, 12:41:08 PM Jose Mourinho will not be Ferguson's successor, senior sources say Moyes clear frontrunner. Story on PA wire
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on May 08, 2013, 01:28:23 PM moyes is huge fav (1/3)
not too sure if he is up for the job cos he doesnt have european experience and never had chunks to spend what he has done at everton is good but not too sure if he is Man u material Jose IMO (3/1) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on May 08, 2013, 01:37:18 PM Can only think Fergie is having a big input on his successor if it's Moyes, huge chance for him if it is.
Very unlikely that his achievements in the game will ever be repeated. ;hattip; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheDazzler on May 08, 2013, 01:45:56 PM The problem I see with Mourinho is that he doesn't play attractive football.
That and the fact he's an absolute nutter. I have a cheeky £2 on Laurent Blanc @ 219/1. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on May 08, 2013, 02:13:36 PM @eddietheshoe 1m
To celebrate Sir Alex #Ferguson's career, all Premier games this weekend will have a minute's applause in the 97th minute. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dubai on May 08, 2013, 02:25:46 PM moyes is huge fav (1/3) not too sure if he is up for the job cos he doesnt have european experience and never had chunks to spend what he has done at everton is good but not too sure if he is Man u material Jose IMO (3/1) In Moyes' 10 years, he has never won a game at Old Trafford, Emirates, Stamford Bridge or Anfield lol. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 08, 2013, 03:04:08 PM Only man for the job in my eyes ego bigger than is appropriate for the position; would want to build a new team too fast; doesn't play the United way Why do you want him? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on May 08, 2013, 03:08:35 PM Only man for the job in my eyes ego bigger than is appropriate for the position; would want to build a new team too fast; doesn't play the United way Why do you want him? Because of his ego! I would of liked him because he is a winner and entertaining. Looks like it is going to be Moyes though! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on May 08, 2013, 03:10:24 PM Only man for the job in my eyes ego bigger than is appropriate for the position; would want to build a new team too fast; doesn't play the United way Why do you want him? Doubt you'll find anyone with a bigger ego than Fergie Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 08, 2013, 03:13:13 PM Only man for the job in my eyes ego bigger than is appropriate for the position; would want to build a new team too fast; doesn't play the United way Why do you want him? Because of his ego! I would of liked him because he is a winner and entertaining. Looks like it is going to be Moyes though! He's entertaining when he talks to the media, we can enjoy that when he's back at Chelsea. I think that's a mistake if it happens btw, (http://www.desicomments.com/dc2/01/174036/1740361.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 08, 2013, 03:16:43 PM Only man for the job in my eyes ego bigger than is appropriate for the position; would want to build a new team too fast; doesn't play the United way Why do you want him? Doubt you'll find anyone with a bigger ego than Fergie But it manifests itself in a very different way. SAF could be proud of his creation, Jose would be starting the new season with Fergie's team, you think he'd handle that well? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on May 08, 2013, 03:21:02 PM Only man for the job in my eyes ego bigger than is appropriate for the position; would want to build a new team too fast; doesn't play the United way Why do you want him? Doubt you'll find anyone with a bigger ego than Fergie But it manifests itself in a very different way. SAF could be proud of his creation, Jose would be starting the new season with Fergie's team, you think he'd handle that well? Moyes is a horrible appointment. Mourrinho the obvious choice, but Klopp would have been the bold move. The team he's built at Dortmund is truly special and he obv loves his teams to play entertaining football. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 08, 2013, 03:25:32 PM Explain why Mourinho is the 'obvious' choice please.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on May 08, 2013, 03:29:00 PM Explain why Mourinho is the 'obvious' choice please. Because he's the best manager in world. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on May 08, 2013, 03:31:49 PM Only man for the job in my eyes ego bigger than is appropriate for the position; would want to build a new team too fast; doesn't play the United way Why do you want him? Because of his ego! I would of liked him because he is a winner and entertaining. Looks like it is going to be Moyes though! He's entertaining when he talks to the media, we can enjoy that when he's back at Chelsea. I think that's a mistake if it happens btw, It won't be very entertaining when he is winning everything in sight. I don't think Moyes is a mistake if it happens but I don't think its a very exciting move. Doesn't appear to have that little bit of something about him that gets me excited but then again I don't go to watch the manager :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheDazzler on May 08, 2013, 04:14:59 PM Something just doesn't sit right with me.
Why now? If it is Moyes, this is bad timing for Everton as they still have a bit to play for in the league. Also and this is most telling for me, BBC reported on May 5th, two days before the news of this leaked, 'Sir Alex Ferguson says he has no plans to quit as Manchester United manager after the club confirmed he will have surgery in the summer. Ferguson, 71, will have a hip operation but insists his plans are unaffected. "It's always difficult in football to be absolutely sure of the future because the game has a habit of tripping you up," said Ferguson. "I don't have any plans to walk away from what I believe will be something special and worth being around to see." "We will get better and if we apply ourselves in our normal fashion I see our 20th league title as nothing but the start of another decade of success. "Whether I will be here to oversee another decade of success remains to be seen. " http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22417105 And 2 days later, he's retiring????? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on May 08, 2013, 04:19:30 PM If they really dared, they'd go for Klopp.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: aaron1867 on May 08, 2013, 04:21:54 PM Sky News say on their app that they have already made a decision and would be announced in 48 hours.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on May 08, 2013, 04:26:40 PM Something just doesn't sit right with me. Why now? If it is Moyes, this is bad timing for Everton as they still have a bit to play for in the league. Also and this is most telling for me, BBC reported on May 5th, two days before the news of this leaked, 'Sir Alex Ferguson says he has no plans to quit as Manchester United manager after the club confirmed he will have surgery in the summer. Ferguson, 71, will have a hip operation but insists his plans are unaffected. "It's always difficult in football to be absolutely sure of the future because the game has a habit of tripping you up," said Ferguson. "I don't have any plans to walk away from what I believe will be something special and worth being around to see." "We will get better and if we apply ourselves in our normal fashion I see our 20th league title as nothing but the start of another decade of success. "Whether I will be here to oversee another decade of success remains to be seen. " http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22417105 And 2 days later, he's retiring????? I agree, maybe he's not well and it's being kept quiet ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on May 08, 2013, 04:54:49 PM Something just doesn't sit right with me. Why now? If it is Moyes, this is bad timing for Everton as they still have a bit to play for in the league. Also and this is most telling for me, BBC reported on May 5th, two days before the news of this leaked, 'Sir Alex Ferguson says he has no plans to quit as Manchester United manager after the club confirmed he will have surgery in the summer. Ferguson, 71, will have a hip operation but insists his plans are unaffected. "It's always difficult in football to be absolutely sure of the future because the game has a habit of tripping you up," said Ferguson. "I don't have any plans to walk away from what I believe will be something special and worth being around to see." "We will get better and if we apply ourselves in our normal fashion I see our 20th league title as nothing but the start of another decade of success. "Whether I will be here to oversee another decade of success remains to be seen. " http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22417105 And 2 days later, he's retiring????? I agree, maybe he's not well and it's being kept quiet ? possible that they want to move for the replacement *now* because they don't think they'll get him if *he* (assume: Moyes/Jose) signs somewhere else at end of season.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on May 08, 2013, 04:57:46 PM Something just doesn't sit right with me. Why now? If it is Moyes, this is bad timing for Everton as they still have a bit to play for in the league. Also and this is most telling for me, BBC reported on May 5th, two days before the news of this leaked, 'Sir Alex Ferguson says he has no plans to quit as Manchester United manager after the club confirmed he will have surgery in the summer. Ferguson, 71, will have a hip operation but insists his plans are unaffected. "It's always difficult in football to be absolutely sure of the future because the game has a habit of tripping you up," said Ferguson. "I don't have any plans to walk away from what I believe will be something special and worth being around to see." "We will get better and if we apply ourselves in our normal fashion I see our 20th league title as nothing but the start of another decade of success. "Whether I will be here to oversee another decade of success remains to be seen. " http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22417105 And 2 days later, he's retiring????? I agree, maybe he's not well and it's being kept quiet ? It was reported he was ready to retire last season until City won the league in the dying seconds. So hopefully it is not due to an illness. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on May 08, 2013, 04:59:00 PM Why Moyes makes sense to the men behind the pursestrings
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BJwOgM6CQAAVqNC.png:large) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on May 08, 2013, 04:59:51 PM Something just doesn't sit right with me. Why now? If it is Moyes, this is bad timing for Everton as they still have a bit to play for in the league. Also and this is most telling for me, BBC reported on May 5th, two days before the news of this leaked, 'Sir Alex Ferguson says he has no plans to quit as Manchester United manager after the club confirmed he will have surgery in the summer. Ferguson, 71, will have a hip operation but insists his plans are unaffected. "It's always difficult in football to be absolutely sure of the future because the game has a habit of tripping you up," said Ferguson. "I don't have any plans to walk away from what I believe will be something special and worth being around to see." "We will get better and if we apply ourselves in our normal fashion I see our 20th league title as nothing but the start of another decade of success. "Whether I will be here to oversee another decade of success remains to be seen. " http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22417105 And 2 days later, he's retiring????? I agree, maybe he's not well and it's being kept quiet ? possible that they want to move for the replacement *now* because they don't think they'll get him if *he* (assume: Moyes/Jose) signs somewhere else at end of season.. Those were the lines I was thinking along but not more so that Mourinho won't be available for a good few years if he left Madrid for Chelsea. Moyes......surely he is available at any point! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 08, 2013, 05:05:22 PM Explain why Mourinho is the 'obvious' choice please. Because he's the best manager in world. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DaveShoelace on May 08, 2013, 05:12:54 PM In before Operation Yewtree
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on May 08, 2013, 05:40:15 PM ........
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=T-rS1m1vF_k Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on May 08, 2013, 05:46:23 PM ........ http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=T-rS1m1vF_k Dunno why I watch these, yet to find a one that is the slightest bit funny. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on May 08, 2013, 05:54:52 PM ........ http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=T-rS1m1vF_k Dunno why I watch these, yet to find a one that is the slightest bit funny. usually agree but the paul nicholls cheltenham was brilliant Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on May 08, 2013, 05:55:30 PM Yeah and the one on full tilt was pretty hilarious too.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on May 08, 2013, 05:56:18 PM ........ http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=T-rS1m1vF_k Dunno why I watch these, yet to find a one that is the slightest bit funny. usually agree but the paul nicholls cheltenham was brilliant Only saw that the other day, definitely one of the best ones. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 08, 2013, 06:49:44 PM Only man for the job in my eyes ego bigger than is appropriate for the position; would want to build a new team too fast; doesn't play the United way Why do you want him? Doesn't seem to like youth players either. Does he fit the Utd ethos? The huge upside is Ronaldo may head back over. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: kinboshi on May 08, 2013, 08:50:26 PM Looks like it is indeed Moyes. Big shoes to fill.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on May 09, 2013, 12:02:22 AM Hopefully get baines and Fellini
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 09, 2013, 04:56:12 PM Welcome Mr Moyes. One things for sure, we live in interesting times.
If Jose goes to Chelsea I'd make them favourites for the title next year. Thoughts? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on May 09, 2013, 05:36:28 PM When discussing reasons for his resigning I was thinking, dangerous I know but...
Despite records etc it seems fair to say this isn't the greatest Utd side. If as I expect City pile lots more money into it and Chelsea get Mourinho back and also give him chunks to play with then, with or without Fergie, Man U would have very little chance of retaining the title since it seems very unlikely the Glazer's would also splash the cash. To suggest Moyes has a big job on his hands is pretty huge understatement. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on May 09, 2013, 08:10:18 PM Man united are in great shape IMO. Young players like jones/smallibg more experienced forward line on rvp, Hernandez, welbeck all very good and very different ie can adjust to different matches. Who knows about Rooney but i they sell him for 30m and get some world class midfielders then it wouldn't be a bad move.
V good. Young goalkeeper and Carrick in the middle absolutely bossing it week in week out. Rafael looks like one of the best right backs on the league, vidic getting fit. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on May 10, 2013, 12:29:46 PM Welcome Mr Moyes. One things for sure, we live in interesting times. If Jose goes to Chelsea I'd make them favourites for the title next year. Thoughts? Chelsea look like the best team in the league atm. As soon as (and it will happen) RVP gets injured, I genuinely think they'd struggle. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on May 10, 2013, 04:46:37 PM Welcome Mr Moyes. One things for sure, we live in interesting times. If Jose goes to Chelsea I'd make them favourites for the title next year. Thoughts? Chelsea look like the best team in the league atm. As soon as (and it will happen) RVP gets injured, I genuinely think they'd struggle. 100£ that man utd will finish above chelsea next season? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on May 10, 2013, 05:06:59 PM Welcome Mr Moyes. One things for sure, we live in interesting times. If Jose goes to Chelsea I'd make them favourites for the title next year. Thoughts? Chelsea look like the best team in the league atm. As soon as (and it will happen) RVP gets injured, I genuinely think they'd struggle. 100£ that man utd will finish above chelsea next season? obvs not at evens. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on May 10, 2013, 05:16:31 PM Welcome Mr Moyes. One things for sure, we live in interesting times. If Jose goes to Chelsea I'd make them favourites for the title next year. Thoughts? Chelsea look like the best team in the league atm. As soon as (and it will happen) RVP gets injured, I genuinely think they'd struggle. 100£ that man utd will finish above chelsea next season? obvs not at evens. what odds would you want? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 10, 2013, 05:26:26 PM Welcome Mr Moyes. One things for sure, we live in interesting times. If Jose goes to Chelsea I'd make them favourites for the title next year. Thoughts? Chelsea look like the best team in the league atm. As soon as (and it will happen) RVP gets injured, I genuinely think they'd struggle. 100£ that man utd will finish above chelsea next season? obvs not at evens. Evens more than fair Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 11, 2013, 10:25:36 AM Unfortunately Moyes is a very good appointment. With Fellaini added Utd could stroll themselves to 21.
The only concern in the European nights which are totally different but he'll learn quick enough. The side wouldn't have a great shout at the CL anyway next year (IMO) but a few years from now who knows. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 11, 2013, 05:53:03 PM Unfortunately Moyes is a very good appointment. With Fellaini added Utd could stroll themselves to 21. The only concern in the European nights which are totally different but he'll learn quick enough. The side wouldn't have a great shout at the CL anyway next year (IMO) but a few years from now who knows. QFT Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on May 11, 2013, 07:48:56 PM Welcome Mr Moyes. One things for sure, we live in interesting times. If Jose goes to Chelsea I'd make them favourites for the title next year. Thoughts? Chelsea look like the best team in the league atm. As soon as (and it will happen) RVP gets injured, I genuinely think they'd struggle. 100£ that man utd will finish above chelsea next season? obvs not at evens. Evens more than fair United are 2/1 for the totle, Chelsea are 3/1. Evens is a lot less than fair Mr Loooooose. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on May 11, 2013, 09:06:46 PM Does anyone think he might go for jagielka and ship out injury prone vidic?
I'd love to see mirallas at united, top player. Adequate replacement for rooney. Really wish I put that bet on Belgium when I said I my mate four years ago they would be top 3 in world. Mirallas, fellaini, dembele, hazard, witsel, defour (sorry for derail), ridic midfield. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on May 11, 2013, 09:15:25 PM Kompany and lukaku too
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on May 11, 2013, 09:21:57 PM Kompany and lukaku too was just talking about the midfield......benteke, vermalaen, vertonghen, mignolet, alderwereild, courtois..... :Z Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on May 12, 2013, 02:51:56 AM Welcome Mr Moyes. One things for sure, we live in interesting times. If Jose goes to Chelsea I'd make them favourites for the title next year. Thoughts? Chelsea look like the best team in the league atm. As soon as (and it will happen) RVP gets injured, I genuinely think they'd struggle. 100£ that man utd will finish above chelsea next season? obvs not at evens. Evens more than fair United are 2/1 for the totle, Chelsea are 3/1. Evens is a lot less than fair Mr Loooooose. Thought I'd made some glaring error until you posted that ^^ Fwiw I think Moyes a great appt. can learn from fergie etc Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on May 12, 2013, 10:13:04 AM What do u guys think fergies best 11?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 12, 2013, 10:58:41 AM What do u guys think fergies best 11? Fuck off with that, it will make heads explode Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on May 12, 2013, 12:17:26 PM Big day today. Going to be emotional!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 12, 2013, 12:25:02 PM Schmeichel
G Neville Stam Bruce Irwin Ronaldo Keane Scholes Giggs Cantona Van Nistelrooy Bench: Van Der Sar, Ferdinand, Evra, Beckham, Ince, Rooney, Sjolskaer Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on May 12, 2013, 04:01:34 PM Given Swansea fans capital one cup winners flags, class
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rod on May 12, 2013, 07:18:02 PM Out of interest what are the expectations Man Utd fans now have for next season. Do you expect to win the league still?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 12, 2013, 07:50:47 PM Schmeichel G Neville Stam Bruce Irwin Ronaldo Keane Scholes Giggs Cantona Van Nistelrooy Bench: Van Der Sar, Ferdinand, Evra, Beckham, Ince, Rooney, Sjolskaer and there's the difficulty, no room for the man voted as the player's choice of best United player... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on May 12, 2013, 08:11:11 PM Schmeichel G Neville Stam Bruce Irwin Ronaldo Keane Scholes Giggs Cantona Van Nistelrooy Bench: Van Der Sar, Ferdinand, Evra, Beckham, Ince, Rooney, Sjolskaer and there's the difficulty, no room for the man voted as the player's choice of best United player... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: rfgqqabc on May 12, 2013, 08:32:43 PM Really Van Nistelrooy?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 12, 2013, 09:09:30 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 13, 2013, 03:17:44 PM Schmeichel G Neville Stam Bruce Irwin Ronaldo Keane Scholes Giggs Cantona Van Nistelrooy Bench: Van Der Sar, Ferdinand, Evra, Beckham, Ince, Rooney, Sjolskaer and there's the difficulty, no room for the man voted as the player's choice of best United player... Captain Marvel Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on May 14, 2013, 01:08:27 PM That Zaha isn't half bad.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 14, 2013, 03:40:21 PM Really Van Nistelrooy? Best striker we have had IMO. Shame he played when joses Chelsea were unstoppable Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 14, 2013, 03:47:31 PM Really Van Nistelrooy? Best striker we have had IMO. Shame he played when joses Chelsea were unstoppable Played in a golden era and had exceptional service from Beckham, not in same league as Sparky, or Denis Law, and not as complete a player as Rooney. Hughes and Rooney get the nod in an SAF team and Law obviously gets it in an all time United side. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on May 14, 2013, 03:51:34 PM hughes >>> ruud?
notsureifserious.jpg Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 14, 2013, 04:04:08 PM hughes >>> ruud? notsureifserious.jpg more goals, better goals, more important goals, and was doing it in a period when we weren't the dominant force YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBv-4mSUj4 YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WQ4LAr_THw Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 14, 2013, 04:25:33 PM Really Van Nistelrooy? Best striker we have had IMO. Shame he played when joses Chelsea were unstoppable Played in a golden era and had exceptional service from Beckham, not in same league as Sparky, or Denis Law, and not as complete a player as Rooney. Hughes and Rooney get the nod in an SAF team and Law obviously gets it in an all time United side. Don't get this "Complete" striker argument. He scored an amazing number of goals. All strikers get exceptional service at United. Not all had his strike rate and eye for goal Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 14, 2013, 04:39:35 PM Really Van Nistelrooy? Best striker we have had IMO. Shame he played when joses Chelsea were unstoppable Played in a golden era and had exceptional service from Beckham, not in same league as Sparky, or Denis Law, and not as complete a player as Rooney. Hughes and Rooney get the nod in an SAF team and Law obviously gets it in an all time United side. Don't get this "Complete" striker argument. He scored an amazing number of goals. All strikers get exceptional service at United. Not all had his strike rate and eye for goal were you a follower in the days of Hughes? Can you appreciate the importance of that goal against Oldham, or the brace against Barcelona in the Cup-Winners Cup? He was voted PFA Player of the Year 88-89, even though United finished 11th that season. Pretty sure that SAF would choose him over van Nistelroy too Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 14, 2013, 04:49:12 PM Yes I was a follower then. I understand Hughes was very good and extremely important but don't think he would play well up front with cantona :p
Mark Hughes was up there as one of the all time greats. Fucked off to man city and ruined it. Same as when ince went to Liverpool. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on May 14, 2013, 04:50:30 PM Yes I was a follower then. I understand Hughes was very good and extremely important but don't think he would play well up front with cantona :p Mark Hughes was up there as one of the all time greats. Fucked off to man city and ruined it. Same as when ince went to Liverpool. just as well schmeical didnt then, otherwise you end with massimo tiabi in your goal Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on May 14, 2013, 05:00:41 PM Yes I was a follower then. I understand Hughes was very good and extremely important but don't think he would play well up front with cantona :p Mark Hughes was up there as one of the all time greats. Fucked off to man city and ruined it. Same as when ince went to Liverpool. just as well schmeical didnt then, otherwise you end with massimo tiabi in your goal ;applause; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MPOWER on May 15, 2013, 07:18:32 PM Sir Alex Ferguson's hip replacement operation has been cancelled after a bladder problem was diagnosed after he pissed himself watching the F.A Cup Final.
Regards M Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on May 24, 2013, 08:36:48 PM beginning of the downfall?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22656047 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dewi_cool on May 24, 2013, 10:19:59 PM A tribute from a Liverpool fan to Sir ALex, worth reading
http://marksimonfrankland.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/an-anfield-tribute-to-dark-knight-of.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on July 15, 2013, 01:38:42 PM News that we have bid £25m for fabregas
Yes please Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on July 15, 2013, 01:56:07 PM News that we have bid £25m for fabregas Yes please I'd take that Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on July 15, 2013, 03:21:40 PM News that we have bid £25m for fabregas Yes please I'd take that Agree with the above but heard 3-4 weeks ago that Barcelona have no intention of selling him and see him as one of their main players in a couple of seasons. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on July 16, 2013, 09:02:52 AM not looking good for Rooney staying. Sigh, great player. I cant see London being a good thing for him thou
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on July 16, 2013, 11:05:52 PM not looking good for our barcalonian friend coming in either :(
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on July 16, 2013, 11:47:05 PM I reckon they'll end up settling for Fellaini, who to be fair would be a bloody good signing. Versatile and would make us extremely solid, lacks mobility though.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on July 17, 2013, 11:05:06 AM reasonably well sourced stories that Mourinho is offering £10m + Mata or Luiz for Rooney
You'd take Mata plus £10m wouldn't you? 25 assists last season, arguably better than Rooney without the cash adjustment? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on July 17, 2013, 12:43:50 PM Yeh great offer. Hopeful Chelsea come back with mata and hazard plus 8 million
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Alverton on July 17, 2013, 01:19:06 PM What a ridiculous offer, how can they turn it down? Feel there's more to it. Great for Man U. But I, (armchair and all) wouldn't straight swap Mata for Rooney let alone with another £10m.
I do love a good transfer saga though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on July 17, 2013, 01:22:52 PM Man U want Fabregas
Chelsea want Rooney Barcelona meant to want Mata/Luiz Three clubs should get a room, thrash it out Of those 4 players I'd want Mata first and foremost, I think. Mata's only 25yo too Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on July 17, 2013, 01:22:58 PM http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11661/8827852/Transfer-news-Chelsea-have-lodged-a-bid-for-Man-United-s-Wayne-Rooney
chelsea confirm bid, but no players offered in exchange. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on July 17, 2013, 01:24:24 PM Man U want Fabregas Chelsea want Rooney Barcelona meant to want Mata/Luiz Three clubs should get a room, thrash it out Of those 4 players I'd want Mata first and foremost, I think. Mata's only 25yo too Fabregas and Luiz are 26, Rooney 27 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on July 17, 2013, 01:28:28 PM Lol Chelsea! You paid £50m for Torres! Get that cash out!
Sell Rooney, buy ronaldo. Everyone happy Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: booder on July 17, 2013, 07:31:01 PM Breaking news.....
Rooney is to join Chelsea on Monday after wife Coleen agreed personal terms with John Terry. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sweet potata! on July 17, 2013, 08:35:43 PM Lol Chelsea! You paid £50m for Torres! Get that cash out! Sell Rooney, buy ronaldo. Everyone happy How much do you value Rooney at? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on July 18, 2013, 12:00:30 AM It's all a bit of a mess for United this... think they'd very likely sell him to a foreign club but seems suicidal to sell him to Chelsea, would very likely hand them the league. At the same time it's going to create so much destructive negativity if he's fetching for a move & it's in the media every day (which he clearly seems to be judging by the lack of communication with Moyes, public leaks of 'anger', etc). Not really what Moyes needs in his opening months in charge! When you look at how Arsenal have suffered in recent seasons with the RVP, Fabregas and Nasri transfer sagas it's not good. If he wants to go I'd let him and move forward as quickly as possible.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on July 18, 2013, 09:28:07 AM It's all a bit of a mess for United this... think they'd very likely sell him to a foreign club but seems suicidal to sell him to Chelsea, would very likely hand them the league. At the same time it's going to create so much destructive negativity if he's fetching for a move & it's in the media every day (which he clearly seems to be judging by the lack of communication with Moyes, public leaks of 'anger', etc). Not really what Moyes needs in his opening months in charge! When you look at how Arsenal have suffered in recent seasons with the RVP, Fabregas and Nasri transfer sagas it's not good. If he wants to go I'd let him and move forward as quickly as possible. Although I agree Moyes doesn't need the drama, and ideally we should off load aboard, and you would always sooner have a (happy) Rooney than not, we have bought Zaha, so providing we can buy a midfielder who knows what he is doing going forward (fellani, fabregas etc), I think we can afford to lose him from a team point of view. Id just sooner it wasn't to Chelsea. With any luck, if he goes to London he will go off the rails (purely meant in a footballing capacity, I wish him no harm) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on August 16, 2013, 01:20:05 AM From what I have seen of Zaha pre season and in the charity shield, I think he has been told to be much more of a passer and tame his flair for the sake of the team. So I think you might not see the most of him until he gets the balance right with you guys of when to pass and when to charge forward and take players on. He will be at his most fierce when counter attacking and given the freedom to take the man on.
I am excited about watching him for Man U next season and hopefully seeing him flourish into, eventually, an indispensable England player. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on August 16, 2013, 07:17:03 AM Like Ronaldo at the start of his career?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on August 16, 2013, 01:59:40 PM Like Ronaldo at the start of his career? Lol dunno if serious comment or sarcastic because of my comparisons to him before :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on August 17, 2013, 07:54:48 PM Think this picture tells a thousand stories The Man Utd team celebrate Van Persie's second (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BR5CUA-CAAAfAT4.jpg:large) don't sell him and let him rot in the reserves ! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on August 17, 2013, 08:00:56 PM Why let him rot in the reserves? Looked to be putting in effort when he was on the pitch despite not celebrating with the team.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on August 17, 2013, 08:44:23 PM I was doing a few other things whilst watching, but from what I saw he played pretty well when he came on.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on August 17, 2013, 08:59:26 PM because teams are about morale, shared success.
We are in a new era, we don't need a fat prick like Rooney acting like a 5 year old (I really like him as a footballer but can stand this kind of petulance) It just needs 1 high profile footballer to ruin his own career in his best years and others might think twice. Ruin his year, make him fat, make him miss the world cup. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on August 17, 2013, 09:12:06 PM I see what your saying, he appeared to be putting in the effort though during the game.
On the overweight subject, is Anderson carrying some extra weight or just a very well built fella? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on August 17, 2013, 09:13:50 PM I see what your saying, he appeared to be putting in the effort though during the game. On the overweight subject, is Anderson carrying some extra weight or just a very well built fella? I don't even think he is fat! just annoyed at him He can of course choose to do what he likes! Do it with dignity Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on August 17, 2013, 10:37:53 PM We've been privileged to have had the best of Rooney and it seems churlish to wish him ill now.
i thought he put in a good shift and was involved in both goals. i hope Moyes can persuade him to stay Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 17, 2013, 11:11:19 PM Im with David re churlishness (great word if it exists) but it's clear he wants to leave. Think he should allow Rooney to go but make it clear it won't be to one of our rivals
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on August 17, 2013, 11:37:53 PM Im with David re churlishness (great word if it exists) but it's clear he wants to leave. Think he should allow Rooney to go but make it clear it won't be to one of our rivals Agreed, he should sell him to Arsenal. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on August 18, 2013, 09:41:15 AM Moyes needs to stop talking about Manchester United in the third person and start using we and us. It's like he still can't believe he is the manager. Was fine at first, but he needs to get his feet under the desk
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on August 18, 2013, 05:17:17 PM Moyes needs to stop talking about Manchester United in the third person and start using we and us. It's like he still can't believe he is the manager. Was fine at first, but he needs to get his feet under the desk if Moyes' linguistic inclinations are the only problem Manchester United have then I'd say that this great club with such a glorious history is in good shape... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on August 19, 2013, 09:01:00 AM The fellani & baines story feels like a media sensation story to me.
That being said if we can get them for £45m then >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fabregas Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on August 24, 2013, 12:07:07 AM Nope, would take Fabregas > Baines + Fellaini in a heart beat... Fabregas is on a different level to Fellaini, a world class proven creative central midfielder. We clearly don't need Baines either, Evra has been excellent for the last 12 months or so. In effect, we'd be adding 2 strong squad players to an already strong squad, both very good players, but neither will make a substantial impact to our first 11 performance. Fabregas is the type of player you can build a (very good) team around, vastly under-rated.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on August 24, 2013, 08:13:34 AM Fabregas one of,if not the most overrated player in the world.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: curnow on August 24, 2013, 06:13:01 PM Quote David Moyes has claimed Everton's manager, Roberto Martínez, is holding back the careers of Marouane Fellaini and Leighton Baines by not allowing them to be sold to Manchester United. http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/aug/23/david-moyes-marouane-fellaini-leighton-baines?guni=Keyword:news-grid%20main-1%20EVERYDAY%20trailblock:Editable%20trailblock%20-%20news:Position2like whats wrong with the guy , got no right to talk about Everton players like that other thing Evra is a good defender but Baines created more scoring chances than any other player in Europe last season & thats why he is worth so much more than the idiots at Man U want to spend Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 24, 2013, 07:58:59 PM everton and martinez are desperate to sell baines n fellini they made the bid public and then acted shocked about the amount later in the week martinez is again saying its unsettling the players. could have just said no in private and moved on instead of going on about at ever opportunity. i would take fellaini but dont see the point in baines due to his age n cost when evras started to play well again last season after a ropey year or so. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on August 24, 2013, 10:33:51 PM Baines left wing pinging them in for rvp
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 24, 2013, 10:42:47 PM Not that impressed with Fellini. Would
Much rather have fab Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on August 25, 2013, 09:41:20 AM Let's just sell Rooney for 40m, go and buy Shaw from Southampton and Barkley from Everton and put up with the fact that if we win a trophy in the next few years it's a bonus.
Carry on developing the crop of youngsters we've got instead of flogging the majority for a few million when it's clear they will never break into the first team squad. Transfer fees are heavily inflated this summer, not a good time to be buying players for the sake of it, and unless we pull off a couple of monster World Class signings, the squad is not nearly good enough to compete with Chelsea and City. I think both United's owners and Arsenal's owners are of a similar opinion. Lot's of paper talk, but I'd be surprised if either actually pay big money for a marque signing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on August 25, 2013, 10:02:19 AM The FFP clubs and non-FFP clubs are somewhat aligned. Regardless of football rivalries. This much is true.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 25, 2013, 10:39:32 AM We mustn't sell Rooney to Chelsea. They'll just crucify us for years
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on August 25, 2013, 10:42:30 AM We mustn't sell Rooney to Chelsea. They'll just crucify us for years 40 mill for a player who doesn't want to be at the club is vvvvvvvvvv goodIMO I don't think he is worth that much Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 25, 2013, 10:43:44 AM I agree 40m is insane amount of money but it'll basically be handing the title to Chelsea.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 25, 2013, 10:44:13 AM trouble with fabragas is he doesnt want to come, barca dont want to sell and united dont want to make a realistic bid. the deal never had a lot going for it really
united have got to be careful they are getting outspent by norwich and southampton in two years they could be battling to hold onto 4th like arsenal and in 4 years could be like liverpool lets face it transfer fees arent going to get smaller even if they are inflated this year. there should be money available for some signings but interest paments come first. i wonder if this years transfer budget is rooneys fee and wages just that nobody wants him!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 25, 2013, 10:50:48 AM think they would take 40m for rooney even from chelsea they would probably take 25/30m from a foreign club Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on August 25, 2013, 10:53:52 AM trouble with fabragas is he doesnt want to come, barca dont want to sell and united dont want to make a realistic bid. the deal never had a lot going for it really united have got to be careful they are getting outspent by norwich and southampton in two years they could be battling to hold onto 4th like arsenal and in 4 years could be like liverpool lets face it transfer fees arent going to get smaller even if they are inflated this year. there should be money available for some signings but interest paments come first. i wonder if this years transfer budget is rooneys fee and wages just that nobody wants him!! Cant believe you said we could turn out like arsenal. United have good players coming through that we will. Have many years with de gea Raphael jones smelling Hernandez zaha etc etc I can't see arsenal I proving their position in the league for many years Prob won't make 4 th this year also maybe even 5 th Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 25, 2013, 11:17:24 AM lack of spending we will end up like arsenal yes we have a few decent younger players in the back 5 and upfront but giggs is still starting carricks not getting any younger andersons not getting any slimmer or better fletchers more than likely finished which leaves cleverly whos effective for the first 20 minutes in games then fades. i havnt seen any potential first team midfielders in the youth team either. pogba was the hope but his agent packed him off to juventus Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on August 25, 2013, 11:20:23 AM I agree 40m is insane amount of money but it'll basically be handing the title to Chelsea. Do you not think though that with an uninterested Rooney and no new World Class signing, it's already a two horse race between Chelsea and City ? Selling Rooney to Chelsea just swings the balance in their favour, makes no difference to United. The only benefit to us keeping Rooney would be that he should help us compete with Arsenal and Spurs for a top four position. My views on our potential success this season mght change before the end of the transfer window, but it will take more than Fellaini and Baines (both of which we don't need) to see us compete for the title. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 25, 2013, 11:28:46 AM I just think Rooney is the final piece to Chelsea's jigsaw. They lack a decent goal scorer with presence. Rooney is tailor made not just for this year but in subsequent years to come.
Agree it's a difficult situation all round but what good is 40 million in the account if we aren't attracting the players? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on August 25, 2013, 11:37:41 AM How long does Rooney have left on his contract?
Surely getting 40m for a player who doesn't really want to be at the club, is preferable to him coasting through his contract and walking for nothing. I'd prefer to not strengthen Chelsea's position any further too, but it seems like a lost cause, and United still have a week to replace him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 25, 2013, 11:45:17 AM agree rooney to chelsea would give them the title - even with all his faults poor fitness and injurys he still scores and creates lots of goals and crucial goals in big games
its no 2 horse race between city n chelsea yet lets not forget this same united team but with fergie pissed the league last year. citys new players are unproven in this league and the same players from last year could well do there mid season disappearing act and i think they have the same defence and dodgy keeper. chelsea are the worry for me mourhinos a postive for them like moyes is a negative. would take a draw tomorrow like a shot Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 25, 2013, 11:49:30 AM How long does Rooney have left on his contract? Surely getting 40m for a player who doesn't really want to be at the club, is preferable to him coasting through his contract and walking for nothing. I'd prefer to not strengthen Chelsea's position any further too, but it seems like a lost cause, and United still have a week to replace him. 2 years left i would take 40m + 20+m saved in wages for him but nobodys going to pay that if it was guaranteed the money would be spent on players ideally midfielders and the money not dissappear into the black hole the same as the ronaldo money Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on August 25, 2013, 05:57:43 PM The general consensus is Fellaini would be a bad signing?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on August 25, 2013, 06:08:58 PM The general consensus is Fellaini would be a bad signing? Think he is good but not a player who will put united to the next level But we need mid fielders Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on August 25, 2013, 09:27:38 PM This thread is turning into a poor copy of the Liverpool FC thread.
We are United and this season won't be made or broken in this transfer window. The squad that won the League by a distance last season remains pretty much as was and despite the changes in management at City and Chelsea their frailties remain. Tottenham and Arsenal will fight it out for fourth with maybe a surprise side like Villa or Southampton getting into that mix but the value bet for the title is to back us at the almost 3/1 odds on offer. Those odds will change tomorrow and if we win you'll regret missing them, but if we don't they'll lengthen and IMHO will still be excellent value. I know this sounds like pissing in the wind, but I get tired of the same old reactions from the doomsayers. I also have a degree of faith in the handover of management to Moyes. He was my declared preference (fwiw) from some distance out. All that having been said, I wouldn't mind Fabregas or Ronaldo coming in. Or maybe Messi. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on August 26, 2013, 02:00:50 PM Rumours of Rooney + 60m for Bale.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on August 26, 2013, 02:04:31 PM Rumours of Rooney + 60m for Bale. i i could be persuaded that this is a good thing but given that Bale has spent the weekend in Madrid it feels unlikely Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on August 26, 2013, 02:06:27 PM Rumours of Rooney + 60m for Bale. i i could be persuaded that this is a good thing but given that Bale has spent the weekend in Madrid it feels unlikely Yeah I'm not buying it but it seemed post worthy. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on August 26, 2013, 02:15:20 PM Seems pretty unlikely as both players would prefer to go somewhere else.
How Bale is worth anyway near these kind of numbers I have no idea, wp Levy I guess. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on August 26, 2013, 03:24:33 PM Excluding RVP (22m) Man Utd havent spent £20m on a player for 5 years since the Berbatov signing, cant see them spending £60m on a player, just not the Glazer way.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on August 26, 2013, 08:04:18 PM Rooney starts. A hands off message to Mourinho?
Not a 'must win', nor even a 'mustn't lose' but important nonetheless. Looking forward to this with some anticipation tinged with sadness that my first call post match won't be to my Dad Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: kinboshi on August 27, 2013, 03:14:56 AM (http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c17/JCtheMessiah/Rooney.jpg)
Moyes ponders Rooney's future at Old Trafford (sorry, couldn't think of anywhere else to post this). Seriously though, I can't believe United are considering selling a player of Rooney's qualityto a main rival like Chelsea. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 27, 2013, 12:03:45 PM chelsea were they for the taking last night. would have taken a point before the game looked like both sides were happy enough with it aswell. on to the scousers always good to give them a good hiding!! has moyes ever won at anfield?? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on August 30, 2013, 03:30:50 PM Quote from: Sky Updates We are hearing that Manchester United are edging closer to agreeing a deal for Everton ace Marouane Fellaini. Talks are thought to be at an advanced stage between both clubs. Fellaini is expected to play for Everton against Cardiff on Saturday, but United are hopeful of securing the Belgian's signature before Monday's transfer deadline. Seem to be linked with every midfielder going today but Fellaini would be a great improvement on Cleverly especially in the role he played vs Chelsea! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 30, 2013, 04:19:41 PM wonder if they will get him for less than the buy out fee was earlier in the summer should have just paid up then and had fellaini do a full pre season with the team the other player from spain they have bid on also has a buy out clause which they have bid under - if they want these players surely they should stop pissin about and offer what its going to take they have had all summer to do it aswell. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on August 30, 2013, 04:59:32 PM wonder if they will get him for less than the buy out fee was earlier in the summer should have just paid up then and had fellaini do a full pre season with the team the other player from spain they have bid on also has a buy out clause which they have bid under - if they want these players surely they should stop pissin about and offer what its going to take they have had all summer to do it aswell. He has been getting coaching from Wenger ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 01, 2013, 04:46:18 PM Less than good enough today. RVP isolated, not by particularly good defending, more by poor approach play and his own poor positioning.
Defence looked fine but the midfield just got bypassed in the first half and in the second when we had much more of the ball there was way to much sideways and not enough incisive passes. Lots of poor first touches too from players who are accepted as being of international class. Liverpool always raise their game in this fixture and got in our faces in every area of the pitch. If they play with that intensity every week they'll be contenders. (Won't happen) Usually, when Liverpool beat us, I take solace from saying that this is going to be the highlight of their season and that ours will come in May. This may well be their highlight, if we don't pick up the pace and find some improvement we may not have one. This from someone who is generally very positive about the outlook. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 01, 2013, 05:15:54 PM World Class midfielder desperately needed
Can't hope to compete this season at the very top with Young and Cleverly in a middle four Ozil tomorrow? On a second issue, why on earth is Kagawa not getting a look in? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pokerfan on September 01, 2013, 05:48:08 PM World Class midfielder desperately needed Can't hope to compete this season at the very top with Young and Cleverly in a middle four Ozil tomorrow? On a second issue, why on earth is Kagawa not getting a look in? Yeah, if only they had a double Bundesliga winning midfielder.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 01, 2013, 07:38:31 PM giggs is still starting???? yet moyes has said hes happy with the squad today haha expect em to sign fellini or the lad from spain 2mrw if they do nothing bit of a joke really when moyes has already said the midfield isnt up to scratch kagawa hasnt shown hes cut out for this league yet never mind getting a game away from home at the scousers still should have won today they were shite but we still couldnt beat em moyes will have to watch himself city up soon scousers in league cup and that champs league group is a lot tougher than is being made out Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on September 01, 2013, 08:05:08 PM Why would Rooney, when fit, ever be on the bench when he can play midfield ?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 01, 2013, 08:24:42 PM Why would Rooney, when fit, ever be on the bench when he can play midfield ? he cant play midfield tho especially not in a 4 he can run around in midfield and hit the big cross field pass whens hes got loads of time but hes no midfielder Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 02, 2013, 09:32:55 AM ;D
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugUAgG4POQk Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 02, 2013, 09:55:21 AM ;D YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugUAgG4POQk ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on September 02, 2013, 02:50:22 PM Can't believe we are not in for Mesut Özil
Herrera looks average from his stats and €36m seems way over the odds Similarly, I think Fellaini is not what we need Özil has scored plenty for Real over the past few years and also has provided the most assists in La Liga over the past few years. Great signing for Arsenal when it is completed. This is turning into a bad day. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: outragous76 on September 02, 2013, 02:57:11 PM Not sure why the hate for fellani?
He has beaten premier league teams on his own for Everton. He is world class and would walk into our squad. Exactly what we need Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 02, 2013, 03:02:40 PM i am just relieved it finally looks like we are signing midfielders its unbelievable!!
dont know much about herrera - when they give us a good hiding in the uefa cup everyone was raving about munian some name like that. to be fair in those game every player they had looked better than we had fellanis alright knows what the leagues all about been here for years and we wont have to play against always had a blinder against us. wont get away with his elbows for us tho press will be all over for him it now Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on September 02, 2013, 05:03:32 PM Mata going to PSG ?
Would still swap Rooney for him if Chelsea were keen. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on September 02, 2013, 06:19:52 PM giggs is still starting???? yet moyes has said hes happy with the squad today haha expect em to sign fellini or the lad from spain 2mrw if they do nothing bit of a joke really when moyes has already said the midfield isnt up to scratch kagawa hasnt shown hes cut out for this league yet never mind getting a game away from home at the scousers still should have won today they were shite but we still couldnt beat em moyes will have to watch himself city up soon scousers in league cup and that champs league group is a lot tougher than is being made out Not really had a chance yet though has he! Due to niggling injuries or because Fergy/Moyes don't fancy him I am not sure? Fellaini is a defensive midfielder and is a major upgrade on Cleverly! Is Zaha injured? Edit: appears he isn't after a quick google, why was he not on the bench at the weekend! Moyes doesn't seem to want to take any chances early on in his career. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 02, 2013, 09:57:28 PM yeh kagawa has been a bit stop start first season got games tho - had a stinker of a pre season and has done nothing to say he should be given a decent run as of yet either. difficult player to find a postion for at united probaly would be class at arsenal. off what we have seen its not like hes the answer to all our problems zaha was our best player pre season went to play for england hasnt been seen since haha these transfers are taking too long to get sorted beginning to think nothings guna get done at this rate Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 02, 2013, 10:02:39 PM Jurgen Klopp is amazed that Kagawa doesn't start. I am too.
Sit him in front of Carrick and let him play. I gather Moyes was offered Ozil but said no. A bit of ma head scratcher given what he puts on the field in midfield currently Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 02, 2013, 10:28:18 PM this transfer 3 jokers running round spain claiming to be working for united and they arent were a joke of a club. if city had done this we would be laughing about it for months united arent good enough in midfield to have kagawa roaming around doing what he wants hence this fred carnos transfer window. carricks isolated enough as it is playin with giggs n cleverly last thing we need is another lightweight in there. play him behind rvp fair enough but what about rooney then Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 02, 2013, 10:29:46 PM when kagawa was doing the business in germany he had better players around him is what im trying to say i suppose Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 02, 2013, 10:47:19 PM Disappointing.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 02, 2013, 10:52:43 PM so who turned up at La Liga pretending to be Manchester Utd and unable to pay the Herrera release clause?
Amazing stuff. WTF? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on September 02, 2013, 10:54:08 PM Delay tax tic by utd wp
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 02, 2013, 10:58:55 PM so who turned up at La Liga pretending to be Manchester Utd and unable to pay the Herrera release clause? Amazing stuff. WTF? the tapas 3 to be fair to them they got further than united have yet in getting a deal sorted this summer Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on September 02, 2013, 11:01:50 PM so who turned up at La Liga pretending to be Manchester Utd and unable to pay the Herrera release clause? Amazing stuff. WTF? Happened at Anfield yesterday as well. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 02, 2013, 11:24:07 PM paid 4m more than the buy out clause for fellini well done all involved Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 04, 2013, 01:28:58 PM press is having a field day with these transfer hi jinks should use the fergie method ban all reporters still they start towing the party line Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 05, 2013, 10:57:19 AM So, unemployed ex-director of football Damien Comoli thinks that Manchester United need a Director of Football eh?
Impressive record over the years with signings including Andy Carroll, Charlie Adam and Stewart Downing (for balance he's also credited with the signing of Liverpool's Number One PR darling Luis Suarez and Jordan Henderson) Can anyone identify a substantial English club where a DoF has been a positive move? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on September 05, 2013, 11:33:46 AM Seems to be working okay at Spurs with Baldini and at Watford with Nani? Think you need an overseas manager who is comfortable with the system.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on September 07, 2013, 03:15:53 AM Tbf I think it works if (and with some clubs it's a big if) the set up is correct. Man Utd are an exception due to the sheer longevity of SAF. When someone that good at their job is there I can understand why a DOF won't work and isn't needed. However over a large sample I'd argue that one man in control of everything is typically a bad thing. I'll try to find the study on it from a year or two back but the stats support a DOF/head of recruitment set up. I also think its quite surprising how many clubs do have it in place in England but you only hear about the bad ones. That's the old school mentality for you. Comoli is obv not the answer but SAF is a once in a generation manager. Even he would have had stats men and trusted advisors who were very involved.
The current Liverpool set up (a four man committee with manager veto on any player) works well. I find it hard to believe a "manager only" set up can be the future. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on September 07, 2013, 03:21:41 AM Also, I really don't like Commoli, at all. But his players bought vs their sell on fee record is pretty good. After Bale to Madrid it will probably look very good. Not that this is a great measure of his role and what he's meant to do (he had far too much say at LFC) but it does show good ROI, which some "successful" managers, who would typically be in charge of all transfers, such as MON, cannot show.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on September 14, 2013, 12:55:25 PM Kagawa doesn't even make the bench again today.
Played and scored in Japan's friendly on Tuesday night, but picked up an illness according to a few sources. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 14, 2013, 04:04:37 PM kagawa has got flu Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on September 14, 2013, 04:28:45 PM kagawa has got flu One sneeze apparently - www.twitter.com/evilkagawa ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 17, 2013, 09:44:25 PM Rooney obviously a spent force at Old Trafford and needs a new challenge...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 17, 2013, 10:03:30 PM lets see him do it for the year hopefully he doesnt get angry and confused over anything Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 17, 2013, 10:16:25 PM lets see him do it for the year hopefully he doesnt get angry and confused over anything I understand your choice of name now Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on September 18, 2013, 08:26:13 AM So, unemployed ex-director of football Damien Comoli thinks that Manchester United need a Director of Football eh? Impressive record over the years with signings including Andy Carroll, Charlie Adam and Stewart Downing (for balance he's also credited with the signing of Liverpool's Number One PR darling Luis Suarez and Jordan Henderson) Can anyone identify a substantial English club where a DoF has been a positive move? there are lots As The Baron says the good ones dont get picked up on Comoli has a very good record were he has been would have no problem getting another job and will soon Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 22, 2013, 10:22:17 PM what a pathetic performance - shuffling about like they didnt have a clue to make matters worse rumours of a bust up between rvp n moyes aswell Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 25, 2013, 10:57:14 PM showed some balls tonight had to after sunday aswell poor old tyler on sky seemed distraught the scousers couldnt get back into it Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 27, 2013, 12:37:44 PM Not strictly United, but hopefully one day he will be again :)
Just saw the story to which the video relates on Eurosport news, and thought it was a nice touch by Ronaldo YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4Ca0HDBSL8 Following that incident the fan has been charged with trespassing and disorderly conduct, which could cause him problems with both his education and immigration too. Ronaldo has written a letter asking if they could drop the charges "I understand your position and the importance of enforcing rules and law," Ronaldo wrote in a letter to the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office. "However, I respectfully request that you and your office reconsider this decision and dismiss the two criminal charges this young man faces." Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 27, 2013, 07:19:23 PM litterally never see that man have a bad word said about his conduct.
He always shows respect for United, sheer class that man. Hope he comes back one day CR7 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 28, 2013, 05:01:59 PM the plot thickens Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Squid on September 28, 2013, 07:29:40 PM Beginning of the end.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 28, 2013, 11:17:10 PM Used to like match of the day :(
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Rod on September 28, 2013, 11:18:25 PM I am not a fan of Man Utd or any premiership team in the least but surely this was expected. They have completely changed their management, surely it will take the new manager time to settle in and get the club as he wants it, they should still be successful, obviously they will not be as good as they were under SAF, for a long while at least, as he was a great manager who had forever to get the team as he wanted it and it was his team. Now their fans need to be patient whilst DM gets it sorted his way. It is something Man Utd have not had to do before so will be interesting to see how they handle it.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on September 29, 2013, 12:35:20 PM I don't buy the concept of a man taking the champions to a Europa league spot with a stronger squad and being able to explain it away as "transition".
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 29, 2013, 12:39:40 PM when i take over man u on Football manager i can still win the premier league. whats the difference?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on September 29, 2013, 12:53:13 PM It's the post match interviews that I would find worrying. No matter what disaster has just unfolded Moyes is "looking forward to the next game - these things happen"
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: McGlashan on September 29, 2013, 01:17:39 PM The post match interviews are definitely a concern, he is far from being settled into the job. By that reckoning it is also too early to judge him.
Regarding the Football Manager chat, Moyes is at the stage we'd turn the game off without saving then start again from scratch. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 29, 2013, 01:50:17 PM The post match interviews are definitely a concern, he is far from being settled into the job. By that reckoning it is also too early to judge him. Regarding the Football Manager chat, Moyes is at the stage we'd turn the game off without saving then start again from scratch. I never did that. You didnt see me did you?! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: McGlashan on September 29, 2013, 01:57:41 PM The post match interviews are definitely a concern, he is far from being settled into the job. By that reckoning it is also too early to judge him. Regarding the Football Manager chat, Moyes is at the stage we'd turn the game off without saving then start again from scratch. I never did that. You didnt see me did you?! No, me neither and that club voluntarily bid 40million for Anderson. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 29, 2013, 02:47:12 PM its been a total disaster so far for moyes from a poor pre season, shambles of a transfer window, poor performances and results. he looks shell shocked in interviews now after his early im just happy to be here stuff i think it was a mistake to ditch fergies backroom staff so quickly they could have pointed him in the right direction over a few things his treatment of evra a united legend has been a right mess, rvp rumoured to be grumbling over the training and a few other things bubbling in the background it doesnt look good. on the plus side hes got a great cup game record and rooney looks interested again. how long it lasts with rooney time will tell he always has spurts of fitness and form every season Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on September 29, 2013, 03:23:24 PM Evrs cliffs?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 29, 2013, 04:59:29 PM just the way moyes was chasing baines all summer badly, then in the last minute of the transfer window hes trying to get that other left back in on loan which was another balls up now hes dropping him for home games. evras won everything loved by the fans played 100s of games been captain loads of times is one of the leaders in the dressing room and moyes made up his mind about him before the season started. i think moyes could lose the dressing room and fans ( who have been backing him ) over stuff like that and aswell as picking anderson who the fans gave up on a long time ago. raphael isnt getting much of a look in this could be injury but hes another fan favourite and is the best right back at the club. zaha hasnt been given a chance, he was one of the best players pre season hes not even getting on the bench. moyes has come out n said were about 5 or 6 players short if so why did he only sign 1 in the summer and hes had a terrible start aswell, you wouldnt trust moyes to get it right with his next 5 signings. other comments about players like they tell me hes got a great touch or is a great finisher whos telling him all this stuff he sacked all the coaches and why hasnt he figured it for himself yet. i think moyes is out of his depth and is getting it wrong all over the place. its not like losing a few games at everton united is one of the biggest clubs in the world, an unexpected draw leads to a major inquiry. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on September 29, 2013, 05:03:15 PM just the way moyes was chasing baines all summer badly, then in the last minute of the transfer window hes trying to get that other left back in on loan which was another balls up now hes dropping him for home games. evras won everything loved by the fans played 100s of games been captain loads of times is one of the leaders in the dressing room and moyes made up his mind about him before the season started. i think moyes could lose the dressing room and fans ( who have been backing him ) over stuff like that and aswell as picking anderson who the fans gave up on a long time ago. raphael isnt getting much of a look in this could be injury but hes another fan favourite and is the best right back at the club. zaha hasnt been given a chance, he was one of the best players pre season hes not even getting on the bench. moyes has come out n said were about 5 or 6 players short if so why did he only sign 1 in the summer and hes had a terrible start aswell, you wouldnt trust moyes to get it right with his next 5 signings. other comments about players like they tell me hes got a great touch or is a great finisher whos telling him all this stuff he sacked all the coaches and why hasnt he figured it for himself yet. i think moyes is out of his depth and is getting it wrong all over the place. its not like losing a few games at everton united is one of the biggest clubs in the world, an unexpected draw leads to a major inquiry. Yeah I thought that was a really strange comment to make. Also agree about backroom staff being a mistake. He hasn't come across well in interviews so far for sure. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheDazzler on September 30, 2013, 11:15:02 AM just the way moyes was chasing baines all summer badly, then in the last minute of the transfer window hes trying to get that other left back in on loan which was another balls up now hes dropping him for home games. evras won everything loved by the fans played 100s of games been captain loads of times is one of the leaders in the dressing room and moyes made up his mind about him before the season started. i think moyes could lose the dressing room and fans ( who have been backing him ) over stuff like that and aswell as picking anderson who the fans gave up on a long time ago. raphael isnt getting much of a look in this could be injury but hes another fan favourite and is the best right back at the club. zaha hasnt been given a chance, he was one of the best players pre season hes not even getting on the bench. moyes has come out n said were about 5 or 6 players short if so why did he only sign 1 in the summer and hes had a terrible start aswell, you wouldnt trust moyes to get it right with his next 5 signings. other comments about players like they tell me hes got a great touch or is a great finisher whos telling him all this stuff he sacked all the coaches and why hasnt he figured it for himself yet. i think moyes is out of his depth and is getting it wrong all over the place. its not like losing a few games at everton united is one of the biggest clubs in the world, an unexpected draw leads to a major inquiry. A couple of things. Firstly Evra is 32. He's still excellent but United will need a replacement at some rapidly apporaching point. Baines is 28 and looks the perfect fit to replace him. United didn't handle the pursuit well. Whether that's down to Moyes or not, I don't know. As regards 'dropping' Evra for home games, I presume he didn't 'drop' him but rested or rotated him. In the absence of Baines, Buttner is his understudy. Last year Buttner played 5 league games. He needs to play. If there was ever a game you thought it would be safe enough to give him a start, it would have been yesterday. Ferguson got away with it last year, Evra hardly missed a game. But if Evra gets injured, where do they turn to? They'll need Buttner to get some playing experience. As regards this 'United beiing 5 or 6 world class short' story, it's utter media nonsense. He DID not say that. "To win the Champions League, you need five or six world-class players," said Moyes, who took over the club in July. "That's the level you have to be at to win it. We've not got that yet but what we have got is experience." He's saying that any team needs 5 or 6 world class players. I'm sure he would argue that Rooney and RVP are world class. And then possibly De Gea, maaaaybe Vidic. So he's probably saying they are 2 or 3 short. Fair comment I think. As for Moyes being out of his depth, maybe you're right. Anyone who comes in after Ferguson is going to have a tough time. I read around the time of his appointment someone saying that the easiest job will the man after the man that replaces Ferguson. This seems likely. Moyes has an impossible job, everything he does will be compared to Ferguson. The man replacing Moyes will have much less pressure. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 30, 2013, 02:40:49 PM trouble is united fans dont know when its acceptable to start slaughtering the manager we havnt had to for so long - ive probably gone early haha when i use to have a moan up about fergies teams the older heads would always say you should have been here under sexton this is nothing moyes has got to start showing some nous and quickly - everytime he opens his mouth he puts his foot in it, the vultures in the press are circling, a lot fans didnt want him from day 1 if it carries on he could lose the crowd but that wont matter til next seasons renewal time and i think hes gotta dread carefully with the dressing room. the start of the season could hardly have gone worse - the only surprise to me is that he has won in europe but his quotes have already ruled us out of winning that Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: McGlashan on September 30, 2013, 02:46:04 PM As for Moyes being out of his depth, maybe you're right. Anyone who comes in after Ferguson is going to have a tough time. I read around the time of his appointment someone saying that the easiest job will the man after the man that replaces Ferguson. This seems likely. Moyes has an impossible job, everything he does will be compared to Ferguson. The man replacing Moyes will have much less pressure. There's not a man in this list that has had realistic expections put upon him or would claim that hte job was easy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Aberdeen_F.C._managers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Aberdeen_F.C._managers) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on September 30, 2013, 05:09:28 PM I find it truly amazing that any United fans could fall for the medias shit stirring. We are not even two months into the season, United have had a horrible schedule and have lost three games but two of those were away to Man City and Liverpool and in the other you were without your best player. If you look back to when Fergie was there the first two years of his reign were horrible but you have to give managers time. If Fergie had been under this kind of pressure so early he would never have lasted. You talk about the way Evra has been treated. How many United legends over the years did Ferguson quietly ship out when they had outlasted their usefulness? That is what the best managers do.....they realise when players need replacing or when they can be sold at the peak of their form and value. The transfer window wasn't handled particularly well but it is hard to blame Moyes for that. Transfer business is very much handled by the CEO's now and United have a new guy in charge there too which undoubtedly impacted on their window.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on September 30, 2013, 06:16:10 PM "If you look back to when Fergie was there the first two years of his reign were horrible but you have to give managers time"
Not sure I agree with this view. Fergie was given 3/4 years because when he came in to take over an aging Man Utd team with a drink culture who hadn't won the league for 15 years. Moyes has a squad which won the league last year and has added Fellaini. I think these are hugely different situations and Moyes saying he needs to add players to be competitive is laughable in my opinion. I'm not saying he needs to win the league, but taking the champs to 4th spot (if that is what happens) is abject failure. I'm not a Man Utd fan by the way. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 30, 2013, 06:21:41 PM a schedule moyes was moaning about straight away when the fixtures were out - could be described as getting his excuses in early
he hasnt done too well with the easy games in the tough start either as united fan losing to the scousers and getting a good hiding off city is not a way to endear to yourself to the fans 25 / 30 years ago managers got time not anymore they have got to hit the ground running dont be fooled that fergie wouldnt have got the bullet - edwards said many times if people stop going through the turnstiles because of it fergie would have gone moyes doesnt have that pressure as fans are locked into season tickets now and its the 3rd most important thing now after tv revenues and commercial deals - maybe the tipping point would be not qualifying for the champions league - the glazers wouldnt like that with the interest payments to find every year Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on September 30, 2013, 10:24:01 PM "If you look back to when Fergie was there the first two years of his reign were horrible but you have to give managers time" Not sure I agree with this view. Fergie was given 3/4 years because when he came in to take over an aging Man Utd team with a drink culture who hadn't won the league for 15 years. Moyes has a squad which won the league last year and has added Fellaini. I think these are hugely different situations and Moyes saying he needs to add players to be competitive is laughable in my opinion. I'm not saying he needs to win the league, but taking the champs to 4th spot (if that is what happens) is abject failure. I'm not a Man Utd fan by the way. Fergie also got time, I'd think, because he had already had quite a lot of success as a manager. David Moyes hasn't. At the time he was appointed I kind of admired Man U for going for someone like him but I thought/hoped it was a terrible choice. We'll all get to see I guess Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: McGlashan on September 30, 2013, 10:32:37 PM I find it truly amazing that any United fans could fall for the medias shit stirring. We are not even two months into the season, United have had a horrible schedule and have lost three games but two of those were away to Man City and Liverpool and in the other you were without your best player. If you look back to when Fergie was there the first two years of his reign were horrible but you have to give managers time. If Fergie had been under this kind of pressure so early he would never have lasted. You talk about the way Evra has been treated. How many United legends over the years did Ferguson quietly ship out when they had outlasted their usefulness? That is what the best managers do.....they realise when players need replacing or when they can be sold at the peak of their form and value. The transfer window wasn't handled particularly well but it is hard to blame Moyes for that. Transfer business is very much handled by the CEO's now and United have a new guy in charge there too which undoubtedly impacted on their window. Bolding that just incase anyone missed it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 01, 2013, 01:14:40 PM the media are getting stuck in no doubt but dont be fooled that the main topic for united fans since may hasnt been moyes - whats he like, whats he going to do, hows he going to play, is he up to it. now a full pre season and two months into the season we have got something to judge him on. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Squid on October 01, 2013, 04:01:39 PM Times have changed. You don't get two years to get things sorted at a top club any longer. Utd have resources far in excess of 17 of the other sides in the Premier League. That wasnt the case when Fergie took over.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on October 01, 2013, 05:26:11 PM Times have changed. You don't get two years to get things sorted at a top club any longer. Utd have resources far in excess of 17 of the other sides in the Premier League. That wasnt the case when Fergie took over. Arsenal had 8 years without a trophy though Brandon rogers has been given time also Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on October 01, 2013, 05:47:24 PM Times have changed. You don't get two years to get things sorted at a top club any longer. Utd have resources far in excess of 17 of the other sides in the Premier League. That wasnt the case when Fergie took over. Arsenal had 8 years without a trophy though Brandon rogers has been given time also Not quite the same paul. Arsenal have built a brand new stadium and created a self-sustaining model. Manure have a self-sustaining debt and unlimited resources. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on October 01, 2013, 06:10:57 PM Times have changed. You don't get two years to get things sorted at a top club any longer. Utd have resources far in excess of 17 of the other sides in the Premier League. That wasnt the case when Fergie took over. True yet the successful managers are still almost without fail those that have been given time. In ever aspect of life these days we are over focused on short term results and ignore natural variance and football takes it to a ridiculous extreme. He might never be as good as Ferguson but then who is? United fans have to accept how lucky they were to have him but Moyes will be fine if he is given the time and this that say he wasn't successful at Everton literally know nothing about football. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 01, 2013, 08:04:33 PM Times have changed. You don't get two years to get things sorted at a top club any longer. Utd have resources far in excess of 17 of the other sides in the Premier League. That wasnt the case when Fergie took over. Arsenal had 8 years without a trophy though Brandon rogers has been given time also Not quite the same paul. Arsenal have built a brand new stadium and created a self-sustaining model. Manure have a self-sustaining debt and unlimited resources. rodgers has had a year liverpool dont really have any expectations he took over mid table side and thats what they still are wengers survived the sack in the last 3 years due to getting into the holy grail of the champions league. unlimited resources?? uniteds priority is interest payments. they spend alot more on interest than transfers. net transfer spend under the glazers is very low last time i looked they were getting outspent by the likes of stoke never mind city and chelsea. a bonus in getting moyes he was free and use to having no money to spend the glaziers whole scheme is based on guaranteed champions league money if moyes doesnt get them in that hes in big trouble Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 02, 2013, 12:51:34 AM Isn't net spend distorted by the sale of Ronaldo?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 02, 2013, 10:22:10 AM we sold him and replaced him with owen obertan and valencia look what spurs did with the bale money - they spent it Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on October 03, 2013, 11:32:38 PM Moyes still a v shrewd appointment IMO.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 03, 2013, 11:38:05 PM He needs time and support. This was always gonna happen
Same with Fellani- I've never really been a fan but let's give him a chance to settle in Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 04, 2013, 09:00:43 AM we sold him and replaced him with owen obertan and valencia look what spurs did with the bale money - they spent it Spurs had more need to spend than we did Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on October 04, 2013, 12:15:34 PM I'm not overly concerned about United in the medium-term. We can put out an U23's side that looks like this
de Gea (22) Fabio (23) Rafael (23) Keane (20) Smalling (23) Jones (21) Zaha (20) Powell (19) Lingard (20) Januzaj (18) Welbeck (22) We've got players ages 24/25 such as Cleverly, Evans, Fellaini, Kagawa, Hernandez (I exclude Anderson from that list ;) ) Moyes is right in the fact that the squad lacks a number of real world class players, but at the moment for whatever reason, they are either unavailable, or do not want to join the club. Vidic, Rooney and Van Persie fit that bill at the moment. Nani potentially could have, but he's just the most frustrating player. Carrick is not world class, but has always done an excllent job for us. People question his inability to turn up for the big games, but he hasn't had a quality central midfield partner for few seasons now. It might well be a trophyless few seasons, but it will be more of a dip than an unstoppable decline. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on October 04, 2013, 02:50:05 PM Enjoy.
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Bjkk411Mpc Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 04, 2013, 08:24:32 PM we sold him and replaced him with owen obertan and valencia look what spurs did with the bale money - they spent it Spurs had more need to spend than we did so do you believe we have unlimited funds aswell then?? surely you can see the difference post plc where the moneys going now?? worrying when a liverpool fan pops up and says moyes is a shrewd appointment - dalglish was at it last week aswell Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on October 04, 2013, 08:36:09 PM brilliant interview!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC a sad sad story Post by: sovietsong on October 05, 2013, 06:14:55 PM Defence looking poor today
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 05, 2013, 08:32:58 PM fuckin hell that 1st half hahaha all over the place could and should have been 2/3/4 down at half time a win from behind should do wonders for there confidence Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 26, 2013, 04:01:19 PM bood off at half time the natives are restless Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on October 26, 2013, 04:02:17 PM Now on sale in the Man Utd shop, the Davy Moyes lamp......It looks great in the middle of the table!!!!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 26, 2013, 04:08:39 PM moyes is in danger of turning us into liverpool
ive never known us bood off at half time its a different type of supporter who goes now but fuckin hell Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on October 26, 2013, 04:24:58 PM fuckin hell that 1st half hahaha all over the place could and should have been 2/3/4 down at half time a win from behind should do wonders for there confidence Like at Sunderland Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 26, 2013, 04:28:59 PM think i wrote that about sunderland game they have just bood nani off now which is just embarrasing and not on putting the half time boos down to the same idiots still things are not right i havnt got a clue whats goin on Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 26, 2013, 04:53:50 PM panic over til tuesday Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 28, 2013, 07:48:29 PM Darren Fletcher returning to action :)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24721071 A full return to fitness would be excellent news on so many levels Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on October 30, 2013, 10:40:00 AM the best football card ever?
(https://scontent-a-lhr.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/s403x403/1383443_10101036430552027_320429093_n.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 10, 2013, 06:21:53 PM Game on!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on November 10, 2013, 06:41:18 PM Game on! We'll see about that. Rooney was tremendous and Oliver played well too ;) I'm not convinced about the balance of your side this season thus far. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on November 11, 2013, 01:29:14 PM what do you mean by balance?? not sure if this international break is good or bad for us seem to be stringing a few results together of late if they scrapped in season internationals the season would finish weeks earlier and they could play them all then would be miles better than breaking up the season every month Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 11, 2013, 02:53:02 PM Game on! We'll see about that. Rooney was tremendous and Oliver played well too ;) I'm not convinced about the balance of your side this season thus far. Ralph, I expected better of you than a snide comment about the referee. Spot on about Rooney obviously, but some clarification about your view on the balance of the side might be interesting. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on November 11, 2013, 03:21:33 PM Game on! We'll see about that. Rooney was tremendous and Oliver played well too ;) I'm not convinced about the balance of your side this season thus far. Ralph, I expected better of you than a snide comment about the referee. Spot on about Rooney obviously, but some clarification about your view on the balance of the side might be interesting. Michael Oliver reffed the match like an out and out homer in my and many other's opinion failing to book Evra and Rooney for similar offences which got Sagna and Flamini booked for us before finally booking Rooney late on. The meagre three minutes of injury time seemed odd too even to Gary Neville. The reason I'm suggesting that the balance of your side doesn't seem right to me is illustrated to some extent by our having 61% of possession at OT, a previously pretty much unheard of amount, and we had a bit of an off-day too. I'm sure if and when Moyes does get the balance right he won't be chopping and changing midfield as he currently seems to be. I can't remember the last time we had that many misplaced passes as in the first half, some of which was obviously due to your pressing, but still very poor by the standards we have set ourselves this season. Well done on the win, it makes the league more interesting. I'm still satisfied with our haul from the last three games but a point yesterday would have been all the sweeter. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on November 11, 2013, 08:56:31 PM jones got booked for nowt and ref should have given us a pen for a foul on rooney these refs cant be trusted to remember who pays there wages now fergies gone Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 11, 2013, 10:48:40 PM 60% of the ball with most of it being taken up passing across the back line and in your own half...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: paulhouk03 on November 11, 2013, 11:04:40 PM Who would we wanna see in a united shirt in jan?
Obv has to be realistic Watching pogba vids recently it's a shame we didn't keep hold of him Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on November 11, 2013, 11:13:28 PM 60% of the ball with most of it being taken up passing across the back line and in your own half... Did you watch the game David? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on November 12, 2013, 06:44:24 AM Pretty miserable that Arsenal didn't really get going in the game. Man U showed their appetite for big games I guess but I thought they looked like a slower, longer ball less incisive version of Everton
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on November 12, 2013, 01:16:32 PM Who would we wanna see in a united shirt in jan? Obv has to be realistic Watching pogba vids recently it's a shame we didn't keep hold of him linked with a couple of dortmund players today with kagawa goin back - give that a go seems to have gone quiet on the spanish players we were shambling after on deadline day fellini could do with pulling his finger out hes been a disaster so far - needs a wrist op aswell they are holding off on should just have it done now hes staking up valuable space on the bench Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on December 05, 2013, 11:00:22 PM Not been here for ages, but couldn't resist closing this old debate.
David De Gea. world class. Admittedly the rest is pretty depressing for us Mancs. THE FORTY BEST PLAYERS ON THE CONTINENT (ACCORDING TO UEFA) GOALKEEPERS - Petr Cech, Thibaut Courtois, David de Gea, Manuel Neuer DEFENDERS - David Alaba, Giorgio Chiellini, Dante, Mats Hummels, Branislav Ivanovic, Philipp Lahm, Stephan Lichtsteiner, Filipe Luis, Vincent Kompany, Gerard Pique, Sergio Ramos, Thiago Silva MIDFIELDERS - Gareth Bale, Ilkay Gundogan, Isco, Paul Pogba, Mesut Ozil, Menaja Matic, Blaise Matuidi, Marco Reus, Franck Ribery, Arjen Robben, Bastian Schweinsteiger, Yaya Toure Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on December 06, 2013, 12:28:45 AM Can't say it doesn't seem right that there aren't any United outfield players in those lists.
I take it Van Persie makes the list of strikers though? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on December 06, 2013, 01:03:25 AM Wait, hold on, I can't see Danny Gabbidon.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TL900 on December 06, 2013, 02:45:55 AM Lloris > De Gea
Maybe Mignolet too Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on December 06, 2013, 03:15:31 AM Lloris > De Gea Maybe Mignolet too Thought De Gea was poor for Oviedo's goal but normally he is great and has improved a lot from last season. I think Lloris is the best keeper in the prem, as his command of the area adds so much to Tottenham's defence. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on December 07, 2013, 12:25:30 AM Any truth in RVP rumour?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: jackinbeat on December 07, 2013, 12:36:59 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: sovietsong on December 07, 2013, 12:41:44 PM Any truth in RVP rumour? Seems fair enough that he wants to leave. He wants to win trophies & now that's not going to happen for a while it's understandable he wants out. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on December 07, 2013, 02:56:29 PM "If you look back to when Fergie was there the first two years of his reign were horrible but you have to give managers time" Not sure I agree with this view. Fergie was given 3/4 years because when he came in to take over an aging Man Utd team with a drink culture who hadn't won the league for 15 years. Moyes has a squad which won the league last year and has added Fellaini. I think these are hugely different situations and Moyes saying he needs to add players to be competitive is laughable in my opinion. I'm not saying he needs to win the league, but taking the champs to 4th spot (if that is what happens) is abject failure. I'm not a Man Utd fan by the way. Fergie also got time, I'd think, because he had already had quite a lot of success as a manager. David Moyes hasn't. At the time he was appointed I kind of admired Man U for going for someone like him but I thought/hoped it was a terrible choice. We'll all get to see I guess Moyes is breaking records all over the shop these days. Gotta chortle - shirley he cannae last there ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on December 07, 2013, 03:24:44 PM "If you look back to when Fergie was there the first two years of his reign were horrible but you have to give managers time" Not sure I agree with this view. Fergie was given 3/4 years because when he came in to take over an aging Man Utd team with a drink culture who hadn't won the league for 15 years. Moyes has a squad which won the league last year and has added Fellaini. I think these are hugely different situations and Moyes saying he needs to add players to be competitive is laughable in my opinion. I'm not saying he needs to win the league, but taking the champs to 4th spot (if that is what happens) is abject failure. I'm not a Man Utd fan by the way. Fergie also got time, I'd think, because he had already had quite a lot of success as a manager. David Moyes hasn't. At the time he was appointed I kind of admired Man U for going for someone like him but I thought/hoped it was a terrible choice. We'll all get to see I guess Moyes is breaking records all over the shop these days. Gotta chortle - shirley he cannae last there ? Heard RVP looking to move to Arsenal, said he want to move to a team that can win trophies. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on December 10, 2013, 11:42:05 AM using a mobile on the bench
player having to have his stomach pumped rio questioning his time of team selection strange goings on Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on January 23, 2014, 02:40:00 PM Police have asked distressed Manchester United fans not to use 999 to air their gripes about the Red Devils poor form after a drunk supporter dialled the emergency services line demanding to speak to former manager Sir Alex Ferguson.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: millidonk on January 23, 2014, 02:50:53 PM Police have asked distressed Manchester United fans not to use 999 to air their gripes about the Red Devils poor form after a drunk supporter dialled the emergency services line demanding to speak to former manager Sir Alex Ferguson. Hear it here: http://lockerdome.com/awaydays/6169470909558849/6294767822710036 (http://lockerdome.com/awaydays/6169470909558849/6294767822710036) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 23, 2014, 08:06:09 PM Manchester City Ruined My Life
I've been a fan since 25 May 1963, when I sat down to watch the FA Cup Final with my dad. His support went back further, to the era of Duncan Edwards, Roger Byrne and the other Busby Babes. Over the half century since then I've seen a lot of low points. Relegation in a season where Alex Stepney led the goals list at one stage. Losing the FA Cup Final to Southampton. Missing out on the league for year after year after year as Liverpool established their record total of titles. This isn't going to be a great season, but it will be better than 73-74, and a fair few others we've experienced over the last fifty years. For those of you who favour The Reds but who have known no other manager than SAF it must be hard to take the way this season has gone so far. All I can say is 'Keep the Faith, the club is still the club of Edwards, Charlton, Best, Law, Pearson, Hughes, Buchan, McQueen, Stepney, Robson, Bruce, Giggs, Beckham, Butt, Scholes, Keane, Schmeichel, Solskjaer, Cantona, Cole, Yorke, Hill, Coppel and even if the season ends with us in mid-table and without a trophy we will be back. Maybe not for a year or two, but we are still Manchester United Football Club. 20 League Titles 11 FA Cup wins 4 Leage Cup wins 3 European Cups 1 European Cup-Winners Cup 1 European Super Cup 1 Inter-Continental Cup 1 FIFA Clubs World Cup Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on January 24, 2014, 12:28:03 AM Don't worry I'm one of the few that have known no other but SAF I still have the faith I know we have had it so good for the last 25 years it's time to take some pain and suffering so when the good times return they will be enjoyed even more!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on January 24, 2014, 11:46:55 AM Manchester City Ruined My Life I've been a fan since 25 May 1963, when I sat down to watch the FA Cup Final with my dad. His support went back further, to the era of Duncan Edwards, Roger Byrne and the other Busby Babes. Over the half century since then I've seen a lot of low points. Relegation in a season where Alex Stepney led the goals list at one stage. Losing the FA Cup Final to Southampton. Missing out on the league for year after year after year as Liverpool established their record total of titles. This isn't going to be a great season, but it will be better than 73-74, and a fair few others we've experienced over the last fifty years. For those of you who favour The Reds but who have known no other manager than SAF it must be hard to take the way this season has gone so far. All I can say is 'Keep the Faith, the club is still the club of Edwards, Charlton, Best, Law, Pearson, Hughes, Buchan, McQueen, Stepney, Robson, Bruce, Giggs, Beckham, Butt, Scholes, Keane, Schmeichel, Solskjaer, Cantona, Cole, Yorke, Hill, Coppel and even if the season ends with us in mid-table and without a trophy we will be back. Maybe not for a year or two, but we are still Manchester United Football Club. 20 League Titles 11 FA Cup wins 4 Leage Cup wins 3 European Cups 1 European Cup-Winners Cup 1 European Super Cup 1 Inter-Continental Cup 1 FIFA Clubs World Cup Like that David. It's pretty jarring to see so much negativity, especially towards Moyes, who was, effectively, selected by SAF. SAF was THE BEST, what a tough act to follow. Now it's time for the good-time fans to man up, & show a bit of loyalty, character, & backbone, when the Team most needs it. I watched that penalty shootout the other night, & then the inevitable barrage of toxic shite on Twitter. Call themselves professional footballers, they ought to do better Well yes, they should. Have any of those who are abusing those guys ever been in that pressure spot? I doubt that. Did you see the players faces, each of them, as they stepped up to take those penalties? The self-doubt was there for all to see, the penalties were dreadful. People need to look a little deeper, confidence & psychology are amazingly powerful things. I'm not a Man U supporter, or a Man U hater, I'm ambivelant, but I find this whole thing fascinating to watch, more for the reactions of those who don't have the character or mettle to handle a bump in the road, be they players, fans, or whatever. Even better, all this is happening whilst Man C are on a proper roll. Many can't look that fact in the eye. A bit of adversity soon seperates the men from the boys. Good on you David, that's a great Post. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on January 29, 2014, 12:00:07 AM Mata Rooney RVP adnan will be interesting if these guys can all get fit!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 29, 2014, 12:39:44 AM Hopefully Man City do us a favour tomorrow
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 06, 2014, 10:08:34 PM #flowersofmanchester
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on February 07, 2014, 01:50:35 AM http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1707264/manchester-united-nemanja-vidic-leave-old-trafford-eight-years?cc=5739
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 07, 2014, 07:21:36 AM http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1707264/manchester-united-nemanja-vidic-leave-old-trafford-eight-years?cc=5739 Thanks for that, I daresay we might have missed it had you not taken the time and trouble to post a link. I'll rise above the tribal. Vidic was immense for us for five and a half seasons, and massively influential even during the injury years. Five Premier League medals Three League Cups Champions League FIFA Club World Cup Five Community Shields I hope wherever he goes he finds full fitness and adds a few more medals. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 07, 2014, 07:00:33 PM http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1707264/manchester-united-nemanja-vidic-leave-old-trafford-eight-years?cc=5739 Thanks for that, I daresay we might have missed it had you not taken the time and trouble to post a link. I'll rise above the tribal. You jest! I thought we were meant to post more on here than on the thread named for our own team! "No?" (In a Rafa accent obv) :) Serious Q, who the bejeezus replaces Vidic? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 07, 2014, 07:42:10 PM http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1707264/manchester-united-nemanja-vidic-leave-old-trafford-eight-years?cc=5739 Thanks for that, I daresay we might have missed it had you not taken the time and trouble to post a link. I'll rise above the tribal. You jest! I thought we were meant to post more on here than on the thread named for our own team! "No?" (In a Rafa accent obv) :) Serious Q, who the bejeezus replaces Vidic? You're always welcome Baron, as one of those who are less tribal. Who replaces Vidic? I guess we have to wait to find out, but he wasn't exactly a fixture for the last two seasons which ended with a very very close 2nd and a title winning margin of 11pts... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on February 08, 2014, 12:07:13 AM http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1707264/manchester-united-nemanja-vidic-leave-old-trafford-eight-years?cc=5739 Thanks for that, I daresay we might have missed it had you not taken the time and trouble to post a link. I'll rise above the tribal. You jest! I thought we were meant to post more on here than on the thread named for our own team! "No?" (In a Rafa accent obv) :) Serious Q, who the bejeezus replaces Vidic? You're always welcome Baron, as one of those who are less tribal. Who replaces Vidic? I guess we have to wait to find out, but he wasn't exactly a fixture for the last two seasons which ended with a very very close 2nd and a title winning margin of 11pts... Fair one. I guess it's more who replaces the partnership. Would Utd fans want jagielka? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 08, 2014, 09:39:46 AM The partnership? I don't have stats to hand but I doubt that Ferdinand & Vidic have played together in more than 1 game in 5 over the last couple of seasons.
Personally, I'd love it if Evans, Jones and Smalling fulfilled their early promise. Sadly a combination of injuries and the constant use of the two Englishmen out of position seems to have set them back at best, ruined them at worst. If we now get the rest of this season with Vidic playing most of most games and bringing the best out of the younger players they could still be the future for us. A new left back would be handy though Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on February 27, 2014, 03:44:04 AM I just don't see it with smalling, technically is poor and lacking in game intelligence, in short isn't Manchester United standard. Very dubious about mr jones too, treaded water for a good while now. Would consider them both utility players but certainly not the foundations to build our team on. Evans is average too, plays well when alongside a quality centre back like a vidic or rio in their prime. So many holes to fill in our team, lol
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on March 17, 2014, 11:16:19 PM The biggest problem United have right now is a desire by Moyes to play Rvp, Rooney and Mata together. If we had a stronger midfield and defense then yes, a formation could be constructed to blend them together. But playing effectively 4-4-2 with two flicky, like to cut in, don't like to track back wide players/playmakers in mata and januzaj is a recipe for disaster against most decent teams nowadays. Part of that problem is the lack of pace of Rvp and Rooney... Pace breeds fear in opposing defences, meaning they drop deeper. Liverpool pushed high against us knowing we couldn't get in behind them, and they could do so to us at will. The team is so imbalanced, no cohesive game plan or strategy, just a mish mash of expensive players, many of whom have seen their best years.
If they keep the faith and he turns it around I'll doff my cap to him.... but I agree with jandellis, he seems to have lost his belief to the point where he's repeatedly making statements which are uninspiring and defeatist , can only see this going one way :/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 18, 2014, 08:44:29 AM For me, one of the attractions of having Moyes as our new manager was a sense that he had very little ego and that he wouldn't arrive with a feeling of wanting to stamp his personality on the club. The squad may not have been at it's peak but had been good enough to win the title last season and there was a well-oiled machine below SAF that would support him as he got to grips with the job.
I wonder if he now regrets the wholesale clear out of that supporting cast? Too late to go back now and the knives are out in the media and across the social networks. A bad performance tomorrow night and it will all intensify. "Lost the dressing room", "poor motivator" and "poor tactically" will be aimed at him and who could blame him for succumbing to the pressures. From the outside it's hard to know the influences that have affected results this season. Certainly we've conceded too many late goals that have cost us points and cup places. That's a significant change from a club where titles and cups were won by playing hard and concentrating through to the 95th minute plus. That concentration stems from training routines and being motivated. Again, I wonder if he regrets that wholesale clear out? I want him to stick it out and for the club to come back strongly over the rest of this season and to be challenging again next season. But I suspect that part of my desire for that is a sense that if he fails I will have been proved wrong in my own assessment of it all initially. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Acidmouse on March 18, 2014, 10:25:22 AM YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zy8LdGQt_6Y
He keeps saying its Bobbins lol. Not heard that for a few years. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 18, 2014, 08:07:07 PM Great post David.
Genuinely thought it was a good choice but I see so much of Hodgson at Liverpool in Moyes at Utd I think I could be very wrong. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 18, 2014, 08:41:19 PM Great post David. Genuinely thought it was a good choice but I see so much of Hodgson at Liverpool in Moyes at Utd I think I could be very wrong. One for the scrap book. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on March 18, 2014, 11:07:18 PM I don't think he has lost the dressing room. I don't think he ever had the dressing room at any stage of this season to actually lose. I went to the Manure v Stoke game this season relatively early in the season as guests of betfair and spoke to numerous people during the day who worked at the club who weren't convinced by Moyes. I remember reading his program notes the same day as they were the same negative dross he has been pulling out in the media for months. The bottom line is anyone on this forum could probably coach this Manure team to their performance this season across all competitions given the level/depth of talent within their squad. They were very lucky to get 3 points against Stoke that day. I really feel if Manure had run bad this season they would be in even worse shape than they actually are.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on March 19, 2014, 04:24:19 PM The thing that people overlook is that the United team of the last few years under SAF was, statistically, running incredibly well. In terms of the stuff that the analystics guys look at like shots, shots on target etc they were never more than about 3rd or 4th in the Premier League. I don't know whether that was because Fergie had some magic formula or they just ran good but either way they were always very likely to regress somewhat. Possibly it has been worse than expected but they also lost a fair few important players too.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on March 19, 2014, 04:26:21 PM Oh please lord, just let us have some fight tonight.
I just want to see a team who looks like they want to win. Only banker for tonight is the atmosphere will be incred like it has been all season. 20 times man united, playing football the Matt busby way. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 19, 2014, 04:43:50 PM Oh please lord, just let us have some fight tonight. I just want to see a team who looks like they want to win. Only banker for tonight is the atmosphere will be incred like it has been all season. 20 times man united, playing football the Matt busby way. European nights at OT are special, if the team can't raise their game tonight then it feels like they never will. A fighting exit would be something, a fighting progression to the next round would be something else. Frighteningly, we need to win every game from here to the end of the PL season to equal our worst ever points tally... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on March 19, 2014, 04:54:22 PM Oh please lord, just let us have some fight tonight. I just want to see a team who looks like they want to win. Only banker for tonight is the atmosphere will be incred like it has been all season. 20 times man united, playing football the Matt busby way. European nights at OT are special, if the team can't raise their game tonight then it feels like they never will. A fighting exit would be something, a fighting progression to the next round would be something else. Frighteningly, we need to win every game from here to the end of the PL season to equal our worst ever points tally... agreed and im gonna miss them next year. Just hearing that music sends tingles down your spine. A good start tonight would be good. Nice early goals! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 19, 2014, 11:05:51 PM Result!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Tal on March 19, 2014, 11:15:13 PM I know it's not cool, but I like seeing United do well (we spurs fans know how crucial you've been to stopping Chelsea and the other team winning the league over the past fifteen years). Pleased for you tonight.
You're the outsider of the eight now and that must be a bit weird for you!? Happy with anyone but Barca/Real/Bayern? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Cf on March 19, 2014, 11:23:41 PM I've enjoyed Man Utd's downfall this season but was also pleased to see them go through.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 22, 2014, 07:58:24 PM Mata looked so good through the middle and Kagawa put a decent shift in too.
Feel for Fellani who is nothing like a holding midfielder Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 22, 2014, 10:53:22 PM Mata looked so good through the middle and Kagawa put a decent shift in too. Feel for Fellani who is nothing like a holding midfielder But was chosen as Man of the Match... :dontask: by Stan Collymore Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 01, 2014, 10:01:00 PM Would it be unfair to suggest Rooney hasn't produced in big European games for Man U overall ? Would say he'd be lucky to get a 6 tonight, just doesn't feel like the 1st time I've felt he hasn't done it for you in these big CL games. I was impressed by Carrick, and Wellbeck had a decent game other than the wasted chance.
Rooney hasn't really done it for England in the big games neither, I've always been a big fan but think this is becoming a pretty big question mark over how good he actually is, or maybe I'm just hugely over-exaggerating it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 02, 2014, 12:23:18 AM Rooney did well tonight. It was tough for out forwards.
Again Fellani just isn't good enough to play in front of the back 4. Play him up top or take a loss on him. Waste of time- if we hadn't played such a ridiculous price for him he would've been droppe by now Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 02, 2014, 08:59:28 AM Agree with George, and thought that Rooney put in a decent shift last night.
Fellaini is definitely looking lost at the moment, but the problem was exacerbated markedly due to the opposition. Thought he looked much better later in the game when getting forward more, but he certainly doesn't need to be marauding around in the Keane role. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 02, 2014, 09:02:32 AM Showed how much we will miss Vidic.
We're still in it, another big performance over there and who knows. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on April 02, 2014, 11:51:39 AM Only one player in the Bayern Munich squad cost more than Fellaini !
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on April 02, 2014, 12:18:46 PM Fellani was appualing until they shoved him up the pitch and just punted the bal into him like he used to do for Everton. But there are only very few teams united should be playing like that agaisnt teams and that's gonna be the top top teams when we have 0% possession
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 09, 2014, 08:49:55 PM So far so good but we need to score at least once...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 09, 2014, 09:02:47 PM Put Fellani up top and punt it to him
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on April 09, 2014, 09:15:55 PM BOOMMMMMMMM!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: celtic on April 09, 2014, 09:17:10 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on April 09, 2014, 09:20:00 PM How did I do that?
Still, 1-1 would not be a disaster. Far better than 0-0. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on April 09, 2014, 09:22:42 PM How did I do that? Still, 1-1 would not be a disaster. Far better than 0-0. aye but good luck beating the Germans on penalties ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on April 09, 2014, 09:26:36 PM Ugh. That IS a disaster. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on April 09, 2014, 09:28:16 PM ....maybe. One goal would suffice now, right? ( as long as it is Man U who get it). Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on April 09, 2014, 09:35:01 PM No.......... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on April 09, 2014, 10:14:06 PM Oh well, there's always next year
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 09, 2014, 10:23:44 PM Oh well, there's always next year Arsene's speech at the end of season do? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on April 09, 2014, 10:46:27 PM Oh well, there's always next year Arsene's speech at the end of season do? We're gonna win 2 trofes this year, oi oi. Anyhoo this is the Man U's thread, was just offering some encouragement Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 09, 2014, 11:25:20 PM Those in glass houses
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on April 09, 2014, 11:43:42 PM Those in glass houses Shouldn't undress with the lights on. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bagel on April 10, 2014, 12:05:27 AM heartbreaking stuff
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 10, 2014, 12:07:43 AM Oh well, there's always next year Arsene's speech at the end of season do? We're gonna win 2 trofes this year, oi oi. Anyhoo this is the Man U's thread, was just offering some encouragement From a completely selfish perspective, I hope Arsenal do win the cup, and will certainly be cheering them on! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 10, 2014, 12:09:38 AM heartbreaking stuff Isn't it a bit late for you to be playing on the pc? ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bagel on April 10, 2014, 12:16:41 AM heartbreaking stuff Isn't it a bit late for you to be playing on the pc? ;) no highlights on so i guess you are right. night night. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on April 10, 2014, 01:29:10 AM Bah would have taken them two games two weeks ago but really felt afterwords that we could have done it
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 21, 2014, 03:27:31 PM Wonder if we have anyone lined up
http://m.skysports.com/article/football//9276770 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on April 21, 2014, 03:53:34 PM Wonder if we have anyone lined up http://m.skysports.com/article/football//9276770 im hearing giggs is in line Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 21, 2014, 11:18:59 PM He'll make a mediocre club half decent.
Moyes to be Spurs manager. You heard it here first! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: marcro on April 22, 2014, 09:08:00 AM Here is how Manchester United broke the news on Twitter:
Man Utd: Manchester United announces that David Moyes has left the club. The club would like to place on record its thanks for the hard work, honesty and integrity he brought to the role. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: millidonk on April 22, 2014, 09:12:49 AM Pretty filthy how he's been treated imo.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on April 22, 2014, 09:16:25 AM Not dealt with very well but would not have lasted as long at any other big club
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 22, 2014, 09:18:33 AM sigh
a disappointing end to a disappointing season been through all this before when Sir Matt stepped down and it took a long time to find the right man. Maybe it has to; maybe we have to kiss a lot of frogs before we find our prince. I do hope not. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 22, 2014, 10:49:01 AM Giggs is interimming - confirmed this morning by Imogen Thomas
Ancelotti in the summer if he doesn't win either of the big 2 with Madrid? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on April 22, 2014, 11:00:09 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Blz-mFlIAAAwdnC.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: kinboshi on April 23, 2014, 09:34:24 PM Jurgan Klopp has ruled himself out of the Man Utd job, but said his brother, Klipity might be interested.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 23, 2014, 10:30:14 PM Jurgan Klopp has ruled himself out of the Man Utd job, but said his brother, Klipity might be interested. Haven't you got a quiz reveal to do? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: kinboshi on April 24, 2014, 10:06:15 AM Jurgan Klopp has ruled himself out of the Man Utd job, but said his brother, Klipity might be interested. Haven't you got a quiz reveal to do? Looking like it could happen this weekend when I'm back. Sunday evening? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 24, 2014, 10:13:44 AM Jurgan Klopp has ruled himself out of the Man Utd job, but said his brother, Klipity might be interested. Haven't you got a quiz reveal to do? Looking like it could happen this weekend when I'm back. Sunday evening? There's already been enough farce in this thread over the last 9 months. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Tal on April 24, 2014, 12:01:51 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bl5L21DIcAApPOM.png:large)
On Bleacher Report today Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 24, 2014, 05:15:58 PM so glad to see the back of that fraud who next for the hot seat?? klopp has sort of ruled himself in today van gal seems a bit of a crank could do with a bit of personality after this season Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 24, 2014, 05:26:58 PM so glad to see the back of that fraud who next for the hot seat?? klopp has sort of ruled himself in today van gal seems a bit of a crank could do with a bit of personality after this season You meant 'out', right? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 24, 2014, 05:31:26 PM no - in said the quotes this week ruling himself out didnt come from him Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on April 24, 2014, 05:38:22 PM so glad to see the back of that fraud who next for the hot seat?? klopp has sort of ruled himself in today van gal seems a bit of a crank could do with a bit of personality after this season i shouldn't react but come on, a fraud? the owners take 100s of millions out of the club, Sir Alex disguises the impact with genius management, leaves at the right time. the players won't play for him, let him down badly...the club doesn't deliver on the summer signings list and he's a fraud? sure he may not have been good enough, but fraud is way too strong. An honest hard working man in a tough gig. 100% certain he'll be a great success in the next job Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 24, 2014, 05:38:39 PM so glad to see the back of that fraud who next for the hot seat?? klopp has sort of ruled himself in today van gal seems a bit of a crank could do with a bit of personality after this season Why is he a fraud? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 24, 2014, 06:00:21 PM he was a fraud - but hes walked away with 10 million hope he enjoys spending it when the plane banner went up storming out infront of the players acting like he was in control rest of the season slumped in his seat hiding in the dugout his interviews - promising to make it difficult for newcastle at home then getting beat saying we aspire to be manchester city after losing to liverpool - there will be more days like these - cheers dave you were right tho everton are a different club now they av got rid will be interesting who gives him his next job and when Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 24, 2014, 06:07:34 PM Would snap take him, sadly doubt he's that stupid though.
Think Pep/Jose would've struggled to get you in top 4 with players Moyes' had available this season, but they'd have been able to attract better players in the 2 windows so kinda irrelevant. Some of his comments in interviews were pretty strange, did seem like job was too big for him, even the two above might've struggled taking over from Fergie though, was an impossible job pretty much. Do you even want to be in Europa League ? +1 to "fraud" is really harsh, and doesn't really make any sense. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on April 24, 2014, 06:07:56 PM He got £4.5m for 1 year of his remaining contract, this was widely reported on Sunday/monday.
think your take is way off. the blame lies just as much with the board and the players Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on April 24, 2014, 06:08:19 PM None of that makes him a fraud. Like it or not you do aspire to be Man City.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on April 24, 2014, 06:10:24 PM Would snap take him, sadly doubt he's that stupid though. Think Pep/Jose would've struggled to get you in top 4 with players Moyes' had available this season, but they'd have been able to attract better players in the 2 windows so kinda irrelevant. Some of his comments in interviews were pretty strange, did seem like job was too big for him, even the two above might've struggled taking over from Fergie though, was an impossible job pretty much. Do you even want to be in Europa League ? Also very much this. Would have him in heartbeat. If Man Utd fans want manager who spouts aimless platitudes and won't tell you there'll be more days like this (losing to Liverpool) but instead come up with novel excuse (it's the press fault!) then Pardew available. Pretty sure Monda and I will carry him to Old Trafford for you if you want him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on April 24, 2014, 06:14:49 PM Would snap take him, sadly doubt he's that stupid though. Think Pep/Jose would've struggled to get you in top 4 with players Moyes' had available this season, but they'd have been able to attract better players in the 2 windows so kinda irrelevant. Some of his comments in interviews were pretty strange, did seem like job was too big for him, even the two above might've struggled taking over from Fergie though, was an impossible job pretty much. Do you even want to be in Europa League ? Also very much this. Would have him in heartbeat. If Man Utd fans want manager who spouts aimless platitudes and won't tell you there'll be more days like this (losing to Liverpool) but instead come up with novel excuse (it's the press fault!) then Pardew available. Pretty sure Monda and I will carry him to Old Trafford for you if you want him. If he keeps his mouth shut then yeah in, if not he's going in the nearest river. Obv we worlds apart in who we can attract as manager, but think a lot of clubs would want him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Kmac84 on April 24, 2014, 07:44:18 PM Isn't this just a case of many Manure fans not knowing what it is to struggle and lose and they are acting like spoilt little bitches?
This is only the beginning. Its all downhill for the next few years imo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 24, 2014, 07:48:56 PM he got his pay off and the years wages its around the 10m mark - what was it the 5th highest paid coach in the world or something??
he got the runaway champions last season into 7th pretty much every player has got worse under his and his staffs coaching a host of them asked to leave if he was staying 51 different team selections 11 defeats something very wrong about all that. following fergie is tough but blimey evertons next manager should have had the same problems following moyes to a lesser degree - they have gone from strength to strength Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 24, 2014, 07:50:43 PM It's never that crystal clear. Calling him a fraud is harsh.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on April 24, 2014, 07:54:46 PM don't think there was a single non-deluded man utd fan who thought they'd be anywhere near the championship this year.
and by that I mean the title, not the actual championship :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 24, 2014, 08:00:19 PM 7th place is even more far fetched then winning it Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 24, 2014, 08:01:59 PM It's never that crystal clear. Calling him a fraud is harsh. hes been called a lot worse all year by all and sundry including the players Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 24, 2014, 09:20:06 PM Would snap take him, sadly doubt he's that stupid though. Think Pep/Jose would've struggled to get you in top 4 with players Moyes' had available this season, but they'd have been able to attract better players in the 2 windows so kinda irrelevant. Some of his comments in interviews were pretty strange, did seem like job was too big for him, even the two above might've struggled taking over from Fergie though, was an impossible job pretty much. Do you even want to be in Europa League ? +1 to "fraud" is really harsh, and doesn't really make any sense. +1 Crap interviews in line with Hodgson at Liverpool and job too big for him but never a fraud. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 24, 2014, 09:26:37 PM he got his pay off and the years wages its around the 10m mark - what was it the 5th highest paid coach in the world or something?? he got the runaway champions last season into 7th pretty much every player has got worse under his and his staffs coaching a host of them asked to leave if he was staying 51 different team selections 11 defeats something very wrong about all that. following fergie is tough but blimey evertons next manager should have had the same problems following moyes to a lesser degree - they have gone from strength to strength I think there is only something very wrong about it, if you're not able to look at things objectively. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 27, 2014, 05:00:32 PM best put this one in here http://oi61.tinypic.com/qqsd51.jpg Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on April 27, 2014, 05:55:29 PM pretty much every player has got worse under his and his staffs coaching This shows a lack of understanding about the way that players decline with age. They didn't get worse because they were badly coached, they got worse because they are too old. Giggs, Evra, Vidic, RvP, Ferdinand are all on the downgrade now and Rooney will be soon. If Moyes has a fault in all of this it was that he wasn't bold enough and didn't recognise this and have a mass clear out early. The stalwarts of those great teams will never perform at that level again and it seems that the younger players simply aren't good enough. I think as United fans you need to accept that you are very unlikely to win anything significant for the next 3-4 years and the team needs rebuilding totally. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 27, 2014, 06:39:18 PM nobody said this when moyes took over tho 2 months into his reign its a 200m rebuilding job best week in a long a while to be a united fan anyway Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 27, 2014, 06:40:59 PM nobody said this when moyes took over tho 2 months into his reign its a 200m rebuilding job best week in a long a while to be a united fan anyway If that last line is true then that's a great thing for us! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on April 27, 2014, 06:45:52 PM nobody said this when moyes took over tho 2 months into his reign its a 200m rebuilding job best week in a long a while to be a united fan anyway Pretty sure Ferguson knew it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 27, 2014, 06:54:09 PM nobody said this when moyes took over tho 2 months into his reign its a 200m rebuilding job best week in a long a while to be a united fan anyway If that last line is true then that's a great thing for us! course it is we av got rid of an incompetent manager we thought we were stuck with til christmas at best won 4 nil yesterday at home aswell -7th is secured thank god Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 27, 2014, 06:55:41 PM nobody said this when moyes took over tho 2 months into his reign its a 200m rebuilding job best week in a long a while to be a united fan anyway Pretty sure Ferguson knew it. wish he would have told moyes Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bagel on April 27, 2014, 06:57:29 PM does 7th get europa league this year?
if it does i certainly would not be happy about that if i was a utd fan. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on April 27, 2014, 07:00:05 PM nobody said this when moyes took over tho 2 months into his reign its a 200m rebuilding job best week in a long a while to be a united fan anyway Pretty sure Ferguson knew it. wish he would have told moyes pretty sure he told the world when he retired. and just lol at calling Moyes an incompetent manager. I think you honestly have no idea how absolutely blessed you've been with the best manager ever to have been in the game for all those years and how absolutely golden you ran by not sacking him in like 89 or whenever it was. I do wonder if you'll call Van Gaal, Ancelloti, whomever incompetent if you don't win the league next year either. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on April 27, 2014, 07:28:02 PM nobody said this when moyes took over tho 2 months into his reign its a 200m rebuilding job best week in a long a while to be a united fan anyway Pretty sure Ferguson knew it. wish he would have told moyes Pretty obvious you were in trouble when Fergie needed to wheel Paul Scholes out of retirement. Rio has been a liability for 2 seasons, and none of the younger centre backs have looked remotely good enough to replace him. Add to that Giggs, Evra, Feltcher, Young, Anderson and Nani all neded replacing. Really amazing Utd won the league last season. With the squad they've got City should be as dominant in English football as Bayern currently are in Germany. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: donttiltboy on April 27, 2014, 07:38:18 PM does 7th get europa league this year? Pretty sure it doesn't this year if it does i certainly would not be happy about that if i was a utd fan. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on April 27, 2014, 07:40:55 PM does 7th get europa league this year? Pretty sure it doesn't this year if it does i certainly would not be happy about that if i was a utd fan. it does if Everton finish above Arsenal for 4th place I think. otherwise it doesn't. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Kmac84 on April 27, 2014, 08:10:58 PM Malt Vinegar is trying to level us all, no?
I feel tilted and I hate United, God I hate the EPL most overrated and over hyped league in football imo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 27, 2014, 09:44:25 PM How many people were calling Fergie incompetent during the early years of his reign? U just know nothing about football if you're calling Moyes incompetent
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 27, 2014, 11:10:31 PM Somewhere around 2005 I had a long evening drive and listened to 606 as I drove.
The lines were full of experts on MUFC who all wanted SAF out, and one of the issues that irked them was that Giggs was past it. These are the same people who will now be calling Moyes incompetent and worse; the same people who are singing 'Giggs will tear you apart, again'; some of them will be the clowns who wore a Green and Yellow scarf over their Red replica shirt. I'm pretty sure that David Moyes is a decent bloke and that he has a very good set of managerial skills. I'm also pretty sure that the players chose not to commit themselves to his cause as they did to SAF's cause last season and through previous seasons. Winning the next three games will just confirm that. I'm disappointed that it came to this, but when the new season starts, whoever is in charge, I'll be cheering them on. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 28, 2014, 12:39:03 AM the love for moyes on here is something else - i can understand it from non united fans not winning the league isnt the issue - who expects to win the league ever year its the coming 7th, its the performances, its the lack of any tactical nous, its 51 different teams, its 80 crosses in a game, its bringing 11 back to defend a corner, its surrendering to your most hated rivals at home, its round and lumsden, its the promising to try to make things difficult for newcastle at home and losing. even fergie washed his hands of him if the next man does the same as moyes he will be gone aswell and rightly so theres a spring back in the step of united fans this week now that burdens gone - just need another small miracle and have chelsea somehow win the league Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 28, 2014, 01:09:09 AM Heh if we win it by some miracle can't wait to stick up a few of Stevie G trophy in hand on here!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Kmac84 on April 28, 2014, 07:13:11 AM When the players show a complete lack of professionalism and think they are bigger than the club your anger should be turned towards them not a new manager.
United are on a downward Spiral. SAF knew this, that's why he got out. He done the same with Aberdeen look at the mess they are in now and have been for a number of years. Moyes record at Everton and Preston stands up to scrutiny its all one the armchair experts say look at what Martinez has done, sure he has them playing better footballl but he inherited a perfectly good squad on an upward curve. For me Manchester United winning the league last year was a miracle but helped by the fact that Citeh thought they only had to turn up to win it, chelsea going through a mini crisis, Spurs believing their own hype and Liverpool not being good enough. All you have done in this thread is regurgitate lazy facts that the media printed, we all know everything you posted but try looking beyond that. IMO it doesn't matter who you bring in they have a massive task to break into top 4 next season and I don't see it happening unless yous spend big in the summer but is your club capable of that sort of expenditure and who is going to want to go to United without Champions League football? 2 seasons without playing with the big boys will have such a detrimental effect on the club finances. Not being in the top 4 will also harm finances. Next season to be competitie, you realistically need 2 centre halves, a left back, 3 midfielders and a striker. Good luck geting that when your re-mortgaged upto the hilt. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 28, 2014, 09:16:21 AM It's not love for him. It's the language your using to describe him. Out of his depth maybe but incompetent and a fraud? No
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 28, 2014, 10:14:52 AM It's not love for him. It's the language your using to describe him. Out of his depth maybe but incompetent and a fraud? No Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on April 28, 2014, 01:33:22 PM I really don't think we will struggle to break into the top 4 next year. Especially if we are not in Europe.
Citeh and chelski will be up there as per Liverpool will struggle with the added European pressure if they don't expand their squad. Their 1st team currently is probably the 3rd best in the league but when they start adding in the next line of players it really does drop off fast Aresenal Tottenham Everton - this will again depend on who is in Europe I suspect it will be a mix of these 3 plus united and Liverpool fighting for 3/4th I would put united and arsenal as fav's for these two places next year depending on what happens in the summer but that's what I think right now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 28, 2014, 01:49:16 PM Heh if we win it by some miracle can't wait to stick up a few of Stevie G trophy in hand on here! fair dos aswell if you cant rub peoples noses in it wheres the fun in that http://p.twimg.com/A7BFabDCcAAAxJK.jpg:large i do think your still going to win it aswell Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 28, 2014, 02:02:54 PM I really don't think we will struggle to break into the top 4 next year. Especially if we are not in Europe. Citeh and chelski will be up there as per Liverpool will struggle with the added European pressure if they don't expand their squad. Their 1st team currently is probably the 3rd best in the league but when they start adding in the next line of players it really does drop off fast Aresenal Tottenham Everton - this will again depend on who is in Europe I suspect it will be a mix of these 3 plus united and Liverpool fighting for 3/4th I would put united and arsenal as fav's for these two places next year depending on what happens in the summer but that's what I think right now. totally agree with this with a manager who knows his onions a couple of players united will be in the mix for the last 2 european places. depends how everton replace the loan players if they can keep it up who knows what will happen with spurs rumours levy likes moyes so that would rule them out wenger could be on his bike cant see it myself if he did anything could happen and like you say liverpool will need some cover with the extra games Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on April 28, 2014, 02:30:35 PM When the players show a complete lack of professionalism and think they are bigger than the club your anger should be turned towards them not a new manager. United are on a downward Spiral. SAF knew this, that's why he got out. He done the same with Aberdeen look at the mess they are in now and have been for a number of years. Moyes record at Everton and Preston stands up to scrutiny its all one the armchair experts say look at what Martinez has done, sure he has them playing better footballl but he inherited a perfectly good squad on an upward curve. For me Manchester United winning the league last year was a miracle but helped by the fact that Citeh thought they only had to turn up to win it, chelsea going through a mini crisis, Spurs believing their own hype and Liverpool not being good enough. All you have done in this thread is regurgitate lazy facts that the media printed, we all know everything you posted but try looking beyond that. IMO it doesn't matter who you bring in they have a massive task to break into top 4 next season and I don't see it happening unless yous spend big in the summer but is your club capable of that sort of expenditure and who is going to want to go to United without Champions League football? 2 seasons without playing with the big boys will have such a detrimental effect on the club finances. Not being in the top 4 will also harm finances. Next season to be competitie, you realistically need 2 centre halves, a left back, 3 midfielders and a striker. Good luck geting that when your re-mortgaged upto the hilt. haha fergie left aberdeen in 1986 you would think fergie jacked it at 50 hes in his 70s he could keel over at anytime they way he gives it to refs - hes earnt a few years on the piss and giving his grandkids a bollocking yeh we need players which club doesnt 3 or 4 in get the deadwood out we wont need a big squad for next season the league will be shite next year anyway all the best players will be goosed after the world cup most of ours will be well rested after a fortnight in magaluf the more i think about we will probably have it won by march Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Kmac84 on April 28, 2014, 06:30:42 PM I laid United for top 4 and top6 at the beginning of the season (only season long winning bet, fml) I will probably do the same next year but much will depend on the odds.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 28, 2014, 07:08:30 PM Utd will undoubtedly improve next year. But I think most teams above you will also improve at a better rate.
Everton are the exception, IMHO they will struggle. No way Barry, Lukaku etc have the same effect if they're even there. Oh Spurs will change manger so they'll probs be shit also. Basically I would expect the same top 4 maybe in a different order. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 28, 2014, 07:21:02 PM Utd will undoubtedly improve next year. But I think most teams above you will also improve at a better rate. Everton are the exception, IMHO they will struggle. No way Barry, Lukaku etc have the same effect if they're even there. Oh Spurs will change manger so they'll probs be shit also. Basically I would expect the same top 4 maybe in a different order. Think Liverpool will find it tougher. More teams will bring the twin double decker. They've been relatively injury free too Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on April 28, 2014, 07:37:35 PM Utd will undoubtedly improve next year. But I think most teams above you will also improve at a better rate. Everton are the exception, IMHO they will struggle. No way Barry, Lukaku etc have the same effect if they're even there. Oh Spurs will change manger so they'll probs be shit also. Basically I would expect the same top 4 maybe in a different order. Think Liverpool will find it tougher. More teams will bring the twin double decker. They've been relatively injury free too Agree but we "should" have better quality personnel. I also think more players will improve under Rodgers. Even if Utd go for a great manager like LVG it will take more than a year. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheDazzler on April 28, 2014, 08:33:49 PM I laid United for top 4 and top6 at the beginning of the season (only season long winning bet, fml) I will probably do the same next year but much will depend on the odds. You laid Utd top 6??????? What price, must have been massive? 25/1? 33/1? I mean there are only 6 teams that could conceivably have finished ahead of them and all of them obviously now look like they will. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on April 28, 2014, 08:37:12 PM 1/25 pre season on bf to make the top 6.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 28, 2014, 08:47:10 PM Biggeradz in the house :D
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 28, 2014, 09:02:30 PM Utd will undoubtedly improve next year. But I think most teams above you will also improve at a better rate. Everton are the exception, IMHO they will struggle. No way Barry, Lukaku etc have the same effect if they're even there. Oh Spurs will change manger so they'll probs be shit also. Basically I would expect the same top 4 maybe in a different order. Think Liverpool will find it tougher. More teams will bring the twin double decker. They've been relatively injury free too Agree but we "should" have better quality personnel. I also think more players will improve under Rodgers. Even if Utd go for a great manager like LVG it will take more than a year. Pressure to win brings its own pressure. Liverpool had one game a week with not much to lose. Next year is going to be interesting that's for sure Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Kmac84 on April 28, 2014, 09:24:22 PM Biggeradz in the house :D I think I may have posted somewhere on here before that I had opposed United. It was the best way I could think of making my point earlier, wasn't meant for rubz. Iremember the impact Ferguson leaving Aberdeen had and thought this was going to be similar. When discussing it with some mates I said that it was the worse possible job for Moyes to take, shame he never listened to me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: flushthemout on April 28, 2014, 09:26:31 PM To big a job for Moyes and to soon, yes limited budget at Everton but how can a club as big as Manure employ a manager who has never won anything in his managerial career? Beeing a City Fan I would love to see Giggs get the job, but again to soon for him, and he has stopped going into Yates Wine bar and sleeping with his Bros Wife.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on April 29, 2014, 12:05:12 AM Many may find this a bold, even ridiculous statement, but I will be amazed if we don't finish top four next season, if not challenging for the title again. Obvs the signings we make will be influential but I really can't see United making as big a balls up of a season as they have done this year. The diminished quality of our squad is massively overstated imo....the biggest issue this year was the players not buying into the manager. Whether it's a big name Van Gaal etc or Giggs, I predict a dramatic improvement. This idea that we were lucky to win the league last year by just the 11 points and that it was solely down to the magic of Ferguson and weakness of the rest is nonsense. Fergie was a key factor but it's an insult to the players to suggest they weren't the key factor, a point Moyes missed when he repeatedly spoke of changes at the end of the season. A point the players no doubt did not miss.
Taking into account we're gonna be out of European competition, and with the 2-3 quality additions, we'll be right up there again next season. I think if they have any sense though they should give Ferdinand and Evra one more year, even if they each only get 20-25 games. To lose Vidic and Ferdinand in the same season would be reckless, with Ferdinand's experience and tutoring ability still valuable assets. If we get Shaw then keeping Evra for one more year and rotating them would help Shaw's integration and keep some stability. Changing too much too soon rarely works, as we've seen at Tottenham. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on April 29, 2014, 12:09:09 AM Checked the prices on oddschecker and united are 2nd favs behind Liverpool for top 4 (ignoring chelski and Citeh) which is fair at this stage and the odds are close will be watching through the summer but if the RIGHT decisions are made united I guess will shorten espically if the fans like the ideas because the fan money is pretty big with united. As it is with the scouse!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on April 29, 2014, 12:34:36 AM Man United are currently half the price of Arsenal to win the league next year and 4/7 to finish top 4 whilst Arsenal are 5/4. I will lay anyone in this thread that wants to put their money where their mouth is 4/5 Man United to finish above Arsenal next season for up to a grand. Settle up end of next season.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on May 01, 2014, 08:52:52 PM dunno i think arsenal will just plod on like they always do threatening to win it then threatening to come 5th and finishing 3rd or 4th - unless wenger jacks it in then they come 7th liverpool could struggle more for top 4 - champions league disrupting things say drawing juventus , small squad, suarez on his bike, who knows what the balls up this season will have on them if they do blow it. then again they could win it keep suarez and spend a load of money!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bagel on May 01, 2014, 09:10:30 PM dunno i think arsenal will just plod on like they always do threatening to win it then threatening to come 5th and finishing 3rd or 4th - unless wenger jacks it in then they come 7th liverpool could struggle more for top 4 - champions league disrupting things say drawing juventus , small squad, suarez on his bike, who knows what the balls up this season will have on them if they do blow it. then again they could win it keep suarez and spend a load of money!! try reading that nonsense again. its ridiculous yet i i have heard it repeated from numerous people since sunday. "who knows what the balls up this season will have on them". liverpool losing a game against chelsea , who have been consistently up there amongst the top of english football for the last few years is not remotely "ballsing up a season". that result will very possibly cost liverpool the title. still way beyond the expectations of last august. if this season was a balls up, then i look forward to the next few years. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on May 01, 2014, 09:19:46 PM Don't see how Liverpool need to spend a tonne to win it next year. Prolly need to keep Suarez and give some serious consideration to the purchase of some centre backs that can defend, but that aside I don't see them spending huge this summer.
They will coast into top 4 along with city and Chelsea and leave Everton and Arsenal to fight it out for 4th. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on May 01, 2014, 09:24:17 PM Don't see how Liverpool need to spend a tonne to win it next year. Prolly need to keep Suarez and give some serious consideration to the purchase of some centre backs that can defend, but that aside I don't see them spending huge this summer. They will coast into top 4 along with city and Chelsea and leave Everton and Arsenal to fight it out for 4th. with the added pressure of European football plus a lot of there team going to the world cup they will struggle if they dont get some reinforcements. Luckily we have cleverly Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bagel on May 01, 2014, 10:23:21 PM "with the added pressure of European football plus a lot of there team going to the world cup they will struggle if they dont get some reinforcements."
in 2004/5 season liverpools team wasnt great to say the least. we finished 5th, 37 points behind chelsea. and behind everton. that season, with the "added pressure of european football lol", we played, and beat , monaco,olympiakos, deportivo la coruna,bayer leverkusen,juventus,chelsea, and then ac milan in the champions league final in istanbul. was it a very special experience? yes of course it was. did it make liverpool the best team in europe that season? no obviously not. cup competitions , in any format, are a bit like a sit and go. you can be the worst player at the table and beat a few really good players and you are the champion. congratulations. greece won the euro championships in 2004,playing against france , russia, spain,portugal x2, czech republic. pretty sure they were not best team in europe. liverpool havent finished where they are in the league this year by luck. even if it does end up 2nd. we are a fucking good team. and we are back. so get used to it. regarding lots of liverpool players going to the world cup being detrimental, it is more than likely less than 5 hours of football which some of them wont even play. if it does go to the magical 9 hours i would argue that the any people that were a part of it would draw far more positives than negatives from the whole experience. i think being in the champions league can only be a great thing for liverpool. vast majority of games are on your doorstep pretty much. play tuesday or wednesday with most prem kick offs on saturday afternoon. not to mention being able to attract top players to sign. dont see too many negatives. europa league obviously very different for everton spurs etc going to ukraine and the arse end of nowhere every thursday night. does you no favours at all. really hope utd scrape into it this year. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on May 01, 2014, 10:27:20 PM "with the added pressure of European football plus a lot of there team going to the world cup they will struggle if they dont get some reinforcements." in 2004/5 season liverpools team wasnt great to say the least. we finished 5th, 37 points behind chelsea. and behind everton. that season, with the "added pressure of european football lol", we played, and beat , monaco,olympiakos, deportivo la coruna,bayer leverkusen,juventus,chelsea, and then ac milan in the champions league final in istanbul. was it a very special experience? yes of course it was. did it make liverpool the best team in europe that season? no obviously not. cup competitions , in any format, are a bit like a sit and go. you can be the worst player at the table and beat a few really good players and you are the champion. congratulations. greece won the euro championships in 2004,playing against france , russia, spain,portugal x2, czech republic. pretty sure they were not best team in europe. liverpool havent finished where they are in the league this year by luck. even if it does end up 2nd. we are a fucking good team. and we are back. so get used to it. regarding lots of liverpool players going to the world cup being detrimental, it is more than likely less than 5 hours of football which some of them wont even play. if it does go to the magical 9 hours i would argue that the any people that were a part of it would draw far more positives than negatives from the whole experience. i think being in the champions league can only be a great thing for liverpool. vast majority of games are on your doorstep pretty much. play tuesday or wednesday with most prem kick offs on saturday afternoon. not to mention being able to attract top players to sign. dont see too many negatives. europa league obviously very different for everton spurs etc going to ukraine and the arse end of nowhere every thursday night. does you no favours at all. really hope utd scrape into it this year. This is the main point though miles off the pace in the prem, its so hard nowadays to fight on all fronts, almost impossible which is why i think liverpool will struggle for top 4 next year. The reason the WC has such an effect is normally these players have there feet up on the beach instead there playing and training everyday in rio no matter how long they get on the pitch it has a massive effect Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bagel on May 01, 2014, 10:45:27 PM atletico madrid are well clear (4 points) of barca and 6 clear of real madrid with 3 games left. also have got through to the champions league final. what price would you have laid that at the start of the season?
la liga has 38 games, same as premiership. i dont know a lot about their squad but i reckon a lot of them may be going to the world cup next month. you reckon atletico will suddenly struggle next year ? me neither. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on May 01, 2014, 10:50:48 PM atletico madrid are well clear (4 points) of barca and 6 clear of real madrid with 3 games left. also have got through to the champions league final. what price would you have laid that at the start of the season? la liga has 38 games, same as premiership. i dont know a lot about their squad but i reckon a lot of them may be going to the world cup next month. you reckon atletico will suddenly struggle next year ? me neither. start of the season that probably was 300/1 poss more i would guess. Unbelievable achievement by them to crack madrid and barca, next year i wouldnt expect the same there will be some roastings at barca and madrid if atherlectic do the double. but you wont be getting 300/1 on them next year to win the champions league and la liga. Also the Spanish league is slightly different with 2 (now 3) top teams and the drop off is quite quick after that. Which would make it an "easier" league that the prem. Although if Chelski or City were in that league i would reckon they would struggle to break the top 2/3 i would say that the top 7 in the premiership would not struggle to get a place in the top 4 in la liga. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bagel on May 01, 2014, 10:58:33 PM if you put chelsea , city or liverpool into that league i would be surprised if they didnt get top three to be honest.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on May 01, 2014, 11:02:46 PM I can see them struggling in the sense they'll be behind real and Barca next season, they've had the season of a lifetime and look likely to lose costa who is key to their pressing /aggressive strategy.
And yes, I can see Liverpool struggling next season too in comparison to this season. I'll bet most teams come up with a better way to manage their quick starts for example. I expect Chelsea to be very strong as they've effectively been handicapped this season without a consistent striker, United will vastly improve, and City will be there or thereabouts of course (they btw can rightly argue they're at the top to stay due to consistency over a few seasons, Liverpool haven't earnt that grading yet). Arsenal are consistently around the 3rd or 4th spot but injuries/squad improvements permitting I predict a stronger season from them, can't underestimate the loss of Ramsey and Walcott to the effectiveness of their strategy in the second half of the season. In short, I actually fancy Chelsea or City next season for the title, with United, Arsenal and liverpool scrapping for 3rd and 4th. I might revise that if United spend £200m on the right players tho, ha. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on May 01, 2014, 11:20:59 PM 200 million only gets you 4 or 5 players now
and united need about 16 or 17 to rebuild there squad Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on May 01, 2014, 11:26:09 PM 200 million only gets you 4 or 5 players now and united need about 16 or 17 to rebuild there squad slight exaggeration but yeh 200 million gets you 4 top or 8 mediocre players probably. As proved with Liverpool this year to win the league you dont need a brilliant squad if your not in europe. Just some quality in your starting 11, 3/4 toptop players and then 3/4 good back ups Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on May 01, 2014, 11:30:08 PM One mismanaged season and suddenly our whole team is awful.... sigh.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on May 01, 2014, 11:46:08 PM One mismanaged season and suddenly our whole team is awful.... sigh. Not whole team awful, but come on ffs even we beat you at Old Trafford and we are the worst team ever to have played in the EPL. I also think people underestimate how golden Utd ran last year too. Was a bit perfect storm to win with that squad and really don't think you'd have won it this year (or even been that close) if Fergie was managing this year (assuming same squad, ofc SAF prolly can attract bigger players) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on May 01, 2014, 11:59:25 PM One mismanaged season and suddenly our whole team is awful.... sigh. Not whole team awful, but come on ffs even we beat you at Old Trafford and we are the worst team ever to have played in the EPL. I also think people underestimate how golden Utd ran last year too. Was a bit perfect storm to win with that squad and really don't think you'd have won it this year (or even been that close) if Fergie was managing this year (assuming same squad, ofc SAF prolly can attract bigger players) Definitely this! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheDazzler on May 02, 2014, 01:54:04 AM One mismanaged season and suddenly our whole team is awful.... sigh. Not whole team awful, but come on ffs even we beat you at Old Trafford and we are the worst team ever to have played in the EPL. I also think people underestimate how golden Utd ran last year too. Was a bit perfect storm to win with that squad and really don't think you'd have won it this year (or even been that close) if Fergie was managing this year (assuming same squad, ofc SAF prolly can attract bigger players) Definitely this! I think United will be fine. I don't see Pool finishing ahead of them next year and shall be backing accordingly. All this talk of £200m and 10+ players needed is way ott imo. Break it down, what do they really need? A left back certainly. A right back probably. Cover at centre half. A couple of midfielders. They are okay up front (even overstocked) with RVP, Rooney, Hernandez, Welbeck. Their keeper is excellent and getting better with a decent back up. If Van Gaal can get Kagawa to play, there is a world class midfielder right there. Mata is excellent, Januzaj can kick on. Carrick is still very decent. Then assuming Fletcher and Giggs are gone, you've got Cleverly, Fellaini, Young, Valencia, Nani. All of those have been very decent Prem footballers in the past (bar maybe Cleverly) and are not old. If Van Gaal can re-invigorate them, they can be again. Anyway, let's say he keeps any 2 and ships out 3, well there's some money in. Pick up a couple of players from the relegated clubs, like Cardiff, for cheap. Gary Medel as a midfield enforcer who can fill in in defence too. Stephen Caulker at centre half. Matthias Ginter is a young highly rated centre half at Freiburg that wouldn't cost the earth. Daley Blind is a Dutch international left back that Van Gaal might have influence over. Whatever, we could list off all the hot transfer targets but when it comes down to it, I reckon Van Gaal might ship out about 5 players and bring in about 5 decent players, maybe with one marquee signing and the nett cost will leave plenty of change from £100m. And United will be fine. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mondatoo on May 02, 2014, 02:04:59 AM Cover at CB ? Who are the starters ?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on May 02, 2014, 02:09:13 AM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on May 02, 2014, 02:15:13 AM gary medel? :D oh my i would love that!
caulker is just another smalling/jones imo Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on May 02, 2014, 02:45:55 AM One mismanaged season and suddenly our whole team is awful.... sigh. Not whole team awful, but come on ffs even we beat you at Old Trafford and we are the worst team ever to have played in the EPL. I also think people underestimate how golden Utd ran last year too. Was a bit perfect storm to win with that squad and really don't think you'd have won it this year (or even been that close) if Fergie was managing this year (assuming same squad, ofc SAF prolly can attract bigger players) Definitely this! I think United will be fine. I don't see Pool finishing ahead of them next year and shall be backing accordingly. All this talk of £200m and 10+ players needed is way ott imo. Break it down, what do they really need? A left back certainly. A right back probably. Cover at centre half. A couple of midfielders. They are okay up front (even overstocked) with RVP, Rooney, Hernandez, Welbeck. Their keeper is excellent and getting better with a decent back up. If Van Gaal can get Kagawa to play, there is a world class midfielder right there. Mata is excellent, Januzaj can kick on. Carrick is still very decent. Then assuming Fletcher and Giggs are gone, you've got Cleverly, Fellaini, Young, Valencia, Nani. All of those have been very decent Prem footballers in the past (bar maybe Cleverly) and are not old. If Van Gaal can re-invigorate them, they can be again. Anyway, let's say he keeps any 2 and ships out 3, well there's some money in. Pick up a couple of players from the relegated clubs, like Cardiff, for cheap. Gary Medel as a midfield enforcer who can fill in in defence too. Stephen Caulker at centre half. Matthias Ginter is a young highly rated centre half at Freiburg that wouldn't cost the earth. Daley Blind is a Dutch international left back that Van Gaal might have influence over. Whatever, we could list off all the hot transfer targets but when it comes down to it, I reckon Van Gaal might ship out about 5 players and bring in about 5 decent players, maybe with one marquee signing and the nett cost will leave plenty of change from £100m. And United will be fine. There are a lot of if's in that post. If LVG can get Kagawa playing, if Januzaj kicks on, if the list of players that were once decent can regain their form (and only really Nani was ever good at a team challenging for leagues). Also agree that their biggest problem is at CB, not sure who you make the first choices in those positions are. All of those if's are added to other if's like if this bunch of players will play for a disciplinarian like Van Gaal. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheDazzler on May 02, 2014, 03:54:22 AM One mismanaged season and suddenly our whole team is awful.... sigh. Not whole team awful, but come on ffs even we beat you at Old Trafford and we are the worst team ever to have played in the EPL. I also think people underestimate how golden Utd ran last year too. Was a bit perfect storm to win with that squad and really don't think you'd have won it this year (or even been that close) if Fergie was managing this year (assuming same squad, ofc SAF prolly can attract bigger players) Definitely this! I think United will be fine. I don't see Pool finishing ahead of them next year and shall be backing accordingly. All this talk of £200m and 10+ players needed is way ott imo. Break it down, what do they really need? A left back certainly. A right back probably. Cover at centre half. A couple of midfielders. They are okay up front (even overstocked) with RVP, Rooney, Hernandez, Welbeck. Their keeper is excellent and getting better with a decent back up. If Van Gaal can get Kagawa to play, there is a world class midfielder right there. Mata is excellent, Januzaj can kick on. Carrick is still very decent. Then assuming Fletcher and Giggs are gone, you've got Cleverly, Fellaini, Young, Valencia, Nani. All of those have been very decent Prem footballers in the past (bar maybe Cleverly) and are not old. If Van Gaal can re-invigorate them, they can be again. Anyway, let's say he keeps any 2 and ships out 3, well there's some money in. Pick up a couple of players from the relegated clubs, like Cardiff, for cheap. Gary Medel as a midfield enforcer who can fill in in defence too. Stephen Caulker at centre half. Matthias Ginter is a young highly rated centre half at Freiburg that wouldn't cost the earth. Daley Blind is a Dutch international left back that Van Gaal might have influence over. Whatever, we could list off all the hot transfer targets but when it comes down to it, I reckon Van Gaal might ship out about 5 players and bring in about 5 decent players, maybe with one marquee signing and the nett cost will leave plenty of change from £100m. And United will be fine. There are a lot of if's in that post. If LVG can get Kagawa playing, if Januzaj kicks on, if the list of players that were once decent can regain their form (and only really Nani was ever good at a team challenging for leagues). Also agree that their biggest problem is at CB, not sure who you make the first choices in those positions are. All of those if's are added to other if's like if this bunch of players will play for a disciplinarian like Van Gaal. 1st choice CBs are Jones, Smalling, Evans. They are all decent. Better than John '5 Prem league medals' O' Shea at least :) Of course there are a lot of ifs. Nobody really knows at this stage. I'm throwing out a lot of hypotheticals obviously but my real point is that wholesale changes are both unlikely and, imo, unnecessary. At least to the extent that people are talking about. And the Glaziers are not going to throw £200m at this, no chance! The way I laid it out, is really doing it on the cheap but I really can't see a 10 players out, 10 players in scenario. It won't work, ask Spurs. All of those players have Prem winners medals, it just needs tinkering. Why wouldn't LVG get Kagawa playing? He's a world class player. Why wouldn't those other players regain their form? They all endured 1 nightmare, transition season. They are the same players, it's just a confidence issue. And they WILL play for Van Gaal or it IS 10 players in, 10 players out :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on May 02, 2014, 12:33:16 PM yeh more than likely about 8 squad players out vidic maybe rio giggs evra and young gone will be a huge chunk of wages to be freed up 4 brought in left / right back center half and a midfielder. rafaels a fair enough right back hes just a crackpot so maybe another midfielder. if available i would take ashley cole at left for a year or 2 he might be sick of not playing at chelsea and he would only cost wages. lvg will get the rest playing he knows his business rumours are that woodward wants a big signing and hes sniffing around cavani who wont come cheap dont see the point of that unless they plan to get rid of rooney Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on May 02, 2014, 01:12:55 PM LVG is a class act no doubt
But he is a very very slow starter generally speaking. If the younger players there that obviously have potential still but may have stalled a bit (imo) are willing to listen to and learn from lvg Man Utd could surprise a few next season If infact it would be a surprise Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on May 02, 2014, 01:41:50 PM didnt know he was a slow starter that could be a problem with him only rocking up after the world cup as it is Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on May 03, 2014, 01:11:34 AM http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/27264909
Possibly the most obvious statement ever made by a player in the history of football. glgl ever starting another meaningful game for manure again fellaini! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on May 03, 2014, 02:32:02 AM Personally, I hope Fellaini gets a good run in the side next year.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on May 03, 2014, 10:37:20 AM Dazzler you obviously know your stuff. But some of these players mentioned were thin. Kanga was world class? Smalling Jones and Evans?
I know without any tint LFC had a perfect storm this year. It's pretty clear Utd did last year? I think with LVG top 4 is on the cards but I would be amazed if Utd were there challenging at this stage next season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on May 03, 2014, 11:45:49 AM Dazzler's transfer targets amused me tbh. We have a huge transfer budget, we're United, so let's go out and pick up some Cardiff players cos they're getting relegated, like... it's the equivalent of having £100m to spend on Football Manager and going straight to the transfer list ☺️
Kagawa is a quality player who has been mismanaged to date fwiw, ask Klopp what he thinks about him! Smalling - massive weak link as his retention of the ball is awful, undermines any possession based team, so dozy Jones - I've watched him play some very good games this season, and a lot of iffy ones... Definitely worth persisting on, great utility player and I'd bet every one of the top four would snap him up if they had the option How would it be 'amazing' for United to be challenging for the top four next season? I find the assumption many seem to have that United won't be contending for a few years baffling. This isn't the 80's/90's, you can buy your way out of trouble nowadays with the right players / manager. They could well have a similar season next year, although I'll be amazed if the next manager struggles quite as much as the serial record breaker David Moyes has. But to suggest United finishing fourth would be an amazing event is laughable. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on May 03, 2014, 02:00:08 PM It didn't take much thought to anticipate Moyes would probably fail at Man U
I think LVG will be a hilarious failure if he gets the job. Serial achiever of just below expectation I'd say Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on May 03, 2014, 02:06:33 PM could end up in the europa league here if were not careful!! suppose we can win that and that gets you into the champions league Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on May 12, 2014, 08:00:05 AM 6/1 to win the League in 2014/15. If I were forced to bet on the winner, that's where my money would be, though 12/1 Arsenal tempts, too. http://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/next-season-winner Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on May 12, 2014, 09:50:41 PM n an open letter on his website, Ferdinand said: "I have thought long and hard over the last few months about my future, and after 12 fantastic years playing for what I regard as the best club in the world, I have decided the time is right for me to move on.
"Circumstances didn't allow for me to say goodbye the way I would have liked but I'd like to take this opportunity to thank my team-mates, staff, the club and the fans for an unbelievable 12 years that I'll never forget. Winning trophies I dreamed about as a kid came true at this great club. Why do players say this? No Rio the club decided it was time for you to move on and didn't offer you another contract not you. 'Circumstances didnt allow for me to say goodbye' = i was praying the club would offer me another year extension after the last game but they didn't. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 12, 2014, 09:56:39 PM Regardless he's been a great player and sad to see him go.
Really think we should persevere with Jones/Smalling/Evans and get new fullbacks. Rafael is a liability at times. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on May 12, 2014, 09:56:56 PM I take it that's a rhetorical question?
:D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on May 12, 2014, 09:57:29 PM Regardless he's been a great player and sad to see him go. Really think we should persevere with Jones/Smalling/Evans and get new fullbacks. Rafael is a liability at times. I think that Rafael is a headless chicken! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on May 19, 2014, 03:42:25 PM giggs has retired from playing - what a career!!!!!!!!!!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Waz1892 on May 28, 2014, 09:22:43 PM Breaking news on sky - malcolm glazer has died!!
Rip. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on May 28, 2014, 09:34:10 PM RIP Malcolm glazier.
United fans are already making me sick when I red about people cheering the death of the owner of our football club. People really are brutal and sick. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on May 29, 2014, 05:49:02 PM lets hope they sell up and fuck off now Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on May 29, 2014, 05:56:35 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on May 29, 2014, 05:58:47 PM As all six children are on the Man U board and he wasn't, i would think nothing will change
Some of the reactions yesterday were disgraceful. They may not think much of the man, fair enough, but he was someone's dad, grandad, husband first and foremost and a successful businessman too http://metro.co.uk/2014/05/28/manchester-united-fans-rejoice-at-death-of-owner-malcolm-glazer-4743148/ Some people really show up the worst of themselves in these instances Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on June 18, 2014, 12:12:37 PM Got to love your fixtures right up to the end of transfer window talk about easing your manager in with a schedule
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on June 18, 2014, 12:43:25 PM Got to love your fixtures right up to the end of transfer window talk about easing your manager in with a schedule A lot easier start than last season on paper, but as Cloughie regularly said, "The game is played on grass" Will look in more detail once the World Cup is over and we've had a proper break from football. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on June 23, 2014, 08:27:30 PM As all six children are on the Man U board and he wasn't, i would think nothing will change Some of the reactions yesterday were disgraceful. They may not think much of the man, fair enough, but he was someone's dad, grandad, husband first and foremost and a successful businessman too http://metro.co.uk/2014/05/28/manchester-united-fans-rejoice-at-death-of-owner-malcolm-glazer-4743148/ Some people really show up the worst of themselves in these instances That is absolutely dreadful. It's beyond belief the depths to which (a small minority of) football supporters will stoop. I would hope that the vast majority of true Man United supporters will be ashamed of that sort of stuff. Nobody in their right mind could rejoice at the death of the guy, irrespective of their views on how he ran his business. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on June 26, 2014, 06:42:07 PM Have we just signed Vanessa Selbst ?
(http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/75856000/jpg/_75856323_brewvdpccaad4vj.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on June 26, 2014, 07:34:59 PM Paul Zimbler, surely?
(https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQJctZ8KVYbVJZaFHwobeL4ow4pAfMbnWsbnhwCZqaJ02GwkuiCVw) (http://media.cardplayer.com/assets/000/002/626/Zimbler_black_and_white-215x280.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on July 05, 2014, 11:55:39 PM Wish list:
Hummels De Vrij Vidal Robben Sanchez (unlikely) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on July 05, 2014, 11:56:07 PM Some balls Van Gaal bringing on Krul. Love it
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dwayne110 on July 06, 2014, 01:00:06 AM Has de vrij impressed that much? robben would be my preference by a distance from that list... Van Gaal is incred, doesn't give a shit! lol
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on July 06, 2014, 01:02:25 AM Has de vrij impressed that much? robben would be my preference by a distance from that list... Van Gaal is incred, doesn't give a shit! lol I think he's looked good- and is available for around 10-12m. Vidal impressed me most and exactly the type of player we need in the middle of the park although I don't know much about the type of player Herrara is. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on July 09, 2014, 03:23:14 AM add kroos
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ant040689 on July 10, 2014, 12:08:24 AM I think in penalty situations, it is such a lottery either way that a manager should be voided of praise or scorn, but if you are going to applaud him putting Krul on as a sub, you have to lambast him for letting Vlaar take that first pen.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on July 11, 2014, 12:24:05 AM I've heard that Fellaini's getting a haircut.
Please let it be a big afro-mohawk. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on July 11, 2014, 11:45:15 AM From his twitter account
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BsMz5stCQAAmGWp.jpg:large) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on July 21, 2014, 06:22:17 PM Evra gone for 1.2m. Another great servant- here's hoping Luke Shaw can step up to the mark!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on August 20, 2014, 05:35:29 PM http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/28858116
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeeMcshane on August 21, 2014, 12:19:49 PM Good signing for Man Utd, just need at least 2 more decent signings to improve the starting 11
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TheDazzler on August 23, 2014, 12:15:05 AM I'm not sure what thread to put this in but David Moyes doing the ice bucket challenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-_oiGf78d8 Terrific comment a few quotes down from mufc187; 'I'm surprised he didn't ask for more time to complete the challenge' :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dreenie on August 23, 2014, 12:41:56 AM Think they will scrape into the top 4, would defo back them to win FA cup. Really really wanted robben, great news on the biggest signing getting injured for 6 mths wiiiiiiiiii :/
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 24, 2014, 01:38:25 PM Looks like another panic buy is on the way. Why has it taken so long to do any business? 60m for a reserve no matter how good he is seems ridiculous.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DropTheHammer on August 24, 2014, 03:12:37 PM Looks like another panic buy is on the way. Why has it taken so long to do any business? 60m for a reserve no matter how good he is seems ridiculous. I was most unimpressed watching him at the WC, this could be the most expensive EPL flop ever... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on August 24, 2014, 03:15:04 PM but he was the man who in the CL final drove RM back into it way more than bale or ronaldo
a lot of european based players, after a 60+ game season had a poor world cup the price is obviously barmy, but no more barmy than any other price these days top quality player. couple of centre backs would be the real issue though Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 24, 2014, 03:18:08 PM i reckons hes better than young - that will do for me
dont care about the price united are a money making juggernaut of a business i mean football club dont know why all this couldnt have been sorted weeks ago maybe if we get beat again today they will spend another 100 million next week Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: buzzharvey22 on August 24, 2014, 07:14:36 PM Cleverly and fletcher centre mid. GL getting top half never mind CL.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on August 25, 2014, 11:59:10 AM This really could be the end of a huge era at Manure paying £60/70m for Madrid rejects. Are we now seeing that Manure really can't compete in the transfer market for the real top players not on transfer fees paid but for the attraction of playing for the club?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on August 25, 2014, 12:10:02 PM He is a top, top class player but paying that kind of money for a player of that age is pretty awful from a transfer strategy point of view because he is going to have very little resale value in 3-4 years time.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on August 25, 2014, 12:31:19 PM Woodward just seems to be to be a fish out of water in the CEO role. He is like a roulette punter 10 minutes before the casino closes doing whatever it takes to try and win back his cash so his wife can feed the kids tomorrow at any price with no forward planning.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 25, 2014, 01:50:38 PM woodwards transfer strategy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cZqTKzS2aI&feature=youtu.be Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on August 25, 2014, 01:54:08 PM http://i.minus.com/i6UqqRrwxo2OC.gif Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on August 25, 2014, 07:18:43 PM From what little I've seen of him in the WC, Di Maria looks extremely talented but rather selfish and showboaty even in that Argentina side.
Better than Ashley Young though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: McGlashan on August 25, 2014, 07:51:30 PM woodwards transfer strategy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cZqTKzS2aI&feature=youtu.be That's brilliant :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: booder on August 26, 2014, 10:08:23 PM :hello:
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on August 26, 2014, 10:14:24 PM in moyes we trust
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 26, 2014, 10:50:24 PM Should've signed Di Maria a couple of days ago
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on August 26, 2014, 10:52:28 PM incredible game. Assume wellbeck is already gone by the way he played tonight.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on August 30, 2014, 01:45:49 PM jesus blackett so frustrating, he cannot pass. its painful to watch.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on August 30, 2014, 01:55:50 PM rvp looks awful too. very slow.
play rooney as the striker with adnan and di maria either side Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 30, 2014, 01:58:44 PM Been saying the same thing for ages- rvp not at the races ATM. Put Rooney up top with mata behind until he finds some form
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 01, 2014, 11:43:10 AM an interested observer
Man U's best hope this year is 4th, if that? their problems are implementing a new system, wing backs, 3-5-2 without the right sort of players to fill the 3 and the wide positions in the 5? i think so you can understand Danny Blind, has played LVG's systems for a while so why, with this being the major problem and realistically the top 4 a real challenge do United pay a premium for a one year loan for someone like Falcao, with no champions league to play him in? doesn't it seem a bit kneejerk, and superfluous? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 01, 2014, 12:30:49 PM I'm puzzled by it all to be honest. Falcao presumably makes Hernadez and Welbeck's departures more likely, but now we'll have RVP, Captain Rooney and £50mm man Falcao to fill the 2 up front roles.
The Feguson years had their share of puzzling transfers but at least they were accompanied by the development of home grown talent, some substantially better buys and a winning mentality. Van Gaal is a puzzle too, he seems very set on the 3-5-2 system but doesn't seem to be encouraging any of the three to step out with the ball. Surely something that Jones at least should be capable of. I hate to say it, but is it possible we were hasty in parting company with Moyes? Still, we have some talent on the injured list and maybe it will all come good and we can make our bid for Wenger's trophy (4th). A long wait to find out if we'll be chasing FA Cup glory too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 01, 2014, 01:18:49 PM The whole transfer strategy has been a puzzle however rvp has been poor and it looks like rooneys operating behind the main striker so may be a decent signing.
As for paying a premium- clubs know we are drawing dead and are going to charge us the max- if these signings somehow get united into the top 4 the premium will have been worth it Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 01, 2014, 01:36:38 PM made me chuckle
new formation (https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10599318_10152431574981884_2582081601729936332_n.jpg?oh=615b560027c29dd2c0e223c1fb9194e3&oe=5474271A&__gda__=1415751692_b0ad4c546a6bb96b4da40cc70ee5bc7c) seriously though, i know Hummels is ungettable but with Vidic and Rio past their best last year and gone this..and playing 3 of Jones/Evans/Smalling/Blackett in the back three i would have thought 2 cast iron signings in that position were the absolutely number 1 area to strengthen, but nothing... odd, isn't it? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on September 01, 2014, 01:38:49 PM Pretty sure RVP needs a knee op sharpish
Falcao will score a bucketload if fit bit risky but well worth it Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 01, 2014, 02:06:18 PM Pretty sure RVP needs a knee op sharpish Falcao will score a bucketload if fit bit risky but well worth it Ferguson ran so, so golden with him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 01, 2014, 02:10:12 PM United going to give it a spin playing like Keegan's Toon side :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on September 01, 2014, 04:11:27 PM The whole transfer strategy has been a puzzle however rvp has been poor and it looks like rooneys operating behind the main striker so may be a decent signing. As for paying a premium- clubs know we are drawing dead and are going to charge us the max- if these signings somehow get united into the top 4 the premium will have been worth it You're making it sound as though finishing in the top four is like a trophy. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on September 01, 2014, 04:14:25 PM The whole transfer strategy has been a puzzle however rvp has been poor and it looks like rooneys operating behind the main striker so may be a decent signing. As for paying a premium- clubs know we are drawing dead and are going to charge us the max- if these signings somehow get united into the top 4 the premium will have been worth it You're making it sound as though finishing in the top four is like a trophy. they should award a trophy for it now because it's more important than the FA cup or league cup. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 01, 2014, 05:34:12 PM The whole transfer strategy has been a puzzle however rvp has been poor and it looks like rooneys operating behind the main striker so may be a decent signing. As for paying a premium- clubs know we are drawing dead and are going to charge us the max- if these signings somehow get united into the top 4 the premium will have been worth it You're making it sound as though finishing in the top four is like a trophy. ... Still, we have some talent on the injured list and maybe it will all come good and we can make our bid for Wenger's trophy (4th). A long wait to find out if we'll be chasing FA Cup glory too. Can't see us going 8 or 9 seasons without a solid trophy of some form. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on September 01, 2014, 07:03:58 PM Ogden reporting in the Telegraph that his wages are £346,000 per week = £18million for the year plus the loan fee of £6million.
Nice work if you can get it... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on September 01, 2014, 07:05:50 PM Ogden reporting in the Telegraph that his wages are £346,000 per week = £18million for the year plus the loan fee of £6million. Nice work if you can get it... His contract is tax free so that's what Manure have to pay him before tax so he gets his contracted tax free (monaco based) amount in the uk after all taxes are paid. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on September 01, 2014, 07:07:39 PM Ogden reporting in the Telegraph that his wages are £346,000 per week = £18million for the year plus the loan fee of £6million. Nice work if you can get it... His contract is tax free so that's what Manure have to pay him before tax so he gets his contracted tax free (monaco based) amount in the uk after all taxes are paid. to get it tax free he can only be in the country for under 6 months of the year cant see man u liking that Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on September 01, 2014, 07:11:11 PM Manure really are in panic mode with some of these investments or just trying to send a message that their commerical arm is so big they can afford to blow this type of money. You have to wonder if all is really well with RVP (he hasn't been impressive at all this season)given this huge investment in a player they really don't need on paper.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 01, 2014, 07:18:09 PM Horsey said earlier, Van Persie needs a knee op, so it makes a little more sense in that respect.
However, that doesn't help with the holes at the back... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on September 01, 2014, 07:21:29 PM Horsey said earlier, Van Persie needs a knee op, so it makes a little more sense in that respect. However, that doesn't help with the holes at the back... Maybe they are going for the scousers strategy last year. Score 100 and concede 50 and come 2nd! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 01, 2014, 07:57:04 PM Horsey said earlier, Van Persie needs a knee op, so it makes a little more sense in that respect. However, that doesn't help with the holes at the back... Maybe they are going for the scousers strategy last year. Score 100 and concede 50 and come 2nd! Yeah, I said that they must be going for the Newcastle strategy from Keegan's reign... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Cf on September 01, 2014, 08:49:36 PM Horsey said earlier, Van Persie needs a knee op, so it makes a little more sense in that respect. However, that doesn't help with the holes at the back... Maybe they are going for the scousers strategy last year. Score 100 and concede 50 and come 2nd! Yeah, I said that they must be going for the Newcastle strategy from Keegan's reign... Sounds like the current Newcastle strategy under Pardew. Except for the scoring goals bit. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 01, 2014, 10:53:26 PM need cover for rooney he will do his usual disappearing act soon rvp has hardly played 4 a year as it is cant see how signing 1 of the top 3 strikers in the world is a panic buy its about time we started buying the finished article united chucking the money around seems to have put a few noses of joint Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 01, 2014, 10:57:29 PM hundreds of million in debt (albeit with a global franchise to generate a lot of revenue) and not even started rebuilding the back three yet...not exactly financial management at it's finest is it?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 01, 2014, 11:07:00 PM signed rojo hes part of the back of 3 / shaw back 5 - wouldnt be a surprise if the went back 4 soon they cant seem to get there heads round it
city broke ffp n won the league whos there financial managers Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 01, 2014, 11:08:14 PM Horsey said earlier, Van Persie needs a knee op, so it makes a little more sense in that respect. However, that doesn't help with the holes at the back... Maybe they are going for the scousers strategy last year. Score 100 and concede 50 and come 2nd! Yeah, I said that they must be going for the Newcastle strategy from Keegan's reign... Sounds like the current Newcastle strategy under Pardew. Except for the scoring goals bit. ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: exstream on September 01, 2014, 11:10:10 PM need cover for rooney he will do his usual disappearing act soon rvp has hardly played 4 a year as it is cant see how signing 1 of the top 3 strikers in the world is a panic buy its about time we started buying the finished article united chucking the money around seems to have put a few noses of joint You've signed Aguero, Ibrahimovic, Suarez or Diego Costa?! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 01, 2014, 11:10:58 PM signed rojo hes part of the back of 3 / shaw back 5 city broke ffp n won the league whos there financial managers City have losses of £556m in the last 6 years. Oil money, not funded by debt which is the way the Glazer family fund Man U and i think non recourse losses too, unlike the debt The whole of top end English football is seeing a massive transfer from TV companies via the clubs to players and agents. so in that arms race Man U compete but are miles behind in terms of getting the right squad/rebuild of the last good ferguson team and starting with the debt mountain. not good Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 01, 2014, 11:20:59 PM need cover for rooney he will do his usual disappearing act soon rvp has hardly played 4 a year as it is cant see how signing 1 of the top 3 strikers in the world is a panic buy its about time we started buying the finished article united chucking the money around seems to have put a few noses of joint You've signed Aguero, Ibrahimovic, Suarez or Diego Costa?! my top 3 would be zlat suarez n falcao - top 5 then??? edit - hes still not signed yet anyway Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 01, 2014, 11:28:25 PM signed rojo hes part of the back of 3 / shaw back 5 city broke ffp n won the league whos there financial managers City have losses of £556m in the last 6 years. Oil money, not funded by debt which is the way the Glazer family fund Man U and i think non recourse losses too, unlike the debt The whole of top end English football is seeing a massive transfer from TV companies via the clubs to players and agents. so in that arms race Man U compete but are miles behind in terms of getting the right squad/rebuild of the last good ferguson team and starting with the debt mountain. not good what do you want the clubs to spend all the money on they are getting?? 750m kit deal they signed last month - united are of the few clubs that generate there own money if the debts getting serviced whats the problem. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 01, 2014, 11:39:12 PM signed rojo hes part of the back of 3 / shaw back 5 city broke ffp n won the league whos there financial managers City have losses of £556m in the last 6 years. Oil money, not funded by debt which is the way the Glazer family fund Man U and i think non recourse losses too, unlike the debt The whole of top end English football is seeing a massive transfer from TV companies via the clubs to players and agents. so in that arms race Man U compete but are miles behind in terms of getting the right squad/rebuild of the last good ferguson team and starting with the debt mountain. not good what do you want the clubs to spend all the money on they are getting?? 750m kit deal they signed last month - united are of the few clubs that generate there own money if the debts getting serviced whats the problem. because, one day, the music stops. (tv deals) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 01, 2014, 11:40:07 PM 1 day we all die
mite as well live for the moment then Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on September 01, 2014, 11:54:29 PM signed rojo hes part of the back of 3 / shaw back 5 city broke ffp n won the league whos there financial managers City have losses of £556m in the last 6 years. Oil money, not funded by debt which is the way the Glazer family fund Man U and i think non recourse losses too, unlike the debt The whole of top end English football is seeing a massive transfer from TV companies via the clubs to players and agents. so in that arms race Man U compete but are miles behind in terms of getting the right squad/rebuild of the last good ferguson team and starting with the debt mountain. not good Is it possible that a 'Leeds' could actually happen to Manure? Even a 1% chance if no champs league football for 2/3/4 years? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 02, 2014, 12:03:07 AM will always be a billionaire somewhere that will buy united Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 02, 2014, 12:05:50 AM You could certainly argue it is a trophy asset and might change ownership again
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: exstream on September 02, 2014, 12:32:14 AM Did Man U just pretend to be signing Radamel Falcao, just so that Arsenal couldn't get him - and would have to settle for taking Danny Welbeck off their hands instead?!? #conspiracytheory
Thought that was pretty funny. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on September 02, 2014, 01:40:16 AM mata and fletcher bench warmers now?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: exstream on September 02, 2014, 02:45:51 AM Bye bye Kagawa, Hernandez and Welbeck.
Young, Anderson, Fellaini still around. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: baldock92 on September 02, 2014, 11:00:45 AM Can any United fans on here give me their thoughts on the transfer window and their squad for the new season? As good as Falcao is, Blackett is still in the team...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: MANTIS01 on September 02, 2014, 06:20:46 PM Think this notion of building a team is a luxury in the english prem today. As a manager you have about 5mins flat to prove yourself before being marched out the door. Moyes was doing all that planning for the future jazz, lot of work on youth development, and how did that go down? Or players just bog off to a better deal elsewhere flushing your plans down the toilet.
What happened here is Woodward or whoever bowled up to LVG and goes "We can get Radamel Falcao...you want him?" and LVG goes "Huh, yeah ok". That was the strategy. These days the manager isn't involved in finances so doesn't rightly care about the $$. And woodward knows a couple of hero goals and the shirt sales from China cover the wages. And LVG knows Falcao could help him make it to the end of the season. Yep, the romance of building a team is quite a luxury with the demands for instant gratification today. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on September 02, 2014, 10:37:13 PM Think this notion of building a team is a luxury in the english prem today. As a manager you have about 5mins flat to prove yourself before being marched out the door. Moyes was doing all that planning for the future jazz, lot of work on youth development, and how did that go down? Or players just bog off to a better deal elsewhere flushing your plans down the toilet. What happened here is Woodward or whoever bowled up to LVG and goes "We can get Radamel Falcao...you want him?" and LVG goes "Huh, yeah ok". That was the strategy. These days the manager isn't involved in finances so doesn't rightly care about the $$. And woodward knows a couple of hero goals and the shirt sales from China cover the wages. And LVG knows Falcao could help him make it to the end of the season. Yep, the romance of building a team is quite a luxury with the demands for instant gratification today. You are right as far as the recent United strategy is concerned but I don't think that is the case as far as Chelsea and City are concerned. Both clubs have had defined strategies as to what they need and gone about their business accordingly. This is in contrast to United's scattergun approach over the last 12 months. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on September 03, 2014, 10:39:53 AM "I really want to bring the championship here to the people of Man United," he said. "Every manager loves recognition and appreciation. But you also need a bit of luck. "I have been lucky in the beginning of my career. Ajax wanted to sack me halfway in my first season at the club. But they kept believing in me - and look what happened." That explains the bad start to season van gaal has told the players he wants them to experience the championship so they are just following orders Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: redarmi on September 03, 2014, 12:38:33 PM Any United fans out there interested in a match bet Welbeck versus Falcao. I want to take Welbeck either plus some goals or decent odds against off scratch.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 03, 2014, 04:46:07 PM Any United fans out there interested in a match bet Welbeck versus Falcao. I want to take Welbeck either plus some goals or decent odds against off scratch. this was 4/1 on paddy i think arsenal fans mite take the bet they seemed underwhelmed by welbeck Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: McGlashan on September 03, 2014, 05:52:27 PM Any United fans out there interested in a match bet Welbeck versus Falcao. I want to take Welbeck either plus some goals or decent odds against off scratch. this was 4/1 on paddy i think arsenal fans mite take the bet they seemed underwhelmed by welbeck Sky have gone 1/5 Falcao and 10/3 Welbeck. With game time as a main striker you've got to fancy the over side of Danny's 7.5 goal line. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 14, 2014, 06:31:09 PM OK it was only QPR at home but that looked much more like a Manchester United team.
Blind looks like he's been there for years, Mata obviously enjoyed the game as did Cap'n Wayne and RVP. Di Maria? Really good performance and even more to come. It will be good to see how we get on next weekend and beyond. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 14, 2014, 06:47:50 PM Blind exactly what we needed though will see how he copes with better players against him in midfield
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 14, 2014, 06:54:52 PM Blind exactly what we needed though will see how he copes with better players against him in midfield We'll see how they all cope against better sides, but that was a very encouraging display Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on September 14, 2014, 11:18:29 PM Only QPR but very encouraging. Amount of quality going forward, particularly if they play to their potential, is breathtaking.
Relatively straightforward next 4 games for the system/familiarity to bed in before the real test of Chelsea,City and Arsenal in the space of 4 games. 3rd favourites to win the league and 1.68 on Betfair to finish top 4. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: buzzharvey22 on September 14, 2014, 11:32:48 PM Blind more important to this team than Falcao by a country mile.
Watched a bit of Man utd this season and watched when you drew with us 1-1 at the SOL. Everything was just so static with RVP, Mata and Rooney. Today though they were moving everywhere and interchanging between the 3, swopping wings, getting in behind, one of the 3 coming deep. Must be a bitch to defend against. And Di Maria has bags of pace which none of them 3 have so its an extra dimension. Shame for UTD that theyve kinda wasted the easiest start to a Prem League season you could have wished for. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on September 15, 2014, 11:35:12 PM It was only QPR but disappointingly they do look pretty strong again.
Di Maria is an amazing signing - can't believe RM let him go Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 15, 2014, 11:51:15 PM It was only QPR but disappointingly they do look pretty strong again. Di Maria is an amazing signing - can't believe RM let him go The front men are going to need to have a blinding season, because I don't think Blind is going to be enough to counteract the other donuts that are plotted up at the back... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on September 15, 2014, 11:55:37 PM It was only QPR but disappointingly they do look pretty strong again. Di Maria is an amazing signing - can't believe RM let him go The front men are going to need to have a blinding season, because I don't think Blind is going to be enough to counteract the other donuts that are plotted up at the back... That is all true football fan's hopes of course :-) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on September 15, 2014, 11:58:04 PM It was only QPR but disappointingly they do look pretty strong again. Di Maria is an amazing signing - can't believe RM let him go Ban for trolling please. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on September 16, 2014, 12:08:54 AM It was only QPR but disappointingly they do look pretty strong again. Di Maria is an amazing signing - can't believe RM let him go Ban for trolling please. lol, sorry, nice to see you around Oh and visit a new personalised plate thread while yr here Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on September 21, 2014, 03:41:01 PM Anybody home?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on September 21, 2014, 03:42:18 PM Anybody home? Just so enjoyable watching 200m play like Brazil v Germany Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bagel on September 21, 2014, 04:09:32 PM gotta be buying money laying 0 0 every game. will score tons and let in tons. def will be fun to watch this year.
would love to know what one of the experts that post on blonde, redarmi arbboy etc, would give for utd to go rest of the prem season without drawing 0 0. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on September 21, 2014, 05:52:14 PM gotta be buying money laying 0 0 every game. will score tons and let in tons. def will be fun to watch this year. would love to know what one of the experts that post on blonde, redarmi arbboy etc, would give for utd to go rest of the prem season without drawing 0 0. If you base the average 0-0 price for the rest of the season around the 14/16/1 mark on average it would be about a 5/1 shot roughly for no 0-0 for remaining 33 league games. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 21, 2014, 06:10:07 PM Anybody home? Shell-shocked Can't begin to describe the feeling. I keep expecting the manager to rip off a latex mask and reveal himself to be Kevin Keegan. LVG is supposed to be a master tactician but he seems to have decided that asking any of the squad to do some defensive work would be beneath them. Doubt we'd surrender a two goal lead under Moyes. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 21, 2014, 06:25:18 PM This goes deeper than the manager. He just doesn't have the personnel. All our defenders are looking around at each other looking for someone to take the lead.
Drop RVP and Rooney- both haven't done anything recently and need some time out after World Cup. Play mata and Di Maria behind Falcao and two proectecting the back 4 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on September 21, 2014, 06:27:14 PM The fact he has started slow in every one of his last five jobs is surely enough reason not to panic
That front four will win you a lot more games regardless of the defence Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on September 21, 2014, 06:30:35 PM I also think this Leicester team are a bit better than people give them credit for. They have come up with 100 points (statistically proven to be a good bench mark for premiership survival historically) and have spent well over the summer relatively to other new comers.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on September 21, 2014, 08:18:11 PM The fact he has started slow in every one of his last five jobs is surely enough reason not to panic Setting aside Holland, one league title in 15 years..er with Bayern, wpwp. add Holland in and it's 2That front four will win you a lot more games regardless of the defence Massively over rated and ludicrously arrogant imho Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 21, 2014, 09:20:51 PM Anybody home? Shell-shocked Can't begin to describe the feeling. I keep expecting the manager to rip off a latex mask and reveal himself to be Kevin Keegan. LVG is supposed to be a master tactician but he seems to have decided that asking any of the squad to do some defensive work would be beneath them. Doubt we'd surrender a two goal lead under Moyes. Would do well to get a 2 goal lead under Moyes... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on September 21, 2014, 09:23:04 PM Pulis should get the Manure job. The current front line could do whatever it liked every game and Tony just focus on the back 5 and Manure would be unstoppable.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Eck on September 21, 2014, 09:23:32 PM The fact he has started slow in every one of his last five jobs is surely enough reason not to panic Setting aside Holland, one league title in 15 years..er with Bayern, wpwp. add Holland in and it's 2That front four will win you a lot more games regardless of the defence Massively over rated and ludicrously arrogant imho Totally this i'm afraid. Didn't see much of them at the world cup but from what I did it seemed he had a Dutch team of very capable football players yet his tactics were to get Kuyt pinging balls into the box from about 35 yards out. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 22, 2014, 07:55:40 PM result like that is the perfect excuse for lvg to start up the 5 at the back again if there was enough players available - dont think there will be for wknd embarrassing the way they imploded never seen anything like it - 1 terrible decision n they all saw there arses - pub sides dont do that rooney showed hes not captain material losing it like that - fergie had it right about him should have been flogged last summer things i would like to know - whats lvg scribbling away at all game , whys giggs always sniffing his fingers and are all coaches and backroom superglued into there seats in the dugout that ref should be struck off for a game or 2 aswell positives - di maria can play a bit any opinions on blackett - i think hes got the makings of a decent player hes just been hung out to dry by experienced full internationals got no help off them at all. could finish him off this. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 22, 2014, 08:01:56 PM Hopefully not too far behind by xmas, and he needs to do about 100m on defenders in January.
They should contact that bloke who got 900k on 'No' to get them on over 4.5 every week, and hopefully make enough to pay for a couple of them. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 22, 2014, 08:09:10 PM One centre half is all we need. Jones/Evans are both decent enough players but they need a world class centre half to play with.
I also think that playing two up top is not the way to go. Pick Falcao or rvp and stick with them. I still believe having mata and di Maria behind Falcao is the way to go with two holding midfielders filling on for when the fullbacks get forward. Rvp and Rooney haven't been good enough- simple as that. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 22, 2014, 10:49:34 PM result like that is the perfect excuse for lvg to start up the 5 at the back again if there was enough players available - dont think there will be for wknd embarrassing the way they imploded never seen anything like it - 1 terrible decision n they all saw there arses - pub sides dont do that rooney showed hes not captain material losing it like that - fergie had it right about him should have been flogged last summer things i would like to know - whats lvg scribbling away at all game , whys giggs always sniffing his fingers and are all coaches and backroom superglued into there seats in the dugout that ref should be struck off for a game or 2 aswell positives - di maria can play a bit any opinions on blackett - i think hes got the makings of a decent player hes just been hung out to dry by experienced full internationals got no help off them at all. could finish him off this. Perhaps you don't remember Bryan Robson or Roy Keane? Blackett has some learning to do and as we observed last season, if you change the defence every game and lack a defensive midfielder you will create problems. It can't be good for the lad to be as exposed as he is being. Yesterday was a freakish result, maybe lessons will have been learnt. I certainly hope so. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 22, 2014, 10:53:44 PM I really don't care about his performance as a captain. He's just not influencing games like he used to. When he was younger he used to be able to dribble the ball and be a general nuisance more recently he's controlled the game with his distribution. We are getting neither at the moment. He either gives the ball away or gets tackled too easily
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on September 23, 2014, 03:47:08 PM rooneys ranting and raving and general attention seeking after giving the ball away for the 3rd goal himself is whole different ball game to robson and keane. they would do it before the worst happened he was doing after it happened. if he wanted to make a point to the players it should have been after the pen but he was too busy losing his shit with the ref. rooney should look closer to home to his own control, passing and shooting - typical scouser always blaming somebody else Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 26, 2014, 11:18:02 PM I believe we should give lvg time however I wish he would stop being so candid with the press especially about his thoughts on players.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 27, 2014, 09:16:45 AM I believe we should give lvg time however I wish he would stop being so candid with the press especially about his thoughts on players. Since taking charge on 16 July, Van Gaal has experimented with different formations and made several alterations at the club's training ground in an attempt to implement his "philosophy". The former Ajax, Barcelona and Bayern Munich coach is adamant that the club will benefit but has conceded that he may have pushed his players too far, too soon. "You have to work out that information," said the United manager, who acknowledged that fans are already "very tired" of hearing his pleas for patience. "It's very difficult because we are starting with a new team and a new relationship between players so that's why it needs time." We're paying the price for having changed not just the manager but also the backroom staff twice in eighteen months. Why was Moyes allowed to let people like Eric Steele, Mike Phelan and Rene Meulensteen go when he arrived? I know it is the way it happens in most clubs but Manchester United aren't 'most clubs'. So now we've got wholesale changes in the squad and in the people who work with them and inevitably it will take time, and of course we have to give LVG time to see if his "philosophy" can work. But, and this is back to the original point, we had a pretty good footballing philosophy embedded in the DNA of the club. Sir Matt created a great club and SAF bought into that style and belief and developed it further and his legacy was squandered last year. We're stuck with what we've got now and ultimately we have to hope that van Gaal will succeed. Given the wealth of attacking options we have, and the paucity of our defensive choices it could be exciting times ahead. caveat - if we lose at home today he may be ringing Pardew tonight to talk through his problems with the fans. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 05, 2014, 02:25:14 PM Good result today but you can still see the scars of the 5-3 to Leicester. Very nervy and unable to keep the ball is going to cost us some points if we don't address it. Will probably come in time with results and confidence.
Positives- Falcao goal though he still looks a bit leggy and unfit. Obviously Di Maria is class- was concerned we had overpaid for him but he's looking awesome. Rojo and Blind looked good today. Finally De Gea. I was unsure when he arrived but he a world class keeper. Two huge saves- could be the difference for us this year. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on October 05, 2014, 02:26:48 PM Falcao's use of space is fantastic. Going to score a lot of goals once he settles in/fully fit
team looked better without Rooney sort the back 4/holding midfield out and go from there Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 05, 2014, 09:28:42 PM falcao needed to get off the mark if he didnt today it would have a become a thing he has had the chances about time degea got his hands to a few aswell chelsea n city up soon think he will go 1 up front for them get carrick into the midfield next to blind hope he doesnt go the extra defender Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 05, 2014, 10:01:45 PM Sounds like a lot plan. Needs to persevere with Falcao unless RVP finds some form. Fletch in if carrick not fit
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: malt vinegar on October 06, 2014, 05:44:58 PM yeh its rvp n rooney i would be dropping. di maria in behind falcoa then get 4 grafters in midfield for chelsea n city. falcaos been decent - so far every game early on hes been clattered hes just got up n cracked on with it - i like his attitude Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 25, 2014, 08:00:47 PM massive game tomorrow just got bigger given results elsewhere
i may have to watch through my fingers as LVG faces his former assistant Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Kmac84 on October 25, 2014, 08:17:12 PM Chesea win by at least 2 imo. BTTS I am thinking 1 - 3 or 1 - 4. But then its a super Sunday game which more often than not mean the games turns out to be shite.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 25, 2014, 08:18:44 PM thoguhts on starting line up?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 25, 2014, 08:23:24 PM Think he should play 451
De gea Shaw Rojo jones rafael Blind fletcher Herrera Di Maria Valencia Rvp/Falcao Concerned about RVPs form and I think rafael needs protection Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 25, 2014, 08:26:46 PM rooney back?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 25, 2014, 08:27:38 PM Suspended
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: exstream on October 25, 2014, 08:29:35 PM Think he should play 451 De gea Shaw Rojo jones rafael Blind fletcher Herrera Di Maria Valencia Rvp/Falcao Concerned about RVPs form and I think rafael needs protection wouldnt play shaw on the right m8 ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on October 25, 2014, 08:33:39 PM Or try starting with 12 :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on October 25, 2014, 08:36:26 PM Chesea win by at least 2 imo. BTTS I am thinking 1 - 3 or 1 - 4. But then its a super Sunday game which more often than not mean the games turns out to be shite. I decided to lay United, so I get paid, or I'm happy :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 25, 2014, 08:53:50 PM They'll never expect it
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Kmac84 on October 25, 2014, 09:23:18 PM Rojo is beter at LB than Centre Half.
Why put Rapahel on the Left? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on October 25, 2014, 09:28:26 PM Rojo is beter at LB than Centre Half. Why put Rapahel on the Left? I'd sooner have his namesake from the Ninja Turtles playing! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 25, 2014, 09:30:16 PM Obviously I've just fucked up with right and left side.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Kmac84 on October 25, 2014, 09:33:08 PM Obviously I've just fucked up with right and left side. My Mrs has problems that when you give her directions n the car. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 26, 2014, 06:44:56 PM Played a lot better than recent times and deserved at least the point we got.
Had Janusjaz and di Maria managed to find a few decent crosses it could have been even better. Januszaj looked out of his depth a lot of the time but a significantly improved Fellaini and a better marshalled defence is an encouragement. Just a trip across town next Sunday 😄 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 26, 2014, 07:44:25 PM We still look aimless going forward. Getting it wide and pinging in crosses when there's usually just rvp in the box. Need to be more subtle in attack esp against better defences
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 02, 2014, 09:15:55 PM Well, that could have been substantially worse.
A draw would have been an injustice although obviously I'd have celebrated it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 02, 2014, 09:18:44 PM Even though statistically this is the worst start to the premiership we've had I feel optimistic for the future. Would like to know what Smalling was thinking for either booking. Naive and unnecessary
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on November 02, 2014, 09:32:22 PM Even though statistically this is the worst start to the premiership we've had I feel optimistic for the future. Would like to know what Smalling was thinking for either booking. Naive and unnecessary Lack of ambition possibly? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 02, 2014, 09:33:50 PM Not being results oriented. Team is starting to take shape
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 02, 2014, 10:38:11 PM Even though statistically this is the worst start to the premiership we've had I feel optimistic for the future. Would like to know what Smalling was thinking for either booking. Naive and unnecessary Lack of ambition possibly? In what sense Ralph? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: exstream on November 03, 2014, 12:02:38 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B1eIRUVIgAALz6k.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B1dAIL2CcAEUZ16.jpg) last derby Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 22, 2014, 11:41:06 PM Decent result
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on November 23, 2014, 12:07:49 PM LVG knowing what he is doing shock...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 14, 2014, 03:27:59 PM Having to rely on Sam Mataface and Stan Doggingmore to keep tabs on the game today. Even they can't extinguish my sense of satisfaction at how it's going.
Either LVG really knows what he's doing or Brendan Rodgers really really doesn't. This time last year Rodgers was a genius and our then manager was being mocked from every angle. A year, and the loss of one player, makes such a difference. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 14, 2014, 03:49:33 PM Pretty flattering scoreline.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on December 14, 2014, 04:03:09 PM Having to rely on Sam Mataface and Stan Doggingmore to keep tabs on the game today. Even they can't extinguish my sense of satisfaction at how it's going. Either LVG really knows what he's doing or Brendan Rodgers really really doesn't. This time last year Rodgers was a genius and our then manager was being mocked from every angle. A year, and the loss of one player, makes such a difference. Helps having one of the best keepers in the world between the sticks. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: icles test on December 14, 2014, 04:13:45 PM Having to rely on Sam Mataface and Stan Doggingmore to keep tabs on the game today. Even they can't extinguish my sense of satisfaction at how it's going. Either LVG really knows what he's doing or Brendan Rodgers really really doesn't. This time last year Rodgers was a genius and our then manager was being mocked from every angle. A year, and the loss of one player, makes such a difference. Helps having one of the best keepers in the world between the sticks. never rated brad jones.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on December 14, 2014, 04:14:50 PM Having to rely on Sam Mataface and Stan Doggingmore to keep tabs on the game today. Even they can't extinguish my sense of satisfaction at how it's going. Either LVG really knows what he's doing or Brendan Rodgers really really doesn't. This time last year Rodgers was a genius and our then manager was being mocked from every angle. A year, and the loss of one player, makes such a difference. Helps having one of the best keepers in the world between the sticks. never rated brad jones.... :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 14, 2014, 04:25:15 PM United nowhere near at their best but they still look much better than they did under moyes.
I was one of the de gea bashers. How wrong I was- he is indispensable and could be the difference between CL and 5th spot Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 14, 2014, 05:27:07 PM Pretty flattering scoreline. (http://media2.giphy.com/media/ARCWUrEw8UNRC/200_s.gif) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on December 16, 2014, 11:11:12 AM This match-fixing business with Ander Hererra sounds serious.
He was supposedly one of the players who had money paid into his account which he then withdrew in cash and handed over to a player from the other team. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: horseplayer on December 16, 2014, 11:14:22 AM This match-fixing business with Ander Hererra sounds serious. He was supposedly one of the players who had money paid into his account which he then withdrew in cash and handed over to a player from the other team. The reporting of it over here is sensationalist at its best Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 16, 2014, 11:17:13 AM This match-fixing business with Ander Hererra sounds serious. He was supposedly one of the players who had money paid into his account which he then withdrew in cash and handed over to a player from the other team. If confirmed he's obviously destined to be an ex-player. Do you think it might put Wenger off signing anyone in the transfer window for fear of a similar history? Or will he find some other excuse? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on December 16, 2014, 11:50:25 AM This match-fixing business with Ander Hererra sounds serious. He was supposedly one of the players who had money paid into his account which he then withdrew in cash and handed over to a player from the other team. If confirmed he's obviously destined to be an ex-player. Do you think it might put Wenger off signing anyone in the transfer window for fear of a similar history? Or will he find some other excuse? You know what Arsene's like, it'll have to be the right player at the right price. One thing it won't be is some broken-down crock who comes on and plays a fifteen minute cameo every few games whilst pocketing £265K netto per week. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 16, 2014, 03:30:39 PM This match-fixing business with Ander Hererra sounds serious. He was supposedly one of the players who had money paid into his account which he then withdrew in cash and handed over to a player from the other team. If confirmed he's obviously destined to be an ex-player. Do you think it might put Wenger off signing anyone in the transfer window for fear of a similar history? Or will he find some other excuse? You know what Arsene's like, it'll have to be the right player at the right price. One thing it won't be is some broken-down crock who comes on and plays a fifteen minute cameo every few games whilst pocketing £265K netto per week. saucer of milk for Methuselah please :-) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 11, 2015, 07:54:36 PM Not good enough.
Same points total as this time last year. We may be in the CL spots but we won't stay there if the Gaalacticos continue to underperform like that. Carrick pretty much the only bright spot of the day. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 11, 2015, 09:16:36 PM Not good enough. Same points total as this time last year. We may be in the CL spots but we won't stay there if the Gaalacticos continue to underperform like that. Carrick pretty much the only bright spot of the day. United at the moment remind a bit of City when they first got money. Bought lots of very good players (Santa Cruz, Robinho, Benjani, Elano) but they played like individuals - not like a team. It wasn't until Yaya Toure joined in 2010 that they became a team. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on January 12, 2015, 12:36:53 AM Not good enough. Same points total as this time last year. We may be in the CL spots but we won't stay there if the Gaalacticos continue to underperform like that. Carrick pretty much the only bright spot of the day. United at the moment remind a bit of City when they first got money. Bought lots of very good players (Santa Cruz, Robinho, Benjani, Elano) but they played like individuals - not like a team. It wasn't until Yaya Toure joined in 2010 that they became a team. I understand and agree with the comparison with City in the sense that it that it can take a while for the new players to bed in and a true trophy competing team to establish itself. City got the new owners at the start of the 2008/2009 season and it wasn't until 2010/2011 that they became a real force. Also agree that YaYa Toure was a big part of that along with Silva who arrived at the same time to build on the platform of the likes of Kompany, Tevez, Lescott & Barry. Many will scorn at the last 2 but they were both instrumental to City's early success. With United now I'd suggest there is an absolute inevitabily they will be competing for the title again very soon. Probably from next season. Progression to establishing " a team" again will be quicker and so it should because they are starting from a far stronger base - 7 of the 9 players this season with most minutes played were an integral part of the 2012/2013 league winning side. Incidentally, Benjani and Elano were pre the Abu Dhabi money. Santa Cruz was a crock at City - think he only started about 10 games in total. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 12, 2015, 01:42:59 AM Not good enough. Same points total as this time last year. We may be in the CL spots but we won't stay there if the Gaalacticos continue to underperform like that. Carrick pretty much the only bright spot of the day. United at the moment remind a bit of City when they first got money. Bought lots of very good players (Santa Cruz, Robinho, Benjani, Elano) but they played like individuals - not like a team. It wasn't until Yaya Toure joined in 2010 that they became a team. I understand and agree with the comparison with City in the sense that it that it can take a while for the new players to bed in and a true trophy competing team to establish itself. City got the new owners at the start of the 2008/2009 season and it wasn't until 2010/2011 that they became a real force. Also agree that YaYa Toure was a big part of that along with Silva who arrived at the same time to build on the platform of the likes of Kompany, Tevez, Lescott & Barry. Many will scorn at the last 2 but they were both instrumental to City's early success. With United now I'd suggest there is an absolute inevitabily they will be competing for the title again very soon. Probably from next season. Progression to establishing " a team" again will be quicker and so it should because they are starting from a far stronger base - 7 of the 9 players this season with most minutes played were an integral part of the 2012/2013 league winning side. Incidentally, Benjani and Elano were pre the Abu Dhabi money. Santa Cruz was a crock at City - think he only started about 10 games in total. Of all the huge money Utd spent on sexy players, I have a feeling the least sexy of the lot, Daley Blind, might prove to be the best. Could be a successor for Paul Scholes. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2015, 08:58:01 AM Not good enough. Same points total as this time last year. We may be in the CL spots but we won't stay there if the Gaalacticos continue to underperform like that. Carrick pretty much the only bright spot of the day. United at the moment remind a bit of City when they first got money. Bought lots of very good players (Santa Cruz, Robinho, Benjani, Elano) but they played like individuals - not like a team. It wasn't until Yaya Toure joined in 2010 that they became a team. I understand and agree with the comparison with City in the sense that it that it can take a while for the new players to bed in and a true trophy competing team to establish itself. City got the new owners at the start of the 2008/2009 season and it wasn't until 2010/2011 that they became a real force. Also agree that YaYa Toure was a big part of that along with Silva who arrived at the same time to build on the platform of the likes of Kompany, Tevez, Lescott & Barry. Many will scorn at the last 2 but they were both instrumental to City's early success. With United now I'd suggest there is an absolute inevitabily they will be competing for the title again very soon. Probably from next season. Progression to establishing " a team" again will be quicker and so it should because they are starting from a far stronger base - 7 of the 9 players this season with most minutes played were an integral part of the 2012/2013 league winning side. Incidentally, Benjani and Elano were pre the Abu Dhabi money. Santa Cruz was a crock at City - think he only started about 10 games in total. Of all the huge money Utd spent on sexy players, I have a feeling the least sexy of the lot, Daley Blind, might prove to be the best. Could be a successor for Paul Scholes. I hope you're right. We could use a successor to the likes of Foulkes, Ure, Buchan, Pallister, Bruce, Stam, Vidic right now though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on January 12, 2015, 11:29:14 AM Not good enough. Same points total as this time last year. We may be in the CL spots but we won't stay there if the Gaalacticos continue to underperform like that. Carrick pretty much the only bright spot of the day. United at the moment remind a bit of City when they first got money. Bought lots of very good players (Santa Cruz, Robinho, Benjani, Elano) but they played like individuals - not like a team. It wasn't until Yaya Toure joined in 2010 that they became a team. I understand and agree with the comparison with City in the sense that it that it can take a while for the new players to bed in and a true trophy competing team to establish itself. City got the new owners at the start of the 2008/2009 season and it wasn't until 2010/2011 that they became a real force. Also agree that YaYa Toure was a big part of that along with Silva who arrived at the same time to build on the platform of the likes of Kompany, Tevez, Lescott & Barry. Many will scorn at the last 2 but they were both instrumental to City's early success. With United now I'd suggest there is an absolute inevitabily they will be competing for the title again very soon. Probably from next season. Progression to establishing " a team" again will be quicker and so it should because they are starting from a far stronger base - 7 of the 9 players this season with most minutes played were an integral part of the 2012/2013 league winning side. Incidentally, Benjani and Elano were pre the Abu Dhabi money. Santa Cruz was a crock at City - think he only started about 10 games in total. Of all the huge money Utd spent on sexy players, I have a feeling the least sexy of the lot, Daley Blind, might prove to be the best. Could be a successor for Paul Scholes. I hope you're right. We could use a successor to the likes of Foulkes, Ure, Buchan, Pallister, Bruce, Stam, Vidic right now though. I'm not sure you want "the likes of" Ian Ure, he was terrible. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on January 12, 2015, 11:31:19 AM Not good enough. Same points total as this time last year. We may be in the CL spots but we won't stay there if the Gaalacticos continue to underperform like that. Carrick pretty much the only bright spot of the day. United at the moment remind a bit of City when they first got money. Bought lots of very good players (Santa Cruz, Robinho, Benjani, Elano) but they played like individuals - not like a team. It wasn't until Yaya Toure joined in 2010 that they became a team. I understand and agree with the comparison with City in the sense that it that it can take a while for the new players to bed in and a true trophy competing team to establish itself. City got the new owners at the start of the 2008/2009 season and it wasn't until 2010/2011 that they became a real force. Also agree that YaYa Toure was a big part of that along with Silva who arrived at the same time to build on the platform of the likes of Kompany, Tevez, Lescott & Barry. Many will scorn at the last 2 but they were both instrumental to City's early success. With United now I'd suggest there is an absolute inevitabily they will be competing for the title again very soon. Probably from next season. Progression to establishing " a team" again will be quicker and so it should because they are starting from a far stronger base - 7 of the 9 players this season with most minutes played were an integral part of the 2012/2013 league winning side. Incidentally, Benjani and Elano were pre the Abu Dhabi money. Santa Cruz was a crock at City - think he only started about 10 games in total. Of all the huge money Utd spent on sexy players, I have a feeling the least sexy of the lot, Daley Blind, might prove to be the best. Could be a successor for Paul Scholes. I hope you're right. We could use a successor to the likes of Foulkes, Ure, Buchan, Pallister, Bruce, Stam, Vidic right now though. Ooooooooo Martin Buchan. I always had a beef with him. He was one of the hardest stickers to find in the 1975 collection. Had to part with about 25 swapsies for one Martin Buchan sticker... It does seem weird defence wasn't addressed more in the summer though. Lost Evra, Vidic and Ferdinand in the last 12 months and replaced them with......... Shaw and Rojo? That's a pretty huge downgrade. Falcao seemed at the time as a weird signing, even more so now. Unless Van Gaal really doesn't rate/like Mata. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2015, 02:24:58 PM Not good enough. Same points total as this time last year. We may be in the CL spots but we won't stay there if the Gaalacticos continue to underperform like that. Carrick pretty much the only bright spot of the day. United at the moment remind a bit of City when they first got money. Bought lots of very good players (Santa Cruz, Robinho, Benjani, Elano) but they played like individuals - not like a team. It wasn't until Yaya Toure joined in 2010 that they became a team. I understand and agree with the comparison with City in the sense that it that it can take a while for the new players to bed in and a true trophy competing team to establish itself. City got the new owners at the start of the 2008/2009 season and it wasn't until 2010/2011 that they became a real force. Also agree that YaYa Toure was a big part of that along with Silva who arrived at the same time to build on the platform of the likes of Kompany, Tevez, Lescott & Barry. Many will scorn at the last 2 but they were both instrumental to City's early success. With United now I'd suggest there is an absolute inevitabily they will be competing for the title again very soon. Probably from next season. Progression to establishing " a team" again will be quicker and so it should because they are starting from a far stronger base - 7 of the 9 players this season with most minutes played were an integral part of the 2012/2013 league winning side. Incidentally, Benjani and Elano were pre the Abu Dhabi money. Santa Cruz was a crock at City - think he only started about 10 games in total. Of all the huge money Utd spent on sexy players, I have a feeling the least sexy of the lot, Daley Blind, might prove to be the best. Could be a successor for Paul Scholes. I hope you're right. We could use a successor to the likes of Foulkes, Ure, Buchan, Pallister, Bruce, Stam, Vidic right now though. I'm not sure you want "the likes of" Ian Ure, he was terrible. Fair point, although it's a close call. I'd take David May right now. Or McQueen, Johnsson, Berg, or Blanc. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 12, 2015, 02:45:20 PM No mention of Jaap Stam?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2015, 03:09:27 PM No mention of Jaap Stam? Between Bruce and Vidic in my original list. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 06, 2015, 01:01:11 PM (http://i4.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/incoming/article1241425.ece/alternates/s1023/TRtRZVY_5795391.jpg)
We love them We mourn for them Unlucky boys of Red I wish I'd gone down Gone down with them To where Mother Nature makes their bed We miss them Every night we kiss them Their faces fixed in our heads I wish I'd gone down Gone down with them To where Mother Nature makes their bed They can't hurt you Their style will never desert you Because they're all safely dead I wish I'd gone down Gone down with them To where Mother Nature makes their bed Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on February 06, 2015, 04:53:05 PM Keep The Red Flag Flying High. Cause Man Utd, Will Never Die.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on February 06, 2015, 04:55:27 PM One cold and bitter Thursday in Munich, Germany,
Eight great football stalwarts conceded victory, Eight men will never play again who met destruction there, The flowers of English football, the flowers of Manchester Matt Busby’s boys were flying, returning from Belgrade, This great United family, all masters of their trade, The pilot of the aircraft, the skipper Captain Thain, Three times they tried to take off and twice turned back again. The third time down the runaway disaster followed close, There was slush upon that runaway and the aircraft never rose, It ploughed into the marshy ground, it broke, it overturned. And eight of the team were killed as the blazing wreckage burned. Roger Byrne and Tommy Taylor who were capped for England’s side. And Ireland’s Billy Whelan and England’s Geoff Bent died, Mark Jones and Eddie Colman, and David Pegg also, They all lost their lives as it ploughed on through the snow. Big Duncan he went too, with an injury to his brain, And Ireland’s brave Jack Blanchflower will never play again, The great Matt Busby lay there, the father of his team Three long months passed by before he saw his team again. The trainer, coach and secretary, and a member of the crew, Also eight sporting journalists who with United flew, and one of them Big Swifty, who we will ne’er forget, the finest English ‘keeper that ever graced the net. Oh, England’s finest football team its record truly great, its proud successes mocked by a cruel turn of fate. Eight men will never play again, who met destruction there, the flowers of English football, the flowers of Manchester Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Woodsey on February 16, 2015, 10:55:16 PM Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuck, as a Preston lad through and through I thought we were in with a sniff there after that 1st goal. Oh well good luck Man U.....
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 16, 2015, 10:56:29 PM Season defining game against arsenal
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 16, 2015, 10:59:23 PM That was poor, again.
Winning Cup Quarter Finals doesn't define seasons for Manchester United. Losing one might. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 16, 2015, 11:01:56 PM I think the after effect of winning or losing the game will be huge personally.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 16, 2015, 11:06:11 PM I think the after effect of winning or losing the game will be huge personally. Agree, but winning the QF vs Arsenal is just a step along the way. Losing that game doesn't bear thinking about Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 16, 2015, 11:08:49 PM Think we're saying the same thing but in different ways!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 16, 2015, 11:14:46 PM Think we're saying the same thing but in different ways! Pretty much Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on February 17, 2015, 12:09:00 AM Falcao on his bike?
He has been so poor this year. Watching him week in week out is so frustrating, no pace, no power, cannot seem to hold the ball up. I have not had any wow jaw dropping moments with him. Such a shame as I was buzzing when he arrived. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 17, 2015, 01:37:47 AM Falcao on his bike? He has been so poor this year. Watching him week in week out is so frustrating, no pace, no power, cannot seem to hold the ball up. I have not had any wow jaw dropping moments with him. Such a shame as I was buzzing when he arrived. Can't see him staying esp how much he's going to cost considering his age and fitness. I think he's suffered due to Van Gaal not knowing his best team Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 17, 2015, 07:56:18 AM It's difficult to see which, if any, of the new arrivals have made a consistent significant contribution.
Including the manager. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on February 17, 2015, 09:48:23 AM Young has impressed me a lot this year I wihld go back to 3 at the back.
Young and Valencia as wing backs Blind Herrera Rooney di Maria RVP Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 17, 2015, 01:19:51 PM Young has impressed me a lot this year I wihld go back to 3 at the back. Young and Valencia as wing backs Blind Herrera Rooney di Maria RVP So who are your three at the back? I posted itt last year that it was time for Smalling Evans and Jones to fulfil their potential. Sadly I think they already have. They have been measured, they have been weighed, and they have been found wanting. So, who plays in the three? Carrick, Rojo and Rafael/Shaw? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 17, 2015, 01:23:23 PM In favour of a back 4 personally but it leaves the midfield really unbalanced.
Spose you can have Carrick and Blind protecting the back 4 with Mata and Di Maria behind Rooney/Falcao or RVP Just seem to have a really unbalanced squad with no identity (even tho LVG keeps banging on about philosphy) Maybe stick with long balls punted up to Fellani until the summer Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on February 17, 2015, 04:17:20 PM I'd just favour a decision about the system we're going to play.
Carrick's return can't come soon enough for me. Not sure Blind gets a game when Carrick is available, Herrera is more positive and offers a lot more, but the core of the team (de Gea, Jones, Evans, Smalling, Carrick, Rooney, RVP, Young, Valancia ) were all title winners in 2013. So what did we get for our money in the summer? btw, Martin Keown may well be right in his comments about United but his obvious enjoyment of the situation makes me want to punch him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: buzzharvey22 on February 17, 2015, 04:47:45 PM Thoughts on Di Maria's first 3/4 of a season at UTD? He seemed to be UTD's only promise (outfield anyways) in the first couple of months in the season and looked as though he was going to go someway to repay the money spent. But recently, he hasnt looked any better than Janujaz. Wonder if being the "main man" effected him, as he's been used to playing 2nd fiddle behind Ronaldo and Messi in recent years.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on February 17, 2015, 07:33:59 PM I think the player who has performed the best of our big signings has been Blind. He breaks the play up well and is versatile which has been important with the injuries we have. Di Maria has shown flashes of his worth. Herrara not really been given a chance. As for the rest nothing exciting. Hopefully it's a settling in period for most and we will see the best of them next year
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 10, 2015, 05:04:59 PM A few questions I'd like to ask LVG...
Why is it that when we have genuinely tricky and fast wide men, we currently choose to deliver the ball to them via three or four other players? Why do you change the team every week? Why doesn't someone explain to the midfield that they are expected to get at least close to the opponent's penalty area in numbers? Why do we currently look behind us for options for a pass before looking forward? Were you ashamed a couple of weeks ago when we turned an attacking free kick into a pass back to the goalkeeper in three or four passes? We weren't winning at the time. What the fuck is your plan for Falcao? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 10, 2015, 05:07:16 PM man u lads
if allardyce had been playing LVG's tactics of recent weeks eg fellaini up top or as the support striker, lump it up to him, look for the knock downs....little width, couple of defensive midfielders he would have been derided for being a dinosaur and under pressure from his fan base etc why is the team under this supposed tactical master so naive? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 10, 2015, 05:13:29 PM man u lads if allardyce had been playing LVG's tactics of recent weeks eg fellaini up top or as the support striker, lump it up to him, look for the knock downs....little width, couple of defensive midfielders he would have been derided for being a dinosaur and under pressure from his fan base etc why is the team under this supposed tactical master so naive? SAF wasn't averse to taking the long ball route at times, but your point is well made. I have no idea of the answer to your question. I have a few of my own as you can see in the post above. LVG is no doubt a wise and talented manager, although he seems to be hiding it very well at the moment. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 10, 2015, 05:18:04 PM His pedigree and handling of the media are the main reasons he's been given more time and also ofc because he's following Moyes not Fergie
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on March 10, 2015, 05:49:38 PM Interesting how poor the quality is in general this year.
Amazing that Man U have been able to maintain a top 4 position for so long and lose, relatively, so few games. Found their football yesterday to be worthy of derision though, just so far from what they once were. Could bank on an attractive, attacking style even when not at their absolute best Could have written the last couple of lines about Arsenal as well tbf Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on March 10, 2015, 06:08:48 PM The most disappointing thing about the season is that we've had so much possession in games, yet never looked like turning the screw on any of the opposition.
I think there has only been 4 games where the opposition have had more possession, and we won 3 of those (Home to Everton and Away to Saints and Arsenal). With the attacking options we have in the squad, we should be turning >60% possession into more shots on target, but the players seem more concerned with keeping the ball (actually, I change that to not losing the ball) than they do about taking risks in the oppositions half. That partly stems from last season where the confidence of the whole squad took a massive knock, but you have to question LVG's 'philosophy'. Players like Falcoa, Di Maria, Blind, Rojo, Herrera and Shaw should have all been arriving at the club high on confidence and in a position where they have little to lose. (Based on last seasons performances). Yet none of them have got anywhere close to showing what they are capable of doing. RVP looks a shadow of the player he was two seasons ago, Rooney has been forced to play out of position. It's painful to think that De Gea is not only out best player this season, but is about the only one who has improved. Ashley Young actually did look okay as a let wingback earlier in the season, but when he's playing as an out and out winger, he just doesn't cut it. We've got too may square pegs for round holes. Perhaps injuries have limited some tactical decisions in games, but the cup tie against The Gunners was just another example of LVG making changes that limit his options towards the end of a game. Bringing Carrick and Jones on at half time (which must have been because of injuries) was just ridiculous, and goes back to my previous comment about not taking risks. If Shaw was injured, drop Young to left back and bring another attacking player on and let's go for it. But we invited pressure onto ourselves, gave away any momentum and then got undone by an individual error from a player that should never be playing right back in a back four. We've got to give LVG time to get everything in place. He goes on about how important a Top 4 finish is, but we're not playing with the confidence of a Top 4 side, and with our run-in, I think we will come unstuck on a number of occasions before the season is out. Arsenal, Liverpool and Tottenham are showing much more momentum heading towards the finish line, we could easily end up 6th/7th. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on March 15, 2015, 05:09:38 PM What a wonderful goal by Rooney. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DropTheHammer on March 15, 2015, 05:52:18 PM I preferred the celebration; i had no idea he boxed Phil Bardsley and got KOd!
It's on YouTube Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 16, 2015, 01:21:44 AM That was more like it!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 16, 2015, 06:17:46 AM Is LVG a Blonde?
Yesterday's performance was so much more positive, sharper, goals and goal attempts from midfield players, and we've discovered a role for Falcao as a low impact late substitute. A few questions I'd like to ask LVG... Why is it that when we have genuinely tricky and fast wide men, we currently choose to deliver the ball to them via three or four other players? Why do you change the team every week? Why doesn't someone explain to the midfield that they are expected to get at least close to the opponent's penalty area in numbers? Why do we currently look behind us for options for a pass before looking forward? Were you ashamed a couple of weeks ago when we turned an attacking free kick into a pass back to the goalkeeper in three or four passes? We weren't winning at the time. What the fuck is your plan for Falcao? at least we can go down fighting next weekend. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 22, 2015, 02:20:10 PM Decent start ;yippee;
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on March 22, 2015, 02:53:47 PM Not seen Man U play so assured, fluid and confident for a very long time. Really good game to watch, too, no hanky panky. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 22, 2015, 02:57:17 PM Sharper and more positive throughout. Job half done, We Go Again in the second half
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on March 22, 2015, 03:04:57 PM Good first half to watch.
Hoping for more of the same but with half a dozen red cards too this half ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on March 22, 2015, 03:08:23 PM Good first half to watch. Hoping for more of the same but with half a dozen red cards too this half ;) One already! Amazing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on March 22, 2015, 03:09:31 PM Must be one of the shortest appearances ever, 25 seconds. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 22, 2015, 03:09:58 PM Nice to see a cameo performance from Stevie G.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 22, 2015, 03:11:58 PM Nice to see a cameo performance from Stevie G. as a neutral, that is comfortably the funniest moment in football for many a season Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on March 22, 2015, 03:13:40 PM Nice to see a cameo performance from Stevie G. as a neutral, that is comfortably the funniest moment in football for many a season Thought exactly this, espesh since the first half was full of 'Steve Gerrard, Steve Gerrard' Hilarious club sometimes Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on March 22, 2015, 03:15:12 PM i really don't mind who wins, but here's gerrard's heat map
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAtXTnoUcAEE98H.png) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on March 22, 2015, 03:17:34 PM i really don't mind who wins, but here's gerrard's heat map (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAtXTnoUcAEE98H.png) Chortle Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on March 22, 2015, 03:18:26 PM That could easily have been another red.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on March 22, 2015, 03:20:06 PM The DiMario catch was another comical moment, too.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on March 22, 2015, 03:21:23 PM Oh my, this gets better and better, even as a complete neutral. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 22, 2015, 03:22:23 PM Nice to see a cameo performance from Stevie G. as a neutral, that is comfortably the funniest moment in football for many a season As a Liverpool fan you have to find it slightly funny. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 22, 2015, 03:22:50 PM That was somewhat special
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 22, 2015, 03:23:52 PM It's a bit quiet over there
http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=244.0 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on March 22, 2015, 03:28:22 PM And for the encore, Balotelli comes on. Perfect temprement for the job in hand. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on March 22, 2015, 03:29:54 PM Lol, how long did it take for him to get a yellow? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 22, 2015, 03:31:54 PM World class De Gea
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 22, 2015, 03:32:17 PM Lol, how long did it take for him to get a yellow? What price he het's a second? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on March 22, 2015, 03:33:42 PM Lol, how long did it take for him to get a yellow? What price he het's a second? FRED would appreciate that, we have a bet on him getting a red this season, I think. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 22, 2015, 03:35:57 PM World class De Gea You're being outplayed at home and that's the best you have ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on March 22, 2015, 03:43:47 PM Phil Jones has been really good today.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 22, 2015, 03:45:41 PM Phil Jones has been really good today. Call the police, someone has hacked The Camel's account Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Baron on March 22, 2015, 03:46:56 PM World class De Gea You're being outplayed at home and that's the best you have ? Lol were awful and have 10 men and are back in it and you bit. 😄 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on March 22, 2015, 03:58:22 PM Phil Jones has been really good today. Call the police, someone has hacked The Camel's account I remember when Fergie said he was going to be better than Beckanbauer, Moore and Charlton added together or some such nonsense. Must have been some pressure to heap on a young player. This was the best game I've seen him play in ages. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on March 22, 2015, 04:07:40 PM Phil Jones has been really good today. Call the police, someone has hacked The Camel's account I remember when Fergie said he was going to be better than Beckanbauer, Moore and Charlton added together or some such nonsense. Must have been some pressure to heap on a young player. This was the best game I've seen him play in ages. Smalling who I've never thought was great, was pretty good too. Considering how the defence looked at the start of the season they've held it together really well tbf Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on March 22, 2015, 04:46:09 PM Phil Jones has been really good today. Call the police, someone has hacked The Camel's account I remember when Fergie said he was going to be better than Beckanbauer, Moore and Charlton added together or some such nonsense. Must have been some pressure to heap on a young player. This was the best game I've seen him play in ages. Smalling who I've never thought was great, was pretty good too. Considering how the defence looked at the start of the season they've held it together really well tbf No coincidence that we finally have an effective defensive midfield presence. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on March 22, 2015, 05:40:20 PM YES!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 12, 2015, 06:10:00 PM What a lovely afternoon it's been :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 12, 2015, 07:28:31 PM Hard not to get carried away. Great performance.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on April 12, 2015, 07:36:58 PM Hard not to get carried away. Great performance. That's not like you George. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2015, 07:39:12 PM any re-assessment of Moyes due?
an impossible spot taking over from SAF, and the players in the vanguard of the second half of the season for Man U are Moyes signings Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on April 12, 2015, 07:41:29 PM any re-assessment of Moyes due? an impossible spot taking over from SAF, and the players in the vanguard of the second half of the season for Man U are Moyes signings Was always going to be the case. Impossible job for next man in, and a freeroll for whoever followed, because he would be trying to sort out the 'mess' left by his successor. Should have sat tight for a couple years, and then gone :D That said, I think Moyes is pretty negative from a style point of view, which wouldn't have been much fun to watch had he been 2nd man in. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 12, 2015, 07:52:56 PM any re-assessment of Moyes due? an impossible spot taking over from SAF, and the players in the vanguard of the second half of the season for Man U are Moyes signings Don't recall Moyes signing Carrick or deGea, nor Young, Valencia, Jones or Smalling. He signed Fellaini and used him badly. He did sign Mata, in a January panic. Not sure he had a clear idea about how that would work. i'd love to be wrong about this because I was a Moyes supporter when he arrived, but it never felt like we would get back to playing as we have been lately under him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 12, 2015, 08:09:36 PM Moyes just didn't have the pedigree of demeanour to manage a club of Uniteds size. He should stick the evertons and liverpools
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on April 12, 2015, 08:16:19 PM Moyes just didn't have the pedigree of demeanour to manage a club of Uniteds size. He should stick the evertons and liverpools Ooohhhh...... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 12, 2015, 08:19:32 PM Moyes just didn't have the pedigree of demeanour to manage a club of Uniteds size. He should stick the evertons and liverpools Ooohhhh...... ;ifm; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on April 29, 2015, 02:57:26 PM realistically please
how close would you feel LVG and MU would get to the title next year if they bought in the summer Hummels or Varane? (a young commanding centre back anyway) Gundogan for midfield a quality striker and churned the squad of the marginal guys, Falcao goes....with RVP maybe moving on too close to chelsea (they will strengthen again in the summer)? a way off still? ty Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 29, 2015, 07:46:32 PM realistically please how close would you feel LVG and MU would get to the title next year if they bought in the summer Hummels or Varane? (a young commanding centre back anyway) Gundogan for midfield a quality striker and churned the squad of the marginal guys, Falcao goes....with RVP maybe moving on too close to chelsea (they will strengthen again in the summer)? a way off still? ty Had we started this season better we'd be pretty close now. Dropped seven points in the first three games and arguably dropped ten in the first five. I don't know the players you've mentioned but for sure we need to strengthen the central defence, to have at least one and preferably two decent DMs and to add at least one goal scorer (or get Falcao/RVP firing), That probably gets us closer. Not sure it gets us the title though. Need a new keeper next season too, probably. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: muckthenuts on April 29, 2015, 08:11:02 PM I think united fans have forgotten how lucky they were in so many games this season. Plenty more points could have been easily dropped mid-season, they've run way above expectation and and still probably going to finish 4th.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on April 29, 2015, 08:59:41 PM I think united fans have forgotten how lucky they were in so many games this season. Plenty more points could have been easily dropped mid-season, they've run way above expectation and and still probably going to finish 4th. Of course we get lucky occasionally, every team does, but to say that our luck outweighed that of the other sides seems somewhat selective to me. Certainly don't agree that we have exceptionally well, nor that our league position is above expectation. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 29, 2015, 10:50:10 PM No one's forgotten anything. United weren't as poor as everyone was making out at the start and not as good as everyone is at the end BUT the performances in the last couple of months or so have been very encouraging. I think with a couple of signings we will be up there again next year however it also depends on how the sides around us strengthen.
Will be another interesting season regardless Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on April 30, 2015, 02:39:38 AM The whole league is piss poor really.
The Chelsea team which is going to stroll to the title wouldn't have won any in the United glory years. City and United are woeful this year. If it wasn't for Young and Feilani you wouldn't be in the CL spots. Hands up if you thought either of those two would get any games outside the Capital One Cup this season. Can't quite work out how Barca, Real and Bayern have left English teams needed binoculars to see them in the distance, they are so far ahead. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 30, 2015, 02:45:51 AM Agree with almost everything apart from Chelsea being poor
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on April 30, 2015, 11:26:05 AM Agree with almost everything apart from Chelsea being poor I Think they have been poor winners of the league. In my head when I think of league winning sides I have memories of United, the invincibles, ageroooooooo etc. As a United fan we have definitely had years when we have won it and not been our best. I think it shows with how we cannot compete in Europe at the minute with how far behind we are. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on April 30, 2015, 11:46:55 AM Agree with almost everything apart from Chelsea being poor Hazard is obviously an outstanding player and I really like Matic - he suits their system. Fabregas started the season on fire (and to be fair for the first dozen or so games Chelsea were really really good) But since Christmas they've been rubbish. Fabregas, Oscar, Diego Costa, Remy. Virtually every attacking or creative player theyown has been woeful. Maybe it's because the "challengers" have been even worse and the manager decided draws and 1-0 wins were enough to take the title. The best and most appropriate description for Chelsea since Christmas is "hard working". Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on April 30, 2015, 12:15:30 PM The whole league is piss poor really. The Chelsea team which is going to stroll to the title wouldn't have won any in the United glory years. City and United are woeful this year. If it wasn't for Young and Feilani you wouldn't be in the CL spots. Hands up if you thought either of those two would get any games outside the Capital One Cup this season. Can't quite work out how Barca, Real and Bayern have left English teams needed binoculars to see them in the distance, they are so far ahead. Agree the league has been poor this season and certainly less compelling than the close title races of 2014 City/Liverpool/Chelsea and 2012 City/United. The must successful year for United from their "glory years" was 1999 and I'd take the view this Chelsea team is far stronger. Using 1999 as an example United didn't particularly dominate - they only won 22 of their 38 league games finishing on 79 points and only won 2 of their 6 Champions League group games. Sure, Chelsea haven't had a challenge since City's form spiralled after being joint top on New Year's day. This Chelsea, tho, are a ridiculously difficult team to beat - only 3 defeats all season including Champions League. Of those defeats only 2 in the league so far and if they remain unbeaten it 3rd best performances in terms of losses in PL history after the Invincibles and their own record in 2005 when they only lost 1. The Barca/Real/bayern conundrum is pretty straightforward really - Ronaldo, Suarez, Bale, Messi, Robben etc etc. Stick those players in the top PL sides and lets see how we get on in Europe then. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on April 30, 2015, 02:21:02 PM I'd agree. The Barca/Bayern/Real thing is down to proper World Class players.
If you were putting a current best in the world squad together (2 players per position), how many would be from the PL ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on April 30, 2015, 02:22:43 PM I'd agree. The Barca/Bayern/Real thing is down to proper World Class players. If you were putting a current best in the world squad together (2 players per position), how many would be from the PL ? None? not a single englishman i can think of hazard, costa, aguero not top 2 globally in their positions and those three would be closest? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: DungBeetle on April 30, 2015, 02:28:54 PM Courtois/Lloris would have a chance for the keeper slot?
Alexis Sanchez out wide? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on April 30, 2015, 02:52:38 PM Obviously depends on the exact formation you choose to play, and where you choose to play some of the players, but I was thinking it would be 4-3-3 of sorts
2 x Goalkeepers 2 x Left Backs 2 x Right Backs 4 x Centre Backs 6 x Midfielders 6 x Forwards Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 30, 2015, 02:53:13 PM De Gea/Lloris/courtois
Could make a case for matic. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on April 30, 2015, 02:54:58 PM De Gea/Lloris/courtois Could make a case for matic. one of them behind Neuer possibly yes couldn't personally have matic or alexis in. terrific players but not in top 6 worldwide midfield/forward for me Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on April 30, 2015, 03:06:02 PM Thing is when you talk about Europes elite yes the premiership is behind but as a league itself I think it's tougher than la liga/bundesliga (if that makes sense)
Matic is a specialist in his role- can't think of anyone better than him in that position off the top of my head. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on April 30, 2015, 03:14:05 PM Thing is when you talk about Europes elite yes the premiership is behind but as a league itself I think it's tougher than la liga/bundesliga (if that makes sense) Matic is a specialist in his role- can't think of anyone better than him in that position off the top of my head. you might be right Matic is excellent. fabregas and hazard can do what they do because matic is so great behind them (and ramires as well to a less consistent extent) xabi alonso, busquets, vidal, matuidi, kroos, khedira, martinez, neustadter, schweinsteiger? all in the pot here i would suggest for probably 2 places in a 6 man midfield squad that you have to get your attacking midfield flair players into Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on May 02, 2015, 08:55:22 PM Why would United do anything the easy way?!?!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pawprint on May 02, 2015, 09:31:02 PM I can't remember three games in a row that we have dominated with so much possession, scored no goals and got no points.
As you say, doing it the hard way. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on May 07, 2015, 12:38:58 PM Manchester United's new signing Memphis Depay is having an absolutely monstrous statistical season in the Eredivisie.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CEZe60CW0AAi3F7.png) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on May 07, 2015, 12:42:54 PM Manchester United's new signing Memphis Depay is having an absolutely monstrous statistical season in the Eredivisie. (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CEZe60CW0AAi3F7.png) I've been betting on that league this season. And although Depay is obviously good, I wouldn't read too much into those stats. Some of the defending by the bottom half teams makes the QPR back four look like Fort Knox. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on May 10, 2015, 03:21:26 AM http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/11594591/Manchester-United-rule-out-selling-Old-Trafford-naming-rights.html
This isn't a pop at manure (Geordie's amongst others could have it thrown at them) but why is this such a big deal in England? Dallas cowboy fans (and all US sports fans across all sports) literally couldn't give a shit about this. Why do English football fans care so much when turning down the money potentially costs them a player which might take them over the edge? Makes no sense to me. If they call old trafford the 'Barclays Stadium' for £20m a year it will always be known as 'old trafford' to the fans. Can a proper english football fan explain to me why they want their club to be at a £20m a year financial disadvantage just so the ground doesn't change names?' Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on May 11, 2015, 07:29:57 PM http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/11594591/Manchester-United-rule-out-selling-Old-Trafford-naming-rights.html This isn't a pop at manure (Geordie's amongst others could have it thrown at them) but why is this such a big deal in England? Dallas cowboy fans (and all US sports fans across all sports) literally couldn't give a shit about this. Why do English football fans care so much when turning down the money potentially costs them a player which might take them over the edge? Makes no sense to me. If they call old trafford the 'Barclays Stadium' for £20m a year it will always be known as 'old trafford' to the fans. Can a proper english football fan explain to me why they want their club to be at a £20m a year financial disadvantage just so the ground doesn't change names?' Might have to wash my hands after saying this. But absolutely agree. The official name doesn't matter, it's what people call the stadium which matters. How long has it been since Whitbread stopped sponsoring that steeplechase at Sandown? 15 years maybe? Everyone I know still calls it the Whitbread. Ad no-one calls Bournemouth "AFC Bournemouth" Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on June 24, 2015, 04:06:20 PM this summer
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CIRY-gGUsAAGPMX.png) give me two names you'd like (feasibly) above all others for united this offseason Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on June 24, 2015, 04:08:41 PM Bale
Lloris (if De Gea goes) Hummels Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: cheapwetsuit on June 24, 2015, 04:57:12 PM Schweinsteiger (been wanting him at United for years)
Lacazette Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: booder on June 24, 2015, 07:20:02 PM this summer (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CIRY-gGUsAAGPMX.png) give me two names you'd like (feasibly) above all others for united this offseason No mention of Emile Heskey ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on June 29, 2015, 11:36:08 AM Betting suspended on Morgan Schneiderlin joining Man Utd after a flurry of large bets at 1/12.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on June 29, 2015, 11:41:50 AM Betting suspended on Morgan Schneiderlin joining Man Utd after a flurry of large bets at 1/12. One bet of £100 and two of £50? In James Milton's article in the Post yesterday, he recounted the bet he had at the end of the season. Thinking Immobile hadn't exactly been a roaring success at Dortmund and Inter Milan were likely to need a striker he put two and two together and placed £25 on this transfer happening at 12/1. The "bookie" who accepted this bet immediately cut the price to 3/1! The price slashing was probably reported in Gazetta, and might have started an avalance of publicity which led to the move actually happening! Bonkers. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on July 04, 2015, 03:50:56 PM Van Persie agrees terms with Fenerbahce http://gu.com/p/4act3/stw
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on July 04, 2015, 04:08:26 PM Van Persie agrees terms with Fenerbahce http://gu.com/p/4act3/stw Taking Nani to carry his bags hopefully. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on July 04, 2015, 06:54:07 PM Robin van Turkey.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on July 11, 2015, 12:37:37 AM http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/11733101/Man-Utd-transfer-news-Bastian-Schweinsteiger-set-to-join.html
great signing for the price might mean you guys lose interest in morgan so great business for us too Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: youthnkzR on July 11, 2015, 03:07:20 PM One of the players I've wanted at United for ages! Great news!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dewi_cool on July 11, 2015, 06:04:05 PM Rumours that Ronaldo coming OT in a swop deal involving DDG, adidas financing it apparently, 7/2 most places but Unibet still offering 10/1
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on July 11, 2015, 06:12:19 PM Rumours that Ronaldo coming OT in a swop deal involving DDG, adidas financing it apparently, 7/2 most places but Unibet still offering 10/1 Really? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dewi_cool on July 11, 2015, 06:22:47 PM Well it is a rumour
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dan on July 11, 2015, 10:13:34 PM Casillas has just gone to Porto! De Gea is Madrid bound on Monday!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dewi_cool on July 11, 2015, 10:26:10 PM Casillas has just gone to Porto! De Gea is Madrid bound on Monday! That means Utd have the upper hand in negotiations for whatever player they want from Real though, which is good news. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: dan on July 11, 2015, 10:28:09 PM I personally don't think United will get any player from Madrid in that deal but that's just my opinion.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on July 12, 2015, 11:44:45 PM grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr if this is true
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/manchester-united-agree-morgan-schneiderlin-9641501 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Dewi_cool on July 13, 2015, 01:44:41 AM grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr if this is true done dealhttp://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/manchester-united-agree-morgan-schneiderlin-9641501 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: OHCARRION on July 13, 2015, 10:52:22 AM These are the kind of players Utd should have signed last season. Makes you wonder why they didn't...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on July 13, 2015, 11:38:17 AM These are the kind of players Utd should have signed last season. Makes you wonder why they didn't... Timing is everything. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on July 13, 2015, 01:15:22 PM These are the kind of players Utd should have signed last season. Makes you wonder why they didn't... Timing is everything. Prolly about 2 seasons to late for Basti then ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on July 13, 2015, 02:27:39 PM These are the kind of players Utd should have signed last season. Makes you wonder why they didn't... Timing is everything. Prolly about 2 seasons to late for Basti then ;) You could well be right about that. Not at all sure what our transfer policy is these days, not that it was ever really clear in SAF's time either. We have a pretty long list of big purchases that didn't deliver, and although there were more than enough that did we do seem to have kissed a lot of toads that turned out to be just toads. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: cheapwetsuit on July 30, 2015, 04:33:47 AM Man U have been absolutely atrocious tonight. They must have made some sort of deal with PSG to sign Ibrahimovic. I say unload the clip at 12/1 he signs with them.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: cheapwetsuit on July 30, 2015, 04:54:22 AM And then he goes and wears a t-shirt with "Paris" written on it. Must be his way of saying goodbye.
PS. Look at the second goal. Never seen such suspect defending in my whole life. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on July 30, 2015, 05:00:19 AM Man U have been absolutely atrocious tonight. They must have made some sort of deal with PSG to sign Ibrahimovic. I say unload the clip at 12/1 he signs with them. Unloaded! £1.75 @ 12/1 :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on August 25, 2015, 05:32:27 PM Are Utd fans worried about Woodwards ability to land that big name?
Have you got enough firepower up front? Do you still need another CB? Is Romero the answer in goal? Lots of questions about the Utd team for me lots of run good to have 7 points so far this season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: POWWWWWWWW on August 25, 2015, 06:27:06 PM Are Utd fans worried about Woodwards ability to land that big name? Have you got enough firepower up front? Do you still need another CB? Is Romero the answer in goal? Lots of questions about the Utd team for me lots of run good to have 7 points so far this season. I don't think we've ever had the ability to attract the "big names" from those above us in the pecking order. All the big marquee names that would improve us already play for huge teams and they don't want to sell. Chelsea are clearly above us in the pecking order so I'm not surprised Pedro went there. CB issue will be fine and improved massively by the Schmidfield/Darmian signings and Luke Shaws return to fitness. Same with Romero. Although I think DDG will come back mid Septemberish. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 25, 2015, 08:39:21 PM I think Pedro wouldve come to us had we acted a lot sooner. I dont understand what happened there. He wouldve been an ideal replacement for Di Maria
I think we need: A world class centre half A wide player with genuine pace A striker We also need to decide who is going to play in the number 10 role and stick with it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: LeKnave on August 25, 2015, 09:15:55 PM We also need to decide who is going to play in the number 10 role and stick with it. anyone but januzaj Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 25, 2015, 11:18:24 PM or just play them all
Romero Shaw smalling blind darmain Carrick Mata fellani januzaj Rooney depay Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on August 26, 2015, 12:10:13 AM or just play them all Romero Shaw smalling blind darmain Carrick Mata fellani januzaj Rooney depay You are kidding, right? Back four has looked ok and shows good signs for the future with Smalling finally living up to the rating SAF gave him. But we need two defensive minded midfielders at the moment. That's Carrick/ Schweinsteiger plus Schneiderlin and then four from Mata, Janusjaz, Rooney, Depay, Fellaini, Young, Wilson, Valencia. Rooney, Mata and Depay probably fixtures when fit. Fellaini for away games and Top Six. Janusjaz/Young/Valencia for home games and some of the less testing away fixtures. Goalkeeper situation needs to be resolved. Romero or de Gea (obv) but sort it out and let's get back to having a keeper who is an integral part of the defensive unit rather than just the last line. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on August 26, 2015, 12:32:02 AM lol course Im kidding
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on August 30, 2015, 08:06:18 PM how can MUFC can spend $475M on new players since Sir Alex left, & have 1 senior striker (if Hernandez leaves)?
It's incredible. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on August 30, 2015, 08:19:04 PM Do LvG & Ryan Giggs not get on?
Their body language on the bench today very much suggests as much. Does the role of "Assistant Manager" mean much? Pat Rice held that title at Arsenal for many years, & he seemed a lovely chap, but it was hard to see what he bought to the party. Brian Kidd is the "Co-Assistant Manager" (Ha!) @ Man C, does he really yield much influence? Watching them today, I could not help but think of what a difference a Keane, Bruce or Schmichael would have made, there does not seem to be any dominant characters there. In case anyone gets uppity, I'm neither pro nor anti Man U. I used to relish the prospect of a Man U game though, there was always an excitement, a buzz, the knowledge that they would batter almost any team, & fight tooth & nail to the bitter end. Now it all seems a bit mundane, somehow. I hope they eventually get back on track, but they seem destined for a good few years in the relative doldrums yet. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on August 30, 2015, 08:25:07 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on August 30, 2015, 08:29:54 PM how can MUFC can spend $475M on new players since Sir Alex left, & have 1 senior striker (if Hernandez leaves)? It's incredible. If you find out the answer to this question, please share it with me. I am at a loss to understand what LVG is attempting. Wish I knew the answer to Tikay's question about Giggs too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: hhyftrftdr on August 30, 2015, 08:51:24 PM Do LvG & Ryan Giggs not get on? Their body language on the bench today very much suggests as much. Does the role of "Assistant Manager" mean much? Pat Rice held that title at Arsenal for many years, & he seemed a lovely chap, but it was hard to see what he bought to the party. Brian Kidd is the "Co-Assistant Manager" (Ha!) @ Man C, does he really yield much influence? Watching them today, I could not help but think of what a difference a Keane, Bruce or Schmichael would have made, there does not seem to be any dominant characters there. In case anyone gets uppity, I'm neither pro nor anti Man U. I used to relish the prospect of a Man U game though, there was always an excitement, a buzz, the knowledge that they would batter almost any team, & fight tooth & nail to the bitter end. Now it all seems a bit mundane, somehow. I hope they eventually get back on track, but they seem destined for a good few years in the relative doldrums yet. Influence? Probably not a huge amount, no. But it speaks volumes that when Pellegrini came in and cleared the decks for his own staff, Kidd is still there. Highly regarded amongst the players, whilst he may not have a big say on who plays week in week out, he is a great bridge between the senior management and the players. He knows the league inside out, you can't put a price on that kind of stuff. If it's not remiss of me to say, it is probably quite a comparable relationship between Kidd and City and you and Sky poker. And I mean that in a very complimentary way. Apart from Kidd doesn't fuck up UKOPs promos and have to explain that to the powers that be ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 01, 2015, 01:02:12 PM What is van Gaal up to? MUFC now really short of top-class 1. strikers; 2. defenders; 3. goalkeepers. Still plenty of midfielders & wingers
not trolling, just trying to understand what his strategy is Man U fans Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 01, 2015, 01:54:05 PM What is van Gaal up to? MUFC now really short of top-class 1. strikers; 2. defenders; 3. goalkeepers. Still plenty of midfielders & wingers not trolling, just trying to understand what his strategy is Man U fans I dont know, I just simply to get it. If we had bought one top class striker and one top class CB I would have been happy this summer, we seemed to have sold everything and bought things we dont need. Madness Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 01, 2015, 02:40:55 PM What is van Gaal up to? MUFC now really short of top-class 1. strikers; 2. defenders; 3. goalkeepers. Still plenty of midfielders & wingers not trolling, just trying to understand what his strategy is Man U fans I dont know, I just simply to get it. If we had bought one top class striker and one top class CB I would have been happy this summer, we seemed to have sold everything and bought things we dont need. Madness :dontask: ;boltpp; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on September 11, 2015, 01:18:09 AM Saturday could be the first time Liverpool and Manchester United have ever play with neither team fielding a locally grown player.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 11, 2015, 02:51:16 AM De Gea in contract talks now. Surely not?!?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on September 11, 2015, 09:38:53 AM De Gea in contract talks now. Surely not?!? That's what the media seem to be suggesting. If true, a most unexpected turn of events, which invites an array of speculation as to what may or may not happen next year. All very odd. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on September 11, 2015, 09:42:54 AM What is van Gaal up to? MUFC now really short of top-class 1. strikers; 2. defenders; 3. goalkeepers. Still plenty of midfielders & wingers not trolling, just trying to understand what his strategy is Man U fans Maybe that was his plan all along? What I find quite interesting is how prickly & defensive he is getting already with the Media. They are on his case, & he is biting. If he is the top class Manager Man U need, he should be able to rise above that. Don't think SAF was ever too defensive in such matters, he was very much a front foot man. He just banned any aggressive Media types, bless him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 11, 2015, 10:22:55 AM De Gea in contract talks now. Surely not?!? That's what the media seem to be suggesting. If true, a most unexpected turn of events, which invites an array of speculation as to what may or may not happen next year. All very odd. No doubt the Release Clause will form a key part of the negotiations. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 11, 2015, 10:31:14 AM Tikay, you asked why Martial wouldn't play against Liverpool.
I'm more inclined to ask why he would. He's 19, has only played a comparatively small number of games in a very different league. Would you throw him into a game of the stature of this when he's only had a few days to train with his new colleagues? I'd expect to see the stronger players selected for this. Something like... De Gea Darmian, Smalling, Blind, Shaw Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger Mata, Herrera, Fellaini/Rooney Rooney/Depay Think Carrick plays instead of one of the Sch's if he has recovered from the knock that kept him out of the England squad. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on September 11, 2015, 10:34:42 AM De Gea in contract talks now. Surely not?!? That's what the media seem to be suggesting. If true, a most unexpected turn of events, which invites an array of speculation as to what may or may not happen next year. All very odd. No doubt the Release Clause will form a key part of the negotiations. That was exactly my first thought. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on September 11, 2015, 10:35:03 AM Tikay, you asked why Martial wouldn't play against Liverpool. I'm more inclined to ask why he would. He's 19, has only played a comparatively small number of games in a very different league. Would you throw him into a game of the stature of this when he's only had a few days to train with his new colleagues? I'd expect to see the stronger players selected for this. Something like... De Gea Darmian, Smalling, Blind, Shaw Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger Mata, Herrera, Fellaini/Rooney Rooney/Depay Think Carrick plays instead of one of the Sch's if he has recovered from the knock that kept him out of the England squad. You can see why United fans are unhappy. With the notable exception of Mata, there isn't much creativity in that side considering all the money that's been spent. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on September 11, 2015, 10:39:26 AM Tikay, you asked why Martial wouldn't play against Liverpool. I'm more inclined to ask why he would. He's 19, has only played a comparatively small number of games in a very different league. Would you throw him into a game of the stature of this when he's only had a few days to train with his new colleagues? I'd expect to see the stronger players selected for this. Something like... De Gea Darmian, Smalling, Blind, Shaw Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger Mata, Herrera, Fellaini/Rooney Rooney/Depay Think Carrick plays instead of one of the Sch's if he has recovered from the knock that kept him out of the England squad. Me? I'd play him, yes. They paid an arm & a leg for him, best thing since sliced bread, & even with my rudimentary knowledge of football, Man U are desperately in need of someone who can score goals, to assist Rooney & Co. When Malcolm Macdonald signed for Newcastle he was just 20 or 21 as I recall, & scored a hat trick on his very first game - against, spookily, Liverpool. Really, considering what they paid, I'd want him to be in the team from the get go. At that price, he's not supposed to be a work in progress, surely? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: booder on September 11, 2015, 10:40:04 AM there isn't much creativity in that side considering all the money that's been spent. You could say the same about Liverpool Keith. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: marcro on September 11, 2015, 10:46:35 AM Tikay, you asked why Martial wouldn't play against Liverpool. I'm more inclined to ask why he would. He's 19, has only played a comparatively small number of games in a very different league. Would you throw him into a game of the stature of this when he's only had a few days to train with his new colleagues? I'd expect to see the stronger players selected for this. Something like... De Gea Darmian, Smalling, Blind, Shaw Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger Mata, Herrera, Fellaini/Rooney Rooney/Depay Think Carrick plays instead of one of the Sch's if he has recovered from the knock that kept him out of the England squad. Me? I'd play him, yes. They paid an arm & a leg for him, best thing since sliced bread, & even with my rudimentary knowledge of football, Man U are desperately in need of someone who can score goals, to assist Rooney & Co. When Malcolm Macdonald signed for Newcastle he was just 20 or 21 as I recall, & scored a hat trick on his very first game - against, spookily, Liverpool. Really, considering what they paid, I'd want him to be in the team from the get go. At that price, he's not supposed to be a work in progress, surely? Agreed. It does not make any sense to pay that kind of money and stick him in the reserves or on the bench. I don't think LVG is thrilled about having him but then not many are thrilled with the job LVG is doing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 11, 2015, 10:54:24 AM Tikay, you asked why Martial wouldn't play against Liverpool. I'm more inclined to ask why he would. He's 19, has only played a comparatively small number of games in a very different league. Would you throw him into a game of the stature of this when he's only had a few days to train with his new colleagues? I'd expect to see the stronger players selected for this. Something like... De Gea Darmian, Smalling, Blind, Shaw Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger Mata, Herrera, Fellaini/Rooney Rooney/Depay Think Carrick plays instead of one of the Sch's if he has recovered from the knock that kept him out of the England squad. You can see why United fans are unhappy. With the notable exception of Mata, there isn't much creativity in that side considering all the money that's been spent. Quite. But in truth we haven't been that creative for quite a while now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 11, 2015, 11:54:28 AM We have paid an arm an a leg because we are desperate and he is a young talent.
Not that he is the complete package now Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 11, 2015, 12:46:59 PM "I'm delighted to be starting this new chapter in my United career," said De Gea. Read more: http://bit.ly/1VRoS97
4 year contract, option of 5th Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: buzzharvey22 on September 11, 2015, 01:14:17 PM Probably cost Man UTD £3m in extra wages to make sure they get £28m at the end of the season. Fairly clever business.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 11, 2015, 02:27:17 PM Probably cost Man UTD £3m in extra wages to make sure they get £28m at the end of the season. Fairly clever business. Hope for more than just a season, or for more than £28MM. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on September 13, 2015, 11:19:56 AM What did you guys think of the short cameo by Martial? Can't read too much into 20 minutes, & a goal born of youthful exuberance, but when he scored, it suddenly struck me that very few players try to take a man on these days, especially in the box, it's all tip-tap passes, & it was so good to see. Anyway, I suspect you may have a live one there, & have a few years fun & buzz ahead. He seemed like a breath of fresh air. With Chelsea all over the shop, & Liverpool, to my eye, looking really woeful (where was the spirit, the fight we used to associate with them?), there's more room at the top now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 13, 2015, 01:55:44 PM The lack of players running at people is so sad.
Di Maria did it in the first few games then nothing. Depay has one move, cutting inside and teams have worked this out already. Young runs at people and made a real difference. Martial early days but nice to see a bit of pace and movement and players running with the ball. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 13, 2015, 05:09:21 PM The lack of players running at people is so sad. Di Maria did it in the first few games then nothing. Depay has one move, cutting inside and teams have worked this out already. Young runs at people and made a real difference. Martial early days but nice to see a bit of pace and movement and players running with the ball. I'd like to see the wide players being involved quicker, get them running onto the ball more and delivering balls into the box faster. Obviously to go with that we need to get more than just a lone striker into the areas to capitalise on the crosses or knockdowns. Martial took his chance well and although he didn't do much else it was an encouraging start. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 13, 2015, 06:48:15 PM He was making lots of runs off the balls and looked sharp, but thats not hard considering he was replacing fellani in that role, my gran would look fast after him.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on September 15, 2015, 08:58:18 PM sorry watching the aberdeen match just seen upddates on bbc 10 minute delay for an injury to shaw
i hope he is ok and its nothing serious i really rate him as a player Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on September 15, 2015, 09:08:44 PM ok facebook has gone mad now
speedy recovery luke shaw it sounds like it could be a bad one Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: rinswun on September 15, 2015, 09:20:38 PM There's a nasty pic doing the rounds which I won't post. Safe to say he's broken his leg (potentially dislocated ankle too). Sad for him and for England this summer.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 15, 2015, 09:28:06 PM looked terrible
hopefully early chatter that it could be a career ender is misplaced. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 15, 2015, 09:32:04 PM nice
Southampton FC @SouthamptonFC 23m23 minutes ago We'd like to send our best wishes to @LukeShaw23 following his injury while playing for #MUFC tonight. Come back stronger, Luke. Luke Shaw Verified account @LukeShaw23 @SouthamptonFC thank you , you don't know how much you as a club mean to me , thank you so much I really appreciate it Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Mark_Porter on September 15, 2015, 09:33:42 PM Lovely lad, hope he makes a full recovery. Such a shame as he has looked back to his best this season as well for club and country.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 15, 2015, 11:15:11 PM Looked horrible, just hope that he can make a full recovery.
Schweinsteiger appeared to have a phantom fracture in sympathy. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on September 15, 2015, 11:25:59 PM there isn't much creativity in that side considering all the money that's been spent. You could say the same about Liverpool Keith. Oh I disagree with this David. Plenty of creativity in the Liverpool squad (Coutinho, Lallana, Firmino, Allen) just seems like Brendan can't work out the best way to turn the talent in the squad into a decent team. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TL900 on September 16, 2015, 12:55:33 AM there isn't much creativity in that side considering all the money that's been spent. You could say the same about Liverpool Keith. Oh I disagree with this David. Plenty of creativity in the Liverpool squad (Coutinho, Lallana, Firmino, Allen) just seems like Brendan can't work out the best way to turn the talent in the squad into a decent team. ;whistle; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on September 16, 2015, 04:39:27 AM Allen :D
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 16, 2015, 10:59:07 AM there isn't much creativity in that side considering all the money that's been spent. You could say the same about Liverpool Keith. Oh I disagree with this David. Plenty of creativity in the Liverpool squad (Coutinho, Lallana, Firmino, Allen) just seems like Brendan can't work out the best way to turn the talent in the squad into a decent team. ;whistle; I think you could say the same about United Keith. There are creative players there, *(Depay, Rooney, Herrera, Mata) but the LVG philosophy appears to stifle much of it. *an equivalence of talent in my view, but am prepared to debate it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 16, 2015, 11:09:25 AM Moving on
What went wrong last night? We didn't convert dominance into goals, again. We allowed ourselves to be caught by sucker punches when the LVG philosophy of possession possession possession fell down through some poor decision making, or poor passes. Not at all impressed by Schweinsteiger, he seems to slow the game to walking pass every time he gets the ball. Indeed, there were times in the second half where he slowed it to a standstill. I know I am harking back to a golden age, but Scholes, Keane, Butt etc were dynamic both on and off the ball. Carrick looks forward and looks to move the ball quickly, Schweinsteiger just doesn't. Last night Smalling looked the most effective midfielder (had he scored when he burst through from the halfway line people would have been rapturous in their admiration). Finally, Get well soon Luke Shaw. Couple of pins and a few weeks on crutches and hopefully he'll be right as rain by the new year. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: booder on September 16, 2015, 11:30:21 AM Finally, Get well soon Luke Shaw. Yes, hate to see that happen to anyone. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: buzzharvey22 on September 16, 2015, 11:39:42 AM Thoughts on Depay?
Looks about as 1 footed a player as I've ever seen. And I watch Adam Johnson every week. (When hes not in Nick) ((Nick means jail, not a 15 year old boy)) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 16, 2015, 11:48:06 AM Basti I think has been great, he looks so solid and rarely gives the ball away.
He fits well within louis philosophy which I'm growing to live with, it may not be sexy but we are not going to have another fergie popping up anytime soon. Look at Jose and the style of football he has played over the past few years. Boring but effective (this season apart) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 16, 2015, 11:49:42 AM Thoughts on Depay? Looks about as 1 footed a player as I've ever seen. And I watch Adam Johnson every week. (When hes not in Nick) ((Nick means jail, not a 15 year old boy)) Not been blown away yet and I still prefer young on the left, where I sit at old Trafford we get the left side first half attack and depay looks slow with only one move to get past a defender, I don't want to give the game away to much but he cuts back inside off from the left onto his right to cross/shoot, every single time! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on September 16, 2015, 04:06:11 PM there isn't much creativity in that side considering all the money that's been spent. You could say the same about Liverpool Keith. Oh I disagree with this David. Plenty of creativity in the Liverpool squad (Coutinho, Lallana, Firmino, Allen) just seems like Brendan can't work out the best way to turn the talent in the squad into a decent team. ;whistle; I think you could say the same about United Keith. There are creative players there, *(Depay, Rooney, Herrera, Mata) but the LVG philosophy appears to stifle much of it. *an equivalence of talent in my view, but am prepared to debate it. I wouldn't call Depay, Rooney or Herrera particularly creative. They are all excellent players when they are on form obviously, but they are unlikely to play the killer ball players like Scholes or Giggs used to. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 16, 2015, 04:08:26 PM there isn't much creativity in that side considering all the money that's been spent. You could say the same about Liverpool Keith. Oh I disagree with this David. Plenty of creativity in the Liverpool squad (Coutinho, Lallana, Firmino, Allen) just seems like Brendan can't work out the best way to turn the talent in the squad into a decent team. ;whistle; I think you could say the same about United Keith. There are creative players there, *(Depay, Rooney, Herrera, Mata) but the LVG philosophy appears to stifle much of it. *an equivalence of talent in my view, but am prepared to debate it. I wouldn't call Depay, Rooney or Herrera particularly creative. They are all excellent players when they are on form obviously, but they are unlikely to play the killer ball players like Scholes or Giggs used to. It would be nice to have some more forward passes, they dont even have to be killer! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: c4ught on September 16, 2015, 05:09:31 PM Moving on What went wrong last night? We didn't convert dominance into goals, again. We allowed ourselves to be caught by sucker punches when the LVG philosophy of possession possession possession fell down through some poor decision making, or poor passes. Not at all impressed by Schweinsteiger, he seems to slow the game to walking pass every time he gets the ball. Indeed, there were times in the second half where he slowed it to a standstill. I know I am harking back to a golden age, but Scholes, Keane, Butt etc were dynamic both on and off the ball. Carrick looks forward and looks to move the ball quickly, Schweinsteiger just doesn't. Last night Smalling looked the most effective midfielder (had he scored when he burst through from the halfway line people would have been rapturous in their admiration). Finally, Get well soon Luke Shaw. Couple of pins and a few weeks on crutches and hopefully he'll be right as rain by the new year. From what I saw last night he definitely had a few looks but never actually made the pass. Do you think that is just because he is cautious or team mates not offering in a space he wants to pass to? I thought the same as BorntoBubble has been solid and rarely loses possession. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 16, 2015, 05:22:45 PM there isn't much creativity in that side considering all the money that's been spent. You could say the same about Liverpool Keith. Oh I disagree with this David. Plenty of creativity in the Liverpool squad (Coutinho, Lallana, Firmino, Allen) just seems like Brendan can't work out the best way to turn the talent in the squad into a decent team. ;whistle; I think you could say the same about United Keith. There are creative players there, *(Depay, Rooney, Herrera, Mata) but the LVG philosophy appears to stifle much of it. *an equivalence of talent in my view, but am prepared to debate it. I wouldn't call Depay, Rooney or Herrera particularly creative. They are all excellent players when they are on form obviously, but they are unlikely to play the killer ball players like Scholes or Giggs used to. It would be nice to have some more forward passes, they dont even have to be killer! Precious few players can play the killer passes that Scholes did in his prime, and beyond his prime too. I think Keith is being a little mischievous here since none of the LFC players mentioned offer anything more than being 'excellent players when they are on form'. United are, I think/hope, a lot closer to having everything clock into place than LFC though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: mulhuzz on September 16, 2015, 08:13:59 PM I said at the time Basti was 2years past his pomp.
Convinced Depay will come good though. Pardon the comparison but is LvG trying to 'walk it in' like a certain Frenchman who resides in North London? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 16, 2015, 08:44:07 PM I just feel like the team lacks a killer instinct. Under Fergie's reign once we were 1-0 up it was basically game over.
Now when we're leading teams always feel like they're still in it. There's a definite vulnerability which is surprising seeing as we've bought so many defensive minded midfielders. Finally I still don't think LVG knows his best 11 esp in midfield. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Cf on September 17, 2015, 03:10:29 PM Are United fans happy with LVG or with hindsight would you have preferred to see Moyes given more of a crack at it? Would the spending still have been as ridiculous as it has been?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on September 17, 2015, 03:54:26 PM Are United fans happy with LVG or with hindsight would you have preferred to see Moyes given more of a crack at it? Would the spending still have been as ridiculous as it has been? Really don't think he's achieved anything above expectation for 20 years, probably underachieved and vastly over-rated imo. Saying philosophy a few times won't change the Emperor's new clothes feeling I have with him. Just an old arrogant man with a bad hair day Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 17, 2015, 06:12:03 PM He's definitely an improvement on Moyes but I guess it's tough to answer that because Moyes wasn't given time.
LVG's has been given longer I suspect because of his better handling of the media and his past achievements and also cos he followed Moyes and not Fergie. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 17, 2015, 06:15:27 PM He's definitely an improvement on Moyes but I guess it's tough to answer that because Moyes wasn't given time. wouldn't LVG have been in the same boat as Moyes as the first manager after SAF? almost impossible job, whoever did it..in large part because the dressing room didn't go with the new manager. They bear more blame for the poor transition than Moyes imo, though that probably is an unfashionable perception Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 17, 2015, 06:45:06 PM Yes he would've although I think a huge thing that counted against Moyes was that he hadn't won anything of note whereas at least LVG has won the league on more than one occasion
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: anthonyl on September 17, 2015, 06:48:43 PM How much has his net spend been since taking over from moyes?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on September 17, 2015, 07:16:56 PM He's definitely an improvement on Moyes but I guess it's tough to answer that because Moyes wasn't given time. LVG's has been given longer I suspect because of his better handling of the media and his past achievements and also cos he followed Moyes and not Fergie. He's slipping in that department now, in my view. He's getting very defensive & prickly with the press, which, given how things have gone under his tenure (not as well as hoped) is not ideal. Once the Press really get on your case, you add one more problem to the pile, as they just chip away at confidence & the sentiment goes viral. He needs to do a bit of cooey-wooey with them, have a Media Golf Day or whatever, give them some one on one exclusives. It's part of being a Manager, I'd say. FWIW, I don't dislike him at all, but something about him does not quite seem to fit with a club of your stature. I hope he succeeds though. Even for us neutrals, we want to see the "old" Man U, riding high, with other clubs in awe of them. How long since Man U have been better than Man C? Couple of years, maybe? That's not the natural order of things at all. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 17, 2015, 08:33:44 PM How long since Man U have been better than Man C? Couple of years, maybe? That's not the natural order of things at all. 'The natural order of things' would suggest that United have always been more successful than City. This is not the case. It just feels that way because the SAF years were so good, and recent. Football predates the Premier League as you well know, and post Busby it took a long seaRch for a manager who could win more than just the FA Cup. If Moyes was the McGuiness/ O'Farrel of his time, then maybe LVG is Tommy Docherty? We have to get through the Sexton and Atkinson years too. Btw, this is only the third season since we last won the league. Some other clubs with proud history have waited a lot longer than that... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on September 18, 2015, 01:00:00 AM When I talk about LVG's handling of the media I mean in comparison to Moyes.
Moyes was extremely negative and even said that Liverpool were favourites when we played them at home- whether that was true or not it isn't something a Man United manager should be saying. As for Man City being ahead of United I think it's something we perhaps have to get used to. Their owners have laid down a real marker with the spending they've done this year as well as the facilities they've built. Nothing lasts forever. We have a tremendous number of years at the top. It's tougher not than ever at the top. Those who actually support United will be pragmatic rather than those who demand success. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on September 18, 2015, 01:07:31 AM When I talk about LVG's handling of the media I mean in comparison to Moyes. Moyes was extremely negative and even said that Liverpool were favourites when we played them at home- whether that was true or not it isn't something a Man United manager should be saying. As for Man City being ahead of United I think it's something we perhaps have to get used to. Their owners have laid down a real marker with the spending they've done this year as well as the facilities they've built. Nothing lasts forever. We have a tremendous number of years at the top. It's tougher not than ever at the top. Those who actually support United will be pragmatic rather than those who demand success. We had a good run, and definitely better than I can foresee anyone else having in our lifetime. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on September 18, 2015, 08:58:23 AM He's definitely an improvement on Moyes but I guess it's tough to answer that because Moyes wasn't given time. LVG's has been given longer I suspect because of his better handling of the media and his past achievements and also cos he followed Moyes and not Fergie. He's slipping in that department now, in my view. He's getting very defensive & prickly with the press, which, given how things have gone under his tenure (not as well as hoped) is not ideal. Once the Press really get on your case, you add one more problem to the pile, as they just chip away at confidence & the sentiment goes viral. He needs to do a bit of cooey-wooey with them, have a Media Golf Day or whatever, give them some one on one exclusives. It's part of being a Manager, I'd say. FWIW, I don't dislike him at all, but something about him does not quite seem to fit with a club of your stature. I hope he succeeds though. Even for us neutrals, we want to see the "old" Man U, riding high, with other clubs in awe of them. How long since Man U have been better than Man C? Couple of years, maybe? That's not the natural order of things at all. I'll put an exact date on it, 16th April 2011, when City beat United in the FA Cup semi-final and went on to win their first bit of silverware since the money came in. We effectively reached United's level on that date and stopped them winning the double in 2010/2011. In the 8 league derby games since then City have won 6 and United 2. Last 4 seasons it's 2 league titles and 1 league cup for City compared to their 1 league title in Ferguson's last year. I hope and expect City to win the league again this season and extend their recent success. But this is sport. Only 5 months ago United beat City to go 4 points clear in the league with just 6 games to go. City turned that round with a 13 point swing in those 6 games. Things change in relatively short periods of time - Chelsea are a great example this season when they were odds on favourite to win the league just 6 weeks ago. As far as the big long-term picture is concerned, United are the ultimate cash cow and aren't going anywhere and I for one look forward to a healthy and ongoing competitive rivalry. City have moved ahead now and are in a very strong position Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on September 20, 2015, 05:52:22 PM Your new lad has an old head on young shoulders when in front of goal, cool as a cucumber. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 20, 2015, 07:02:24 PM Your new lad has an old head on young shoulders when in front of goal, cool as a cucumber. Doesn't he just. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on September 20, 2015, 07:17:28 PM Your new lad has an old head on young shoulders when in front of goal, cool as a cucumber. Doesn't he just. Early days yet, but other than his natural ability in front of goal - he's a born goal-scorer - it's his temperament which impresses me. No play-acting (so far) & a good, level head. Worth a lot of the fee, that, especially in such a young lad. FWIW, I watched that game today only because I wanted to watch him again. Going back to the SAF days, I watched every Man U (televised) game, but since then, when things became, if I may say so, a tad mediocre, I stopped bothering to watch. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on September 26, 2015, 06:12:15 PM its been a while
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CP13BaCWsAAsdP0.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 26, 2015, 07:06:55 PM Great atmosphere around the ground today fans happy. Not expecting to win the league but good to be in the mix at this early stage
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on September 27, 2015, 12:13:37 PM Only saw the MOTD version so no real idea of how well we played yesterday. Beating this Sunderland team 3-0 seems like a par score, the next two games should give us a clearer picture.
A win on Wednesday is crucial, not losing on Sunday equally so. Playing well in both matches would confirm the trend of an increasing cohesion between players and between players and LVG. btw, Chelsea's start to the season, which they came into as Champions, appears very similar to the start that we had under Moyes, interesting to see how that develops. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on September 27, 2015, 01:31:33 PM Agree that upcoming games will be interesting for United. Certainly on paper the league games look tough and could be very revealing: Arsenal A Everton A City H Palace A Just checked back and Moyes had a better start in 1st 7 games than Mourhino. Chelsea now got 3 home games out of the next 4 and somehow you would expect they will start to build the pressure. Hope not obviously :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on September 27, 2015, 10:59:43 PM Yeah big few games to see how we are getting on.
Sunderland were awful yesterday and bar the two minutes around half time could have made it a lot more nervy for United. Martial is a real bums of seat type of player, I would start young over delay for the time being. Smalling is just getting better and better. Him and DDG this year could give us a real fighting chance by ensuring we concede very few goals. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 01, 2015, 09:08:06 AM How good was Smalling last night?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on October 01, 2015, 11:08:54 AM How good was Smalling last night? Incredible. Chatting to fans about him nobody would have thought he would be this good when asked two years ago. After DDG he is our best player at the moment and them two are some way ahead of the rest. Basti has been incredible as well completely controls a game with or without the ball it's like he's playing Fifa. I hate to say it but the ref really killed the game last night, it had an incredible pace to the first half and then he decided to go all European and give the slightest bit of contact as a foul. Then the bookings of Basti and Morgan really made us struggle in midfield. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: bagel on October 04, 2015, 05:05:30 PM carnage
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on October 04, 2015, 06:25:27 PM carnage That's here http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=244.0 ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on October 04, 2015, 06:28:42 PM Playing Sweinsteiger and Carrick over Scheniderlin (sp) going to cost LVG in these big games.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 04, 2015, 06:45:14 PM Couple more games and it'll be LVG out. Manager merry go round.
Prem could be as close Championship usually is Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on October 04, 2015, 06:47:45 PM Couple more games and it'll be LVG out. Manager merry go round. Prem could be as close Championship usually is Hopefully it will be. Definitely makes it much better viewing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Karabiner on October 04, 2015, 06:48:30 PM I think it's fair to say that we ripped you a new one today.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 04, 2015, 07:06:13 PM I think it's fair to say that we ripped you a new one today. We kept you out for 70minutes, shame it was the last 70. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on October 04, 2015, 07:08:27 PM do we add a sad or 2?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 04, 2015, 07:18:51 PM News elsewhere will keep the focus off today's game.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on October 04, 2015, 07:48:08 PM After 6 mins I'd've taken 3-0
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: youthnkzR on October 04, 2015, 08:22:42 PM After 6 mins I'd've taken 3-0 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on October 23, 2015, 09:23:32 AM This amused me from the Manchester Evening News
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/manchester-united-schweinsteiger-nazi-doll-10311423#rlabs=1%20rt$category%20p$1 Manchester United star Bastian Schweinsteiger has reportedly launched legal action against a Chinese toy manufacturer over a Nazi lookalike doll. German captain Schweinsteiger, who also won a world cup with his national team, has contacted his lawyers over the figure which is called ‘Bastian’. (http://i2.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/incoming/article10311520.ece/ALTERNATES/s1227b/Bastian-Nazi-doll-main.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 23, 2015, 10:28:37 AM It is rather a coincidence...
Looking forward to Sunday with a mixture of anticipation and apprehension. If City turn up with their PL game we could be in trouble. Maybe they'll be in the CL mode though. Haven't a clue what mode we need to be in. De Gea will need to be at his best behind something like Valencia, Smalling, Jones, Daarmian Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger, Carrick Martial, Rooney, Herrera Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on October 24, 2015, 08:07:20 AM It is rather a coincidence... Looking forward to Sunday with a mixture of anticipation and apprehension. If City turn up with their PL game we could be in trouble. Maybe they'll be in the CL mode though. Haven't a clue what mode we need to be in. De Gea will need to be at his best behind something like Valencia, Smalling, Jones, Daarmian Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger, Carrick Martial, Rooney, Herrera LOL. I know that feeling well. The weekend is here and the nerves have kicked in this morning. I see City are the underdogs as far as the betting odds are concerned. Always makes me feel better that.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Marky147 on October 24, 2015, 11:33:29 AM This season shaping up to be one of the best ever, and for the first time in years I'm actually watching a few games every week.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on October 24, 2015, 11:56:49 AM This season shaping up to be one of the best ever, and for the first time in years I'm actually watching a few games every week. Agree, never mind the quality, I just enjoy watching fun football, & with it being much more open this year, I'm loving it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on October 26, 2015, 10:42:06 PM Not bad yesterday
Positives. Rojo, awesome, probably the best I have seen him play. MOM for me. Smalling immense again. Valencia did a great job on Sterling. Basti - just awesome again, so controlling of the game. Morgan - another very solid game, nothing special but no mistakes Rooney - Should have been taken off when Basti came off. Went completely missing, I love him but maybe it is time for some rotation cannot just leave him on because he is captin. Martial - Should have been moved to CF when Rooney should have been taken off. Felt abit wasted on the left, looks tasty again. Thoughts? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on October 26, 2015, 11:29:49 PM Not bad yesterday Positives. Rojo, awesome, probably the best I have seen him play. MOM for me. Smalling immense again. Valencia did a great job on Sterling. Basti - just awesome again, so controlling of the game. Morgan - another very solid game, nothing special but no mistakes Rooney - Should have been taken off when Basti came off. Went completely missing, I love him but maybe it is time for some rotation cannot just leave him on because he is captin. Martial - Should have been moved to CF when Rooney should have been taken off. Felt abit wasted on the left, looks tasty again. Thoughts? Smalling /Jones partnership beginning to fulfil SAF's vision. Smalling has that ability to win the ball without making a tackle which Rio had. Both beginning to look good as they move forward too. Martial is going to be a beast. No, strike that, he already is a beast. Strong on the ball and definitely a long term prospect as CF. Hope we can hang onto him long enough to see all the benefits. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on October 27, 2015, 12:01:37 AM I hope we stop playing him on the left wing
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: booder on October 27, 2015, 10:47:38 AM Smalling maturing into quite a player.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on October 27, 2015, 07:22:56 PM Clearly top 4 is going to be a breeze and you can hope for more, but I wonder what Giggs and Ferguson think when they sit there watching that week after week. How do you all feel about LVG and his philosophy?
A chart halfway down this article Telegraph this morning shows United as 2nd bottom to Sunderland for the number of attempts on goal this season: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/11957741/100-Premier-League-games-into-201516-what-have-we-learnt-so-far.html This is Manchester United and I find that incredible particularly when you are topping the possession stats and the total number of passes stats for the whole league Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: POWWWWWWWW on October 27, 2015, 07:59:13 PM Clearly top 4 is going to be a breeze and you can hope for more, but I wonder what Giggs and Ferguson think when they sit there watching that week after week. How do you all feel about LVG and his philosophy? A chart halfway down this article Telegraph this morning shows United as 2nd bottom to Sunderland for the number of attempts on goal this season: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/11957741/100-Premier-League-games-into-201516-what-have-we-learnt-so-far.html This is Manchester United and I find that incredible particularly when you are topping the possession stats and the total number of passes stats for the whole league LVG is only ever a stop gap anyway. Someone to steady the ship after Moyes. Grinding out top 4 for a couple of seasons, while rebuilding all whole squad nearly, is more important than the actual football being played. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on November 28, 2015, 08:30:02 PM Question for Man Utd fans....can they seriously challenge for the title playing like that? Are they now just a joyless, functional side?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on November 29, 2015, 01:49:03 AM No we can't win the title.
I think LVG has done a great job organising us. Remember we were shipping goals for fun last year and that needed to happen. Downside obviously is going forward. By playing the system we do it really restricts us going forward. I know he's injured right now but I'd love to see Herrara played regularly. He gives us something going forward and makes better use of the ball going forward than any of our other midfielders. I also think it's time Rooney was dropped. He just isn't in any sort of form and looks tired. In the past, even when he hasn't been playing well he's always looked to control and dominate the play but he's even lacking that basic aggression which made him difficult to play against. Put Mata behind Martial or even Fellani as an option Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on November 29, 2015, 10:57:48 AM Are Man Utd dull & boring? And if they are can they "bore" their way to the Premier League title?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/34954731 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on November 29, 2015, 11:00:37 AM Man United failed to complete a single pass inside Leicester City's penalty area. Not much happening up top.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CU7rH1WXAAAMk8C.png) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on November 29, 2015, 01:49:03 PM Pep Guardiola wants to manage Manchester United ahead of rivals City http://dailym.ai/1IhFzb1
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on November 29, 2015, 02:45:52 PM Question for Man Utd fans....can they seriously challenge for the title playing like that? Are they now just a joyless, functional side? Clearly we can win the league this year. The table confirms it and we're getting hard to beat. Are we joyless? Yes. I guess this is how it felt to be a Gooner in the George Graham era. If Guardiola seriously wants the job maybe LVG could be persuaded into early retirement... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on November 29, 2015, 03:53:24 PM seeing him live yesterday, i have to say that Smalling was terrific
United were caught twice on the counter. once, the goal, Vardy got the better of A Young. the other, Mahrez ball to Ulloa. that aside Smalling was in no trouble at all against Vardy i was very surprised that Carrick (one paced these days, doesnt influence the game much??) played over Schneiderlin. were you? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on November 29, 2015, 05:46:55 PM Smalling is Man U's best outfield player and it's really not close.
Man U definitely showing the value of an organised coach that they're performing so well. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: POWWWWWWWW on November 30, 2015, 02:43:06 PM No we can't win the title. I think LVG has done a great job organising us. Remember we were shipping goals for fun last year and that needed to happen. Downside obviously is going forward. By playing the system we do it really restricts us going forward. I know he's injured right now but I'd love to see Herrara played regularly. He gives us something going forward and makes better use of the ball going forward than any of our other midfielders. I also think it's time Rooney was dropped. He just isn't in any sort of form and looks tired. In the past, even when he hasn't been playing well he's always looked to control and dominate the play but he's even lacking that basic aggression which made him difficult to play against. Put Mata behind Martial or even Fellani as an option Dropping one of the holding mids and playing Herrera vs the weaker teams in the league would be so much better. Wilson going out on loan is pretty disheartening. Seems our plan B is always going to be Fellani. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on November 30, 2015, 03:33:05 PM Smalling is Man U's best outfield player and it's really not close. Man U definitely showing the value of an organised coach that they're performing so well. Agreed, Smalling has been a class act this year. Him a DDG is a large reason why we have not been conceding goals along with the negative attitude. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on December 01, 2015, 12:14:05 AM What has happened to Nick Powell?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 01, 2015, 01:32:42 AM He was at loan at Leicester. Don't think he's cut it at the top level
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 01, 2015, 02:01:05 AM He's been out for 9 months with a hamstring injury.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 01, 2015, 10:27:23 AM Powell went to Leicester on loan two seasons ago
the loan was cut short because he was consistently late for training and half hearted in training there were suggestions of a lifestyle problem, drinking and partying Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 01, 2015, 02:01:39 PM Former United star accuses Louis van Gaal of being selfish and scaring his MUFC players
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/12027006/Louis-van-Gaal-is-selfish-and-scaring-his-Manchester-United-players-says-Paul-Parker.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 02, 2015, 11:00:41 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVJ2QmKWUAAxPPr.jpg)
http://www.sportingintelligence.com/2015/08/21/from-man-utd-at-1-8bn-to-cherries-at-104m-whats-your-club-worth-210803/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 02, 2015, 04:28:33 PM Im a Sunderland fan, but I can't believe we are 2nd bottom that list. We must be being ran so badly. We've been in the premiership for 8 or 9 years now. A 50k stadium of which we have 40k+ every week. We sell out every away game without fail. Pretty amazing.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on December 02, 2015, 04:38:50 PM Equally surprised how high Southampton are on that list.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 02, 2015, 07:42:20 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVJ2QmKWUAAxPPr.jpg) http://www.sportingintelligence.com/2015/08/21/from-man-utd-at-1-8bn-to-cherries-at-104m-whats-your-club-worth-210803/ Looks like the Chinese Investors at City may have overpaid if these figures are right. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 04, 2015, 09:44:26 AM <3 Klopp
Manager envy setting in here, he is a refreshing change. The contrast with our own man is depressing really. LVG may be a master tactician with a wonderful philosophy but the constant blaming of everyone but himself for our lack of everything is pitiful. "Yes, we shall have a win today but not when the players do not the philosophy follow" Neville G heading off to Spain to get some managerial experience might be a good sign. Maybe the Class of 92 will sell Salford and buy United. A management team of Giggs, Butt, Scholes, and the Neville boys would bring back the United spirit if nothing else. We have a decent run of fixtures coming up, West Ham, Norwich and Bournemouth, anything less than 9 points should be seen as below par and these are games where we should be looking to score more than 1. The game agains Wolfsburg on Tuesday is pretty key though. Our progress is in our hands. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 04, 2015, 05:11:35 PM http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/35006347
(http://i.imgur.com/Q6QqANz.gif) Such a shame Wilson has gone out on loan though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: HutchGF on December 04, 2015, 05:36:55 PM http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/35006347 (http://i.imgur.com/Q6QqANz.gif) Such a shame Wilson has gone out on loan though. Blessing in disguise. LvG has to play Mata in behind Martial now with two from Lingard, Depay and Young wide. Herrera is a much bigger loss imho. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 04, 2015, 05:47:20 PM Be nice to see Pereira get some minutes as well.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: pleno1 on December 04, 2015, 10:20:21 PM likely starting 6 attacking players tomorrow?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 04, 2015, 11:38:00 PM likely starting 6 attacking players tomorrow? Have we got six who can remember how? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 05, 2015, 12:08:17 AM Lots of criticism and negativity for LVG. Would we prefer a more entertaining team in 8th place?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Tal on December 05, 2015, 12:13:06 AM Lots of criticism and negativity for LVG. Would we prefer a more entertaining team in 8th place? Incredible, isn't it? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 05, 2015, 12:22:20 AM Not really. Fans and supporters as a general population are dumb
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Tal on December 05, 2015, 12:29:25 AM Not really. Fans and supporters as a general population are dumb Sure, but this is a poker forum, where people are supposed to understand this stuff. Not the blokes on Soccer Saturday declaring a manager in trouble after two losses and mocking Brentford for using numbers to run a football club. "Not for me, Jeff" Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 05, 2015, 12:46:02 AM I'm also not comfortable celebrating when a player gets injured
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on December 05, 2015, 12:47:10 AM Not really. Fans and supporters as a general population are dumb Sure, but this is a poker forum, where people are supposed to understand this stuff. Not the blokes on Soccer Saturday declaring a manager in trouble after two losses and mocking Brentford for using numbers to run a football club. "Not for me, Jeff" I think modern society prefers to be negative rather than positive, criticise rather than praise, it's easier. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on December 05, 2015, 12:47:38 AM Lots of criticism and negativity for LVG. Would we prefer a more entertaining team in 8th place? Incredible, isn't it? Not really. United fans want to be entertained, that's what they are accustomed to and that it what they expect. Of the teams in the bottom half, I bet the fans of Bournemouth are enjoying this season the most. their team play attacking, entertaining football and there are lots of goals in their games. I'd rather support them than almost all of the other teams in the Premier League. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on December 05, 2015, 12:50:04 AM If the richest team in the country, packed with players who cost 8 figures and are earning 7 figures annually, can't entertain on Saturday afternoon, it is a pretty sad state of affairs isn't it?
Teams I enjoy watching this season: Leicester Bournemouth Liverpool Arsenal Man City Chelsea (for different reasons!) That's it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 05, 2015, 12:50:46 AM Football isn't a short term game. The job LVG is doing to steady the ship is being underplayed hugely. Maybe that's because of Fergie and our history, maybe because Klopp has had such a huge impact at Liverpool or maybe because LVG is a very tough character to like but the bottom line he is delivering. If in the short term that means we are boring whilst we lock up a top 4 spot so be it.
I'd love to see a little more ambition in cup games- that's the only "criticism" I'd have if any Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 05, 2015, 12:52:08 AM If the richest team in the country, packed with players who cost 8 figures and are earning 7 figures annually, can't entertain on Saturday afternoon, it is a pretty sad state of affairs isn't it? Teams I enjoy watching this season: Leicester Bournemouth Liverpool Arsenal Man City Chelsea (for different reasons!) That's it. Liverpool are a pretty late addition tho? EDIT! Didn't see Man City there! Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on December 05, 2015, 12:54:13 AM If the richest team in the country, packed with players who cost 8 figures and are earning 7 figures annually, can't entertain on Saturday afternoon, it is a pretty sad state of affairs isn't it? Teams I enjoy watching this season: Leicester Bournemouth Liverpool Arsenal Man City Chelsea (for different reasons!) That's it. Liverpool are a pretty late addition tho? EDIT! Didn't see Man City there! Yep, Liverpool wouldn't have made this list a month ago. I only want to watch City when my man Silva is playing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 05, 2015, 01:00:32 AM If City hadn't been without Silva, Aguero and Kompany I think they'd be running away with it.
More madness too- how the fuck is Gary Monk under pressure at Swansea? And Clarke turns down Fulham, two weeks later he's sacked. I despair sometimes. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on December 05, 2015, 01:27:51 AM Not really. Fans and supporters as a general population are dumb Sure, but this is a poker forum, where people are supposed to understand this stuff. Not the blokes on Soccer Saturday declaring a manager in trouble after two losses and mocking Brentford for using numbers to run a football club. "Not for me, Jeff" I think modern society prefers to be negative rather than positive, criticise rather than praise, it's easier. Horse manure So many more happy positive people today than 30-40 years ago Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 05, 2015, 01:38:53 AM Lots of criticism and negativity for LVG. Would we prefer a more entertaining team in 8th place? Incredible, isn't it? Not really. United fans want to be entertained, that's what they are accustomed to and that it what they expect. Of the teams in the bottom half, I bet the fans of Bournemouth are enjoying this season the most. their team play attacking, entertaining football and there are lots of goals in their games. I'd rather support them than almost all of the other teams in the Premier League. No they want to be entertained and win. If it's one or the other ask Moyes what the fans want more. Bournemouth have scored 3 less than United and conceded 3x as many. Ask them how entertaining the Championship is next season. Neither team has the players to play great attacking, winning football. It's one or the other, and it seems only one of them understands this. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Tal on December 05, 2015, 02:03:52 AM Lots of criticism and negativity for LVG. Would we prefer a more entertaining team in 8th place? Incredible, isn't it? Not really. United fans want to be entertained, that's what they are accustomed to and that it what they expect. Of the teams in the bottom half, I bet the fans of Bournemouth are enjoying this season the most. their team play attacking, entertaining football and there are lots of goals in their games. I'd rather support them than almost all of the other teams in the Premier League. No they want to be entertained and win. If it's one or the other ask Moyes what the fans want more. Bournemouth have scored 3 less than United and conceded 3x as many. Ask them how entertaining the Championship is next season. Neither team has the players to play great attacking, winning football. It's one or the other, and it seems only one of them understands this. That's bananas. To add to England's captain and record goalscorer, United have recently purchased: Depay £25m Martial £35m Herrera £27m Fellani £27.5m Mata £37.1m Add to that the money spent on defensive midfielders and the back line. Bournemouth did spend £23m this summer...on eight players. The stat gets better: since the 92/93 season, Bournemouth have spent (gross) £31.5m on players in. The fans of United should be able to expect results from elite players and an elite coach. They have no right to expect anything else, much as they would love to see a more free-flowing style of play. I've spent season after season hearing nonsense from Spurs fans saying we should play "the Spurs way", which I have come to misinterpret as meaning flatter to deceive. Win, dominate and then worry about getting standing ovations afterwards. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 05, 2015, 08:59:29 AM Lots of criticism and negativity for LVG. Would we prefer a more entertaining team in 8th place? Why would the more entertaining team be in 8th? Would you prefer to win the title 1-0? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 05, 2015, 10:44:37 AM If u offered me the title LVG way I'd take it.
And it's clearly one way or the other at this moment in time. We were in disarray at the back last year. He has come and in and organised the team which is no mean feat. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: 77dave on December 05, 2015, 06:26:51 PM Has anyone got a price for man Utd and Chelsea both not making the top 4?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: cambridgealex on December 05, 2015, 07:03:24 PM Has anyone got a price for man Utd and Chelsea both not making the top 4? around 9/1? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on December 05, 2015, 07:13:30 PM taking the top 4 prices directly its a 4/1 double. The two are negatively correlated though just taking the top 4 prices (ie if Chelski don't top 4 manure are more likely and vice versa) so probably around a 5/1 shot.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: cambridgealex on December 05, 2015, 07:51:09 PM taking the top 4 prices directly its a 4/1 double. The two are negatively correlated though just taking the top 4 prices (ie if Chelski don't top 4 manure are more likely and vice versa) so probably around a 5/1 shot. Help out a betting noob, where did I go wrong? I saw Chelsea were 7/2 to make top 4 (22%?) so 78% to not make it. Utd were 1/7 to make top 4 (87.5%) to 12.5% to not make it. So for both those outcomes multiply 0.78*0.125=0.0975 so around 9/1? Add to that the negative correlation you mentioned and it's more like 10,11s? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on December 05, 2015, 07:55:39 PM taking the top 4 prices directly its a 4/1 double. The two are negatively correlated though just taking the top 4 prices (ie if Chelski don't top 4 manure are more likely and vice versa) so probably around a 5/1 shot. Help out a betting noob, where did I go wrong? I saw Chelsea were 7/2 to make top 4 (22%?) so 78% to not make it. Utd were 1/7 to make top 4 (87.5%) to 12.5% to not make it. So for both those outcomes multiply 0.78*0.125=0.0975 so around 9/1? Add to that the negative correlation you mentioned and it's more like 10,11s? The 1/7 you got from oddschecker isn't an accurate guide. Manure are closer to 1/3 (75%) to top 4 on betfair. A much more accurate guide to the actual chance of it happening. Your maths was fine just the relative prices were different which we used. You passed the odds compiling test with ease. Future loltrader i reckon if the poker career stalls. :D Price different now Chelski gone 1-0 down to bournemouth! They really are shocking this season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 05, 2015, 08:54:23 PM 21 shots on goal, only 1 on target, don't even know how that's possible.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Tal on December 05, 2015, 08:59:48 PM taking the top 4 prices directly its a 4/1 double. The two are negatively correlated though just taking the top 4 prices (ie if Chelski don't top 4 manure are more likely and vice versa) so probably around a 5/1 shot. Help out a betting noob, where did I go wrong? The bookies will know the sort of person that is betting on that market is likely to be betting on United making the top four, so they'll squeeze the price in a touch and know they'll still be getting action. Betfair exchange gives you a more distilled version of the chances of it happening, provided there's been a fair bit of money bet on both sides. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 06, 2015, 12:47:06 AM If u offered me the title LVG way I'd take it. I would hate to win the title playing this way. Our well organised defence saved by the post twice. Loathe the way that LVG consistently blames the players in post-match interviews. Last game on MotD again sums it up really. If we go to Wolfsburg playing this way we're heading for the Europa. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 06, 2015, 12:55:57 AM long term>>>>>>>>>>>short term. Embrace the variance
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: cambridgealex on December 06, 2015, 12:59:02 AM long term>>>>>>>>>>>short term. Embrace the variance Are you getting unlucky? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on December 06, 2015, 01:00:02 AM enjoy the variance. Not embrace it. You are running miles ahead of the game at the minute.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: cambridgealex on December 06, 2015, 01:07:21 AM enjoy the variance. Not embrace it. You are running miles ahead of the game at the minute. Exactly. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on December 06, 2015, 01:42:08 AM We are getting incredibly lucky at the minute, really dire, worse than under moyes.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 06, 2015, 05:21:36 AM long term>>>>>>>>>>>short term. Embrace the variance taking the long view is fine if you know what the future holds. I'm struggling to see how parking the bus and then running back and forth up and down the alley is any sort of progress toward an agreeable destination. What do you see as the long term outcome? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on December 06, 2015, 10:21:40 AM United's last 6 home games:
0-0 0-0 1-0 2-0 0-0 0-0 Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 06, 2015, 10:37:21 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVeib1IWwAA-ZVX.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on December 06, 2015, 02:03:18 PM As a City fan, (I'll choose my words carefully here) it would be somewhat of an understatement to say I don't like Manchester United. I've been surrounded by their supporters all my life and it is only natural I like it when the wheels fall off. I'lll always watch them when they are on TV if it doesn't clash with anything City and watching United lose is a great source of enjoyment. However, I love football more than I dislike United and at at times over the years there is no choice but to respect the football when it is good and generally it has been good. Right now I can't stand watching United. The way they are playing is not right. It tilts me. I wish they would return to their historic values and I can enjoy watching them lose whilst playing entertaining football rather than this feast of anti-football. The sooner LVG goes the better for me and for the Premier League in general. On this subject, I thought the quotes below from from City's CEO, Ferran Soriano, were interesting in the context of upholding an attacking philsophy. They were made at City's low-point last season. "There is a core of values, a core of beliefs that all we have,” Soriano said. “We win and we lose, but we never leave these (values). "We always play attacking football, we try to keep the ball, we play with a high defensive line and we apply pressure to recover the ball. “These are very simple things that all our teams do and, hopefully, you see our teams in Melbourne and Manchester play and you will see the same kind of football. “This doesn't mean we'll win. At the weekend, Manchester City had 73 per cent possession in a game we lost (against Crystal Palace). “But we never, ever renounce our values of the way we play football. We believe, because all organisations need some set of basic values that people believe in. "That's very easy to say when things go well, but the challenge and the fascinating situation is, what happens when things go wrong?" You need the commitment from your heart, the kind that can't be bought with a lot of money,” Soriano said. “I think football is a metaphor for life, life in ninety minutes, life in a short space. "You need emotional balance and everyone in the team has to know what is expected of them. They must know what their role is, and accept it. "And we learn more from things that go wrong than things that go well.” Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 06, 2015, 06:06:02 PM To be fair to LVG, he is also sticking rigidly to his values; to produce turgid, bland, sleep inducing football.
Think it was Tighty who posted a stat the other week, when United didn't make a single pass in the penalty vs opposition I can't remember (Leicester?). That is just baffling for a team of Uniteds calibre. I dislike United as much as Archer, but begrudgingly have had to admire some of the players and performances over the years, swashbuckling football at times. How they've gone from that to this being produced under LVG would make me sick if I was a supporter. You don't concede many goals, I'll give you that ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 07, 2015, 03:29:40 PM tabloids report
Manchester United are planning to make a £50m move for Tottenham striker Harry Kane, 22, in the summer transfer window. your thoughts please... Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 07, 2015, 08:53:50 PM tabloids report Manchester United are planning to make a £50m move for Tottenham striker Harry Kane, 22, in the summer transfer window. your thoughts please... Might as well buy him, and Vardy, maybe we could prise Lukaku from Everton too. LVG will sap their belief and turn them into shadows of their former selves. PS - I am embarrassed by my negativity toward LVG but he has turned our footballing heritage to dust. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nuros on December 08, 2015, 01:47:04 AM He's just signed a new contract, isn't 50m a bit on the low side considering Sterling went for 49m? I dunno what price he should be and imo all the numbers bandied about for players are ridiculous these days but surely that number is too low if they want any chance of it being accepted!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 08, 2015, 09:27:53 AM Rather have Lukaku than Kane
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on December 08, 2015, 10:29:27 AM tabloids report Manchester United are planning to make a £50m move for Tottenham striker Harry Kane, 22, in the summer transfer window. your thoughts please... Might as well buy him, and Vardy, maybe we could prise Lukaku from Everton too. LVG will sap their belief and turn them into shadows of their former selves. PS - I am embarrassed by my negativity toward LVG but he has turned our footballing heritage to dust. No need to be embarrassed. It won't be long (relatively) before he is on his way assuming no contract extension. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 08, 2015, 12:22:13 PM tabloids report Manchester United are planning to make a £50m move for Tottenham striker Harry Kane, 22, in the summer transfer window. your thoughts please... Might as well buy him, and Vardy, maybe we could prise Lukaku from Everton too. LVG will sap their belief and turn them into shadows of their former selves. PS - I am embarrassed by my negativity toward LVG but he has turned our footballing heritage to dust. No need to be embarrassed. It won't be long (relatively) before he is on his way assuming no contract extension. Let's not talk about contract extensions Tonight is a massive test and no matter what he may say it is a must win game, or at the very least a 'lose going for it 100% game' Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on December 08, 2015, 01:17:57 PM Big night for man u. Can see them watching the last 16 from the stands with the arse
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: The Camel on December 08, 2015, 10:01:02 PM Nick Powell sighting!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: HutchGF on December 08, 2015, 10:22:19 PM Absolutely horrendous.
Words escape me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 08, 2015, 10:27:34 PM Well at least it was entertaining!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 08, 2015, 10:42:05 PM Apparently we can play an attacking game.
Shame we haven't played that way often enough under LVG. Back to the philosophical approach at the weekend for the tough away trip to Bournemouth 'The Chelsea Slayers' AFC? Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 08, 2015, 11:16:30 PM Careful what you wish for
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 09, 2015, 01:09:17 AM 6 shots on target? Is this real life?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on December 09, 2015, 02:50:00 AM enjoy the variance. Not embrace it. You are running miles ahead of the game at the minute. Regression to the mean i think it is called in the trade. Why are people surprised? How did Wolfs go off nearly 7/4 tonight at home to manure without lolrooney (like he makes a difference nowadays - in recent weeks him missing has actually made manure more likely to win a game according to the sharp betting markets and they still couldn't win when he was at home watching everton with his son on a monday night enjoying his £300k a week he has for the next 3.5 years lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz). Without the comical own goal that kept you in the game you got battered tonight. To not win that group is so funny. It was as weak a group as possible for manure in champs league history. They couldn't have found a weaker group and still couldn't get out of it never mind win it. To say they have been running ahead of the curve in the EPL the last two months is a huge understatement. LVG must be gone surely? Why would u keep him but fire Moyes a season on? If not then Moyes was just a puppet to get over Sir alex retiring. LVG has spent fortunes more than moyes and sent the club even further backwards than Moyes did but is unsackable. Truely incredible. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 09, 2015, 07:45:25 AM enjoy the variance. Not embrace it. You are running miles ahead of the game at the minute. Regression to the mean i think it is called in the trade. Why are people surprised? How did Wolfs go off nearly 7/4 tonight at home to manure without lolrooney (like he makes a difference nowadays - in recent weeks him missing has actually made manure more likely to win a game according to the sharp betting markets and they still couldn't win when he was at home watching everton with his son on a monday night enjoying his £300k a week he has for the next 3.5 years lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz). Without the comical own goal that kept you in the game you got battered tonight. To not win that group is so funny. It was as weak a group as possible for manure in champs league history. They couldn't have found a weaker group and still couldn't get out of it never mind win it. To say they have been running ahead of the curve in the EPL the last two months is a huge understatement. LVG must be gone surely? Why would u keep him but fire Moyes a season on? If not then Moyes was just a puppet to get over Sir alex retiring. LVG has spent fortunes more than moyes and sent the club even further backwards than Moyes did but is unsackable. Truely incredible. ;ifm; Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on December 09, 2015, 10:12:35 AM I think the issue is football is results driven.
He is 3 points off spot whether he is running well or not. He keeps coming out and saying we were unlucky. I disagree and think we have been very lucky, many of the games we have drawn the opposition have had a couple of great chances to score. Whereas we have had 90% of the possession and not looked like scoring. Last night was a one off, he had to attack and had to be open and that made holes at the back where we have been solid all year. Unfortunately he should have done that against PSV then we would have gone through. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 09, 2015, 11:10:51 AM with United second favourites for the Europa league (on name, size and reputation i assume)
do you see them taking the competition seriously and trying to win it? would doing so not get in the way of a top four PL finish? 11/2f Borussia Dortmund, 10/1 Manchester United, 10/1 Napoli, 11/1 Liverpool, 14/1 Tottenham Hotspur. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Cf on December 09, 2015, 11:16:45 AM I still think it's a bit bollocks that champions league teams move down to the Europa league.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 09, 2015, 02:40:31 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVyR3A7WUAAU0GM.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Ironside on December 09, 2015, 02:57:43 PM Winning Europa negates the need for a top 4 spot, intact its better than 4th as gets you past the quailfiers . if its fall off the pace for title surely winning Europa is much higher priority than 4th spot in league
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 09, 2015, 03:19:18 PM I think the issue is football is results driven. He is 3 points off spot whether he is running well or not. He keeps coming out and saying we were unlucky. I disagree and think we have been very lucky, many of the games we have drawn the opposition have had a couple of great chances to score. Whereas we have had 90% of the possession and not looked like scoring. Last night was a one off, he had to attack and had to be open and that made holes at the back where we have been solid all year. Unfortunately he should have done that against PSV then we would have gone through. Had last night not been a one off perhaps the attacking instincts would have been sharper and the defence wouldn't have been quite so unsure and missing the security of having not one, but two defensive midfielders. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on December 10, 2015, 09:17:13 AM . Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 10, 2015, 11:22:58 AM Oh
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CV20RFJWUAAFFZk.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 10, 2015, 11:44:20 AM All data has outliers ;whistle;
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 10, 2015, 05:51:11 PM enjoy the variance. Not embrace it. You are running miles ahead of the game at the minute. Regression to the mean i think it is called in the trade. Why are people surprised? How did Wolfs go off nearly 7/4 tonight at home to manure without lolrooney (like he makes a difference nowadays - in recent weeks him missing has actually made manure more likely to win a game according to the sharp betting markets and they still couldn't win when he was at home watching everton with his son on a monday night enjoying his £300k a week he has for the next 3.5 years lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz). Without the comical own goal that kept you in the game you got battered tonight. To not win that group is so funny. It was as weak a group as possible for manure in champs league history. They couldn't have found a weaker group and still couldn't get out of it never mind win it. To say they have been running ahead of the curve in the EPL the last two months is a huge understatement. LVG must be gone surely? Why would u keep him but fire Moyes a season on? If not then Moyes was just a puppet to get over Sir alex retiring. LVG has spent fortunes more than moyes and sent the club even further backwards than Moyes did but is unsackable. Truely incredible. LVG got hired to make and keep us a top 4 side for the foreseeable future, so we didn't do a Liverpool. And he's achieving exactly that. As long we keep making top 4, we still get the gravy train rolling in. We have no shot of winning the CL (like 13/16 teams left) and the difference in money between group stages and winning is only (i think) £25m. Getting knocked out while isn't pleasant is far from a disaster. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: arbboy on December 10, 2015, 06:05:00 PM enjoy the variance. Not embrace it. You are running miles ahead of the game at the minute. Regression to the mean i think it is called in the trade. Why are people surprised? How did Wolfs go off nearly 7/4 tonight at home to manure without lolrooney (like he makes a difference nowadays - in recent weeks him missing has actually made manure more likely to win a game according to the sharp betting markets and they still couldn't win when he was at home watching everton with his son on a monday night enjoying his £300k a week he has for the next 3.5 years lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz). Without the comical own goal that kept you in the game you got battered tonight. To not win that group is so funny. It was as weak a group as possible for manure in champs league history. They couldn't have found a weaker group and still couldn't get out of it never mind win it. To say they have been running ahead of the curve in the EPL the last two months is a huge understatement. LVG must be gone surely? Why would u keep him but fire Moyes a season on? If not then Moyes was just a puppet to get over Sir alex retiring. LVG has spent fortunes more than moyes and sent the club even further backwards than Moyes did but is unsackable. Truely incredible. LVG got hired to make and keep us a top 4 side for the foreseeable future, so we didn't do a Liverpool. And he's achieving exactly that. As long we keep making top 4, we still get the gravy train rolling in. We have no shot of winning the CL (like 13/16 teams left) and the difference in money between group stages and winning is only (i think) £25m. Getting knocked out while isn't pleasant is far from a disaster. This is the trouble though you are being results orientated over a tiny sample size of games with big over performance points/league position wise. Manure are not playing anywhere like a top 4 side over all known stats and performance indicators. If managers get sacked over short sample sizes when they run 'bad' compared to the performances they should also get fired when they are being incredibly lucky and running miles ahead of their performances points/league position wise and manure's effective performance based on their wage bill/transfer spend is a big underachieve so far this season. You might end up finishing in the top 4 this season but it will be far more to do with other sides issues rather than any improvement your gaffer has made. I would suggest Moyes wouldn't have done any worse if he had spent the amount of cash that has been spent since he left. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 10, 2015, 07:12:50 PM I agree partly with what you're say arrboy. However I think Uniteds demise is being over stated. We have played pretty well at times. Last 10 games have been very poor going forward but that's because I still think he doesn't know his best 11.
Gary Monk sacking just shows how short sighted football chairman are Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 10, 2015, 07:22:44 PM I agree partly with what you're say arrboy. However I think Uniteds demise is being over stated. We have played pretty well at times. Last 10 games have been very poor going forward but that's because I still think he doesn't know his best 11. Gary Monk sacking just shows how short sighted football chairman are Other than the period after Watford equalised, when have we played 'pretty well' in United terms? tbf to LVG it's a fair while since we actually looked like a Manchester United team playing well. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 10, 2015, 08:37:03 PM If you're comparing the team to the Fergie era any team will pale in comparison. Have to have a touch of pragmatism about it
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: david3103 on December 10, 2015, 11:25:12 PM If you're comparing the team to the Fergie era any team will pale in comparison. Have to have a touch of pragmatism about it The squad isn't the issue. The way they are set up and the way they seem to be instructed to play is the issue. I can compare it to the Dave Sexton era and it pales in comparison. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on December 11, 2015, 12:28:40 AM I'm pretty unhappy with the squad as a whole
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 11, 2015, 12:31:30 AM For the money thats been spent on the squad it's fairly awful.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Archer on December 11, 2015, 04:21:53 AM enjoy the variance. Not embrace it. You are running miles ahead of the game at the minute. Regression to the mean i think it is called in the trade. Why are people surprised? How did Wolfs go off nearly 7/4 tonight at home to manure without lolrooney (like he makes a difference nowadays - in recent weeks him missing has actually made manure more likely to win a game according to the sharp betting markets and they still couldn't win when he was at home watching everton with his son on a monday night enjoying his £300k a week he has for the next 3.5 years lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz). Without the comical own goal that kept you in the game you got battered tonight. To not win that group is so funny. It was as weak a group as possible for manure in champs league history. They couldn't have found a weaker group and still couldn't get out of it never mind win it. To say they have been running ahead of the curve in the EPL the last two months is a huge understatement. LVG must be gone surely? Why would u keep him but fire Moyes a season on? If not then Moyes was just a puppet to get over Sir alex retiring. LVG has spent fortunes more than moyes and sent the club even further backwards than Moyes did but is unsackable. Truely incredible. LVG got hired to make and keep us a top 4 side for the foreseeable future, so we didn't do a Liverpool. And he's achieving exactly that. As long we keep making top 4, we still get the gravy train rolling in. We have no shot of winning the CL (like 13/16 teams left) and the difference in money between group stages and winning is only (i think) £25m. Getting knocked out while isn't pleasant is far from a disaster. You are not far out with the £25m in terms of additional prize money over and above the c18million euros already banked. the additional prize money is: 5.5m for last 16 6m for last 8 7m for last 4 15m for winner and a total of 33.5m euros. However, this doesn't take into account the "market pool" which is essentialy the English clubs share of the TV revenues. Last year the 4 Englsih club shared c93m Euros and the figure for 2015/2016 is not yet known but prob c 130m euros to reflect the new BT deal. There is a formula for how this is split which is in 2 parts depending on league position the year before and the total number of matches played in this years competition. Too complicated to explain but, say, if City win the Champions League they would pick up c45million euros compared to c18million for United. In this scenario, there would be a difference in prize money and market pool combined of c60 million Euros plus loss of revenue from home matches (less EL games) and commercial value of late stage CL exposure. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 11, 2015, 10:16:31 AM January transfer window could be fun
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CV7mFKkWcAEbl2n.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: BorntoBubble on December 11, 2015, 11:13:08 AM Slow news day.
We get targeted with around about 200 players each window its so boring. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on December 12, 2015, 07:49:36 PM When Fellaini is your best player.....
Was just typing this and then Van Lol took him off. Very fun Anyway, time to add at least one sad to the title Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on December 12, 2015, 07:52:34 PM With Bournemouth already ahead 2-1, Murray absolutely shreds the Man U defence then somehow balloons it over the bar with just DeGea to beat.
Minutes later, from a corner, Murray somehow blasts it into the stands again when presented with a clear chance to score. Bournemouth don't know how to sit on a lead, and might pay the price, but it's fun to watch. Bournemouth may yet be above Chelsea in the table tonight. Fun times in the EPL. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 07:58:27 PM spent £250m in the summer and have to bring on Nick Powell up front chasing the game..
not good, however the result finishes Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on December 12, 2015, 08:01:25 PM Watching the first 40 mins or so, although Bournemouth went up early - it looked like they would be unable to compete for 90 mins against even this Man U side. Very very ordinary team Bournemouth and doing way better than that squad should do - not quite to Watford's heights but pretty good.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 08:04:13 PM bournemouth are missing wilson, arter, mings and gradel...thats most of the goals, best midfielder, £8m defensive signing and talernted winger
terrific management to have them competitive week after week Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: tikay on December 12, 2015, 08:08:10 PM bournemouth are missing wilson, arter, mings and gradel...thats most of the goals, best midfielder, £8m defensive signing and talernted winger terrific management to have them competitive week after week I read that the Maxim Denim, a Russian geezer, purchased 50% of AFC Bournemouth in 2011 for £850,000. Proper bargain, with the benefit of hindsight. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: tikay on December 12, 2015, 08:14:43 PM Ha, they beat Chelsea last week, and Man U this week, their supporters must think they are dreaming.
Whether they can beat the EPL elite, such as Leicester, Palace and Watford is another matter, of course. Wonderful times. No disrespect to Man U, but for neutrals, this is a season to cherish. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on December 13, 2015, 06:17:38 AM Did we play any better than MotD highlights suggested?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 14, 2015, 01:15:27 PM Did we play any better than MotD highlights suggested? No. Midtjyland v Manchester United in last 32 of the Europa amusingly described post draw as "moneyball v moneypit" meanwhile LVG has gone odds-on next PL boss to go.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on December 14, 2015, 03:24:17 PM Did we play any better than MotD highlights suggested? No. Midtjyland v Manchester United in last 32 of the Europa amusingly described post draw as "moneyball v moneypit" meanwhile LVG has gone odds-on next PL boss to go.... Oh my word. I, for one, will not mourn his departure, but this brings back so many memories of the post-Busby era. Lots of managers survive after being odds-on no doubt. Hope we've got a plan. Suspect it will be from the 'Baldrick Book of Cunning Plans' Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on December 14, 2015, 06:19:38 PM Did we play any better than MotD highlights suggested? No. Midtjyland v Manchester United in last 32 of the Europa amusingly described post draw as "moneyball v moneypit" meanwhile LVG has gone odds-on next PL boss to go.... Oh my word. I, for one, will not mourn his departure, but this brings back so many memories of the post-Busby era. Lots of managers survive after being odds-on no doubt. Hope we've got a plan. Suspect it will be from the 'Baldrick Book of Cunning Plans' David Moyes is "waiting for the right opportunity". Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on December 14, 2015, 07:01:18 PM Did we play any better than MotD highlights suggested? No. Midtjyland v Manchester United in last 32 of the Europa amusingly described post draw as "moneyball v moneypit" meanwhile LVG has gone odds-on next PL boss to go.... Oh my word. I, for one, will not mourn his departure, but this brings back so many memories of the post-Busby era. Lots of managers survive after being odds-on no doubt. Hope we've got a plan. Suspect it will be from the 'Baldrick Book of Cunning Plans' David Moyes is "waiting for the right opportunity". ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Tal on December 14, 2015, 07:33:01 PM Did we play any better than MotD highlights suggested? No. Midtjyland v Manchester United in last 32 of the Europa amusingly described post draw as "moneyball v moneypit" meanwhile LVG has gone odds-on next PL boss to go.... Oh my word. I, for one, will not mourn his departure, but this brings back so many memories of the post-Busby era. Lots of managers survive after being odds-on no doubt. Hope we've got a plan. Suspect it will be from the 'Baldrick Book of Cunning Plans' David Moyes is "waiting for the right opportunity". ;D Yes, but Wenger hasn't retired yet. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on December 14, 2015, 09:03:46 PM Just been out to dinner with a Stoke season ticket holder who said 'If you had been in outer space for three years and came back and seen Manure's performance and stats this season but didn't know who was managing them you would assume Tony Pulis was in charge'. Think it is a fair point but i think Pulis would have made a better job of doing what LVG has done with a much smaller budget and has circa 10 years experience of operating at the sharp end of this league and constantly over achieving.
Why can't managers like Pulis get a chance at the top level if clubs as big as Manure are going to play the same way but just with an overseas manager with no previous experience of the league just to consolidate after Fergie? Pulis is totally unexposed as to what he could actually do with a top 4 Champions league budget as well. He could easily be a great manager with attacking flair if he had the right budget/players to do so. Nobody knows until they are given a chance. Every manure fan in the world would hate pulis i am sure. The bottom line is you have another one who is foreign with no experience of the league doing exactly the same things as TP would do. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: nirvana on December 14, 2015, 10:37:08 PM It didn't take much thought to anticipate Moyes would probably fail at Man U I think LVG will be a hilarious failure if he gets the job. Serial achiever of just below expectation I'd say I think it is reasonable to describe him like this - it's amazing how much I get right, way ahead of the curve Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 15, 2015, 10:35:58 AM On Man United, the fading aura, struggles of Van Gaal & Woodward and being caught by Man City on & off the pitch
Is the brand risking damage? http://bigstory.ap.org/article/20ce98773c1b4d2e9f587950a14f73db/man-united-aura-fades-each-setback-brand-risks-damage Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: LeKnave on December 17, 2015, 05:02:47 PM Come on down Jose
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on December 17, 2015, 08:38:09 PM Come on down Jose Seriously? I still can't see him as a Manchester United manager. But given the recent failure rate i would be prepared to be wrong. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: exstream on December 19, 2015, 04:59:59 PM How is LVG still there
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Graham C on December 19, 2015, 05:00:42 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: exstream on December 19, 2015, 05:03:24 PM The bench is awful. Wilson on loan, lol.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: nirvana on December 19, 2015, 06:07:44 PM If they can hang on to 5th they'll at least be in the Europa thing again. Fingers crossed.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: youthnkzR on December 19, 2015, 06:23:08 PM LVG gettin sack?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 19, 2015, 08:03:14 PM LVG gettin sack? Really hope not! Extend his contract please :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 19, 2015, 09:46:26 PM Struggling to remember a manager constructing such a weak squad from so much expenditure?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: muckthenuts on December 19, 2015, 11:41:24 PM Struggling to remember a manager constructing such a weak squad from so much expenditure? Spurs? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 20, 2015, 11:24:57 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CWnnqh9WoAEHW8b.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 20, 2015, 04:18:05 PM Struggling to remember a manager constructing such a weak squad from so much expenditure? Liverpool. Considering the amount of players that left/retired the players he's brought in have mainly all be good with the exception of Depay. You can't rebuild a whole team for less nowadays, especially one that has to compete for trophies. We'll see when Terry, Cahill, Ivanovic, Fabregas retire how much Chelsea have to spend. People still (bizarrely) include the ADM transfer fee in these figures as well instead of the net loss. I defended him before because he was doing the job he was brought in to do. His recent team selection though has been bizarre. Not playing Schneiderlin, Herrera and Young, who are so obv what we need, is a huge mystery. Fellaini and Carrick can't play together, Fellaini shouldn't be ever playing, and Wilson going on loan is pretty frustrating. His inability to adapt each team to different opposition is going to finish him off. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 21, 2015, 02:26:58 PM (http://i.imgur.com/1LM4ciG.jpg)
lol Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on December 21, 2015, 02:43:50 PM (http://i.imgur.com/1LM4ciG.jpg) lol Wish I could find that funny. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 24, 2015, 10:06:37 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CW8aW45WMAAtLPX.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on December 24, 2015, 11:54:29 AM Must we sully the thread with The Sun?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on December 24, 2015, 12:48:53 PM Must we sully the thread with The Sun? I thought that front page was cruel and a little spiteful when I first saw it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: exstream on December 26, 2015, 01:53:38 PM Lol
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: exstream on December 26, 2015, 02:00:02 PM Lolol
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 26, 2015, 02:17:12 PM leaving aside all the childish baiting ^^^
it does surprise me that Schneiderlin doesn't get into the team any word on why that is? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: pleno1 on December 26, 2015, 02:21:44 PM Stuns me too.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 26, 2015, 02:23:13 PM Looks like they ate plenty sprouts in Stoke yesterday
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on December 26, 2015, 03:12:04 PM Can't see him surviving the weekend. Looks like we will be getting Jose for Christmas
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on December 26, 2015, 03:19:09 PM Can't see him surviving the weekend. Looks like we will be getting Jose for Christmas Would you honestly be happy about that after his revealing behavour under pressure this season? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: LeKnave on December 26, 2015, 03:24:32 PM Can't see him surviving the weekend. Looks like we will be getting Jose for Christmas Would you honestly be happy about that after his revealing behavour under pressure this season? I'd be happy with Alan Curbishley making an Ali like return to the ring at this point Ralph! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on December 26, 2015, 03:27:05 PM He's has one horrid season out of a career of success.
However I'd rather have Pep but that's not gonna happen Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 26, 2015, 03:31:28 PM Paddy Power have paid out on LVG next premier league manager to be sacked
a different era, but LVG has a better record in his first 72 games as man u manager than wenger had in his first 72 at Arsenal Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Tal on December 26, 2015, 03:34:20 PM I'll ask the stupid question again...
How about backing the manager that's sorted out a woeful defence and showing the players they aren't in charge? The last couple of weeks have been awful as an advert for the sport. Players have stopped playing for two of the best club managers of all time and the clubs have bowed to their demands. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 26, 2015, 03:37:46 PM I'll ask the stupid question again... How about backing the manager that's sorted out a woeful defence and showing the players they aren't in charge? The last couple of weeks have been awful as an advert for the sport. Players have stopped playing for two of the best club managers of all time and the clubs have bowed to their demands. that is exactly right. However its not the way football is these days. player power, in terms of contract size/length, is far too strong. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on December 26, 2015, 03:47:31 PM I'll ask the stupid question again... How about backing the manager that's sorted out a woeful defence and showing the players they aren't in charge? The last couple of weeks have been awful as an advert for the sport. Players have stopped playing for two of the best club managers of all time and the clubs have bowed to their demands. As tighty said its not the way things work. No one gets any time. Gary Monk sacked after leading Swansea to their best ever finish being a prime example. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 26, 2015, 04:14:28 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXKV34NW8AAJgmb.png)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on December 26, 2015, 04:37:37 PM I'll ask the stupid question again... How about backing the manager that's sorted out a woeful defence and showing the players they aren't in charge? The last couple of weeks have been awful as an advert for the sport. Players have stopped playing for two of the best club managers of all time and the clubs have bowed to their demands. LVG one of the best club managers of all time? Is this a Channel4 Top 100 with LVG getting a brief mention before the first adverts? Historic success doesn't make him a top manager now. This idea that LVG 'sorted out the defence' is fine and dandy, but the cost of that was to have the back four supported by two totally defensive midfield players and two or three in front of them who are afraid to lose the ball. Hence the inability to score/create decent chances. Even then, this 'sorted' defensive unit has conceded two to Watford, two to Bournemouth, two more to Norwich (at home) and another two today. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: nirvana on December 26, 2015, 05:47:10 PM I cant take any ticket that talks about support the manager and all that stuff. The manager is lauded when successful and fired when results are bad - seems sensible to me.
Most of business is riddled with executives who claim credit when business goes well and explain failure based on 'circumstances' and hang on to their jobs. Zero integrity in this whereas in football the manager firing thing is about the only thing that still has some Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: exstream on December 26, 2015, 06:40:52 PM Will Mourinho even want to go to Man U with the Madrid job supposedly being his once again.
Rooney finished, Martial doesn't look worth whatever they paid for him, how longs shaw out, he never liked mata, fellaini lol, de gea leaving end of season, schweinsteiger old, so much work needs done giggs till end of season? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 28, 2015, 10:53:26 AM Van Gaal fears Manchester United are beyond help but Woodward tells him he's still wanted after Stoke defeat.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/louis-van-gaal-latest-manchester-united-boss-believes-club-are-beyond-help-but-board-urges-him-to-a6787886.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 28, 2015, 10:57:19 AM but another opinion
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXQ27PlWYAAvhuo.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 28, 2015, 10:57:39 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXQ4daGWQAUYtoI.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 28, 2015, 03:18:22 PM jumping the gun, scarf sellers?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXUasiaWwAA59M5.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on December 28, 2015, 04:53:31 PM jumping the gun, scarf sellers? (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXUasiaWwAA59M5.jpg) Hope they don't sell any. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: pleno1 on December 28, 2015, 07:00:43 PM Scweinsteiger/Scheinderlin should play every single game.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 29, 2015, 12:09:20 PM It's not every day a former Man Utd & England footballer rings a phone-in to rant...
http://bbc.in/1NT1L8D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 30, 2015, 07:05:55 PM Glazers' determination to cut wage bill helps explain MUFC's decline
http://www.capx.co/man-utds-woes-are-due-to-failure-to-invest/ (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXfjAWcWAAEn0LC.png) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on December 30, 2015, 07:14:15 PM Glazers' determination to cut wage bill helps explain MUFC's decline http://www.capx.co/man-utds-woes-are-due-to-failure-to-invest/ (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXfjAWcWAAEn0LC.png) Something has to give to pay the bank interest bill every year. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Archer on December 30, 2015, 07:30:12 PM Glazers' determination to cut wage bill helps explain MUFC's decline http://www.capx.co/man-utds-woes-are-due-to-failure-to-invest/ (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXfjAWcWAAEn0LC.png) Something has to give to pay the bank interest bill every year. Not forgetting the $24million annual dividend to the Glazer children Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Tal on December 30, 2015, 07:32:31 PM So Arsenal are lauded as savvy businessmen and United are lunatics?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: tikay on December 30, 2015, 07:40:41 PM So Arsenal are lauded as savvy businessmen and United are lunatics? :) It's a flawed piece of logic, IMO. Just because Man U earn far more revenue should not mean they have some sort of obligation to spend it on players wages, or any other operating costs or overhead. It's a business. The owners are entitled to expect an increase in value, profits and dividend. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 30, 2015, 07:41:33 PM This is article is bizarre. Is it saying that spending 116% of your revenue is something a club should aspire to do? And that getting rid of Hernandez, Nani, RVP, Di Maria, Rafael, Jonny Evans, James Wilson, Cleverley and Falcao was a bad thing?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 30, 2015, 07:48:10 PM This is article is bizarre. Is it saying that spending 116% of your revenue is something a club should aspire to do? And that getting rid of Hernandez, Nani, RVP, Di Maria, Rafael, Jonny Evans, James Wilson, Cleverley and Falcao was a bad thing? not the 116%, but the logic is the debt interest prevents 50% of revenue being 60% of revenue being spent on the squad not all of your list are good misses. chicarito scores for fun in the bundesliga to give one example. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: tikay on December 30, 2015, 07:52:34 PM This is article is bizarre. Is it saying that spending 116% of your revenue is something a club should aspire to do? And that getting rid of Hernandez, Nani, RVP, Di Maria, Rafael, Jonny Evans, James Wilson, Cleverley and Falcao was a bad thing? I only just read the full article linked to. What a pile of tosh. The clue was at the foot of the article - the so called "Red Knights". If that lot ever took control of Man U, it'd be game over for a grand club. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 30, 2015, 07:55:17 PM This is article is bizarre. Is it saying that spending 116% of your revenue is something a club should aspire to do? And that getting rid of Hernandez, Nani, RVP, Di Maria, Rafael, Jonny Evans, James Wilson, Cleverley and Falcao was a bad thing? not the 116%, but the logic is the debt interest prevents 50% of revenue being 60% of revenue being spent on the squad not all of your list are good misses. chicarito scores for fun in the bundesliga to give one example. It doesn't need to be. United pay wages and top transfer fees ( or try to), they aren't getting outbid they just don't spend that % because it would be stupid to. If United doubled their revenue next year would they be complaining we aren't paying people 600k a week? Hernandez was very poor for United and the boys behind him at Bayer are very good. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Archer on December 30, 2015, 08:06:44 PM (http://i3.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/incoming/article8429128.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/CY30443605.jpg)
Ah, the good old Red Knights. Happy days :) The anti-Glazer sentiment is understandable if you consider United’s profits would have been substantially higher if the club did not have to bear the financing costs of the Glazers’ leveraged buy-out. In fact, over the last seven years they have made total operating profits of £457 million (including £148 million from player sales), which have been totally wiped out by net financing costs of £460 million. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Archer on December 30, 2015, 08:51:58 PM So Arsenal are lauded as savvy businessmen and United are lunatics? :) It's a flawed piece of logic, IMO. Just because Man U earn far more revenue should not mean they have some sort of obligation to spend it on players wages, or any other operating costs or overhead. It's a business. The owners are entitled to expect an increase in value, profits and dividend. Tikay, in general terms I agree with the bolded part but not necessarily for a football club. What is United's business - is it playing football or selling noodles? If it's playing football then being successful at that is a pre-requisite. Since Sir AF retired United have struggled. We all assume it is a blip but it can be argued it is a complete failure of core infrastructure and succession policy. For over 20 years, United had a successful system but relied on just one person to implement that system without making any serious attempt to replicate the processes that made it successful and guide a successor to be able to maintain it. If I was a United fan I woud be worried and anti-Glazer. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on December 30, 2015, 08:55:00 PM Deloitte figures for 2013/14
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/premier-league-clubs-revenue-boom-to-33billion-eclipses-rest-of-europe-10295701.html 50% of £433MM = £216.5MM 60% of £348.3MM = £209MM That's Man City in second place in the revenue table and their spend on wages is marginally less than that at United. What's the issue here? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on December 30, 2015, 09:02:13 PM So Arsenal are lauded as savvy businessmen and United are lunatics? :) It's a flawed piece of logic, IMO. Just because Man U earn far more revenue should not mean they have some sort of obligation to spend it on players wages, or any other operating costs or overhead. It's a business. The owners are entitled to expect an increase in value, profits and dividend. Tikay, in general terms I agree with the bolded part but not necessarily for a football club. What is United's business - is it playing football or selling noodles? If it's playing football then being successful at that is a pre-requisite. Since Sir AF retired United have struggled. We all assume it is a blip but it can be argued it is a complete failure of core infrastructure and succession policy. For over 20 years, United had a successful system but relied on just one person to implement that system without making any serious attempt to replicate the processes that made it successful and guide a successor to be able to maintain it. If I was a United fan I woud be worried and anti-Glazer. Of course it's worrying that we have gone backwards since SAF retired. Of course I loathe that we are an asset for the Glazers. But we are, we're an asset that has to be productive. Not a money-laundering image builder, nor a vanity project. Yet we still appear to pay our players more than any other club. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Archer on December 31, 2015, 12:46:07 AM So Arsenal are lauded as savvy businessmen and United are lunatics? :) It's a flawed piece of logic, IMO. Just because Man U earn far more revenue should not mean they have some sort of obligation to spend it on players wages, or any other operating costs or overhead. Edit: Who are the money launderers? It's a business. The owners are entitled to expect an increase in value, profits and dividend. Tikay, in general terms I agree with the bolded part but not necessarily for a football club. What is United's business - is it playing football or selling noodles? If it's playing football then being successful at that is a pre-requisite. Since Sir AF retired United have struggled. We all assume it is a blip but it can be argued it is a complete failure of core infrastructure and succession policy. For over 20 years, United had a successful system but relied on just one person to implement that system without making any serious attempt to replicate the processes that made it successful and guide a successor to be able to maintain it. If I was a United fan I woud be worried and anti-Glazer. Of course it's worrying that we have gone backwards since SAF retired. Of course I loathe that we are an asset for the Glazers. But we are, we're an asset that has to be productive. Not a money-laundering image builder, nor a vanity project. Yet we still appear to pay our players more than any other club. No issue with me regarding the actual wages and I have not commented on the wages. It is unfortunate tho that you are paying more in wages for Rooney than Sanchez & Ozil combined :) United are a huge commercial success and likely to rise to the top of the Money League in 2016 when the projected turnover shows an increase of £100million+ but it is a shame the Glazers are milking the cash cow for their own personal benefit. Meanwhile the structure of the football side of the club is a mess IMO. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Archer on December 31, 2015, 12:49:07 AM Who are the money launderers?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 02, 2016, 07:00:21 PM Scweinsteiger/Scheinderlin should play every single game. Schneiderlin vs Swansea: 93% Pass Success 3 Tackles 5 Interceptions 0 Balls Lost With Shaw and Darmian that's the team that should be playing every week. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on January 05, 2016, 11:24:18 AM Man United take encouragement from Benitez sacking in Bale pursuit...
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/manchester-united-preparing-75million-plus-7117922 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 05, 2016, 12:54:30 PM It's a shame Hazard has become terrible as the only way I'd see them selling Bale was to fund a move for another record breaking transfer.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Archer on January 05, 2016, 01:29:57 PM It's a shame Hazard has become terrible as the only way I'd see them selling Bale was to fund a move for another record breaking transfer. You are probably right. Zidane on record several times about loving Hazard. I love the way the media are reporting this. As an example the Telegraph already has 3 articles on it. The first and my favourite headline : Gareth Bale devastated by Benitez sacking: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/real-madrid/12081700/Gareth-Bale-devastated-by-Real-Madrids-sacking-of-Rafael-Benitez-which-may-encourage-Premier-League-return.html Then the click-bait fest: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/players/gareth-bale/11339654/Gareth-Bale-to-Man-Utd-11-reasons-why-the-transfer-could-happen.html?frame=3540890 It is worth giving them the clicks for the comedy value. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on January 10, 2016, 11:35:33 AM "The players are bored, fans are bored, everyone's bored. You look across at the bench and Van Gaal looks bored as well." Scholes yesterday on BT Sport
without changing manager, what are the tactical solutions to this, if ineed they are needed? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Archer on January 10, 2016, 11:45:50 AM "The players are bored, fans are bored, everyone's bored. You look across at the bench and Van Gaal looks bored as well." Scholes yesterday on BT Sport without changing manager, what are the tactical solutions to this, if ineed they are needed? The stat that was banded about last night is amazing: Last 10 first-halfs at Old Trafford: 0-0, 0-0, 0-0, 0-0, 0-0, 0-0, 0-1, 0-0, 0-0, 0-0. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 11, 2016, 06:38:52 PM "The players are bored, fans are bored, everyone's bored. You look across at the bench and Van Gaal looks bored as well." Scholes yesterday on BT Sport without changing manager, what are the tactical solutions to this, if ineed they are needed? Adapting tactics to the opposition would be a start. We play the same formation vs everyone. Playing 2 defensive mids, 2 number 10's and no wingers vs a team that is going to come and put 11 men behind the ball is just asking for what happened on Saturday. The rigidity in formation is killing the team. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2016, 12:19:05 AM "The players are bored, fans are bored, everyone's bored. You look across at the bench and Van Gaal looks bored as well." Scholes yesterday on BT Sport without changing manager, what are the tactical solutions to this, if ineed they are needed? Adapting tactics to the opposition would be a start. We play the same formation vs everyone. Playing 2 defensive mids, 2 number 10's and no wingers vs a team that is going to come and put 11 men behind the ball is just asking for what happened on Saturday. The rigidity in formation is killing the team. Take the shackles off and let these highly paid and skilled footballers have a go. We appear to have been trained out of any thoughts of creativity in the final third. FFS Arsenal had 25 shots on Saturday, we haven't had that many in the last 6 games at a guess. We certainly haven't had 13 on target. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on January 12, 2016, 12:21:19 AM "The players are bored, fans are bored, everyone's bored. You look across at the bench and Van Gaal looks bored as well." Scholes yesterday on BT Sport without changing manager, what are the tactical solutions to this, if ineed they are needed? Adapting tactics to the opposition would be a start. We play the same formation vs everyone. Playing 2 defensive mids, 2 number 10's and no wingers vs a team that is going to come and put 11 men behind the ball is just asking for what happened on Saturday. The rigidity in formation is killing the team. Take the shackles off and let these highly paid and skilled footballers have a go. We appear to have been trained out of any thoughts of creativity in the final third. FFS Arsenal had 25 shots on Saturday, we haven't had that many in the last 6 games at a guess. We certainly haven't had 13 on target. Def agree with this. Huge case of overthinking/training going on at the minute. Players have not got iq's in the 150's generally. You need to keep it very simple. LVG is def way over complicating things imo and not even getting the results. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on January 12, 2016, 04:22:09 AM http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3394450/Louis-van-Gaal-betraying-Manchester-United-way-one-defeat-sacked-warns-former-striker-Michael-Owen.html
Hate to agree with Michael but he has this spot on apart from the fact why does LVG have to lose a game to get sacked? Why does football keep having to be results orientated? It is great that it provides pro punters with loads of lovely spots to make money but why cant it change and get in the 21st century? Why can't LVG get sacked after 4 1-0 wins in a row and show the judges that football has moved on and you can sack an massive luck box over achieving manager like LVG even when he is winning and in a spot when manure probably should be this season in the league? I would really like the LVG sacking to happen after a win rather than a loss. Am i being too optimistic? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2016, 09:27:20 AM http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3394450/Louis-van-Gaal-betraying-Manchester-United-way-one-defeat-sacked-warns-former-striker-Michael-Owen.html Hate to agree with Michael but he has this spot on apart from the fact why does LVG have to lose a game to get sacked? Why does football keep having to be results orientated? It is great that it provides pro punters with loads of lovely spots to make money but why cant it change and get in the 21st century? Why can't LVG get sacked after 4 1-0 wins in a row and show the judges that football has moved on and you can sack an massive luck box over achieving manager like LVG even when he is winning and in a spot when manure probably should be this season in the league? I would really like the LVG sacking to happen after a win rather than a loss. Am i being too optimistic? Dave Sexton won the last seven games of the season and still got the Spanish Archer. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on January 12, 2016, 03:20:55 PM Grand Prix Poker Tour Old Trafford this weekend
www.gppt.poker As part of the pre-event activities on Saturday at Old Trafford: Legends Q and A with David May and Norman Whiteside, hosted by Simon Lazenby of Sky Sports This will take place at 12.30pm Saturday. Simon will ask David and Norman a selection of the best questions submitted by poker players. Football/Poker/Life..its up to you! Please post questions here and I will collate. Listen to the answers on Saturday and Highlights of the Q and A session will be posted up afterwards, too Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 12, 2016, 07:38:20 PM #MUFC XI to play #NUFC: De Gea, Young, Smalling, Blind, Darmian, Schneiderlin, Fellaini, Lingard, Herrera, Martial, Rooney.
0-0 incoming Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2016, 07:53:48 PM #MUFC XI to play #NUFC: De Gea, Young, Smalling, Blind, Darmian, Schneiderlin, Fellaini, Lingard, Herrera, Martial, Rooney. 0-0 incoming Some of those were picked out of a hat. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 12, 2016, 08:26:56 PM 8 out of the 11 are playing in non preferred positions.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2016, 08:48:06 PM I've always rated Mike Dean :D
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 12, 2016, 09:28:16 PM Nailed on pen for both teams. Fellaini a liability as ever, nice assist though.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2016, 11:17:00 PM Rooney reminds us all that he is a quality player.
Encouraging in it's way, but a lot of simple passes didn't complete and better teams than Newcastle will punish that even more. Liverpool next. Bring it on. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 12, 2016, 11:27:47 PM DEFEND....DEFEND....DEFEND DEFEND DEFEND!!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2016, 11:29:22 PM DEFEND....DEFEND....DEFEND DEFEND DEFEND!! ;applause; ;applause; ;applause; Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 12, 2016, 11:43:02 PM Funny to see all the people in Twitter saying they'd rather lose an entertaining game than win a dull 1-0 complaining tonight.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on January 12, 2016, 11:57:21 PM Funny to see all the people in Twitter saying they'd rather lose an entertaining game than win a dull 1-0 complaining tonight. I'd take a dull 1-0 on Sunday. In principle anyway. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 17, 2016, 10:55:03 PM Funny to see all the people in Twitter saying they'd rather lose an entertaining game than win a dull 1-0 complaining tonight. I'd take a dull 1-0 on Sunday. In principle anyway. :):):):):):):):) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on January 23, 2016, 11:25:54 AM got one spare united ticket for today if anybody is interested.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on January 24, 2016, 02:26:35 PM got one spare united ticket for today if anybody is interested. we knew. Man Utd under Moyes (£60m spent) - 40 points in 23 games. Man Utd under LVG (£250m spent) - 37 points in 23 games. so, serious questions not meant to troll - what do you want to see happen next and when? - would possibly missing the 2016-17 champions league be a big driver in any managerial decision you make? - what three "easy wins" are there in tactics, team selection, approach etc that could see you create more chances for the remainder of the season (assuming giggs caretakes or mourinho is appointed, the answers may be different( thanks Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 24, 2016, 02:53:26 PM "The players are bored, fans are bored, everyone's bored. You look across at the bench and Van Gaal looks bored as well." Scholes yesterday on BT Sport without changing manager, what are the tactical solutions to this, if ineed they are needed? Adapting tactics to the opposition would be a start. We play the same formation vs everyone. Playing 2 defensive mids, 2 number 10's and no wingers vs a team that is going to come and put 11 men behind the ball is just asking for what happened on Saturday. The rigidity in formation is killing the team. Fellaini and Schnerderlin started again, at home to Southampton, who are playing 4-5-1, like every other team that shows up to OT. Just drop Fellaini, drop Herrera back into centre mid then play any combo of Rooney, Martial, Depay, Lingard, Pereira, Januzaj as the front 4. LVG has nothing to lose, performances can't get any worse and he still won't change formation. Having all the quick fullbacks/wingers out at once is a huge blow, and isn't helping the football. Really don't think we're going to change manager before the summer at least. No one at United likes Mourinho and the next manager appointment is so huge and don't think they want to rush it. This is probably the lowest the club has been since I've been alive, but we're only 5 points behind a champions league place (which is Spurs and they'll do a Spurs like they always do), 10 points off top (which is Arsenal who'll do an Arsenal like they always do) and still ahead of Liverpool so can't really complain that much. I'll start to panic when we appoint Pochettino and sign Delle Ali and Kane for £120m. Edit- https://twitter.com/BBCSporf/status/691259435843469312 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Ironside on January 25, 2016, 04:27:44 AM saints didnt play a 4-5-1 we have been playing with 3 centre backs and 2 wing backs for past 3 games
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 25, 2016, 03:18:14 PM Ah I remember when we used to play that last season. Forward passing, shots on target, fun times.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on February 02, 2016, 01:01:54 PM Man u v Stoke Corporate box ticket available for tonight.
Last minute cancellation from a friend has meant i got a 'plus 1' spare for this tonight. Obviously Man U hospitality is as good as it gets. Only asked for a donation to my fav charity for whatever you think is reasonable. Not looking to make money out of it personally. First come first served basis. You will need to be at Old Trafford at 6pm at latest if you want the food etc before kick off. I will be arriving at 5pm when the box opens as there is welcome champagne/unlimited booze for the rest of the evening all included. You will have to make your own way there and back. I can meet you at Pic station circa 4-430pm if that suits and get a taxi to OT or just meet at the ground between 5-6pm. Full 3 course dinner/cheese+biscuits/half time cakes plus unlimited booze all including for free. Good chance to enjoy the MU hospitality for a fraction of the usual cost. Smart casual dress code is obviously required. PM me if you are interested before 3pm. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on February 02, 2016, 01:12:42 PM Sigh would have sold my tickets and done this if i knew earlier!
Certainly owe you a beer or two for tips! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on February 02, 2016, 01:17:44 PM Sigh would have sold my tickets and done this if i knew earlier! Certainly owe you a beer or two for tips! Plenty of time to sell a couple of tickets for a certain 0-0!!!! LVG is certainly making it tougher than previous seasons selling this to friends esp last minute in midweek Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on February 02, 2016, 01:32:19 PM Sigh would have sold my tickets and done this if i knew earlier! Certainly owe you a beer or two for tips! Plenty of time to sell a couple of tickets for a certain 0-0!!!! LVG is certainly making it tougher than previous seasons selling this to friends esp last minute in midweek Got two tickets and already booked in someone to come with that i sorted yesterday. Agreed, went like hotcakes even when Moyesy was around! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on February 02, 2016, 01:37:44 PM Sigh would have sold my tickets and done this if i knew earlier! Certainly owe you a beer or two for tips! Plenty of time to sell a couple of tickets for a certain 0-0!!!! LVG is certainly making it tougher than previous seasons selling this to friends esp last minute in midweek Got two tickets and already booked in someone to come with that i sorted yesterday. Agreed, went like hotcakes even when Moyesy was around! Best casino to play cash afterwards until first train home at 6am? G casino in Salford? Games run until 6am? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 05, 2016, 07:00:55 PM Manchester United are the club that offered £145m for Barcelona star Neymar last summer. The 23-year-old Brazil forward's father revealed it is the Red Devils that have made the huge offer. (Daily Mail - via COPE)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 05, 2016, 07:01:54 PM Manchester United are set to close an entire tier of Old Trafford due to lack of interest in the club's Europa League tie with Midtjylland on 25 February.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on February 05, 2016, 07:14:30 PM Cannot believe how much coverage this story has got, we will get 60,000 in for a game on Thursday night against FC nobody. It's not an LVG issue it has happened before, crap comp, crap night, I will still be there but this story is so zzzzz it's boring. Sure it's been started by a city fan
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on February 05, 2016, 08:39:05 PM Cannot believe how much coverage this story has got, we will get 60,000 in for a game on Thursday night against FC nobody. It's not an LVG issue it has happened before, crap comp, crap night, I will still be there but this story is so zzzzz it's boring. Sure it's been started by a city fan No you know how it feels! Gets pretty tiresome no? ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on February 05, 2016, 11:20:37 PM Looks like things next year are about to get interesting
http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/35508280 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: nirvana on February 05, 2016, 11:44:05 PM Oh man, I hope United lose their minds and appoint Giggs. I'd laugh for quite a few days if that happened
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 07, 2016, 03:02:30 PM Bebe's contract appeared on the internet yesterday (no, i don't know why either)
this was how the Man U bonus scheme broke down for the 2009-10 season https://footballleaks2015.wordpress.com/ (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CangWutW0AAYKjw.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: nirvana on February 08, 2016, 01:36:28 PM United were deece yesterday I thought. Schweinsteiger missing a big plus no ? Takes all the pace out of their game
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 08, 2016, 07:10:35 PM His replacement is Fellaini though, who is equally if not more laborious. Thought we played pretty well. Borthwick-Jackson had a great game again, apart from the goal. Lingard is impressing with his work rate. Same can't be said for Depay though. Giving the ball away when we had 4v4 in the 90th then not tracking back was criminal. Don't think he's got the right mentality for a little fish big pond situation. Still only 21 but I can see him being the first casualty if Mourinho comes in. He def isn't pulling his weight in any department.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: nirvana on February 08, 2016, 10:54:33 PM Darmian on the other side and Carrick to get things moving looked good too
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 09, 2016, 02:25:01 PM Manchester United have spoken to representatives of Tottenham Hotspur manager Mauricio Pochettino, 43, about succeeding Louis van Gaal, 64. according to reports/agent talk/delete as applicable
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Tal on February 09, 2016, 07:09:49 PM Manchester United have spoken to representatives of Tottenham Hotspur manager Mauricio Pochettino, 43, about succeeding Louis van Gaal, 64. according to reports/agent talk/delete as applicable At the risk of an arbboy impression... ...why would he want to leave Spurs to go to United? Spurs have almost unparalleled training facilities, one of the best youth set-ups going, are challenging for the title and have a new stadium coming, with a playing system the manager has complete control over and players who trust him implicitly (the rest having been shown what used to be the revolving door). United...can give him a pay rise? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 09, 2016, 07:22:46 PM "The players are bored, fans are bored, everyone's bored. You look across at the bench and Van Gaal looks bored as well." Scholes yesterday on BT Sport ]without changing manager, what are the tactical solutions to this, if ineed they are needed? Adapting tactics to the opposition would be a start. We play the same formation vs everyone. Playing 2 defensive mids, 2 number 10's and no wingers vs a team that is going to come and put 11 men behind the ball is just asking for what happened on Saturday. The rigidity in formation is killing the team. It begins. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on February 09, 2016, 07:32:43 PM Manchester United have spoken to representatives of Tottenham Hotspur manager Mauricio Pochettino, 43, about succeeding Louis van Gaal, 64. according to reports/agent talk/delete as applicable At the risk of an arbboy impression... ...why would he want to leave Spurs to go to United? Spurs have almost unparalleled training facilities, one of the best youth set-ups going, are challenging for the title and have a new stadium coming, with a playing system the manager has complete control over and players who trust him implicitly (the rest having been shown what used to be the revolving door). United...can give him a pay rise? Play the game Tal, United are one of the biggest clubs in the world yes they are going through a blip but still! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Tal on February 09, 2016, 07:40:22 PM Manchester United have spoken to representatives of Tottenham Hotspur manager Mauricio Pochettino, 43, about succeeding Louis van Gaal, 64. according to reports/agent talk/delete as applicable At the risk of an arbboy impression... ...why would he want to leave Spurs to go to United? Spurs have almost unparalleled training facilities, one of the best youth set-ups going, are challenging for the title and have a new stadium coming, with a playing system the manager has complete control over and players who trust him implicitly (the rest having been shown what used to be the revolving door). United...can give him a pay rise? Play the game Tal, United are one of the biggest clubs in the world yes they are going through a blip but still! Biggest brands, certainly. I could genuinely understand him going to Arsenal if Wenger left (certain Champs League, title contention, money and understanding board) - not that I would want him to - but United has been struggling for a couple of years since the golden era, has players on their last contract, hasn't got a board or fans patient enough to encourage growth and development, has a squad that chucked the manager out not long ago and offers no guarantees of results in the short term. It's a job he could go for in a few years, no question, but I don't see the appeal, apart from a CV point. That worked out well for Moyes, didn't it? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on February 09, 2016, 07:46:20 PM Manchester United have spoken to representatives of Tottenham Hotspur manager Mauricio Pochettino, 43, about succeeding Louis van Gaal, 64. according to reports/agent talk/delete as applicable At the risk of an arbboy impression... ...why would he want to leave Spurs to go to United? Spurs have almost unparalleled training facilities, one of the best youth set-ups going, are challenging for the title and have a new stadium coming, with a playing system the manager has complete control over and players who trust him implicitly (the rest having been shown what used to be the revolving door). United...can give him a pay rise? Play the game Tal, United are one of the biggest clubs in the world yes they are going through a blip but still! Biggest brands, certainly. I could genuinely understand him going to Arsenal if Wenger left (certain Champs League, title contention, money and understanding board) - not that I would want him to - but United has been struggling for a couple of years since the golden era, has players on their last contract, hasn't got a board or fans patient enough to encourage growth and development, has a squad that chucked the manager out not long ago and offers no guarantees of results in the short term. It's a job he could go for in a few years, no question, but I don't see the appeal, apart from a CV point. That worked out well for Moyes, didn't it? Would it not be appealing also now 2 managers have "failed". United are still bringing a lot of youth through the system, BJ/Jesse two prime examples of this at the moment. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 09, 2016, 08:00:45 PM Manchester United have spoken to representatives of Tottenham Hotspur manager Mauricio Pochettino, 43, about succeeding Louis van Gaal, 64. according to reports/agent talk/delete as applicable At the risk of an arbboy impression... ...why would he want to leave Spurs to go to United? Spurs have almost unparalleled training facilities, one of the best youth set-ups going, are challenging for the title and have a new stadium coming, with a playing system the manager has complete control over and players who trust him implicitly (the rest having been shown what used to be the revolving door). United...can give him a pay rise? Play the game Tal, United are one of the biggest clubs in the world yes they are going through a blip but still! Biggest brands, certainly. I could genuinely understand him going to Arsenal if Wenger left (certain Champs League, title contention, money and understanding board) - not that I would want him to - but United has been struggling for a couple of years since the golden era, has players on their last contract, hasn't got a board or fans patient enough to encourage growth and development, has a squad that chucked the manager out not long ago and offers no guarantees of results in the short term. It's a job he could go for in a few years, no question, but I don't see the appeal, apart from a CV point. That worked out well for Moyes, didn't it? They got rid of nearly an entire squad of older players and replaced them with much younger, spending £89m on players under 21. I think the rebuilding process is entirely centered around growth and development and obv not scared to give the youngsters a chance. I'd say a blank cheque book and a young squad in need of molding would be a managers wet dream. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Tal on February 09, 2016, 08:17:13 PM I'm not saying United won't come back. Poch's stock could get even higher if he stays at Spurs and Spurs look to be on the up.
At the end of the day, if he wants to go, he'll go. He left Southampton to come to Spurs. I just see the job as being far riskier right now than what he has. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 10, 2016, 10:59:26 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cazn1s4WEAA41UW.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 16, 2016, 09:49:35 AM Man United ready to break the bank to sign Aubameyang
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/man-united-preparing-60million-move-7376430 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 18, 2016, 12:46:14 PM stories are emerging that Manchester United will consider selling Rooney to the chinese super league in the face of reported interest
is that something, at the right price, that you would support? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on February 18, 2016, 12:50:03 PM stories are emerging that Manchester United will consider selling Rooney to the chinese super league in the face of reported interest is that something, at the right price, that you would support? If the price is right, they'd be silly not to. Only going to regress. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: AndrewT on February 18, 2016, 01:19:30 PM stories are emerging that Manchester United will consider selling Rooney to the chinese super league in the face of reported interest is that something, at the right price, that you would support? Would be worth it to see Coleen's face when Wayne tells her where his new job is. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 20, 2016, 10:27:56 AM Ed Woodward resists sacking Louis van Gaal ahead of crucial run of games -
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/12165610/Manchester-United-crisis-Ed-Woodward-refuses-to-sack-Louis-van-Gaal-and-has-not-spoken-with-Jose-Mourinho.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 21, 2016, 12:14:04 PM Jose Mourinho on his way to Manchester United, Inter director Bedy Moratti lets slip http://dailym.ai/1Q0aSW6
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 22, 2016, 10:24:55 AM Jose Mourinho has 'gentleman's agreement' to become the next Manchester United manager
http://www.thesportbible.com/articles/breaking-jose-mourinho-has-gentleman-s-agreement-to-become-next-manchester-united-manager-210216 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 22, 2016, 12:00:33 PM Manchester United chasing fourth is undignified, says Ole Gunnar Solskjaer. http://gu.com/p/4hvmf/stw
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on February 22, 2016, 02:10:39 PM Well they're only chasing 4th as in how Spurs and Liverpool chase 4th most years.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 22, 2016, 06:21:28 PM David De Gea's contract is the latest to be 'leaked' and there are some interesting big money clauses attached
http://www.thesportbible.com/articles/david-de-gea-s-transfer-to-manchester-united-is-the-latest-to-be-leaked-220216 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: nirvana on February 26, 2016, 02:02:55 PM Interesting draw in the Europa league - starts to look like an interesting competition at this stage. The big news is I'm leaning to making this the first time I ever support Man U cause I feel bad for Van Gaal and am growing to like him
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 27, 2016, 12:22:38 AM Liverpool and Manchester United are no strangers to all-English European ties http://dailym.ai/1WP3lgP
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Tal on February 28, 2016, 04:54:24 PM (http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/live-experience/cps/400/cpsprodpb/vivo/live/images/2016/2/28/309b8ec6-1428-454e-8031-873ef9275d71.jpg)
Discuss. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 28, 2016, 04:56:14 PM great win, well done!
like the look of rashford (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcUD1zNW8AIc-96.jpg) = (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcUD13CW8AAq5ts.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2016, 05:03:58 PM I was doing a few other things, but turned it on just as he was throwing himself on the deck :D
What was it in aid of? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: horseplayer on February 28, 2016, 05:05:33 PM Happy for Lvg
A top class manager (dont get his record without being one) and the blooding of youngsters will help Mourinho if he chooses to use them (doubtful). Obviously a lot of them only playing due to injuries but still brave to do so Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: McGlashan on February 28, 2016, 05:18:21 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcUJr2xW0AAGVeO.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: nirvana on February 28, 2016, 05:30:14 PM I was doing a few other things, but turned it on just as he was throwing himself on the deck :D What was it in aid of? Showing the 4th official how the player dived/fell over. It was the highlight of the entire game, very funny too Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2016, 05:59:25 PM I was doing a few other things, but turned it on just as he was throwing himself on the deck :D What was it in aid of? Showing the 4th official how the player dived/fell over. It was the highlight of the entire game, very funny too Haha, he does make me chuckle with some of his antics. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on March 02, 2016, 10:31:39 PM Throw the kitchen sink at them Louis! 3 points are massive here
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on March 02, 2016, 10:49:35 PM Sigh. A display in dreadful finishing from the Watford boys there.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on March 02, 2016, 11:17:21 PM I'm sure that tighty will be along shortly to put you guys right.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on March 02, 2016, 11:36:59 PM It's come to a pretty sad state of affairs when I'm excited about the possibility of beating City to a CL place (which probably won't happen anyway)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 03, 2016, 01:04:23 AM It's come to a pretty sad state of affairs when I'm excited about the possibility of beating City to a CL place (which probably won't happen anyway) You won't. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on March 03, 2016, 01:08:27 AM Love the complacency. No one expects us to- pressure on your side of Manchester
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 03, 2016, 01:23:07 AM Love the complacency. No one expects us to- pressure on your side of Manchester Complacency? You put forward a situation, admit it probably won't happen, I agree it probably won't happen, and suddenly that's complacent? 3 league defeats in a row concerns me, of course it does, but I also know we're a much better squad of players than the chasing pack, and we should see the season out. The title is a distant memory but consolidating a top 4 finish is more than within our grasp. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on March 03, 2016, 01:27:33 AM It's all banter mate. Enjoy the ride. Announcing Pep has fucked up this season for u but I Spose it's a short term loss for longer term gain
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 03, 2016, 01:35:52 AM It's all banter mate. Enjoy the ride. Announcing Pep has fucked up this season for u but I Spose it's a short term loss for longer term gain Why has the season ''fucked up''? It's not like we've blown a massive lead at the top. We were always in the chasing pack. Some key defeats, against teams that we might have lost regardless of the Pep situaton, mean the title is more than a long shot now. In that same period, we've also won the League Cup and have a foot in the Champions League quarters after a tough first leg in Eastern Europe. Swings and roundabouts but I'm sure enjoying the ride. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: exstream on March 03, 2016, 10:40:05 AM It's all banter mate. Enjoy the ride. Announcing Pep has fucked up this season for u but I Spose it's a short term loss for longer term gain Why has the season ''fucked up''? It's not like we've blown a massive lead at the top. We were always in the chasing pack. Some key defeats, against teams that we might have lost regardless of the Pep situaton, mean the title is more than a long shot now. In that same period, we've also won the League Cup and have a foot in the Champions League quarters after a tough first leg in Eastern Europe. Swings and roundabouts but I'm sure enjoying the ride. what is to blame for the shambles of the league run this season though man city really should be winning the league every year right? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 03, 2016, 01:36:14 PM It's all banter mate. Enjoy the ride. Announcing Pep has fucked up this season for u but I Spose it's a short term loss for longer term gain Why has the season ''fucked up''? It's not like we've blown a massive lead at the top. We were always in the chasing pack. Some key defeats, against teams that we might have lost regardless of the Pep situaton, mean the title is more than a long shot now. In that same period, we've also won the League Cup and have a foot in the Champions League quarters after a tough first leg in Eastern Europe. Swings and roundabouts but I'm sure enjoying the ride. what is to blame for the shambles of the league run this season though man city really should be winning the league every year right? Why? I await the tedious 'money' answer.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: exstream on March 03, 2016, 02:03:38 PM don't think its a tedious answer, with the foundations to build on having won the league in the past, they bought more and more expensive players and haven't seemed to progress, doesn't seem acceptable to be faltering behind teams like leicester and spurs after all the money city have spent
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on March 03, 2016, 02:13:18 PM On paper they have the best team and squad by a country mile
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: exstream on March 03, 2016, 02:17:08 PM city have spent 100 days at the top of the league this season
not good to be where they are now Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 03, 2016, 02:39:43 PM don't think its a tedious answer, with the foundations to build on having won the league in the past, they bought more and more expensive players and haven't seemed to progress, doesn't seem acceptable to be faltering behind teams like leicester and spurs after all the money city have spent I hope the irony of this post isn't lost on you. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on March 03, 2016, 11:46:37 PM don't think its a tedious answer, with the foundations to build on having won the league in the past, they bought more and more expensive players and haven't seemed to progress, doesn't seem acceptable to be faltering behind teams like leicester and spurs after all the money city have spent I hope the irony of this post isn't lost on you. Nice shot sir. Deserved winner. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on March 11, 2016, 07:08:10 PM Scholes knows
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A174OpU4fws Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on March 17, 2016, 12:57:32 PM 'Man Utd face a tough call over their next boss if they decide to replace Van Gaal' http://bbc.in/22odPHI
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: bergeroo on March 17, 2016, 01:57:46 PM 'Man Utd face a tough call over their next boss if they decide to replace Van Gaal' http://bbc.in/22odPHI Poch is second fave in front of Giggs in a number of bookmakers right now. If Spurs don't win the league then could be a good shout I reckon. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: peejaytwo on April 17, 2016, 01:09:08 AM https://m.youtube.com/watch?ebc=ANyPxKr84o95omXz00TzHDNDGh-K5vRnq8RYjfDvtEbGeFicBp-b09DVnR7zsF9Oeoz8vRaX-fcGGOby0mSzm1-qCbjFGfxpVQ&v=sZD8XDqxf9M
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on April 17, 2016, 01:55:17 AM YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1JyTVOSZ8s Too funny :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: peejaytwo on April 17, 2016, 11:51:35 PM Thx for sorting Marky
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 08, 2016, 07:02:31 PM Well, it's been a weird season all round but we are now three wins away from CL qualification and an FA Cup win.
Will we deserve either of those things? Probably yes in the Cup but not really in the league. Will we take them? Hell yes. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on May 08, 2016, 08:15:51 PM Agreed, still think we have been so lucky in the league, but 3 wins away from an ok season.
Ill take it. Lets go boys! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: exstream on May 08, 2016, 11:45:57 PM Man c haven't beat any of the top 5 teams
Deserve to miss out on top 4 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 10, 2016, 08:16:00 PM West Ham fans attacking the United team bus and smashing up the area around their own ground is such a fitting send off to the Boleyn Ground.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 10, 2016, 10:09:51 PM Man c haven't beat any of the top 5 teams Deserve to miss out on top 4 So if Team X didn't beat any fellow top 5 teams but beat everyone else home and away and won the title, they wouldn't deserve it? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on May 10, 2016, 10:35:27 PM West Ham fans attacking the United team bus and smashing up the area around their own ground is such a fitting send off to the Boleyn Ground. West Ham fans classy as always before they get diluted by corporates next year. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 10, 2016, 11:05:23 PM Same old Same old. Not able to deliver when it really counts
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 10, 2016, 11:07:58 PM Same old Same old. Not able to deliver when it really counts I agree but i don't think this Man U side needs much next season to really kick on. The key for me is how Rooney's ego copes with not being anywhere near the main man (apart from on the payroll). If he settles into a new role the front line is open to so much improvement just from natural progression at such young ages that Man U could be seriously scary going forward next season with a couple of signings and a more 'Man U' style attack attack attack manager. Keeper is only going to improve as well at his age. I think they are a bet for the league next year at the current prices. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 10, 2016, 11:15:25 PM I would be shocked if De Gea stays. He has a release clause which Real will probably meet this summer
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 10, 2016, 11:19:55 PM I can't believe the amount of free kicks we've given away when West Ham have the best free kick taker in the league and forwards who are strong in the air.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: flushthemout on May 10, 2016, 11:21:13 PM Bye Bye LVG and ty
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 11, 2016, 04:37:33 PM at lunch yesterday....
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CiLt9XqWkAAK8nD.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on May 11, 2016, 06:11:58 PM Is there any truth in the story that on legal advice the team bus is to have its exterior padded in case any more opposition fans try and headbutt it and consequently try to sue for incurring brain-damage?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 11, 2016, 06:50:00 PM Is there any truth in the story that on legal advice the team bus is to have its exterior padded in case any more opposition fans try and headbutt it and consequently try to sue for incurring brain-damage? Can't be because that person clearly has no brain Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 11, 2016, 06:58:53 PM Is there any truth in the story that on legal advice the team bus is to have its exterior padded in case any more opposition fans try and headbutt it and consequently try to sue for incurring brain-damage? Pretty sure you can do better than this Ralph. The Coach/coach jokes offer far more scope. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on May 11, 2016, 07:23:32 PM Is there any truth in the story that on legal advice the team bus is to have its exterior padded in case any more opposition fans try and headbutt it and consequently try to sue for incurring brain-damage? Can't be because that person clearly has no brain That was part of the gag George :dontask: Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 13, 2016, 03:56:47 PM http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36285921?ocid=socialflow_twitter
Think of all the wingbacks we can buy :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 15, 2016, 03:49:51 PM Love the fake bomb scare to give you a positional edge potentially on the chase for 4th spot. Fergie time in disguise!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: bagel on May 15, 2016, 04:01:38 PM match abandoned
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 15, 2016, 04:08:20 PM incredible scenes.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: flushthemout on May 15, 2016, 07:14:09 PM Just been talking to some Cherry Fans at the Services, they are gonna let the Rags win 0-18 for a Blue sweat.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 15, 2016, 10:00:57 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cihd4wkWkAEsXz9.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 15, 2016, 11:11:06 PM Oh
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 15, 2016, 11:38:27 PM Surely they've got to refund the away fans? That's a long old trip.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Ironside on May 16, 2016, 12:08:50 AM so it turns out that the "suspect device" turns out to look very viable as it was designed to look viable when it was being used then left behind during a training exercise during the week
think someone might be finding there P45 in the post next week Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: muckthenuts on May 16, 2016, 12:14:25 AM so it turns out that the "suspect device" turns out to look very viable as it was designed to look viable when it was being used then left behind during a training exercise during the week think someone might be finding there P45 in the post next week Got to appreciate how you can't take even 1% risk in these scenarios though. Can't gamble with people's lives given recent events. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 16, 2016, 12:18:08 AM Surely when they do these training exercises they 'account' for all the fake devices before and after the exercise? ie 20 fake bombs given out and 20 fake bombs counted back in after the exercise?? Not exactly rocket science is it? Basic stock taking or auditing!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 16, 2016, 12:20:38 AM "Boss we're a fake bomb short"
"Yeh don't worry about that" Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 16, 2016, 01:30:19 AM Surely they've got to refund the away fans? That's a long old trip. http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-Features/Football-News/2016/May/ticket-information-for-rearranged-manchester-united-v-bournemouth-at-old-trafford-on-tuesday-17-may.aspx?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=post&utm_campaign=ManUtd Over/under on amount of away fans making the trip again? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Ironside on May 16, 2016, 03:47:57 AM just had jerry fletcher on the old dog and bone, it was hard to make out what he was saying at first as he had the signal bouncing off about 200 satellites so the call wasn't traceable.
his theory on the whole matter was LVG was behind the whole lets get the match delayed. find out how man city got onif they had lost he can then play his full team in the rematch to get the ECL spot locked down, if man city got anything its rest the first team for the rematch so they are fresh for the FA cup final man city got a point utd now cant get ECL next season so its rest up for the final and 4th prize (after winning EPL, finishing 2/3 in EPL for group ECL seat, finishing 4th for ECL playoff game) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: PathFinder on May 16, 2016, 09:58:06 AM just had jerry fletcher on the old dog and bone, it was hard to make out what he was saying at first as he had the signal bouncing off about 200 satellites so the call wasn't traceable. his theory on the whole matter was LVG was behind the whole lets get the match delayed. find out how man city got onif they had lost he can then play his full team in the rematch to get the ECL spot locked down, if man city got anything its rest the first team for the rematch so they are fresh for the FA cup final man city got a point utd now cant get ECL next season so its rest up for the final and 4th prize (after winning EPL, finishing 2/3 in EPL for group ECL seat, finishing 4th for ECL playoff game) rotflmfao rotflmfao rotflmfao Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 17, 2016, 08:13:21 PM Nothing to play for and an FA cup final in 4 days and LVG goes for the strongest team possible. What could go wrong?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 17, 2016, 08:16:13 PM Nothing to play for and an FA cup final in 4 days and LVG goes for the strongest team possible. What could go wrong? Shackles off and aim for a 19 goal margin? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on May 17, 2016, 08:18:35 PM Nothing to play for and an FA cup final in 4 days and LVG goes for the strongest team possible. What could go wrong? Shackles off and aim for a 19 goal margin? That and the 10% of my FF action that I offered LVG to play Martial and Valencia. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 17, 2016, 08:21:04 PM Nothing to play for and an FA cup final in 4 days and LVG goes for the strongest team possible. What could go wrong? Shackles off and aim for a 19 goal margin? "Shackles off" for LVG means we can pass it sideways rather than backwards. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on May 17, 2016, 08:24:45 PM Is a winning margin of >19 goals a bigger price than 5000/1?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 17, 2016, 08:28:43 PM 2500-1 apparently
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 17, 2016, 08:31:04 PM 2500-1 apparently Is it really twice as likely to happen as Leicester winning the league? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 17, 2016, 08:32:39 PM 250000/1 would be short imo
(http://i.imgur.com/2tQrKI2.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 17, 2016, 08:46:01 PM Philosophy.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 17, 2016, 09:23:15 PM There's a wonderful expression in poker that may have escaped you Mr Consonants, Get It Quiet.
Philosophy. I've heard a few rumours that the land opposite Everards is going to be an Ikea. Sick of seeing the horses on that land struggling to stand on a dry surface. Can't see it being there tbh, Stay put and rebuild onto what you have.Or wait for Leicester to host the Commonwealth Games and get a good deal on the stadium... :) Enjoy the Europa League. Again. The only thing worse than a bad loser is a bad winner. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 17, 2016, 09:31:10 PM There's a wonderful expression in poker that may have escaped you Mr Consonants, Get It Quiet. Philosophy. I've heard a few rumours that the land opposite Everards is going to be an Ikea. Sick of seeing the horses on that land struggling to stand on a dry surface. Can't see it being there tbh, Stay put and rebuild onto what you have.Or wait for Leicester to host the Commonwealth Games and get a good deal on the stadium... :) Enjoy the Europa League. Again. The only thing worse than a bad loser is a bad winner. I deduce you aren't looking forward to another season in the Europa League? ;) Some random Latvian minnows will probably do us in the qualifier, so see you in it. Great away days in that comp. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Ironside on May 17, 2016, 09:58:25 PM There's a wonderful expression in poker that may have escaped you Mr Consonants, Get It Quiet. Philosophy. I've heard a few rumours that the land opposite Everards is going to be an Ikea. Sick of seeing the horses on that land struggling to stand on a dry surface. Can't see it being there tbh, Stay put and rebuild onto what you have.Or wait for Leicester to host the Commonwealth Games and get a good deal on the stadium... :) Enjoy the Europa League. Again. The only thing worse than a bad loser is a bad winner. I deduce you aren't looking forward to another season in the Europa League? ;) Some random Latvian minnows will probably do us in the qualifier, so see you in it. Great away days in that comp. you will be playing a team from a bigger nation than lativa in the seeded draw due to the fact you will be playing another nation who has someone already into the main draw which lativa doesnt Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 17, 2016, 11:21:20 PM There's a wonderful expression in poker that may have escaped you Mr Consonants, Get It Quiet. Philosophy. I've heard a few rumours that the land opposite Everards is going to be an Ikea. Sick of seeing the horses on that land struggling to stand on a dry surface. Can't see it being there tbh, Stay put and rebuild onto what you have.Or wait for Leicester to host the Commonwealth Games and get a good deal on the stadium... :) Enjoy the Europa League. Again. The only thing worse than a bad loser is a bad winner. I deduce you aren't looking forward to another season in the Europa League? ;) Some random Latvian minnows will probably do us in the qualifier, so see you in it. Great away days in that comp. you will be playing a team from a bigger nation than lativa in the seeded draw due to the fact you will be playing another nation who has someone already into the main draw which lativa doesnt Yeah was being tongue in cheek :) I've seen the list of potentials and there are some tricky ties there. Do Saints make it if united win the cup on Saturday? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: RickBFA on May 21, 2016, 08:35:28 PM Is Clattenberg a Man Utd fan?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 21, 2016, 09:23:22 PM Boom! Thought United played really well today altho still no cutting edge in the final third. Rooney was immense
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Tal on May 21, 2016, 09:23:55 PM Boom! Thought United played really well today altho still no cutting edge in the final third. Rooney was immense Where will Mourinho play him? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 21, 2016, 09:27:17 PM Really interesting times if the special one joins us. Today might've earnt LVG yet another reprieve
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Tal on May 21, 2016, 10:25:51 PM Really interesting times if the special one joins us. Today might've earnt LVG yet another reprieve I'd be amazed if this changes things in any way. But then I was convinced this morning LvG was staying. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 21, 2016, 11:21:24 PM BBC reporting deal is done.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: pleno1 on May 21, 2016, 11:40:02 PM where did rooney play? cm? what did he do good/bad?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 21, 2016, 11:44:52 PM Like old times this afternoon. Give our opponents a goal start and equalise, then get someone sent off and finally score a spectacular winner. Only a penalty save missing.
Now we're apparently getting Mourinho, which doesn't fill me with any sense of excitement or enthusiasm. I just don't see how he fits in, his instincts are more tactical and more pragmatic than van Gaal's, his wasting of young players during his spells at Chelsea has been criminal. No doubt he'll nip out and buy a few more £50M players and in a season or so Rashford and Lingard will be playing for Crystal Palace or Sporting Antwerp. I hope I'm wrong. I wanted Moyes and that didn't work out too well so maybe I am. Maybe Jose will breeze in and just set everyone's pulses racing as he returns United to their traditional ways. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 21, 2016, 11:47:15 PM where did rooney play? cm? what did he do good/bad? CM - provided a fulcrum and impetus for pretty much every attack. Martin Keown likened him to Scholes after one pinged 50yd diagonal, OTT maybe, but was sincere. Made a good intervention in our area too when Zaha was through. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: 77dave on May 21, 2016, 11:52:45 PM How long till Mata gets moved on this time?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: Ironside on May 22, 2016, 01:13:19 PM There's a wonderful expression in poker that may have escaped you Mr Consonants, Get It Quiet. Philosophy. I've heard a few rumours that the land opposite Everards is going to be an Ikea. Sick of seeing the horses on that land struggling to stand on a dry surface. Can't see it being there tbh, Stay put and rebuild onto what you have.Or wait for Leicester to host the Commonwealth Games and get a good deal on the stadium... :) Enjoy the Europa League. Again. The only thing worse than a bad loser is a bad winner. I deduce you aren't looking forward to another season in the Europa League? ;) Some random Latvian minnows will probably do us in the qualifier, so see you in it. Great away days in that comp. you will be playing a team from a bigger nation than lativa in the seeded draw due to the fact you will be playing another nation who has someone already into the main draw which lativa doesnt Yeah was being tongue in cheek :) I've seen the list of potentials and there are some tricky ties there. Do Saints make it if united win the cup on Saturday? yeah Man U winning got us into the group stages we would have had to have 2 play off rounds to qualify if palace won the cup Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 23, 2016, 01:23:57 PM Assuming that everything now pans out as per the TV/Radio/Papers predict I think we're going to need at least one very inserted in the thread title.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 23, 2016, 01:25:24 PM How not to manage a team. Any team.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjId5NnWgAA6frq.jpg) the players have begun to spill the beans already https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2016/may/22/louis-van-gaal-manchester-united-players-near-mutiny Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 23, 2016, 01:26:18 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjEpMznWEAAtJyQ.jpg)
Title: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on May 23, 2016, 01:26:38 PM Assuming that everything now pans out as per the TV/Radio/Papers predict I think we're going to need at least one very inserted in the thread title. We can give you one of the no longer needed "sad"s from the Arsenal thread if you wish? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on May 23, 2016, 01:36:16 PM Assuming that everything now pans out as per the TV/Radio/Papers predict I think we're going to need at least one very inserted in the thread title. We can give you one of the no longer needed "sad"s from the Arsenal thread if you wish? I'd keep it for the Man City thread ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: PathFinder on May 23, 2016, 04:05:29 PM How not to manage a team. Any team. (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjId5NnWgAA6frq.jpg) To me it shows a lack of professionalism from the players than bad management. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 23, 2016, 04:11:53 PM Assuming that everything now pans out as per the TV/Radio/Papers predict I think we're going to need at least one very inserted in the thread title. We can give you one of the no longer needed "sad"s from the Arsenal thread if you wish? Maybe we could borrow it for a while? I think they'll need it back around January. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on May 23, 2016, 04:24:41 PM How not to manage a team. Any team. (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjId5NnWgAA6frq.jpg) the players have begun to spill the beans already https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2016/may/22/louis-van-gaal-manchester-united-players-near-mutiny Total unprofessional and spoiled. £200k per week? Stop behaving like a f*cking child and open the email from your boss. You might even learn something which makes you improve. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 05:24:32 PM LVG is a dinosuar. That's not how to lead a team today.
V excited by Jose's appointment. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on May 23, 2016, 07:13:03 PM I'm fairly surprised a top club would employ him after Jose's behaviour last season.
Especially in England after his toe-curlingly embarassing antics. Hopefully there will be more of the same ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 08:32:25 PM He's a winner unlike certain specialists in failure
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: The Camel on May 23, 2016, 08:36:48 PM I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them.
They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 23, 2016, 08:39:21 PM Thought united weren't a sacking club? That's not the united way is it?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 23, 2016, 08:42:48 PM Is there a more perfect match in football than united and mourinho?
Beyond perfect for each other. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 23, 2016, 09:18:38 PM I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them. They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them. They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. I understand your sentiments entirely Mr Hawkins. I have loved Manchester United since 1963 and so much that you have admired kept me attached even through the McGuiness, Sexton, Docherty, Atkinson years. SAF had his faults, lots of them, but he held to the United philosophy, reshaped and improved it. I can't say I'm happy that Mourinho is incoming, I'm very very definitely not excited about it. I fear for the future of Lingard and Rashford, of Foshu-Mensah, Borthwick-Jackson, Blackett, Riley, Keane, Weir, Perera, all no doubt to be seen in the teams of Watford, Antwerp, Hull, Middlesbrough and all points North, South East and West. I fear for the style of play we lost a few seasons ago. Mourinho's coach won't get stuck in traffic, it will be parked across the edge of the area. I fear for the finances of the club. We've effectively just burnt £250Mill and now we're set to burn the same again? I may just start supporting Salford City, or FC United, or maybe Darlington. I hope I'm wrong about this, I hope Mourinho is a changed man and is coming in to pick up where SAF left off. A class of 17 team that sweeps all before it. I would be Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 23, 2016, 09:25:22 PM Thought united weren't a sacking club? That's not the united way is it? We've had three permanent managers in the last 30 years which is less than Watford have had this season, and less than Man City have had since the petro-dollars moved in, let alone the 17 that SAF saw off. What's your point? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 09:27:48 PM The reason Mourinho has been so successful is the players can relate to him,gone are the days a manager can rule with fear etc....
These players now are multi-millionaires with agents running their lives like a corporate business they don't want or have to be treated like children and Mourinho understands this he lives a similar lifestyle to these players ,likes nice things etc... If Brian Clough walked in wearing a stained green sweatshirt and started ranting and sending them for runs through stinging nettles ,how long do you think it would take for the players to get rid of him Time has moved on and Mourinho is the best manager for modern day football Ps . Not a Man Utd fan Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 09:28:33 PM Makes me laugh. Like he isn't going to play a young player if he isn't good enough.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 09:31:07 PM I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them. They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. Anything is a step up from LVG. We will play more attractive footie then the snoozefest we've had to endure this year Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 09:32:29 PM Thought united weren't a sacking club? That's not the united way is it? Whatever happens you wouldn't see the shameful behaviour like the City fans walking out on Pello the last game of the season. It's ironic that United fans get tagged as plastic when you see the behaviour on the other side of the City Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 23, 2016, 09:33:46 PM I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them. They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. Anything is a step up from LVG. We will play more attractive footie then the snoozefest we've had to endure this year Yeah, Mourinho is renowned for his attractive attacking football. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 09:35:49 PM I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them. They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. Anything is a step up from LVG. We will play more attractive footie then the snoozefest we've had to endure this year Yeah, Mourinho is renowned for his attractive attacking football. Didn't say that but we will have more of a cutting edge than under LVG Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 23, 2016, 09:39:34 PM When has Jose ever over achieved relative to the wage bill he has had at his disposal since Porto? Obviously successful at winning trophies but i don't have him as this modern day manager genius so many do.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 09:41:39 PM He' s arguably the best manager in the world so him being at the biggest clubs with the biggest wage bills is hardly a surprise
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 23, 2016, 09:44:07 PM Thought united weren't a sacking club? That's not the united way is it? Whatever happens you wouldn't see the shameful behaviour like the City fans walking out on Pello the last game of the season. It's ironic that United fans get tagged as plastic when you see the behaviour on the other side of the City lol there are plenty of things in football that are shameful. Some fans choosing not to hang around to send off a manager who divided opinion isn't one of them. We go to games, we pay the money and can decided accordingly (I stayed fwiw) Enjoy 3 years under Jose, something tells me you won't. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 09:44:40 PM When has Jose ever over achieved relative to the wage bill he has had at his disposal since Porto? Obviously successful at winning trophies but i don't have him as this modern day manager genius so many do. Think if anything United's tale shows how important the manager is. He has won trophies wherever he has gone and that includes Porto and Inter where he wasn't at super strong clubs. Aside from selling KDB I can't remember him making a huge mistake in the transfer market either. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 23, 2016, 09:44:50 PM He' s arguably the best manager in the world so him being at the biggest clubs with the biggest wage bills is hardly a surprise Why is he? Expand please. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 23, 2016, 09:46:23 PM When has Jose ever over achieved relative to the wage bill he has had at his disposal since Porto? Obviously successful at winning trophies but i don't have him as this modern day manager genius so many do. Think if anything United's tale shows how important the manager is. He has won trophies wherever he has gone and that includes Porto and Inter where he wasn't at super strong clubs. Aside from selling KDB I can't remember him making a huge mistake in the transfer market either. Romelu Lukaku? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 09:47:54 PM Lukaku isn't top grade or consistent enough. Agree partly tho because he would be ideal to deputise for Costa.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 23, 2016, 09:51:12 PM Lukaku isn't top grade or consistent enough. Agree partly tho because he would be ideal to deputise for Costa. lolzzzzzzzzzzzzz rumoured to be on the block for circa £60m this summer. Average service at Everton and scores for fun in a shit team. He would have started every game for Chelski last season without a shadow of doubt. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 09:55:04 PM He' s arguably the best manager in the world so him being at the biggest clubs with the biggest wage bills is hardly a surprise Why is he? Expand please. You don't think it is possible that he is "arguably the best manager in the world" I don't have a list but he has had success of some degree at every club he has managed And a huge wage bill is not a guarantee of success as many mangers have proved I think managing the highest profile players must have its own distinct issues and it could be argued that managing poorer players would be easier,ie. More room for improvement ,less egos etc.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 23, 2016, 09:55:48 PM Lukaku isn't top grade or consistent enough. Agree partly tho because he would be ideal to deputise for Costa. lolzzzzzzzzzzzzz rumoured to be on the block for circa £60m this summer. Average service at Everton and scores for fun in a shit team. He would have started every game for Chelski last season without a shadow of doubt. Yep would deffo have him ahead of Costa all day long. Will score (even) more in the right team with better players behind him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 23, 2016, 09:57:56 PM He' s arguably the best manager in the world so him being at the biggest clubs with the biggest wage bills is hardly a surprise Why is he? Expand please. You don't think it is possible that he is "arguably the best manager in the world" I don't have a list but he has had success of some degree at every club he has managed And a huge wage bill is not a guarantee of success as many mangers have proved I think managing the highest profile players must have its own distinct issues and it could be argued that managing poorer players would be easier,ie. More room for improvement ,less egos etc.... No manager in that level of praise with a wage bill he had last year would have had struggled the way he did. He doesn't over achieve generally with the money he spends. The years he is 'successful' he does pretty much what he should with the insane amount of cash he spends. The years he doesn't he looks bang average to me. Truely great managers develop players and give youth a chance as well not just rely on the chequebook year after year. Correlation between wage bill and success is massively strong generally. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 10:02:41 PM So you can't compare other managers with a high wage bill because they don't get as much praise???!
Do you not think attracting the top(highest paid) players to your club is a management skill? Or do all players just take the highest wage offer? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 10:03:26 PM BTW no one is offering or buying Lukaku for £65mill
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 23, 2016, 10:04:51 PM So you can't compare other managers with a high wage bill because they don't get as much praise???! Do you not think attracting the top(highest paid) players to your club is a management skill? Or do all players just take the highest wage offer? The two biggest factors in signing a player in most cases nowadays imo are the ability to offer champions league football and the level of salary/contract. The gaffer is way down the list of most players imo. You think Sterling signed for City for £180k a week or the gaffer who is no longer there? Do me a favour. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 10:05:13 PM He' s arguably the best manager in the world so him being at the biggest clubs with the biggest wage bills is hardly a surprise Why is he? Expand please. You don't think it is possible that he is "arguably the best manager in the world" I don't have a list but he has had success of some degree at every club he has managed And a huge wage bill is not a guarantee of success as many mangers have proved I think managing the highest profile players must have its own distinct issues and it could be argued that managing poorer players would be easier,ie. More room for improvement ,less egos etc.... No manager in that level of praise with a wage bill he had last year would have had struggled the way he did. He doesn't over achieve generally with the money he spends. The years he is 'successful' he does pretty much what he should with the insane amount of cash he spends. The years he doesn't he looks bang average to me. Truely great managers develop players and give youth a chance as well not just rely on the chequebook year after year. Correlation between wage bill and success is massively strong generally. This is all well and good but someone saying he is arguably the best coach in the world isn't a stretch. If it's so easy why does the manager matter at all? Just give me a massive wage bill and pay me 10 times less. Also your splitting hairs with the transfer market argument. Again he has a pretty decent record of signing players and selling those for a pretty decent wedge Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 10:05:47 PM BTW no one is offering or buying Lukaku for £65mill Arrboy is Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 23, 2016, 10:06:44 PM Where has £65m come from?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 10:08:16 PM Where has £65m come from? Circa 60 guess he's taken that as 65 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 10:09:09 PM I think if I'm one of the top players in the world with a choice of clubs how the manager impresses me or lays out his plans for me would definitely play some part in my decision
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 10:10:20 PM The rumour I saw was £65 mil I just guessed you had mis read :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 10:10:54 PM So you can't compare other managers with a high wage bill because they don't get as much praise???! Do you not think attracting the top(highest paid) players to your club is a management skill? Or do all players just take the highest wage offer? The two biggest factors in signing a player in most cases nowadays imo are the ability to offer champions league football and the level of salary/contract. The gaffer is way down the list of most players imo. You think Sterling signed for City for £180k a week or the gaffer who is no longer there? Do me a favour. Your plucking out singular examples to prove your point. Jose and United will still be able to attract a decent calibre of player albeit it'll be tougher next year without CL footie. Be interesting to see if we can get Zlatan despite not being in the CL Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 10:12:52 PM Maybe Sterling knew his limitations and thought it best to take the highest offer ;)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 23, 2016, 10:13:47 PM I think if I'm one of the top players in the world with a choice of clubs how the manager impresses me or lays out his plans for me would definitely play some part in my decision You work for ABC taxis stuck in a shit Ford Sierra all day on £250 a week great general manager looks after you, gives you a great vision for the future of the business and how big a part you will play in it (which you don't own a share in so will never benefit long term from the graft you put in) and tells you how successful the company will become. XYZ cars down the road has a wanker of a gaffer who has no vision of the future at all and couldn't care less about how you fit into the plans of the future of the company but gives you a Merc S class to drive around in all week and £1200 a week. Bit like when Sterling moved from Lolapool to Man City right? Which one is 99% of taxi drivers choosing? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 23, 2016, 10:14:21 PM So you can't compare other managers with a high wage bill because they don't get as much praise???! Do you not think attracting the top(highest paid) players to your club is a management skill? Or do all players just take the highest wage offer? The two biggest factors in signing a player in most cases nowadays imo are the ability to offer champions league football and the level of salary/contract. The gaffer is way down the list of most players imo. You think Sterling signed for City for £180k a week or the gaffer who is no longer there? Do me a favour. Your plucking out singular examples to prove your point. Jose and United will still be able to attract a decent calibre of player albeit it'll be tougher next year without CL footie. Be interesting to see if we can get Zlatan despite not being in the CL Zlatan will go where he makes the most money. He is a brand/business. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 10:14:28 PM Or maybe ,just maybe better managers knew his limitations and didn't offer as much or anything?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 10:15:21 PM Your analogies don't work because United will still be offering a decent wage just not the nicest routes
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 10:17:33 PM 99% of taxi drivers are not that comparable to 20 year old footballers who have no idea how much money they have in the bank and are not that bothered as there always seems to be enough
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 23, 2016, 10:18:25 PM 99% of taxi drivers are not that comparable to 20 year old footballers who have no idea how much money they have in the bank and are not that bothered as there always seems to be enough Most 20 year old footballers don't make any decisions their agents do. They just turn up to training every day and play and do what they are told. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 23, 2016, 10:21:55 PM How many 20yr old footballers do you know that live like that?
I realise that is the common perception but do we know any that live that way for sure? They will have good friends and family who care about them who would advise them against this wouldn't they? Or are they all amune to that? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 23, 2016, 10:37:27 PM Makes me laugh. Like he isn't going to play a young player if he isn't good enough. Of course he isn't going to play a young player if he isn't good enough, the trouble is that he has no pedigree in either identifying when a young player is good enough, nor in giving them their chance How many under 21s have played in Mourinho teams? Have a look at the wiki page for Mourinho's last full season at Chelsea, specifically have a look at how many Chelsea Academy players made an appearance (other than JT), and look at the loans as reported there, and here As of January Chelsea had 28 players out on loan, most of them were Mourinho era loans. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/01/29/where-are-chelseas-28-on-loan-players1/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: The Camel on May 23, 2016, 10:53:18 PM Makes me laugh. Like he isn't going to play a young player if he isn't good enough. Of course he isn't going to play a young player if he isn't good enough, the trouble is that he has no pedigree in either identifying when a young player is good enough, nor in giving them their chance How many under 21s have played in Mourinho teams? Have a look at the wiki page for Mourinho's last full season at Chelsea, specifically have a look at how many Chelsea Academy players made an appearance (other than JT), and look at the loans as reported there, and here As of January Chelsea had 28 players out on loan, most of them were Mourinho era loans. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/01/29/where-are-chelseas-28-on-loan-players1/ Last year I said Delph would hardly get a game for City, look what happened. Now I will say Rashford, Lingaard and Januzaj won't get more than 20 games COMBINED in the Premier League. I reckon the first two will be shipped out on loan and Adnan will be sold. (And JT doesn't count for Chelsea youngsters who played for Jose, as he was already an international when Mourinho arrived) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: nirvana on May 23, 2016, 10:56:59 PM I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them. They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. True dat Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 11:00:46 PM Good cos Lingaard isn't good enough.
Rashford wouldn't have played had Rooney not got injured. His time will come. Adnan might actually get more of a look in if Jose ships out Mata Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 11:03:40 PM I must be missing this long line of Chelsea talent that has thrived since Jose left and been nurtured by all the subsequent managers been and gone.
City and Chelsea are very much clubs who have been built by billionaires. Not exactly the best environment for younger players to survive. We either move with the times or become Liverpool (if we haven't already done so) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: dino1980 on May 23, 2016, 11:19:53 PM I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them. They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. Anything is a step up from LVG. We will play more attractive footie then the snoozefest we've had to endure this year Yeah, Mourinho is renowned for his attractive attacking football. Not a United fan, but Mourinho's rep as a defensive coach is a bit unfounded IMO and comes from the big games where he's more cautious. His Madrid team outscored Barca in two of the three La Liga campaigns under Mourinho. His last Chelsea title winning team were the second top scorers in the league in 14-15 (behind Man City) they might have one-niled their way to the title but averaged over two goals per game during the first half of the season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: The Camel on May 23, 2016, 11:24:33 PM I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them. They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. Anything is a step up from LVG. We will play more attractive footie then the snoozefest we've had to endure this year Yeah, Mourinho is renowned for his attractive attacking football. Not a United fan, but Mourinho's rep as a defensive coach is a bit unfounded IMO and comes from the big games where he's more cautious. His Madrid team outscored Barca in two of the three La Liga campaigns under Mourinho. His last Chelsea title winning team were the second top scorers in the league in 14-15 (behind Man City) they might have one-niled their way to the title but averaged over two goals per game during the first half of the season. Put simply, Chelsea's success under Mourinho was due to lumping it up to a big, combative striker (Drogba or Costa) who either held it up and waited for support or knocked it down for a midfielder to pick up the pieces. They definitely had skilful players, but they were not allowed to express themselves fully. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 23, 2016, 11:24:42 PM Each team now has an elite coach in Klopp, Jose and Pep along with Poch at Spurs.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: dino1980 on May 23, 2016, 11:27:23 PM When has Jose ever over achieved relative to the wage bill he has had at his disposal since Porto? Obviously successful at winning trophies but i don't have him as this modern day manager genius so many do. Think if anything United's tale shows how important the manager is. He has won trophies wherever he has gone and that includes Porto and Inter where he wasn't at super strong clubs. Aside from selling KDB I can't remember him making a huge mistake in the transfer market either. Falcao! Think one of the big dangers of Mourinho is Jorge Mendes. If he gets his tentacles into the club then they'll still be there long after Mourinho if he does his usual three years. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 23, 2016, 11:47:46 PM I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them. They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. Anything is a step up from LVG. We will play more attractive footie then the snoozefest we've had to endure this year Yeah, Mourinho is renowned for his attractive attacking football. Not a United fan, but Mourinho's rep as a defensive coach is a bit unfounded IMO and comes from the big games where he's more cautious. His Madrid team outscored Barca in two of the three La Liga campaigns under Mourinho. His last Chelsea title winning team were the second top scorers in the league in 14-15 (behind Man City) they might have one-niled their way to the title but averaged over two goals per game during the first half of the season. He'd have been crucified if he didn't score goals as Madrid manager. Not exactly tough to score for fun in that league with the wealth of talent they had/have. His brand of football is pretty dour, only slightly less dour than LVG. I'm sure he'll try and park the bus to the title, don't think its gonna work though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Longines on May 23, 2016, 11:53:53 PM Each team now has an elite coach in Klopp, Jose and Pep along with Poch at Spurs. Trolling ftw. Missing out Ranieri is just taking the piss. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: The Camel on May 23, 2016, 11:59:41 PM Just like Arsenal, Man United have missed out on their perfect manager.
(http://e1.365dm.com/16/02/16-9/20/jurgen-klopp-liverpool-thumbs-up_3412823.jpg?20160208152020) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: dino1980 on May 24, 2016, 12:51:34 AM I don't like Manchester United much, but I've always sneakingly admired them. They've always played exciting attractive football, with players like Best, Cantona, Giggs, Scholes and Charlton. They've always given young, homegrown players a chance to shine. This will all stop now they've employed Jose. I can stop admiring Man Utd now. Anything is a step up from LVG. We will play more attractive footie then the snoozefest we've had to endure this year Yeah, Mourinho is renowned for his attractive attacking football. Not a United fan, but Mourinho's rep as a defensive coach is a bit unfounded IMO and comes from the big games where he's more cautious. His Madrid team outscored Barca in two of the three La Liga campaigns under Mourinho. His last Chelsea title winning team were the second top scorers in the league in 14-15 (behind Man City) they might have one-niled their way to the title but averaged over two goals per game during the first half of the season. He'd have been crucified if he didn't score goals as Madrid manager. Not exactly tough to score for fun in that league with the wealth of talent they had/have. His brand of football is pretty dour, only slightly less dour than LVG. I'm sure he'll try and park the bus to the title, don't think its gonna work though. Of course, and having the shot monster that is Ronaldo in his prime undoubtedly helped, but whichever way you slice it they outscored Barcelona. The tiki-taka titans of attacking football. His brand of football really isn't dour, we just remember the big games where he parks the bus. Michael Cox, who I'd wager has seen far more Mourinho games than you or I, wrote this excellent article on that a couple of days ago: https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2016/may/22/jose-mourinho-manchester-united-old-trafford Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: 77dave on May 24, 2016, 03:10:18 AM How many of the FA cup final team will play on the first game of next season.
LVG spent a lot of money. I'm not sure if any of his signings have increased in value. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on May 24, 2016, 03:19:45 AM How many of the FA cup final team will play on the first game of next season. LVG spent a lot of money. I'm not sure if any of his signings have increased in value. No idea. Think that LVG & Moyes just sprayed dough about for the sake of it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: marcro on May 24, 2016, 09:42:46 AM Why is Woodward still there? Surely he should be sacked?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on May 24, 2016, 01:21:12 PM Sme food for thought here:
www.just-football.com/2016/05/manchester-uniteds-treatment-louis-va Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 24, 2016, 05:18:38 PM Sme food for thought here: www.just-football.com/2016/05/manchester-uniteds-treatment-louis-va Van Gaal's treatment has been poor, no question. Had he earned another season? No, not for me. Had he earned the right to leave with dignity and some warm applause for having unearthed some stars (albeit accidentally)? Absolutely. . Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 24, 2016, 05:26:49 PM Why is Woodward still there? Surely he should be sacked? Incredible he is still there imo. He is a marketing guy pretending to be a CEO and have been given the reins for the top job because he has built the marketing side of the business so well. Never understand how that then qualifies you to be the CEO. Skill sets needed are totally different for the roles. As with most football related decisions though it is totally results orientated and 'he deserves the job' blah blah blah. Hardly a tough job turning Man U into a marketing /branding giant is it? They got a pretty good head start on most rivals in that department just with the fan base. Like putting the head of a betting firm call centre in charge of the trading operation. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 26, 2016, 07:29:39 AM Football eh? Bloody hell!
Negotiations over Jose Mourinho's image rights are delaying him becoming the new Manchester United manager. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36382637 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 27, 2016, 11:20:08 AM modern football
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjaYM2OXEAAS9cN.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 27, 2016, 12:16:50 PM Unemployed EU Migrant gets top job
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjcyrmfVEAA2a4g.jpg:large) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 27, 2016, 01:37:25 PM Bleugh, feels so dirty
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on May 27, 2016, 02:53:39 PM As a neutral, I'm pretty excited by all this.
Hope it works out for you boys. Things won't be the same, that's for sure. Not sure what to make of the old fella - Zlatan - but he's certainly got that Cantona arrogance, & he's deffo Box Office. I much enjoy watching Martial, too, & I still think Rooney has plenty to offer in midfield. For all the stick he got this season, one thing is for sure - he really works hard, & gives his all. Not all of the current team can say that. The matches with City, Liverpool, Chelsea & Arsenal will be pretty interesting, too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 27, 2016, 05:04:28 PM Pretty torn on Zlatan. He's a winner and just coming off his best season ever. Free as well. Loves Mourinho to bits and will be a huge presence in the dressing room, great for Martial/Rashford. However Mourinho always plays with a 1 striker system. This means will be need good service to him, which isn't the case atm. And also that it will limit the amount of minutes Rashford/Martial get up top.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 05:47:24 PM I've always admired Jose. Thought he should've been the easy choice after Fergie but I think I've said before perhaps he's picked a better time.
Super excited- feels like we may genuinely challenge BUT again that's probably getting carried away. City and Chelsea are gonna be stronger for sure. For me I'd love Zlatan to join. Would send a message and I think he would do really well in the Prem. Exciting times! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 27, 2016, 06:00:00 PM Ignoring Zlatan for a moment
who are the striker options in the current squad behind Martial (who LVG liked to play wide but Jose might not?) and Rashford? Wilson? who else? -- Surely a manager like Jose could set up in a way to incorporate at least two of Zlatan (who i know is 35 but is still going to be levels above many PL defenders ), Martial and Rashford and the combination with Rooney in behind prompting would be a huge threat? -- watching as a neutral last season i thought that the developent of the attacking play was very slow. If they set up to transition quicker and play at pace, with the options they have i think it could be a much more exciting season -- presumably De Gea stays for Jose too? -- thanks Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 06:12:04 PM Striking options are definitely limited. Would like to see Zlatan join and maybe a marquee signing up front but no one springs to mind. I know Marota has been linked.
The tempo was Deffo an issue. I have never been so bored and u inspired watching a United side. The style of play isn't effective anymore with high press tactics used by teams. I think if Real want him he will go which will obviously be a massive loss Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on May 27, 2016, 06:22:09 PM Be great if De Gea stays, God knows how many points he was worth to you this season. However, if he goes, who would his likely replacement be? Name three likely options. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on May 27, 2016, 06:24:42 PM Schmichael? :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on May 27, 2016, 06:26:53 PM If Jose behaves like he did in the season just finished how long will he last at untied?
I mean will the yanks be more tolerant of boorish and embarrassing behaviour or will he be given short shrift if he acts up again like he did on numerous occasions last season? Could there even be a clause in his contract to cover such eventualities? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: exstream on May 27, 2016, 06:35:58 PM Navas comes if de gea goes right?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 06:36:45 PM If Jose behaves like he did in the season just finished how long will he last at untied? I mean will the yanks be more tolerant of boorish and embarrassing behaviour or will he be given short shrift if he acts up again like he did on numerous occasions last season? Could there even be a clause in his contract to cover such eventualities? I don't think we will see that behaviour next year. Maybe year 3? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 06:37:34 PM Be great if De Gea stays, God knows how many points he was worth to you this season. However, if he goes, who would his likely replacement be? Name three likely options. Would like to see Lloris but very doubtful. Again no one springs to mind maybe go abroad for a keeper. Or maybe get Navas as part of the deal again Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: dino1980 on May 27, 2016, 09:07:04 PM What about Joe Hart if he became available? Rumours are Pep wants a sweeper keeper who's good with the ball at his feet & thus isn't keen on Hart.
As an aside whilst I think Utd and Chelsea will improve this coming season I don't think either team will finish in the top four. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 09:21:09 PM What about Joe Hart if he became available? Rumours are Pep wants a sweeper keeper who's good with the ball at his feet & thus isn't keen on Hart. As an aside whilst I think Utd and Chelsea will improve this coming season I don't think either team will finish in the top four. Pretty bold statement. Think they both will Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 09:22:48 PM Also very doubtful Hart would come to us. I do think he's a quality keeper
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 27, 2016, 09:39:37 PM What about Joe Hart if he became available? Rumours are Pep wants a sweeper keeper who's good with the ball at his feet & thus isn't keen on Hart. As an aside whilst I think Utd and Chelsea will improve this coming season I don't think either team will finish in the top four. Who's your top 4? Think De Gea will stay. Navas has been great (by all accounts) this season. Zidane really likes him and keeper isn't really the marquee signing they go for, especially as he's going to cost them a fair whack. Especially true if they win the CL. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: exstream on May 27, 2016, 09:49:19 PM What about Joe Hart if he became available? Rumours are Pep wants a sweeper keeper who's good with the ball at his feet & thus isn't keen on Hart. As an aside whilst I think Utd and Chelsea will improve this coming season I don't think either team will finish in the top four. Are Man U improving on fifth? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 09:59:47 PM Maybe being a bit ballsy saying they both will. Think top 4 will be 4 of 6:
Man City Man Utd Liverpool Chelsea Arsenal Spurs Obviously way too early to say without summer business being done. And ofc after this year who knows?? Think city will win it but I do think city United Liverpool and chelsea have 4 outstanding managers Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: dino1980 on May 27, 2016, 10:07:48 PM I think the top three, in no particular order, will be City, Arsenal & Spurs. As things stand today I'd have Liverpool as favourites for fourth, lack of European football etc.
Fwiw I think United are way ahead of Chelsea, IMO their problems run deeper than last season and I think they lack depth to their squad, their transfer dealings last season were bizarre to say the least. Of course they too have no European football and will add quality in the summer. Lots will obviously happen between now and the first game of the season and United will undoubtedly add some quality to their squad. Liverpool will too obv but, without stating the obvious, to my mind their top four prospects rely more on keeping Sturridge and Coutinho fit than who they bring in. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 27, 2016, 10:16:13 PM Heard they might sign Saul Niguez who is absolute top quality
If they got him Ibra,as expected and Manolas they will not be far away Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 10:16:46 PM Arsenal top 3 seems ambitious
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: dino1980 on May 27, 2016, 10:19:15 PM What about Joe Hart if he became available? Rumours are Pep wants a sweeper keeper who's good with the ball at his feet & thus isn't keen on Hart. As an aside whilst I think Utd and Chelsea will improve this coming season I don't think either team will finish in the top four. Are Man U improving on fifth? They won't improve their position in the table (if I'm right) but they'll definitely be in a better place than they were under LVG. Spurs got fewer points this season than when they finished fifth in 2012/13 and only one more than they managed in 11/12 (4th) & 13/14 (6th) yet Spurs were arguably the best or second best team for large portions of last season and are a young tea, which should only get better. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 27, 2016, 10:27:26 PM Really don't see Spurs improving on this term, Kane over performed and everyone else challenging will be spending big this summer which they probably won't with the new stadium build etc
Man City need the most change with so many of their main players at the end of their time Chelsea's new manager totally untested in PL likely to lose some good players (Costa) Arsenal are just Arsenal More I think about it Man Utd are well placed to challenge if not win it Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: DaveShoelace on May 27, 2016, 10:31:19 PM Remarkable how quick we have all written off Leicester.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 27, 2016, 10:32:04 PM Remarkable how quick we have all written off Leicester. Yeah true , really don't know if they can go again especially juggling CL , a CB partnership most thought was past it 4 years ago, v interested to see if Mahrez , Kante stay ... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 27, 2016, 10:32:36 PM Remarkable how quick we have all written off Leicester. . We are winning the champions league. Other prioritiesTitle: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: exstream on May 27, 2016, 10:33:22 PM Really don't see Spurs improving on this term, Kane over performed and everyone else challenging will be spending big this summer which they probably won't with the new stadium build etc Man City need the most change with so many of their main players at the end of their time Chelsea's new manager totally untested in PL likely to lose some good players (Costa) Arsenal are just Arsenal More I think about it Man Utd are well placed to challenge if not win it Over performed? 20+ goal a season striker last 2 seasons since becoming a regular, as the starting striker for Spurs, can't see that changing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 27, 2016, 10:38:47 PM Lol at Hart ever signing for your lot.
You might be able to tempt Big Willy though, which is kinda ironic seeing as you've just hired a massive cock. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 10:40:14 PM Think it's too early to make predictions. Summer signings are pretty key
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 27, 2016, 10:41:29 PM Just my opinion , I actually don't think he is as good as many do particularly his team play ,takes shots when he shouldn't far to often
But I rate Ibrahimovic and all I hear is that he is past it and nearly a goal a game this season in the French league is equivalent to scoring regularly for Forest Green Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 27, 2016, 10:42:41 PM Yeah agree really George ,massive summer for so many PL teams, just guessing
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 10:47:07 PM Lol at Hart ever signing for your lot. You might be able to tempt Big Willy though, which is kinda ironic seeing as you've just hired a massive cock. Nice reasonable debate till the City fans turn up :p Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: dino1980 on May 27, 2016, 11:19:00 PM Remarkable how quick we have all written off Leicester. Not sure people are writing them off tbh. They're seventh favourites with the bookies which feels about right. Writing them off would, in my opinion, be saying that they're going to go back to finishing in the bottom half/fighting relegation. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 11:24:03 PM It was an anomaly. They happen.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: exstream on May 27, 2016, 11:30:46 PM will they go from being the best team in the league to 7th best
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 27, 2016, 11:57:07 PM will they go from being the best team in the league to 7th best Depends where they finish Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 27, 2016, 11:57:45 PM will they go from being the best team in the league to 7th best Chelsea have Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 28, 2016, 10:23:14 AM Lol at Hart ever signing for your lot. You might be able to tempt Big Willy though, which is kinda ironic seeing as you've just hired a massive cock. Nice reasonable debate till the City fans turn up :p Manchester City FC; ruining football debates since 2008. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 28, 2016, 10:27:54 AM Lol at Hart ever signing for your lot. You might be able to tempt Big Willy though, which is kinda ironic seeing as you've just hired a massive cock. Nice reasonable debate till the City fans turn up :p Manchester City FC; ruining football debates since 2008. He has a point. best to avoid irrational biases in these debates, they work better then Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 28, 2016, 10:30:38 AM Lol at Hart ever signing for your lot. You might be able to tempt Big Willy though, which is kinda ironic seeing as you've just hired a massive cock. Nice reasonable debate till the City fans turn up :p Manchester City FC; ruining football debates since 2008. He has a point. best to avoid irrational biases in these debates, they work better then Lol no fun, jokes or tongue in cheek comments allowed. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on May 28, 2016, 10:54:54 AM He's always had an affinity with the untied fans;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBXX61GrdCo Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: JohnCharver on May 28, 2016, 10:58:52 AM Lol at Hart ever signing for your lot. You might be able to tempt Big Willy though, which is kinda ironic seeing as you've just hired a massive cock. Nice reasonable debate till the City fans turn up :p Manchester City FC; ruining football debates since 2008. He has a point. best to avoid irrational biases in these debates, they work better then Lol no fun, jokes or tongue in cheek comments allowed. its worked in the liverpool thread... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on May 28, 2016, 11:53:54 AM I personally think Mourinho is the most odious manager in football and I can’t abide the man. There was talk a while back that he would end up at City and opinion on that on the City boards was well and truly divided. Clearly he has divided opinion at United as well. Now that he is in the door at United I’m happy about it and looking forward to the fireworks because there is something enjoyable about disliking a rival. I’m not looking forward to the charm offensive for the next few months but I wonder how long it will be before he starts with all the crap…
In light of my allegiances I obviously hope it ends in abject failure for the guy. Woodward is calling him the “best manager in the world” but in that regard he has got a lot to prove again. The last 6 years haven’t really been very good for him. 1 league and 1 cup (excluding super cups) with Real Madrid in 3 seasons albeit against a superb Barcelona team. He described his final season at Real in 12/13 as the worse season of his career. Then 1 league and 1 league cup at Chelsea in 3 seasons where they started each season as favourite and 15/16 WAS the worst season of his career. As for the Champions League where it seems like ages since he has overcome one of the big teams in the knock out rounds. Losses against Barcelona, Bayern and Dortmund whilst at Real Madrid followed by losses against Atletico and PSG with Chelsea. Then sacked in 2015/2016 before he had the chance to get knocked out. Earliest chance he will get to have another stab at it is 2017/2018. As for United, Zlatan is an interesting one. Surely he isn’t up to the competitive nature of the PL at 35. He was wasteful against City in the 1st leg of the CL and woeful in the 2nd leg. Hope they sign him so we can find out. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 28, 2016, 11:56:34 AM Says more about where Man U are being forced to shop nowadays that their marque summer signing will be a 35 year old past his best with no experience of the league looking for a final pension. Remember when it was pretty standard to be breaking transfer records most summers and signing players who were going to play 80-100 times for England like Rio and Rooney at the start of their careers so you had them throughout their prime just to name two?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on May 28, 2016, 12:28:22 PM Says more about where Man U are being forced to shop nowadays that their marque summer signing will be a 35 year old past his best with no experience of the league looking for a final pension. Remember when it was pretty standard to be breaking transfer records most summers and signing players who were going to play 80-100 times for England like Rio and Rooney at the start of their careers so you had them throughout their prime just to name two? Shaw potentially fits into that category but that's it. He is the one United signing in recent seasons that I'd like to see at City. Not Englsih but Martial looks as tho he has a big future as well but will he stay? There other big money signings since Fegruson: Fellani Mata Di Maria Herrera Schnederlin Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: peejaytwo on May 28, 2016, 01:22:48 PM http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/sport/sport-headlines/manchester-united-finally-appoint-manager-as-loathsome-as-they-are-20160527109149
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 28, 2016, 02:30:42 PM Says more about where Man U are being forced to shop nowadays that their marque summer signing will be a 35 year old past his best with no experience of the league looking for a final pension. Remember when it was pretty standard to be breaking transfer records most summers and signing players who were going to play 80-100 times for England like Rio and Rooney at the start of their careers so you had them throughout their prime just to name two? Because he's being linked he's their marquee signing? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on May 28, 2016, 02:34:46 PM Says more about where Man U are being forced to shop nowadays that their marque summer signing will be a 35 year old past his best with no experience of the league looking for a final pension. Remember when it was pretty standard to be breaking transfer records most summers and signing players who were going to play 80-100 times for England like Rio and Rooney at the start of their careers so you had them throughout their prime just to name two? Shaw potentially fits into that category but that's it. He is the one United signing in recent seasons that I'd like to see at City. Not Englsih but Martial looks as tho he has a big future as well but will he stay? There other big money signings since Fegruson: Fellani Mata Di Maria Herrera Schnederlin Shaw in the same league as Rio or Rooney or Ronaldo for Man U signings? Do me a favour! Martial agreed. Real deal for me. Married young with a kid. Seems very focused and level headed. Think he will be using Old Trafford as a stepping stone to bigger things though like yourself. Can't see him being a MU 'lifer'. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on May 28, 2016, 04:27:55 PM Says more about where Man U are being forced to shop nowadays that their marque summer signing will be a 35 year old past his best with no experience of the league looking for a final pension. Remember when it was pretty standard to be breaking transfer records most summers and signing players who were going to play 80-100 times for England like Rio and Rooney at the start of their careers so you had them throughout their prime just to name two? Shaw potentially fits into that category but that's it. He is the one United signing in recent seasons that I'd like to see at City. Not Englsih but Martial looks as tho he has a big future as well but will he stay? There other big money signings since Fegruson: Fellani Mata Di Maria Herrera Schnederlin Shaw in the same league as Rio or Rooney or Ronaldo for Man U signings? Do me a favour! Martial agreed. Real deal for me. Married young with a kid. Seems very focused and level headed. Think he will be using Old Trafford as a stepping stone to bigger things though like yourself. Can't see him being a MU 'lifer'. Shaw is only 20, world record transfer fee for a full back and only needs to play for England another 75 times to equal Ferdinand's tally of caps. Easy :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TheDazzler on May 28, 2016, 07:41:27 PM I personally think Mourinho is the most odious manager in football and I can’t abide the man. This.As for United, Zlatan is an interesting one. Surely he isn’t up to the competitive nature of the PL at 35. Ibrahamovic smacks of a Glazer 'merchandice selling' signing to me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Sportshead on May 30, 2016, 11:30:22 AM They have officially offered £15mil for Reece Oxford
As a West Ham fan HANDS OFF Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 30, 2016, 12:13:23 PM In 5 years time, I look forward to the outpouring of people heralding United's 'famed' youth academy, with people pointing at Oxford as a great example of coming through the ranks.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 30, 2016, 06:54:53 PM In 5 years time, I look forward to the outpouring of people heralding United's 'famed' youth academy, with people pointing at Oxford as a great example of coming through the ranks. Least you can do the same with Sterling Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on May 30, 2016, 07:04:06 PM Another product of the United academy scored twice for Barnsley yesterday. Ashley Fletcher was playing in the U21s at the start of the season, ahead of Marcus Rashford. Might even have got the nod vs Mittrejand(sp) instead of him.
Carpe diem. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 30, 2016, 07:08:28 PM In 5 years time, I look forward to the outpouring of people heralding United's 'famed' youth academy, with people pointing at Oxford as a great example of coming through the ranks. Least you can do the same with Sterling He'll be back at QPR by then. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 30, 2016, 07:14:15 PM Anyone watch the Man U-Liverpool game today? Thoughts? Are Man Utd better then everyone else or is it just a poor PL this season? Will they win a record 19th title this season? Who do we need to buy to replace an ageing Giggs/Scholes? Is Berba the real deal or should he go SAF replacement? Mourinho or Guardiola? 5 1/2 years down the line, I bet you didn't for one second think that City would land Guardiola whilst you get stuck with Mourinho almost by default. How times have changed :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: dino1980 on June 01, 2016, 02:32:33 PM Decent article about young Mr Rashford for someone who used to work for Brentford/Midtjylland - http://statsbomb.com/2016/06/arguing-about-marcus-rashford-and-young-player-development/
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on June 07, 2016, 06:48:37 AM Decent article about young Mr Rashford for someone who used to work for Brentford/Midtjylland - http://statsbomb.com/2016/06/arguing-about-marcus-rashford-and-young-player-development/ Interesting stuff. I'm not at all suggesting that the comparison would be favourable, but it would be interesting to see Shearer's stats for his first games. Or Owen's. Meantime we appear to be signing a geriatric Swede who will probably exit the European Championships due to an injury that keeps him sidelined till Christmas. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 01, 2016, 09:38:45 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmNTBG2XIAADAma.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 01, 2016, 07:00:49 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmS3vY7WAAA-Xos.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on July 01, 2016, 07:33:15 PM Didn't do much over 2 legs vs us, kept very quiet by our average defence, especially in the 2nd leg. If Mangala has you in his back pocket you should be worried ;)
A great player and talent, will probably notch a few goals but its one thing banging them in for fun in a league that you win by 31 points, and another thing altogether in the Premier League in 2016 where even the 'crap' teams can cause problems. Good for shirt sales I bet, do they still charge by the letter to have a name on the back? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on July 02, 2016, 11:47:16 AM Must be half a chance he does a Falcao.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 03, 2016, 12:06:28 PM Manchester United are ready to make Paul Pogba the world's first £100million player http://dailym.ai/29CuJOh
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: PokerBroker on July 03, 2016, 02:33:36 PM A £100 million for Pogba, has the world gone madder than normal!!?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on July 03, 2016, 02:36:08 PM A £100 million for Pogba, has the world gone madder than normal!!? No just relative inflation with Troy Deeney being valued at circa £30m. TV money rules. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: PokerBroker on July 03, 2016, 02:45:59 PM A £100 million for Pogba, has the world gone madder than normal!!? No just relative inflation with Troy Deeney being valued at circa £30m. TV money rules. Ha, nobody actually believes Deeney is worth £30 mill though do they? If so that is definite confirmation the world has gone bonkers. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on July 03, 2016, 02:48:59 PM A £100 million for Pogba, has the world gone madder than normal!!? No just relative inflation with Troy Deeney being valued at circa £30m. TV money rules. Ha, nobody actually believes Deeney is worth £30 mill though do they? If so that is definite confirmation the world has gone bonkers. 10-15 goal a season EPL strikers are worth more than £30m when you make circa £100m a year just to stay in the EPL. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on July 03, 2016, 04:40:25 PM A £100 million for Pogba, has the world gone madder than normal!!? No just relative inflation with Troy Deeney being valued at circa £30m. TV money rules. Ha, nobody actually believes Deeney is worth £30 mill though do they? If so that is definite confirmation the world has gone bonkers. Watford were offered 38 million for Ighalo. Based on that Deeney is worth 70 million and Pogba is worth 200. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Cf on July 04, 2016, 12:27:05 PM I get that there's loads of TV money but it only stretches so far surely?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on July 04, 2016, 07:41:21 PM Why would they pay £100M for Pogba when they could get Walcott for half that?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on July 04, 2016, 07:42:59 PM Why would they pay £100M for Pogba when they could get Walcott for half that? rotflmfao rotflmfao. rotflmfao Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on July 04, 2016, 07:46:52 PM I get that there's loads of TV money but it only stretches so far surely? United have sponsorship revenues on top of this that other EPL clubs can only dream of from so many global corporate partners. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 05, 2016, 12:31:36 PM Mourinho says "Rooney will never be 50 metres away from the goal". "He's a 9 or 10 or 9 1/2". "Never a 6". Midfield days over
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Pawprint on July 06, 2016, 01:55:51 PM Thought this was an interesting article about Adrian Doherty. Know very little about his story, going to have to get the book now to read more.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/northern-ireland/36502589 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/northern-ireland/36502589) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 06, 2016, 04:32:53 PM Mkhitaryan signs
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmsFVxLWgAAhcwH.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on July 06, 2016, 05:39:05 PM Genuinely looking forward to this season! Cam on
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on July 21, 2016, 09:58:40 AM For the first time in a fair few years I am excited about the start of the season.
If we have to break a record to get Pogba so be it. We broke one selling Ronaldo In a way I'm glad he wasn't at OT over the last three seasons. Moyes and LVG would have broken him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: exstream on July 21, 2016, 11:52:30 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnzlNmrW8AAlK2f.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 28, 2016, 02:47:55 PM Manchester United boss tells up to NINE players they are off as he clears out the club http://dailym.ai/2ae9JSu
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on July 28, 2016, 03:04:10 PM Think Januzaj, Rojo, Jones, Blackett and Fellaini are all surplus to requirement, although it wouldn't surprise me if Jose had a soft spot for Fellaini (they're both horrible b******s after all). Keane has ran very bad with injuries and Wilson kinda ran bad being sent away on loan last season with Rashford then bursting onto the scene. Could of/should of been him if LVG had any sense. Pereira is the one we must keep. He is going to be big. Going out on loan would prob be best for him this season, wait till Mata leaves then take his spot. Glad Verela went out on loan as well instead of being sold, really like him.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: david3103 on July 28, 2016, 03:21:08 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnzlNmrW8AAlK2f.jpg) There's some cracking bargains in amongst that lot, and some amazingly expensive flops. LDO, but it's interesting reading. Ignoring Pogba for now, I'd sat that 3 of the top 4 by % turned out pretty well. Never understood how Veron was such a disappointment. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on August 08, 2016, 02:29:31 PM Enjoyed the match yesterday, really looking forward to the new season.
Positives: The defence was great. Shaw, Bailly and Valencia are so quick and athletic, hope they can stay fit all season. Not sure whether Bailly had a superb game or was made to look good by Leicester's poor decision making in the final third. Maybe a mix of both, but a few times they had counters and with their pace and quality you'd expect them to create some more clear cut chances. Fellaini actually had a decent game despite the backpass for the goal. Looks like he's here to stay and is obv in Mourinho's plans. Rashford still bossing it. Lingard. Great goal and good energy. Expect him to play a lot this season. Looks like a big Pogba fan as well. Negatives: Rooney. Everything about him was awful yesterday. Ibra. Didn't have an impact on the game at all till he scored. We're really gunna struggle to break teams down if it's him and Rooney up top. Martial had a poor game and his decision making wasn't great. Looked tired. All still felt a bit LVG for most of the game. Missing that link between midfield and attack. Hoping Pogba can bridge that gap. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on August 08, 2016, 02:53:15 PM Sad we didnt get to see Mkhitaryan I think he looks like a great signing.
Ibra is going to float in and out of games, if he scores 20 a season then im happy as long as there are some key goals in there. Bailly looks great, so excited to have Shaw back. Leicester really posed little or no threat to us at all, if it was not for Fellani's poor pass i didn't really see them scoring. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 09, 2016, 11:55:28 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CpaKAmrWIAASbVa.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on August 10, 2016, 12:19:41 PM Football is changing........ YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Jfn-U6EGzU Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on August 10, 2016, 12:26:16 PM 3 things struck me after the Community Shield.
Ego's.... Mata needed "consoling". How does Ibrahamovic react when The Special One subs him, starts him on the bench, or, Heaven forbid, drops him? Did you see the headlines? - "Ibrahamovic wins Community Shield" Will Jose even dare do any of those? Zlatan has been The Main Man in France, but the French League is a bit like the Scottish Premier, all huff & no puff. What with Zlatan, Jose, Pogba even (?), there's an ego or two there. Whatever happens, should be fun times ahead in Manchester. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on August 10, 2016, 12:59:04 PM http://www.skysports.com/football/news/15115/10293043/jose-mourinho-and-zlatan-ibrahimovic-what-they-have-said-about-each-other
The Swede also used his autobiography to compare Mourinho to Guardiola, who he didn't see eye to eye with at Barcelona. "That guy says whatever he wants. I like him. He's the leader of his army. But he cares, too. He would text me all the time at Inter, wondering how I was doing. He's the exact opposite of Pep Guardiola. If Mourinho lights up a room, Guardiola draws the curtains. Mourinho would become a guy I was basically willing to die for." On leaving Inter Milan to join Barcelona in 2009, Ibrahimovic said: "No matter how happy I was going to Barca, it was sad to leave Mourinho. That guy is special." Think they'll be ok. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on August 19, 2016, 11:27:42 PM It's nice to go into games and actually expecting a performance and a win. Spine of the team looks very strong.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: rinswun on August 19, 2016, 11:38:28 PM Getting the wins but still waiting for a performance to be fair.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on August 20, 2016, 12:00:38 PM Getting the wins but still waiting for a performance to be fair. Maybe, but what a joy it is to watch that team now. Really enjoyed it, & in Martial, Zatalan & Pogba, there's real excitement when they are on the ball. Zatalan does not get in the game much, but he seems ruthlessly efficient when he does. He is in pretty good nick considering his age. The real eye opener for me - as I had never watched him before - was Pogba. Just wow, what a handful he is, with exquisite first time touch & fancy feet. As a lay spectator, loved him to bits. I fancy that team might just stick 5 or 6 past someone this season when they all click. And for all the criticism he gets, Rooney just works his socks off, & never seems o worry about others getting the glory. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 26, 2016, 01:45:37 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqyGKcdWYAAJ9RY.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on August 26, 2016, 02:09:22 PM Pretty much the worst group we could have got. Trips to Turkey and Ukraine are not ideal.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 27, 2016, 08:37:54 PM stat alert
Marcus Rashford is the first teenager to score a Premier League goal under a side managed by Jose Mourinho. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: exstream on August 27, 2016, 08:52:04 PM Rooney shouldn't be playing
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Micko on August 27, 2016, 09:18:58 PM Rooney shouldn't be playing Didn't he set the winner up! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: pleno1 on September 13, 2016, 06:00:05 AM Pogba potentially cost United the season this year? Does he have to be left out the big games? They are big 6 pointer games.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on September 13, 2016, 09:15:22 PM I think he will find how he needs to play.
City are the best team in the league at the moment with in my opinion united second. On Saturday we saw to master tacticians go head to head. Pep won the 1st half and Jose admitted that. United got lucky because of possibly the worst keeper ive ever seen after Massimo Taibi, if Ibra had taken his time with the second chance and United had gone in 2-2 I think we may have won 4-2/4-3 in the second half. If Taibi take 2 had not had a howler City may have marched on 3-0/4-0 or even more winners. Once United put the keeper under pressure i was amazed to see no Plan B from Pep. Bravo kept United in the game back making poor decision after poor decision and having worse long ball distribution that Hart, and that's saying something! I think i counted a spell of 5 possessions for Bravo where he had no short ball on, he went long and hit it straight to a Man U player. Seems mental to me to have no plan B, also United didnt really have blistering pace and "work horse" like attitude upfront. Against teams with a bit of pace in the front 3 the pass it from the back tactic if Bravo does not improve is going to get ripped to shreds. The reason why City dominated the first 40 minutes is United had no clue what to do with it, Ibra is not going to chase down, United didnt know whether to push on and press or sit and got caught in a middle ground where it looked like City had two extra men every time they had the ball. Rooney is still in the balance for me, he is making more and more mistakes but really does still work so hard, chasing down balls, making big tackles, being a leader and distributing the ball well. Its just a shame that more and more often now he gives it away with sloppy first touches or bad short passing. What i didnt get was the last 10 minutes, United put on Rashford, he ran at City and they started making mistakes and we had chance after chance around the box where we made nothing off it. Then for some bizarre reason we just started punting it into Fellani and Ibra, where they would win the first ball and nobody would be expecting the knock down, WHY!? Give the ball to Rashford. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 13, 2016, 11:43:07 PM I think he will find how he needs to play. City are the best team in the league at the moment with in my opinion united second. On Saturday we saw to master tacticians go head to head. Pep won the 1st half and Jose admitted that. United got lucky because of possibly the worst keeper ive ever seen after Massimo Taibi, if Ibra had taken his time with the second chance and United had gone in 2-2 I think we may have won 4-2/4-3 in the second half. If Taibi take 2 had not had a howler City may have marched on 3-0/4-0 or even more winners. Once United put the keeper under pressure i was amazed to see no Plan B from Pep. Bravo kept United in the game back making poor decision after poor decision and having worse long ball distribution that Hart, and that's saying something! I think i counted a spell of 5 possessions for Bravo where he had no short ball on, he went long and hit it straight to a Man U player. Seems mental to me to have no plan B, also United didnt really have blistering pace and "work horse" like attitude upfront. Against teams with a bit of pace in the front 3 the pass it from the back tactic if Bravo does not improve is going to get ripped to shreds. The reason why City dominated the first 40 minutes is United had no clue what to do with it, Ibra is not going to chase down, United didnt know whether to push on and press or sit and got caught in a middle ground where it looked like City had two extra men every time they had the ball. Rooney is still in the balance for me, he is making more and more mistakes but really does still work so hard, chasing down balls, making big tackles, being a leader and distributing the ball well. Its just a shame that more and more often now he gives it away with sloppy first touches or bad short passing. What i didnt get was the last 10 minutes, United put on Rashford, he ran at City and they started making mistakes and we had chance after chance around the box where we made nothing off it. Then for some bizarre reason we just started punting it into Fellani and Ibra, where they would win the first ball and nobody would be expecting the knock down, WHY!? Give the ball to Rashford. Last 10 minutes? You started punting it to elbows and Ibra from 60 mins onwards. Laughably one dimensional and despite Bravo's high profile errors he actually had fuck all to do all game, not a single save of any note to make for 90 minutes. If people are gonna judge Bravo, the No1 for Barca for the last 2 seasons, on his debut then so be it, but methinks you'll end up with egg on your face. If the best manager in the world wants you in goal, then I think its safe to say said keeper is more than good enough. Maureen is a great manager but he isn't a ''master tactician'' IMO. He is still a million miles away from Pep. How Maureen gets the best out of Pogba is gonna be interesting. If he continues to suffocate him in midfield then its 90m down the shitter. How Rashford doesn't start is beyond me, way way more effective than Rooney and surely anyone with eyes can see that (I could even see it with my blinkers on). Think you'll scrape top 4 this season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: exstream on September 14, 2016, 12:04:12 AM What's you basing mourinho not being a master tactician on
To do what he did with Porto, inter Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 14, 2016, 12:12:08 AM What's you basing mourinho not being a master tactician on To do what he did with Porto, inter I don't think he has the tactical nous of the elite. Very good manager granted, but sometimes/often caught short. Maybe doesn't have the balls of the best managers in the world, perhaps a better way to phrase it. No way Pep would resort to long balls to 6''4 players with 30 mins to go if things weren't going his way ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on September 14, 2016, 12:19:29 AM What's you basing mourinho not being a master tactician on To do what he did with Porto, inter Probably based on the fact that he's manager of United, and not City :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on September 14, 2016, 03:23:43 AM Ridiculously biased views on here surprise surprise.
Pep and Jose are both excellent at what they do. Both elite managers along with Conte and Klopp. It's clear however that Pep has Joses number when u look at their h2h record. I've said all along City would win it purely on the basis they have Pep. I also remember most people, including myself saying De Gea would not be able to cope with demands of premiership. You can't judge Bravo on one performance. His confidence to play the ball didn't wane either. United were very lucky. Ibra's goal made a game of it otherwise we might have been well beaten. Fernandinho put in the type of performance we need from Pogba. KDB again looked unstoppable perhaps Joses biggest mistake selling him at Chelsea. Sane also looked very good. Positives for United were Bailly who I thought altho was lost along with rest of team at times looks v good at a bargain at 30m. Fellani played well too considering he was stranded and ofc Rashford. I know there's a lot of Rooney hate but he actually played ok. Just have to accept his role is different. Think city will win the league with United and Chelsea battling for 2nd and 3rd. Liverpool might pip 4th but in all honesty we all know it'll be Arsenal. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 14, 2016, 10:50:11 AM lol so its ''ridiculously biased'' to not consider Jose a master tactician? I've never thought of him as that. Great manager, excellent track record everywhere he's been but certainly lacks the tactical nous to ever be thought of as master tactician in my ridiculously biased opinion. And if he is a master tactician, then he hid these master tactics pretty damn well on Saturday ;)
I'm sure all united fans, many of whom were chanting 'fuck off Mourinho' from the stands for the last decade, haven't suddenly changed their opinion on him now that he's their manager, cos that would be ridiculously biased, no? Lets see what Maureen can get out of Pogba. A player to build a team around, or a player to shoehorn into an XI? Went missing on Saturday but I think that's more down to Maureens master selection and tactics than anything else. Would be a shame to waste a world class talent. I think you'll make top 4 though, maybe. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: nirvana on September 14, 2016, 11:32:54 AM City were a team..and they had tactics.
United put a bunch of individuals on the pitch with no obvious game plan..Some of them are talented. That's what Mourinho does. Don't think the siege mentality bollo and going around saying how great you are as a manager has much currency these days. Pep pep all the way. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: cambridgealex on September 14, 2016, 11:46:51 AM lol so its ''ridiculously biased'' to not consider Jose a master tactician? I've never thought of him as that. Great manager, excellent track record everywhere he's been but certainly lacks the tactical nous to ever be thought of as master tactician in my ridiculously biased opinion. And if he is a master tactician, then he hid these master tactics pretty damn well on Saturday ;) I'm sure all united fans, many of whom were chanting 'fuck off Mourinho' from the stands for the last decade, haven't suddenly changed their opinion on him now that he's their manager, cos that would be ridiculously biased, no? Lets see what Maureen can get out of Pogba. A player to build a team around, or a player to shoehorn into an XI? Went missing on Saturday but I think that's more down to Maureens master selection and tactics than anything else. Would be a shame to waste a world class talent. I think you'll make top 4 though, maybe. Not heard what you made of Clattenburgs performance? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: The Camel on September 14, 2016, 11:53:59 AM I think the main reason Man City beat United so easily was simply because they have better players.
Try it for yourself. Draw up the best combined Utd/City XI. I made it 8 City, 3 Utd. And of those 11 positions, De Gea was the only certainty to get in from United. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 14, 2016, 11:56:39 AM lol so its ''ridiculously biased'' to not consider Jose a master tactician? I've never thought of him as that. Great manager, excellent track record everywhere he's been but certainly lacks the tactical nous to ever be thought of as master tactician in my ridiculously biased opinion. And if he is a master tactician, then he hid these master tactics pretty damn well on Saturday ;) I'm sure all united fans, many of whom were chanting 'fuck off Mourinho' from the stands for the last decade, haven't suddenly changed their opinion on him now that he's their manager, cos that would be ridiculously biased, no? Lets see what Maureen can get out of Pogba. A player to build a team around, or a player to shoehorn into an XI? Went missing on Saturday but I think that's more down to Maureens master selection and tactics than anything else. Would be a shame to waste a world class talent. I think you'll make top 4 though, maybe. Not heard what you made of Clattenburgs performance? Still loves the attention a bit too much for my liking but kept a reasonably low profile on Saturday and had a reasonable game. This doesn't change my opinion on him though; his years of big errors in key matches doesn't suddenly disappear off the back of a semi competent performance in a Manchester derby. He wasn't given any huge decisions to get wrong, which certainly helped his cause. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on September 14, 2016, 12:17:30 PM I think the main reason Man City beat United so easily was simply because they have better players. Try it for yourself. Draw up the best combined Utd/City XI. I made it 8 City, 3 Utd. And of those 11 positions, De Gea was the only certainty to get in from United. I did this and had 6 United, 5 city. Think it's a bit easy to put it down to players. Think if pep was at United we would win the league Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 14, 2016, 12:25:47 PM What we going for?
............................DDG........ Valencia.....Kompany.....Stones.....Shaw.... Sterling.....Silva.....fernandinho.....Pogba......KDB .......................Aguero Bench....Bravo, Otamendi, Gundogan, Nolito, Sane, Rashford, Ibra, ^ but that's a very general side, going from this season alone you'd have to play Nolito and Kolarov, so that's no Shaw and Pogba on the bench, KDB in behind Aguero and Nolito out on the flank. Rooney can be water carrier, assuming he's able to do that. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 14, 2016, 12:37:10 PM I think the main reason Man City beat United so easily was simply because they have better players. Try it for yourself. Draw up the best combined Utd/City XI. I made it 8 City, 3 Utd. And of those 11 positions, De Gea was the only certainty to get in from United. I did this and had 6 United, 5 city. Think it's a bit easy to put it down to players. Think if pep was at United we would win the league Please please please can we see the breakdown of the above, I'm sure it won't be ridiculously biased.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on September 14, 2016, 08:37:16 PM Jose's mood in the presser today pre-EL Thursdays was as though his dog had just been run over.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on September 15, 2016, 06:49:13 PM Jose's mood in the presser today pre-EL Thursdays was as though his dog had just been run over. Think Man U need to win tonight, and convincingly. The Jose vultures are circling already, and if they don't win tonight it is gonna get messy quite soon. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on September 15, 2016, 06:57:47 PM Jose's mood in the presser today pre-EL Thursdays was as though his dog had just been run over. Think Man U need to win tonight, and convincingly. The Jose vultures are circling already, and if they don't win tonight it is gonna get messy quite soon. Is the "campaign" lurking in the undergrowth? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on September 15, 2016, 07:16:22 PM Jose's mood in the presser today pre-EL Thursdays was as though his dog had just been run over. Think Man U need to win tonight, and convincingly. The Jose vultures are circling already, and if they don't win tonight it is gonna get messy quite soon. Is the "campaign" lurking in the undergrowth? I gather there are campaigns against both Manchester teams. The whole world is against City, according to Percy Plump. Quite a difference though, with City likely to dominate this season, big time. Think they will win the EPL by a distance. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 15, 2016, 09:11:20 PM Jose's mood in the presser today pre-EL Thursdays was as though his dog had just been run over. Think Man U need to win tonight, and convincingly. The Jose vultures are circling already, and if they don't win tonight it is gonna get messy quite soon. Is the "campaign" lurking in the undergrowth? I gather there are campaigns against both Manchester teams. The whole world is against City, according to Percy Plump. Quite a difference though, with City likely to dominate this season, big time. Think they will win the EPL by a distance. :) I hear the master tactician stuck Smalling up front this evening..... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on September 15, 2016, 10:11:55 PM Anyone seen G2L lately?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on September 16, 2016, 09:02:41 AM I had
DG Valencia Baily Kompany Shaw Fernandinho Pogba Silva KDB Ibra Aguero Bench: bravo, stones, sagna, Fellani, Herrera, ignenacho, rashford Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on September 16, 2016, 09:03:49 AM Probably bench gundogan ahead of fellani
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: PathFinder on September 16, 2016, 09:37:57 AM I had DG Valencia Baily Kompany Shaw Fernandinho Pogba Silva KDB Ibra Aguero Bench: bravo, stones, sagna, Fellani, Herrera, ignenacho, rashford Ah, the famous 4-1-2-1-2 formation used exactly zero times by both Manchester clubs this season. Guess it enables you to shoehorn Ibrahimovic in. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: c4ught on September 16, 2016, 10:05:21 AM Picking benches in a pick the best 11 from United and City...........You didn't have to post the bench to get the Rooney joke in there ;applause;
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 16, 2016, 12:26:19 PM Probably bench gundogan ahead of fellani Hmmm I dunno, Gundogan is all elbows and spitting whilst bog brush is an elegant, gracious, classy footballer who makes the game look easy. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on September 16, 2016, 12:54:29 PM Didn't put Rooney in
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: bagel on September 18, 2016, 02:53:56 PM entertaining viewing while smashing the sunday roast
rooney lookas like he is about to explode Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on September 18, 2016, 03:03:47 PM Watford 3, Man U 1, One side of Manchester is bathed in sunlight, whilst storm clouds gather on the other side. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on September 18, 2016, 03:21:54 PM Is he becoming a specialist?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on September 18, 2016, 03:27:50 PM Obviously enjoyable for me but I thought Rooney was awful. Poor set pieces. Unforced errors. All he seems useful for these days is arguing with the referee or appealing for non existent handballs while Rashford is busy scoring rebounds. He's going to be a very expensive reserve in a year or so.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on September 18, 2016, 04:20:06 PM Probably bench gundogan ahead of fellani Hmmm I dunno, Gundogan is all elbows and spitting whilst bog brush is an elegant, gracious, classy footballer who makes the game look easy. ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 18, 2016, 05:49:51 PM Obviously enjoyable for me but I thought Rooney was awful. Poor set pieces. Unforced errors. All he seems useful for these days is arguing with the referee or appealing for non existent handballs while Rashford is busy scoring rebounds. He's going to be a very expensive reserve in a year or so. Gotta find a manager with the balls to drop him first. He's been crap for a good 2/3 seasons now, everyone can see it, but still somehow worms his way into the starting line up. Long may it continue :) Not seen any action but sounds like it was well deserved today, vwp. Must be nice to beat the teams you'll be competing with in and around the mid-table positions. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: exstream on September 18, 2016, 08:19:59 PM https://streamable.com/i6up
Rooney highlights today lol, dreadful Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on September 18, 2016, 09:07:53 PM Let's hope Allardyce was paying attention.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on September 19, 2016, 08:18:26 AM 3 defeats in a week is not what we were expecting. I was - still am to a degree - hoping that City & United would go head to head this season, & really liven things up. Those 2 going at it hammer & tongs can only be good. It's all a bit sad, too, to see the Rooney & Fellaini haters enjoying themselves so, with their constant jibes from the comfort of their armchairs. Both players would walk into at least 17 or 18 of the EPL first teams. Strange how those people who love to knock & diss so rarely give praise to anyone. If United can run up a little sequence of wins now, & Jose gets back to that wonderfully arrogant chirp mode, it'd be no bad thing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on September 19, 2016, 08:44:20 AM 3 defeats in a week is not what we were expecting. I was - still am to a degree - hoping that City & United would go head to head this season, & really liven things up. Those 2 going at it hammer & tongs can only be good. It's all a bit sad, too, to see the Rooney & Fellaini haters enjoying themselves so, with their constant jibes from the comfort of their armchairs. Both players would walk into at least 17 or 18 of the EPL first teams. Strange how those people who love to knock & diss so rarely give praise to anyone. If United can run up a little sequence of wins now, & Jose gets back to that wonderfully arrogant chirp mode, it'd be no bad thing. Shoehorning Rooney into the team yesterday impacted United's performance in my opinion (and his awful performance). It isn't a matter of hating simply an observation that managers feel they can't drop him. If we are talking of praise it isn't players in a red shirt who deserve it yesterday. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on September 19, 2016, 08:57:35 AM 3 defeats in a week is not what we were expecting. I was - still am to a degree - hoping that City & United would go head to head this season, & really liven things up. Those 2 going at it hammer & tongs can only be good. It's all a bit sad, too, to see the Rooney & Fellaini haters enjoying themselves so, with their constant jibes from the comfort of their armchairs. Both players would walk into at least 17 or 18 of the EPL first teams. Strange how those people who love to knock & diss so rarely give praise to anyone. If United can run up a little sequence of wins now, & Jose gets back to that wonderfully arrogant chirp mode, it'd be no bad thing. Shoehorning Rooney into the team yesterday impacted United's performance in my opinion (and his awful performance). It isn't a matter of hating simply an observation that managers feel they can't drop him. If we are talking of praise it isn't players in a red shirt who deserve it yesterday. Deffo agree that not much praise was due to any United players. I just think it's so easy to criticise the guys who put their head above the parapet every week, & never hide, & that certainly includes Rooney & Fellaini, neither of whom can ever be accused of lack of effort. They are both like a lightning rod for the media to strike, whilst others, who maybe did not make quite so much effort, seem to escape the brunt of criticism. It's SO easy to criticise. I certainly would not level this at you, but some folks criticise anyone & everyone, but never seem to be able to praise anyone. Their views hold zero value. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: horseplayer on September 19, 2016, 09:02:24 AM Rooney just looks a classic burnout effect to me.
Similar to torres playing regular football at such a young age takes it toll rooney was at his physical peak early 20s which is rare. Tbf moyes did try and hold him back at Everton and got pelters for doing so. Wonder where he will go when his contract expires or before. America be to fast paced as stevie g has found out China probably the favourite. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on September 19, 2016, 09:03:22 AM Fair enough. Personally I quite like Fellaini. Elbow issues aside I think he's a good pro and gets a lot of grief. Rooney is also a good pro, but my personal opinion is that trying to play him out of position is detrimental to Man Utd and also doesn't allow England to develop a long term tactical plan for the future. I may be mistaken but I seem to remember the one ray of sunshine when England beat Germany was when Rooney wasn't in the squad so the other players could express themselves without deferring to the fading star? I would ditch him from England (even at the cost of a short term downturn) and at Man Utd would play him as a number 10 or not at all as the match situation demanded it.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on September 19, 2016, 09:08:08 AM Rooney just looks a classic burnout effect to me. Similar to torres playing regular football at such a young age takes it toll rooney was at his physical peak early 20s which is rare. Tbf moyes did try and hold him back at Everton and got pelters for doing so. Wonder where he will go when his contract expires or before. America be to fast paced as stevie g has found out China probably the favourite. I hope he stays in England. After all these years, money & success, he still absolutely loves the game, gives of his best, & expends every ounce of energy. Not too many in his spot can say that. He has strayed from the straight & narrow occasionally, both off the pitch & in contract negotiations, but for the most part, he is a shining example to youngsters that they should a) enjoy the game & b) always give of their best. Ps - Apologies if I am coming across a bit grumpy this morning. That's probably because I generally am grumpy in the morning. And afternoons. I'm OK in the evenings though. Sometimes. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on September 19, 2016, 09:13:11 AM Fair enough. Personally I quite like Fellaini. Elbow issues aside I think he's a good pro and gets a lot of grief. Rooney is also a good pro, but my personal opinion is that trying to play him out of position is detrimental to Man Utd and also doesn't allow England to develop a long term tactical plan for the future. I may be mistaken but I seem to remember the one ray of sunshine when England beat Germany was when Rooney wasn't in the squad so the other players could express themselves without deferring to the fading star? I would ditch him from England (even at the cost of a short term downturn) and at Man Utd would play him as a number 10 or not at all as the match situation demanded it. Maureen promised the world & his wife that Rooney would be played as a striker this season, but his role seems to vary from game to game. If he is being played out of position - see also LvG - that's not Rooney's fault. As to England, well I'm afraid Big Sam seems intent on repeating the errors of Roy H, in fact Sam's team selection was near identical to Roy's. Time for a fresh start imo. Drop all the names, & everyone older than 25, & start with a clean sheet of paper. We have plenty of young talent. It can hardly be worse, can it? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: nirvana on September 19, 2016, 11:03:53 AM Rooney just looks a classic burnout effect to me. Similar to torres playing regular football at such a young age takes it toll rooney was at his physical peak early 20s which is rare. Tbf moyes did try and hold him back at Everton and got pelters for doing so. Wonder where he will go when his contract expires or before. America be to fast paced as stevie g has found out China probably the favourite. I hope he stays in England. After all these years, money & success, he still absolutely loves the game, gives of his best, & expends every ounce of energy. Not too many in his spot can say that. He has strayed from the straight & narrow occasionally, both off the pitch & in contract negotiations, but for the most part, he is a shining example to youngsters that they should a) enjoy the game & b) always give of their best. Ps - Apologies if I am coming across a bit grumpy this morning. That's probably because I generally am grumpy in the morning. And afternoons. I'm OK in the evenings though. Sometimes. You're talking pish of course. Most people talk about Rooney the footballer and his football skills. You're talking about some abstract concepts related to running a lot and being a shining example of .. er.... running a lot. He's just another in a long line of undroppable overpaid meatheads and with wegwet, I can't be persuaded otherwise Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on September 19, 2016, 11:26:08 AM Rooney just looks a classic burnout effect to me. Similar to torres playing regular football at such a young age takes it toll rooney was at his physical peak early 20s which is rare. Tbf moyes did try and hold him back at Everton and got pelters for doing so. Wonder where he will go when his contract expires or before. America be to fast paced as stevie g has found out China probably the favourite. I hope he stays in England. After all these years, money & success, he still absolutely loves the game, gives of his best, & expends every ounce of energy. Not too many in his spot can say that. He has strayed from the straight & narrow occasionally, both off the pitch & in contract negotiations, but for the most part, he is a shining example to youngsters that they should a) enjoy the game & b) always give of their best. Ps - Apologies if I am coming across a bit grumpy this morning. That's probably because I generally am grumpy in the morning. And afternoons. I'm OK in the evenings though. Sometimes. You're talking pish of course. Most people talk about Rooney the footballer and his football skills. You're talking about some abstract concepts related to running a lot and being a shining example of .. er.... running a lot. He's just another in a long line of undroppable overpaid meatheads and with wegwet, I can't be persuaded otherwise Good post, chompy. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 19, 2016, 12:49:38 PM I really hope they continue to play Rooney, in whatever position.
In fact, I hope they give him a contract extension. 2019 is only 3 years away, after all, get him tied down to an even longer deal on even more money. Boy, does he earn it. Trying to put myself in a position as if I was a united fan, which is a shuddering thought, and Rashford often warms the bench? Whilst ''wazza'' always starts? Simply madness, and not the baggy trousers kind. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Cf on September 19, 2016, 03:32:01 PM Think you're all being a bit harsh on Rooney.
He's got that much experience and skill that even our England manager doesn't feel it is place to tell him what position to play in. Presumably he plans out a team of 10 and asks Wayne to play where he feels is most appropriate to make it work. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: exstream on September 19, 2016, 05:28:42 PM 3 defeats in a week is not what we were expecting. I was - still am to a degree - hoping that City & United would go head to head this season, & really liven things up. Those 2 going at it hammer & tongs can only be good. It's all a bit sad, too, to see the Rooney & Fellaini haters enjoying themselves so, with their constant jibes from the comfort of their armchairs. Both players would walk into at least 17 or 18 of the EPL first teams. Strange how those people who love to knock & diss so rarely give praise to anyone. If United can run up a little sequence of wins now, & Jose gets back to that wonderfully arrogant chirp mode, it'd be no bad thing. http://m.independent.ie/sport/soccer/premier-league/manchester-united/wayne-rooneys-presence-is-stifling-zlatan-ibrahimovic-and-paul-pogba-35057272.html People do have their reasons for hating on Rooney. Simply, he's past it. Premier league is so fast paced, no way would he be in 17 or 18 of the teams, and fellaini, just as bad, weren't Sunderland the team wanting him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 20, 2016, 01:38:52 PM Only way forward for Mourinho is to drop Rooney . . . Pep would
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/only-way-forward-for-mourinho-is-to-drop-rooney-pep-would-8xvb9v33p?shareToken=93258aeeb72536188cf3867817345b9f Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on September 20, 2016, 02:18:32 PM According to some Man Utd fanzine a staggering 92 percent want Rooney tinned.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 20, 2016, 10:11:43 PM According to some Man Utd fanzine a staggering 92 percent want Rooney tinned. From what I gather a lot of fans seem to think he has a 'plays if fit' clause in his contract. Seems a bit farfetched maybe but could explain why managers persist in starting him despite him being obviously turd these days. If you believe what you read, Yaya had one at City for a couple of seasons under Bobby/Pellers. Not anymore ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on September 20, 2016, 11:12:55 PM According to some Man Utd fanzine a staggering 92 percent want Rooney tinned. From what I gather a lot of fans seem to think he has a 'plays if fit' clause in his contract. Seems a bit farfetched maybe but could explain why managers persist in starting him despite him being obviously turd these days. If you believe what you read, Yaya had one at City for a couple of seasons under Bobby/Pellers. Not anymore ;) Great article on the SL website about the Yaya situation, and very clever how he has dealt with it. I shouldn't really, but I'm liking him more as time goes by. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 21, 2016, 01:10:10 PM 22 Years ago today, Scholes made his debut for united
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cs302VnWAAEDzW1.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 21, 2016, 02:20:00 PM tactical analysis, why Mourinho needs a new system etc
www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/09/21/is-it-time-for-jose-mourinho-to-try-a-new-tactical-system-at-man/ (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cs38B4_W8AAvoRI.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: BigAdz on September 22, 2016, 09:39:32 AM 3 defeats in a week is not what we were expecting. I was - still am to a degree - hoping that City & United would go head to head this season, & really liven things up. Those 2 going at it hammer & tongs can only be good. It's all a bit sad, too, to see the Rooney & Fellaini haters enjoying themselves so, with their constant jibes from the comfort of their armchairs. Both players would walk into at least 17 or 18 of the EPL first teams. Strange how those people who love to knock & diss so rarely give praise to anyone. If United can run up a little sequence of wins now, & Jose gets back to that wonderfully arrogant chirp mode, it'd be no bad thing. http://m.independent.ie/sport/soccer/premier-league/manchester-united/wayne-rooneys-presence-is-stifling-zlatan-ibrahimovic-and-paul-pogba-35057272.html People do have their reasons for hating on Rooney. Simply, he's past it. Premier league is so fast paced, no way would he be in 17 or 18 of the teams, and fellaini, just as bad, weren't Sunderland the team wanting him. There will always be certain fans who consider this nonsense, and despite someone being past it, they will want them to keep their job forever, because of what they have done in the distant past. ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 22, 2016, 11:36:58 AM Interesting month ahead
Manchester United fixtures from 17th October: Liverpool (a) Fenerbahçe (h) Chelsea (a) Man City (h) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 22, 2016, 12:06:07 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cs8qUTuWcAAJSwL.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on September 22, 2016, 12:19:05 PM Beaten Northampton so united are back, Jose?
Looking forward to our reserve team dumping them out next round :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: exstream on September 24, 2016, 02:52:29 PM They're back!
Rooney dropped, fellaini too, not a coincidence Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on October 18, 2016, 10:28:35 AM top performance from this man last night
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu_8kRZWYAA4-Mp.jpg) typical Mourinho set up against one of the top teams? contain, try and nick one but settle for the draw? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: The Camel on October 18, 2016, 11:06:30 AM top performance from this man last night (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu_8kRZWYAA4-Mp.jpg) typical Mourinho set up against one of the top teams? contain, try and nick one but settle for the draw? Completely un-Manchester United like performance. Even in the days before Fergie, you could guarantee that Man U would play with a certain style and have the supporters on the edge of their seats at times. Last night was horrible. United fans, (like Arsenal fans) must be cursing that Liverpool got Klopp, not them. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on October 18, 2016, 12:40:55 PM Nope they're not. Keith the sun doesn't shine out of Klopp arse and he hasn't achieved anything (yet)
I love Jose. He nullifys teams. Master tactician I prefer stopping a team and getting a point then having a go and losing 5-1. I'm confident he will bring us success altho I do think he isn't number 1 in terms of coaching but only because of Pep and possibly Klopp Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on October 23, 2016, 07:15:55 PM Nope they're not. Keith the sun doesn't shine out of Klopp arse and he hasn't achieved anything (yet) I love Jose. He nullifys teams. Master tactician I prefer stopping a team and getting a point then having a go and losing 5-1. I'm confident he will bring us success altho I do think he isn't number 1 in terms of coaching but only because of Pep and possibly Klopp QFT Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: rinswun on October 23, 2016, 08:11:22 PM Missed Rooney today.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: bagel on October 23, 2016, 08:14:49 PM Missed Rooney today. agreed should have parked the bus Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: RobS on October 23, 2016, 08:36:42 PM Nope they're not. Keith the sun doesn't shine out of Klopp arse and he hasn't achieved anything (yet) I love Jose. He nullifys teams. Master tactician I prefer stopping a team and getting a point then having a go and losing 5-1. I'm confident he will bring us success altho I do think he isn't number 1 in terms of coaching but only because of Pep and possibly Klopp QFT Haha. Shaping up to be a fascinating season for the ABU's Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: nirvana on October 23, 2016, 08:49:03 PM Nope they're not. Keith the sun doesn't shine out of Klopp arse and he hasn't achieved anything (yet) I love Jose. He nullifys teams. Master tactician I prefer stopping a team and getting a point then having a go and losing 5-1. I'm confident he will bring us success altho I do think he isn't number 1 in terms of coaching but only because of Pep and possibly Klopp Tbf, he nullified for 27 seconds. Just need to focus this week on defence a little more - this all out attack is hurting them at the moment Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on October 24, 2016, 03:45:46 AM Those were 4 of the worst goals I've seen us concede in a long time. All ridiculous. A lot of them either looked knackered or completely uninterested, esp at 2-0 down. Be nice if the kids/outcasts got a run out vs City in the irrelevant cup, but seen as we've just been pasted and it's City I suspect it may be another strong team.
Losing Bailly is pretty gutting as well. He's been great all season, even if he looks like he his legs and body think independently. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on October 25, 2016, 10:51:18 AM Interesting article
Manchester United must look deeper than the next shiny new toy https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/oct/24/manchester-united-paul-pogba?CMP=share_btn_tw Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on October 25, 2016, 01:53:42 PM Interesting article Manchester United must look deeper than the next shiny new toy https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/oct/24/manchester-united-paul-pogba?CMP=share_btn_tw Here is another take on it in the Independent: http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/manchester-united-news-jose-mourinho-transfer-how-far-theyve-fallen-city-mark-ogden-a7377686.html Just seen this: "Jose Mourinho has lost 13 of his last 27 Premier League games as a manager. His previous 13 defeats came over a span of 135 league games" The full record in those 27 games is Won 8 Drawn 6 Lost 13. So that's 30 points from 27 games which is slightly better than relegation form. Do United fans still have faith in him? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on October 26, 2016, 01:39:11 PM this is v good
The secret hotel diary of Jose Mourinho, as imagined by Jonathan Liew http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/10/26/the-secret-hotel-diary-of-jose-mourinho-as-imagined-by-jonathan/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on October 26, 2016, 03:41:40 PM That's great, needs more Fellaini though.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: HutchGF on October 27, 2016, 10:42:19 PM this is v good The secret hotel diary of Jose Mourinho, as imagined by Jonathan Liew http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/10/26/the-secret-hotel-diary-of-jose-mourinho-as-imagined-by-jonathan/ A+. Where is Mkhitaryan? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on October 27, 2016, 11:25:19 PM They still can't spell his name so can't put him on the team sheet.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on October 29, 2016, 05:52:28 PM Anyone seen G2L lately?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: pleno1 on October 29, 2016, 05:57:42 PM Playing Herrera as cdm such a bad idea, yes he was good midweek, but he was good at pressing high up the pitch, last man of the midfield is not his nor Pogbas role.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: nirvana on October 29, 2016, 06:20:12 PM Anyone seen G2L lately? Tbf..They did totally nullify Burnley today Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: The Camel on October 29, 2016, 06:30:17 PM Think we can safely unpened the second sad.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on October 30, 2016, 12:34:45 PM Anyone seen G2L lately? Tbf..They did totally nullify Burnley today 10 men hold out for a point, master tactician at work. We are blessed to have him managing in the PL. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on October 30, 2016, 01:02:35 PM Tbf we probably created more clear cut chances yesterday than we have in the last 3 years.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on October 30, 2016, 01:06:11 PM what is the source of his unhappiness with Manchester itself?
missing family? not settling? not as if being shacked up in the lowry is the biggest hardship. why do these managers stay in hotels for months on end? just rent somewhere nice and furnished and temporarily settle down.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on October 30, 2016, 01:25:08 PM Think he said he's super close with his kids, and his daughter and son have stayed in London cos they're at Uni/School etc and this being a big source of unhappiness. Mourinho, Poga and Mkhitaryan are all living in the Lowry, bizarre situation. They should all move in together and make a sitcom.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: PathFinder on October 30, 2016, 02:53:18 PM Think he said he's super close with his kids, and his daughter and son have stayed in London cos they're at Uni/School etc and this being a big source of unhappiness. Mourinho, Poga and Mkhitaryan are all living in the Lowry, bizarre situation. They should all move in together and make a sitcom. Men Behaving Sadly? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: ripple11 on October 30, 2016, 04:30:02 PM Think he said he's super close with his kids, and his daughter and son have stayed in London cos they're at Uni/School etc and this being a big source of unhappiness. Mourinho, Poga and Mkhitaryan are all living in the Lowry, bizarre situation. They should all move in together and make a sitcom. Men Behaving Sadly? ;applause; Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on October 31, 2016, 04:00:12 PM It's early days. In Jose we trust.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on November 07, 2016, 11:12:32 PM For anyone who didn't see this- https://twitter.com/arghappy/status/794273634705690625
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: celtic on November 09, 2016, 10:47:15 PM How hard is it to get tickets for the Liverpool game on January 15? Its for a friend in Malta. and going through an agency isnt really an option due to cost.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on November 10, 2016, 12:03:00 PM would signing Antoine Griezmann, mooted for January, excite you?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on November 10, 2016, 06:40:32 PM Signing David Moyes excited them.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 05, 2016, 02:11:25 PM We were awful yesterday. Performances since the Chelsea game have been very encouraging and have been enjoyable to watch even if the results haven't been great. Yesterday had a bit of the LVG feels about it. Feels like every game is a must win now, which is depressing in November.
This is ridic as well. Nothing going on in this mans head. YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCFKsLLkNkA Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 05, 2016, 02:36:17 PM We were awful yesterday. Performances since the Chelsea game have been very encouraging and have been enjoyable to watch even if the results haven't been great. Yesterday had a bit of the LVG feels about it. Feels like every game is a must win now, which is depressing in November. This is ridic as well. Nothing going on in this mans head. YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCFKsLLkNkA The rules of the game are absurd. Due to the ref missing it there is no ban for this horror challenge yet Pereyra gets a 3 game ban because the ref saw him wave a handbag at McClean! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on December 12, 2016, 04:31:38 PM Was pretty nice to hold out ftw for a change yesterday. Still not able to finish off teams though despite having a few good chances. Really going to hurt us in the long run if this remains the case. Mkhitaryan's touch and finish for the goal were sublime, Herrera and Pogba were great as usual and Rojo and Jones (bizarrely) are really starting to create a solid partnership. Be nice to see Jones stay fit for the rest of the season, think him and Bailly could form a great partnership. Only 6 and 7 points behind City and Liverpool which is very fortunate given recent results, however goal difference is letting us down again for the 4th season in a row. Couple of tough away games next up, really need to have full concentration here and be lethal at finishing to get 6 points,
St Etienne in the Europa, haven't seen them play in years but not too far to travel. Think they're 8th in Ligue and struggling to score. Be great if we can put a few past them at home to set up a relatively straight forward 2nd leg before the Manchester derby 3 days later. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 18, 2017, 06:38:59 PM Looks like Depay is on his way out of OT. Pretty disappointed overall, not that he's leaving, but that he never even came close to fulfilling his potential. His decision making is horrific and he always seems to be playing with his head down. Seems like he needs a cuddle and a bit of guidance. He def wsn't going to get that from LVG or Jose (maybe Fergie would have been better), but hope he gets it at Lyon and starts playing regularly again.
Scheiderlin also gone to Everton. If you asked me to name a game he even played in, let alone made an impression I couldn't tell you. Very under whelming signing. Think these 2 sum up United in the last few seasons. Didn't really do much and won't be missed. Griezmann links hotting up again today with a few notables saying it's done verbally, whatever that means. Pretty meh on him tbh. Going to cause a lot of formation problems and he'll def be in at the expense of someone, most likely Martial, which is criminal in my view. Game on Sunday was awful. Not finishing chances is the theme of this season and is going to cost us so bad. Mkhitaryan should have buried his chance (although was a decent save), Pogba should have buried his (target would have been nice) and Martial should have buried his (kicking the ball would have been nice). Pogba had his worst game for us, he's been exceptional the last few months so was pretty funny to see people's reactions. He tries to hard at the best of times and giving away the penalty just made it worse. Thought Liverpool were excellent pressing and gave us real trouble at set pieces. Think with Mane in the team they would have scored on the counter. They had a fair few counters but didn't really create anything from them which I didn't expect. Next 4 or so weeks we've got a great run of games and all the teams above us play each other. Gotta win em all and we'll be at least 3rd. Arsenal away and Spurs away 2 of the last 3 games of the season is going to be crunch. I really don't fancy us if we need wins from these games. We're terrible at breaking teams down and even when we do we're just not putting the chances away. Still in all 4 comps which is nice. Hope Southampton beat Pool as I think they'll def beat us in a one off game. Europa league looks best bet, with only Spurs the real threat. They're better than us but never show up. Villareal would be the worst match in history. 0-0 0-0 penalties written all over it. Haven't seen or even heard of a lot of the other teams so with 5 really good teams above us in the league atm it seems like we should be taking it very seriously. Shaw is back fit, think this next 4 months is crucial for him as a United player. Jose doesn't seem to like him and with his historical fitness problems can't see that changing. If Darmian is still playing left back for the Europa league game vs St Etienne I think we can probably gg his United career. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: rinswun on January 18, 2017, 08:06:38 PM Bit harsh on Martial. The pass from Mik was awful in every possible way - too late, too hard, misdirected. Really should have been rolling it into an open net but was instead made to try a backheel on a ball travelling at massive pace.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on January 19, 2017, 03:14:28 PM Looks like Depay is on his way out of OT. Pretty disappointed overall, not that he's leaving, but that he never even came close to fulfilling his potential. His decision making is horrific and he always seems to be playing with his head down. Seems like he needs a cuddle and a bit of guidance. He def wsn't going to get that from LVG or Jose (maybe Fergie would have been better), but hope he gets it at Lyon and starts playing regularly again. Scheiderlin also gone to Everton. If you asked me to name a game he even played in, let alone made an impression I couldn't tell you. Very under whelming signing. Think these 2 sum up United in the last few seasons. Didn't really do much and won't be missed. Griezmann links hotting up again today with a few notables saying it's done verbally, whatever that means. Pretty meh on him tbh. Going to cause a lot of formation problems and he'll def be in at the expense of someone, most likely Martial, which is criminal in my view. Game on Sunday was awful. Not finishing chances is the theme of this season and is going to cost us so bad. Mkhitaryan should have buried his chance (although was a decent save), Pogba should have buried his (target would have been nice) and Martial should have buried his (kicking the ball would have been nice). Pogba had his worst game for us, he's been exceptional the last few months so was pretty funny to see people's reactions. He tries to hard at the best of times and giving away the penalty just made it worse. Thought Liverpool were excellent pressing and gave us real trouble at set pieces. Think with Mane in the team they would have scored on the counter. They had a fair few counters but didn't really create anything from them which I didn't expect. Next 4 or so weeks we've got a great run of games and all the teams above us play each other. Gotta win em all and we'll be at least 3rd. Arsenal away and Spurs away 2 of the last 3 games of the season is going to be crunch. I really don't fancy us if we need wins from these games. We're terrible at breaking teams down and even when we do we're just not putting the chances away. Still in all 4 comps which is nice. Hope Southampton beat Pool as I think they'll def beat us in a one off game. Europa league looks best bet, with only Spurs the real threat. They're better than us but never show up. Villareal would be the worst match in history. 0-0 0-0 penalties written all over it. Haven't seen or even heard of a lot of the other teams so with 5 really good teams above us in the league atm it seems like we should be taking it very seriously. Shaw is back fit, think this next 4 months is crucial for him as a United player. Jose doesn't seem to like him and with his historical fitness problems can't see that changing. If Darmian is still playing left back for the Europa league game vs St Etienne I think we can probably gg his United career. Not sure I approve of this post. Far too much understatement and not enough hyperbole and entitlement. Or is this the new mind set of the average United supporter after 3 years of relative dross and failure post-Ferguson and recognition of the new Manchester order? Come on, give us something to get our teeth into :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 19, 2017, 04:52:21 PM Peps a bald *****.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 19, 2017, 04:52:32 PM 20 times
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 19, 2017, 05:23:55 PM Looks like Depay is on his way out of OT. Pretty disappointed overall, not that he's leaving, but that he never even came close to fulfilling his potential. His decision making is horrific and he always seems to be playing with his head down. Seems like he needs a cuddle and a bit of guidance. He def wsn't going to get that from LVG or Jose (maybe Fergie would have been better), but hope he gets it at Lyon and starts playing regularly again. Scheiderlin also gone to Everton. If you asked me to name a game he even played in, let alone made an impression I couldn't tell you. Very under whelming signing. Think these 2 sum up United in the last few seasons. Didn't really do much and won't be missed. Griezmann links hotting up again today with a few notables saying it's done verbally, whatever that means. Pretty meh on him tbh. Going to cause a lot of formation problems and he'll def be in at the expense of someone, most likely Martial, which is criminal in my view. Game on Sunday was awful. Not finishing chances is the theme of this season and is going to cost us so bad. Mkhitaryan should have buried his chance (although was a decent save), Pogba should have buried his (target would have been nice) and Martial should have buried his (kicking the ball would have been nice). Pogba had his worst game for us, he's been exceptional the last few months so was pretty funny to see people's reactions. He tries to hard at the best of times and giving away the penalty just made it worse. Thought Liverpool were excellent pressing and gave us real trouble at set pieces. Think with Mane in the team they would have scored on the counter. They had a fair few counters but didn't really create anything from them which I didn't expect. Next 4 or so weeks we've got a great run of games and all the teams above us play each other. Gotta win em all and we'll be at least 3rd. Arsenal away and Spurs away 2 of the last 3 games of the season is going to be crunch. I really don't fancy us if we need wins from these games. We're terrible at breaking teams down and even when we do we're just not putting the chances away. Still in all 4 comps which is nice. Hope Southampton beat Pool as I think they'll def beat us in a one off game. Europa league looks best bet, with only Spurs the real threat. They're better than us but never show up. Villareal would be the worst match in history. 0-0 0-0 penalties written all over it. Haven't seen or even heard of a lot of the other teams so with 5 really good teams above us in the league atm it seems like we should be taking it very seriously. Shaw is back fit, think this next 4 months is crucial for him as a United player. Jose doesn't seem to like him and with his historical fitness problems can't see that changing. If Darmian is still playing left back for the Europa league game vs St Etienne I think we can probably gg his United career. Not sure I approve of this post. Far too much understatement and not enough hyperbole and entitlement. Or is this the new mind set of the average United supporter after 3 years of relative dross and failure post-Ferguson and recognition of the new Manchester order? Come on, give us something to get our teeth into :) Tbf I don't think a lot of United fans are too disappointed with the situation we're in now at the minute. We're only 5 points from 2nd and still in all 4 competitions. The football has been a million times better than the last couple of years, there seems to be an actual plan. Even if the plan is spend tons and rebuild again, no one is complaining with Pogba and co coming in. As long as we're on top of the financials and signing top players no ones arsed if we have to play Europa league for a couple of seasons, as we're not good enough to get anywhere near winning the CL and we've had 25 years of getting to QF,SF,finals etc. The football is better and more positive so it would take maybe 2-3 more years of stagnating around top 6 for people to get worried. You get a ridic amount of schadenfreude as a United fan as well to keep you happy. Everyone hates you and there are a lot of clubs expecting things. Liverpool blowing a 1-0 lead in the 2nd half of the Europa league final was better than winning the FA cup by some margin. And Gerrard slipping and costing them the title after saying lets not let this slip was infinitely better than the Moyes season was bad. This season we've got the Pep circus, Arsenal fan TV and the incoming scouser heartbreak so we can't really complain. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: nirvana on January 19, 2017, 09:24:42 PM You get a ridic amount of schadenfreude as a United fan as well to keep you happy. Everyone hates you and there are a lot of clubs expecting things. Liverpool blowing a 1-0 lead in the 2nd half of the Europa league final was better than winning the FA cup by some margin. And Gerrard slipping and costing them the title after saying lets not let this slip was infinitely better than the Moyes season was bad. This season we've got the Pep circus, Arsenal fan TV and the incoming scouser heartbreak so we can't really complain. Love this, really sums up what being a proper fan is all about. As an Arsenal fan I identify with this more than any thing else I've read in all the footie posts I've ever read on blonde. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on January 19, 2017, 09:35:43 PM Id agree that United fans are "happy" at the moment, the football is better and there is progress after 3 years of dross.
I would say all of the top 6 apart from Chelsea are much of a muchness at the moment. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 20, 2017, 12:16:24 AM You get a ridic amount of schadenfreude as a United fan as well to keep you happy. Everyone hates you and there are a lot of clubs expecting things. Liverpool blowing a 1-0 lead in the 2nd half of the Europa league final was better than winning the FA cup by some margin. And Gerrard slipping and costing them the title after saying lets not let this slip was infinitely better than the Moyes season was bad. This season we've got the Pep circus, Arsenal fan TV and the incoming scouser heartbreak so we can't really complain. Love this, really sums up what being a proper fan is all about. As an Arsenal fan I identify with this more than any thing else I've read in all the footie posts I've ever read on blonde. YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrlPxPLXsVE YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uExTwNxNxiw Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on January 20, 2017, 11:01:08 AM Man Utd work on £86m Antoine Griezmann deal, as Atletico Madrid say they won't stand in player's way
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/01/19/man-utd-working-86-million-antoine-griezmann-deal-atletico-madrid/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: muckthenuts on January 20, 2017, 04:21:39 PM Man Utd work on £86m Antoine Griezmann deal, as Atletico Madrid say they won't stand in player's way http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/01/19/man-utd-working-86-million-antoine-griezmann-deal-atletico-madrid/ Does CL football not mean as much to players any more? Too many games in a season at present? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 20, 2017, 05:11:42 PM It def does imo, but I think United are in a unique position of still be able to pay top transfer fees and top wages despite not being in it, and probably will continue till they do reestablish themselves as a CL club. I think players joining (maybe joining) appreciate this and can see that the team being built won't be out of the top 4 for much longer. Griezmann and his brother are (were?) also massive United fans. Not really believing all this paper talk as of yet. Other clubs will be in for him but it's nice that he won't go to Real, Barca have the 3 best strikers in the world already and we can probably outdraw/outspend any other team. Atletico are busto by all accounts due to moving to the new stadium, which is probably the wood fueling this speculation. Tbh we should just try and buy whoever Atletico are going to replace Griezmann with. It'll be a lot cheaper and whoever they are after is sure to be a hit. Think it's gone Torres>Aguero>Falcao>Villa>Costa>Manzukic>Griezmann as their strikers for the last 10 years. All in their peak as well.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: verndog158 on January 20, 2017, 07:04:34 PM Man Utd work on £86m Antoine Griezmann deal, as Atletico Madrid say they won't stand in player's way http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/01/19/man-utd-working-86-million-antoine-griezmann-deal-atletico-madrid/ Does CL football not mean as much to players any more? Too many games in a season at present? surely they are all just after the £££? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on January 20, 2017, 07:12:11 PM Man Utd work on £86m Antoine Griezmann deal, as Atletico Madrid say they won't stand in player's way http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/01/19/man-utd-working-86-million-antoine-griezmann-deal-atletico-madrid/ Does CL football not mean as much to players any more? Too many games in a season at present? surely they are all just after the £££? You find me a football player that is not in it for the money and i will show you a liar. As a kid now you know if you make it you are rich. As a footballer you have circa 10-15 years to earn your lifes wage. Now on £100k a week that shouldn't be too hard if you can avoid gambling, alcohol, drugs and women. But then whats the point? Most footballers are still grafting there bollocks of for a "good" wage but living the lifestyle of a millionaire so spend all they have. If a Vardy type hits the jackpot after grafting in the lower leagues, so what if he takes the big pay day. If Rooney buggers off to China at the end of the year for £500k a week who am i to argue with him. I currently work within a family business earning £xxk a year. if someone offers me £x,xxxk a year im off, see you dad, mum, brother on your bike. No loyalty shown from me there but that is what these footballers are doing. The only people that are loyal are the fans, and most fans need to get over the fact that the players are not loyal, its a job they maximise their earning potential like everyone else does. The days of Giggs, Scholes, Neville etc (One Club Men) are gone in my eyes. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on January 20, 2017, 07:18:39 PM Man Utd work on £86m Antoine Griezmann deal, as Atletico Madrid say they won't stand in player's way http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/01/19/man-utd-working-86-million-antoine-griezmann-deal-atletico-madrid/ Does CL football not mean as much to players any more? Too many games in a season at present? surely they are all just after the £££? You find me a football player that is not in it for the money and i will show you a liar. As a kid now you know if you make it you are rich. As a footballer you have circa 10-15 years to earn your lifes wage. Now on £100k a week that shouldn't be too hard if you can avoid gambling, alcohol, drugs and women. But then whats the point? Most footballers are still grafting there bollocks of for a "good" wage but living the lifestyle of a millionaire so spend all they have. If a Vardy type hits the jackpot after grafting in the lower leagues, so what if he takes the big pay day. If Rooney buggers off to China at the end of the year for £500k a week who am i to argue with him. I currently work within a family business earning £xxk a year. if someone offers me £x,xxxk a year im off, see you dad, mum, brother on your bike. No loyalty shown from me there but that is what these footballers are doing. The only people that are loyal are the fans, and most fans need to get over the fact that the players are not loyal, its a job they maximise their earning potential like everyone else does. The days of Giggs, Scholes, Neville etc (One Club Men) are gone in my eyes. Very easy to claim to be a one club man when said club is smashing the joint up for 10/15 years and winning everything with the GOAT managing them. Alongside that you also get offered the huge wages without having to move because you are winning everything. Would have been interesting to see how loyal those red nose lifers would have been if manure were suddenly a mid table club in the primes of their careers and winning nothing. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: BorntoBubble on January 20, 2017, 07:23:18 PM Man Utd work on £86m Antoine Griezmann deal, as Atletico Madrid say they won't stand in player's way http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/01/19/man-utd-working-86-million-antoine-griezmann-deal-atletico-madrid/ Does CL football not mean as much to players any more? Too many games in a season at present? surely they are all just after the £££? You find me a football player that is not in it for the money and i will show you a liar. As a kid now you know if you make it you are rich. As a footballer you have circa 10-15 years to earn your lifes wage. Now on £100k a week that shouldn't be too hard if you can avoid gambling, alcohol, drugs and women. But then whats the point? Most footballers are still grafting there bollocks of for a "good" wage but living the lifestyle of a millionaire so spend all they have. If a Vardy type hits the jackpot after grafting in the lower leagues, so what if he takes the big pay day. If Rooney buggers off to China at the end of the year for £500k a week who am i to argue with him. I currently work within a family business earning £xxk a year. if someone offers me £x,xxxk a year im off, see you dad, mum, brother on your bike. No loyalty shown from me there but that is what these footballers are doing. The only people that are loyal are the fans, and most fans need to get over the fact that the players are not loyal, its a job they maximise their earning potential like everyone else does. The days of Giggs, Scholes, Neville etc (One Club Men) are gone in my eyes. Very easy to claim to be a one club man when said club is smashing the joint up for 10/15 years and winning everything with the GOAT managing them. Alongside that you also get offered the huge wages without having to move because you are winning everything. Would have been interesting to see how loyal those red nose lifers would have been if manure were suddenly a mid table club in the primes of their careers and winning nothing. I think only Scholes would have stayed tbh maybe Neville as he was not as "gifted" as the others. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on January 20, 2017, 07:28:59 PM Man Utd work on £86m Antoine Griezmann deal, as Atletico Madrid say they won't stand in player's way http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/01/19/man-utd-working-86-million-antoine-griezmann-deal-atletico-madrid/ Does CL football not mean as much to players any more? Too many games in a season at present? surely they are all just after the £££? You find me a football player that is not in it for the money and i will show you a liar. As a kid now you know if you make it you are rich. As a footballer you have circa 10-15 years to earn your lifes wage. Now on £100k a week that shouldn't be too hard if you can avoid gambling, alcohol, drugs and women. But then whats the point? Most footballers are still grafting there bollocks of for a "good" wage but living the lifestyle of a millionaire so spend all they have. If a Vardy type hits the jackpot after grafting in the lower leagues, so what if he takes the big pay day. If Rooney buggers off to China at the end of the year for £500k a week who am i to argue with him. I currently work within a family business earning £xxk a year. if someone offers me £x,xxxk a year im off, see you dad, mum, brother on your bike. No loyalty shown from me there but that is what these footballers are doing. The only people that are loyal are the fans, and most fans need to get over the fact that the players are not loyal, its a job they maximise their earning potential like everyone else does. The days of Giggs, Scholes, Neville etc (One Club Men) are gone in my eyes. Very easy to claim to be a one club man when said club is smashing the joint up for 10/15 years and winning everything with the GOAT managing them. Alongside that you also get offered the huge wages without having to move because you are winning everything. Would have been interesting to see how loyal those red nose lifers would have been if manure were suddenly a mid table club in the primes of their careers and winning nothing. I think only Scholes would have stayed tbh maybe Neville as he was not as "gifted" as the others. Agreed i never got the impressions Scholes was remotely interested in money in the slightest at any stage of his career. Probably one of the few footballers who never made any decision based on financial reasons during his playing career. Once he had made enough to live on for life if they said 'right son you are out' he would have probably said listen if i play for free will you let me stay as i have no interest playing anywhere else. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Tal on January 20, 2017, 07:46:20 PM Man Utd work on £86m Antoine Griezmann deal, as Atletico Madrid say they won't stand in player's way http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/01/19/man-utd-working-86-million-antoine-griezmann-deal-atletico-madrid/ Does CL football not mean as much to players any more? Too many games in a season at present? surely they are all just after the £££? You find me a football player that is not in it for the money and i will show you a liar. As a kid now you know if you make it you are rich. As a footballer you have circa 10-15 years to earn your lifes wage. Now on £100k a week that shouldn't be too hard if you can avoid gambling, alcohol, drugs and women. But then whats the point? Most footballers are still grafting there bollocks of for a "good" wage but living the lifestyle of a millionaire so spend all they have. If a Vardy type hits the jackpot after grafting in the lower leagues, so what if he takes the big pay day. If Rooney buggers off to China at the end of the year for £500k a week who am i to argue with him. I currently work within a family business earning £xxk a year. if someone offers me £x,xxxk a year im off, see you dad, mum, brother on your bike. No loyalty shown from me there but that is what these footballers are doing. The only people that are loyal are the fans, and most fans need to get over the fact that the players are not loyal, its a job they maximise their earning potential like everyone else does. The days of Giggs, Scholes, Neville etc (One Club Men) are gone in my eyes. Very easy to claim to be a one club man when said club is smashing the joint up for 10/15 years and winning everything with the GOAT managing them. Alongside that you also get offered the huge wages without having to move because you are winning everything. Would have been interesting to see how loyal those red nose lifers would have been if manure were suddenly a mid table club in the primes of their careers and winning nothing. I think only Scholes would have stayed tbh maybe Neville as he was not as "gifted" as the others. Agreed i never got the impressions Scholes was remotely interested in money in the slightest at any stage of his career. Probably one of the few footballers who never made any decision based on financial reasons during his playing career. Once he had made enough to live on for life if they said 'right son you are out' he would have probably said listen if i play for free will you let me stay as i have no interest playing anywhere else. GNev would have been sold to West Ham in 1998, after United decided they had to spend money to get back into Europe and bought Cafu from Palmeiras in the summer of 97. GNev goes on to have a successful career under Arry, persuades Frank Lampard not to go to Chelsea and enables John Hartson to come second in the 1999 golden boot. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on January 21, 2017, 07:50:19 PM record breaker
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tZ8RrXAAEaBu5.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on January 22, 2017, 10:37:36 AM That's some record, well done Wayne. As he has aged, he has come in for some brutal comments from Team Armchair & the Press, but he always gave his all, has a great engine & never fails to give 100%. As age has taken it's inevitable toll, & he was no longer guaranteed a place every week, & often sat warming the subs bench, which must be quite an ignominy for one with such a great record, & he seemed to handle it pretty well. In his early years, first at Everton & then Man U, he was one of those players you would always be excited to watch, as he had audacious skills. What a career he has had, & we've been lucky to see his like. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: nirvana on January 22, 2017, 10:49:28 AM That's some record, well done Wayne. As he has aged, he has come in for some brutal comments from Team Armchair & the Press, but he always gave his all, has a great engine & never fails to give 100%. As age has taken it's inevitable toll, & he was no longer guaranteed a place every week, & often sat warming the subs bench, which must be quite an ignominy for one with such a great record, & he seemed to handle it pretty well. In his early years, first at Everton & then Man U, he was one of those players you would always be excited to watch, as he had audacious skills. What a career he has had, & we've been lucky to see his like. Er... Given his all Looks like a career in footie punditry awaits you Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: nirvana on January 22, 2017, 11:21:16 AM That's some record, well done Wayne. As he has aged, he has come in for some brutal comments from Team Armchair & the Press, but he always gave his all, has a great engine & never fails to give 100%. As age has taken it's inevitable toll, & he was no longer guaranteed a place every week, & often sat warming the subs bench, which must be quite an ignominy for one with such a great record, & he seemed to handle it pretty well. In his early years, first at Everton & then Man U, he was one of those players you would always be excited to watch, as he had audacious skills. What a career he has had, & we've been lucky to see his like. Er... Given his all Looks like a career in footie punditry awaits you Nothing to see here. Mis read. Move on. And yah, Rooney, never thought he really reached the heights but excellent all the same Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: teddybloat on January 22, 2017, 11:52:25 AM Imagine captaining United and England and breaking the goal scoring record for both, imagine playing over 600 top flight + 110 international games before your 32nd birthday, imagine hoovering up winner medals - to the point that in terms of league and champions league medals if you were a club you'd be chelsea... and still being considered a bit of a let down.
Wp Wayne lad, you are a boss. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on January 22, 2017, 11:57:31 AM Imagine captaining United and England and breaking the goal scoring record for both, imagine hoovering up winner medals - to the point that in terms of league and champions league medals if you were a club you'd be chelsea - and still being considered a bit of a let down. Wp Wayne lad, you are a boss. Yup. Every footballer has those dreams. Rooney achieved them. What a wonderful feeling that must be. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: teddybloat on January 22, 2017, 12:33:18 PM gullit was on top form on MOTD last night saying rooney isnt considered as a great player as he has never performed well in an international tournament - before qualifying that by saying you have to ignore the time he did perform well in a tournament for that statement to be true : "armstrong has never walk on the moon, well if you ignore the first time he walked on the moon..."
we are constantly being told that we fortunate to be be able, if you wish, to see the greatest forward line ever assembled play for barcalona. messi, neymar and suarez. lets examine their record in international tournaments: 1 red card, one bite, one instance of being a member of the most embarrassingly inept home nation and a decent goal against iran. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 06, 2017, 05:27:55 AM Stumbled across this earlier.
Big chances missed: Zlatan 12 (top of PL. Next highest is Afobe of Bournemouth with 8) Pogba 5 Lingard 3 Mata 3 Rashford 2 Rooney 2 https://www.premierleague.com/stats/top/players/big_chance_missed Conversion rate of non-penalty shots taken inside the area Zlatan 10 goals from 65 non-penalty shots taken inside the area = 15% Martial 2 from 10 = 20% Rashford 3 from 19 = 15.7% Pogba 3 from 32 = 9% Mata 4 from 23 = 17% Rooney 1 from 16 = 6% Mkhitaryan 2 from 12 = 16.7% Team stats for goals scored inside the area (our main problem. We are 9th, miles behind the top 5): https://www.premierleague.com/stats/top/clubs/att_ibox_goal 8 headed goals from 595 crosses (goal every 75) (https://i.gyazo.com/1dd20b3fb379479548284febb82c8f04.png) Can't seem to dig out the page, but I think we've had something like 112 shots in the games vs Stoke, Burnley, West Ham, and Hull and scored twice. That's 8 points dropped there, from games we should have won by a big margin. Would have put us 2nd and only 6 behind Chelsea. Of course all teams drop points, have bad performances, but it's the worrying similarity from all the games of wasting very good opportunities. Today was a lot better, we didn't create that much but put away our chances. Teams above us should be out of sight by now but are dropping equally as silly points as us. They still have a few games to play vs each while we've got easy fixtures on paper. Might even be up to 4th by March. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on February 07, 2017, 01:54:15 PM Even with the draws it is a pretty impressive run of results..... 31 points last 15 which ordinarily is a shoe in for CL qualification if average 2ppg over the season. As it stands 45 points from 24 played is still the highest recorded in PL history for a 6th place team at this stage of the season. Despite the blips for the teams above, Arsenal are in 4th with 47 points and that has never been bettered by a 4th place team at this stage of the season also.
Big 6 fixtures still to come: Spurs - Liverpool (a) Arsenal (h) United (h) Liverpool - Spurs (h) Arsenal (h) City (a) City - Liverpool (h) United (h) Arsenal (a) Chelsea (a) Arsenal - Liverpool (a) city (h) Spurs (a) United (h) United - City (a) Chelsea (h) Arsenal (a) Spurs (a) With 3 from 4 away I would have said United's fixtures are the toughest. Unless you mean the forthcoming fixtures. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 07, 2017, 02:12:22 PM I hadn't realised until i watched Pogba live (at the weekend) how huge he is
such a big unit, impossible to knock off the ball, distributes it well. really protects the back four nicely with Herrera never really stood out for me on TV until i saw him at close quarters Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 07, 2017, 02:16:20 PM Yeh up until Chelsea in the middle of March we've got some really good fixtures. That's 7 games where we probably should be getting max points. We realistically need a nice cushion for top 4 before the run of death. I can see us being hard to beat in those games but if we are going away from home to those teams looking for wins I think we're going to come up short. We've got the worst goal difference as well. Would be sickening to lose out via that again knowing the amount of chances we've pissed away consistently every game.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 07, 2017, 03:18:31 PM I hadn't realised until i watched Pogba live (at the weekend) how huge he is such a big unit, impossible to knock off the ball, distributes it well. really protects the back four nicely with Herrera never really stood out for me on TV until i saw him at close quarters Yeh he was great defensively on Sunday.Said it right before we signed him that he was exactly the type of player we've been missing. Shame people won't look past his price tag as I think along with Valencia he's been our player of the season. I think he needs couple of years of to mature, as most games he's just trying way too hard to impress. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 16, 2017, 11:49:14 PM That was a strange game. First half we were awful at the back, looked very nervous and making tons of mistakes. Wouldn't have been surprised if we had conceded. If that had been a Champions league clash any team in it would have scored 1 or more of those chances. Thought Herrera looked poor all game, gave the ball away a lot and was caught on the wrong side a couple of times. First goal was great. Zlatan has smashed every single free kick he's had this season into the wall, one of them had to sneak through sooner or later.
2nd half thought we were great. Pogba bossed the game again, should have scored with the header but had a great game non the less. Martial had the fullbacks on toast, he's been back to his old self last couple of games, what ever Mourinho said to him seems to have worked. Lingard, Martial and Rashford is such a great attacking line up, I wished we played all 3 together more. Add in Valencia and Shaw (when he comes back) and that's a frightening amount of pace. 3-0 flattered us and St Etienne were unfortunate to not get an away goal, but that's pretty much the perfect attacking performance and we can just go to France and park some kind of large vehicle. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on February 20, 2017, 01:16:17 PM For a 35 year old on a free transfer, this Zlatan fella is pretty handy, huh? 15 goals & 4 assists is it? When I was able to see Man U v Hull, the crown were getting on his back, as they claimed he was lazy, but he does not strike me as a team player - just a lethal, selfish goal machine. Where would Man U be this season without him? In his absence for injury, or after he moves on/retires, who would replace him? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on February 20, 2017, 02:12:29 PM Rashford will be a star, I think.
Obv a bit small for a target man, though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 21, 2017, 10:30:48 AM For a 35 year old on a free transfer, this Zlatan fella is pretty handy, huh? 15 goals & 4 assists is it? When I was able to see Man U v Hull, the crown were getting on his back, as they claimed he was lazy, but he does not strike me as a team player - just a lethal, selfish goal machine. Where would Man U be this season without him? In his absence for injury, or after he moves on/retires, who would replace him? I think people get on his back because he is so wasteful. Like I posted further up the page, he's got one of the worst shot conversion rates of any striker in the Prem and misses the most clear goal scoring opportunities. United create so many chances if we had a proper lethal striker we'd be top of the Prem or thereabouts. That run of draws we had 112 shots and scored 2 goals. Fans are sick of us being so team playing so well and being so wasteful, and when you play as a lone striker a lot of the stick is going to fall at your feet. He's 35 so I don't think people are expecting him to be chasing everything, but I do think they expect him to be putting away the chances when they fall to him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on February 21, 2017, 10:35:46 AM For a 35 year old on a free transfer, this Zlatan fella is pretty handy, huh? 15 goals & 4 assists is it? When I was able to see Man U v Hull, the crown were getting on his back, as they claimed he was lazy, but he does not strike me as a team player - just a lethal, selfish goal machine. Where would Man U be this season without him? In his absence for injury, or after he moves on/retires, who would replace him? I think people get on his back because he is so wasteful. Like I posted further up the page, he's got one of the worst shot conversion rates of any striker in the Prem and misses the most clear goal scoring opportunities. United create so many chances if we had a proper lethal striker we'd be top of the Prem or thereabouts. That run of draws we had 112 shots and scored 2 goals. Fans are sick of us being so team playing so well and being so wasteful, and when you play as a lone striker a lot of the stick is going to fall at your feet. He's 35 so I don't think people are expecting him to be chasing everything, but I do think they expect him to be putting away the chances when they fall to him. So back to my question, where would Man U be without him this season? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 21, 2017, 10:43:32 AM Without him and with just the other strikers we have, we'd def be struggling.
Without him and with a suitable replacement I don't think there'd be any difference. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: pleno1 on February 21, 2017, 02:35:41 PM Also think he's one of the most overrated players the premiership has to offer. Every time I've watched him he's been awful and missed a bunch of absolute sitters.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on February 21, 2017, 02:39:48 PM Also think he's one of the most overrated players the premiership has to offer. Every time I've watched him he's been awful and missed a bunch of absolute sitters. I think he has hurt the overall development of their squad further down the line this year. Typical Jose all about the present and fuck youth development. If you had used his wage budget you would have got similar production without him. You might have got the same production without even having him if you give Rashford and Martial the free reign. That isn't Jose's style though. Hence why he doesn't last long as most clubs. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 21, 2017, 02:58:07 PM YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjlBU1AsMrI
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57r58OXQRoY These 2 vids highlight some of his misses earlier in the season and it's been a similar story since. Those two headers vs Chelsea and Liverpool were at crucial stages of the game and should be bread and butter for a player like him. Notice Pogba is assisting a lot of these chances. His link up play with Zlatan has been incredible this year, they both should be hitting league best goals and assists. While I kinda agree with arb the thing you get with Zlatan is that experience and ego with him. He's always going to play, and as we've seen get the goals. Even through rough patches his head isn't going to drop and he's a big enough character to take any stick people throw at him. Which, if we did have Martial and Rashford as our only strike force, like we've seen earlier this season, they've gone big spells without goals, heads have dropped, and they've been left out for a while and come back better, so it's nice to be able to rely on someone like Zlatan. I think so one or two seasons he's a perfect stop gap till we get someone else in. Plus we've still got up to 25 games left this season. The young lads are going to be getting games, and having these players with bags of pace as impact subs is going to be pretty important. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on February 21, 2017, 02:58:32 PM The family man likes him and compares him to Cantona:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/ryan-giggs-hails-unbelievable-zlatan-9860522 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 22, 2017, 10:01:30 AM off to china next week?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C5OQf1ZXUAQ1zN7.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 24, 2017, 01:36:22 PM Celta v Krasnodar
APOEL v Anderlecht Schalke 04 v Borussia Monchengladbach Lyon v Roma Rostov v Man Utd Olympiacos v Beşiktaş Gent v Genk Copenhagen v Ajax As far as draws go that isn't the worst. Rostov are 7th in the Russian league, although they did beat Bayern earlier on in the season. 2 of Lyon, Roma, Schalke and Gladbach are going to be out by the semi's and at least one of the Belgian clubs (maybe 2) are going to be left in. Trip to Russia 4 days before we play Chelsea isn't ideal, but FA Cup is prob bottom of priorities list this season anyway. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: JohnCharver on February 24, 2017, 02:36:48 PM Celta v Krasnodar APOEL v Anderlecht Schalke 04 v Borussia Monchengladbach Lyon v Roma Rostov v Man Utd Olympiacos v Beşiktaş Gent v Genk Copenhagen v Ajax As far as draws go that isn't the worst. Rostov are 7th in the Russian league, although they did beat Bayern earlier on in the season. 2 of Lyon, Roma, Schalke and Gladbach are going to be out by the semi's and at least one of the Belgian clubs (maybe 2) are going to be left in. Trip to Russia 4 days before we play Chelsea isn't ideal, but FA Cup is prob bottom of priorities list this season anyway. Lyon Roma looks a cracking tie Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on February 27, 2017, 12:24:48 AM Great game of football today. Credit to Southampton, both on and off the pitch. Their fans were amazing and pretty much out sung us the entire match. In the game you could tell they'd had 2 weeks to prepare, we looked knackered and Redmond/Bertrand got in behind so many times. Set pieces we were awful from again, Pogba in particular, the mans an absolute unit but horrendous in the air. Got caught under the ball for Gabbiadini's goal and out muscled when Romeu hit the post. We looked really shaky at the back all game, similar to the first 20 mins vs St Etienne. I think this time it was due to how dangerous Southampton were going forward.
Was nice to see Ibrahimovic actually clear the wall for the opener, which will have him on free kicks for the rest of the season now. Which is a shame because 10 minutes later he was back to his old self smashing it into the wall again. 2nd goal was really poor from Southampton, you can't give anyone that much space and time to take a touch, turn and shoot in the box, even if it was only Lingard. They thoroughly deserved to be level at half time, ridic decision for the disallowed goal. Totally changes the game if they go 1-0 up, chasing a game with the fitness levels we could get caught out on the break so easily. Gabbiadini looks a handful, great finish for his 2nd goal, and great movement for the 1st and disallowed goal. Surprised they took him off with 15? mins left. I'd like to say I fell for Southampton, and I do to a certain extent, but the winning goal you can't really defend on any level. 3 mins left in a cup final, they've left a 2v2 break on, Zlatan's slowed the play down to let everyone get back, then strolled into the area and had a free header from 6 yards. Crazy from their point of view, especially seen as they had the fitness levels to really punish us in extra time. First trophy under Jose is good to get out of the way, got a nice full week off before Bournemouth at home, hope some players get a rest as we've then got to go to Russia, back to Chelsea away and 2nd leg vs Rostov in the space of a week. The game looked like it took a lot out of a few players today. This next week or so will really show if we've got the depth to compete in all competitions. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on February 27, 2017, 10:50:26 AM the Zlatan final?
the ultimate club big game player? (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C5nLEXSWUAE1kvj.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on March 02, 2017, 11:03:59 AM want to feel old?
Ryan Giggs made his debut for MUFC 26 years ago today.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on March 04, 2017, 03:53:53 PM Forever
(https://i.gyazo.com/0cd316c3eff8820586e8e00c318ce629.png) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on March 05, 2017, 12:32:40 PM do you think Zlatan will or should get a retrospective ban?
the Mings stamp is an open and shut one. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: booder on March 05, 2017, 01:28:25 PM Zlatan offence more clear cut , 3 games imo
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on March 05, 2017, 01:44:37 PM Zlatan offence more clear cut , 3 games imo Agreed about Zlatan. I'm not sure what the punishment should be for stamping on someone's ponytail. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on March 05, 2017, 01:53:13 PM Anyone remember when football was a man's game and stuff like this used to happen every week and it wasn't even considered news?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Cavey007 on March 05, 2017, 02:41:53 PM do you think Zlatan will or should get a retrospective ban? the Mings stamp is an open and shut one. At full speed the Mings one is very difficult to prove intent, even in slow mo, you could argue that he was just trying to get back into position. I'm not sure how they will be able to assertion his intentions. For the record I think he could of missed the head but chose to leave a bit there. Everything always looks worse in slow mo. Obviously Rooney will be the judge on it seeing as he definitely saw it in real time (despite facing the opposite direction) The elbow really doesn't look good and will probably end with a 3 game ban. As said it's much easier to see intent there Quite liked both of their responses in post match neither of them really cared and just said what happens on the pitch stays on the pitch. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Dewi_cool on March 05, 2017, 03:06:06 PM Think the retrospective ban all depends on what the ref, Zlatan and Rooney were talking about after the incident, if ref was aware of the elbow and decided a talking to was good enough, then they can't ban him can they?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on March 05, 2017, 03:13:41 PM Think the retrospective ban all depends on what the ref, Zlatan and Rooney were talking about after the incident, if ref was aware of the elbow and decided a talking to was good enough, then they can't ban him can they? that is correct if the referee says he has seen the incidents, end of case if he has seen them and done nothing, he'll be a laughing stock and due a spell out of the PL (see Mike Dean) . i expect he'll say unsighted on both and the FA will swing into action Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on March 05, 2017, 11:10:25 PM Clearly the Zlatan elbow is pre-meditated and he should have gone. The long chat with Rooney and Ibra was intriguing - it did look as though Friend was taking him to one side before sending him off and I was very surprised when he didn't.
I'd think that the most likely outcome is the ref didn't see it "fully" and he gets his 3 match ban. It is win win for me - clearly he should get his 3 match ban but the outrage will be fun if he gets away with it based on Friend's report. As well as "not seeing" the elbow, Friend might add the off the ball incident when Ibra thew Mings to the ground. Was that a red card offence in its own right? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on March 06, 2017, 03:58:21 PM Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Tyrone Mings have been charged with alleged violent conduct by the FA. More: http://bbc.in/2mWplvu
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on March 07, 2017, 01:47:33 PM I think if anything works in Zlatan's favor it's that he never takes his eyes off the ball during the challenge and both his arm make the same pump movement. Obv still think he'll get a ban after the outcry. The off the ball incident where he throws Mings over is more of a sending off imo. It's off the ball and the ref is looking straight at it. Surely picking someone up and throwing them on the floor is violent conduct? The ref had an absolute mare again in one of our games, totally lost his head during the sending off and Zlatan/Mings incident.
Nice to have Shaw back, thought he played great and that left hand side is looking very strong. Again we should have been 4-0 after 20 mins, again the worst keeper in the league has his best game of the season, again Zlatan misses a load of big chances and again we're on the fortunate end of some terrible reffing. Top 4 is incredibly close, but it looks like we're going to have to be getting something out of the games away vs City, Spurs and Arsenal. Not ideal given that we need 20 chances to score and still have the clumsiest defence in Premier League history. Looks like a 3 game ban minimum for Zlatan. Will be nice to see how we setup without him. Will also be nice if we can put in someone who can finish too. This is the big chances missed stat I posted earlier in the thread, (https://i.gyazo.com/447e8683336664c1e6c89da1a2c7c21f.png) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on March 09, 2017, 11:05:08 AM Bournemouth were'nt happy at 5 games for Mings
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6aiCJxWcAEO2Hm.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on March 10, 2017, 12:18:25 PM ouch
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6jQpBEV0AAdfqc.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on March 10, 2017, 02:48:22 PM (https://s18.postimg.org/eplztzzrt/giphy.gif)
Pretty good result last night given the circumstances. Performance was pretty bad though. Pogba, Ibra and the entire back line weren't great. I'd like to see a weakened team for the Chelsea game but I think we'll put out another strong lineup and still get smashed. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on March 17, 2017, 11:07:16 AM I loved the Jose sideshow with his banana last night: (http://i63.tinypic.com/2emix50.jpg) Then there was Keane ranting in spectacular fashion: YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQJyJK-0-hs TBF, as much as I think Jose is a banana and always likes to get all the excuses in, , the current schedule is crippling. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on March 17, 2017, 01:26:43 PM Anderlecht (Bel) v Manchester United (Eng)
Celta Vigo (Spa) v Genk (Bel) Ajax (Net) v Schalke (Ger) Lyon (Fra) v Besiktas (Tur) (https://i.gyazo.com/26a5de30bc34bc48c9342a5e88e7dae4.gif) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on April 05, 2017, 11:44:54 PM Form is temporary. 6th is permanent.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on April 13, 2017, 01:19:07 PM Quote Harry Kane and Romelu Lukaku have been nominated for both the Professional Footballers' Association player of the year and young player awards. They join Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Alexis Sanchez, Eden Hazard and N'Golo Kante on the shortlist for the main prize. Quote They join Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Alexis Sanchez, Eden Hazard and N'Golo Kante on the shortlist for the main prize. Quote They join Zlatan Ibrahimovic Quote Zlatan Ibrahimovic Quote Zlatan (https://i.gyazo.com/7999fa5f0d41c65b70312f9be97fc993.png) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on April 28, 2017, 09:17:42 AM Jose Mourinho hoping to partner Antoine Griezmann with Alvaro Morata next season
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/04/27/jose-mourinho-wants-partner-antoine-griezmann-alvaro-morata/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 04, 2017, 09:31:23 AM Manchester United have £72m bid for Monaco’s Kylian Mbappé rejected http://trib.al/uN9uAyw
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on May 04, 2017, 09:38:17 AM Manchester United have £72m bid for Monaco’s Kylian Mbappé rejected http://trib.al/uN9uAyw I think the Mbappe kid will be sold for over £100 milly in the current market. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 04, 2017, 10:08:16 AM Useless bidding right now as well I think with CL qualification being so up in the air for United.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 04, 2017, 01:51:58 PM Strong suggestions here that Kasper Schmeichel has agreed a move to Old Trafford,when De Gea departs in the summer
will be a huge loss for us, not only between the sticks but as a dressinfg room leader Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 08, 2017, 10:05:48 AM Manchester Utd STILL haven't scored away to a top-6 team this season & are the ONLY Premier League team with 0 goals away against the top-6.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_P0nXYWAAA019x.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on May 09, 2017, 10:57:54 AM Manchester Utd STILL haven't scored away to a top-6 team this season & are the ONLY Premier League team with 0 goals away against the top-6. (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_P0nXYWAAA019x.jpg) It also extends to 2015/2016 season as well with Mourinho. He played 2 away games against Big 6 teams before he was sacked by Chelsea - 0-3 at City and 0-0 at Spurs. Neville and Carragher featured it last night on MNF with the 6-3-1 formation. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 09, 2017, 11:17:54 AM Still more points than Arsenal though?
Play to win at home and not to lose away is always going to be Mourinho's tactic unless he absolutely has to win. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on May 09, 2017, 02:29:22 PM Still more points than Arsenal though? Play to win at home and not to lose away is always going to be Mourinho's tactic unless he absolutely has to win. Small sample size of 2 seasons in the PL (but several seasons in the CL) but Full Jose negative mode against the bigger sides doesn't appear to be as successful as it once was. The point for me tho is that it is just awful to watch and this is Manchester United we are talking about. May it continue :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 09, 2017, 04:08:18 PM Chelsea lost 3-0 away to Arsenal, 2-0 away to Spurs, 2-0 away to United and 1-1 with Liverpool, all while having 6 shots on target. In 4 games. Don't think Conte has cracked playing the "big boys" away from home yet. No ones arsed if your turning over the dross of the league though, which Chelsea have done very well this season. United turn even 3/4 of the 11 draws they should have won this season and they're in a title race. Fact is they haven't finished their chances from day 1, that's why their 5th, Chelsea have been ruthless and are going to win the league.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on May 09, 2017, 07:55:10 PM Chelsea lost 3-0 away to Arsenal, 2-0 away to Spurs, 2-0 away to United and 1-1 with Liverpool, all while having 6 shots on target. In 4 games. Don't think Conte has cracked playing the "big boys" away from home yet. No ones arsed if your turning over the dross of the league though, which Chelsea have done very well this season. United turn even 3/4 of the 11 draws they should have won this season and they're in a title race. Fact is they haven't finished their chances from day 1, that's why their 5th, Chelsea have been ruthless and are going to win the league. No team has cracked the Big6 away games this season except Liverpool: Liverpool 9 points 9-7 City 4 points 5-8 Chelsea 4 points 4-9 Spurs 2 points 4-8 United 2 points 0-6 Arsenal 1 point 4-11 The column on the right is goals for and against. 1 game to go for United of course and a very tiny sample size but still very revealing IMO. You didn’t score against Chelsea in the cup as well. Pragmatism is one thing but Jose at times takes it to extremes against the better sides. I hate it. No rules against it but if you want to defend him good for you. As for United not talking their chances go and have a look at xG, xGA and xGD data which is a better indicator of the quality of chances for and against. As of about a week ago United were 3rd for both xG and xGA suggesting underlying performance merits a higher position than 6th. This is an improvement from a couple of months ago (when United already had 7 home draws on the board) and were then 5th for xG. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 09, 2017, 09:23:43 PM Chelsea lost 3-0 away to Arsenal, 2-0 away to Spurs, 2-0 away to United and 1-1 with Liverpool, all while having 6 shots on target. In 4 games. Don't think Conte has cracked playing the "big boys" away from home yet. No ones arsed if your turning over the dross of the league though, which Chelsea have done very well this season. United turn even 3/4 of the 11 draws they should have won this season and they're in a title race. Fact is they haven't finished their chances from day 1, that's why their 5th, Chelsea have been ruthless and are going to win the league. lol 1st....Chelsea......84 points X X X 5th....united.....65 points Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on May 09, 2017, 10:50:27 PM Chelsea lost 3-0 away to Arsenal, 2-0 away to Spurs, 2-0 away to United and 1-1 with Liverpool, all while having 6 shots on target. In 4 games. Don't think Conte has cracked playing the "big boys" away from home yet. No ones arsed if your turning over the dross of the league though, which Chelsea have done very well this season. United turn even 3/4 of the 11 draws they should have won this season and they're in a title race. Fact is they haven't finished their chances from day 1, that's why their 5th, Chelsea have been ruthless and are going to win the league. lol 1st....Chelsea......84 points X X X 5th....united.....65 points Currently on a massive 24 home league goals, if United score 1 goal or less in their last home league game against Palace it will be their lowest home league tally since the relegation season over 40 years ago in 1974. Pretty impressive for the most expensive squad assembled in the history of Europe's top 5 leagues - €718m (not including fees paid to Pogba's agent). TBF they have missed a few chances. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 12, 2017, 12:46:58 PM (https://i.gyazo.com/a14345128fbcd5e89684007f19d9753f.png)
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN5fziYYsnM (https://i.gyazo.com/58df0874f160216e2a37aac5f2e9b0c9.png) Banter United Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: cambridgealex on May 13, 2017, 11:31:13 AM (https://i.gyazo.com/a14345128fbcd5e89684007f19d9753f.png) YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN5fziYYsnM (https://i.gyazo.com/58df0874f160216e2a37aac5f2e9b0c9.png) Banter United His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy. He's missed an open goal already, John Guidetti. (from twitter) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 16, 2017, 09:02:58 AM Why Manchester United's Europa League final is the biggest game of Jose Mourinho's career
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/05/15/manchester-uniteds-europa-league-final-biggest-game-jose-mourinhos/?WT.mc_id=tmg_share_tw … Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 16, 2017, 09:06:34 AM The announcement of James Rodriguez signing for United will take place after end of season (via CaracolRadio)
http://as.com/en/2017/05/15/football/1494835810_769369.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 16, 2017, 11:36:39 AM The announcement of James Rodriguez signing for United will take place after end of season (via CaracolRadio) http://as.com/en/2017/05/15/football/1494835810_769369.html I bet he can't wait to play under Mourinho's unique, expansive, free flowing attacking football philosophy. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on May 16, 2017, 12:01:21 PM The announcement of James Rodriguez signing for United will take place after end of season (via CaracolRadio) http://as.com/en/2017/05/15/football/1494835810_769369.html I bet he can't wait to play under Mourinho's unique, expansive, free flowing attacking football philosophy. TBF to Jose there are 4 teams who have scored less at home in the league this season. Still the theatre of dreams for me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: SuuPRlim on May 16, 2017, 12:46:48 PM Man Utd over the last 3 years have spent £450m on transfers.
FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION POUNDS. FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION POUNDS. One, two, three, four...FOUR! AND... 50!!! another 50 million on top of the 400 (yes, FOUR HUNDRED) already spent. Picture £1...then times it by 450 MILLION, thats how much they spent. Might be about to land the EUROPA LEAGUE though, so all money well spent :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on May 22, 2017, 10:14:26 AM Fascinating press conference by Mourinho after the 2-0 defeat of Crystal Palace. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39994896 PS - Don't worry if you are short of time - it lasts less than 20 seconds. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 23, 2017, 08:13:15 AM Antoine Griezmann drops biggest hint yet that he will complete Man Utd transfer
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/05/22/antoine-griezmann-drops-biggest-hint-yet-will-complete-man-utd/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 25, 2017, 07:44:47 AM 42: the answer to life, the universe and everything. (And Manchester, united, back on their perch)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DAnnYbrXYAAMsye.jpg) bigger and stronger than their opponents last night and excellente tactics from Jose, go direct to bypass the Ajax pretty midfield and don't allow them to high press i know he'snegative in some big games but in a one off final i don't think there are many managers better at setting it up and getting a result Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on May 25, 2017, 09:05:58 AM It really was men against boys last night, & in some ways, I'm pleased for Man United.
It was 100% predictable, & a little bile inducing, to awake this morning to headlines of "we did it for the Manchester bomb victims". Did they bollox. Yuk. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on May 25, 2017, 09:25:51 AM So, how would the Man United fans judge their season? Expectations for next season? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Doobs on May 25, 2017, 09:32:18 AM It really was men against boys last night, & in some ways, I'm pleased for Man United. It was 100% predictable, & a little bile inducing, to awake this morning to headlines of "we did it for the Manchester bomb victims". Did they bollox. Yuk. I don't think it is that clear cut. Rooney has been in Manchester for years. Rashford, Jones and Lingard are all from nearby. Pogba spent his teenage years there. Fellani has loved there for years. They'll know the site, some may have gone to the same school as some of the victims, may even know of some through friends. How can they not feel a connection? I feel a connection to the Bradford City fire all those years ago and I wasn't even there. I was in Manchester when the IRA bomb went off and I am sure it hit me at the time. Even though London is a big sprawling place, I think I felt a bit the same way with the tube bombings. Just feels a bit more personal when they attack close to home. It would be hard to just forget it and play football a couple of days later. Maybe they are just saying what is expected, but maybe they just mean it right now? Even I wanted them to win last night and I spent many years as a full time ABU. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on May 25, 2017, 12:42:49 PM It really was men against boys last night, & in some ways, It was 100% predictable, & a little bile inducing, to awake this morning to headlines of "we did it for the Manchester bomb victims". Did they bollox. Yuk. I'm with you on this Tikay. The celebratory songs in the dressing room ("why don't City **** off home) say it all: http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-players-take-shine-10495773 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on May 25, 2017, 01:01:04 PM It really was men against boys last night, & in some ways, It was 100% predictable, & a little bile inducing, to awake this morning to headlines of "we did it for the Manchester bomb victims". Did they bollox. Yuk. I'm with you on this Tikay. The celebratory songs in the dressing room ("why don't City **** off home) say it all: http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-players-take-shine-10495773 I'd be lying if I said I wanted them to win last night. I was perhaps a little more indifferent than usual, but still wanted Ajax to do them and was disappointed they fluffed their chance to shine with a very subdued performance. Lingard is clearly a gobshite and more than a few sandwiches short of a picnic (think he has previous for stuff like this), and none of the 'we did this for Manchester' rhetoric washes with me. Amuses me that in their moment of glory, they have to include City in the songs. Oh how we'd get accused of being small time if City did that :) Enjoy the Champions League group stages. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 25, 2017, 03:10:01 PM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DAnnYbrXYAAMsye.jpg) (https://media.giphy.com/media/2XME3sPKy6YcU/giphy.gif)Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: George2Loose on May 26, 2017, 09:28:52 PM <3 Jose we'll be removing these sads very soon
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 28, 2017, 09:42:42 AM Manchester United are likely to limit their summer spending to three or four key signings. Full story: http://bbc.in/2qU2S65
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 05, 2017, 09:28:34 AM in the papers today
EXCL: Rooney IS going to Everton. OFF Utd US tour. GONE by end of the week. All done. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 06, 2017, 09:04:08 AM http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/07/05/manchester-united-plan-use-wayne-rooney-makeweight-bid-hijack/
Rooney plus cash for Lukaku Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 06, 2017, 10:16:01 AM Manchester United have agreed a £75m deal to sign Romelu Lukaku from Everton
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: maldini32 on July 06, 2017, 11:01:18 AM Manchester United have agreed a £75m deal to sign Romelu Lukaku from Everton That is a lot of money for a guy with a horrendous first touch Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on July 06, 2017, 11:13:07 AM Prefer this to either Griezmann or Morata. Way lower variance signing, probably replacing like for like goals with Ibra but does still feel a little under whelming. His first touch is shit and so is his hold up play. But out of the options available (which were very limited) he's probably the best fit overall. With the exception of De Gea, Valencia and Herrera our starting line up is 24 or under. Think we'll still sign one more player, a holding midfielder type and fingers crossed another striker, unless Jose is going to bring more of the academy lads through for league cup etc. Hernandez back would be ideal, he's a real fan fav, relatively cheap and great to throw on to grab you a goal.
Really looking forward to a Stormzy, Desiigner, Pogba colab on the announcement vid. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: toddswain on July 06, 2017, 11:49:53 AM Basically 75m for gtd 15-25 goals a season. Defo better value than morata for same fee
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 22, 2017, 08:40:42 AM Chelsea chief Roman Abramovich willing to sell Nemanja Matic to Manchester United — as a £50million 'FAVOUR'
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/chelsea-willing-matic-united-50m-10847660 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: youthnkzR on July 23, 2017, 08:38:26 PM I love Matic.. pay them the £50m even at 28.
Unsure about a paying a similar fee (£48m Has been mentioned I think) for Peresic tho. Also 28. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Noose on July 24, 2017, 03:20:05 AM I love Matic.. pay them the £50m even at 28. Unsure about a paying a similar fee (£48m Has been mentioned I think) for Peresic tho. Also 28. Matic any day. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on July 24, 2017, 06:25:02 PM Pretty torn between splashing £50m on Matic or Dier. We really need to get someone in so it releases Pogba further up the pitch, giving him more freedom. But at the same time £50m is a lot and we more creative players. Lack of goals killed us last year and unless Rashford, Martial, Lingard etc start banging in 15 each we're going to have the same problems again. I really like TFM in the anchor role, but he's still really young and inexperienced. Played great this pre season so far but it's a big ask to chuck him in at the deep end all season. Still think we need another striker, Hernandez for £13m is ridic in this market. Would be happy to sit on the bench again and can always get you a goal. Great buy for West Ham.
Seems like the Perisic deal is dead as they want Martial included, which obv they have no chance of (see gif). After him haven't heard of any other players we might go for so not really sure where we go from here. Is the first team good enough to start the season? Definitely. Is the squad? No chance. (https://i.gyazo.com/5bb06b5db2f11268623a4c814eb9ffa9.gif) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 28, 2017, 09:02:16 AM now this would be a game changer?
Manchester United ready to go for Gareth Bale as Zidane hints at star's exit if Real Madrid can land Kylian Mbappe http://dailym.ai/2u3Giqj Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: sherwyn on July 28, 2017, 01:11:59 PM now this would be a game changer? Manchester United ready to go for Gareth Bale as Zidane hints at star's exit if Real Madrid can land Kylian Mbappe http://dailym.ai/2u3Giqj Dont know I would like this as a United fan.... Bale is a bit injury prone and the amount it would cost would easily go towards sealing the Perisic and Matic deal Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on July 29, 2017, 09:20:11 PM (https://i.gyazo.com/edd98b77dc60ad04727fa0fc18079fdf.png)
(https://media.giphy.com/media/NqNkgNRKjdAje/giphy.gif) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on July 30, 2017, 12:29:03 AM Fee for Fellaini?!
A Freddo and 7 monthly instalments of Space Raiders? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Marky147 on July 30, 2017, 12:33:18 AM Fee for Fellaini?! A Freddo and 7 monthly instalments of Space Raiders? United offered 10m, but Galatasaray have countered with 15. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: sherwyn on July 30, 2017, 10:07:39 AM Hope to see the end of him
Always reminded me of the Moyes era. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on July 30, 2017, 03:51:56 PM (https://i.gyazo.com/48272b4cbbe6fa7cd0c59097e644347a.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/06a7afdc37488a33d2eb1f9cdf38cfce.png) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 30, 2017, 03:53:48 PM is the major significance of that is that it frees Pogba up to play further forward and create more?
Matic will sit in front of the back 4 to allow it -- Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on July 30, 2017, 04:02:58 PM Yeh for sure. Very underwhelming but prob the most needed position. Entering peak years for that position. £50m is steep though, can't really say who is better out there for that price but i'm sure there's gotta be someone. Guess Mourinho really rates and trusts him though so can't complain.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: HutchGF on July 30, 2017, 04:08:13 PM He will play alongside Herrara and allow Pogba the freedom he has for the national team.
I think it's an excellent signing and a huge upgrade on Fellaini. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: youthnkzR on July 30, 2017, 04:44:24 PM great signing!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on July 30, 2017, 09:02:43 PM (https://i.gyazo.com/edd98b77dc60ad04727fa0fc18079fdf.png) (https://media.giphy.com/media/NqNkgNRKjdAje/giphy.gif) (https://i.gyazo.com/dbd973a980dc412bdb70094065d3cab2.png) (https://media.giphy.com/media/QIN5rGvDafjI4/giphy.gif) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on July 31, 2017, 06:44:55 PM Does this not suggest that Chelsea/Conte do not consider Untied/Maureen serious rivals?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on July 31, 2017, 06:47:38 PM Does this not suggest that Chelsea/Conte do not consider Untied/Maureen serious rivals? No they sold to manure because to get top dollar for a player outside of selling to the big 5 in europe you have to sell to EPL club because of the inflated fees from the EPL TV money. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on July 31, 2017, 06:49:19 PM And mourinho was prepared to pay the buyers premium for a 29yo.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on July 31, 2017, 07:16:30 PM And mourinho was prepared to pay the buyers premium for a 29yo. Alexis turns 29 in December but I doubt that would be looked at in a similar pragmatic light.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: diondustbin on August 03, 2017, 11:16:39 PM that mkhitaryan breakaway goal was lovely, looking good this season
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on August 07, 2017, 11:08:16 AM Pretty torn between splashing £50m on Matic or Dier. We really need to get someone in so it releases Pogba further up the pitch, giving him more freedom. But at the same time £50m is a lot and we more creative players. Lack of goals killed us last year and unless Rashford, Martial, Lingard etc start banging in 15 each we're going to have the same problems again. I really like TFM in the anchor role, but he's still really young and inexperienced. Played great this pre season so far but it's a big ask to chuck him in at the deep end all season. Still think we need another striker, Hernandez for £13m is ridic in this market. Would be happy to sit on the bench again and can always get you a goal. Great buy for West Ham. Seems like the Perisic deal is dead as they want Martial included, which obv they have no chance of (see gif). After him haven't heard of any other players we might go for so not really sure where we go from here. Is the first team good enough to start the season? Definitely. Is the squad? No chance. (https://i.gyazo.com/5bb06b5db2f11268623a4c814eb9ffa9.gif) https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/aug/07/transfer-round-up-manchester-united-timothy-fosu-mensah-crystal-palace Great move for big Tim, hopefully he gets regular starts and gets a full season under his belt. He had a great pre season and has looked calm and composed every time he's stepped up to the first team. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2017, 08:26:46 AM Jose Mourinho: I will try to sign Gareth Bale if he is not in Real Madrid's plans
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/08/07/jose-mourinho-will-try-sign-gareth-bale-not-real-madrids-plans/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 09, 2017, 09:12:26 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGvIef4XkAAzBy9.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 14, 2017, 09:35:00 AM Is Nemanja Matić the best defensive midfielder in the premierleague? Report here: http://skysports.tv/6U9CfX
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHIDYxWXsAAxU7_.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 15, 2017, 08:45:36 AM How Jose Mourinho has begun to restore the United Way
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/08/14/jose-mourinho-brought-united-way-back-old-trafford-west-ham/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 15, 2017, 08:47:01 AM 'Unplayable' Marcus Rashford must find goals to make himself indispensable to Jose Mourinho
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/08/14/unplayable-marcus-rashford-must-find-goals-make-indispensable/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 22, 2017, 07:53:03 AM How Jose Mourinho has finally forged the team he wants to power Manchester United back into title hunt http://dailym.ai/2wghkci
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 24, 2017, 07:57:00 AM who do you want?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DH8Rs0ZWAAA3VeQ.jpg) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DH8RtshW0AMFbOA.jpg) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DH8RudJW0AgGaPa.jpg) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DH8RvRpXgAA7Mex.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 24, 2017, 02:16:11 PM Zlatan Ibrahimovic has re-signed for Manchester United on a one-year contract. Developing story: http://bbc.in/2xfFu47
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on August 24, 2017, 06:05:58 PM Group A: Benfica, Manchester United, Basel, CSKA Moscow
Swap Anderlecht for CSKA and this is prob the perfect draw. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Archer on August 24, 2017, 06:19:58 PM Very sim to 11/12 when you had basel and benfica in the group.
Lets hope the results are the same ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on August 24, 2017, 07:24:24 PM Seem to remember us dropping down into the Europa and getting absolutely schooled by Bilbao. What a shit year of football that was.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on August 24, 2017, 07:28:02 PM (https://i.gyazo.com/45edbafbf5f295012c1698bb9194f4e5.png)
Moscow game is going to be a killer in between those two. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 06, 2017, 08:23:57 AM Ray Wilkins says the sale of Nemanja Matic to Man Utd is the "worst" piece of business he has ever seen at Chelsea: http://skysports.tv/wnn1PH
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on September 06, 2017, 09:23:34 AM There is a very enjoyable 2 page interview in today's Times with Mourinho. It includes this rhetorical question by Jose, under "style of play"...... "Which of the last three (Premier League) Champions played the most offensive football? Be honest, it was mine" Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: tikay on September 06, 2017, 09:26:17 AM (http://i.imgur.com/Ill6I9y.jpg) (https://imgur.com/Ill6I9y) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 06, 2017, 10:45:03 AM "Romelu Lukaku on August 31 would have been £150m. Neymar changed everything." Agree with Jose Mourinho? http://skysports.tv/HRplPc
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: arbboy on September 06, 2017, 11:32:04 AM "Romelu Lukaku on August 31 would have been £150m. Neymar changed everything." Agree with Jose Mourinho? http://skysports.tv/HRplPc Probably but Man U wouldn't have paid £150m. Someone is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. No club in their right mind would have paid £150m for him before or after Neymar. It's like comparing Cyrille Regis with Maradona. Seems more of an article of Jose just stroking his ego in an aftertiming smug manner saying how great they were. Why didn't he come out and say this once the summer signings were done in July if he was such a genius? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 13, 2017, 10:00:39 AM Marcus Rashford has scored in his CL, EL, PL & League Cup debuts for Man Utd and his England senior & U21 debuts
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Karabiner on September 25, 2017, 06:31:59 PM I can't believe that maureen has escaped having those offending toes chopped off.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on September 26, 2017, 01:39:43 AM He had to graft to escape a ban tbf
(https://i.gyazo.com/c02ae8ab1a26457bbd0db96a8e0d5c7b.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on September 28, 2017, 10:58:40 AM The opponents were pretty bad, even so, another good performance last night, I thought.
They seem to be making some good progress overall now, it can't be denied. They were missing some very important players but still got the job done in decent fashion. Think the second sad (pending) will have to go. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on October 18, 2017, 09:10:18 PM You won't see many goals like that in the CL. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on November 06, 2017, 03:12:32 PM Why Man Utd's conservatism in big away games only helps Man City. Piece from Stamford Bridge https://t.co/1KinkX9Ku8
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on November 07, 2017, 09:10:48 AM How much are Manchester United missing Paul Pogba?
The chances and goals are declining in his absence: http://skysports.tv/ONIKQH Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on November 24, 2017, 01:17:27 PM He has got to be kidding, right? Fellaini sues boot manufacturer for £2 million, claiming his boots were "too tight". http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/23/manchester-uniteds-marouane-fellaini-sues-new-balance-defective/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 17, 2017, 08:42:15 AM Mourinho is having to tackle his biggest challenge as a manager.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2017/dec/16/jose-mourinho-manchester-united-city?CMP=share_btn_tw Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 24, 2017, 11:25:36 AM Why Ed Woodward is to blame for Man Utd's title gap to rivals City - not Jose Mourinho
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/12/23/manchester-uniteds-biggest-mistake-recent-years-making-no-serious/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 27, 2017, 10:18:41 AM Jose Mourinho on the reality of where Manchester United is as a football club.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DR_mZxQWAAAHtAu.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 27, 2017, 10:18:58 AM José Mourinho says ‘£300m not enough’ for Manchester United to compete https://trib.al/jzY8TeG
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 27, 2017, 12:45:45 PM Mourinho effectively saying that he cannot be effective as a manager unless he has the biggest budget. If you have 2nd biggest budget then Mourinho is saying he is a poor candidate for the job.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on December 27, 2017, 12:57:57 PM Mourinho effectively saying that he cannot be effective as a manager unless he has the biggest budget. If you have 2nd biggest budget then Mourinho is saying he is a poor candidate for the job. Think that applies to most PL Managers though. Rafa Benitez, who is inexplicably adored by Newcastle fans, keeps bleating on & on about lack of investment in players being the sole reason for poor results. Sean Dyche, Manager of the Year for me last year, & well on course for the double this year, seems to cope though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: PokerBroker on December 27, 2017, 01:00:45 PM José Mourinho says ‘£300m not enough’ for Manchester United to compete https://trib.al/jzY8TeG Maybe Jose needs to realise he just isn't that special afterall. The makings of a good manager is one who take players to a different level and also who can identify talent buy it cheap and manage to sell it on. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 27, 2017, 01:16:39 PM Mourinho effectively saying that he cannot be effective as a manager unless he has the biggest budget. If you have 2nd biggest budget then Mourinho is saying he is a poor candidate for the job. Think that applies to most PL Managers though. Rafa Benitez, who is inexplicably adored by Newcastle fans, keeps bleating on & on about lack of investment in players being the sole reason for poor results. Sean Dyche, Manager of the Year for me last year, & well on course for the double this year, seems to cope though. The difference is only a clown utterly lacking in self awareness would say it repeatedly when he has spent about 200 Million on Pogba and lukaku. And that’s before we get to the supporting cast. When Newcastle spend 30 million less than watford Rafa probably has a point. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on December 27, 2017, 01:26:40 PM Jose has never been anything other than a cheque book manager. Very lucky at Chelski to be gifted Terry (youth system) and Lampard (bought by a previous manager) for his entire stint there as their two major players. His whining really does get on your tits after a while when he has still spent fortunes in the market (relatively badly a lot would argue) compared to their main rivals Liverpool/Arsenal/Spurs/Chelsea. They have also run ahead of EV so far this season and a lot of xg tables have them in 5th or 6th spot yet the gaffer still moans relentlessly.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 27, 2017, 01:31:01 PM Mourinho- ''City buy full backs for the price of strikers''
Mourinho buys United's own academy players for the price of Burnley FC. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Karabiner on December 27, 2017, 02:00:40 PM As Fletcher would say "he's a charmless nerk".
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on December 27, 2017, 02:06:50 PM Jose would be a terrible results orientated gambler. Could you imagine him moaning how bad he was running playing roulette when he was breaking even during a session (effectively beating the house edge and running ahead of ev). This is pretty much the same as his moaning about their season so far this year. Running ahead of EV but he deludes himself he is running bad.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 27, 2017, 02:10:31 PM Mourinho- ''City buy full backs for the price of strikers'' Mourinho buys United's own academy players for the price of Burnley FC. Kyle Walker 50 million gbp is outrageous. Lindelof 45 million euro? Nothing to see here. I used the like him at Chelsea but these days the guy is simply a whining idiot. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on December 27, 2017, 04:20:25 PM https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2017/dec/27/jose-mourinho-has-a-point-when-he-says-manchester-united-are-not-a-big-team
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: MANTIS01 on December 27, 2017, 05:40:48 PM Mourinho is one smart cookie and knows how to play this football manager game better than any of us. How many games do you get before you're under pressure these days? I would say it's about 3 or 4. Yet he deflects attention from inept performances and results like an absolute boss. So after luckily drawing at home to Burnley and finding Man City out of sight everybody is talking about his moaning or his bad luck, not his future. See what he did there? The guy knows exactly what he's doing, he plays everyone, he buys time and keeps pressure off his players all at the same time. He isn't deluded at all imo.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on December 27, 2017, 05:46:01 PM Mourinho is one smart cookie and knows how to play this football manager game better than any of us. How many games do you get before you're under pressure these days? I would say it's about 3 or 4. Yet he deflects attention from inept performances and results like an absolute boss. So after luckily drawing at home to Burnley and finding Man City out of sight everybody is talking about his moaning or his bad luck, not his future. See what he did there? The guy knows exactly what he's doing, he plays everyone, he buys time and keeps pressure off his players all at the same time. He isn't deluded at all imo. He hasn't been unlucky or had bad luck. The total opposite is true. His team are running ahead of EV results wise based on performance stats. It is his moaning about how bad he is running when he is actually running like god that is tilting. His team isn't as good as he thinks it is and even though they are ahead of the curve results wise it still isn't enough for the fans. When they regress to the mean he will really be under the cosh because where he is currently isn't good enough for them and they are lucky to be where they are now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 27, 2017, 05:53:13 PM Mourinho is one smart cookie and knows how to play this football manager game better than any of us. How many games do you get before you're under pressure these days? I would say it's about 3 or 4. Yet he deflects attention from inept performances and results like an absolute boss. So after luckily drawing at home to Burnley and finding Man City out of sight everybody is talking about his moaning or his bad luck, not his future. See what he did there? The guy knows exactly what he's doing, he plays everyone, he buys time and keeps pressure off his players all at the same time. He isn't deluded at all imo. He hasn't been unlucky or had bad luck. The total opposite is true. His team are running ahead of EV results wise based on performance stats. It is his moaning about how bad he is running when he is actually running like god that is tilting. His team isn't as good as he thinks it is and even though they are ahead of the curve results wise it still isn't enough for the fans. When they regress to the mean he will really be under the cosh because where he is currently isn't good enough for them and they are lucky to be where they are now. Some punter was on talksport when I was driving saying Rashford and Martial should be shipped out because they weren’t of the required quality to be part of a Man Utd squad! Maybe he is right and Jose is just being held back. Give the man 2 billion and he’ll get you to within single digits of Man City. The shoestring he is operating on is unacceptable :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 27, 2017, 05:56:14 PM Mourinho is one smart cookie and knows how to play this football manager game better than any of us. How many games do you get before you're under pressure these days? I would say it's about 3 or 4. Yet he deflects attention from inept performances and results like an absolute boss. So after luckily drawing at home to Burnley and finding Man City out of sight everybody is talking about his moaning or his bad luck, not his future. See what he did there? The guy knows exactly what he's doing, he plays everyone, he buys time and keeps pressure off his players all at the same time. He isn't deluded at all imo. I don’t think he’s under any pressure at all. If he delivers champ league places while rebuilding the Moyes/Van Gaal team that will be enough in the medium term. That doesn’t change the fact he is a moron for complaining of lack of resource. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: MANTIS01 on December 27, 2017, 07:12:27 PM Mourinho is one smart cookie and knows how to play this football manager game better than any of us. How many games do you get before you're under pressure these days? I would say it's about 3 or 4. Yet he deflects attention from inept performances and results like an absolute boss. So after luckily drawing at home to Burnley and finding Man City out of sight everybody is talking about his moaning or his bad luck, not his future. See what he did there? The guy knows exactly what he's doing, he plays everyone, he buys time and keeps pressure off his players all at the same time. He isn't deluded at all imo. I don’t think he’s under any pressure at all. If he delivers champ league places while rebuilding the Moyes/Van Gaal team that will be enough in the medium term. That doesn’t change the fact he is a moron for complaining of lack of resource. He's won the title everywhere he's been, usually in the 2nd season. He desperately wants to win the title, the board brought him in to win the title, the fans still romanticising over the SAF era dream of winning the title. Recently lost the derby, drew with Leicester and narrowly avoided home defeat to Burnley. According to arbboy his team is running above EV. The noisy neighbours are streets ahead and he's spent £300m. But you don't think he's under any pressure at all? Like I say his moaning and complaining have nicely created the illusion that he's not under pressure. The guy is a very smart cookie. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on December 27, 2017, 07:41:27 PM Mourinho is one smart cookie and knows how to play this football manager game better than any of us. How many games do you get before you're under pressure these days? I would say it's about 3 or 4. Yet he deflects attention from inept performances and results like an absolute boss. So after luckily drawing at home to Burnley and finding Man City out of sight everybody is talking about his moaning or his bad luck, not his future. See what he did there? The guy knows exactly what he's doing, he plays everyone, he buys time and keeps pressure off his players all at the same time. He isn't deluded at all imo. I don’t think he’s under any pressure at all. If he delivers champ league places while rebuilding the Moyes/Van Gaal team that will be enough in the medium term. That doesn’t change the fact he is a moron for complaining of lack of resource. He's BOUGHT the title everywhere he's been, usually in the 2nd season. He desperately wants to win the title, the board brought him in to win the title, the fans still romanticising over the SAF era dream of winning the title. Recently lost the derby, drew with Leicester and narrowly avoided home defeat to Burnley. According to arbboy his team is running above EV. The noisy neighbours are streets ahead and he's spent £300m. But you don't think he's under any pressure at all? Like I say his moaning and complaining have nicely created the illusion that he's not under pressure. The guy is a very smart cookie. FYP. The biggest mistake he has made this time is not joining the club in the EPL with the biggest bankroll to keep fooling everyone he is a great manager. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DropTheHammer on December 27, 2017, 08:40:57 PM Mourinho isn't under any pressure. They will keep him even if they miss out on. CL qualification, they'd be mad to sack him as that would mean another 200m outlay.
If Martial and Rashford are happy not starting every game then the united fans are crazy to call for their sale. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Tal on December 27, 2017, 08:59:22 PM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep.
Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Karabiner on December 27, 2017, 09:11:46 PM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep. Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. You must have read my mind slightly although I am hardly a fan of the charmless nerk that is maureen. I was just about to post that Pep is clearly a great coach with an open cheque-book, but will we ever find out how good he is with a lesser budget. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 27, 2017, 09:42:29 PM Mourinho is one smart cookie and knows how to play this football manager game better than any of us. How many games do you get before you're under pressure these days? I would say it's about 3 or 4. Yet he deflects attention from inept performances and results like an absolute boss. So after luckily drawing at home to Burnley and finding Man City out of sight everybody is talking about his moaning or his bad luck, not his future. See what he did there? The guy knows exactly what he's doing, he plays everyone, he buys time and keeps pressure off his players all at the same time. He isn't deluded at all imo. I don’t think he’s under any pressure at all. If he delivers champ league places while rebuilding the Moyes/Van Gaal team that will be enough in the medium term. That doesn’t change the fact he is a moron for complaining of lack of resource. He's won the title everywhere he's been, usually in the 2nd season. He desperately wants to win the title, the board brought him in to win the title, the fans still romanticising over the SAF era dream of winning the title. Recently lost the derby, drew with Leicester and narrowly avoided home defeat to Burnley. According to arbboy his team is running above EV. The noisy neighbours are streets ahead and he's spent £300m. But you don't think he's under any pressure at all? Like I say his moaning and complaining have nicely created the illusion that he's not under pressure. The guy is a very smart cookie. Do you honestly think the board are in any way thinking of sacking Mourinho after the last few seasons they have had? Not sure you have much of a read on this situation to be honest. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 27, 2017, 09:46:09 PM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep. Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. Pep improves players. De Bruyne and Sterling are miles ahead in performance from where they were before he arrived. We may well never know if he can work on a budget, but the same can be said of Mourinho. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: MANTIS01 on December 27, 2017, 10:23:38 PM Mourinho is one smart cookie and knows how to play this football manager game better than any of us. How many games do you get before you're under pressure these days? I would say it's about 3 or 4. Yet he deflects attention from inept performances and results like an absolute boss. So after luckily drawing at home to Burnley and finding Man City out of sight everybody is talking about his moaning or his bad luck, not his future. See what he did there? The guy knows exactly what he's doing, he plays everyone, he buys time and keeps pressure off his players all at the same time. He isn't deluded at all imo. I don’t think he’s under any pressure at all. If he delivers champ league places while rebuilding the Moyes/Van Gaal team that will be enough in the medium term. That doesn’t change the fact he is a moron for complaining of lack of resource. He's won the title everywhere he's been, usually in the 2nd season. He desperately wants to win the title, the board brought him in to win the title, the fans still romanticising over the SAF era dream of winning the title. Recently lost the derby, drew with Leicester and narrowly avoided home defeat to Burnley. According to arbboy his team is running above EV. The noisy neighbours are streets ahead and he's spent £300m. But you don't think he's under any pressure at all? Like I say his moaning and complaining have nicely created the illusion that he's not under pressure. The guy is a very smart cookie. Do you honestly think the board are in any way thinking of sacking Mourinho after the last few seasons they have had? Not sure you have much of a read on this situation to be honest. I think he's under pressure from his own expectations, his prior record at other clubs, the fan's hopes, recent results & displays, arch rivals pep and citeh way ahead, losing the derby, the big bucks he's spent and the history of the club he's at. If you don't think that puts him under any pressure at all then fair enough, you have a better read on the situation than me. However, I do remember an interview where he said there is no pressure at the top, being second or third is where all the pressure is. As stated though if he lost the next 4 games on the bounce I do think the board would entertain the possiblity yes. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 27, 2017, 10:26:58 PM Mourinho is one smart cookie and knows how to play this football manager game better than any of us. How many games do you get before you're under pressure these days? I would say it's about 3 or 4. Yet he deflects attention from inept performances and results like an absolute boss. So after luckily drawing at home to Burnley and finding Man City out of sight everybody is talking about his moaning or his bad luck, not his future. See what he did there? The guy knows exactly what he's doing, he plays everyone, he buys time and keeps pressure off his players all at the same time. He isn't deluded at all imo. I don’t think he’s under any pressure at all. If he delivers champ league places while rebuilding the Moyes/Van Gaal team that will be enough in the medium term. That doesn’t change the fact he is a moron for complaining of lack of resource. He's won the title everywhere he's been, usually in the 2nd season. He desperately wants to win the title, the board brought him in to win the title, the fans still romanticising over the SAF era dream of winning the title. Recently lost the derby, drew with Leicester and narrowly avoided home defeat to Burnley. According to arbboy his team is running above EV. The noisy neighbours are streets ahead and he's spent £300m. But you don't think he's under any pressure at all? Like I say his moaning and complaining have nicely created the illusion that he's not under pressure. The guy is a very smart cookie. Do you honestly think the board are in any way thinking of sacking Mourinho after the last few seasons they have had? Not sure you have much of a read on this situation to be honest. I think he's under pressure from his own expectations, his prior record at other clubs, the fan's hopes, recent results & displays, arch rivals pep and citeh way ahead, losing the derby, the big bucks he's spent and the history of the club he's at. If you don't think that puts him under any pressure at all then fair enough, you have a better read on the situation than me. However, I do remember an interview where he said there is no pressure at the top, being second or third is where all the pressure is. As stated though if he lost the next 4 games on the bounce I do think the board would entertain the possiblity yes. Agree to disagree I guess. In other news Jose will surely blow a gasket over 75m van dijk!! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Tal on December 27, 2017, 10:43:52 PM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep. Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. Pep improves players. De Bruyne and Sterling are miles ahead in performance from where they were before he arrived. We may well never know if he can work on a budget, but the same can be said of Mourinho. I'm not saying he's a bad coach. Every top flight manager improves players. They're on millions a year to do that. Jose has done it with a budget: Uniao de Leiria and Porto weren't rich clubs and punched well above their weight through his work, ideas and implementation. He's done it with money and without money. If I owned a midtable team, he'd be the first name I wanted without hesitation. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: PokerBroker on December 27, 2017, 11:06:21 PM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep. Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. This has to be a level right? Pep cut his teeth bringing through a whole generation of Barcelona players who went on to arguably be the best group in the world. His teams play beautiful football in the spirit it’s meant to be played in. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Tal on December 27, 2017, 11:13:50 PM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep. Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. This has to be a level right? Pep cut his teeth bringing through a whole generation of Barcelona players who went on to arguably be the best group in the world. His teams play beautiful football in the spirit it’s meant to be played in. It doesn't have to be the case that one is a genius and the other a charlatan. Both are very good. I put Mourinho above Pep. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on December 27, 2017, 11:27:37 PM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep. Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. This has to be a level right? Pep cut his teeth bringing through a whole generation of Barcelona players who went on to arguably be the best group in the world. His teams play beautiful football in the spirit it’s meant to be played in. It doesn't have to be the case that one is a genius and the other a charlatan. Both are very good. I put Mourinho above Pep. If spurs needed a new manager tomorrow which one would you choose assuming both were equally available in fantasy land? Surely you take Pep over Jose? I think its a level as well. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: rinswun on December 28, 2017, 12:17:48 AM Has to be a level!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 28, 2017, 12:34:05 AM 100% level.
No football fan on this planet can claim Maureen to be the superior manager over Pep. Anyone who uses the excuse that Pep has spent £X is talking out their arse. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: nirvana on December 28, 2017, 12:42:31 AM I'd be really unhappy if any of the top 5 managers, bar one, were sought by arsenal. Can't stand the managers who want it all to be about them. Of the 4 look-at-me's, Pep is the least worst.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 28, 2017, 07:10:15 AM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep. Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. Pep improves players. De Bruyne and Sterling are miles ahead in performance from where they were before he arrived. We may well never know if he can work on a budget, but the same can be said of Mourinho. I'm not saying he's a bad coach. Every top flight manager improves players. They're on millions a year to do that. Jose has done it with a budget: Uniao de Leiria and Porto weren't rich clubs and punched well above their weight through his work, ideas and implementation. He's done it with money and without money. If I owned a midtable team, he'd be the first name I wanted without hesitation. Walter Mazzari regressed a number of players at Watford. I’m sure other clubs can list similar managers in the top flight to do so! Put it this way, if Pep had joined Man Utd summer 2016 and Jose Man City and has the same budgets as were given, I don’t think Man Utd would be 15 points behind right now. I’d go as far to say they would be on a par due to Pep’s impact. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Tal on December 28, 2017, 07:16:35 AM 100% level. No football fan on this planet can claim Maureen to be the superior manager over Pep. Anyone who uses the excuse that Pep has spent £X is talking out their arse. Oh stop being so melodramatic! It's not like I've said my favourite flavour of monster munch is roast beef! They're both good managers and coaches. Some people believe one is better; others the other. As for who I'd want at spurs, it's tough because both build teams up and then leave. If Jose can persuade Bale to come back, he gets it. If I were a mid table team fan, it'd be Jose in a heartbeat. Thus is the Man United thread. Think it's ok to express a view that their manager is better than another team's. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Tal on December 28, 2017, 07:43:36 AM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep. Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. Pep improves players. De Bruyne and Sterling are miles ahead in performance from where they were before he arrived. We may well never know if he can work on a budget, but the same can be said of Mourinho. I'm not saying he's a bad coach. Every top flight manager improves players. They're on millions a year to do that. Jose has done it with a budget: Uniao de Leiria and Porto weren't rich clubs and punched well above their weight through his work, ideas and implementation. He's done it with money and without money. If I owned a midtable team, he'd be the first name I wanted without hesitation. Walter Mazzari regressed a number of players at Watford. I’m sure other clubs can list similar managers in the top flight to do so! Put it this way, if Pep had joined Man Utd summer 2016 and Jose Man City and has the same budgets as were given, I don’t think Man Utd would be 15 points behind right now. I’d go as far to say they would be on a par due to Pep’s impact. On your first point, if you're saying that some managers are overpaid and the likes of Tuchel, Anceotti, Pep, Sir Alex and Jose are (comparatively) underpaid, we have common ground. It's way too flat. Pep has done very well at City, Barca and Bayern. Would Jose have been 15 points clear? There's surely an element of variance here: 17 wins in a row is a freak result, even in what might be a relatively weak league. Mancini's City dominated in the first half of 2010/11(?) too. Personally, I choose Mourinho. That's all really. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 28, 2017, 08:02:15 AM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep. Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. Pep improves players. De Bruyne and Sterling are miles ahead in performance from where they were before he arrived. We may well never know if he can work on a budget, but the same can be said of Mourinho. I'm not saying he's a bad coach. Every top flight manager improves players. They're on millions a year to do that. Jose has done it with a budget: Uniao de Leiria and Porto weren't rich clubs and punched well above their weight through his work, ideas and implementation. He's done it with money and without money. If I owned a midtable team, he'd be the first name I wanted without hesitation. Walter Mazzari regressed a number of players at Watford. I’m sure other clubs can list similar managers in the top flight to do so! Put it this way, if Pep had joined Man Utd summer 2016 and Jose Man City and has the same budgets as were given, I don’t think Man Utd would be 15 points behind right now. I’d go as far to say they would be on a par due to Pep’s impact. On your first point, if you're saying that some managers are overpaid and the likes of Tuchel, Anceotti, Pep, Sir Alex and Jose are (comparatively) underpaid, we have common ground. It's way too flat. Pep has done very well at City, Barca and Bayern. Would Jose have been 15 points clear? There's surely an element of variance here: 17 wins in a row is a freak result, even in what might be a relatively weak league. Mancini's City dominated in the first half of 2010/11(?) too. Personally, I choose Mourinho. That's all really. It’s the style though as well. This current City team take opponents out of the equation. Newcastle did not feel they could even attack at home last night. Pep’s teams dominate a game in way a José team never can. I’d be surprised if more than 10% of fans would take Mourinho over Pep. But it’s just an opinion as you say. Who would be better for Watford is an interesting question. If I were a team with a decent flow of youth players like Spurs, Everton, Saints I would definitely take Pep. For a Watford/WBA type team it is less clear cut. Maybe Jose pragmatism wins the day. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: rinswun on December 28, 2017, 08:46:49 AM I'm genuinely shocked that anyone would think that Jose would be a better option than Pep for any club. The argument that Pep has never done it at a smaller club is moot because he's never had a chance - and never will. What he has done is elevate every single big club he's been at to be the most successful they have ever been - see the winning runs each has racked up - playing a style of football that is the envy of every other club.
Whilst he's been successful, of the club's he's been at Jose has only really elevated Porto. Potentially you could argue Chelsea but their budget was so far beyond the rest of the league in that period that it would have been a failure if he'd not won the league. Indeed, whilst he's won trophies, he's also alienated players, staff and fans and generally has always left his clubs on a sore note. No brainer for me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 28, 2017, 11:57:27 AM I'm genuinely shocked that anyone would think that Jose would be a better option than Pep for any club. The argument that Pep has never done it at a smaller club is moot because he's never had a chance - and never will. What he has done is elevate every single big club he's been at to be the most successful they have ever been - see the winning runs each has racked up - playing a style of football that is the envy of every other club. Whilst he's been successful, of the club's he's been at Jose has only really elevated Porto. Potentially you could argue Chelsea but their budget was so far beyond the rest of the league in that period that it would have been a failure if he'd not won the league. Indeed, whilst he's won trophies, he's also alienated players, staff and fans and generally has always left his clubs on a sore note. No brainer for me. Is the correct answer. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Marky147 on December 28, 2017, 12:42:04 PM 100% level. No football fan on this planet can claim Maureen to be the superior manager over Pep. Anyone who uses the excuse that Pep has spent £X is talking out their arse. Oh stop being so melodramatic! It's not like I've said my favourite flavour of monster munch is roast beef! They're both good managers and coaches. Some people believe one is better; others the other. As for who I'd want at spurs, it's tough because both build teams up and then leave. If Jose can persuade Bale to come back, he gets it. If I were a mid table team fan, it'd be Jose in a heartbeat. Thus is the Man United thread. Think it's ok to express a view that their manager is better than another team's. Roast Beef fan here :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: engy on December 28, 2017, 04:45:44 PM I'm genuinely shocked that anyone would think that Jose would be a better option than Pep for any club. The argument that Pep has never done it at a smaller club is moot because he's never had a chance - and never will. What he has done is elevate every single big club he's been at to be the most successful they have ever been - see the winning runs each has racked up - playing a style of football that is the envy of every other club. Whilst he's been successful, of the club's he's been at Jose has only really elevated Porto. Potentially you could argue Chelsea but their budget was so far beyond the rest of the league in that period that it would have been a failure if he'd not won the league. Indeed, whilst he's won trophies, he's also alienated players, staff and fans and generally has always left his clubs on a sore note. No brainer for me. With city's budget and squad could the same be said? I think it would have been failure if city never won the league this season Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Tal on December 28, 2017, 06:05:28 PM 100% level. No football fan on this planet can claim Maureen to be the superior manager over Pep. Anyone who uses the excuse that Pep has spent £X is talking out their arse. Oh stop being so melodramatic! It's not like I've said my favourite flavour of monster munch is roast beef! They're both good managers and coaches. Some people believe one is better; others the other. As for who I'd want at spurs, it's tough because both build teams up and then leave. If Jose can persuade Bale to come back, he gets it. If I were a mid table team fan, it'd be Jose in a heartbeat. Thus is the Man United thread. Think it's ok to express a view that their manager is better than another team's. Roast Beef fan here :) (http://stylealchemy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/bowiedisapproves.gif) (https://78.media.tumblr.com/5428ba15ff7a1f895a10cb81945eccc5/tumblr_inline_o12vbkL7R21rku3fs_500.gif) (https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-rCakw9lzxuc/UyvvyjBjgbI/AAAAAAAAA0Y/gDy1xCG6llA/s288-Ic42/rolleyesprince-vi.gif) I'm even breaking this one out: (https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2013-12/enhanced/webdr06/16/12/anigif_enhanced-buzz-29446-1387214753-45.gif) We're trying to have an adult conversation here, Marky. You can't come steaming in with absurdities or you'll turn people off the forum. What do you think this is? Some form of facility for people to express genuinely held but differing views on a range of subjects? (https://i0.wp.com/gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Jon-Stewart-Yelling-Unacceptable.gif?ssl=1) https://sabotagetimes.com/.amp/life/pickled-onion-monster-munch-an-appreciation Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Marky147 on December 28, 2017, 06:15:29 PM (https://media0.giphy.com/media/qOnWoPxXnm0Vi/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Karabiner on December 28, 2017, 06:53:18 PM Unacceptable that I am unable to isolate the gif but it's the thought that counts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_wkO4hk07o Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: MANTIS01 on December 28, 2017, 07:27:22 PM Obv both are the genuine article and their trophy cabinets prove that. I think pep is ahead in player improvement because Jose tends to freeze out those he doesn't fancy, I mean surely he could do something with Luke Shaw about now. That said Mourinho is light years ahead of Benitez in terms of player development and management. As far as I remember Jose won the treble with Inter and the fat Spanish waiter very easily and very seamlessly turned them into dog-shit overnight.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: MANTIS01 on December 28, 2017, 07:28:29 PM Oh and pickled onion smacks roast beef. I do believe that is a fact.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Marky147 on December 28, 2017, 08:58:34 PM (https://media3.giphy.com/media/JLNepXapyM8i4/giphy.gif)
Can't stand them. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Archer on December 28, 2017, 10:04:48 PM I'm genuinely shocked that anyone would think that Jose would be a better option than Pep for any club. The argument that Pep has never done it at a smaller club is moot because he's never had a chance - and never will. What he has done is elevate every single big club he's been at to be the most successful they have ever been - see the winning runs each has racked up - playing a style of football that is the envy of every other club. Whilst he's been successful, of the club's he's been at Jose has only really elevated Porto. Potentially you could argue Chelsea but their budget was so far beyond the rest of the league in that period that it would have been a failure if he'd not won the league. Indeed, whilst he's won trophies, he's also alienated players, staff and fans and generally has always left his clubs on a sore note. No brainer for me. With city's budget and squad could the same be said? I think it would have been failure if city never won the league this season The net spend for Chelsea in the 3 seasons 2003-2005 was c£300 million. United, Arsenal and Liverpool had a combined net spend of c£90mill over the same period so an avg of £30mill each. Following a renewed period of heavy spending, City have spent about £340mill net over the last 3 seasons 2015-2017. Allowing for transfer fee inflation the City spend is no where near as significant as peak Abramovich. This is not to say we don't have a huge competitive advantage now, we clearly do, but United and others have spent shed loads as well. That wasn't the case back in 2003-2005. City were a 7/4 favourite pre-season. Can a 7/4 shot not coming in be really deemed as failure? I don't think so but it would be a failure if there wasn't a serious challenge for the title and Champions League. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Archer on December 28, 2017, 10:10:13 PM I'm sure there's some tongues in cheek here, but I'd have Jose a long way above Pep. Pep is the one of the two who needs a bottomless budget or a squad that's already assembled for him. Find it hard to understand the rationale for those choosing Pep over Jose. Of course you understand the rationale. Nice wind-up Tal in this post and your follow ups ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Cf on December 29, 2017, 10:17:44 AM Mourinho effectively saying that he cannot be effective as a manager unless he has the biggest budget. If you have 2nd biggest budget then Mourinho is saying he is a poor candidate for the job. Rafa Benitez, who is inexplicably adored by Newcastle fans Wtf kind of comment is this. One of the top managers in the world comes in to try and save us from relegation and then stays with us in the championship to get us back up. He's been constantly messed around by Ashley (we have a negative net transfer spend since Rafa has been here) and yet still sticks with the club. And it's strongly suspected he has been quite pivotal in making this takeover happen (assuming it does). He owed and owes us nothing. Yet here he is doing his best to make NUFC into something big. And you say "inexplicably adored by"? Ffs. Also I'd be very interested in how Mourinho, Guardiola et al were to do in similar circumstances of championship squad with no funds to back them. All undoubtedly good managers but I can't see any of them doing what Rafa has done for NUFC. Strong chance we remain a mid table championship team existing only to advertise sports direct without him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 30, 2017, 09:26:31 AM Jose:
"Lots of credit to Man City but Pep arrived. Has England keeper. Doesn’t like. Buys the Barca keeper. Doesn’t like. Buys another one. Has Zabaleta + Kolarov. Replaces them with 3; from Tottenham, Monaco + Real. Can we buy 6/7 players at same time + invest £600m/£700m? No" Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 30, 2017, 09:28:53 AM Jamie Carragher column: Why I believe United would win title if Pep was in charge instead of Jose
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/12/29/jose-mourinho-sounds-like-broken-record-pep-guardiola-man/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 30, 2017, 11:56:49 AM Jose: "Lots of credit to Man City but Pep arrived. Has England keeper. Doesn’t like. Buys the Barca keeper. Doesn’t like. Buys another one. Has Zabaleta + Kolarov. Replaces them with 3; from Tottenham, Monaco + Real. Can we buy 6/7 players at same time + invest £600m/£700m? No" Did Bravo, Ederson, Mendy, Walker and Danilo cost 600m? No, they cost pretty much the same as Lukaku and Lindelöf. The man is an utter uttter cretinZ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Archer on December 30, 2017, 12:43:01 PM Jamie Carragher column: Why I believe United would win title if Pep was in charge instead of Jose http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/12/29/jose-mourinho-sounds-like-broken-record-pep-guardiola-man/ I enjoyed that as well. Hard to disagree with Carragher :). IMO of course... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Archer on December 30, 2017, 01:16:36 PM Jose: "Lots of credit to Man City but Pep arrived. Has England keeper. Doesn’t like. Buys the Barca keeper. Doesn’t like. Buys another one. Has Zabaleta + Kolarov. Replaces them with 3; from Tottenham, Monaco + Real. Can we buy 6/7 players at same time + invest £600m/£700m? No" Did Bravo, Ederson, Mendy, Walker and Danilo cost 600m? No, they cost pretty much the same as Lukaku and Lindelöf. The man is an utter uttter cretinZ Well, you predicted earlier in the thread he would blow a gasket over van dijk :) It's been a bad month for Jose and he seems to be getting hammered now everywhere. Difficult times for him and the Champions League will be huge for him. Increased worries about the Premier League as well because whilst the actual points total so far is the highest since Ferguson the underlying numbers aren't great and there has been a big drop off since early season. Opponents have had the best of it in xG terms in 8 of the 20 games. Granted some only marginal but the numbers, game by game, are for worse than the other big teams. Here is a chart comparing with City: (http://i64.tinypic.com/zugn4n.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: RobS on December 30, 2017, 07:35:38 PM Another Mourinho masterclass.
Give him a new contract please. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 30, 2017, 08:21:24 PM Jose: "Lots of credit to Man City but Pep arrived. Has England keeper. Doesn’t like. Buys the Barca keeper. Doesn’t like. Buys another one. Has Zabaleta + Kolarov. Replaces them with 3; from Tottenham, Monaco + Real. Can we buy 6/7 players at same time + invest £600m/£700m? No" Did Bravo, Ederson, Mendy, Walker and Danilo cost 600m? No, they cost pretty much the same as Lukaku and Lindelöf. The man is an utter uttter cretinZ The way Maureen goes on, you'd think he hasn't had a penny to spend since taking over. We got KDB and Ederson for the price of Pogba. We got Sane and B.Silva for the price of Lukaku. We got Gundogan for half the price of Matic ffs. Yes, City have spent plenty but we are far from alone in that respect. Pep has spent very wisely, I don't think that is acknowledged enough as its clouded by the sums involved but he knew where to improve us and went out and got the right players (perhaps excluding Bravo ;) ) Oh, and a big +1 for a new contract for Maureen. If Moyes got 6 years, let Jose have 10. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: MANTIS01 on December 30, 2017, 11:41:12 PM Home fans boo manager off. Manager under no pressure at all?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 31, 2017, 12:12:55 AM Home fans boo manager off. Manager under no pressure at all? Hopefully the only pressure is on the pen he uses to scribble his signature on a new contract. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Tal on December 31, 2017, 12:19:49 AM The level of trolling in this thread lately is ridiculous.
IIRC blonde lost posters because of this sort of guff on the Liverpool thread. Easy to see why United fans aren't posting much of late. Can't the City fans have their sport on their own thread? The football threads really do get irksome, as people take the banter baton and keep running. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 31, 2017, 12:30:52 AM The level of trolling in this thread lately is ridiculous. IIRC blonde lost posters because of this sort of guff on the Liverpool thread. Easy to see why United fans aren't posting much of late. Can't the City fans have their sport on their own thread? The football threads really do get irksome, as people take the banter baton and keep running. If you can't have a laugh at Mourinho then what in life can you laugh at? (unless you love him of course ;) ) They were the late KO and drew yet again, think its pretty standard to see a flurry of comments. Plus all of Mourinho's media comments simply invites people to come and take a look and maybe comment or post. I don't think this thread has been a hotbed of united fans for a long time. It's not as if any of their contributions are being lost amongst other fans. Lighten up. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on December 31, 2017, 01:53:12 AM The level of trolling in this thread lately is ridiculous. IIRC blonde lost posters because of this sort of guff on the Liverpool thread. Easy to see why United fans aren't posting much of late. Can't the City fans have their sport on their own thread? The football threads really do get irksome, as people take the banter baton and keep running. If Mourinho didn’t make such idiotic comments I wouldn’t feel the need to post. I don’t really care if Man Utd win of lose but I do care if their manager twists the truth in such an absurd way. If objecting to that is unacceptable then this isn’t much of a forum. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 31, 2017, 10:50:00 AM this is a good read,for context
Ed Woodward, the Glazers and the crippling lack of vision that is hobbling Manchester United http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-5223501/Woodward-know-like-Mourinhos-enemy.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: sonour on December 31, 2017, 03:42:42 PM The level of trolling in this thread lately is ridiculous. IIRC blonde lost posters because of this sort of guff on the Liverpool thread. Easy to see why United fans aren't posting much of late. Can't the City fans have their sport on their own thread? The football threads really do get irksome, as people take the banter baton and keep running. If you can't have a laugh at Mourinho then what in life can you laugh at? (unless you love him of course ;) ) They were the late KO and drew yet again, think its pretty standard to see a flurry of comments. Plus all of Mourinho's media comments simply invites people to come and take a look and maybe comment or post. I don't think this thread has been a hotbed of united fans for a long time. It's not as if any of their contributions are being lost amongst other fans. Lighten up. +1 Tal, I usually agree with you but this thread has been fina as far as I'm concern. No real abuse. I'm a Man U fan and I agree with everything being said about Mourinho. The man is an absolute disgrace. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on December 31, 2017, 05:00:55 PM Man U xG and xA this season. Quite a fascinating chart
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Archer on January 01, 2018, 09:30:36 AM Man U xG and xA this season. Quite a fascinating chart Very scary graph reflecting the performance drop-off. Cumulative xGA is the worst by some distance relative to the big 6 and particularly Chelsea, Spurs and City. In fact xGA is almost at the total for the entire 16/17 season. Helps enormously that DDG is so good. 3 tough away fixtures this month for United - Everton, Burnley and Spurs. Love him or loathe him it is a big month for Jose. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on January 07, 2018, 11:39:20 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DS4jJ-2WAAAdLyM.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: flushthemout on January 07, 2018, 04:42:45 PM I was a big Maureen fan and would have gladly had him at the home of the new champions. Obv until Pep came calling. No respect for him or Conte behaving like the world owe them something. Both teams simply not good enough this season. Both great managers but there huge egos have taken away what they are supposed to be good at. Zero trophies for both this season.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Karabiner on January 07, 2018, 06:07:12 PM I quite like Conte inviting maureen into a room to sort the matter out in private.
After seeing his knees turn to jelly when he thought Arsene was going to stick one on him I know who my money would be on. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Doobs on January 07, 2018, 06:51:14 PM I quite like Conte inviting maureen into a room to sort the matter out in private. After seeing his knees turn to jelly when he thought Arsene was going to stick one on him I know who my money would be on. Confirmed that Conte (1.78m) is a bigger man than Mourinho (1.74m). Both of them suffering from Napoleon syndrome. Guaridola is 1.8m, which would explain a lot, until you discover Wenger is 1.91m and Klopp was 1.93m. Crouch will be an excellent manager obv. People should put heaps on him for Stoke boss in the circumstances. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on January 16, 2018, 09:18:33 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DTnGxjlW4AIHQZI.jpg)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: flushthemout on January 16, 2018, 09:47:57 AM Good luck to Sanchez where ever he goes, Nice to see City making a stand.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on January 16, 2018, 12:23:27 PM Looks increasingly like Mkhitaryan is going the other way. Would be happy with that + a nominal £ amount for Sanchez. Luke Shaw is bound to get injured again soon, so it's nice to have a ready replacement.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on January 19, 2018, 10:16:29 AM Man Utd committing £180m to Alex Sanchez deal for 4.5 years including transfer fee, agent, signing-on fee and wages = about 5.25% of their expected income in that period. Extraordinary.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on January 19, 2018, 10:22:12 AM Man Utd committing £180m to Alex Sanchez deal for 4.5 years including transfer fee, agent, signing-on fee and wages = about 5.25% of their expected income in that period. Extraordinary. Crikey. Extraordinary indeed. Hard to make numbers like that add up. And it has a knock-on effect - it bumps up the numbers for all future deals. This financial lunacy has to end badly eventually. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Karabiner on January 22, 2018, 06:52:38 PM Man Utd committing £180m to Alex Sanchez deal for 4.5 years including transfer fee, agent, signing-on fee and wages = about 5.25% of their expected income in that period. Extraordinary. Crikey. Extraordinary indeed. Hard to make numbers like that add up. And it has a knock-on effect - it bumps up the numbers for all future deals. This financial lunacy has to end badly eventually. A credible source said he's on £350K pw plus a £30M signing-on fee spread across four years. I'm not sure how much of that Atom and Humber will get. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: youthnkzR on March 09, 2018, 04:48:48 PM https://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/man-utd-v-liverpool/winner
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on March 09, 2018, 05:06:16 PM https://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/man-utd-v-liverpool/winner That is incredible. Long long time since the scousers went to manure as favs on the road. Just shows you how golden manure have been this year stats wise compared to liverpool for liverpool to be considered half a goal better than man U on a neutral ground. That is a huge difference. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on March 10, 2018, 12:30:45 PM https://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/man-utd-v-liverpool/winner That is incredible. Long long time since the scousers went to manure as favs on the road. Just shows you how golden manure have been this year stats wise compared to liverpool for liverpool to be considered half a goal better than man U on a neutral ground. That is a huge difference. Man U 9/4 Liverpool 6/4 on the off. Incredible scenes. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: kukushkin88 on March 10, 2018, 12:40:24 PM https://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/man-utd-v-liverpool/winner That is incredible. Long long time since the scousers went to manure as favs on the road. Just shows you how golden manure have been this year stats wise compared to liverpool for liverpool to be considered half a goal better than man U on a neutral ground. That is a huge difference. Man U 9/4 Liverpool 6/4 on the off. Incredible scenes. Are you with Utd? I've had a decent bet, 9/4 must be a bit big. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on March 10, 2018, 12:46:50 PM https://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/man-utd-v-liverpool/winner That is incredible. Long long time since the scousers went to manure as favs on the road. Just shows you how golden manure have been this year stats wise compared to liverpool for liverpool to be considered half a goal better than man U on a neutral ground. That is a huge difference. Man U 9/4 Liverpool 6/4 on the off. Incredible scenes. Are you with Utd? I've had a decent bet, 9/4 must be a bit big. Amazing price. Man U are the price they used to be pre game a few years ago 1-0 up! That probably just put another £10m on Butland's transfer fee in the summer when Liverpool come calling. Keeper should have done better there. Wasn't anywhere near the bottom corner. Some goal though by Rashford. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on March 10, 2018, 12:48:05 PM https://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/man-utd-v-liverpool/winner That is incredible. Long long time since the scousers went to manure as favs on the road. Just shows you how golden manure have been this year stats wise compared to liverpool for liverpool to be considered half a goal better than man U on a neutral ground. That is a huge difference. Man U 9/4 Liverpool 6/4 on the off. Incredible scenes. Are you with Utd? I've had a decent bet, 9/4 must be a bit big. Impeccable timing, well done. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on March 10, 2018, 12:55:03 PM Rremember when big sam and pulis used to get grief for this long ball football. Amazing how its ok if you are a handsome European chequebook manager with a big mouth/ego!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: kukushkin88 on March 10, 2018, 01:18:24 PM https://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/man-utd-v-liverpool/winner That is incredible. Long long time since the scousers went to manure as favs on the road. Just shows you how golden manure have been this year stats wise compared to liverpool for liverpool to be considered half a goal better than man U on a neutral ground. That is a huge difference. Man U 9/4 Liverpool 6/4 on the off. Incredible scenes. Are you with Utd? I've had a decent bet, 9/4 must be a bit big. Impeccable timing, well done. Inspired by and dedicated to Keith's excellent 'swimming against the tide' thread. Now, let's hope they hold on:-) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: nirvana on March 13, 2018, 09:41:02 PM Can't believe they didn't play Sanchez
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on March 13, 2018, 09:45:54 PM :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: rinswun on March 13, 2018, 09:53:52 PM He's turned Paul Pogba into Mathias Pogba and Alexis Sanchez into Sanchez Watt. Impressive.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: youthnkzR on March 14, 2018, 02:57:56 AM https://twitter.com/utdxtra/status/973696038333763585
Is this acceptable? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: kukushkin88 on March 14, 2018, 06:30:56 AM https://twitter.com/utdxtra/status/973696038333763585 Is this acceptable? I think the full transcript of what he said looks fine, it's just an inelegant way of trying to keep losing a game of football in perspective. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: teddybloat on March 14, 2018, 07:14:17 AM I fear united fans are about to turn into liverpool fans; this is going to have them making banners, maybe in cod latin...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on March 14, 2018, 10:51:51 AM That might legitimately be the tactically worst 2 legged tie in European history.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on March 15, 2018, 10:17:56 AM Manchester United were exceptional in the Champions League. They were the only club in the last 16 who lost when richer (income / wages) than their opponents.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYR5fUyW4AEtcSg.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on April 07, 2018, 10:40:55 PM I’d be dead chuffed for Chris Smalling scoring the winner in a derby if he hadn’t given away that first goal. Or lost a header to the smallest man on the pitch in the dying minutes. Or be the worst player on the pitch by a large margin. Or be the worst United player in living memory by an even larger margin.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on April 08, 2018, 10:51:04 AM quite like this, Smalling and Kompany exactly an hour apart
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Marky147 on April 08, 2018, 02:39:09 PM Great photos, Tighty.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on May 05, 2018, 08:00:14 PM Sir Alex Ferguson 'seriously ill' in hospital. Having emergency surgery tonight.
Best wishes to him Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on June 03, 2018, 10:45:01 AM Kanchelskis
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Marky147 on June 03, 2018, 07:19:08 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 24, 2018, 09:37:42 AM !
"I would have quit any other club': Jose Mourinho tells friends he would have resigned over Man United's transfer woes if he was at any of their rivals https://dailym.ai/2wn9lZ0 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad and very very expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on August 27, 2018, 10:53:40 PM ! "I would have quit any other club': Jose Mourinho tells friends he would have resigned over Man United's transfer woes if he was at any of their rivals https://dailym.ai/2wn9lZ0 Be our guest Jose. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. I wish I knew who should come in as a replacement, but right now it would be anyone but Maureen. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad and very very expensive story Post by: Karabiner on August 27, 2018, 11:17:16 PM ! "I would have quit any other club': Jose Mourinho tells friends he would have resigned over Man United's transfer woes if he was at any of their rivals https://dailym.ai/2wn9lZ0 Be our guest Jose. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. I wish I knew who should come in as a replacement, but right now it would be anyone but Maureen. Wenger in? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad and very very expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on August 28, 2018, 06:31:40 AM ! "I would have quit any other club': Jose Mourinho tells friends he would have resigned over Man United's transfer woes if he was at any of their rivals https://dailym.ai/2wn9lZ0 Be our guest Jose. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. I wish I knew who should come in as a replacement, but right now it would be anyone but Maureen. Wenger in? Chris Morris, Tinkerman, Wenger, Wagner, Stevie G, Neville G, Kenny Gee, The 43yr old bloke from Ormskirk who has won the Treble for five seasons in a row on Championship Manager. Someone with a smile; someone who doesn’t act like they are doing us a favour: someone who gets it. We’re not in bad shape if we can find a manager capable of extracting the best out of the squad. One or two of them have potential Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on August 28, 2018, 12:35:33 PM Respect. Respect. R-e-s-p-e-c-t. Perhaps it was an Aretha Franklin tribute? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45325398 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on August 28, 2018, 03:20:55 PM ! "I would have quit any other club': Jose Mourinho tells friends he would have resigned over Man United's transfer woes if he was at any of their rivals https://dailym.ai/2wn9lZ0 The pay off wouldn't have been worth hanging around for at most other clubs. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad and very very expensive story Post by: nirvana on August 28, 2018, 03:46:53 PM ! "I would have quit any other club': Jose Mourinho tells friends he would have resigned over Man United's transfer woes if he was at any of their rivals https://dailym.ai/2wn9lZ0 Be our guest Jose. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. I wish I knew who should come in as a replacement, but right now it would be anyone but Maureen. Wenger in? Chris Morris, Tinkerman, Wenger, Wagner, Stevie G, Neville G, Kenny Gee, The 43yr old bloke from Ormskirk who has won the Treble for five seasons in a row on Championship Manager. Someone with a smile; someone who doesn’t act like they are doing us a favour: someone who gets it. We’re not in bad shape if we can find a manager capable of extracting the best out of the squad. One or two of them have potential I'd have to acknowledge that there were times when Wenger could rile you as a a fan and very odd occasions where he embarrassed himself and the club I think. Mourinho is a whole different level, just a permanent embarrassment to a great club - do any United fans actually like him being there or do most feel like you - the latter i would hope. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on August 28, 2018, 03:53:00 PM interesting article
United pay the price for dismantling Ferguson's legacy https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-soccer-england-mun-tot/united-pay-the-price-for-dismantling-fergusons-legacy-idUKKCN1LD1HD Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Mark_Porter on August 28, 2018, 04:08:46 PM Shaw looks a different player already this season.
A real menace going forward, hope he nails down that spot. He is a better "defender" than he gets credit for too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on August 28, 2018, 07:25:30 PM Respect. Respect. R-e-s-p-e-c-t. Perhaps it was an Aretha Franklin tribute? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45325398 E-M-B-A-R-R-A-S-S-I-N-G interesting article United pay the price for dismantling Ferguson's legacy https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-soccer-england-mun-tot/united-pay-the-price-for-dismantling-fergusons-legacy-idUKKCN1LD1HD Chosen Mastermind subject? Stating the bleeding obvious. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: 4KSuited on August 28, 2018, 08:27:21 PM I must admit to being surprised when Mourinho was appointed. Hadn't Sir Bobby already expressed a view that the sullen Portuguese was not of the right character for his beloved club? After all, Maureen had been caught eye-gouging (among other things) and possessed an ego that was clearly bigger than the aggregate of the MOTD panel. There was never going to be a happy ending IMO; I'm only surprised that it's taken this long.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pokerpops on August 28, 2018, 11:39:23 PM I was a fan of Mourinho during the better part of his tenure at Chelsea - not keen on the style of football he had them playing, but he brought something to the English game with his personality. However, in the later days at Chelsea and subsequently he doesn't seem to me to be of the right 'stuff' for us. SAF plays mindgames, but Mourinho goes too far, and seems to be losing the plot - the fuss around the game against Barca is a case in point http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/apr/28/jose-mourinho-real-madrid-barcelona Not Officer Material Jus sayin Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on August 30, 2018, 03:47:21 PM https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2018/08/29/manchesterunited-defy-jose-mourinho-offer-anthony-martial-five/
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on August 30, 2018, 10:53:21 PM https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2018/08/29/manchesterunited-defy-jose-mourinho-offer-anthony-martial-five/ I believe this is one of the better recent decisions from the club. We’ve given up on a few too many players in the last few seasons. SAF failed with some too in his time. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on September 20, 2018, 07:13:24 AM https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2018/08/29/manchesterunited-defy-jose-mourinho-offer-anthony-martial-five/ I believe this is one of the better recent decisions from the club. We’ve given up on a few too many players in the last few seasons. SAF failed with some too in his time. Took his chance and his goal well. Three goals in one game is a rarity, the last time was the City game in April. They lost last night too. Coincidence? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on September 20, 2018, 09:33:31 AM The form, results & (non) performance of Sanchez, who cost Man U a pretty fortune, is a bit sad to see, & something of a mystery to me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on September 20, 2018, 02:06:33 PM The form, results & (non) performance of Sanchez, who cost Man U a pretty fortune, is a bit sad to see, & something of a mystery to me. Are you now the resident football thread fluffer? Sanchez was a strange acquisition, it’s little wonder that he’s struggling to make an impact in a team whose style of play is very very different from that which suited him at Arsenal. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on September 20, 2018, 05:50:27 PM The form, results & (non) performance of Sanchez, who cost Man U a pretty fortune, is a bit sad to see, & something of a mystery to me. Panic buy that the noisy neighbours declined at the price and them declining and man u falling into the trap of buying has just made the gap between the two clubs even bigger. What an incredible contract/pension to be on the hook for for many years to come. Quite incredible. He was never a top 10 performer in the epl before he went for me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: BigAdz on September 20, 2018, 08:31:57 PM The form, results & (non) performance of Sanchez, who cost Man U a pretty fortune, is a bit sad to see, & something of a mystery to me. Panic buy that the noisy neighbours declined at the price and them declining and man u falling into the trap of buying has just made the gap between the two clubs even bigger. What an incredible contract/pension to be on the hook for for many years to come. Quite incredible. He was never a top 10 performer in the epl before he went for me. Right up there with some of the stupidest things written on this forum. And as a writer of many of the others I am in a position to judge. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on September 20, 2018, 08:43:21 PM I will bite once.
I don't want to even list the players they would be LOCKS to be considered better than him prior to him leaving Arsenal. It would be longer than 10. The fact Man City didn't sign him would suggest at least five of their team were better than him before we consider Kane, Hazard, Kante, Costa, De Gea, the scouse front line and Van Dijk. Lukaku (given he starts ahead of him). Given Arsenal 'paid' Ozil his money and rejected Sanchez (they could only afford one on £350k a week) would suggest your own club didn't rate him ahead of Ozil at the time. At least six of these are literally 1.01 to be considered superior (and not even close) to Sanchez even at his peak. Please feel free Adz to list (the very short list) of players who you consider better than Sanchez. Must be sub 5 for my statement to be 'right up there with the stupidest things written on this forum'. Looking forward to seeing who makes and misses the cut. Vardy/Saha probably marginally behind him but still in the debate in that era. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on September 20, 2018, 09:17:25 PM Pretty pointless to compare Sanchez with de Gea, van Dijk, Kante. Looks a tad desperate Arb.
But i agree with the overall sentiment and I very much doubt that he gets in any end of season representative EPL team through his career. Decent addition to the team of ‘never did it at OT’ though. Still, we did a win away in the CL. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on September 20, 2018, 09:18:30 PM Pretty pointless to compare Sanchez with de Gea, van Dijk, Kante. Looks a tad desperate Arb. But i agree with the overall sentiment and I very much doubt that he gets in any end of season representative EPL team through his career. Decent addition to the team of ‘never did it at OT’ though. Still, we did a win away in the CL. It isn't pointless at all. I said he was never considered a top 10 player in the EPL. I didn't discuss position. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on September 21, 2018, 08:56:19 AM The form, results & (non) performance of Sanchez, who cost Man U a pretty fortune, is a bit sad to see, & something of a mystery to me. Are you now the resident football thread fluffer? Well, when time permits I'm trying to breathe a little life into a few of these threads, yes. A shame to see such indifference, though when posts are made it does seem to get folks posting. August was blonde's quietest month for 13 years, & September might not be much better. The Liverpool thread is a real shame, the glory days are well & truly in sight, everything they do excites, & yet there's barely a post on the thread. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: DungBeetle on September 21, 2018, 09:50:24 AM The form, results & (non) performance of Sanchez, who cost Man U a pretty fortune, is a bit sad to see, & something of a mystery to me. Are you now the resident football thread fluffer? Well, when time permits I'm trying to breathe a little life into a few of these threads, yes. A shame to see such indifference, though when posts are made it does seem to get folks posting. August was blonde's quietest month for 13 years, & September might not be much better. The Liverpool thread is a real shame, the glory days are well & truly in sight, everything they do excites, & yet there's barely a post on the thread. Nonsense. Liverpool fans everywhere are becoming unbearable. I visit the Liverpool thread on here as a safe area to get away from it all. I spend hours just sitting in the thread hiding away from the rest of the internet. Best thread on blond imo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Killerkilsby on September 21, 2018, 03:39:07 PM The form, results & (non) performance of Sanchez, who cost Man U a pretty fortune, is a bit sad to see, & something of a mystery to me. Are you now the resident football thread fluffer? Well, when time permits I'm trying to breathe a little life into a few of these threads, yes. A shame to see such indifference, though when posts are made it does seem to get folks posting. August was blonde's quietest month for 13 years, & September might not be much better. The Liverpool thread is a real shame, the glory days are well & truly in sight, everything they do excites, & yet there's barely a post on the thread. Have to be careful as one post anti anything in a thread causes carnage. People have to learn to debate and not get instantly defensive or personal. Liverpool fans IMO are keeping it down as for so many recent years they have looked good but flopped at te end. Yet to see if King Klopp will be King Flopp. Footballs incred tho. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Archer on September 22, 2018, 12:59:20 AM The form, results & (non) performance of Sanchez, who cost Man U a pretty fortune, is a bit sad to see, & something of a mystery to me. Are you now the resident football thread fluffer? Well, when time permits I'm trying to breathe a little life into a few of these threads, yes. A shame to see such indifference, though when posts are made it does seem to get folks posting. August was blonde's quietest month for 13 years, & September might not be much better. The Liverpool thread is a real shame, the glory days are well & truly in sight, everything they do excites, & yet there's barely a post on the thread. Nonsense. Liverpool fans everywhere are becoming unbearable. I visit the Liverpool thread on here as a safe area to get away from it all. I spend hours just sitting in the thread hiding away from the rest of the internet. Best thread on blond imo. :) :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on September 22, 2018, 08:06:54 AM Will you lot bugger off with your discussion of Liverpool please. There’s a perfectly good thread for that which would have erupted had they managed to beat Real.
They didn’t because I, and probably many more United fans accepted City winning the league and losing the FA Cup Final as being better outcomes than that. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: 77dave on September 23, 2018, 01:37:51 AM The form, results & (non) performance of Sanchez, who cost Man U a pretty fortune, is a bit sad to see, & something of a mystery to me. Are you now the resident football thread fluffer? Well, when time permits I'm trying to breathe a little life into a few of these threads, yes. A shame to see such indifference, though when posts are made it does seem to get folks posting. August was blonde's quietest month for 13 years, & September might not be much better. The Liverpool thread is a real shame, the glory days are well & truly in sight, everything they do excites, & yet there's barely a post on the thread. This is because for months and months the thread asked to be policed but due to bias it was not and people like baron and kinboshi are no more. Warnings were given and ignored. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on September 23, 2018, 09:43:44 AM The form, results & (non) performance of Sanchez, who cost Man U a pretty fortune, is a bit sad to see, & something of a mystery to me. Are you now the resident football thread fluffer? Well, when time permits I'm trying to breathe a little life into a few of these threads, yes. A shame to see such indifference, though when posts are made it does seem to get folks posting. August was blonde's quietest month for 13 years, & September might not be much better. The Liverpool thread is a real shame, the glory days are well & truly in sight, everything they do excites, & yet there's barely a post on the thread. This is because for months and months the thread asked to be policed but due to bias it was not and people like baron and kinboshi are no more. Warnings were given and ignored. That may or may not be true, Jim, but that was then & this is now. Folks still read the threads as much as ever, they just don't post. If folks are reactive in posting rather than pro-active then the place will die. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: tikay on September 23, 2018, 09:44:53 AM The old boy was back at OT yesterday, & what a wonderful reception he got. No matter who we support, I doubt any person in English football is better respected. (http://i.imgur.com/6RoYZeQ.jpg) (https://imgur.com/6RoYZeQ) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 23, 2018, 09:58:42 AM There was no bias. Still, lets hold grudges hey?
Liverpool will win the title and no one will still post? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on September 23, 2018, 03:21:15 PM There was no bias. Still, lets hold grudges hey? Liverpool will win the title and no one will still post? You think that’s likely Richard? Even if it is, could you keep such talk out of this thread please - it really stings to even consider the prospect. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 25, 2018, 11:31:52 AM The reason why every bad result at Manchester United under Jose Mourinho feels as though it spells the end
Since the departure of Sir Alex Ferguson, every bad result is a calamity always threatening to instantly and unfairly diminish any good results from before https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/manchester-united-news-fc-jose-mourinho-why-loss-season-fixtures-watch-video-a8553511.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: TightEnd on September 25, 2018, 05:18:55 PM Jose Mourinho has told his mufc players that Paul Pogba will not captain the team again. Mourinho annoyed with Pogba’s attitude & wanted to remind the players that no one is bigger than the club.
in The Times tomorrow Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on September 25, 2018, 05:45:03 PM Jose Mourinho has told his mufc players that Paul Pogba will not captain the team again. Mourinho annoyed with Pogba’s attitude & wanted to remind the players that no one is bigger than the club. in The Times tomorrow Is this the way to get the best from your expensively assembled squad? Nice work. Someone needs to remind Jose that he’s not bigger than the club either. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on September 28, 2018, 09:21:10 AM I appreciate the lack of jibes about our latest debacle.
It’s all rather sad, and the suggestion that Zidane could be the replacement for Mourinho could be the final straw. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Karabiner on September 28, 2018, 06:46:00 PM I appreciate the lack of jibes about our latest debacle. It’s all rather sad, and the suggestion that Zidane could be the replacement for Mourinho could be the final straw. I think many of us feel numb regarding maureen's antics much in the same way that we have grown somewhat immune to Trump's nonsense. It's all a little unseemly. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: youthnkzR on September 29, 2018, 01:04:09 AM As a fan I've tried hard to picture a way in which Mourinho / Utd goes well from this point..... It just doesn't.*
Jose isn't the same guy he once was. I don't mean that in the sense of hes aged badly, hes just.... lost it... The charisma/flair...etc. All the things which made Jose Mourinho (as he once was) have gone, replaced by bitterness. From what I know of him, I like Jose the person..... I don't like Jose the (United) manager. *(I would LOVE to be wrong) **Not a recent revelation... just thought I'd throw my 2p in Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: youthnkzR on September 29, 2018, 04:38:23 AM Karl Pilkington on supporting Manchester United: "I feel like supporting United is like having a tortoise as a pet. I had a tortoise, and they are not entertaining to watch. You don't watch them, but you know you have got a bit of responsibility to show some interest."
rotflmfao Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on September 29, 2018, 07:57:02 AM As a fan I've tried hard to picture a way in which Mourinho / Utd goes well from this point..... It just doesn't.* Jose isn't the same guy he once was. I don't mean that in the sense of hes aged badly, hes just.... lost it... The charisma/flair...etc. All the things which made Jose Mourinho (as he once was) have gone, replaced by bitterness. From what I know of him, I like Jose the person..... I don't like Jose the (United) manager. *(I would LOVE to be wrong) **Not a recent revelation... just thought I'd throw my 2p in I’d be happy for us both to be wrong, but I fear we’re not. He just isn’t the right man for us. I’m still not clear on who there is out there who could be. Someone like Klopp or Pochetino maybe. Not them, but someone who has their qualities. Love the Karl Pilkington quote Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: arbboy on September 29, 2018, 12:58:36 PM must be time for the sads to be re added to the title.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: kukushkin88 on September 29, 2018, 02:19:25 PM must be time for the sads to be re added to the title. I think at least one, especially when you consider that they need City to stop Liverpool winning the league, tough time to be a Man Utd fan. I find I like them atm though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on September 29, 2018, 03:52:38 PM Get him out, so he can at least pay for me to see the UFC next year ;D
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a less sad but expensive story Post by: Doobs on September 29, 2018, 04:19:31 PM must be time for the sads to be re added to the title. Fair point, but can't believe the Stoke thread has none. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on October 03, 2018, 12:00:28 AM I'm baffled nobody is talking about the Valencia match. One of the best matches to be played under the OT lights.... ;sleep;
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on October 03, 2018, 05:54:52 PM Don't you just love those awkward moments? Antonio Valencia: Man Utd captain sorry for liking 'time for Mourinho to go' post https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45730077 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: MANTIS01 on October 04, 2018, 10:58:00 AM Thought the performance against Valencia was just dreadful. Always been a fan of Mourinho and surprised how things are panning out for him at United. He seems to love a good war of attrition, readily becoming entrenched in battles against players, fans, press, whoever. But with these elite clubs I figure that extra 2% performance comes from the mystique of playing for a revered side and really it's JM job to create that intoxicating atmosphere. I mean the fella says nobody is bigger than the club but injecting his own personal feelings into the situation, creating politics and disharmony is plainly at odds with that sentiment. Reaching the heights of managing or playing for United is football utopia and every day staff should be beaming but it's quite the opposite and the accountability for that rests with the manager.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on October 04, 2018, 11:07:38 AM I'm sure he doesn't mean to but his every utterance is demotivational and banging on about past success just makes him seem increasingly past it
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on October 04, 2018, 11:27:18 AM I'm sure he doesn't mean to but his every utterance is demotivational and banging on about past success just makes him seem increasingly past it It's almost as though he's become a specialist in failure.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on October 04, 2018, 11:47:31 AM I'm sure he doesn't mean to but his every utterance is demotivational and banging on about past success just makes him seem increasingly past it It's almost as though he's become a specialist in failure.. I would hang on to my past successes if i could earn £15m a year from them for as long as possible knowing i am completely gone at the game. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on October 04, 2018, 11:57:38 AM I read somewhere yesterday that he's never managed a club for longer than 3.5 years. He seems to collect £10 million or whatever every time he gets the tin tack, & if Man U get rid, that'll be another £15 milly in his pocket. MBN. Very odd that, almost throughout top level football, Managers get so handsomely rewarded for failure. I grew up in a world where failure meant you walked away with bugger all. I rather enjoy having him manage in the PL, he's fun to watch & listen to in a perverse way, but it is sad to see Man U losing their heritage, & becoming ordinary. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on October 04, 2018, 12:17:44 PM I would buy heavily at £15m what he will walk off with when he gets the tin tack.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 04, 2018, 12:38:49 PM I'm sure he doesn't mean to but his every utterance is demotivational and banging on about past success just makes him seem increasingly past it It's almost as though he's become a specialist in failure.. You’ve waited patiently to use that Ralph. WP Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on October 05, 2018, 11:05:21 PM Jose just gone very very short to be the next prem manager to leave post
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/next-manager-to-leave-post edit: I only glanced at skybet where he was 1/8... not as short as I made out. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on October 06, 2018, 05:50:34 PM Oh my. Man U 2-0 down. After 10 minutes. At home. To Newcastle. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Killerkilsby on October 06, 2018, 05:51:14 PM Incred scenes too!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Killerkilsby on October 06, 2018, 05:53:54 PM Can someone explain to me the debt fuelled bit in the title? I never track the clubs profitability but assumed Utd were doing v well financially?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on October 06, 2018, 05:55:28 PM (http://i.imgur.com/O5MsRAk.jpg) (https://imgur.com/O5MsRAk) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on October 06, 2018, 05:59:12 PM Can someone explain to me the debt fuelled bit in the title? I never track the clubs profitability but assumed Utd were doing v well financially? They are but they are laced with debt (and interest payments) albeit at current income levels they can easily service it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on October 06, 2018, 06:06:57 PM Can someone explain to me the debt fuelled bit in the title? I never track the clubs profitability but assumed Utd were doing v well financially? Think the Glasers have used the club to finance their other exploits, but could be wrong. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on October 06, 2018, 06:18:32 PM Can someone explain to me the debt fuelled bit in the title? I never track the clubs profitability but assumed Utd were doing v well financially? They are but they are laced with debt (and interest payments) albeit at current income levels they can easily service it. They are gonna have to sell a hell of a lot of McTominay shirts in the Championship. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on October 06, 2018, 06:37:18 PM Current back 3: Matic, Smalling, Pogba. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Killerkilsby on October 06, 2018, 07:23:21 PM Never in doubt!!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Tal on October 06, 2018, 07:34:00 PM (http://i.imgur.com/O5MsRAk.jpg) (https://imgur.com/O5MsRAk) How do you do it? :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on October 06, 2018, 07:37:47 PM Reverse bokking ITT!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on October 06, 2018, 07:50:53 PM Marky knows. Most enjoyable Man U game all season for me, great fun. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on October 07, 2018, 03:06:47 AM I would buy heavily at £15m what he will walk off with when he gets the tin tack. https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/revealed-huge-sum-sacking-jose-13376032 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on October 21, 2018, 10:41:43 AM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on October 21, 2018, 05:26:42 PM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 21, 2018, 11:43:11 PM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Steady on feller. The UAE doesn’t have a squeaky clean image regarding Human Rights. I don’t recall any principled protest against your current owners when they started pouring the money in. I would hope that the Saudis are told to do one if they come knocking. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on October 22, 2018, 12:32:09 AM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Steady on feller. The UAE doesn’t have a squeaky clean image regarding Human Rights. I don’t recall any principled protest against your current owners when they started pouring the money in. I would hope that the Saudis are told to do one if they come knocking. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates That's an opinion taken from a united forum, not Archer's opinion. This is my opinion; I couldn't care less who owns them. They are so far beneath us now that no amount of money or investment will bridge the gap as it stands. Not a single united player would get near our best XI. And hardly any would make the squad. DDG would make a reasonable back up keeper and thats about it. Not in my lifetime :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 22, 2018, 07:15:16 AM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Steady on feller. The UAE doesn’t have a squeaky clean image regarding Human Rights. I don’t recall any principled protest against your current owners when they started pouring the money in. I would hope that the Saudis are told to do one if they come knocking. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates That's an opinion taken from a united forum, not Archer's opinion. This is my opinion; I couldn't care less who owns them. They are so far beneath us now that no amount of money or investment will bridge the gap as it stands. Not a single united player would get near our best XI. And hardly any would make the squad. DDG would make a reasonable back up keeper and thats about it. Not in my lifetime :D Irrespective of where the line came from, Archer chose to post it here. You may well be right about the quality of the two squads. But then you’ve had all the dirty money pouring in, whilst we’ve been funding the Glazers. Say what you like about MUFC but the money we spend has all derived from our efforts, backed by our history and worldwide reputation. Liverpool have done pretty well on a similar basis, as have Arsenal and Tottenham. Back to the actual football. We did pretty well on Saturday and it was good to see that when the shackles are off we can be an attacking force to be reckoned with. Looking forward to Tuesday evening with great apprehension. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on October 22, 2018, 05:29:55 PM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Steady on feller. The UAE doesn’t have a squeaky clean image regarding Human Rights. I don’t recall any principled protest against your current owners when they started pouring the money in. I would hope that the Saudis are told to do one if they come knocking. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates I was quoting an extreme anti-Glazer view but pro-Saudi from a United forum in response to Ralph wondering how United fans felt. I also made the point it was a minority view. So I'm not sure how you have jumped to UAE Human Rights but you are right there was no principled protest against our owners. Likewise, when Liverpool were close to a deal with Dubai International Capital there was no protest. In fact the banners in the ground were protesting against H&G and wanting DIC. Also, I don't recall protest from United fans when the Qatar royal family were rumoured to be on the brink of a takeover a few years ago. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on October 22, 2018, 05:36:40 PM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Steady on feller. The UAE doesn’t have a squeaky clean image regarding Human Rights. I don’t recall any principled protest against your current owners when they started pouring the money in. I would hope that the Saudis are told to do one if they come knocking. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates That's an opinion taken from a united forum, not Archer's opinion. This is my opinion; I couldn't care less who owns them. They are so far beneath us now that no amount of money or investment will bridge the gap as it stands. Not a single united player would get near our best XI. And hardly any would make the squad. DDG would make a reasonable back up keeper and thats about it. Not in my lifetime :D Irrespective of where the line came from, Archer chose to post it here. You may well be right about the quality of the two squads. But then you’ve had all the dirty money pouring in, whilst we’ve been funding the Glazers. Say what you like about MUFC but the money we spend has all derived from our efforts, backed by our history and worldwide reputation. Liverpool have done pretty well on a similar basis, as have Arsenal and Tottenham. Back to the actual football. We did pretty well on Saturday and it was good to see that when the shackles are off we can be an attacking force to be reckoned with. Looking forward to Tuesday evening with great apprehension. Dirty money? What makes it dirty? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 22, 2018, 06:09:59 PM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Steady on feller. The UAE doesn’t have a squeaky clean image regarding Human Rights. I don’t recall any principled protest against your current owners when they started pouring the money in. I would hope that the Saudis are told to do one if they come knocking. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates That's an opinion taken from a united forum, not Archer's opinion. This is my opinion; I couldn't care less who owns them. They are so far beneath us now that no amount of money or investment will bridge the gap as it stands. Not a single united player would get near our best XI. And hardly any would make the squad. DDG would make a reasonable back up keeper and thats about it. Not in my lifetime :D Irrespective of where the line came from, Archer chose to post it here. You may well be right about the quality of the two squads. But then you’ve had all the dirty money pouring in, whilst we’ve been funding the Glazers. Say what you like about MUFC but the money we spend has all derived from our efforts, backed by our history and worldwide reputation. Liverpool have done pretty well on a similar basis, as have Arsenal and Tottenham. Back to the actual football. We did pretty well on Saturday and it was good to see that when the shackles are off we can be an attacking force to be reckoned with. Looking forward to Tuesday evening with great apprehension. Dirty money? What makes it dirty? I thought we’d established that control of the sovereign wealth of the UAE is in the hands of people whose approach to human rights is about as rigorous as my approach to removing fat from my bacon butty. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on October 22, 2018, 06:11:35 PM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Steady on feller. The UAE doesn’t have a squeaky clean image regarding Human Rights. I don’t recall any principled protest against your current owners when they started pouring the money in. I would hope that the Saudis are told to do one if they come knocking. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates That's an opinion taken from a united forum, not Archer's opinion. This is my opinion; I couldn't care less who owns them. They are so far beneath us now that no amount of money or investment will bridge the gap as it stands. Not a single united player would get near our best XI. And hardly any would make the squad. DDG would make a reasonable back up keeper and thats about it. Not in my lifetime :D Irrespective of where the line came from, Archer chose to post it here. You may well be right about the quality of the two squads. But then you’ve had all the dirty money pouring in, whilst we’ve been funding the Glazers. Say what you like about MUFC but the money we spend has all derived from our efforts, backed by our history and worldwide reputation. Liverpool have done pretty well on a similar basis, as have Arsenal and Tottenham. Back to the actual football. We did pretty well on Saturday and it was good to see that when the shackles are off we can be an attacking force to be reckoned with. Looking forward to Tuesday evening with great apprehension. Dirty money? What makes it dirty? I remember when we used to get called bitter. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on October 22, 2018, 10:51:31 PM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Steady on feller. The UAE doesn’t have a squeaky clean image regarding Human Rights. I don’t recall any principled protest against your current owners when they started pouring the money in. I would hope that the Saudis are told to do one if they come knocking. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates That's an opinion taken from a united forum, not Archer's opinion. This is my opinion; I couldn't care less who owns them. They are so far beneath us now that no amount of money or investment will bridge the gap as it stands. Not a single united player would get near our best XI. And hardly any would make the squad. DDG would make a reasonable back up keeper and thats about it. Not in my lifetime :D Irrespective of where the line came from, Archer chose to post it here. You may well be right about the quality of the two squads. But then you’ve had all the dirty money pouring in, whilst we’ve been funding the Glazers. Say what you like about MUFC but the money we spend has all derived from our efforts, backed by our history and worldwide reputation. Liverpool have done pretty well on a similar basis, as have Arsenal and Tottenham. Back to the actual football. We did pretty well on Saturday and it was good to see that when the shackles are off we can be an attacking force to be reckoned with. Looking forward to Tuesday evening with great apprehension. Dirty money? What makes it dirty? I thought we’d established that control of the sovereign wealth of the UAE is in the hands of people whose approach to human rights is about as rigorous as my approach to removing fat from my bacon butty. Ah, you associate human rights issues with dirty money. I didn't realise there was a correlation. I associate dirty money with corruption, crime, money laundering, criminal gangs, drugs etc etc...rather than money earned from natural resources and investment of the proceeds. By the way, City aren't owned by a SWF. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 23, 2018, 07:16:51 AM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Steady on feller. The UAE doesn’t have a squeaky clean image regarding Human Rights. I don’t recall any principled protest against your current owners when they started pouring the money in. I would hope that the Saudis are told to do one if they come knocking. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates That's an opinion taken from a united forum, not Archer's opinion. This is my opinion; I couldn't care less who owns them. They are so far beneath us now that no amount of money or investment will bridge the gap as it stands. Not a single united player would get near our best XI. And hardly any would make the squad. DDG would make a reasonable back up keeper and thats about it. Not in my lifetime :D Irrespective of where the line came from, Archer chose to post it here. You may well be right about the quality of the two squads. But then you’ve had all the dirty money pouring in, whilst we’ve been funding the Glazers. Say what you like about MUFC but the money we spend has all derived from our efforts, backed by our history and worldwide reputation. Liverpool have done pretty well on a similar basis, as have Arsenal and Tottenham. Back to the actual football. We did pretty well on Saturday and it was good to see that when the shackles are off we can be an attacking force to be reckoned with. Looking forward to Tuesday evening with great apprehension. Dirty money? What makes it dirty? I thought we’d established that control of the sovereign wealth of the UAE is in the hands of people whose approach to human rights is about as rigorous as my approach to removing fat from my bacon butty. Ah, you associate human rights issues with dirty money. I didn't realise there was a correlation. I associate dirty money with corruption, crime, money laundering, criminal gangs, drugs etc etc...rather than money earned from natural resources and investment of the proceeds. By the way, City aren't owned by a SWF. We could debate this for months but that would get really dull, really fast. I note that the ownership is in the sole hands of one man whose wealth derives from his position within the controlling family. I’ll avoid further criticism since it seems to be bad for your health https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates Should probably have this conversation over at yours, but what are your expectations this season? Champions - obviously Champions League - Win? Would beaten finalist be good? Semi? Othker cups? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on October 23, 2018, 05:56:12 PM I wonder how both fans and especially sports journalists feel regarding the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia buying the club? over a billion pound was taken of the club by the leeches Glazers A billion ffs. Imagine how much could sir Alex invested if he had that money, we could have been with 5 or 6 extra champions league with this money. I hate them so much and I wish the saudis take over the club and kick those bastards away. Well, that is one view expressed on a leading United forum. It is a minority view though. Steady on feller. The UAE doesn’t have a squeaky clean image regarding Human Rights. I don’t recall any principled protest against your current owners when they started pouring the money in. I would hope that the Saudis are told to do one if they come knocking. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates That's an opinion taken from a united forum, not Archer's opinion. This is my opinion; I couldn't care less who owns them. They are so far beneath us now that no amount of money or investment will bridge the gap as it stands. Not a single united player would get near our best XI. And hardly any would make the squad. DDG would make a reasonable back up keeper and thats about it. Not in my lifetime :D Irrespective of where the line came from, Archer chose to post it here. You may well be right about the quality of the two squads. But then you’ve had all the dirty money pouring in, whilst we’ve been funding the Glazers. Say what you like about MUFC but the money we spend has all derived from our efforts, backed by our history and worldwide reputation. Liverpool have done pretty well on a similar basis, as have Arsenal and Tottenham. Back to the actual football. We did pretty well on Saturday and it was good to see that when the shackles are off we can be an attacking force to be reckoned with. Looking forward to Tuesday evening with great apprehension. Dirty money? What makes it dirty? I thought we’d established that control of the sovereign wealth of the UAE is in the hands of people whose approach to human rights is about as rigorous as my approach to removing fat from my bacon butty. Ah, you associate human rights issues with dirty money. I didn't realise there was a correlation. I associate dirty money with corruption, crime, money laundering, criminal gangs, drugs etc etc...rather than money earned from natural resources and investment of the proceeds. By the way, City aren't owned by a SWF. We could debate this for months but that would get really dull, really fast. I note that the ownership is in the sole hands of one man whose wealth derives from his position within the controlling family. I’ll avoid further criticism since it seems to be bad for your health https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/united-arab-emirates Should probably have this conversation over at yours, but what are your expectations this season? Champions - obviously Champions League - Win? Would beaten finalist be good? Semi? Othker cups? I've read that link before and indeed many of the other country chapters. I just tire that the human rights stick is used to beat City by rival football supporters. Citeh bingo at it's finest. Yet all the big clubs are happy to take the dollar from dubious sources. United have or have had associations with state or private businesses from a variety of colourful regimes: Russia, Turkey Saudi, Azerbaijan, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Myanmar, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE all with related United sponsorships. The Billionaires Club is a good read. UAE gets a section naturally but the book is particularly scathing on USA owners as well. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: MANTIS01 on October 23, 2018, 08:54:46 PM What a lack lustre first half on a European night at Old Trafford, verging on the embarrassing.
Can't say I approve of all the hugging and kissing of oppos in the tunnel pre-match. Let's get the opposition all relaxed and happy, makes it feel like a testimonial. Remember Roy Keane bristling in the tunnel telling Viera he was getting fucked up out on the pitch. United miss that type of character, I mean Valencia just doesn't fulfil that leader role for me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on October 23, 2018, 08:58:37 PM I hope Jose has some half-time magic up his sleeve, his team were completely outclassed first half. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 23, 2018, 09:03:31 PM Juve are rather good.
Hoping we can string a few passes together in the second half and maybe even get in their faces a bit more. Still, the Valencia/Young Boys result is helpful. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 23, 2018, 09:07:57 PM I wish Martin Keown would just STFU.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on October 23, 2018, 09:12:39 PM Juve are rather good. To be fair, yes, very good. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on October 23, 2018, 10:19:57 PM Mourinho made some game changing substitution attempts
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on October 23, 2018, 11:31:25 PM They're just not very good anymore are they?
Yeah they will probs qualify from the group in 2nd, then get turfed out in the knockout stages by the first team they come up against. But what a fall from grace. Mourinho is fast becoming a tactical dinosaur and its hard to think of a manager (apart from Moyes) who's stock has fallen as vastly and quickly as his. Great stuff and long may it continue. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on October 24, 2018, 12:25:44 AM They're just not very good anymore are they? Yeah they will probs qualify from the group in 2nd, then get turfed out in the knockout stages by the first team they come up against. But what a fall from grace. Mourinho is fast becoming a tactical dinosaur and its hard to think of a manager (apart from Moyes) who's stock has fallen as vastly and quickly as his. Great stuff and long may it continue. You just summed it up. They are bang average and over paid for a lot of talent that isn't worth it relative to their rivals buys for similar money. Ed Wood has a lot to answer for but never has his head on the block. i want it to be the mid 1980s again this year and they finish solid mid table like when i was a kid. They were never a big club when i was a kid. Would be amazing to get back to those days. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on October 24, 2018, 10:43:42 AM Anyone watch the Man U-Liverpool game today? Thoughts? United showed a lot of patience to get the right guy..hahawwhafffwhafffAre Man Utd better then everyone else or is it just a poor PL this season? Will they win a record 19th title this season? Who do we need to buy to replace an ageing Giggs/Scholes? Is Berba the real deal or should he go SAF replacement? Mourinho or Guardiola? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 24, 2018, 02:51:42 PM Anyone watch the Man U-Liverpool game today? Thoughts? United showed a lot of patience to get the right guy..hahawwhafffwhafffAre Man Utd better then everyone else or is it just a poor PL this season? Will they win a record 19th title this season? Who do we need to buy to replace an ageing Giggs/Scholes? Is Berba the real deal or should he go SAF replacement? Mourinho or Guardiola? WP WP ;applause; ;applause; ;applause; Title: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on October 25, 2018, 09:05:25 AM Manchester United’s shambolic investments lack a grand design
says https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/oct/24/manchester-united-shambolic-investments-lack-grand-design-jose-mourinho Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 29, 2018, 10:18:57 PM Manchester United’s shambolic investments lack a grand design says https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/oct/24/manchester-united-shambolic-investments-lack-grand-design-jose-mourinho He’s not wrong. Although there were some encouraging moments in yesterday’s game, there was still the sense that it could all go horribly awry. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: guardian2017 on October 30, 2018, 02:03:54 PM Manchester United ready to back José Mourinho with £100m-plus in January
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/oct/29/manchester-united-back-jose-mourinho-january-transfer-window-100m Varane and ...? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: rinswun on October 30, 2018, 02:06:12 PM £100mil is not even Varane on his own.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on October 30, 2018, 02:06:29 PM Ah the yearly Varane speculation
I’m sure Madrid will sell in january Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on November 07, 2018, 09:26:20 PM Man U were doing pretty well, but that Ronaldo goal was superb, can't save them buggers. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on November 07, 2018, 09:54:57 PM What a result, awesome. Not wholly undeserved either. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on November 07, 2018, 09:57:09 PM Man U were doing pretty well, but that Ronaldo goal was superb, can't save them buggers. Ronaldo’s goal was pretty good, not as good as Vardy’s against Liverpool in Leicester’s Title Season. Mata’s free kick was decent, and oh my, what a turn up, the Juve ‘Professors of Defending’ slipped up tonight. Overall, a very encouraging performance and a great result. We might even manage to keep City to 2 or 3 goals on Sunday. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on November 08, 2018, 07:48:57 AM (http://i.imgur.com/r6GcQnB.jpg) (https://imgur.com/r6GcQnB) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Tal on November 08, 2018, 08:29:16 AM (https://redmangoreviews.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/allo-allo5.jpg?w=616)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on November 08, 2018, 03:19:55 PM (http://i.imgur.com/r6GcQnB.jpg) (https://imgur.com/r6GcQnB) Seen on Twitter; Graeme Souness on Mourinho's celebrations last night: "He could've caused a riot." Mick McCarthy's response: "You stuck a Galatasary flag in the middle of Fenerbahce's pitch!" (http://i.imgur.com/lOhI5js.jpg) (https://imgur.com/lOhI5js) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on November 08, 2018, 04:14:21 PM Brilliant :D
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on November 11, 2018, 05:32:47 PM City are, as we knew, pretty good.
How is it only 1-0? Second half of attrition coming up. Wouldn’t feel too comfortable if I was a City fan though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on November 11, 2018, 09:23:54 PM They’ve just asked on
@SundaySupp “has the gulf ever been wider between the two teams [United and City]” I’m gonna suggest ‘99 when United won the treble and City were in League One just about edges it... #ManchesterDerby Lol Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on November 12, 2018, 01:27:37 PM https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46175181
Mid table club with mid table GD kidding themselves. Its only a shock to those who actually thought they shouldn't have finished 6th last season. The Man U 'sp' yesterday on bf just before the off said it all about the gulf iin class. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: teddybloat on November 12, 2018, 01:49:45 PM They’ve just asked on @SundaySupp “has the gulf ever been wider between the two teams [United and City]” I’m gonna suggest ‘99 when United won the treble and City were in League One just about edges it... #ManchesterDerby Lol How would city 99 v United 99 be priced compared to yesterday? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on November 12, 2018, 02:31:25 PM They’ve just asked on @SundaySupp “has the gulf ever been wider between the two teams [United and City]” I’m gonna suggest ‘99 when United won the treble and City were in League One just about edges it... #ManchesterDerby Lol How would city 99 v United 99 be priced compared to yesterday? man city away would have been about a 20/1 poke i would have imagined in that era if it was a cup game and both teams playing to full strength. Back in that era very few teams were ever odds on away in league games. Top v bottom in the EPL would have been priced roughly around 1/3 home team 9/1 away team. Now its closer to 1/10 and 40/1. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on November 13, 2018, 12:58:13 PM From their worst goal difference in 41 years to keeping just one clean sheet in 12 games: The stats that shame Man United as they break records for all the wrong reasons
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-6379851/The-stats-shame-Jose-Mourinhos-Manchester-United-latest-defeat-City.html Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: teddybloat on November 13, 2018, 01:01:43 PM They’ve just asked on @SundaySupp “has the gulf ever been wider between the two teams [United and City]” I’m gonna suggest ‘99 when United won the treble and City were in League One just about edges it... #ManchesterDerby Lol How would city 99 v United 99 be priced compared to yesterday? man city away would have been about a 20/1 poke i would have imagined in that era if it was a cup game and both teams playing to full strength. Back in that era very few teams were ever odds on away in league games. Top v bottom in the EPL would have been priced roughly around 1/3 home team 9/1 away team. Now its closer to 1/10 and 40/1. thanks for this very interesting Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on November 14, 2018, 01:31:14 PM Blimey. (http://i.imgur.com/lHprOx2.jpg) (https://imgur.com/lHprOx2) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on November 14, 2018, 06:35:26 PM They’ve just asked on @SundaySupp “has the gulf ever been wider between the two teams [United and City]” I’m gonna suggest ‘99 when United won the treble and City were in League One just about edges it... #ManchesterDerby Lol How would city 99 v United 99 be priced compared to yesterday? man city away would have been about a 20/1 poke i would have imagined in that era if it was a cup game and both teams playing to full strength. Back in that era very few teams were ever odds on away in league games. Top v bottom in the EPL would have been priced roughly around 1/3 home team 9/1 away team. Now its closer to 1/10 and 40/1. thanks for this very interesting yep interesting a couple of years later in 2000/2001 City were back in the PL and united played city at old trafford close to the end of the season....united were champions in 2000/2001 and City relegated again ..with 34 points WH odds in 00/01 United 1.36 Draw 4 City 7.00 WH odds at the weekend City 1.38 Draw 5 United 7.55 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on November 15, 2018, 02:18:40 AM They’ve just asked on @SundaySupp “has the gulf ever been wider between the two teams [United and City]” I’m gonna suggest ‘99 when United won the treble and City were in League One just about edges it... #ManchesterDerby Lol How would city 99 v United 99 be priced compared to yesterday? man city away would have been about a 20/1 poke i would have imagined in that era if it was a cup game and both teams playing to full strength. Back in that era very few teams were ever odds on away in league games. Top v bottom in the EPL would have been priced roughly around 1/3 home team 9/1 away team. Now its closer to 1/10 and 40/1. thanks for this very interesting yep interesting a couple of years later in 2000/2001 City were back in the PL and united played city at old trafford close to the end of the season....united were champions in 2000/2001 and City relegated again ..with 34 points WH odds in 00/01 United 1.36 Draw 4 City 7.00 WH odds at the weekend City 1.38 Draw 5 United 7.55 Maybe i am being too generous then calling Manure a mid table side currently then! Where did you get the 00/01 WH odds from just out of interest? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on November 15, 2018, 07:14:02 AM They’ve just asked on @SundaySupp “has the gulf ever been wider between the two teams [United and City]” I’m gonna suggest ‘99 when United won the treble and City were in League One just about edges it... #ManchesterDerby Lol How would city 99 v United 99 be priced compared to yesterday? man city away would have been about a 20/1 poke i would have imagined in that era if it was a cup game and both teams playing to full strength. Back in that era very few teams were ever odds on away in league games. Top v bottom in the EPL would have been priced roughly around 1/3 home team 9/1 away team. Now its closer to 1/10 and 40/1. thanks for this very interesting yep interesting a couple of years later in 2000/2001 City were back in the PL and united played city at old trafford close to the end of the season....united were champions in 2000/2001 and City relegated again ..with 34 points WH odds in 00/01 United 1.36 Draw 4 City 7.00 WH odds at the weekend City 1.38 Draw 5 United 7.55 Maybe i am being too generous then calling Manure a mid table side currently then! Where did you get the 00/01 WH odds from just out of interest? Exactly :) Historical odds for each year since 2000/2001 here: http://www.football-data.co.uk/englandm.php A bit fiddly to find at first but I stick a filter on the spreadsheets and it's quick enough. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on November 15, 2018, 08:38:36 AM It is truly incredible the prices the top v bottom go off now giiven how the epl tv money is supposed to be acting as a leveler as its equal across all teams yet the hugely dominant teams of the past like the great Manure/Arsenal/Liverpool teams never went off the prices the big 2 go off routinely nowadays for games.
When a lolbig 6 clash has a team going off 4/11 at home to a fellow lolbig6 team its incredible scenes really. There used to be an old school saying in football betting in this era 'never bet odds on away' because there were hardly ever any odds on away teams and they were always deemed too short. It is entirely possible man city could go off shade of odds on at Old trafford this season! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on November 25, 2018, 09:24:58 AM Fourth time MUFC have failed to score at home in nine games this season. Fans booed at the end. MUFC's worst start to a season in 28 years.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on November 26, 2018, 12:27:28 PM Welcome to the modern day Manchester United, a stuttering, labouring, plodding monument to mediocrity assembled at exorbitant cost
says https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2018/11/24/manchester-united-vs-crystal-palace-premier-league-live-score/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on November 26, 2018, 01:04:03 PM Nothing wrong that a change of manager wouldn’t fix.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 03, 2018, 03:16:01 PM Strange times when a lowly team draws with Man U & the Manager gets the sack. I'm largely a neutral, but it's pretty sad to see the demise of Man U. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 03, 2018, 03:44:20 PM Strange times when a lowly team draws with Man U & the Manager gets the sack. I'm largely a neutral, but it's pretty sad to see the demise of Man U. Don’t let Ironside hear you say that! The ‘demise’ of MUFC is both somewhat exaggerated, and inevitable. Younger viewers will have known only the glory years of SAF, but some of us remember that it took a while to replace Sir Matt. McGuiness, O’Farrell, Docherty, Sexton and Atkinson all came and went with the odd cup success to savour before Ferguson arrived. It took him a few years to really get into his stride. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on December 03, 2018, 04:06:30 PM the difference, compared to the prior generations, being the financial disparity top six v the rest now v then and Man U's transfer and wage spending correlating to a far higher position than 7th, were the league table to equate to spend
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on December 03, 2018, 05:21:49 PM the difference, compared to the prior generations, being the financial disparity top six v the rest now v then and Man U's transfer and wage spending correlating to a far higher position than 7th, were the league table to equate to spend But looking at the current league alone is misleading; Manchester United have performed at least as well as Liverpool and Spurs in the Champion's League. They outperformed them both in last year's Premier League too. You could probably make a decent case that they are performing in line with their spend since the beginning of last season. It could be just City are outliers and Mourinho isn't nearly as popular with neutrals/press as Klopp, hence every bad result is magnified. It feels like a lot of this could be just short term variance. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 03, 2018, 07:49:46 PM the difference, compared to the prior generations, being the financial disparity top six v the rest now v then and Man U's transfer and wage spending correlating to a far higher position than 7th, were the league table to equate to spend But looking at the current league alone is misleading; Manchester United have performed at least as well as Liverpool and Spurs in the Champion's League. They outperformed them both in last year's Premier League too. You could probably make a decent case that they are performing in line with their spend since the beginning of last season. It could be just City are outliers and Mourinho isn't nearly as popular with neutrals/press as Klopp, hence every bad result is magnified. It feels like a lot of this could be just short term variance. If spend automatically equates 100% to league position we might as well all give up now. If that had been Mourinho dancing onto the pitch the press would have been calling for him to be put in the stocks. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: MANTIS01 on December 03, 2018, 08:29:35 PM I just don't recognise Mourinho anymore. At Chelsea the bond he had with his players was tangible, like a band of brothers, hiding in the laundry basket to be with his team, a solid unit.
At United he feels almost poisonous towards the playing staff, constant criticism, saying they lack bottle & fight, professionalism, Pogba a 'virus', Shaw 'lazy' etc. I don't know what it's all about. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on December 03, 2018, 09:52:42 PM the difference, compared to the prior generations, being the financial disparity top six v the rest now v then and Man U's transfer and wage spending correlating to a far higher position than 7th, were the league table to equate to spend But looking at the current league alone is misleading; Manchester United have performed at least as well as Liverpool and Spurs in the Champion's League. They outperformed them both in last year's Premier League too. You could probably make a decent case that they are performing in line with their spend since the beginning of last season. It could be just City are outliers and Mourinho isn't nearly as popular with neutrals/press as Klopp, hence every bad result is magnified. It feels like a lot of this could be just short term variance. This is a level doobs right? I will bite. Everyone knows manure should have comfortably finished 6th last year in the epl on all known data and it wasn't even close. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 03, 2018, 10:55:00 PM the difference, compared to the prior generations, being the financial disparity top six v the rest now v then and Man U's transfer and wage spending correlating to a far higher position than 7th, were the league table to equate to spend But looking at the current league alone is misleading; Manchester United have performed at least as well as Liverpool and Spurs in the Champion's League. They outperformed them both in last year's Premier League too. You could probably make a decent case that they are performing in line with their spend since the beginning of last season. It could be just City are outliers and Mourinho isn't nearly as popular with neutrals/press as Klopp, hence every bad result is magnified. It feels like a lot of this could be just short term variance. This is a level doobs right? I will bite. Everyone knows manure should have comfortably finished 6th last year in the epl on all known data and it wasn't even close. Opta stats and xG don’t count in the real world though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on December 04, 2018, 11:43:26 AM i can't find the table now but there is a very high correlation for 3 seasons in the PL between squad wage spend and league position, R-squared in the 70-80% region
obviously Man U are currently spoiling that i did get these back off my bookmarks though... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on December 04, 2018, 11:44:13 AM Interesting CIES Football review of Big 5 transfers 2010-18
http://www.football-observatory.com/IMG/sites/mr/mr37/en/ Seven big clubs in Europe have each spent €1bn+ gross in that time. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on December 04, 2018, 11:45:00 AM Most expensively assembled (current) squads in Europe's Big 5 leagues, from CIES Football
http://www.football-observatory.com/IMG/sites/b5wp/2018/233/en/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on December 04, 2018, 11:45:40 AM And so to the Premier League, where the division-wide riches are so extraordinary and by and large you see wage bill more or less equals league position +/- a few spots
Man U highest wage bill in the division and obviously miles away from the top 3 (in squad quality?) i would say its a strategic thing not just a short term blip in form Woodward and co don't gel with Mourinho and co to build a squad worthy of the wage bill and transfer fees https://www.globalsportssalaries.com/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 04, 2018, 11:53:05 AM And so to the Premier League, where the division-wide riches are so extraordinary and by and large you see wage bill more or less equals league position +/- a few spots Man U highest wage bill in the division and obviously miles away from the top 3 (in squad quality?) i would say its a strategic thing not just a short term blip in form Woodward and co don't gel with Mourinho and co to build a squad worthy of the wage bill and transfer fees https://www.globalsportssalaries.com/ If that graph is correct, quite amazing that Man U's wage bill is some 10% higher than the City wage bill. Most neutral observers would surely suggest the City squad is a much better squad. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 04, 2018, 12:21:28 PM And so to the Premier League, where the division-wide riches are so extraordinary and by and large you see wage bill more or less equals league position +/- a few spots Man U highest wage bill in the division and obviously miles away from the top 3 (in squad quality?) i would say its a strategic thing not just a short term blip in form Woodward and co don't gel with Mourinho and co to build a squad worthy of the wage bill and transfer fees https://www.globalsportssalaries.com/ If that graph is correct, quite amazing that Man U's wage bill is some 10% higher than the City wage bill. Most neutral observers would surely suggest the City squad is a much better squad. You don’t have to be neutral to acknowledge that the City squad is outperforming us. Pep is the better manager at the moment and it’s hard to argue against the thought that the City coaching staff are better too. Woodward deserves a lot of the blame for the current situation, but he’s not alone. Mourinho was never the right choice, but given that he was given the job it is falling to see him declaring time and again that everyone needs to change but him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on December 04, 2018, 12:27:06 PM In gambling terms when buying players and paying wages Manure keep backing even money shots at 4/11 and Man City keep backing 11/4 shots at evens. It's no wonder why the teams are where they are in the league. One is hopeless at finding value and chasing losses and the other one plans well, does their research and doesn't overpay for talent. It also helps when you have pep as manager to 'underpay' relative to the talent you are buying and you are gtd trophies every season.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 04, 2018, 03:22:03 PM In gambling terms when buying players and paying wages Manchester United F C keep backing even money shots at 4/11 and Man City keep backing 11/4 shots at evens. It's no wonder why the teams are where they are in the league. One is hopeless at finding value and chasing losses and the other one plans well, does their research and doesn't overpay for talent. It also helps when you have pep as manager to 'underpay' relative to the talent you are buying and you are gtd trophies every season. fyp Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 04, 2018, 06:23:48 PM And so to the Premier League, where the division-wide riches are so extraordinary and by and large you see wage bill more or less equals league position +/- a few spots Man U highest wage bill in the division and obviously miles away from the top 3 (in squad quality?) i would say its a strategic thing not just a short term blip in form Woodward and co don't gel with Mourinho and co to build a squad worthy of the wage bill and transfer fees https://www.globalsportssalaries.com/ If that graph is correct, quite amazing that Man U's wage bill is some 10% higher than the City wage bill. Most neutral observers would surely suggest the City squad is a much better squad. What was the banner at O/T the other year? 'Your players make money, our players make history' Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on December 05, 2018, 10:58:37 PM Great show on the previous mid table man U side of the 1970s on BT sport now until midnight.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on December 09, 2018, 01:58:25 AM (https://i.imgur.com/R23EoTv.png)
Have Jose / Abramovich learnt from Rafa and Liverpool? (https://i.imgur.com/kWVQqeo.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: kukushkin88 on December 09, 2018, 02:32:29 AM They are definitely top 10 ever managers and top 25 ever players in EPL. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: rinswun on December 09, 2018, 11:35:05 AM Matic top 25 ever?! Miss a 0 off that?!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: kukushkin88 on December 09, 2018, 11:39:36 AM Matic top 25 ever?! Miss a 0 off that?! I guess top 100 feels ~right. It’s a pretty awful post though and I’m glad you criticised it. A bad evening for the ban on excess booze. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: rinswun on December 09, 2018, 04:28:37 PM haha. could probably make a case for Torres towards the backend of the 25. Was incredible during his Liverpool time. Matic has really only had one great season though and a couple of decent ones.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on December 09, 2018, 04:37:14 PM neither are anywhere close to the top 25 ever! It's not even close.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 09, 2018, 04:41:16 PM Are we ok with both Rafa and Jose being in the top ten managers?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on December 09, 2018, 05:16:14 PM Are we ok with both Rafa and Jose being in the top ten managers? Yeah I think so. Not having Matic anywhere near the top 25 but I think Torres is there or there abouts. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: rinswun on December 09, 2018, 05:51:12 PM I'd say both managers comfortably inside the top 10.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 09, 2018, 06:26:59 PM I'd say both managers comfortably inside the top 10. I guess so if football only started in 1992 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: rinswun on December 09, 2018, 06:38:44 PM I'd say both managers comfortably inside the top 10. I guess so if football only started in 1992 Given the Prem started then and that was the quote then yes, that is correct. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 10, 2018, 11:24:46 PM I'd say both managers comfortably inside the top 10. I guess so if football only started in 1992 Given the Prem started then and that was the quote then yes, that is correct. Indeed it is. But isn’t it rather sad that so many people now weigh up their footballing opinions based on such a brief period? In other news: I see that at least one piece of the chip wrappers industry is suggesting that we are sending Sanchez back and taking Ozil in his place. Please say it isn’t so. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 11, 2018, 09:01:51 PM Manchester United, more able to give opponents a two goal lead than any other team
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/manchester-united-premier-league-comebacks-15526460.amp Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 14, 2018, 07:09:40 AM Big game on Sunday. One that still matters more for both teams than their games against their more local rivals.
Strangely, in Liverpool’s 80’s heyday we frequently bucked the odds https://amp.theguardian.com/football/that-1980s-sports-blog/2018/dec/13/liverpool-manchester-united-alex-ferguson-kenny-dalglish I’m at the APAT event at Grosvenor Bury New Road at the weekend - could be noisy at times. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on December 15, 2018, 05:49:42 AM Can’t wait to get battered by Liverpool on Saturday. I say this only half tounge in cheek too as it may be one of the final nails in the coffin for Jose.
It’s quite clear this can’t continue but assuming he gets the boot, where do United look for a manager after Jose? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 15, 2018, 08:17:47 AM Can’t wait to get battered by Liverpool on Saturday. I say this only half tounge in cheek too as it may be one of the final nails in the coffin for Jose. It’s quite clear this can’t continue but assuming he gets the boot, where do United look for a manager after Jose? You'll have to wait an extra 24 hours, the game is Sunday. Will certainly be worth watching, or I hope it will. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: BigAdz on December 15, 2018, 08:38:34 AM Can’t wait to get battered by Liverpool on Saturday. I say this only half tounge in cheek too as it may be one of the final nails in the coffin for Jose. It’s quite clear this can’t continue but assuming he gets the boot, where do United look for a manager after Jose? To quote other threads, there is no one else about........ Anyway, hopefully you could rub it into Jose's face and give it to Wenger. Realistically, wouldn't you go after Zidane? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 15, 2018, 08:48:56 AM Can’t wait to get battered by Liverpool on Saturday. I say this only half tounge in cheek too as it may be one of the final nails in the coffin for Jose. It’s quite clear this can’t continue but assuming he gets the boot, where do United look for a manager after Jose? To quote other threads, there is no one else about........ Anyway, hopefully you could rub it into Jose's face and give it to Wenger. Realistically, wouldn't you go after Zidane? That sounds like There really isn’t an obvious candidate, Giggs maybe? Then ring all the backroom staff that Moyes disposed of and grovel to get them back. Fat Sam is available. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on December 15, 2018, 02:54:15 PM Can’t wait to get battered by Liverpool on Saturday. I say this only half tounge in cheek too as it may be one of the final nails in the coffin for Jose. It’s quite clear this can’t continue but assuming he gets the boot, where do United look for a manager after Jose? To quote other threads, there is no one else about........ Anyway, hopefully you could rub it into Jose's face and give it to Wenger. Realistically, wouldn't you go after Zidane? That sounds like There really isn’t an obvious candidate, Giggs maybe? Then ring all the backroom staff that Moyes disposed of and grovel to get them back. Fat Sam is available. Maybe not if this is correct https://www.transfermarkt.com/zinedine-zidane/spielertransfers/trainer/21284 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on December 18, 2018, 09:52:37 AM Jose Mourinho has been sacked by Manchester United.
Full story: https://bbc.in/2LnHxe2 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on December 18, 2018, 09:54:53 AM the big six has become a big five this season
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Chompy on December 18, 2018, 10:03:30 AM Caretaker to the end of the season, most likely Steve Evans.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on December 18, 2018, 10:19:40 AM David Moyes?
6 months left on his original contract. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on December 18, 2018, 10:21:13 AM Mark Hughes perhaps - vastly experienced in this league and used to play for the club.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 18, 2018, 10:34:08 AM An early Christmas present ;karabiner;
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 18, 2018, 10:38:45 AM I'm guessing this man won't be too sad this morning. (http://i.imgur.com/8H3dykE.jpg) (https://imgur.com/8H3dykE) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Chompy on December 18, 2018, 10:57:27 AM Guess they'll look for an experienced pair of hands, someone who's proven at the top level but who'll be the opposite of Jose and let the players express themsevles.
Shame Ranieri took the Fulham gig, as he'd have been the obvious candidate. Wenger? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on December 18, 2018, 11:17:18 AM Guess they'll look for an experienced pair of hands, someone who's proven at the top level but who'll be the opposite of Jose and let the players express themsevles. Shame Ranieri took the Fulham gig, as he'd have been the obvious candidate. Wenger? Under normal circumstances I'd say there is no chance as he said he wouldn't take another manager's job in England. The idea of sticking it in Jose's eye must be fairly tempting though.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 18, 2018, 11:40:24 AM Ain't gonna happen, but this would be so funny....(seen on Twitter) Imagine the faces of Paul Pogba and Jesse Lingard if Roy Keane turns up at Carrington with his training kit on Thursday morning... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: BigAdz on December 18, 2018, 11:43:46 AM Can’t wait to get battered by Liverpool on Saturday. I say this only half tounge in cheek too as it may be one of the final nails in the coffin for Jose. It’s quite clear this can’t continue but assuming he gets the boot, where do United look for a manager after Jose? To quote other threads, there is no one else about........ Anyway, hopefully you could rub it into Jose's face and give it to Wenger. Realistically, wouldn't you go after Zidane? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Dewi_cool on December 18, 2018, 12:09:01 PM They will go after Pochettino at the end of the season, god knows why he would want the job though.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on December 18, 2018, 03:21:32 PM Mark Hughes perhaps - vastly experienced in this league and used to play for the club. I would stop supporting united. This clown should never manage in the football league again. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on December 18, 2018, 03:24:25 PM Blanc seems an obvious choice.
Carlos Queiroz I would expect is a possibility. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on December 18, 2018, 03:25:36 PM Can’t wait to get battered by Liverpool on Saturday. I say this only half tounge in cheek too as it may be one of the final nails in the coffin for Jose. It’s quite clear this can’t continue but assuming he gets the boot, where do United look for a manager after Jose? To quote other threads, there is no one else about........ Anyway, hopefully you could rub it into Jose's face and give it to Wenger. Realistically, wouldn't you go after Zidane? Blanc seems an obvious choice. Carlos Queiroz I would expect is a possibility. I wouldn't mind an Eddie Howe type personally. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on December 18, 2018, 03:26:52 PM http://www.redcafe.net/threads/mourinho-gone.443645/
Popular decision it seems Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: RED-DOG on December 18, 2018, 04:27:26 PM Mark Hughes perhaps - vastly experienced in this league and used to play for the club. I would stop supporting united. This clown should never manage in the football league again. I'm not really up on fan etiquette but is that allowed? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 18, 2018, 04:58:45 PM Mark Hughes perhaps - vastly experienced in this league and used to play for the club. I would stop supporting united. This clown should never manage in the football league again. I'm not really up on fan etiquette but is that allowed? May have to defer to the Rt Hon Tal Bloke here Tom, but if you were talking football, I'm not sure the words "fan" & "etiquette" can be used together. As a clue - & because I like you a bit - start with the notion that every armchair football fan knows better than every professional football Manager, especially when it comes to selecting the team. Please also note that Pogba is utter shite. Just as Rooney was. (It's true, it was on Twitter). You are welcome. Oh, & no, nobody in the history of ever stops supporting a Club because they don't approve of the new Manager. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on December 18, 2018, 05:20:10 PM Mark Hughes perhaps - vastly experienced in this league and used to play for the club. I would stop supporting united. This clown should never manage in the football league again. I'm not really up on fan etiquette but is that allowed? It was a joke, just trying to show my level of dislike for the man. He comes across as an asshole and in my eyes is up there with the worst managers to have ever managed in the prem. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on December 18, 2018, 06:04:41 PM Mark Hughes perhaps - vastly experienced in this league and used to play for the club. I would stop supporting united. This clown should never manage in the football league again. I'm not really up on fan etiquette but is that allowed? It was a joke, just trying to show my level of dislike for the man. He comes across as an asshole and in my eyes is up there with the worst managers to have ever managed in the prem. When Maureen was mooted as Arsene's sucessor I also threatened to not only stop supporting Arsenal but cross the house and support Spurs instead. On the matter at hand, I think he was actually trying to get the sack so as to get the lucrative settlement, move out of the hotel and back to his house in London. If he had been trying to get sacked I'm not sure he could have done a better job without making it too obvious and forfeiting the lump-sum. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 18, 2018, 06:34:39 PM Today is a sad day.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 18, 2018, 06:43:56 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on December 18, 2018, 07:23:29 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: booder on December 18, 2018, 09:33:46 PM Mark Hughes perhaps - vastly experienced in this league and used to play for the club. I would stop supporting united. This clown should never manage in the football league again. I'm not really up on fan etiquette but is that allowed? It was a joke, just trying to show my level of dislike for the man. He comes across as an asshole and in my eyes is up there with the worst managers to have ever managed in the prem. Amen. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on December 18, 2018, 09:53:52 PM Pardiola likes his teams to play in an attacking style. Let's face it he isn't ever going to annoy the players by introducing strategies that the players disapprove of, or any strategy at all. Sure having Pardiola and Guardiola in the same city, could introduce useful rhyming possibilities in your chants too. And he can't make too much mess in a few months.
Bet he's dusting off his CV right now. Don't come crying to me if you miss the 150/1 with sporting bet. Sometimes you have to think outside the box. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on December 18, 2018, 10:29:35 PM https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnDavies350/status/1075154781134618625
Ole Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on December 18, 2018, 11:52:37 PM Who needs to make humorous suggestions when Paul Ince makes them seriously:
https://twitter.com/5liveSport/status/1075105606254522370 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on December 19, 2018, 02:28:32 AM Who needs to make humorous suggestions when Paul Ince makes them seriously: https://twitter.com/5liveSport/status/1075105606254522370 Glazers might as well sell up to Michael Knighton whilst we are it and back him to score in the EPL like he bragged he would the last time Bruce was relevant at Old Trafford. Things have moved on a bit since those days. Manure are a brand now not a football club. Neville said so himself on sky tonight. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 19, 2018, 06:54:28 AM Who needs to make humorous suggestions when Paul Ince makes them seriously: https://twitter.com/5liveSport/status/1075105606254522370 Glazers might as well sell up to Michael Knighton whilst we are it and back him to score in the EPL like he bragged he would the last time Bruce was relevant at Old Trafford. Things have moved on a bit since those days. Manchester United are a brand now not a football club. Neville said so himself on sky tonight. FYP Agree though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 19, 2018, 09:20:11 AM Who needs to make humorous suggestions when Paul Ince makes them seriously: https://twitter.com/5liveSport/status/1075105606254522370 The comments beneath the Tweet are nothing short of delicious, but this one surely gets the prize; This door handle in my house always reminds me of a surprised Steve Bruce after scoring v Sheff Wed in 1993 (http://i.imgur.com/FeDwlzl.jpg) (https://imgur.com/FeDwlzl) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: marcro on December 19, 2018, 10:06:56 AM Mourinho is a master of negotiating a pay out clause in his contract then cleverly engineering the club to sack him.
It has happened too many times to be a coincidence. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 19, 2018, 10:12:07 AM Mourinho is a master of negotiating a pay out clause in his contract then cleverly engineering the club to sack him. It has happened too many times to be a coincidence. Oh come on. You can see from his reaction, as he left Manchester yesterday after being dismissed, how desperately sad he was. (http://i.imgur.com/uvpNrGk.jpg) (https://imgur.com/uvpNrGk) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on December 19, 2018, 10:16:55 AM Mourinho is a master of negotiating a pay out clause in his contract then cleverly engineering the club to sack him. It has happened too many times to be a coincidence. Oh come on. You can see from his reaction, as he left Manchester yesterday after being dismissed, how desperately sad he was. (http://i.imgur.com/uvpNrGk.jpg) (https://imgur.com/uvpNrGk) Mark Hughes and Alan Pardew must be masters of this game. It has happened too many times to be a coincidence. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: BigAdz on December 19, 2018, 10:48:52 AM The last ten years have been like the early days of Timeshare for mediocre Managers.
The money just keeps rolling and and people just keep falling for it! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: marcro on December 19, 2018, 10:54:44 AM Mourinho is a master of negotiating a pay out clause in his contract then cleverly engineering the club to sack him. It has happened too many times to be a coincidence. Oh come on. You can see from his reaction, as he left Manchester yesterday after being dismissed, how desperately sad he was. (http://i.imgur.com/uvpNrGk.jpg) (https://imgur.com/uvpNrGk) Mark Hughes and Alan Pardew must be masters of this game. It has happened too many times to be a coincidence. These other managers got the sack for poor results. Mourinho's actions, behaviour, interviews, etc. sent a clear message to the club to sack him. Although I do find it difficult to understand why managers who have been sacked for failure are given the chance again and again and again. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Mark_Porter on December 19, 2018, 11:19:38 AM Are United fans happy with Solskjaer?
From an outsiders view point, it just looks bizarre. Ignoring the fact he is a legend, he does't really have any pedigree as a manager at all. I don't really understand it. Just writing off this season to allow the time to get the right guy in the Summer I guess. Why not just go all out for the right person now? Why do you need 6 months to appoint a new manager? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on December 19, 2018, 11:44:26 AM Are United fans happy with Solskjaer? From an outsiders view point, it just looks bizarre. Ignoring the fact he is a legend, he does't really have any pedigree as a manager at all. I don't really understand it. Just writing off this season to allow the time to get the right guy in the Summer I guess. Why not just go all out for the right person now? Why do you need 6 months to appoint a new manager? Not a united fan, but he has had success with Molde in Norway. He has had 10 years coaching and managing experience. I get that he hasn't managed in a top league, but people talk of him like he has never managed. I guess they have an unannounced deal with someone, but he can't join for 6 months because of his contract or some agreement he has come to with his current club. I don't think Manchester United are incompetent enough to just do a temp appointment for no good reason. Given their current position, they may as well take a chance on potential rather than take someone who clearly is never going to be top class? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: BigAdz on December 19, 2018, 11:56:10 AM Managing Molde to a degree of success is hardly managing on anywhere near the scale required. Its the equivalent of not having managed in my books.
I have Captained the First Team for my Golf Club, but doesn't mean I should Captain the Ryder Cup Team.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Mark_Porter on December 19, 2018, 12:03:49 PM Are United fans happy with Solskjaer? From an outsiders view point, it just looks bizarre. Ignoring the fact he is a legend, he does't really have any pedigree as a manager at all. I don't really understand it. Just writing off this season to allow the time to get the right guy in the Summer I guess. Why not just go all out for the right person now? Why do you need 6 months to appoint a new manager? Not a united fan, but he has had success with Molde in Norway. He has had 10 years coaching and managing experience. I get that he hasn't managed in a top league, but people talk of him like he has never managed. I guess they have an unannounced deal with someone, but he can't join for 6 months because of his contract or some agreement he has come to with his current club. I don't think Manchester United are incompetent enough to just do a temp appointment for no good reason. Given their current position, they may as well take a chance on potential rather than take someone who clearly is never going to be top class? United are the richest club in the world. This is the equivalent of Tesco naming Jim who runs the cornershop as their interim CEO. I am sure he knows his stuff but, come on, it's United. I assume they want to go all out for Poch but have no chance mid season. I suppose whether United finish 6th or 10th doesn't make a huge deal of difference this season either so no real risk attached. I dunno, just seems weird to me. If he hadn't played for United previously, this would obv never happen and not sure why him being a club legend is relevant other than making fans smile and feel nostalgic. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: DungBeetle on December 19, 2018, 12:20:56 PM Are United fans happy with Solskjaer? From an outsiders view point, it just looks bizarre. Ignoring the fact he is a legend, he does't really have any pedigree as a manager at all. I don't really understand it. Just writing off this season to allow the time to get the right guy in the Summer I guess. Why not just go all out for the right person now? Why do you need 6 months to appoint a new manager? Not a united fan, but he has had success with Molde in Norway. He has had 10 years coaching and managing experience. I get that he hasn't managed in a top league, but people talk of him like he has never managed. I guess they have an unannounced deal with someone, but he can't join for 6 months because of his contract or some agreement he has come to with his current club. I don't think Manchester United are incompetent enough to just do a temp appointment for no good reason. Given their current position, they may as well take a chance on potential rather than take someone who clearly is never going to be top class? He had a dreadful stint at Cardiff. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: horseplayer on December 19, 2018, 01:28:04 PM He knows the club
I have no idea what that means this rubbish that Man United is so different to anything else in football is just that he must be pinching himself today his cv would not get him a job at the top end of the championship Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 19, 2018, 06:03:21 PM He knows the club I have no idea what that means this rubbish that Man United is so different to anything else in football is just that he must be pinching himself today his cv would not get him a job at the top end of the championship The Manchester United 'way' innit. They play nice football, they don't sack managers, they have a million youth players coming through the ranks etc All clubs are envious of the well oiled Salford machine. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 19, 2018, 07:47:15 PM He knows the club I have no idea what that means this rubbish that Man United is so different to anything else in football is just that he must be pinching himself today his cv would not get him a job at the top end of the championship The Manchester United 'way' innit. They play nice football, they don't sack managers, they have a million youth players coming through the ranks etc All clubs are envious of the well oiled Salford machine. Many clubs are envious of our history. The Busby Babes The first English club to win the European Cup 12 FA Cup wins 20 Top flight league wins One of only two teams to have done the league and FA Cup double more than once. Three, the same number as Arsenal. It’s only been done 11 times in all. The only English Club to do the treble A lot of clubs, including one that plys it’s trade in close proximity to us are envious of our history. Our youth programme produced the class of ‘92 - a group of players that made Alan Hansen eat his words. Our current squad includes two England players who have come through outr academy, and produced more EPL players last season than any other. https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/the-20-man-utd-academy-graduates-to-appear-in-the-premier-league-last-season/ Nobody envies us our present predicament, and it suits fans of other, lesser clubs, to pretend that we are now in terminal decline. We’re not in good shape, but if it takes money to get us back on track then we’ll generate that money ourselves by utilising the goodwill and support that that history has built. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 19, 2018, 08:18:03 PM Nibble nibble.
You only said 'history' 3 times in that post. ''Just like the Scousers, you live in the past'' Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on December 19, 2018, 09:31:18 PM Must be nice to know a few more years like this and you will lose all the plastics you have built up over the past 20 years?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on December 20, 2018, 01:02:03 AM Are United fans happy with Solskjaer? From an outsiders view point, it just looks bizarre. Ignoring the fact he is a legend, he does't really have any pedigree as a manager at all. I don't really understand it. Just writing off this season to allow the time to get the right guy in the Summer I guess. Why not just go all out for the right person now? Why do you need 6 months to appoint a new manager? Happy Mourinho has gone. OK with Solskjaer. Not gonna make top 4, not gonna get relegated. Nobody with any quality was gonna come, happy to give Ole a shot and see if he can pull something out of the bag. Interested / excited to see what this squad can do with a more attacking style (have read / watched a fair bit about how Ole sets his teams up)... After years and years of LVG and Jose god knows we needed this. Pretty much a win win situation. We freeroll him becoming a fantastic UTD manager, if not at least the atmosphere is lifted and we shOOOOOOT more. #Invalid YouTube Link# https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-9VQH9akwk Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: DungBeetle on December 20, 2018, 07:30:24 AM He knows the club I have no idea what that means this rubbish that Man United is so different to anything else in football is just that he must be pinching himself today his cv would not get him a job at the top end of the championship The Manchester United 'way' innit. They play nice football, they don't sack managers, they have a million youth players coming through the ranks etc All clubs are envious of the well oiled Salford machine. Many clubs are envious of our history. The Busby Babes The first English club to win the European Cup 12 FA Cup wins 20 Top flight league wins One of only two teams to have done the league and FA Cup double more than once. Three, the same number as Arsenal. It’s only been done 11 times in all. The only English Club to do the treble A lot of clubs, including one that plys it’s trade in close proximity to us are envious of our history. Our youth programme produced the class of ‘92 - a group of players that made Alan Hansen eat his words. Our current squad includes two England players who have come through outr academy, and produced more EPL players last season than any other. https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/the-20-man-utd-academy-graduates-to-appear-in-the-premier-league-last-season/ Nobody envies us our present predicament, and it suits fans of other, lesser clubs, to pretend that we are now in terminal decline. We’re not in good shape, but if it takes money to get us back on track then we’ll generate that money ourselves by utilising the goodwill and support that that history has built. It takes money to get you back on track? You’ve already spent bucketloads of money and have a higher wage bill than Man City. Playing the poverty card is a bit absurd. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 20, 2018, 07:59:45 AM If it takes money.
Not sure where I played the poverty card either. Just the **bitter envious one that the sheikhs rolled into the wrong side of town ;whistle; ** not really envious. No truly that bothered where others get their money in this context, but it does give an extra button to press when debating with City fans Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on December 20, 2018, 04:00:29 PM City just spend their money in a much more effective/efficient manner than your owners/corporates do. That's the reality of the situation. Comparing some of your signings and their signings for similar fees/wages you really wonder how the marketing manager EW still has a job more than anyone at the club. He is so out of his depth running that club it's embarrassing. Him being the CEO is as crazy as Pulis being your next manager in the summer. You could put a trainee accountant straight out of uni in as CEO there and the money would still roll in like it has under him.
You have tried the 'money route to fix it' it doesn't work at the very top it just attracts the pension seekers and gold diggers that you have attracted recently who have little desire to play for the club other than to line their own pockets when you are miles off being the best club in the league/europe. When you have an rookie CEO who doesn't know what he is doing and wants a quick fix to protect his cash cow brand and his own job/reputation he shouldn't have in the first place. Totally different throwing money at stuff when the truly best players in the world don't want to play for you which is the reality for the last 5 years. Imagine the mess you would be in without the keeper who really should have gone back to Spain Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 20, 2018, 04:41:45 PM City just spend their money in a much more effective/efficient manner than your owners/corporates do. That's the reality of the situation. Comparing some of your signings and their signings for similar fees/wages you really wonder how the marketing manager EW still has a job more than anyone at the club. He is so out of his depth running that club it's embarrassing. Him being the CEO is as crazy as Pulis being your next manager in the summer. You could put a trainee accountant straight out of uni in as CEO there and the money would still roll in like it has under him. You have tried the 'money route to fix it' it doesn't work at the very top it just attracts the pension seekers and gold diggers that you have attracted recently who have little desire to play for the club other than to line their own pockets when you are miles off being the best club in the league/europe. When you have an rookie CEO who doesn't know what he is doing and wants a quick fix to protect his cash cow brand and his own job/reputation he shouldn't have in the first place. Totally different throwing money at stuff when the truly best players in the world don't want to play for you which is the reality for the last 5 years. Imagine the mess you would be in without the keeper who really should have gone back to Spain Ignoring the hyperbole, and the ‘trainee accountant’ line, you’re about right. It’s going to be an interesting few months I think. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 20, 2018, 08:31:16 PM He knows the club I have no idea what that means this rubbish that Man United is so different to anything else in football is just that he must be pinching himself today his cv would not get him a job at the top end of the championship The Manchester United 'way' innit. They play nice football, they don't sack managers, they have a million youth players coming through the ranks etc All clubs are envious of the well oiled Salford machine. Many clubs are envious of our history. The Busby Babes The first English club to win the European Cup 12 FA Cup wins 20 Top flight league wins One of only two teams to have done the league and FA Cup double more than once. Three, the same number as Arsenal. It’s only been done 11 times in all. The only English Club to do the treble A lot of clubs, including one that plys it’s trade in close proximity to us are envious of our history. Our youth programme produced the class of ‘92 - a group of players that made Alan Hansen eat his words. Our current squad includes two England players who have come through outr academy, and produced more EPL players last season than any other. https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/the-20-man-utd-academy-graduates-to-appear-in-the-premier-league-last-season/ Nobody envies us our present predicament, and it suits fans of other, lesser clubs, to pretend that we are now in terminal decline. We’re not in good shape, but if it takes money to get us back on track then we’ll generate that money ourselves by utilising the goodwill and support that that history has built. It takes money to get you back on track? You’ve already spent bucketloads of money and have a higher wage bill than Man City. Playing the poverty card is a bit absurd. Not just any money either, but historic money built from goodwill and history. And more history. There is no finer currency than the historic £. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 20, 2018, 10:46:47 PM He knows the club I have no idea what that means this rubbish that Man United is so different to anything else in football is just that he must be pinching himself today his cv would not get him a job at the top end of the championship The Manchester United 'way' innit. They play nice football, they don't sack managers, they have a million youth players coming through the ranks etc All clubs are envious of the well oiled Salford machine. Many clubs are envious of our history. The Busby Babes The first English club to win the European Cup 12 FA Cup wins 20 Top flight league wins One of only two teams to have done the league and FA Cup double more than once. Three, the same number as Arsenal. It’s only been done 11 times in all. The only English Club to do the treble A lot of clubs, including one that plys it’s trade in close proximity to us are envious of our history. Our youth programme produced the class of ‘92 - a group of players that made Alan Hansen eat his words. Our current squad includes two England players who have come through outr academy, and produced more EPL players last season than any other. https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/the-20-man-utd-academy-graduates-to-appear-in-the-premier-league-last-season/ Nobody envies us our present predicament, and it suits fans of other, lesser clubs, to pretend that we are now in terminal decline. We’re not in good shape, but if it takes money to get us back on track then we’ll generate that money ourselves by utilising the goodwill and support that that history has built. It takes money to get you back on track? You’ve already spent bucketloads of money and have a higher wage bill than Man City. Playing the poverty card is a bit absurd. Not just any money either, but historic money built from goodwill and history. And more history. There is no finer currency than the historic £. I thought you were now above being bitter? Seems that’s something else I was wrong about 😂 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 20, 2018, 11:04:48 PM He knows the club I have no idea what that means this rubbish that Man United is so different to anything else in football is just that he must be pinching himself today his cv would not get him a job at the top end of the championship The Manchester United 'way' innit. They play nice football, they don't sack managers, they have a million youth players coming through the ranks etc All clubs are envious of the well oiled Salford machine. Many clubs are envious of our history. The Busby Babes The first English club to win the European Cup 12 FA Cup wins 20 Top flight league wins One of only two teams to have done the league and FA Cup double more than once. Three, the same number as Arsenal. It’s only been done 11 times in all. The only English Club to do the treble A lot of clubs, including one that plys it’s trade in close proximity to us are envious of our history. Our youth programme produced the class of ‘92 - a group of players that made Alan Hansen eat his words. Our current squad includes two England players who have come through outr academy, and produced more EPL players last season than any other. https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/the-20-man-utd-academy-graduates-to-appear-in-the-premier-league-last-season/ Nobody envies us our present predicament, and it suits fans of other, lesser clubs, to pretend that we are now in terminal decline. We’re not in good shape, but if it takes money to get us back on track then we’ll generate that money ourselves by utilising the goodwill and support that that history has built. It takes money to get you back on track? You’ve already spent bucketloads of money and have a higher wage bill than Man City. Playing the poverty card is a bit absurd. Not just any money either, but historic money built from goodwill and history. And more history. There is no finer currency than the historic £. I thought you were now above being bitter? Seems that’s something else I was wrong about 😂 No bitterness here. Just sheer enjoyment at watching united fans morph into Liverpool fans. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on December 20, 2018, 11:10:59 PM It's tough trying to figure out which is more amusing...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 22, 2018, 06:13:20 PM Are these the same players?
Amazing what happens when you release the horses Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 25, 2018, 02:38:46 PM Happy Christmas United Fans
https://youtu.be/y3eVIJ9dAN8 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 27, 2018, 08:52:56 AM Don't worry United fans, your worries are over. (http://i.imgur.com/J8RYfQC.jpg) (https://imgur.com/J8RYfQC) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 27, 2018, 10:05:47 AM Don't worry United fans, your worries are over. (http://i.imgur.com/J8RYfQC.jpg) (https://imgur.com/J8RYfQC) rotflmfao rotflmfao rotflmfao Date was 16/02/16 Should have been 01/04/xx Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on December 27, 2018, 10:35:25 AM Just imagine. Everything could have been so different..... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: BigAdz on December 27, 2018, 10:42:35 AM Amusing to see UTD doing well after The Special One has gone, but the first thing I would have done(after the congrats) was fine the feckers at least a months salary, especially Pogba.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 27, 2018, 10:56:58 AM Amusing to see UTD doing well after The Special One has gone, but the first thing I would have done(after the congrats) was fine the feckers at least a months salary, especially Pogba. In principle I would agree with the sentiment, but when the players are removing the poisonous Portugese an exception can be made. I would fine Ed Woodward though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 28, 2018, 07:02:32 PM There has been some discussion over at the Noisy Neighbours’ thread about the Academy programmes.
Surely the first and foremost aim for any academy is to produce players for the first team, and potentially save millions in transfer fees by doing so? Not sure they are farm systems for spending years in developing players only to sell them on for someone else to get the benefit, whilst of course accepting that the hit rate at the top clubs will be low because the PL squads contain world class players that are difficult to dislodge This I think will be even more the case post Brexit with possible restrictions on overseas players coming in, and already 11(I think) of match day squads have to be homegrown (developed in this country) The academy is there to produce footballers. In an ideal world for us, but the nature of the beast is that it's highly unlikely they will make the grade with City, hence our academy primarily being there to make £££. If we unearth a gem along the way then happy days, but that would be a bonus rather than an expectation. There isn't really one youngster we've sold in recent years that looks a bad decision. Sancho might come back to bite us on the arse, but there was a lot more going on behind the scenes with that. There is another young lad who moved to Spain, name escapes me, who is doing pretty well but again hardly a regret. I know a lot of fans pine for local lads to rise through the ranks to the first team, and at many clubs that is still a possibility, but at the very top end for clubs like City, expected to challenge on 4 fronts every season, any youngster hoping to get some game time has to be incredibly good and patient. It's not one size fits all so the academy at Crystal Palace for example serves a slightly different purpose to ours. I view our academy like its a university; anyone lucky enough to go there will get a great football education, and the end goal will hopefully be a career in the game. Just probably not for City. Across town, the United Academy has produced Rashford, Lingard, MacTominay, Pogba (ok,ok, I know!), Angel Gomes, and a couple more who may make their debuts in the next few games. Over the past few decades the Youth Programme/Academy has given us a lot of joy. Who can forget ‘the kids’, the Nevilles G and P, Butt, Scholes, Beckham to the fore. I’d include Giggs here too, although he was on City’s books first. Some have gone on to decent careers elsewhere 20 United Academy graduates played in the EPL last season https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/the-20-man-utd-academy-graduates-to-appear-in-the-premier-league-last-season/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 28, 2018, 07:08:52 PM Between the 'class of 92' and the ones kicking about at the moment (Rashford etc), who broke through at united to play regularly in the first team in that 20/25 year window?
Genuine question btw, cos I'm struggling to think of any. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: DropTheHammer on December 29, 2018, 12:24:47 AM Wes Brown
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 29, 2018, 07:10:08 AM Between the 'class of 92' and the ones kicking about at the moment (Rashford etc), who broke through at united to play regularly in the first team in that 20/25 year window? Genuine question btw, cos I'm struggling to think of any. Fletcher, O’Shea, Brown, Welbeck, Cleverley... sure there are a few more with multiple EPL medals Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 29, 2018, 06:57:56 PM Between the 'class of 92' and the ones kicking about at the moment (Rashford etc), who broke through at united to play regularly in the first team in that 20/25 year window? Genuine question btw, cos I'm struggling to think of any. Fletcher, O’Shea, Brown, Welbeck, Cleverley... sure there are a few more with multiple EPL medals A melting pot of talent indeed. Averaging about 1 every 4 years or so in that period in between? Kinda proves the point I made on the City thread then. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 29, 2018, 08:23:13 PM Between the 'class of 92' and the ones kicking about at the moment (Rashford etc), who broke through at united to play regularly in the first team in that 20/25 year window? Genuine question btw, cos I'm struggling to think of any. Fletcher, O’Shea, Brown, Welbeck, Cleverley... sure there are a few more with multiple EPL medals A melting pot of talent indeed. Averaging about 1 every 4 years or so in that period in between? Kinda proves the point I made on the City thread then. Maybe. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 30, 2018, 03:03:13 PM 80 years of home grown talent. This article is a year old now, but the record continues to grow.
http://www.espn.co.uk/soccer/club/manchester-united/360/blog/post/3243336/marcus-rashford-continues-80-year-streak-for-manchester-united-academy Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 30, 2018, 04:19:21 PM 80 years of home grown talent. This article is a year old now, but the record continues to grow. http://www.espn.co.uk/soccer/club/manchester-united/360/blog/post/3243336/marcus-rashford-continues-80-year-streak-for-manchester-united-academy Would you like to sound a little bit more desperate? 😂😂😂 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 30, 2018, 05:17:47 PM 80 years of home grown talent. This article is a year old now, but the record continues to grow. http://www.espn.co.uk/soccer/club/manchester-united/360/blog/post/3243336/marcus-rashford-continues-80-year-streak-for-manchester-united-academy Would you like to sound a little bit more desperate? 😂😂😂 Hardly desperate. Just a reflection of the way this club goes about things. I am back to enjoying my football at the moment after the exit of the not so special one. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: BigAdz on December 30, 2018, 06:42:47 PM Amusing to see UTD doing well after The Special One has gone, but the first thing I would have done(after the congrats) was fine the feckers at least a months salary, especially Pogba. Make that a year. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on December 30, 2018, 06:52:43 PM Amusing to see UTD doing well after The Special One has gone, but the first thing I would have done(after the congrats) was fine the feckers at least a months salary, especially Pogba. Make that a year. I think he’d pay it with a smile. But the difference between his performances under Mourinho and now aren’t all his fault. The manager’s role is to get the best from his players. That means playing them where their strengths come to the fore. Devising tactics that get the benefits of the players talents. The freedom that Pogba now enjoys was denied him by Mourinho. Let’s judge him at the end of the season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on December 30, 2018, 08:40:58 PM It looked like the good old days at Old Trafford today, some lovely attacking football and even a ref doing a decent Howard Webb impression until he dished out that red card.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on January 02, 2019, 10:12:58 PM Absolutely no way we would have won that match under Mourinho.
We would have been playing defensive possession type football, slow build ups and gotten nowhere.... 0-0 if we were lucky. I know we didn't score the first from open play (game then opened up), but we got some free kicks in decent areas thanks to playing higher up the field and the constant probing. I absolutely love what OGS and team are doing.... Matic is a completely different player and play is going THROUGH him rather than bouncing it off him back to the defence. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 02, 2019, 10:52:03 PM Absolutely no way we would have won that match under Mourinho. We would have been playing defensive possession type football, slow build ups and gotten nowhere.... 0-0 if we were lucky. I know we didn't score the first from open play (game then opened up), but we got some free kicks in decent areas thanks to playing higher up the field and the constant probing. I absolutely love what OGS and team are doing.... Matic is a completely different player and play is going THROUGH him rather than bouncing it off him back to the defence. Absolutely this. If they can just teach Luke Shaw how to make a pass that creates something rather than him getting into some great attacking positions and then shuffling the ball back and inside... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on January 03, 2019, 10:14:46 AM Solksjaer is making taking charge of a maureen team after he's turned sour look like the easiest job in football.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 03, 2019, 10:50:48 AM Solksjaer and Phelan are making taking charge of a maureen team after he's turned sour look like the easiest job in football. FYP The return of Mike Phelan is massive. Moyes should never have been allowed to get rid of him. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on January 03, 2019, 10:55:46 AM Lovely to see, but lets not go mad.
Look at who we've played thus far :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on January 03, 2019, 11:03:13 AM Lovely to see, but lets not go mad. Look at who we've played thus far :D The comparisons to Matt Busby do seem like a bit of a stretch.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on January 03, 2019, 11:23:41 AM Lovely to see, but lets not go mad. Look at who we've played thus far :D The comparisons to Matt Busby do seem like a bit of a stretch.. :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 06, 2019, 09:41:11 AM According to today’s Telegraph our noisy neighbours are inserting a clause into the sale agreement for Diaz to Real Madrid that means an increase in sell-on % if he is subsequently sold to us.
15% if he goes anywhere else, 40% if he comes to Old Trafford. Is this common? It feels wrong somehow. Unfair on the player certainly. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 13, 2019, 06:32:55 PM Can we lose the sad soon?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on January 13, 2019, 06:48:28 PM Can we lose the sad soon? In all honesty you should have had more than one so consider yourselves fortunate. Well played today, De Gea had a decent game too. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on January 13, 2019, 10:36:39 PM Sad goes next time they win the title, which could be a good while.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 14, 2019, 01:01:45 AM Sad goes next time they win the title, which could be a good while. That can’t be right, Liverpool haven’t had a sad at all... Nor Leicester. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 14, 2019, 01:02:52 AM Can we lose the sad soon? In all honesty you should have had more than one so consider yourselves fortunate. Well played today, De Gea had a decent game too. Stating the bleedin’ obvious there. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on January 14, 2019, 01:15:31 AM Sad goes next time they win the title, which could be a good while. That can’t be right, Liverpool haven’t had a sad at all... Nor Leicester. Giving them one would have been stating the obvious ;scarymoment; Leicester could never win again and they don't get one :) Title: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 14, 2019, 05:02:38 PM Need to sign Herrera up- unsung hero in recent performances
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, a very sad (second sad pending) and expensive story Post by: Pokerpops on January 14, 2019, 05:27:59 PM Need to sign Herrera up- unsung hero in recent performances Important but hardly irreplaceable. Would expect him to stick around now anyway, given the new circumstances. Welcome back to the thread btw. Still <3 Jose? <3 Jose we'll be removing these sads very soon Title: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 14, 2019, 06:34:05 PM Need to sign Herrera up- unsung hero in recent performances Herrara has been somewhat undershaowed because of all the attacking play but he has been at the hub of everything. I’d like him to stay. Was a staunch Jose supporter but his ego made his position untenable unfortunately. Would like Poch don’t think Ole will sustain this form. Title: Re: Manchester United FC Post by: Pokerpops on January 18, 2019, 11:37:14 PM Need to sign Herrera up- unsung hero in recent performances Herrara has been somewhat undershaowed because of all the attacking play but he has been at the hub of everything. I’d like him to stay. Was a staunch Jose supporter but his ego made his position untenable unfortunately. Would like Poch don’t think Ole will sustain this form. Pretty sure the management will be doing all they can to hang on to Herrera. Matic has also returned to his best role, and Lindelof has been tremendous playing the ball out of defence. Clearly difficult for United to continue recent, OGS ‘inspired’ form but for sure they will play a more attractive style of football than Mourinho could ever have countenanced. Can’t get excited about Pochetino and would much prefer to see OGS stay, with Phelan and Carrick alongside him. Title: Manchester United FC Post by: George2Loose on January 19, 2019, 10:31:28 AM Just don’t think Ole is even remotely qualified to take the role long term but at the same time can’t fault what he’s done so far. I’m pretty sure Poch will be the man but if Ole continues this golden form then obviously it’s hard to ignore claims for the role.
DDG saved him from his first real setback but as with Poker I guess rather be lucky than good Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 19, 2019, 12:41:39 PM I don’t get this thing about being ‘qualified’ for the job. What does Pochetino have on his CV that OGS doesn’t.
His list of League Titles or Cups won is worse than OGS. His win ratio at Spurs is ok (57%), but they had the title in their grasp and let it slip in Leicester’s year. They are off the pace now and likely to slip further back over the next couple of months. There were many who thought that Mourinho was qualified. I was amongst those who thought that Moyes had what was needed. He might still be there if he hadn’t got rid of the entire title winning back room team. Were there any who really thought that LVG could succeed? That notion vanished pretty quickly in the turgid nature of his plans. If Pochetino comes then I will be pleased to have him and his style of play which is broadly akin to what this group of players are suited to. But my absolute first choice would be the Solsjkaer/Phelan/Carrick team. Regardless of how the rest of this season plays out. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: George2Loose on January 19, 2019, 01:15:49 PM More to do with style of play, being a moderniser then anything else and of course there’s a huge difference between ole and Poch’s CVs. Everyone’s getting carried away with us beating 6 shit teams when mourinho’s exit was the main impact
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 20, 2019, 09:28:35 AM More to do with style of play, being a moderniser then anything else and of course there’s a huge difference between ole and Poch’s CVs. Everyone’s getting carried away with us beating 6 shit teams when mourinho’s exit was the main impact Those six shit teams include Pochetino’s Tottenham, It’s seven now btw... Let’s just enjoy the games to come and worry about a new manager in the summer. We have an interesting game on Friday evening to look forward to. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on January 20, 2019, 10:42:18 AM I've realised that my historical dislike of Man U is 100% related to the manager - pre-Ferguson I always appreciated them.
Moyes, Van Gaal and especially Mourinho made it so easy to enjoy the ongoing pain of the united fans. But Ole, how can anyone not like his little cute face and pleasant demeanour - even enjoyed watching Rashford and Pogba over the last few weeks Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on January 20, 2019, 10:45:47 AM Ole really is giving the powers that be at Manchester a bit of a headache. They can't possibly have expected this run of results, & it must have been in their mind to use him to buy time & get through the season, then get rid. Even better, maybe they already have someone signed up, Poch or whoever, & now they have to sit & grimace as Ole keeps on winning games & they qualify for CL. Nice problem to have, but a problem, for sure. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on January 20, 2019, 10:57:53 AM Ole really is giving the powers that be at Manchester a bit of a headache. They can't possibly have expected this run of results, & it must have been in their mind to use him to buy time & get through the season, then get rid. Even better, maybe they already have someone signed up, Poch or whoever, & now they have to sit & grimace as Ole keeps on winning games & they qualify for CL. Nice problem to have, but a problem, for sure. I do agree, but beating those 6 shit teams weren't unexpected, and Spurs was a bit lucky. People were saying he had run good on the fixtures, so could easily win the first 4 when he was announced. Hence, saying they couldn't possibly of expected it is a bit of a stretch. I do think they have an issue though, as I assumed they must have someome lined up when it was announced. and Nirvana, people are always hating on the top sides; Liverpool were the hated side for a lomg time, then Manchester United, then Chelsea for a while, now Manchester City and so on. Maybe we get to dislike Liverpool again soon. Me, I just got older and think I just gave up on hating other football teams. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on January 20, 2019, 12:42:52 PM Ole really is giving the powers that be at Manchester a bit of a headache. They can't possibly have expected this run of results, & it must have been in their mind to use him to buy time & get through the season, then get rid. Even better, maybe they already have someone signed up, Poch or whoever, & now they have to sit & grimace as Ole keeps on winning games & they qualify for CL. Nice problem to have, but a problem, for sure. I do agree, but beating those 6 shit teams weren't unexpected, and Spurs was a bit lucky. People were saying he had run good on the fixtures, so could easily win the first 4 when he was announced. Hence, saying they couldn't possibly of expected it is a bit of a stretch. I do think they have an issue though, as I assumed they must have someome lined up when it was announced. and Nirvana, people are always hating on the top sides; Liverpool were the hated side for a lomg time, then Manchester United, then Chelsea for a while, now Manchester City and so on. Maybe we get to dislike Liverpool again soon. Me, I just got older and think I just gave up on hating other football teams. Haha, good last point - I'm nearly there although I am stereotypical in that Liverpool really irritate me at the moment Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on January 20, 2019, 12:52:25 PM Ole really is giving the powers that be at Manchester a bit of a headache. They can't possibly have expected this run of results, & it must have been in their mind to use him to buy time & get through the season, then get rid. Even better, maybe they already have someone signed up, Poch or whoever, & now they have to sit & grimace as Ole keeps on winning games & they qualify for CL. Nice problem to have, but a problem, for sure. It's not dissimilar to the Di Matteo situation at Fulham Rd. a few years ago. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 20, 2019, 02:27:23 PM Ole really is giving the powers that be at Manchester a bit of a headache. They can't possibly have expected this run of results, & it must have been in their mind to use him to buy time & get through the season, then get rid. Even better, maybe they already have someone signed up, Poch or whoever, & now they have to sit & grimace as Ole keeps on winning games & they qualify for CL. Nice problem to have, but a problem, for sure. It's not dissimilar to the Di Matteo situation at Fulham Rd. a few years ago. That had a decent short term outcome as I recall. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: BigAdz on January 20, 2019, 04:09:33 PM Ole really is giving the powers that be at Manchester a bit of a headache. They can't possibly have expected this run of results, & it must have been in their mind to use him to buy time & get through the season, then get rid. Even better, maybe they already have someone signed up, Poch or whoever, & now they have to sit & grimace as Ole keeps on winning games & they qualify for CL. Nice problem to have, but a problem, for sure. Give him the job. Will be great while they stick with him for a year while the gloss wears off. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Longines on January 24, 2019, 12:22:41 PM An interesting read:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2019/01/24/jesper-blomqvist-man-utd-treble-winner-found-peace-running-pizzeria/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on January 24, 2019, 01:06:09 PM An interesting read: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2019/01/24/jesper-blomqvist-man-utd-treble-winner-found-peace-running-pizzeria/ Great article, that. Who wouldn't be happy in a pizzeria ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on January 25, 2019, 06:23:11 PM Score prediction tonight, anyone? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: RED-DOG on January 25, 2019, 07:29:39 PM 2-1 Manure
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on January 25, 2019, 07:33:57 PM 3-2 Arsenal
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Dewi_cool on January 25, 2019, 07:35:14 PM 2-3
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on January 25, 2019, 08:32:19 PM 3-2 Arsenal Half the job done - 2 quality goals there Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 26, 2019, 06:46:25 AM Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 26, 2019, 06:57:06 AM Never in doubt.
The fixtures over the next four weeks will provide a couple of real tests of our revival. Burnley (H) Leicester (A) Fulham (A) PSG (H) Liverpool (H) Palace (A) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: RED-DOG on January 26, 2019, 11:28:02 AM This has whooshed me.??? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 26, 2019, 11:52:12 AM This has whooshed me.??? Technology issues I’ll try again Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 26, 2019, 11:52:39 AM Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 26, 2019, 12:02:29 PM love you Tom. Post was fine originally.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on January 28, 2019, 05:31:39 PM Now fav for the home leg vs PSG who are supposedly going to be missing Neymar for both legs.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 28, 2019, 08:16:04 PM Another favourable cup draw for us...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on January 29, 2019, 09:43:20 PM Never in doubt. The fixtures over the next four weeks will provide a couple of real tests of our revival. Burnley (H) Leicester (A) Fulham (A) PSG (H) Liverpool (H) Palace (A) I knew Burnley at home would be the acid test Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on January 29, 2019, 09:51:39 PM Amazo, the spirit of '99 from the inspirational Solskjaer
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 30, 2019, 11:24:02 AM Never in doubt. The fixtures over the next four weeks will provide a couple of real tests of our revival. Burnley (H) Leicester (A) Fulham (A) PSG (H) Liverpool (H) Palace (A) I knew Burnley at home would be the acid test Absolutely. A small part of me is pleased that the 100% record is gone. But only a very very small part of me. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Longines on February 06, 2019, 03:59:40 PM From Twitter: for the first time since the Glazers took over, the cumulative spend on player transfers now exceeds the cumulative spend on debt interest.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on February 12, 2019, 11:02:36 PM That was a tough watch, PSG were a cut above, and it could so easily have been 3-0 or 4-0. Hard to see a single positive in that performance. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: George2Loose on February 13, 2019, 02:35:19 AM Unfortunately this is where Ole will be found and the goodwill of beating a bunch of also ran teams starts to fade
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: pleno1 on February 13, 2019, 04:51:07 AM I mean Sanchez and Mata just can’t play this level. You need pace, PSG went from playing around their own box to playing around Uniteds. Very unfortunate injuries, if Di Maria and Mbappe go off injured then the game changes the other way too. Don’t think Oke for particularly found out, if anything when both teams had their 11s PSG looked very poor.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on February 13, 2019, 10:09:05 AM Can anyone explain to me how come Ashley Young avoided a second yellow card for his assault on Di Maria when he deliberately shoved him off the pitch?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 13, 2019, 01:24:49 PM Unfortunately this is where Ole will be found and the goodwill of beating a bunch of also ran teams starts to fade Let’s see how he goes till the end of March. PSG will test a lot of teams and the idea that losing to them having lost two of our key attacking players to injury is indicative of OGS being ‘found out’ is hasty at best. Can anyone explain to me how come Ashley Young avoided a second yellow card for his assault on Di Maria when he deliberately shoved him off the pitch? I don”t think the referee is a member of Blonde so the definitive explanation may have to wait. Meantime I can offer the view that he didn’t get booked because the referee decided that the challenge didn’t warrant a booking. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: MANTIS01 on February 13, 2019, 01:55:01 PM The fact Utd are in a CL position and somewhat disappointed to lose vs PSG is indicative of how well OGS has performed. Whether he's going to do more than just lift the gloom remains to be seen. Last night I wudda played Sanchez, Lukaku & Mata as a front 3 as opposed to Lingard, Rashford & Martial. Just think the first 3 are more seasoned veterans for a night like this where composure & experience were perhaps more valuable than excitable rawness. Was pace really going to be the right weapon, I thought PSG were going to be more tactically reliant on speedy counters. Utd keeping ball with slow build up pressure gets the crowd more into the moment. Wudda given those guys some big confidence as well, can't imagine keep getting jocked onto the bench is the way to bring out their best.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 14, 2019, 11:46:08 PM Sad day
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/manchester-united-eric-harrison-dead-15828732 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on February 15, 2019, 06:31:24 AM When lingard and martial went off everything went to pot.... Sanchez is ridiculously lazy off the ball and leaves so much space in behind him - I think I’m finally ready to give up on him... Mata is amazing technically but I’d have to agree with pleno in that he lacks the pace to play at this level nowadays. Lukaku is utter shite, the sooner he’s moved along the better.
One thing you don’t really get the feel for on tv is how slowly play transitions through Luke Shaw. If we had a LB capable of playing at a normal tempo and not needing an extra touch every time Martial really could have caused PSG problems... He was constantly making great runs in behind and Shaw just isn’t capable of finding him. Honestly.. we could have done with Fellaini (I was never a hater). Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 15, 2019, 07:00:59 AM When lingard and martial went off everything went to pot.... Sanchez is ridiculously lazy off the ball and leaves so much space in behind him - I think I’m finally ready to give up on him... Mata is amazing technically but I’d have to agree with pleno in that he lacks the pace to play at this level nowadays. Lukaku is utter shite, the sooner he’s moved along the better. One thing you don’t really get the feel for on tv is how slowly play transitions through Luke Shaw. If we had a LB capable of playing at a normal tempo and not needing an extra touch every time Martial really could have caused PSG problems... He was constantly making great runs in behind and Shaw just isn’t capable of finding him. Honestly.. we could have done with Fellaini (I was never a hater). Shaw promises so much and consistently fails to deliver. So many times he gets into a perfect position to deliver a cross, or find Martial as you say, and then stops and passes the ball backwards and in field. It feels like a confidence issue, maybe all that negativity from Mourinho has broken him permanently? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on February 15, 2019, 04:27:36 PM When lingard and martial went off everything went to pot.... Sanchez is ridiculously lazy off the ball and leaves so much space in behind him - I think I’m finally ready to give up on him... Mata is amazing technically but I’d have to agree with pleno in that he lacks the pace to play at this level nowadays. Lukaku is utter shite, the sooner he’s moved along the better. One thing you don’t really get the feel for on tv is how slowly play transitions through Luke Shaw. If we had a LB capable of playing at a normal tempo and not needing an extra touch every time Martial really could have caused PSG problems... He was constantly making great runs in behind and Shaw just isn’t capable of finding him. Honestly.. we could have done with Fellaini (I was never a hater). Shaw promises so much and consistently fails to deliver. So many times he gets into a perfect position to deliver a cross, or find Martial as you say, and then stops and passes the ball backwards and in field. It feels like a confidence issue, maybe all that negativity from Mourinho has broken him permanently? He honestly he just seems heavy. He’s so flat footed when he receives he ball he always needs the extra touch which leads to him playing back in field. I don’t think it’s mourinho as there’s been a lot of faith shown in him lately, I think it’s physical Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on February 15, 2019, 05:51:22 PM When lingard and martial went off everything went to pot.... Sanchez is ridiculously lazy off the ball and leaves so much space in behind him - I think I’m finally ready to give up on him... Mata is amazing technically but I’d have to agree with pleno in that he lacks the pace to play at this level nowadays. Lukaku is utter shite, the sooner he’s moved along the better. One thing you don’t really get the feel for on tv is how slowly play transitions through Luke Shaw. If we had a LB capable of playing at a normal tempo and not needing an extra touch every time Martial really could have caused PSG problems... He was constantly making great runs in behind and Shaw just isn’t capable of finding him. Honestly.. we could have done with Fellaini (I was never a hater). When Alexis came to Arsenal he was non-stop action and used to berate his team-mates(with gestures obv.) if they didn't press the way he did. He was a leader by example then and that's why we adored him - well that and all of those goals he scored. It was often said that players who left Arsenal and Arsene Wenger for pastures new were never the same subsequently*. *Apart from RvP who miraculously had his first and only injury-free season with you. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 15, 2019, 06:59:27 PM When lingard and martial went off everything went to pot.... Sanchez is ridiculously lazy off the ball and leaves so much space in behind him - I think I’m finally ready to give up on him... Mata is amazing technically but I’d have to agree with pleno in that he lacks the pace to play at this level nowadays. Lukaku is utter shite, the sooner he’s moved along the better. One thing you don’t really get the feel for on tv is how slowly play transitions through Luke Shaw. If we had a LB capable of playing at a normal tempo and not needing an extra touch every time Martial really could have caused PSG problems... He was constantly making great runs in behind and Shaw just isn’t capable of finding him. Honestly.. we could have done with Fellaini (I was never a hater). When Alexis came to Arsenal he was non-stop action and used to berate his team-mates(with gestures obv.) if they didn't press the way he did. He was a leader by example then and that's why we adored him - well that and all of those goals he scored. It was often said that players who left Arsenal and Arsene Wenger for pastures new were never the same subsequently*. *Apart from RvP who miraculously had his first and only injury-free season with you. Off the top of my head... Cashley did Ok at Chelsea I think. Vierra had a decent run at City, RvP as you say. Fabregas? Sure there are more examples but my knowledge of all things Arsenal is limited. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on February 15, 2019, 07:25:24 PM When lingard and martial went off everything went to pot.... Sanchez is ridiculously lazy off the ball and leaves so much space in behind him - I think I’m finally ready to give up on him... Mata is amazing technically but I’d have to agree with pleno in that he lacks the pace to play at this level nowadays. Lukaku is utter shite, the sooner he’s moved along the better. One thing you don’t really get the feel for on tv is how slowly play transitions through Luke Shaw. If we had a LB capable of playing at a normal tempo and not needing an extra touch every time Martial really could have caused PSG problems... He was constantly making great runs in behind and Shaw just isn’t capable of finding him. Honestly.. we could have done with Fellaini (I was never a hater). When Alexis came to Arsenal he was non-stop action and used to berate his team-mates(with gestures obv.) if they didn't press the way he did. He was a leader by example then and that's why we adored him - well that and all of those goals he scored. It was often said that players who left Arsenal and Arsene Wenger for pastures new were never the same subsequently*. *Apart from RvP who miraculously had his first and only injury-free season with you. Off the top of my head... Cashley did Ok at Chelsea I think. Vierra had a decent run at City, RvP as you say. Fabregas? Sure there are more examples but my knowledge of all things Arsenal is limited. Vieira was a shadow of his Arsenal-self at citeh having previously had a few successful but post-peak seasons in Italy(ask yourself which club he is remembered for). Fabregas played mostly from the bench in Barcelona and never had the same kind of influence at chelski as he did with us. Ashley Cole on the other hand should never have left and was a major executive cock-up over(what would seem today a paltry) £5K pw. I could list you a dozen "top-flight" transfers out who never achieved the heights they did with us after they left. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on February 15, 2019, 07:31:38 PM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicklas_Bendtner
This one of them Ralph? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: George2Loose on February 15, 2019, 07:53:33 PM Can also name a shitload of players Wenger signed that were absolute dog shit.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on February 15, 2019, 08:07:33 PM Can also name a shitload of players Wenger signed that were absolute dog shit. I raise you Djemba-Djemba Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: George2Loose on February 15, 2019, 09:20:17 PM I raise u like a gazillion trophies :D
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on February 15, 2019, 09:30:22 PM I raise u like a gazillion trophies :D You forgot all those prawn sandwiches. I've missed you George - welcome home x Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on February 15, 2019, 10:43:55 PM When lingard and martial went off everything went to pot.... Sanchez is ridiculously lazy off the ball and leaves so much space in behind him - I think I’m finally ready to give up on him... Mata is amazing technically but I’d have to agree with pleno in that he lacks the pace to play at this level nowadays. Lukaku is utter shite, the sooner he’s moved along the better. One thing you don’t really get the feel for on tv is how slowly play transitions through Luke Shaw. If we had a LB capable of playing at a normal tempo and not needing an extra touch every time Martial really could have caused PSG problems... He was constantly making great runs in behind and Shaw just isn’t capable of finding him. Honestly.. we could have done with Fellaini (I was never a hater). When Alexis came to Arsenal he was non-stop action and used to berate his team-mates(with gestures obv.) if they didn't press the way he did. He was a leader by example then and that's why we adored him - well that and all of those goals he scored. It was often said that players who left Arsenal and Arsene Wenger for pastures new were never the same subsequently*. *Apart from RvP who miraculously had his first and only injury-free season with you. * Apart from Samir Nasri - 176 City appearances - 2 Premier League Titles - 1 League Cup * Apart from Gael Clichy - 203 City appearances - 2 Premier League Titles - 2 League Cups * Apart from Kolo Toure - 102 City appearances - 1 Premier League Title - 1 FA Cup - 1 World Renown Song Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 15, 2019, 11:19:57 PM Can also name a shitload of players Wenger signed that were absolute dog shit. I raise you Djemba-Djemba I call your Djemba-Djemba and raise, Anderson. Fergie made plenty of poor signings, but he did also buy a lot of players who made a very positive mark on the club. Not least the bargain basement signing of Cantona. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on February 15, 2019, 11:24:33 PM When lingard and martial went off everything went to pot.... Sanchez is ridiculously lazy off the ball and leaves so much space in behind him - I think I’m finally ready to give up on him... Mata is amazing technically but I’d have to agree with pleno in that he lacks the pace to play at this level nowadays. Lukaku is utter shite, the sooner he’s moved along the better. One thing you don’t really get the feel for on tv is how slowly play transitions through Luke Shaw. If we had a LB capable of playing at a normal tempo and not needing an extra touch every time Martial really could have caused PSG problems... He was constantly making great runs in behind and Shaw just isn’t capable of finding him. Honestly.. we could have done with Fellaini (I was never a hater). When Alexis came to Arsenal he was non-stop action and used to berate his team-mates(with gestures obv.) if they didn't press the way he did. He was a leader by example then and that's why we adored him - well that and all of those goals he scored. It was often said that players who left Arsenal and Arsene Wenger for pastures new were never the same subsequently*. *Apart from RvP who miraculously had his first and only injury-free season with you. * Apart from Samir Nasri - 176 City appearances - 2 Premier League Titles - 1 League Cup * Apart from Gael Clichy - 203 City appearances - 2 Premier League Titles - 2 League Cups * Apart from Kolo Toure - 102 City appearances - 1 Premier League Title - 1 FA Cup - 1 World Renown Song Archer, I always considered you to be a sensible and rational man amongst footie fans - are you seriously saying that kolo Toure played to the same standard for your lot as he did for us? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 28, 2019, 11:04:49 PM Disappointing reaction to a harmless charitable venture from a club that doesn’t need the money, and needs another reason for the haters to hate even less.
https://amp.theguardian.com/football/2019/feb/27/manchester-united-tell-panini-cheapskates-to-stop-selling-stickers Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on March 06, 2019, 08:39:39 PM https://www.clippituser.tv/c/gekypm
What a player Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on March 06, 2019, 09:58:17 PM Surely Ole gets the gig now? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2019, 09:58:44 PM OMG I was so wrong. Give him the job. Just how??
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on March 06, 2019, 09:59:36 PM OMG I was so wrong. Give him the job. Just how?? Me too, I never gave him a chance, but what a turn round he has engineered. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on March 06, 2019, 10:03:39 PM OMG I was so wrong. Give him the job. Just how?? Me too, I never gave him a chance, but what a turn round he has engineered. I thought he was worth a go, but there is no way I expected this to happen either! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on March 06, 2019, 10:05:25 PM Could he possibly do a Di Matteo?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: teddybloat on March 06, 2019, 10:05:29 PM He called it as well.
Wanted to be in with a chance with 20 to play. Then rode his luck without being reckless. Luck = prep x opportunity. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on March 06, 2019, 10:09:20 PM Football eh? Bloody hell!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on March 06, 2019, 10:44:55 PM 28% possession. No corners. 4 shots on target. 3 goals. You run like god. Don't get carried away and be results orientated!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on March 06, 2019, 10:57:08 PM Tottenham, Arsenal, Chelsea and PSG
Man Utd have won every single game away from home under Ole Ole Gunnar Solskjær: WWWWWWWWW Goals: 23 Conceded: 4 Clean sheets: 5 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on March 06, 2019, 10:59:41 PM 28% possession. No corners. 4 shots on target. 3 goals. You run like god. Don't get carried away and be results orientated! Football is, inevitably, results orientated though. Did PSG run badly? Other than for the VAR Penalty that is. Tactically United got it very right tonight. Ceding possession and defending deep restricted PSG goal chances and a chunk of their 72% was ineffective. Anyway, don’t piss on our parade! We’re in the CL quarter finals. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on March 06, 2019, 11:04:34 PM 28% possession. No corners. 4 shots on target. 3 goals. You run like god. Don't get carried away and be results orientated! Football is, inevitably, results orientated though. Did PSG run badly? Other than for the VAR Penalty that is. Tactically United got it very right tonight. Ceding possession and defending deep restricted PSG goal chances and a chunk of their 72% was ineffective. Anyway, don’t piss on our parade! We’re in the CL quarter finals. gl winning by 2 away from home with 28% possession. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on March 06, 2019, 11:23:19 PM 28% possession. No corners. 4 shots on target. 3 goals. You run like god. Don't get carried away and be results orientated! Football is, inevitably, results orientated though. Did PSG run badly? Other than for the VAR Penalty that is. Tactically United got it very right tonight. Ceding possession and defending deep restricted PSG goal chances and a chunk of their 72% was ineffective. Anyway, don’t piss on our parade! We’re in the CL quarter finals. gl winning by 2 away from home with 28% possession. Are you implying United would have been higher EV attempting to go toe to toe with PSG? .... Deffo isn't the case, especially with the squad available. Gl winning by 2 away from home in general nevermind vs PSG.... United put themselves in the best position they could to get a result out the game by the way they set up. Obviously isn't a 'fair' outcome as PSG were far better over the two legs but I'll take it ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2019, 11:38:30 PM Isn’t just about today’s result. The whole way he’s handled himself and rejuvenated the club he deserves a chance. Could do a RDM but he’s earnt the shot at least
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: George2Loose on March 06, 2019, 11:40:31 PM 28% possession. No corners. 4 shots on target. 3 goals. You run like god. Don't get carried away and be results orientated! That was a classic Stoke City performance- thought you’d approve! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on March 06, 2019, 11:55:49 PM Mason Greenwood becomes the 231st United youth player to feature in the #mufc first team...50% of all first team players since 1939 have come through the United Academy.
Nice to see 4 academy boys finish the game, with 7 in the squad. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on March 07, 2019, 12:00:36 AM Isn’t just about today’s result. The whole way he’s handled himself and rejuvenated the club he deserves a chance. Could do a RDM but he’s earnt the shot at least You have a relatively huge wage bill/squad valuation. Any normal manager would be achieving this relative to the clubs huge financial advantage. Jose took the club so far south they nearly went under. Doesn't mean Ole is Pep. Honeymoon factor as well. He has had a very easy fixture list to get the ball rolling as well confidence wise. So if Pulis had taken over and produced these short term results you would be happy for him to continue long term ? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on March 07, 2019, 12:09:31 AM 28% possession. No corners. 4 shots on target. 3 goals. You run like god. Don't get carried away and be results orientated! Maybe the luckiest part was Kimpembe should have been off in the first leg so wouldn't have been able to fanny out of blocking a shot. And Pogba was sent off in the first game so he couldn't take the penalty, which he would have inevitably missed. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on March 07, 2019, 12:34:07 AM Gotta love this 'photo; (http://i.imgur.com/030e1O2.jpg) (https://imgur.com/030e1O2) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: George2Loose on March 07, 2019, 01:15:06 AM Isn’t just about today’s result. The whole way he’s handled himself and rejuvenated the club he deserves a chance. Could do a RDM but he’s earnt the shot at least You have a relatively huge wage bill/squad valuation. Any normal manager would be achieving this relative to the clubs huge financial advantage. Jose took the club so far south they nearly went under. Doesn't mean Ole is Pep. Honeymoon factor as well. He has had a very easy fixture list to get the ball rolling as well confidence wise. So if Pulis had taken over and produced these short term results you would be happy for him to continue long term ? Look at my previous posts. I wanted Poch and agree with a lot of what you’re saying but I think he’s earnt a chance. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on March 07, 2019, 01:44:10 AM Gotta love this 'photo; (http://i.imgur.com/030e1O2.jpg) (https://imgur.com/030e1O2) What a pic! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on March 07, 2019, 06:14:19 AM Gotta love this 'photo; (http://i.imgur.com/030e1O2.jpg) (https://imgur.com/030e1O2) What a pic! Where’s the ‘like’ button? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on March 07, 2019, 08:18:54 AM Isn’t just about today’s result. The whole way he’s handled himself and rejuvenated the club he deserves a chance. Could do a RDM but he’s earnt the shot at least You have a relatively huge wage bill/squad valuation. Any normal manager would be achieving this relative to the clubs huge financial advantage. Jose took the club so far south they nearly went under. Doesn't mean Ole is Pep. Honeymoon factor as well. He has had a very easy fixture list to get the ball rolling as well confidence wise. So if Pulis had taken over and produced these short term results you would be happy for him to continue long term ? Look at my previous posts. I wanted Poch and agree with a lot of what you’re saying but I think he’s earnt a chance. 100% he has i think the owners always wanted him long term and give him every chance fixture list wise. He will be a relatively 'cheap' option for the owners salary wise compared to Jose. Cheap salary, the fans love him and he keeps winning. What a combo. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on March 07, 2019, 08:36:55 AM Be a nightmare for the Board if they had already entered into some prenuptial with a high-profile Manager (Poch, Zidane or whatever) as soon as Jose went, installed Ole as a temporary stop-gap & then he finished the season in a blaze of glory. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: George2Loose on March 07, 2019, 08:43:14 AM Always felt like that was the case and someone has been lined up. Someone needs to burn that contract
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on March 28, 2019, 11:34:50 AM Ole Ole Ole. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47691296 Good decision? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on March 28, 2019, 02:25:15 PM Ole Ole Ole. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47691296 Good decision? A better choice than the last one certainly. I’m optimistic about the next couple of seasons now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Cf on March 29, 2019, 10:25:12 AM This feels to me like it'll either go spectacularly right or spectacularly wrong with no middle ground.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on March 29, 2019, 01:21:37 PM This feels to me like it'll either go spectacularly right or spectacularly wrong with no middle ground. Spectacularly right would be a return to the trophy collecting of the SAF era. Spectacularly wrong would be playing as we did under Jose and winning nothing. To me, there is a middle ground of playing with style and passion and developing the youngsters but recognising that the playing field has changed over the past six years. Being in contention for the league every season, winning a cup or two, would be middle ground for us. Winning the league before his three years is up feels ambitious, but we need to be in there fighting for it, Second last season by a mile wasn’t success. Second next season with the chance to see that just a couple of results that went the wrong way for us changed the overall result would be. There is still a lot to play for this season, Top 4 and beat Barcelona would be exceptional given the situation when OGS was appointed. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on April 11, 2019, 08:51:33 AM I watched last night's game, it's no shame to lose to Barcelona, & that's what happened.
Reading reports after, I gather United never had a single shot on target. First time that's happened to United in a CL tie since 2005, 14 years ago. It's not as if Barca had a well-organised defence, they looked comically bad at the back at times. It got me thinking afterwards. After Ole moved in, they went on the most wonderful run of results, win after win. Then, a month (?) or so ago, they gave him a contract, since when they have lost to Wolves (twice), & Arsenal, though they did have a great result at PSG. Can't recall if the PSG result was before or after Ole got the gig officially. Don't you just love the glorious unpredictability of sport? PS - I'm not a Man U hater, far from it, I'm broadly neutral on most PL sides, though I do try to watch most Man U games as they still have that aura about them. And Pogba. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on April 13, 2019, 01:12:31 PM A Tweet appeared on my timeline the other day saying Alexis Sanchez has been paid in excess of £60M in wages at Man Untied and only scored four goals.
That is a truly amazing decline in form for someone who was considered by many to be a world-class player during his time at Arsenal. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on April 13, 2019, 03:01:42 PM A Tweet appeared on my timeline the other day saying Alexis Sanchez has been paid in excess of £60M in wages at Man Untied and only scored four goals. That is a truly amazing decline in form for someone who was considered by many to be a world-class player during his time at Arsenal. Has been paid £60M? His injuries haven’t helped and neither did the Mourinho period. Time will tell if he had any pride in his reputation or the character to show his talents. He has a world-class agent. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on April 14, 2019, 11:07:35 PM A Tweet appeared on my timeline the other day saying Alexis Sanchez has been paid in excess of £60M in wages at Man Untied and only scored four goals. That is a truly amazing decline in form for someone who was considered by many to be a world-class player during his time at Arsenal. That's a milly a week. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on April 15, 2019, 12:38:39 AM A Tweet appeared on my timeline the other day saying Alexis Sanchez has been paid in excess of £60M in wages at Man Untied and only scored four goals. That is a truly amazing decline in form for someone who was considered by many to be a world-class player during his time at Arsenal. That's a milly a week. I think he's been there over two years now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on April 16, 2019, 06:55:36 PM Hope springs eternal in the human breast
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on April 16, 2019, 06:58:42 PM (http://i.imgur.com/lXJudH8.png) (https://imgur.com/lXJudH8) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on April 16, 2019, 07:49:56 PM Just want to see goallllllllllls!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on April 16, 2019, 08:36:55 PM Not quite what I was hoping for, but got some :D
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on April 16, 2019, 09:05:17 PM VAR couldn’t save us, it did delay things though
Can’t give up yet Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on April 16, 2019, 09:54:43 PM That Messi eh?
He’s pretty good isn’t he Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on April 16, 2019, 11:01:48 PM If you'd have said we'd have lost 4-0 on aggregate before the tie I'd have snapped your hand off.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on April 16, 2019, 11:28:24 PM If you'd have said we'd have lost 4-0 on aggregate before the tie I'd have snapped your hand off. Wouldn't have minded a couple for our mob :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on April 21, 2019, 03:11:11 PM 4 more - and counting - in the against column. This is turning into a nightmare. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on April 21, 2019, 03:36:11 PM 4 more - and counting - in the against column. This is turning into a hilarious reality. FYP. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on April 21, 2019, 04:27:22 PM 4 more - and counting - in the against column. This is turning into a hilarious reality. FYP. :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on April 21, 2019, 06:20:59 PM 4 more - and counting - in the against column. This is turning into a hilarious reality. FYP. Saving ourselves for Wednesday evening? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: DungBeetle on April 21, 2019, 07:00:20 PM Don't worry. Olly's at the wheel :) :) :)
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on April 21, 2019, 07:43:24 PM Price for United home win v City at OT in league games since City ruined football:
11/12 2.0 12/13 2.3 13/14 3.5 14/15 2.63 15/16 2.6 16/17 2.38 17/18 3.39 Next Wednesday: currently in range 6.5 - 7.0 Incredible scenes. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Ironside on April 21, 2019, 09:38:07 PM Price for United home win v City at OT in league games since City ruined football: 11/12 2.0 12/13 2.3 13/14 3.5 14/15 2.63 15/16 2.6 16/17 2.38 17/18 3.39 Next Wednesday: currently in range 6.5 - 7.0 Incredible scenes. As much as i dislike Man U all i can say is at 7.0 is how much can i afford to lose cause i am ALL ABOARD that ship Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on April 21, 2019, 10:51:42 PM Price for United home win v City at OT in league games since City ruined football: 11/12 2.0 12/13 2.3 13/14 3.5 14/15 2.63 15/16 2.6 16/17 2.38 17/18 3.39 Next Wednesday: currently in range 6.5 - 7.0 Incredible scenes. As much as i dislike Man U all i can say is at 7.0 is how much can i afford to lose cause i am ALL ABOARD that ship That’s the spirit! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: SuperJez on April 22, 2019, 09:46:18 AM Reading Utd forums and twitter posts it seems the vast majority of MU fans want them to lose to City on Wed.
Gary Neville certainly does and has not made much attempt to hide that on Sky. That coupled with the fact they are shite, and City are amazing means surely this is a foregone conclusion? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on April 22, 2019, 11:04:04 AM Reading Utd forums and twitter posts it seems the vast majority of MU fans want them to lose to City on Wed. Gary Neville certainly does and has not made much attempt to hide that on Sky. That coupled with the fact they are shite, and City are amazing means surely this is a foregone conclusion? Now that Spurs have done their bit and killed the quadruple dream, City winning the league >>>>>>>>> Liverpool winning it. Hoping Watford win the Cup though. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on April 22, 2019, 06:00:58 PM Any thoughts about making OGS "interim manager" again?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on April 23, 2019, 09:44:22 AM After the Everton performance this City game has got a spirited 0-0, dig your heels in, make the badge proud, absolute shit show of an affair which hands Liverpool the title and doesn't help us in the top 4 race. If Ole is as passionate and proud United as he says he'll play himself up front, Mike Phelan center and Bobby Charlton center mid. C'mon City! Blue moooooooooon.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on April 23, 2019, 02:59:29 PM After the Everton performance this City game has got a spirited 0-0, dig your heels in, make the badge proud, absolute shit show of an affair which hands Liverpool the title and doesn't help us in the top 4 race. If Ole is as passionate and proud United as he says he'll play himself up front, Mike Phelan center and Bobby Charlton center mid. C'mon City! Blue moooooooooon. Haha. Excellent Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on April 24, 2019, 08:44:13 AM Tonight just got a little more interesting. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48028390 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on April 24, 2019, 09:31:46 AM Tonight just got a little more interesting. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48028390 Not really. All the top sides make tactical fouls, the Liverpool of the Boot Room era were adept at it. Phil Thompson’s protests about the penalty he conceded in the League Cup Final Replay were a trigger in the move towards red cards for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity. OGS took a red card vs Newcastle in 98 rather than let the title slip away. BBC breakfast reported 85% of United fans asked would rather lose to City than help Liverpool to the title. The other 15% presumably either lied, or didn’t understand the need to keep Liverpool off the f*cking perch. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on April 24, 2019, 09:51:04 AM all of the salford reds can keep singing '20 times 20 times man utd'
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on April 24, 2019, 09:55:15 AM Extraordinary prices tonight. They vary from firm to firm, obviously, but plenty of 11/2 United available, with City, the away team, at 4/9, & the Draw 18/5. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on April 24, 2019, 10:10:59 AM Tonight just got a little more interesting. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48028390 Not really. All the top sides make tactical fouls, the Liverpool of the Boot Room era were adept at it. Phil Thompson’s protests about the penalty he conceded in the League Cup Final Replay were a trigger in the move towards red cards for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity. OGS took a red card vs Newcastle in 98 rather than let the title slip away. BBC breakfast reported 85% of United fans asked would rather lose to City than help Liverpool to the title. The other 15% presumably either lied, or didn’t understand the need to keep Liverpool off the f*cking perch. Really? I just don't get it. I get Liverpool used to be the big rivals, as City weren't as strong back in the day, but surely Man City/Liverpool shouldn't make a lot of difference anymore? Maybe I got too old for football; or Bradford City have been so bad, for so long, that hating on anyone else seems so futile. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on April 24, 2019, 10:17:28 AM Extraordinary prices tonight. They vary from firm to firm, obviously, but plenty of 11/2 United available, with City, the away team, at 4/9, & the Draw 18/5. 7.4 on Betfair. Fill your boots Tikay. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on April 24, 2019, 10:52:34 AM Tonight just got a little more interesting. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48028390 Not really. All the top sides make tactical fouls, the Liverpool of the Boot Room era were adept at it. Phil Thompson’s protests about the penalty he conceded in the League Cup Final Replay were a trigger in the move towards red cards for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity. OGS took a red card vs Newcastle in 98 rather than let the title slip away. BBC breakfast reported 85% of United fans asked would rather lose to City than help Liverpool to the title. The other 15% presumably either lied, or didn’t understand the need to keep Liverpool off the f*cking perch. Really? I just don't get it. I get Liverpool used to be the big rivals, as City weren't as strong back in the day, but surely Man City/Liverpool shouldn't make a lot of difference anymore? Maybe I got too old for football; or Bradford City have been so bad, for so long, that hating on anyone else seems so futile. It's not true Doobs that's why. Just a ruse to wind-up Liverpool fans before the game and to save face and wind-up Liverpool fans should United lose the game. For once United supporters are in a win-win situation. They will celebrate win or lose. As Poww says, though, a draw doesn't really do either City or United any favours. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on April 24, 2019, 12:16:48 PM Tonight just got a little more interesting. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48028390 Not really. All the top sides make tactical fouls, the Liverpool of the Boot Room era were adept at it. Phil Thompson’s protests about the penalty he conceded in the League Cup Final Replay were a trigger in the move towards red cards for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity. OGS took a red card vs Newcastle in 98 rather than let the title slip away. BBC breakfast reported 85% of United fans asked would rather lose to City than help Liverpool to the title. The other 15% presumably either lied, or didn’t understand the need to keep Liverpool off the f*cking perch. Really? I just don't get it. I get Liverpool used to be the big rivals, as City weren't as strong back in the day, but surely Man City/Liverpool shouldn't make a lot of difference anymore? Maybe I got too old for football; or Bradford City have been so bad, for so long, that hating on anyone else seems so futile. (https://i.ibb.co/wMpYdVx/79575394efb914f1ed872d41e3e7f3dd.png) (https://ibb.co/MMP9gr3) (https://i.ibb.co/ft1MvnK/e3cba62cbe08a3820680230b807c8acb.png) (https://imgbb.com/) City can hold the fort till we get a Fergie reincarnation. Hopefully the world will have moved on to renewable energy by then. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on April 24, 2019, 11:30:38 PM (https://i.ibb.co/HNgt10f/adc6ed9e3fb016a66ba7af5547edb95f.png)
Textbook back line. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on April 26, 2019, 05:39:34 PM https://www.givemesport.com/1470551-manchester-united-fans-tweet-splitting-the-clubs-players-into-groups-has-gone-viral?autoplay=on&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=website-link&utm_campaign=paid-social Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on April 27, 2019, 01:44:12 PM https://www.givemesport.com/1470551-manchester-united-fans-tweet-splitting-the-clubs-players-into-groups-has-gone-viral?autoplay=on&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=website-link&utm_campaign=paid-social Clickbait alert... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on April 27, 2019, 08:10:33 PM https://www.givemesport.com/1470551-manchester-united-fans-tweet-splitting-the-clubs-players-into-groups-has-gone-viral?autoplay=on&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=website-link&utm_campaign=paid-social Clickbait alert... I believe he refers to it as enlightened spam... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on April 27, 2019, 08:12:07 PM They somehow got hold of the NBA site for a while, and it was an absolute shitshow.
Horrible website! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: DungBeetle on April 28, 2019, 05:23:35 PM Yet another De Gea howler. How long before he is on the Joe Hart scrapheap?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on April 28, 2019, 11:01:50 PM Yet another De Gea howler. How long before he is on the Joe Hart scrapheap? Not sure of the source, but the statistic mentioned on R5L today was that before his recent 3 in 4 games he had made 3 in 120 odd. These things happen, he hasn’t gone from being one of the best keepers in the world to being scrapheap material in the last month. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: DungBeetle on April 29, 2019, 01:53:05 PM Yet another De Gea howler. How long before he is on the Joe Hart scrapheap? Not sure of the source, but the statistic mentioned on R5L today was that before his recent 3 in 4 games he had made 3 in 120 odd. These things happen, he hasn’t gone from being one of the best keepers in the world to being scrapheap material in the last month. For me he was THE best. That said I remember all these arguments being made about Joe Hart and now he’s Burnley’s back up. Obviously De Gea has some way to go before he matches Joe’s journey. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on April 29, 2019, 02:03:57 PM Yet another De Gea howler. How long before he is on the Joe Hart scrapheap? Not sure of the source, but the statistic mentioned on R5L today was that before his recent 3 in 4 games he had made 3 in 120 odd. These things happen, he hasn’t gone from being one of the best keepers in the world to being scrapheap material in the last month. For me he was THE best. That said I remember all these arguments being made about Joe Hart and now he’s Burnley’s back up. Obviously De Gea has some way to go before he matches Joe’s journey. And now he's not even the best keeper in Manchester. Long way to go before he could have a career crash as epic as Hart, but it is unusual to see him make so many basic errors. His shot stopping has mostly made up for his deficiencies elsewhere in his game, so if he starts continually letting in weak goals then questions will be asked. Still a top class keeper, though he has been overtaken comfortably by Allison and Ederson as the best modern day keepers. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: POWWWWWWWW on April 29, 2019, 02:39:43 PM Yet another De Gea howler. How long before he is on the Joe Hart scrapheap? Not sure of the source, but the statistic mentioned on R5L today was that before his recent 3 in 4 games he had made 3 in 120 odd. These things happen, he hasn’t gone from being one of the best keepers in the world to being scrapheap material in the last month. For me he was THE best. That said I remember all these arguments being made about Joe Hart and now he’s Burnley’s back up. Obviously De Gea has some way to go before he matches Joe’s journey. And now he's not even the best keeper in Manchester. Long way to go before he could have a career crash as epic as Hart, but it is unusual to see him make so many basic errors. His shot stopping has mostly made up for his deficiencies elsewhere in his game, so if he starts continually letting in weak goals then questions will be asked. Still a top class keeper, though he has been overtaken comfortably by Allison and Ederson as the best modern day keepers. Yeh I agree. I'd like to see De Gea play in a team that is able to play out from the back and is comfortable playing in and around their own area to see if he has got anything in his locker other than big hoof. I'd also legit like to see Ederson turn out for City in an outfield position. I think he'd be cracking in the Carrick role. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on June 01, 2019, 10:28:37 PM Well. That was a disappointing outcome.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Chris_T on June 28, 2019, 10:59:05 AM With Lukaku going who would you prefer to see up top? Martial or Rashford...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on June 29, 2019, 06:09:15 PM Was somewhat amused by this photo on Twitter of new signing Wan Bissaka &, I assume, his family. Maybe Man U signed them all. One wag on Twitter added.... Wan bissaka 2 bissaka 3 bissaka 4 (http://i.imgur.com/SRT84q4.jpg) (https://imgur.com/SRT84q4) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: booder on June 29, 2019, 06:52:59 PM One wag on Twitter added.... Wan bissaka 2 bissaka 3 bissaka 4 rotflmfao Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on June 29, 2019, 06:59:57 PM Was somewhat amused by this photo on Twitter of new signing Wan Bissaka &, I assume, his family. Maybe Man U signed them all. One wag on Twitter added.... Wan bissaka 2 bissaka 3 bissaka 4 (http://i.imgur.com/SRT84q4.jpg) (https://imgur.com/SRT84q4) Be a few of them wanting their mortgages paid off. Plenty of hungry looking eyes. Poor kid. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on June 29, 2019, 07:09:24 PM ^^^^ White Waistcoat will be first in the queue. Bet he'll want to be his agent too. Good luck to them though. Good to see a kid make good. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Chris_T on July 04, 2019, 11:49:46 AM If he signs Maguire as well for £70 million that's a massive spend on the defence... makes VVD look like a bargain
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: vegaslover on July 04, 2019, 03:39:07 PM Was somewhat amused by this photo on Twitter of new signing Wan Bissaka &, I assume, his family. Maybe Man U signed them all. One wag on Twitter added.... Wan bissaka 2 bissaka 3 bissaka 4 (http://i.imgur.com/SRT84q4.jpg) (https://imgur.com/SRT84q4) Be a few of them wanting their mortgages paid off. Plenty of hungry looking eyes. Poor kid. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: MANTIS01 on July 04, 2019, 03:57:41 PM Hungry eyes indeed. Think I read he wanted to share a hugely proud moment with his close knit family who’ve always been Man U fans. And at £80k a week I’m super cool about paying the mortgages of family I love who supported and sacrificed to get me there.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on July 04, 2019, 04:17:52 PM Why does a family photo amuse people and how do they look like hungry eyes lol
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on July 04, 2019, 04:59:56 PM Why does a family photo amuse people and how do they look like hungry eyes lol I hate to say it, but as Ali G might have said “is it coz he is ...” Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Killerkilsby on July 05, 2019, 12:28:41 AM First post in ages but feel strongly enough. Why the hate for this pic? Especially from someone in TK’s position, why does there have to be an agenda, why would he not want his family around? Why are they hungry eyes? Jesus christ!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on July 05, 2019, 12:45:56 AM Uproar if Danny Baker was amused by the hungry eyes photo
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on July 05, 2019, 06:09:32 AM First post in ages but feel strongly enough. Why the hate for this pic? Especially from someone in TK’s position, why does there have to be an agenda, why would he not want his family around? Why are they hungry eyes? Jesus christ! Huh? Think you need to read my Post again. "Was somewhat amused by this photo on Twitter of new signing Wan Bissaka &, I assume, his family. Maybe Man U signed them all. One wag on Twitter added.... Wan bissaka 2 bissaka 3 bissaka 4" Not an ounce of hate, why on earth would you assume that? No mention of hungry eyes either. Though White Waistcoat does look like Wan's Agent in the making. Nothing wrong with that either. I thought the photo was fantastic, uplifting & joyous in every way. Black lad makes good, his whole family turn up for the photoshoot. How many times have you seen a similar photo in the Premier League? Almost never, I'd say. Everything about the photo made me smile. In a nice way. I have no idea what this implies either; Especially from someone in TK’s position What position is that? What "agenda" are you assuming? There's no agenda, just a nice photo, & me seeding the forum. You've completely misread my Post. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: scotty2hatty on July 05, 2019, 11:22:44 AM Obviously unnecessary to dig you out Tikay but your post following Arb's post (the one that people seem to have taken offence to) looks clearly in agreement/supportive of his hungry eyes point. I merely smirked at Arb's comments, no harm.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on July 05, 2019, 11:49:23 AM Without wishing to sound like Woodsey and Adz the world has gone mad if people are implying my post was in any shape or form racist. If a white kid from the streets of Liverpool was sitting there surrounded by his (extended) family i would have said the same. It is a well known fact in professional sport that extended family/'friends' and hangeroners send more athletes skint in the USA than virtually anything else.
Suppose its lucky i am not Danny Baker and i won't lose my career over something not remotely racist. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: scotty2hatty on July 06, 2019, 09:28:19 AM Without wishing to sound like Woodsey and Adz the world has gone mad if people are implying my post was in any shape or form racist. If a white kid from the streets of Liverpool was sitting there surrounded by his (extended) family i would have said the same. It is a well known fact in professional sport that extended family/'friends' and hangeroners send more athletes skint in the USA than virtually anything else. Suppose its lucky i am not Danny Baker and i won't lose my career over something not remotely racist. For clarity, I, in no way, thought you were racist. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on July 11, 2019, 06:45:44 AM (http://i.imgur.com/8M2G129.jpg) (https://imgur.com/8M2G129) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on July 26, 2019, 09:20:55 AM https://news.paddypower.com/football/2019/07/25/ed-woodward-negotiation-tactics/
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: booder on July 26, 2019, 09:36:57 AM https://news.paddypower.com/football/2019/07/25/ed-woodward-negotiation-tactics/ :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: TightEnd on August 09, 2019, 12:10:32 PM A year ago Manchester United were 7/1 for the title, their longest odds in the Premier League era. This season, they are 40/1.
What would represent a good season? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on August 09, 2019, 01:41:44 PM A year ago Manchester United were 7/1 for the title, their longest odds in the Premier League era. This season, they are 40/1. What would represent a good season? Champions League? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on August 09, 2019, 03:45:27 PM A year ago Manchester United were 7/1 for the title, their longest odds in the Premier League era. This season, they are 40/1. What would represent a good season? Champions League? Best chance of that might be via the Thursday Night Cup. A good season in the League? Staying in the Top 6 is a must. Top 4 would be good-ish. 40/1 though? What are the e/w terms? Is it just 2 places? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on August 09, 2019, 04:01:35 PM A year ago Manchester United were 7/1 for the title, their longest odds in the Premier League era. This season, they are 40/1. What would represent a good season? Champions League? Best chance of that might be via the Thursday Night Cup. A good season in the League? Staying in the Top 6 is a must. Top 4 would be good-ish. 40/1 though? What are the e/w terms? Is it just 2 places? Two places for the ew bet, you're 5/4 to finish in the top-4. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on August 09, 2019, 06:02:54 PM A year ago Manchester United were 7/1 for the title, their longest odds in the Premier League era. This season, they are 40/1. What would represent a good season? Champions League? Best chance of that might be via the Thursday Night Cup. A good season in the League? Staying in the Top 6 is a must. Top 4 would be good-ish. 40/1 though? What are the e/w terms? Is it just 2 places? Two places for the ew bet, you're 5/4 to finish in the top-4. No value at 5/4 is there? I’ll be happy to look back in 9 months time and wish i’d had a punt. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on August 09, 2019, 06:30:24 PM A year ago Manchester United were 7/1 for the title, their longest odds in the Premier League era. This season, they are 40/1. What would represent a good season? Champions League? Best chance of that might be via the Thursday Night Cup. A good season in the League? Staying in the Top 6 is a must. Top 4 would be good-ish. 40/1 though? What are the e/w terms? Is it just 2 places? Surprised it's as low as 40s tbh. Realistically, you have about as much chance as Wolves of getting anywhere near the title. The fact OGS is favourite for the sack race speaks volumes. Sadly, I do think you might scrape into the top 4, on account of post Hazard Chelsea regressing under Lampard and the transfer ban. Probs between you and Arsenal for 4th. Which is incred as it was only a few years ago when the title was between you and Arsenal most seasons. How the mighty have fallen :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on August 09, 2019, 06:33:01 PM Wasn't a bad run, though.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on August 09, 2019, 11:19:43 PM A year ago Manchester United were 7/1 for the title, their longest odds in the Premier League era. This season, they are 40/1. What would represent a good season? Champions League? Best chance of that might be via the Thursday Night Cup. A good season in the League? Staying in the Top 6 is a must. Top 4 would be good-ish. 40/1 though? What are the e/w terms? Is it just 2 places? Surprised it's as low as 40s tbh. Realistically, you have about as much chance as Wolves of getting anywhere near the title. The fact OGS is favourite for the sack race speaks volumes. Sadly, I do think you might scrape into the top 4, on account of post Hazard Chelsea regressing under Lampard and the transfer ban. Probs between you and Arsenal for 4th. Which is incred as it was only a few years ago when the title was between you and Arsenal most seasons. How the mighty have fallen :) We had a fabulous run. We haven’t fallen that far either. Were you at Wembley in ‘99 for the start of a rather prolonged recovery? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on August 10, 2019, 05:25:43 PM A year ago Manchester United were 7/1 for the title, their longest odds in the Premier League era. This season, they are 40/1. What would represent a good season? Champions League? Best chance of that might be via the Thursday Night Cup. A good season in the League? Staying in the Top 6 is a must. Top 4 would be good-ish. 40/1 though? What are the e/w terms? Is it just 2 places? Surprised it's as low as 40s tbh. Realistically, you have about as much chance as Wolves of getting anywhere near the title. The fact OGS is favourite for the sack race speaks volumes. Sadly, I do think you might scrape into the top 4, on account of post Hazard Chelsea regressing under Lampard and the transfer ban. Probs between you and Arsenal for 4th. Which is incred as it was only a few years ago when the title was between you and Arsenal most seasons. How the mighty have fallen :) We had a fabulous run. We haven’t fallen that far either. Were you at Wembley in ‘99 for the start of a rather prolonged recovery? Nah, Manchester City only started appealing to me around the 2008 time, not sure why. I was a diehard Chelsea fan before that. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on August 10, 2019, 10:58:40 PM A year ago Manchester United were 7/1 for the title, their longest odds in the Premier League era. This season, they are 40/1. What would represent a good season? Champions League? Best chance of that might be via the Thursday Night Cup. A good season in the League? Staying in the Top 6 is a must. Top 4 would be good-ish. 40/1 though? What are the e/w terms? Is it just 2 places? Surprised it's as low as 40s tbh. Realistically, you have about as much chance as Wolves of getting anywhere near the title. The fact OGS is favourite for the sack race speaks volumes. Sadly, I do think you might scrape into the top 4, on account of post Hazard Chelsea regressing under Lampard and the transfer ban. Probs between you and Arsenal for 4th. Which is incred as it was only a few years ago when the title was between you and Arsenal most seasons. How the mighty have fallen :) We had a fabulous run. We haven’t fallen that far either. Were you at Wembley in ‘99 for the start of a rather prolonged recovery? Nah, Manchester City only started appealing to me around the 2008 time, not sure why. I was a diehard Chelsea fan before that. ; ;joestrummer; ;joestrummer; ;joestrummer; Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on August 11, 2019, 06:43:02 PM Well, that was a half-decent start to the season.
Maguire and Wan-Bissaka looks like they’d been in the job for years. Pogba, although he lost possession too often, looked interested and the pass for Rashford’s second was pure class. As were Rashford’s two touches. Chelsea now know how much they depended on Hazard. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on September 06, 2019, 08:49:49 AM Blimey......
I fancy Mr Keane best not hold his breath awaiting that apology from Sir Alex. https://twitter.com/utdxtra/status/1169670234921472002 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: teddybloat on September 22, 2019, 10:10:20 PM interesting lip read here.
https://twitter.com/Garwain/status/1175818145778556930?s=20 phil jones' attitude matches his ability. what a chancer Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on September 22, 2019, 10:18:08 PM interesting lip read here. https://twitter.com/Garwain/status/1175818145778556930?s=20 phil jones' attitude matches his ability. what a chancer Mind the door doesn't hit you on the way out Phil. You had so much potential but didn't make the effort needed to bring it to the fore. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on September 22, 2019, 10:28:30 PM interesting lip read here. https://twitter.com/Garwain/status/1175818145778556930?s=20 phil jones' attitude matches his ability. what a chancer Mind the door doesn't hit you on the way out Phil. You had so much potential but didn't make the effort needed to bring it to the fore. Same as wez brown as soon as you marry a lap dancer you career is over effectively. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: teddybloat on September 22, 2019, 11:23:19 PM Can you imagine the standards that slob of a footballer sets in and around the club.
If he left United he'd never play another game of European football or play for a top half team. The players are rotten at United and that comedic mess of a defender is joking about ole getting sacked. All from the stands whilst looking like a 50 year bar fly who smokes 40 a day. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on September 23, 2019, 07:08:13 AM Can you imagine the standards that slob of a footballer sets in and around the club. If he left United he'd never play another game of European football or play for a top half team. The players are rotten at United and that comedic mess of a defender is joking about ole getting sacked. All from the stands whilst looking like a 50 year bar fly who smokes 40 a day. The transfer policy post SAF has been chaotic at best. Woodward has to bear much of the blame for that. We let Evans go and kept the doughboy. We sent Smalling off to Italy and kept the doughboy. It's no wonder that DeGea has been player of the year so often. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Juperjiper on September 23, 2019, 11:22:08 AM People actually believe the lip read? Lol
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Chompy on October 06, 2019, 05:52:11 PM I once saw Peterborough draw 0-0 with Halifax on a Tuesday night. It was about zero degress and it was so boring that me and a mate wound up having a Bovril drinking competition, which ended up about 7-7.
It was still better than this. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 06, 2019, 06:34:20 PM I once saw Peterborough draw 0-0 with Halifax on a Tuesday night. It was about zero degress and it was so boring that me and a mate wound up having a Bovril drinking competition, which ended up about 7-7. It was still better than this. Can’t argue with that. The quality of football you saw that night was probably better too. Tuanzebe looked ok though, and Maguire was our most threatening player when he came forward into midfield, Fred might as well pack his bags now. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on October 06, 2019, 08:44:34 PM Not so fiery Fred..
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 06, 2019, 10:44:58 PM Not so fiery Fred.. Damp squib Fred. Sideways or back passing Fred. He had so many touches in such good positions and did nothing effective with them Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on October 19, 2019, 04:37:50 PM Interesting line-up. I'm not sure what the formation will be - three at the back or Rodri at LB?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on October 19, 2019, 05:22:46 PM Interesting line-up. I'm not sure what the formation will be - three at the back or Rodri at LB? Oops wrong thread, my minces must be on the blink. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 20, 2019, 12:47:42 PM Games between us and LFC often produce results that are against the form. Hopefully today is in that trend.
A win by a 2 goal margin today moves us up to 7th It may not be likely, it may not happen, and I wouldn’t bet on it happening, but the gap between 6th and 18th is very small. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on October 20, 2019, 12:55:49 PM Games between us and LFC often produce results that are against the form. Hopefully today is in that trend. A win by a 2 goal margin today moves us up to 7th It may not be likely, it may not happen, and I wouldn’t bet on it happening, but the gap between 6th and 18th is very small. A more realistic 4-0 defeat puts you in the bottom five to add balance. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on October 20, 2019, 06:12:47 PM Fiery Fred having his best game by far that I have watched.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: RED-DOG on October 20, 2019, 06:39:18 PM Fiery Fred having his best game by far that I have watched. Commentator as Fred shoots with his other foot: "Left said Fred! Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 20, 2019, 07:09:49 PM Games between us and LFC often produce results that are against the form. Hopefully today is in that trend. A win by a 2 goal margin today moves us up to 7th It may not be likely, it may not happen, and I wouldn’t bet on it happening, but the gap between 6th and 18th is very small. A more realistic 4-0 defeat puts you in the bottom five to add balance. Thanks for pointing that out Arb. As it happens that was the most encouraging display for quite some time. Well worth a point, wouldn’t have been a travesty if we’d won. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 20, 2019, 08:50:22 PM Fiery Fred having his best game by far that I have watched. Fred and Perrera turned up today. Let’s see f they can repeat that effort against Norwich. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on October 20, 2019, 09:27:19 PM YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EWiDHy5HiU
Keane is superb. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on October 20, 2019, 09:28:34 PM Games between us and LFC often produce results that are against the form. Hopefully today is in that trend. A win by a 2 goal margin today moves us up to 7th It may not be likely, it may not happen, and I wouldn’t bet on it happening, but the gap between 6th and 18th is very small. A more realistic 4-0 defeat puts you in the bottom five to add balance. Thanks for pointing that out Arb. As it happens that was the most encouraging display for quite some time. Well worth a point, wouldn’t have been a travesty if we’d won. I enjoyed that today . Certainly deserved the point but a shame you didn't hold out for the win. VAR was fun as well :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on October 21, 2019, 02:05:40 PM AWB was getting so much space going forward, he really needed to do better. If he’d have had more confidence and quality on the day we could have really punished Liverpool’s dreadful first half performance.
Fred and Perrera really put a shift in and played just about as well as I think it’s possible for them to play. McT unfortunately didn’t have his best game, especially when he could have rolled James in 1v1 in the first half but had a game shot from edge of 18 yard box instead. Defence was solid, Young especially played very well. Cops for some very unnecessary flack a lot of times. Great to see Rashford on the scoresheet. That will do his confidence a world of good. Now if only he would stop jumping and ducking when the ball gets near his head we might have a player. James was class again. A real buzz when he gets the ball. He really is so quick but unlike rashford used to he can actually take the ball with him and not run past. Quality end product from him too.. he’ll have w great future. The obvious negative was that united probably played somewhere around their peak vs a Liverpool team firing at 3/10 and we still only scraped a draw. If the game goes on 5-10 mins longer we concede another, maybe more. It’s apparent how big the gulf in class is but end of the day we took a point and stopped their win streak. Good day. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 10, 2020, 05:57:32 PM Interesting take
I particularly liked this line about the Glazers a set of disengaged vulture capitalists for whom this grand old footballing house is a leaky roofed global ATM, the cash cow that just won’t die. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 19, 2020, 06:39:29 PM Not so fiery Fred.. Damp squib Fred. Sideways or back passing Fred. He had so many touches in such good positions and did nothing effective with them Different man now. Fred the Red Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: booder on January 23, 2020, 09:08:08 AM Time for another sad ?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on January 23, 2020, 10:58:36 AM Time for another sad ? Time for another Manager more like. Send for this guy before someone else snaffles him. (http://i.imgur.com/poh4Ix1.jpg) (https://imgur.com/poh4Ix1) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 12:15:41 PM I think they need to make a standard over the odds value wise signing that has become so standard for Man U in recent years because they are Man U, they are loaded and they can and sign Vardy. They need some leadership and experience in that dressing room, basically don't have a striker for the rest of the year and he won't cost as much as they were wiiling to over pay for Sanchez and others. He is a total grafter 100% of the time which is what most of the United dressing room aren't.
Leicester have shown at the right price they are happy to sell anyone to anyone (Man U are currently a direct rival and they still sold Maguire), Vardy would get a short term huge pension type deal (probably £350k a week) to retire on which he deserves and Man U get the final two years of him at the very top level (he surely has to start aging soon given his skill set). Seems a perfect win win win trade for all 3 parties for me. £60m and £350k a week for a 2-3 year deal. Chicken feed to the Man U money printing machine. Too much for Vardy and Leicester to turn down at this stage of his career. Plus the huge lol ego factor that Man U are buying past their prime players over the odds price wise from Leicester who have had his prime years after doing it themselves for decades to clubs would be a sharp reality check of where Man U are shopping currently. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 12:30:32 PM Or maybe the corporate plan is to stand pat in January and deliberately finish outside of the top 6 (to be able to play only once a week next season like sub par Chelsea and Leics teams did to win the title in recent years) so they have a huge scheduling edge next season to try and make the jump slowly back to the promised land via a top 4 finish next season. Ole gets time this year to experiment with any players he wants in the write off season. The new crop of kids are all a year older and more experienced next year etc etc. Given the behaviour last night and entitlement of most man u 'fans' would they be intelligent enough to realise finishing outside the top 6 this season is a big edge next season?
I wouldn't be against them tanking this season. It pretty standard in the NFL/NBA for top teams to tank and write off seasons (Golden State this season) to have a better edge the following season. Would be nice if Martial fancied turning up as the main man for a few months now though given he is paid to perform like the main man. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on January 23, 2020, 01:02:42 PM On a brighter note, to my admittedly easily-impressed eye this Brandon Williams kid is different gravy, he looks really special to me, especially for one who's barely 19 years old. (http://i.imgur.com/FbLqegf.jpg) (https://imgur.com/FbLqegf) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on January 23, 2020, 03:01:39 PM I think they need to make a standard over the odds value wise signing that has become so standard for Man U in recent years because they are Man U, they are loaded and they can and sign Vardy. They need some leadership and experience in that dressing room, basically don't have a striker for the rest of the year and he won't cost as much as they were wiiling to over pay for Sanchez and others. He is a total grafter 100% of the time which is what most of the United dressing room aren't. Leicester have shown at the right price they are happy to sell anyone to anyone (Man U are currently a direct rival and they still sold Maguire), Vardy would get a short term huge pension type deal (probably £350k a week) to retire on which he deserves and Man U get the final two years of him at the very top level (he surely has to start aging soon given his skill set). Seems a perfect win win win trade for all 3 parties for me. £60m and £350k a week for a 2-3 year deal. Chicken feed to the Man U money printing machine. Too much for Vardy and Leicester to turn down at this stage of his career. Plus the huge lol ego factor that Man U are buying past their prime players over the odds price wise from Leicester who have had his prime years after doing it themselves for decades to clubs would be a sharp reality check of where Man U are shopping currently. Leicester accepted Arsenal's £20M bid for Vardy near the end of Wenger's reign but he turned the move down. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 03:05:02 PM I think they need to make a standard over the odds value wise signing that has become so standard for Man U in recent years because they are Man U, they are loaded and they can and sign Vardy. They need some leadership and experience in that dressing room, basically don't have a striker for the rest of the year and he won't cost as much as they were wiiling to over pay for Sanchez and others. He is a total grafter 100% of the time which is what most of the United dressing room aren't. Leicester have shown at the right price they are happy to sell anyone to anyone (Man U are currently a direct rival and they still sold Maguire), Vardy would get a short term huge pension type deal (probably £350k a week) to retire on which he deserves and Man U get the final two years of him at the very top level (he surely has to start aging soon given his skill set). Seems a perfect win win win trade for all 3 parties for me. £60m and £350k a week for a 2-3 year deal. Chicken feed to the Man U money printing machine. Too much for Vardy and Leicester to turn down at this stage of his career. Plus the huge lol ego factor that Man U are buying past their prime players over the odds price wise from Leicester who have had his prime years after doing it themselves for decades to clubs would be a sharp reality check of where Man U are shopping currently. Leicester accepted Arsenal's £20M bid for Vardy near the end of Wenger's reign but he turned the move down. Arsenal barely offered him more wages wise than Leics did though. Man Utd could blow him out of the water wages wise for a 2.5 year contract. Maybe it wouldn't take £60m to get him then but what i am saying is if MU aren't in tank this season mode then they need to break the bank for instant goals to compete this year otherwise they could easily finish 8-10th this season if they are not careful without MR. Man U have a different 'premier' price list for players (esp from Leics) in their current climate of decline. Given Vardy's performance this season even at his age i think it would take Leicester a lot more than £20m to sell him right now. Leicester are a club where everyone has a price and there is only one club in the EPL who don't care about price and that is why this is a perfect storm potentially. You could easily say the same about Spurs and Jose. He would be a typical 'at his peak' purchase for Jose with Kane out but i doubt Levy would given give the numbers and balance sheet hit a second thought. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 03:41:04 PM .
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 23, 2020, 04:11:47 PM . The first good point you’ve made in this thread for a long time ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 04:16:14 PM . The first good point you’ve made in this thread for a long time ;) ? Feel free to say what i have said that doesn't make any sense. Which of the two is it? Are you tanking this season or all out for a top 4 spot. Falling into the 'death trap' of the 5th/6th spots with Thursday night football which doesn't help attract players at all is the nut worse scenario for your long term development. If you are tanking to avoid Thurs nights for next season i couldn't argue with that. If you are not tanking then you need a top class instant goals striker to have any chance of making the top 4. I think your squad is so bad currently you could go for the top 4 and buy vardy or someone of similar proven EPL quality and still end up effectively 'tanking' by finishing outside the top 6 if you run bad and/or other teams run good for the rest of the season. Probably going to need a record low 4th spot points total to get CL football next season as well. Chelsea are regressing from their fast start relative to expectations with their kids. It is all up for grabs. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51216217 Obviously this whole discussion is based on him being fit by the end of Jan. Given the above report it would seem that is possible. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on January 23, 2020, 07:29:18 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 07:37:49 PM I got his 'gag' but would like to know what man u fans are wanting out of the season hence my questions.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on January 23, 2020, 07:54:51 PM I am curious to know if any of them really thought at any time or still think that OGS is actually the right man for the job.
To me, a somewhat impartial observer he always looked way out of his depth, even after his good start. I reckon I could have replaced maureen and improved the atmosphere/results at OT. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 08:19:06 PM I am curious to know if any of them really thought at any time or still think that OGS is actually the right man for the job. To me, a somewhat impartial observer he always looked way out of his depth, even after his good start. I reckon I could have replaced maureen and improved the atmosphere/results at OT. We know never know tbh because he is managing a mid table quality squad of players in the modern day EPL. He is overachieving in 5th currently but its a 'fake 5th' because of the tiny points total this season. He is probably achieving what he should be with this squad but it won't be enough for the plastics who demand success. I get the feeling the club are using him as a 'cheap' short term fix to bring the kids on then when they are closer to their prime a heavy hitter will come in and take over which is why it makes sense to 'tank' this season for me. They have an roughly equal chance of getting champions league next year from the Europa league or thee EPL top 4 spot on the betting. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 23, 2020, 08:25:21 PM I got his 'gag' but would like to know what man u fans are wanting out of the season hence my questions. Obviously buying a striker to keep us scoring seems attractive, but Leicester play to Vardy’s strengths and I’m not sure we can adjust to suit him quickly enough to make it worthwhile. Even if Brendan would be at all willing to let him go. I’ve been a fan for 50+ years so short term results are less important to me than seeing a team which has a core of home grown players in it. Over 4000 games across 73 years our match day squad has included at least one academy graduate. Rashford burst onto the scene as a result of Martial injuring himself in the warm up and the Rashford story began. Time for Greenwood to take his chance as a starter maybe. I can’t see the club opting to tank the season, but it wouldn’t be the worst thing to happen if it did. As an eternal optimist I still have hopes of a Europa win and CL football next year. Yeah, I know, but... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 23, 2020, 08:29:51 PM I am curious to know if any of them really thought at any time or still think that OGS is actually the right man for the job. To me, a somewhat impartial observer he always looked way out of his depth, even after his good start. I reckon I could have replaced maureen and improved the atmosphere/results at OT. We know never know tbh because he is managing a mid table quality squad of players in the modern day EPL. He is overachieving in 5th currently but its a 'fake 5th' because of the tiny points total this season. He is probably achieving what he should be with this squad but it won't be enough for the plastics who demand success. I get the feeling the club are using him as a 'cheap' short term fix to bring the kids on then when they are closer to their prime a heavy hitter will come in and take over which is why it makes sense to 'tank' this season for me. They have an roughly equal chance of getting champions league next year from the Europa league or thee EPL top 4 spot on the betting. Sod the plastics, OGS/Phelan/Carrick have what is needed for me. PS Ralph, you could have improved the atmosphere and results at The Library too. It ill behoves you to crow about OGS when Arteta is still in his honeymoon period. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 08:36:11 PM Given the equal likeliehood of each outcome i think the optimal approach is to 100% focus on the EL, tank the league and either way you don't have to play Thurs night next year with the same chance of being in the CL.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on January 23, 2020, 08:57:29 PM I got his 'gag' but would like to know what man u fans are wanting out of the season hence my questions. Obviously buying a striker to keep us scoring seems attractive, but Leicester play to Vardy’s strengths and I’m not sure we can adjust to suit him quickly enough to make it worthwhile. Even if Brendan would be at all willing to let him go. I’ve been a fan for 50+ years so short term results are less important to me than seeing a team which has a core of home grown players in it. Over 4000 games across 73 years our match day squad has included at least one academy graduate. Rashford burst onto the scene as a result of Martial injuring himself in the warm up and the Rashford story began. Time for Greenwood to take his chance as a starter maybe. I can’t see the club opting to tank the season, but it wouldn’t be the worst thing to happen if it did. As an eternal optimist I still have hopes of a Europa win and CL football next year. Yeah, I know, but... Fans only care about this homegrown soppiness when they ain't winning anything. We were the same with SWP when we were shite. When you're winning trophies and successful, you really don't care if they are from Stockport or Sudan. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on January 23, 2020, 09:02:01 PM I am curious to know if any of them really thought at any time or still think that OGS is actually the right man for the job. To me, a somewhat impartial observer he always looked way out of his depth, even after his good start. I reckon I could have replaced maureen and improved the atmosphere/results at OT. We know never know tbh because he is managing a mid table quality squad of players in the modern day EPL. He is overachieving in 5th currently but its a 'fake 5th' because of the tiny points total this season. He is probably achieving what he should be with this squad but it won't be enough for the plastics who demand success. I get the feeling the club are using him as a 'cheap' short term fix to bring the kids on then when they are closer to their prime a heavy hitter will come in and take over which is why it makes sense to 'tank' this season for me. They have an roughly equal chance of getting champions league next year from the Europa league or thee EPL top 4 spot on the betting. Sod the plastics, OGS/Phelan/Carrick have what is needed for me. PS Ralph, you could have improved the atmosphere and results at The Library too. It ill behoves you to crow about OGS when Arteta is still in his honeymoon period. Even the great man himself said this week that we lost our soul when we left The Library. I'm hardly crowing David, as we don't even have a string of good results to crow about bar that win against your lot. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 09:17:09 PM Wolves goal moves them into 5th! Would a United fan prefer Wolves to win here to busto the scousers unbeaten streak or stay in the top 5 with a Liverpool win?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 23, 2020, 10:49:07 PM Wolves goal moves them into 5th! Would a United fan prefer Wolves to win here to busto the scousers unbeaten streak or stay in the top 5 with a Liverpool win? I’d take 10th if it meant Liverpool not winning the league. I’d take 17th if Leicester got it instead. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 23, 2020, 10:52:24 PM I got his 'gag' but would like to know what man u fans are wanting out of the season hence my questions. Obviously buying a striker to keep us scoring seems attractive, but Leicester play to Vardy’s strengths and I’m not sure we can adjust to suit him quickly enough to make it worthwhile. Even if Brendan would be at all willing to let him go. I’ve been a fan for 50+ years so short term results are less important to me than seeing a team which has a core of home grown players in it. Over 4000 games across 73 years our match day squad has included at least one academy graduate. Rashford burst onto the scene as a result of Martial injuring himself in the warm up and the Rashford story began. Time for Greenwood to take his chance as a starter maybe. I can’t see the club opting to tank the season, but it wouldn’t be the worst thing to happen if it did. As an eternal optimist I still have hopes of a Europa win and CL football next year. Yeah, I know, but... Fans only care about this homegrown soppiness when they ain't winning anything. We were the same with SWP when we were shite. When you're winning trophies and successful, you really don't care if they are from Stockport or Sudan. Hogwash. Besides SWP wasn’t homegrown. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 11:02:15 PM Liverpool need 27 points from 15 games or Man City win out for them not to win the league. It is not a big price they win their next 9 games if you look at the fixture list for them.
WHam x 2, Norwich, Soton, Watford, Bournemouth, Everton, Palace and the ninth game (away at Man City). It isn't a huge price they go into Man City game with 8 on the bounce. They basically have to have Arsenal form for the rest of the season even if MC win out. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on January 23, 2020, 11:38:11 PM I got his 'gag' but would like to know what man u fans are wanting out of the season hence my questions. Obviously buying a striker to keep us scoring seems attractive, but Leicester play to Vardy’s strengths and I’m not sure we can adjust to suit him quickly enough to make it worthwhile. Even if Brendan would be at all willing to let him go. I’ve been a fan for 50+ years so short term results are less important to me than seeing a team which has a core of home grown players in it. Over 4000 games across 73 years our match day squad has included at least one academy graduate. Rashford burst onto the scene as a result of Martial injuring himself in the warm up and the Rashford story began. Time for Greenwood to take his chance as a starter maybe. I can’t see the club opting to tank the season, but it wouldn’t be the worst thing to happen if it did. As an eternal optimist I still have hopes of a Europa win and CL football next year. Yeah, I know, but... Fans only care about this homegrown soppiness when they ain't winning anything. We were the same with SWP when we were shite. When you're winning trophies and successful, you really don't care if they are from Stockport or Sudan. Hogwash. Besides SWP wasn’t homegrown. No he wasn't. We only picked him up cos Forest deemed him to be too small. Their loss was our gain. Ultimately, why would anyone really care where Player X got their football education? There are no real tangible benefits once you've crossed the white line. This whole 'united have had an academy player in the squad for 8 million games in a row' stuff is obv something you're proud of, but if you were running away with the league like Liverpool are, or City were 2 years ago, I bet you wouldn't even be batting an eyelid at that stat. I guess when you've got an utter laughing stock of a manager and squad, you'll cling onto anything that takes your attention off the guff being served up on the pitch. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on January 23, 2020, 11:39:42 PM Man City's next 8 EPL games are as follows just for balance: Tough to pick a softer and harder schedule for the two contenders. The fixture computer certainly hasn't been kind to City. Their last 6 games are all against bottom sides when effectively they will be totally meaningless. Locked in the top 4 but can't win the league. This probably makes them a cracking bet for the other cups. They are probably worth a sell on the spreads for their total season points as they will probably go off a lot bigger for some of these meaningless games at the end of the season than they should be.
Spurs away WHam home Leics away Arsenal home Man Utd Away Burnley home Chelsea away Liverpool home It's totally possible the league is over in March way before the Liverpool Man City clash. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 24, 2020, 08:57:38 AM I got his 'gag' but would like to know what man u fans are wanting out of the season hence my questions. Obviously buying a striker to keep us scoring seems attractive, but Leicester play to Vardy’s strengths and I’m not sure we can adjust to suit him quickly enough to make it worthwhile. Even if Brendan would be at all willing to let him go. I’ve been a fan for 50+ years so short term results are less important to me than seeing a team which has a core of home grown players in it. Over 4000 games across 73 years our match day squad has included at least one academy graduate. Rashford burst onto the scene as a result of Martial injuring himself in the warm up and the Rashford story began. Time for Greenwood to take his chance as a starter maybe. I can’t see the club opting to tank the season, but it wouldn’t be the worst thing to happen if it did. As an eternal optimist I still have hopes of a Europa win and CL football next year. Yeah, I know, but... Fans only care about this homegrown soppiness when they ain't winning anything. We were the same with SWP when we were shite. When you're winning trophies and successful, you really don't care if they are from Stockport or Sudan. Hogwash. Besides SWP wasn’t homegrown. No he wasn't. We only picked him up cos Forest deemed him to be too small. Their loss was our gain. Ultimately, why would anyone really care where Player X got their football education? There are no real tangible benefits once you've crossed the white line. This whole 'united have had an academy player in the squad for 8 million games in a row' stuff is obv something you're proud of, but if you were running away with the league like Liverpool are, or City were 2 years ago, I bet you wouldn't even be batting an eyelid at that stat. I guess when you've got an utter laughing stock of a manager and squad, you'll cling onto anything that takes your attention off the guff being served up on the pitch. I guess the bitterness of having been the joke yourself for so long never really goes away. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on January 24, 2020, 08:19:10 PM I got his 'gag' but would like to know what man u fans are wanting out of the season hence my questions. Obviously buying a striker to keep us scoring seems attractive, but Leicester play to Vardy’s strengths and I’m not sure we can adjust to suit him quickly enough to make it worthwhile. Even if Brendan would be at all willing to let him go. I’ve been a fan for 50+ years so short term results are less important to me than seeing a team which has a core of home grown players in it. Over 4000 games across 73 years our match day squad has included at least one academy graduate. Rashford burst onto the scene as a result of Martial injuring himself in the warm up and the Rashford story began. Time for Greenwood to take his chance as a starter maybe. I can’t see the club opting to tank the season, but it wouldn’t be the worst thing to happen if it did. As an eternal optimist I still have hopes of a Europa win and CL football next year. Yeah, I know, but... Fans only care about this homegrown soppiness when they ain't winning anything. We were the same with SWP when we were shite. When you're winning trophies and successful, you really don't care if they are from Stockport or Sudan. Hogwash. Besides SWP wasn’t homegrown. No he wasn't. We only picked him up cos Forest deemed him to be too small. Their loss was our gain. Ultimately, why would anyone really care where Player X got their football education? There are no real tangible benefits once you've crossed the white line. This whole 'united have had an academy player in the squad for 8 million games in a row' stuff is obv something you're proud of, but if you were running away with the league like Liverpool are, or City were 2 years ago, I bet you wouldn't even be batting an eyelid at that stat. I guess when you've got an utter laughing stock of a manager and squad, you'll cling onto anything that takes your attention off the guff being served up on the pitch. I guess the bitterness of having been the joke yourself for so long never really goes away. Yeah we were a joke for many many years, but at least we knew we were a joke. united fans can be in as much denial as they like, but the joke is now them. Joke manager Joke owners Joke players Now its your turn so embrace it like we did, don't deny it. You'd look very silly indeed if you tried to deny it. Mind the gap. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 24, 2020, 09:10:23 PM I got his 'gag' but would like to know what man u fans are wanting out of the season hence my questions. Obviously buying a striker to keep us scoring seems attractive, but Leicester play to Vardy’s strengths and I’m not sure we can adjust to suit him quickly enough to make it worthwhile. Even if Brendan would be at all willing to let him go. I’ve been a fan for 50+ years so short term results are less important to me than seeing a team which has a core of home grown players in it. Over 4000 games across 73 years our match day squad has included at least one academy graduate. Rashford burst onto the scene as a result of Martial injuring himself in the warm up and the Rashford story began. Time for Greenwood to take his chance as a starter maybe. I can’t see the club opting to tank the season, but it wouldn’t be the worst thing to happen if it did. As an eternal optimist I still have hopes of a Europa win and CL football next year. Yeah, I know, but... Fans only care about this homegrown soppiness when they ain't winning anything. We were the same with SWP when we were shite. When you're winning trophies and successful, you really don't care if they are from Stockport or Sudan. Hogwash. Besides SWP wasn’t homegrown. No he wasn't. We only picked him up cos Forest deemed him to be too small. Their loss was our gain. Ultimately, why would anyone really care where Player X got their football education? There are no real tangible benefits once you've crossed the white line. This whole 'united have had an academy player in the squad for 8 million games in a row' stuff is obv something you're proud of, but if you were running away with the league like Liverpool are, or City were 2 years ago, I bet you wouldn't even be batting an eyelid at that stat. I guess when you've got an utter laughing stock of a manager and squad, you'll cling onto anything that takes your attention off the guff being served up on the pitch. I guess the bitterness of having been the joke yourself for so long never really goes away. Yeah we were a joke for many many years, but at least we knew we were a joke. united fans can be in as much denial as they like, but the joke is now them. Joke manager Joke owners Joke players Now its your turn so embrace it like we did, don't deny it. You'd look very silly indeed if you tried to deny it. Mind the gap. Can’t hide from the reality of our current and recent position. Since SAF retired we’ve only won one FA Cup, one League Cup and one Europa League. Joke. Dropped as low as 7th in the PL too. Joke. Recruitment policy in the Woodward era? Joke. None of them are as good a joke as 7 managers in less than 10 years though. Nor as funny as time spent in Division Three. Can we get to be that amusing? Maybe, but it feels very unlikely. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on January 24, 2020, 10:36:59 PM I got his 'gag' but would like to know what man u fans are wanting out of the season hence my questions. Obviously buying a striker to keep us scoring seems attractive, but Leicester play to Vardy’s strengths and I’m not sure we can adjust to suit him quickly enough to make it worthwhile. Even if Brendan would be at all willing to let him go. I’ve been a fan for 50+ years so short term results are less important to me than seeing a team which has a core of home grown players in it. Over 4000 games across 73 years our match day squad has included at least one academy graduate. Rashford burst onto the scene as a result of Martial injuring himself in the warm up and the Rashford story began. Time for Greenwood to take his chance as a starter maybe. I can’t see the club opting to tank the season, but it wouldn’t be the worst thing to happen if it did. As an eternal optimist I still have hopes of a Europa win and CL football next year. Yeah, I know, but... Fans only care about this homegrown soppiness when they ain't winning anything. We were the same with SWP when we were shite. When you're winning trophies and successful, you really don't care if they are from Stockport or Sudan. Hogwash. Besides SWP wasn’t homegrown. No he wasn't. We only picked him up cos Forest deemed him to be too small. Their loss was our gain. Ultimately, why would anyone really care where Player X got their football education? There are no real tangible benefits once you've crossed the white line. This whole 'united have had an academy player in the squad for 8 million games in a row' stuff is obv something you're proud of, but if you were running away with the league like Liverpool are, or City were 2 years ago, I bet you wouldn't even be batting an eyelid at that stat. I guess when you've got an utter laughing stock of a manager and squad, you'll cling onto anything that takes your attention off the guff being served up on the pitch. I guess the bitterness of having been the joke yourself for so long never really goes away. Yeah we were a joke for many many years, but at least we knew we were a joke. united fans can be in as much denial as they like, but the joke is now them. Joke manager Joke owners Joke players Now its your turn so embrace it like we did, don't deny it. You'd look very silly indeed if you tried to deny it. Mind the gap. Can’t hide from the reality of our current and recent position. Since SAF retired we’ve only won one FA Cup, one League Cup and one Europa League. Joke. Dropped as low as 7th in the PL too. Joke. Recruitment policy in the Woodward era? Joke. None of them are as good a joke as 7 managers in less than 10 years though. Nor as funny as time spent in Division Three. Can we get to be that amusing? Maybe, but it feels very unlikely. Division 3? The 1960's called, they want their decade back. Is it still 2 points for a win? Mind the gap. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 06, 2020, 07:41:36 AM We love them
We mourn for them Unlucky boys of red Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on March 04, 2020, 11:04:05 AM I must say you seem to hace acquired a gem in Bruno - he's got the whole team balanced and energized.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on March 04, 2020, 06:14:07 PM I must say you seem to hace acquired a gem in Bruno - he's got the whole team balanced and energized. He’s been a breath of fresh air Ralph. Fred appears to have started to fire up a bit too. There are encouraging signs in a lot of areas. Not least the fact that the last few games have been reminiscent of the teams of yore. Our defence has had more than it’s share of criticism this season, yet we have conceded less than everyone bar Liverpool, City and Sheffield United. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on March 08, 2020, 06:36:43 PM That went well.
No doubt hhfyhhhlllll will be along soon to point out that City are still a long way ahead of us in the league... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 08, 2020, 06:38:16 PM That went well. No doubt hhfyhhhlllll will be along soon to point out that City are still a long way ahead of us in the league... Mind the gap. ;) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 08, 2020, 06:48:28 PM In all seriousness both teams looked poor, we gifted you 2 goals but don't think either team pulled up many trees. One of the worst derbies of recent memory.
It's such an insignificant fixture for us (just like it used to be for you 10+ years ago, but now it's your cup final whereas it used to be ours), much bigger fish to fry on the horizon, and I think that showed in how lacklustre we were. It's genuinely like playing Everton or Burnley these days when there is nothing riding on it (apart from bragging rights) like today. Always disappointing to lose a derby but it's a very meh feeling. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on October 05, 2020, 08:15:53 PM I must confess to refraining from posting this yesterday as I understand how real fans must feel after a game like that.
The question is whether it's mere coincidence that the performances were so much better when Pogba was injured for ~6-months. He is clearly a Rolls-Royce of a player/athelete - but is he possibly a disruptive/negative influence on the team? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on October 05, 2020, 11:59:42 PM I must confess to refraining from posting this yesterday as I understand how real fans must feel after a game like that. The question is whether it's mere coincidence that the performances were so much better when Pogba was injured for ~6-months. He is clearly a Rolls-Royce of a player/athelete - but is he possibly a disruptive/negative influence on the team? We're consistently a much better team without him albeit with a slightly lower top level. The team would benefit from his departure, but I can't see it happening any time soon. He's one of very few 'superstars' United have and we're unlikely to pull more in unless there are drastic changes. Pogba aside we really really needed a big transfer window. We didn't get it. LB position been strengthened thankfully but still lacking at CB and RW. Gutted we didn't get Sancho but glad we didn't get Dembele in. Bad attitude, didn't want to come. Would have been Di Maria v2. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 06, 2020, 12:27:56 PM We’re short of at least one sad in the title.
Losing 6-1 to Spurs fades into insignificance compared to the ineptitude of Woodward and whoever else is supposed to be handling transfers. Still, freak results happen, and at least both our and City’s recent big losses were against Top 6 teams. Must be really galling for LFC fans to not be able to rub it in. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 13, 2021, 03:50:31 PM We’re short of at least one sad in the title. Losing 6-1 to Spurs fades into insignificance compared to the ineptitude of Woodward and whoever else is supposed to be handling transfers. Still, freak results happen, and at least both our and City’s recent big losses were against Top 6 teams. Must be really galling for LFC fans to not be able to rub it in. It’s a funny old game ... Unbeaten in the league since that horror show and currently top of the league. Still not a fan of Woodward, but over the last few months there have been some periods of play that made me want to call my Dad and share the joy ☹️ He would have loved Bruno. Not that we’re quite the one-man team that is being suggested. Roll on Sunday and whatever the result we will still be in contention. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on January 14, 2021, 10:57:53 AM Cant help but be pleased for Solskjaer, seems like one of lifes good guys.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on January 14, 2021, 11:38:44 AM Cant help but be pleased for Solskjaer, seems like one of lifes good guys. True this, think he has had the rub of the green this season, but am genuinely pleased for him. I just looked up the xG table to see how lucky he had been, and the answer is quite a bit, but not massively so. xG still has Manchester United in 3rd. https://understat.com/league/EPL (https://understat.com/league/EPL) As an aside Sheffield United, Brighton, Chelsea and Fulham are the teams that have run bad, and none have lost faith in their manager yet. West Brom really looked doomed, and Newcastle shoild be in the relegation scrap, though we knew that already. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 15, 2021, 09:01:56 AM Cant help but be pleased for Solskjaer, seems like one of lifes good guys. Sam Wallace in the Telegraph described him as having a mood barometer naturally set to somewhere between last day of school term and chips for tea. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on January 15, 2021, 09:39:10 AM Cant help but be pleased for Solskjaer, seems like one of lifes good guys. Sam Wallace in the Telegraph described him as having a mood barometer naturally set to somewhere between last day of school term and chips for tea. Haha, thats spot on Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on January 15, 2021, 11:34:49 AM Cant help but be pleased for Solskjaer, seems like one of lifes good guys. Absolutely. He still commands the full support of the Manchester City fanbase. Don't think this was a good look for him: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2020/02/14/ole-gunnar-solskjaer-not-fit-lead-manchester-united-says-woman/ Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on January 15, 2021, 11:45:49 AM We’re short of at least one sad in the title. Losing 6-1 to Spurs fades into insignificance compared to the ineptitude of Woodward and whoever else is supposed to be handling transfers. Still, freak results happen, and at least both our and City’s recent big losses were against Top 6 teams. Must be really galling for LFC fans to not be able to rub it in. Your unbeaten run started after the later Arsenal defeat and not the Spurs mauling. Still mightily impressive results since then if not always performance with W9 Dr2 L0 since then. Value at 7/1 for the title? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on January 15, 2021, 11:56:18 AM Cant help but be pleased for Solskjaer, seems like one of lifes good guys. True this, think he has had the rub of the green this season, but am genuinely pleased for him. I just looked up the xG table to see how lucky he had been, and the answer is quite a bit, but not massively so. xG still has Manchester United in 3rd. https://understat.com/league/EPL (https://understat.com/league/EPL) As an aside Sheffield United, Brighton, Chelsea and Fulham are the teams that have run bad, and none have lost faith in their manager yet. West Brom really looked doomed, and Newcastle shoild be in the relegation scrap, though we knew that already. United and City were impacted more than anyone by the lack of preseason due late involvement in European comps (City's pre-season started on 14/9 and the first league fixture was 21/9) meaning both so far off the pace in the early weeks. If you recalculate the understat table with a 17/10 start date (after the 1st in season international break) you see a different picture - United/City 1st and 2nd on points & City/United 1st and 2nd on expected points. Credit particularly to United for that. Happy for them to finish 2nd ahead of Liverpool if City go on to win it :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 15, 2021, 12:19:48 PM Cant help but be pleased for Solskjaer, seems like one of lifes good guys. Absolutely. He still commands the full support of the Manchester City fanbase. Don't think this was a good look for him: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2020/02/14/ole-gunnar-solskjaer-not-fit-lead-manchester-united-says-woman/ No, it wasn’t. Kyle Walker still getting games. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on January 15, 2021, 02:21:44 PM What's Walker got to do with anything? He's an idiot. Meanwhile, the PE teacher is presented as some nice guy when really deep down he is a ****. Anyway, I was generally saying nice things about United ;) Just seen Fernandes has won Player of the Month for the 4th time. Made me smile. He joins this group of PL greats who have also won it 4 times: Dennis Bergkamp Thierry Henry Frank Lampard Cristiano Ronaldo Paul Scholes Alan Shearer[d] Jamie Vardy Only these ahead of him: Rooney 5 RVP 5 Gerrard 6 Kane 6 Aguero7 And looking at those players you'll understand why it made me smile. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on January 15, 2021, 05:32:35 PM Welcome back, Archer!
Definitely a much missed poster* *Even if you're a City fan :) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on January 15, 2021, 07:24:45 PM I am sure the PE teacher is a **** given he is a PE teacher. But which PE teacher and what connection does he have with Kyle Walker?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 16, 2021, 12:00:57 PM What's Walker got to do with anything? He's an idiot. Meanwhile, the PE teacher is presented as some nice guy when really deep down he is a ****. Anyway, I was generally saying nice things about United ;) Just seen Fernandes has won Player of the Month for the 4th time. Made me smile. He joins this group of PL greats who have also won it 4 times: Dennis Bergkamp Thierry Henry Frank Lampard Cristiano Ronaldo Paul Scholes Alan Shearer[d] Jamie Vardy Only these ahead of him: Rooney 5 RVP 5 Gerrard 6 Kane 6 Aguero7 And looking at those players you'll understand why it made me smile. Bruno has been a massive influence, but four time player of the month in basically one season is probably OTT. I’m surprised at the absentees from the list. No KdB, no VvD, no Yaya, no Keane, no David Silva, no Vierra. But they had a lot more competition in their prime. Who are you cheering for tomorrow? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on January 16, 2021, 03:11:12 PM Welcome back, Archer! Definitely a much missed poster* *Even if you're a City fan :) :)up :)up Need hyy to stir things up Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on January 16, 2021, 03:16:24 PM I am sure the PE teacher is a **** given he is a PE teacher. But which PE teacher and what connection does he have with Kyle Walker? PE teacher is one of the friendly nicknames given to Ole by certain northern football supporters and pops introduced walker to the thread not me.... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on January 16, 2021, 03:28:09 PM What's Walker got to do with anything? He's an idiot. Meanwhile, the PE teacher is presented as some nice guy when really deep down he is a ****. Anyway, I was generally saying nice things about United ;) Just seen Fernandes has won Player of the Month for the 4th time. Made me smile. He joins this group of PL greats who have also won it 4 times: Dennis Bergkamp Thierry Henry Frank Lampard Cristiano Ronaldo Paul Scholes Alan Shearer[d] Jamie Vardy Only these ahead of him: Rooney 5 RVP 5 Gerrard 6 Kane 6 Aguero7 And looking at those players you'll understand why it made me smile. Bruno has been a massive influence, but four time player of the month in basically one season is probably OTT. I’m surprised at the absentees from the list. No KdB, no VvD, no Yaya, no Keane, no David Silva, no Vierra. But they had a lot more competition in their prime. Who are you cheering for tomorrow? KDB 0 Yaya 0 Silva 1 VVD 1 Keane 2 Vierra 0 Fernandes 4 lol ----------------- Draw>United win>Liverpool win Both United & Liverpool dropping 2 points is best. If we go on to beat Palace we'll be 1 point ahead of Liverpool with game in hand and 2 points behind you with the same game in hand. So, poll position for top spot as we approach the half way spot of the season. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on January 16, 2021, 03:30:43 PM Welcome back, Archer! Definitely a much missed poster* *Even if you're a City fan :) :)up :)up Need hyy to stir things up Definitely! Handy to have him around so he can give us the behind the scenes on flights starting up, too ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 16, 2021, 08:05:51 PM What's Walker got to do with anything? He's an idiot. Meanwhile, the PE teacher is presented as some nice guy when really deep down he is a ****. Anyway, I was generally saying nice things about United ;) Just seen Fernandes has won Player of the Month for the 4th time. Made me smile. He joins this group of PL greats who have also won it 4 times: Dennis Bergkamp Thierry Henry Frank Lampard Cristiano Ronaldo Paul Scholes Alan Shearer[d] Jamie Vardy Only these ahead of him: Rooney 5 RVP 5 Gerrard 6 Kane 6 Aguero7 And looking at those players you'll understand why it made me smile. Bruno has been a massive influence, but four time player of the month in basically one season is probably OTT. I’m surprised at the absentees from the list. No KdB, no VvD, no Yaya, no Keane, no David Silva, no Vierra. But they had a lot more competition in their prime. Who are you cheering for tomorrow? KDB 0 Yaya 0 Silva 1 VVD 1 Keane 2 Vierra 0 Fernandes 4 lol ----------------- Draw>United win>Liverpool win Both United & Liverpool dropping 2 points is best. If we go on to beat Palace we'll be 1 point ahead of Liverpool with game in hand and 2 points behind you with the same game in hand. So, poll position for top spot as we approach the half way spot of the season. I agree with you on the player of the month stuff, but apparently the only players in Europe with more ‘goal involvements’ than Bruno in the period since he arrived in the EPL are CR7, Messi, and Lewandowski... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on January 16, 2021, 11:48:34 PM Cant help but be pleased for Solskjaer, seems like one of lifes good guys. Absolutely. He still commands the full support of the Manchester City fanbase. Don't think this was a good look for him: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2020/02/14/ole-gunnar-solskjaer-not-fit-lead-manchester-united-says-woman/ Genuinely think abuse and violence against women is one of the major scourges that never gets sufficient attention but dont really expect employers and managers to act as police judge and jury when someone is accused. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on January 17, 2021, 12:02:42 PM What's Walker got to do with anything? He's an idiot. Meanwhile, the PE teacher is presented as some nice guy when really deep down he is a ****. Anyway, I was generally saying nice things about United ;) Just seen Fernandes has won Player of the Month for the 4th time. Made me smile. He joins this group of PL greats who have also won it 4 times: Dennis Bergkamp Thierry Henry Frank Lampard Cristiano Ronaldo Paul Scholes Alan Shearer[d] Jamie Vardy Only these ahead of him: Rooney 5 RVP 5 Gerrard 6 Kane 6 Aguero7 And looking at those players you'll understand why it made me smile. Bruno has been a massive influence, but four time player of the month in basically one season is probably OTT. I’m surprised at the absentees from the list. No KdB, no VvD, no Yaya, no Keane, no David Silva, no Vierra. But they had a lot more competition in their prime. Who are you cheering for tomorrow? KDB 0 Yaya 0 Silva 1 VVD 1 Keane 2 Vierra 0 Fernandes 4 lol ----------------- Draw>United win>Liverpool win Both United & Liverpool dropping 2 points is best. If we go on to beat Palace we'll be 1 point ahead of Liverpool with game in hand and 2 points behind you with the same game in hand. So, poll position for top spot as we approach the half way spot of the season. I agree with you on the player of the month stuff, but apparently the only players in Europe with more ‘goal involvements’ than Bruno in the period since he arrived in the EPL are CR7, Messi, and Lewandowski... Fun stat if true. 27G+17A in 3854mins is impressive. 15 penalties included in the 27 goals distorts the numbers somewhat. Salah was at 43G + 15A in 17/18. with just the 1 pen. Don't want to dismiss his influence though. Obviously a fantastic player and massively impactful for you so can totally understand the love-in. You've needed it for while. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 17, 2021, 02:58:37 PM What's Walker got to do with anything? He's an idiot. Meanwhile, the PE teacher is presented as some nice guy when really deep down he is a ****. Anyway, I was generally saying nice things about United ;) Just seen Fernandes has won Player of the Month for the 4th time. Made me smile. He joins this group of PL greats who have also won it 4 times: Dennis Bergkamp Thierry Henry Frank Lampard Cristiano Ronaldo Paul Scholes Alan Shearer[d] Jamie Vardy Only these ahead of him: Rooney 5 RVP 5 Gerrard 6 Kane 6 Aguero7 And looking at those players you'll understand why it made me smile. Bruno has been a massive influence, but four time player of the month in basically one season is probably OTT. I’m surprised at the absentees from the list. No KdB, no VvD, no Yaya, no Keane, no David Silva, no Vierra. But they had a lot more competition in their prime. Who are you cheering for tomorrow? KDB 0 Yaya 0 Silva 1 VVD 1 Keane 2 Vierra 0 Fernandes 4 lol ----------------- Draw>United win>Liverpool win Both United & Liverpool dropping 2 points is best. If we go on to beat Palace we'll be 1 point ahead of Liverpool with game in hand and 2 points behind you with the same game in hand. So, poll position for top spot as we approach the half way spot of the season. I agree with you on the player of the month stuff, but apparently the only players in Europe with more ‘goal involvements’ than Bruno in the period since he arrived in the EPL are CR7, Messi, and Lewandowski... Fun stat if true. 27G+17A in 3854mins is impressive. 15 penalties included in the 27 goals distorts the numbers somewhat. Salah was at 43G + 15A in 17/18. with just the 1 pen. Don't want to dismiss his influence though. Obviously a fantastic player and massively impactful for you so can totally understand the love-in. You've needed it for while. He has almost eliminated my KdB envy Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 25, 2021, 12:10:06 AM Spirit and determination. A plan to capitalise on the spaces left behind the full backs. The only downside is the poor showing from Van de Beek.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: RED-DOG on February 09, 2021, 10:00:55 PM Ole Gunnar Solskjær is a great manager but he has has a serious case of RBF.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on February 09, 2021, 10:19:37 PM Ole Gunnar Solskjær is a great manager but he has has a serious case of RBF. He's a mere amateur. (http://i.imgur.com/X4kVmvG.jpg) (https://imgur.com/X4kVmvG) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: RED-DOG on February 09, 2021, 11:07:37 PM Ole Gunnar Solskjær is a great manager but he has has a serious case of RBF. He's a mere amateur. (http://i.imgur.com/X4kVmvG.jpg) (https://imgur.com/X4kVmvG) (((Shudder))) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on April 04, 2021, 07:25:11 PM Manure 4/6 or bigger to beat Brighton (the bloom xg boys) at home! Would have been 1/4 in a normal season. Chunks been done at 5/6! Fill your boots. This is close to full strength manure at home as well. 2020/21 is a funny year. I can get anything beat but brighton are virtually on the beach now as well relegation wise.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on April 04, 2021, 07:51:26 PM welbeck 1-0 oh shit he doesn't play for manure anymore!
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on April 04, 2021, 09:25:49 PM somehow it worked. I arbbokked it as well as usual.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: bergeroo on April 29, 2021, 10:10:31 PM The Roma manager looks like he belongs in Season Two of The Wire.
First game of the season I watched, United are always this good....right? Or...? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on May 02, 2021, 04:39:02 PM Most exciting scenes at Old Trafford in years. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on May 02, 2021, 05:36:25 PM Match postponed. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on May 02, 2021, 06:00:29 PM What are they all playing at?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on May 02, 2021, 06:54:02 PM Love the Manure fans on five live wanting them out! Who do they think will pay £5bn for manure? Just another set of corporate parasites. That's what pro sport is lads. It's not your club. You are a customer. Imagine if bet365.com customers starting demanding Denise's company was their firm when they had zero ownership of the firm. Football is a strange thing that fans think they 'own' the club whilst 25 rich young men run off with virtually the entire turnover of the business every year but they get zero shit at all whilst the owners who put up chunks to take all the risks are parasites and not due a huge return on their investment. Put your £5bn up as 50k season ticket holders combined and buy the club and you will send it skint quicker than any yanks could. You had your twenty years with fergie and the class of 92 suck it up. The golden days are long gone.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on September 11, 2021, 04:57:43 PM seems to have been a decent return to Old Trafford for the boy Ronaldo.
One swallow doesn’t make a summer, and all that but it’s time to start feeling extra positive I think. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on September 11, 2021, 07:40:45 PM seems to have been a decent return to Old Trafford for the boy Ronaldo. One swallow doesn’t make a summer, and all that but it’s time to start feeling extra positive I think. I must confess to being somewhat sceptical(grumpy old buggers usually are) re. the number of games a 36-y-o is capable of playing in this league. There's no doubting the guy's amazing hunger and desire to score goals though and if he does somehow stay fit enough you may have a bargain.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on September 19, 2021, 08:58:23 PM seems to have been a decent return to Old Trafford for the boy Ronaldo. One swallow doesn’t make a summer, and all that but it’s time to start feeling extra positive I think. I must confess to being somewhat sceptical(grumpy old buggers usually are) re. the number of games a 36-y-o is capable of playing in this league. There's no doubting the guy's amazing hunger and desire to score goals though and if he does somehow stay fit enough you may have a bargain.. He is an animal in terms of fitness Ralph. Probably fitter than most of the twenty somethings in the PL. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on September 19, 2021, 09:11:50 PM He's not a '36yo', though. He's an absolute freak of nature.
Didn't they run physicals on him and he was actually in the condition of someone in their 20s? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on September 20, 2021, 08:35:21 AM He's not a '36yo', though. He's an absolute freak of nature. Didn't they run physicals on him and he was actually in the condition of someone in their 20s? Bit like Tom Brady then - except Tom Brady is (I think) 44. Brady is a slam-dunk to throw more touchdown passes in his forties than he did in his twenties. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on September 20, 2021, 02:56:50 PM He's not a '36yo', though. He's an absolute freak of nature. Didn't they run physicals on him and he was actually in the condition of someone in their 20s? Didn’t I already say that? seems to have been a decent return to Old Trafford for the boy Ronaldo. One swallow doesn’t make a summer, and all that but it’s time to start feeling extra positive I think. I must confess to being somewhat sceptical(grumpy old buggers usually are) re. the number of games a 36-y-o is capable of playing in this league. There's no doubting the guy's amazing hunger and desire to score goals though and if he does somehow stay fit enough you may have a bargain.. He is an animal in terms of fitness Ralph. Probably fitter than most of the twenty somethings in the PL. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on September 20, 2021, 03:03:24 PM Not exactly, but if you want to play chief pedant, crack on :D
You said he is probably fitter than most of the twenty somethings in the PL. I was referring to a show/article where they actually ran a battery of tests. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on September 20, 2021, 03:04:03 PM He's not a '36yo', though. He's an absolute freak of nature. Didn't they run physicals on him and he was actually in the condition of someone in their 20s? Bit like Tom Brady then - except Tom Brady is (I think) 44. Brady is a slam-dunk to throw more touchdown passes in his forties than he did in his twenties. Some boy, Thomas. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on September 20, 2021, 04:48:33 PM YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6vtUUnv_MY
Was when he signed for Juve. I think it was Arb that posted the article about it, back when they did the tests. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on September 20, 2021, 05:22:42 PM ESPN sports science lab team did an article saying he had 40 inch vertical leap which is top end nba standard. That's what made me read the article years ago.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on September 20, 2021, 05:32:30 PM ESPN sports science lab team did an article saying he had 40 inch vertical leap which is top end nba standard. That's what made me read the article years ago. Crazy, isn't it! Soccer's version of Lebron. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on September 20, 2021, 05:42:50 PM Yes comparing him to Brady is silly because TB doesn't remotely operate and stll exist on athletic talent albeit he is super strict diet/regime wise he isn't remotely physically gifted. Ronaldo is easily the most naturally gifted/artificially enhanced through 20 years of commitment to excellence football has ever seen. Pointless compared him to any past footballer aging wise as there is no one remotely like him.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on September 20, 2021, 06:13:08 PM Yes comparing him to Brady is silly because TB doesn't remotely operate and stll exist on athletic talent albeit he is super strict diet/regime wise he isn't remotely physically gifted. Ronaldo is easily the most naturally gifted/artificially enhanced through 20 years of commitment to excellence football has ever seen. Pointless compared him to any past footballer aging wise as there is no one remotely like him. Be interesting to see just how long he lasts at the top level. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on September 20, 2021, 06:16:17 PM Yes comparing him to Brady is silly because TB doesn't remotely operate and stll exist on athletic talent albeit he is super strict diet/regime wise he isn't remotely physically gifted. Ronaldo is easily the most naturally gifted/artificially enhanced through 20 years of commitment to excellence football has ever seen. Pointless compared him to any past footballer aging wise as there is no one remotely like him. Be interesting to see just how long he lasts at the top level. I agree. The legs usually just "go" at some stage however fit a player is - usually on a cold Tuesday night in Stoke.. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on September 20, 2021, 06:22:01 PM Yes comparing him to Brady is silly because TB doesn't remotely operate and stll exist on athletic talent albeit he is super strict diet/regime wise he isn't remotely physically gifted. Ronaldo is easily the most naturally gifted/artificially enhanced through 20 years of commitment to excellence football has ever seen. Pointless compared him to any past footballer aging wise as there is no one remotely like him. Be interesting to see just how long he lasts at the top level. I agree. The legs usually just "go" at some stage however fit a player is - usually on a cold Tuesday night in Stoke.. He won't have to worry about any of those for a few years, unless it's a midweek cup game ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on October 26, 2021, 03:45:43 PM Oh dear.... Next up Spurs (a) and City (h). I'll be staggered if he doesn't revert to a low block, counter attacking plan against City... Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 27, 2021, 11:09:08 PM Oh dear.... Next up Spurs (a) and City (h). I'll be staggered if he doesn't revert to a low block, counter attacking plan against City... You forgot Atalanta (a). :) I’m not sure we have the personnel to play that system effectively… I’m holding faith in OGS, but it starts to feel more difficult. The sad truth is that while we were out chasing Sancho, we forgot to look for a proper DM. Varane may or may not be the CD we need alongside Maguire, but Lindelof and Bailey definitely aren’t. I yearn for a return of Vidic. Tbh, he’d probably improve our defence even now. Oh, and I wouldn’t shed a tear if Pogba never played for us again. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokitren on October 29, 2021, 10:14:39 AM Oh dear.... Next up Spurs (a) and City (h). I'll be staggered if he doesn't revert to a low block, counter attacking plan against City... You forgot Atalanta (a). :) I’m not sure we have the personnel to play that system effectively… I’m holding faith in OGS, but it starts to feel more difficult. The sad truth is that while we were out chasing Sancho, we forgot to look for a proper DM. Varane may or may not be the CD we need alongside Maguire, but Lindelof and Bailey definitely aren’t. I yearn for a return of Vidic. Tbh, he’d probably improve our defence even now. Oh, and I wouldn’t shed a tear if Pogba never played for us again. Do you think that Pogba is no longer the same and his time has passed? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on October 29, 2021, 12:51:10 PM I’m holding faith in OGS, but it starts to feel more difficult.... As much as I love Ole this is getting embarrassing now. Would absolutely love to see Graham Potter in charge. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 29, 2021, 02:13:15 PM Oh dear.... Next up Spurs (a) and City (h). I'll be staggered if he doesn't revert to a low block, counter attacking plan against City... You forgot Atalanta (a). :) I’m not sure we have the personnel to play that system effectively… I’m holding faith in OGS, but it starts to feel more difficult. The sad truth is that while we were out chasing Sancho, we forgot to look for a proper DM. Varane may or may not be the CD we need alongside Maguire, but Lindelof and Bailey definitely aren’t. I yearn for a return of Vidic. Tbh, he’d probably improve our defence even now. Oh, and I wouldn’t shed a tear if Pogba never played for us again. Do you think that Pogba is no longer the same and his time has passed? I’m sure he still has the skills, but he lacks the application and I’m sick of seeing him loping slowly back after the opponent who just took the ball from him because he wanted to make one more turn in the centre circle. I’m holding faith in OGS, but it starts to feel more difficult.... As much as I love Ole this is getting embarrassing now. Would absolutely love to see Graham Potter in charge. Might as well get Moyes back. Potter is doing really well at Brighton, but then Eddie Howe was great at Bournemouth and he’s not in the frame. It’s difficult to see a candidate that I could get excited about. I love this club, I’ve loved them for nearly fifty years, and I’ve loved them through the years of Frank O’Farrel, Dave Sexton, Wilf McGuniness and all the others that filled the role between Busby and Ferguson. There were some dark times in those days, way darker than our current dilemma of being 7th and looking like making the KO stages of the CL. SAF didn’t just walk in and start winning trophies. I’m not comparing them. Solskjaer is not, and never will be the equal of Ferguson, But for me, the club had far more knocked out of them by Moyes, van Gaal and Mourinho than was acknowledged. More blame for our current malaise should be laid at the feet of the board, and the inadequate Woodward. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: youthnkzR on October 29, 2021, 11:51:45 PM Just because there were worse times decades ago doesn’t mean this situation is acceptable. We play poker, we know small sample when we see one and we understand EV.
PL is 9 in and United have 14 points... W4 D2 L3. If we were running at EV we’d had about 9 points. We were extremely lucky to win vs West Ham and Wolves. Even though we ran out clear winner vs Newcastle we could have conceded 10 vs a more clinical team. Southampton draw was lucky. In Europe we have 6 points. Should have 3 points max. Every game in Europe has been terrible and we had a very kind draw. Limping through whilst way above EV isn’t acceptable. — Moyes was never a good fit + nobody in the world was ever gonna succeed SAF.. especially when inheriting that squad. LVG was, stubborn, tried to implement a completely different style with the wrong personnel, and wasn’t backed from higher up. Jose was the worst fit in the world. I kinda get why at the time... serial winner and all that but is literally the opposite of ‘the United way’.. We have seen progression under Ole, we’ve also seen a way better atmosphere from within . Problem is when comparing progression with the strength of the squad. We’re nowhere near achieving what we should be. Potter and Howe are worlds apart. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 30, 2021, 07:28:47 PM Life could be worse.
Tal knows Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on November 02, 2021, 09:53:18 PM Ronaldo = a freak. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on November 02, 2021, 09:57:14 PM Shame he causes just as many problems as he solves by never defending or pressing. never mind stunting the development of the kids coming through. Sells lots of shirts and has lots of followers though so it works
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on November 02, 2021, 10:24:56 PM Shame he causes just as many problems as he solves by never defending or pressing. never mind stunting the development of the kids coming through. Sells lots of shirts and has lots of followers though so it works 95.3 million followers. Insane. @Cristiano This Privacy Policy addresses the collection and use of personal information - http://cristianoronaldo.com/terms facebook.com/cristianoJoined June 2010 58 Following 95.3M Followers Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on November 02, 2021, 10:28:46 PM Shame he causes just as many problems as he solves by never defending or pressing. never mind stunting the development of the kids coming through. Sells lots of shirts and has lots of followers though so it works 95.3 million followers. Insane. @Cristiano This Privacy Policy addresses the collection and use of personal information - http://cristianoronaldo.com/terms facebook.com/cristianoJoined June 2010 58 Following 95.3M Followers Got about 350 on Instagram :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on November 02, 2021, 10:34:31 PM Shame he causes just as many problems as he solves by never defending or pressing. never mind stunting the development of the kids coming through. Sells lots of shirts and has lots of followers though so it works 95.3 million followers. Insane. @Cristiano This Privacy Policy addresses the collection and use of personal information - http://cristianoronaldo.com/terms facebook.com/cristianoJoined June 2010 58 Following 95.3M Followers Got about 350 on Instagram :D I don't even know what Instagram is. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on November 02, 2021, 10:38:06 PM Shame he causes just as many problems as he solves by never defending or pressing. never mind stunting the development of the kids coming through. Sells lots of shirts and has lots of followers though so it works 95.3 million followers. Insane. @Cristiano This Privacy Policy addresses the collection and use of personal information - http://cristianoronaldo.com/terms facebook.com/cristianoJoined June 2010 58 Following 95.3M Followers Got about 350 on Instagram :D I don't even know what Instagram is. Another of Zuck's firms. Just had a look, and he has 362m followers there. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on November 09, 2021, 10:05:26 AM Oh dear.... Next up Spurs (a) and City (h). I'll be staggered if he doesn't revert to a low block, counter attacking plan against City... Oh dear again.... Not seen anything quite like that before at Old Trafford. Incredible he keeps his job really. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on November 21, 2021, 08:17:45 AM Oh dear.... Next up Spurs (a) and City (h). I'll be staggered if he doesn't revert to a low block, counter attacking plan against City... Oh dear again.... Not seen anything quite like that before at Old Trafford. Incredible he keeps his job really. He doesn’t. Yesterday was the final straw. Eff knows who might be able to do something with this bunch of talented misfits, but we live in hope. I see Zidane is being mentioned. Yep, that’s what we need, another supersized ego. May as well see if Zlatan fancies it. Maybe youthinkz is right about Potter. But managing a squad that you assembled at Brighton is a long way from managing this bunch. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on November 21, 2021, 11:09:07 AM Is Big Ron still alive?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on November 21, 2021, 03:18:13 PM Get Big Sam on the blower ;D
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on November 21, 2021, 04:13:03 PM Get Big Sam on the blower ;D I don't think Pardiola has much of a role right now. Would be good to have the two great footballing brains of our generation both in Manchester. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on November 21, 2021, 04:37:38 PM Get Big Sam on the blower ;D I don't think Pardiola has much of a role right now. Would be good to have the two great footballing brains of our generation both in Manchester. Dream Team needed, obv. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on November 21, 2021, 06:16:08 PM More bad news for Man U, "I am committed to Derby County" says Wayne Rooney. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on November 21, 2021, 08:13:30 PM More bad news for Man U, "I am committed to Derby County" says Wayne Rooney. He is doing pretty well given the resources he has. Kind of an anti-Solskjaer? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: arbboy on November 23, 2021, 08:26:17 PM Ronny to the rescue again! huge goal to potentially recruit who they actually want to recruit this year as a manager being in the last 16 of the CL. WP carrick your job is done. Football's first ever 'interim interim' manager does his job at the first attempt. Impressive. So impressive he might upgrade to the interim job and then hopefully the next generation of ole for 3 years then at xmas 2024 when they are still mid table we can start the process again with Ronny or Rooney as the interim manager.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on November 24, 2021, 07:47:40 AM Ronny to the rescue again! huge goal to potentially recruit who they actually want to recruit this year as a manager being in the last 16 of the CL. WP carrick your job is done. Football's first ever 'interim interim' manager does his job at the first attempt. Impressive. So impressive he might upgrade to the interim job and then hopefully the next generation of ole for 3 years then at xmas 2024 when they are still mid table we can start the process again with Ronny or Rooney as the interim manager. Two pretty good saves from DeGea rank above CR7’s goal in importance last night. The second half save was special. Sunday’s game may flatten the Carrick bounce. Whatever the result, we should have someone other than Woodward on the recruitment job. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 04, 2022, 11:36:12 PM Despair seems appropriate.
Norwich have a (marginally) smaller gap to us than we have between us and Guardiola’s paradigm of how to build a functioning football team. Which means the only real enjoyment to be had from the PL this season is that Liverpool won’t win it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on January 05, 2022, 11:04:03 AM Despair seems appropriate. Norwich have a (marginally) smaller gap to us than we have between us and Guardiola’s paradigm of how to build a functioning football team. Which means the only real enjoyment to be had from the PL this season is that Liverpool won’t win it. Always look on the bright side of life :) Since 1st December: Pep P8 W8 D0 L0 Pts 24 Spurs. P6 W4 D 2 L0 Pts 14 Liverp. P7 W4 D 2 L1 Pts 14 United P6 W4 D 1 L1 Pts 13 Chelsea P8 W3 D 4 L4 Pts 12 Arsenal P7 W4 D0 L3 Pts 12 Based on points per game you are the 3rd most in-form team since the 1st December. And still the CL to play for. Meanwhile Arsenal fans are buzzing after their "best performance in years" with 7 shots against a subpar City and throwing it away with the same old lack of discipline. Funny old game. Edit: Ronaldo was a mistake. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 05, 2022, 11:48:58 AM Despair seems appropriate. Norwich have a (marginally) smaller gap to us than we have between us and Guardiola’s paradigm of how to build a functioning football team. Which means the only real enjoyment to be had from the PL this season is that Liverpool won’t win it. Always look on the bright side of life :) Since 1st December: Pep P8 W8 D0 L0 Pts 24 Spurs. P6 W4 D 2 L0 Pts 14 Liverp. P7 W4 D 2 L1 Pts 14 United P6 W4 D 1 L1 Pts 13 Chelsea P8 W3 D 4 L4 Pts 12 Arsenal P7 W4 D0 L3 Pts 12 Based on points per game you are the 3rd most in-form team since the 1st December. And still the CL to play for. Meanwhile Arsenal fans are buzzing after their "best performance in years" with 7 shots against a subpar City and throwing it away with the same old lack of discipline. Funny old game. Edit: Ronaldo was a mistake. Thank you for your words of encouragement. We’re still in the FA Cup too! maybe we can revert to the 80s/90s role of being a Cup team for a while. Statistics conceal so much though. It’s not just about results (I mean, obviously it is, but…) it’s also about style and the sense that we should be better than we are. If all our players were fit what would be our strongest team? DeGea is the only certainty. Pep, Klopp, Tuchel all have at least six automatic picks. Reverse schadenfreude is an awful sensation and I suffer it every time I see your lot flow forward with passes that don’t have to be thought about because the players have such a high level of understanding of their roles. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on January 05, 2022, 12:14:15 PM Despair seems appropriate. Norwich have a (marginally) smaller gap to us than we have between us and Guardiola’s paradigm of how to build a functioning football team. Which means the only real enjoyment to be had from the PL this season is that Liverpool won’t win it. Always look on the bright side of life :) Since 1st December: Pep P8 W8 D0 L0 Pts 24 Spurs. P6 W4 D 2 L0 Pts 14 Liverp. P7 W4 D 2 L1 Pts 14 United P6 W4 D 1 L1 Pts 13 Chelsea P8 W3 D 4 L4 Pts 12 Arsenal P7 W4 D0 L3 Pts 12 Based on points per game you are the 3rd most in-form team since the 1st December. And still the CL to play for. Meanwhile Arsenal fans are buzzing after their "best performance in years" with 7 shots against a subpar City and throwing it away with the same old lack of discipline. Funny old game. Edit: Ronaldo was a mistake. Thank you for your words of encouragement. We’re still in the FA Cup too! maybe we can revert to the 80s/90s role of being a Cup team for a while. Statistics conceal so much though. It’s not just about results (I mean, obviously it is, but…) it’s also about style and the sense that we should be better than we are. If all our players were fit what would be our strongest team? DeGea is the only certainty. Pep, Klopp, Tuchel all have at least six automatic picks. Reverse schadenfreude is an awful sensation and I suffer it every time I see your lot flow forward with passes that don’t have to be thought about because the players have such a high level of understanding of their roles. meh, he has had 5 games(?), you have had one bad result and you are still in the Champions League. Surely top 4 is still a possibility too? Think we should do a swap and you should spend a couple of seasons suporting Bradford City and I get to cheer on all your underperforming show ponies for a bit. Sure I'd still have a better time of it. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 05, 2022, 01:49:14 PM Despair seems appropriate. Norwich have a (marginally) smaller gap to us than we have between us and Guardiola’s paradigm of how to build a functioning football team. Which means the only real enjoyment to be had from the PL this season is that Liverpool won’t win it. Always look on the bright side of life :) Since 1st December: Pep P8 W8 D0 L0 Pts 24 Spurs. P6 W4 D 2 L0 Pts 14 Liverp. P7 W4 D 2 L1 Pts 14 United P6 W4 D 1 L1 Pts 13 Chelsea P8 W3 D 4 L4 Pts 12 Arsenal P7 W4 D0 L3 Pts 12 Based on points per game you are the 3rd most in-form team since the 1st December. And still the CL to play for. Meanwhile Arsenal fans are buzzing after their "best performance in years" with 7 shots against a subpar City and throwing it away with the same old lack of discipline. Funny old game. Edit: Ronaldo was a mistake. Thank you for your words of encouragement. We’re still in the FA Cup too! maybe we can revert to the 80s/90s role of being a Cup team for a while. Statistics conceal so much though. It’s not just about results (I mean, obviously it is, but…) it’s also about style and the sense that we should be better than we are. If all our players were fit what would be our strongest team? DeGea is the only certainty. Pep, Klopp, Tuchel all have at least six automatic picks. Reverse schadenfreude is an awful sensation and I suffer it every time I see your lot flow forward with passes that don’t have to be thought about because the players have such a high level of understanding of their roles. meh, he has had 5 games(?), you have had one bad result and you are still in the Champions League. Surely top 4 is still a possibility too? Think we should do a swap and you should spend a couple of seasons suporting Bradford City and I get to cheer on all your underperforming show ponies for a bit. Sure I'd still have a better time of it. You are right, and I know that struggles are relative. I’ve got plenty of memories of being not quite good enough to pip Liverpool for the league in the 70s and 80s. I’ve got memories of being not good enough for the top flight too! Bradford City you say? Tempting Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on January 05, 2022, 02:37:12 PM Despair seems appropriate. Norwich have a (marginally) smaller gap to us than we have between us and Guardiola’s paradigm of how to build a functioning football team. Which means the only real enjoyment to be had from the PL this season is that Liverpool won’t win it. Always look on the bright side of life :) Since 1st December: Pep P8 W8 D0 L0 Pts 24 Spurs. P6 W4 D 2 L0 Pts 14 Liverp. P7 W4 D 2 L1 Pts 14 United P6 W4 D 1 L1 Pts 13 Chelsea P8 W3 D 4 L4 Pts 12 Arsenal P7 W4 D0 L3 Pts 12 Based on points per game you are the 3rd most in-form team since the 1st December. And still the CL to play for. Meanwhile Arsenal fans are buzzing after their "best performance in years" with 7 shots against a subpar City and throwing it away with the same old lack of discipline. Funny old game. Edit: Ronaldo was a mistake. Thank you for your words of encouragement. We’re still in the FA Cup too! maybe we can revert to the 80s/90s role of being a Cup team for a while. Statistics conceal so much though. It’s not just about results (I mean, obviously it is, but…) it’s also about style and the sense that we should be better than we are. If all our players were fit what would be our strongest team? DeGea is the only certainty. Pep, Klopp, Tuchel all have at least six automatic picks. Reverse schadenfreude is an awful sensation and I suffer it every time I see your lot flow forward with passes that don’t have to be thought about because the players have such a high level of understanding of their roles. meh, he has had 5 games(?), you have had one bad result and you are still in the Champions League. Surely top 4 is still a possibility too? Think we should do a swap and you should spend a couple of seasons suporting Bradford City and I get to cheer on all your underperforming show ponies for a bit. Sure I'd still have a better time of it. You are right, and I know that struggles are relative. I’ve got plenty of memories of being not quite good enough to pip Liverpool for the league in the 70s and 80s. I’ve got memories of being not good enough for the top flight too! Bradford City you say? Tempting I remember dropping out of the premier league and people saying well at least we can be competitive and win a few games in the championship. And it has been a bit like that since then, with many false dawns. Think you should still have a bit of hope given how individually talented many of your squad are, and we aren't THAT far off the playoffs... If you squint hard enough, you can almost imagine how you could play like City when you put it all together. If it is any consolation you have become a bit of a pity team for me, and I was genuinely urging you to score against Wolves. Better than to be hated I guess, though struggle to hate any team right now. Think Watford are probably closest due to the crappy way they treat their managers. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 05, 2022, 05:49:12 PM Despair seems appropriate. Norwich have a (marginally) smaller gap to us than we have between us and Guardiola’s paradigm of how to build a functioning football team. Which means the only real enjoyment to be had from the PL this season is that Liverpool won’t win it. Always look on the bright side of life :) Since 1st December: Pep P8 W8 D0 L0 Pts 24 Spurs. P6 W4 D 2 L0 Pts 14 Liverp. P7 W4 D 2 L1 Pts 14 United P6 W4 D 1 L1 Pts 13 Chelsea P8 W3 D 4 L4 Pts 12 Arsenal P7 W4 D0 L3 Pts 12 Based on points per game you are the 3rd most in-form team since the 1st December. And still the CL to play for. Meanwhile Arsenal fans are buzzing after their "best performance in years" with 7 shots against a subpar City and throwing it away with the same old lack of discipline. Funny old game. Edit: Ronaldo was a mistake. Thank you for your words of encouragement. We’re still in the FA Cup too! maybe we can revert to the 80s/90s role of being a Cup team for a while. Statistics conceal so much though. It’s not just about results (I mean, obviously it is, but…) it’s also about style and the sense that we should be better than we are. If all our players were fit what would be our strongest team? DeGea is the only certainty. Pep, Klopp, Tuchel all have at least six automatic picks. Reverse schadenfreude is an awful sensation and I suffer it every time I see your lot flow forward with passes that don’t have to be thought about because the players have such a high level of understanding of their roles. meh, he has had 5 games(?), you have had one bad result and you are still in the Champions League. Surely top 4 is still a possibility too? Think we should do a swap and you should spend a couple of seasons suporting Bradford City and I get to cheer on all your underperforming show ponies for a bit. Sure I'd still have a better time of it. You are right, and I know that struggles are relative. I’ve got plenty of memories of being not quite good enough to pip Liverpool for the league in the 70s and 80s. I’ve got memories of being not good enough for the top flight too! Bradford City you say? Tempting I remember dropping out of the premier league and people saying well at least we can be competitive and win a few games in the championship. And it has been a bit like that since then, with many false dawns. Think you should still have a bit of hope given how individually talented many of your squad are, and we aren't THAT far off the playoffs... If you squint hard enough, you can almost imagine how you could play like City when you put it all together. If it is any consolation you have become a bit of a pity team for me, and I was genuinely urging you to score against Wolves. Better than to be hated I guess, though struggle to hate any team right now. Think Watford are probably closest due to the crappy way they treat their managers. I know what you mean about struggling to hate other teams. I am in awe of the way that City play right now and can even find a grudging admiration for parts of the Liverpool team. I don’t like Klopp much, but part of that may be envy that he’s there and not at OT. Oh, and I’ve been squinting like that for a few years now. It’s beginning to make my face hurt. At least the managers at Watford know what they are signing up for. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on January 07, 2022, 05:38:10 PM How anyone can't like Klopp is puzzling, to me.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 10, 2022, 12:14:16 AM How anyone can't like Klopp is puzzling, to me. Like I said, part of it might be envy. Part of it might be that he’s irritating. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on January 10, 2022, 05:35:24 PM How anyone can't like Klopp is puzzling, to me. Like I said, part of it might be envy. Part of it might be that he’s irritating. One of those types of people where it's very easy to understand why Liverpool fans love him but I also find him very irritating. In fairness, the irritation is mainly driven by post match interviews which are probably 85% due to the inanity of the questions asked rather than him. Perhaps I'll try finding him speaking in other scenarios to give him a chance to redeem himself Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Archer on January 10, 2022, 11:07:02 PM Mr Ferguson at his finest makes Klopp look like a pussy cat: https://twitter.com/slbsn/status/1476992016374714368 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 11, 2022, 09:04:27 AM Mr Ferguson at his finest makes Klopp look like a pussy cat: https://twitter.com/slbsn/status/1476992016374714368 I try to avoid twitter, it’s not always possible and when I do venture into it’s realm I almost always find myself leaving with a sense of despondency at the level of critical thought evidenced by the twitter masses. Victoria C-M’s feed is a notable exception. I’ll accept that SAF was an arse with the press and a bigger arse with the BBC. He had, maybe still has, massive flaws. We don’t have to admire the man to appreciate his achievements. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 11, 2022, 03:58:59 PM If the true indicator of champions is to win when you don’t play well then we nailed it last night.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on January 30, 2022, 11:05:14 AM Looks like it will be a while before we see Mason Greenwood on a football pitch again. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on January 30, 2022, 01:11:41 PM Looks like it will be a while before we see Mason Greenwood on a football pitch again. Yuk, way to throw away a glittering future. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: tikay on January 30, 2022, 06:36:34 PM Mason Greenwood and held in custody. Some 24 hours, that. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60192303 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on January 30, 2022, 07:13:52 PM Hopefully get some of his own medicine while he's inside.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 31, 2022, 07:49:42 AM Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets.
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Doobs on January 31, 2022, 09:34:44 AM Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. We shouldn't discuss his guilt given he is now arrested. Her father released a statement which wasn't as critical as you'd expect (Man United fan (NAP)). Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: RED-DOG on March 13, 2022, 10:27:36 AM Cracking match from a neutral POV so kudos to Spurs.
Ronaldo though... Different gravy Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on March 14, 2022, 03:11:31 PM Cracking match from a neutral POV so kudos to Spurs. Ronaldo though... Different gravy Classic stuff from the GOAT which papers over the cracks again. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on August 22, 2022, 11:30:01 PM My Facebook feed was full of mockery from Liverpool fans last weekend.
They’ve gone very quiet tonight :dontask: Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on August 23, 2022, 04:34:03 PM i'm not sure if I find Liverpool losing more enjoyable than United loosing but yesterday cemented that Liverpool losing is more fun for me
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on August 24, 2022, 04:39:15 PM i'm not sure if I find Liverpool losing more enjoyable than United loosing but yesterday cemented that Liverpool losing is more fun for me Because we're shit now, and are going to lose a fair amount of the time :D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on August 25, 2022, 03:44:11 PM i'm not sure if I find Liverpool losing more enjoyable than United loosing but yesterday cemented that Liverpool losing is more fun for me Because we're shit now, and are going to lose a fair amount of the time :D Unfortunately, was away so couldn't actually see the game but the reports suggest United were pretty good - did manage to see very enjoyable highlights of Van Dijk doing some kind of Dexy's Midnight Runners dance while Sancho scored the easiest goal of his career so far Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Marky147 on August 26, 2022, 10:16:17 PM i'm not sure if I find Liverpool losing more enjoyable than United loosing but yesterday cemented that Liverpool losing is more fun for me Because we're shit now, and are going to lose a fair amount of the time :D Unfortunately, was away so couldn't actually see the game but the reports suggest United were pretty good - did manage to see very enjoyable highlights of Van Dijk doing some kind of Dexy's Midnight Runners dance while Sancho scored the easiest goal of his career so far I'd imagine it was Liverpool underperforming, as much it was United playing well. I saw Ronaldo speak to Roy Keane & Gary Neville before the game, and go out of his way to blank Carragher, which was pretty funny. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: RiderJake on September 13, 2022, 08:09:04 AM i'm not sure if I find Liverpool losing more enjoyable than United loosing but yesterday cemented that Liverpool losing is more fun for me After the many antics of Liverpool fans, I began to think the same way :)up Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on October 02, 2022, 11:00:03 PM We won the second half 3-2 ;marks;
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on January 15, 2023, 10:15:08 PM I received a message from my City supporting friend yesterday
“Congrats on the win, but football was the loser today” rotflmfao rotflmfao rotflmfao Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Ironside on February 02, 2023, 05:26:37 PM Mason Greenwood and held in custody. Some 24 hours, that. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60192303 Hopefully get some of his own medicine while he's inside. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. We shouldn't discuss his guilt given he is now arrested. Her father released a statement which wasn't as critical as you'd expect (Man United fan (NAP)). charges dropped is there anyway back for him though just because the charges are dropped as the CPS doesn't think it can win will the "public" still class him as innocent until "proven" innocent? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 03, 2023, 01:23:03 PM Mason Greenwood and held in custody. Some 24 hours, that. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60192303 Hopefully get some of his own medicine while he's inside. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. We shouldn't discuss his guilt given he is now arrested. Her father released a statement which wasn't as critical as you'd expect (Man United fan (NAP)). charges dropped is there anyway back for him though just because the charges are dropped as the CPS doesn't think it can win will the "public" still class him as innocent until "proven" innocent? Pretty much sums up the options… https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/feb/02/manchester-united-mason-greenwood-huge-decision Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on February 03, 2023, 04:25:30 PM Mason Greenwood and held in custody. Some 24 hours, that. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60192303 Hopefully get some of his own medicine while he's inside. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. We shouldn't discuss his guilt given he is now arrested. Her father released a statement which wasn't as critical as you'd expect (Man United fan (NAP)). charges dropped is there anyway back for him though just because the charges are dropped as the CPS doesn't think it can win will the "public" still class him as innocent until "proven" innocent? Pretty much sums up the options… https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/feb/02/manchester-united-mason-greenwood-huge-decision I'm sure one of the many top-flight clubs owned by misogynistic nation-states will be happy to take him off your hands for a knock-down fee. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 04, 2023, 06:52:48 PM Mason Greenwood and held in custody. Some 24 hours, that. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60192303 Hopefully get some of his own medicine while he's inside. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. We shouldn't discuss his guilt given he is now arrested. Her father released a statement which wasn't as critical as you'd expect (Man United fan (NAP)). charges dropped is there anyway back for him though just because the charges are dropped as the CPS doesn't think it can win will the "public" still class him as innocent until "proven" innocent? Pretty much sums up the options… https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/feb/02/manchester-united-mason-greenwood-huge-decision I'm sure one of the many top-flight clubs owned by misogynistic nation-states will be happy to take him off your hands for a knock-down fee. Can’t imagine he’ll play in the PL again. Such a waste of talent. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Karabiner on February 05, 2023, 01:24:54 PM Mason Greenwood and held in custody. Some 24 hours, that. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60192303 Hopefully get some of his own medicine while he's inside. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. We shouldn't discuss his guilt given he is now arrested. Her father released a statement which wasn't as critical as you'd expect (Man United fan (NAP)). charges dropped is there anyway back for him though just because the charges are dropped as the CPS doesn't think it can win will the "public" still class him as innocent until "proven" innocent? Pretty much sums up the options… https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/feb/02/manchester-united-mason-greenwood-huge-decision I'm sure one of the many top-flight clubs owned by misogynistic nation-states will be happy to take him off your hands for a knock-down fee. Can’t imagine he’ll play in the PL again. Such a waste of talent. As you say it's a terrible waste of talent - he must be worth £100M+ in today's market under normal circumstances. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 05, 2023, 11:12:54 PM Mason Greenwood and held in custody. Some 24 hours, that. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60192303 Hopefully get some of his own medicine while he's inside. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. Seems to be no room for doubt. He deserves everything he gets. We shouldn't discuss his guilt given he is now arrested. Her father released a statement which wasn't as critical as you'd expect (Man United fan (NAP)). charges dropped is there anyway back for him though just because the charges are dropped as the CPS doesn't think it can win will the "public" still class him as innocent until "proven" innocent? Pretty much sums up the options… https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/feb/02/manchester-united-mason-greenwood-huge-decision I'm sure one of the many top-flight clubs owned by misogynistic nation-states will be happy to take him off your hands for a knock-down fee. Can’t imagine he’ll play in the PL again. Such a waste of talent. As you say it's a terrible waste of talent - he must be worth £100M+ in today's market under normal circumstances. Maybe, but that would presuppose that he was fit, physically and mentally and that he had continued to develop. Given that he had already demonstrated some degree of flakiness in his extracurricular activities whilst with the England squad I have doubts over him even without the more recent events. Like I said, he definitely had talent but that’s not always enough. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 06, 2023, 07:05:30 AM We love them
We mourn for them Unlucky boys of red I wish I'd gone down Gone down with them To where mother nature makes their bed We miss them Every night we kiss them Their faces fixed in our heads I wish I'd gone down Gone down with them To where mother nature makes their bed They can't hurt you Their style will never desert you Because they're all safely dead I wish I'd gone down Gone down with them Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: Pokerpops on February 27, 2023, 01:25:57 PM Maybe time to adjust the thread title?
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, an increasingly sad debt fuelled story Post by: nirvana on February 27, 2023, 05:31:53 PM United definitely looking the part again. Glad we've played them twice already and hope they have a few slip ups in the next 3 months of course. Imagine they will be very competitive next year too.
Only good thing is that whatever lols I could have at the expense of United are easily diverted to superschadenfreude at Liverpool and Chelsea's expense for the time being. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: TightEnd on February 28, 2023, 10:49:29 AM thread title...
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: tikay on February 28, 2023, 11:03:29 AM Ha, excellent. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2023, 02:01:03 PM Very good ;D
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: Pokerpops on March 02, 2023, 05:10:32 PM Title: Re: Manchester United FC, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: nirvana on March 05, 2023, 05:55:37 PM United definitely looking the part again. Glad we've played them twice already and hope they have a few slip ups in the next 3 months of course. Imagine they will be very competitive next year too. Only good thing is that whatever lols I could have at the expense of United are easily diverted to superschadenfreude at Liverpool and Chelsea's expense for the time being. Can I take this back, good lol at Man U today, come on the red men Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: tikay on March 05, 2023, 10:17:08 PM A 7-0 shocker is "competent"? New thread title suggestions please. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: tikay on March 05, 2023, 11:00:08 PM "Incompetent again"? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: Marky147 on March 06, 2023, 01:16:24 AM "Incompetent again"? Reserve that for whoever has the heating responsibilities at Rendezvous ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: tikay on March 06, 2023, 02:18:51 AM "Incompetent again"? Reserve that for whoever has the heating responsibilities at Rendezvous ;D Don't remind me. Photo courtesy of Jen Mason. (https://i.imgur.com/7322yxc.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: Pokerpops on March 06, 2023, 09:44:21 AM These things happen occasionally.
it’s been reassuring to see so many LFC fans resurface on Facebook. I was worried about them. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: tikay on March 06, 2023, 09:51:15 AM https://twitter.com/KonateFC/status/1632503062387359750 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: tikay on March 06, 2023, 09:52:34 AM https://twitter.com/_Version4/status/1632495717553000452 Title: Re: Manchester United FC, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: TightEnd on March 06, 2023, 12:51:25 PM there is a new thread title
Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: booder on March 06, 2023, 12:57:17 PM Like
Title: Re: Manchester United FC, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: Pokerpops on March 06, 2023, 01:11:24 PM there is a new thread title ;gobsmacked; ;tk; ;grr; Too soon Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: bagel on March 06, 2023, 01:19:38 PM These things happen occasionally. occasionally ? becoming more like a habit actually , since may 2021 pool have won twice at the theatre of delusions 4-2 and 5-0 , at anfield 4-0 and 7-0 and yesterday could have been far far worse if the ref had done his job anywhere near properly. could easily have ended with 9 men liverpool been way off it this season, but utd celebrating last week like they had won the world cup showed just how far they have fallen. easiest run to the final in history to boot. Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: Marky147 on March 06, 2023, 01:52:26 PM "Incompetent again"? Reserve that for whoever has the heating responsibilities at Rendezvous ;D Don't remind me. Photo courtesy of Jen Mason. (https://i.imgur.com/7322yxc.jpg) Superb ;D Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: Pokerpops on March 06, 2023, 04:30:22 PM These things happen occasionally. occasionally ? becoming more like a habit actually , since may 2021 pool have won twice at the theatre of delusions 4-2 and 5-0 , at anfield 4-0 and 7-0 and yesterday could have been far far worse if the ref had done his job anywhere near properly. could easily have ended with 9 men liverpool been way off it this season, but utd celebrating last week like they had won the world cup showed just how far they have fallen. easiest run to the final in history to boot. Celebrating like they had won the World Cup? Seriously? They celebrated like a team that had won their first trophy in a while. As they should. Look, it was an awful performance that led to an awful defeat. Liverpool deserved their win. Not sure they were actually worthy of the margin, but meh every snap shot went in yesterday. xG was about 3.5. Two games against Betis with Southampton in-between and then Fulham in the Cup before the international break. Three points plus progress in the two cups is the target, would you bet against them? Title: Re: Manchester United FC, Competence at last Post by: nirvana on March 06, 2023, 05:50:38 PM These things happen occasionally. occasionally ? becoming more like a habit actually , since may 2021 pool have won twice at the theatre of delusions 4-2 and 5-0 , at anfield 4-0 and 7-0 and yesterday could have been far far worse if the ref had done his job anywhere near properly. could easily have ended with 9 men liverpool been way off it this season, but utd celebrating last week like they had won the world cup showed just how far they have fallen. easiest run to the final in history to boot. Celebrating like they had won the World Cup? Seriously? They celebrated like a team that had won their first trophy in a while. As they should. Look, it was an awful performance that led to an awful defeat. Liverpool deserved their win. Not sure they were actually worthy of the margin, but meh every snap shot went in yesterday. xG was about 3.5. Two games against Betis with Southampton in-between and then Fulham in the Cup before the international break. Three points plus progress in the two cups is the target, would you bet against them? Fulham are a tough game these days but sure they'll bounce back Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: tikay on March 07, 2023, 11:00:52 AM (https://i.imgur.com/8XfEGj4.jpg) Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: Pokerpops on March 07, 2023, 06:50:30 PM Barney knows stuff…
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/mar/06/manchester-united-bruising-loss-to-liverpool-evident-of-a-decade-of-decay Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: Pokerpops on March 07, 2023, 06:52:49 PM On the plus side, all those Liverpool supporters that had been so absent from my Facebook feed since the match it Lod Trafford that I worried about their wellness have emerged blinking back into the light :)
Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: nirvana on March 08, 2023, 12:33:45 AM Barney knows stuff… https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/mar/06/manchester-united-bruising-loss-to-liverpool-evident-of-a-decade-of-decay Good read that. For any opposition fan, Fernandes is obviously really difficult to like but he's been the best player in that team over the last couple of years. You'd think people would give him a break Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: bagel on March 09, 2023, 11:29:26 AM the young lad who ran on the pitch could learn from this chap
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-v9-hHt96g&t=54s Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: arbboy on March 09, 2023, 12:53:18 PM For anyone who wants to make 2% virtually risk free on their money in the next 4-6 weeks can lay man utd at 50/1 to win the league on bf which is literally stealing money. They will probably be beat mathematically and your money returned by the end of April. Man City would have to be relegated with a points deduction and Arsenal turn into Everton overnight and it probably still wouldn't cop.
If they win out they have 88 points (87 effectively for winning the league purposes as their GD is so shockingly inferior). Doubt 87 points would win the league this year. Sporting index has arsenal and man citys points both in for 85-86 plus they are still fighting on all four fronts. They do have a very easy run in with both games are done against Liverpool, Ars and City. There only really tough games left are spurs and newc away and Chelsea at home. Man City got Ars Liverpool and Chelsea at home. Nothing tough away. Arsenal got Man city Newcastle and Liverpool away and Chelsea at home. A chat group friend who bets football for a living makes them 750/1 to win the league on his stimulations so only sheer weight of money and delusion that they are actually playing as well as their league position suggests which they arent on Xg data makes them this crazy price. Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: vegaslover on March 09, 2023, 03:14:00 PM For anyone who wants to make 2% virtually risk free on their money in the next 4-6 weeks can lay man utd at 50/1 to win the league on bf which is literally stealing money. They will probably be beat mathematically and your money returned by the end of April. Man City would have to be relegated with a points deduction and Arsenal turn into Everton overnight and it probably still wouldn't cop. If they win out they have 88 points (87 effectively for winning the league purposes as their GD is so shockingly inferior). Doubt 87 points would win the league this year. Sporting index has arsenal and man citys points both in for 85-86 plus they are still fighting on all four fronts. They do have a very easy run in with both games are done against Liverpool, Ars and City. There only really tough games left are spurs and newc away and Chelsea at home. Man City got Ars Liverpool and Chelsea at home. Nothing tough away. Arsenal got Man city Newcastle and Liverpool away and Chelsea at home. A chat group friend who bets football for a living makes them 750/1 to win the league on his stimulations so only sheer weight of money and delusion that they are actually playing as well as their league position suggests which they arent on Xg data makes them this crazy price. Cheers Arb. I've actually made the most profit on manure backing them in games this season. Still giving my manure supporting mates plenty of grief over Sunday mind Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: vegaslover on March 09, 2023, 03:20:05 PM You've moved the needle slightly Arb, 55s now
City and Arsenal 1.02 to finish top 4 is also giving money away imo Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: arbboy on March 09, 2023, 06:12:41 PM You've moved the needle slightly Arb, 55s now City and Arsenal 1.02 to finish top 4 is also giving money away imo Needle will never be moved enough in these spots because of manures huge mug fan base alongside the underlying terrible data they have compared to their points total. Im really gutted i didn't unload more at 14/1 pre 7-0 scousers but i am totally full now so i passed on the info so anyone as sick as me who loves stealing money!! It isn't a rub on manure i promise. Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: Pokerpops on March 10, 2023, 03:19:41 PM For anyone who wants to make 2% virtually risk free on their money in the next 4-6 weeks can lay man utd at 50/1 to win the league on bf which is literally stealing money. They will probably be beat mathematically and your money returned by the end of April. Man City would have to be relegated with a points deduction and Arsenal turn into Everton overnight and it probably still wouldn't cop. If they win out they have 88 points (87 effectively for winning the league purposes as their GD is so shockingly inferior). Doubt 87 points would win the league this year. Sporting index has arsenal and man citys points both in for 85-86 plus they are still fighting on all four fronts. They do have a very easy run in with both games are done against Liverpool, Ars and City. There only really tough games left are spurs and newc away and Chelsea at home. Man City got Ars Liverpool and Chelsea at home. Nothing tough away. Arsenal got Man city Newcastle and Liverpool away and Chelsea at home. A chat group friend who bets football for a living makes them 750/1 to win the league on his stimulations so only sheer weight of money and delusion that they are actually playing as well as their league position suggests which they arent on Xg data makes them this crazy price. Can’t fault the analysis. Never really in with a shot at the league this year although the dream was kind of alive till we lost at the library. City again I fear. Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: Pokerpops on March 11, 2023, 02:48:39 PM We’re worse than I thought. Losing to a team that couldn’t beat Bournemouth!
Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: arbboy on March 12, 2023, 03:58:58 PM still only 140/1 now after not winning at home to soton and the main man being banned for a few games
Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: booder on December 09, 2023, 07:20:35 PM We’re worse than I thought. Losing to a team that couldn’t beat Bournemouth! Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: bagel on December 09, 2023, 08:17:10 PM We’re worse than I thought. Losing to a team that couldn’t beat Bournemouth! Ahrt Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: Pokerpops on December 10, 2023, 12:15:35 PM We’re worse than I thought. Losing to a team that couldn’t beat Bournemouth! Ahrt Well played! Yesterday morning I posted an image of our three awards from November “Player, Manager and Goal” of the month with a comment about how it wasn’t bad for a club in crisis. Later in the day I added a comment about how well the post had aged… Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: Pokerpops on May 26, 2024, 09:35:41 AM Well, that was a pleasant surprise!
Title: Re: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up Post by: bagel on September 01, 2024, 05:51:38 PM always look on the bright side of life
|