|
Title: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 07, 2011, 09:28:56 AM PM me your answers by midnight on Monday 11th April.
Please put RSQ 52 in the subject header and give the corresponding number for each question with each answer. The reveal will take place at 8pm on Tuesday 12/04/2011 on this thread. Your score for each question is the number of people who give the same correct answer. The answer most commonly given is called the sheep, with the corresponding sheep score. If you score the only ACE (an ace being a correct answer which no-one else submits) in any round, you will receive MINUS 1 points for that round. You are not allowed to do research such as using Google to come up with answers, and you are not allowed to ask others for help with your answers. Remember, you are only cheating yourself (and your illustrious peers). If you give an incorrect answer, you will receive the sheep score + 5 points You may pass on one, and only one, question and you will receive a score of 0 for that question. All entrants will be treated equally fairly/harshly ( even the person who failed my cannelloni answer to the question about naming a food with a hole in it despite the fact that cannelloni is a tube), and the rules will not arbitrarily change. The questions. 1. The name of a footballer who played for England in the 1966 world cup final versus Germany. 2. A famous crime fighting duo. 3. A singer/band that has represented the UK at the Euro-vision song contest. 4. A Christmas pantomime. 5. From Dads Army the name of someone from the Warmington-on-sea home guard platoon. 6. A Walt Disney film released before 1970. 7. A common site on the body for a piercing. 8. A team sport that has between 2 and 11 members in it. 9. An edible nut. 10. An actor who has played the role of James Bond in a film. Entrants redsimon milligan 84 George2Loose Girgy85 kinboshi longines Claw75 Shogun112 Doogan Tightend trafficjam cf sharplea joobie538 Snoopy The Crow technolog Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 07, 2011, 10:29:49 AM Hector - THAT is a proper RSQ.
;hattip; Quick question, what happens if someone scores the only Ace in a round, the only reason I ask... Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: snoopy1239 on April 07, 2011, 01:08:08 PM Excellent questions. Isn't this about the tenth quiz that someone has had to title 'Back to Basics'?
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: redsimon on April 07, 2011, 08:31:32 PM in
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Cf on April 07, 2011, 10:22:34 PM Give me a bit. I'm sure I think of something to complain about.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: millidonk on April 07, 2011, 10:35:20 PM In. one of my answers will probably be quite controversial.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Girgy85 on April 08, 2011, 03:07:05 PM In.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Ironside on April 08, 2011, 06:07:52 PM wow a simple rsq with proper questions even rhm could answer without swearing and no need for sharplee to google although he will
if i remember nd have time i am in Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Robert HM on April 08, 2011, 06:10:32 PM wow a simple rsq with proper questions even rhm could answer without swearing and no need for sharplee to google although he will if i remember nd have time i am in Cheek! I don't swear on here Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 08, 2011, 06:15:06 PM In
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Ironside on April 08, 2011, 06:31:08 PM wow a simple rsq with proper questions even rhm could answer without swearing and no need for sharplee to google although he will if i remember nd have time i am in Cheek! I don't swear on here Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Robert HM on April 08, 2011, 08:02:02 PM wow a simple rsq with proper questions even rhm could answer without swearing and no need for sharplee to google although he will if i remember nd have time i am in Cheek! I don't swear on here To right I ******* do Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 10, 2011, 09:48:12 AM In researching the questions i found i could name all of the England world cup winning team bar one. I predict that, should he enter, Tightend will chose the man I couldn't remember.
p.s What is the lowest number of entrants there has ever been? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Laxie on April 10, 2011, 09:51:55 AM Not sure, but you won't even come close to competing for that record. We just like to wait until the very last minute to submit answers. All about causing the most stress possible for the QM. :D
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: redsimon on April 10, 2011, 01:55:05 PM In researching the questions i found i could name all of the England world cup winning team bar one. I predict that, should he enter, Tightend will chose the man I couldn't remember. p.s What is the lowest number of entrants there has ever been? think i had 9 or 10...late entries will easily beat that Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 10, 2011, 07:26:23 PM in
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 11, 2011, 10:35:15 AM Last day to get your entries in.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 11, 2011, 07:31:16 PM Only a few more hours to go.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Cf on April 11, 2011, 10:12:09 PM I can see this being messy!
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 11, 2011, 11:05:24 PM I can see this being messy! I think I know what you are talking about. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 11, 2011, 11:41:16 PM Pleased with those. See you tomorrow.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Cf on April 12, 2011, 07:33:53 PM I'm going to be out for the reveal. But i'll do my best to login on my phone. Wouldn't want to miss the fun!
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 07:38:22 PM Good evening to all those able to watch the footee and the RSQ reveal at the same time.
I would like to thank all of you who took part in the quiz or this reveal and just remember that just like the special olympics "you are all winners". 22 mins to the off. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 07:59:07 PM Ready. Carry on.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:01:05 PM OK here we go.
Are we sitting comfortably? Then i shall begin. Q 1. The name of a footballer who played for England in the 1966 world cup final versus Germany. Sheep answer 4 Points Alan Ball 4 Points Girgy85 Shogun 112 Sharplea Snoopy 1239 Nobby Stiles 3 Points George2Loose Claw 75 Doogan Martin Peters 3 points redsimon Kinboshi The Crow George Cohen 2 Points Milligan 84 Longines Gordon Banks 2 Points traffic jam cf Aces Bobby Charlton Joobie538 Ray Wilson Tightend Jack Charlton Technolog 3 interesting things about the game. Martin Peters was the only person to be booked, there were no substitutes allowed, and Alan Ball won man of the match. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:01:51 PM looks like it is 3 of us.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:03:14 PM :hello:
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:04:17 PM and we are up to 3.
Yippeee Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 08:04:18 PM looks like it is 3 of us. Nice quiet night for you - don't knock it! Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:05:22 PM then give us a extra -1 point for dedication
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:06:55 PM with no objections then on to the next question.
Q2. A famous crime fighting duo. Sheep Dempsey and Makepeace 4 Points George2Loose kinboshi Shogun 112 Tightend Sherlock Holmes & Dr Watson 3 Points redsimon Cf The Crow Sharky and George 2 Points Milligan 84 Joobie538 Dangermouse and Penfold 2 Points Claw 75 Snoopy1239 Aces Randall and Hopkirk Technolog Cagney & Lacey Sharplea Hart to Hart traffic jam Batfink and Karate Doogan Mike Lowrey and Marcus Burnett Girgy 85 Morse and Lewis Longines No Batman and Robin, Starsky and Hutch or my favourite and the toughest pair by far Bodie and Doyle. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:08:14 PM objection to 'hart to hart'. that's the name of a programme, not the duo.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Joobie538 on April 12, 2011, 08:08:47 PM objection to 'hart to hart'. that's the name of a programme, not the duo. I agree Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:09:23 PM objection to 'hart to hart'. that's the name of a programme, not the duo. agreed Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:10:24 PM Over ruled. On their answer sheet they stated the duos name, it was me that changed it for the un educated reader.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:11:12 PM Over ruled. On their answer sheet they stated the duos name, it was me that changed it for the un educated reader. photos or it didnt happen Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:11:39 PM Over ruled. On their answer sheet they stated the duos name, it was me that changed it for the un educated reader. is it too early to slag off the QM? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 08:11:54 PM I loved Bodie & Doyle
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Joobie538 on April 12, 2011, 08:12:32 PM Over ruled. On their answer sheet they stated the duos name, it was me that changed it for the un educated reader. is it too early to slag off the QM? of course not! people don't normally ask first lol Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 08:12:41 PM If you don't mind Claire I did name them lol
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:13:13 PM If you don't mind Claire I did name them lol QM trying to stitch you up imo. uneducated! hmph. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:14:18 PM Positions after round 2
Technolog 2 Joobies 3 traffic jam 3 Longines 3 Milligan84 4 Doogan 4 Tightend 5 Cf 5 Claw 5 Sharplea 5 Girgy85 5 The crow 6 red Simon 6 Snoopy1239 6 Kinboshi 7 George2Loose 7 Shogun112 8 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 08:15:01 PM Over ruled. On their answer sheet they stated the duos name, it was me that changed it for the un educated reader. is it too early to slag off the QM? Joke right? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 08:15:38 PM Over ruled. On their answer sheet they stated the duos name, it was me that changed it for the un educated reader. is it too early to slag off the QM? Joke right? Early days Jack Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: The-Crow on April 12, 2011, 08:17:25 PM bodie and doyle was also George Cowley as the boss . So there were 3 of 'em
The sweeney was great Reagan and Carter Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:19:35 PM Wish i knew how to do picture thingys.
On to the next question then. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 08:19:47 PM Sigh at Dempsey & Makepeace being a sheep.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:20:24 PM Q3. A singer/band that has represented the UK at the Euro-vision song contest.
Sheep Michael Ball 2 Points George2Loose Doogan Daz Sampson 2 Points Girgy85 Sharplea Gina G 2 Points cf joobie538 Brotherhood of Man 2 Points Tightend Snoopy1239 Aces Matt Monro traffic jam Sandie Shaw red Simon Samantha Janus kinboshi Lulu Longines Scott Fitzgerald Claw 75 Sonia Shogun 112 Jessica Garlick The Crow Mary Hopkin Technolog Fails 7 Points A1 Milligan 84 A useless piece of information for you all. I was in the same class at school as Michael Ball. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:21:16 PM sake, knew i should of gone with Cliff
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:21:55 PM I also wish my cut and paste didn't get all messed up.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: The-Crow on April 12, 2011, 08:22:22 PM just looked for a picture of Jack Reagan and Carter and this popped up lol
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 08:23:41 PM Oh ffs this hasn't started well :(
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:24:00 PM I wonder if tighty is at the leicester game. He won't be happy, they are 1-0 down already.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:24:52 PM I wonder if tighty is at the leicester game. He won't be happy, they are 1-0 down already. better get a few fails in just to make his night Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 08:25:03 PM I wonder if tighty is at the leicester game. He won't be happy, they are 1-0 down already. I'm here Still sulking that Dempsey and Makepeace was so popular. FML Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:25:05 PM Positions after round 3
Technolog 3 traffic jam 4 Longines 4 Joobies 5 Doogan 6 Claw 6 Tightend 7 Cf 7 Sharplea 7 Girgy85 7 The crow 7 red Simon 7 Snoopy1239 8 Kinboshi 8 George2Loose 9 Shogun112 9 Milligan84 11 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:27:47 PM I wonder if tighty is at the leicester game. He won't be happy, they are 1-0 down already. I'm here Still sulking that Dempsey and Makepeace was so popular. FML and brotherhood of man? was your google broken this week? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:28:20 PM I wonder if tighty is at the leicester game. He won't be happy, they are 1-0 down already. I'm here Still sulking that Dempsey and Makepeace was so popular. FML what about not getting extra points for batfink and karate?????? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:28:36 PM Ooh it's gone swimmingly so far. On to the next. Could be in the shower by 9pm.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:29:21 PM Ooh it's gone swimmingly so far. On to the next. Could be a shower by 9pm. fyp Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:29:45 PM 4. A Christmas pantomime.
Sheep 3 points Jack and the beanstalk red Simon Longines cf Cinderella 2 Points traffic jam sharplea Aces The Snow Queen Doogan Snow White Girgy 85 Peter Pan Claw 75 A Christmas Carol Milligan 84 Dick Whittington George2Loose Goldilocks kinboshi Sleeping Beauty Tightend Puss in Boots Snoopy1239 Mother Goose The Crow Babes in the Wood Technolog Pass Shogun 112 joobie538 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: The-Crow on April 12, 2011, 08:30:46 PM No-one put Batman and Robin the best crime fightin duo ever
amazing Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: The-Crow on April 12, 2011, 08:32:04 PM Objection you can't allow Passes
There was no Passes mentioned in Rules Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:32:05 PM A christmas carol? really?
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 08:32:50 PM Pass was mentioned
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:33:10 PM Positions after round 4
Technolog 4 Joobies 5 traffic jam 6 Longines 7 Doogan 7 Claw 7 Tightend 8 Girgy85 8 The crow 8 Sharplea 9 Snoopy1239 9 Kinboshi 9 Shogun112 9 Cf 10 red Simon 10 George2Loose 10 Milligan84 12 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:33:14 PM Objection you can't allow Passes There was no Passes mentioned in Rules correct. apart from where it said this: "You may pass on one, and only one, question and you will receive a score of 0 for that question" Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: The-Crow on April 12, 2011, 08:34:30 PM OOOps sorry guys
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:34:35 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:34:47 PM 4. A Christmas pantomime. Sheep 3 points Jack and the beanstalk red Simon Longines cf Cinderella 2 Points traffic jam sharplea Aces The Snow Queen Doogan Snow White Girgy 85 Peter Pan Claw 75 A Christmas Carol Milligan 84 Dick Whittington George2Loose Goldilocks kinboshi Sleeping Beauty Tightend Puss in Boots Snoopy1239 Mother Goose The Crow Babes in the Wood Technolog Pass Shogun 112 joobie538 surely should be goldilocks and the 3 bears? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 08:35:20 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school. Curly Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 08:35:43 PM Reminder
9pm for a bit of MTT fun while we are [ ] having RSQ fun http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=52627.75 password:richardmtt Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:35:52 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school. Ballsy Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 08:36:12 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school. Curly oops take that back I don't want a minus point Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:37:04 PM A christmas carol? really? Yes. This one did surprise me but Google is your friend. Even found a script for it.Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:37:26 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school. butter ball Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 08:37:31 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school. Bouncy Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 08:37:50 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school. Ed. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 08:38:18 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school. Bollock Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:38:55 PM michael foot
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:39:01 PM 4. A Christmas pantomime. Sheep 3 points Jack and the beanstalk red Simon Longines cf Cinderella 2 Points traffic jam sharplea Aces The Snow Queen Doogan Snow White Girgy 85 Peter Pan Claw 75 A Christmas Carol Milligan 84 Dick Whittington George2Loose Goldilocks kinboshi Sleeping Beauty Tightend Puss in Boots Snoopy1239 Mother Goose The Crow Babes in the Wood Technolog Pass Shogun 112 joobie538 surely should be goldilocks and the 3 bears? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 08:39:05 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school. Micky Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 08:39:24 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school. Bollock We must be telepathic I just was going to say that but with an s on the end! Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:39:30 PM golden balls
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 08:40:33 PM In RSQ you have to put the exact words in answer, including spelling mistakes
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:40:56 PM he was a fat kid so chunk or something similar, you boarding school kids are all just mean
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 08:41:14 PM Cabbage Face?
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:41:21 PM In RSQ you have to put the exact words in answer, including spelling mistakes you tell 'im nellie. how can we properly object if we don't know what they said?! Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:41:31 PM I will give a minus bonus point if anyone can guess Michael Balls nickname at school. butter ball Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 08:42:04 PM In RSQ you have to put the exact words in answer, including spelling mistakes you tell 'im nellie. how can we properly object if we don't know what they said?! Agree, 3 bears is a fail Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:42:42 PM Butty
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:43:39 PM 5. From Dads Army the name of someone from the Warmington-on-sea home guard platoon.
Sheep 3 Points Pike Milligan 84 Longines Snoopy1239 Private Walker 2 Points Doogan Tightend Captain Mainwaring 2 Points joobie538 The Crow Aces Sgt Wilson red Simon Private Sponge Technolog Fails 8 Points Chief Warden Hodges Shogun 112 Pass Girgy 85 George2Loose Kinboshi Claw 75 traffic jam Cf Sharplea Answers not selected Corporal Jones, Privates Godfrey, Frazer and the very obscure Private Cheeseman. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: The-Crow on April 12, 2011, 08:43:50 PM Agree, 3 bears is a fail
Oh No it Isn't Its behind You Stupid Boy Pike They don't like it up'em Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:46:48 PM Positions after round 5
Technolog 5 traffic jam 6 Joobies 7 Claw 7 Girgy85 8 Doogan 9 Sharplea 9 Kinboshi 9 Longines 10 Tightend 10 The crow 10 Cf 10 George2Loose 10 red Simon 11 Snoopy1239 12 Milligan84 15 Shogun112 17 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:47:06 PM cant just say pike, need at least first name or rank
and someone knowing sponge just screams of google Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:48:08 PM cant just say pike, need at least first name or rank and someone knowing sponge just screams of google they probably did say more than pike, QM edited coz he likes doing that. technolog is old. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:48:23 PM Time for the 5th inning stretch methinks.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 08:48:46 PM Private Sponge Technolog Obvious google. I mean, come on Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 08:48:56 PM cant just say pike, need at least first name or rank and someone knowing sponge just screams of google Seconded Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:50:43 PM cant just say pike, need at least first name or rank and someone knowing sponge just screams of google Seconded Private Sponge (Colin Bean)—Private Sponge, a sheep farmer, had the job of representing those members of the platoon not in Corporal Jones’ first section. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:52:28 PM I am prepared to accept Sponge as legitimate as he was in several episodes and i remembered him. Unlike Cheeseman.
More to the point was Shogun who remembered Hodges was a Chief Warden ( just as in IMDB) but not remembering that he wasn't in the platoon. Very suspicious indeed. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 08:53:11 PM Private Sponge Technolog Obvious google. I mean, come on Just too young eh Rich? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:54:22 PM did people just write pike or did you not transfer word for word?
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 08:54:31 PM cant just say pike, need at least first name or rank and someone knowing sponge just screams of google they probably did say more than pike, QM edited coz he likes doing that. technolog is old. Thanks for the support Claw. I'll wear it always. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 08:54:34 PM Private Sponge Technolog Obvious google. I mean, come on Just too young eh Rich? No I watched it Very impressive if you knew it, well done Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:55:00 PM Pike on it's own is fine imo
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 08:55:19 PM 6. A Walt Disney film released before 1970.
Sheep 4 Points Fantasia Milligan 84 George2Loose Longines Sharplea Dumbo 2 Points Claw75 joobie538 Aces Bambi traffic jam Lady and the Tramp Snoopy1239 Jungle Book Girgy85 The 3 Caballeros cf Alice in wonderland kinboshi 20,000 leagues under the sea Shogun 112 The Sword in the Stone Doogan The Love Bug Tightend Peter Pan The Crow The Incredible Journey Technolog Pass red Simon The Love Bug was the first film I ever saw at the cinema. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 08:56:10 PM Private Sponge Technolog Obvious google. I mean, come on Just too young eh Rich? Very impressive if you knew it, well done If? Fecking IF!!! It's there man in black & white! Were you the lad at your school that took the ball home if he didn't win? Sad really. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 08:56:52 PM Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 08:57:12 PM Private Sponge Technolog Obvious google. I mean, come on Just too young eh Rich? If? Fecking IF!!! It's there man in black & white! Were you the lad at your school that took the ball home if he didn't win? Sad really. No I watched it Very impressive if you knew it, well done You doth protest too much, Mr quote fail. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 08:57:39 PM Pike on it's own is fine imo nooooooo needs a first name or rank i reckon Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 08:59:34 PM Private Sponge Technolog Obvious google. I mean, come on Just too young eh Rich? If? Fecking IF!!! It's there man in black & white! Were you the lad at your school that took the ball home if he didn't win? Sad really. No I watched it Very impressive if you knew it, well done You doth protest too much, Mr quote fail. It was the anger boiling up inside what did it. It's my era innit. T'is all. Couldn't quite make the ninja edit either, more disappointingly :( Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 09:00:23 PM Private Sponge Technolog Obvious google. I mean, come on Just too young eh Rich? If? Fecking IF!!! It's there man in black & white! Were you the lad at your school that took the ball home if he didn't win? Sad really. No I watched it Very impressive if you knew it, well done You doth protest too much, Mr quote fail. It was the anger boiling up inside what did it. It's my era innit. T'is all. Couldn't quite make the ninja edit either, more disappointingly :( I know, I am just jealous Well done. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:00:54 PM Positions after round 6
Technolog 6 traffic jam 7 Joobies 9 Claw 9 Girgy85 9 Doogan 10 Kinboshi 10 Tightend 11 The crow 11 Cf 11 red Simon 11 Sharplea 13 Snoopy1239 13 Longines 14 George2Loose 14 Shogun112 18 Milligan84 19 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 09:01:26 PM Private Sponge Technolog Obvious google. I mean, come on Just too young eh Rich? If? Fecking IF!!! It's there man in black & white! Were you the lad at your school that took the ball home if he didn't win? Sad really. No I watched it Very impressive if you knew it, well done You doth protest too much, Mr quote fail. It was the anger boiling up inside what did it. It's my era innit. T'is all. Couldn't quite make the ninja edit either, more disappointingly :( I know, I am just jealous Well done. Means a lot ;D Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:04:28 PM 7. A common site on the body for a piercing.
Sheep Clitoris 2 Points Girgy85 Cf Ear 3 Points red Simon Longines Joobie538 Septum 3 Points Shogun 112 Snoopy1239 Technolog Eyebrow 3 Points Tightend traffic jam The Crow Lip 2 Points George2Loose Kinboshi Aces Clittoral hood Claw Foreskin Doogan Nipple Milligan 84 Nape sharplea Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 09:05:03 PM http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038166/
i think its spelt the 3 google caballeros Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 09:05:35 PM Objection
A foreskin is not a common site for a piercing Common is a subjective term of course but surely foreskin piercings are not common? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:06:05 PM 7. A common site on the body for a piercing. Sheep Clitoris/Hood 3 Points Girgy85 Claw 75 Cf please don't whale these answers. they are different body parts/different piercings Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:07:18 PM OBJECTION!!!
I said below the lower lip, that is definitely not the lip Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:08:18 PM OBJECTION!!! I said below the lower lip, that is definitely not the lip One of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labret Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 09:08:49 PM Objection A foreskin is not a common site for a piercing Common is a subjective term of course but surely foreskin piercings are not common? i only have 1 piercing so you could call it common Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:09:46 PM OBJECTION!!! I said below the lower lip, that is definitely not the lip One of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labret (http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc43/kinboshi/150px-An_azure_depth.jpg) Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 09:10:16 PM i would say nape (i guess thats nape of neck) is less common than foreskin)
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 09:10:18 PM Objection A foreskin is not a common site for a piercing Common is a subjective term of course but surely foreskin piercings are not common? i only have 1 piercing so you could call it common yes but 1 occurrence, so far, in a UK population of 35 million men is not exactly common is it? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:10:33 PM Objection A foreskin is not a common site for a piercing Common is a subjective term of course but surely foreskin piercings are not common? Not in Israel. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:10:48 PM yeah foreskin pretty common imo.
you could argue that clit piercings are pretty uncommon. most go for the hood yo. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 09:10:59 PM Objection A foreskin is not a common site for a piercing Common is a subjective term of course but surely foreskin piercings are not common? i only have 1 piercing so you could call it common loads have them yes but 1 occurrence, so far, in a UK population of 35 million men is not exactly common is it? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: KarmaDope on April 12, 2011, 09:11:25 PM i would say nape (i guess thats nape of neck) is less common than foreskin) It is the neck and it's a pretty common form of surface piercing. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:12:22 PM OBJECTION!!! I said below the lower lip, that is definitely not the lip One of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labret (http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc43/kinboshi/150px-An_azure_depth.jpg) Just in case you missed my objection, esteemed QM. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:13:03 PM Objection I agree that common is a subjective word and i decided to go to the site that came up top of the googling list and peruse the matter. They even had a price for it so that was good enough for me. And google images had lots of pictures of it.A foreskin is not a common site for a piercing Common is a subjective term of course but surely foreskin piercings are not common? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 09:13:22 PM OBJECTION!!! I said below the lower lip, that is definitely not the lip One of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labret (http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc43/kinboshi/150px-An_azure_depth.jpg) Just in case you missed my objection, esteemed QM. did you call it under lip or labret? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:14:35 PM OBJECTION!!! I said below the lower lip, that is definitely not the lip One of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labret did you call it under lip or labret? (http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc43/kinboshi/150px-An_azure_depth.jpg) Just in case you missed my objection, esteemed QM. The question asked for a location - I said "below the bottom lip". Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:14:42 PM 7. A common site on the body for a piercing. Sheep Clitoris/Hood 3 Points Girgy85 Claw 75 Cf please don't whale these answers. they are different body parts/different piercings cough Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:16:09 PM OBJECTION!!! I said below the lower lip, that is definitely not the lip One of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labret did you call it under lip or labret? (http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc43/kinboshi/150px-An_azure_depth.jpg) Just in case you missed my objection, esteemed QM. The question asked for a location - I said "below the bottom lip". should have said 'below the hairline'. covers loads, that Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 09:17:26 PM OBJECTION!!! I said below the lower lip, that is definitely not the lip One of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labret did you call it under lip or labret? (http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc43/kinboshi/150px-An_azure_depth.jpg) Just in case you missed my objection, esteemed QM. The question asked for a location - I said "below the bottom lip". then i agree with answer, farce of a question Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:19:00 PM 7. A common site on the body for a piercing. Sheep Clitoris/Hood 3 Points Girgy85 Claw 75 Cf please don't whale these answers. they are different body parts/different piercings Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:20:02 PM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoris_piercing "relatively uncommon"
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:21:08 PM 7. A common site on the body for a piercing. Sheep Clitoris/Hood 3 Points Girgy85 Claw 75 Cf please don't whale these answers. they are different body parts/different piercings farce. would have chosen a different answer if i'd known you were going to lump together any parts of body within a 6 mile radius. please see link above. fail anyone that said 'clit' pass anyone that said 'hood' imo Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:21:12 PM I can only type with 2 fingers.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:23:23 PM In my considerable experience, although i agree its often dark, there isn't a large distance from one bit to the other.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:24:13 PM In my considerable experience, although i agree its often dark, there isn't a large distance from one bit to the other. irrelevant. one is a common site for piercings, the other is 'relatively uncommon'. they are separate entities, either of which can be pierced. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:25:58 PM Things can only get worse with the next question but first the scores.
Positions after round 7 Technolog 9 traffic jam 10 Doogan 11 Joobies 12 Claw 10 Girgy85 11 Kinboshi 12 Tightend 14 The crow 14 Cf 13 red Simon 14 Sharplea 14 Snoopy1239 16 George2Loose 16 Longines 17 Milligan84 20 Shogun112 21 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:26:12 PM 7. A common site on the body for a piercing. Sheep Clitoris/Hood 3 Points Girgy85 Claw 75 Cf please don't whale these answers. they are different body parts/different piercings Top lip of mouth, bottom lip of mouth or below the bottom lip and therefore not the lip. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:27:21 PM seriously, change the ridiculous whaling on the last question or this is in danger of becoming a complete farce.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:27:21 PM 8 An edible nut.
When I posed this question about nuts I was not trying to show off as some botanical smart alec.I am no botanist, I am not very smart and I am not called alec. Hell I am not even called hector! I had thought someone may opt for pine nuts or peanuts which I could fail quite happily. No one chose them but when someone picked coconuts, that set off some alarm bells as it did not seem like the rest of the nuts chosen( it’s even got milk inside it). My instincts were proved correct as the coconut is in fact a drupe. However the wikipedia pages on drupes and nuts then threw the whole time/space/nut continuum completely out of wack. I have marked the answers as fairly as I could and before you all object go to wikipedia and the page on nuts/fruit definition and see what I have had to deal with Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: The-Crow on April 12, 2011, 09:27:47 PM you just gotta see these
http://funnytogo.com/pictures/extremebodypiercing/cults.htm Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:28:22 PM As with the last RSQ, there is the requirement for updating your own score correctly.
kinboshi - 11 points. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 09:29:26 PM what about team sport question?
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:29:44 PM Sorry my mistake.
8. A team sport that has between 2 and 11 members in it. Sheep 2 Points Handball Tightend cf Rugby 7’s red Simon Technolog Aces 5 a side Football The Crow Lacrosse Milligan 84 Synchronised swimming George2Loose Lawn Bowls Doogan Elephant Polo Claw75 Polo Snoopy1239 Kabaddi Longines Curling Shogun 112 Waterpolo joobie538 Fails 7 Points Badminton traffic jam Mixed Pairs Badminton Girgy85 Cycling Madison Kinboshi Cricket sharplea Interesting fact. The word kabaddi derives from a Tamil word meaning “ holding of hand”. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:30:07 PM 7. A common site on the body for a piercing. Sheep Clitoris/Hood 3 Points Girgy85 Claw 75 Cf please don't whale these answers. they are different body parts/different piercings Top lip of mouth, bottom lip of mouth or below the bottom lip and therefore not the lip. ;bump; Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:30:56 PM seriously, change the ridiculous whaling on the last question or this is in danger of becoming a complete farce. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:31:37 PM Sorry my mistake. 8. A team sport that has between 2 and 11 members in it. Sheep 2 Points Handball Tightend cf Rugby 7’s red Simon Technolog Aces 5 a side Football The Crow Lacrosse Milligan 84 Synchronised swimming George2Loose Lawn Bowls Doogan Elephant Polo Claw75 Polo Snoopy1239 Kabaddi Longines Curling Shogun 112 Waterpolo joobie538 Fails 7 Points Badminton traffic jam Mixed Pairs Badminton Girgy85 Cycling Madison Kinboshi Cricket sharplea Interesting fact. The word kabaddi derives from a Tamil word meaning “ holding of hand”. OBJECTION. Why is Madison a fail? It's a team sport. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:31:49 PM seriously, change the ridiculous whaling on the last question or this is in danger of becoming a complete farce. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: KarmaDope on April 12, 2011, 09:32:08 PM Same objection for cricket, there's only 11 players on a team at the same time.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:33:27 PM Sorry my mistake. 8. A team sport that has between 2 and 11 members in it. Sheep 2 Points Handball Tightend cf Rugby 7’s red Simon Technolog Aces 5 a side Football The Crow Lacrosse Milligan 84 Synchronised swimming George2Loose Lawn Bowls Doogan Elephant Polo Claw75 Polo Snoopy1239 Kabaddi Longines Curling Shogun 112 Waterpolo joobie538 Fails 7 Points Badminton traffic jam Mixed Pairs Badminton Girgy85 Cycling Madison Kinboshi Cricket sharplea Interesting fact. The word kabaddi derives from a Tamil word meaning “ holding of hand”. OBJECTION. Why is Madison a fail? It's a team sport. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 09:34:04 PM the question was phrased to include 2 and 11, I thought.....
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:34:11 PM Same objection for cricket, there's only 11 players on a team at the same time. If cricket's a fail, then loads of the others are too that have teams/squads that are bigger than 11. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:34:31 PM Same objection for cricket, there's only 11 players on a team at the same time. 11 is not between 2 and 11 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: KarmaDope on April 12, 2011, 09:35:54 PM the question was phrased to include 2 and 11, I thought..... This. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:36:01 PM Sorry my mistake. 8. A team sport that has between 2 and 11 members in it. Sheep 2 Points Handball Tightend cf Rugby 7’s red Simon Technolog Aces 5 a side Football The Crow Lacrosse Milligan 84 Synchronised swimming George2Loose Lawn Bowls Doogan Elephant Polo Claw75 Polo Snoopy1239 Kabaddi Longines Curling Shogun 112 Waterpolo joobie538 Fails 7 Points Badminton traffic jam Mixed Pairs Badminton Girgy85 Cycling Madison Kinboshi Cricket sharplea Interesting fact. The word kabaddi derives from a Tamil word meaning “ holding of hand”. OBJECTION. Why is Madison a fail? It's a team sport. Madison can have 3 in a team. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:36:18 PM the question was phrased to include 2 and 11, I thought..... Had that been the case it would have read " a team sport with less than 12 players or maybe 2 to 11 inclusive. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 09:36:36 PM Same objection for cricket, there's only 11 players on a team at the same time. 11 is not between 2 and 11 not what your question said between 2 and 11 is INCLUSIVE if you'd asked more than 2 and less than 11, fine, but you didn't Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:37:04 PM erm, pretty sure 'between 2 and 11' implies inclusive
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:37:13 PM Same objection for cricket, there's only 11 players on a team at the same time. If cricket's a fail, then loads of the others are too that have teams/squads that are bigger than 11. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:38:11 PM Sorry my mistake. 8. A team sport that has between 2 and 11 members in it. Sheep 2 Points Handball Tightend cf Rugby 7’s red Simon Technolog Aces 5 a side Football The Crow Lacrosse Milligan 84 Synchronised swimming George2Loose Lawn Bowls Doogan Elephant Polo Claw75 Polo Snoopy1239 Kabaddi Longines Curling Shogun 112 Waterpolo joobie538 Fails 7 Points Badminton traffic jam Mixed Pairs Badminton Girgy85 Cycling Madison Kinboshi Cricket sharplea Interesting fact. The word kabaddi derives from a Tamil word meaning “ holding of hand”. OBJECTION. Why is Madison a fail? It's a team sport. Madison can have 3 in a team. http://www.swimbikerunner.com/more-cycling-glossary/ 2-3 members in a team. 2 is between 2 and 11, and 3 certainly is. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:38:22 PM kinboshi - 12 points
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:39:17 PM Sorry my mistake. 8. A team sport that has between 2 and 11 members in it. Sheep 2 Points Handball Tightend cf Rugby 7’s red Simon Technolog Aces 5 a side Football The Crow Lacrosse Milligan 84 Synchronised swimming George2Loose Lawn Bowls Doogan Elephant Polo Claw75 Polo Snoopy1239 Kabaddi Longines Curling Shogun 112 Waterpolo joobie538 Fails 7 Points Badminton traffic jam Mixed Pairs Badminton Girgy85 Cycling Madison Kinboshi Cricket sharplea Interesting fact. The word kabaddi derives from a Tamil word meaning “ holding of hand”. OBJECTION. Why is Madison a fail? It's a team sport. Madison can have 3 in a team. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: KarmaDope on April 12, 2011, 09:39:45 PM And there are six-a-side cricket matches.
Pretty sure England won a 6 a side international tourney in 2008... Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 09:40:57 PM i'm gonna give up soon. this is ridic. had high hopes for hector too
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 09:41:07 PM And there are six-a-side cricket matches. Pretty sure England won a 6 a side international tourney in 2008... you didnt mention 6/side. people said 5 a side football Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: KarmaDope on April 12, 2011, 09:41:59 PM And there are six-a-side cricket matches. Pretty sure England won a 6 a side international tourney in 2008... you didnt mention 6/side. people said 5 a side football Maybe because its not called 6 a side. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:42:12 PM And there are six-a-side cricket matches. Had you stated a truncated version of the game, a la 5 aside football, i would have passed it.Pretty sure England won a 6 a side international tourney in 2008... Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: KarmaDope on April 12, 2011, 09:43:58 PM "The Hong Kong Cricket Sixes (name of tournament) is an annual 10-team international cricket tournament held at the Kowloon Cricket Club and fully sanctioned by the International Cricket Council. The tournament is made for television, with rules and a venue that encourage aggressive batting and high scoring. Because every player (except the wicket-keeper) is required to bowl one over, the format suits all-rounders."
Where in there does it state that its a six a side cricket tournament. It is a game of cricket with 6 players per team. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: KarmaDope on April 12, 2011, 09:46:12 PM Your question says "Name a team sport that has between 2 and 11 members in it".
Cricket is a team sport. It has between 2 and 11 members in it. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:46:31 PM Claw you win. I should have been in the shower ages ago.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: KarmaDope on April 12, 2011, 09:47:11 PM Same objection for cricket, there's only 11 players on a team at the same time. 11 is not between 2 and 11 not what your question said between 2 and 11 is INCLUSIVE if you'd asked more than 2 and less than 11, fine, but you didn't Oh, and if the QM didn't like my first 3 objections... THIS. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:47:24 PM 9. An edible nut.
Sheep 3 Points Chestnut sharplea Snoopy1239 Technolog Hazelnut/Cob Nut 2 Points cf joobie538 Fails 8 Points Brazil Girgy85 Claw 75 Cashew red Simon Pistachio Milligan 84 Almond George2Loose Pecan kinboshi Okari Longines Mongongo Shogun 112 Maccademia Tightend Coconut Doogan Walnut traffic jam The Crow Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Cf on April 12, 2011, 09:47:38 PM I was the only person to select the same answer as tightend. I have reached the pinnacle of my rsq career.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 09:50:10 PM wtf?
explain please Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 09:50:26 PM Fails 8 Points
Brazil Girgy85 Claw 75 Cashew red Simon Pistachio Milligan 84 Almond George2Loose Pecan kinboshi Okari Longines Mongongo Shogun 112 Maccademia Tightend Coconut Doogan Walnut traffic jam The Crow ridiculous Hector, you pillock I am out of here, goodnight Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:50:48 PM 9. An edible nut. Sheep 3 Points Chestnut sharplea Snoopy1239 Technolog Hazelnut/Cob Nut 2 Points cf joobie538 Fails 8 Points Brazil Girgy85 Claw 75 Cashew red Simon Pistachio Milligan 84 Almond George2Loose Pecan kinboshi Okari Longines Mongongo Shogun 112 Maccademia Tightend Coconut Doogan Walnut traffic jam The Crow LOL Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:51:12 PM kinboshi - 13 points
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: The-Crow on April 12, 2011, 09:53:07 PM walnuts are the Healthiest nuts you can eat
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110327191040.htm Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:53:44 PM Blame the Botanical society not me.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 09:54:26 PM The nuts are a valuable food crop. Only two of the species, Macadamia integrifolia and Macadamia tetraphylla, are of commercial importance. The remainder of the genus possess poisonous and/or inedible nuts, such as M. whelanii and M. ternifolia; the toxicity is due to the presence of cyanogenic glycosides. These glycosides can be removed by prolonged leaching, a practice carried out by some Indigenous Australian people in order to use these species as well.
The two species of edible macadamia readily hybridize, and M. tetraphylla is threatened in the wild due to this. The nut was first discovered by Europeans south of Brisbane in 1828 by the explorer and botanist Alan Cunningham. One of the locations where wild nut trees were originally found was at Mount Bauple near Maryborough in southeast Queensland, Australia. Locals in this area still refer to them as "Bauple nuts". The macadamia nut is the only plant food native to Australia that is produced and exported in any significant quantity.[c Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:55:00 PM You asked for edible nuts, not botanical nuts.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:56:00 PM They're not nuts, and 3 isn't between 2 and 11.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 09:56:18 PM Blame the Botanical society not me. Sigh. Edible nuts do not have to be classed nuts by the botanical society!!!! Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 09:56:55 PM The nuts are a valuable food crop. Only two of the species, Macadamia integrifolia and Macadamia tetraphylla, are of commercial importance. The remainder of the genus possess poisonous and/or inedible nuts, such as M. whelanii and M. ternifolia; the toxicity is due to the presence of cyanogenic glycosides. These glycosides can be removed by prolonged leaching, a practice carried out by some Indigenous Australian people in order to use these species as well. The two species of edible macadamia readily hybridize, and M. tetraphylla is threatened in the wild due to this. The nut was first discovered by Europeans south of Brisbane in 1828 by the explorer and botanist Alan Cunningham. One of the locations where wild nut trees were originally found was at Mount Bauple near Maryborough in southeast Queensland, Australia. Locals in this area still refer to them as "Bauple nuts". The macadamia nut is the only plant food native to Australia that is produced and exported in any significant quantity.[c I recognise that from wikipedia. Now check on the page for what constitues a nut where it states quite clearly that the macademia is not a nut. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:57:24 PM Blame the Botanical society not me. ..and are you blaming the mathematical society for 3 not being between 2 and 11; and blaming who exactly for 'below the bottom lip' being the same as 'the lips'? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 09:57:52 PM The nuts are a valuable food crop. Only two of the species, Macadamia integrifolia and Macadamia tetraphylla, are of commercial importance. The remainder of the genus possess poisonous and/or inedible nuts, such as M. whelanii and M. ternifolia; the toxicity is due to the presence of cyanogenic glycosides. These glycosides can be removed by prolonged leaching, a practice carried out by some Indigenous Australian people in order to use these species as well. The two species of edible macadamia readily hybridize, and M. tetraphylla is threatened in the wild due to this. The nut was first discovered by Europeans south of Brisbane in 1828 by the explorer and botanist Alan Cunningham. One of the locations where wild nut trees were originally found was at Mount Bauple near Maryborough in southeast Queensland, Australia. Locals in this area still refer to them as "Bauple nuts". The macadamia nut is the only plant food native to Australia that is produced and exported in any significant quantity.[c I recognise that from wikipedia. Now check on the page for what constitues a nut where it states quite clearly that the macademia is not a nut. LOL!!! It is a plant that has a nut. THE NUT IS EDIBLE! This is what you asked!!! Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:57:54 PM The nuts are a valuable food crop. Only two of the species, Macadamia integrifolia and Macadamia tetraphylla, are of commercial importance. The remainder of the genus possess poisonous and/or inedible nuts, such as M. whelanii and M. ternifolia; the toxicity is due to the presence of cyanogenic glycosides. These glycosides can be removed by prolonged leaching, a practice carried out by some Indigenous Australian people in order to use these species as well. The two species of edible macadamia readily hybridize, and M. tetraphylla is threatened in the wild due to this. The nut was first discovered by Europeans south of Brisbane in 1828 by the explorer and botanist Alan Cunningham. One of the locations where wild nut trees were originally found was at Mount Bauple near Maryborough in southeast Queensland, Australia. Locals in this area still refer to them as "Bauple nuts". The macadamia nut is the only plant food native to Australia that is produced and exported in any significant quantity.[c I recognise that from wikipedia. Now check on the page for what constitues a nut where it states quite clearly that the macademia is not a nut. Do you recognise the number 3? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 09:58:02 PM Blame the Botanical society not me. Sigh. Edible nuts do not have to be classed nuts by the botanical society!!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_culinary_nuts ANSWERS ALLL Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 09:59:26 PM List of RSQ QM Nuts
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 10:00:16 PM Some fruits and seeds that do not meet the botanical definition but are nuts in the culinary sense:
Almonds, pecans and walnuts are the edible seeds of drupe fruits — the leathery "flesh" is removed at harvest. Brazil nut is the seed from a capsule. Candlenut (used for oil) is a seed. Cashew nut is a seed.[4] Gevuinanut Horse-chestnut is an inedible capsule. Macadamia nut is a creamy white kernel (Macadamia integrifolia). Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: KarmaDope on April 12, 2011, 10:01:52 PM Just post Q10 and then the final scores :P
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 10:01:59 PM Positions after round 9
Technolog 14 Joobies 15 Cf 17 Doogan 20 Snoopy1239 20 Claw 19 The crow 23 Tightend 24 red Simon 24 Sharplea 24 traffic jam 25 George2Loose 25 Longines 26 Girgy85 26 Kinboshi 27 Milligan84 29 Shogun112 30 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 10:02:00 PM Some fruits and seeds that do not meet the botanical definition but are nuts in the culinary sense: Almonds, pecans and walnuts are the edible seeds of drupe fruits — the leathery "flesh" is removed at harvest. Brazil nut is the seed from a capsule. Candlenut (used for oil) is a seed. Cashew nut is a seed.[4] Gevuinanut Horse-chestnut is an inedible capsule. Macadamia nut is a creamy white kernel (Macadamia integrifolia). for crying out loud YOU ASKED FOR EDIBLE NUTS, not for the botanical source of the nut Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 10:02:08 PM Some fruits and seeds that do not meet the botanical definition but are nuts in the culinary sense: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_culinary_nutsAlmonds, pecans and walnuts are the edible seeds of drupe fruits — the leathery "flesh" is removed at harvest. Brazil nut is the seed from a capsule. Candlenut (used for oil) is a seed. Cashew nut is a seed.[4] Gevuinanut Horse-chestnut is an inedible capsule. Macadamia nut is a creamy white kernel (Macadamia integrifolia). Gives all nutes if classed as seeds/drupes or nuts. and botanical classings Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 10:03:17 PM Who decides what is a nut? Delia Smith or Richard Attenborough?
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 10:03:23 PM Positions after round 9 Technolog 14 Joobies 15 Cf 17 Doogan 20 Snoopy1239 20 Claw 19 The crow 23 Tightend 24 red Simon 24 Sharplea 24 traffic jam 25 George2Loose 25 Longines 26 Girgy85 26 Kinboshi 27 Milligan84 29 Shogun112 30 kinboshi - 13 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 10:04:01 PM Or should that be David Attenborough
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 10:04:12 PM Absolute joke
What is it about RSQ QMing that dashes the watching hopes of all who enter? You all lose any common sense Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 10:04:13 PM Who decides what is a nut? Delia Smith or Richard Attenborough? Who decides if 3 is an integer between 2 and 11 and if 'below the lip' is different to 'the lips'? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 10:04:52 PM Positions after round 9 Technolog 14 Joobies 15 Cf 17 Doogan Snoopy1239 20 Claw 19 The crow 23 Tightend 24 red Simon 24 Sharplea 24 traffic jam 25 George2Loose 25 Longines 26 Girgy85 26 Kinboshi 27 Milligan84 29 Shogun112 30 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 10:04:58 PM This has made me tilt the game tonight!
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 10:05:09 PM 10. An actor who has played the role of James Bond in a film.
Sheep 3 Points David Niven Longines Shogun 112 Cf Pierce Brosnan Girgy 85 Milligan84 The Crow Roger Moore 2 Points George2loose traffic jam Daniel Craig 2 Points Claw 75 Sharplea George Lazenby 2 Points red Simon Joobie538 Aces minus 1 point Sean Connery Kinboshi Pass Doogan Tightend Snoopy1239 Technolog Only correct answer not selected was Timothy Dalton Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 10:05:10 PM Dicky Attenborough was a dinosaur nut in Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 10:05:18 PM Who decides what is a nut? Delia Smith or Richard Attenborough? Delia for EDIBLE nuts. D Attenborough for Botany. As your question veered towards delia, then lets go with that Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 10:06:01 PM kinboshi - 12 points
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 10:06:41 PM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_culinary_nuts
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 10:07:13 PM Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 10:07:17 PM 2 < 3 < 11
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 10:08:39 PM TightEnd 13 points
Who is the correct winner? We can disregard Hector's disaster http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_culinary_nuts Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 10:09:12 PM A nut is a living thing and must be classed by the botanist not a chef. The fact that i wanted a nut that could be eaten is incidental.
Still we have all learnt something tonight. Don't try to win one of these things. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 10:09:39 PM (http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc43/kinboshi/imagesqtbnANd9GcSyD52YrwRUPLLc2mGBH.jpg)
Here we see two locations for piercings - the lip and below the bottom lip. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 10:09:56 PM Positions after round 10
Technolog 14 Joobies 17 Doogan 20 Snoopy1239 20 Cf 20 Claw 21 Tightend 24 The crow 26 red Simon 26 Sharplea 26 Kinboshi 26 traffic jam 27 George2Loose 27 Longines 29 Girgy85 29 Milligan84 32 Shogun112 33 Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Claw75 on April 12, 2011, 10:10:07 PM (http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc43/kinboshi/imagesqtbnANd9GcSyD52YrwRUPLLc2mGBH.jpg) Here we see two locations for piercings - the lip and below the bottom lip. i shant post pictures in support of my piercing objection Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 10:10:31 PM (http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc43/kinboshi/imagesqtbnANd9GcSyD52YrwRUPLLc2mGBH.jpg) Here we see two locations for piercings - the lip and below the bottom lip. i shant post pictures in support of my piercing objection boooo Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: kinboshi on April 12, 2011, 10:10:46 PM A nut is a living thing and must be classed by the botanist not a chef. The fact that i wanted a nut that could be eaten is incidental. Still we have all learnt something tonight. Don't try to win one of these things. ..and your poor excuse for the number 3 not being between 2 and 11, and for your incorrect whaling of the piercing question? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 10:11:09 PM (http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc43/kinboshi/imagesqtbnANd9GcSyD52YrwRUPLLc2mGBH.jpg) Here we see two locations for piercings - the lip and below the bottom lip. i shant post pictures in support of my piercing objection Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: trafficjam on April 12, 2011, 10:11:43 PM COMPLETE FARCE
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 10:11:47 PM Positions after round 10 Technolog 14 Joobies 17 Doogan 20 Snoopy1239 20 Cf 20 Claw 21 Tightend 24 The crow 26 red Simon 26 Sharplea 26 Kinboshi 26 traffic jam 27 George2Loose 27 Longines 29 Girgy85 29 Milligan84 32 Shogun112 33 Christ no. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: KarmaDope on April 12, 2011, 10:12:14 PM We're all doomed.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 10:13:15 PM We're all doomed. if Jack nominates, we have some hope. Slender hope, but hope is hope Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 10:15:18 PM We're all doomed. if Jack nominates, we have some hope. Slender hope, but hope is hope Happy (so, so happy) to nominate. Can I nominate tighty to nominate someone? Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 10:15:55 PM It's shower time.
I enjoyed it immensely thanks to all you Drupers. It has been emotional. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: The-Crow on April 12, 2011, 10:17:08 PM Nominate me I'ves got questions ready NOW
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: millidonk on April 12, 2011, 10:18:32 PM The nut question was redic.. no idea why A1 came to my head for repping UK when they sang for Norway. I was gonna put Timothy Dalton for Bond but thought everyone won. 2nd to last. I can live with that. Enjoyed it. wp!
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 10:18:38 PM It's shower time. I enjoyed it immensely thanks to all you Drupers. It has been a farce, and I wont darken Rsq with another quiz again. I wholeheartedly apologise to all involved for my colossal fcuk up. well done for admitting it. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: doogan on April 12, 2011, 10:34:25 PM well that was fun, i must remember to have a few bottles of vino everytime i enter
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: hector62 on April 12, 2011, 10:34:59 PM My final thought on the nut question which came to me in the shower.
What if my question had been " name a nut you could play football with?" You may reasonably expect Gaza to decide if he could play football with a said nut but not to decide if the item was a nut. Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 10:47:45 PM Nominate me I'ves got questions ready NOW Get 'em up crow! I predict a riot :) Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: technolog on April 12, 2011, 10:48:34 PM Oh. And there better be at least 1 non-sausage question!
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: TightEnd on April 12, 2011, 10:50:45 PM Congratulations Crow
No sausage questions!! Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Cf on April 12, 2011, 11:20:05 PM Oh god lol. Just read it. I said it would be messy and I wasn't wrong! As soon as I read that nut question the word "FARCE" sprang straight to mind.
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Laxie on April 12, 2011, 11:21:52 PM I was annoyed with meself for not entering in time this morning.
This evening I reckon it was a good swerve. That nut question woulda put me over the edge. Well played QM!!! rotflmfao Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: Shogun112 on April 13, 2011, 12:24:42 AM Do you realise that its more dificult to come last than come first..!!!
Title: Re: RSQ 52 Back to basics Post by: snoopy1239 on April 13, 2011, 01:58:35 AM Was pretty tilted by my progress at first, but was worth reading whole thread just for nutgate. hehe
|