blonde poker forum

Community Forums => Betting Tips and Sport Discussion => Topic started by: TightEnd on October 14, 2015, 11:36:26 AM



Title: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 14, 2015, 11:36:26 AM
this is early i know but we can cover the play offs and onwards

shaping up to be a corker isn't it? all the better for having northern ireland and wales in it

Pelle top scored in qualification for italy

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQMc5WhoQrKYdNpr5tWF2A4Goio0sfMeDIBel3NhXJqsH9gDe-mGA)

belgium won their group

(http://www.jewishnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/HAZARD1.jpg)

a golden generation, apprently

(http://e0.365dm.com/14/09/660x350/gareth-bale-goal-celeb-andorra-wales-european-qualifier_3202108.jpg)


meanwhile

oh dear

(http://i3.dailyrecord.co.uk/incoming/article6601451.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/JS74066347.jpg)

oh dear

(http://e2.365dm.com/15/10/16-9/20/holland-czech-republic_3363770.jpg?20151013221323)



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 14, 2015, 11:39:50 AM
 The eight teams finishing third will contest four two-legged play-off ties.

They are:

Bosnia (Group B)

Ukraine (Group C)

Republic of Ireland (Group D)

Slovenia (Group E)

Hungary (Group F)

Sweden (Group G)

Norway (Group H)

Denmark (Group I)


The draw for the play-offs will take place on 18 October.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 14, 2015, 11:43:24 AM
through

Czech
Iceland
Turkey
Belgium
Wales
Spain
Slovakia
Germany
Poland
England
Switzerland
Northern Ireland
Romaina
Austria
Russia
Italy
Croatia
Portugal
Albania

and the hosts, France


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 14, 2015, 01:47:47 PM
The draw for next summer's Euro 2016 finals will take place on Saturday December 12 in Paris at 1700 GMT.

The teams will be drawn into six groups of four from four pots of seeds.


Both the hosts, France, and the defending champions, Spain, are automatically among the top seeds with France having already been placed in Group A. The four teams joining Spain in pot one will being determined by the UEFA national team coefficient ranking which will be published once November's play-offs have taken place (see above). Were the current rankings to be used, the four other top seeds would be Germany, England, Portugal and Belgium, who edged ahead of Italy after the final round of qualifiers.

The make-up of the other pots will also be determined by the rankings with the next six best-ranked teams in pot two and so on.

It is worth noting the UEFA ranking is considerably different to the FIFA world rankings. For example, while Wales are ranked eighth by FIFA, they are currently only 28th on UEFA's list. That means they, like Northern Ireland, are likely to be in the fourth pot on draw day.

Key dates

Oct 18 - Play-off draw
Nov 12-17 Play-offs
Dec 12 - Finals draw
May 31 - Squad deadline
Jun 10 - Finals begin
Jul 10 - Euro 2016 final


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 14, 2015, 01:48:20 PM
The finals themselves take place in France from Friday June 10 to Sunday July 10 next year. With the tournament having been expanded to 24 teams, it will now last as long as a World Cup, stretching over a four-week period, as opposed to three as has been the case with the previous 16-team events.

Only eight of the 24 nations will be eliminated in the group phase with the top two in each group plus the four best third-placed teams progressing to the last-16 knockout stage - for those old enough to remember, the format is reminiscent of the one used at the Italia 90 World Cup.

Which third-placed team slots in where in the last-16 draw is already set but is subject to a pretty complicated explanation - details can be found in the official tournament regulations.

The final will take place in the Stade de France in Paris, venue for the 1998 World Cup final. It is the largest of the 10 venues with a capacity of 80,000.

The semi-finals will take place in Lyon and Marseille which, along with Lille, are the other stadia which hold more than 50,000.

The capital will also stage matches at Paris Saint-Germain's Parc des Princes ground, while Bordeaux, Lens, Nice, Saint-Etienne and Toulouse are the other cities chosen to host games.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 14, 2015, 01:49:28 PM
World champions Germany are currently the 3/1 favourites for Euro 2016

Hosts France can be backed at 7/2, with holders Spain only third favourites at 13/2.

England are fifth in the outright market at 11/1, behind 9/1 shots Belgium, while traditional continental powerhouses Italy are out at 16/1.


Sky Bet also currently bet on who will start England's first game of the tournament. Twelve players are odds-on but the shortest prices suggest this will be the XI: Hart, Clyne, Smalling, Cahill, Baines, Henderson, Milner, Walcott, Sturridge, Rooney, Sterling.

John Stones is the other player currently odds-on. Ross Barkley, who has impressed in recent games, is out at 9/4.

There's also a market for players to make the England squad with 25 players currently odds-on - only 23 will make the trip.

Taking out the longest-odds player from the defence, midfield and forward options and adding a third keeper (only two are odds-on) you get the following squad:

Hart, Butland, Forster, Cahill, Smalling, Stones, Baines, Jagielka, Clyne, Jones, Bertrand, Henderson, Milner, Barkley, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Lallana, Delph, Wilshere, Rooney, Sterling, Kane, Walcott, Sturridge.

When the book was opened in May, the expected squad had a different look to it:

Hart, Foster, Forster, Cahill, Baines, Smalling, Jones, Clyne, Stones, Shaw, Jagielka, Henderson, Sterling, Milner, Lallana, Walcott, Delph, Wilshere, Carrick, Rooney, Sturridge, Kane, Welbeck.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: kp24 on October 14, 2015, 02:36:00 PM
Was just talking about this at work today don't think there are really good sides apart from Germany and Spain but even they have holes in their sides otherwise I think it's up for grabs,the Belgium side are very disappointing to me with the amount of talent at their disposal and play some very uninspiring football.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on October 14, 2015, 03:02:38 PM
Looking forward to this, and hopefully it won't be like the last WC out in Vegas :(


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Teacake on October 15, 2015, 09:36:17 PM
I'm going over for the first week of this and really looking forward to it as I've never done a major finals.
We have tickets for 3 games in Bordeaux and Toulouse, flights and accommodation sorted as well as my mate has property there.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on October 15, 2015, 10:04:03 PM
I'd never applied for tickets to a major summer football tourn before and me and 3 mates thought it might be like the olympics/rwc. Ended up with 4x tickets to 17 games! Will wait to see what we got once the draw is made but will definitely be selling a few back. If anyone wants some, happy to sell at face for those games we decide not to go to.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on October 15, 2015, 10:12:47 PM
Couple mates of mine went travelling in 1998, which ended up with them doing Le Mans, and the whole WC. So long ago, I can't remember what games they went to, but they said it was incred, and obv makes for some lifelong memories.

Definitely more exciting than watching them with a hangover and a fruit plate, at the Nugget ;D


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on October 16, 2015, 01:08:05 AM
24 nations seems way too many. Basically almost everyone gets in apart from San Marino, Andorra and Scotland?



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on October 16, 2015, 01:34:40 AM
24 nations seems way too many. Basically almost everyone gets in apart from San Marino, Andorra and Scotland?



This. 100% this


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on October 16, 2015, 01:35:59 AM
can we make it 32 nations next time please


oh wait scotland still wont get in


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 18, 2015, 01:47:39 PM
play off draw

Ukraine v Slovenia;
Sweden v Denmark;
Bosnia-Herzegovina v Republic of Ireland;
Norway v Hungary

the four winners are?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: ForthThistle on October 18, 2015, 01:52:59 PM
Slovenia and 3 Homes


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 16, 2015, 12:12:20 PM
Hungary qualified last night, their first major tournament appearance since 92

republic of ireland's big night tonight

sweden lead denmark

ukraine lead slovenia

in the other ties


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on November 16, 2015, 01:28:54 PM
Hungary qualified last night, their first major tournament appearance since 92

republic of ireland's big night tonight

sweden lead denmark

ukraine lead slovenia

in the other ties


Think Hungary is first appearance since Mexico 86.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 17, 2015, 10:02:11 AM
they made it

(http://e0.365dm.com/15/11/16-9/20/jon-walters-jonathan-ireland-goal-celebration-republic-of_3377710.jpg?20151116212358)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 17, 2015, 10:02:45 AM
horribly torn about tonight

want Kasper Schmeichel to get there, but don't want Zlatan to miss out on another major.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 17, 2015, 11:33:48 AM
EURO2016 draw pots are confirmed on Wednesday; here's the 4 ways the seedings could end up http://uefa.to/1X4bTj1 

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CUAa4-mXIAAQkRS.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on November 17, 2015, 07:42:26 PM
horribly torn about tonight

want Kasper Schmeichel to get there, but don't want Zlatan to miss out on another major.

Sounds like a win win to me that :)

I'll go with Kasper. I used to see him  knocking around quite a lot when he was a kid and before he signed pro for City. Always liked him and wanted him to do well.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 18, 2015, 10:01:45 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CUCy9tWWcAE7adn.png)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CUC55GrWUAAR8U0.png)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 11, 2015, 10:25:57 AM
the draw is tomorrow night



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 11, 2015, 01:40:14 PM
The Process

There will be four pots for the draw, with seedings based on the UEFA national team coefficient rankings.

England are one of the top seeds thanks to their record in qualifying and will not be drawn in the same group as any of the other nations in Pot One - Spain, Germany, Portugal and Belgium. Meanwhile, hosts France automatically take position one in Group A.

Those six countries will be drawn alongside one team each from Pots Two, Three and Four.

image: http://www.thefa.com/~/media/images/thefaportal/pillars/england/2015/general-images/euro-2016-top-seeds.ashx?la=en
France qualify as hosts, while Germany, Spain, England, Portugal and Belgium are top seeds in Euro 2016 draw

The hosts and the top seeds

The Pots and the Nations

Position One, Group A: France (hosts)
Pot One: Spain (holders), Germany, England, Portugal, Belgium
Pot Two: Italy, Russia, Switzerland, Austria, Croatia, Ukraine
Pot Three: Czech Republic, Sweden, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Hungary
Pot Four: Turkey, Republic of Ireland, Iceland, Wales, Albania, Northern Ireland

The Finals

The draw will reveal the six four-nation groups for next year's Finals, which will start on Friday 10 June at the Stade de France when France meet the team drawn into position two in Group A.

There will be 36 games played across the six groups between 10 and 22 June.

The top two in each of the groups will progress into the round of 16 knockout stage and will be joined by the four best third-placed sides.

The knockout competition continues with the eight last-16 winners moving into the quarter-finals, and so on.

The Final - the 51st game of the month-long competition - will take place back where it all began at the Stade de France in Saint-Denis on Sunday 10 July 2016.

Read more at http://www.thefa.com/news/england/2015/dec/euro-2016-draw-how-it-works#x1iR2ZZOuEHjkSbD.99


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 06:21:45 PM
England get the Marseille group, not ideal

England play in Marseille, Lens and Saint Etienne...


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 06:24:18 PM
England get Wales.

Oof.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on December 12, 2015, 06:25:02 PM
run better france


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 06:25:07 PM
N Ireland get Germany

Oof.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 06:30:36 PM
opening game France v Romania 10th June


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on December 12, 2015, 06:31:10 PM
slovakia decent draw


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 06:31:17 PM
Slovakia for England

Hamsik etc


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on December 12, 2015, 06:37:23 PM
Not italy ty


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 06:38:38 PM
England, Russia, Sovakia, Wales

will take that, compared to some draws


France have a lovely draw too


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on December 12, 2015, 06:39:26 PM
England, Russia, Sovakia, Wales

will take that, compared to some draws


France have a lovely draw too

portugals is still nice if they get italy lol

D plus italy would be death


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 06:39:36 PM
England v Russia, Marseille, June 11

 England v Wales, Lens, June 16

 England v Slovakia, St Etienne, June 20


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 06:41:40 PM
ouch

belgium, italy, republic of ireland and zlatan


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on December 12, 2015, 06:41:54 PM
oh to be portugal

lump on ronaldo top scorer


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 06:44:46 PM
Group A: France, Albania, Romania, Switzerland.
Group B: England, Wales, Slovakia, Russia.
Group C: Germany, Northern Ireland, Poland, Ukraine.
Group D: Spain, Turkey, Czech Republic, Croatia.
Group E: Belgium, Republic of Ireland, Sweden, Italy.
Group F: Portugal, Iceland, Hungary, Austria


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2015, 08:12:54 PM
the matches

fyi, eurostar are yet to put prices up for london-lille on the 15th-16th june for england-wales, if you mgiht be planning it

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CWC8UsvXIAAMk-I.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Teacake on December 12, 2015, 09:18:39 PM
Have tickets for Spain v Czech Rep, Austria v Hungary and Belgiuim v Ireland,. Happy with that, Austria Hungary is a bit meh but avoided the teams that I wanted too and got an Ireland game.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 13, 2015, 11:25:05 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CWC7GTAWcAEOgz5.png)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 13, 2015, 01:42:09 PM
Muller, Ronaldo and Benzema looking the best shouts for top scorer based on the groups. Maybe a tickle on Kane as well depending on the price/his form leading up to June.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 13, 2015, 01:45:04 PM
Benzema won't be in the squad unless his case is resolved favourably


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on December 13, 2015, 01:51:02 PM
Benzema won't be in the squad unless his case is resolved favourably

Ah yeah of course, forgot he is a potential wrong 'un. Who leads the line for France in his absence? Giroud?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 13, 2015, 01:54:03 PM
Benzema won't be in the squad unless his case is resolved favourably

Ah yeah of course, forgot he is a potential wrong 'un. Who leads the line for France in his absence? Giroud?

or Martial/Griezmann


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on May 06, 2016, 10:26:05 AM
5 weeks today

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Chwm6YoW0AER32z.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on May 12, 2016, 12:11:15 PM
squad announcements starting

heres belgium

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CiP5IJzVAAAkwll.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 12, 2016, 08:23:14 PM
France's squad announced, few surprises:

(http://i.imgur.com/DIrl646.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on May 17, 2016, 12:14:50 PM
There's no place for Costa, Torres or Mata in Spain's provisional squad for Euro 2016. http://bbc.in/1TdCM7O


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 17, 2016, 12:24:54 PM
No Bellerin or Monreal?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on May 17, 2016, 02:22:51 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CiqHlvYWYAAxwCR.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on May 17, 2016, 02:24:28 PM
No Bellerin or Monreal?

bellerin is 21, presumably doesn't get in yet

monreal is behind jordi alba

no santi caz either

lots of strength in depth


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: POWWWWWWWW on May 17, 2016, 02:27:58 PM
No Bellerin or Monreal?

bellerin is 21, presumably doesn't get in yet

monreal is behind jordi alba

no santi caz either

lots of strength in depth

Presume Azpilicueta gets in because he can play both left and right back?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on May 17, 2016, 02:32:48 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CiqHlvYWYAAxwCR.jpg)

Looks a strong squad as always. Fullback a potential weakness if there is one (maybe!)

I haven't seen that much German football this year but Bellarabi one to watch according to those that do. Got double figures from midfield the past two seasons, is 26.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: bergeroo on May 17, 2016, 02:35:17 PM
Who is going to start up front for Spain - Morata? Or will they go with a false 9 (Cesc?)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on May 17, 2016, 02:38:35 PM
France's squad announced, few surprises:

(http://i.imgur.com/DIrl646.jpg)

Don't think Coman will start but he might well play his way into the side during the course of the tournament. He's looked the real deal in the Champions League this year. Like Raheem Sterling of two years ago but with shooting ability too.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on May 17, 2016, 02:39:03 PM
No Bellerin or Monreal?

bellerin is 21, presumably doesn't get in yet

monreal is behind jordi alba

no santi caz either

lots of strength in depth

Presume Azpilicueta gets in because he can play both left and right back?

yes i should have added that.

that flexibility is key in a 23 manner


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on May 17, 2016, 02:42:00 PM
Who is going to start up front for Spain - Morata? Or will they go with a false 9 (Cesc?)

I think the answer is we can't be 100% sure yet and knowing Spain they'll probably switch it up depending on opponent. I've backed Morata for top scorer fwiw. Sid Lowe's predicted line-up from end of March had Morata up top.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: AdamM on May 17, 2016, 02:43:59 PM
I've come up with a game I'm running at work for the Euros, and I think it's quite a good idea. Thought I'd share it in case anyone else likes the look of it and want to run it amongst their workmates or friends.

I've called it "Four Play" and it works like this:

The 24 teams have been split into 4 seed groups, based on the bookies odds of them winning their groups. Those seed groups are:
1. France
2. Germany
3. Spain
4. England
5. Belgium
6. Portugal

1. Italy
2. Croatia
3. Russia
4. Austria
5. Switzerland
6. Poland

1. Ukraine
2. Sweden
3. Wales
4. Czech Rep
5. Romania
6. Iceland

1. Turkey
2. R. Ireland
3. Slovakia
4. Albania
5. Hungary
6. N.Ireland

Entrants are rolling a dice four times, selecting a team from each group with each roll.

Their teams score the following points:
Group match draw - 1
Group match win - 3
Last 16 match win - 5
Quarter final win - 10
Semi final win - 15
Final win - 20

Bonuses
Handicap group winner - 1/2/3/4 (if a top seed team wins the group, 1 point, 2nd seed team 2 points, etc)
Score 4 or more in a game - 5
Win a penalty shootout - 10

What I like about it is, people with zero football knowledge will be able to get involved and have the same chance as football fans, but there's a lot more interest than a simple sweep.

I've rolled terribly and have Belgium, Poland, Rimanua and N.Ireland :(


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: bergeroo on May 17, 2016, 03:13:08 PM
I had a little ew on Morata with the last of the 25s for topscorer!

Draw for the last 16 could look like this if it goes to form.

Second place teams
Spain v x
England v x
Portugal v Belg/Italy
-----
Germany v x
Italy/Belg v x
France v x
Second place teams

The two favourites look likely to be in the same half of the draw if it goes to form. Spain avoid them both and get to play second place teams in the quarters, must be nice!

England's draw could be better, could be worse I guess. If we come second in the group we get a second place team in the last 16 from Group F (weakest Group) - but would be in Germany/France side of the draw

---

On a side note, I wish they had kept it at 16 teams, can't really get excited about the group stages. Think there will be a lot of negative games with draws being more important as four of the third place sides go through. Hope I'm wrong!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on May 17, 2016, 03:17:06 PM
this is some of my stuff, with the simulation material sourced



The groups drawn were as follows:

Group A: France, Albania, Romania, Switzerland.
Group B: England, Wales, Slovakia, Russia.
Group C: Germany, Northern Ireland, Poland, Ukraine.
Group D: Spain, Turkey, Czech Republic, Croatia.
Group E: Belgium, Republic of Ireland, Sweden, Italy.
Group F: Portugal, Iceland, Hungary, Austria.

Due to the competition format, simulations in the following report

http://www.scribd.com/doc/290626039/EURO-2016-The-Group-E-effect

have shown that teams from Group E have an approximately 28% lower chance of reaching the final than teams from group A.

With placings for the last sixteen already decided, this is because according to the report linked above

“1. The winners of group A, B, C and D get to face third-placed teams, when the winners of group E and F move on to face runner-ups (A clear disadvantage)

2. The runner-ups of group A, B, C and F get to face other runner-ups, when the runner-ups of group D and E move on to face winners (A clear disadvantage).

3. This would in theory mean that teams that qualify from Group E already have a lower probability of reaching the quarter-final just by getting drawn into group E. For group D and F this means that they will have a higher probability than the teams from group E, but a lower probability than the ones from group A, B or C”


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: bergeroo on May 17, 2016, 03:35:28 PM
Interesting link - thanks!

It is almost as if the hosts set it up to have the easiest route to the final!

this is some of my stuff, with the simulation material sourced



The groups drawn were as follows:

Group A: France, Albania, Romania, Switzerland.
Group B: England, Wales, Slovakia, Russia.
Group C: Germany, Northern Ireland, Poland, Ukraine.
Group D: Spain, Turkey, Czech Republic, Croatia.
Group E: Belgium, Republic of Ireland, Sweden, Italy.
Group F: Portugal, Iceland, Hungary, Austria.

Due to the competition format, simulations in the following report

http://www.scribd.com/doc/290626039/EURO-2016-The-Group-E-effect

have shown that teams from Group E have an approximately 28% lower chance of reaching the final than teams from group A.

With placings for the last sixteen already decided, this is because according to the report linked above

“1. The winners of group A, B, C and D get to face third-placed teams, when the winners of group E and F move on to face runner-ups (A clear disadvantage)

2. The runner-ups of group A, B, C and F get to face other runner-ups, when the runner-ups of group D and E move on to face winners (A clear disadvantage).

3. This would in theory mean that teams that qualify from Group E already have a lower probability of reaching the quarter-final just by getting drawn into group E. For group D and F this means that they will have a higher probability than the teams from group E, but a lower probability than the ones from group A, B or C”



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on June 03, 2016, 12:58:28 PM
Anyone put any bets on yet? I've mainly concentrated on the Outright and Top Goalscorer markets thus far although I've done Spain/France and Spain/Germany 'name the finalists' bets.


I've got:

Outright:
France
Austria
Croatia
Portugal

Top Goalscorer:

Fancied:
Griezmann
Giroud

Mid-priced:
Morata
Pelle
KDB
Hazard
Janko

Long shots:
Milik
Hanrik
Arnautovic

I may have gone overboard in the top goalscorer market! However I'm in profit should one of them scoop. Top Goalscorer market usually chopped though which is a concern!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: exstream on June 03, 2016, 01:03:31 PM
Giroud, very prolific


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 03, 2016, 01:52:08 PM
this is really good

every squad and every player analysed

http://www.theguardian.com/football/ng-interactive/2016/jun/01/euro-2016-the-complete-guide-to-every-squad-and-every-player-in-france


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on June 03, 2016, 02:21:29 PM
Just realised my post above is in the wrong thread, should've gone in the general Euro 2016 thread. Feel free to move it mods. Thanks.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: bergeroo on June 03, 2016, 02:35:20 PM
Don't think this is the right thread but what the hell!

I like the shout on Sterling to start vs Russia, gonna look at that now. I had a nice score on Rashford being in the squad, so I am happy about that.

I've gone Spain each way - which was also recommended at BE today.

Top scorer - matched some of your selections
Giroud likely to be the starting striker for the tournament favourites, seems like a good price to me.
Morata, likely to be starting striker for tournament third favourites
Gomez - seems likely to be the starter for tournament second favourites
Griezmann - feel like he should be joint fave in this market with Mueller. Price has come in a little but still feel like it is good

Some doubt about selection of the first three of these guys which translates to the price, I've backed all three. Even if they don't start, they are likely to come on in matches, maybe for some of the 'garbage minutes' in group games against softer opposition when the match is won. They are likely to get six matches each. I think Gomez will lead the line, with Mueller behind.

I've got each way bets on the four teams which are most likely to finish second place in groups A and C, which will then meet in the second round in the top (likely softer section) of the draw.
Poland, Switzerland
With smaller bet on Ukraine and v small bet on Romania.

Various other small bets on top scorers for various countries, biggest one on Shaqiri for Switz


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 03, 2016, 05:20:52 PM
Not sure why Germany are so hotly tipped.

Defense looks weak, strikers look weak, midfield doesn't look great.

Missing Reus, Lahm retired, Scweinsteiger passed it.

Will probably oppose them in most games.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 03, 2016, 06:42:53 PM
Really not so sure that Gomez will start for Germany Bergeroo , they play their last warm up game tomorrow so that may give more of a clue, he started in the loss to Slovakia but was heavily criticised
I think they will go with Gotze as a false 9


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on June 04, 2016, 08:16:11 PM
this is really good

every squad and every player analysed

http://www.theguardian.com/football/ng-interactive/2016/jun/01/euro-2016-the-complete-guide-to-every-squad-and-every-player-in-france

Agreed. Just read this about Lewandowski

The Bayern striker is extremely careful with his diet and looks out for every nutritional detail. Everything he eats, he eats backwards – so if having three courses he starts with having dessert first, then the main course before finishing with a starter.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 05, 2016, 03:02:58 AM
I assume Lewandowski doesn't order the soufflé then.  Would be the hight of selfishness if you are waiting for soup of the day.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on June 07, 2016, 07:12:20 PM
http://play.wincashlive.com/england-russia?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=cpm&utm_campaign=mnfdeppixellookalike-eng-rus

Have no idea what these guys are like. I'll be honest have never heard of them. 5 quid max. Winnings paid in 5 quid free bets. Doesn't seem to be any rollover requirements. If it loses get your fiver back.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 07, 2016, 07:52:49 PM
How do we expect France to line up? Not particularly interested in their defence, more their midfield and forwards. Do they play both Griezmann and Giroud? Is Payet a regular now? How far forward and how much freedom does Pogba get?

Got my eye on a few potential bets....


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 07, 2016, 09:12:44 PM
Great article in The Guardian. Well worth a read. Sahin married his cousin, surprised he didn't fit in at Liverpool tbh.

Surprising to see how many ex City players will be present in France. Obvious ones like Boateng and Given, but plenty of more obscure ones like Fernades, Westwood and Chorluka that I'm sure had slipped off many people's radars.

Roll on wall to wall football from Friday.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 07, 2016, 10:52:01 PM
I assume Lewandowski doesn't order the soufflé then.  Would be the hight of selfishness if you are waiting for soup of the day.

excellent wp


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on June 07, 2016, 10:56:45 PM
How do we expect France to line up? Not particularly interested in their defence, more their midfield and forwards. Do they play both Griezmann and Giroud? Is Payet a regular now? How far forward and how much freedom does Pogba get?

Got my eye on a few potential bets....

Guardian Experts Network is a superb series with great insight into the players, tactics and what went on during qualifying, all written by brilliant local journos. They've been publishing three a day starting from Group A (https://www.theguardian.com/football/series/euro-2016-guardian-experts-network)

The expected line-up as per the French team guide is below: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/jun/02/france-euro-2016-team-guide

                   Lloris

Sagna-Mangala-Koscielny--Evra
                 Kante
     Maltuidi           Pogba
    Marital-Giroud-Griezmann



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 08, 2016, 06:21:01 PM
watching 1996 eng v german semi with a mate on bt sport now and we just talking about how England can't possibly win the Euros this year because none of the current squad (in 2016 obv Rooney would have done in his prime but he isn't in his prime in 2016) would have got into the starting 11 of the 1996 team.   Anyone think anyone in the current England squad would have started in 1996 and ahead of who?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 08, 2016, 06:25:54 PM
watching 1996 eng v german semi with a mate on bt sport now and we just talking about how England can't possibly win the Euros this year because none of the current squad would have got into the starting 11 of the 1996 team.   Anyone think anyone in the current England squad would have started in 1996 and ahead of who?

I'd probably put Ali in ahead of Anderton?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 08, 2016, 06:31:24 PM
watching 1996 eng v german semi with a mate on bt sport now and we just talking about how England can't possibly win the Euros this year because none of the current squad would have got into the starting 11 of the 1996 team.   Anyone think anyone in the current England squad would have started in 1996 and ahead of who?

I'd probably put Ali in ahead of Anderton?

That was the only discussion we had.   The rest weren't even close in virtually every other position.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 08, 2016, 06:46:24 PM
How do we expect France to line up? Not particularly interested in their defence, more their midfield and forwards. Do they play both Griezmann and Giroud? Is Payet a regular now? How far forward and how much freedom does Pogba get?

Got my eye on a few potential bets....

Guardian Experts Network is a superb series with great insight into the players, tactics and what went on during qualifying, all written by brilliant local journos. They've been publishing three a day starting from Group A (https://www.theguardian.com/football/series/euro-2016-guardian-experts-network)
Q
The expected line-up as per the French team guide is below: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/jun/02/france-euro-2016-team-guide

                   Lloris

Sagna-Mangala-Koscielny--Evra
                 Kante
     Maltuidi           Pogba
    Marital-Giroud-Griezmann



Pretty sure Payet starts , has been close to MOM in all his last few starts


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Karabiner on June 08, 2016, 06:49:48 PM
How do we expect France to line up? Not particularly interested in their defence, more their midfield and forwards. Do they play both Griezmann and Giroud? Is Payet a regular now? How far forward and how much freedom does Pogba get?

Got my eye on a few potential bets....

Guardian Experts Network is a superb series with great insight into the players, tactics and what went on during qualifying, all written by brilliant local journos. They've been publishing three a day starting from Group A (https://www.theguardian.com/football/series/euro-2016-guardian-experts-network)
Q
The expected line-up as per the French team guide is below: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/jun/02/france-euro-2016-team-guide

                   Lloris

Sagna-Mangala-Koscielny--Evra
                 Kante
     Maltuidi           Pogba
    Marital-Giroud-Griezmann



Pretty sure Payet starts , has been close to MOM in all his last few starts


Agree on Payet, he's been a key player lately.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 08, 2016, 06:52:41 PM
Think Payet could potentially be the star of the Tournement

Maybe bias as a West Ham fan, but he really is a great player to watch


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Mark_Porter on June 08, 2016, 07:20:14 PM
How do we expect France to line up? Not particularly interested in their defence, more their midfield and forwards. Do they play both Griezmann and Giroud? Is Payet a regular now? How far forward and how much freedom does Pogba get?

Got my eye on a few potential bets....

Guardian Experts Network is a superb series with great insight into the players, tactics and what went on during qualifying, all written by brilliant local journos. They've been publishing three a day starting from Group A (https://www.theguardian.com/football/series/euro-2016-guardian-experts-network)

The expected line-up as per the French team guide is below: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/jun/02/france-euro-2016-team-guide

                   Lloris

Sagna-Mangala-Koscielny--Evra
                 Kante
     Maltuidi           Pogba
    Marital-Giroud-Griezmann



Rami will start ahead of Mangala too I think.

It's a brilliant team, defence will need help but Kante should be more than up for that.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 08, 2016, 07:45:22 PM
So much competition in the squad

Lassana Diarra has started the last 3 friendlies as the DM


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on June 08, 2016, 08:09:40 PM
So much competition in the squad

Lassana Diarra has started the last 3 friendlies as the DM

He's out of the squad with a knee injury, Schneiderlin has replaced him.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 08, 2016, 08:20:08 PM
Ah cheers had not seen that


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on June 08, 2016, 08:55:28 PM
Sky Poker TV recorded a whole bunch of Euro 2016 Betting Previews this week, with tips on the same markets by different analysts.

WARNING - May contain Sky Bet spam.

Outright & Golden Boot

https://youtu.be/l9RKxBOIXJo

 

Home Nations & Groups

https://youtu.be/DSWzebZUtT4





Outright



https://youtu.be/VlCAI69yryU



 



Golden Boot



https://youtu.be/c-9tiFzUbaA



 



Opening Game



https://youtu.be/1CgCNXWE9n8



 



Group A



https://youtu.be/AP5lf45YKyQ



 



Group B



https://youtu.be/lZZF-Ab2CD4



 



Group D



https://youtu.be/PWlk0WFT3w8



 



England vs Russia



https://youtu.be/n53OMYFd_Vk




 England v Wales



https://youtu.be/Q3Yu06m13Nk



 



Rep Ireland v Sweden



https://youtu.be/Y3m_wSnK4PU



 



Top Tip



https://youtu.be/zwAt2a2bgfQ




Outright

https://youtu.be/mRMibxaUs8s

 

Golden Boot

https://youtu.be/wdcA6C54K3k

 

Opening Game

https://youtu.be/GNbU34pabTM

 

England v Russia

https://youtu.be/fcN-nf3Ef6U

 

England v Wales

https://youtu.be/TmgvvesK-CU

 

Wales v Slovakia

https://youtu.be/TmgvvesK-CUv

 

Rep Ireland v Sweden

https://youtu.be/MzMDuyAneTA

 

Northern Ireland v Poland

https://youtu.be/2w4ir4ynKX0

 

Group C

https://youtu.be/jQpBBjFcQvg

 

Group E

https://youtu.be/yiObeAMcVM4

 

Group F

https://youtu.be/eTNE1vmB12k

 

Top Tip

https://youtu.be/OQSU6MIxJCA

 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 08, 2016, 09:21:46 PM
How do we expect France to line up? Not particularly interested in their defence, more their midfield and forwards. Do they play both Griezmann and Giroud? Is Payet a regular now? How far forward and how much freedom does Pogba get?

Got my eye on a few potential bets....

Guardian Experts Network is a superb series with great insight into the players, tactics and what went on during qualifying, all written by brilliant local journos. They've been publishing three a day starting from Group A (https://www.theguardian.com/football/series/euro-2016-guardian-experts-network)

The expected line-up as per the French team guide is below: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/jun/02/france-euro-2016-team-guide

                   Lloris

Sagna-Mangala-Koscielny--Evra
                 Kante
     Maltuidi           Pogba
    Marital-Giroud-Griezmann



Walker and Rose would start full backs. Hart would start on goal. Dier would start defensive midfield


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 08, 2016, 09:25:21 PM
Behave. Seaman would start ahead of Hart. Pearce miles ahead of rose. Walker ahead of Gary Neville? Not a hope .Only really the anderton and mcmanaman spots in the 96 team would be vulnerable to Amy in this squad


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 08, 2016, 09:30:00 PM
You really think that Seaman as he was would play as a professional goalkeeper? And that Pearce would play left back in the premiership? If you're talking relative then sure, but if we're talking actual then most players simply weren't good enough athletes to play top tier now


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 08, 2016, 09:35:35 PM
Assuming players back then would have modern sports science, nutrition and training so that different eras are on the same footing then yes. Seaman and Pearce and by a long way.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 08, 2016, 09:36:34 PM
Can't see how Dier starts ahead of Ince either



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 08, 2016, 09:43:32 PM
Pearce would destroy the modern day EPL fitness wise.  He was one of the strongest fittest player of that era.   I witnessed him getting sent off at Filbert St (tighty might have been there) for Forest when he nearly broke Paul Reid's legs twice in the first 30 minutes of a league game in the late 80s. Both tackles would be auto 3 match bans and straight red's in the modern era. Of all those players most suited to cope with the phsyical demands of the EPL Pearce would adapt the easiest by a mile.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 08, 2016, 09:53:01 PM
Pearce would destroy the modern day EPL fitness wise.  He was one of the strongest fittest player of that era.   I witnessed him getting sent off at Filbert St (tighty might have been there) for Forest when he nearly broke Paul Reid's legs twice in the first 30 minutes of a league game in the late 80s.  Of all those players most suited to cope with the phsyical demands of the EPL Pearce would adapt the easiest by a mile.

Absolutely this.

And Seaman over Hart every day of the week and twice on Sundays. Obviously apart from when he was getting lobbed by Nayiiiim....


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 08, 2016, 10:07:39 PM
Joe Hart is one of England's most over rated keepers ever.  He has had an extension to his soft rein with Butland's injury.  The clock is ticking Joe enjoy it while it lasts.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 08, 2016, 10:09:47 PM
Pleno would bench Maradona for Milner given the chance if he's sticking Dier ahead of Ince .


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 08, 2016, 11:35:06 PM
I was talking about the exact once of 96 trying to get a game in today's team with physical limitations etc


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 09, 2016, 01:21:26 AM
Physical limitations - Paul Ince? Really? He'd eat Dier for breakfast then go for a five mile run. 10x the player Dier is.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 09, 2016, 09:49:39 AM
Don't even think Anderton/mcmanaman would be under threat, our wide options are shit. Who knows how good, Kane, dier, fullbacks, alli are, but to choose them over established England greats is ridiculous. Our big hopes are just that, the ppl you are comparing them to, have proven their level. Hart shouldn't start instead of Forster who is potentially an England great and hart for me is limited to being very good, good enough for any club but never destined to bother the overall argument England great or best keeper in the world today.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 09, 2016, 10:31:02 AM
Given that we played three at the back that day then Pearce could easily lose out to Smalling, and both McManaman and Anderton would be bettered by most of today's crop of wide players who have a far greater awareness of the need to work without the ball.
I'd say that any of the current squad's 'full backs' would be sufficiently better defensively to outweigh the reduction in threat levels.

Hard to make a case for replacing any of the others though.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 09, 2016, 10:33:29 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ckb1n19XEAEbwjR.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 09, 2016, 10:56:21 AM
That Lewandowski bloke and Pogba must be rubbish because they were transferred for zero :)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: toddswain on June 09, 2016, 12:21:03 PM
Anyone know more about Italy's team, odds would suggest de Rossi may not start but I would assume he does


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 09, 2016, 05:09:57 PM
Anyone know more about Italy's team, odds would suggest de Rossi may not start but I would assume he does

They have a lot of injury issues in midfield, so it's not clear who will be fit


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 09, 2016, 11:22:46 PM
Joe Hart is one of England's most over rated keepers ever.  He has had an extension to his soft rein with Butland's injury.  The clock is ticking Joe enjoy it while it lasts.

First time I've 100% agreed with you. Be really isn't a top class goalkeeper, just good. I'm sure if City thought they could get better they would. Let's in the odd stinker and quite a few soft ones. 

Would have had Butland over him anytime.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 09, 2016, 11:32:13 PM
Lol Hart is comfortably England's best keeper, and has been for a number of years. If Butland gets anywhere near Joe's level he'll have done very well for himself.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 10, 2016, 12:06:05 AM
Lol Hart is comfortably England's best keeper, and has been for a number of years. If Butland gets anywhere near Joe's level he'll have done very well for himself.

Is that your unbiased opinion based on a careful study of the relative merits of the candidates?



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 12:41:12 AM
Lol Hart is comfortably England's best keeper, and has been for a number of years. If Butland gets anywhere near Joe's level he'll have done very well for himself.

Is that your unbiased opinion based on a careful study of the relative merits of the candidates?



It's my opinion based on having watched him week in week out for numerous years, seen him pick up the golden glove for 4 of the past 6 seasons, seen him make some stunning saves and keep City in various games across all competitions. Look at some of his performances in Europe if you're in any doubt about his ability. Butland is a decent keeper and could go far in the game but he really isn't at Joe's level yet.

Who would you have starting vs Russia, Hart or Butland?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 10, 2016, 01:16:08 AM
Jack will never start for England playing for Stoke.  Woy is a big 6 only type hence all the lolapool's in the squad.   If Jack leaves Stoke for a bigger club he will be England's number 1 immediately i would imagine.

Pretty hard for anyone neutral to say Hart was better than Jack last season in the EPL prior to his injury surely?  Butland was sensational for virtually the whole season.   Stoke's form dropped right off after his injury unsurprisingly.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 10, 2016, 06:16:11 AM
Lol Hart is comfortably England's best keeper, and has been for a number of years. If Butland gets anywhere near Joe's level he'll have done very well for himself.

Is that your unbiased opinion based on a careful study of the relative merits of the candidates?



It's my opinion based on having watched him week in week out for numerous years, seen him pick up the golden glove for 4 of the past 6 seasons, seen him make some stunning saves and keep City in various games across all competitions. Look at some of his performances in Europe if you're in any doubt about his ability. Butland is a decent keeper and could go far in the game but he really isn't at Joe's level yet.

Who would you have starting vs Russia, Hart or Butland?

Hart obviously. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/35918252

I'm indifferent as to the choice between Hart and Forster though.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 10, 2016, 07:44:06 AM
Hart is pretty average. No surprise that Pep is looking to replace him according to the media reports. Can judge a player alright.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 10, 2016, 10:16:23 AM
Jack will never start for England playing for Stoke.  Woy is a big 6 only type hence all the lolapool's in the squad.   If Jack leaves Stoke for a bigger club he will be England's number 1 immediately i would imagine.

Pretty hard for anyone neutral to say Hart was better than Jack last season in the EPL prior to his injury surely?  Butland was sensational for virtually the whole season.   Stoke's form dropped right off after his injury unsurprisingly.

Just seen your post on the transfer thread about short-term results, variance and sample size.  What are your thoughts on this (without using outfielders as examples because the context is different) bearing in mind Butland has an all-time sample size of 37 Premier League starts?  

Which "lolapools" in the squad would you remove and who would you replace them with?









Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 10, 2016, 11:08:18 AM
Jack will never start for England playing for Stoke.  Woy is a big 6 only type hence all the lolapool's in the squad.   If Jack leaves Stoke for a bigger club he will be England's number 1 immediately i would imagine.

Pretty hard for anyone neutral to say Hart was better than Jack last season in the EPL prior to his injury surely?  Butland was sensational for virtually the whole season.   Stoke's form dropped right off after his injury unsurprisingly.

Just seen your post on the transfer thread about short-term results, variance and sample size.  What are your thoughts on this (without using outfielders as examples because the context is different) bearing in mind Butland has an all-time sample size of 37 Premier League starts?  

Which "lolapools" in the squad would you remove and who would you replace them with?









Comparing sample sizes for these two things is pointless.   Just because Butland (or Harry Kane last year) only had 37 EPL appearances doesn't make any difference.   It is pretty obvious from a small sample of games from top level performers at this level that they are the real deal and highly likely to stay that way and are hugely progressive still because of their age.  OBviously they can become gambling addicts, fail a drugs test or go off the rails with a WAG at their side but this can happen to anyone.  A sample size of 40 games at EPL level at his age is usually a solid guide to future performance especially when you are playing in a bang average side like Stoke were last season.   He was the main reason Stoke were not in a relegation battle tbh.  God knows how bad Stoke's -14 GD would have been without him last year yet they still run like god and finished 9th.

You don't need a sample size of 200 games to realise guys like Butland (who is like an unexposed 2 year old in horse racing terms and still open to any amount of improvement) is only going one way performance wise all other things being equal.  He was the stand out English goalkeeper in the EPL last season playing most of his season in front of a banged up defense adjusting to life without Huth and an injured Shawcross for most of the season.

Most of the LFC players in the England squad are 'jobbers' and it is highly probably that no LFC player starts any game at the Euro's anyway (Milner included but he is a Woy fav and will probably start - bet 365 make him a flip to start the first game) but get the 'safe' nod on the bench because of their big club status (from the 1980's).  So their inclusion is mainly to pad out the squad and they will play very few minutes combined but it says more about the mindset of Woy and how demotivating it must be for players who don't wear the big clubs badges on their shirts in order to get a run in the England team.  The EPL has never been more competitive and 'flat' in terms of money across the whole league yet the England set up is like a dinosaur concept of still thinking the big clubs are a million miles ahead of the rest of the league.

I wouldn't have taken Sturridge as a reserve forward.   Defoe would have gone for me instead as he is bang in form. Henderson is so marginal and pointless to the squad he might as well stay at home anyway and we just go with 22 players.  Woy, true to form, sticks to the 'big clubs' he spends his whole life watching.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 04:17:32 PM
Hart is pretty average. No surprise that Pep is looking to replace him according to the media reports. Can judge a player alright.

Yes it was in The Sun and Mail so it must be true.

Since his wobble a couple of years ago when Pellers dropped him, he's been pretty much rock solid. Like every keeper, he does have the odd moment, but his crucial and often world class saves more than offset this.

Look at his performances in the Champions League. In the biggest games, against the best players, he is more than up to the task. England need big game players and that is exactly what Hart is. We are very lucky to have a keeper of that calibre at City.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Nakor on June 10, 2016, 04:31:44 PM
Loads of story's floating round this afternoon that Spain have sent 4+ players home, due to a historic sexual assault case.
De Gea and Isco could/maybe facing charges and are thought to be 2 of those sent home - can find no validation of the story yet, but likely to have implications on price/progression if true.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 10, 2016, 04:57:18 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3635405/David-Gea-sent-home-Euro-2016-caught-prostitution-scandal.html


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 05:13:19 PM
After robbing donuts a few years ago this was inevitable.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 10, 2016, 07:08:45 PM
Hart is pretty average. No surprise that Pep is looking to replace him according to the media reports. Can judge a player alright.

Yes it was in The Sun and Mail so it must be true.

Since his wobble a couple of years ago when Pellers dropped him, he's been pretty much rock solid. Like every keeper, he does have the odd moment, but his crucial and often world class saves more than offset this.

Look at his performances in the Champions League. In the biggest games, against the best players, he is more than up to the task. England need big game players and that is exactly what Hart is. We are very lucky to have a keeper of that calibre at City.

Of the teams in the top 10 of them premier league table, he'd only get into West Ham and Liverpool as first choice keeper imo.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 10, 2016, 07:19:48 PM
Hart is pretty average. No surprise that Pep is looking to replace him according to the media reports. Can judge a player alright.

Yes it was in The Sun and Mail so it must be true.

Since his wobble a couple of years ago when Pellers dropped him, he's been pretty much rock solid. Like every keeper, he does have the odd moment, but his crucial and often world class saves more than offset this.

Look at his performances in the Champions League. In the biggest games, against the best players, he is more than up to the task. England need big game players and that is exactly what Hart is. We are very lucky to have a keeper of that calibre at City.

Of the teams in the top 10 of them premier league table, he'd only get into West Ham and Liverpool as first choice keeper imo.

Bit harsh.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 10, 2016, 07:42:56 PM
Hart is pretty average. No surprise that Pep is looking to replace him according to the media reports. Can judge a player alright.

Yes it was in The Sun and Mail so it must be true.

Since his wobble a couple of years ago when Pellers dropped him, he's been pretty much rock solid. Like every keeper, he does have the odd moment, but his crucial and often world class saves more than offset this.

Look at his performances in the Champions League. In the biggest games, against the best players, he is more than up to the task. England need big game players and that is exactly what Hart is. We are very lucky to have a keeper of that calibre at City.

Of the teams in the top 10 of them premier league table, he'd only get into West Ham and Liverpool as first choice keeper imo.

On the other thread Pleno is claiming that all big team bench warmers would walk into the Leicester team.  Goodness knows what he is going to make of the claim that Schmeichel is better than Hart.  He'd put Willy Caballero in Kaspar's place!  :)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 10, 2016, 07:58:47 PM
Payet and Kante starting for France tonight


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 08:03:02 PM
Hart is pretty average. No surprise that Pep is looking to replace him according to the media reports. Can judge a player alright.

Yes it was in The Sun and Mail so it must be true.

Since his wobble a couple of years ago when Pellers dropped him, he's been pretty much rock solid. Like every keeper, he does have the odd moment, but his crucial and often world class saves more than offset this.

Look at his performances in the Champions League. In the biggest games, against the best players, he is more than up to the task. England need big game players and that is exactly what Hart is. We are very lucky to have a keeper of that calibre at City.

Of the teams in the top 10 of them premier league table, he'd only get into West Ham and Liverpool as first choice keeper imo.

I'd say De Gea is the best keeper in the league when he's not arranging for U21 players to roast prostitutes.

It's pretty close between Hart, Lloris and Courtois in the next bracket. Those 4 are ahead of a good chasing pack that includes Cech, Forster, Schmeichel, Butland etc, IMO ofc.

Very surprised at the question marks that people seem to have over Joe. We watch him every week and see just how good he is so maybe that's it, I really don't know.

Humble pie being prepared in case he lets a Taibi in this month ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 10, 2016, 08:07:44 PM
Hart is pretty average. No surprise that Pep is looking to replace him according to the media reports. Can judge a player alright.

Yes it was in The Sun and Mail so it must be true.

Since his wobble a couple of years ago when Pellers dropped him, he's been pretty much rock solid. Like every keeper, he does have the odd moment, but his crucial and often world class saves more than offset this.

Look at his performances in the Champions League. In the biggest games, against the best players, he is more than up to the task. England need big game players and that is exactly what Hart is. We are very lucky to have a keeper of that calibre at City.

Of the teams in the top 10 of them premier league table, he'd only get into West Ham and Liverpool as first choice keeper imo.

So you would have Butland over Hart then as Stoke finished 9th?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 10, 2016, 08:24:15 PM
Hart is pretty average. No surprise that Pep is looking to replace him according to the media reports. Can judge a player alright.

Yes it was in The Sun and Mail so it must be true.

Since his wobble a couple of years ago when Pellers dropped him, he's been pretty much rock solid. Like every keeper, he does have the odd moment, but his crucial and often world class saves more than offset this.

Look at his performances in the Champions League. In the biggest games, against the best players, he is more than up to the task. England need big game players and that is exactly what Hart is. We are very lucky to have a keeper of that calibre at City.

No surprise to you but I'm with you all the way on this.  KUTGW :)   
I hope to post some interesting stuff after the match  on Hart and Butland in response to Arb's post from this morning


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 10, 2016, 08:26:11 PM
My buy of Payet tournament goal minutes at 42 could be epic if he holds down a starting place in a free scoring team.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 08:27:58 PM
My buy of Payet tournament goal minutes at 42 could be epic if he holds down a starting place in a free scoring team.

Just stuck a quick e/w bet on him at 66/1 top scorer. I hope France are nice and theatrical just outside the box :)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 10, 2016, 08:50:11 PM
Hart is pretty average. No surprise that Pep is looking to replace him according to the media reports. Can judge a player alright.

Yes it was in The Sun and Mail so it must be true.

Since his wobble a couple of years ago when Pellers dropped him, he's been pretty much rock solid. Like every keeper, he does have the odd moment, but his crucial and often world class saves more than offset this.

Look at his performances in the Champions League. In the biggest games, against the best players, he is more than up to the task. England need big game players and that is exactly what Hart is. We are very lucky to have a keeper of that calibre at City.

Of the teams in the top 10 of them premier league table, he'd only get into West Ham and Liverpool as first choice keeper imo.

I'd say De Gea is the best keeper in the league when he's not arranging for U21 players to roast prostitutes.

It's pretty close between Hart, Lloris and Courtois in the next bracket. Those 4 are ahead of a good chasing pack that includes Cech, Forster, Schmeichel, Butland etc, IMO ofc.

Very surprised at the question marks that people seem to have over Joe. We watch him every week and see just how good he is so maybe that's it, I really don't know.

Humble pie being prepared in case he lets a Taibi in this month ;)

Lol...     I don't get it I really don't.  Hart has been excellent in recent times and, as you say, his record on the big stage of Champions League nights  etc has been superb.

Just 4 more caps and he moves into 4th place in the all-time appearance list for English goalkeepers behind Shilton, Banks and Seaman and he is still so young relatively for a goalkeeper.

 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 10, 2016, 09:27:37 PM
I don't think Leics would swap Schmeichel for Hart. Organises his defence better, better on corners and distributes better. Cech is a better keeper, Lloris would be picked ahead of Hart every time, De Gea best keeper in the prem. Cortois better and younger. Burland younger, equally good at shot stopping, possibly not quite as confident but higher upside.

Hart probably more consistent that Forster, I might concede that. Better than Mignolet and Adrian.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 09:31:50 PM
I don't think Leics would swap Schmeichel for Hart. Organises his defence better, better on corners and distributes better. Cech is a better keeper, Lloris would be picked ahead of Hart every time, De Gea best keeper in the prem. Cortois better and younger. Burland younger, equally good at shot stopping, possibly not quite as confident but higher upside.

Hart probably more consistent that Forster, I might concede that. Better than Mignolet and Adrian.

How gracious.

It's amusing that a keeper who has won 4 of the last 6 golden glove awards, often playing in front of a much maligned defence, is way behind the ability of many other keepers in the league.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 10, 2016, 09:38:50 PM
Golden Glove just the least goals conceded in a season?  What are the actual rules?   


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 10, 2016, 09:43:46 PM
Golden Glove just the least goals conceded in a season?  What are the actual rules?   

Least dandruff?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 10, 2016, 09:45:37 PM
Wow didn't realize how good Pogba was. Greizman similarly to the champions league final very underwhelming though.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 10, 2016, 09:47:14 PM
Kante best player on the pitch at the moment


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 10, 2016, 09:49:41 PM
Kante playing too well for lcfc. What a player he is. Reads the game, tackles. Intercepts, range of passing, runs all day


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 09:50:35 PM
Golden Glove just the least goals conceded in a season?  What are the actual rules?   

Yeah most clean sheets. As said, often playing behind a much maligned defence and midfield that offered little protection. I think it's his performances in Europe that really stick out, if you'd seen them you'd remember them. He was a one man machine vs Messi the other year.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 10, 2016, 09:52:23 PM
Think the set piece deliveries of Payet have been a bit poor apart from the one to Giroud right at the end.  France defence looks panic stations as well apart from Sagna.  More negatives than positives at half time for them.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 10, 2016, 09:53:25 PM
If they put someone on to run in behind pogba will rip these to bits. Giroud looks out of place.

2 - Olivier Giroud has completed just 2 passes in the 1st half & 1 of those was kick-off.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 10, 2016, 09:53:47 PM
We,West ham ,were in for Kante at the same time as when you signed him, really is a great player have said many times how every team in the world bar possibly Barcelona could do with him in their midfield

So much energy and drive absolute joy to watch, allowing Payet ,Pogba etc to do what they do


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 10, 2016, 09:58:09 PM
I don't think Leics would swap Schmeichel for Hart. Organises his defence better, better on corners and distributes better. Cech is a better keeper, Lloris would be picked ahead of Hart every time, De Gea best keeper in the prem. Cortois better and younger. Burland younger, equally good at shot stopping, possibly not quite as confident but higher upside.

Hart probably more consistent that Forster, I might concede that. Better than Mignolet and Adrian.

How gracious.

It's amusing that a keeper who has won 4 of the last 6 golden glove awards, often playing in front of a much maligned defence, is way behind the ability of many other keepers in the league.
If it's any consolation to you, we'd take him at Brentford.

Golden glove this year Cech? When was the last time an Arsenal keeper won it before him? I don't think it really has much relevance to be fair.

In the NHL there is an award for the goalie who's team let in the least but no one pays any attention, what matters is the award for the best keeper as voted for by his peers. Hart's not been in since 2012 indicating his stalled in his development and hasn't kicked on. Cortois, Lloris, Butland all
joined the league since.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 10, 2016, 10:00:09 PM
Golden Glove just the least goals conceded in a season?  What are the actual rules?   

Yeah most clean sheets. As said, often playing behind a much maligned defence and midfield that offered little protection. I think it's his performances in Europe that really stick out, if you'd seen them you'd remember them. He was a one man machine vs Messi the other year.

Remember Frazer Forster for Celtic against Barca? Stand out goalkeeping display in Europe this decade.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 10:08:05 PM
I don't think Leics would swap Schmeichel for Hart. Organises his defence better, better on corners and distributes better. Cech is a better keeper, Lloris would be picked ahead of Hart every time, De Gea best keeper in the prem. Cortois better and younger. Burland younger, equally good at shot stopping, possibly not quite as confident but higher upside.

Hart probably more consistent that Forster, I might concede that. Better than Mignolet and Adrian.

How gracious.

It's amusing that a keeper who has won 4 of the last 6 golden glove awards, often playing in front of a much maligned defence, is way behind the ability of many other keepers in the league.
If it's any consolation to you, we'd take him at Brentford.

Golden glove this year Cech? When was the last time an Arsenal keeper won it before him? I don't think it really has much relevance to be fair.

In the NHL there is an award for the goalie who's team let in the least but no one pays any attention, what matters is the award for the best keeper as voted for by his peers. Hart's not been in since 2012 indicating his stalled in his development and hasn't kicked on. Cortois, Lloris, Butland all
joined the league since.

We're obviously at different ends of the spectrum cos I think Hart is significantly better than he was 4 seasons ago. He's cut out most of the silly mistakes, is much more mature between the sticks, he's always been confident but I think the arrogance that was creeping into his game a couple of years ago was soon removed when MP dropped him.

I don't think he's the best keeper in the league although he's up there, but I think he's clearly England's best keeper. Genuinely amazed that people seem to think Butland or Forster are a better option than Joe.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 10:13:16 PM
That Romanian keeper is better than Hart ;)

Got Giroud top scorer, few more please.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 10, 2016, 10:15:14 PM
Golden Glove just the least goals conceded in a season?  What are the actual rules?   

Yeah most clean sheets. As said, often playing behind a much maligned defence and midfield that offered little protection. I think it's his performances in Europe that really stick out, if you'd seen them you'd remember them. He was a one man machine vs Messi the other year.

Remember Frazer Forster for Celtic against Barca? Stand out goalkeeping display in Europe this decade.

He done it more than once.  A better GK than Hart imo. 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 10, 2016, 10:16:49 PM
That Romanian keeper is better than Hart ;)

Got Giroud top scorer, few more please.

That was unreal bad. Pretty ironic during all this discussion who romanias bench keeper is lol


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 10, 2016, 10:20:11 PM
Hart would have stopped that


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 10:21:00 PM
Hart would have stopped that

Agreed ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 10, 2016, 10:26:01 PM
Hart will be a very short price to win this award just because he plays for the clear market leader in the league.  Any keeper outside of the top 6 in the ante post betting literally is a million to win this award just because of what price their team goes off every week.   If Hart played for Stoke he literally couldn't win this award.  It is meaningless.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on June 10, 2016, 10:35:54 PM
We,West ham ,were in for Kante at the same time as when you signed him, really is a great player have said many times how every team in the world bar possibly Barcelona could do with him in their midfield

So much energy and drive absolute joy to watch, allowing Payet ,Pogba etc to do what they do

Tighty might be able to confirm but from what I understand Idrissa Gueye - who signed for Villa - was LCFC's first choice target. He chose Villa so LCFC bought Kante. He didn't start the first game of the season in CM it took an injury for Ranieri to form the Kante/Drinkwater partnership.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 10, 2016, 10:40:34 PM
Jordan Veretout


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 10, 2016, 10:40:47 PM
We,West ham ,were in for Kante at the same time as when you signed him, really is a great player have said many times how every team in the world bar possibly Barcelona could do with him in their midfield

So much energy and drive absolute joy to watch, allowing Payet ,Pogba etc to do what they do

Tighty might be able to confirm but from what I understand Idrissa Gueye - who signed for Villa - was LCFC's first choice target. He chose Villa so LCFC bought Kante. He didn't start the first game of the season in CM it took an injury for Ranieri to form the Kante/Drinkwater partnership.

Best scouting in the league though!  Or just variance?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 10, 2016, 10:41:19 PM
Jordan veretout, turned us down for villa. After the 5:2 arsenal defeat ranieri introduced Simpson and kantecto tighten us up and we never looked back


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on June 10, 2016, 10:42:56 PM
Pick. That. Out.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 10, 2016, 10:43:35 PM
And what a goal that was dmitri. Wow


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 10, 2016, 10:47:10 PM
Payet looked quite upset, but I figured it out when i seen who his replacement was


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 10, 2016, 10:47:41 PM
If Troy Deeney is worth £20 mil

What is Payet worth? I would not accept below £2.8 billion 😃

Please stay Dimi


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 10, 2016, 10:48:59 PM
Payet and kante at psg come August.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 10, 2016, 10:50:24 PM
Congrats on the goal minutes Dung.  You run good.  What an awesome free roll to have for the event now with 40 units profit banked on day 1!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 10, 2016, 10:57:42 PM
Congrats on the goal minutes Dung.  You run good.  What an awesome free roll to have for the event now with 40 units profit banked on day 1!

Yeah - that was sweet and should guarantee him a starting berth for the tournament now!  Much for France to ponder defensively though in my opinion.  That game wouldn't have filled me with confidence.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 11:01:45 PM
Congrats on the goal minutes Dung.  You run good.  What an awesome free roll to have for the event now with 40 units profit banked on day 1!

Yeah - that was sweet and should guarantee him a starting berth for the tournament now!  Much for France to ponder defensively though in my opinion.  That game wouldn't have filled me with confidence.

Need Mangala...... ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 10, 2016, 11:05:08 PM
Congrats on the goal minutes Dung.  You run good.  What an awesome free roll to have for the event now with 40 units profit banked on day 1!

Yeah - that was sweet and should guarantee him a starting berth for the tournament now!  Much for France to ponder defensively though in my opinion.  That game wouldn't have filled me with confidence.

Need more hart...... ;)

fyp



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 10, 2016, 11:06:42 PM
What a substitution. Balls to take Pogba off and put Payet in the hole. Incredible.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 10, 2016, 11:08:29 PM
Congrats on the goal minutes Dung.  You run good.  What an awesome free roll to have for the event now with 40 units profit banked on day 1!

Yeah - that was sweet and should guarantee him a starting berth for the tournament now!  Much for France to ponder defensively though in my opinion.  That game wouldn't have filled me with confidence.

Need Mangala...... ;)

I think they should be worried as favs.  Their defending of corners looked dreadful, and Evra looked like a weak link throughout (defensively).  Skinned a couple of times first half and then absurd challenge for penalty.  Kante and Pogba are awesome though.

As a side show minor irritation Greizmann did that slow snivelling sulky walk off when he got subbed when the team needed all the minutes it could get.  Pogba was a man and ran off!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 10, 2016, 11:21:03 PM
Congrats on the goal minutes Dung.  You run good.  What an awesome free roll to have for the event now with 40 units profit banked on day 1!

Yeah - that was sweet and should guarantee him a starting berth for the tournament now!  Much for France to ponder defensively though in my opinion.  That game wouldn't have filled me with confidence.

Need Mangala...... ;)

I think they should be worried as favs.  Their defending of corners looked dreadful, and Evra looked like a weak link throughout (defensively).  Skinned a couple of times first half and then absurd challenge for penalty.  Kante and Pogba are awesome though.

As a side show minor irritation Greizmann did that slow snivelling sulky walk off when he got subbed when the team needed all the minutes it could get.  Pogba was a man and ran off!

Yeah I think better teams could punish France in the final 3rd. They look so good going forward and have bags of talent in that direction, but certainly defensively they could be found wanting.

Kante, Pogba and Payet all looked class. Gonna be an interesting tournament.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 11, 2016, 12:05:42 AM
I don't think Leics would swap Schmeichel for Hart. Organises his defence better, better on corners and distributes better. Cech is a better keeper, Lloris would be picked ahead of Hart every time, De Gea best keeper in the prem. Cortois better and younger. Burland younger, equally good at shot stopping, possibly not quite as confident but higher upside.

Hart probably more consistent that Forster, I might concede that. Better than Mignolet and Adrian.

How gracious.

It's amusing that a keeper who has won 4 of the last 6 golden glove awards, often playing in front of a much maligned defence, is way behind the ability of many other keepers in the league.
If it's any consolation to you, we'd take him at Brentford.

Golden glove this year Cech? When was the last time an Arsenal keeper won it before him? I don't think it really has much relevance to be fair.

In the NHL there is an award for the goalie who's team let in the least but no one pays any attention, what matters is the award for the best keeper as voted for by his peers. Hart's not been in since 2012 indicating his stalled in his development and hasn't kicked on. Cortois, Lloris, Butland all
joined the league since.

I like you - your whoppers are getting bigger and bigger :)  The "correllation" between inclusion or not in the PFA Team of the Year as a measure of stalled development is pretty good.  Well done.

 It says a lot for the award that matters that  Aguero  has not made 1 of the 2 striker positions in the PFA team of the year in any of his 5 years in the PL.  Does that mean he is really average as well?  At least Hart can take some consolation that he has made it as best keeper twice which is the same number as Cech. However Cech has played more PL seasons than Hart therefore Hart's achievement is better than Cech but Hart is average and Cech is good. I'm confused now.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 11, 2016, 12:28:25 AM
I don't think Leics would swap Schmeichel for Hart. Organises his defence better, better on corners and distributes better. Cech is a better keeper, Lloris would be picked ahead of Hart every time, De Gea best keeper in the prem. Cortois better and younger. Burland younger, equally good at shot stopping, possibly not quite as confident but higher upside.

Hart probably more consistent that Forster, I might concede that. Better than Mignolet and Adrian.

How gracious.

It's amusing that a keeper who has won 4 of the last 6 golden glove awards, often playing in front of a much maligned defence, is way behind the ability of many other keepers in the league.
If it's any consolation to you, we'd take him at Brentford.

Golden glove this year Cech? When was the last time an Arsenal keeper won it before him? I don't think it really has much relevance to be fair.

In the NHL there is an award for the goalie who's team let in the least but no one pays any attention, what matters is the award for the best keeper as voted for by his peers. Hart's not been in since 2012 indicating his stalled in his development and hasn't kicked on. Cortois, Lloris, Butland all
joined the league since.

I like you - your whoppers are getting bigger and bigger :)  The "correllation" between inclusion or not in the PFA Team of the Year as a measure of stalled development is pretty good.  Well done.

 It says a lot for the award that matters that  Aguero  has not made 1 of the 2 striker positions in the PFA team of the year in any of his 5 years in the PL.  Does that mean he is really average as well?  At least Hart can take some consolation that he has made it as best keeper twice which is the same number as Cech. However Cech has played more PL seasons than Hart therefore Hart's achievement is better than Cech but Hart is average and Cech is good. I'm confused now.


Don't think there is a single whooper there, just honest opinion.

Does appear to be a City bias being shown by the blue mooners though. Interesting that not one non-city fan has come out and said that they feel Hart is signif ahead as English number one and most have said quite the opposite.

Pretty sure that if City had anyone else between the sticks you'd also be raving about them and be equally as successful. If they had De Gea in nets they'd probably be signif more successful. Hart's is serviceable as a good prem goalie but I don't think he's 'worth as many points' (to coin a phrase) as the other keepers prev mentioned. Certainly not world class.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 11, 2016, 12:48:29 AM
I don't think Leics would swap Schmeichel for Hart. Organises his defence better, better on corners and distributes better. Cech is a better keeper, Lloris would be picked ahead of Hart every time, De Gea best keeper in the prem. Cortois better and younger. Burland younger, equally good at shot stopping, possibly not quite as confident but higher upside.

Hart probably more consistent that Forster, I might concede that. Better than Mignolet and Adrian.

How gracious.

It's amusing that a keeper who has won 4 of the last 6 golden glove awards, often playing in front of a much maligned defence, is way behind the ability of many other keepers in the league.
If it's any consolation to you, we'd take him at Brentford.

Golden glove this year Cech? When was the last time an Arsenal keeper won it before him? I don't think it really has much relevance to be fair.

In the NHL there is an award for the goalie who's team let in the least but no one pays any attention, what matters is the award for the best keeper as voted for by his peers. Hart's not been in since 2012 indicating his stalled in his development and hasn't kicked on. Cortois, Lloris, Butland all
joined the league since.

I like you - your whoppers are getting bigger and bigger :)  The "correllation" between inclusion or not in the PFA Team of the Year as a measure of stalled development is pretty good.  Well done.

 It says a lot for the award that matters that  Aguero  has not made 1 of the 2 striker positions in the PFA team of the year in any of his 5 years in the PL.  Does that mean he is really average as well?  At least Hart can take some consolation that he has made it as best keeper twice which is the same number as Cech. However Cech has played more PL seasons than Hart therefore Hart's achievement is better than Cech but Hart is average and Cech is good. I'm confused now.


Don't think there is a single whooper there, just honest opinion.

Does appear to be a City bias being shown by the blue mooners though. Interesting that not one non-city fan has come out and said that they feel Hart is signif ahead as English number one and most have said quite the opposite.

Pretty sure that if City had anyone else between the sticks you'd also be raving about them and be equally as successful. If they had De Gea in nets they'd probably be signif more successful. Hart's is serviceable as a good prem goalie but I don't think he's 'worth as many points' (to coin a phrase) as the other keepers prev mentioned. Certainly not world class.

Sample size; there are 2 City fans sticking up for Hart, a Stoke fan wanting Butland as No.1 and a couple of others questioning Joe. Not sure what opinion you can really form from that.

I think DDG is the best keeper in the league but he's worth way more to them than he would be for us. Interested in how we'd be ''significantly more successful'' with DDG between the sticks instead of Hart. Maybe we'd have won the quadruple last season with De Gea?

It's pretty obv we're gonna stick up for a keeper we watch week in week out when you probably only see him on the MOTD highlight reel. I wish he would fucking catch the ball sometimes though, more than happy to concede that ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 11, 2016, 01:09:20 AM
I don't think Leics would swap Schmeichel for Hart. Organises his defence better, better on corners and distributes better. Cech is a better keeper, Lloris would be picked ahead of Hart every time, De Gea best keeper in the prem. Cortois better and younger. Burland younger, equally good at shot stopping, possibly not quite as confident but higher upside.

Hart probably more consistent that Forster, I might concede that. Better than Mignolet and Adrian.

How gracious.

It's amusing that a keeper who has won 4 of the last 6 golden glove awards, often playing in front of a much maligned defence, is way behind the ability of many other keepers in the league.
If it's any consolation to you, we'd take him at Brentford.

Golden glove this year Cech? When was the last time an Arsenal keeper won it before him? I don't think it really has much relevance to be fair.

In the NHL there is an award for the goalie who's team let in the least but no one pays any attention, what matters is the award for the best keeper as voted for by his peers. Hart's not been in since 2012 indicating his stalled in his development and hasn't kicked on. Cortois, Lloris, Butland all
joined the league since.

I like you - your whoppers are getting bigger and bigger :)  The "correllation" between inclusion or not in the PFA Team of the Year as a measure of stalled development is pretty good.  Well done.

 It says a lot for the award that matters that  Aguero  has not made 1 of the 2 striker positions in the PFA team of the year in any of his 5 years in the PL.  Does that mean he is really average as well?  At least Hart can take some consolation that he has made it as best keeper twice which is the same number as Cech. However Cech has played more PL seasons than Hart therefore Hart's achievement is better than Cech but Hart is average and Cech is good. I'm confused now.


Don't think there is a single whooper there, just honest opinion.

Does appear to be a City bias being shown by the blue mooners though. Interesting that not one non-city fan has come out and said that they feel Hart is signif ahead as English number one and most have said quite the opposite.

Pretty sure that if City had anyone else between the sticks you'd also be raving about them and be equally as successful. If they had De Gea in nets they'd probably be signif more successful. Hart's is serviceable as a good prem goalie but I don't think he's 'worth as many points' (to coin a phrase) as the other keepers prev mentioned. Certainly not world class.

Sample size; there are 2 City fans sticking up for Hart, a Stoke fan wanting Butland as No.1 and a couple of others questioning Joe. Not sure what opinion you can really form from that.

I think DDG is the best keeper in the league but he's worth way more to them than he would be for us. Interested in how we'd be ''significantly more successful'' with DDG between the sticks instead of Hart. Maybe we'd have won the quadruple last season with De Gea?

It's pretty obv we're gonna stick up for a keeper we watch week in week out when you probably only see him on the MOTD highlight reel. I wish he would fucking catch the ball sometimes though, more than happy to concede that ;)

This guy was pretty good at catching the ball, didn't always need two hands either

Second clip ...

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9fp4aD3X-E


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 11, 2016, 09:33:29 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cknm-DeVEAAn1ZT.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cknll-7WgAE9q27.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CknlFvNXIAAGwUQ.jpg)



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 11, 2016, 09:39:47 AM
completely dispassionate view

Gary Lineker ‏@GaryLineker

Said it many times this season but Kanté is as good a holding player as I've ever seen. It's like having 2 men in one position.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 11, 2016, 11:35:34 AM
I hadn't seen much of Kante in the PL.  But by god he was impressive last night.  Linekar spot on, he was everywhere.  How much ground doe he cover in an average game.  I could actually see him in a Barcelona team giving them that extra bit of steel that sometimes it seems they miss.  It's great having the ball 80% of the time but when you don't have it and your not the best defence it helps having someone who can break just about everything up. 

I also thought Payet was good, a bit wasteful in the first half but then I don't think France started that well.  The occassion seemed to get to a few of them.  Even Deschamps looked a bit nervy at times and he's one of the coolest heads around. 

Also agree with some comments about the French back line, it looks fragile.  My bets last night were mainly centred around the fact I thought the French were overrated and Romania underrated. 

Not to aftertime but I done quite well on the game last night with BTTS/Overs and 2 - 1 France I also backed 1 - 1 and 2 - 1 Romania.  I think that would have been the nut best result in terms of the night and overall for me as I have the Swiss to win that group. 

Albania from what I know and have seen will be pretty defensive, they won't have much going forward so today I'll be concentrating on unders, Swiss to win to nil and a bet I quite like Swiss to score first.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 11, 2016, 07:49:30 PM
Love wales, hopefully england give us a sweat as this is the best tournament in terms of interest for a very long time. Skrtel has acted like a total moron all match, he should have gone for an absolute pointless elbow early and was totally rash a few times.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 11, 2016, 07:51:21 PM
Roy has decided to play as many people in their preferred position as possible.

Entirely welcome as a 4-3-3 with Rooney and Alli deeper, but one wonders why this hasn't been tried before.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 11, 2016, 08:00:37 PM
Sad to see it all kicking off in Marsaille, loads of videos floating around Twitter of the usual cowardice displayed from the hooligan element  :(


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 11, 2016, 08:43:20 PM
Bbc - " russian hooligans fighting with English fans".   No editorial direction then......


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 11, 2016, 08:45:25 PM
If anyone is wondering why former French tennis player Marion Bartoli is doing interviews for ITV's football coverage and how that is bonkers and weird, fear not...

On German TV, they have Phil Neville. He can't speak German, so he sits and watches the others discuss things and then, when it's his turn to answer a question, he waits for the translation to come through his earpiece and answers in English...which is them dubbed over for the audience.

I'm told he just said Alli is "like Ballack"


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 11, 2016, 08:45:34 PM
England's fighting team get weaker and weaker every year with all the banning orders in place.   Ruskies def have an competitive advantage over us.  Can't imagine they bother with banning orders for their finest 'fans'.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 11, 2016, 09:44:42 PM
Hard to see how Spurs dont start winning things soon if their playerkeep improving like they are.  Ali is running this game imo.  Rooney thinking he is Scholes thought doesn't wash.  Hoddle should be put out to pasture.  Lallana is wasteful I'd have Vardy or Rashford on for him.  Why is Kane taking corners does he think he's Ronaldo?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 11, 2016, 09:51:12 PM
Hard to see how Spurs dont start winning things soon if their playerkeep improving like they are.  Ali is running this game imo.  Rooney thinking he is Scholes thought doesn't wash.  Hoddle should be put out to pasture.  Lallana is wasteful I'd have Vardy or Rashford on for him.  Why is Kane taking corners does he think he's Ronaldo?

Are you serious? Rooney and Lallana best two players on pitch by country mile.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: jakally on June 11, 2016, 09:54:18 PM
Hard to see how Spurs dont start winning things soon if their playerkeep improving like they are.  Ali is running this game imo.  Rooney thinking he is Scholes thought doesn't wash.  Hoddle should be put out to pasture.  Lallana is wasteful I'd have Vardy or Rashford on for him.  Why is Kane taking corners does he think he's Ronaldo?

Are you serious? Rooney and Lallana best two players on pitch by country mile.

Agree completely with this. I think Rooney has been excellent.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 11, 2016, 09:54:29 PM
Good performance so far.  Agree about Kane on corners though.  Just doesn't make sense - he isn't great at them and he's great in the box so why put him on them?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 11, 2016, 09:57:02 PM
Hard to see how Spurs dont start winning things soon if their playerkeep improving like they are.  Ali is running this game imo.  Rooney thinking he is Scholes thought doesn't wash.  Hoddle should be put out to pasture.  Lallana is wasteful I'd have Vardy or Rashford on for him.  Why is Kane taking corners does he think he's Ronaldo?

Are you serious? Rooney and Lallana best two players on pitch by country mile.

Agree completely with this. I think Rooney has been excellent.

Yep. Full backs have been the standouts for me, but they're being given far too much room.

I'd have Rooney as MOTM in-running right now. He's drifting around and finding 10 yards of space almost like Pirlo. Not put a foot wrong.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 11, 2016, 10:02:07 PM
www.twitter.com/SportsJOEdotie/status/741719607787065345

This is getting silly now..!

Still can't hear the song without thinking of this:

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZvwAqb-3V8


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 11, 2016, 10:17:19 PM
Hard to see how Spurs dont start winning things soon if their playerkeep improving like they are.  Ali is running this game imo.  Rooney thinking he is Scholes thought doesn't wash.  Hoddle should be put out to pasture.  Lallana is wasteful I'd have Vardy or Rashford on for him.  Why is Kane taking corners does he think he's Ronaldo?

Are you serious? Rooney and Lallana best two players on pitch by country mile.

aye if you like wasting the ball/chances. 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 11, 2016, 10:18:42 PM
Hard to see how Spurs dont start winning things soon if their playerkeep improving like they are.  Ali is running this game imo.  Rooney thinking he is Scholes thought doesn't wash.  Hoddle should be put out to pasture.  Lallana is wasteful I'd have Vardy or Rashford on for him.  Why is Kane taking corners does he think he's Ronaldo?

Are you serious? Rooney and Lallana best two players on pitch by country mile.

Agree completely with this. I think Rooney has been excellent.

Yep. Full backs have been the standouts for me, but they're being given far too much room.

I'd have Rooney as MOTM in-running right now. He's drifting around and finding 10 yards of space almost like Pirlo. Not put a foot wrong.


Almost like Pirlo?  What, did you ever see Pirlo play.  Rooney ain't even close. 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 11, 2016, 10:23:51 PM
Hard to see how Spurs dont start winning things soon if their playerkeep improving like they are.  Ali is running this game imo.  Rooney thinking he is Scholes thought doesn't wash.  Hoddle should be put out to pasture.  Lallana is wasteful I'd have Vardy or Rashford on for him.  Why is Kane taking corners does he think he's Ronaldo?

Are you serious? Rooney and Lallana best two players on pitch by country mile.

Agree completely with this. I think Rooney has been excellent.

Yep. Full backs have been the standouts for me, but they're being given far too much room.

I'd have Rooney as MOTM in-running right now. He's drifting around and finding 10 yards of space almost like Pirlo. Not put a foot wrong.


Almost like Pirlo?  What, did you ever see Pirlo play.  Rooney ain't even close. 

::)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 11, 2016, 10:42:46 PM
What was it Clive was saying #JusticeForTheEngland11 the next referendum Scotland has should be a night after an England game where Sir Clive commentates it has to be worth a 15% swing. 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Dekka on June 11, 2016, 10:47:05 PM
The history of the England football team 1967 - 2016 in a 91st minute nutshell.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 11, 2016, 10:47:31 PM
Hart floating around in no man's land!   ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 11, 2016, 10:50:28 PM
Showed good heart and bad hart


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 11, 2016, 10:51:32 PM
Takes considerable courage, but bringing Vardy on for Sterling, rather than Milner, offered the chance to break on the counter. Instead, by holding for the 1-0, we tried to rely on our weakest part: the defence. Vardy's benefit far outweighs the gap left behind.

Easy call to see and make from the armchair. Michael Cheika did that move this morning in the rugby and lost. Playing it safe is often the -EV play but sport only cares about short term variance.

It's a great start for England. Far better than our usual first game draws. Can't criticise the selections or the effort today.

Roll on Thursday.

 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 11, 2016, 10:53:51 PM
Pretty sound performance, better than expected. thought Sterling was very wasteful. Provides a great outlet at times but delivers little.. frustrating player to watch


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 11, 2016, 10:54:02 PM
Hart floating around in no man's land!   ;)

Should have and could have done better with it.  


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 11, 2016, 10:56:22 PM
Good performance.  But Sterling geez.  Apart from his pace he's so average.  Passing, shooting, football intelligence.  Surely there had never been a worse £20 million+ player (and I know he went for a lot more!)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 11, 2016, 11:00:37 PM
Funny everybody goes after Sterling. He didn't have a great game but he offered something different to everybody else and we actually looked most dangerous when he was committing players. Harry Kane was woeful and not a single word said about him.

Thought we looked really good, taking Rooney off who was playing great was an awful substitution though.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 11, 2016, 11:04:33 PM
Funny everybody goes after Sterling. He didn't have a great game but he offered something different to everybody else and we actually looked most dangerous when he was committing players. Harry Kane was woeful and not a single word said about him.

Thought we looked really good, taking Rooney off who was playing great was an awful substitution though.

Didn't think he had that bad a game either.  Broke them open enough times, though obv some touches were terrible. 

We've had worse starts to a tournament and just ran a bit bad.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 11, 2016, 11:07:05 PM
Funny everybody goes after Sterling. He didn't have a great game but he offered something different to everybody else and we actually looked most dangerous when he was committing players. Harry Kane was woeful and not a single word said about him.

Thought we looked really good, taking Rooney off who was playing great was an awful substitution though.

Sterling is an outlet because of his pace.  You could put Anya there if Scotland hadn't snaffled him - got the same shooting and decision making skills.  Kane didn't do much I agree and I also think it was a good performance overall.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 11, 2016, 11:09:07 PM
Funny everybody goes after Sterling. He didn't have a great game but he offered something different to everybody else and we actually looked most dangerous when he was committing players. Harry Kane was woeful and not a single word said about him.

Thought we looked really good, taking Rooney off who was playing great was an awful substitution though.

Wilshere looked great when he came on and we almost scored within minutes of the change, thanks to his passing and movement. He's ideal as an impact player. Lallana and Rooney looked like they were tired. Of the two, saving Rooney's legs makes more sense. Henderson and Wilshere are natural replacements as they get match fitter.

Kane was fine. They marked him well but his movement - in fairness the movement of all the front 3 - was what created the space for the full backs and midfielders to run into.

Sterling will be out when Sturridge is fit, I expect.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 11, 2016, 11:10:05 PM
Sterling's final ball is the problem. Gets into position and then zilch. Frustrating. Didn't like the defensive substitutions. Wanted vardy on at 1-0 to hit them on the counter. Russia were very ponderous and burgled a point.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 11, 2016, 11:10:22 PM
Yep, Rooney coming off seemed like overthinking..don't think it changed anything but still seemed kinda pointless


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: anthonyl on June 11, 2016, 11:12:21 PM
Wouldn't have sterling anywhere near the team so wasteful. Been awful for more than 12 months.

Vardy in for sterling please for Wales and we should win by a couple. Have to probably win both games now to top the group.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 11, 2016, 11:13:29 PM
Another one here in the 'Sterling played fine' camp. I'm the first to lambast his shooting though, generally. His shots have the power of a Travelodge hairdryer. Still, I can easily think of half a dozen worse EPL players who cost over £20m.

Did anyone spot the Kane Salmon dive? Or hear that loud explosion near the end?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 11, 2016, 11:15:20 PM
Funny everybody goes after Sterling. He didn't have a great game but he offered something different to everybody else and we actually looked most dangerous when he was committing players. Harry Kane was woeful and not a single word said about him.

Thought we looked really good, taking Rooney off who was playing great was an awful substitution though.

this exactly sums up what I thought. Kane was terrible but people are on sterling when if he had of had vardy there with the legs to keep up they would have wiped the floor with russia. Kane taking corners is lol, and he has no clue what to do when hes not going to just shoot.

hodgson reverted to type and we got punished


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 11, 2016, 11:17:03 PM
"His shots have the power of a Travelodge hairdryer"

:)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 11, 2016, 11:18:52 PM
Oh dear -  trouble in the stadium - sounds like Russians kicking off.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 11, 2016, 11:19:45 PM
Oh dear -  trouble in the stadium - sounds like Russians kicking off.

They all backed Hart for the golden gloves!  Fuming. 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 11, 2016, 11:31:14 PM
Sterling very Walcott like tonight.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 11, 2016, 11:34:50 PM
His play reminds me more of Franz Carr for those that can remember.  £50
Million or whatever it was? :). Liverpool did so well!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 11, 2016, 11:46:07 PM
His play reminds me more of Franz Carr for those that can remember.  £50
Million or whatever it was? :). Liverpool did so well!

Carr better.  Same delivery but quicker over 40 metres.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: BorntoBubble on June 12, 2016, 12:10:18 AM
Why can hart not distribute the ball. Puts his defenders under needless pressure, kicks it out to much and does not seem to kick it to his men up the field.

Maybe I am blessed watching DDG every week who is immense at distribution but I think it's such a key area, espically  when you have Kane upfield who is great with his head.

Aside from that Sterling was awful.

Full backs were great I thought, dier and Rooney worked well and I was very impressed with Lallana he never stopped running, lots of heart and involved in lots of good plays.

For sure we should have shoved vardy on for sterling. Earlier subs also, I remember reading that around the 60th minute was optimal for the first sub.

Vardy would have caused havoc at that time in the game.

Don't take Rooney off unless he is injured.




Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: BorntoBubble on June 12, 2016, 12:11:27 AM
Oh dear -  trouble in the stadium - sounds like Russians kicking off.

Looks bad media saying distinct lack of police,steward support. Women and children getting trampled.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 12, 2016, 12:12:48 AM
Vardys wife was saying on twitter it was mayhem. After the match Joe Hart was trying to find his family in the crowd to tell the to keep safe.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 12, 2016, 09:45:20 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CksMCK1W0AEuYK9.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CksDRA8WgAEd34o.jpg)

(https://o.twimg.com/2/proxy.jpg?t=HBiqAWh0dHBzOi8vaS5ndWltLmNvLnVrL2ltZy9tZWRpYS9kYjAzMjI0ZjY2MGRlMWQ5MTI1Y2RlNzkyOGI1YjQ2MmUyYmRhOTk5LzBfMjM0XzM4NjVfMjMxOS8zODY1LmpwZz93PTEyMDAmcT01NSZhdXRvPWZvcm1hdCZ1c209MTImZml0PW1heCZzPTk4MmU3M2YyNmUxNzJkOTlhYTlkMTI2N2M1MGFlMDYxFOASFOYJHBSEBhSUAwAAFgASAA&s=P6VEv348eub_ezdQ1-TMpJ8Fi14Sc8lxLf92_S9PGys)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CksDzqQWkAI7nYS.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CksoDrsXIAASFIq.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CksoKa6XEAE7pnR.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CksrCQsXIAE-vzu.jpg)

(http://)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Rod Paradise on June 12, 2016, 12:01:39 PM
Vardys wife was saying on twitter it was mayhem. After the match Joe Hart was trying to find his family in the crowd to tell the to keep safe.


Would he have been better asking Forster or Butland to do it? ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 12, 2016, 12:17:52 PM
proceedings opened against Russia

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkvlXvhWUAAW7al.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 12, 2016, 01:21:17 PM
Enjoyed the 1st half enormously last night and we should have had the game won by half-time.

Lots of criticism on here (and bile in many other places) about Sterling. I actually thought he was very good in the 1st half but very disappointing from some promising positions in the 2nd half. Definitely a tale of 2 halves for him and I understand the frustration but to mark his overall performance as “awful” is ridiculous.

Thought Hodgson should have pulled him at about 60 mins. In fact very difficult to understand why Hodgson didn’t change it in the 2nd half particularly when you consider the options on the bench. Kane had a poor match and no one has mentioned Lallana who had good moments in the 1st half but was totally anonymous in the 2nd.

I’ve watched a recording of the game again this morning. More to the point it wasn’t really “watching” but more of a crude analysis breaking down the game into segments and looking at specific things. It is something I do relatively regularly for big City games when I’ve seen the game live. One specific “thing” I looked at it this morning was Sterling and to test if my perception that he had a very good 1st first half was over influenced by my City bias. It wasn’t. He was pretty much faultless for the 1st 30 minutes and involved in so much that was good about England’s domination of the early stages.

If anyone has kept a recording, is as sad as me and has the time or inclination, have a look at:

2.36
8.27
11.47
16.39
20.19
23.30  (running through on goal and great defending – would Vardy have done better there?)
30.29  (his 1st mistake when he scuffed an easy ball that would have released Kane)
35.44
39.55


I can also post the times from the 2nd half which didn’t end too well :)




Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 12, 2016, 01:51:11 PM
Enjoyed the 1st half enormously last night and we should have had the game won by half-time.

Lots of criticism on here (and bile in many other places) about Sterling. I actually thought he was very good in the 1st half but very disappointing from some promising positions in the 2nd half. Definitely a tale of 2 halves for him and I understand the frustration but to mark his overall performance as “awful” is ridiculous.

Thought Hodgson should have pulled him at about 60 mins. In fact very difficult to understand why Hodgson didn’t change it in the 2nd half particularly when you consider the options on the bench. Kane had a poor match and no one has mentioned Lallana who had good moments in the 1st half but was totally anonymous in the 2nd.

I’ve watched a recording of the game again this morning. More to the point it wasn’t really “watching” but more of a crude analysis breaking down the game into segments and looking at specific things. It is something I do relatively regularly for big City games when I’ve seen the game live. One specific “thing” I looked at it this morning was Sterling and to test if my perception that he had a very good 1st first half was over influenced by my City bias. It wasn’t. He was pretty much faultless for the 1st 30 minutes and involved in so much that was good about England’s domination of the early stages.

If anyone has kept a recording, is as sad as me and has the time or inclination, have a look at:

2.36
8.27
11.47
16.39
20.19
23.30  (running through on goal and great defending – would Vardy have done better there?)
30.29  (his 1st mistake when he scuffed an easy ball that would have released Kane)
35.44
39.55


I can also post the times from the 2nd half which didn’t end too well :)




I didn't think Sterling had a good game overall, but I agree my perception was clouded by the second half and I likely didn't given him credit for the 1st half when as you say he was part of a strong England performance.  I think he suffers criticism due to his price tag that City paid for him.  Whenever I see him play I always immediately think of him as "the £50 million pound player" and expect a strong performance which is unfair as the price City paid isn't his fault.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 12, 2016, 02:12:08 PM
Sterling was like various England players, good in the first half but faded in the 2nd. His end product is frustrating, no getting away from that. His best work is sometimes off the ball, dragging people out of position and out of their comfort zones, and this ultimately frees up space for others to exploit.

It does look sometimes that the price tag weighs on his shoulders, which as pointed out is silly as it was nothing to do with him.

Why the fuck does Kane take corners? Does anyone actually know the reasoning or logic behind it?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 12, 2016, 02:20:24 PM
Sterling was like various England players, good in the first half but faded in the 2nd. His end product is frustrating, no getting away from that. His best work is sometimes off the ball, dragging people out of position and out of their comfort zones, and this ultimately frees up space for others to exploit.

It does look sometimes that the price tag weighs on his shoulders, which as pointed out is silly as it was nothing to do with him.

Why the fuck does Kane take corners? Does anyone actually know the reasoning or logic behind it?

Sterling just looks massively short of confidence as he has all season

The Kane thing just baffles me.......it's not as if his delivery is particularly good,he did say he is just following orders
How bad can the likes of Lallana or Wayne( the new Pirlo 😂)Rooney be at taking them?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 12, 2016, 03:28:33 PM
Sterling was like various England players, good in the first half but faded in the 2nd. His end product is frustrating, no getting away from that. His best work is sometimes off the ball, dragging people out of position and out of their comfort zones, and this ultimately frees up space for others to exploit.

It does look sometimes that the price tag weighs on his shoulders, which as pointed out is silly as it was nothing to do with him.

Why the fuck does Kane take corners? Does anyone actually know the reasoning or logic behind it?

Woy knows.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 12, 2016, 03:30:23 PM
Enjoyed the 1st half enormously last night and we should have had the game won by half-time.

Lots of criticism on here (and bile in many other places) about Sterling. I actually thought he was very good in the 1st half but very disappointing from some promising positions in the 2nd half. Definitely a tale of 2 halves for him and I understand the frustration but to mark his overall performance as “awful” is ridiculous.

Thought Hodgson should have pulled him at about 60 mins. In fact very difficult to understand why Hodgson didn’t change it in the 2nd half particularly when you consider the options on the bench. Kane had a poor match and no one has mentioned Lallana who had good moments in the 1st half but was totally anonymous in the 2nd.

I’ve watched a recording of the game again this morning. More to the point it wasn’t really “watching” but more of a crude analysis breaking down the game into segments and looking at specific things. It is something I do relatively regularly for big City games when I’ve seen the game live. One specific “thing” I looked at it this morning was Sterling and to test if my perception that he had a very good 1st first half was over influenced by my City bias. It wasn’t. He was pretty much faultless for the 1st 30 minutes and involved in so much that was good about England’s domination of the early stages.

If anyone has kept a recording, is as sad as me and has the time or inclination, have a look at:

2.36
8.27
11.47
16.39
20.19
23.30  (running through on goal and great defending – would Vardy have done better there?)
30.29  (his 1st mistake when he scuffed an easy ball that would have released Kane)
35.44
39.55


I can also post the times from the 2nd half which didn’t end too well :)




Did you log the times when Hart kicked for touch? His distribution of the ball is poor considering he is England's No1.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 12, 2016, 03:36:10 PM
My fav hart moment was when he threw the ball off his defenders head when going upfield.

The whole team need to stop passing for the sake of it as it was so obvious where they were going to go. Loads of times people were left space and tried to thread the needle instead of committing defenders. I think we need goals from the two wide men and that would mean it's better vardy plays even if it's a bit unbalanced. Townsend would have had a field day in the llamas position, baffling we try to play like this with lack of wide players we took.

Modric, is so special like.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 12, 2016, 08:16:32 PM
Enjoyed the 1st half enormously last night and we should have had the game won by half-time.

Lots of criticism on here (and bile in many other places) about Sterling. I actually thought he was very good in the 1st half but very disappointing from some promising positions in the 2nd half. Definitely a tale of 2 halves for him and I understand the frustration but to mark his overall performance as “awful” is ridiculous.

Thought Hodgson should have pulled him at about 60 mins. In fact very difficult to understand why Hodgson didn’t change it in the 2nd half particularly when you consider the options on the bench. Kane had a poor match and no one has mentioned Lallana who had good moments in the 1st half but was totally anonymous in the 2nd.

I’ve watched a recording of the game again this morning. More to the point it wasn’t really “watching” but more of a crude analysis breaking down the game into segments and looking at specific things. It is something I do relatively regularly for big City games when I’ve seen the game live. One specific “thing” I looked at it this morning was Sterling and to test if my perception that he had a very good 1st first half was over influenced by my City bias. It wasn’t. He was pretty much faultless for the 1st 30 minutes and involved in so much that was good about England’s domination of the early stages.

If anyone has kept a recording, is as sad as me and has the time or inclination, have a look at:

2.36
8.27
11.47
16.39
20.19
23.30  (running through on goal and great defending – would Vardy have done better there?)
30.29  (his 1st mistake when he scuffed an easy ball that would have released Kane)
35.44
39.55


I can also post the times from the 2nd half which didn’t end too well :)




Did you log the times when Hart kicked for touch? His distribution of the ball is poor considering he is England's No1.

No I didn't log his long ball distribution because it is something that can be quickly looked up on a "match stat" site.  All his short passes were ok and he misplaced 11 long balls. On the face of it that sounds lots doesn't it? It is, however, pretty standard for Hart because he averaged 10 inaccurate long balls per game in the PL last season.

I would have thought there must be room for improvement there and you certainly won't catch me, or for that matter probably any City fan,  shouting from the rooftops suggesting Hart has great distribution.

As you are a United fan, how do you feel about De Gea's distribution?
Are you in the same camp as BorntoBubble who said last night  "maybe I'm blessed watching DDG every week who is immense at distribution"?
Are you aware, as great a goalkeeper as DDG is, that he averaged nearly 11 inaccurate long balls per game in the PL last season? Coincidentally the same number as Hart last night....



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 12, 2016, 08:35:45 PM
Enjoyed the 1st half enormously last night and we should have had the game won by half-time.

Lots of criticism on here (and bile in many other places) about Sterling. I actually thought he was very good in the 1st half but very disappointing from some promising positions in the 2nd half. Definitely a tale of 2 halves for him and I understand the frustration but to mark his overall performance as “awful” is ridiculous.

Thought Hodgson should have pulled him at about 60 mins. In fact very difficult to understand why Hodgson didn’t change it in the 2nd half particularly when you consider the options on the bench. Kane had a poor match and no one has mentioned Lallana who had good moments in the 1st half but was totally anonymous in the 2nd.

I’ve watched a recording of the game again this morning. More to the point it wasn’t really “watching” but more of a crude analysis breaking down the game into segments and looking at specific things. It is something I do relatively regularly for big City games when I’ve seen the game live. One specific “thing” I looked at it this morning was Sterling and to test if my perception that he had a very good 1st first half was over influenced by my City bias. It wasn’t. He was pretty much faultless for the 1st 30 minutes and involved in so much that was good about England’s domination of the early stages.

If anyone has kept a recording, is as sad as me and has the time or inclination, have a look at:

2.36
8.27
11.47
16.39
20.19
23.30  (running through on goal and great defending – would Vardy have done better there?)
30.29  (his 1st mistake when he scuffed an easy ball that would have released Kane)
35.44
39.55


I can also post the times from the 2nd half which didn’t end too well :)




Did you log the times when Hart kicked for touch? His distribution of the ball is poor considering he is England's No1.

No I didn't log his long ball distribution because it is something that can be quickly looked up on a "match stat" site.  All his short passes were ok and he misplaced 11 long balls. On the face of it that sounds lots doesn't it? It is, however, pretty standard for Hart because he averaged 10 inaccurate long balls per game in the PL last season.

I would have thought there must be room for improvement there and you certainly won't catch me, or for that matter probably any City fan,  shouting from the rooftops suggesting Hart has great distribution.

As you are a United fan, how do you feel about De Gea's distribution?
Are you in the same camp as BorntoBubble who said last night  "maybe I'm blessed watching DDG every week who is immense at distribution"?
Are you aware, as great a goalkeeper as DDG is, that he averaged nearly 11 inaccurate long balls per game in the PL last season? Coincidentally the same number as Hart last night....



Lies, damned lies, and statistics. :)

I'm not surprised at the figures, although they are a very base way of measuring the efficacy of a keeper's distribution. I cba to check but I wouldn't be surprised if Schmeichel's numbers were good as he had the option of lumping it upfield and having Jamie Vardy chasing it.
DDG probably had the ball passed to him a lot more than Hart last season bearing in mind United's position in the sideways and backwards pass league, his 11 per game might only have been a small percentage. Whereas Hart was playing for the ever expansive Manchester City and maybe only had to distribute the ball 12 times a game :)

My issue last night was that Hart didn't seem capable of keeping it on the pitch.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Woodsey on June 12, 2016, 09:52:15 PM
Sick of these wankers that want to fuck up things for everyone else by fighting.

The U.K. Govt should just offer up a bunch of SAS troops to hit them hard at the first hint of trouble and lob them in a back of a van and back home on the first cargo plane.

I'm sure the Russians would be equally effective also given the nod....


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: flushthemout on June 12, 2016, 11:46:17 PM
Why do the press never ask RH about Kane taking corners?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 12, 2016, 11:47:08 PM
Why has Hart not been outed for his terrible 'no mans land position' for the goal last night?  Everyone keeps saying 'there was nothing he could do about it blah blah blah'.  Correct given how bad a position he took up and how he was so desperate to moan for offside after he realised  he was totally out of position for this so called 'non stoppable' header.  Didn't look too unstoppable to me if he was positioned correctly.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 13, 2016, 12:01:06 AM
Enjoyed the 1st half enormously last night and we should have had the game won by half-time.

Lots of criticism on here (and bile in many other places) about Sterling. I actually thought he was very good in the 1st half but very disappointing from some promising positions in the 2nd half. Definitely a tale of 2 halves for him and I understand the frustration but to mark his overall performance as “awful” is ridiculous.

Thought Hodgson should have pulled him at about 60 mins. In fact very difficult to understand why Hodgson didn’t change it in the 2nd half particularly when you consider the options on the bench. Kane had a poor match and no one has mentioned Lallana who had good moments in the 1st half but was totally anonymous in the 2nd.

I’ve watched a recording of the game again this morning. More to the point it wasn’t really “watching” but more of a crude analysis breaking down the game into segments and looking at specific things. It is something I do relatively regularly for big City games when I’ve seen the game live. One specific “thing” I looked at it this morning was Sterling and to test if my perception that he had a very good 1st first half was over influenced by my City bias. It wasn’t. He was pretty much faultless for the 1st 30 minutes and involved in so much that was good about England’s domination of the early stages.

If anyone has kept a recording, is as sad as me and has the time or inclination, have a look at:

2.36
8.27
11.47
16.39
20.19
23.30  (running through on goal and great defending – would Vardy have done better there?)
30.29  (his 1st mistake when he scuffed an easy ball that would have released Kane)
35.44
39.55


I can also post the times from the 2nd half which didn’t end too well :)




Did you log the times when Hart kicked for touch? His distribution of the ball is poor considering he is England's No1.

No I didn't log his long ball distribution because it is something that can be quickly looked up on a "match stat" site.  All his short passes were ok and he misplaced 11 long balls. On the face of it that sounds lots doesn't it? It is, however, pretty standard for Hart because he averaged 10 inaccurate long balls per game in the PL last season.

I would have thought there must be room for improvement there and you certainly won't catch me, or for that matter probably any City fan,  shouting from the rooftops suggesting Hart has great distribution.

As you are a United fan, how do you feel about De Gea's distribution?
Are you in the same camp as BorntoBubble who said last night  "maybe I'm blessed watching DDG every week who is immense at distribution"?
Are you aware, as great a goalkeeper as DDG is, that he averaged nearly 11 inaccurate long balls per game in the PL last season? Coincidentally the same number as Hart last night....



Game set and match Archer.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 13, 2016, 12:03:53 AM
Why has Hart not been outed for his terrible 'no mans land position' for the goal last night?  Everyone keeps saying 'there was nothing he could do about it blah blah blah'.  Correct given how bad a position he took up and how he was so desperate to moan for offside after he realised  he was totally out of position for this so called 'non stoppable' header.  Didn't look too unstoppable to me if he was positioned correctly.

I don't think his position was terrible. To save it, he would've had to have been on his line, and that would have been terrible positioning in itself.

I'm sure Butland would have kept it out, and then saved the 2 follow up attempts.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 13, 2016, 12:08:54 AM
Why has Hart not been outed for his terrible 'no mans land position' for the goal last night?  Everyone keeps saying 'there was nothing he could do about it blah blah blah'.  Correct given how bad a position he took up and how he was so desperate to moan for offside after he realised  he was totally out of position for this so called 'non stoppable' header.  Didn't look too unstoppable to me if he was positioned correctly.

I don't think his position was terrible. To save it, he would've had to have been on his line, and that would have been terrible positioning in itself.

I'm sure Butland would have kept it out, and then saved the 2 follow up attempts.

Nothing worse than being in no man's land.   Way better on the line or committing in full than just standing in a spot where nothing could be done.  Where is the benefit of being in the position he was in?   He had nothing to do all night apart from this and got it wrong as usual.  Nothing to do with Jack or any other keeper.  The bottom line is he talks a lot of bollocks in press conferences after the match and singing the national anthum dreaming he is the modern day Stuart Pearce when he is just a jobbing keeper who has had the easiest 6 year reign as a number 1 keeper with zero competition in the history of the game.  Pretty sure Pep sees it the same.   I would be amazed if he is still your keeper at the end of next season.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 13, 2016, 12:17:29 AM
Enjoyed the 1st half enormously last night and we should have had the game won by half-time.

Lots of criticism on here (and bile in many other places) about Sterling. I actually thought he was very good in the 1st half but very disappointing from some promising positions in the 2nd half. Definitely a tale of 2 halves for him and I understand the frustration but to mark his overall performance as “awful” is ridiculous.

Thought Hodgson should have pulled him at about 60 mins. In fact very difficult to understand why Hodgson didn’t change it in the 2nd half particularly when you consider the options on the bench. Kane had a poor match and no one has mentioned Lallana who had good moments in the 1st half but was totally anonymous in the 2nd.

I’ve watched a recording of the game again this morning. More to the point it wasn’t really “watching” but more of a crude analysis breaking down the game into segments and looking at specific things. It is something I do relatively regularly for big City games when I’ve seen the game live. One specific “thing” I looked at it this morning was Sterling and to test if my perception that he had a very good 1st first half was over influenced by my City bias. It wasn’t. He was pretty much faultless for the 1st 30 minutes and involved in so much that was good about England’s domination of the early stages.

If anyone has kept a recording, is as sad as me and has the time or inclination, have a look at:

2.36
8.27
11.47
16.39
20.19
23.30  (running through on goal and great defending – would Vardy have done better there?)
30.29  (his 1st mistake when he scuffed an easy ball that would have released Kane)
35.44
39.55


I can also post the times from the 2nd half which didn’t end too well :)




Did you log the times when Hart kicked for touch? His distribution of the ball is poor considering he is England's No1.

No I didn't log his long ball distribution because it is something that can be quickly looked up on a "match stat" site.  All his short passes were ok and he misplaced 11 long balls. On the face of it that sounds lots doesn't it? It is, however, pretty standard for Hart because he averaged 10 inaccurate long balls per game in the PL last season.

I would have thought there must be room for improvement there and you certainly won't catch me, or for that matter probably any City fan,  shouting from the rooftops suggesting Hart has great distribution.

As you are a United fan, how do you feel about De Gea's distribution?
Are you in the same camp as BorntoBubble who said last night  "maybe I'm blessed watching DDG every week who is immense at distribution"?
Are you aware, as great a goalkeeper as DDG is, that he averaged nearly 11 inaccurate long balls per game in the PL last season? Coincidentally the same number as Hart last night....



Game set and match Archer.

Just spent some time on a stats site, I won't be arguing football statistics with Archer again.
Clearly Joe Hart is a Demi-God and England are fortunate indeed to have him.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 13, 2016, 12:22:54 AM
#Funny when keepers are getting evaluated on how good their distribution is without considered how many times they play a long ball up field!  Just take the absolute numbers don't worry about how many times they are actually forced to do this.  What about worrying about the real reason the keeper is there?  To stop goals going in.  Surely their distribution of the ball is way down the list of how you judge a keeper.  Like asking how many times does your centre forward make a backward pass in judging how good he is at his job?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: swinebag22 on June 13, 2016, 12:46:07 AM
#Funny when keepers are getting evaluated on how good their distribution is without considered how many times they play a long ball up field!  Just take the absolute numbers don't worry about how many times they are actually forced to do this.  What about worrying about the real reason the keeper is there?  To stop goals going in.  Surely their distribution of the ball is way down the list of how you judge a keeper.  Like asking how many times does your centre forward make a backward pass in judging how good he is at his job?

'Sweeper Keepers' are all the rage these days, so while I disagree about most of what you said about Hart and the goal conceded, I agree that he could be out of Pep's plans for next year. Not because he is a poor keeper but more to do with poor feet skills.

Already a few keepers being linked with City and Everton linked with Hart


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 13, 2016, 01:16:52 AM
Enjoyed the 1st half enormously last night and we should have had the game won by half-time.

Lots of criticism on here (and bile in many other places) about Sterling. I actually thought he was very good in the 1st half but very disappointing from some promising positions in the 2nd half. Definitely a tale of 2 halves for him and I understand the frustration but to mark his overall performance as “awful” is ridiculous.

Thought Hodgson should have pulled him at about 60 mins. In fact very difficult to understand why Hodgson didn’t change it in the 2nd half particularly when you consider the options on the bench. Kane had a poor match and no one has mentioned Lallana who had good moments in the 1st half but was totally anonymous in the 2nd.

I’ve watched a recording of the game again this morning. More to the point it wasn’t really “watching” but more of a crude analysis breaking down the game into segments and looking at specific things. It is something I do relatively regularly for big City games when I’ve seen the game live. One specific “thing” I looked at it this morning was Sterling and to test if my perception that he had a very good 1st first half was over influenced by my City bias. It wasn’t. He was pretty much faultless for the 1st 30 minutes and involved in so much that was good about England’s domination of the early stages.

If anyone has kept a recording, is as sad as me and has the time or inclination, have a look at:

2.36
8.27
11.47
16.39
20.19
23.30  (running through on goal and great defending – would Vardy have done better there?)
30.29  (his 1st mistake when he scuffed an easy ball that would have released Kane)
35.44
39.55


I can also post the times from the 2nd half which didn’t end too well :)




Did you log the times when Hart kicked for touch? His distribution of the ball is poor considering he is England's No1.

No I didn't log his long ball distribution because it is something that can be quickly looked up on a "match stat" site.  All his short passes were ok and he misplaced 11 long balls. On the face of it that sounds lots doesn't it? It is, however, pretty standard for Hart because he averaged 10 inaccurate long balls per game in the PL last season.

I would have thought there must be room for improvement there and you certainly won't catch me, or for that matter probably any City fan,  shouting from the rooftops suggesting Hart has great distribution.

As you are a United fan, how do you feel about De Gea's distribution?
Are you in the same camp as BorntoBubble who said last night  "maybe I'm blessed watching DDG every week who is immense at distribution"?
Are you aware, as great a goalkeeper as DDG is, that he averaged nearly 11 inaccurate long balls per game in the PL last season? Coincidentally the same number as Hart last night....



Lies, damned lies, and statistics. :)

I'm not surprised at the figures, although they are a very base way of measuring the efficacy of a keeper's distribution. I cba to check but I wouldn't be surprised if Schmeichel's numbers were good as he had the option of lumping it upfield and having Jamie Vardy chasing it.
DDG probably had the ball passed to him a lot more than Hart last season bearing in mind United's position in the sideways and backwards pass league, his 11 per game might only have been a small percentage. Whereas Hart was playing for the ever expansive Manchester City and maybe only had to distribute the ball 12 times a game :)

My issue last night was that Hart didn't seem capable of keeping it on the pitch.


:)  TBF,  De Gea's long ball accuracy was about 40% last season and Hart's about 35%. Schmeichel's was about 31% albeit there must have been a far better ultimate end result on his numbers.

I suppose the point is that goalkeeper long-ball accuracy has not been mastereed and they are all shit. Different story for the easy short-ball stuff but De Gea had the worst % success rate in the league which surprised me somewhat.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 13, 2016, 01:23:48 AM
Why has Hart not been outed for his terrible 'no mans land position' for the goal last night?  Everyone keeps saying 'there was nothing he could do about it blah blah blah'.  Correct given how bad a position he took up and how he was so desperate to moan for offside after he realised  he was totally out of position for this so called 'non stoppable' header.  Didn't look too unstoppable to me if he was positioned correctly.

I don't think his position was terrible. To save it, he would've had to have been on his line, and that would have been terrible positioning in itself.

I'm sure Butland would have kept it out, and then saved the 2 follow up attempts.

Nothing worse than being in no man's land.   Way better on the line or committing in full than just standing in a spot where nothing could be done.  Where is the benefit of being in the position he was in?   He had nothing to do all night apart from this and got it wrong as usual.  Nothing to do with Jack or any other keeper.  The bottom line is he talks a lot of bollocks in press conferences after the match and singing the national anthum dreaming he is the modern day Stuart Pearce when he is just a jobbing keeper who has had the easiest 6 year reign as a number 1 keeper with zero competition in the history of the game.  Pretty sure Pep sees it the same.   I would be amazed if he is still your keeper at the end of next season.

Jobbing keeper? Classic line - genuinely made me laugh. WP.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 13, 2016, 01:39:41 AM
#Funny when keepers are getting evaluated on how good their distribution is without considered how many times they play a long ball up field!  Just take the absolute numbers don't worry about how many times they are actually forced to do this.  What about worrying about the real reason the keeper is there?  To stop goals going in.  Surely their distribution of the ball is way down the list of how you judge a keeper.  Like asking how many times does your centre forward make a backward pass in judging how good he is at his job?

Absolute numbers worked best to make the point to these pesky United fans who were having a pop at Hart's distribution. I can bore you to death with the rest if you want.

As Swinebag says, sweeper keepers are the rage. Pep loves them because, simplistically, he can get an extra man in midfield and theoretically dominate midfield to attack more and restrict the opponent to fewer opportunities. A downgrade on Hart's stop shotting ability to someone more comfortable with the ball at his feet  might well be a priority for Pep and I wouldn't be surprised to see the departure of Hart if he doesn't adapt after Pep's arrival. 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 13, 2016, 01:44:59 AM
Why has Hart not been outed for his terrible 'no mans land position' for the goal last night?  Everyone keeps saying 'there was nothing he could do about it blah blah blah'.  Correct given how bad a position he took up and how he was so desperate to moan for offside after he realised  he was totally out of position for this so called 'non stoppable' header.  Didn't look too unstoppable to me if he was positioned correctly.

I don't think his position was terrible. To save it, he would've had to have been on his line, and that would have been terrible positioning in itself.

I'm sure Butland would have kept it out, and then saved the 2 follow up attempts.


Nothing worse than being in no man's land.   Way better on the line or committing in full than just standing in a spot where nothing could be done.  Where is the benefit of being in the position he was in?   He had nothing to do all night apart from this and got it wrong as usual.  Nothing to do with Jack or any other keeper.  The bottom line is he talks a lot of bollocks in press conferences after the match and singing the national anthum dreaming he is the modern day Stuart Pearce when he is just a jobbing keeper who has had the easiest 6 year reign as a number 1 keeper with zero competition in the history of the game.  Pretty sure Pep sees it the same.   I would be amazed if he is still your keeper at the end of next season.

Jobbing keeper? Classic line - genuinely made me laugh. WP.

That's why a team who finished in the bottom half of the EPL last season have real ambitions to sign him.  That is his level.  Most keepers in the EPL could have played in front of your defence/midfield in the last few years and it wouldn't have made a great deal of difference to your results.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 13, 2016, 02:21:03 AM
Why has Hart not been outed for his terrible 'no mans land position' for the goal last night?  Everyone keeps saying 'there was nothing he could do about it blah blah blah'.  Correct given how bad a position he took up and how he was so desperate to moan for offside after he realised  he was totally out of position for this so called 'non stoppable' header.  Didn't look too unstoppable to me if he was positioned correctly.

I don't think his position was terrible. To save it, he would've had to have been on his line, and that would have been terrible positioning in itself.

I'm sure Butland would have kept it out, and then saved the 2 follow up attempts.


Nothing worse than being in no man's land.   Way better on the line or committing in full than just standing in a spot where nothing could be done.  Where is the benefit of being in the position he was in?   He had nothing to do all night apart from this and got it wrong as usual.  Nothing to do with Jack or any other keeper.  The bottom line is he talks a lot of bollocks in press conferences after the match and singing the national anthum dreaming he is the modern day Stuart Pearce when he is just a jobbing keeper who has had the easiest 6 year reign as a number 1 keeper with zero competition in the history of the game.  Pretty sure Pep sees it the same.   I would be amazed if he is still your keeper at the end of next season.

Jobbing keeper? Classic line - genuinely made me laugh. WP.

That's why a team who finished in the bottom half of the EPL last season have real ambitions to sign him.  That is his level.  Most keepers in the EPL could have played in front of your defence/midfield in the last few years and it wouldn't have made a great deal of difference to your results.

His level? Well, it would be interesting to see him play for a mid-table team again with a mid-table defence  like he did when he was on loan to Birmingham as a 22 year old in 2009/2010 in their 1st year back in the PL. He was able to showcase his talents back then and he helped them finish 9th in the league and was their  POTY.
 
There is a quirky coincidence with Butland there because he was also 22 I think at the start of 2015/2016, Stoke finshed 9th and Butland was POTY.

For good measure, Hart also was the PFA goalkeeper of the year in 2009/2010. And up the foodchain he went to his correct level.......





Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 13, 2016, 09:34:55 AM
#Funny when keepers are getting evaluated on how good their distribution is without considered how many times they play a long ball up field!  Just take the absolute numbers don't worry about how many times they are actually forced to do this.  What about worrying about the real reason the keeper is there?  To stop goals going in.  Surely their distribution of the ball is way down the list of how you judge a keeper.  Like asking how many times does your centre forward make a backward pass in judging how good he is at his job?

Absolute numbers worked best to make the point to these pesky United fans who were having a pop at Hart's distribution. I can bore you to death with the rest if you want.

As Swinebag says, sweeper keepers are the rage. Pep loves them because, simplistically, he can get an extra man in midfield and theoretically dominate midfield to attack more and restrict the opponent to fewer opportunities. A downgrade on Hart's stop shotting ability to someone more comfortable with the ball at his feet  might well be a priority for Pep and I wouldn't be surprised to see the departure of Hart if he doesn't adapt after Pep's arrival. 

My Unitedness wasn't what prompted my comment, it was a text from my City supporting mate which was sent unprompted and said "Hart's distribution has been shocking all season"

Can we move onto the next game now? Same starting eleven?
Wales likely to defend deep might favour Kane, or dare I suggest Rashford? Vardy still a great sub as the game changes, especially f we get in front.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 13, 2016, 09:44:50 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkwUX0hXAAAiqXd.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkxDntcWYAABCVx.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ckxm7jGW0AEsUpq.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ckxo4wOXAAA42zv.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkzqwjVWsAAwbpa.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ckwc6CBWsAAumPw.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkxBWBiWsAEhSHM.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 13, 2016, 01:52:11 PM
this is an excellent read

http://www.espnfc.com/european-championship/74/blog/post/2891011/euro-2016-fan-clashes-at-england-vs-russia-match-troublinng-sign


there are some genuinely worrying quotes coming out of Russia today

Vladislav Zhukov (Russian MP) - "If England fans don't want to get beaten up they shouldn't go to football matches. They are babies."

"Black fans and gays cannot be guaranteed safety at the 2018 Russia World Cup but that is their problem not ours".

Igor Lebedev, Russian FA executive: "90% of the fans go to football to fight, and that is normal. Our guys stood for our country"


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: HutchGF on June 13, 2016, 02:03:44 PM
this is an excellent read

http://www.espnfc.com/european-championship/74/blog/post/2891011/euro-2016-fan-clashes-at-england-vs-russia-match-troublinng-sign


there are some genuinely worrying quotes coming out of Russia today

Vladislav Zhukov (Russian MP) - "If England fans don't want to get beaten up they shouldn't go to football matches. They are babies."

"Black fans and gays cannot be guaranteed safety at the 2018 Russia World Cup but that is their problem not ours".

Igor Lebedev, Russian FA executive: "90% of the fans go to football to fight, and that is normal. Our guys stood for our country"

Wow! Those quotes and incredibly damning. If I was in charge I would give serious consideration to taking the World Cup off them.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Woodsey on June 13, 2016, 02:06:34 PM
But Russian MP Igor Lebedev criticised French police and called on Russian football fans to

"keep up the good work"

"I see nothing wrong with football fans fighting. On the contrary, well done to our boys! Keep up the good work!" he tweeted.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 13, 2016, 04:47:52 PM
Russia is gonna be absolute carnage in 2 years. Couldn't pay me enough to go there for the WC. I'll stick to watching jobbing keepers on the box.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 13, 2016, 04:50:56 PM
Russia is gonna be absolute carnage in 2 years. Couldn't pay me enough to go there for the WC. I'll stick to watching jobbing keepers on the box.

Fancy an even money bet Hart starts the first game of 2018 WC for England?  You have the best of it by a mile but i will accommodate you for small stakes for a bit of interest.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 13, 2016, 04:56:59 PM
Russia is gonna be absolute carnage in 2 years. Couldn't pay me enough to go there for the WC. I'll stick to watching jobbing keepers on the box.

Fancy an even money bet Hart starts the first game of 2018 WC for England?  You have the best of it by a mile but i will accommodate you for small stakes for a bit of interest.

I actually had a bet with myself that you'd offer some Hart related gamble before midnight ;)

I'm flattered, honestly I am, but your small stakes is probably the equivalent of my weekly wage! I'm happy to debate whatever aspect of the Euros whilst keeping the elastic bands on my wallet.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 13, 2016, 05:00:21 PM
Russia is gonna be absolute carnage in 2 years. Couldn't pay me enough to go there for the WC. I'll stick to watching jobbing keepers on the box.

Fancy an even money bet Hart starts the first game of 2018 WC for England?  You have the best of it by a mile but i will accommodate you for small stakes for a bit of interest.

I actually had a bet with myself that you'd offer some Hart related gamble before midnight ;)

I'm flattered, honestly I am, but your small stakes is probably the equivalent of my weekly wage! I'm happy to debate whatever aspect of the Euros whilst keeping the elastic bands on my wallet.

How many previous days have you had the same mythical bet though and lost because i only mentioned it today!   ;)

How would other people (outside of the debate) price Hart to start the first game of the 2018 WC?  If England don't qualify the bet loses.  Evens is too big right?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 13, 2016, 05:12:51 PM
Russia is gonna be absolute carnage in 2 years. Couldn't pay me enough to go there for the WC. I'll stick to watching jobbing keepers on the box.

Fancy an even money bet Hart starts the first game of 2018 WC for England?  You have the best of it by a mile but i will accommodate you for small stakes for a bit of interest.

I actually had a bet with myself that you'd offer some Hart related gamble before midnight ;)

I'm flattered, honestly I am, but your small stakes is probably the equivalent of my weekly wage! I'm happy to debate whatever aspect of the Euros whilst keeping the elastic bands on my wallet.

How many previous days have you had the same mythical bet though and lost because i only mentioned it today!   ;)

How would other people (outside of the debate) price Hart to start the first game of the 2018 WC?  If England don't qualify the bet loses.  Evens is too big right?

I'll level with you Arbboy, I've had that mythical bet with myself every day. I actually feel like I've made it on Blonde now :)

Yeah I'd say evens is pretty big. It's 2 years down the line so not exactly easy to price 'correctly' and there are many variables that could happen, but at 29 he is in his prime so you'd have to assume heavy odds on.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 13, 2016, 05:16:46 PM
Russia is gonna be absolute carnage in 2 years. Couldn't pay me enough to go there for the WC. I'll stick to watching jobbing keepers on the box.

Fancy an even money bet Hart starts the first game of 2018 WC for England?  You have the best of it by a mile but i will accommodate you for small stakes for a bit of interest.

I actually had a bet with myself that you'd offer some Hart related gamble before midnight ;)

I'm flattered, honestly I am, but your small stakes is probably the equivalent of my weekly wage! I'm happy to debate whatever aspect of the Euros whilst keeping the elastic bands on my wallet.

How many previous days have you had the same mythical bet though and lost because i only mentioned it today!   ;)

How would other people (outside of the debate) price Hart to start the first game of the 2018 WC?  If England don't qualify the bet loses.  Evens is too big right?

Think it relies on a few factors:

1) Pep keeping him as number 1 at Man City (having home grown senior keeper must be a plus though and let's face it he's adequate for a top 4 premier team?  Pep got bigger issues to address).
2) Whether Roy stays in charge of England (as reckon that would make it a lock).
3) England qualifying plus potential injuries

All in all, I'd probably think evens is a good bet for him to start WC2018?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Sportshead on June 13, 2016, 06:17:22 PM
I would say Evens is a little big but not far away
He will be 31 so age not an issue
Manager could change and not fancy him, if he left City for say Everton would it effect his place much?
Not anyone outstanding coming through
Still think he is a good keeper myself ,does things nice and simple pretty solid


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on June 13, 2016, 06:28:56 PM
this is an excellent read

http://www.espnfc.com/european-championship/74/blog/post/2891011/euro-2016-fan-clashes-at-england-vs-russia-match-troublinng-sign


there are some genuinely worrying quotes coming out of Russia today

Vladislav Zhukov (Russian MP) - "If England fans don't want to get beaten up they shouldn't go to football matches. They are babies."

"Black fans and gays cannot be guaranteed safety at the 2018 Russia World Cup but that is their problem not ours".

Igor Lebedev, Russian FA executive: "90% of the fans go to football to fight, and that is normal. Our guys stood for our country"

Bloody Hell.

Is this genuine?

If so, the ruling bodies need to take the World Cup elsewhere.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 13, 2016, 06:48:20 PM
this is an excellent read

http://www.espnfc.com/european-championship/74/blog/post/2891011/euro-2016-fan-clashes-at-england-vs-russia-match-troublinng-sign


there are some genuinely worrying quotes coming out of Russia today

Vladislav Zhukov (Russian MP) - "If England fans don't want to get beaten up they shouldn't go to football matches. They are babies."

"Black fans and gays cannot be guaranteed safety at the 2018 Russia World Cup but that is their problem not ours".

Igor Lebedev, Russian FA executive: "90% of the fans go to football to fight, and that is normal. Our guys stood for our country"

Bloody Hell.

Is this genuine?

If so, the ruling bodies need to take the World Cup elsewhere.

And then Qatar in 2022.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-36516006


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 13, 2016, 06:55:08 PM
Rooney's message to the fans today was heartfelt, genuine and natural. Well done Wayne.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 13, 2016, 09:15:24 PM
What on earth has the bog brush done to his hair?!

Italy team is so old I'm just waiting for them to limp min re-raise AA.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 13, 2016, 11:26:45 PM
Belgium are so restricted by their nomark manager. 

12.50% win rate at Schalke
22.73% win rate at Sint Truiden (sacked)
That's it.

This man is entrusted with the Belgian golden generation.   They need to sack this clown so they at least have a chance to make an impact at Russia 2018 or it will be the usual mediocrity interspersed with some individual class.  He takes 10-15% off their potential imo.

Reckon you could pop a forumite who spoke French in charge and it would be equal EV in terms of results.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 14, 2016, 10:51:57 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck1rFUQWEAI_tnT.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck2F5ZdWUAA8m5D.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck2MxtPXEAE_tD8.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck2SXhdXAAAZbpa.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck2Sio4WgAA-j0_.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck2tb-bWUAE-jrc.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck2_GvxXIAEdhbG.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 14, 2016, 10:53:08 AM
Scheme triumphed over talent as Conte’s tactics helped an ordinary Italy side beat star-studded Belgium

http://www.espnfc.com/blog/the-match/60/post/2892423/antonio-conte-tactics-too-good-as-italy-beat-belgium-at-euro-2016


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 14, 2016, 12:51:51 PM
UEFA imposes suspended disqualification from Euro 2016 on Russia

"suspension will be lifted if similar incidents happen remaining matches"


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on June 14, 2016, 10:15:06 PM
Massive fight has broken out at the football in France Romanians are fighting the poles . Albanians are fighting the Portuguese and the Turkish are fighting the slovakians police have said they will all be rounded up and deported back to England


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 15, 2016, 09:36:42 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck7fqRnW0AIIH34.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck7jnJeXAAAJejp.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck7kazNW0AAs9JA.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck73ZmPWYAUYsFl.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck8ABcUWsAEh1XE.jpg)



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on June 15, 2016, 06:54:18 PM

Ray Parlour, who guested on the Sky Poker show last night, aired his views on Euro16.

Warning - may contain spam.

England v Wales
https://youtu.be/5NVU9sGBPSw

Rep Ireland v Belgium
https://youtu.be/P70zM3Dh-Pk

N Ireland v Ukraine
https://youtu.be/TX3U5o14VmQ

Germany v Poland
https://youtu.be/CFKy1jeSSHM

France v Albania
https://youtu.be/CJ0UvoixDtY

Spain v Turkey
https://youtu.be/YSN0cIcZUFE

Outright
https://youtu.be/neUBxUPD5As

Golden Boot
https://youtu.be/3ITycLPFp80


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 16, 2016, 10:01:06 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ck_xwELXIAAzZY9.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClAa3VhXIAAvXhz.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClAk460UoAA-iST.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClBTC90WIAEW_Kb.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClBT8CiXEAA7Nvh.jpg)

into 100/30 for player of the tournament....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClBYxw_WIAApKcZ.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 16, 2016, 11:44:27 AM
Got him (e/w) at 66/1 for top scorer, I was concerned France may rest him for the last game but as its against the Swiss who can still win the group, that seems unlikely :)

France again looked suspect from corners, Albania could have scored a goal or 2 and must count themselves a little unlucky. No team yet to take a beating, is the gap in international football shortening a la the Premier League? All the teams look very well drilled and organised even if they lack a star player.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on June 16, 2016, 11:56:01 AM
Under 2.5 goals must be getting smashed atm


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 16, 2016, 12:02:42 PM
Under 2.5 goals must be getting smashed atm

Bookies seem to have adjusted for it though - for example total goal minutes on the spreads was 114 to buy in the Romania game last night, compared to 130/140 in a premier league game, 150 in a championship game, and 165 in a Peterborough game.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 16, 2016, 02:20:53 PM
Nice rub from Rio there about Spurs.  'Ali certain to play for a big club very soon'  :D  Tried quickly to dig himself out of the hole.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 16, 2016, 03:39:01 PM
Can we mark that one down as a Hart error?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 16, 2016, 03:40:23 PM
Lol. Hart and sterling. How sterling gets in ahead of vardy is quite beyond me


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Nakor on June 16, 2016, 03:40:35 PM
Can we mark that one down as a Hart error?

In before Arb. Impressive ;)
And yes.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 16, 2016, 03:41:03 PM
Joe fucking Fart!   Two things to do the whole first half.  Drops a cross in the first 5 minutes under no real pressure that could easily have led to a goal then that effort.  Enjoy your last 2 games Joe for England and your move to mid table EPL in the summer.  


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 16, 2016, 03:41:22 PM
Can we mark that one down as a Hart error?

Absolutely terrible. World class goalkeeper 😂😂😂


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 16, 2016, 03:44:02 PM
Vardy for sterling now please. Surely this is unarguable? Same pace, better finishing.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: booder on June 16, 2016, 03:49:24 PM
Vardy for sterling now please. Surely this is unarguable? Same pace, better finishing.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: anthonyl on June 16, 2016, 03:51:08 PM
Like in the first game, Sterling, awful. Really bad. Wouldn't make my squad of 50 players let alone start.

Vardy and Sturrige on for Sterling and Kane at HT please.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Junior Senior on June 16, 2016, 03:53:14 PM
Sterling is like having ten men. He is actually having a nett negative effect on England. Absolutely woeful performance from him.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 16, 2016, 04:03:40 PM
Like in the first game, Sterling, awful. Really bad. Wouldn't make my squad of 50 players let alone start.

Vardy and Sturrige on for Sterling and Kane at HT please.

Anthony knew :)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 16, 2016, 04:16:18 PM
Reckon Sterling would have put away that Sturridge chance ;whistle;


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 16, 2016, 04:47:45 PM
Reckon Sterling would have put away that Sturridge chance ;whistle;

He wouldn't have scored that one though  ;sexybanana; ;sexybanana;


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 16, 2016, 04:49:23 PM
Vardy looked way out of his depth, or at least not suited to this style at all. Would play Rashford and Sturridge, both looked class.

Thought Allo looked terrible though.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 16, 2016, 04:50:57 PM
ROY FUKN HODGSON TAKE A BOW

Sturridge if he's fit should obv be 1st name on the sheet.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 16, 2016, 04:51:47 PM
Lol. Vardy is best on the counter and in behind. Wales defended deep. Vardy had one chance, took it. Job done.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 16, 2016, 04:55:06 PM
sturridge was class, great in a crowded box. i would start him next match too.

vardy, as george2loose says to me, would be good when we are up against it defending against germany or france with much less possession, hit them on the counter

i agree Dele Alli had a disappointing game

don't think we will see Sterling again this championships


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: anthonyl on June 16, 2016, 04:55:27 PM
Like in the first game, Sterling, awful. Really bad. Wouldn't make my squad of 50 players let alone start.

Vardy and Sturrige on for Sterling and Kane at HT please.

Called it.

Sterling can't play a single minute for England again.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: BorntoBubble on June 16, 2016, 04:56:48 PM
Rashford.

That is all


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 16, 2016, 04:56:53 PM
edit, lovely piece of skill by Alli for the sturridge goal.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 16, 2016, 04:56:55 PM
Hart jumping around the pitch thanking the boys for covering up another shit game from him.  Please woy do the right thing don't be results orientated all your life.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: George2Loose on June 16, 2016, 04:59:03 PM
Sturridge needs to play up top. Vardy when we are playing on the break

Drop Sterling move Alli further forward and bring in Wiltshere.

Thought Rooney and Cahill played really well


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on June 16, 2016, 05:08:10 PM
Think Rooney has been superb in both games so far.

Sterling is the English equivalent of Chicago's Jay Cutler.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Graham C on June 16, 2016, 05:12:55 PM
Good to see positive subs at half time rather than leaving it until 10 mins to go.   Nifty result, could be more comfortable but this is England.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 16, 2016, 05:36:49 PM
Unbiased question.

What do people think of Robbie Saveage as co-comm?

if you think he is good or bad, would you accept that is unconventional to have a co comm so very keen on the side he is supporting?


who are the best and worst pundits so far inthe euros?

can i put forward?

slaven bilic - brilliant

and you can give me some other names, good or bad


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 16, 2016, 05:40:37 PM
Liked Savage today.   Thought he was a bit biased first half but was very unbiased in the second half whilst still make it obvious he was massively up for it for Wales.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: George2Loose on June 16, 2016, 05:42:06 PM
Think Savage is v good on radio phone ins. His straightforward nature works well in that format.

As a pundit or commentator I think he's absolute gash


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 16, 2016, 05:43:36 PM
Thought the reaction after the 1st game was absurd ( actually made a big post but iPad died lol) all you can ask for is the team gives it there all and you can't accuse them of not doing that. We are very unlikely to win the tournament but so far I'm absolutely delighted at how we've gave it 100% for once in a major tournament, and I would've said that if it finished 1-1. You can say the manager got things wrong, you can criticise performances as that's what everyone loves to do but who has played so far that isn't giving it a 100% ?

Absolutely buzzing and feel it was thoroughly deserved.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: teddybloat on June 16, 2016, 05:58:14 PM
i like the idea of colour commentary for football.

football is a pretty dull sport. a good portion of the time the ball is out of play, when it is in play nothing much happens. as goals are so rare, slight run good in taking / missing chances / bad decisions in relation to goals disproportionally changes the outcome of games - and it renders much analysis irrelevant and completely results oriented.

so when you have people over-analysing the game and theorising over formations and tactics i find it to be a complete snooze-fest. much rather have people being partisan and giving strident unbalanced opinions.

people taking football seriously is a turn off for me.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 16, 2016, 06:21:31 PM
The result really moves away criticism from Hart, when potentially if we didn't grab the win he was the sole reason we may not have qualified. I think Slovakia will give us a good game & we was looking at elimination. Questionable for the Russia goal, completely at fault for the second. If we had Butland in the team, would be calling for him to be taking over.

Sick of Alli getting involved in confrontations too.

We deserved the win in the end though.

As for Savage, he really is dull as dishwater. But at least he isn't biased, he could have been a Wales pundit saying they deserved a point, but told it How it was that Wales didn't deserve a point.

The group also very unclear. Wales still can finish bottom!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 16, 2016, 06:59:12 PM
Decent performance. Deserved to win. Sterling shocking again. Hart again letting himself down. Hennessy even worse though. Worst keeper in the prem imo.

One thing this tournament is highlighting for me - Christian Eriksen is a hell of a player. Pulls the strings for Spurs and makes Kane and Alli much better players.

Kyle Walker was outstanding today. Superb display.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 16, 2016, 07:08:24 PM
Vardy only 7 touches all 2nd half which is ridiculously low but doesn't matter if he gets an important striker goal.
Sturridge has to start next time out - classiest striker we have. Glad now that Hodgson took the chance on him with his dodgy fitness.

As for the City boys, Sterling woeful and, after his v good 1st half against Russia,  that is 90 mins of nothing and unlikely we will be seeing him again. Comedy keeping from Hart - as bad as it gets that one.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 16, 2016, 09:01:16 PM
.

...

One thing this tournament is highlighting for me - Christian Eriksen is a hell of a player. Pulls the strings for Spurs and makes Kane and Alli much better players.

...


Eriksen plays on the left in our current system. He's had far less influence than previous years, although he's top or close to the top in our running stats, I believe.

Dembélé is the man that pulls the strings. I thought Alli had a quiet game but he was clearly targeted by 90s Gary Barlow Aaron Ramsey. Dier I thought did a decent job, with a few good interceptions and tackles.

Full backs are loving this system and, like the rest of us, I'm delighted to see Kane taken off corners (Premier League's top scorer from corners last season). He's only scored one free kick, too, and that took a wicked deflection. Surely Rooney is handy close up and Dier or Walker can leather one from distance?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 17, 2016, 12:39:40 AM
Walker could end up a star of this tourney if he improves his final product/ we get a striker who adapts to what hes doing. Think people are writing off kane too early, the way we are playing/having to play hasnt suited him and once we play teams interested in playing football he will shine. The llama is pointless, we need goals from his position and hes a negative option. We need to get to a situation against slovakia where it looks like the front 5 are a threat, sterling and llalana havent done this and need dropped. Think he should look at the diamond again but with alli at point instead of rooney. We simply have no wide players and everyone looks uncomfortable as wide of 3.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: swinebag22 on June 17, 2016, 12:55:27 AM
Unbiased question.

What do people think of Robbie Saveage as co-comm?

if you think he is good or bad, would you accept that is unconventional to have a co comm so very keen on the side he is supporting?


who are the best and worst pundits so far inthe euros?

can i put forward?

slaven bilic - brilliant

and you can give me some other names, good or bad

Thought savage was very good today. Obviously up for the Welsh which is fine from a co-comm, but gave good impartial opinions throughout.

The only annoying thing about him was that he was good as I can't normally stand him.

Agree that Bilic has been great. Just don't like Henry even though he speaks well. and the usual MOTD crew are pretty awful.

As for England. Great to see Rashford playing like Sterling used to before things got serious. Poor Raheem, seems to carry the weight of the world and looks like he needs to fall in love with the game again. Nothing comes naturally to him now and I'll be amazed if he gets another minute in this comp.

Vardy needs to start, especially in  the games where we are losing the possession stats. Wiltshire needs to play as well for me. Think Roy got lucky today against an average side. I'm happy to give him credit for bold substitutions but overall he seems a bit clueless. Can't remember him playing 3/4 strikers before in a warm up game or qualifier so it appears his plan B was concocted in the Lens toilets at half time when he's had all year to draw one up and try it out.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 17, 2016, 09:18:04 AM
Unbiased question.

What do people think of Robbie Saveage as co-comm?

if you think he is good or bad, would you accept that is unconventional to have a co comm so very keen on the side he is supporting?


who are the best and worst pundits so far inthe euros?

can i put forward?

slaven bilic - brilliant

and you can give me some other names, good or bad

Thought savage was very good today. Obviously up for the Welsh which is fine from a co-comm, but gave good impartial opinions throughout.

The only annoying thing about him was that he was good as I can't normally stand him.

Agree that Bilic has been great. Just don't like Henry even though he speaks well. and the usual MOTD crew are pretty awful.

As for England. Great to see Rashford playing like Sterling used to before things got serious. Poor Raheem, seems to carry the weight of the world and looks like he needs to fall in love with the game again. Nothing comes naturally to him now and I'll be amazed if he gets another minute in this comp.

Vardy needs to start, especially in  the games where we are losing the possession stats. Wiltshire needs to play as well for me. Think Roy got lucky today against an average side. I'm happy to give him credit for bold substitutions but overall he seems a bit clueless. Can't remember him playing 3/4 strikers before in a warm up game or qualifier so it appears his plan B was concocted in the Lens toilets at half time when he's had all year to draw one up and try it out.

Roy did the 4 strikers at Fulham when they made the Europa Final.
Vardy was peripheral other than his goal. He's not suited to a game where the opposition are playing deep and defending hard. Not sure Slovakia will play much different from Wales, a draw will probably be enough for them. Start with Sturridge or Rashford alongside Kane feels better. I thought Lallana might be an answer in the first half hour v Russia, but much as it pains me to say it, maybe Milner really does warrant a place. If only Delph had been available and not ruined by greed.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: exstream on June 17, 2016, 09:36:36 AM
Delph?
Where would he fit in


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 17, 2016, 09:50:00 AM

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClE7cwhWAAAbOnb.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClFB2oaWEAAGvKE.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClFOOxPWYAESJoY.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClFNhIGWQAIJAm0.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClFrXP3WkAAZfUC.jpg)

(https://o.twimg.com/2/proxy.jpg?t=HBhcaHR0cDovL2kuZGFpbHltYWlsLmNvLnVrL2kvcGl4LzIwMTYvMDYvMTYvMTgvMzU1RERFMUUwMDAwMDU3OC0wLWltYWdlLWEtMjVfMTQ2NjA5NzE2NzI2NC5qcGcU-AkUmAUcFIQGFJQDAAAWABIA&s=wQs6ek0Ei2JC0MCEsgzJA9VXzoUy4c7xkPrwsT7hPx4)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClGdlTFWMAAPSsS.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClGcKhnWIAAaY2E.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClGcD0WWgAAqElh.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClGdY9xXEAISTFT.png)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 17, 2016, 10:20:49 AM
Delph?
Where would he fit in

F*** knows, I was just indulging in a little City baiting :)

But there has to be a better option than Lallana.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 17, 2016, 11:04:27 AM
any thoughts on any issue or not with Kane

as usual people are trying to back fit to work out his performances

one suggestion is he is knackered

65 games in the last 12 months

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClI7ahbUkAI0uKr.jpg)

Petit said last night "that is why you English will never win anything, no winter break"

He has certainly looked a bit sluggish over a game and a half here

why would he lack confidence after the season he has had?

Wuld you start him against Slovakia? Try and get him a goal.......


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 17, 2016, 11:12:54 AM
Rooney has surprised me with his (relative) composure in the midfield role. Assuming Sterling is toast, I'd start Wilshere in a central role, move Alli out to the left and Sturridge for Kane seems a no-brainer while Kane is having a, hopefully, temporary dip in form

Looks a bit silly that we don't have Townsend as an option now


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 17, 2016, 11:20:52 AM
Was also thinking that Rooney is having his best tournament for a while and thinking it's no coincidence that the weight of expectation on him is far far less than previous tourns. Probably quite liberating for him.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 17, 2016, 11:56:03 AM
With Kane I imagine playing the U21 tournament last year, and now Euros this year is tough.  Plus Spurs very rarely rotate him (if at all?)



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 17, 2016, 12:01:24 PM
I'd rest Kane for the first half vs Slovakia. Let him come on early in the 2nd. He will react well imo as he did when sub previous. Sturridge lost or wasted possession a lot on the wing and either plays upfront or doesn't play for me. We need two forwards in the middle to allow our fullbacks good work to have an end product as swinging it in atm seems to be betting on your striker outdoing 4 players. Our width is the key to success and obv we only now how fullbacks to provide this. Let's see vardy and Sturridge, we may just benefit from sturridges injury plagued season meaning he's fresh and give vardy 60 mins to show what he's got, then let Kane show us what he's got. Make Kane hungry and fight for his place and he will come back better imo. Play 4 in midfield, Rooney alli dier and pick one that's not called Milner.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 17, 2016, 12:13:21 PM
Really looking forward to watching Croatia later. Modric, Rakitic, Perisic. What a superb midfield they have.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 17, 2016, 12:30:23 PM
Really looking forward to watching Croatia later. Modric, Rakitic, Perisic. What a superb midfield they have.

Odds on commentator pointing out the Czechs aren't the ones in checks?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 17, 2016, 12:52:31 PM
With Kane I imagine playing the U21 tournament last year, and now Euros this year is tough.  Plus Spurs very rarely rotate him (if at all?)



Started every PL game last season.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on June 17, 2016, 01:15:10 PM
I figure the table below will come in useful over the next few days:

* If England or Wales top Group B they're very unlikely to face Northern Ireland, it'll be one of Romania/Albania or Turkey/Czech Republic.
* If England or Wales finish third in Group B they're very likely to face Germany or Poland
* If Northern Ireland finish third in Group C they're most likely to face France (or whoever wins Group A)





Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 17, 2016, 01:51:56 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClJjkJUUoAE8DVK.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 17, 2016, 01:57:28 PM
I figure the table below will come in useful over the next few days:

* If England or Wales top Group B they're very unlikely to face Northern Ireland, it'll be one of Romania/Albania or Turkey/Czech Republic.
* If England or Wales finish third in Group B they're very likely to face Germany or Poland
* If Northern Ireland finish third in Group C they're most likely to face France (or whoever wins Group A)





finishing second looks pretty nice there, group F are all pretty poor based on first showing.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 17, 2016, 07:43:28 PM
Croatia looked like the best side in the tourney , dunno whos had the bigger meltdown their fans or their players.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 17, 2016, 11:56:53 PM
Wow, who has the co-commentator tonight in the Spain match? Worst I've ever heard, awful


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 18, 2016, 12:37:31 AM
Tony Pulis


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 18, 2016, 09:52:22 AM
in the last sixteen the permuations are in the graph below

we are heading for

#ITA - #CRO
#NIR - #FRA
#SUI - #POL

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClLjNAJWAAEwlRs.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 18, 2016, 09:52:46 AM
Wow, who has the co-commentator tonight in the Spain match? Worst I've ever heard, awful

lol

you didn't recognise Pulis?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 18, 2016, 09:55:19 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClKX5VtWAAAnQpH.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClKSvxsXIAA58_J.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClKw2xXWEAAQTYk.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClK0JnDWkAAlshU.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClK5Fq4XEAA07QM.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClK8NRzWYAAjF2Z.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClK9eEbXIAEh0wx.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClLU0ENWEAA1uXL.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClLWaFLWEAAk-ot.jpg)



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 18, 2016, 09:56:11 AM
Minutes of Euro 2016 goals thus far:

5 10 18 19 31 32 32 37 41 42 44 45 47 49 50 51 54 56 57 57 61 62 65 71 73 80 81 87 88 88 89 90 90 90 90 90 90 90


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: teddybloat on June 18, 2016, 10:02:57 AM
Goals do tend to cluster towards the end of the games

Don't forget what's classed as the 90th minute probably averages 180 - 300 seconds with added time - so even discounting the effects of tiredness, teams sitting back - pushing forward the '90th' minute is already 3-5 times more likely to house a goal as it lasts longer than all other minutes


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 18, 2016, 04:50:39 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClPbf5bXIAEFrna.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClPbiN7WYAAo4GC.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClPcWBNWkAAKxg7.jpg)

(https://o.twimg.com/2/proxy.jpg?t=HBhcaHR0cDovL2kuZGFpbHltYWlsLmNvLnVrL2kvcGl4LzIwMTYvMDYvMTgvMTUvMzU2RDg0NzcwMDAwMDU3OC0wLWltYWdlLWEtNjBfMTQ2NjI2MDMzMDY1NC5qcGcU-AkUmAUcFIQGFJQDAAAWABIA&s=_0_4ZQ5YgDnBPR391Hvku6SlzzqhiXLbOOsqz4ny_G0)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 19, 2016, 10:27:50 AM
Voted the two best pics of Euro 2016 so far in one poll

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClRCUqjWMAApCBx.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClRCR9mWMAAMP7x.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 19, 2016, 10:31:12 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClP2xWQWYAA9LTV.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClQNUzsXIAApP3X.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClQw4SfWkAAIIGC.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClQ1KanWYAEY22q.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClQtMbgWgAAyPfj.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 19, 2016, 09:52:44 PM
The goalkeeping throughout this competition has been awful.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 19, 2016, 11:23:03 PM
Been away all weekend, have I missed much? Sterling still absolute class and Hart as solid as a rock?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on June 20, 2016, 12:23:48 AM
Been away all weekend, have I missed much? Sterling still absolute class and Hart as solid as a rock?

;D


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 20, 2016, 09:47:43 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClU_YI0WgAAloTs.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClV32zpXEAEHt25.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClV7-iQWAAA2PTP.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClV40yQWgAIsrVX.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClWFCvVWIAExUpQ.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 20, 2016, 09:49:13 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClWEl4_WYAA77Ec.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClWCgTuWIAA4ykH.jpg)


Team is apparently

                   Hart

Clyne Smalling Cahill Bertrand

                 Dier

          Henderson Wilshere

             Lallana

         Sturridge Vardy


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on June 20, 2016, 11:44:25 AM
I can completely understand two  of those changes, the two strikers. Roy & his team obviously have more info than us, but given the earliest we can play is Saturday then resting the two full backs, who've been key, seems a slight risk. Clyne and Bertrand both good though so talent drop off not massive and the diamond system means they won't have to provide as much width.

Alli for Wilshere is fine IMO but that seems a choice born out of resting Rooney which to me seems like madness. He's been in great form, is the captain and highly experienced. Resting him for a must win game seems insane. Quite ironic given many wanted him left at home.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 20, 2016, 11:50:54 AM
Agree, resting Rooney seems bad plan unless he's asked for it.

Why is the team leaked every single game without fail and nobody seems to give a shit about that ?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on June 20, 2016, 12:27:50 PM
Agree, resting Rooney seems bad plan unless he's asked for it.

Why is the team leaked every single game without fail and nobody seems to give a shit about that ?

I'm guessing here but to me it seems to usually be a combo of comments from Hodgson & 'bib theory' in how England line-up in their final training session.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 20, 2016, 01:22:49 PM
Agree, resting Rooney seems bad plan unless he's asked for it.

Why is the team leaked every single game without fail and nobody seems to give a shit about that ?

I'm guessing here but to me it seems to usually be a combo of comments from Hodgson & 'bib theory' in how England line-up in their final training session.

I wonder when the last time was that the papers got it wrong ? Seems to be spot on everytime, bit of a joke.

I assumed it was most likely from a leak in the camp.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PathFinder on June 20, 2016, 04:20:28 PM
They got it wrong when they took a picture of some names on Ray Lewington's clip board and said it would be the opening lineup for the Russia Game. They were also wrong when some fringe England players were pictured modelling the New England suits (Gibbs was one of them I think). The British press really is the pits, don't forget their European Super League 'Exclusive'


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on June 20, 2016, 04:31:08 PM
Decent analysis this: https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/euro-2016--will-seismic-changes-actually-improve-england-110153260.html


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 20, 2016, 11:05:39 PM
Wilshire performance was absolutely disgraceful.

Such poor management from Roy not playing Stones today, very important to have him stepping out with the ball and being positive.

We looked so narrow in the second half, not taking Townsend was big mistake, especially if Barkley isn't getting on the pitch.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: toddswain on June 20, 2016, 11:17:22 PM
Hendo wilshere and sterling should be on plane home. All terrible


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on June 20, 2016, 11:21:03 PM
Hendo wilshere and sterling should be on plane home. All terrible

Same for Llalana imo. Wasted playing advanced as even worse than Sterling at shooting


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Newportlad on June 20, 2016, 11:25:44 PM
Well done Wales!

Great team performance.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 20, 2016, 11:33:40 PM
Well done Wales!

Great team performance.



This, very well done, enjoy it.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 20, 2016, 11:49:49 PM
Superstars win titles in sport.  Wales have one.  England have none.  I would love to see Wales win it all.  They have got a lovely draw now.

It is incredible how many bang average players are lauded in this England squad.  Wiltshire going to be the next greatest overpaid EPL/Arsenal star to follow in Walcott's shoes over the next 5 years.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 20, 2016, 11:55:33 PM
Hendo was shocking. I saw five of his crosses and every single one was overhit, culminating in the last one that was still too high for Kane. He had one strike that was heading straight at the keeper until a defender blocked it. It's only because he plays for Liverpool that he's so over-rated. Thank god he's been forced out of the starting eleven.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 20, 2016, 11:57:33 PM
Hendo was shocking. I saw five of his crosses and every single one was overhit, culminating in the last one that was still too high for Kane. He had one strike that was heading straight at the keeper until a defender blocked it. It's only because he plays for Liverpool that he's so over-rated. Thank god he's been forced out of the starting eleven.

If Hendo played for Southampton, West Ham, Stoke or Everton he would be nowhere near this Engerland squad.  Amazing what playing for a once great mid table club does for your pulling power.  He is an absolute joke as i said before the Euro's how he is even close to being in this squad which is bang average anyway.  Is milner still in France or gone on holiday?  Of all the scousers i was expecting to play this summer i thought he would be involved just for his work rate.

Did woy think we already had 6 points on the board and first place locked up tonight then?  What was the deal with dropping the two full backs who created all the problems against Wales and the space?  Seriously wonder if these gaffers actually understand the implications of taking the piss out of the event resting players when winning the group gives you such an easier route.  I thought i had seen it all with England until this team selection tonight.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 21, 2016, 12:02:18 AM
Superstars win titles in sport.  Wales have one.  England have none.  I would love to see Wales win it all.  They have got a lovely draw now.

But when we had all the superstars we still got no-where! Greece were a good example of a no-superstar team winning something.

Well done to Wales I hope they kick on even more. Didn't you tip them to win the euros or WC at some huge price a while ago arbboy?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 21, 2016, 12:08:00 AM
It's always tough to play against a team that defends as deep and as organised as Slovakia were tonight. Especially so when you lack the spark of genius.
Most of the best creators of chances in the EPL aren't English, we're left with lots of players who are ball winners and recyclers, and strikers who need the ball played to their specific strengths. Had Vardy's one significant moment ended in a goal who knows how the game would have gone.

KO games will suit us better, as long as we don't get to a shootout obviously.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: bergeroo on June 21, 2016, 12:12:56 AM
Draw opening up nicely for Spain now if they can avoid defeat against Croatia.

Will be fantastic for them if Portugal also end up in the bottom half of the draw. Great opportunity for Wales to progress to the last eight here and even beyond as Belgium are not playing to their potential. England could be ruing the team selection if we end up playing Portugal and Wales play against Albania.

Just poor tonight though, yet the commentators are just so positive. I don't get it.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 21, 2016, 12:20:02 AM
Superstars win titles in sport.  Wales have one.  England have none.  I would love to see Wales win it all.  They have got a lovely draw now.

But when we had all the superstars we still got no-where! Greece were a good example of a no-superstar team winning something.

Well done to Wales I hope they kick on even more. Didn't you tip them to win the euros or WC at some huge price a while ago arbboy?

Yes but that isn't why i want them to win.  I have a few quid on but nothing life changing.  I think they are under rated outside of Bale (who is always relatively under rated for me).  I think the gaffer is under rated.   People under rate Ashley Williams massively (he would start for England for me at CH).  Ramsey is hardly ever spoke about (an upgrade on club mate Wiltshire?)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 21, 2016, 12:24:25 AM
Draw opening up nicely for Spain now if they can avoid defeat against Croatia.

Will be fantastic for them if Portugal also end up in the bottom half of the draw. Great opportunity for Wales to progress to the last eight here and even beyond as Belgium are not playing to their potential. England could be ruing the team selection if we end up playing Portugal and Wales play against Albania.

Just poor tonight though, yet the commentators are just so positive. I don't get it.

We have been piss poor in all three games.  Let's not forget who we are playing in this group.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 21, 2016, 01:01:24 AM
Superstars win titles in sport.  Wales have one.  England have none.  I would love to see Wales win it all.  They have got a lovely draw now.

But when we had all the superstars we still got no-where! Greece were a good example of a no-superstar team winning something.

Well done to Wales I hope they kick on even more. Didn't you tip them to win the euros or WC at some huge price a while ago arbboy?

We hadn't had a true world superstar since Gazza and Lineker whatever the media will fool the public into thinking in recent years with all the EPL hype.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 21, 2016, 01:12:32 AM
Roy is delighted as usual I see.  5 points in that group but Roy's take is "the way we are playing I don't fear anyone.  We could not have done more"


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 21, 2016, 01:20:52 AM
I really hope Portugal finish second and drill us in the 2nd round.  Properly drill us as well.  30 years i have been watching England and listening to all the same bullshit event after event from the media/managers/players.  As it stands that looks 10% likely we play Portugal and 80% likely we play Hungary or Iceland.  So we fall into the last 8 and then get drilled as usual and say 'that's where we should have finished' blah blah the same as the last 20 years.

Who are people selecting for the 11 against the mighty Iceland or Hungary then?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on June 21, 2016, 02:01:19 AM
Draw opening up nicely for Spain now if they can avoid defeat against Croatia.

Will be fantastic for them if Portugal also end up in the bottom half of the draw. Great opportunity for Wales to progress to the last eight here and even beyond as Belgium are not playing to their potential. England could be ruing the team selection if we end up playing Portugal and Wales play against Albania.

Just poor tonight though, yet the commentators are just so positive. I don't get it.

We have been piss poor in all three games.  Let's not forget who we are playing in this group.

Gonna be the same problem for Wales.
They were shocking against us and their defence will get taken apart when they do play someone decent.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 21, 2016, 02:03:22 AM
Piss poor is just a beyond ridiculous statement to make, nearly as much so as the cringeworthy Woy posts itt. This is ofc coming from a blinkered, idiotic, patriotic (PC wanker re the Woy criticism obv) England fan (ignoring the fact I said we may not get out the group of course). Germany played a drab 0-0 draw, does that mean they are awful also ? France took 89 mins to break Albania down so they are surely woeful as well.

It's just fucking drivel, why England fans have to be so negative I have no idea. Who of the players that have played in 3 games so far would you say hasn't gave 100% ? If the answer to that is nobody then wtf is there to complain about ? We aren't a team full of stars, we don't have one Superstar in the whole team, why not just be glad they are through and appreciate they are giving it there all instead of wanting to rip shreds off them ? Plenty in the past rightfully deserved criticism, I just don't see that here at all. When we play a Germany or a Spain we will very likely get hammered and be on the next plane home, why fucking bitch and moan every game until that point if we are giving it everything and not playing that poorly either.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 21, 2016, 03:12:01 AM
Can we still blame Sterling for tonight? I'm unsure.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: anthonyl on June 21, 2016, 10:22:45 AM
Extremely poor. At least Hodgson won't now have his contract renewed.

God knows how Barkley didn't come on, albeit off form towards end of season he would have been the player to unlock such a negative team.

France are beatable though and so is anyone from group F.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 21, 2016, 10:23:49 AM
Piss poor is just a beyond ridiculous statement to make, nearly as much so as the cringeworthy Woy posts itt. This is ofc coming from a blinkered, idiotic, patriotic (PC wanker re the Woy criticism obv) England fan (ignoring the fact I said we may not get out the group of course). Germany played a drab 0-0 draw, does that mean they are awful also ? France took 89 mins to break Albania down so they are surely woeful as well.

It's just fucking drivel, why England fans have to be so negative I have no idea. Who of the players that have played in 3 games so far would you say hasn't gave 100% ? If the answer to that is nobody then wtf is there to complain about ? We aren't a team full of stars, we don't have one Superstar in the whole team, why not just be glad they are through and appreciate they are giving it there all instead of wanting to rip shreds off them ? Plenty in the past rightfully deserved criticism, I just don't see that here at all. When we play a Germany or a Spain we will very likely get hammered and be on the next plane home, why fucking bitch and moan every game until that point if we are giving it everything and not playing that poorly either.


Well said Way  ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 21, 2016, 10:25:28 AM
Can we still blame Sterling for tonight? I'm unsure.

Yes, if he'd converted any of his chances vs Russia we would have been top. ;)



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 10:33:43 AM
to answer Ray's question, i think he is far too harsh on the fans

Yes there has certainly been an unwarranted sense of entitlement about Egland's prospects for many major championships

and yes we don't have world class players

but finishing second in the group is entirely self-inflicted by the manager

of course this is results orientated, we should have been winning at half time and job done

but he's made six changes when we weren't guaranteed to win the group without a result. I could understand the strikers and could understand both full backs possibly but resting Rooney and Alli seemed a step too far to me

Surely he must have started with a first choice team and then rested players through substitutions if the situation allowed it? the imperative to anyone even with a cursory glance at the draw was to stay out of the bottom half and france/germany/italy

from a broader perspective he's picked two players in Wilshere and Henderson for the squad who are just coming back to fitness. Not a single winger in the squad (Townsend would have presented a very different challenge for Slovakia in the second half).

Compare to France for whom Payet and Kante didn't play qualifying, got picked on 2016 form and have both made a huge difference in the early stages of this championship. Deschamps went for form not reputation.

Wilshere and Henderson played qualifying, Hodgson is stubborn and loyal and picks them on past form and they are both disappointing when required.

As for Barkley, what's he doing in the squad? Awful season, devoid of confidence, Hodgson doesn't see him as an option off the bench even when he is rotating in a third group game.  

I think all of this is the frustration that gets expressed, and you don't need to think that England should be winning the competition or every game to express it. Nor do you need to think that any player isn't giving 100%, clearly they are and its an irrelevance to the complaint. The complaint is with Hodgson. We're average but better tactics and selections would maximise outr chances, such as they are, more


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 10:37:23 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cla_jbUWMAAXx3Y.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClbGVzvXEAA9eqd.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClbMRBYWgAEEfsJ.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClbWTuxVAAEdEr_.jpg)



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 21, 2016, 11:12:44 AM
to answer Ray's question, i think he is far too harsh on the fans

Yes there has certainly been an unwarranted sense of entitlement about Egland's prospects for many major championships

and yes we don't have world class players

but finishing second in the group is entirely self-inflicted by the manager

of course this is results orientated, we should have been winning at half time and job done

but he's made six changes when we weren't guaranteed to win the group without a result. I could understand the strikers and could understand both full backs possibly but resting Rooney and Alli seemed a step too far to me

Surely he must have started with a first choice team and then rested players through substitutions if the situation allowed it? the imperative to anyone even with a cursory glance at the draw was to stay out of the bottom half and france/germany/italy

from a broader perspective he's picked two players in Wilshere and Henderson for the squad who are just coming back to fitness. Not a single winger in the squad (Townsend would have presented a very different challenge for Slovakia in the second half).

Compare to France for whom Payet and Kante didn't play qualifying, got picked on 2016 form and have both made a huge difference in the early stages of this championship. Deschamps went for form not reputation.

Wilshere and Henderson played qualifying, Hodgson is stubborn and loyal and picks them on past form and they are both disappointing when required.

As for Barkley, what's he doing in the squad? Awful season, devoid of confidence, Hodgson doesn't see him as an option off the bench even when he is rotating in a third group game.  

I think all of this is the frustration that gets expressed, and you don't need to think that England should be winning the competition or every game to express it. Nor do you need to think that any player isn't giving 100%, clearly they are and its an irrelevance to the complaint. The complaint is with Hodgson. We're average but better tactics and selections would maximise outr chances, such as they are, more

Barkley was in a very poor Everton team and managed 8 goals and 8 assists. His previous season he managed only 2 goals.

Allí managed 10 goals and 9 assists in an exceptional Spurs team.

Lallana 4 goals, 6 assists.

Sterling 6 goals 2 assists.

Its just typical of Englands fans to sum up Barkley as having an "awful season" or lacking in confidence. Sure sometimes his team didn't play well and he didn't have much of the ball, but throughout the season he dominated games and performed statistically better than those who are getting the nod ahead of him.

Theres a lot of players who shouldn't have got in the squad, Barkley for sure wasn't one of them.

I think both he and John Stones are top, top class and will prove it over the next few years.

One of the reasons we didn't pick the Slovakians apart was distribution, Stones would have been a far more assured defensive option and more tactical minded managers would have realised that. Barkley also has the drop of the shoulder in those tight areas and can penetrate and commit players. Not even going to start with Townsend.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3315195/Barcelona-star-Gerard-Pique-picks-world-XI-Everton-s-John-Stones-dream-team-Wayne-Rooney-bench.html

I think this says a lot!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 11:20:59 AM
but Hodgson chose not to pick Barkley even when he made a raft of changes, or bring him on when needing a goal?. Spoke volumes

i should have clarified. barkley's form dipped dramatically after Xmas. how much is him, how much the team/manager etc...don't know. watched him closely live towards the end of the season and he couldn't have given less of a toss about the game he was playing in.

don't care too much about your arbitrary statistics really. he's a "reputation" pick not a "form" pick.

Stones is classy, but would you be happy if injury meant he was in our back four for a quarter against France? i wouldn't be, might be in 2-3 years when he's been De-Martinezed and properly coached 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Graham C on June 21, 2016, 11:28:26 AM
Extremely poor. At least Hodgson won't now have his contract renewed.

He's only one game away from being England's most successful manager since Euro 96.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 21, 2016, 11:32:52 AM
to answer Ray's question, i think he is far too harsh on the fans

Yes there has certainly been an unwarranted sense of entitlement about Egland's prospects for many major championships

and yes we don't have world class players

but finishing second in the group is entirely self-inflicted by the manager

of course this is results orientated, we should have been winning at half time and job done

but he's made six changes when we weren't guaranteed to win the group without a result. I could understand the strikers and could understand both full backs possibly but resting Rooney and Alli seemed a step too far to me

Surely he must have started with a first choice team and then rested players through substitutions if the situation allowed it? the imperative to anyone even with a cursory glance at the draw was to stay out of the bottom half and france/germany/italy

from a broader perspective he's picked two players in Wilshere and Henderson for the squad who are just coming back to fitness. Not a single winger in the squad (Townsend would have presented a very different challenge for Slovakia in the second half).

Compare to France for whom Payet and Kante didn't play qualifying, got picked on 2016 form and have both made a huge difference in the early stages of this championship. Deschamps went for form not reputation.

Wilshere and Henderson played qualifying, Hodgson is stubborn and loyal and picks them on past form and they are both disappointing when required.

As for Barkley, what's he doing in the squad? Awful season, devoid of confidence, Hodgson doesn't see him as an option off the bench even when he is rotating in a third group game.  

I think all of this is the frustration that gets expressed, and you don't need to think that England should be winning the competition or every game to express it. Nor do you need to think that any player isn't giving 100%, clearly they are and its an irrelevance to the complaint. The complaint is with Hodgson. We're average but better tactics and selections would maximise outr chances, such as they are, more

Barkley was in a very poor Everton team and managed 8 goals and 8 assists. His previous season he managed only 2 goals.

Allí managed 10 goals and 9 assists in an exceptional Spurs team.

Lallana 4 goals, 6 assists.

Sterling 6 goals 2 assists.

Its just typical of Englands fans to sum up Barkley as having an "awful season" or lacking in confidence. Sure sometimes his team didn't play well and he didn't have much of the ball, but throughout the season he dominated games and performed statistically better than those who are getting the nod ahead of him.

Theres a lot of players who shouldn't have got in the squad, Barkley for sure wasn't one of them.

I think both he and John Stones are top, top class and will prove it over the next few years.

One of the reasons we didn't pick the Slovakians apart was distribution, Stones would have been a far more assured defensive option and more tactical minded managers would have realised that. Barkley also has the drop of the shoulder in those tight areas and can penetrate and commit players. Not even going to start with Townsend.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3315195/Barcelona-star-Gerard-Pique-picks-world-XI-Everton-s-John-Stones-dream-team-Wayne-Rooney-bench.html

I think this says a lot!

That article is from November, which maybe says something you didn't intend. Stones was high up on most people's lists back then.  He may well have a bright future, but he did seem to get worse as the season went on.

I am a bit with Ray on this.  I think we played ok in all 3 games.  In the last game we started with the 2 strikers people were calling for and though I wouldnt have dropped the full backs, but Clyne played very well.  And on the midfielders, I thought Rooney had well, but some had been calling for specialists  and many others had said don't even take him.  Feels like you can't win.

Roy seems to get castigated for both taking no risks (he has the youngest squad here??); and taking too many.  I think we were all over them last night and just got unlucky, as we did vs the Russians.  Either way we are still in and I don't think we are that bad.  We started art 9/1, now we are 10/1 or a bit bigger, so that doesn't suggest a major catastrophe.

I'd much prefer to be in the other half of the draw, but Hungary are pretty bad and Portugal have been worse than us.  I think France are too short in the betting, so even though meeting them so early isn't ideal, I'd much rather face them than Spain.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 21, 2016, 11:41:39 AM
I just think the majority are much keener to pick holes in what he's doing then to praise him.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 11:54:46 AM
I just think the majority are much keener to pick holes in what he's doing then to praise him.

certainly true, but i don't think its aimed at many (a few, but that will always be the case) of the players.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 21, 2016, 11:56:12 AM
I just think the majority are much keener to pick holes in what he's doing then to praise him.

I think Hodgson has performed averagely overall.  Good in qualifying, disappointing in major events (so far).  My issue with him is that he constantly talks up the team (and thus his own performance) to the point that some of his post match comments are gibberish (eg Portugal friendly and Costa Rica world cup match).  I find that really off putting.  He's an average manager delivering average performances who talks rubbish in press conferences as far as I am concerned.  


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 12:06:22 PM
England are playing France/Germany/Italy/Spain in the late stages of this knockout comp

we are going to be under the pump for territory and possession

(does Hodgson know his best team?)


what formation and team do you line up with?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 21, 2016, 12:19:21 PM
I still have hope for when we play the bigger nations as we've got quite a lot of pace.  I just hope Wilshire is not in the team for those games.  We can't afford to have players who are not match fit (as should have been obvious to Hodgson when he picked the squad).


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 21, 2016, 12:33:16 PM
When was the last time a team at a major championship rested both their clear first choice full backs for a game that wasn't a dead rubber?  Has it ever happened?  Hard to imagine Cashley/Red Nev would have been rested 10 years ago in a game like that.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 21, 2016, 01:01:07 PM
When was the last time a team at a major championship rested both their clear first choice full backs for a game that wasn't a dead rubber?  Has it ever happened?  Hard to imagine Cashley/Red Nev would have been rested 10 years ago in a game like that.

You don't think the difference in quality is much closer than when those 2 played ? Clyne was very good lnite, Bertrand not as impressive but a few on here were saying Bertrand >>>>>> Rose.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 21, 2016, 01:02:18 PM
He guna look like a genius when Wales end up with Croatia in last 16 :P


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 21, 2016, 01:11:28 PM
When was the last time a team at a major championship rested both their clear first choice full backs for a game that wasn't a dead rubber?  Has it ever happened?  Hard to imagine Cashley/Red Nev would have been rested 10 years ago in a game like that.

You don't think the difference in quality is much closer than when those 2 played ? Clyne was very good lnite, Bertrand not as impressive but a few on here were saying Bertrand >>>>>> Rose.

Forster is as good as Hart but we didn't play him.  Surely it's about building momentum and understanding - it's a 7 match tournament not a league season.

Roy did a good illustration just now on what I was talking about his press conferences.  Someone asked about the 6 changes and Roy started banging on about Vardy and Sturridge against Wales.  That's right Roy - the question was really about Vardy and Sturridge as opposed to Wilshire, Henderson and the full backs, but you go ahead and brush your errors under the carpet.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 21, 2016, 01:14:36 PM
99.9% of managers do that though ?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 21, 2016, 01:17:29 PM
If someone had said Roy would have made 6 changes for last night and not dropped Hart most punters would have struggled to name the 6 players he would have changed and who they would have been replaced by. I would be amazed if anyone in England apart from Roy would have played the 11 he did last night.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 21, 2016, 01:17:56 PM
99.9% of managers do that though ?

I don't think I've ever seen a manager describe a poor/average performance as strong as much as Hodgson does for England.  Wenger often concedes below par performances when his team mess up a winnable game?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 21, 2016, 01:20:50 PM
Extremely poor. At least Hodgson won't now have his contract renewed.

He's only one game away from being England's most successful manager since Euro 96.


I don't understand this comment.  We made 2012, 2006, 2004, 2002 Quarter Finals of various tournaments (although I agree Roy's squad isn't as good as some of those so it counts for more)?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 21, 2016, 01:23:12 PM
I totally agree that it was ott and too risky. I'd never have rested Rooney unless he requested it which I highly doubt, same with Alli. I would just rather support them when they're giving 100% as I've already said, maybe I just set the bar so low after the disappointment of the last few tournaments that have just been dire. Just think people could and should be a bit more positive.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 21, 2016, 01:23:41 PM
I'm fully behind d our boys, proper jingoistic like, but Roy is tewwible


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 21, 2016, 01:27:14 PM
I totally agree that it was ott and too risky. I'd never have rested Rooney unless he requested it which I highly doubt, same with Alli. I would just rather support them when they're giving 100% as I've already said, maybe I just set the bar so low after the disappointment of the last few tournaments that have just been dire. Just think people could and should be a bit more positive.

I probably agree with you in that I think we've looked pretty good in the matches and I still think we've got a shot here.  I just have a gripe with Hodgson taking a completely needless risk and now we are in the wrong half of the draw.  I just don't understand it.  I understand little of what he says or does to be honest.  I think he's a negative to our hopes but the FA love him so hey-ho.

edit: and to be fair most of the flak I see is directed at Hodgson's thought processes, rather than the players themselves.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 21, 2016, 01:27:21 PM
99.9% of managers do that though ?

I don't think I've ever seen a manager describe a poor/average performance as strong as much as Hodgson does for England.  Wenger often concedes below par performances when his team mess up a winnable game?

I guess we see different Wenger interviews post match then :P

I agree that he's not the best public speaker, but these days think very few actually excel in this department, big fan of Klopp for this.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 21, 2016, 01:32:11 PM
I totally agree that it was ott and too risky. I'd never have rested Rooney unless he requested it which I highly doubt, same with Alli. I would just rather support them when they're giving 100% as I've already said, maybe I just set the bar so low after the disappointment of the last few tournaments that have just been dire. Just think people could and should be a bit more positive.

We are, no doubt, playing better than in the recent past but it doesn't feel like part of a cohesive strategy. O  the other hand..Roy has chucked in a lot of good young players and form players despite the blunders with wilshere, henderson, Barklay (probably). Deserves a bit of credit compared with the turgidity of the play when we kept picking the same old players from the lolden generation a few years back


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 21, 2016, 01:41:43 PM
I think the Portugal game was so bad he realised playing Rooney as a no10 was a terrible plan. I think better late then never he also realised our defence is not good enough so created this system to support them as much as possible whilst also trying to play everyone in correct positions. Most people on here, myself included, said Rooney either shouldn't go or shouldn't be in the team yet most would now agree he's been our best player. Everyone will have differing opinions on some decisions and would do things different, overall I think he's doing a decent job of it.

Ofc there's a difference between positivity and stupidity and once France tear us a new one in the quarters I'll be more than happy to jump on the Roy is a twat and there all useless wankers bandwagon, may as well enjoy it for now though.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 21, 2016, 01:48:30 PM
"I think the Portugal game was so bad he realised playing Rooney as a no10 was a terrible plan."

Maybe he did Mondatoo, but he'd have more credibility if he didn't talk gibberish afterwards in that case:

"I'm not prepared to accept that we didn't play well,” Hodgson said. “We looked good, we had composure throughout the game"




Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 21, 2016, 01:48:40 PM
Yep. Have had to do a complete about face with Rooney..didn't think he could play that role from the evidence at man u


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: jakally on June 21, 2016, 02:41:20 PM
"I think the Portugal game was so bad he realised playing Rooney as a no10 was a terrible plan."

Maybe he did Mondatoo, but he'd have more credibility if he didn't talk gibberish afterwards in that case:

"I'm not prepared to accept that we didn't play well,” Hodgson said. “We looked good, we had composure throughout the game"




If his worst crime is refusing to criticise his side straight after a game, then he can't be that bad. Some excellent managers have been masters of that art.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 21, 2016, 02:46:35 PM
"I think the Portugal game was so bad he realised playing Rooney as a no10 was a terrible plan."

Maybe he did Mondatoo, but he'd have more credibility if he didn't talk gibberish afterwards in that case:

"I'm not prepared to accept that we didn't play well,” Hodgson said. “We looked good, we had composure throughout the game"




If his worst crime is refusing to criticise his side straight after a game, then he can't be that bad. Some excellent managers have been masters of that art.

It's something that winds me up in the extreme.  I am already cringing at the thought of what he will come out with if we lose to France and he is trying to spin it for a new contract.

It's not his worse failing of course.  His team selection last night and an unfit Wilshire being in the squad are worse in the grand scheme of things.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: jakally on June 21, 2016, 03:04:11 PM
"I think the Portugal game was so bad he realised playing Rooney as a no10 was a terrible plan."

Maybe he did Mondatoo, but he'd have more credibility if he didn't talk gibberish afterwards in that case:

"I'm not prepared to accept that we didn't play well,” Hodgson said. “We looked good, we had composure throughout the game"




If his worst crime is refusing to criticise his side straight after a game, then he can't be that bad. Some excellent managers have been masters of that art.

It's something that winds me up in the extreme.  I am already cringing at the thought of what he will come out with if we lose to France and he is trying to spin it for a new contract.

It's not his worse failing of course.  His team selection last night and an unfit Wilshire being in the squad are worse in the grand scheme of things.

I think I'm ok mostly with last night. Generally played ok, and wouldn't end up scoreless very often if we repeated that game a number of times.
Wilshere? Think he's auto in the squad at his best, therefore it's probably a reasonable risk to take him.

Of the opinion that not taking Townsend is an error though. Shape of the team is much better with Sterling, and we are short of options if he doesn't feel that he can put him in.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 03:17:10 PM
this is an interesting perspective

"England arrived in France with Leicester in mind but look more like Arsenal "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/06/21/england-arrived-at-euro-2016-with-leicester-in-mind-but-have-loo/


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: buzzharvey22 on June 21, 2016, 04:40:36 PM
Danny Sturridge. Fantastic finisher and absolutly lethal in the box. But why is he so obsessed with dropping so deep? Even 3 minutes into a game so can't use the excuse that he wasn't getting service.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: bergeroo on June 21, 2016, 05:39:07 PM
Henderson rated as England's best player in L'Equipe today 7/10. The Slovak goalie got their MOM with 8/10. They are pretty mean with their marking to be fair but seemed a bit odd with Henderson.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: cambridgealex on June 21, 2016, 05:56:23 PM
Although Walker has been fantastic you can't really say that wasn't the reason we didn't win - I thought Clyne was our best player by far.  Rooney and Alli needed to play yes, but we still should've been able to do the job with that team.

The stronger teams won't park the bus so maybe we'll have more openings.

Think we played well over the three games, lots of positivity and creating chances, finishing was lacking but it's a far cry from the performances from 2014 and other recent tournaments.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 06:49:35 PM
Watching how Germany play against a deep defence. Use width and quick interchanges, one touch passing. By comparison we were narrow and slow. Slovakia and northern Ireland one spot apart in the fifa rankings


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 21, 2016, 06:56:45 PM
Henderson rated as England's best player in L'Equipe today 7/10. The Slovak goalie got their MOM with 8/10. They are pretty mean with their marking to be fair but seemed a bit odd with Henderson.

Henderson's stats rating was pretty good - 3rd highest after Clyne and Dier for the starting 11.

Skrtel was the overall stats MOTM and their keeper was 2nd.

(http://i63.tinypic.com/21kl578.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 21, 2016, 10:01:30 PM
Not sure how my thought process bears out but to my mind Euro 96 apart in tournaments spanning since 1988 I get the impression taht at major champs that England always seem to struggle for goals when they get to the big tournaments. 

Despite the action generated in the PL  it always seems to me that they are concerned first of all by not losing the game and dont really have a go, and it feels like a waste with some of the players who have played for England during that time. 

Even now, the play seems so one dimensional and slow. 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 10:06:30 PM
As David said yesterday, all of the best creative players in the PL are not English. Our strikers in this tournament are not bring supplied by the quality of player they are at club level eg Silva, De bruyne, ozil, fabregas, mahrez,eriksen etcetc


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 21, 2016, 10:40:28 PM
De Gea is such a jobbing keeper.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 21, 2016, 10:48:09 PM
Spain-Italy thought we had fucked up lololol


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 10:48:46 PM
. Spain, Germany, France, Italy, england In the same half!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 21, 2016, 10:54:52 PM
Given the Croatia keeper position for the pen save off his line can someone explain the purpose of the referee tools on the goal line?  We have goal line tech so surely on a penalty that is his sole job of the 5th official or whatever he is called?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 21, 2016, 10:59:02 PM
Puts NI through aswell, well deserved imo, well their keeper deserved it


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on June 21, 2016, 11:03:59 PM
Given the Croatia keeper position for the pen save off his line can someone explain the purpose of the referee tools on the goal line?  We have goal line tech so surely on a penalty that is his sole job of the 5th official or whatever he is called?

Those extra referees on the line have been fkn useless ever since they were brought in. Every week in euro comps they miss something blatantly obvious.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on June 21, 2016, 11:09:53 PM
I've thrown a couple of darts at Wales to win the whole thing e/w - there's a touch of attacking incisivenss there that can stand them in good stead now they're in the weaker half of the draw.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 11:11:54 PM
I have done a little 40-1 ew Wales bet365 too. Don't think the price will last. Northern Ireland then Belgium then Croatia maybe?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 21, 2016, 11:13:03 PM
Anyone know where we can get an updated version of that percentages table that Tighty posted the other day?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on June 21, 2016, 11:23:07 PM
Croatia 7/1 is surely a massive overcorrection to beating Spain (when Spain missed a penalty)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Ledders on June 21, 2016, 11:30:11 PM
It's entirely due to the draw. Spain have nearly doubled in price


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 21, 2016, 11:32:39 PM
Kick on wAles. I might escape on the month with a Wales win and bale top scorer!! What a chance they have. 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 21, 2016, 11:35:52 PM
As David said yesterday, all of the best creative players in the PL are not English. Our strikers in this tournament are not bring supplied by the quality of player they are at club level eg Silva, De bruyne, ozil, fabregas, mahrez,eriksen etcetc

That is true now but even when there were guys like Beckham, Scholes, Gerrard,Lampard, Gazza etc it seems to my mind that there were still issues scoring goals??

I see no reason why England with the players they have should be playing 2 holding midfielders, perhaps in games against better teams that's a tactic to use but that Russian side were bad and Slovakia not much beter.  Wales are no better than average and despite lots of posession the results have been unconvincing.  

Are there creative players in England who could have gone to these champs who never made the squad?  


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 21, 2016, 11:38:03 PM
Puts NI through aswell, well deserved imo, well their keeper deserved it

I stated on here a few weeks ago I thought he was a cracking keeper and worthy of a move to the EPL, a disaster by Celtic letting him leave like the same way we let Given. Friedel, Marshall etc pretty much walk out the door. 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 21, 2016, 11:42:33 PM
As David said yesterday, all of the best creative players in the PL are not English. Our strikers in this tournament are not bring supplied by the quality of player they are at club level eg Silva, De bruyne, ozil, fabregas, mahrez,eriksen etcetc

That is true now but even when there were guys like Beckham, Scholes, Gerrard,Lampard, Gazza etc it seems to my mind that there were still issues scoring goals??

I see no reason why England with the players they have should be playing 2 holding midfielders, perhaps in games against better teams that's a tactic to use but that Russian side were bad and Slovakia not much beter.  Wales are no better than average and despite lots of posession the results have been unconvincing. 

Are there creative players in England who could have gone to these champs who never made the squad? 
no I don't think there are. Number of eligible English players in the top sides at very low levels as a whole too


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 21, 2016, 11:55:14 PM
Kick on wAles. I might escape on the month with a Wales win and bale top scorer!! What a chance they have. 


Did you do this as a double, or two separate bets? I like the methodology if they let you do it as a double.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 22, 2016, 10:39:02 AM
Bottom half of the EURO2016 draw has nations with 20 major titles (11 WC, 9 Euros). Top half: ZERO.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClgczwkWgAAdB0p.jpg:large)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 22, 2016, 10:41:43 AM
(http://)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClfQHN9XIAEI1NY.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClfcPWPWAAAVn-t.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClgHKA5WAAAVGp2.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClgHn8NWAAE3Dgs.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClgOnnQXIAQT9Nu.jpg)



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 22, 2016, 11:51:17 AM
Will Grigg's heat map for the Euros so far

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cli-AQ6UgAAJXE8.jpg:large)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 22, 2016, 04:56:41 PM
I love the fact he isn't even playing

(http://img2.thejournal.ie/inline/2836662/original/?width=630&version=2836662)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: engy on June 22, 2016, 06:46:56 PM
Are we betting Wales because we really think they can win it or just the 33/1 is too big? England are poor according to everyone yet we outplayed them ?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 22, 2016, 06:51:33 PM
Are we betting Wales because we really think they can win it or just the 33/1 is too big? England are poor according to everyone yet we outplayed them ?

Who is saying to bet Wales at 33/1?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 22, 2016, 07:37:54 PM
Are we betting Wales because we really think they can win it or just the 33/1 is too big? England are poor according to everyone yet we outplayed them ?

Who is saying to bet Wales at 33/1?

JUst seen the previous page with people saying they are backing them. 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 22, 2016, 07:41:41 PM
Are we betting Wales because we really think they can win it or just the 33/1 is too big? England are poor according to everyone yet we outplayed them ?

Who is saying to bet Wales at 33/1?

JUst seen the previous page with people saying they are backing them. 

They were backing them at 40/1 though.  A bit quicker and they could get 50/1.  Think 33/1 is less appealing, but there must be a price where they are still too big. 

PS need to bump that 500/1 conversation.   


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 22, 2016, 07:45:13 PM
Iceland score in late injury time!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 22, 2016, 07:48:32 PM
Iceland score in late injury time!

Incred scenes


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 22, 2016, 07:49:38 PM
So who do we play?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: George2Loose on June 22, 2016, 07:51:27 PM
Iceland


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 22, 2016, 08:26:20 PM
The horrendous goalkeeping continues


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Karabiner on June 22, 2016, 08:42:51 PM
The horrendous goalkeeping continues

As does the excellent refereeing.

I've hardly seen any controversy or refs who want to be the stars of the show.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 22, 2016, 08:47:13 PM
The horrendous goalkeeping continues

As does the excellent refereeing.

I've hardly seen any controversy or refs who want to be the stars of the show.

Largely agree.  The Spanish penalty was a joke though.  Keeper 3 yards off line and Croatian defenders encroaching.  5th official and referee looking directly at both offences respectively.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Karabiner on June 22, 2016, 09:04:03 PM
The horrendous goalkeeping continues

As does the excellent refereeing.

I've hardly seen any controversy or refs who want to be the stars of the show.

Largely agree.  The Spanish penalty was a joke though.  Keeper 3 yards off line and Croatian defenders encroaching.  5th official and referee looking directly at both offences respectively.

Obviously true even if there was a slight stutter-step.

I'm not sure that I can recall one of those 5th officials ever making a pertinent call.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 22, 2016, 09:07:16 PM
He did one today in the Portugal game!  Authoritatively signalled goal kick when ref wasn't sure.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: kp24 on June 22, 2016, 09:13:56 PM
The horrendous goalkeeping continues

As does the excellent refereeing.

I've hardly seen any controversy or refs who want to be the stars of the show.

Pointless having them if they don't get involved have to agree that the refs have been excellent

Largely agree.  The Spanish penalty was a joke though.  Keeper 3 yards off line and Croatian defenders encroaching.  5th official and referee looking directly at both offences respectively.

Obviously true even if there was a slight stutter-step.

I'm not sure that I can recall one of those 5th officials ever making a pertinent call.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 22, 2016, 09:40:45 PM
You gotta feel for the oirish tonight - they're getting fouled left, right and center and not getting anything from the ref.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 22, 2016, 09:50:27 PM
Sorry I'm on my phone but what's the route? Once we beat Iceland (if) who is the game were matched against? Ad


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 22, 2016, 09:51:10 PM
Sorry I'm on my phone but what's the route? Once we beat Iceland (if) who is the game were matched against? Ad

France (probably).


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 22, 2016, 10:04:34 PM
The horrendous goalkeeping continues

As does the excellent refereeing.

I've hardly seen any controversy or refs who want to be the stars of the show.

Clattenburg.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 22, 2016, 10:47:53 PM
Another goalkeeping error. So bad.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 22, 2016, 10:59:38 PM
Sorry I'm on my phone but what's the route? Once we beat Iceland (if) who is the game were matched against? Ad

France (probably).

Or ROI


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 22, 2016, 11:01:38 PM
(https://s32.postimg.org/zaall8fk1/round_of_16.png) (https://postimg.org/image/zaall8fk1/)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 22, 2016, 11:02:45 PM
I love the fact he isn't even playing

(http://img2.thejournal.ie/inline/2836662/original/?width=630&version=2836662)

What ever happens against Wales, they've got to give the lad some game time, even if it's just a token minute at the end of the match.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 22, 2016, 11:03:53 PM
Sorry I'm on my phone but what's the route? Once we beat Iceland (if) who is the game were matched against? Ad

France (probably).

Or ROI

Hopefully, Robbie Keane handles the ball into the net, does his trademark handspring, forward roll and cowboy firing trick and the stickman sees nothing.

(http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/media/images/83430000/jpg/_83430020_henry.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on June 22, 2016, 11:07:38 PM
^ horrible moment. I hope they smash the frogs.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 22, 2016, 11:25:38 PM
Has Henry ever talked about that incident?  At least Maradona plays up to the camera as pantomime villain but Henry just seems to airbrush it from history and want to come over as a wonderful media ambassador.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 23, 2016, 10:05:48 AM
(http://)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClkXZSRWQAAWokW.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Clkn4lsWQAAbkNs.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClkutcwXIAAmgmz.jpg)

[imghttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClkxtTBWQAAlaMT.jpg]http://[/img]

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CllTaH5WIAAkczW.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CllVFiuWAAAdr7Z.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CllYU4rWkAAjisw.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 23, 2016, 10:07:52 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Clnio_dWYAAZhPX.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CllX3B1WAAAIFAc.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 23, 2016, 12:18:09 PM
i assume we've all seen this?

cracking stuff. Iceland no pushovers on monday either, sit deep and ask us to break them down. just as well we have so many game changers really

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3u9bB23X7No


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 23, 2016, 01:55:18 PM
another great euro2016 photo

(http://www.irishtimes.com/polopoly_fs/1.2696184.1466663339!/image/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/box_620_330/image.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Woodsey on June 23, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
(http://i444.photobucket.com/albums/qq167/Andr4w/image_zpsmeqfqngk.jpeg) (http://s444.photobucket.com/user/Andr4w/media/image_zpsmeqfqngk.jpeg.html)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 24, 2016, 06:52:35 AM
who scored's team of the group stages

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClqMnbHWQAEl78v.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on June 24, 2016, 07:46:22 AM
Off to France tomorrow morning to take in the Wales/NI, Germany/Slovakia and Italy/Spain games. Pleased I purchased my Euros a few weeks back!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on June 24, 2016, 07:57:32 PM
BREAKING NEWS
Wayne Rooney has just been found sobbing his heart out at a French Airport saying "I can't believe we're out of the Euros"


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 25, 2016, 10:36:31 AM
england 6 major tournament knockout game wins in 50 years

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClyIFh4WEAAXPqD.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 25, 2016, 06:12:51 PM
Why is Michael Oliver being lino for Martin Atkinson?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 25, 2016, 06:16:06 PM
Why is Michael Oliver being lino for Martin Atkinson?
each referee is assisted by 4 referees from his own association.the clattenburg refereeimg team includes marriner behind the goal for example


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on June 25, 2016, 06:29:49 PM
Some goal from shaqiri didnt deserve to go home.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Woodsey on June 26, 2016, 12:15:47 AM
(http://i444.photobucket.com/albums/qq167/Andr4w/image_zpsozg48af2.jpeg) (http://s444.photobucket.com/user/Andr4w/media/image_zpsozg48af2.jpeg.html)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on June 26, 2016, 12:25:15 AM
 rotflmfao rotflmfao rotflmfao good one Woodsey


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 26, 2016, 10:33:22 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClzPhB6WYAAN34T.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClzPqXOXEAIX01-.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Clzdg-NWgAAgnP6.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl0I7SpWQAABTAu.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl0ZQkEWkAA_1SE.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl07040WQAEUBNi.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl0723IWIAA9TA8.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 27, 2016, 09:10:30 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl4TNCQXEAI2IZZ.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl4RdwwWEAAIIBZ.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl4VhoXWkAE4lGA.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl4Y20qWMAAVa6Q.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl4onDhWQAAKb-L.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl4ovshWQAAEbzU.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl5s4yyXEAAm7Dy.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl48iimWMAEomYG.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl48whWWYAAVm7S.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl5l2DOWYAEILJN.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl57p17WIAA1L7O.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl58bbUWYAE6auk.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 27, 2016, 11:37:12 AM
whoscored top 10 players so far:

(http://i67.tinypic.com/fbjrki.jpg)


According to most papers  England starting  with a front 3 of Sturridge, Kane and Sterling.  Lallana and Vardy on the bench.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 27, 2016, 11:41:51 AM
vary or kane tonight?

predictions on team?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on June 27, 2016, 12:33:56 PM
Class starting to show through now we are into the knockout phase.
England need a convincing win


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 27, 2016, 12:44:35 PM
vary or kane tonight?

predictions on team?

Hart
Walker
Cahill
Smalling
Rose

Dier
Rooney
Alli

Sturridge
Kane
Sterling

Not a prediction as such but this appears to be the team papers are going with so Kane rather than Vardy and Sterling rather than Lallana


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 27, 2016, 12:50:24 PM
understand kane over vardy. sturridge has to play and vardy needs more space in behind than iceland have to offer

without getting tabloid and me just saying "he's crap", what would be the thinking in re-introducing Sterling?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 27, 2016, 12:53:10 PM
understand kane over vardy. sturridge has to play and vardy needs more space in behind than iceland have to offer

without getting tabloid and me just saying "he's crap", what would be the thinking in re-introducing Sterling?

Surely just the sheer pace he has verses a relative paceless Iceland defence? Can't be any other reason right?  He has a bigger relative edge as a player in this game than any other with his limited skill set.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 27, 2016, 01:04:36 PM
Lallana missed the last couple training sessions also.

I'd rather have Vardy to bring off the bench then play him oop which doesn't seem to suit him.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 27, 2016, 02:16:19 PM
understand kane over vardy. sturridge has to play and vardy needs more space in behind than iceland have to offer

without getting tabloid and me just saying "he's crap", what would be the thinking in re-introducing Sterling?

Surely just the sheer pace he has verses a relative paceless Iceland defence? Can't be any other reason right?  He has a bigger relative edge as a player in this game than any other with his limited skill set.

Think this too.  Was all over the Russians at the start of that game.  Brave by Hodgson even if I think it is probably right.  It isn't like Lallana and Kane have been that great.  Think Vardy is a bit unlucky, but maybe the best time fir him is against France or Germany.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: exstream on June 27, 2016, 02:27:27 PM
Beat Iceland 1-0 with Kane and sterling
Hodgson won't drop them in the next round and we're out


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PathFinder on June 27, 2016, 03:55:37 PM
I like how you've turned a potential England win into a negative lol! I really hope Sterling has a good game tonight he gets so much abuse from England Fans that his confidence is shot too pieces. Vardy not starting makes sense be good to see him brought on if we take the lead and Iceland then have to push further up.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 27, 2016, 04:47:38 PM
understand kane over vardy. sturridge has to play and vardy needs more space in behind than iceland have to offer

without getting tabloid and me just saying "he's crap", what would be the thinking in re-introducing Sterling?

Surely just the sheer pace he has verses a relative paceless Iceland defence? Can't be any other reason right?  He has a bigger relative edge as a player in this game than any other with his limited skill set.

Think this too.  Was all over the Russians at the start of that game.  Brave by Hodgson even if I think it is probably right.  It isn't like Lallana and Kane have been that great.  Think Vardy is a bit unlucky, but maybe the best time fir him is against France or Germany.

Disagree with Arb that Sterling specifically has a bigger relative edge in this game - some of his best games in the the last 12 months have been in the Champions League against quality teams.

Agree with Doobs that Sterling was all over Russia in the 1st half of that game. If that Sterling turns up tonight he is better than Vardy playing down the left. If the other Sterling turns up it will be scapegoat time again.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 27, 2016, 05:02:16 PM
Beat Iceland 1-0 with Kane and sterling
Hodgson won't drop them in the next round and we're out


I don't get that. Take Kane, sure he has had a poor tournament based on the 150 minutes we've seen him for. Hardly a great sample size and with strikers 1 goal can see the floodgates opening. A bit like Shearer who went 2 seasons without scoring for England over 12 or 13 games before Euro96. He then was excellent.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 27, 2016, 05:02:52 PM
I like how you've turned a potential England win into a negative lol! I really hope Sterling has a good game tonight he gets so much abuse from England Fans that his confidence is shot too pieces. Vardy not starting makes sense be good to see him brought on if we take the lead and Iceland then have to push further up.


Agree with that. It's not just England fans - he has been hammered by the media as well.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 27, 2016, 05:33:04 PM
Kompany will be in demand in the media when he hangs up his boots. Completely shits all over nearly all the other pundits and embarrasses the likes of Rio, Shearer, Murphy etc


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 27, 2016, 09:00:25 PM
Ha, go Sterling fk the haters

Edith ffs


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 27, 2016, 09:03:04 PM
Sterlings fault for not giving their long throw specialist a dead arm in the tunnel.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: teddybloat on June 27, 2016, 09:06:19 PM
What'll come first a Rooney forward pass or Kyle walker showing competence in defence?



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: teddybloat on June 27, 2016, 09:15:27 PM
Sterlings fault for not giving their long throw specialist a dead arm in the tunnel.

He did give the (beautifully dandruff free) Joe one though.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: exstream on June 27, 2016, 09:15:31 PM
Lol


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on June 27, 2016, 09:15:42 PM
The England defence and Joe Hart, who knew ;whistle; ;whistle; ;whistle;


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 27, 2016, 09:17:22 PM
If Hodgson doesn't drop that clown in the net (if we get through), then he really doesn't deserve another contract. Mistake every f-game


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: byronkincaid on June 27, 2016, 09:43:48 PM
I seem to be in some bizzare alternate universe where Iceland are outplaying England. What's happening in the real world?



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Rexas on June 27, 2016, 09:45:48 PM
I seem to be in some bizzare alternate universe where Iceland are outplaying England. What's happening in the real world?



Only on the score board, just a crying shame every time they have the ball in our half we fall apart.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 27, 2016, 09:46:11 PM
Squad looks thin now - Ross barkley anyone ? I would


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 27, 2016, 09:48:26 PM
Rashford. Play sturridge central too. Anything really!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 27, 2016, 09:51:10 PM
Looking forward to the England equaliser when that dullard goalkeeper runs the length of the pitch to celebrate  as if he is making a positive contribution.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on June 27, 2016, 09:52:01 PM
It's like a conspiracy from Joe Hart just to prove Arbboy right.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 27, 2016, 09:52:16 PM
Looking forward to the England equaliser when that dullard goalkeeper runs the length of the pitch to celebrate  as if he is making a positive contribution.

lol


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 27, 2016, 09:53:03 PM
Not mine but the favourite line I saw "hodgson standing there like a golden retriever trying to understand a card trick"


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 27, 2016, 09:54:08 PM
Iceland 2.82 on the exchange. How tempting?!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 27, 2016, 09:55:00 PM
Rashford. Play sturridge central too. Anything really!

You not think this is made for Vardy?  Their defence has been quite high at times?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 27, 2016, 09:55:20 PM
Iceland 2.82 on the exchange. How tempting?!

Will lay


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 27, 2016, 09:56:20 PM
Iceland 2.82 on the exchange. How tempting?!

Will lay

Maybe not.  Wilshere for dier??


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 27, 2016, 09:57:37 PM
Because wilshere is another in form game changer. Yes roy. Exactly what I was thinking


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Rexas on June 27, 2016, 09:58:45 PM
Rumors going around that Joe Hart pulled Iceland in the England team sweepstake.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 27, 2016, 09:59:52 PM
Because wilshere is another in form game changer. Yes roy. Exactly what I was thinking

Amazing not one for Roy bashing, but that was baffling unless Dier is injured


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: RED-DOG on June 27, 2016, 10:01:44 PM
I seem to be in some bizzare alternate universe where Iceland are outplaying England. What's happening in the real world?




The leave voters were in the majority, Cameron resigned, Corbyn won't resign, the £ has gone tits up.....


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 27, 2016, 10:06:03 PM
Between the subs bench and the crowd it might be that every male Icelander over 20 and under 50 is in the crowd.

I love that 'OOH' thing they do


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 27, 2016, 10:07:11 PM
ffs, doing tricks in our box now - look like Brazil


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 27, 2016, 10:13:12 PM
The incompetent Hodgson now asking Vardy to save his job.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 27, 2016, 10:16:31 PM
The incompetent Hodgson now asking Vardy to save his job.

It always seems harsh picking on the manager but really - £4m a year to have absolutely no game plan..against Iceland - contrast it with Italy and it's just laughable


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 27, 2016, 10:17:53 PM
Bale carrying Wales. Payet carrying France.

British Airways carrying England.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: exstream on June 27, 2016, 10:18:17 PM
Kane's freekicks are great


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: teddybloat on June 27, 2016, 10:18:28 PM
Rooney insisting on standing in the centre circle and spraying Hollywood passes to the full backs.

The English pirlo


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 27, 2016, 10:19:45 PM
Kane's freekicks are great

It's jokes when Ronaldo tries it from 35 yards but at least he is Ronaldo


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 27, 2016, 10:20:13 PM
The incompetent Hodgson now asking Vardy to save his job.

It always seems harsh picking on the manager but really - £4m a year to have absolutely no game plan..against Iceland - contrast it with Italy and it's just laughable

If that is right we have paid this dinosaur 20 million to waste 5 years.  He is no further forward than when we played for a penalty shootout against Italy in Euro 2012.  Useless clown.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 27, 2016, 10:26:49 PM
I hope we go out, can't deal with how bad we are and how naive Hodgson is.

Not to mention Glenn Hoddle who just said "good save by Joe Hart, makes up for this earlier error" when hart saved a shot straight at him.

75 min, England 1-2 Iceland


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 27, 2016, 10:31:25 PM
This is our Eddo Brandes moment.

We clearly need an aussie coach.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 27, 2016, 10:31:42 PM
The worst thing is that Iceland really haven't played well.  Just mistake after mistake.  Didn't think this week could get worse.

Come on ffs


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: George2Loose on June 27, 2016, 10:32:56 PM
Get BoJo on


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 27, 2016, 10:33:09 PM
I guess this is what happens when you leave form players behind and stick to the managers favourites.  

But also can't just be the manager becauuse Sven and Capello never done that much better in terms of threatening to win a major.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 27, 2016, 10:37:45 PM
Hodgson making a sub in the 86th minute. This man is truly deluded.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 27, 2016, 10:38:47 PM
We have no game changers. Fetchers, carriers but no one to pick a pass. Players out of position. No tactics. No heart. Utterly inept on and off the field and frankly embarrasingq


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 27, 2016, 10:40:08 PM
Can't wait for Hodgson to come out with his usual post match gibberish about how unlucky we were and how well we played.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: exstream on June 27, 2016, 10:40:11 PM
Still taking free kicks lol


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: MANTIS01 on June 27, 2016, 10:40:37 PM
I swear to God we miss David Beckham. I mean we miss Gazza but we always will. But God our delivery & free kicks have been woeful.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 27, 2016, 10:41:44 PM
The more i see of Raheem Sterling the more convinced I am that Brendan Rodgers will comfortably lead Celtic to 10 in a row, how did he manage to get nearly £40 million for him? 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 27, 2016, 10:42:02 PM
We simply ain't as good as we/the media think we are or would like us to think. None of these players would get into a good nations team. We have some reasonable players but no-one outstanding, no game changers.

Been completely indifferent towards England for years so this is water off a ducks back for me. Bring on August when the real stuff starts again.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: MANTIS01 on June 27, 2016, 10:42:27 PM
Rashford has been our best player


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 27, 2016, 10:44:17 PM
Kane, one of best headers of ball is taking set pieces, all of them poor.

Sterling played poor all previous matches, Hodgson plays him.

Desperate for time and game changers, Hodgson makes an 86th min sub.

Sees Rashford can make a difference, doesn't play him.

Beats Wales, Hodgson makes 6 changes.

Comfortable against Russia, Hodgson makes changes, draw 1-1.

Bring back McLaren.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: atdc21 on June 27, 2016, 10:44:51 PM
what a crock of shit.....another thing we voted ourselves out of.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: BigAdz on June 27, 2016, 10:45:46 PM
Please Woy. Just go.

Dont make excuses. Just go.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: MANTIS01 on June 27, 2016, 10:46:27 PM
Same old England, never changes. The year of the underdog continues.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: BigAdz on June 27, 2016, 10:47:01 PM
Can we have a petition to play the game again, as I didnt like the result?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 27, 2016, 10:47:58 PM
Well done Iceland, very deserved.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 27, 2016, 10:48:22 PM
Players..retain a shred of dignity and don't writhe on the pitch in agonies..just get off


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: RickBFA on June 27, 2016, 10:50:57 PM
Unreal how bad we were.

Got to be a strong candidate for worst England performance in the last 40 years and we've seen plenty.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 27, 2016, 10:51:52 PM
Clive Tyldsley really is an arse. It's because of people him Scot's like me take so much pleasure seeing your boys getting turned over.  


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 27, 2016, 10:53:07 PM
Ian Darke called it "the most humiliating defeat in English history".

Then added "In football". I had to laugh at that.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: BigAdz on June 27, 2016, 10:57:54 PM
Why does Rooney ALWAYS underperform in the big games for England?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Woodsey on June 27, 2016, 11:00:35 PM
Fcks sake, embarrassing........soooooo wanted England to win but   :'(

I recommend switching to supporting egg chasing as they are on the up. 3-0 win over the Aussies, gonna be a bright 2 or 3 years ahead.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 27, 2016, 11:07:10 PM
Hodgson quits on the spot. Sadly the players won't take much responsibility the spineless fuckwits


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: BigAdz on June 27, 2016, 11:07:44 PM
Every cloud....


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hector62 on June 27, 2016, 11:08:11 PM
I hope Jeremy Corbyn was watching that.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 27, 2016, 11:15:03 PM
How was Rooney so bad 2nd half ?
How was Sturridge so bad all game ?
How was Kane so bad all tournament ?
Hodgson had to go for letting Kane take any set pieces alone!
Any fan that thinks the manager is the main culprit in this failure is a fucking idiot !!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: MANTIS01 on June 27, 2016, 11:16:56 PM
Jesus the list of candidates to replace Woy is soul-destroying. Southgate fav? Pardew 2nd fav? Fuck off.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 27, 2016, 11:17:34 PM
Roy was right that someone would be on the end of a hiding soon


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 27, 2016, 11:19:29 PM
How was Rooney so bad 2nd half ?
How was Sturridge so bad all game ?
How was Kane so bad all tournament ?
Hodgson had to go for letting Kane take any set pieces alone!
Any fan that thinks the manager is the main culprit in this failure is a fucking idiot !!


Do you think the manager has minimal input?  Would you prefer we ditched Kane and Sturridge rather than Hodgson?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: BigAdz on June 27, 2016, 11:20:28 PM
How was Rooney so bad 2nd half ?
How was Sturridge so bad all game ?
How was Kane so bad all tournament ?
Hodgson had to go for letting Kane take any set pieces alone!
Any fan that thinks the manager is the main culprit in this failure is a fucking idiot !!



But he is the one that isn't spotting Rooney is playing dreadfully until 4 mins left.
Ditto Sturridge but leaves him on
He probably told Kane to take them.

He has choices only he can make. Pretty sure that makes him the main culprit in my book.

I have always maintained Rooney is a flat track bully who only shines against lesser teams or when there is no real pressure. He keeps underperforming when the brightest lights are focussed on him. Its almost like you can set your clock by him. Great in qualifiers and friendlies but shocking when we really need him.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 27, 2016, 11:21:50 PM
Think Hodgson pretty obviously was main culprit. Why was Sturridge bad? He was playing it of position. We simply lacked width against a team who makes the pitch narrow, we played 4 strikers and no wingers and kept pumping the ball into the box and losing every header.

Not understanding that we needed Stones in the pitch against these teams was very big error.

Taking Dier off instead of Cahill was a big mistake.

Not taking Townsend was a huge mistake.

Giving Rashford 5 minutes was a huge mistake.

Not playing any wingers against a team with poor fullbacks and great centre backs was a critical mistake.

Putting Wilshire on who just goes sideways or gives the ball away ahead of Barkley who commits players and is a genuine goal thread was a huge mistake.

The set up for the defines ice throw in was ridiculous. Rooney going against their best header instead of Cahill/Smalling/Kane/Dier was a huge mistake.

Hodgson way out of his depth.

If we had Conte as our manager today I think we win almost always.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 27, 2016, 11:23:45 PM
Barkley didn't kick the ball once this tournament?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 27, 2016, 11:24:39 PM
Jesus the list of candidates to replace Woy is soul-destroying. Southgate fav? Pardew 2nd fav? Fuck off.

Bad list but wouldn't mind Eddie Howe


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 27, 2016, 11:25:35 PM
Barkley didn't kick the ball once this tournament?
no. Townsend should have gone, he didn't trust Barkley enough to use him


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 27, 2016, 11:32:29 PM
Barkley didn't kick the ball once this tournament?
no. Townsend should have gone, he didn't trust Barkley enough to use him

If you take Barkley I think you have to use him, bad end to the season but one of England's better players, such a waste to take him to only leave him on the bench.

Agreed on Townsend.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: HutchGF on June 27, 2016, 11:34:51 PM
Such s rogues gallery of next potential managers.

Wouldn't hate Howe.


How about Bilic at 25s?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on June 27, 2016, 11:38:25 PM
I know it's a very old cliche, but English players play far too much football.

They looked knackered out there.

Alli, Kane and Dier were fantastic all season for Tottenham, but looked jaded all tournament.

Bin the Milk Cup and scrap replays for the FA Cup for starters.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: MANTIS01 on June 27, 2016, 11:40:53 PM
Can't beat Russia. Last minute luckbox to scrape past Wales. Can't beat Slovakia. Can't beat Iceland. Urgghh I feel dirty.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 27, 2016, 11:42:33 PM
I guess it must be true, every England manager is a fucking clown and the players are just so unlucky to have one idiot after another telling them what to do.

That'll be why Sturridge literally didn't do one thing well tonight, obv coz he's oop, the same position he played in versus Wales when he looked great, truth is he was just shit, that's it, not because Roy Hodgson is a clown, but because today he played fucking shit.

And so did most of the rest of them. That's the fucking story, they were SHIT! That's it, why does there have to be a fucking scapegoat everytime ffs.

Bobby Robson was almost hounded out pre WC90 and we nearly won the thing, Eriksson was a clown despite being one of the most sort after managers in the World. It's absolutely madness. The reason we fail time after time is because we regurgitate the same incapabilites of performing on the biggest stage and I guarentee if we continue with this bullshit cycle nothing will ever change.

100% the fans and press are playing a part in that failing cycle.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 27, 2016, 11:44:03 PM
Ranieri? Tactically great. Media savvy, popular. ..


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: anthonyl on June 27, 2016, 11:45:30 PM
I'm done with watching England, club football so much more enjoyable.

Sterling shouldn't have played a single minute since Russia game.
Kane shouldn't have taken a single set play after Russia game.
Alli should have been dropped for Barkley.
Sturridge playing right midfield - what?!

Anyway, pre season has started and in 5.5 weeks I'll be at Derby away.

Can't see anyone bothering with the WC in Russia.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: BigAdz on June 27, 2016, 11:45:38 PM
I know it's a very old cliche, but English players play far too much football.

They looked knackered out there.

Alli, Kane and Dier were fantastic all season for Tottenham, but looked jaded all tournament.

Bin the Milk Cup and scrap replays for the FA Cup for starters.



Plenty of others in the Tourney play in our league don't look tired, including a few of the Iceland mob!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 27, 2016, 11:47:36 PM
I guess it must be true, every England manager is a fucking clown and the players are just so unlucky to have one idiot after another telling them what to do.

That'll be why Sturridge literally didn't do one thing well tonight, obv coz he's oop, the same position he played in versus Wales when he looked great, truth is he was just shit, that's it, not because Roy Hodgson is a clown, but because today he played fucking shit.

And so did most of the rest of them. That's the fucking story, they were SHIT! That's it, why does there have to be a fucking scapegoat everytime ffs.

Bobby Robson was almost hounded out pre WC90 and we nearly won the thing, Eriksson was a clown despite being one of the most sort after managers in the World. It's absolutely madness. The reason we fail time after time is because we regurgitate the same incapabilites of performing on the biggest stage and I guarentee if we continue with this bullshit cycle nothing will ever change.

100% the fans and press are playing a part in that failing cycle.


It's really not the fans - we all try to believe, then we sort of believe and then we think they're a bunch of twats ..until we rinse repeat the next time. Agree about Robson though


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: pleno1 on June 27, 2016, 11:55:49 PM
I guess it must be true, every England manager is a fucking clown and the players are just so unlucky to have one idiot after another telling them what to do.

That'll be why Sturridge literally didn't do one thing well tonight, obv coz he's oop, the same position he played in versus Wales when he looked great, truth is he was just shit, that's it, not because Roy Hodgson is a clown, but because today he played fucking shit.

And so did most of the rest of them. That's the fucking story, they were SHIT! That's it, why does there have to be a fucking scapegoat everytime ffs.

Bobby Robson was almost hounded out pre WC90 and we nearly won the thing, Eriksson was a clown despite being one of the most sort after managers in the World. It's absolutely madness. The reason we fail time after time is because we regurgitate the same incapabilites of performing on the biggest stage and I guarentee if we continue with this bullshit cycle nothing will ever change.

100% the fans and press are playing a part in that failing cycle.



Sturridge did amazing ball in second minute for the penalty. If Hodgson set up team defensively well then he would have had a lot more chances and time in the ball. Jnstead we give away goals and they put two men on Sturridge. The one time he had an option for a good ball he played a world class ball and we scored. He got literally zero service from Rooney, Wilshire and Alli all game. Stroker playing way out of position and did the one world class thing in the entire game.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 27, 2016, 11:59:17 PM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 28, 2016, 12:01:21 AM
Rashford has been our best player

Sample size issues there


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 28, 2016, 12:01:32 AM
I guess it must be true, every England manager is a fucking clown and the players are just so unlucky to have one idiot after another telling them what to do.

That'll be why Sturridge literally didn't do one thing well tonight, obv coz he's oop, the same position he played in versus Wales when he looked great, truth is he was just shit, that's it, not because Roy Hodgson is a clown, but because today he played fucking shit.

And so did most of the rest of them. That's the fucking story, they were SHIT! That's it, why does there have to be a fucking scapegoat everytime ffs.

Bobby Robson was almost hounded out pre WC90 and we nearly won the thing, Eriksson was a clown despite being one of the most sort after managers in the World. It's absolutely madness. The reason we fail time after time is because we regurgitate the same incapabilites of performing on the biggest stage and I guarentee if we continue with this bullshit cycle nothing will ever change.

100% the fans and press are playing a part in that failing cycle.



Just to a clarify.  You think Hodgson has done a good job and should be given a new contract?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on June 28, 2016, 12:01:58 AM
I know it's a very old cliche, but English players play far too much football.

They looked knackered out there.

Alli, Kane and Dier were fantastic all season for Tottenham, but looked jaded all tournament.

Bin the Milk Cup and scrap replays for the FA Cup for starters.



Plenty of others in the Tourney play in our league don't look tired, including a few of the Iceland mob!

I can only think of one Premier League player who has been outstanding in this tournament, Eden Hazard.

And he pretty much had last season off.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Chompy on June 28, 2016, 12:02:19 AM
Get ready for a wishy-washy Southgate era. Should be comedy.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 28, 2016, 12:03:13 AM
I guess it must be true, every England manager is a fucking clown and the players are just so unlucky to have one idiot after another telling them what to do.

That'll be why Sturridge literally didn't do one thing well tonight, obv coz he's oop, the same position he played in versus Wales when he looked great, truth is he was just shit, that's it, not because Roy Hodgson is a clown, but because today he played fucking shit.

And so did most of the rest of them. That's the fucking story, they were SHIT! That's it, why does there have to be a fucking scapegoat everytime ffs.

Bobby Robson was almost hounded out pre WC90 and we nearly won the thing, Eriksson was a clown despite being one of the most sort after managers in the World. It's absolutely madness. The reason we fail time after time is because we regurgitate the same incapabilites of performing on the biggest stage and I guarentee if we continue with this bullshit cycle nothing will ever change.

100% the fans and press are playing a part in that failing cycle.



Just to a clarify.  You think Hodgson has done a good job and should be given a new contract?

Yeah, I guess you clarified that from me saying he deserved to lose his job from putting Kane on set peices alone, solid post, good read  :)up


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 28, 2016, 12:05:28 AM
I guess it must be true, every England manager is a fucking clown and the players are just so unlucky to have one idiot after another telling them what to do.

That'll be why Sturridge literally didn't do one thing well tonight, obv coz he's oop, the same position he played in versus Wales when he looked great, truth is he was just shit, that's it, not because Roy Hodgson is a clown, but because today he played fucking shit.

And so did most of the rest of them. That's the fucking story, they were SHIT! That's it, why does there have to be a fucking scapegoat everytime ffs.

Bobby Robson was almost hounded out pre WC90 and we nearly won the thing, Eriksson was a clown despite being one of the most sort after managers in the World. It's absolutely madness. The reason we fail time after time is because we regurgitate the same incapabilites of performing on the biggest stage and I guarentee if we continue with this bullshit cycle nothing will ever change.

100% the fans and press are playing a part in that failing cycle.



Just to a clarify.  You think Hodgson has done a good job and should be given a new contract?

Yeah, I guess you clarified that from me saying he deserved to lose his job from putting Kane on set peices alone, solid post, good read  :)up

Sorry.  Where in your post do you mention Kane?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 28, 2016, 12:06:35 AM
Hodgson had to go for letting Kane take any set pieces alone!

I made two posts, guess you missed the early one, unfortunate.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 28, 2016, 12:07:55 AM
I know it's a very old cliche, but English players play far too much football.

They looked knackered out there.

Alli, Kane and Dier were fantastic all season for Tottenham, but looked jaded all tournament.

Bin the Milk Cup and scrap replays for the FA Cup for starters.



Plenty of others in the Tourney play in our league don't look tired, including a few of the Iceland mob!

I can only think of one Premier League player who has been outstanding in this tournament, Eden Hazard.

And he pretty much had last season off.

KDB, Pelle, Payet haven't been too bad either.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on June 28, 2016, 12:10:00 AM
I know it's a very old cliche, but English players play far too much football.

They looked knackered out there.

Alli, Kane and Dier were fantastic all season for Tottenham, but looked jaded all tournament.

Bin the Milk Cup and scrap replays for the FA Cup for starters.

Plenty of others in the Tourney play in our league don't look tired, including a few of the Iceland mob!

I can only think of one Premier League player who has been outstanding in this tournament, Eden Hazard.

And he pretty much had last season off.

KDB, Pelle, Payet haven't been too bad either.

Also, Walker and Rose lack quality but they didn't look tired


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 28, 2016, 12:14:04 AM
Hodgson had to go for letting Kane take any set pieces alone!

I made two posts, guess you missed the early one, unfortunate.

My bad.  I should read your entire posting history before commenting on one of your witty sarcastic posts.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 28, 2016, 12:15:46 AM
http://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/england/next-permanent-manager

April 1?  Really.  Southgate and Pardew?  

The most comical price cut in the history of online gambling is Alan Curbishley has been cut from 66/1 into 33/1 today!   Don't be too careful paddy!  I will lay anyone 660/1 he is the next england gaffer.

http://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/england/next-permanent-manager/bet-history/alan-curbishley/today


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hummuspie on June 28, 2016, 12:16:33 AM
Would love to see Benitez as England manager, must be one of the best cup competition managers around


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 28, 2016, 12:17:36 AM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 28, 2016, 12:21:50 AM
If Man City knew they could get a world class goalkeeper, they would get him. Maybe Butland. Butland number 1 for England when he's back.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 28, 2016, 12:22:27 AM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?

Butland is the saviour of English football.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 28, 2016, 12:23:00 AM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?

Hart was awful all tournament.  The most telling bit was after round 1 when he said "I've had nothing to do really".

WTF?  He had one howler and one goal with questionable positioning.  Is the goon trying to airbrush it from history?  If guess that kind of arrogance is allowed and results in another mess up tonight.  A very average goalie who rates himself as a superstar.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: atdc21 on June 28, 2016, 12:31:41 AM
oh well at least they all got 140k a week jobs to go back to....


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on June 28, 2016, 12:39:26 AM
Sturridge was awful tonight, typified one of his moody Liverpool performances, doesn't look to pass, doesn't chase balls down, sloppy when he was passing.

Hart at fault for both goals, just stood there watching for the first, sboulda been coming out for it. The 2nd was obv awful keeping too.

Woy banged on about not taking unfit/untested players then took several. Left all the form boys at home.

Players like Drinkwater & Lennon should have gone. I would have taken Carroll too. He was in form and also offers something different, especially when teams defend deep and you insist on floating balls high into the oppo box.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: maldini32 on June 28, 2016, 01:03:54 AM
Phenomenal performance from Conte and the boys. Just imagine if Marchisio and Verrati had been fit.

Bring on ze Germans


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: maldini32 on June 28, 2016, 01:08:58 AM
My take on England/Roy -

If you're going to play Sturridge play him through the middle or dont play him

Rooney is never ever an international centre midfielder

If you're going to play 433 take more than 1 out of form winger

Square pegs round holes galore

The lack of intensity in the play was astonishing, it's just the euros lads

The team has no identity

Joe Hart sings the anthem the loudest - but absolutely turd throughout.

Funniest bit of Roy's press conference 'I'm proud of the last 4 years' Really?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on June 28, 2016, 01:27:09 AM
Sturridge was awful tonight, typified one of his moody Liverpool performances, doesn't look to pass, doesn't chase balls down, sloppy when he was passing.

Hart at fault for both goals, just stood there watching for the first, sboulda been coming out for it. The 2nd was obv awful keeping too.

Woy banged on about not taking unfit/untested players then took several. Left all the form boys at home.

Players like Drinkwater & Lennon should have gone. I would have taken Carroll too. He was in form and also offers something different, especially when teams defend deep and you insist on floating balls high into the oppo box.

Sturridge was out of position.

He's the best striker in England and was played on the wing.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: 77dave on June 28, 2016, 01:36:55 AM
no idea who the next manager should be

no idea what the starting XI will be for the first WC qualifier will be


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 28, 2016, 01:37:50 AM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?

Can't defend him for the 2nd goal which was simply awful.

I can defend him for his performances for City over the last 6 seasons where overall his performances have been superb including last season when he was 1 of only a handful who had a great season.

I watched Calamity James close up at City. James  is a 50+ caps keeper and not a patch on Joe Hart. If Guardiola gets rid of Hart it doesn't alter my opinion of  Hart > James.




 



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 28, 2016, 01:39:48 AM
Will Rooney ever play for England again?  


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 28, 2016, 01:40:52 AM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?

Can't defend him for the 2nd goal which was simply awful.

I can defend him for his performances for City over the last 6 seasons where overall his performances have been superb including last season when he was 1 of only a handful who had a great season.

I watched Calamity James close up at City. James  is a 50+ caps keeper and not a patch on Joe Hart. If Guardiola gets rid of Hart it doesn't alter my opinion of  Hart > James.




 



Was the 2nd goal tonight any better/worse than any of his other comical fuck ups throughout this event?   You are very deluded if you think Hart is any better than James.  Don't forget the back 4 and defensive midfielders Hart has played in front of for the oil boys for years.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: 77dave on June 28, 2016, 01:48:19 AM
Will Rooney ever play for England again?  

yes at least 10 more caps

but shouldnt


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 28, 2016, 01:51:07 AM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?

Can't defend him for the 2nd goal which was simply awful.

I can defend him for his performances for City over the last 6 seasons where overall his performances have been superb including last season when he was 1 of only a handful who had a great season.

I watched Calamity James close up at City. James  is a 50+ caps keeper and not a patch on Joe Hart. If Guardiola gets rid of Hart it doesn't alter my opinion of  Hart > James.




 



Was the 2nd goal tonight any better/worse than any of his other comical fuck ups throughout this event?   You are very deluded if you think Hart is any better than James. 

I like you Arb but it can be difficult to debate with you sometimes ;)

With Archer, he's obviously had a poor tournament and at fault for at least a couple of sloppy goals conceded. He entered Euro 16 as the number 1 and rightly so based on his mostly excellent City performances, if a new manager takes a look at the goalkeeper spot and considers changes then that's his prerogative, ditto for Pep when he takes over.

We're not deluded, we watch him week in week out playing for City, and he's been fantastic for us. A bad showing in a tournament where pretty much all of the team/squad were at best ok and at worst woeful isn't gonna change our opinion of him. I hope he starts the season at City between the sticks and am grateful we have a keeper of his calibre on our books.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 28, 2016, 01:58:21 AM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?



Can't defend him for the 2nd goal which was simply awful.

I can defend him for his performances for City over the last 6 seasons where overall his performances have been superb including last season when he was 1 of only a handful who had a great season.

I watched Calamity James close up at City. James  is a 50+ caps keeper and not a patch on Joe Hart. If Guardiola gets rid of Hart it doesn't alter my opinion of  Hart > James.




 



Was the 2nd goal tonight any better/worse than any of his other comical fuck ups throughout this event?   You are very deluded if you think Hart is any better than James. 

I like you Arb but it can be difficult to debate with you sometimes ;)

With Archer, he's obviously had a poor tournament and at fault for at least a couple of sloppy goals conceded. He entered Euro 16 as the number 1 and rightly so based on his mostly excellent City performances, if a new manager takes a look at the goalkeeper spot and considers changes then that's his prerogative, ditto for Pep when he takes over.

We're not deluded, we watch him week in week out playing for City, and he's been fantastic for us. A bad showing in a tournament where pretty much all of the team/squad were at best ok and at worst woeful isn't gonna change our opinion of him. I hope he starts the season at City between the sticks and am grateful we have a keeper of his calibre on our books.

Perfectly expressed sir.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: 77dave on June 28, 2016, 02:04:27 AM
Will Rooney ever play for England again?  

yes at least 10 more caps

but shouldnt

Wayne Rooney insists he has no plans to retire from international football and intends to remain as England's captain heading into the 2018 World Cup qualification campaign.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Rexas on June 28, 2016, 02:17:56 AM
Will Rooney ever play for England again?  

yes at least 10 more caps

but shouldnt

Wayne Rooney insists he has no plans to retire from international football and intends to remain as England's captain heading into the 2018 World Cup qualification campaign.

No problem with that, he had a shit second half but I thought he played really well in the first 3 games.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 28, 2016, 02:18:41 AM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?

Can't defend him for the 2nd goal which was simply awful.

I can defend him for his performances for City over the last 6 seasons where overall his performances have been superb including last season when he was 1 of only a handful who had a great season.

I watched Calamity James close up at City. James  is a 50+ caps keeper and not a patch on Joe Hart. If Guardiola gets rid of Hart it doesn't alter my opinion of  Hart > James.




 



Was the 2nd goal tonight any better/worse than any of his other comical fuck ups throughout this event?   You are very deluded if you think Hart is any better than James.  

I like you Arb but it can be difficult to debate with you sometimes ;)

With Archer, he's obviously had a poor tournament and at fault for at least a couple of sloppy goals conceded. He entered Euro 16 as the number 1 and rightly so based on his mostly excellent City performances, if a new manager takes a look at the goalkeeper spot and considers changes then that's his prerogative, ditto for Pep when he takes over.

We're not deluded, we watch him week in week out playing for City, and he's been fantastic for us. A bad showing in a tournament where pretty much all of the team/squad were at best ok and at worst woeful isn't gonna change our opinion of him. I hope he starts the season at City between the sticks and am grateful we have a keeper of his calibre on our books.

Much harder to debate with fan boys who can't see the wood for the trees when it is staring any non MC fan straight in the face. ;D  His numerous errors are the sole reason we are out of the event.  We did more than enough to advance to the last 8 without the numerous errors Hart made across the 4 games even though we have played poorly against 4 sides well below us world ranking wise.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on June 28, 2016, 02:28:09 AM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?

Can't defend him for the 2nd goal which was simply awful.

I can defend him for his performances for City over the last 6 seasons where overall his performances have been superb including last season when he was 1 of only a handful who had a great season.

I watched Calamity James close up at City. James  is a 50+ caps keeper and not a patch on Joe Hart. If Guardiola gets rid of Hart it doesn't alter my opinion of  Hart > James.




 



Was the 2nd goal tonight any better/worse than any of his other comical fuck ups throughout this event?   You are very deluded if you think Hart is any better than James. 

I like you Arb but it can be difficult to debate with you sometimes ;)

With Archer, he's obviously had a poor tournament and at fault for at least a couple of sloppy goals conceded. He entered Euro 16 as the number 1 and rightly so based on his mostly excellent City performances, if a new manager takes a look at the goalkeeper spot and considers changes then that's his prerogative, ditto for Pep when he takes over.

We're not deluded, we watch him week in week out playing for City, and he's been fantastic for us. A bad showing in a tournament where pretty much all of the team/squad were at best ok and at worst woeful isn't gonna change our opinion of him. I hope he starts the season at City between the sticks and am grateful we have a keeper of his calibre on our books.

Sorry, what? You watch him week in, week out? The Premier League is the most watched league in the world, so I think you'll find that most of us watch him week in, week out.

I have found that the 15/16 season at City, he made less clear mistakes as the previous season. But he let in quite a few soft ones. The season before that, wasn't that the season where we struggled and had a genuine battle to be number 1, for part of the season?

He is a good goalkeeper, but it is a clear weak spot for City & shouldn't be a weak spot for a top 10 ranked team like England, but of course, he's cost us our place in France. He was potentially at fault for the Russia goal, he was at fault for Bale FK, had a couple of other horrors and tonight was horrid. Yeah, he hasn't had much to do, but when he has, he's made a total mess.

I think if Man City could get a better goalkeeper, they would. There's nothing between Butland & Hart, but 100000% more potential in Butland to go forward. Hart will always be a good goalkeeper, never world class.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: BigAdz on June 28, 2016, 04:52:16 AM
I have worried for years that Hart would get more caps than Shilts, but surely had his day now. It's not the first time I have felt he is responsible for our exit from a Tourney, and I just don't get the love for him.

Felt for Sturridge, totally OOP.

Said already about Rooney. fine against poor teams, but don't see how he can continue if you then don't play him when the going gets tough when/if we qualify for WC. New Captain? If so, then would pride mean he does a messi(Lionel!).

Felt like Wilshire was almost hiding when he came on. Never got stuck in like he does normally. Kane very poor.

As stated, never understood why we left form players behind.

Have always thought the England job is a very easy one to ' get right' just read the papers each day and broadly follow what the masses want. Then if it does go wrong, no one can really have a go as the nation is pretty much in agreement. Pick up you £4 milly and go home.

Time after time, Woy made errors that even non footballing experts could see were going to fail, like bringing back Sterling today. Ok he got a pen, but generally he did he usual, ran directly at/into defenders and held onto the ball well past its passing date.

Listen to what's in the press, if you can't make up your mind but ffs have some sort of plan and stick to it for more than one game.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: baldock92 on June 28, 2016, 07:36:03 AM
I missed the game due to the time difference, couldn't believe I woke up to find out we'd lost!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: teddybloat on June 28, 2016, 08:16:12 AM


Felt fhought the England job is a very easy one to ' get right' just read the papers each day and broadly follow what the masses want. Then if it does go wrong, no one can really have a go as the nation is pretty much in agreement. Pick up you £4 milly and go home.





The problem with following the  press is sports journalists are journalists in the same way as Dan Wooten and the 3am Girls are journalists: they have zero accountability with regard to what they write - as we all know they are writing about a game - and they operate on a "throw enough shit and some will stick" approach. I imagine for people wanting to enter serious journalism ending up on the sports desk is akin to wanting to be a police officer and ending up as a traffic warden.

Even if a manager follows press concensous and fails they will be slaughtered by men who have the intellectual and journailistic weight of Paris Hilton. People will be too full of faux outrage and awareness of sports journalism's resemblance to the colour commentors of American wrestling to pull them up on their hypocrisy.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 28, 2016, 09:47:34 AM
The times ratings

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmAk3dvWEAAeLu-.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 28, 2016, 09:50:07 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl-NLvsWYAALQTS.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl-c6v0WEAA6Cxy.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl-yAyfWQAA6KBI.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl-yBC2WkAEzQhV.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl-xvQQWIAAm4uK.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl-3KRJWgAAvXFq.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl_FuLCWYAEcRK-.png)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 28, 2016, 09:55:31 AM
Where is Dewi?  This could be a great thread.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: peejaytwo on June 28, 2016, 11:51:13 AM
'Arry on 5live just gave Southgate a bit of a slagging then spoilt it by recommending Glen Hoddle or Tim Sherwood.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 28, 2016, 12:26:38 PM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?

Can't defend him for the 2nd goal which was simply awful.

I can defend him for his performances for City over the last 6 seasons where overall his performances have been superb including last season when he was 1 of only a handful who had a great season.

I watched Calamity James close up at City. James  is a 50+ caps keeper and not a patch on Joe Hart. If Guardiola gets rid of Hart it doesn't alter my opinion of  Hart > James.




 



Was the 2nd goal tonight any better/worse than any of his other comical fuck ups throughout this event?   You are very deluded if you think Hart is any better than James. 

I like you Arb but it can be difficult to debate with you sometimes ;)

With Archer, he's obviously had a poor tournament and at fault for at least a couple of sloppy goals conceded. He entered Euro 16 as the number 1 and rightly so based on his mostly excellent City performances, if a new manager takes a look at the goalkeeper spot and considers changes then that's his prerogative, ditto for Pep when he takes over.

We're not deluded, we watch him week in week out playing for City, and he's been fantastic for us. A bad showing in a tournament where pretty much all of the team/squad were at best ok and at worst woeful isn't gonna change our opinion of him. I hope he starts the season at City between the sticks and am grateful we have a keeper of his calibre on our books.

Sorry, what? You watch him week in, week out? The Premier League is the most watched league in the world, so I think you'll find that most of us watch him week in, week out.

I have found that the 15/16 season at City, he made less clear mistakes as the previous season. But he let in quite a few soft ones. The season before that, wasn't that the season where we struggled and had a genuine battle to be number 1, for part of the season?

He is a good goalkeeper, but it is a clear weak spot for City & shouldn't be a weak spot for a top 10 ranked team like England, but of course, he's cost us our place in France. He was potentially at fault for the Russia goal, he was at fault for Bale FK, had a couple of other horrors and tonight was horrid. Yeah, he hasn't had much to do, but when he has, he's made a total mess.

I think if Man City could get a better goalkeeper, they would. There's nothing between Butland & Hart, but 100000% more potential in Butland to go forward. Hart will always be a good goalkeeper, never world class.

You watch Hart for 90 minutes every week? Regardless of if its a televised game or not?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 28, 2016, 12:34:19 PM
We lost yet again because of Joe Hart.  Simples.  Do people watch the same games as me?  I have spent all night listening to rubbish.  Joe Hart is shit.  We went 1-0 up.  We shouldn't need to score again.  Joe Hart is shit.  Easily the worse England player to get 50+ caps in history.

Any comments from the Man City fan boys or are they just going to ignore the comments?  You all piped up after the first game defending him.  I assume you don't class him as your keeper any more now he should/will ever play for Man City/England ever again right?

Can't defend him for the 2nd goal which was simply awful.

I can defend him for his performances for City over the last 6 seasons where overall his performances have been superb including last season when he was 1 of only a handful who had a great season.

I watched Calamity James close up at City. James  is a 50+ caps keeper and not a patch on Joe Hart. If Guardiola gets rid of Hart it doesn't alter my opinion of  Hart > James.




 



Was the 2nd goal tonight any better/worse than any of his other comical fuck ups throughout this event?   You are very deluded if you think Hart is any better than James.  

I like you Arb but it can be difficult to debate with you sometimes ;)

With Archer, he's obviously had a poor tournament and at fault for at least a couple of sloppy goals conceded. He entered Euro 16 as the number 1 and rightly so based on his mostly excellent City performances, if a new manager takes a look at the goalkeeper spot and considers changes then that's his prerogative, ditto for Pep when he takes over.

We're not deluded, we watch him week in week out playing for City, and he's been fantastic for us. A bad showing in a tournament where pretty much all of the team/squad were at best ok and at worst woeful isn't gonna change our opinion of him. I hope he starts the season at City between the sticks and am grateful we have a keeper of his calibre on our books.

Much harder to debate with fan boys who can't see the wood for the trees when it is staring any non MC fan straight in the face. ;D  His numerous errors are the sole reason we are out of the event.  We did more than enough to advance to the last 8 without the numerous errors Hart made across the 4 games even though we have played poorly against 4 sides well below us world ranking wise.

Has Hart had a poor tournament for England? Yes.
Is Hart one of Citys most important players? Yes.

We judge him on what he does for both club and country, whereas as I guess most of the none City fans will be looking predominantly at his international goalkeeping. I can't begrudge you laying into him because he has been crap this summer, but equally us City fans aren't simply gonna forget the previous 6 seasons where he's been excellent for us on the whole.

Perhaps the new manager, whomever it is, will take a look at the keeping position and perhaps put Hart to one side, who can blame them after this tournament? I reiterate though that I hope he starts the season between the sticks for us as he's been a fantastic keeper over numerous years for City......and he's homegrown ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 28, 2016, 12:37:45 PM
he's not homegrown

he was signed from shrewsbury, where he was born



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 28, 2016, 12:42:34 PM
he's not homegrown

he was signed from shrewsbury, where he was born



Which makes him a homegrown player according to FA rules.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 28, 2016, 12:45:45 PM
he's not homegrown

he was signed from shrewsbury, where he was born



Which makes him a homegrown player according to FA rules.

yes i understand, homegrown in that sense. i misunderstood what you meant

i backed him at a nice price to play for england when i saw him play for shrewsbury in 2006 in my ground hopping/get to the 92 days 


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 28, 2016, 12:52:14 PM
he's not homegrown

he was signed from shrewsbury, where he was born



Which makes him a homegrown player according to FA rules.

yes i understand, homegrown in that sense. i misunderstood what you meant

i backed him at a nice price to play for england when i saw him play for shrewsbury in 2006 in my ground hopping/get to the 92 days 

Being homegrown adds even more value to him for us, as we're not exactly flooded with English/British players (thank god). Shrewsbury did a great job with him, and the year on loan at Birmingham put him on the map.

I think Shrewsbury ended up getting more in add ons than the initial fee paid (if memory serves me correct it was 600k rising to 1.5m)

Gonna divulge the price you got for him? ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 28, 2016, 12:58:26 PM
66-1. there is a thread on here from 2006 (the day after the match) but a search didn't find it


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on June 28, 2016, 01:09:47 PM
Love the homegrown tag.  Incredible.  Anyone remember when home grown meant actually coming through the system and not part of a cheque book policy?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Dewi_cool on June 28, 2016, 01:28:19 PM
Where is Dewi?  This could be a great thread.

He's keeping quiet, not expecting too much  ;D


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 28, 2016, 02:03:36 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmCS5KpWgAAxmSR.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 28, 2016, 02:09:16 PM
i think this is a good point

Paul Hayward ‏@_PaulHayward

Before anyone searches too hard for an Eddie Jones as England football manager, the players wouldn't cope with that kind of brutal honesty.

--


players earning up to £300k a week are basically in charge, no matter how inept the tactics.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Matt50 on June 28, 2016, 02:26:05 PM
i think this is a good point

Paul Hayward ‏@_PaulHayward

Before anyone searches too hard for an Eddie Jones as England football manager, the players wouldn't cope with that kind of brutal honesty.

--


players earning up to £300k a week are basically in charge, no matter how inept the tactics.

Well if they cant take the honesty maybe they are not cut out to play for their country.

Maybe the time has come where the public would rather see a squad of players who really care and would accept anything to play for England rather than the 'most talented' squad.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PathFinder on June 28, 2016, 02:27:38 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmCS5KpWgAAxmSR.jpg)

LOL! This doesn't even try to come across as remotely true


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 28, 2016, 02:33:07 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmCS5KpWgAAxmSR.jpg)

LOL! This doesn't even try to come across as remotely true

I don't know about that, but surely the Harry Kane "quote" shows a lack of intelligence rather than a lack of respect. 



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on June 28, 2016, 04:41:22 PM


(http://i63.tinypic.com/34y21jt.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on June 28, 2016, 04:51:33 PM


(http://i63.tinypic.com/34y21jt.jpg)

Senior England players didn't question the selection of senior England players against Iceland?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Matt50 on June 28, 2016, 05:01:03 PM


(http://i63.tinypic.com/34y21jt.jpg)

If that's true and that's the reason for the totally inept performance last night then they are even bigger wa**ers than I thought.
Do they have no personal pride, or thoughts for the thousands of fans who have spent fortunes to travel to watch them.
Whether they agree with the managers selections or not they should be giving everything they have in the middle of a major tournament.
Those senior players that felt that way should never play for England again IMO.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: superwomble on June 28, 2016, 05:25:55 PM
Hodgson began his press conference this afternoon with the same words everyone has thought of him during his management: "I don't really know what I'm doing here."


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 28, 2016, 08:46:49 PM
Love the homegrown tag.  Incredible.  Anyone remember when home grown meant actually coming through the system and not part of a cheque book policy?

You can thank the FA for using the homegrown tag. Does it annoy you that Clichy is homegrown? ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 28, 2016, 09:01:20 PM
Love the homegrown tag.  Incredible.  Anyone remember when home grown meant actually coming through the system and not part of a cheque book policy?

You can thank the FA for using the homegrown tag. Does it annoy you that Clichy is homegrown? ;)


1.00001 it does.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 28, 2016, 09:13:52 PM
Love the homegrown tag.  Incredible.  Anyone remember when home grown meant actually coming through the system and not part of a cheque book policy?

You can thank the FA for using the homegrown tag. Does it annoy you that Clichy is homegrown? ;)


1.00001 it does.

As short as that?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: RickBFA on June 28, 2016, 09:56:48 PM
i think this is a good point

Paul Hayward ‏@_PaulHayward

Before anyone searches too hard for an Eddie Jones as England football manager, the players wouldn't cope with that kind of brutal honesty.

--


players earning up to £300k a week are basically in charge, no matter how inept the tactics.

Maybe the trick would be to not pick some of the senior, complacent players.

Find the right coach and pick players with the discipline to play a system.

Strange how well paid players in German, Italian teams can manage it but we cant.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on June 28, 2016, 10:31:27 PM
Harry Redknapp must be going senile.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PathFinder on June 29, 2016, 12:02:06 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmCS5KpWgAAxmSR.jpg)

LOL! This doesn't even try to come across as remotely true

I don't know about that, but surely the Harry Kane "quote" shows a lack of intelligence rather than a lack of respect.  
Do we have to post these "pictures with quote"... They are clearly just BS 99% of the time and people tend to lap it up

https://twitter.com/karibestmeister/status/747806818664091648 (https://twitter.com/karibestmeister/status/747806818664091648)




Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on June 29, 2016, 12:08:24 AM
Harry Redknapp must be going senile.

Hoddle or Sherwood, he recommended, right?

If we can't find football's Trevor Bayliss or Eddie Jones, I'd sooner have Ian Holloway than any of the top ten in the betting. If we are going to ruin everything, we might as well do it with fun and passion.

Be good to enjoy international games again.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on June 29, 2016, 12:15:30 AM
Harry Redknapp must be going senile.

Hoddle or Sherwood, he recommended, right?

If we can't find football's Trevor Bayliss or Eddie Jones, I'd sooner have Ian Holloway than any of the top ten in the betting. If we are going to ruin everything, we might as well do it with fun and passion.

Be good to enjoy international games again.

Harry also mention Big Sam or Steve Bruce.

I'm depressed enough about Brexit without any of those four getting the England job.

Holloway would be great but I would prefer Kevin Keegan.

At least he made football fun, which after all, is why we love the game.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: MANTIS01 on June 29, 2016, 12:37:01 AM
Thinking we should get the England players to do a Game of Thrones style walk of atonement down Wembley Way...shame, shame, shame.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: George2Loose on June 29, 2016, 01:10:50 AM
Don't see why Steve Bruce would be such a bad appointment.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: 77dave on June 29, 2016, 02:05:52 AM
Thinking we should get the England players to do a Game of Thrones style walk of atonement down Wembley Way...shame, shame, shame.

you want to see them naked???


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on June 29, 2016, 07:20:49 AM
Don't see why Steve Bruce would be such a bad appointment.

I loathe myself for even thinking this, let alone actually saying it, but I would rather have Shearer than Bruce as England Manager.
Bruce's record as a club manager is average at best and his lack of international experience as a player is a clear handicap.
Shearer's lack of management credentials is offset by his experience and reputation.

For the record, I'm not saying I want Shearer in the job, just that he would be a better choice than Brucie.

I'd definitely prefer to go on the lash with Bruce.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on June 29, 2016, 08:41:36 AM
Don't see why Steve Bruce would be such a bad appointment.

I loathe myself for even thinking this, let alone actually saying it, but I would rather have Shearer than Bruce as England Manager.
Bruce's record as a club manager is average at best and his lack of international experience as a player is a clear handicap.
Shearer's lack of management credentials is offset by his experience and reputation.

For the record, I'm not saying I want Shearer in the job, just that he would be a better choice than Brucie.

I'd definitely prefer to go on the lash with Bruce.



International management is most definitely a different ball game from club football.  I'm not saying Bruce would be a good appointment but if I were English I'd rather have him than Southgate.  For me an international manager is more like a babysitter they have to bring in many different personalities and build a team around huge egos - more so than club level as when you make an international squad i think the ego only gets bgger.  I'm not sure that Bruce is cut out to deal with that but neither is Southgate.  Big Sam would deal with the ego's I think he has that air of authority, but the football would be turgid. 

A foreigner is ruled out imo given what has happened before with them at the helm.  (Unless it was someone previously experienced in the English game)

So the list becomes pretty short, in my mind at least.  Especially if I was going English, as I'm not so sure there is a talent pool bg enough to chose from. 

Names that I think would do a good job include Rafa, Tinkerman, Billic.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 29, 2016, 09:44:32 AM
Would big Sam be so bad?  If we accept we don't have a world beating squad (and aren't likely to in the future) you'd expect him to organise them well, play them in their correct positions and make sensible choices.  I reckon he'd be nailed on to get us to Quarter Finals which would seem acceptable for where we are right now.  Hodgson just looked completely lost, changing his mind from one moment to the next.  I doubt you'd get that with Allardyce.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nellberg on June 29, 2016, 09:55:42 AM
Looking down the names on English managers at the head of the bookies market, none of them inspire me. Southgate at 6/4 fav makes me want to puke. I doubt he'd come, given West Ham are going well and they've just moved to the Olympic stadium etc, but he should at least be having a crack at getting Bilic. Experience of being an international manager, experience of the premier league and (judging by his punditry on ITV) a great tactical thinker.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on June 29, 2016, 11:22:48 AM
Would big Sam be so bad?  If we accept we don't have a world beating squad (and aren't likely to in the future) you'd expect him to organise them well, play them in their correct positions and make sensible choices.  I reckon he'd be nailed on to get us to Quarter Finals which would seem acceptable for where we are right now.  Hodgson just looked completely lost, changing his mind from one moment to the next.  I doubt you'd get that with Allardyce.

Yes. Big Sam would be so bad.

"If we accept we don't have a world beating squad" - why do we have to accept that?

Before the tournament they were being talked up as a "golden generation". 4 games doesn't suddenly make them bad players. Alli, Kane, Dier, Barkley, Sturridge, Stones, Smalling, Butland etc all have limitless upside. Just need a schedule which produces fit and fresh players when the big tournaments start. And a manager who can devise a formation and tactics which gets the best from them.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 29, 2016, 11:33:17 AM
Would big Sam be so bad?  If we accept we don't have a world beating squad (and aren't likely to in the future) you'd expect him to organise them well, play them in their correct positions and make sensible choices.  I reckon he'd be nailed on to get us to Quarter Finals which would seem acceptable for where we are right now.  Hodgson just looked completely lost, changing his mind from one moment to the next.  I doubt you'd get that with Allardyce.

Yes. Big Sam would be so bad.

"If we accept we don't have a world beating squad" - why do we have to accept that?

Before the tournament they were being talked up as a "golden generation". 4 games doesn't suddenly make them bad players. Alli, Kane, Dier, Barkley, Sturridge, Stones, Smalling, Butland etc all have limitless upside. Just need a schedule which produces fit and fresh players when the big tournaments start. And a manager who can devise a formation and tactics which gets the best from them.

I think you are over rating them.  There is a reason why historically English players rarely end up playing for Bayern/Barca/Madrid.   We are a mid tier international side which occasionally gets a good batch of players (and I certainly don't mean this lot compared to other squads we have had) - I think if we accepted that we'd be in a better position to get the best out of them rather than telling them they are world beaters.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 29, 2016, 11:41:56 AM
we try to play an expansive style when really our player base, quality wise, suits something much more compact.

against Iceland Rooney was trying to do his impersonation of Iniesta, only hardly found a pass all night.

as it happens i don't think we have the back four to play a "solid" style at the moment either.


i do think they should look closely at ranieri. wouldn't take him long to get them playing a consistent style and picking the right players for it

a few player egos would have to pipe down to get them to play non-possession based, fast breaking football though...


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on June 29, 2016, 11:48:14 AM
Would big Sam be so bad?  If we accept we don't have a world beating squad (and aren't likely to in the future) you'd expect him to organise them well, play them in their correct positions and make sensible choices.  I reckon he'd be nailed on to get us to Quarter Finals which would seem acceptable for where we are right now.  Hodgson just looked completely lost, changing his mind from one moment to the next.  I doubt you'd get that with Allardyce.

Yes. Big Sam would be so bad.

"If we accept we don't have a world beating squad" - why do we have to accept that?

Before the tournament they were being talked up as a "golden generation". 4 games doesn't suddenly make them bad players. Alli, Kane, Dier, Barkley, Sturridge, Stones, Smalling, Butland etc all have limitless upside. Just need a schedule which produces fit and fresh players when the big tournaments start. And a manager who can devise a formation and tactics which gets the best from them.

I think you are over rating them.  There is a reason why historically English players rarely end up playing for Bayern/Barca/Madrid.   We are a mid tier international side which occasionally gets a good batch of players (and I certainly don't mean this lot compared to other squads we have had) - I think if we accepted that we'd be in a better position to get the best out of them rather than telling them they are world beaters.

Tottenham were clearly, and by some margin, the best team in the Premier League for the second half of last season.

And all their key players (apart from Eriksen) are English.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 29, 2016, 11:53:43 AM
Would big Sam be so bad?  If we accept we don't have a world beating squad (and aren't likely to in the future) you'd expect him to organise them well, play them in their correct positions and make sensible choices.  I reckon he'd be nailed on to get us to Quarter Finals which would seem acceptable for where we are right now.  Hodgson just looked completely lost, changing his mind from one moment to the next.  I doubt you'd get that with Allardyce.

Yes. Big Sam would be so bad.

"If we accept we don't have a world beating squad" - why do we have to accept that?

Before the tournament they were being talked up as a "golden generation". 4 games doesn't suddenly make them bad players. Alli, Kane, Dier, Barkley, Sturridge, Stones, Smalling, Butland etc all have limitless upside. Just need a schedule which produces fit and fresh players when the big tournaments start. And a manager who can devise a formation and tactics which gets the best from them.

I think you are over rating them.  There is a reason why historically English players rarely end up playing for Bayern/Barca/Madrid.   We are a mid tier international side which occasionally gets a good batch of players (and I certainly don't mean this lot compared to other squads we have had) - I think if we accepted that we'd be in a better position to get the best out of them rather than telling them they are world beaters.

Tottenham were clearly, and by some margin, the best team in the Premier League for the second half of last season.

And all their key players (apart from Eriksen) are English.

That's true - but everyone kept telling us what a poor league it was last season.  Half a season does not make a team of world champs.  This batch has potential, but at the moment at international level it's bang average imo.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 29, 2016, 12:18:27 PM
Would big Sam be so bad?  If we accept we don't have a world beating squad (and aren't likely to in the future) you'd expect him to organise them well, play them in their correct positions and make sensible choices.  I reckon he'd be nailed on to get us to Quarter Finals which would seem acceptable for where we are right now.  Hodgson just looked completely lost, changing his mind from one moment to the next.  I doubt you'd get that with Allardyce.

Yes. Big Sam would be so bad.

"If we accept we don't have a world beating squad" - why do we have to accept that?

Before the tournament they were being talked up as a "golden generation". 4 games doesn't suddenly make them bad players. Alli, Kane, Dier, Barkley, Sturridge, Stones, Smalling, Butland etc all have limitless upside. Just need a schedule which produces fit and fresh players when the big tournaments start. And a manager who can devise a formation and tactics which gets the best from them.

I think you are over rating them.  There is a reason why historically English players rarely end up playing for Bayern/Barca/Madrid.   We are a mid tier international side which occasionally gets a good batch of players (and I certainly don't mean this lot compared to other squads we have had) - I think if we accepted that we'd be in a better position to get the best out of them rather than telling them they are world beaters.

Tottenham were clearly, and by some margin, the best team in the Premier League for the second half of last season.

And all their key players (apart from Eriksen) are English.

not true

since 30.12.15 leicester won 42 points, Spurs 35

on the second point, the key creative player is eriksen.

take him out, as we see, and the spurs players are nowhere near as effective

same as it is for mahrez, ozil, sanchez, kdb, silva etc

the english players in those teams are simply less effective without the overseas creative players making space, the right passes

we play a style that assumes england can create as the PL overseas players can do. we can't


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 29, 2016, 12:23:14 PM
or put another way

when spurs really needed to win, end of season. one off games in effect, must win

what happened? exactly the same as england. too soft.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on June 29, 2016, 12:27:11 PM
Would big Sam be so bad?  If we accept we don't have a world beating squad (and aren't likely to in the future) you'd expect him to organise them well, play them in their correct positions and make sensible choices.  I reckon he'd be nailed on to get us to Quarter Finals which would seem acceptable for where we are right now.  Hodgson just looked completely lost, changing his mind from one moment to the next.  I doubt you'd get that with Allardyce.

Yes. Big Sam would be so bad.

"If we accept we don't have a world beating squad" - why do we have to accept that?

Before the tournament they were being talked up as a "golden generation". 4 games doesn't suddenly make them bad players. Alli, Kane, Dier, Barkley, Sturridge, Stones, Smalling, Butland etc all have limitless upside. Just need a schedule which produces fit and fresh players when the big tournaments start. And a manager who can devise a formation and tactics which gets the best from them.

I'd be shocked if you could find one quote from any media source that described them "as a golden generation" or did you just mean people on twitter ?

Without a revamp of the system from the very top instead of just snap sacking every manager nothing will change and we'll continue to fail at major tournaments.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on June 29, 2016, 12:43:29 PM
or put another way

when spurs really needed to win, end of season. one off games in effect, must win

what happened? exactly the same as england. too soft.

My thoughts exactly, replicated on Monday night too.
Don't get the 'no foreign manager' thinking either. People are saying that they have been rubbish, have a look at the recent English managers ffs.

Fk it, have big Sam, far more forward thinking than given credit for.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on June 29, 2016, 12:50:29 PM
Another plus is when he grows a moustache he looks a bit like Harry Bassett England manager and I can picture him doing that half time team talk when they were "2-0 down to the ****ing Mexicans"


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on June 30, 2016, 08:37:37 PM
Giggs, an enthralling pundit.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: superwomble on June 30, 2016, 11:43:54 PM
Did Lewandowski choose to go second in the shootout?! If he did he should be stripped of the captaincy.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 30, 2016, 11:45:33 PM
He did. But of a shocker that. Pressure all on team going second


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 30, 2016, 11:47:10 PM
Actually he won toss and chose the end.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: superwomble on June 30, 2016, 11:48:13 PM
You don't choose to go first or second if you win the toss? Bit odd that.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: superwomble on June 30, 2016, 11:51:59 PM
http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_14_the_penalty_kick_en_47369.pdf

Winner of toss chooses to go first or second according to FIFA.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 01, 2016, 09:37:34 AM
Portugal have led for just 19 minutes all tournament. They have yet to win a game in 90 minutes. They are in the semi-finals.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmOTh4pWEAA0JcK.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmOTiJAXEAA2ku7.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmOTiY0WYAAGDum.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmOTispWAAAE6cJ.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmOx4BhWgAA7g6z.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmOwHQCWAAQepC9.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: dino1980 on July 01, 2016, 04:46:53 PM
Actually he won toss and chose the end.

I thought there were two tosses and Lewandowski won both, at least from the pictures I saw.

After the second toss the ref points to RL and he then points at Ronaldo. The ref then turns to RL and says to him 'they go first,' and he nods. Very strange decision if that was indeed the case.

Some further reading from Prozone on penalties here: www.ksi.is/media/landslidsvefur/Hvernig-er-best-ad-taka-og-verja-vitaspyrnur.docx

Some interesting 'facts' such as: "the success rates for the first and fifth penalties were far higher than those recorded for the second, third and fourth. The first penalties were scored 81.2% of the time, with the fifth kicks having the strongest rate of success at 87.5% and the other three mustering an average of just 61.5%."


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 01, 2016, 06:52:10 PM
EXCLUSIVE: Jurgen Klinsmann is ready to answer the #ENG’s emergency call http://thesun.uk/6018BvcNw


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on July 01, 2016, 10:18:43 PM
Wales doing great with a clear game plan.  Makes Hodgson look even more utterly useless than he does already.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 01, 2016, 10:38:53 PM
Brilliant! Couple of really really good goals second half. Excellent organisation and spirit too


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on July 01, 2016, 10:40:48 PM
Amazing scenes.  Classic example of the sum of the parts better than the parts alone this game.   What an effort from 1-0 down.  VWP Wales.  Please go on and win it!

Bale SPOTY 1.01 surely.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on July 01, 2016, 10:45:08 PM
Yep very good indeed.  Deserved winners.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on July 01, 2016, 10:47:35 PM
HArdly a one man team tonight.  Bale just has the natural ability of making players believe they can play at his level even though they know deep down they shouldn't be able to.  Ronaldo could really take a lesson from Bale on leading men who are not as talented as you.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on July 01, 2016, 10:57:40 PM
Team of the Year for Sports Personality?  Is their a market up?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on July 01, 2016, 10:58:31 PM
HArdly a one man team tonight.  Bale just has the natural ability of making players believe they can play at his level even though they know deep down they shouldn't be able to.  Ronaldo could really take a lesson from Bale on leading men who are not as talented as you.

Head to head and we will find out. Ramsey is priceless aswell, made R-kanu look better than england have.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on July 01, 2016, 11:00:45 PM
Team of the Year for Sports Personality?  Is their a market up?

http://www.oddschecker.com/awards/sports-personality-of-the-year/team-of-the-year

Just got trimmed. They need to make a final min to get it anyway so youll be better off just backing them for that.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on July 01, 2016, 11:04:39 PM
Hate to kick man city fans again after Joe Hart's heroics but wasn't Denayer a bit of a headless chicken for a couple of the goals?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on July 02, 2016, 01:39:21 AM
Team of the Year for Sports Personality?  Is their a market up?

http://www.oddschecker.com/awards/sports-personality-of-the-year/team-of-the-year

Just got trimmed. They need to make a final min to get it anyway so youll be better off just backing them for that.

Plus there's that video going around social media of Wales celebrating England getting knocked out. No way they're beating Leicester City even if they win the bloody thing IMO.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on July 02, 2016, 09:56:33 AM
Team of the Year for Sports Personality?  Is their a market up?

http://www.oddschecker.com/awards/sports-personality-of-the-year/team-of-the-year

Just got trimmed. They need to make a final min to get it anyway so youll be better off just backing them for that.

Plus there's that video going around social media of Wales celebrating England getting knocked out. No way they're beating Leicester City even if they win the bloody thing IMO.
is it a public vote for team of the year?

always surprises me when my have fans don't get ABE, how many Liverpool fans will support UTD in Europe or spurs fans cheering on arsenal or pompey fans supporting the saints?
England are our local rivals the big boys on the block the team we all love to hate, the team that one it all in 66 and the media keep reminding us. Yeah there are a few people in the home nations that hate the English but for the majority it's banter that seems to get lost


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 02, 2016, 10:17:03 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmTVo74XEAEN3Sl.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmTXxGnWAAAlgWW.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmTbA1dWAAAzpVy.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmTi5qWXYAANY3M.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmTpySyXgAAL6X1.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmTuLr9WAAAfrWB.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmTt0B-WcAEP6DE.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on July 02, 2016, 11:27:15 AM
Hate to kick man city fans again after Joe Hart's heroics but wasn't Denayer a bit of a headless chicken for a couple of the goals?

Yeah dropped in at the deep end to a degree and I think his lack of experience showed on occasion.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on July 02, 2016, 11:44:35 AM
Hate to kick man city fans again after Joe Hart's heroics but wasn't Denayer a bit of a headless chicken for a couple of the goals?

Yeah dropped in at the deep end to a degree and I think his lack of experience showed on occasion.

Will he be playing for City this season or loaned out again?  Will be interesting to see if Mangala has a good season now he has settled in.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on July 02, 2016, 12:02:03 PM
Hate to kick man city fans again after Joe Hart's heroics but wasn't Denayer a bit of a headless chicken for a couple of the goals?

Yeah dropped in at the deep end to a degree and I think his lack of experience showed on occasion.

Will he be playing for City this season or loaned out again?  Will be interesting to see if Mangala has a good season now he has settled in.

I think a lot hinges on Stones (groan) for both players. I'd like to keep Denayer in and around the first team squad, but if he isn't gonna get many minutes then we might as well loan him out again as his 2 previous stints in Scotland and Turkey have been pretty successful. Denayer can also play right back which does give him quite an advantage as both our full back positions have question marks hanging over them.

I'll probably get shot down for this, but I actually like Mangala. Don't get me wrong, he's a walking mistake at times, but when he plays well he plays really fucking well; commanding in the air, strong in the tackle, a very physical presence at the back, and only recently turned 25 so his best years ahead of him. He's a confidence player though, and when his head drops he's gone. He's very effective against the big forwards (Costa, Deeney, Ibra, Lukaku) but does struggle against the smaller nippy ones, whereas someone like Kompany is equally adept against both.

If we sign Stones, and this is looking increasingly likely, something has to give as we can't start the season with Kompany, Otamendi, Mangala, Denayer and Stones in the same squad. Rumours abound that Mangala goes back to Porto on loan if we raid Everton.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on July 02, 2016, 12:07:05 PM
I agree about Mangala.  I think he'll have a really strong second season if he gets the chance.

Think Watford are playing 3 centre backs this year so I'd like us to take Denayer on loan.  We've just signed his Belgian fellow centre back and those 2 plus Carhcart, Britos and Prodl would be a strong set to rotate.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on July 02, 2016, 12:08:05 PM
I agree about Mangala.  I think he'll have a really strong second season if he gets the chance.

Think Watford are playing 3 centre backs this year so I'd like us to take Denayer on loan.  We've just signed his Belgian fellow centre back and those 2 plus Carhcart, Britos and Prodl would be a strong set to rotate.

This will be his 3rd season ;)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on July 02, 2016, 12:11:30 PM
I agree about Mangala.  I think he'll have a really strong second season if he gets the chance.

Think Watford are playing 3 centre backs this year so I'd like us to take Denayer on loan.  We've just signed his Belgian fellow centre back and those 2 plus Carhcart, Britos and Prodl would be a strong set to rotate.

A year in the PL would do him good I think. Means Pep could keep a very close eye on him.

Apparently we're battling your boys for some Torino right back.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 02, 2016, 12:23:00 PM
another good pic from last night

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmT97ipXEAAlI20.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 02, 2016, 12:23:24 PM
give me strength

Glenn Hoddle welcomes FA talks over England role after Roy Hodgson exit. Full story here: http://skysports.tv/upcmkr


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: mondatoo on July 02, 2016, 01:46:50 PM
Even if Wales win the thing, and gl to them, it wouldn't even come remotely close to what Leicester achieved. I think they have a great chance of making the final as well, Ramsey will be a huge miss but Portugal's defence isn't great, inb4 Bale is the hero again.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: superwomble on July 02, 2016, 11:38:31 PM
Looked like Schweinsteiger chose to go 2nd there too?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on July 02, 2016, 11:39:30 PM
Europes two best tournament teams are having one of the worst pen comps Ive ever seen, how the fuck the germans never do this against us.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 02, 2016, 11:46:20 PM
Every premier league player that took one, missed one. ZazAs  dressage run up. Wtf?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: superwomble on July 02, 2016, 11:48:52 PM
Zaza was unbelievable. Brought on specifically to take a pen then does that?!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 02, 2016, 11:52:21 PM
Every premier league player that took one, missed one. ZazAs  dressage run up. Wtf?

Giaccarini not still on Sunderland's books?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 02, 2016, 11:53:26 PM
Every premier league player that took one, missed one. ZazAs  dressage run up. Wtf?

Giaccarini not still on Sunderland's books?
on loan at bologna!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 02, 2016, 11:55:00 PM
Every premier league player that took one, missed one. ZazAs  dressage run up. Wtf?

Giaccarini not still on Sunderland's books?
on loan at bologna!

Stewards?!

:D


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on July 03, 2016, 12:02:48 AM
Possibly the highlight of the tournament for me.

Bring on a penalty taker in the 120th minute....watch said penalty taker sky the fucker a few minutes later.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on July 03, 2016, 12:05:46 AM
Possibly the highlight of the tournament for me.

Bring on a penalty taker in the 120th minute....watch said penalty taker sky the fucker a few minutes later.

Dunno watching a bloke who cant get a game for sunderland being one of the stars of the tournament is pretty funny.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on July 03, 2016, 12:52:00 AM
Quote from John Hartson.

It sounds ridiculous to say Wales are 90 minutes away from the final of Euro 2016, but we are - and anything can happen now.

I am trying not to get carried away, even though I think I really should, but I think we might even start Wednesday's semi-final against Portugal as favourites.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36696343

Easy to see why Hartson lost the lot gambling during his career!  Portugal are 11/10 wales 10/3!  You won't start favs John.  You have more chance of having a full head of hair on Wednesday than Wales starting as favs.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DropTheHammer on July 03, 2016, 01:01:33 AM
10/3 is mental for Wales IMO, I've rushed to get on that as I thought it would be a lot closer odds-wise. I hope they go all the way, I really do - a fantastic team spirit coupled with the underdog tag.

Also, every impressive euros performance makes the 500-1 WC tickets look very appertising.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: jakally on July 03, 2016, 01:10:20 AM
10/3 is mental for Wales IMO, I've rushed to get on that as I thought it would be a lot closer odds-wise. I hope they go all the way, I really do - a fantastic team spirit coupled with the underdog tag.

Also, every impressive euros performance makes the 500-1 WC tickets look very appertising.

Really hope they go all the way but think Ramsey is a big miss for them.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: maldini32 on July 03, 2016, 01:27:50 AM
Heartbroken.

Being a fan is excruciatingly painful at times.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 03, 2016, 08:47:54 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmYziHWWYAQAAKq.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmYzB4aWYAQVemE.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmY3TaXWIAAnpKo.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmY2U0ZWYAA2-sY.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmY-7YFWIAAy09v.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmZBnAxWIAAsecf.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmZFcNCWYAAm1hw.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmZEFurWcAAqzeP.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmZD-owWgAA1G4C.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 03, 2016, 09:29:49 AM
Looked like Schweinsteiger chose to go 2nd there too?

I thought he won both tosses and for some reason chose to go in front of the Italian fans. And to go second?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: booder on July 03, 2016, 11:46:13 AM
10/3 is mental for Wales IMO, I've rushed to get on that as I thought it would be a lot closer odds-wise. I hope they go all the way, I really do - a fantastic team spirit coupled with the underdog tag.

Also, every impressive euros performance makes the 500-1 WC tickets look very appertising.

Really hope they go all the way but think Ramsey is a big miss for them.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 04, 2016, 09:34:09 AM
(http://)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmdpY2BWAAEARNs.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cmdq8rfWAAAjMjE.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cmd6H7KXgAAEaE9.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cmd9zgSW8AENlWl.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmeBsJJWgAAMVkY.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cmd--o2XgAAVqYt.jpg)



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 06, 2016, 11:37:15 AM
Sam now clear favourite next England manager

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmrBZ6-W8AAUNc9.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: bagel on July 06, 2016, 09:31:37 PM
wales should be playing in red.

wtf are portugal wearing?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 06, 2016, 09:35:01 PM
Portugal are the designated home team. Ref decided their red was too dark and clashed with the Wales away kit, so both In away strips.Wales not allowed to wear red


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on July 07, 2016, 01:40:05 AM
Two poor performances tonight in a poor match. Wales clearly missed Ramsey, totally forgot he was suspended.

What price do FRA/GER start against them? 8/13?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on July 07, 2016, 01:49:11 AM
Two poor performances tonight in a poor match. Wales clearly missed Ramsey, totally forgot he was suspended.

What price do FRA/GER start against them? 8/13?

They will be 1/2 to lift the trophy whoever gets through and around evens to win in 90 minutes.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 07, 2016, 09:51:18 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmtSUVlW8AA_M8r.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmtWKv-WgAA40Z5.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmtWn9RXgAA6TpO.jpg)



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: exstream on July 07, 2016, 08:56:49 PM
Sissoko instead of Kante vs Germany


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 08, 2016, 09:01:11 AM
Mancini interested in England job

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/roberto-mancini-poised-enter-next-8372984


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 08, 2016, 09:14:39 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmyXT03WEAA3bF-.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmyaNQFWcAAQot4.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cmyh26aXgAA6tnU.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 08, 2016, 09:37:14 AM
As expected, Mark Clattenburg has been chosen to referee the Euro 2016 final on Sunday


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: superwomble on July 08, 2016, 10:23:13 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmyXT03WEAA3bF-.jpg)

I don't understand why the complains about this were so heated - clear pen!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on July 08, 2016, 05:24:51 PM
I'm too hungover to check myself!

How are bookies gonna settle e/w top scorer bets? As it stands, 6 players are on 3 goals. These are separated by assists, so the top 4 is Griezmann out in front followed by Giroud, Payet and Ronaldo as the latter 3 have 2 assists each, whereas Nani has 3 goals but 1 assist so is 5th on the list.

Imagine no more goals are scored, will they pay out the top 4 as it stands, or include the other players on 3 goals and slice the e/w odds further?

I know what I'm trying to ask but I'm struggling to articulate it properly so apologies if that doesn't make sense!

Least I have a decent sweat to take to the final; France/Griezmann double at 20/1 and an e/w on Payet at 66/1. Only very small stakes cos I'm poor :)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 08, 2016, 06:25:33 PM
I'm too hungover to check myself!

How are bookies gonna settle e/w top scorer bets? As it stands, 6 players are on 3 goals. These are separated by assists, so the top 4 is Griezmann out in front followed by Giroud, Payet and Ronaldo as the latter 3 have 2 assists each, whereas Nani has 3 goals but 1 assist so is 5th on the list.

Imagine no more goals are scored, will they pay out the top 4 as it stands, or include the other players on 3 goals and slice the e/w odds further?

I know what I'm trying to ask but I'm struggling to articulate it properly so apologies if that doesn't make sense!

Least I have a decent sweat to take to the final; France/Griezmann double at 20/1 and an e/w on Payet at 66/1. Only very small stakes cos I'm poor :)

Unless specified, everyone on 3 will pay out, but it'll be at a reduced price. If you get 1 on 4 goals and 6 people on 3, paying 4 places, that means you have 2nd, 3rd and 4th split between 6 players, so you'll get half price for each place bet.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on July 08, 2016, 06:31:46 PM
Assists will have nothing to do with it if you have backed the top goalscorer market.  D/h rules will apply for the places (similar to a golf event) like Tal has said.  If you have backed golden boot winner and assists count for that as a tie breaker then it will be different i would imagine.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on July 08, 2016, 06:34:08 PM
Thanks guys, thought as much with the dead heat rule. Could do with Payet notching in the final :)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: teddybloat on July 08, 2016, 07:25:05 PM
The beeb said last night that this was germany's 20th semi final appearance in their last 26 tournaments.

Puts the FAs benchmark of scrapping into the quarters into some sober perspective


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 09, 2016, 09:19:55 AM
UEFA says ISL v ENG had a 99.8% market share in Iceland - just 298 people in the whole country chose to watch a different programme on TV


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 10, 2016, 10:01:59 AM
From the geniuses that brought you charging Man City fans for booing their anthem...

Wales charged by UEFA over players bringing their children onto the pitch to celebrate Euro 2016 triumphs

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/wales-charged-uefa-over-players-11591535


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: hhyftrftdr on July 10, 2016, 03:00:13 PM
From the geniuses that brought you charging Man City fans for booing their anthem...

Wales charged by UEFA over players bringing their children onto the pitch to celebrate Euro 2016 triumphs

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/wales-charged-uefa-over-players-11591535

You really couldn't make this shit up.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 10, 2016, 10:45:14 PM
Any prices on the French FA getting a fine in this game for failing to control the moths?


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 10, 2016, 10:58:47 PM
Koscielny 72/72 on passes in the first 90 minutes, per Opta.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Mark_Porter on July 10, 2016, 11:43:11 PM
Jose Fonte fairy tale rivals the Vardy one.

Gone from winning the JPT and playing in league one to dragging his club team to top 6 in the prem, making his international debut just short of 31st birthday, plays way into the team and wins the lot. WP sir.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: JohnCharver on July 10, 2016, 11:54:21 PM
Eder winner and sissoko best player for much of game. Lol what a shit tourney.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on July 11, 2016, 03:14:45 AM
This must have been the worst tournament in recent history. The excitement and quality of matches was poor, even when it went past the group stage. Pundits saying the new format isn't good and the matches was poor, they wasn't much better past the group stage.

Nothing will change for next time, none of the stars really turned up and the final was poor.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: George2Loose on July 11, 2016, 05:28:02 AM
Have to agree. Watched the least amount of games I've ever watched for a summer tournament. Group format made it poor.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on July 11, 2016, 09:51:53 AM
This must have been the worst tournament in recent history. The excitement and quality of matches was poor, even when it went past the group stage. Pundits saying the new format isn't good and the matches was poor, they wasn't much better past the group stage.

Nothing will change for next time, none of the stars really turned up and the final was poor.

I think it will be even worse next time.  It's the one where there isn't a host nation and the games are dotted all over Europe, so you don't even get the sense of occasion where all the games are in one (or two) countries.  Platini's idea.  It's going to just feel like a load of random friendlies all over Europe.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 11, 2016, 10:14:09 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnBvNgjWcAAH1x9.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnBtUZMWYAAXTXF.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnB04JtWYAAxcLX.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnCAcN1XgAYPupM.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnCAcN1XgAYPupM.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnCJYAYW8AApt_R.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnCJKNSWYAAa6d-.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnCJFeeXYAA2a9l.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnCJXRQW8AAmbXw.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnCO5PDXYAA8LhL.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 11, 2016, 02:24:25 PM
who scored's team of the tournament

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnFXuE0XYAATTZM.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 11, 2016, 03:45:15 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnFptziWYAAW_pU.jpg:large)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Teacake on July 11, 2016, 04:06:41 PM
A tournament that got the winner it deserved.

24 is a bad number to work with and the tournament has become too big with too many games spread over 4 weeks which is too long. Logistically it's become too big to host for any country bar the biggest nations.

England should forget about trying to host a World Cup and go for the Euros in 2024, apparently only Turkey are showing an interest so far.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on July 11, 2016, 06:15:05 PM
A tournament that got the winner it deserved.

24 is a bad number to work with and the tournament has become too big with too many games spread over 4 weeks which is too long. Logistically it's become too big to host for any country bar the biggest nations.

England should forget about trying to host a World Cup and go for the Euros in 2024, apparently only Turkey are showing an interest so far.

Euro 2020 semis and final will be at Wembley though.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on July 11, 2016, 06:34:15 PM
Have to agree. Watched the least amount of games I've ever watched for a summer tournament. Group format made it poor.

Have to agree. The final just about summed up the whole tournie imo.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on July 11, 2016, 07:30:22 PM
Did we expect a feast of attacking football and thrills galore?

When was the last time a major tournament delivered more than a couple of decent games?

2014 WC had, errrm, Germany v Brazil, but not much else.

At least this tourney gave us the feelgood stories of Wales, Iceland and Northern Ireland.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: George2Loose on July 11, 2016, 08:15:45 PM
Did we expect a feast of attacking football and thrills galore?

When was the last time a major tournament delivered more than a couple of decent games?

2014 WC had, errrm, Germany v Brazil, but not much else.

At least this tourney gave us the feelgood stories of Wales, Iceland and Northern Ireland.

Brazil was a great tourney.

Worst tourney since SA FA cup finals


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on July 11, 2016, 08:47:48 PM
Did we expect a feast of attacking football and thrills galore?

When was the last time a major tournament delivered more than a couple of decent games?

2014 WC had, errrm, Germany v Brazil, but not much else.

At least this tourney gave us the feelgood stories of Wales, Iceland and Northern Ireland.

I'm with you on this and the supporters of so many teams have had an absolute blast. FWIW I enjoyed loads of games for a variety of reasons but accept there was no exceptional team and last night was a damp squib.

I think it is amusing we look back with dewy eye sentimentality at, say,  1996 yet the knock-out stages were awful. We loved England's progress but there were a distinct lack of goals - 6 in total from the 6 games in the quarters and semis and 4 of those games went to extra-time. By comparison, Euro 2016 delivered 19 goals from the equivalent number of games.

I loved the Brazil World Cup but again there was lots of rubbish.



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on July 11, 2016, 09:02:19 PM
Did we expect a feast of attacking football and thrills galore?

When was the last time a major tournament delivered more than a couple of decent games?

2014 WC had, errrm, Germany v Brazil, but not much else.

At least this tourney gave us the feelgood stories of Wales, Iceland and Northern Ireland.

I'm with you on this and the supporters of so many teams have had an absolute blast. FWIW I enjoyed loads of games for a variety of reasons but accept there was no exceptional team and last night was a damp squib.

I think it is amusing we look back with dewy eye sentimentality at, say,  1996 yet the knock-out stages were awful. We loved England's progress but there were a distinct lack of goals - 6 in total from the 6 games in the quarters and semis and 4 of those games went to extra-time. By comparison, Euro 2106 delivered 19 goals from the equivalent number of games.

I loved the Brazil World Cup but again there was lots of rubbish.



England 1 - 0 Argentina
Portugal 5 - 3 North Korea
W Germany 4 - 0 Uruguay
Soviet Union 2 - 1 Hungary
Both semi finals were won 2-1 and I make that 22 goals...

and the final had another six including a hat-trick

Will grant that the group games were dour at times but the tournament averaged >2.5 goals per game. Plus, North Korea :)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on July 11, 2016, 09:07:10 PM
Average goals been really low this year but plenty of games had bundles of chances.  Ronaldo could have easily locked up the golden boot in one game in the group stages.  Plus a lot of keepers had good events (excluding Hart obv).  Think it was as good as several previous events tbh.  Lot of the major teams didn't have great strikers this year either in all time great terms as well.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on July 11, 2016, 09:18:56 PM
From the wiki page on EUFA Championships...


Tournament
Most goals scored in a tournament
108 goals,
2016
Fewest goals scored in a tournament
7 goals, 1968
Fewest goals scored in a tournament (since 1980)
27 goals, 1980
Most goals per match in a tournament
4.75 goals per match, 1976
Most goals per match in a tournament (since 1980)
2.74 goals per match, 2000
Fewest goals per match in a tournament
1.4 goals per match, 1968
Fewest goals per match in a tournament (since 1980)
1.93 goals per match, 1980
Most scorers in a tournament
76, 2016

Most players scoring at least two goals in a tournament
20, 2000
Most players scoring at least three goals in a tournament
8, 2004
Most players scoring at least four goals in a tournament
3, 2000 & 2004
Most players scoring at least five goals in a tournament
2, 2000


You need to choose your statistics :)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: George2Loose on July 11, 2016, 09:22:14 PM
There were more games tho


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: redsimon on July 11, 2016, 09:22:37 PM
Did we expect a feast of attacking football and thrills galore?

When was the last time a major tournament delivered more than a couple of decent games?

2014 WC had, errrm, Germany v Brazil, but not much else.

At least this tourney gave us the feelgood stories of Wales, Iceland and Northern Ireland.
[/quo

I'm with you on this and the supporters of so many teams have had an absolute blast. FWIW I enjoyed loads of games for a variety of reasons but accept there was no exceptional team and last night was a damp squib.

I think it is amusing we look back with dewy eye sentimentality at, say,  1996 yet the knock-out stages were awful. We loved England's progress but there were a distinct lack of goals - 6 in total from the 6 games in the quarters and semis and 4 of those games went to extra-time. By comparison, Euro 2106 delivered 19 goals from the equivalent number of games.

I loved the Brazil World Cup but again there was lots of rubbish.



England 1 - 0 Argentina
Portugal 5 - 3 North Korea
W Germany 4 - 0 Uruguay
Soviet Union 2 - 1 Hungary
Both semi finals were won 2-1 and I make that 22 goals...

and the final had another six including a hat-trick

Will grant that the group games were dour at times but the tournament averaged >2.5 goals per game. Plus, North Korea :)




1996 not 1966! :)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on July 11, 2016, 09:26:14 PM
Did we expect a feast of attacking football and thrills galore?

When was the last time a major tournament delivered more than a couple of decent games?

2014 WC had, errrm, Germany v Brazil, but not much else.

At least this tourney gave us the feelgood stories of Wales, Iceland and Northern Ireland.
[/quo

I'm with you on this and the supporters of so many teams have had an absolute blast. FWIW I enjoyed loads of games for a variety of reasons but accept there was no exceptional team and last night was a damp squib.

I think it is amusing we look back with dewy eye sentimentality at, say,  1996 yet the knock-out stages were awful. We loved England's progress but there were a distinct lack of goals - 6 in total from the 6 games in the quarters and semis and 4 of those games went to extra-time. By comparison, Euro 2106 delivered 19 goals from the equivalent number of games.

I loved the Brazil World Cup but again there was lots of rubbish.



England 1 - 0 Argentina
Portugal 5 - 3 North Korea
W Germany 4 - 0 Uruguay
Soviet Union 2 - 1 Hungary
Both semi finals were won 2-1 and I make that 22 goals...

and the final had another six including a hat-trick

Will grant that the group games were dour at times but the tournament averaged >2.5 goals per game. Plus, North Korea :)




1996 not 1966! :)

LMAO

I'm older than I look you know. Things were so much better when I was a boy.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on July 11, 2016, 09:28:19 PM
Did we expect a feast of attacking football and thrills galore?

When was the last time a major tournament delivered more than a couple of decent games?

2014 WC had, errrm, Germany v Brazil, but not much else.

At least this tourney gave us the feelgood stories of Wales, Iceland and Northern Ireland.
[/quo

I'm with you on this and the supporters of so many teams have had an absolute blast. FWIW I enjoyed loads of games for a variety of reasons but accept there was no exceptional team and last night was a damp squib.

I think it is amusing we look back with dewy eye sentimentality at, say,  1996 yet the knock-out stages were awful. We loved England's progress but there were a distinct lack of goals - 6 in total from the 6 games in the quarters and semis and 4 of those games went to extra-time. By comparison, Euro 2106 delivered 19 goals from the equivalent number of games.

I loved the Brazil World Cup but again there was lots of rubbish.



England 1 - 0 Argentina
Portugal 5 - 3 North Korea
W Germany 4 - 0 Uruguay
Soviet Union 2 - 1 Hungary
Both semi finals were won 2-1 and I make that 22 goals...

and the final had another six including a hat-trick

Will grant that the group games were dour at times but the tournament averaged >2.5 goals per game. Plus, North Korea :)




1996 not 1966! :)

LMAO

I'm older than I look you know. Things were so much better when I was a boy.

LOL  I was about to point out I was talking about Euro 1996 and not 1966.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on July 11, 2016, 10:44:17 PM
Did we expect a feast of attacking football and thrills galore?

When was the last time a major tournament delivered more than a couple of decent games?

2014 WC had, errrm, Germany v Brazil, but not much else.

At least this tourney gave us the feelgood stories of Wales, Iceland and Northern Ireland.

I remember the 2006 World Cup in Germany as a good tournament.  The euros/world cups since have been much of a muchness with 2010 World Cup being especially poor.  However it is possible that 2006 is just far enough back to get a "nostalgia" aspect in my brain which falsely inflates it!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on July 12, 2016, 02:05:15 AM
The last really good tournament was Euro 2000.

Portugal coming from 2 goals down to beat England, England beating Germany then getting screwed by a last minute penalty v Romania.

Spain scoring twice in injury time to beat Yugoslavia 4-3

Holland beating France 3-2

Holland managing to lose the semi-final against Italy by missing 2 penalties against 10 men for an hour.

France's dodgy penalty against Portugal right at the end of extra time in the other semi

France winning the final with an injury time equaliser then a golden goal.

This one had the Viking handclap, Will Grigg's On fire and moths.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 12, 2016, 12:18:29 PM
Euro 2016: A dull tournament? The stats back it up.... http://bbc.in/29zcNFT

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnGiVdBW8AEjh-W.jpg)


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on July 12, 2016, 01:43:21 PM
Euro 2016: A dull tournament? The stats back it up.... http://bbc.in/29zcNFT

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnGiVdBW8AEjh-W.jpg)

Sample size is necessarily small and in any event goals per game isn't a pure measure of the level of entertainment provided.
If you start your graph at 1988 then 2000 looks like an outlier.

I'm not arguing that Euro 2016 was a feast for football fans, clearly it wasn't, but it had drama, heartbreak, disappointment and joyous over-achieving.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Horneris on July 12, 2016, 02:52:33 PM
A big factor in this is obviously the extension from 16 to 24 teams. This meant two things, one was the obvious dilution in quality and the other was regarding the three to qualify in 4 of the groups, meaning teams had less incentive to win matches.

Lots of the smaller nations who don't usually qualify for major comps were very well coached and well organised, i.e. Albania, Northern Ireland, Hungary to a certain extent.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on July 12, 2016, 03:12:33 PM
To be honest, when it comes to the summer if there are 3 international matches every day then I'm happy even if it is a bit stodgy!



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on July 12, 2016, 03:16:54 PM
To be honest, when it comes to the summer if there are 3 international matches every day then I'm happy even if it is a bit stodgy!



Take out Ronaldo how many all time great strikers at the top of their game for all the major countries were actually on show this summer?  Hardly any.   It was a relatively poor quality, but competitive, renewal of the event imo.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on July 12, 2016, 04:30:08 PM
Euro 2016: A dull tournament? The stats back it up.... http://bbc.in/29zcNFT

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnGiVdBW8AEjh-W.jpg)

Sample size is necessarily small and in any event goals per game isn't a pure measure of the level of entertainment provided.
If you start your graph at 1988 then 2000 looks like an outlier.

I'm not arguing that Euro 2016 was a feast for football fans, clearly it wasn't, but it had drama, heartbreak, disappointment and joyous over-achieving.

Every tournament has "drama, heartbreak, disappointment & an over-achiever"


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on July 12, 2016, 04:42:58 PM
To be honest, when it comes to the summer if there are 3 international matches every day then I'm happy even if it is a bit stodgy!



Take out Ronaldo how many all time great strikers at the top of their game for all the major countries were actually on show this summer?  Hardly any.   It was a relatively poor quality, but competitive, renewal of the event imo.

Interesting point about lack of strikers. Ibra is an all-time great but didn't go too well for him. In fact  there were only (I think) 8 players there who had scored 20+ more goals in 1 of the big 5 european leagues in 15/16:

Ronaldo
Ibra
Lewandowski
Muller
Griezmann
Vardy
Kane
Aduriz


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on July 12, 2016, 04:46:18 PM
Euro 2016: A dull tournament? The stats back it up.... http://bbc.in/29zcNFT

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnGiVdBW8AEjh-W.jpg)

Sample size is necessarily small and in any event goals per game isn't a pure measure of the level of entertainment provided.
If you start your graph at 1988 then 2000 looks like an outlier.

I'm not arguing that Euro 2016 was a feast for football fans, clearly it wasn't, but it had drama, heartbreak, disappointment and joyous over-achieving.

What was your favourite tournament for quality and excitement?

Every tournament has "drama, heartbreak, disappointment & an over-achiever"


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: david3103 on July 12, 2016, 07:04:47 PM
Euro 2016: A dull tournament? The stats back it up.... http://bbc.in/29zcNFT

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnGiVdBW8AEjh-W.jpg)

Sample size is necessarily small and in any event goals per game isn't a pure measure of the level of entertainment provided.
If you start your graph at 1988 then 2000 looks like an outlier.

I'm not arguing that Euro 2016 was a feast for football fans, clearly it wasn't, but it had drama, heartbreak, disappointment and joyous over-achieving.

What was your favourite tournament for quality and excitement?

Every tournament has "drama, heartbreak, disappointment & an over-achiever"

Do I have to have one?
I have a number that I'm happy to consign to the dustbin from the perspective of an Englnd fan.
Equally from that perspective, 1966 stands out. But this is sport at a high level, as Aaron so perceptively points out, there is always drama, etc etc. That's what makes sport so special. If players freeze, or indeed rise above their level in that moment that's part of the glorious unpredictability of sporting contests


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: Archer on July 12, 2016, 07:41:12 PM
Euro 2016: A dull tournament? The stats back it up.... http://bbc.in/29zcNFT

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnGiVdBW8AEjh-W.jpg)

Sample size is necessarily small and in any event goals per game isn't a pure measure of the level of entertainment provided.
If you start your graph at 1988 then 2000 looks like an outlier.

I'm not arguing that Euro 2016 was a feast for football fans, clearly it wasn't, but it had drama, heartbreak, disappointment and joyous over-achieving.

What was your favourite tournament for quality and excitement?

Every tournament has "drama, heartbreak, disappointment & an over-achiever"

Do I have to have one?
I have a number that I'm happy to consign to the dustbin from the perspective of an Englnd fan.
Equally from that perspective, 1966 stands out. But this is sport at a high level, as Aaron so perceptively points out, there is always drama, etc etc. That's what makes sport so special. If players freeze, or indeed rise above their level in that moment that's part of the glorious unpredictability of sporting contests


I was asking Aaron but messed up in the quote box:)   

I'm on your side with this and have enjoyed Euro 2106 as a whole and lots of individual  games for different reasons. Others seem to have written it off as being crap.

I was a kid in 66 but  clearly stands out.  My other favourite world cup was probably Argentina in 78 - engrossed in the atmosphere of it all. Only 16 teams back then and no England.





Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on July 12, 2016, 07:48:01 PM
To be honest, when it comes to the summer if there are 3 international matches every day then I'm happy even if it is a bit stodgy!



Take out Ronaldo how many all time great strikers at the top of their game for all the major countries were actually on show this summer?  Hardly any.   It was a relatively poor quality, but competitive, renewal of the event imo.

Interesting point about lack of strikers. Ibra is an all-time great but didn't go too well for him. In fact  there were only (I think) 8 players there who had scored 20+ more goals in 1 of the big 5 european leagues in 15/16:

Ronaldo
Ibra
Lewandowski
Muller
Griezmann
Vardy
Kane
Aduriz

Good work from Hodgson to have 20% of the 20 goal men and still not have a clue what his best formation was by the abysmal exit!


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: nirvana on July 12, 2016, 08:06:08 PM
I only pay games around 70% attention these days, watched like that the whole thing seemed pretty deece to me - wonder if other countries viewed it the same way.

England crap as usual and far from playing without enough passion (commentator and pundit bollocks) they play with too much. If they were cool and good at football that would be a massive step in the right direction

Think people are way too concerned about goals per game and that sort of stuff - really enjoyed the final.  Not (m)any  games spent screaming at refs or players too much for specially ridic play acting. Only screaming reserved for the inane commentators banging on and on - half the time about games being boring...yah, cause you don't get football you mug



Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: aaron1867 on July 13, 2016, 04:26:39 AM
I'm not sure what you was asking Archer? I enjoyed Euro 2016, but I was expecting a lot better. I suspect if we all bet on 0-0 being the half time score in each match, we would all have had a very profitable tournament. Many of the games was drab, quite a few goals was down to comedy goalkeeping too! Could you name 3 really good matches at the tournament? The only really good game for goals I can remember was. Portugal v Hungary.

Away from that, will be happy to be Big Sam as manager of England. I think we really need to go back to basics and if it's long balls upto Kane to get us into QF's, SF's and beyond, then so be it.


Title: Re: Euro 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 13, 2016, 09:05:19 AM
the argument for big samuel

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnM0sofWcAEPKKP.jpg)