blonde poker forum

Community Forums => Betting Tips and Sport Discussion => Topic started by: TightEnd on March 23, 2016, 03:36:33 PM



Title: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on March 23, 2016, 03:36:33 PM
thought i would kick this off ahead of the draft and with free agency in full swing

this was announced today

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CePX1BxUMAAfcYY.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: MattyHollis on March 23, 2016, 03:44:30 PM
Looking forward to Rams hard knocks - should be quality!

Not so pleased with hearing that the kickoff returns will now start from the 25 yard line though! :(


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on March 23, 2016, 04:43:56 PM
Oakland to make the playoffs this year.

Let's just get that in on page 1.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ForthThistle on March 23, 2016, 05:33:35 PM
Cannot Wait.!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on March 24, 2016, 01:07:00 AM

Not so pleased with hearing that the kickoff returns will now start from the 25 yard line though! :(

Agree. Hazard a guess it's designed to reduce the run backs and associated injuries that have been very prevalent past couple of years.
As a Bears fan, free agency bee very good for us imo.

Tickets for Wembley & Twickenham purchased at start of year


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on March 24, 2016, 07:39:54 AM
I've bumped the Fantasy League thread to coincide with this.  If anyone fancies giving it a go for the first time, then post a message on that thread please.

http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=54617.0


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on March 24, 2016, 02:36:53 PM

Not so pleased with hearing that the kickoff returns will now start from the 25 yard line though! :(

Agree. Hazard a guess it's designed to reduce the run backs and associated injuries that have been very prevalent past couple of years.


It's designed to do that, but will it?

If I was Special Teams coach, I'd now want all my kickoffs to land inside the 5 so that the touchback isn't an option unless the return team lets the ball bounce, which obviously means a risk of it not bouncing into the end zone. Probably get better average field position that way, plus the opportunity to force a fumble on the return. I'd also be going for an onside kick any time there's a 15 yard penalty enforced on the kickoff, because the difference in average field position between a failed onside kick and a touchback is maybe 10-12 yards now. If coaches use their brains, it should actually mean LESS touchbacks, and more onside kicks.

Knowing how risk averse NFL coaches are though, absolutely nothing will change. Just means more tilt at game theory fails for me watching games next year.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 24, 2016, 07:44:35 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeVajofWAAAlst6.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: fatcatstu on March 24, 2016, 08:19:45 PM
Down at Wembley for Colts v Jags, which just so happens to fall on the day of my birthday. Thats not going to be messy at all.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 27, 2016, 10:27:44 AM
If they want to eliminate injuries on kick returns then they may as well just stsrt at the 25 instead of going for half measures, shame as a fan i enjoy kick returns.

Have got tickets for the Bengals match at wembley in October, cant wait! Even though they only have one WR, will be an interesting and vital draft for them, hooefully be taking one of the top WR kids although have also seen some thinking theyll take offensive line. Bengals never do much in free agency so not too fussed about the lack of signings so far.

Still 30odd days till the drsft and im already looking forward to the season!

Unfortunately i think the Steelers may reach the showpiece this year, especially if Lev Bell stays fit.

Texans have signed well although i think Brock is a risk, Jags again have signed well although Ivory being there has ruined him and Yeldon for fantasy. Shoukd be an interesting season

Definitely want to get in the fantasy league on here this year too.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on March 28, 2016, 10:55:57 AM
If they want to eliminate injuries on kick returns then they may as well just stsrt at the 25 instead of going for half measures, shame as a fan i enjoy kick returns.

Have got tickets for the Bengals match at wembley in October, cant wait! Even though they only have one WR, will be an interesting and vital draft for them, hooefully be taking one of the top WR kids although have also seen some thinking theyll take offensive line. Bengals never do much in free agency so not too fussed about the lack of signings so far.

Still 30odd days till the drsft and im already looking forward to the season!

Unfortunately i think the Steelers may reach the showpiece this year, especially if Lev Bell stays fit.

Texans have signed well although i think Brock is a risk, Jags again have signed well although Ivory being there has ruined him and Yeldon for fantasy. Shoukd be an interesting season

Definitely want to get in the fantasy league on here this year too.
If lafell and dansby sign this week I expect bengals go b.p.a first 2 rounds then look at need 3-7.Think a lot of u d f a get a shot at wr in camp this year with Alford and kumerow (burkhead in the slot?)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on March 29, 2016, 07:01:20 PM
Quickfire question for you: with the first overall pick, the Tennessee Titans will:

A) Draft the superb, Seahawks-esque Cornerback Jalen Ramsey
B) Draft the monstrous Offensive Tackle Laremy Tunsil to protect its franchise Quarterback
C) Trade down to a team desperate for one of the above and take the best available.

Short of a really great offer (Washington, this is usually where you come in), B seems like a no-brainer to me. They drafted a tackle last season who can switch to the right. They've brought in a good running back and have a division that will be bolstering its defenses. Tunsil looks every bit an NFL starter.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 29, 2016, 07:24:41 PM
Quickfire question for you: with the first overall pick, the Tennessee Titans will:

A) Draft the superb, Seahawks-esque Cornerback Jalen Ramsey
B) Draft the monstrous Offensive Tackle Laremy Tunsil to protect its franchise Quarterback
C) Trade down to a team desperate for one of the above and take the best available.

Short of a really great offer (Washington, this is usually where you come in), B seems like a no-brainer to me. They drafted a tackle last season who can switch to the right. They've brought in a good running back and have a division that will be bolstering its defenses. Tunsil looks every bit an NFL starter.

b probably, Ramsey looks to go 2 or 3. couple of quarterbacks in the top ten too. 49ers might be trading into top 5 for one of them

i saw a comparison to ramsey as charles woodson. that would be some career. don't think you can go wrong with tunsil or ramsey but keeping mariota upright probably wins out

only a month away


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: DungBeetle on March 29, 2016, 07:34:51 PM
As a fledgling fan is there anywhere to see a summary of the free agency moves ahead of the draft?  Or someone willing to post the key moves so far would be great.  Cheers!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 29, 2016, 07:37:43 PM
As a fledgling fan is there anywhere to see a summary of the free agency moves ahead of the draft?  Or someone willing to post the key moves so far would be great.  Cheers!

biggest deals at top

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on March 29, 2016, 08:18:45 PM
Quickfire question for you: with the first overall pick, the Tennessee Titans will:

A) Draft the superb, Seahawks-esque Cornerback Jalen Ramsey
B) Draft the monstrous Offensive Tackle Laremy Tunsil to protect its franchise Quarterback
C) Trade down to a team desperate for one of the above and take the best available.

Short of a really great offer (Washington, this is usually where you come in), B seems like a no-brainer to me. They drafted a tackle last season who can switch to the right. They've brought in a good running back and have a division that will be bolstering its defenses. Tunsil looks every bit an NFL starter.

As a Titans fan (I know - start following the NFL in the McNair, George era) I really hope we stick and pick Tunsil. We've seen what Murray can do behind a good offensive line in Dallas and establishing a decent ground game will allow Mariota to develop a potentially exciting relationship with Dorial Green-Beckham - convinced he's going to be a stud. Also, protecting Mariota from JJ Watt twice a year isn't going to do any harm - Zach Mettenberger never really recovered from the beat down JJ put on him two years ago thanks to a revolving door offensive line.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on March 31, 2016, 10:18:31 AM
I don't know too much about the NFL, I watch it, I have small bets I try and play some fantasy for fun but overall my knowledge would be well below par. 

That said, I did like what I seen of Brock Osweiler when he came in for Peyton last season, so with the retirement of #18 I am surprised to see that he has moved.   I'd have thought he was a shoe-in to be the starter in Denver this coming season.   

What happens now with Denver do they draft a QB?  Aren't they going to be last to pick does that mean they will struggle to pick up one of the better QB's? 



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 31, 2016, 10:39:58 AM
He was a free agent

His relationship soured with the team when he was benched for Manning mid game towards the end of the season. check out you tube for his reaction on the bench

So Denver made a good offer to keep him but he chose to go elsewhere. obviously Houston have a lot of potential, but haven't had a quarterback for years

Denver have been investigating the free agent market (and Kaepernick, most publically) and are widely assumed to want to draft Paxton Lynch at 31 in the draft, the 3rd ranking qb in the draft

they may need to trade up to get him as multiple teams will be looking to trade back into the back end of the first round to leapfrog Denver

expect them to go into 2016-2017 with a free agent vet, a rookie to back up and rely on that defense again to keep them competitive

with oakland making huge strides, the chiefs very solid its going to be one of the tougher divisions next year


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: PokerBroker on March 31, 2016, 10:43:33 AM
Excellent thanks, Just stumbled across this and it makes sense and confirms your thoughts. 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/jason-la-canfora/25536095/heres-why-john-elway-is-right-not-to-panic-over-broncos-qb-situation

I think I might lend my support to the Jags this year.   I love having no emotional tie to the NFL so I don't feel bad chopping and changing. 


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on March 31, 2016, 01:32:25 PM
Excellent thanks, Just stumbled across this and it makes sense and confirms your thoughts. 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/jason-la-canfora/25536095/heres-why-john-elway-is-right-not-to-panic-over-broncos-qb-situation

I think I might lend my support to the Jags this year.   I love having no emotional tie to the NFL so I don't feel bad chopping and changing. 

No bad thing supporting Jags if you already have a team. Get to see them every year in London too.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on March 31, 2016, 01:42:22 PM
I don't know too much about the NFL, I watch it, I have small bets I try and play some fantasy for fun but overall my knowledge would be well below par. 

That said, I did like what I seen of Brock Osweiler when he came in for Peyton last season, so with the retirement of #18 I am surprised to see that he has moved.   I'd have thought he was a shoe-in to be the starter in Denver this coming season.   

What happens now with Denver do they draft a QB?  Aren't they going to be last to pick does that mean they will struggle to pick up one of the better QB's? 



Denver acquired Mark Sanchez from Philly in a trade when they realised Ossie might be on his way. Not really the QB you want starting for you if you can help it but probably in the top half of back up QB's. If they are going to get Kap it seems likely to be soon as his salary is gtd at about 11 million with San Fran if he is on the roster on April 1st. In terms of starting calibrate QB that isn't really a lot of money, think Bradfird signed for about 18 million a year and Ryan Fitzpatrick who is playing a cute game of chess with the Jets at the mo wants 16 million ( well that's his starting negotiating number so he will really be looking for slightly less). If Denver don't get Kap then Fitz would seem to be the next logical target. After that it is probably a case of drafting a QB and seeing if they beat out Sanchez for the starting job over the summer.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 31, 2016, 03:18:11 PM
They won the Superbowl with statistically the worst QB in the league last season, so while losing Osweiler and Manning at the same time might seem bad, it really doesn't matter that much, they just need someone to steer the ship as Manning did when he came back.

Iiirc Osweiler has gone for $17m a year, and he hardly proved himself in his time at Denver, they obviously felt it a worthwhile risk, and as stated he apparently wasn't best pleased at being replaced by Manning during the run to the SB.

Sanchez is by no means great, but is he a step down from what we've seen so far from Osweiler? and does it really matter?

Fitz is 33, has had one good season, making the apparent $16m a year seem rather high, although I do think he deserves more than the $7m that the Jets who have offered, which is frankly pretty insulting given that he was a starter last season, and you'd assume will be again.

However as said above, I would expect a move to be made for someone else to come in whether FA or Drafted


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on April 02, 2016, 11:02:20 AM
Sanchez is by no means great, but is he a step down from what we've seen so far from Osweiler? and does it really matter?

Yes, and yes. Although he looked a solid backup in Philly in 2014 and some Philly fans wanted him to start over Bradford last year, but when Bradford eventually got injured he came in and totally sucked. I still remember the red zone pick in the 4th quarter of the game Bradford got injured in when down by 1 or 2 points, and it's right up there for most boneheaded QB play by someone not called Colin Kaepernick last season. He's just far too inconsistent, really doesn't complement the Broncos' defence at all to have such an errant QB who is likely to give away points/field position at any moment. The Broncos don't need a great QB by any stretch, but they do need someone who isn't going to turn the football over. Their defence can win games 9-7, 7-6 if that's what it takes, but that's no good if the other team are able to score on defence, or are already in field goal range when they get the ball back. When Peyton Manning came back into the starting lineup last year, him not turning the ball over was a huge deal. And Sanchez can't be a game manager.

The Broncos play Carolina and NE next year @ Mile High. NE is HUGE because #1 seed implications, lose that and you're a game behind the Pats, which basically becomes 1.5 games as the Pats will almost certainly have the division record tiebreaker because LOL AFC EAST. Lose that and the road to the Superbowl for the Broncos goes through Foxborough. All of a sudden, getting to the Superbowl just became a whole lot tougher. And Denver ain't beating Carolina in a million years with Sanchez at QB, either.

If they start dropping games in the division to the Raiders and Chiefs too, which they easily could with Sanchez at QB against a quality Chiefs D, and a Raiders D that ain't too shabby either, then they're in big trouble. AFCN has 3 teams that could all potentially win 12 games if they didn't have to play each other IMO, but is usually a lock for 1 of the wildcard spots at 10-6 or 11-5. Assuming AFCN is lock for 1 wildcard spot, that leaves 1 more, and you'd favour whichever one of Houston/Indy doesn't win the division for that because they get to play the Titans/Jags twice, whereas even the Chargers in the AFCW aren't an easy game. (Yes, I know the Jags are no pushovers, but they're probably an easier game than the 3rd best team in the AFCW)

I think if the Broncos go 10-6 and don't win the division, they'll struggle to even make the playoffs. And if they're to get to the Superbowl, that game against New England in the regular season becomes an absolute must win. Really is Superbowl 50.5 in terms of importance to both teams IMO. You ain't beating New England with Mark Sanchez lol.

======
======

IMO, the key to the Broncos QB situation in 2016 is actually a guy who a lot of people probably hasn't even heard of, Trevor Siemian. Was the 3rd string QB behind Manning and Osweiler in his rookie year, but everything coming out of Denver about him in recent memory seems to suggest that the coaches think pretty highly of him.

It's very unlikely he's going to have a chance to start in Week 1 this year. However, everything I've read about his development makes it sound like the Broncos are pretty impressed with him so far. I don't know whether that translates into him seeing any meaningful snaps any time this year, but the impression I get is that if his development continues then could he potentially start further down the line.

If so, then that affects free agency decisions. If you think Siemian has a decent chance to start any time soon (This season, or start of 2017), then you're probably better off holding on to a 1st/2nd round draft pick that you might use on Glennon/Rookie and maybe going after someone else to compete with Sanchez/Siemian for a conditional pick (Or maybe pick up McCown to start if the Browns cut him after they signed RG3).

The other option is trading to get Mike Glennon. However, if you think Siemian is anywhere in the picture going forwards, why would you spend probably a high draft pick to trade for Glennon, then have to pay him next year, when you can keep the draft pick AND Siemian is on a rookie contract for 3 more years, allowing you to keep a couple of extra players on the roster. Basically, if the Broncos don't do anything exciting at QB, I think it means that Siemian is going to be the guy in the medium/long term.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 14, 2016, 03:22:42 PM
well well well

the rams love one of the quarterbacks then

the titans get a lot of picks to build around mariota

* throws half an article out the window *

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CgAXK1FXIAIusCV.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 14, 2016, 06:16:41 PM
Wonder where Tunsil ends up after the Rams Titans trade..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 14, 2016, 06:17:27 PM
Wonder where Tunsil ends up after the Rams Titans trade..

3 chargers?

4 cowboys? 4 somewhere else?

not much lower than that


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 14, 2016, 06:28:15 PM
If the Browns don't fancy Goff reckon hue Jackson might trade down.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 14, 2016, 06:42:53 PM
i am coming round to thinking it might go qb, qb

rams QB at 1

eagles or 49ers trade with browns to get 1 at 2. eagles were trying to get to 1 apprently and have been all over scouting quarterbacks

maybe then lynch goes top 10 too

browns, like titans, then get a lot of picks to rebuild a roster.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 14, 2016, 06:56:30 PM
Gut feeling for your Cowboys.Ramsey Bosa maybe?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 14, 2016, 06:59:15 PM
Schedule out tonight bet we get steelers game 4 for burficts return.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 14, 2016, 07:07:05 PM
Rips up colour coded, finely tuned mock draft.

Gets fresh piece of paper.

Gets scribbling...

I am amazed so many people have been saying the Rams will take Wentz. They need Goff IMO and he ticks the additional box of being a California boy with all the marketing that brings for a franchise moving to LA.

Makes far more sense that the Niners, Eagles and Jets wanted Goff (or at least might have wanted Goff) and the Rams made the call they simply had to make to get their man. It's a superb piece of business for Tennessee but it could work out well for LA, too.

I was all for the Titans taking Tunsil but this deal is too good to reject. That AFC South is really turning around, at long last.

As for Cleveland, I say trade down in what isn't a stellar QB year and run with RG3, with a developmental guy underneath for one year. They can take Best Available without even the smallest fear of trouble. Any of RB/WR/DE/OT/DL/S would do! More picks this year would make sense. Not like they won't be drafting top ten next season is it?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: LeKnave on April 14, 2016, 08:40:10 PM
Makes me laugh seeing all the journos seeming to think the decision hasn't been made on which one to draft.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 15, 2016, 03:53:51 PM
Would be nice to have a home opener,7th straight season starting on the road.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 15, 2016, 03:55:40 PM
Gut feeling for your Cowboys.Ramsey Bosa maybe?

i wanted one of the QBs, which are likely to go 1 and 2 now

Lynch may still be a possibility maybe with a trade down. depends how highlty they rate him (word is very high)

Ramsey if he is there, maybe Zeke Elliott would be my favourite 2 non QBs


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ChipRich on April 15, 2016, 08:04:54 PM
http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=66859.0

Please see above thread.

About a trip i'm planning this year. Anyone with any experience of the places mentioned or games and what to do/not to do would be great.

Thanks


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 15, 2016, 08:24:00 PM
The Von Miller v Cam Newton love in just gets better and better.

(http://cdn.chatsports.com/cache/65/bb/65bb2453b95ea1f90396e5456234b7cb-original.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Graham C on April 15, 2016, 09:01:31 PM
Any ideas when the pre-season game are announced?  Hoping for 49'ers or Oakland in August!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ChipRich on April 15, 2016, 09:11:19 PM
Cant see them on NFL site, but searched and found this

Hopefully its correct!

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/schedules/preseason


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Graham C on April 15, 2016, 11:05:43 PM
Cheers.  The LA game may work, think we'll have left SF by the 14th.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 18, 2016, 07:35:02 PM
A nice article, explaining just what a mess the Bills are in:

http://www.theherdreport.com/posts/2016/4/14/why-the-2016-offseason-is-so-pivotal-for-the-buffalo-bills

In other news, Rob Ryan sleeps at the office three nights a week and Rex Ryan is introducing Donald Trump tonight.  

Any good QBs lined up for the 2017 Draft?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 20, 2016, 08:23:27 PM
eagles have traded for 2nd overall pick while maintaining bradford is starting QB and wont be traded

who are the eagles after cause it seems a big price to pay

http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/article-1/Eagles-Acquire-No-2-Pick-From-Browns/0dc948c1-5d70-4725-a361-c34452054855


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 20, 2016, 08:37:52 PM
eagles have traded for 2nd overall pick while maintaining bradford is starting QB and wont be traded

who are the eagles after cause it seems a big price to pay

http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/article-1/Eagles-Acquire-No-2-Pick-From-Browns/0dc948c1-5d70-4725-a361-c34452054855

They are convinced they know who the Rams are taking (they say...)

They are drafting "the guy we want" and he will be the number 2 to Bradford, who they say won't be traded to Denver.

Sell the house for a backup quarterback. That is a month after you spent $20m on Chase Daniels. You sure Chip Kelly has left?

Joking aside, Bradford will be tradeable at the end of the coming season and, if it all falls into place, Wentz will be ready to go. The problem is Bradford doesn't have a lot of working body parts.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 20, 2016, 08:40:57 PM
Second time in the last 40 years the top two picks were traded.

Makes you wonder why Dallas lost all those games at the end of last season. These teams do realise Winston and Mariota were last year, right?

There's a real possibility now that Ezekiel Elliot will be available still win the Raiders are on the clock. I think that could be a very exciting pairing.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 20, 2016, 09:07:34 PM
Zeke is going top 10, maybe at 4. Won't last to dolphins or raiders, would need to trade up


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 20, 2016, 09:14:46 PM
Bradford is on a lot of money too (17m) so that could put people off if he doesn't have a good season this time around.

Seems probable that Goff goes to the Rams which means Eagles will get Wentz (although reports seem to suggest he's the better Qb I can't argue with the inside the huddle podcast that Goff fits the LA franchise image a lot more being a Califronia kid anyway.

Either way the Eagles must be fairly taken on both of them on the off chance that the Rams go for the other.

I'd be amazed if Zeke drops down to the Raiders. As said he should be going top 10.

Ironically I think this move actually helps the 49ers as they've got far more issues than just a Qb they cab go BPA get a solid first round pick and a few others and draft a Qb in the top 10 next year too.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 20, 2016, 09:49:01 PM
Zeke is going top 10, maybe at 4. Won't last to dolphins or raiders, would need to trade up

You surely take Ramsey at 4? Arguably the best player in the draft in the area you're weakest. He could go to Miami, although they need cover for their ageing defensive superstars. Dodd or Lawson if available would make sense.

Matt Miller's latest 10:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CggVUSKWwAAc2oo.jpg)

Don't agree with the pick at 3. Ravens would be delighted to get Tunsil. He won't get past Jacksonville if he didn't end up in San Diego.

Think the 49ers have 12 picks this year. Even Chip Kelly should be able to find someone he won't fall out with out of that lot.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on April 20, 2016, 10:09:41 PM
Second time in the last 40 years the top two picks were traded.

Makes you wonder why Dallas lost all those games at the end of last season. These teams do realise Winston and Mariota were last year, right?

There's a real possibility now that Ezekiel Elliot will be available still win the Raiders are on the clock. I think that could be a very exciting pairing.

We have Latavius Murray already, so think it's pretty unlikely we take a RB at 14. I would be okay with it if we did take him, as he'd probably be the best player on the board if he falls that far, and I can see what adding a second quality RB would do for us even though it's not a need that we have to fill at this point in the draft. Giants @ 10 seems a very plausible landing spot even though they have other needs too, and Dolphins don't have Lamar Miller any more cos he's gone to the Texans. So if he gets past the Dolphins who are immediately above us, I'll be amazed. Would be totally okay with taking him at 14 if the opportunity arose, but it's very unlikely he gets to 14, and it's not that likely we take him there if he does.

Much more likely we draft on defence, probably at Linebacker. Aldon Smith I think is suspended for the whole of next year as it stands, and we cut Curtis Lofton too. We picked up Bruce Irvin but I'd still like to see us take an OLB, especially if we plan on using Khalil Mack at DE a lot again next year then we could use a really good "backup" OLB who will get significant playing time. Reggie Ragland is a decent option to replace Curtis Lofton in the middle, too, and would probably be my pick.

If we don't take a linebacker then we'll probably get a Corner or Safety. We need to find someone to 'replace' Charles Woodson, and D.J. Hayden hasn't lived up to expectations for a first round pick at CB either. Looking at some of the teams above us though, I expect a few CBs going off the board early. Is the 4th best corner in the draft the best way to use the 14th pick? Would expect there to be better value for the pick at other positions, then grab a corner in the 2nd round.

We'll probably pick up a couple of RBs later on and pick up some undrafted free agents though, the depth chart is pretty grim after Latavius Murray. We'll probably use a 3rd/4th on a RB who'll be pencilled in as the backup, then bring in a couple of UFAs to compete for the job/roster spots in preseason.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 20, 2016, 11:15:06 PM
Second time in the last 40 years the top two picks were traded.

Makes you wonder why Dallas lost all those games at the end of last season. These teams do realise Winston and Mariota were last year, right?

There's a real possibility now that Ezekiel Elliot will be available still win the Raiders are on the clock. I think that could be a very exciting pairing.

We have Latavius Murray already, so think it's pretty unlikely we take a RB at 14. I would be okay with it if we did take him, as he'd probably be the best player on the board if he falls that far, and I can see what adding a second quality RB would do for us even though it's not a need that we have to fill at this point in the draft. Giants @ 10 seems a very plausible landing spot even though they have other needs too, and Dolphins don't have Lamar Miller any more cos he's gone to the Texans. So if he gets past the Dolphins who are immediately above us, I'll be amazed. Would be totally okay with taking him at 14 if the opportunity arose, but it's very unlikely he gets to 14, and it's not that likely we take him there if he does.

Much more likely we draft on defence, probably at Linebacker. Aldon Smith I think is suspended for the whole of next year as it stands, and we cut Curtis Lofton too. We picked up Bruce Irvin but I'd still like to see us take an OLB, especially if we plan on using Khalil Mack at DE a lot again next year then we could use a really good "backup" OLB who will get significant playing time. Reggie Ragland is a decent option to replace Curtis Lofton in the middle, too, and would probably be my pick.

If we don't take a linebacker then we'll probably get a Corner or Safety. We need to find someone to 'replace' Charles Woodson, and D.J. Hayden hasn't lived up to expectations for a first round pick at CB either. Looking at some of the teams above us though, I expect a few CBs going off the board early. Is the 4th best corner in the draft the best way to use the 14th pick? Would expect there to be better value for the pick at other positions, then grab a corner in the 2nd round.

We'll probably pick up a couple of RBs later on and pick up some undrafted free agents though, the depth chart is pretty grim after Latavius Murray. We'll probably use a 3rd/4th on a RB who'll be pencilled in as the backup, then bring in a couple of UFAs to compete for the job/roster spots in preseason.

It's not likely, I grant you, but stranger things have happened. If he's still on the board when you're on the clock, it's a no brainer to take Zeke. Giants should take him but they are a barmy bunch. And yes I backed them last year!

A good third down back is exactly what Carr needs and I trust the Raiders right now to make good decisions. Haven't said that in a while!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 21, 2016, 08:07:24 AM
What time does the draft start and is it on tv?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Newportlad on April 21, 2016, 10:18:47 AM
What time does the draft start and is it on tv?

The last couple of years, the draft has been shown live on Sky Sports. Will start around 0100 I think.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 21, 2016, 11:00:34 AM
sky should cover the first round

www.nfl.com stream nfl network free for the three days


Thursday 28th 8pm ET: The first round

Friday 29th 7pm ET: The Second and third rounds

Saturday 30th Noon ET: Fourth to seventh rounds


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 23, 2016, 09:07:33 PM

NFL – Verified account ‏@NFL

"The San Diego @Chargers could likely trade out of the #3 overall pick."  http://snpy.tv/1Sqr9Vq
11:45 a.m. - 23 Apr 2016


This is getting silly now...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: fatcatstu on April 25, 2016, 08:26:44 PM
Brady's 4 game ban has been reinstated by the Supreme Appeals Court in America.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 25, 2016, 08:34:14 PM
Any mock draft competitions about? Anyone know of good sites for it running comps?

Tighty has piqued my interest with his 2004 boss moding. I fancy Darvin Mooning my way to the place money.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 25, 2016, 08:47:45 PM
Ourlads.com


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 25, 2016, 09:39:12 PM
Ourlads.com

Seven rounds?! That's an awful lot of research.

Anything nearer one round?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 25, 2016, 09:44:16 PM
Check nfl.com


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 27, 2016, 12:22:34 AM
Tal's mock draft (subject to fourteen more versions in the next 48 hours):

1. LA - Goff - QB
2. PHI - Wentz - QB
3. SD - Tunsil - OL
4. DAL - Bosa - DE
5. JAX - Ramsey - CB/S
6. BAL - Bucknor - DE
7. SF - Stanley - OT

Trade alert! Oakland and Cleveland trade picks.

8. OAK - Elliott - RB
9. TB - Hargreaves - CB
10. NYG - Floyd - OLB
11. CHI - Lawson - DE
12. NO - Lynch - QB
13. MIA - Apple - CB
14. CLE - Jack - LB
15. TEN - Conklin - OT
16. DET - Robinson - DT
17. ATL - Ragland - LB
18. IND - Decker - OT
19. BUF - Reed - DT
20. NYJ - Dodd - DE
21. WAS - (Ryan) Kelly - C
22. HOU - Coleman - WR
23. MIN - Treadwell - WR
24. CIN - Ogbah - DE
25. PIT - Jackson III - CB
26. SEA - Ifedi - OT
27. GB - Lee - LB
28. KC - Rankins - DT
29. ARI - Joseph - S
30. CAR - Spriggs - OT
31. DEN - Whitehair - OG

Anyone else fancy posting theirs?

Any views on the list above? Marks out of 31?

I can see a trade or two in the 17-24 range, as teams vie for particular players, but I am struggling to see where, based on the order as I've done it. As played, I think that stays as it is.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 27, 2016, 07:55:44 AM
Best prices for the Superb Owl:

15/2 Seattle Seahawks
9/1 New England Patriots
9/1 Carolina Panthers
12/1 Pittsburgh Steelers
12/1 Green Bay Packers
14/1 Arizona Cardinals
16/1 Cincinnati Bengals
18/1 Denver Broncos
25/1 bar

Seahawks favourite? The three teams below them in this list should win their divisions. Seattle will struggle to win 11 games and might not make the cut. What's the bookies' reasoning?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 27, 2016, 10:08:40 AM
Tal, most versions i submit are no trades but as you have done trades

1. LA - Goff - QB
2. PHI - Wentz - QB
3. SD - Buckner - DE
4. DAL - Ramsey CB/S
5. JAX - Bosa - DE
6. BAL - Tunsil - OT
7. Trade MIA Elliott - RB.
8. Trade OAK - Hargreaves - CB
9. TB - Stanley -OT
10. NYG - Floyd -OLB
11. CHI - Apple - CB
12. NO - Rankins - DT
13. SF - Lawson - DE
14. CLE - Ragland - LB
15. TEN - Conklin -OT
16. DET - Decker -OT
17. ATL - Jack - LB
18. IND - Jackson - CB
19. BUF - Lee - LB
20. trade DEN - Lynch- QB
21. WAS - Kelly - C
22. HOU - Coleman - WR
23. MIN - Treadwell - WR
24. CIN - Doctson - WR
25. PIT - Ragland LB
26. SEA - Whitehair - OG
27. GB - Robinson - DT
28. KC- Fuller - WR
29. ARI - Joseph - S
30. CAR - Alexander- CB
31. NYJ - Cook QB


fancy a competition?

1 points for getting a first round pick
upgrade to 3 points first round pick to right team

winner buys the other a cuppa next time we meet?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 27, 2016, 10:41:09 AM
Go on then.

:D

I'll get my Dante Fowler shoes ready to watch it on Friday morning.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on April 27, 2016, 11:49:28 AM
If Tunsil is still there at 5 I think the Titans will try and move back up.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on April 27, 2016, 05:50:56 PM
Terrible news...

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_FfrVqHXbw

RIP First Take  :'(


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 27, 2016, 05:56:17 PM
thank heavens for that

horrific pundit, terrible show

unlucky Fox sports, dumbing down coming your way.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 27, 2016, 06:06:42 PM
thank heavens for that

horrific pundit, terrible show

unlucky Fox sports, dumbing down coming your way.

All those ESPN shows where they argue black is white for the sake of a debate like Around the Horn or Pardon the Interruption are garbage...

But Stephen A v Skip is by far the best


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 27, 2016, 06:59:19 PM
thank heavens for that

horrific pundit, terrible show

unlucky Fox sports, dumbing down coming your way.

All those ESPN shows where they argue black is white for the sake of a debate like Around the Horn or Pardon the Interruption are garbage...

But Stephen A v Skip is by far the best

Pardon The Interuption is fantastic!

Wilbon and Kornheiser >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Smith and Bayless.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 27, 2016, 08:04:58 PM
thank heavens for that

horrific pundit, terrible show

unlucky Fox sports, dumbing down coming your way.

All those ESPN shows where they argue black is white for the sake of a debate like Around the Horn or Pardon the Interruption are garbage...

But Stephen A v Skip is by far the best

Pardon The Interuption is fantastic!

Wilbon and Kornheiser >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Smith and Bayless.

The cringiest part is always whenever these shows have to discuss soccerball. At least Steven A has the decency to say he has no idea about the sport. It'd be like me offering punditry on ice hockey (and calling it ice hockey) because I used to play some game on the megadrive 20 years ago.

Letterman, America's Parkie, looks baffled as John Oliver explains the football league system to him:

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJZEcneHZNY

Camel, how would you price up Tal v Tighty in a Draft-off?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 28, 2016, 09:39:26 AM
Best prices for the Superb Owl:

15/2 Seattle Seahawks
9/1 New England Patriots
9/1 Carolina Panthers
12/1 Pittsburgh Steelers
12/1 Green Bay Packers
14/1 Arizona Cardinals
16/1 Cincinnati Bengals
18/1 Denver Broncos
25/1 bar

Seahawks favourite? The three teams below them in this list should win their divisions. Seattle will struggle to win 11 games and might not make the cut. What's the bookies' reasoning?

Was hoping the Steelers would be bigger. Hurts to say it but I think they'll get there this year. Unfortunately don't think the Bengals will do too well this season, the Ravens won't be that bad again. Steelers are a very good team. And Bengals schedule isn't the easiest either apart from no East coast matches which helps


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 28, 2016, 11:29:26 AM
thank heavens for that

horrific pundit, terrible show

unlucky Fox sports, dumbing down coming your way.

All those ESPN shows where they argue black is white for the sake of a debate like Around the Horn or Pardon the Interruption are garbage...

But Stephen A v Skip is by far the best

Pardon The Interuption is fantastic!

Wilbon and Kornheiser >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Smith and Bayless.

The cringiest part is always whenever these shows have to discuss soccerball. At least Steven A has the decency to say he has no idea about the sport. It'd be like me offering punditry on ice hockey (and calling it ice hockey) because I used to play some game on the megadrive 20 years ago.

Letterman, America's Parkie, looks baffled as John Oliver explains the football league system to him:

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJZEcneHZNY

Camel, how would you price up Tal v Tighty in a Draft-off?

Incredible as it may seem, the NFL draft bewilders me as much British football bewilders Letterman.

In your respective lists, I know a little about maybe 8 players (that might be an exaggeration!) and I've heard the names of about half.

Studying the draft would involve listening extensively to the views of Kiper and Mayock, who would be in my top 5 most annoying analysts of any sport.

I will watch the start of tonight's coverage only because I've got a bet on who the first player drafted is and apart from that, I will read all the analysis of how each team drafted after the event.

The whole hoopla of the event mystifies me by somewhat, I would rather study a class 6 handicap at Bath, than try to work out which LB Buffalo will draft in the 3rd round.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 28, 2016, 11:36:25 AM
you don't have to listen to Kiper and Mayock

a lot of the local guys just as knowledgable, closer to the teams

its like a giant game theory puzzle, as fascinating to me as when i first discovered it around 2002

as an individual, nothing better than watching some film (not even the coaches film but a college game or a highlights package) deciding you think Randy Mcrunningback from Nebraska is going to be the next big thing and following him from an 18yo  freshman to the NFL, seeing where he is picked etc


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 28, 2016, 12:01:47 PM
Bewildered is probably the wrong word.

If you enjoy college football as much as NFL (I don't, far too many mismatches and too much pressure on young kids for my liking) I can understand why you'd enjoy the draft and all it's nuances.

Just seems like starting from a standpoint of knowing virtually nothing, to having an understanding deep enough to know what is happening exactly and why, seems like a task far too daunting to achieve.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on April 28, 2016, 01:53:57 PM
thank heavens for that

horrific pundit, terrible show

unlucky Fox sports, dumbing down coming your way.

All those ESPN shows where they argue black is white for the sake of a debate like Around the Horn or Pardon the Interruption are garbage...

But Stephen A v Skip is by far the best

Stephen A is superb, and even better when Skip is winding him up.

Viewing for the fishcakes like myself, rather than the finer palates, like Camel & Tighty ;D


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ForthThistle on April 28, 2016, 05:25:37 PM
Can someone tell me in Bullet Points how this Draft Works?

Like why would teams give up #1 Pick and Stuff?

No idea but will watch it anyway. lol


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 28, 2016, 05:31:45 PM
Can someone tell me in Bullet Points how this Draft Works?

Like why would teams give up #1 Pick and Stuff?

No idea but will watch it anyway. lol

Goes reverse order on how the teams finished the previous season

So the Titans had the worse record. So they were first pick. They traded out because they felt they'd achieve more with more picks further down the draft instead of taking Laremy Tunsil and only really strengthening that position. And the Rams traded up as they've just moved to LA and currently have an average QB. They need a face of the franchise so are probably gonna choose Goff.

The Titans now have 5 picks in the top 75 (or so) which means they can seriously strengthen their team. Same as for the Browns. They are so inadequate at so many places, it benefits them to take more picks rather than a top pick.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 28, 2016, 05:34:45 PM
I've actually got all my draft 'knowledge' from listening mainly to the nfl.com podcasts. Dj and Bucky are very good and have had 3 or 4 a week over the last few weeks. The fantasy live podcast is a decent listen too. Around the nfl and Dameshek are both good for a laugh with the idea of talking football.

Then got the fantasy football guys. The fantasy footballers and footballguys.com all of whom offer varying knowledge and are either humorous or just plain random. Either way a good listen.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on April 28, 2016, 05:51:56 PM
NBA draft seems a lot more straight forward than the NFL one just because of squad size.  Quite enjoy watching the NBA one but have never watched the NFL one.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 28, 2016, 07:33:42 PM
Americarnage podcast is a good one for all American sports, not least because it features Mike Carlsen and Nat Coombes. Also any discussion where they suggest Jimmy Garropolo is a member of the Sopranos is frankly just funny. Cue accents.

The draft is essentially an exercise in levelling the playing field. The worst teams get to pick the best players, fill gaps in their team and build for the future. The best teams have to wait.

Of course, some teams pick badly, some pick players based on want over need, some just get plain unlucky. Conversely, some good teams have excellent scouting systems and outstanding technical coaches that can find diamonds in the rough and make them sparkle.

The oft-trotted one is Tom Brady going in the sixth round. That was mostly luck, as he was an average at best QB when selected and looked very unathletic at the combine.

Tennessee will be able to make a series of good decisions and can afford to take a risk or two because of how many picks they have high up in the draft. Cleveland might well trade down again to get even more picks over the next two years. Those two teams have needs all over the team: why spend it all on one guy for one gap when you can get five gaps plugged with solid talent?

Some teams just need a couple of pieces to complete their puzzle and can afford to gamble on a potential superstar.

The fun part is seeing the teams clearly torn between picking who their analytics department says they should take and who the GM or owner wants. Think about if Chelsea were on the clock...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ForthThistle on April 28, 2016, 08:20:31 PM
Cheers.



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 28, 2016, 08:39:20 PM
Best prices for the Superb Owl:

15/2 Seattle Seahawks
9/1 New England Patriots
9/1 Carolina Panthers
12/1 Pittsburgh Steelers
12/1 Green Bay Packers
14/1 Arizona Cardinals
16/1 Cincinnati Bengals
18/1 Denver Broncos
25/1 bar

Seahawks favourite? The three teams below them in this list should win their divisions. Seattle will struggle to win 11 games and might not make the cut. What's the bookies' reasoning?

Was hoping the Steelers would be bigger. Hurts to say it but I think they'll get there this year. Unfortunately don't think the Bengals will do too well this season, the Ravens won't be that bad again. Steelers are a very good team. And Bengals schedule isn't the easiest either apart from no East coast matches which helps
Big rumour bengals take fuller or doctson if there still on the board..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 28, 2016, 09:10:14 PM
Best prices for the Superb Owl:

15/2 Seattle Seahawks
9/1 New England Patriots
9/1 Carolina Panthers
12/1 Pittsburgh Steelers
12/1 Green Bay Packers
14/1 Arizona Cardinals
16/1 Cincinnati Bengals
18/1 Denver Broncos
25/1 bar

Seahawks favourite? The three teams below them in this list should win their divisions. Seattle will struggle to win 11 games and might not make the cut. What's the bookies' reasoning?

Was hoping the Steelers would be bigger. Hurts to say it but I think they'll get there this year. Unfortunately don't think the Bengals will do too well this season, the Ravens won't be that bad again. Steelers are a very good team. And Bengals schedule isn't the easiest either apart from no East coast matches which helps
Big rumour bengals take fuller or doctson if there still on the board..

From what I've heard I'd prefer Doctson or Coleman to Fuller. Even Michael Thomas. I know they lost 2 Wrs. But anyone coming in will be 4/5th target behind Green Eifert Bernard LaFell   

But supposedly Fuller just has his pace and is prone to drops due to having 'tiny' hand size and arm length


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 28, 2016, 09:21:13 PM
Fuller fits the Sanu role of end arounds and gadget plays due to his speed.Think it's a smoke screen and we go defense rounds 1 and 2.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 28, 2016, 10:26:24 PM
Fuller fits the Sanu role of end arounds and gadget plays due to his speed.Think it's a smoke screen and we go defense rounds 1 and 2.

Generally go BPA which I get the felling would be defence, saw this tweet earlier that suggests first choice is D

Take a look at @JoeGoodberry's Tweet: https://twitter.com/JoeGoodberry/status/725642987645100036?s=09


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 28, 2016, 11:32:36 PM
question about the draft

if you are drafted in say 3rd or 4th round and get released and then no one signs you do you still get paid and for how long?

has any player been drafted in 1st round and then released ?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 28, 2016, 11:40:36 PM
Rookie contracts are 4-5 years and its cheap Labour. If released are paid value of contract, all are slotted at signing. Yes even top picks can be huge busts.look up Ryan leaf and jamarcus Russell


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 28, 2016, 11:47:08 PM
so a 24 year old being drafted will get paid peanuts till he is 28/29 and beat up?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 28, 2016, 11:51:47 PM
1st round picks paid well. 2nd round less etc and so on. Rookie min salary is $450k. The main opportunity I'd to get a second contract, 4 years into a potential 10+ years career and make Jay financially then. 256 rookies drafted each year, plus undrafted free agents and well under that will stick on rosters each year


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 28, 2016, 11:57:32 PM
so a rookie gets signed then dropped will get at-least $1.8 million and a college education?
so a nice start to adult life?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on April 29, 2016, 12:04:14 AM
if you are drafted in say 3rd or 4th round and get released and then no one signs you do you still get paid and for how long?

has any player been drafted in 1st round and then released ?

I'm not aware of any players being drafted in the 1st round then being released before the start of the regular season in the same year they were drafted, if that's what you mean. Plenty get cut after a couple of seasons though.

Recent examples would be Johnny Manziel, drafted 22nd a couple of years back getting cut, and Trent Richardson got traded from Cleveland to Indy, then cut by the Colts after being taken with the 3rd/4th pick a few years ago. Probably will become less common than it was before the rookie contracts came in, because players back then could be signed to longer contracts, so cutting a player 5 years into a 7 year rookie deal might not necessarily have meant they're a bust, simply that the team needed to make cap space.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 29, 2016, 12:22:14 AM
wow i remember watching johnny get drafted think that was my first year in fantasy

he was expected to be a early pick but ended up near the bottom of the 1st round and they were saying that
his misbehavior had cost him millions

i expect he will still be on a very good contract for next couple of years even if no one picks him up


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 29, 2016, 01:38:05 AM
ok how much time will the rams and the eagles run off the clock before making the picks they have traded so heavily for?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 01:51:30 AM
ok how much time will the rams and the eagles run off the clock before making the picks they have traded so heavily for?

I can answer this one!

As soon as they on the clock, the team will call their player. The coach and GM will have a quick chat "Welcome to the 8-8 Rams Jared. Looking forward to working with you"

And then pass the details on to Rog.

Pprobably take 5 minutes in all.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on April 29, 2016, 02:06:01 AM
ok how much time will the rams and the eagles run off the clock before making the picks they have traded so heavily for?

I can answer this one!

As soon as they on the clock, the team will call their player. The coach and GM will have a quick chat "Welcome to the 8-8 Rams Jared. Looking forward to working with you"

And then pass the details on to Rog.

Pprobably take 5 minutes in all.

*taps watch*


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on April 29, 2016, 02:07:31 AM
Surely the NFL draft doubles up as the World Cup of Filling Time By Summarisers.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 02:09:45 AM
The only player I've read much about pre draft is Robert Nkemdiche.

He seems like a complex, intelligent and interesting kid. I am rooting for him.

I've just found out he has picked Bowie as his walk on music.

I'm REALLY rooting for him now.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 02:37:34 AM
So Jerry just couldn't resist the star RB in the end, think Jax and Balti are over the moon to have Ramsey Tunsil and Buckner available to them at 5 and 6.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 29, 2016, 02:40:00 AM
tal goes 3-2 up on tighty for correct teams


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 02:48:00 AM
Surely not?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/poor-timing--laremy-tunsil-takes-down-twitter-video-of-him-and-a-bong-001502430.html

literally a huge schoolboy error.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 02:54:34 AM

Surely not?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/poor-timing--laremy-tunsil-takes-down-twitter-video-of-him-and-a-bong-001502430.html

Maybe the stupidest thing anyone has done today.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 02:57:00 AM

Surely not?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/poor-timing--laremy-tunsil-takes-down-twitter-video-of-him-and-a-bong-001502430.html

Maybe the stupidest thing anyone has done today.

seems his Twitter was hacked but incred spite to do that just before the draft. Tenneesse traded up to 8 now, its getting interesting.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on April 29, 2016, 02:57:08 AM
These guys really are not the intellectual elite


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 02:58:26 AM

Surely not?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/poor-timing--laremy-tunsil-takes-down-twitter-video-of-him-and-a-bong-001502430.html

Maybe the stupidest thing anyone has done today.

seems his Twitter was hacked but incred spite to do that just before the draft. Tenneesse traded up to 8 now, its getting interesting.

Ahhh the old "my account was hacked" line.

Good one.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on April 29, 2016, 03:02:13 AM

Surely not?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/poor-timing--laremy-tunsil-takes-down-twitter-video-of-him-and-a-bong-001502430.html

Maybe the stupidest thing anyone has done today.

seems his Twitter was hacked but incred spite to do that just before the draft. Tenneesse traded up to 8 now, its getting interesting.

Ahhh the old "my account was hacked" line.

Good one.

I remember the time Ian Botham's Twitter was hacked just moments before he sent a photo of his middle stump to some woman who was not his wife.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 03:03:24 AM
;o) tradetastic now Keith


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 03:04:28 AM

Surely not?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/poor-timing--laremy-tunsil-takes-down-twitter-video-of-him-and-a-bong-001502430.html

Maybe the stupidest thing anyone has done today.

seems his Twitter was hacked but incred spite to do that just before the draft. Tenneesse traded up to 8 now, its getting interesting.

Ahhh the old "my account was hacked" line.

Good one.

I remember the time Ian Botham's Twitter was hacked just moments before he sent a photo of his middle stump to some woman who was not his wife.

no wonder his nickname is Beefy


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 29, 2016, 03:07:17 AM
been search the web for rookie contracts since my earlier posts seems like tunsils twitter post looks to have cost him about 10 million

from last years picks


http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbelzer/2015/05/01/2015-nfl-draft-1st-round-rookie-salary-projections/#b92fa276d0f3


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 03:07:50 AM

Surely not?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/poor-timing--laremy-tunsil-takes-down-twitter-video-of-him-and-a-bong-001502430.html

Maybe the stupidest thing anyone has done today.

seems his Twitter was hacked but incred spite to do that just before the draft. Tenneesse traded up to 8 now, its getting interesting.

Ahhh the old "my account was hacked" line.

Good one.

I remember the time Ian Botham's Twitter was hacked just moments before he sent a photo of his middle stump to some woman who was not his wife.

My blondepoker account is hacked around 3 times per year.

Usually just before a disagreement with Woodsey, BigAdz or Mantis.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 03:09:21 AM
Why wasn't I following Tunsill on Twitter?

It would have meant backing Stanley to be the first OT to be drafted would be a great bet.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 03:10:56 AM
Tunsil and Jack could end up being incred value for teams willing to take the risks attached now.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 03:13:43 AM
Tunsil and Jack could end up being incred value for teams willing to take the risks attached now.

Saw a picture of the kid in the Green Room.

Looks absolutely desolate. You'd need a heart of stone not to feel sorry for him for him right now.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 03:17:18 AM
Tunsil and Jack could end up being incred value for teams willing to take the risks attached now.

La'el Collins went undrafted after his ex-gf was murdered last year.

He ended up starting on the best OL in football.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 03:21:37 AM
Tunsil and Jack could end up being incred value for teams willing to take the risks attached now.

Saw a picture of the kid in the Green Room.

Looks absolutely desolate. You'd need a heart of stone not to feel sorry for him for him right now.

he did didn't he, what an incredible thing to happen and it's changing the entire expected draft order too.

I was thinking of last year too Keith, I suppose as a long term pick even allowing for a potential ban he must be value now?

Saw  a doc earlier tonight that said a rumour went around in 94 that Warren Sapp had failed 7 drugs tests in college and he fell like a stone too.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on April 29, 2016, 03:27:09 AM
To be fair to Laremy Tunsil, I'd upload a video of myself smoking pot and pretend I got hacked if I thought I might fall to the Cleveland Browns, too.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 03:29:55 AM
To be fair to Laremy Tunsil, I'd upload a video of myself smoking pot and pretend I got hacked if I thought I might fall to the Cleveland Browns, too.

lol


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 03:33:32 AM
Tunsil and Jack could end up being incred value for teams willing to take the risks attached now.

Saw a picture of the kid in the Green Room.

Looks absolutely desolate. You'd need a heart of stone not to feel sorry for him for him right now.

he did didn't he, what an incredible thing to happen and it's changing the entire expected draft order too.

I was thinking of last year too Keith, I suppose as a long term pick even allowing for a potential ban he must be value now?

Saw  a doc earlier tonight that said a rumour went around in 94 that Warren Sapp had failed 7 drugs tests in college and he fell like a stone too.

Apparently the video is 5 years old.

So, almost unbelievably, the hacking excuse is probably true.

Assuming it's a friend who had the video, with friends like him, who needs enemies.

I think he'll still go in the first round if it really is 5 years old. Seahawks will snap him up if he lasts that long.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 03:39:40 AM
His step father posted it?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 29, 2016, 03:40:11 AM
His step father did it?


wow thats some crap


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 03:40:19 AM
they just mentioned it might be his step father, sure I read somewhere his step father is suing him already for assaulting him.



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 03:41:29 AM
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2636100-laremy-tunsil-sued-by-stepfather-over-june-domestic-violence-incident


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 29, 2016, 03:43:10 AM
jerry springer needs to meet this family


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 29, 2016, 03:44:52 AM
jerry springer needs to meet this family

lol, what a turn of events. Miami could have got some value there.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 29, 2016, 03:47:16 AM
yeah the guy was likely best guy in the draft


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 29, 2016, 03:55:40 AM
think tighty is 4-3 up in correct teams


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 04:05:22 AM
Mayock is king of the aftertimers.

Every time he gets a pick right, he flags it up.

No mention of his picks otherwise.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 04:08:28 AM
Jane Coaston ‏@cjane87 6m6 minutes ago Washington, DC

Remember: Tunsil is being sued by his stepfather for "emotional distress" when Tunsil allegedly stopped him from attacking his mother.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 29, 2016, 04:27:19 AM
Mayock mentions two WRs as possibles for the Texans.

Texans pick a different WR.

Mayock "Just as I said, it was obvious the Texans would pick a wide receiver"


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 29, 2016, 08:39:59 AM
Best prices for the Superb Owl:

15/2 Seattle Seahawks
9/1 New England Patriots
9/1 Carolina Panthers
12/1 Pittsburgh Steelers
12/1 Green Bay Packers
14/1 Arizona Cardinals
16/1 Cincinnati Bengals
18/1 Denver Broncos
25/1 bar

Seahawks favourite? The three teams below them in this list should win their divisions. Seattle will struggle to win 11 games and might not make the cut. What's the bookies' reasoning?

Was hoping the Steelers would be bigger. Hurts to say it but I think they'll get there this year. Unfortunately don't think the Bengals will do too well this season, the Ravens won't be that bad again. Steelers are a very good team. And Bengals schedule isn't the easiest either apart from no East coast matches which helps
Big rumour bengals take fuller or doctson if there still on the board..

From what I've heard I'd prefer Doctson or Coleman to Fuller. Even Michael Thomas. I know they lost 2 Wrs. But anyone coming in will be 4/5th target behind Green Eifert Bernard LaFell   

But supposedly Fuller just has his pace and is prone to drops due to having 'tiny' hand size and arm length

So William Jackson III. Another corner. Not surprised they went a bit left field. With the big Wrs all gone I reckon theyll address that in the second round as there's not much difference in receivers now those few have gone. Hopefully Michael Thomas will still be around.

Interested to see who takes Derrick Henry. He's a beast who could easily fail in the nfl. But looks like he'll be entertaining anyway


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 29, 2016, 10:40:06 AM
Tal, most versions i submit are no trades but as you have done trades

1. LA - Goff - QB
2. PHI - Wentz - QB
3. SD - Buckner - DE
4. DAL - Ramsey CB/S
5. JAX - Bosa - DE
6. BAL - Tunsil - OT
7. Trade MIA Elliott - RB.
8. Trade OAK - Hargreaves - CB
9. TB - Stanley -OT
10. NYG - Floyd -OLB
11. CHI - Apple - CB
12. NO - Rankins - DT
13. SF - Lawson - DE
14. CLE - Ragland - LB
15. TEN - Conklin -OT
16. DET - Decker -OT
17. ATL - Jack - LB
18. IND - Jackson - CB
19. BUF - Lee - LB
20. trade DEN - Lynch- QB
21. WAS - Kelly - C
22. HOU - Coleman - WR
23. MIN - Treadwell - WR
24. CIN - Doctson - WR
25. PIT - Ragland LB
26. SEA - Whitehair - OG
27. GB - Robinson - DT
28. KC- Fuller - WR
29. ARI - Joseph - S
30. CAR - Alexander- CB
31. NYJ - Cook QB


fancy a competition?

1 points for getting a first round pick
upgrade to 3 points first round pick to right team

winner buys the other a cuppa next time we meet?

24 correct names

7 to the right team. goff, wentz, conklin, lynch, decker, rankins, treadwell

(17 x 1) + (7 x 3)= 38

now to do Tal's


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 29, 2016, 10:42:21 AM
Tal's mock draft (subject to fourteen more versions in the next 48 hours):

1. LA - Goff - QB
2. PHI - Wentz - QB
3. SD - Tunsil - OL
4. DAL - Bosa - DE
5. JAX - Ramsey - CB/S
6. BAL - Bucknor - DE
7. SF - Stanley - OT

Trade alert! Oakland and Cleveland trade picks.

8. OAK - Elliott - RB
9. TB - Hargreaves - CB
10. NYG - Floyd - OLB
11. CHI - Lawson - DE
12. NO - Lynch - QB
13. MIA - Apple - CB
14. CLE - Jack - LB
15. TEN - Conklin - OT
16. DET - Robinson - DT
17. ATL - Ragland - LB
18. IND - Decker - OT
19. BUF - Reed - DT
20. NYJ - Dodd - DE
21. WAS - (Ryan) Kelly - C
22. HOU - Coleman - WR
23. MIN - Treadwell - WR
24. CIN - Ogbah - DE
25. PIT - Jackson III - CB
26. SEA - Ifedi - OT
27. GB - Lee - LB
28. KC - Rankins - DT
29. ARI - Joseph - S
30. CAR - Spriggs - OT
31. DEN - Whitehair - OG

Anyone else fancy posting theirs?

Any views on the list above? Marks out of 31?

I can see a trade or two in the 17-24 range, as teams vie for particular players, but I am struggling to see where, based on the order as I've done it. As played, I think that stays as it is.

23 correct names

7 correct team goff, wentz, ramsey, hargreaves,conklin, treadwell, ifedi

(16x 1) + (7x3) = 37


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 29, 2016, 12:18:33 PM
GG WP.

Can't believe neither of us decided the potential number one overall pick two weeks ago would have a video posted on his twitter account an hour before the draft of him smoking pot...




Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on April 30, 2016, 04:17:43 AM
Highlight of the draft so far, for me - https://vine.co/v/iPI0jtFiFtA

Patriots' 3rd round pick, former Pats RB Kevin Faulk comes out to announce the pick, with a Tom Brady jersey on under an unbuttoned suit jacket.

"With the 78th pick, the New England Patriots AND Tom Brady select Joe Thuney, North Carolina State"  ;ifm;


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on April 30, 2016, 04:56:09 AM
Highlight of the draft so far, for me - https://vine.co/v/iPI0jtFiFtA

Patriots' 3rd round pick, former Pats RB Kevin Faulk comes out to announce the pick, with a Tom Brady jersey on under an unbuttoned suit jacket.

"With the 78th pick, the New England Patriots AND Tom Brady select Joe Thuney, North Carolina State"  ;ifm;

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000658177/article/kevin-faulk-supports-tom-brady-at-nfl-draft

Better quality video


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 30, 2016, 11:44:41 AM
Happy with Tyler Boyd for the Bengals

Jags taking a risk on Jack looks good for them. They'll be a good watch next year. Cowboys have taken some crackers (although injured)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 30, 2016, 12:12:15 PM
Happy with Tyler Boyd for the Bengals

Jags taking a risk on Jack looks good for them. They'll be a good watch next year. Cowboys have taken some crackers (although injured)

The AFC South is the division to watch this year. I wonder what price the Colts will be to finish fourth.

As for the Cowboys, I'm convinced they made a mistake taking Elliott. They have RunDMC and Alfred Morris who can carry the rock 20 times a game without issue and are both good enough to make use of an excellent offensive line. You or I could get 500 yards in this team. Instead of getting help in an area they need it (DE, secondary), they instead decided to please the fans and take a guy who won't be so much above what is there in 2016 (he will be in 2017).

The bit in brackets above is precisely why I can't get my head around the choice of Jaylon Smith in the second round. Tony Romo has 2 years left at most. It's a winnable division in 2016, so make the defense strong enough to win the ball in field position. No, what they do is draft a guy who won't be around until next year, when he might not have a quarterback to win the ball for.

It's really hard to understand the mentality. What is the strategy? Elliott is a great pass protector? Lovely. He's going to get tired of 17 stone blokes pushing him during play actions, though.

Tighty, what's your take on it?

Conversely, I'm amazed that the Bills have drafted very sensibly. That doesn't seem like us at all.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 30, 2016, 12:28:43 PM
i think Elliott is an exciting pick.

Immediate candidate for offensive rookie of the year, rushing behind the best OL in the game

won't come off the field, mcfadden is a cut candidate as he doesn't play special teams and his contract makes him very cuttable. was very much a bridge player to get you from demarco to a rookie, and he has done that job fine

mcfadden got 1100 yards in 12 starts last year but the OL had to change substantially as he couldn't run into a zone blocking scheme which they like to run. He only got 3 rushing touchdowns

Elliott takes that OL back to what they are good at and should be substantially better than what they had in 2015.

think 1500 yards+, 10 or so touchdowns if he plays all 16

He blocks too, better than most rb's you'll see so Romo protection goes up a notch

in theory he keeps the dallas defense off the field more, he sustains drives...we could hardly do anything on 3rd and 1 last year as defenses stacked the box. if you stack the box now, assuming romo is fit, the passing game might get you and if you don't stack it elliott will

so its a "win now" pick, which sort of goes with romo having a couple more years and the two QBs not being available when dallas drafted

in isolation, fine. we then tried to trade back in and get paxton lynch which made sense too, develop him for a couple of years, but denver had a better trade offer


i then thought immediate defensive help was likely in rounds 2 and 3. i was stunned to see them pick jaylon smith who is likely to need a redshirt season. this seemed completely inconsistent with the strategy behind picking elliott

only a GM who isn't at risk of being fired, as he won't fire himself, can make that pick

now jaylon looks wonderful when fit, top player but its a luxury pick

so we have elliott/jaylon and a back up in the third round

the strategy just seems schizophrenic but this is really no different than we see every year as he is owner and GM

Isit there watching the draft and thinking about team A "yes, that makes sense" and team B "ok, good value" and then Dallas drafts and i spend hours working out wtf they are thinking. Nt so much the first round picks, which have been by and large very good...but the mid round stuff works less often than it should


the problem with the top of this draft was

- weak
- two top quarterbacks out of reach for dallas
- no pass rusher worth pick 4
- the top DB is a corner/safety hybrid exactly like the one they drafted in the first round last year
- we have an all pro OL, so don't need to pick high there

so i can understand elliott.

it was yesterday i struggled with.



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 30, 2016, 12:34:13 PM
Teams stacked the box against Dallas last year because Bryant was out and whoever was under center had to run it. That won't be the case this year.

Elliott might well be OROTY but Dallas are still one of four teams who can win their division. That to me is the problem.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 30, 2016, 12:37:36 PM

Elliott might well be OROTY but Dallas are still one of four teams who can win their division. That to me is the problem.

i don't understand the problem? that's the same for any division

washington are improving fast. drafting really really well, smart man is their GM
giants are going to be decent. loved the pick of sterling shepard
eagles going to be competitive and more so if wentz becomes the franchise qb they hope

whatever we did at pick 4 doesn't change that. nfl east always going to be a bun fight, any year

there really wasn't a defensive player at 4 that would make the impact elliott will.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on April 30, 2016, 12:52:40 PM

Elliott might well be OROTY but Dallas are still one of four teams who can win their division. That to me is the problem.

i don't understand the problem? that's the same for any division

washington are improving fast. drafting really really well, smart man is their GM
giants are going to be decent. loved the pick of sterling shepard
eagles going to be competitive and more so if wentz becomes the franchise qb they hope

whatever we did at pick 4 doesn't change that. nfl east always going to be a bun fight, any year

there really wasn't a defensive player at 4 that would make the impact elliott will.

Fair enough.

Bosa was the guy for me but he'd gone. I would have gone Ramsey because you play Kirk Cousins twice a year and Eli twice a year and a CB/S with that much talent is going to find stray passes.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 30, 2016, 12:59:46 PM
Ramsey would have been a perfectly understandable pick but not the slam dunk a real 20 sacks a year pass rush star would have been but there wasn't one in this draft.

I think he is a safety though, not a shutdown corner. We drafted a safety/corner hybrid number 1 last year

I think i know Elliott will be a star, i'm not sure Ramsey would be at cornerback. the jags are playing him at cornerback

Ramsey has bricks for hands, very few interceptions. If he is patrick peterson or richard sherman, then great. lets see

if there was a deion sanders, demarcus ware, michael strahan, jj watt, von miller etc etc sitting there and we passed on him for a running back however good the running back might be then i'd be pretty unhappy.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 30, 2016, 02:39:15 PM
Tal and I were chatting about this last night Rich, the way teams approach the draft now is so different to the days of 'take the best man on the board when it gets to your pick'  and improve depth/value of your squad.

The tendency now just seems to be 'what do we need now' and then just draft to that need irrespective of the value you are getting with that pick, so mainly selecting players with a short term view. A couple of things struck me as quite odd (apart from trading up to take a kicker in the 2nd round that is), firstly Houston traded up one spot to take a WR at pick 21 when there was always going to be a run for WR in the 20-30 range and the general consensus was there really was no WR that stood out. It surely makes more sense to just sit to your turn and then take the best one on your board, not see who is the best on your board 1 pick earlier and then talk yourself into believing teams might trade over you and take that player. If he goes he goes, you then have a new best player on the board and take that guy and don't have to pay the price by giving away later picks to do that.

On top of that they did the same thing again in round 2, they traded up 2 spots with Atlanta to take a center who can also play guard. The two teams in front of them at the time they traded form that pick were the Jets and Atlanta who have Mangold and Alex Mack as their centers, two of the best in the game. Almost no way either of those 2 teams take a center with the picks they have before you (ok, a very small chance Jets might want to take someone to fit in behind Mangold as they struggled when he was injured last year but nobody ever expected Jets to be taking center here did they) Houston have traded up two spots to jump teams that were not going to take 'their' guy anyway and again given up a pick lower down to do that.

Back on the point of taking best players and not what you think you need now The Jets have taken another QB with their 2nd round pick. Last year they also took a QB  who is still with them. So 2 years on the trot they have taken a QB because they have some need there well above where they should be drafted. They now have Petty and Hakenberg on their squad for picks above their worth and are talking like Geno Smith will start if Fitz doesn't re sign. That would be happening if they hadn't reached for those 2 QB's anyway. Contrast that to The Bears who were again supposed to be taking a QB in behind Cutler but didn't fall for that and drafted down to let the ones that were happy to move up move up, got players in positions they wanted anyway lower down and stocked up extra picks too.

This draft what we need this year instead of best players can't work out long term can it? ( bar obv top QB's being targetted at the very top but even then the teams have given up an awful lot to take one player because they need that type now)





Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 30, 2016, 02:45:26 PM
well its an art not a science. best player available with "need" breaking ties seems reasonable to me.

the best teams look at the roster in a couple of years time, what contracts are expiring etc and draft accordingly

i am not sure of you are agreeing with me or not. i liked the elliott pick, wasn't a need, definitely a top five talent in the draft. there wan't a "need" rusher there, so take best player available and go from there

we haven't even talked the buccs trading up for a kicker in the second round!

you see all sorts of stuff every year, thats the fascination of it.

the hoston trade up was odd. I loved Washington taking Doctson straight after. Hands down a better player than Fuller


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 30, 2016, 03:03:20 PM
I wasn't really thinking about The Cowboys here more a general approach thru the league. I thought they would take Elliot tho but I didn't think that was deffo the best way for them to go.

Was interesting to hear someone saying that Jaylon Smith was a really good pick as it was taking a top 10 player for next year for a 2nd round pick this year. If he has to sit the season out he is still going to be a good player for them and that kinda backs up the take the best player on the board approach because he was value having fallen so far. Elliot looks the complete back tho and does look the perfect fit.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 30, 2016, 03:11:19 PM
my beef was really that we make a habit of

a) taking medical redshirts
b) taking character risks and thinking we can sort young kids out
c) taking projects

this puts a lot of variables into the draft that you don't need to put into an already quite random process

the hit rate on these three categories is consistently less than 50% for us. sean lee was a recent hit, many more weren't

a team like the ravens, who are consistently amongst the best drafters, rarely trade, take the safe picks every time and always draft well. mind you, you could then mention ray lewis to me, who was clearly a high risk pick

Will be happy if Jaylon turns into an all-pro, but the inconsistency of drafting elliott to help win now with a redshirt next who might never play again is quite stark 


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 30, 2016, 03:31:34 PM
my beef was really that we make a habit of

a) taking medical redshirts
b) taking character risks and thinking we can sort young kids out
c) taking projects

this puts a lot of variables into the draft that you don't need to put into an already quite random process

the hit rate on these three categories is consistently less than 50% for us. sean lee was a recent hit, many more weren't

a team like the ravens, who are consistently amongst the best drafters, rarely trade, take the safe picks every time and always draft well. mind you, you could then mention ray lewis to me, who was clearly a high risk pick

Will be happy if Jaylon turns into an all-pro, but the inconsistency of drafting elliott to help win now with a redshirt next who might never play again is quite stark 

I deffo see your point there.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 30, 2016, 07:34:07 PM
Bengals bag Billings. Cracking pick at #124 would of been happy with him second round tbh


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 30, 2016, 08:47:03 PM
Peko and Atkins are good character guys for Billings to learn from.Great draft so far on paper for cincy.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 30, 2016, 09:00:10 PM
Peko and Atkins are good character guys for Billings to learn from.Great draft so far on paper for cincy.

Inside the jungle podcast were very keen on Billings. So I'm very happy and putting him along side Atkins especially is a great thing. Westerman another seemingly well chosen player for us. Although already saying Bodine is the starting center

Cowboys have their Romo replacement in Dak Prescott at 135 :|

Browns take their 4th WR


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 30, 2016, 09:17:18 PM
Did anyone see the fans forum with Kirk Cousins the other day?

What an engaging, open and interesting guy. Seemed to answer difficult questions fully and honestly.

So few of the cliches NFL players come up with in situations like that. Worth watching on catch up if you missed it.

Made me want to root for the Redskins next season.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on April 30, 2016, 09:52:27 PM
I'm amazed the Raiders traded up to get Cook. Why? 4th rounder and a 5th rounder for a backup?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on April 30, 2016, 11:06:11 PM
I'm amazed the Raiders traded up to get Cook. Why? 4th rounder and a 5th rounder for a backup?

It looks like a strange move, I admit. But the more I think about it, the more it makes sense.

Matt McGloin, our current backup, is a restricted free agent (RFA). My understanding of how it works is there's a RFA minimum salary for next season, but if another team wants to sign him then we can either choose to match their offer, or let him go for a 2nd round pick. He's a solid backup but not worth anywhere near a 2nd round pick, so chances are that nobody will take him and he'll be our backup next year for the RFA price, with Connor Cook as our 3rd string QB to develop and compete for the backup job in preseason.

It's highly unlikely that anyone takes McGloin given the price. Guy's probably worth like a 5th rounder to a team suddenly in need of a QB when shit hits the fan during the season, but there's no way we get a 2nd rounder for him. Drafting Cook means we can try to get something for McGloin before he becomes a free agent, with Cook to become the backup long term/possibly win the job in preseason.

This move is more to do with 2017 onwards. We have to pay McGloin next year, so we'll probably let him go after this season if Connor Cook is good enough to be the backup going forwards, save some money and get a late compensatory pick for McGloin (probably making up for the 5th rounder we gave up this year to trade up). Worst case scenario, we still have the option to keep a solid backup in McGloin on the 2017 roster if things don't work out with Cook.

I like McGloin, so it's a shame that drafting Cook means this is probably his last season as a Raider. But this is a cap move with some decent upside if we can develop Cook and get a decent pick for him in a few years, or upgrade the backup QB spot.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on May 02, 2016, 02:25:39 PM
I'm amazed the Raiders traded up to get Cook. Why? 4th rounder and a 5th rounder for a backup?

It looks like a strange move, I admit. But the more I think about it, the more it makes sense.

Matt McGloin, our current backup, is a restricted free agent (RFA). My understanding of how it works is there's a RFA minimum salary for next season, but if another team wants to sign him then we can either choose to match their offer, or let him go for a 2nd round pick. He's a solid backup but not worth anywhere near a 2nd round pick, so chances are that nobody will take him and he'll be our backup next year for the RFA price, with Connor Cook as our 3rd string QB to develop and compete for the backup job in preseason.

It's highly unlikely that anyone takes McGloin given the price. Guy's probably worth like a 5th rounder to a team suddenly in need of a QB when shit hits the fan during the season, but there's no way we get a 2nd rounder for him. Drafting Cook means we can try to get something for McGloin before he becomes a free agent, with Cook to become the backup long term/possibly win the job in preseason.

This move is more to do with 2017 onwards. We have to pay McGloin next year, so we'll probably let him go after this season if Connor Cook is good enough to be the backup going forwards, save some money and get a late compensatory pick for McGloin (probably making up for the 5th rounder we gave up this year to trade up). Worst case scenario, we still have the option to keep a solid backup in McGloin on the 2017 roster if things don't work out with Cook.

I like McGloin, so it's a shame that drafting Cook means this is probably his last season as a Raider. But this is a cap move with some decent upside if we can develop Cook and get a decent pick for him in a few years, or upgrade the backup QB spot.

Ahhhh, I forgot McGloin was RFA this season. That would explain it. Be good for Cook to develop under Carr as well.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bergeroo on May 24, 2016, 11:24:22 AM
Pittsburgh Steelers: NFL side uses robot training dummies
http://www.bbc.com/sport/american-football/36363989

Those dummies look quite handy, could certainly do a job in some Football League defences...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on May 24, 2016, 07:08:15 PM
From the pen of the Buffalo Bills:

Reports (which also include radio reports, tweets, podcasts and blogs) pertaining to strategic and tactical information are strictly prohibited. This includes:

Referencing plays run or game strategy, including trick plays or unusual formations.

Reporting on personnel groupings, sub-packages, players who are practicing with individual units (first team, second team, goal line, offense, nickel defense, etc.), special plays, who is rushing the passer, dropped passes, interceptions, QB completion percentage, etc.

Media should not report on any injury situation occurring during a practice that is not open to the public with detailed speculation to the potential nature, severity of the injury or level of practice participation. Acknowledging an injury occurred is permitted, but anything beyond a general report would be purely speculative and possibly inaccurate.

Still and television photographers are not permitted to shoot or film injured players at a closed practice, even during the period that is open to the media. Filming of injured players rehabbing either before, during or after closed practices is prohibited.



I blame Dallas. They started this silliness...

At least with buffalo this will have little impact on anyone's fantasy teams.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on May 24, 2016, 07:17:24 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjO-MzuWgAATw8a.jpg)

Michael Tanier – Verified account ‏@MikeTanier

OK. I will go to #Bills camp in this "ordinary fan" disguise, sit in the stands and Tweet specifics.



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on May 25, 2016, 11:15:02 PM
11/8 for the Steelers to win the AFC North is imo very big!

Bengals have obviously lost their 2nd and 3rd reciever and now without Tyler Eifert for a few games at the start of the season. Who scored 40% of their TDs last season. Boyd is unproven. Burkhead a slot reciever. Could do something. Kroft. Unproven backup TE.

The Steelers however could have Lev Bell back. If not D'angelo Williams is more than capable backup. Brown is top 3 Wr and even without Bryant they'll score a lot still. They play the Bengals early one while Burfict is still out too.

Not great to say as a Bengals fan but think anything over Evens is a good bet on them


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on June 28, 2016, 02:48:13 PM
RIP Buddy Ryan (father of Rex and Rob)

I remember him as the Eagles coach for several years.  He's probably more famous for his role with the 1985 Bears.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/2016/6/28/12050308/buddy-ryan-eagles-head-coach-nfl-legend-defense-chicago-bears-1985-defense?_ga=1.75129298.1523330522.1409528280


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 28, 2016, 03:07:41 PM
from one of ryan's playbooks

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmCdKimWkAAOyes.jpg)

the 30 for 30 on the 85 bears, a team that got many UK fans into the NFL, is a must watch for the Ryan stuff.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on June 30, 2016, 06:30:31 PM
Do we know if any of the UK bookies usually do division forecast betting? Had a quick look around and at the moment I can't find any offering it?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on June 30, 2016, 06:34:00 PM
Yes but too early. Early August typically...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on June 30, 2016, 06:40:56 PM
Cheers, will have a look around then, day off work so thought i'd see what was about... Steelers v Packers 33/1 for the Superbowl...

Actually seems the Betfred have the forecasts up already, so going to have a nose on those and see what's about, just priced up a longshot 5 fold for Division winners. Raiders, Steelers, Texans, Giants, Cardinals .. 250ish/1 ... Raiders are the biggest there obviously. But doesn't seem too impossible, not placing it yet as a lot can happen. Price on Steelers has dropped a lot since I posted above a month or two ago, even odds on on Skybet


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on July 04, 2016, 04:06:48 PM
All or nothing a season with the Arizona Cardinals is well worth watching for all those needing an NFL fix.Free to view on Amazon prime.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 06, 2016, 08:52:02 AM
The inimitable Mike Tanier forecasts the season for Bleacher Report...



Bleacher Report has just what you need to get back in the NFL state of mind: a primer for everything you'll experience during the 2016 season. It's the football equivalent of that back-to-school circular that arrived on your doorstep this morning: Autumn is on its way, so mark your calendar for these key dates!

Saturday, Aug. 27: Hours before the Jets-Giants preseason game, the Jets' quarterback situation is thrown into turmoil when Bryce Petty injures his throwing hand by punching Christian Hackenberg for calling a fake punt in Madden 17. Petty claims the play was not fair because he still has not found the audible button. A desperate last-minute call to Ryan Fitzpatrick goes to voicemail while the quarterback shops for beard oil at an Austin flea market. The entire incident is blamed on Geno Smith.

Sunday, Aug. 28: The Vikings host the Chargers in the first game at sparkly new U.S. Bank Stadium. Adrian Peterson complains during warm-ups that the turf is "a little too springy." Minnesota state legislature immediately approves a $223 million bond referendum for less springy turf.

Wednesday, Sept. 7: The Supreme Court upholds the decision to overturn an appeal of the summary judgment to delay the reversal of the reinstatement of the vacation of the Deflategate suspension. "Does that mean I'm suspended?" Tom Brady asks.

Thursday, Sept. 8: Season opener. Broncos defeat Panthers 16-10. Von Miller, playing under the franchise tag, records 3.5 sacks and throws a touchdown pass to Emmanuel Sanders on a trick play. John Elway increases Miller's contract offer to include discount oil changes and an Amazon Prime membership.

Friday, Sept. 9, 7:45 p.m.: Cam Newton finally shows up for the Broncos-Panthers postgame press conference.

Tuesday, Sept. 13, 1:30 a.m.: Week 1 finally ends when Aaron Donald sacks Blaine Gabbert for a safety and a 5-3 Rams victory over the 49ers. You toss and turn yourself to sleep wondering why everyone gripes about the Pro Bowl but gives this awful annual Monday doubleheader a pass.

Sunday, Sept. 18: Bengals at Steelers. Special guest referees include John Cena, Ronda Rousey, Henry Kissinger, SEAL Team Six and the U.N. Security Council. It's a 1 p.m. kickoff early in the season, so the Bengals win and feel really good about themselves.

Thursday, Sept. 22: Jimmy Garoppolo leads the Patriots to victory against the Texans. Bill O'Brien tries to offer Bill Belichick a pair of second-round picks for Garoppolo during the postgame handshake but is tackled by Texans owner Bob McNair.

Sunday, Sept. 25: Odell Beckham Jr. vs. Josh Norman I. The "Norman is overrated" tweets are scheduled for 1:25 p.m., when Beckham catches a six-yard slant. The "Well, actually, Norman was playing thumbs coverage in Cover 7 on that catch" tweets (by people who learned about strategy by calling audibles in Madden) are scheduled for 1:26. Your migraine is scheduled for 1:27. Beckham finishes the game with one catch for six yards.

Sunday, Oct. 2: The Colts face the Jaguars in London. According to the new exchange rates, Andrew Luck's salary for the game converts to 6 million farthings, 300,000 florins, 60 thruppence and a stag from Ye Royale Game Lands. In fairness, it would have been no less confusing before Brexit. Also, Allen Hurns is elected prime minister.

Sunday, Oct. 9: Tom Brady returns to the field to lead a 56-8 rout of the Browns. Citizens across America find themselves more energetic and optimistic, as if suddenly waking from a two-year shame spiral. But really, this is just one more damn thing that happens to the Browns.

Sunday, Oct. 16: J.J. Watt celebrates his second sack of Andrew Luck by flashing the money sign, ripping up an imaginary $140 million contract, and bringing a Fisher Price cash register onto the field and using a selfie stick to film himself cha-chinging it. The Texans' victory raises their record to 2-4. Talk radio spends Monday criticizing Cam Newton for smiling too broadly after beating the Saints.

Sunday, Oct. 30: The Broncos move to 6-2 with a 16-10 win over the Chargers. Mark Sanchez overtakes Von Miller for the team lead in touchdown passes.

Tuesday, Nov. 8 (Election Day): Bad news: Our next president made a shocking last-minute campaign promise to reopen Deflategate.

Monday, Nov. 14 : The 7-3 Broncos have won and lost every game by a 16-10 score, so they devise a new way to kick-start Paxton Lynch's development: a copy of Andrew Luck's contract dangling from a fishing pole in front of a treadmill. The fact that John Elway will only handle the contract while wearing oven mitts is considered a discouraging sign.

Thursday, Nov. 24: Thanksgiving. Adrian Peterson rushes 20 times for 74 yards in a Vikings loss to the Lions and complains about the play-calling. Ezekiel Elliott carries the ball 20 times for 74 yards in a loss to Washington; Jerry Jones complains about the play-calling. Colts running backs carry the ball 10 times for seven yards in a loss to the Steelers, but Andrew Luck doesn't dare complain about the play-calling. Calvin Johnson enjoys turkey with family and friends and wonders why the heck he didn't think of this retirement thing sooner.

Sunday, Dec. 4: Newton-Wilson VII. Yep, roman numerals. They are even prominently displayed on the NFL.com official schedule! Whose bright idea was it to give Newton-Wilson the Brady-Manning treatment? Oh wait…it was me. I'm sure the royalty check is in the mail.

Sunday, Dec. 11: The Packers lose to the Seahawks to fall behind in the home-field-advantage chase. Choose your own postgame storyline adventure: Is Aaron Rodgers' 21-of-28, two-touchdown game against the Legion of Boom a sign of a slump? Should Clay Matthews move to [insert position here]? Or, Is Eddie Lacy too skinny?

Sunday, Dec. 18: Steelers at Bengals. Steel cage around the field provided by Queen City Electrified Fencing and Razor Wire Incorporated. Late kickoff, late in the season, big playoff implications. Steelers win. This isn't neurosurgery, folks.

Sunday, Dec. 18: Broncos at Patriots. Paxton Lynch hears the Foxborough crowd and melts into a puddle of tears. Mark Sanchez accidentally crams a football into his helmet's ear hole. Broncos fans who have tried to make Tebow Time happen again with the "Clever Trevor Endeavor" fall into despair when Trevor Siemian throws three interceptions to Charles Tillman, whom the Patriots signed when no one was paying attention. Patriots win 16-10. John Elway tries to offer Bill Belichick two second-round picks for Jimmy Garoppolo but gets tackled by Bill O'Brien. Peyton Manning enjoys turkey with family and friends and wonders why the heck he didn't think of this retirement thing sooner.

Saturday, Dec. 24: The Rams beat the 49ers to raise their record to 7-8. Jeff Fisher is given the keys to the city of Los Angeles. Chip Kelly and Trent Baalke are now giving separate, simultaneous and contradictory press conferences.

Sunday, Jan. 1: The Cowboys, Eagles, Giants and Redskins all finish with 7-9 records. The NFC East is decided by the rare and unprecedented "119th tiebreaker": most six-yard slants completed against divisional opponents. See that: Josh Norman really is overrated!

Friday, Jan. 6: James Harrison sneers at his captors from inside an indestructible holding cell before a Steelers-Bengals game. "If he's our 'prisoner,' how come he looks like the only person who wants to be here?" a panicked Andy Dalton asks Marvin Lewis.

Saturday, Jan. 8: The Chiefs lose a playoff game when their two-minute drill actually stops the earth from rotating on its axis.

Tuesday, Jan. 10: A humiliating Bengals playoff loss brings the traditional results: Marvin Lewis remains the team's head coach, and both coordinators become head coaches for other teams. That unsettling sound heard throughout New England is Bill Belichick's laughter.

Sunday, Jan. 22: Newton-Wilson VIII in the NFC Championship Game. Wilson throws a touchdown pass to Doug Baldwin with the entire Panthers defensive line draped on him. Newton's comeback bid fails when he makes the mistake of throwing a 60-yard Hail Mary directly into Ted Ginn Jr.'s hands. Newton arrives for the postgame press conference in April. Marshawn Lynch celebrates his former team's return to the Super Bowl with a NSFW review of the 2017 Porsche Cayenne on YouTube (to be expected of a luxury car review).

Saturday, Feb. 4: The NFL hands out its awards. Brady wins MVP, Antonio Brown is Offensive Player of the Year, Watt gets Defensive Player of the Year and Ezekiel Elliott takes Rookie of the Year. Comeback Player of the Year goes to Chad Pennington, which tells you all you need to know about how the Jets' quarterback situation worked out.

Sunday, Feb. 5: Super Bowl LI. The Patriots take a 21-17 lead with two minutes left. The Seahawks drive down to the 1-yard line, where Russell Wilson is sacked because emergency left tackle Jimmy Graham (replacing the left tackle who started for the team throughout the playoffs: Drake) whiffs on a block of Dwight Freeney, whom the Patriots signed when no one was paying attention. Marshawn Lynch eats turkey while road-testing a Jaguar F-Pace and wonders why he didn't think of this freaking retirement thing sooner.

Monday, Feb. 6: Investigators discover that Rob Gronkowski's Super Bowl cleats were 0.05 of an inch longer than regulation. Attempts to reach Gronk after the game prove unsuccessful when his cellphone is found in the mud wrestling pool of a Houston gentleman's club.

Will CleatGate cast doubt on the Patriots legacy? Will Gronk make jokes about his extra-long cleats? Will Cardinals fans complain in the comment thread about their team not getting mentioned in this article? Those questions, and many others, are far too stressful for you to worry about in early July.

 

Mike Tanier covers the NFL for Bleacher Report. Follow him on Twitter at @MikeTanier.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on July 06, 2016, 08:05:00 PM
http://www.espn.co.uk/american-fb/story/_/id/16823583/why-nfl-players-never-make-nba-mlb-money-andrew-luck-mike-conley

Interesting read regarding NBA v NFL salaries now the NBA salary cap has ballooned this summer to monster new levels.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on July 10, 2016, 08:45:53 AM

Can someone explain what a "franchise tag" is, please?

Been following the Von Miller story, and it seems he is refusing to play under a franchise tag. If only we knew what one of those was.....


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 10, 2016, 09:03:19 AM
It's given to one player per team to keep them there. I believe it restricts their contract which is why he's not happy because he was probably the best defensive player on the league last year he wants to get paid.  And seeing as Fletcher Cox got the biggest ever non-qb contract a few weeks back he will want more than that.

Seems it's in place so that owners can use the money they'd spend on their top player in other areas of the team to strengthen the team. So that player gets 'less than their worth' in the idea that better players can be brought in


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on July 10, 2016, 09:12:55 AM
It's given to one player per team to keep them there. I believe it restricts their contract which is why he's not happy because he was probably the best defensive player on the league last year he wants to get paid.  And seeing as Fletcher Cox got the biggest ever non-qb contract a few weeks back he will want more than that.

Seems it's in place so that owners can use the money they'd spend on their top player in other areas of the team to strengthen the team. So that player gets 'less than their worth' in the idea that better players can be brought in

Gotcha, thank you.

He was interviewed on TV, and seemed a decent and reasonable sort of chap.

He has been offered a lot more money in a long term deal but is not happy with it, and so a his team said he must accept it, or he gets put on a franchise tag, and Von said he'd rather sit out the season that accept the franchise tag thing.

Sounds to me like he has made a 5 bet.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 10, 2016, 09:22:11 AM
I'd be surprised if he sits out the year. But Elway seems to be pretty hard nosed and blunt and if he doesn't think a player is worth it. He won't pay it. So who knows. I get the feeling they'll cave in and pay up especially after losing Malic Jackson, Trevathan and Talib shooting himself in the leg. They're gonna need to keep him seeing as they also don't really have a starting QB.

All points to the Raiders imo at 10/3 however as before I'll be waiting till later in the off season


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 10, 2016, 09:25:49 AM
the franchise tag is a way of protecting a team trying to do a deal with star player

the player is trying to get top dollar and a long term deal

but the club has to stay within a salary cap, so within reason wants to play hardball

we see this each year in various situations

the club places a franchise tag on a player. this does the following

- pays the player the average of the top five salaries in his position at the league. in this case this is LESS than Miller would get on the open market or should get from the Broncos, hence he is unhappy. NFL careers are short and a one year deal doesn't do much for him

- once a player is under a franchise tag any other club wanting to secure his services can only do so by offering the Broncos two first round draft picks, a valuable commodity in the salary cap era as rookies out of college are cheap, and first round draft picks should be the best players

a franchise tag can be rolled over next year too

Now Miller can sit out, but at least the club is compensated if it loses him but if he sits out its likely to delay that long term deal further

what usually happens is the franchise tag allows the club to exert some leverage and get a deal done.





Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on July 11, 2016, 10:54:14 AM
Someone offered me odds on Johnny Manziel ever taking the field as a NFL player again.

I think the price he offered was value.

What % chance would you make it?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 11, 2016, 11:15:45 AM
I'd say it's more likely he turns uo dead somewhere


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 11, 2016, 11:57:00 AM
Someone offered me odds on Johnny Manziel ever taking the field as a NFL player again.

I think the price he offered was value.

What % chance would you make it?

What price Tony Romo gets injured in 2017?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 11, 2016, 12:00:49 PM
Someone offered me odds on Johnny Manziel ever taking the field as a NFL player again.

I think the price he offered was value.

What % chance would you make it?

What price Tony Romo gets injured in 2017?

high, but Manziel won't be the answer there.

He's a mess and we drafted a quarterback who we would go with

i would put it at 10-15% Manziel sees the field again. complete guess obviously

in his favour there aren't 32 NFL starting quality quarterbacks around

against him he might not one of them, even leaving aside his off the field issues


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 11, 2016, 05:13:35 PM
He's supposedly only at 140lbs as well which is way off match fit. Heard someone suggesting a year or two in the CFL would benefit him as it's more his game. But I think he'll just carry on getting wasted until his cash runs out or his does too much. Says something when his dad is talking about how worried he is about him killing himself and then he posts an image at the top of a gorge in Mexico mocking him


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on July 11, 2016, 05:17:34 PM
They offered me 50/1, which I thought was far too big.

It Matt Bush can get into the MLB (he was further away from the big leagues than Johnny Football is from the NFL now), I think it is more than possible.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 11, 2016, 07:27:32 PM
They offered me 50/1, which I thought was far too big.

It Matt Bush can get into the MLB (he was further away from the big leagues than Johnny Football is from the NFL now), I think it is more than possible.

I'd risk a few quid at 50s tbh despite what I've said. He's young. And who knows. Might sort himself out


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 11, 2016, 07:36:35 PM
He would have at least one 4 game suspension to see out if he returned (likely more), so he won't be a quick fix last resort for anyone. He's 2017 at earliest, say his people.

CFL would make sense. Maybe Jeff Reinebold can sort him out?

(https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/657080852409552896/xTeSYF9Q.jpg)

Joking aside, if Buffalo make the playoffs this year, that probably means Tyrod Taylor will be demanding a new contract we can't afford to give him...and Rex does have form for taking on projects.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 11, 2016, 07:41:42 PM
He would have at least one 4 game suspension to see out if he returned (likely more), so he won't be a quick fix last resort for anyone. He's 2017 at earliest, say his people.

CFL would make sense. Maybe Jeff Reinebold can sort him out?

(https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/657080852409552896/xTeSYF9Q.jpg)

Joking aside, if Buffalo make the playoffs this year, that probably means Tyrod Taylor will be demanding a new contract we can't afford to give him...and Rex does have form for taking on projects.


He was asked on inside the huddle this week actually (which maybe what you're referring to) The timber cats or whatever ridiculous team he coaches on have first pick on him


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: MereNovice on July 13, 2016, 08:26:47 PM
Deflate-gate: Tom Brady's four-match ban appeal rejected

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/american-football/36788846


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 15, 2016, 08:42:17 PM
Unsurprisingly Von Miller has signed a long term contract. 6 years $114.5m

According to rap sheet "Some details on Von Miller’s 6-year, $114.5M deal. $23M to sign. $42M fully guaranteed at signing. $70M in total guarantees. (A lot)."


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 15, 2016, 08:51:00 PM
Unsurprisingly Von Miller has signed a long term contract. 6 years $114.5m

According to rap sheet "Some details on Von Miller’s 6-year, $114.5M deal. $23M to sign. $42M fully guaranteed at signing. $70M in total guarantees. (A lot)."

No pressure, lad.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on July 22, 2016, 05:55:37 PM
Le'veon Bell potentially out for first 4 games after missing a drugs test😃


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 22, 2016, 05:56:16 PM
And no point me trying to trade up for Zeke Elliott...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 22, 2016, 06:11:28 PM
Le'veon Bell potentially out for first 4 games after missing a drugs test😃

They're such lovely people those Steelers. Must of been hanging around with Martavis


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on July 22, 2016, 06:19:34 PM
And no point me trying to trade up for Zeke Elliott...

** looks up likely top draft picks in 2017 draft **

ffs.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 22, 2016, 06:31:54 PM
And no point me trying to trade up for Zeke Elliott...

** looks up likely top draft picks in 2017 draft **

ffs.

David "Future HOFer" Johnson will be the carrying the Gravediggers' hopes early on, methinks.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on July 25, 2016, 10:22:22 PM
Josh Gordon conditionally reinstated, will serve a 4 game ban.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 25, 2016, 10:31:12 PM
Josh Gordon conditionally reinstated, will serve a 4 game ban.

Was just coming to post this. Hopefully he'll get himself together and get going again. He was pretty damn good. You'd think he'd need the extra 4 games to get himself ready for the go anyway. Learning playbook and settling etc.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 25, 2016, 10:36:02 PM
Josh Gordon conditionally reinstated, will serve a 4 game ban.

How long do we reckon? Does he play 12 games?

Browns have drafted heavily at wide receiver. There is a new quarterback for a change and they are hoping to build some support for Catfish Joe on the offensive line.

Let's be honest, if Travis Benjamin could get nearly 1,000 yards with them last season, it must be possible for someone highly rated to come in and do a job.

How does bringing back Josh Gordon help this new post-Manziel era?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on July 25, 2016, 10:37:35 PM
Does anyone sign Ray Rice? He is saying he will donate his salary to charities helping the victims of domestic abuse.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 25, 2016, 10:42:58 PM
Josh Gordon conditionally reinstated, will serve a 4 game ban.

How long do we reckon? Does he play 12 games?

Browns have drafted heavily at wide receiver. There is a new quarterback for a change and they are hoping to build some support for Catfish Joe on the offensive line.

Let's be honest, if Travis Benjamin could get nearly 1,000 yards with them last season, it must be possible for someone highly rated to come in and do a job.

How does bringing back Josh Gordon help this new post-Manziel era?

Gordon was woth RG3 at baylor so if the Browns keep him then he at least has a previous relationship with his QB. Everyone expects the Browns to finish bottom of their division and to challenge the niners for first pick so in fairness there's zero expectation there which must be a good thing for him coming back, and although they drafted there Corey Coleman was the only expected to really do anything this season so he'll slot straight in if he gets the playbook and fitness I'd imagine


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on July 25, 2016, 11:34:56 PM
Commissioner has also bent the rules and allowed him to train with the team.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on July 25, 2016, 11:39:16 PM
Does anyone sign Ray Rice? He is saying he will donate his salary to charities helping the victims of domestic abuse.
Cowboys😄


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 01, 2016, 07:58:46 AM
Bills training report, day 2 (per WKBW.com):

Rex Ryan surely couldn’t have been happy with the way the second training camp practice of the year was conducted. It was a sloppy effort that produced a lot of lost opportunities in the process. Passes were inaccurate, some accurate passes were dropped, and the penalties were voluminous. On one snap in particular, Tyrod Taylor dropped back in half speed due to the intended receiver ran at half speed, while the receiver on the opposite side put everything he could into the route. Things were clearly not on the same page for the offense, which led to Rex Ryan declaring that the defense had won the day. While a few players did well for themselves, the level of efficiency the offense ran with on Sunday was not at all exemplary. The offensive players weren’t the only ones committing penalties, the defense was just as guilty. All around, the day was one to forget and one that was full of rust from the offseason.

http://www.wkbw.com/sports/bills/7-bills-training-camp-observations-day-2-731

An early outing for the Three Stooges Triple Facepalm, methinks.

(http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/lummc/images/a/ae/Three-stooges-facepalm.gif/revision/latest?cb=20130617025952)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 01, 2016, 06:57:14 PM
Have done a few write ups of my opinion on a couple of things on my blog if anyone is interested and I'm going to try to put something up once a week till the season starts then I'll get some proper tips there if anyone wants to have a nose.

When it comes season I will definitely keep an eye on here and see what's on people's minds


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on August 01, 2016, 08:05:38 PM
Have done a few write ups of my opinion on a couple of things on my blog if anyone is interested and I'm going to try to put something up once a week till the season starts then I'll get some proper tips there if anyone wants to have a nose.

When it comes season I will definitely keep an eye on here and see what's on people's minds
Whereabouts can I read your blog Cavey?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 01, 2016, 08:30:53 PM
Have done a few write ups of my opinion on a couple of things on my blog if anyone is interested and I'm going to try to put something up once a week till the season starts then I'll get some proper tips there if anyone wants to have a nose.

When it comes season I will definitely keep an eye on here and see what's on people's minds
Whereabouts can I read your blog Cavey?

Nfltipsblog.WordPress.com wasn't sure whether I could post it or not. Obviously it's all opinion and it's all 37 days out from the start of the season! But I figure if I can show my workings then if they fail I get half credit anyway :/


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on August 01, 2016, 09:48:31 PM
Cheers had a read of your blog and Twitter.Personally love the under 1300 yards for A.J Green as expecting a lot of screens slants checkdowns in the passing game and a lot of pulling lineman in a run heavy game now ogbuehi gets the starting rt gig.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 01, 2016, 09:53:56 PM
I'll have to have a listen to their new podcast and see what happens during the pre season. In fairness Boyd seems to have been making an impression too. Coach Lewis was re-iterating pound the rock in an interview too however that was more we'll keep doing what we've been doing rather than we'll run and run.

Hoping the individual markets will be out in the next few weeks, I'm on holiday next week anyway so I'll have another look when I'm back


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 04, 2016, 10:49:31 PM
Regular listeners of the Around the NFL Podcast will very much enjoy this:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/around-the-nfl/0ap3000000679556/Lil-Debbie-Invades-the-ATN-Podcast

"You're like the Donovan McNabb of hip hop"

:D


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on August 05, 2016, 09:21:13 AM
Have done a few write ups of my opinion on a couple of things on my blog if anyone is interested and I'm going to try to put something up once a week till the season starts then I'll get some proper tips there if anyone wants to have a nose.

When it comes season I will definitely keep an eye on here and see what's on people's minds
Whereabouts can I read your blog Cavey?

Nfltipsblog.WordPress.com wasn't sure whether I could post it or not. Obviously it's all opinion and it's all 37 days out from the start of the season! But I figure if I can show my workings then if they fail I get half credit anyway :/

Feel free to post a link to it.

blonde works best in these spots with give & take, wise folks exchanging information, so no harm can come from posting a link to it. 




Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on August 05, 2016, 09:22:41 AM

In fact, there you go, sorted.


https://nfltipsblog.wordpress.com/


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 05, 2016, 11:54:48 AM
Regular listeners of the Around the NFL Podcast will very much enjoy this:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/around-the-nfl/0ap3000000679556/Lil-Debbie-Invades-the-ATN-Podcast

"You're like the Donovan McNabb of hip hop"

:D

Will be listening to this on the plane home from holiday! And thanks for posting the link, I do enjoy having a chat about nfl and know the chaps on here at the very least, come across as knowledgable. Mainly been writing a few things up when I'm bored, gives me something to do and has helped having an early look at some markets and trying to find something I'd consider value, also means I'm logging my thoughts at that time somewhere.

Bengals training camp hasn't been going too well so far. Kroft was karted off last week with a knee. So was Shawn Williams who's reggie nelsons replacement at Safety. So onto third choice TE Uzomah who's had 1 reception in his career


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2016, 10:42:39 AM
More Vegas money was bet on the NFL exhibition game, cancelled last night because of the surface, than 10 of yesterday's 15 MLB games


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on August 08, 2016, 02:58:11 PM
More Vegas money was bet on the NFL exhibition game, cancelled last night because of the surface, than 10 of yesterday's 15 MLB games
Crazy, bet millions of dollars are bet on pre season games as well.Are you gonna put up your NFL thoughts for this season on here or BE in the next few weeks?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2016, 03:02:07 PM
More Vegas money was bet on the NFL exhibition game, cancelled last night because of the surface, than 10 of yesterday's 15 MLB games
Crazy, bet millions of dollars are bet on pre season games as well.Are you gonna put up your NFL thoughts for this season on here or BE in the next few weeks?

just about to write them, maybe 10 days time all being well


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on August 12, 2016, 01:10:30 AM
FML didnt want to sign up to nfl gamepass for the full season this year as i get most of my viewing from sky espically with red button etc
but they dont have the preseason stuff so signed up on the 7 day free view tonight then canceled it straight away so they didnt take £140 from me

guess that was a mistake as they didnt give me the full 7 days just canceled straight away


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 12, 2016, 09:07:58 PM
Quiz question: How many games has Tyrod Taylor started?

Answer: Doesn't matter. The Bills are giving him a six year contract.




Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 17, 2016, 08:45:14 AM
Tighty, any truth in the rumour the Bills and the Cowboys are going to be playing together this year and employing a brand new 1A/1B committee defense?

We can't have 11 available guys for week one...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 17, 2016, 11:08:17 AM
Hard Knocks is coming to SkySports

Starting this Friday, 10:30pm, Sky Sports 2

great news, series link time

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqDLySlWcAADb7J.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on August 19, 2016, 03:06:15 AM
Hard Knocks is coming to SkySports

Starting this Friday, 10:30pm, Sky Sports 2

great news, series link time

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqDLySlWcAADb7J.jpg)

Boom! Cheers.

Dunno if there's any Raiders/Packers fans ITT, but streaming the preseason game here. Packers starting OL + Lacy looked good, Hundley looked decent playing with the starters and definitely an upgrade over Tolzien if anything happens to Rodgers, albeit a small sample. Gonna be a hell of an offense to watch this season if they can keep everyone healthy, which has been the story for the last few seasons.

Raiders looked pretty meh so far, particularly on offense, although our new safety that we drafted in the first round impressed me in a couple of spots on the opening drive.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 19, 2016, 11:03:30 AM
Has anyone got a view on anything that stands out on the individual markets? Seem only to be 365 at the moment

https://mobile.bet365.com/default.aspx?lng=1&zn=1&apptype=&appversion=&rnd=43504#type=Coupon;key=12-20464405-1-28861573-2-0-0-0-1-0-0-4063-0-0-1-0-0-0-0-0-719;ip=0;lng=1;anim=1

I noted a few that I'm already arguing with myself on


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 19, 2016, 11:17:36 AM
prices are up in lots of places

go via http://www.oddschecker.com/american-football/nfl-specials/regular-season/betting-markets


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 19, 2016, 11:57:57 AM
I get an error on that link

Couldn't find individual records. Lots of most passing/rec/rushing yards markets. But couldn't find o/u?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 19, 2016, 12:06:31 PM
this one? http://www.oddschecker.com/american-football/nfl-specials

i tend not to do 10/11 each of two stuff over 17 weeks so wouldn't know about player o/u


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 19, 2016, 12:07:22 PM
hold on they are there too

bet365 eg http://www.oddschecker.com/american-football/nfl-specials/regular-season/total-receiving-yds-julio-jones


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 19, 2016, 01:57:10 PM
Has anyone got a view on anything that stands out on the individual markets? Seem only to be 365 at the moment

https://mobile.bet365.com/default.aspx?lng=1&zn=1&apptype=&appversion=&rnd=43504#type=Coupon;key=12-20464405-1-28861573-2-0-0-0-1-0-0-4063-0-0-1-0-0-0-0-0-719;ip=0;lng=1;anim=1

I noted a few that I'm already arguing with myself on

I'm trying to put together a season preview type thing here by the end of the preseason. There are a few teams I'm cute on and one or two surprises I'm going to say won't make the playoffs (like the superbowl champions for instance).

Things are really busy for me ATM and it also obviously makes sense to wait for at least 3 games of the preseason to start the full prediction stuff. Also things like the LeVeon Bell situation to be determined.

Not sure of the level of detail as yet but it'll be something along the lines of finishing orders in the divisions, some projections of player performances and maybe a mock playoff route to the superbowl. Bills 4th in the AFC East anyone?

I'm going to have a few season long bets (probably leaning towards the unders in these o/u markets, the nearer to the off we get, because, as we know, the punters love betting on things to happen, rather than betting on them not to happen), but I'd hate to take overs on anyone now when they could get injured before we even begin. Maybe that's just poor mentality on my part but I am not a massive antepost guy in any sport.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 19, 2016, 02:13:21 PM
Actually mentioned the other day on twitter that the Bills could be awful with all their injuries and suspensions and the Ryans there


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 19, 2016, 02:38:05 PM
Actually mentioned the other day on twitter that the Bills could be awful with all their injuries and suspensions and the Ryans there

We will start 2017 with significantly fewer injuries, suspensions and Ryans. 


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 24, 2016, 08:29:22 PM
Joey Bosa released by the San Diego Chargers.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 24, 2016, 08:54:40 PM
The chargers are cheap. For bosa it will cost him a lot of money as there are better de's than him in next years draft


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: LeKnave on August 24, 2016, 09:10:01 PM
Joey Bosa released by the San Diego Chargers.

Chargers ''release'' a statement on Joey Bosa*


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 24, 2016, 09:13:49 PM
The kid is an ass-hat. He's going to make a fortune anyway. Why does he need/want the money so quickly when he'll make millions anyway. He was always going to get the money eventually. I hope no-one picks him up. But he probably will within the week

Chargers statement. I think... https://mobile.twitter.com/Chargers/status/768509903707123712/photo/1


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 24, 2016, 09:17:47 PM
No if he doesn't agree with the chargers he goes back into next years draft. No team has any money left in rookie pools


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Skippy on August 24, 2016, 09:19:13 PM
Excuse the noob question but I thought the deal with the draft was that you got picked, you had to play for the team that picked you and the salary and the length of the contract was all set in stone based on where you went in the draft.  So what is there to talk about?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 24, 2016, 09:26:05 PM
This is why this is very rare. The 2011 cba basically slotted every draft pick to financial deals meaning hold outs and non signings became a thing if the past The chargers have though asked him to accept less than slot. The chargers have picked 11th to 25th since that cba, this is the first year they are on the hook for lots of money since quinten jammer and phillip rivers iirc


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 24, 2016, 09:27:25 PM
Excuse the noob question but I thought the deal with the draft was that you got picked, you had to play for the team that picked you and the salary and the length of the contract was all set in stone based on where you went in the draft.  So what is there to talk about?

Ah. Sorry tighty. Wasn't aware of that. Thought he'd just go to free agency. Makes sense. So he'll be wasting a year doing nothing and presumably get drafted lower next year as he seems to be proving hard work.


Hadn't heard about them asking him to take less, I thought it was about how he's paid his bonuses. He wants all his signing on bonus up front. But the chargers don't do that. (although could be that he recieves less this year as they try to spread out that cash)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 24, 2016, 09:32:09 PM
My understanding is the deal gets done if the bonus gets paid up front, which is standard practice. Revenue across the league from TV etc is spread equally, all franchises are wealthy. It seems a bit cheap not to pay him and lose the player in a rare year when you can draft a top ten talent


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 24, 2016, 09:36:12 PM
I see both sides. He's gonna get paid either way eventually. But his dad played didn't he. So obviously advising him and suggesting a holdout is a better idea.

As you say it's not like they are struggling for cash. But at this point I think it's them nit wanting a player to have the "upperhand"


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 24, 2016, 09:36:24 PM
My understanding is the deal gets done if the bonus gets paid up front, which is standard practice. Revenue across the league from TV etc is spread equally, all franchises are wealthy. It seems a bit cheap not to pay him and lose the player in a rare year when you can draft a top ten talent

But that is how they do business. Always have. How much power do the players need?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 25, 2016, 10:34:52 AM
the Chargers have history

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqpXptdUsAInlx8.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 25, 2016, 10:36:20 AM
Bonus deferral speaks to Chargers cash flow, but offset language only comes into play if Bosa washes out in NFL...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqpybZMUsAAafRx.jpg)

one analyst summarised as follows "meaning Chargers are signalling that they're cash strapped, & that they are preparing for a definite possibility of Bosa flopping in NFL"


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 25, 2016, 10:38:13 AM
"Matt Miller ‏@nfldraftscout

Rookie deals in top 5 don't have offsets and deferments though. @chargers want both."


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 25, 2016, 04:51:26 PM
Las Vegas Raiders trademark applications have been filed by the Oakland Raiders...

rumour is a change of ownership, and then the NFL gets to go to Vegas....(which is slightly odd given their attitude to gambling)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on August 27, 2016, 08:50:46 PM
Tony Romo injured.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000691153/article/jason-garrett-tony-romo-has-broken-bone-in-his-back

In other news, today is a day of the week ending in "Y".


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 27, 2016, 08:56:16 PM
Ah poop. Was hoping 365 was still have his yards as a market. They quick.

Gotta be good for Zeke yardage though. I know Dak Prescott has looked good but he's had it easy so far. Simple playbook. Simple reads etc. Be interesting to see how he does week 1


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 27, 2016, 09:09:15 PM
Since Week 1 2015 & including the 2016 preseason Tony Romo has started 6 games and suffered major injuries in 3 of those 6 games.

i feel for him.

Hope we sink or swim with the rookie and don't block his progress with a vet. lets see what we've got and if it fails we'll have a high draft pick to work with next time round (couldn't get goff or wentz this may, tried to trade up for lynch and connor cook)



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 27, 2016, 09:10:33 PM
Dak Prescott was 5000-1 OROY before the seattle game

still a huge longshot, but you never know


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 27, 2016, 09:35:31 PM
25/1 for him now...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 29, 2016, 06:54:54 PM
I've had a go at predicting the unpredictable. Enjoy. Discussion welcome:

http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=67137.0

(Mods, don't mind whether you merge the threads, but as there is a lot of content, I figured I'd keep them separate)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on August 30, 2016, 02:46:17 AM
Joey Bosa finally signs his rookie contract


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on August 30, 2016, 11:21:37 AM
Would just like to say thanks to Tighty and Tal for putting up their NFL previews/predictions in the last week or so.With the emphasis on parity and 32 teams it involves watching hours of footage and keeping up with constant depth chart changes...top work and good luck with the season bets.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on August 30, 2016, 01:15:25 PM
I know a lot of the NFL guys enjoy watching & listening to Mike Carlson, well he is the Guest on the Sky Poker Grudge Match tonight, on SS3 from 10pm until Midnight.

In between the poker, Mike will be taking questions from Twitter, & if anything pops up on here, I will pass it on.

Obv, I'll be marking the Producer's card & prompting some interesting questions from my extensive NFL knowledge.  






Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 30, 2016, 07:06:19 PM
Would definitely be interested in Mr Carlson's views on my prediction that the Denver Broncos do not make the playoffs this year.

Would think you'd also want to discuss the Los Angeles Rams, given Sky Sports is broadcasting the Hard Knocks series on Fridays, which focuses on them this year. Nice and "on message", that.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: MattyHollis on August 30, 2016, 07:38:07 PM
Would definitely be interested in Mr Carlson's views on my prediction that the Denver Broncos do not make the playoffs this year.


Reckon he might offer to take the other side of that huge coin flip prediction.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on August 30, 2016, 07:53:47 PM
Would definitely be interested in Mr Carlson's views on my prediction that the Denver Broncos do not make the playoffs this year.

Would think you'd also want to discuss the Los Angeles Rams, given Sky Sports is broadcasting the Hard Knocks series on Fridays, which focuses on them this year. Nice and "on message", that.

THEY may want to discuss - I'm not doing tonight, that pleasure falls to Stu Rutter. I am doing next Tuesday. Knowing my luck it will be a SCD special.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on August 30, 2016, 09:04:08 PM
Oh dear...

"Bad scene. Bridgewater down in pocket grabbing left knee. Players freaked out, swearing and praying. Immobilized. Practice halted #Vikings"


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 30, 2016, 09:59:39 PM
Sounds like a bad one, ambulance and trauma team called immediately. Defense and lumps of Adrian Peterson then again


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 30, 2016, 10:03:47 PM
Would definitely be interested in Mr Carlson's views on my prediction that the Denver Broncos do not make the playoffs this year.

Would think you'd also want to discuss the Los Angeles Rams, given Sky Sports is broadcasting the Hard Knocks series on Fridays, which focuses on them this year. Nice and "on message", that.

THEY may want to discuss - I'm not doing tonight, that pleasure falls to Stu Rutter. I am doing next Tuesday. Knowing my luck it will be a SCD special.

Please don't mention an SCD Special if it isn't going to happen. I couldn't take the news it's a joke.

Claudia Winkleman on the sofa that week would be fun:

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/09/11/2C16440D00000578-3227391-Strike_a_pose_Claudia_also_shared_a_snap_with_model_Daisy_Lowe_w-a-3_1441793266654.jpg)

(Seen here with 2016 contestant, Daisy Lowe)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on August 30, 2016, 10:05:39 PM
Sounds like a bad one, ambulance and trauma team called immediately. Defense and lumps of Adrian Peterson then again

Shaun Hill still the number 2?

He was ok filling in for Sam Bradford in St Louis, IIRC. Not like they need a superstar replacement. Clearly going to be missed, though.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on August 31, 2016, 11:13:31 AM
yesterday

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CrIABcWVIAASNlZ.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: horseplayer on August 31, 2016, 11:30:22 AM
Presume you guys have seen this?

https://www.spreadex.com/sports/nfl-super-challenge/?utm_campaign=Social+Media+++-+Twitter&utm_content=NFL&utm_source=Social+Media++&utm_medium=Twitter

14k to the winner last season looks well worth a go for some of the minds on the nfl on here?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on August 31, 2016, 05:53:05 PM
Sounds like a bad one, ambulance and trauma team called immediately. Defense and lumps of Adrian Peterson then again

Dislocated knee and torn ACL.



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 01, 2016, 09:08:57 AM
tibiofemoral dislocation, ruptured ACL for Bridgewater. "Trainers may have saved his leg and career by quick action."


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 03, 2016, 04:33:50 PM
Vikings trading for Sam Bradford

they have to trade for someone as the cowboys have waiver priority for any QB scraps in the cut to 53


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 03, 2016, 04:34:46 PM
christ, they were desperate

"Source confirms: the Vikings have traded for Sam Bradford. They gave up a 1st-round pick in 2017 and an additional pick in 2018."


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 03, 2016, 04:39:16 PM
A little worse than Bridgewater. A little better than Hill.

That leaves Chase to start for the Eagles then...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 03, 2016, 04:50:48 PM
christ, they were desperate

"Source confirms: the Vikings have traded for Sam Bradford. They gave up a 1st-round pick in 2017 and an additional pick in 2018."

Says more about the Eagles than the Vikings.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on September 03, 2016, 04:54:40 PM
christ, they were desperate

"Source confirms: the Vikings have traded for Sam Bradford. They gave up a 1st-round pick in 2017 and an additional pick in 2018."

Says more about the Eagles than the Vikings.
wentz is ready


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 03, 2016, 04:57:13 PM
christ, they were desperate

"Source confirms: the Vikings have traded for Sam Bradford. They gave up a 1st-round pick in 2017 and an additional pick in 2018."

Says more about the Eagles than the Vikings.
wentz is ready


lol he most certainly is not!



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: horseplayer on September 03, 2016, 05:12:17 PM
Presume you guys have seen this?

https://www.spreadex.com/sports/nfl-super-challenge/?utm_campaign=Social+Media+++-+Twitter&utm_content=NFL&utm_source=Social+Media++&utm_medium=Twitter

14k to the winner last season looks well worth a go for some of the minds on the nfl on here?

Bump again if it was missed no rake either


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 03, 2016, 06:56:36 PM
Jeez apparently they'll be starting Wentz if he's recovered for the first game


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on September 03, 2016, 09:10:33 PM
christ, they were desperate

"Source confirms: the Vikings have traded for Sam Bradford. They gave up a 1st-round pick in 2017 and an additional pick in 2018."

Says more about the Eagles than the Vikings.
wentz is ready


lol he most certainly is not!


its not like the division has any talent in it we will be ok :-)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 04, 2016, 12:21:06 AM
Very troubling reading

http://projects.buffalonews.com/long-reads/bjorn-nittmo/index.html



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on September 04, 2016, 09:43:34 AM
Very troubling reading

http://projects.buffalonews.com/long-reads/bjorn-nittmo/index.html



That's a painful (& long) read Keith.

Do NFL players not have a support network, such as the PFA in football?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on September 04, 2016, 10:26:52 AM
A friend of mine who played number 8 at school got badly knocked out during the first half of a game, but ended up completing the game. After the game, he kept asking why we weren't playing a second half. To the point where I thought he was putting it on and it became quite annoying. He ended up having to stop playing rugby due to headaches and always seemed a bit slower of thought thereafter.

He ended up rowing in the coded 8 for Britain in the World Championships though so might have been a odd type of blessing.

Concussions are very troubling though. You only have to look at Junior Seau's case to understand the tragic consequences. Good to see that they're attempting to increase the diligence paid to head injuries but you still feel that coaches will put pressure to get stars back out on the field at all costs as their jobs depend on results.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 04, 2016, 12:30:18 PM
With the season upcoming would be good to here people's expectations for their teams..
Bengals 11-5 afc n champs
Think zampese is way ahead of hue Jackson in the play calling department and will get the max out of hill and bernard.Im very bullish again this season but expecting plenty of low scoring wars of attrition..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 04, 2016, 01:15:09 PM
With the season upcoming would be good to here people's expectations for their teams..
Bengals 11-5 afc n champs
Think zampese is way ahead of hue Jackson in the play calling department and will get the max out of hill and bernard.Im very bullish again this season but expecting plenty of low scoring wars of attrition..

I've got us at 10-6. I think we may lose the first game v the Jets without Eifert there. Uzomah has hardly impressed in the reps he's had at tight end during pre season. I'm glad we've rostered Ericsson he's looked a play maker and will be on special teams I assume. Probably on returns instead of Tate. Boyd has looked good. LaFell doesn't seem to have done much so far. The only proper pre season action was first half of the Jags game and we were 21-3 up. So thats definitely a good thing


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 04, 2016, 01:42:59 PM
With the season upcoming would be good to here people's expectations for their teams..
Bengals 11-5 afc n champs
Think zampese is way ahead of hue Jackson in the play calling department and will get the max out of hill and bernard.Im very bullish again this season but expecting plenty of low scoring wars of attrition..

I've got us at 10-6. I think we may lose the first game v the Jets without Eifert there. Uzomah has hardly impressed in the reps he's had at tight end during pre season. I'm glad we've rostered Ericsson he's looked a play maker and will be on special teams I assume. Probably on returns instead of Tate. Boyd has looked good. LaFell doesn't seem to have done much so far. The only proper pre season action was first half of the Jags game and we were 21-3 up. So thats definitely a good thing
Think we beat the jets 10+ in the opener tiring out Wilkerson and co with plenty of screens and dump offs.Hill running behind a fullback will make a nice change from jacksons 1 back sets.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 04, 2016, 04:47:43 PM
With the season upcoming would be good to here people's expectations for their teams..
Bengals 11-5 afc n champs
Think zampese is way ahead of hue Jackson in the play calling department and will get the max out of hill and bernard.Im very bullish again this season but expecting plenty of low scoring wars of attrition..

I've got us at 10-6. I think we may lose the first game v the Jets without Eifert there. Uzomah has hardly impressed in the reps he's had at tight end during pre season. I'm glad we've rostered Ericsson he's looked a play maker and will be on special teams I assume. Probably on returns instead of Tate. Boyd has looked good. LaFell doesn't seem to have done much so far. The only proper pre season action was first half of the Jags game and we were 21-3 up. So thats definitely a good thing
Think we beat the jets 10+ in the opener tiring out Wilkerson and co with plenty of screens and dump offs.Hill running behind a fullback will make a nice change from jacksons 1 back sets.

I hope so! Hill loois like he could be back to his first year again. Looks like he's just going for gaps instead of hesitating. Fingers crossed anyway. I've had a little each way at 28/1 on him being top td scorer!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 04, 2016, 05:13:36 PM
With the season upcoming would be good to here people's expectations for their teams..
Bengals 11-5 afc n champs
Think zampese is way ahead of hue Jackson in the play calling department and will get the max out of hill and bernard.Im very bullish again this season but expecting plenty of low scoring wars of attrition..

I've got us at 10-6. I think we may lose the first game v the Jets without Eifert there. Uzomah has hardly impressed in the reps he's had at tight end during pre season. I'm glad we've rostered Ericsson he's looked a play maker and will be on special teams I assume. Probably on returns instead of Tate. Boyd has looked good. LaFell doesn't seem to have done much so far. The only proper pre season action was first half of the Jags game and we were 21-3 up. So thats definitely a good thing
Think we beat the jets 10+ in the opener tiring out Wilkerson and co with plenty of screens and dump offs.Hill running behind a fullback will make a nice change from jacksons 1 back sets.

I hope so! Hill loois like he could be back to his first year again. Looks like he's just going for gaps instead of hesitating. Fingers crossed anyway. I've had a little each way at 28/1 on him being top td scorer!
Read your blog really like that bet.If Hill plays 16 games with Hewitt wiping out linebackers can see him getting 10+ td's easily.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 05, 2016, 10:18:36 AM
With the season upcoming would be good to here people's expectations for their teams..
Bengals 11-5 afc n champs
Think zampese is way ahead of hue Jackson in the play calling department and will get the max out of hill and bernard.Im very bullish again this season but expecting plenty of low scoring wars of attrition..

I've got us at 10-6. I think we may lose the first game v the Jets without Eifert there. Uzomah has hardly impressed in the reps he's had at tight end during pre season. I'm glad we've rostered Ericsson he's looked a play maker and will be on special teams I assume. Probably on returns instead of Tate. Boyd has looked good. LaFell doesn't seem to have done much so far. The only proper pre season action was first half of the Jags game and we were 21-3 up. So thats definitely a good thing
Think we beat the jets 10+ in the opener tiring out Wilkerson and co with plenty of screens and dump offs.Hill running behind a fullback will make a nice change from jacksons 1 back sets.

I hope so! Hill loois like he could be back to his first year again. Looks like he's just going for gaps instead of hesitating. Fingers crossed anyway. I've had a little each way at 28/1 on him being top td scorer!
Read your blog really like that bet.If Hill plays 16 games with Hewitt wiping out linebackers can see him getting 10+ td's easily.
Cavey have you seen that we've put a 3rd qb on the roster and waived dawson.With 11 draft picks already next year I reckon we're shopping mccarron around for a first..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 05, 2016, 10:30:10 AM
Whose the third? Wenning? I'd be surprised if we trade Mccarron as we generally do well in drafts anyway so don't really need the extra picks. But I wouldn't be surprised if he'd started getting itchy feet as he's better than quite a few of the starters in the league


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 05, 2016, 10:36:07 AM
Whose the third? Wenning? I'd be surprised if we trade Mccarron as we generally do well in drafts anyway so don't really need the extra picks. But I wouldn't be surprised if he'd started getting itchy feet as he's better than quite a few of the starters in the league
Wenning cut picked up a qb from the 49ers.See Bud Dupree put on ir for the steelers😄


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on September 05, 2016, 12:19:43 PM
christ, they were desperate

"Source confirms: the Vikings have traded for Sam Bradford. They gave up a 1st-round pick in 2017 and an additional pick in 2018."

Says more about the Eagles than the Vikings.
wentz is ready


lol he most certainly is not!



The price we got for Bradford is incredible, given that he was, at best, our QB for this season only.  1st and a conditional 4th (becomes a 3rd if MIN make the Superbowl, and a 2nd if they win it this season).

This season had all the makings of being a transition, so although we lose out short-term on Bradford not being there it's a great deal for us.

I just hope they don't rush Wentz to start if he's not fully fit.  I can live with Chase Daniel at QB for now and getting Wentz healthy to begin his NFL education.

And we can now look forward to having a 1st round pick when the draft takes place in Philadelphia next year too.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Nakor on September 05, 2016, 04:17:45 PM
Tighty - you doing a Pick Em league on NFL this year?
If you are drop me the code please.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 05, 2016, 04:22:27 PM
Whose the third? Wenning? I'd be surprised if we trade Mccarron as we generally do well in drafts anyway so don't really need the extra picks. But I wouldn't be surprised if he'd started getting itchy feet as he's better than quite a few of the starters in the league
Wenning cut picked up a qb from the 49ers.See Bud Dupree put on ir for the steelers😄

I never like players getting injured, but I can smile at a Steeler at least, poor them. If we didn't let the Vikings have McCarron for a first and a future 4th like for Bradford then I would assume we're keeping him... (I'd assume they'd of offered something similar if they'd been interested, and again i'd of thought he would of been a player they'd of looked at)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 05, 2016, 05:42:49 PM
Wentz starting v the Browns.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 06, 2016, 10:17:54 AM
Updated chart of when 1st-round qbs got their first start. Wentz becomes the 14th (of 24) to start opener since '08.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Crm4JGfW8AEnTh-.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 06, 2016, 10:18:47 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Crm6oeMUEAAp3m7.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 06, 2016, 10:41:29 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Crm6oeMUEAAp3m7.jpg)
Haha, seriously though I'm delighted he's gone there as I've bet the house on the Vikings winning the division.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on September 06, 2016, 10:47:35 AM
Sky Poker & Sky Bet had NFL Bloke Mike Carlson & Betting Bloke Neil Channing in the studio last week, & they gave their views on a few NFL matters.

Each vid is short & sharp, around 50 seconds, so an easy watch. Quite a miracle of TV Producing to keep Mr C to less than a minute, let me tell you.  

They have spammy headers, but they are free.

Vids follow.....


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on September 06, 2016, 10:48:12 AM

Mike Carlson on Denver Broncos repeating.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FusrGy_erI8


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on September 06, 2016, 10:48:53 AM

Mike Carlson on Superbowl winner.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTk10Ls0MDM


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on September 06, 2016, 10:49:39 AM

Mike Carlson on Miami Dolphins challenging.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6O178oe6C8


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on September 06, 2016, 10:50:17 AM

Mr Channing on Superbowl 51.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrnQ689lsQo


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on September 06, 2016, 10:50:47 AM

Mr Channing on NFL North.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAKx6CXU8QU


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on September 06, 2016, 10:51:25 AM

Mr Channing on NFC East.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIP8OCNJPLo


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: MattyHollis on September 06, 2016, 10:55:25 AM

Mr Channing on NFL North.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAKx6CXU8QU

When were these recorded? I'm guessing before Bridgewater got injured?

Eddie Lacy is only 26 fwiw.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on September 06, 2016, 11:03:11 AM

Mr Channing on NFL North.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAKx6CXU8QU

When were these recorded? I'm guessing before Bridgewater got injured?

Eddie Lacy is only 26 fwiw.

Tuesday of last week, as per my intro.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 06, 2016, 11:18:44 AM
Thanks for putting those up Tikay.Lot of love for the Giants everywhere but can't see it myself.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Horneris on September 08, 2016, 01:13:38 PM
If anyone wants to play the pigskin pick-ems (make a pick on the spread in every game over the course of the reg season), I started a thread here: http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=67155.msg2156661#new


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 08, 2016, 05:16:42 PM
Id imagine i'll be in, do we need to sort it before tonight? Maybe i should actually read the thread.

Yeah ill sign up in  bit, can i pay tomorrow? Payday.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 08, 2016, 05:19:48 PM
https://nfltipsblog.wordpress.com/2016/09/08/its-finally-here-opening-game-denver-broncos-host-carolina-panthers/

My scribble for tonights match...

Picks if you dont read the link,
Siemian passing yards – u220.5 – 5/7  (Bet365) (If you want you can cover o180.5 on Skybet at 10/11)
CJ Anderson rushing yards – o53.5 – 5/6 (Paddypower)
Devin Funchess recieving yards – o37.5 – 5/6 (PaddyPower)
Both players TDs – Anderson and Olsen – 7/2 (Skybet)

Have also personally gone with D/ST td scored at 7/4 was a good one for both teams last season


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on September 08, 2016, 05:26:09 PM

Mr Channing on NFL North.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAKx6CXU8QU

When were these recorded? I'm guessing before Bridgewater got injured?

Eddie Lacy is only 26 fwiw.

Tuesday of last week, as per my intro.

The vikings quarterback got injured after he tipped them, so you can ignore that one.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 08, 2016, 06:32:14 PM
 Inside Sheldon Adelson’s plan to build an NFL stadium in Las Vegas for the Raiders

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-inside-sheldon-adelsons-plan-to-build-an-nfl-stadium-in-las-vegas-151026939.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw

(https://o.twimg.com/2/proxy.jpg?t=HBjIAWh0dHA6Ly9sMS55aW1nLmNvbS91dS9hcGkvcmVzLzEuMi9QVU5BSlZyODBLbTJuNVkyODBqcTNRLS0vYUQwek5qYzdkejAyTnpBN2MyMDlNVHRoY0hCcFpEMTVkR0ZqYUhsdmJnLS0vaHR0cDovL21lZGlhLnplbmZzLmNvbS9lbi9ob21lcnVuL2ZlZWRfbWFuYWdlcl9hdXRvX3B1Ymxpc2hfNDk0L2I5MTBlOWZlZTQ4ZDM3YTdlOWVmNmNjOTc1ZDM2NjA2FLwKFLwFHBSEBhSUAwAAFgASAA&s=DHKImZMMII-AqVMPvjJqw_S77JvhRoRvE0mqlC3HJU8)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: MattyHollis on September 08, 2016, 07:28:53 PM

Mr Channing on NFL North.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAKx6CXU8QU

When were these recorded? I'm guessing before Bridgewater got injured?

Eddie Lacy is only 26 fwiw.

Tuesday of last week, as per my intro.

The vikings quarterback got injured after he tipped them, so you can ignore that one.

Oh, I have.

Ignored them all, especially when he shouts what a price about the Cardinals being 9/1 for the Super Bowl. Don't know how he kept a straight face trying to big up the worst industry price to the mugs watching.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on September 08, 2016, 07:49:53 PM

Mr Channing on NFL North.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAKx6CXU8QU

When were these recorded? I'm guessing before Bridgewater got injured?

Eddie Lacy is only 26 fwiw.

Tuesday of last week, as per my intro.

The vikings quarterback got injured after he tipped them, so you can ignore that one.

Oh, I have.

Ignored them all, especially when he shouts what a price about the Cardinals being 9/1 for the Super Bowl. Don't know how he kept a straight face trying to big up the worst industry price to the mugs watching.

Neil just is one of the most knowledgeable people in gambling*.  If people just only ever listened to him when he talks about betting hey should be winning gamblers. 

Obviously when on a Sky betting show, he is going to have to stick to Sky prices, but anyone with a modicum of betting sense could look for the best price on his tips.

So many charlatans out there putting up bet365 accas to make commission, and you go after one of the good guys.  I can't think of anybody I have learned more from.



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 08, 2016, 08:18:04 PM
Yeah they always refer only to sky prices on the sky show. That's been true for the betting preview shows they've done for years (but which are sadly missing from the new format). Fairly obvious what is implied.

Also, the Cardinals ARE going to win the super bowl, so it's fine ;)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 08, 2016, 09:47:21 PM
I've gone Cards highest pt scorers at 9/1. The NFC is so competitive at the top. 3 other teams to realistically work through to get to the Superbowl (Panthers, Seahawks and probably the Packers) I think it'll probably be Seahawks or Cards


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 08, 2016, 10:12:00 PM
Do anywhere offer a total sacks market? I'll be honest I usually check three bookies and can't see it on any of them


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: MattyHollis on September 08, 2016, 11:39:10 PM

Mr Channing on NFL North.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAKx6CXU8QU

When were these recorded? I'm guessing before Bridgewater got injured?

Eddie Lacy is only 26 fwiw.

Tuesday of last week, as per my intro.

The vikings quarterback got injured after he tipped them, so you can ignore that one.

Oh, I have.

Ignored them all, especially when he shouts what a price about the Cardinals being 9/1 for the Super Bowl. Don't know how he kept a straight face trying to big up the worst industry price to the mugs watching.

Neil just is one of the most knowledgeable people in gambling*.  If people just only ever listened to him when he talks about betting hey should be winning gamblers. 

Obviously when on a Sky betting show, he is going to have to stick to Sky prices, but anyone with a modicum of betting sense could look for the best price on his tips.

So many charlatans out there putting up bet365 accas to make commission, and you go after one of the good guys.  I can't think of anybody I have learned more from.



I've not gone after anybody. Merely stated what I watched and what he said. He puts himself out there he's going to create opinions and posts and i'm sure he knows this and has had much worse than me effectively quoting what he says and wondering how he can keep a straight face whilst saying it.

I guess you are a fan/friend of his as any other rando getting the same said about them you wouldn't even bat an eyelid i'm sure.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 09, 2016, 12:01:07 AM

Mr Channing on NFL North.....

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAKx6CXU8QU

When were these recorded? I'm guessing before Bridgewater got injured?

Eddie Lacy is only 26 fwiw.

Tuesday of last week, as per my intro.

The vikings quarterback got injured after he tipped them, so you can ignore that one.

Oh, I have.

Ignored them all, especially when he shouts what a price about the Cardinals being 9/1 for the Super Bowl. Don't know how he kept a straight face trying to big up the worst industry price to the mugs watching.

Neil just is one of the most knowledgeable people in gambling*.  If people just only ever listened to him when he talks about betting hey should be winning gamblers.  

Obviously when on a Sky betting show, he is going to have to stick to Sky prices, but anyone with a modicum of betting sense could look for the best price on his tips.

So many charlatans out there putting up bet365 accas to make commission, and you go after one of the good guys.  I can't think of anybody I have learned more from.



I've not gone after anybody. Merely stated what I watched and what he said. He puts himself out there he's going to create opinions and posts and i'm sure he knows this and has had much worse than me effectively quoting what he says and wondering how he can keep a straight face whilst saying it.

I guess you are a fan/friend of his as any other rando getting the same said about them you wouldn't even bat an eyelid i'm sure.

I'll put in a disclaimer first, Neil is a mate and we go back nearly 40 years now. So take this post with a pinch of salt if you wish.

Neil is sponsored by Skybet and it is a Skybet programme.

Obviously on an NFL betting preview show, he's going to have to give an outright selection.

What do you want him to do? Lie about who he fancies and pick a team who are best priced with Skybet (if there is one)? Or put up theteam he has backed at a slightly lower price offered by his sponsor?

It's a no win situation for Neil, and it is very possible he thinks Arizona are value at 9/1 even if they are available at a bigger price elsewhere.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 09, 2016, 12:13:19 AM
I suppose he could have something like "I prefer to wait a few weeks before playing outright usually".

But I'm guessing S*ybet pressed him to make a pick.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on September 09, 2016, 01:25:10 AM
I suppose he could have something like "I prefer to wait a few weeks before playing outright usually".

But I'm guessing S*ybet pressed him to make a pick.

Those were the 3 tips written by tighty on the betting emporium preview.  So I guess they were all discussed between the two.  So I think it is pretty clear he likely thought they were, at least, reasonable bets at best prices.  Even if people didn't like the prices on Sky, it was pretty easy to see what Neil wanted to say, but couldn't. 

And just for Matty, of course I am not going to defend a random in the same way, because pretty much zero percent of randoms are as wise as Neil when it comes to betting.  He just gets it.  I simply didn't think it showed great insight to come on here saying that you didn't back any of these tips, and then proceed to attack him.  In my OP I was just letting people know that you could now take the Vikings rec with a pinch of salt as circumstances had changed since the preview was aired.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Horneris on September 09, 2016, 03:28:00 AM
Eddie Lacy an older guy? Hes barely out of college, what on earth!!!

And Randall Cobb is also 26. And Rodgers and Nelson at 32 and 31 respectively are in their absolute prime. Not too many old stagers in their defence either nowadays, TJ Lang 28, Clay Matthews 30, Haha Clinton Dix 23, Micah Hyde 25, don't get this reasoning at all.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: MattyHollis on September 09, 2016, 05:35:59 PM
Eddie Lacy an older guy? Hes barely out of college, what on earth!!!

And Randall Cobb is also 26. And Rodgers and Nelson at 32 and 31 respectively are in their absolute prime. Not too many old stagers in their defence either nowadays, TJ Lang 28, Clay Matthews 30, Haha Clinton Dix 23, Micah Hyde 25, don't get this reasoning at all.

You must be in the clique to get away with feeling no backlash for daring to disagree with something Neil Channing says.

As for attacking Channing, take your fanboy glasses off. Yeah he's paid and sponsored to do a job that's all fine but he's not obligated to shout WHAT A PRICE at the end of it - yet chose to. Purely there making selections on everything they throw infront of him to try and drum up trade for Skybet and nothing else, which is why these selections just simply cannot be followed. And that is why I said i've not followed anything & expressed my dislike for his comment - lolattack.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Newportlad on September 11, 2016, 06:03:23 PM
Dara Kennedy again lead presenter with Sky.

Really?

FML!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 11, 2016, 06:07:17 PM
Dara Kennedy again lead presenter with Sky.

Really?

FML!

I think Kevin Cadle pissed off SKY when promoting his book on the programme last year.

I have no idea why they don't use Mike Carlsen, easily the best analyst on British TV.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 11, 2016, 09:11:42 PM
Apparently she reported that the jags went 1-4 in pre season


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 11, 2016, 10:06:32 PM
Yessssss Bengals! Tough win that. Had us down as a loss so very happy!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on September 11, 2016, 10:19:29 PM
christ, they were desperate

"Source confirms: the Vikings have traded for Sam Bradford. They gave up a 1st-round pick in 2017 and an additional pick in 2018."

Says more about the Eagles than the Vikings.
wentz is ready


lol he most certainly is not!



improvement on last years QBs


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 11, 2016, 10:38:49 PM
Drew Brees 423 passing yards, 4 TDs and a loss.

It shouldn't be funny or predictable.

What a call by Del Rio to go for 2, though. Wow.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on September 11, 2016, 10:47:53 PM
Drew Brees 423 passing yards, 4 TDs and a loss.

It shouldn't be funny or predictable.

What a call by Del Rio to go for 2, though. Wow.

some cracking plays in that game

i think i need to invest in another 3 or 4 screens for next week 3 isnt enough


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 11, 2016, 11:41:10 PM
Not sure if the Giants Offense is incredible or the Cowboys Defense is woeful.

Probably a bit of both.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 12, 2016, 12:42:54 AM
Not sure if the Giants Offense is incredible or the Cowboys Defense is woeful.

Probably a bit of both.

Dallas D really stepped up in 2H


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 12, 2016, 01:21:06 AM
Yessssss Bengals! Tough win that. Had us down as a loss so very happy!
Watched the game in a Bengals bar in madeira beach fl,30 or so very relieved bengals at the end..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 12, 2016, 01:25:32 AM
Dallas lost, but how impressive was Prescott?

Obv helped by their incred O line, but I think I saw one bad throw all game.

Most impressive debut from a rookie QB I've ever seen I think.

How good must the 6 QBs picked in front of him be?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on September 12, 2016, 01:36:02 AM
Dallas lost, but how impressive was Prescott?

Obv helped by their incred O line, but I think I saw one bad throw all game.

Most impressive debut from a rookie QB I've ever seen I think.

How good must the 6 QBs picked in front of him be?

did you see wentz? 278 passing yards 2 passing TD no turnovers

could of been over 300 if eagles wasnt so far ahead

couple of impressive QB week 1 debuts this season


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on September 12, 2016, 02:50:42 AM
Dara Kennedy again lead presenter with Sky.

Really?

FML!

I think Kevin Cadle pissed off SKY when promoting his book on the programme last year.

I have no idea why they don't use Mike Carlsen, easily the best analyst on British TV.

Can't stand Dara.. She's so wooden... Agree Carlson is the absolute best but his not a lead man his the guy the presenter brings in for his class analysis


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on September 12, 2016, 02:58:43 AM
They should get Tuchman or Nat in to host, and Carlsen as his wingman.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on September 13, 2016, 08:38:04 AM
I'm still feeling my way with this NFL stuff, but this must surely have raised an eyebrow or two?

Rams 0 49ers 28

That was quite the upset, was it not?

Doers this alter any season projections, or was it just a freak result?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 13, 2016, 08:47:57 AM
I'm still feeling my way with this NFL stuff, but this must surely have raised an eyebrow or two?

Rams 0 49ers 28

That was quite the upset, was it not?

Doers this alter any season projections, or was it just a freak result?


I had the niners to win. And my overall season predictions I had the Rams at 3 wins. I put it down to the fact that they were the last division I got to and I'd been too generous throughout the others and quite harsh on the Rams. However. They're a one man team and from what I've been told the 49ers just stuffed the box and blocked the run. Knowing that they have practically zero passing game. Most teams will do that I'd imagine.

Definitely a shock that San Fran managed to do something, I doubt anyone thought it'd be that score! And that the Rams D, which is a strength for them, couldn't stop them. I would be surprised if they make 7-9 this year.

(saved my weekend however as tipped the overs in the Steelers and unders in that and the double. That and Eli Rogers got my blog back to near even for the weekend after an awful Sunday for me)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 13, 2016, 07:26:41 PM
How risky was Oakland's 2 Point conversion call?

https://www.numberfire.com/nfl/news/10428/how-risky-was-oakland-s-two-point-conversion-attempt


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 13, 2016, 07:32:17 PM
How risky was Oakland's 2 Point conversion call?

https://www.numberfire.com/nfl/news/10428/how-risky-was-oakland-s-two-point-conversion-attempt

I always thought the only times you should go for 2 in this spot were if you were a huge underdog to win the game or you have a particularly shitty (or injured) kicker.

This spot where both offenses were moving the ball at will against terrible defenses seems like an excellent third reason.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Karabiner on September 13, 2016, 07:34:06 PM
I'm still feeling my way with this NFL stuff, but this must surely have raised an eyebrow or two?

Rams 0 49ers 28

That was quite the upset, was it not?

Doers this alter any season projections, or was it just a freak result?


Aren't they (The Rams) the team that Stan Kroenke owns and somewhat controversially moved?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on September 13, 2016, 07:42:31 PM
How risky was Oakland's 2 Point conversion call?

https://www.numberfire.com/nfl/news/10428/how-risky-was-oakland-s-two-point-conversion-attempt

I always thought the only times you should go for 2 in this spot were if you were a huge underdog to win the game or you have a particularly shitty (or injured) kicker.

This spot where both offenses were moving the ball at will against terrible defenses seems like an excellent third reason.

Carr had hurt himself on the drive, so it wasn't clear whether he'd have been able to play on in OT too.

I think that was a big factor.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 13, 2016, 08:33:12 PM
In tft. There was talk about home advantage. Or not 

Theory goes that if you're at home you'd play for the draw and overtime. Away from home. More likely to go for the win. Still only the 5th time in history I think that a team has gone for the win and got it


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 14, 2016, 09:55:29 AM
Pinnacle article

Home-field advantage is a known phenomenon amongst those with knowledge of NFL betting. http://bit.ly/2bFUeU9


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 14, 2016, 11:23:47 AM
This is pretty good.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000702018/article/kevin-harlan-is-the-greatest-broadcaster-of-alltime



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 14, 2016, 04:13:54 PM
This is pretty good.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000702018/article/kevin-harlan-is-the-greatest-broadcaster-of-alltime


Very good..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 15, 2016, 10:14:23 AM
Any thoughts for tonight? I'm completely uninspired on it. Got Jets+2.5 earlier in the week. Which is now Jets-1 I'll be taking that still. Other than that. Really not a match I can pick much from.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 15, 2016, 04:42:48 PM
Jeff Fisher has 6 winning seasons in 21 as a head coach

he has no winning seasons since 2008

the Rams are about tto give him a three year extension

anyone want to help me understand?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on September 15, 2016, 04:49:52 PM
Music City Miracle though!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on September 15, 2016, 05:19:31 PM
Jeff Fisher has 6 winning seasons in 21 as a head coach

he has no winning seasons since 2008

the Rams are about tto give him a three year extension

anyone want to help me understand?

He's run badly for 21 years?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 15, 2016, 07:08:26 PM
Jeff Fisher has 6 winning seasons in 21 as a head coach

he has no winning seasons since 2008

the Rams are about tto give him a three year extension

anyone want to help me understand?

He's run badly for 21 years?


He won't be going 7-9 this year at least?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 15, 2016, 07:09:23 PM
Jeff Fisher has 6 winning seasons in 21 as a head coach

he has no winning seasons since 2008

the Rams are about tto give him a three year extension

anyone want to help me understand?

He might be helped by the fact the OC spent four quarters against the worst team in the NFL calling this sequence of four downs:

1st: Gurley rush into 8 fat blokes. 1 yard.
2nd: Gurley rush into 8 fat blokes. 2 yards.
3rd: Play action, 2 yard pass behind the line of scrimmage to Tavon Austin for not enough.
4th: Punt.

That said, if they waited one more year, a defensively minded, run first Head Coach with unlimited rentaquotism would be available...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 16, 2016, 09:50:43 AM
Tourism committee recommends $750M in public money for Raiders stadium

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CsanYP6VYAAvz3x.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on September 16, 2016, 05:06:55 PM
What a shit end to his game.

''Marquise Goodwin - WR - Bills
Bills WR Marquise Goodwin is in the league's concussion protocol.
Goodwin banged his head on the turd on the last play of the game''


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 16, 2016, 07:30:55 PM
Bills fire Greg Roman.

Because it's definitely the offensive coordinator's fault we have half a roster.



Will Brinson of North State Journal:
‏@WillBrinson

Fire all the people you want, Rex. Winter is still coming.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CsfgmDLWcAAq081.jpg)

10:33 am - 16 Sep 2016



Running back coach Anthony Lynn has been promoted.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 16, 2016, 07:44:48 PM
ESPN:
Under Roman (since start of 2015), Bills’ off ranked higher in yards per play (8th in NFL) than Bills’ def (25th)

Football Outsiders:
2015 DVOA (efficiency rating): Offense 9th. Defense 24th.

And this is with half a running back, a free agent QB, no right side OL and one wide receiver.

My head hurts.

This could turn into a Tighty rant. I'm going to go for a lie down.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 16, 2016, 09:00:20 PM
Local news view:

http://www.wkbw.com/sports/bills/joe-b-with-roman-fired-rex-is-betting-on-rex-even-more


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 17, 2016, 10:51:48 AM
^ as a fan of a very frustrating franchise myself (owner who is a terrible GM, unimaginative coaching, iffy drafting) the Bills situation is equally as odd

Ryan's signature defence gives up 37 points and 500 yards to Fitzmagic. In the game Darby and Glmore are being torched (surprisingly) left single high deep against decker, marshall and enunwa and there is no sign of any change of approach through the game

they drafted injured players (known injured) in the first two rounds, gave a new contract to a player everyone knew was at risk of suspension too and hey presto he gets suspended

and the offense is the problem? don't think so, lacks a bit of talent but then they haven't invested in the offense much its a conservative defense led tea. or is meant to be.

the head coach and his brother are the issue.    


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 17, 2016, 11:24:16 AM
^ as a fan of a very frustrating franchise myself (owner who is a terrible GM, unimaginative coaching, iffy drafting) the Bills situation is equally as odd

Ryan's signature defence gives up 37 points and 500 yards to Fitzmagic. In the game Darby and Glmore are being torched (surprisingly) left single high deep against decker, marshall and enunwa and there is no sign of any change of approach through the game

they drafted injured players (known injured) in the first two rounds, gave a new contract to a player everyone knew was at risk of suspension too and hey presto he gets suspended

and the offense is the problem? don't think so, lacks a bit of talent but then they haven't invested in the offense much its a conservative defense led tea. or is meant to be.

the head coach and his brother are the issue.    

We will be 0-4 before we start to get players back from suspension and then need to win in LA, at home against the Niners and a divisional game in Miami to be back on track.

In theory...

Watkins is playing with a foot injury. He could be stuck playing with it all season, by the sound of it, as Woods, Salas and Goodwin probably won't scare too many defenses.

Look again at that list of fixtures. Don't win those three games and we are in with the Browns and Niners for the first overall pick.

Comes back to the point that we'll get a decent draft pick next year, but the draft is full of defensive players when ours will be back recovered from their 2016 injuries. Maybe we pick up a WR but there won't be many there (Mike Williams?) and the team will be better.

Owners had to decide whether the back Rex or sack him. Clearly that has implications when he's got other staff here...

Rex and Roman rumoured not to be the best of friends, although that could just be beat writer talk.

It's a mess.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 17, 2016, 02:01:35 PM
Last one. Probably.

https://www.numberfire.com/nfl/news/10525/firing-greg-roman-does-little-to-solve-the-bills-problems


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 18, 2016, 07:46:19 PM
Dare anyone whisper the words "quarterback controversy"?

(http://2kolf.com/News/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/new-england-patriots-jimmy-garoppolo-836x470.jpg)

(http://flashwarner.com/images/tuckownsbrady.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on September 18, 2016, 08:20:47 PM
Cracking bokking skills Keith. Immediately injured!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 18, 2016, 08:26:10 PM
Cracking bokking skills Keith. Immediately injured!

That's why I said whisper it :-)

At the very least the Pats will surely be Jimmy's team by 2017.

They won't want him walking lkike Osweiler did for the Broncos.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 18, 2016, 11:20:22 PM
Bengals comeback destroyed by a bloody awful call from the officials. Not sure how it wasn't overturned on the review. Would of been them on the Pitt 30 odd with just under 2 mins left. But oh well. The league loves Pittsburgh.

Been hitting the post in my bets recently. Frustrating.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 18, 2016, 11:21:35 PM
Gotta feel sorry for the Chargers. Woodhead out now with a serous looking knee injury


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 19, 2016, 01:45:35 AM
Bengals comeback destroyed by a bloody awful call from the officials. Not sure how it wasn't overturned on the review. Would of been them on the Pitt 30 odd with just under 2 mins left. But oh well. The league loves Pittsburgh.

Been hitting the post in my bets recently. Frustrating.
Very frustrating game and poor officiating.If we can beat Denver wk3 that will be a great start with Burfict coming back and hopefully Eifert.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 19, 2016, 09:32:22 AM
Bengals comeback destroyed by a bloody awful call from the officials. Not sure how it wasn't overturned on the review. Would of been them on the Pitt 30 odd with just under 2 mins left. But oh well. The league loves Pittsburgh.

Been hitting the post in my bets recently. Frustrating.
Very frustrating game and poor officiating.If we can beat Denver wk3 that will be a great start with Burfict coming back and hopefully Eifert.

The utter lack of a running game is worrying. Although been up against two top defences. Got to be said. Shazier is a brilliant player for them. Would of set up a great end of the game if they'd overturned that decision though. Hell of a start to the season. Gets a bit better after next week


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 20, 2016, 04:00:32 AM
christ, they were desperate

"Source confirms: the Vikings have traded for Sam Bradford. They gave up a 1st-round pick in 2017 and an additional pick in 2018."

Says more about the Eagles than the Vikings.
wentz is ready


lol he most certainly is not!



Looking ready so far tonight.

Very impressive.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on September 20, 2016, 05:37:34 AM
as i said last week wentz is looking the real deal best QB i have seen at the eagles in my short time watching the NFL

lots of options in the passing and running game ok we might struggle when we play against a better team but we have the building blocks for the future


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 20, 2016, 06:28:15 AM
Watched the game in Florida with loads of neutrals and everyone agreed that if Wentz protects himself better he could be the real deal.Cutler looked awful felt sorry for the Bears defense who played hard..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on September 20, 2016, 06:47:47 AM
Watched the game in Florida with loads of neutrals and everyone agreed that if Wentz protects himself better he could be the real deal.Cutler looked awful felt sorry for the Bears defense who played hard..

First take should be good tomorrow then ;D


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on September 20, 2016, 09:34:32 PM
SAS loves him some Cutler :D

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnhzMjHo3mo


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 21, 2016, 04:03:50 AM
SAS loves him some Cutler :D

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnhzMjHo3mo
Enjoyed watching that 'Cutlers got the loser limp'


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on September 21, 2016, 05:54:21 AM
Hilarious watching him going into one about Cutler, and it's not like he's ever short of ammo.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 21, 2016, 09:05:05 AM
How long has it been since the Patriots have been underdogs at home?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 21, 2016, 11:30:38 AM
How long has it been since the Patriots have been underdogs at home?

2003



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on September 21, 2016, 11:41:49 AM
Hilarious watching him going into one about Cutler, and it's not like he's ever short of ammo.

had to turn off half way through... why do americans feel the need to shout whilst making a point ?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 21, 2016, 07:17:12 PM
How long has it been since the Patriots have been underdogs at home?

2003


2 seasons ago bengals 1-2 point favourites at foxboro.Bellichick answered every question all week 'on to Cincinnati' Patriots put up 40 odd points and went to the Super Bowl beating Seattle..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 22, 2016, 11:38:21 AM
NFL Throws through the first two weeks

strangely hypnotic

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cs5lWXvWgAA4Dpp.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 23, 2016, 08:22:40 PM
Austin Seferian J – Verified account ‏@Aesj88

Thank you TB! Next chapter
10:59 am - 23 Sep 2016 from Tampa, FL


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on September 23, 2016, 08:26:34 PM
Austin Seferian J – Verified account ‏@Aesj88

Thank you TB! Next chapter
10:59 am - 23 Sep 2016 from Tampa, FL

released after an arrest for drink driving


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 23, 2016, 08:28:29 PM
Austin Seferian J – Verified account ‏@Aesj88

Thank you TB! Next chapter
10:59 am - 23 Sep 2016 from Tampa, FL

released after an arrest for drink driving

Paging Rex...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on September 23, 2016, 08:37:41 PM
Austin Seferian J – Verified account ‏@Aesj88

Thank you TB! Next chapter
10:59 am - 23 Sep 2016 from Tampa, FL

released after an arrest for drink driving

Paging Rex...

Or Jerry ;D


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 23, 2016, 08:38:47 PM
Jacoby Brissett needs thumb surgery.

Anyone else think they should have let Tom Brady serve his suspension last season?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 24, 2016, 07:15:36 AM
Jacoby Brissett needs thumb surgery.

Anyone else think they should have let Tom Brady serve his suspension last season?
[/quote

I've come to the conclusion that they could trot me out at QB and still win a match the way they've dealt with everything this year


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 24, 2016, 03:27:17 PM
Few guys I was interested to see the price on for tomorrows matches. Not necessarily for bets. But just to see how the bookies have gone. Kenyan Drake at Miami...  To score anytime TD. Skybet - 13/8. Bet365 - 8/1

And the guy who's in at tight end for Denver. Heuerman Skybet has him at 10/1 while PP is only at 3/1 on him

Both have a chance of scoring. I'd say that Drake is more likely. Foster is out at RB. They obviously don't like Ajayi and Drake was mixed in last week. Probably between him and Pead


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 24, 2016, 03:30:30 PM
Few guys I was interested to see the price on for tomorrows matches. Not necessarily for bets. But just to see how the bookies have gone. Kenyan Drake at Miami...  To score anytime TD. Skybet - 13/8. Bet365 - 8/1

And the guy who's in at tight end for Denver. Heuerman Skybet has him at 10/1 while PP is only at 3/1 on him

Both have a chance of scoring. I'd say that Drake is more likely. Foster is out at RB. They obviously don't like Ajayi and Drake was mixed in last week. Probably between him and Pead

I'm sure they do actually like Ajayi. I know they didn't draft him, but the coaches didn't take long to forget he had a strop at the airport before Week 1 when giving him the bulk of the carries last week. He's great in open spaces and I expect him to get the rock tomorrow. Drake might get goal line work but I'm not expecting a 1A/1B RBBC approach, even if a few guys get carries.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 24, 2016, 03:52:05 PM
Fair enough. I hope Jay plays. I liked the look of him when he was given some play last year. So do hope he gets the bulk of the carries. Seems that Gase isn't sure who's his choice yet.

And against a woeful damaged Browns they should get ahead and then in theory run the ball more which could mix in any of the 3 or 4 they've got. We'll see tomorrow I guess.

At the price I'll be having a little on Drake any time. Especially with such a big discrepancy between companies


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 25, 2016, 11:04:15 AM
Fair enough. I hope Jay plays. I liked the look of him when he was given some play last year. So do hope he gets the bulk of the carries. Seems that Gase isn't sure who's his choice yet.

And against a woeful damaged Browns they should get ahead and then in theory run the ball more which could mix in any of the 3 or 4 they've got. We'll see tomorrow I guess.

At the price I'll be having a little on Drake any time. Especially with such a big discrepancy between companies

Rap Sheet says Drake starts. Hope you got on.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on September 25, 2016, 11:28:39 AM
The real match up today is Patrick Peterson v Robert Woods. Tough to pick a winner there...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 25, 2016, 11:02:42 PM
christ, they were desperate

"Source confirms: the Vikings have traded for Sam Bradford. They gave up a 1st-round pick in 2017 and an additional pick in 2018."

Says more about the Eagles than the Vikings.
wentz is ready


lol he most certainly is not!



Looking ready so far tonight.

Very impressive.

Just gone past Tom Brady's record of 81 passes without an INT to start an NFL career.

Eagles 2-0 and beating the Steelers 10-0

Just imagine how good Wentz will be when he's ready!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 25, 2016, 11:28:02 PM
Really thought he'd be found out today. But he's look impeccable. Will be interesting to see if he can keep up with Ben. If they manage to get it going


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on September 25, 2016, 11:44:58 PM
whats the record for plays without a turnover ?
he must of been close before i just jinxed him


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 25, 2016, 11:46:26 PM
whats the record for plays without a turnover ?
he must of been close before i just jinxed him


Well over 200 IIRC


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 25, 2016, 11:47:43 PM
whats the record for plays without a turnover ?
he must of been close before i just jinxed him


Well over 200 IIRC

Pass attempts without an INT is 335

http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/most-consecutive-pass-attempts-without-an-interception-by-an-nfl-quaterback/


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on September 26, 2016, 12:04:34 AM
not expecting that i was meaning how many plays without turning the ball over to start a career, so far no fumble or INT

touch wood


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 26, 2016, 09:59:50 AM
Weird night last night. I've caught tighty in the prediction league though.

Cards and Steelers shafted most of my bets. The Browns did what the Browns do and somehow managed to lose when winning was easier. Not sure what happened with Drake in the Miami run game.
The Titans managed to throw away at least overtime with their center smashing into some guys as the play was blown dead. Ridiculous choice by him and one other guy.
 Bengals bummed by the Broncos but dropped 3 ints and a few easy catches. Been unable to run it all season then somehow managed against the best defence in the league. Very frustrating but they've got a much easier slate coming now starting on Thursday with the Dolphins. Hill scored a couple for my top td scorer bet anyway
The Ravens and Jags shared the worst 2 mins of football you'll ever see with 3 ints in 4 attempts (or so it seemed on redzone anyway)
Wilson has an mcl sprain for the Seahawks. Not sure if that affects his participation next week or not.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on September 26, 2016, 12:15:54 PM
As my comment seems to be thrown back at me each weekend

Wentz played one pre-season game, the intention was to sit him for a year and let him mature as the Eagles felt he was not ready

then Bridgewater got injured and the Eagles, who had given up multiple picks in a very ballsy move to get Wentz in the draft, were offered a first round pick for Bradford. This was a no-brainer to accept, get the first round pick lost to get Wentz back and this committed themselves (they thought) to starting Wentz and taking the growing pains

As it happens that trade, although early days, looks like a win win as Bradford can do enough for the Vkes alongside that fantastic defense to ensure they are competitive

Wentz has looked brilliant and for any NFL franchise its better to be lucky than clever. If Bridgewater hadn't got injured....

As it is the Eagles were ballsy in April and are reaping the rewards now, though at 3-0 as much credit needs to be given to Schwartz's defense which is playing light years ahead of last year

Generally, with Wentz, Dak, Brissett etc its good to see some young QB talent coming through and beginning to replace some NFL re-treads

this was interesting

Through 3 games:

Carson Wentz: 66/102 (64.7%) 769 yds, 5 TDs (5 pass), 0 INTs
Dak Prescott: 66/99 (66.7%) 767 yds, 3 TDs (1 pass), 0 INTs

Dak's under contract for 4 years at a 4th rounder rookie salary too. Not the player Wentz is (wouldn't appear to have that cannon of am arm) but encouraging nonetheless.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 27, 2016, 01:03:14 AM
Only teasing you tighty.

I won't mention it again.







Until next week at the earliest :)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 27, 2016, 05:36:16 AM
Painful watching the saints defense tonight..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on September 27, 2016, 10:50:04 AM
As my comment seems to be thrown back at me each weekend

Wentz played one pre-season game, the intention was to sit him for a year and let him mature as the Eagles felt he was not ready

then Bridgewater got injured and the Eagles, who had given up multiple picks in a very ballsy move to get Wentz in the draft, were offered a first round pick for Bradford. This was a no-brainer to accept, get the first round pick lost to get Wentz back and this committed themselves (they thought) to starting Wentz and taking the growing pains

As it happens that trade, although early days, looks like a win win as Bradford can do enough for the Vkes alongside that fantastic defense to ensure they are competitive

Wentz has looked brilliant and for any NFL franchise its better to be lucky than clever. If Bridgewater hadn't got injured....

As it is the Eagles were ballsy in April and are reaping the rewards now, though at 3-0 as much credit needs to be given to Schwartz's defense which is playing light years ahead of last year

Generally, with Wentz, Dak, Brissett etc its good to see some young QB talent coming through and beginning to replace some NFL re-treads

this was interesting

Through 3 games:

Carson Wentz: 66/102 (64.7%) 769 yds, 5 TDs (5 pass), 0 INTs
Dak Prescott: 66/99 (66.7%) 767 yds, 3 TDs (1 pass), 0 INTs

Dak's under contract for 4 years at a 4th rounder rookie salary too. Not the player Wentz is (wouldn't appear to have that cannon of am arm) but encouraging nonetheless.

Pretty much agree with what Tighty says here, although I think it was always unlikely that Bradford would have seen out the season as the starting QB.  Given his earlier attempt to get traded, he was pretty unpopular with the supporters so you could see a scenario where a couple of poor games would lead to them pushing for Wentz to start, making things pretty uncomfortable for everyone concerned.

As it happened, we hit the jackpot with the trade and (so far) have had the bonus of seeing Wentz play very well in a season that we'd pretty much written off as a development year for him.  It may well still turn out that way, so I'm keeping expectations low for now.  However, I doubt very much that we'd be 3-0 if Bradford had been the starting QB.

As Tighty mentioned, the signing of Jim Schwartz has been huge for us.  He's aggressive in his philosophy so may finally be the replacement for the late Jim Johnson that we've failed to find to date.

I have to admit that I like the look of Prescott too for the Cowboys, albeit he's had less of a weight of expectation behind him.  It'll be intriguing to see how both perform over the next few games as it's hard to judge them on only 3 games.  Sterner tests will come as opposing coaches accumulate more footage on them and start to plan around their specific weaknesses.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on September 27, 2016, 05:15:35 PM
Painful watching the saints defense tonight..

As a saints fan.. yup.. they are hideous.. consoled myself with the overs total.. saints over 27.5.. and brees over 324.5... as they say scoopio !


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on September 30, 2016, 01:09:27 AM
"Denver is playing like a world champion in large part because quarterback Trevor Siemian is playing like Peyton Manning.

Just compare Siemian's first three games this season to Manning's first three games last season.

Through three games in 2016, Siemian has thrown for five touchdowns, three interceptions and 756 yards.

Through three games last season, Manning threw for five touchdowns, three interceptions and 755 yards."

Quality stat from ESPN.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on September 30, 2016, 01:24:52 AM
Siemian has been good, but Wentz and Prescott have been unbelievable

CW 66-102-5-0 103.8
DP 66-99-1-0 93.3

Unprecedented for two rookies to start like this surely.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on September 30, 2016, 05:20:41 AM
Thank God Eifert is back next week. Bengals unable to convert in the red zone. They completely dominated this match and had to settle for 5 Fgs after the first quarter Green Td. Green was at 123 yards and a touch in the first half.

Still virtually unable to run the ball as well which is a worry. Hill 71 yards. At just under 3 a carry but no penetration really, had 2 attempts from 5 yards for the td bet and got nowhere, in fairness they rushed the second one because I think Dalton was worried about a potential fumble being reviewed. He's looking better than last year as a runner, nowhere near as much stuttering but they're just not making any gaps for him

5 sacks on Tannenhill. Bengals only had to rush 4 all night and got through that beaten up Dolphins o line.

All in all. Easy win for the Bengals but could of been by 40 if they could convert. Cowboys then Pats up next. I forgot how shit their schedule is this year.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 02, 2016, 01:42:23 PM
betting a nice perfect storm spot for a flyer today :


Melvin gordon san diego 2 or more td's doubled with denver sanders and/or andersons 2 or more td...

my beloved saints cannot defend especially the run... and tampa just love to give up points too...both teams bottom of the points conceded column... saints game could develop into the wild west show...and denvers ferocious deense should give their offense the ball plenty of times.... all 3 guys in good form and will look to feast on these defenses

example gordon/sanders double is a tempting 48-1 :)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 02, 2016, 03:59:45 PM
Gordon seems like a gimme. But at 7/2 it's pretty short for what it is. Should come in against the Saints. But very short for what is needed.

I'd be taking CJ personally of the 3 Denver threats. And Sanders over Thomas is you wanted one of the Wrs


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 03, 2016, 11:14:04 AM
betting a nice perfect storm spot for a flyer today :


Melvin gordon san diego 2 or more td's doubled with denver sanders and/or andersons 2 or more td...

my beloved saints cannot defend especially the run... and tampa just love to give up points too...both teams bottom of the points conceded column... saints game could develop into the wild west show...and denvers ferocious deense should give their offense the ball plenty of times.... all 3 guys in good form and will look to feast on these defenses

example gordon/sanders double is a tempting 48-1 :)

Sigh crossbar..as expected Gordon hit.. sanders and anderson 1 a piece and anderson 3 yards out got stuffed for the scoopio.. game stopped with 7 mins left for severe weather.. and when they came back out just jogged through the last bit


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 03, 2016, 03:04:21 PM
Matt Ryan: 503 pass yds Julio Jones: 300 receiving yds 1st game in NFL history with a 500-yd passer AND 300-yd receiver

against Carolina too!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CtzdhLjWIAQE6Gf.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 03, 2016, 03:21:25 PM
Is 2016 the best QB class in recent memory?

(Tongue in cheek but not as daft a question as it was a month ago)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 03, 2016, 03:32:57 PM
let you know in 3 years, though early signs obviously great.

i actually like winston and mariota a lot as a pair from last year but being let down by baffling coaching and roster/personanel decisions by their teams, so far


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 05, 2016, 09:27:33 PM
Thursday game ... David Johnson over 88.5 yards rushing.. Second year superstar should have a massive game against the defence with the worst rush defence in the league allowing average running backs 100 yard games and Dallas star rookie last week ran for 138 yards.. Add to that San Francisco lost their star linebacker Bowman for the season and Arizona QB PAlmer is out and the reserve QB Arizona don't trust much so a heavy dose of run game is expected


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 06, 2016, 10:26:46 AM
NFL ratings so far this season are down between 11 and 17% depending on TNF, SNF, MNF, regular Sunday football

reasons given are

- no one knows what is/isn't a catch
- taunting flags are being overdone
- no celebrations allowed, its less fun to watch

agree with any of those?

are you watching any less, if so why?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 06, 2016, 10:38:43 AM
NFL ratings so far this season are down between 11 and 17% depending on TNF, SNF, MNF, regular Sunday football

Reason is they keep showing the Bears.


FYP.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on October 06, 2016, 02:51:42 PM
i keep falling asleep during the late night games which is odd as i only get 2-3 hours sleep a day at the moment and it seems to be coming at a time i should be awake enjoying the games


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 06, 2016, 03:04:50 PM
oh and if you can get over 49.5 total points for the raiders game grab it..line can only go north


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 06, 2016, 11:29:28 PM
- no one knows what is/isn't a catch
- taunting flags are being overdone
- no celebrations allowed, its less fun to watch

Definitely the taunting and celebrations. I'd watch regardless, but both annoy me. The catch rules don't bother me as much as they seem to bother other people.

I think the biggest thing is that the selection of primetime games has been pretty average. Dolphins @ Bengals on TNF? And the damn Bears couldn't be more irrelevant right now if they tried. Schedule makers, c'mon man. Offenses don't get any more fun to watch tonight with Carson Palmer out, unless you're Blaine Gabbert's mum.

NFL probably ran bad too tbf. Texans @ Patriots and Chiefs @ Steelers should've, on paper, been much tighter games than they actually turned out to be. But some really poor picks in there too.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 07, 2016, 09:48:54 AM
Thursday game ... David Johnson over 88.5 yards rushing.. Second year superstar should have a massive game against the defence with the worst rush defence in the league allowing average running backs 100 yard games and Dallas star rookie last week ran for 138 yards.. Add to that San Francisco lost their star linebacker Bowman for the season and Arizona QB PAlmer is out and the reserve QB Arizona don't trust much so a heavy dose of run game is expected

Easy winner there. I stayed away from it as he makes a lot of catches from the backfield. Landed 3/4 of the tips on my page oast night. Think I'm finally hitting my stride on it after a rough few weeks. Was hardly rocket science last night though. Johnson anytime. 2+ and 3+  Johnson and Hyde tds and Cardinals -3.  All pretty obvious bets but made some decent money on it. Had a little personal bet on Cards by 11-15 at 8/1 as well.

Looks like the first half was awful. I woke up randomly at 220 and it was 0-0 with 7:40 left in the second quarter. I would guess they just wore them down in the end. Glad Drew Staunton played. Gave me chance to watch the greatest gift in sports again and again  http://m.imgur.com/gallery/JxLbXrc


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 07, 2016, 11:48:04 AM
Lol..

Yup most of the first half was an offensive nightmare but strangely was good to watch... DJ was nailed on for big rushing numbers v that D even with him slipping out into the flat for the easy catch :)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 07, 2016, 10:43:15 PM
Random, I know, but, I just spent a little time seeing who has scored in which quarter over the season so far... (Living the dream on a Friday night) But I like the score every quarter markets, at usually fairly good odds...

The Bengals and Falcons have only missed 1 qtr so far, the Bengals have played Jets, Steelers and Broncos (their one miss) all 3 of which are pretty tough defences, they travel to Dallas this weekend, so looks good.
The Falcons haven't had it as tough, their 1 miss came against the Raiders. They play the Broncos this week, so expect that to slump.

The Steelers and Saints, unsurprisingly have scored every quarter at home so far, admittedly only 2 games, but it's known the Brees always scores in NO, and Big Ben has some fairly obviously home/road splits, so makes sense.

Ravens have only missed a couple of quarters, while the Cardinals have yet to score in every quarter of a match.

I think I really need to get it organised by who concedes every quarter at home as well, that should give me some instruction on good matchups for these types of bets, should I want.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 07, 2016, 11:10:13 PM
Random, I know, but, I just spent a little time seeing who has scored in which quarter over the season so far... (Living the dream on a Friday night) But I like the score every quarter markets, at usually fairly good odds...

The Bengals and Falcons have only missed 1 qtr so far, the Bengals have played Jets, Steelers and Broncos (their one miss) all 3 of which are pretty tough defences, they travel to Dallas this weekend, so looks good.
The Falcons haven't had it as tough, their 1 miss came against the Raiders. They play the Broncos this week, so expect that to slump.

The Steelers and Saints, unsurprisingly have scored every quarter at home so far, admittedly only 2 games, but it's known the Brees always scores in NO, and Big Ben has some fairly obviously home/road splits, so makes sense.

Ravens have only missed a couple of quarters, while the Cardinals have yet to score in every quarter of a match.

I think I really need to get it organised by who concedes every quarter at home as well, that should give me some instruction on good matchups for these types of bets, should I want.

Which bookie does this? Not seen that market before.

Definitely good to know this stuff, but you're backing a 4 timer acca, so the odds are presumably going to be heavily in the house's favour.

Would you try to back against teams that are shallow in defence (like San Francisco last night), where the team is tiring or the weaker back ups are on the field and taking a pounding?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on October 07, 2016, 11:32:36 PM
NFL ratings so far this season are down between 11 and 17% depending on TNF, SNF, MNF, regular Sunday football

reasons given are

- no one knows what is/isn't a catch
- taunting flags are being overdone
- no celebrations allowed, its less fun to watch

agree with any of those?

are you watching any less, if so why?

Too many games on TV and too many of the too many are bad games.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 07, 2016, 11:59:07 PM
Random, I know, but, I just spent a little time seeing who has scored in which quarter over the season so far... (Living the dream on a Friday night) But I like the score every quarter markets, at usually fairly good odds...

The Bengals and Falcons have only missed 1 qtr so far, the Bengals have played Jets, Steelers and Broncos (their one miss) all 3 of which are pretty tough defences, they travel to Dallas this weekend, so looks good.
The Falcons haven't had it as tough, their 1 miss came against the Raiders. They play the Broncos this week, so expect that to slump.

The Steelers and Saints, unsurprisingly have scored every quarter at home so far, admittedly only 2 games, but it's known the Brees always scores in NO, and Big Ben has some fairly obviously home/road splits, so makes sense.

Ravens have only missed a couple of quarters, while the Cardinals have yet to score in every quarter of a match.

I think I really need to get it organised by who concedes every quarter at home as well, that should give me some instruction on good matchups for these types of bets, should I want.

Which bookie does this? Not seen that market before.

Definitely good to know this stuff, but you're backing a 4 timer acca, so the odds are presumably going to be heavily in the house's favour.

Would you try to back against teams that are shallow in defence (like San Francisco last night), where the team is tiring or the weaker back ups are on the field and taking a pounding?

It's a market on bet365, not sure anywhere else offers it, although you can get it on request a bet on Skybet as well, as you say with it being essentially a 4fold acca, it's probably not a long term solution for making solid money, the faves are usually around 9/4, 11/4 that kind of area.

Arizona last night was one that if it was on a Sunday I would of probably looked at, with Bowman out, and after what Zeke did to them once he was out, I probably would of gone for Arizona scoring every qtr against them, luckily it was a Thursday night game and I went for individual players instead! (I know that doesn't really make sense but generally if there's only 1 match on i'll focus on an individual target, last night was David Johnson which was basically printing money.

Browns and Indy have conceded all but 1 quarter so far, Browns face NE this week (Pats are 6/4), who without Brady are yet to score every qtr, and the Colts face the Bears who haven't scored in every qtr of a single match yet. (Bears are 7/2) As mentioned Steelers have done every qtr at home, they're 7/4 this week.

I'll keep an eye of them for this week and see if anything pops up anyway, and if there is any correlation of whether it's just a case of knowing the game, I mean gamescript affects these kinds of things as well, Mike McCarthy for example at Green Bay will happily sat back if his team takes a decent lead and let the other team score a few (almost cost them the game v Detroit) so it'll need a bit of knowledge of situations as well as the bare stats


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 08, 2016, 09:29:48 AM
Random, I know, but, I just spent a little time seeing who has scored in which quarter over the season so far... (Living the dream on a Friday night) But I like the score every quarter markets, at usually fairly good odds...

The Bengals and Falcons have only missed 1 qtr so far, the Bengals have played Jets, Steelers and Broncos (their one miss) all 3 of which are pretty tough defences, they travel to Dallas this weekend, so looks good.
The Falcons haven't had it as tough, their 1 miss came against the Raiders. They play the Broncos this week, so expect that to slump.

The Steelers and Saints, unsurprisingly have scored every quarter at home so far, admittedly only 2 games, but it's known the Brees always scores in NO, and Big Ben has some fairly obviously home/road splits, so makes sense.

Ravens have only missed a couple of quarters, while the Cardinals have yet to score in every quarter of a match.

I think I really need to get it organised by who concedes every quarter at home as well, that should give me some instruction on good matchups for these types of bets, should I want.

Which bookie does this? Not seen that market before.

Definitely good to know this stuff, but you're backing a 4 timer acca, so the odds are presumably going to be heavily in the house's favour.

Would you try to back against teams that are shallow in defence (like San Francisco last night), where the team is tiring or the weaker back ups are on the field and taking a pounding?

It's a market on bet365, not sure anywhere else offers it, although you can get it on request a bet on Skybet as well, as you say with it being essentially a 4fold acca, it's probably not a long term solution for making solid money, the faves are usually around 9/4, 11/4 that kind of area.

Arizona last night was one that if it was on a Sunday I would of probably looked at, with Bowman out, and after what Zeke did to them once he was out, I probably would of gone for Arizona scoring every qtr against them, luckily it was a Thursday night game and I went for individual players instead! (I know that doesn't really make sense but generally if there's only 1 match on i'll focus on an individual target, last night was David Johnson which was basically printing money.

Browns and Indy have conceded all but 1 quarter so far, Browns face NE this week (Pats are 6/4), who without Brady are yet to score every qtr, and the Colts face the Bears who haven't scored in every qtr of a single match yet. (Bears are 7/2) As mentioned Steelers have done every qtr at home, they're 7/4 this week.

I'll keep an eye of them for this week and see if anything pops up anyway, and if there is any correlation of whether it's just a case of knowing the game, I mean gamescript affects these kinds of things as well, Mike McCarthy for example at Green Bay will happily sat back if his team takes a decent lead and let the other team score a few (almost cost them the game v Detroit) so it'll need a bit of knowledge of situations as well as the bare stats

6/4 would mean backing the Pats at 4/11 to score in any given quarter. Some quarters are more likely than others (Pats are likely to defer if they win the toss, so maybe they will be slightly more likely to score in the second and third quarters than in the first and fourth?)

I would have thought the best way to do your acca is to pick specific quarters you fancy the bookies have priced up wrongly in games and acca those. Seems like you have the data for that to take advantage if there's a duff price. Higher variance probably but more chance of a profit.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 08, 2016, 01:47:39 PM
Not sure there's anywhere that will let you bet specific quarters. Can pick the highest scoring quarter I believe. But not score in or not score in (that I know of)

Few bigger priced anytime scorers I found this morning. Gillislee for the Bills at 6/1. Shady looks like he'll be out with a hand. So it'll be between him and Reggie Bush. Iron Mike is the better of those two. (Seems McCoy isn't bad and will likely play so scratch that)

Kenneth Dixon was available at 8s this morning for the Ravens. He's gonna debut this weekend and while West will be the no. 1 he should get in on the action. Was as low as 9/5 at other places. Playing an awful run defence.

Last up was Austin Hooper for the Falcons. A ailable at 10s, they're playing Denver who are the best (or second best) D in the opaque. But they historically can be beaten by tight ends.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 08, 2016, 02:18:52 PM
Not sure there's anywhere that will let you bet specific quarters. Can pick the highest scoring quarter I believe. But not score in or not score in (that I know of)

Few bigger priced anytime scorers I found this morning. Gillislee for the Bills at 6/1. Shady looks like he'll be out with a hand. So it'll be between him and Reggie Bush. Iron Mike is the better of those two. (Seems McCoy isn't bad and will likely play so scratch that)

Kenneth Dixon was available at 8s this morning for the Ravens. He's gonna debut this weekend and while West will be the no. 1 he should get in on the action. Was as low as 9/5 at other places. Playing an awful run defence.

Last up was Austin Hooper for the Falcons. A ailable at 10s, they're playing Denver who are the best (or second best) D in the opaque. But they historically can be beaten by tight ends.

Bush is done. I can see him being cut soon. The Bills will re-sign Karlos Williams in the next couple of weeks, although it's not clear yet whether it'll be to the practice squad. If it's to the main roster, it could be at the expense of Bush. They need a vertical runner desperately.

What's absolutely clear is that the Bills know the gap between Shady and the rest of the backfield is too wide.

It's quite possible our best 5 offensive linemen start this Sunday. We will need them.

There's been a bit of talk about the Rams being weak at corner. I think the problem for them is they have dominated against the run, kept games tight (week one aside) and forced teams to throw, which inevitably means the corners give a few up. Football Outsiders has them as performing 8th best against deep passes this season.

Jeff Fisher and Rex Ryan. Two coaches who flatter to deceive, who are riding high and have a winnable game ahead, so you expect them to lose. This is the hardest game to call this weekend IMO. Could be under 25 points or could be over 60. I've not the faintest clue.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 08, 2016, 05:01:16 PM
Not sure there's anywhere that will let you bet specific quarters. Can pick the highest scoring quarter I believe. But not score in or not score in (that I know of)

Few bigger priced anytime scorers I found this morning. Gillislee for the Bills at 6/1. Shady looks like he'll be out with a hand. So it'll be between him and Reggie Bush. Iron Mike is the better of those two. (Seems McCoy isn't bad and will likely play so scratch that)

Kenneth Dixon was available at 8s this morning for the Ravens. He's gonna debut this weekend and while West will be the no. 1 he should get in on the action. Was as low as 9/5 at other places. Playing an awful run defence.

Last up was Austin Hooper for the Falcons. A ailable at 10s, they're playing Denver who are the best (or second best) D in the opaque. But they historically can be beaten by tight ends.

Bush is done. I can see him being cut soon. The Bills will re-sign Karlos Williams in the next couple of weeks, although it's not clear yet whether it'll be to the practice squad. If it's to the main roster, it could be at the expense of Bush. They need a vertical runner desperately.

What's absolutely clear is that the Bills know the gap between Shady and the rest of the backfield is too wide.

It's quite possible our best 5 offensive linemen start this Sunday. We will need them.

There's been a bit of talk about the Rams being weak at corner. I think the problem for them is they have dominated against the run, kept games tight (week one aside) and forced teams to throw, which inevitably means the corners give a few up. Football Outsiders has them as performing 8th best against deep passes this season.

Jeff Fisher and Rex Ryan. Two coaches who flatter to deceive, who are riding high and have a winnable game ahead, so you expect them to lose. This is the hardest game to call this weekend IMO. Could be under 25 points or could be over 60. I've not the faintest clue.

As you say. A very tough match to call. Has the potential to be the worst game of the week. But could be a shootout. Woods has done ok for you filling in for Sammy hasn't he. Agree with Bush. He can offer a little but not really worth a roster spot. I'm amazed no-one has snapped up Williams. He must be in worse shape than we think. McCoy in fairness is a fair distance ahead of a lot of RBs in the league. I personally really like Gillislee so would of been happy to see McCoy ruled out!

Kenneth Dixon price has gone. Now best of 7/2 :(


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 08, 2016, 05:58:10 PM
Looking at tmmr NFL .. It’s a very tough week to call in the NFL and I think we have already spotted the best two bets nice and early.. but.. Atlanta goes to Denver on a massive high smashing in points all over the place.. Trouble is it’s been against teams that cannot defend.. and I mean really bad defensive teams Tampa Bay, Raiders, New Orleans and the panthers who without Josh Norman in the secondary look a shadow of the defence of last year.. Step forward Denver’s ferocious pass rush and top tier secondary.. Matt Ryan Atlanta’s QB isn’t going to get the time to chuck the ball 40 yards down the field before getting smashed in the teeth by Von mIller and his crew.. look for Atlanta to go behind early as they too cannot defend and then chase desperately with Ryan putting the ball up for Denver’s secondary to feed on.. I like Denver -4.5 here...
 
Eagles at Detroit.. Wentz rookie QB for the Eagles is playing like a well oiled machine and has an array of weapons and have won their 3 games this season by +19..+15 and + 31.. add to that the number one defence in the league against a Lions offense that has no run game and very few top targets for Stafford to throw to now Megatron has retired.. They couldn’t even beat Tennessee at home last week who are one of the lowest scoring offences in the league..
Have to love eagles -3 here..singles and doubles gents
 
If you want to add in one for the treble... Houston to score under 17... They go to Minnesota who has the most fearsome defence in the league.. No team has scored more than 14 points against them all season and their new superdome stadium is as intimidating as they come.. Houston has no run game and one top receiving option in Hopkins... Look for the Vikings shutdown secondary to be all over him with Xavier Rhodes shadowing him like he did with Odell beckham junior last week


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on October 08, 2016, 06:13:13 PM
Another one - Seth Roberts Anytime TD (or First TD for a bit more of a gamble) for OAK vs SD on Sunday.

Roberts is Derek Carr's go-to option in the Red Zone as the Slot Receiver. Normally the Raiders like to run in their TDs and up until last week. Roberts was the only man to catch a passing TD for the entire season. SD has a hell of a lot better rush DEF than their passing DEF.

Roberts is best 23/10 for the anytime TD, 10/1 first OAK TD with Ladbrokes.

He's also 25/1 first TD overall with Billy Hills.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 08, 2016, 09:13:29 PM
Another one - Seth Roberts Anytime TD (or First TD for a bit more of a gamble) for OAK vs SD on Sunday.

Roberts is Derek Carr's go-to option in the Red Zone as the Slot Receiver. Normally the Raiders like to run in their TDs and up until last week. Roberts was the only man to catch a passing TD for the entire season. SD has a hell of a lot better rush DEF than their passing DEF.

Roberts is best 23/10 for the anytime TD, 10/1 first OAK TD with Ladbrokes.

He's also 25/1 first TD overall with Billy Hills.

They should get at least 4 tds tomorrow against the chargers. On the ground Lat. Murray is out. DeAndre Washington will probably be there. He's around 11/4 (annoyingly I thought I'd get higher) I'd be happy to take him. In the air, My only issue with Roberts is that they should be ahead in this matchup but have to score TDs stoll they're currently 8/9 in red zone this year. Personally I'd look at Crabtree. But as a bigger bet Roberts and Walford are definitely tempting! I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest to see Roberts hitting the first td


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 08, 2016, 09:21:45 PM
Actually think the black unicorn. Martellus Bennett is practically guaranteed at whatever price you can get him tomorrow. Gronk is nowhere near healthy. If they play 2 tight end sets with Brady in his first game back. He'll ignore the coverage on Gronk and aim for Bennett. I've got him at 9/4 on Billys. Seems 12/5 is there on Irish or betfair


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 09, 2016, 12:33:49 AM
They should get at least 4 tds tomorrow against the chargers. On the ground Lat. Murray is out. DeAndre Washington will probably be there. He's around 11/4 (annoyingly I thought I'd get higher) I'd be happy to take him. In the air, My only issue with Roberts is that they should be ahead in this matchup but have to score TDs stoll they're currently 8/9 in red zone this year. Personally I'd look at Crabtree. But as a bigger bet Roberts and Walford are definitely tempting! I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest to see Roberts hitting the first td

I'm not sure how they'll split carries between him and Jalen Richard, plus we're one of the few teams that still carry a fullback (Jamize Olawale) on the roster who has a rushing TD this year, he'll probs get carries near the goal line, too. Historically we'd start Marcel Reece in these kind of spots, but he got suspended then cut this offseason, so it's anybody's guess what we do with splitting the carries between the two rookies and Olawale.

Think Seth Roberts is a good shout, mind.

Taken u42.5 in the Miami game because Hurricane Matthew.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on October 09, 2016, 01:39:02 PM
Game day can't come around quick enough...Backed jets +7.5 lions +4 bengals-2 in a treble more out of hope than expectation.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 09, 2016, 03:33:44 PM
Game day can't come around quick enough...Backed jets +7.5 lions +4 bengals-2 in a treble more out of hope than expectation.

Did my write ups this morning and put a shovel full of bets on, then have that horrible 6 hours to wait until game time. Was hoping/expecting the Bengals game to be on TV tonight, a) it'll be a good game, and b) the Cowboys are usually on TV but they've gone for Falcons v Broncos. Which in fairness is a good choice, best offence v best defence, should be a good game. As much as I dislike Talib and his bunch of lovely chaps.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 10, 2016, 09:29:03 AM
Well. The Bengals sucked again. Can't establish the run. Or stop anyone else's. The pats are going to smash them next week :( Zeke looks the real deal. Getting better every week.

40pts up on my blog last night. Into profit for the season finally. And that was after I removed Henry and Crabtree both to score at 5/1 as well.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 10, 2016, 09:40:20 AM
Nice to see the Cowboys OL completely mash up Peko and Atkins. threw them about luike rag dolls

meanwhile

Most Pass Att Before 1st Career Int

2000-01 T. Brady 162
2016 D. Prescott 155 and counting
2016 C. Wentz 135
1984 W. Moon 131


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Nakor on October 10, 2016, 10:31:45 AM
Nice to see the Cowboys OL completely mash up Peko and Atkins. threw them about luike rag dolls

meanwhile

Most Pass Att Before 1st Career Int

2000-01 T. Brady 162
2016 D. Prescott 155 and counting
2016 C. Wentz 135
1984 W. Moon 131

I know you not big on backing/bragging on the Cowboys but I assume you are getting a little excited now?  Not talking SB 2016 excited but the pair (Prescott & Elliott) do look a bit special.  I know this OL can make anyone look good but this pair are beyond that?  You see a bright Cowboy future in Tightland?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 10, 2016, 10:42:45 AM
Big question is do the Cowboys bring back Romo.. I say not.. opinions Tighty ? Hot Hand and all that...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 10, 2016, 10:43:58 AM
Nice to see the Cowboys OL completely mash up Peko and Atkins. threw them about luike rag dolls

meanwhile

Most Pass Att Before 1st Career Int

2000-01 T. Brady 162
2016 D. Prescott 155 and counting
2016 C. Wentz 135
1984 W. Moon 131

I know you not big on backing/bragging on the Cowboys but I assume you are getting a little excited now?  Not talking SB 2016 excited but the pair (Prescott & Elliott) do look a bit special.  I know this OL can make anyone look good but this pair are beyond that?  You see a bright Cowboy future in Tightland?

Getting there

The OL and the running game should really set up the rest of the offense either when Romo comes back or Prescott develops further.

On the OL it was absolutely incredible to watch Zeke's long touchdown yesterday. Zack Martin annihilated a DT one way, Travis Frederick swallowed up the other DT the other and Zeke goes 60 yards untouched.

So far Dak has shown incredible poise, no mistakes and the game plan is nice and conservative. Hopefully a bigger play game can follow

Defenses will have to pick their poison. flood the box to stop the run leaves Dez and co one on one outside. Six or seven in the box and Zeke should have his way

Probably a draft or two of high defensive picks (pass rusher, couple of corners out of contract this off-season) from being really competitive for the post season but on the way. Then again with Wentz so are the Eagles so its fun times

I mean look at what the Vikes are doing. Over half their offense is out and that defense is so good that they can still be competitive. We are a way off that.

There's a lot of luck involved. The Cowboys would have loved Wentz, Lynch or Cook but couldn't draft any of them. "Settling" for Dak they expected to groom him behind Romo. Forced to start him, no one expected him to be as good as he has been. Part of the credit has to go to the offensive coaching staff, a much maligned group, but part of it is a happy accident of circumstances.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 10, 2016, 10:50:07 AM
Big question is do the Cowboys bring back Romo.. I say not.. opinions Tighty ? Hot Hand and all that...

Nice problem to have. If (big if because its Lambeau then the Eagles) we are 5-2 going into the second half of the season then they can easily say Romo's not quite ready and ride it out

In practice though Romo should be (subject to his usual brain fades) dynamite with this running game as he offers a big play ability that they haven't asked from Dak yet.

When you watch Ryan with Atlanta this season, defenses have the same problem. Take away Julio Jones, as Denver tried to yesterday, and Freeman and Coleman kill you because without 8 or 9 stopping the run a competent OL can scheme the neceesary openings.

In theory with Romo back there not Prescott opposing defenses have real problems.

In poker terms Romo is the Laggy option, Prescott the taggy option.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on October 10, 2016, 01:48:01 PM
Very impressed with the cowboys looked like they can go on a deep run in the playoffs..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on October 10, 2016, 01:56:03 PM
Well. The Bengals sucked again. Can't establish the run. Or stop anyone else's. The pats are going to smash them next week :( Zeke looks the real deal. Getting better every week.

40pts up on my blog last night. Into profit for the season finally. And that was after I removed Henry and Crabtree both to score at 5/1 as well.
No aggression last night just going through the motions.I love coach Lewis but he's not one too stir up the troops into a frenzy.Miss zimmer throwing a few fucks into them now and then.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 10, 2016, 03:36:20 PM
oh and if you can get over 49.5 total points for the raiders game grab it..line can only go north

was an easy spot and the line went off at 51..65 points easy win nice double with johnson yards


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 10, 2016, 03:43:56 PM
Looking at tmmr NFL .. It’s a very tough week to call in the NFL and I think we have already spotted the best two bets nice and early.. but.. Atlanta goes to Denver on a massive high smashing in points all over the place.. Trouble is it’s been against teams that cannot defend.. and I mean really bad defensive teams Tampa Bay, Raiders, New Orleans and the panthers who without Josh Norman in the secondary look a shadow of the defence of last year.. Step forward Denver’s ferocious pass rush and top tier secondary.. Matt Ryan Atlanta’s QB isn’t going to get the time to chuck the ball 40 yards down the field before getting smashed in the teeth by Von mIller and his crew.. look for Atlanta to go behind early as they too cannot defend and then chase desperately with Ryan putting the ball up for Denver’s secondary to feed on.. I like Denver -4.5 here...
 
Eagles at Detroit.. Wentz rookie QB for the Eagles is playing like a well oiled machine and has an array of weapons and have won their 3 games this season by +19..+15 and + 31.. add to that the number one defence in the league against a Lions offense that has no run game and very few top targets for Stafford to throw to now Megatron has retired.. They couldn’t even beat Tennessee at home last week who are one of the lowest scoring offences in the league..
Have to love eagles -3 here..singles and doubles gents
 
If you want to add in one for the treble... Houston to score under 17... They go to Minnesota who has the most fearsome defence in the league.. No team has scored more than 14 points against them all season and their new superdome stadium is as intimidating as they come.. Houston has no run game and one top receiving option in Hopkins... Look for the Vikings shutdown secondary to be all over him with Xavier Rhodes shadowing him like he did with Odell beckham junior last week

wow Atlanta Defence really outperformed themselves.. and denver o line along with  a nervy paxton lynch performed poorly... was seen as a bit of a shock... eagles decided to give Detroit a 14 point running start for some reason and almost got them..

vikings D just a wrecking ball


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 15, 2016, 01:40:14 AM
Early doors in NFL are my current favourites the Oakland Raiders Total points line.

Raiders are fantastic in offense and dire in defence which creates a sublime paradox of potential shootouts against any opponent, of the 5 games so far this season only one of them has been under 55 points.. the exception being against Baltimore who have one of the most lacklustre offences in recent times and a defense that continues to be stingy in all departments.

This trend seems set to continue and I see no reason to oppose the over points market any time soon. Sunday brings the Kansas chiefs to Oakland… offensively they are no better than average but against this Raiders D.. 24 points + looks likely.. defensively they seem to have lost a step from recent years and gave up 43 last week to a rampant Pittsburgh.

Carr ( in the form of his short career ) and a balanced Raiders run ( even without Murray ) pass attack look set to pile in another 28+ score.. Carr can hit instantly from anywhere on the field to elite deep threats like Crabtree and Cooper.

Recommend over 46.5 Total Points

 

New Orleans host Carolina in the Superdome in a potential shootout.. although Carolina’s offense even with Newton at the helm has looked patchy at best.

Defensively Carolina seem a shadow of their former selves and now with two rookie corner backs and struggling to get to the QB they have the potential to get scorched by a top NFL QB. Drew Brees is that QB, the future hall of fame lock is a secondary’s nightmare.. he can shred you anytime anywhere and has the ability to keep a play alive even when the protection breaks down and when in the superdome with that crowd.. the danger is multiplied.Even without a running game Brees can still destroy a team.If this one turns into a Wild West shootout as many expect Brees is going to be firing bombs all day long.

So the generous line for New Orleans total points of over 24 is a must. At home Saints have only failed to score less than 26 points once in the last ten home games ( and put up 38 in this fixture last year when Carolina’s defense was one of the most feared )

We spoke already regarding the Raiders game and the line for the Raiders points is 22.5…??

Kansas defense numbers so far this season are a little misleading.. they restricted the Jets and the Texans in points.. you know those two powerhouse offenses ranked 24th and dead last respectively. You would kind of expect them to show up good against those.. so what happened when they came up against teams that can score.. San Diego put 27 past them in Kansas and the Steelers buried them for 43 last time out. Raiders offense is ranked top 5 and should be able to muster more than 22.5 against the deceptively 17th ranked Kansas Defense

Recommend

Sainta over 24 points

Raiders over 22.5 Points

Singles and a double on this line


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 15, 2016, 01:24:34 PM
I like the team points double.

Justin Forsett is 7/1 on Skybet (12/5 on paddy) Theo Riddick is out. Washington is questionable i believe. Forsett may be their only option.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on October 16, 2016, 10:04:45 AM
The dreaded @ Patriots week.Good luck today with your bets Sicilian and cavey,I've gone for an anytime touchdown patent of West,Jones and Bernard.Also thrown away £50 bengals 3/1 £50 bengals +13 winning margin 25/1 in hope of a bounce back game that's highly unlikely.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 16, 2016, 12:19:24 PM
Ok.. my bet of the week.. was waiting for the line to see if the compilers were going to be lazy..and yes they are🙂

LeSean McCoy over 87.5 rushing yards…

The Bills are a run first offense and McCoy is in great form.. Bills have the 3rd best rush offense in the league avg 137 yards per game.. they come up against our old friends the 49’s who have the 2nd worst rush defense in the league averaging 146 yards to opposing runners and have lost their defense general linebacker Bowman for the season.

McCoy has run for 58,59,110,70 and 150 yards in each of his games.. but lets look closer.. the 58 and 59 totals game against the Ravens and Jets number 4 and 2 in rush defense..so a tough time would be expected he ran 110 v Arizona 23 rd rush defense 70 v New England 9th ranked and last week tore the Rams up for 150 who rank.. 28th in the league.

So not hard to figure out.. but the compilers have basically added up and divided by 5 and you get 89.4.. many lines are at 89.5..B365 currently 87.5.. so no account has been taken for the opposition etc..etc.. just average it up and bang a line out there..remember the 49’s last game against Johnson we had.. he ripped them for 157 yards.. McCoy in a run first offense v this rush D..should have 100 + ..



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 16, 2016, 12:22:49 PM
The dreaded @ Patriots week.Good luck today with your bets Sicilian and cavey,I've gone for an anytime touchdown patent of West,Jones and Bernard.Also thrown away £50 bengals 3/1 £50 bengals +13 winning margin 25/1 in hope of a bounce back game that's highly unlikely.

good luck.. my anytime TD acca goes murray Tennessea..brown Steeleers..hyde frisco and nelson GB


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 16, 2016, 06:31:11 PM
I've got a whole host of bets on my blog. Nap is Murray anytime at 10/11 on paddypower. Can't see that not landing 

I may be crazy. But I think 100/1 on Gurley and Zeke both to be o120yds rushing and a TD is over priced. GB have had a good rush defence. But it's been against crap. Zeke is one of the best in the league


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 16, 2016, 10:11:20 PM
You score a touchdown to go 19-28 in the fourth quarter.

Do you:

a) Take the extra point, leave yourself 8 points behind so one score away.

b) Go for 2, meaning if you get it, you still need a touchdown and if you don't, you need two scores?

If you answered (a), you're never going to get a job in Cleveland but, good news, you're clinically sane.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 16, 2016, 10:27:46 PM
They needed 2 at some point. Went for it then instead of the next score? I can see their thinking. I had Browns +7 so good for me either way :/

Need Cowboys +4 for a nice little 4 fold to land


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on October 16, 2016, 10:29:57 PM
You score a touchdown to go 19-28 in the fourth quarter.

Do you:

a) Take the extra point, leave yourself 8 points behind so one score away.

b) Go for 2, meaning if you get it, you still need a touchdown and if you don't, you need two scores?

If you answered (a), you're never going to get a job in Cleveland but, good news, you're clinically sane.

Does it make a difference?

You need to hit 2 points this time or next time.  If you miss the 2 pointer you go for, you still need an extra score.  Either way 2 scores is not enough.  Might be better to go now, if it is the time the defence least expects it?  This ignores the different psycholigical impacts on both teams of an 8 or 9 point difference. 



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 16, 2016, 10:40:27 PM
They needed 2 at some point. Went for it then instead of the next score? I can see their thinking. I had Browns +7 so good for me either way :/

Need Cowboys +4 for a nice little 4 fold to land

But you throw away the game if you don't get the conversion. That's exactly what they did, too.

Good luck with your acca.

I predicted a team from the Super Bowl wouldn't make the playoffs. Granted, not this one...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 16, 2016, 10:44:12 PM
You score a touchdown to go 19-28 in the fourth quarter.

Do you:

a) Take the extra point, leave yourself 8 points behind so one score away.

b) Go for 2, meaning if you get it, you still need a touchdown and if you don't, you need two scores?

If you answered (a), you're never going to get a job in Cleveland but, good news, you're clinically sane.

Does it make a difference?

You need to hit 2 points this time or next time.  If you miss the 2 pointer you go for, you still need an extra score.  Either way 2 scores is not enough.  Might be better to go now, if it is the time the defence least expects it?  This ignores the different psycholigical impacts on both teams of an 8 or 9 point difference. 



Teams will be prepared either way as the offense will be on the field for the 2.

If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, but the certainty of being 8 behind seems far better than the possibility of being either 7 or 9 behind.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Doobs on October 17, 2016, 12:12:13 AM
I have had a look around, and there are charts saying you should do as you say Tal, but.

Say chance of 1 point conversion = 0.95 and chance of 2 point conversion = 0.5

Chance of 1 point then 2 = .95 x .5.  Chance of 2 point then 1 = .5 x .95.

.5 x .95 = .95 x .5.

Other than the psychological effect of been 1 score away, I don't see the difference.  The psychology thing should only be a minor secondary effect, but humans are weird.

It is getting late, so not going to worry about this much more, would be good to see some proof that one is better than tge other.

 


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 17, 2016, 02:22:10 PM
Early doors in NFL are my current favourites the Oakland Raiders Total points line.

Raiders are fantastic in offense and dire in defence which creates a sublime paradox of potential shootouts against any opponent, of the 5 games so far this season only one of them has been under 55 points.. the exception being against Baltimore who have one of the most lacklustre offences in recent times and a defense that continues to be stingy in all departments.

This trend seems set to continue and I see no reason to oppose the over points market any time soon. Sunday brings the Kansas chiefs to Oakland… offensively they are no better than average but against this Raiders D.. 24 points + looks likely.. defensively they seem to have lost a step from recent years and gave up 43 last week to a rampant Pittsburgh.

Carr ( in the form of his short career ) and a balanced Raiders run ( even without Murray ) pass attack look set to pile in another 28+ score.. Carr can hit instantly from anywhere on the field to elite deep threats like Crabtree and Cooper.

Recommend over 46.5 Total Points

 

New Orleans host Carolina in the Superdome in a potential shootout.. although Carolina’s offense even with Newton at the helm has looked patchy at best.

Defensively Carolina seem a shadow of their former selves and now with two rookie corner backs and struggling to get to the QB they have the potential to get scorched by a top NFL QB. Drew Brees is that QB, the future hall of fame lock is a secondary’s nightmare.. he can shred you anytime anywhere and has the ability to keep a play alive even when the protection breaks down and when in the superdome with that crowd.. the danger is multiplied.Even without a running game Brees can still destroy a team.If this one turns into a Wild West shootout as many expect Brees is going to be firing bombs all day long.

So the generous line for New Orleans total points of over 24 is a must. At home Saints have only failed to score less than 26 points once in the last ten home games ( and put up 38 in this fixture last year when Carolina’s defense was one of the most feared )

We spoke already regarding the Raiders game and the line for the Raiders points is 22.5…??

Kansas defense numbers so far this season are a little misleading.. they restricted the Jets and the Texans in points.. you know those two powerhouse offenses ranked 24th and dead last respectively. You would kind of expect them to show up good against those.. so what happened when they came up against teams that can score.. San Diego put 27 past them in Kansas and the Steelers buried them for 43 last time out. Raiders offense is ranked top 5 and should be able to muster more than 22.5 against the deceptively 17th ranked Kansas Defense

Recommend

Sainta over 24 points

Raiders over 22.5 Points

Singles and a double on this line

Raiders turned the ball over on several occasions .. Kansas performed as expected with 26 points ( predicted 24 ) raiders just didn't hold up their end for the bet to come in.

Saints over 24 was like printing money.. smashed 41 past the ailing Panthers


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 17, 2016, 02:24:56 PM
Ok.. my bet of the week.. was waiting for the line to see if the compilers were going to be lazy..and yes they are🙂

LeSean McCoy over 87.5 rushing yards…

The Bills are a run first offense and McCoy is in great form.. Bills have the 3rd best rush offense in the league avg 137 yards per game.. they come up against our old friends the 49’s who have the 2nd worst rush defense in the league averaging 146 yards to opposing runners and have lost their defense general linebacker Bowman for the season.

McCoy has run for 58,59,110,70 and 150 yards in each of his games.. but lets look closer.. the 58 and 59 totals game against the Ravens and Jets number 4 and 2 in rush defense..so a tough time would be expected he ran 110 v Arizona 23 rd rush defense 70 v New England 9th ranked and last week tore the Rams up for 150 who rank.. 28th in the league.

So not hard to figure out.. but the compilers have basically added up and divided by 5 and you get 89.4.. many lines are at 89.5..B365 currently 87.5.. so no account has been taken for the opposition etc..etc.. just average it up and bang a line out there..remember the 49’s last game against Johnson we had.. he ripped them for 157 yards.. McCoy in a run first offense v this rush D..should have 100 + ..



Glad to see my homework paid off .. McCoy smashed that 49 er defense for 140 Yards and 3 TD... will be looking for runners v this D all season


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 17, 2016, 02:25:33 PM
The dreaded @ Patriots week.Good luck today with your bets Sicilian and cavey,I've gone for an anytime touchdown patent of West,Jones and Bernard.Also thrown away £50 bengals 3/1 £50 bengals +13 winning margin 25/1 in hope of a bounce back game that's highly unlikely.

good luck.. my anytime TD acca goes murray Tennessea..brown Steeleers..hyde frisco and nelson GB

im awful at TD scorers LOL


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 17, 2016, 05:11:18 PM
really like this photo

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu-n8iZXYAAqXni.jpg)

dolphins have done a great job on that stadium refurb too


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ruud on October 17, 2016, 07:55:01 PM
anyone going to the first game at Twickers this weekend?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 17, 2016, 09:42:28 PM
The dreaded @ Patriots week.Good luck today with your bets Sicilian and cavey,I've gone for an anytime touchdown patent of West,Jones and Bernard.Also thrown away £50 bengals 3/1 £50 bengals +13 winning margin 25/1 in hope of a bounce back game that's highly unlikely.

good luck.. my anytime TD acca goes murray Tennessea..brown Steeleers..hyde frisco and nelson GB

im awful at TD scorers LOL

I tipped up Gillislee. LaFell and Kuhn at big odds and won on Murray too. Few lovely little earners at 11/4 and 10/3

BIlal Powell is my bigger odds for the night. Around 3/1. He's been getting equal snaps to Forte and playing better. They'll need to try and get the ground game going otherwise they'll just be letting Fitz throw it to Matthieu and his mates all night. It's big at that price


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 17, 2016, 10:06:02 PM
anyone going to the first game at Twickers this weekend?

Yes. Is it a royal pain to get to? Some of us folk are heading from north of Watford and it looks like it'll take longer to get to Richmond from Euston than it takes to get to Euston from Birmingham.

Thought London was supposed to have transport links ::)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ruud on October 17, 2016, 11:23:21 PM
anyone going to the first game at Twickers this weekend?

Yes. Is it a royal pain to get to? Some of us folk are heading from north of Watford and it looks like it'll take longer to get to Richmond from Euston than it takes to get to Euston from Birmingham.

Thought London was supposed to have transport links ::)

Was hoping you'd be able to help me!!! I'm coming from Notts sonny train goes to st Pancras and it looks like it's gonna be a challenge to get there to say the least!!!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on October 18, 2016, 04:40:54 AM
such a bad game tonight


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on October 18, 2016, 08:30:37 AM
anyone going to the first game at Twickers this weekend?

Yes. Is it a royal pain to get to? Some of us folk are heading from north of Watford and it looks like it'll take longer to get to Richmond from Euston than it takes to get to Euston from Birmingham.

Thought London was supposed to have transport links ::)

Now now, it has amazingly good transport links, plus, as a bonus, you get to enjoy the engineering marvel of the London Underground system, as well as the stunning punctuality & reliability of South West Trains.

Assume you will get the big train to Euston?

Then you want a Northern Line train southbound (that's the black line on Underground maps) direct to Waterloo. These run every 2 minutes on a Saturday. Journey time is 16 minutes.

From Waterloo, you want the Twickenham train, these run 12 times an hour this Sunday, & it takes around 30 minutes on a stopper.  

So, from Euston to Twickenham in less than an hour allowing for changes.

It's a short walk to the Stadium from Twickenham Station, or you can alight at St Margarets, which is a slightly longer but more pleasant walk.

I'm guessing you have not been to Twickers before? It's a fine, fine stadium by UK standards. The oddity, which has always bemused me, is that right opposite Twickenham Stadium - & I do mean right opposite, literally the other side of the A316 - is The Stoop, which is home to Harlequins. Land costs in London being what they are, that's just bizarre.  

The Stoop Car Park is the VIP & Media Car Park for Twickenham Stadium on match days, it's that close.

Both stadiums can be seen in this photo;





Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on October 18, 2016, 08:40:42 AM
anyone going to the first game at Twickers this weekend?

Yes. Is it a royal pain to get to? Some of us folk are heading from north of Watford and it looks like it'll take longer to get to Richmond from Euston than it takes to get to Euston from Birmingham.

Thought London was supposed to have transport links ::)

Was hoping you'd be able to help me!!! I'm coming from Notts sonny train goes to st Pancras and it looks like it's gonna be a challenge to get there to say the least!!!

Not at all.

From St Pancras Station (which is, effectively, the same place as Kings Cross Station), you can use the Northern Line, but it involves quite a trek at St Pancras, so better to take the Victoria Line to Green Park, then Jubilee Line to Waterloo. 


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 18, 2016, 10:27:32 AM
Nevada governor signs bill to approve Las Vegas stadium plan

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000722987/article/nevada-governor-signs-bill-to-approve-las-vegas-stadium-plan?campaign=Twitter_atn

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu_7ypOUkAA9_VQ.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ruud on October 18, 2016, 02:50:32 PM
anyone going to the first game at Twickers this weekend?

Yes. Is it a royal pain to get to? Some of us folk are heading from north of Watford and it looks like it'll take longer to get to Richmond from Euston than it takes to get to Euston from Birmingham.

Thought London was supposed to have transport links ::)

Was hoping you'd be able to help me!!! I'm coming from Notts sonny train goes to st Pancras and it looks like it's gonna be a challenge to get there to say the least!!!

Not at all.

From St Pancras Station (which is, effectively, the same place as Kings Cross Station), you can use the Northern Line, but it involves quite a trek at St Pancras, so better to take the Victoria Line to Green Park, then Jubilee Line to Waterloo. 

Thanks for this Tikay. I'm currently in a pot due to broken foot so minimal walking is my aim!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on October 18, 2016, 02:56:25 PM
anyone going to the first game at Twickers this weekend?

Yes. Is it a royal pain to get to? Some of us folk are heading from north of Watford and it looks like it'll take longer to get to Richmond from Euston than it takes to get to Euston from Birmingham.

Thought London was supposed to have transport links ::)

Was hoping you'd be able to help me!!! I'm coming from Notts sonny train goes to st Pancras and it looks like it's gonna be a challenge to get there to say the least!!!

Not at all.

From St Pancras Station (which is, effectively, the same place as Kings Cross Station), you can use the Northern Line, but it involves quite a trek at St Pancras, so better to take the Victoria Line to Green Park, then Jubilee Line to Waterloo. 

Thanks for this Tikay. I'm currently in a pot due to broken foot so minimal walking is my aim!

Yikes, you have a tidy walk at the Twickenham end of the journey.

How did you manage that?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ruud on October 19, 2016, 11:11:10 AM
anyone going to the first game at Twickers this weekend?

Yes. Is it a royal pain to get to? Some of us folk are heading from north of Watford and it looks like it'll take longer to get to Richmond from Euston than it takes to get to Euston from Birmingham.

Thought London was supposed to have transport links ::)

Was hoping you'd be able to help me!!! I'm coming from Notts sonny train goes to st Pancras and it looks like it's gonna be a challenge to get there to say the least!!!

Not at all.

From St Pancras Station (which is, effectively, the same place as Kings Cross Station), you can use the Northern Line, but it involves quite a trek at St Pancras, so better to take the Victoria Line to Green Park, then Jubilee Line to Waterloo. 

Thanks for this Tikay. I'm currently in a pot due to broken foot so minimal walking is my aim!

Yikes, you have a tidy walk at the Twickenham end of the journey.

How did you manage that?

Not thrilled about that walking then!!! How far we talking? I had thought maybe I should go to Vauxhall and get the proper train from there?

Very embarrassing - fell off a climbing wall the first time, then just when it was on the verge of being fixed, I fell over putting my shoe on to re-break it.

Classy bloke, me.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 19, 2016, 11:30:51 AM
anyone going to the first game at Twickers this weekend?

Yes. Is it a royal pain to get to? Some of us folk are heading from north of Watford and it looks like it'll take longer to get to Richmond from Euston than it takes to get to Euston from Birmingham.

Thought London was supposed to have transport links ::)

Was hoping you'd be able to help me!!! I'm coming from Notts sonny train goes to st Pancras and it looks like it's gonna be a challenge to get there to say the least!!!

Not at all.

From St Pancras Station (which is, effectively, the same place as Kings Cross Station), you can use the Northern Line, but it involves quite a trek at St Pancras, so better to take the Victoria Line to Green Park, then Jubilee Line to Waterloo. 

Thanks for this Tikay. I'm currently in a pot due to broken foot so minimal walking is my aim!

Yikes, you have a tidy walk at the Twickenham end of the journey.

How did you manage that?

Not thrilled about that walking then!!! How far we talking? I had thought maybe I should go to Vauxhall and get the proper train from there?

Very embarrassing - fell off a climbing wall the first time, then just when it was on the verge of being fixed, I fell over putting my shoe on to re-break it.

Classy bloke, me.

Vauxhall to Twickenham 35 minutes

up the stairs, turn right out of Twickenham station. 10 minute walk without a pot on/follow the crowds



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 19, 2016, 11:43:16 AM
Shuttle buses will be running from Richmond, Hounslow and Waterloo.

http://www.nfluk.com/news/internationalseries/article-1/Getting-To-Twickenham/0e21a072-a5bb-4955-ad8d-1d58a07a6f65


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on October 19, 2016, 11:55:31 AM
What was the reason given for playing this match at Twickenham?

Can't imagine it will have same atmosphere/vibe as the Wembley games.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 19, 2016, 12:15:39 PM
What was the reason given for playing this match at Twickenham?

Can't imagine it will have same atmosphere/vibe as the Wembley games.

3 games going there in the next three years. RFU outbid Wembley stadium Ltd for a package of games

Proximity to heathrow and training bases that side of London reduces travel time for the teams too, and reputedly the Giants (who i think fly in late) were quite happy it wasn't Wembley

Obviously Wembley is great, agree on the atmosphere. A full Twickenham is some sight when you are in it though, very good acoustics


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on October 19, 2016, 12:29:30 PM
What was the reason given for playing this match at Twickenham?

Can't imagine it will have same atmosphere/vibe as the Wembley games.

3 games going there in the next three years. RFU outbid Wembley stadium Ltd for a package of games

Proximity to heathrow and training bases that side of London reduces travel time for the teams too, and reputedly the Giants (who i think fly in late) were quite happy it wasn't Wembley

Obviously Wembley is great, agree on the atmosphere. A full Twickenham is some sight when you are in it though, very good acoustics

Would imagine the pitch will take the punishment better than Wembley.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on October 19, 2016, 12:32:17 PM
anyone going to the first game at Twickers this weekend?

Yes. Is it a royal pain to get to? Some of us folk are heading from north of Watford and it looks like it'll take longer to get to Richmond from Euston than it takes to get to Euston from Birmingham.

Thought London was supposed to have transport links ::)

Was hoping you'd be able to help me!!! I'm coming from Notts sonny train goes to st Pancras and it looks like it's gonna be a challenge to get there to say the least!!!

Not at all.

From St Pancras Station (which is, effectively, the same place as Kings Cross Station), you can use the Northern Line, but it involves quite a trek at St Pancras, so better to take the Victoria Line to Green Park, then Jubilee Line to Waterloo. 

Thanks for this Tikay. I'm currently in a pot due to broken foot so minimal walking is my aim!

Yikes, you have a tidy walk at the Twickenham end of the journey.

How did you manage that?

Not thrilled about that walking then!!! How far we talking? I had thought maybe I should go to Vauxhall and get the proper train from there?

Very embarrassing - fell off a climbing wall the first time, then just when it was on the verge of being fixed, I fell over putting my shoe on to re-break it.

Classy bloke, me.

Yup, Victoria Line to Vauxhall works just as well, but it's a naff station, whereas Waterloo rocks.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on October 19, 2016, 09:00:20 PM
I'm going to the game at the weekend, via Victoria. A couple of the guys going go to twickers or the Stoop regularly so should know our quickest route there


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 20, 2016, 12:50:40 AM
Any opinions on tomorrow nights match? I'm really uninspired by it tbh. Packers aren't playing well. Bears aren't very good. Division match. And at Lambeau so have to look towards Green Bay. But man. I'm really not feeling anything.

Can't see Knile Davis doing too much after 2 days. Guessing it'll still be Montgomery out of the backfield and a lot of passing. The green bay o line has been giving Rodgers so much time but he hasn't been finding players. Thinking it might be a decent game for Cobb providing Davis doesn't get too much workload.

Hoyer throws 300 yds per game. But struggles to get tds. Guess Jordan Howard. Cameron Meridian and Zach Miller there. Packers secondary is fairly good in general. They were top rush defence before Zeke. But in fairness they were the only decent rush team they've played so far. Jordan Howard has looked pretty good so far. So I think he'll be fine


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 20, 2016, 09:28:01 AM
Cavey, looks like a rotten game to bet on. Actually, looks like a rotten game full stop. Would quite like the Bears to find a win. If Jeffery is fit, the Packers have been allowing 118.8 yards per game to opposing WR1s this season, and it's not like it's all garbage time stuff.

That's all I have there. Time better spent sleeping, I'd venture.

Strength of remaining schedule. Comparing the teams in contention for the number 1 overall pick next year, it's impressive how much the 49ers have ahead of them, compared with the Browns and the Bears (who seem to be the other two).

http://nfltraderumors.co/2016-nfl-strength-schedule/

Anyone think it could be a fourth team, out of interest? The Jets seem possible, although I can't get over that they should have enough talent to win 4 games.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 20, 2016, 11:30:59 AM
Cavey, looks like a rotten game to bet on. Actually, looks like a rotten game full stop. Would quite like the Bears to find a win. If Jeffery is fit, the Packers have been allowing 118.8 yards per game to opposing WR1s this season, and it's not like it's all garbage time stuff.

That's all I have there. Time better spent sleeping, I'd venture.

Strength of remaining schedule. Comparing the teams in contention for the number 1 overall pick next year, it's impressive how much the 49ers have ahead of them, compared with the Browns and the Bears (who seem to be the other two).

http://nfltraderumors.co/2016-nfl-strength-schedule/

Anyone think it could be a fourth team, out of interest? The Jets seem possible, although I can't get over that they should have enough talent to win 4 games.

That was pretty much my thinking on tonights game. There's nothing there that interest me. I'll do a little write up. And probably pick something. But won't be much. Jeffrey seems fit enough. Just not targetted at all.

Regards to first pick. I think the Browns will get a win. There's at least some effort there. Hopefully not this week vs my Bengals. But I wouldn't be shocked to see Hue come in and get the W. Not sure on the injury update for Hyde after last week. But if he's gone. The niners are done. I don't think the Bears are in the same category as them or the niners, for some reason I think they're ok, I can't really explain it! The Jets have had a horrible start. And a horrible schedule. I think they'll be fine. Until last week I might of floated the Dolphins as they were garbage. But that win against the Steelers could be a turning point. Apparently they had their ideal OL out there and it obviously helped Ajayi.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on October 20, 2016, 04:14:05 PM
Nevada governor signs bill to approve Las Vegas stadium plan

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000722987/article/nevada-governor-signs-bill-to-approve-las-vegas-stadium-plan?campaign=Twitter_atn

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu_7ypOUkAA9_VQ.jpg)

Any idea where exactly in Vegas this is planned to be?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Skippy on October 20, 2016, 04:25:14 PM
Nevada governor signs bill to approve Las Vegas stadium plan

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000722987/article/nevada-governor-signs-bill-to-approve-las-vegas-stadium-plan?campaign=Twitter_atn

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu_7ypOUkAA9_VQ.jpg)

Any idea where exactly in Vegas this is planned to be?

I was going to say that in Vegas they might struggle for "home fans", but thinking about it really nobody lives in Foxboro, and that still sells out every time.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on October 20, 2016, 04:28:11 PM
Nevada governor signs bill to approve Las Vegas stadium plan

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000722987/article/nevada-governor-signs-bill-to-approve-las-vegas-stadium-plan?campaign=Twitter_atn

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu_7ypOUkAA9_VQ.jpg)

Any idea where exactly in Vegas this is planned to be?

I was going to say that in Vegas they might struggle for "home fans", but thinking about it really nobody lives in Foxboro, and that still sells out every time.

The transient nature of Vegas tourists would fill it, I'd say. It'd be part & parcel of a Vegas trip for most. And regular NFL fans can use it as an excuse to pop to Vegas for the weekend. You can fly a long way for $100 on SouthWest Airlines.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 20, 2016, 04:35:00 PM
one of two locations west of the strip

http://vegas-raiders.net/stadium-location


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 21, 2016, 08:17:30 AM
So Devontae Adams played last night then. Was sure he'd be missing with concussion.

Hoyer suffered a broken left arm which messed up an already miserable game even more (by the look of it)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on October 21, 2016, 04:16:23 PM
Bonus being the only person in our friends and family who likes American football is that you bag all the freebies.Wangled free hospitality to jags colts and now get me and the missus free rams giants tickets as my mate 'has something better to do'


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 22, 2016, 04:59:41 PM
A tough week for spots.. those pesky bookies dont like giving it away do they😦

However there are still some interesting spots if we delve deep enough and spot a lazy compiler.

NY Jets v Baltimore

Matt Forte of the Jets had a great start to the season running for 96 & 100 yards against the bengals & bills who rank 20th & 15th against the run so not exactly brick walls.. since then its been ugly for Forte and his looked disinterested.. His last 4 games his gone for 65,27,53 and 19 v 24th,3rd,13th and 17th ranked run defences. The only really run stopping defence was Seattle who stuffed him up for the 27. Powell the back up has also been taking touches off him.

The jets are a mess offensively.. The QB’s are a joke and as touched upon the run game isnt much better. Sunday they come up against the equally inept offence of Baltimore.. however they do have a pretty handy defence and rank n0.1 against..you guessed it ..the run allowing an average of 69 yards.

In all honesty they have come up against some poor run teams and there numbers may look a bit better than an honest line.. but in order they have allowed 15..31..30..17..133 and 58.. the 133 v cleveland is a little skewed as one massive busted play alone went for 85 yards.. take that anomaly away and Crowell went for 48 on the day.

So they rank number one v the run against average to poor run teams.. hey the jets are an average to poor run team and Forte looks like he wished he never left Chicago.

So the line for Forte rush yards is 60.5.. thats odd divide his yards to date by the number of games and you get.. 60… wow could you be any lazier Mr compiler..

So Matt Forte under 60.5 yards has to be this weeks nap selection


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 22, 2016, 11:51:21 PM
A tough week for spots.. those pesky bookies dont like giving it away do they😦

However there are still some interesting spots if we delve deep enough and spot a lazy compiler.

NY Jets v Baltimore

Matt Forte of the Jets had a great start to the season running for 96 & 100 yards against the bengals & bills who rank 20th & 15th against the run so not exactly brick walls.. since then its been ugly for Forte and his looked disinterested.. His last 4 games his gone for 65,27,53 and 19 v 24th,3rd,13th and 17th ranked run defences. The only really run stopping defence was Seattle who stuffed him up for the 27. Powell the back up has also been taking touches off him.

The jets are a mess offensively.. The QB’s are a joke and as touched upon the run game isnt much better. Sunday they come up against the equally inept offence of Baltimore.. however they do have a pretty handy defence and rank n0.1 against..you guessed it ..the run allowing an average of 69 yards.

In all honesty they have come up against some poor run teams and there numbers may look a bit better than an honest line.. but in order they have allowed 15..31..30..17..133 and 58.. the 133 v cleveland is a little skewed as one massive busted play alone went for 85 yards.. take that anomaly away and Crowell went for 48 on the day.

So they rank number one v the run against average to poor run teams.. hey the jets are an average to poor run team and Forte looks like he wished he never left Chicago.

So the line for Forte rush yards is 60.5.. thats odd divide his yards to date by the number of games and you get.. 60… wow could you be any lazier Mr compiler..

So Matt Forte under 60.5 yards has to be this weeks nap selection

Good call there. I think Powell actually aged more snaps than him last week. But can't verify that. Sure I heard it on a podcast. Not sure on my nap of the week tbh. Just done my write up on the Twickenham game and it's largely Beckham-centric which I'm sure he'd appreciate. Will look tomorrow for other bets.

Early thoughts would be the Mike Gillislee anytime at 11/10 or Jacquizz Rodgers over whatever is on offer (looks like 63.5 which I may well suggest lumping on to a large extent) would be competing for nap/nb. However you can also get near Evens for AJ green any time vs a depleted Browns defence.

Apologies. Probably need to explain my reasons more. It looks very likely that shady McCoy will be out for the Bills. They are now a run heavy offence and even with Shady there Gillislee has been scoring. He went for o60 yards and a TD last week as second choice. Shove him in at no. 1 and with his over 5 ypg average. Against a poor run defence. Surely he's going to eat 

Rodgers is the only guy left in the run game for Tampa. Martin suffered a set back. Sims is on IR. Against a team who gave up over 300 yards last week. And 138 the week before to Zeke (the loss of Navarre bowman has killed them) Rodgers was o100 in their last match. They've had a bye and time to rest and analyse. 64 yards seems perfectly acceptable.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 23, 2016, 12:12:33 AM
A tough week for spots.. those pesky bookies dont like giving it away do they😦

However there are still some interesting spots if we delve deep enough and spot a lazy compiler.

NY Jets v Baltimore

Matt Forte of the Jets had a great start to the season running for 96 & 100 yards against the bengals & bills who rank 20th & 15th against the run so not exactly brick walls.. since then its been ugly for Forte and his looked disinterested.. His last 4 games his gone for 65,27,53 and 19 v 24th,3rd,13th and 17th ranked run defences. The only really run stopping defence was Seattle who stuffed him up for the 27. Powell the back up has also been taking touches off him.

The jets are a mess offensively.. The QB’s are a joke and as touched upon the run game isnt much better. Sunday they come up against the equally inept offence of Baltimore.. however they do have a pretty handy defence and rank n0.1 against..you guessed it ..the run allowing an average of 69 yards.

In all honesty they have come up against some poor run teams and there numbers may look a bit better than an honest line.. but in order they have allowed 15..31..30..17..133 and 58.. the 133 v cleveland is a little skewed as one massive busted play alone went for 85 yards.. take that anomaly away and Crowell went for 48 on the day.

So they rank number one v the run against average to poor run teams.. hey the jets are an average to poor run team and Forte looks like he wished he never left Chicago.

So the line for Forte rush yards is 60.5.. thats odd divide his yards to date by the number of games and you get.. 60… wow could you be any lazier Mr compiler..

So Matt Forte under 60.5 yards has to be this weeks nap selection

Good call there. I think Powell actually aged more snaps than him last week. But can't verify that. Sure I heard it on a podcast. Not sure on my nap of the week tbh. Just done my write up on the Twickenham game and it's largely Beckham-centric which I'm sure he'd appreciate. Will look tomorrow for other bets.

Early thoughts would be the Mike Gillislee anytime at 11/10 or Jacquizz Rodgers over whatever is on offer (looks like 63.5 which I may well suggest lumping on to a large extent) would be competing for nap/nb. However you can also get near Evens for AJ green any time vs a depleted Browns defence.

Apologies. Probably need to explain my reasons more. It looks very likely that shady McCoy will be out for the Bills. They are now a run heavy offence and even with Shady there Gillislee has been scoring. He went for o60 yards and a TD last week as second choice. Shove him in at no. 1 and with his over 5 ypg average. Against a poor run defence. Surely he's going to eat 

Rodgers is the only guy left in the run game for Tampa. Martin suffered a set back. Sims is on IR. Against a team who gave up over 300 yards last week. And 138 the week before to Zeke (the loss of Navarre bowman has killed them) Rodgers was o100 in their last match. They've had a bye and time to rest and analyse. 64 yards seems perfectly acceptable.

been waiting for the line on Rodgers yards as san fran look like they would give up a hundred + to my granny carrying me on her back... after last weeks performance and against the worst run D.. i can see Tampa just pounding it like last week v Carolina


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 23, 2016, 10:13:38 AM
Interesting to see the the handicap has flipped on Tampa now. They were -1 in the week at San Fran. Now +1 so obviously a lot of cash for San Fran. I can't see Tampa losing tbh. I know the niners play better at home. But they're crap. They have lost their best rusher for the week too. Kap isn't very good even the td they had last week was from an awful underthrown pass. Tampa haven't been impressive but have had the week off to concentrate on getting right for this game. What am I missing?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on October 23, 2016, 10:48:26 AM
Interesting to see the the handicap has flipped on Tampa now. They were -1 in the week at San Fran. Now +1 so obviously a lot of cash for San Fran. I can't see Tampa losing tbh. I know the niners play better at home. But they're crap. They have lost their best rusher for the week too. Kap isn't very good even the td they had last week was from an awful underthrown pass. Tampa haven't been impressive but have had the week off to concentrate on getting right for this game. What am I missing?

Kaepernick has a lot of baggage but he did throw the ball reasonably well last week. The Buccs haven't scored well in most of their games this season. Perhaps there's a view that they might nick a close one?

I do like Cameron Brate first TD, though, at 14/1. Wouldn't worry about who receives first, as neither team is a heavy scorer.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on October 23, 2016, 03:32:39 PM
What was the reason given for playing this match at Twickenham?

Can't imagine it will have same atmosphere/vibe as the Wembley games.

3 games going there in the next three years. RFU outbid Wembley stadium Ltd for a package of games

Proximity to heathrow and training bases that side of London reduces travel time for the teams too, and reputedly the Giants (who i think fly in late) were quite happy it wasn't Wembley

Obviously Wembley is great, agree on the atmosphere. A full Twickenham is some sight when you are in it though, very good acoustics

Would imagine the pitch will take the punishment better than Wembley.

LOL

It just goes to prove how long it's been since I watched a rugby match, I thought Twickenham had 4 individual stands!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 23, 2016, 10:54:19 PM
Rodgers yards practically in after 20 mins. I doubled it with AJ green anytime for a little boost.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 23, 2016, 11:10:09 PM
Rodgers yards practically in after 20 mins. I doubled it with AJ green anytime for a little boost.

Over 100 after 21 mins. Printing money


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on October 24, 2016, 05:03:04 AM
Ari Sea did they both forget there offenses?


has there ever been a 3-0 game at full time ?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 24, 2016, 06:45:32 AM
Ari Sea did they both forget there offenses?


has there ever been a 3-0 game at full time ?

Lowest scoring OT game in history


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 24, 2016, 07:48:09 AM
Ah. Apparently lowest scoring overtime tie in history. Won't let me modify that previous one for some reason.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 24, 2016, 06:08:14 PM
All star receiver struggles to comes to terms with a draw

US Sports don't do draws....

Larry Fitzgerald: "It feels like you lost... You didn’t win, but you didn’t lose. A perplexing feeling.”

a remarkable match really, 27 and 24 yard FGs missed by Haushka and Catanzaro in overtime!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 24, 2016, 07:01:57 PM
Ari Sea did they both forget there offenses?


has there ever been a 3-0 game at full time ?

Yes - There was a game between Miami and Pittsburgh on MNF a few years back. It was insanely wet, there was a field goal with about 20 seconds left in regulation to break the 0-0 tie.

EDIT - Vid won't play when embedded because the NFL blocks it being viewed unless you're watching on YouTube's website. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7DTNEa2E7w

Here is a list of all the games in NFL history that have finished 3-0; there's been 6 since the 1970 merger. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/game_scores_find.cgi?pts_win=3&pts_lose=0



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on October 24, 2016, 07:36:50 PM
Ari Sea did they both forget there offenses?


has there ever been a 3-0 game at full time ?

Yes - There was a game between Miami and Pittsburgh on MNF a few years back. It was insanely wet, there was a field goal with about 20 seconds left in regulation to break the 0-0 tie.

EDIT - Vid won't play when embedded because the NFL blocks it being viewed unless you're watching on YouTube's website. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7DTNEa2E7w

Here is a list of all the games in NFL history that have finished 3-0; there's been 6 since the 1970 merger. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/game_scores_find.cgi?pts_win=3&pts_lose=0



wow 4 games in history have finished 2-0  wonder if thats same scoring system and games were won with a safety
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/game_scores_find.cgi?pts_win=2&pts_lose=0


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 24, 2016, 10:21:54 PM
Ari Sea did they both forget there offenses?


has there ever been a 3-0 game at full time ?

Yes - There was a game between Miami and Pittsburgh on MNF a few years back. It was insanely wet, there was a field goal with about 20 seconds left in regulation to break the 0-0 tie.

EDIT - Vid won't play when embedded because the NFL blocks it being viewed unless you're watching on YouTube's website. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7DTNEa2E7w

Here is a list of all the games in NFL history that have finished 3-0; there's been 6 since the 1970 merger. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/game_scores_find.cgi?pts_win=3&pts_lose=0



wow 4 games in history have finished 2-0  wonder if thats same scoring system and games were won with a safety
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/game_scores_find.cgi?pts_win=2&pts_lose=0

Yeah, all these games would've been won with a safety. There's actually far more 0-0 draws from this era, before they used to have overtime. Unfortunately, their database search thing freaks out if you try to search for 0-0 results :(

The game favoured defence far more in that era - Teams were still working out how to take advantage of forward passes being legal, a rule change that came in for safety reasons to reduce player fatalities because the alternative was banning the sport altogether.

On 3rd & 4, running the ball would've still been the norm, rather than trying to throw the ball to pick up a 1st down, such was the simplicity and ineffectiveness of the 1930s passing game. For most teams, passing would've been reserved for 3rd and long. Throwing the ball on 1st down would've been almost unheard of.

Also think how much harder it would be to score points having no specialist kicker - you'd simply have the best kicker/punter out of the players on your team kicking field goals and/or being responsible for punting.

The more you think about the way the game was played at that time, you can see how a lot of games would've been incredibly low scoring.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on October 24, 2016, 10:54:18 PM
The main reason for the early running game was that until 1934 they essentially played with a rugby ball (wider with more rounded ends).

When the ball got its current shape it became more throwable (and also effectively eliminated the drop goal from the game, which is still legal)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 24, 2016, 11:03:23 PM
The main reason for the early running game was that until 1934 they essentially played with a rugby ball (wider with more rounded ends).

When the ball got its current shape it became more throwable (and also effectively eliminated the drop goal from the game, which is still legal)

Yeah, the last drop goal (before Doug Flutie) was 1941 I believe, so the dropkick stuck around for a few years after the rule change, but soon disappeared out of the game altogether.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 25, 2016, 06:00:18 PM
Of the teams yet to play in the International Series who would you like to see the most next year?

give me a top 3


Packers
Cardinals
Eagles
Ravens
Browns
Seahawks
Panthers
Titans

.....


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on October 25, 2016, 06:01:23 PM
Packers
Cardinals
Seahawks


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 25, 2016, 06:01:30 PM
Packers (history, Aaron, cheeseheads at Wembley)
Eagles (to anti-rail)
Seahawks (Wilson and that defense)

for me


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 25, 2016, 06:49:02 PM
Cardinals
Packers
Seahawks

Could solve 2 in 1 go and bring the Seahawks v Cards over here. But that's the biggest game in their division. I doubt they'd do that. Also both West coast they tend to do at least one East coast don't they?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Horneris on October 26, 2016, 12:28:57 PM
About time they gave us some decent teams I think so Packers, Eagles and Panthers.

Not sure about Cardinals and Seahawks, although quality defences, I'd kill myself if I went all the way to Wembley and it was 6-6.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 26, 2016, 02:31:11 PM
I'm having a real problem figuring where Carolina are a 3 point favourite over Arizona..

I know Carolina are coming off the bye and are at home but they have horrific issues with their D this year especially in the secondary and Cam looks a shadow of himself.

They have only managed to beat the woeful 49'ers..

Arizona have misfired a bit but are solid in defense and have enough offense to compete and win..

Thoughts ?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 27, 2016, 09:43:25 AM
My thoughts would be that I'm avoiding that game. Cardinals aren't playing well enough to give me confidence in them at all. Panthers aren't as bad a team as their record. Yes their secondary is pretty poor. But they have enough on offence that I wouldn't be touching that match

Atlanta match for me is badly handicapped. I think they could well stuff the Packers. However the loss of Coleman (assuming he's out) might mess that a bit.

Saying that I got 5/15 on the picker last week which was pretty poor and shows how random this league is


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 27, 2016, 01:43:12 PM
I am however keeping an eye on jj nelsons odds. If they're 6/1 or above I'll have a little dabble


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on October 27, 2016, 01:44:27 PM
C&P from TFT just incase any of the nfl boys don't read TFT.

One for the nfl boys and arbers.  Tonight's game winning margin.  Tenn 1-6 winning margin.  Just laid someone on bf a carpet at 11/4 on this when 7/2 is freely available and 10/3 and 3/1 is also freely available.  Any reason why someone seems so keen to get on this bet at such a short price so early in the day.  Seems very unlikely to be a wagon at 11am in the morning putting up this bet.  The game total isn't that low at 43.5.  Anyone got any thoughts?  Punters still looking for 3/1 on the machine for any arbers out there who want to nick a few quid and can get the 7/2.

Either way it is probably a bet at 7/2 for those that can get on.

http://www.oddschecker.com/american-football/nfl/jacksonville-jaguars-at-tennessee-titans/winning-margin


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 27, 2016, 04:39:43 PM
Latest thoughts.. went 5/7 last week.. unfortunately one of them wasn't my nap :(


https://degeneratethoughtsblog.wordpress.com/


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on October 27, 2016, 05:40:38 PM
http://www.espn.co.uk/american-fb/story/_/id/17899388/actually-take-points-throwing-football-unwritten-rules-nfl-2016

Good stats based article here


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 27, 2016, 09:23:37 PM
Probably a random question and I'm not sure if anyone will be able to help out. But seeing as a few of you do your own blogs and writing yourselves.

Have you been approached by website asking you to wrote for them and what was your response?

Just been msged again on twitter by some guys and i've said as long as I can promote my site too then I'm happy for them to use my write ups on the games. Waiting to see what happens.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ForthThistle on October 28, 2016, 12:18:27 AM
Probably a random question and I'm not sure if anyone will be able to help out. But seeing as a few of you do your own blogs and writing yourselves.

Have you been approached by website asking you to wrote for them and what was your response?

Just been msged again on twitter by some guys and i've said as long as I can promote my site too then I'm happy for them to use my write ups on the games. Waiting to see what happens.
Whats your Site?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 28, 2016, 05:36:59 AM
Probably a random question and I'm not sure if anyone will be able to help out. But seeing as a few of you do your own blogs and writing yourselves.

Have you been approached by website asking you to wrote for them and what was your response?

Just been msged again on twitter by some guys and i've said as long as I can promote my site too then I'm happy for them to use my write ups on the games. Waiting to see what happens.
Whats your Site?

www.Touchdowntips.com

Tonight didn't go too well. Titans destroyed the jags. But no walker td despite 75 yds. Marquis Lee may have got his yards if he could catch the ball. Had a few at least 10 yd catches he dropped in the second half that would of put him close


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on October 28, 2016, 11:28:32 AM
Probably a random question and I'm not sure if anyone will be able to help out. But seeing as a few of you do your own blogs and writing yourselves.

Have you been approached by website asking you to wrote for them and what was your response?

Just been msged again on twitter by some guys and i've said as long as I can promote my site too then I'm happy for them to use my write ups on the games. Waiting to see what happens.
Whats your Site?

www.Touchdowntips.com

Tonight didn't go too well. Titans destroyed the jags. But no walker td despite 75 yds. Marquis Lee may have got his yards if he could catch the ball. Had a few at least 10 yd catches he dropped in the second half that would of put him close

Nice write ups.. and blog... mines a lot more basic as it was solely created for a group i belong to and was just easier to get it across to them.. thought i'd put it up here too.

Tipping is a thankless task.. especially NFL which can just throw curve balls at the most unexpected times.. people always just waiting for you to look like a fool no matter how good you have been previously.. at least we have the balls to put our thoughts and money up

Keep up the good work fella :)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 28, 2016, 12:36:56 PM
Probably a random question and I'm not sure if anyone will be able to help out. But seeing as a few of you do your own blogs and writing yourselves.

Have you been approached by website asking you to wrote for them and what was your response?

Just been msged again on twitter by some guys and i've said as long as I can promote my site too then I'm happy for them to use my write ups on the games. Waiting to see what happens.
Whats your Site?

www.Touchdowntips.com

Tonight didn't go too well. Titans destroyed the jags. But no walker td despite 75 yds. Marquis Lee may have got his yards if he could catch the ball. Had a few at least 10 yd catches he dropped in the second half that would of put him close

Nice write ups.. and blog... mines a lot more basic as it was solely created for a group i belong to and was just easier to get it across to them.. thought i'd put it up here too.

Tipping is a thankless task.. especially NFL which can just throw curve balls at the most unexpected times.. people always just waiting for you to look like a fool no matter how good you have been previously.. at least we have the balls to put our thoughts and money up

Keep up the good work fella :)

Thanks for that, just a bit of a hobby at the moment. The missus started uni so she's doing a lot in the evenings now so figured I'd find something to keep me busy as well! Its not easy. That's for sure. That's why I try and look for deeper bets that may have been missed by the bookies (crowning glory so far was Hunter Henry at 7/1 on a sat night when he went off 7/4 the next day). Bigger odds. They won't always win. But it looks good when they do. I'm about 20 pts up for the year so far. That's after a dismal first 3 or 4 weeks. So things are trending the right way now there's some stats around


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on October 29, 2016, 04:54:18 PM
 Cavey...Munoz Anderson Lapham and others in the Admiralty trafalgar sq tonight.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on October 29, 2016, 05:00:26 PM
Cavey...Munoz Anderson Lapham and others in the Admiralty trafalgar sq tonight.

I'm there and back tomorrow. Couldn't make it down tonight. Hopefully there will be a few of them around after the match tomorrow. Seen a lot of the pics from the admiralty on twitter. Looks really good!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 30, 2016, 04:20:58 PM
ICYMI, you can vote on the game selection for the Sky 6pm and 9pm kickoffs in week 10.

http://www.skysports.com/nfl/news/12118/10638728/vote-for-which-nfl-games-sky-sports-will-show-in-week-10

The late game is a lock, Cowboys @ Steelers has like 70% of the vote and the other 2 games are meh. The early game vote is pretty tight though.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 30, 2016, 05:12:04 PM
Saints @ Dolphins will be one of the London games next season, venue TBC.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000729869/article/miami-dolphins-will-play-saints-in-london-in-2017


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: 4KSuited on October 30, 2016, 09:33:55 PM
Cavey...Munoz Anderson Lapham and others in the Admiralty trafalgar sq tonight.

I'm there and back tomorrow. Couldn't make it down tonight. Hopefully there will be a few of them around after the match tomorrow. Seen a lot of the pics from the admiralty on twitter. Looks really good!

Just catching up on here: The Admiralty is a superb Fullers conversion pub. Needless to say the beer is excellent, and the location iconic. Worth a visit (food's vg too) even when the NFL isn't in town.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 31, 2016, 01:20:10 PM
a mistake riddled unconvincing performance, but i will take it!

fun to be winning again.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwEYeidUEAA1aGr.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on October 31, 2016, 05:59:36 PM
New England have just traded Jamie Collins to Cleveland for a 3rd round pick, wtf?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on October 31, 2016, 06:23:25 PM
i know its a surprise but

a) its his contract year and he wants a von miller type contract. so if you aren't going to pay it (see the chandler jones trade) then effectively you get your 3rd round compensatory pick a year early

b) he's not playing as well as hightower and they really like his back up, roberts i think his name in

i think i read that belichek has now done 24 trades intra season in the last three years. i think the hit rate on players he trades away (not then being that good for the new club) is quite high too

poor Jamie now steps onto a rebuilding project somewhere near the bottom, and misses out on a possible superbowl ring (in a year when there aren't very many good teams and the pats look the best of the lot)


alternatively, ignore all that and bill just thinks brady is finding it too easy and wants to make it more of a challenge for him


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 01, 2016, 10:57:09 AM
How to maintain salary cap discipline and keep a dynasty going 15 years.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwHQE4nUIAA_ujw.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on November 01, 2016, 07:53:17 PM
How to maintain salary cap discipline and keep a dynasty going 15 years.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwHQE4nUIAA_ujw.jpg)

Could Matt Cassel look any more out of place on that list if he tried?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 05, 2016, 11:28:34 AM
Few for the weekend 

Main one is Latavius Murray at 5/1 anytime on the Green Irish guys. They've mispriced that badly. He's around 6/4 everywhere else. Not an easy match up. But they concede more on the ground than the air. Would of had that to tikay but obviously he can't use them.

I think Moncrief is overpriced at 7/4 anytime and 12/1 2 or more on Skybet too. So on that.

Can't see why the Saints are only 3.5pts favourites vs the Niners either tbh so all over that, along with Lions +6 and Panthers -3.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on November 05, 2016, 10:10:11 PM
I want to be knile davis's estate agent
In 3 weeks he has gone from kansas to green bay to new York and now back to kansas


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on November 06, 2016, 09:55:08 PM
 Safe to say AFC north won't be taking 3 teams to the playoffs


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 06, 2016, 10:04:38 PM
Safe to say AFC north won't be taking 3 teams to the playoffs

Nope. Makes our draw last week even more painful now. Could of been above the Steelers. They've got 3 of 4 away from home and they're awful there. Also we've got to host them later in the year. It's anyone's division


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on November 06, 2016, 10:11:25 PM
No excuses for us now with the whole roster basically fit for selection.My man in the know reckons Jackson is almost good to go.Would recommend us at 3/1 for the division on tft but my record there is awful.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 07, 2016, 03:36:44 AM
My blog hit about 40 pts profit on the night (before Booker and Crabtree have settled) thanks to Murray at 5/1. The handicap treble getting 2 and a void. Hightower. Beckham. Etc. www.Touchdowntips.com puts me at 70+ pts up on the year. Not a bad night at all


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bergeroo on November 07, 2016, 12:45:31 PM
Thanks for Murray!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on November 07, 2016, 02:40:54 PM
Kicker thinks he's Cristiano Ronaldo, then shows that he isn't.

http://digg.com/video/steelers-onside-kick-boswell


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on November 07, 2016, 02:41:09 PM
How to maintain salary cap discipline and keep a dynasty going 15 years.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwHQE4nUIAA_ujw.jpg)

Could Matt Cassel look any more out of place on that list if he tried?

Think Hernadez is the real eye opener on that list. Hard to claim cutting him after he murdered someone deserves to be a success on a a notable players released or traded list.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on November 07, 2016, 03:05:30 PM
Kicker thinks he's Cristiano Ronaldo, then shows that he isn't.

http://digg.com/video/steelers-onside-kick-boswell

I laughed out loud when he did this, especially as they had mounted a good comeback to be in with a chance. Its about that time in the season that coaches tend to get more 'genius' with each passing week.

You can imagine the convo 'what kick will they be expecting us to do?

'OK, then what can you do that they won't ever expect us to do'

'Well I could trot up to it and instead of kicking it normally I could try a crazy back heal style thing that the do in the soccer'

'Will we look clever doing that? ok, give that one a go'


I'm a bit surprised that more teams don't just kick the ball str8 at the defender that stands in front of the kicker to stop him squibbing it down the middle. If you kick it str8 at him very hard two things happen. It either hits him and it's then a free for all to get the ball but has an element of surprise. Or you miss him and it goes down the middle of the pitch where there are very few players and it then becomes a bobbling ball and a race.

Indy did that kind of kick against Tampa many years ago in an incredible 21 point comeback tho I can't seem to find a video clip of it.




Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 07, 2016, 04:15:57 PM
Love this one

Golden Tate wins it in overtime

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cwqz2bBUoAAKLRz.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 08, 2016, 01:36:15 PM
with respect to the minnesota-detroit game

Teams that were down exactly 3 points w/ 30 seconds or less in the 4th with the ball inside their own 30 were 0-98 since 2001.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on November 08, 2016, 04:26:35 PM
Clean sweep last week :)  makes 17/20 last 3 weeks.. made one of my fellow punters 2.5K..apparently he thinks im the greatest.. I will remind him of this this when we go 0/7 next week :)

https://degeneratethoughtsblog.wordpress.com/


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 08, 2016, 07:56:01 PM
Clean sweep last week :)  makes 17/20 last 3 weeks.. made one of my fellow punters 2.5K..apparently he thinks im the greatest.. I will remind him of this this when we go 0/7 next week :)

https://degeneratethoughtsblog.wordpress.com/

That's pretty darn impressive. Will have to keep an eye of that for next weekend. A chap I follow on Twitter was let down on his 7 fold by going u42 pts on last night's match


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on November 09, 2016, 12:28:54 PM
Question for Tighty :

Im having a little trouble figuring why Dallas are a 2.5 dog to Pittsburgh ?... I know Pittsburgh are at home and although Big Ben is trending up his still hobbled.. Dallas are looking good.. can control the game behind Elliot and the O line and the D has stepped right up.. Am I missing something.. has Jerry Jones demanded Romo back ?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 09, 2016, 12:41:58 PM
Question for Tighty :

Im having a little trouble figuring why Dallas are a 2.5 dog to Pittsburgh ?... I know Pittsburgh are at home and although Big Ben is trending up his still hobbled.. Dallas are looking good.. can control the game behind Elliot and the O line and the D has stepped right up.. Am I missing something.. has Jerry Jones demanded Romo back ?

Romo is not quite ready and in amongst Jerry's mixed messages the realistic expecation is that they will ride the hot hand in Dak and not disturb things. In theory Romo could be in for a 6 week or so season (week 12 onwards and maybe the play offs) but can kick that down the road a while yet.

If they were both fully fit and it was an even choice i think they would stick Romo back in but its swings and roundabouts. Romo gives them a deeper passing game that could be lethal given the single coverage everywhere with so many focussed on stopping the run. Dak though gives them a QB running game that Romo doesn't

Ben has tended to be much better in his frequent injuury comebacks at home and specifically a lot better than he tends to be in his first game back (he comes back and plays when a lot of other QBs would be sitting out still, a really tough competitior) and at the Ravens which was last week.

the line, allowing for a standard 3 points to the home side, has Dallas as slight favourites on a neutral fieldwhich is probably about right. Have to factor in that Ben will be much better this week than last. Granted beyond Brown and Bell they have a lot of injuries at skill positions. Sammie Coates also couldn't catch a cold in a deep freezer since his hand injury.  I note that ladarius green is expected to be fit though

that said the Steelers have problems on their O-Line and perhaps more notably struggle to stop the run and the pass

the Zeke pick has turned into a 10 out of 10 slam dunk because the O-Line is so good. teams load up the box to try and stop the run but he suits the zone blocking scheme perfectly and Dak has been accurate enough to find receivers open down the field. A real "pick your poison" offense while the major factors are fit and firing. OK it was only cleveland last weekend but go and watch the touchdowns. cleveland stick 8 in the box, double Dez and the likes of Beasley and Witten are completely open a lot of the time

the defense is much improved. i have my doubts its championship quality, doesn't quite make enough plays which will be a concern when it comes to Atlanta etc if we make the post season


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 09, 2016, 07:20:45 PM
I think the line is about right and I'm leaning towards Dallas. However I shall be avoiding this match completely for win purposes

But it's dangerous to bet against the Steelers at home. Their home/away splits historically are frankly ridiculous. They also seem to play to the level of the opponent.

Ryan Shazier was back last week for them and he's one of the best line backers in the league imo. He's a filthy sod. But got to respect his talent.

I've been really disappointed with Brown and Bell this year, they've been putting up ok numbers. But they're meant to be the best in the league at their positions and they just aren't at the moment. Doesn't mean that they won't be if Ben is healthier though.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 10, 2016, 09:34:53 AM
Early look at tonight's match.

Steve Smith o38.5.5 and Kenneth Dixon o24.5 rushing look good to me.

The Browns are not very good defensively (understatement) and Smith should shape fitter than last week where he got 44 yds vs the Steelers. Worry on Smith would be if the game gets out of hand.

If it does. Should mean Dixon getting more. He's supposed to be getting more action alongside West anyway and the Browns give up nearly 150 yards per game rushing. Admittedly his stats so far and the Ravens run game in general aren't as convincing though. 9 attempts for 13 yards last week :/ although that was his highest attempts of the year.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 10, 2016, 10:53:57 AM
spotted this and thought it was remarkable

In terms of QB production on 3rd down this season, there's Tom Brady, then everyone else:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw1DzlAWIAAjmZb.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 10, 2016, 04:03:25 PM
just after the half way point of the season

the Patriots look the class of the field

lots of mediocre teams, when i looked 5 of the 8 divisions didn't have more than one winning team


if you had to name the superbowl sides now, you would suggest which two teams?

expect the NFC responses to have a wider spread than the AFC responses


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on November 10, 2016, 05:05:13 PM
just after the half way point of the season

the Patriots look the class of the field

lots of mediocre teams, when i looked 5 of the 8 divisions didn't have more than one winning team


if you had to name the superbowl sides now, you would suggest which two teams?

expect the NFC responses to have a wider spread than the AFC responses


I actually have Dallas.. Patriots.. I think because of their defense Atlanta will fall short


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 10, 2016, 05:46:17 PM
Seahawks v Pats

The hawks haven't been good but Wilson is getting healthier and their defence is still brilliant. Also they've got the experience of doing it. Boring. But most likely imo


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on November 10, 2016, 05:54:26 PM
Dallas  Pats for me on what ive seen so far.Been really busy this year and haven't watched as many games as I'd like but the Chiefs seem like a lively outsider..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on November 10, 2016, 06:15:18 PM
just after the half way point of the season

the Patriots look the class of the field

lots of mediocre teams, when i looked 5 of the 8 divisions didn't have more than one winning team


if you had to name the superbowl sides now, you would suggest which two teams?

expect the NFC responses to have a wider spread than the AFC responses



I reckon the Raiders have the kind of team that could upset the applecart in Foxboro. What a game that would be for the pennant.

In the NFC goodness knows. Pete Carroll will probably do his playoff thing, so I'm looking elsewhere. Dallas look good but it could be Romo in the playoffs and who know where that takes them. Right now, I'd say Atlanta.

Wouldn't need to work hard to sell tickets to Oakland v Atlanta!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on November 10, 2016, 06:20:00 PM
just after the half way point of the season

the Patriots look the class of the field

lots of mediocre teams, when i looked 5 of the 8 divisions didn't have more than one winning team


if you had to name the superbowl sides now, you would suggest which two teams?

expect the NFC responses to have a wider spread than the AFC responses



I reckon the Raiders have the kind of team that could upset the applecart in Foxboro. What a game that would be for the pennant.

In the NFC goodness knows. Pete Carroll will probably do his playoff thing, so I'm looking elsewhere. Dallas look good but it could be Romo in the playoffs and who know where that takes them. Right now, I'd say Atlanta.

Wouldn't need to work hard to sell tickets to Oakland v Atlanta!

Can't have Altanta on my mind. Defense is bordering on terrible.

Oakland's secondary is very exploitable too.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on November 10, 2016, 06:20:59 PM
Tal, your SF bet needs some help.

Where are Cleveland going to get a couple of wins from?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 10, 2016, 06:22:00 PM
i had seahawks v raiders in mind

seahawks competitive even while Russell has been on one leg. the running game will come around when wilson can run again and rawls is back, graham is firing too and the defense is built for post season

obviously the pats are likely to have to be beaten in foxboro in the play offs. maybe the chiefs can do that but as long as the raiders defense continues to improve then that offense can put up a lot of points on anybody. good OL, good running game, good receivers, gunslinger quarterback etc


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on November 10, 2016, 06:41:03 PM
just after the half way point of the season

the Patriots look the class of the field

lots of mediocre teams, when i looked 5 of the 8 divisions didn't have more than one winning team


if you had to name the superbowl sides now, you would suggest which two teams?

expect the NFC responses to have a wider spread than the AFC responses



I reckon the Raiders have the kind of team that could upset the applecart in Foxboro. What a game that would be for the pennant.

In the NFC goodness knows. Pete Carroll will probably do his playoff thing, so I'm looking elsewhere. Dallas look good but it could be Romo in the playoffs and who know where that takes them. Right now, I'd say Atlanta.

Wouldn't need to work hard to sell tickets to Oakland v Atlanta!

Can't have Altanta on my mind. Defense is bordering on terrible.

Oakland's secondary is very exploitable too.

Atlanta have a pass rush. 9 sacks in their last three games. They just have to be mediocre on that side of the ball to win games. Quinn has got the offense working and not reliant on Julio.

Oakland have the best pass protecting offensive line in football, per Football Outsiders. The best.

It's a great year for the pundits. No one has a clue, apart from everyone saying the New England Trumps.

Tal, your SF bet needs some help.

Where are Cleveland going to get a couple of wins from?

Of the two, I'd say San Francisco are more likely to tank this season (trade their few assets for picks, make sure Chip goes back to college, just give up...) than the Browns, who are developing a philosophy and have looked good for three quarters of games of late. They should have beaten the Jets. They just need to have the same barely competent quarterback for two consecutive games...

Ladbrokes are:

10/11 Cleveland
7/4 San Fran

Quite happy with my 7/1 ticket thank you.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on November 10, 2016, 06:53:12 PM
i had seahawks v raiders in mind

seahawks competitive even while Russell has been on one leg. the running game will come around when wilson can run again and rawls is back, graham is firing too and the defense is built for post season

obviously the pats are likely to have to be beaten in foxboro in the play offs. maybe the chiefs can do that but as long as the raiders defense continues to improve then that offense can put up a lot of points on anybody. good OL, good running game, good receivers, gunslinger quarterback etc

Not sure the running backs are the problem in Seattle.

Buffalo have the 20th best rush defense in the league yet on traditional running plays Seattle gained 10 yards on 9 attempts. The offensive line just opened up no holes.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 10, 2016, 07:01:48 PM
i had seahawks v raiders in mind

seahawks competitive even while Russell has been on one leg. the running game will come around when wilson can run again and rawls is back, graham is firing too and the defense is built for post season

obviously the pats are likely to have to be beaten in foxboro in the play offs. maybe the chiefs can do that but as long as the raiders defense continues to improve then that offense can put up a lot of points on anybody. good OL, good running game, good receivers, gunslinger quarterback etc

Not sure the running backs are the problem in Seattle.

Buffalo have the 20th best rush defense in the league yet on traditional running plays Seattle gained 10 yards on 9 attempts. The offensive line just opened up no holes.

yes you are right. what i meant was that when wilson is able to run properly he has to be accounted for, which means there is a hole or two more than when you have 8 people keying in on christine michael etc

it would also help if tyler lockett was fit and able to contribute fully too, to open things up a bit


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on November 10, 2016, 07:19:06 PM
just after the half way point of the season

the Patriots look the class of the field

lots of mediocre teams, when i looked 5 of the 8 divisions didn't have more than one winning team


if you had to name the superbowl sides now, you would suggest which two teams?

expect the NFC responses to have a wider spread than the AFC responses



I reckon the Raiders have the kind of team that could upset the applecart in Foxboro. What a game that would be for the pennant.

In the NFC goodness knows. Pete Carroll will probably do his playoff thing, so I'm looking elsewhere. Dallas look good but it could be Romo in the playoffs and who know where that takes them. Right now, I'd say Atlanta.

Wouldn't need to work hard to sell tickets to Oakland v Atlanta!

Can't have Altanta on my mind. Defense is bordering on terrible.

Oakland's secondary is very exploitable too.

Atlanta have a pass rush. 9 sacks in their last three games. They just have to be mediocre on that side of the ball to win games. Quinn has got the offense working and not reliant on Julio.

Oakland have the best pass protecting offensive line in football, per Football Outsiders. The best.

It's a great year for the pundits. No one has a clue, apart from everyone saying the New England Trumps.

Tal, your SF bet needs some help.

Where are Cleveland going to get a couple of wins from?

Of the two, I'd say San Francisco are more likely to tank this season (trade their few assets for picks, make sure Chip goes back to college, just give up...) than the Browns, who are developing a philosophy and have looked good for three quarters of games of late. They should have beaten the Jets. They just need to have the same barely competent quarterback for two consecutive games...

Ladbrokes are:

10/11 Cleveland
7/4 San Fran

Quite happy with my 7/1 ticket thank you.
Will be cheering on the Browns for you tonight tal..


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on November 10, 2016, 07:24:53 PM
i had seahawks v raiders in mind

seahawks competitive even while Russell has been on one leg. the running game will come around when wilson can run again and rawls is back, graham is firing too and the defense is built for post season

obviously the pats are likely to have to be beaten in foxboro in the play offs. maybe the chiefs can do that but as long as the raiders defense continues to improve then that offense can put up a lot of points on anybody. good OL, good running game, good receivers, gunslinger quarterback etc

Not sure the running backs are the problem in Seattle.

Buffalo have the 20th best rush defense in the league yet on traditional running plays Seattle gained 10 yards on 9 attempts. The offensive line just opened up no holes.

yes you are right. what i meant was that when wilson is able to run properly he has to be accounted for, which means there is a hole or two more than when you have 8 people keying in on christine michael etc

it would also help if tyler lockett was fit and able to contribute fully too, to open things up a bit

Wilson moved better on Monday than he has done all season, I think he's close to full fitness.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on November 10, 2016, 07:42:50 PM
Whilst I'd love to see my Raiders in the Superbowl, I think we're a year or two off. Need to sort out that secondary.

Pats vs Seahawks for me.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on November 10, 2016, 08:44:55 PM
I think Kansas are a better team than Oakland and with Denver D banged up, struggling to run the ball and TS a middle of the road QB I can see Kansas going deep into the play offs. Going to be tough to get Pats out of a top 2 seed in the AFC tho.

In the NFC not sure Seattle are close to their best of 2-3 seasons ago and they have had a soft schedule so far. Zona should have beaten them, Bills had every chance to beat them this week too. O line is terrible, meaning the running game is struggling, thankfully Wilson looked far fitter this week but he's going to work with a set of unproven rbs and two genuine pass catching threats. He's going to have to do a lot.

Arizona are my best result and I actually topped up at 44 last week. Been banged up at QB WR and on D at various times during first 9 weeks and missed a FG to beat New Eng and a FG to beat Seattle too but coming off a bye to rest up I'm hopeful they can finish strongly. In general I'm not rushing to get with Carson Palmer but do think they are a more balanced/have more options side than Seattle. think their record is misleading at the mo. Wouldn't be amazed to see Carolina win the South either. Dallas looking good but tho their record is impressive that Div looks like a any team can beat the other and Dallas have had a nice soft out of Div schedule bar the Green Bay game.

So maybe a Pats v Zona SB.






Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 11, 2016, 10:40:57 AM
the reason i ask is this

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw6sp3PVIAApmLF.jpg:large)

it looks like the Pats, but if it isn't...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 12, 2016, 08:55:09 AM
Without wanting to sound stupid. What's the +400 or what have you?

Got a few very speculative anytime scorers for the weekend already. Bryce Treggs at Phillie 10/1. Cordarelle Patterson. Viks 4/1. Damien Williams Mia 5/1. Then a couple for Monday Paul Perkins 5/1 and Roger Lewis 14/1 (Lewis won't be that if Cruz doesn't train today)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 12, 2016, 10:37:00 AM
Without wanting to sound stupid. What's the +400 or what have you?



American odds

https://www.pinnacle.com/en/betting-articles/educational/odds-formats-available-at-pinnacle-sports

+400 is 4/1


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 14, 2016, 01:39:56 AM
Boom! A classic in Pittsburgh. Zekeeeee


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 14, 2016, 07:56:30 AM
Boom! A classic in Pittsburgh. Zekeeeee

I get the feeling he's going to be rather good.

What a weekend of football all round (well except the Jets v Rams as expected) I did terribly bad on my bets for the weekend. But some brilliant matches. Not sure what happened with Arizona struggling that much against the Niners. Chargers lose by a score with a late pick 6 against them. Seahawks possibly back to what we expect? Although they seem to have got away with a pass interference call again at the end of the match. Cowboys v Seahawks would be a heck of a matchup in the conference title match. The Titans won. And look like the best all round team in the AFC south which is still led by the stinking Texans. Falcons lost. Panthers threw away a 17 pt lead.

Amazing weekend 

I could do with Paul Perkins or especially Roger Lewis scoring tonight for my bets. Then the Bengals still winning for them to go to 2nd in the AFC North. They've still got to play the Ravens twice some how. So that division is wide open still


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 14, 2016, 09:58:02 AM
Seahawks-Patriots was a brilliant game too. 6 lead changes in that one

a really good NFL weekend


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on November 14, 2016, 11:18:21 AM
Was a wild weekend indeed.. epitomized by the saints game.. needing over 24 points for the saints to bring in a nice bet I was praying for the blocked extra point.. Ecstasy to misery in 8 seconds as they block the kick and then run it back for a game killing 2 points.

Falcons crashing did me ill.. but Dallas and titans helped me out


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 15, 2016, 10:08:53 AM
The Bengals stunk again last night. Couple of big plays. And started the second half well. Managed to establish a run game, then for some reason went away from it and completely flopped in the 4th quarter. The OL was shocking. Giants started the night second worst in sacks. Bengals just let them stroll through. Summed up by this photo... https://mobile.twitter.com/KJS_football_78/status/798390566379786240/photo/1

Mcadoo going for it on 4th wouldn't have happened from Marvin. He'd of taken the 3. The end of the first half especially showed a complete lack of urgency. 40 seconds and a time out (or two) left with the ball and they ran down the clock and took the half time. I think they went 1/10 or close to that on 3rd downs. Defence wasn't exactly great either. Allowed the Giants their most rushing of the season. Although Burfict and Atkins did quite well.

But luckily the AFC North is "butt" this year. So they're actually only 1.5 games behind the Ravens and have to play them twice. Hopefully AJ greens ankle injury isn't too bad and he'll be a go against the Bills on Sunday


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Nakor on November 15, 2016, 11:21:15 AM
Pick Em on the NFL site . . .

Seems my Pick em ability is slightly better then my FF ability this season.  Boasting a 92/53 record in 530th position currently.  10 games out of first.  Maybe I should start backing my weekly picks.

Really enjoying the closeness of it all this season.  Predictions on here show how open it all is.  "Lets go Dallas".


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 15, 2016, 12:15:45 PM
Pick Em on the NFL site . . .

Seems my Pick em ability is slightly better then my FF ability this season.  Boasting a 92/53 record in 530th position currently.  10 games out of first.  Maybe I should start backing my weekly picks.

Really enjoying the closeness of it all this season.  Predictions on here show how open it all is.  "Lets go Dallas".

There's 6 I think doing the ESPN pickem (although one guy has dropped out) which is against the spread. Gonna blow my own horn and say I'm leading on there with 81. It's been a strange year for results so uo at 92 is impressive! I'm guessing the nfl is straight up since they hate gambling.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on November 15, 2016, 10:11:19 PM
alshon jeffrey suspended 4 games for drugs

massive hit to his free agency value i think


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 15, 2016, 10:31:25 PM
alshon jeffrey suspended 4 games for drugs

massive hit to his free agency value i think

yes, but he took an anti-inflammatory for an injury which unwittingly for him contained a banned substance, not "drugs"

should be snapped up in free agency eg Eagles, Titans etc


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on November 16, 2016, 10:12:53 PM
Just seen on my facebook that a steelers fan has died after being hit by a cowboys fan at Heinz field.Seems to be quite a few instances of fan violence in and around NFL stadiums.Anyone think that away fan sections will eventually be brought into the game or more alcohol control?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on November 16, 2016, 11:18:09 PM
Christine Michael joins the Packers

It begins...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 17, 2016, 12:28:05 AM
Christine Michael joins the Packers

It begins...

The awakening. Part II.

I've got him in a League. Picked up Starks in a couple too. That's shafted thst idea. Probably.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 19, 2016, 06:50:21 PM
Thomas Rawls is interesting for tomorrow. Mixed reports on what he'll do. But Pete Carroll said he doesn't have a problem with Rawls getting "quite a few plays" and he'll be mixed-in. Apparently the implication is thst he'll be able to do whatever is required by the coaching staff. They cut C Mike in the week so they must have some confidence in his ability to handle a lot alongside CJ Prosise.

He's 3/1 on one site. 7/4 is the best elsewhere and some have him at 5/4. So I'll be giving him a look at that price. If he's back near where he was there's a decent chance.

Rishard Matthews is quite a nice price at 9/4 (6 in his last 6 games. Playing the Colts this week). Steve Smith interests me at 13/5 for the Ravens although a risk against the Cowboys with Flacco throwing to him (apparently his football life which aired yesterday was brilliant and he's a guy I really like). And Sterling Shepard also at 15/8 against the Bears who seem adequate in slowing down the no. 1 receiver but not quite as good vs the others.

I've also had probably the most random bet I've ever put on this week... Longest field goal treble... Bear with me... The weather in Ohio is meant to be very windy this weekend. 25+mph winds In Cleveland. The Steelers also don't like kicking it. Gone for u42.5 yards there. Now I made a silly assumption that it would also be windy in Cincinnati, looks like it'll be 15mph at most. However neither the Bills or Bengals have a very reliable/well known kicker so went for u44.5 there. Final leg in the treble. If the first to make it in comes on Monday might. The Raider and Texans play in Mexico city which is 7000ft above sea level. So the ball should fly and Janikowski is one of the best in the league, gone for o43.5 there. Worked out around 8/1. So thought I'd throw a few quid at it


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 21, 2016, 10:36:30 AM
There were 11 missed extra points yesterday, a record.

some bad weather and wind, but 11!

Extra points missed: Entire 2011 season: 7 Entire 2012 season: 6 Entire 2013 season: 5 Entire 2014 season: 8


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 21, 2016, 10:37:55 AM
Patriots are 5th team in NFL history – and first since 1983-'98 49ers – to have at least 16 consecutive seasons with .500 or better record.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 21, 2016, 10:38:47 AM
Cowboys have gained 400 or more yards in eight straight games, matching the 2007 Patriots and 2013 Broncos

NFC East is fun, looking like its sendign three teams to the play offs. Giants have won 5 straight, Cowboys 9 straight


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 23, 2016, 01:28:01 PM
7 live games this week, xmas has come early

Minnesota Vikings @ Detroit Lions

NFL - Week 12, Sky Sports 1 HD (17:00), Sky Sports Mix (17:00)

Washington Redskins @ Dallas Cowboys

NFL - Week 12, Sky Sports 1 HD (21:00)

Fri 25th November

Pittsburgh Steelers @ Indianapolis Colts

NFL - Week 12, Sky Sports 1 HD (01:00)

Sun 27th November

Arizona Cardinals @ Atlanta Falcons

NFL - Week 12, Sky Sports 2 HD (17:30)

Carolina Panthers @ Oakland Raiders

NFL - Week 12, Sky Sports 2 HD (21:15)

Mon 28th November

Kansas City Chiefs @ Denver Broncos

NFL - Week 12, Sky Sports 1 HD (01:00)

Tue 29th November

Green Bay Packers @ Philadelphia Eagles


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 23, 2016, 01:43:37 PM
That first one Vikings at Lions in on freebies channel 11 as well. Pick.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 24, 2016, 04:44:18 PM
He's in no way a guaranteed scorer, but Ladarius Green is available at 5/1 anytime on BillyHills, and less than 2/1 everywhere else. He's been upping his snap count in recent weeks, and apparently a full go tonight, if they run away with it, which is possible i'd imagine they'll try and get him involved in the game even more.

I'm struggling for anything else special for todays games, my treble on my blog is Min v Det- any other result, (either team win by 5 or less) Cowboys win by 1-13 and Ind v Pit u48pts

Cowboys being my best bet of the night with that kind of range, they won't run away with it, but I think they'll keep the redskins generally off the field (as they have done to everyone all season) which will make it hard for them to get the points to outscore the Cowboys, should mean for a lot of passing from the 'Skins as they'll probably have less of the ball. Rob Kelley u17.5 carries was tempting too for the same reason, but he's had o20 in all 3 games he's been the lead back so I gave it a miss.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on November 24, 2016, 10:41:44 PM
i feel dirty supporting dallas tonight


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 27, 2016, 02:26:04 PM
Can't put it in tips for tikay. Because it's paddypower. But Tevin Coleman over 51.5 combined yards is 5/6 looks quite low to me. He's gone over that line in 7/10 games this year and is fully fit after the bye week and good to go


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 27, 2016, 10:59:32 PM
Can't put it in tips for tikay. Because it's paddypower. But Tevin Coleman over 51.5 combined yards is 5/6 looks quite low to me. He's gone over that line in 7/10 games this year and is fully fit after the bye week and good to go

Well. That fucking stank. His yards went to Taylor Gabriel. Got himself a Td off a 2 yd run


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 28, 2016, 12:25:41 PM
by heck Chiefs-Broncos was a fun game

last three weeks have seen some classics


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 28, 2016, 12:27:47 PM
love watching the Raiders

Derek Carr dislocates his throwing hand finger, puts it back, shoves a glove on and comes back and slings it everywhere

the atmosphere in the coliseum seemed amazing their first winning season since 2002!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on November 28, 2016, 01:20:49 PM
by heck Chiefs-Broncos was a fun game

last three weeks have seen some classics



How that game produced 57 points I'll never know.

Spread betting on that would have been fun.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 28, 2016, 01:35:11 PM
not sure if you were watching but the Broncos had an interesting decision in OT, late

27-27. 1.06 left. 4th and 10 from the KC 44

options

- attempt 62 yard FG. at altitude, but odds against to get it, and give KC field position if miss (would need 15 yards to get in FG range themselves)
- go for it. again, odds against and give KC field position if fail
- punt and pin KC back, but probably get a draw at best when you are behind the raiders in the division

nasty decision, any of them didn't seem a great option 


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on November 28, 2016, 01:48:33 PM
not sure if you were watching but the Broncos had an interesting decision in OT, late

27-27. 1.06 left. 4th and 10 from the KC 44

options

- attempt 62 yard FG. at altitude, but odds against to get it, and give KC field position if miss (would need 15 yards to get in FG range themselves)
- go for it. again, odds against and give KC field position if fail
- punt and pin KC back, but probably get a draw at best when you are behind the raiders in the division

nasty decision, any of them didn't seem a great option 


Yes, I watched.

I felt going for the FG was easily the worst option (not Bigadzing!).

It was freezing cold and although they have an excellent kicker and the advantage of high altitude (ball travels 10% further apparently), I still felt making that FG was somewhere in the 4/1 range.

I don't often advocate the conservative choice in NFL decisions, but I would have punted and taken the tie.

In other news, isn't Tyreek Hill an exciting player?

KC hasn't seen the like since the days of Dante Hall.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on November 28, 2016, 04:15:59 PM
not sure if you were watching but the Broncos had an interesting decision in OT, late

27-27. 1.06 left. 4th and 10 from the KC 44

options

- attempt 62 yard FG. at altitude, but odds against to get it, and give KC field position if miss (would need 15 yards to get in FG range themselves)
- go for it. again, odds against and give KC field position if fail
- punt and pin KC back, but probably get a draw at best when you are behind the raiders in the division

nasty decision, any of them didn't seem a great option  


Yes, I watched.

I felt going for the FG was easily the worst option (not Bigadzing!).

It was freezing cold and although they have an excellent kicker and the advantage of high altitude (ball travels 10% further apparently), I still felt making that FG was somewhere in the 4/1 range.

I don't often advocate the conservative choice in NFL decisions, but I would have punted and taken the tie.

In other news, isn't Tyreek Hill an exciting player?

KC hasn't seen the like since the days of Dante Hall.

Supposedly the kicker had mentioned earlier in the day that 60 is really his limit. I think it was the right decision still, obviously with hindsight, maybe, and punting and trusting your league leading D would of been the better plan.

Only thought towards going for the win rather than the draw, it was a division game obviously, and they've still got to travel to Arrowhead on Christmas day, so I would assume they wanted to at least split the record with them so they'd have the advantage head to head, maybe thinking they'd struggle to win at KC?

Tyreek Hill looks a very exciting player, although anyone with a bit of spark would look exciting next to the rest of that offence. Can't be many players who've had a Special teams, a run, and a passing TD in the same game?

Also a little surprised the Broncos didn't call a time out just before the kick to try and put more pressure on him


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on November 28, 2016, 04:57:20 PM
not sure if you were watching but the Broncos had an interesting decision in OT, late

27-27. 1.06 left. 4th and 10 from the KC 44

options

- attempt 62 yard FG. at altitude, but odds against to get it, and give KC field position if miss (would need 15 yards to get in FG range themselves)
- go for it. again, odds against and give KC field position if fail
- punt and pin KC back, but probably get a draw at best when you are behind the raiders in the division

nasty decision, any of them didn't seem a great option  


Yes, I watched.

I felt going for the FG was easily the worst option (not Bigadzing!).

It was freezing cold and although they have an excellent kicker and the advantage of high altitude (ball travels 10% further apparently), I still felt making that FG was somewhere in the 4/1 range.

I don't often advocate the conservative choice in NFL decisions, but I would have punted and taken the tie.

In other news, isn't Tyreek Hill an exciting player?

KC hasn't seen the like since the days of Dante Hall.

Supposedly the kicker had mentioned earlier in the day that 60 is really his limit. I think it was the right decision still, obviously with hindsight, maybe, and punting and trusting your league leading D would of been the better plan.

Only thought towards going for the win rather than the draw, it was a division game obviously, and they've still got to travel to Arrowhead on Christmas day, so I would assume they wanted to at least split the record with them so they'd have the advantage head to head, maybe thinking they'd struggle to win at KC?

Tyreek Hill looks a very exciting player, although anyone with a bit of spark would look exciting next to the rest of that offence. Can't be many players who've had a Special teams, a run, and a passing TD in the same game?

Also a little surprised the Broncos didn't call a time out just before the kick to try and put more pressure on him

They used their last TO to decide whether to go for the 62 yarder or not..

And anyway, there's zero evidence that icing the kicker actually works. Indeed if they call the Time Out really late, they often give the kicker the chance to practice the kick.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on November 28, 2016, 06:21:19 PM
not sure if you were watching but the Broncos had an interesting decision in OT, late

27-27. 1.06 left. 4th and 10 from the KC 44

options

- attempt 62 yard FG. at altitude, but odds against to get it, and give KC field position if miss (would need 15 yards to get in FG range themselves)
- go for it. again, odds against and give KC field position if fail
- punt and pin KC back, but probably get a draw at best when you are behind the raiders in the division

nasty decision, any of them didn't seem a great option 


Yes, I watched.

I felt going for the FG was easily the worst option (not Bigadzing!).

It was freezing cold and although they have an excellent kicker and the advantage of high altitude (ball travels 10% further apparently), I still felt making that FG was somewhere in the 4/1 range.

I don't often advocate the conservative choice in NFL decisions, but I would have punted and taken the tie.

In other news, isn't Tyreek Hill an exciting player?

KC hasn't seen the like since the days of Dante Hall.

I was watching it as well with some serious sweats in the game. I seed the bf NFL markets for sky TV games on most of the non main markets and had a couple of incredible sweats on the game last night.

I laid a punter 140/1 on the winning margin market a tie in the game ( overtime included) he must have gone huge odds on in running before the incredible bad decision to go for the fg. Agree with camel that was easily the nut worat option out of the three available percentage wise (again with the adzdonk aftertimjng disclaimer). I just assumed they would punt and I would knock out a serious lump of money on a 140/1 poke! Still don't sure how I eacaped it

I also
Laid a punter a decent bet st 1/33 the game went to overtime. No idea why you would pick a game with a total tht low pre game to bet no overtime. This game was easily the most likely game of the weekend to go to overtime. Given the huge score the punter must have been fuming it did.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on November 29, 2016, 04:54:28 PM
this was on reddit

jeff fisher's record by Starting QB

If it wasn't for McNair....

yet he has head coached 337 games!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CycHWSdXgAQO2tz.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on November 29, 2016, 05:19:40 PM
Looks like neither Superbowl team might make the playoffs this year - I assumed that was super rare but it's actually happened 4 times before, probably testament to the levelling nature of the NFL.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 01, 2016, 12:16:32 PM
4 NFL games for London to be confirmed shortly

Dolphins/Saints we know

Jags/Ravens is the next coming

two more (not involving the Jags)

all kick offs going to be 6pm, which is a bit awkward for non-Londoners but the early kick offs been nixed on grounds of US audience ratings(low) and unpopularity with the teams who increasingly only came across thurs/fri this year and tried to stay on S time zones for sleep/practice etc


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on December 01, 2016, 12:19:25 PM
4 NFL games for London to be confirmed shortly

Dolphins/Saints we know

Jags/Ravens is the next coming

two more (not involving the Jags)

all kick offs going to be 6pm, which is a bit awkward for non-Londoners but the early kick offs been nixed on grounds of US audience ratings(low) and unpopularity with the teams who increasingly only came across thurs/fri this year and tried to stay on S time zones for sleep/practice etc

Boo. The 2pm kick offs were fantastic.

American friends liked them too.



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on December 01, 2016, 12:36:25 PM
4 NFL games for London to be confirmed shortly

Dolphins/Saints we know

Jags/Ravens is the next coming

two more (not involving the Jags)

all kick offs going to be 6pm, which is a bit awkward for non-Londoners but the early kick offs been nixed on grounds of US audience ratings(low) and unpopularity with the teams who increasingly only came across thurs/fri this year and tried to stay on S time zones for sleep/practice etc

Back to the rush for the last trains again then.  Definite backward step for UK fans, and probably makes Twickenham pretty much impossible from Leeds without a long drive or overnight stay.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on December 01, 2016, 12:37:24 PM
Losing the early kick-off is a big blow - that was always one of the big drivers of the London thing, trying to open up a new TV slot for a live game.

Given the London game is never going to be one of the top games, its visibility in the US will be much reduced.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on December 01, 2016, 12:41:13 PM
This will be a nightmare if they blackout red zone while the UK game is on live.
They did this during the recent overtime game


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 02, 2016, 12:07:13 PM
better enjoy it while it lasts. won ugly last night, shame the Vkings D is let down by such a putrid offense after all the injuries

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CypR_pFUQAIp47E.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 06, 2016, 06:17:37 PM
play off sceanrios for week 14

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzAkmcsXgAELMLi.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 09, 2016, 02:21:01 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzPJLMIXAAEaf7x.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on December 12, 2016, 08:53:32 PM
La Rams have fired their head coach


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on December 12, 2016, 09:27:24 PM
La Rams have fired their head coach

Always promoted young talent but hasn't developed an offense. It's incredible he's been allowed to keep his job for this long.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on December 12, 2016, 11:07:20 PM
La Rams have fired their head coach

Always promoted young talent but hasn't developed an offense. It's incredible he's been allowed to keep his job for this long.

His record for the rams is crazily awful. How he made it this far I'm not sure. They're in a new fan base trying to establish a team. They need better than 4-12 to keep fickle LA fans going to games


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 13, 2016, 11:21:28 AM
no holding back then

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzgD088VEAA3RDQ.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 13, 2016, 02:13:06 PM
Dolphins Saints

Ravens Jags

Browns Vikings

Rams Cardinals

London games confirmed

(not the most marquee set of games you'll ever see, tbh)

will go for dolphins/Saints first. (last chance to see Brees, first chance to see Michael Tomas etc)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on December 13, 2016, 02:14:49 PM
Dolphins Saints

Ravens Jags

Browns Vikings

Rams Cardinals

London games confirmed

(not the most marquee set of games you'll ever see, tbh)

will go for dolphins/Saints first. (last chance to see Brees, first chance to see Michael Tomas etc)

Hugely disappointing list of games.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on December 13, 2016, 02:18:26 PM
First two at Wembley in weeks 3 and 4.
Third and fourth at Twickenham for weeks 7 and 8.

Order and times will be confirmed in the Spring.



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: AndrewT on December 13, 2016, 02:48:22 PM
A grand total of zero teams currently in the post-season places - it's like the Premier League having 4 games in the US and the best of the bunch being Everton v Bournemouth.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on December 13, 2016, 03:01:26 PM
A grand total of zero teams currently in the post-season places - it's like the Premier League having 4 games in the US and the best of the bunch being Everton v Bournemouth.

And how many will have new head coaches?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on December 13, 2016, 05:58:17 PM
Dolphins Saints

Ravens Jags

Browns Vikings

Rams Cardinals

London games confirmed

(not the most marquee set of games you'll ever see, tbh)

will go for dolphins/Saints first. (last chance to see Brees, first chance to see Michael Tomas etc)

Thats my first choice. Then the Cardinals mainly for David Johnson. Love that guy. I'd also like to give Twickenham a go as well. Not the best as you say but it was hardly going to be and I doubt it will. At least there's a divisional game in there


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: rinswun on December 13, 2016, 06:26:26 PM
Seems like the league testing UK fans. "If you can sell out this slate we know you are in it for the long haul. Here's a franchise."


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on December 13, 2016, 07:11:28 PM
I'm pretty sure they'll all sell out still, after going this year, admittedly to support my team, i'll definitely be looking to see another match next year, and i'd imagine i'll have a bit of a struggle for tickets still

It is also tough to judge how a team will be come October next year, obviously the league is designed to promote competition and parity. Look at teams like the Raiders and Lions who I doubt many would of thought would be where they are at the moment (although I did tip the Raiders to win the AFC West) The Jaguars have a very good roster on paper, a lot of potentially explosive talent, and they'll be getting another top 5 pick this year, when they get rid of Bradley at the end of this year who knows how they'll be when they come over here

There's a lot of variables on who comes over, it's not just a case of picking a team and sending them over here. As was said earlier in the thread, there's certain home games that would never be sent over here as they're the main games for teams in the states. Not many teams will give up a home match vs the Seahawks or Packers as they're still a big draw. Would be great to see either of them come over.

Have a listen to the most recent Gridiron podcast for a bit more insight, Will Gavin seems quite knowledgeable on the whole thing, he was explaining why it would be Jags twice, why it would be 2 Twickenham and 2 Wembley (general jist was they're owed X amount of matches and with the Spurs stadium due some from 2018 they'll probably try and get the Twickenham games out of the way as early as possible for more flexibility in future). The Talksport2 NFL pod recently had an interview with the head of NFL UK (Iirc) which was insightful towards it all as well, and why they'll probably only ever be in London and not elsewhere in the country.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Horneris on December 14, 2016, 11:07:42 AM
How can they sell those games out? They are an absolute disgrace.

I'd rather rip out my eye balls than watch Cleveland play Minnesota


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on December 14, 2016, 07:01:26 PM
Some interesting bets around for tomorrow night's match. First up Rams team points are set to 10.5. I can't remember the last time I saw a team total that low. 49ers were 12.5 at a point last season that was the lowest I've noticed.

I know they weren't very good under Fisher and it'll be hard to change that in 3 days. But 10.5 pts is very low. It's 1/1 at the moment.

But probably more tempting for me is they are 5/6 to score in both halves obviously means they could win that bet (theoretically) with 4 pts


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on December 14, 2016, 11:07:21 PM
Dolphins Saints

Ravens Jags

Browns Vikings

Rams Cardinals

London games confirmed

(not the most marquee set of games you'll ever see, tbh)

will go for dolphins/Saints first. (last chance to see Brees, first chance to see Michael Tomas etc)

Not the best bunch selection of games, but the only terrible one there is Browns/Vikings, and they have to send Cleveland because they haven't yet.

Rams/Cardinals is a division game, two quality defences, and will be interesting to see how Jared Goff develops in his 2nd year with a new HC. Both teams have a lot of potential, Arizona obv got to the NFC championship game last year, and the Rams just need to learn how to score points. Best game of the bunch by far, IMO.

Ravens/Jags could be decent and meaningful for both teams if Bortles can get himself sorted out and get back to 2015 levels of production with Hurns & Robinson. Neither team is a mile away from being a playoff team with regards to talent, particularly a talented Jags team on paper in a pretty average division.

Dolphins/Saints, meh you know you're getting lots of points with the Saints. The only game I'd want to avoid is the Browns/Vikings, nobody wants to see the Browns, particularly not against that miserable Vikings offense.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on December 14, 2016, 11:13:40 PM
Some interesting bets around for tomorrow night's match. First up Rams team points are set to 10.5. I can't remember the last time I saw a team total that low. 49ers were 12.5 at a point last season that was the lowest I've noticed.

I know they weren't very good under Fisher and it'll be hard to change that in 3 days. But 10.5 pts is very low. It's 1/1 at the moment.

But probably more tempting for me is they are 5/6 to score in both halves obviously means they could win that bet (theoretically) with 4 pts

Random fact on the subject of the Rams and London games: The Rams are the only team to score exactly 4 points in a single quarter in NFL history - Against their London opponents next year, the Cardinals.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2011110611/2011/REG9/rams@cardinals#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A09000d5d823e1a02&tab=recap


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on December 14, 2016, 11:54:52 PM
Some interesting bets around for tomorrow night's match. First up Rams team points are set to 10.5. I can't remember the last time I saw a team total that low. 49ers were 12.5 at a point last season that was the lowest I've noticed.

I know they weren't very good under Fisher and it'll be hard to change that in 3 days. But 10.5 pts is very low. It's 1/1 at the moment.

But probably more tempting for me is they are 5/6 to score in both halves obviously means they could win that bet (theoretically) with 4 pts

Random fact on the subject of the Rams and London games: The Rams are the only team to score exactly 4 points in a single quarter in NFL history - Against their London opponents next year, the Cardinals.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2011110611/2011/REG9/rams@cardinals#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A09000d5d823e1a02&tab=recap

That is a random fact.

What do you think of our chances this week? We going to spoil things for the Steelers? Maybe injure someone at least... Usually manage to keep Brown fairly quiet, but they work through Bell for everything at the moment, it's going to be hard to keep him less than shouting I reckon.

Boyd has looked good in his increased time. Oh and Randy Bullock REVENGE game of course...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on December 15, 2016, 01:17:48 AM
Some interesting bets around for tomorrow night's match. First up Rams team points are set to 10.5. I can't remember the last time I saw a team total that low. 49ers were 12.5 at a point last season that was the lowest I've noticed.

I know they weren't very good under Fisher and it'll be hard to change that in 3 days. But 10.5 pts is very low. It's 1/1 at the moment.

But probably more tempting for me is they are 5/6 to score in both halves obviously means they could win that bet (theoretically) with 4 pts

Random fact on the subject of the Rams and London games: The Rams are the only team to score exactly 4 points in a single quarter in NFL history - Against their London opponents next year, the Cardinals.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2011110611/2011/REG9/rams@cardinals#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A09000d5d823e1a02&tab=recap

That is a random fact.

What do you think of our chances this week? We going to spoil things for the Steelers? Maybe injure someone at least... Usually manage to keep Brown fairly quiet, but they work through Bell for everything at the moment, it's going to be hard to keep him less than shouting I reckon.

Boyd has looked good in his increased time. Oh and Randy Bullock REVENGE game of course...

I'm a Raiders fan fwiw - Can't tell if you thought I was a Bengals fan because of your use of "our", or were just interested in my thoughts.

But from what I've seen of the Bengals and Steelers this year, I don't think it's that far off being a flip, although Steelers obvs favourites. As you say, particularly playing in an outdoor stadium where it's going to be cold at this time of year, I think Bell is the biggest weapon that you need to take away, and if Roethlisberger and Brown beat you instead, then so be it. They have so many weapons on offense that you have to pick your poison, but I think you've got a better chance of winning if Big Ben targets Brown a dozen times than if he turns around and gives it to Bell all afternoon, especially if last week was anything to go by.

Thought Sanu was a huge loss for you guys in the offseason, but LaFell and Boyd seem to have filled in pretty well in his absence.

I'm glad that Mike Nugent has been cut at last though. Probably the most overdue cut in the league for a couple of years at least, certainly at the kicker position, ever since that tie a couple of years ago where he missed a pretty short FG attempt at the end of OT. Think he's been consistently one of the worst kickers in the league for a while. Randy Bullock defo an upgrade IMO, although I wouldn't exactly want him lining up to kick the game winner in a Superbowl for me, either.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on December 15, 2016, 08:50:08 AM
Some interesting bets around for tomorrow night's match. First up Rams team points are set to 10.5. I can't remember the last time I saw a team total that low. 49ers were 12.5 at a point last season that was the lowest I've noticed.

I know they weren't very good under Fisher and it'll be hard to change that in 3 days. But 10.5 pts is very low. It's 1/1 at the moment.

But probably more tempting for me is they are 5/6 to score in both halves obviously means they could win that bet (theoretically) with 4 pts

Random fact on the subject of the Rams and London games: The Rams are the only team to score exactly 4 points in a single quarter in NFL history - Against their London opponents next year, the Cardinals.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2011110611/2011/REG9/rams@cardinals#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A09000d5d823e1a02&tab=recap

That is a random fact.

What do you think of our chances this week? We going to spoil things for the Steelers? Maybe injure someone at least... Usually manage to keep Brown fairly quiet, but they work through Bell for everything at the moment, it's going to be hard to keep him less than shouting I reckon.

Boyd has looked good in his increased time. Oh and Randy Bullock REVENGE game of course...

I'm a Raiders fan fwiw - Can't tell if you thought I was a Bengals fan because of your use of "our", or were just interested in my thoughts.

But from what I've seen of the Bengals and Steelers this year, I don't think it's that far off being a flip, although Steelers obvs favourites. As you say, particularly playing in an outdoor stadium where it's going to be cold at this time of year, I think Bell is the biggest weapon that you need to take away, and if Roethlisberger and Brown beat you instead, then so be it. They have so many weapons on offense that you have to pick your poison, but I think you've got a better chance of winning if Big Ben targets Brown a dozen times than if he turns around and gives it to Bell all afternoon, especially if last week was anything to go by.

Thought Sanu was a huge loss for you guys in the offseason, but LaFell and Boyd seem to have filled in pretty well in his absence.

I'm glad that Mike Nugent has been cut at last though. Probably the most overdue cut in the league for a couple of years at least, certainly at the kicker position, ever since that tie a couple of years ago where he missed a pretty short FG attempt at the end of OT. Think he's been consistently one of the worst kickers in the league for a while. Randy Bullock defo an upgrade IMO, although I wouldn't exactly want him lining up to kick the game winner in a Superbowl for me, either.

Yeah. Did think you were a Bengals fan. I'm sure someone on here is... :/

If I didn't have a team I would have probably been a raiders fan for this year at least, great to watch then this season


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on December 16, 2016, 08:42:27 PM
Just upped my opinion on the London 2017 games with a little insight in to how they reached the choices they ended up with if anyone fancies a read.

Haven't actually written an article as such before so comments welcome! www.touchdowntips.com


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on December 17, 2016, 10:29:04 PM
Just a reminder to all insomniacs Dolphins @ Jets is on tonight at 1.30.Gonna have a dabble on a defense/special teams td


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on December 17, 2016, 11:24:04 PM
Just a reminder to all insomniacs Dolphins @ Jets is on tonight at 1.30.Gonna have a dabble on a defense/special teams td

You're the Bengals fan. Not that other guy!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on December 17, 2016, 11:42:24 PM
Just a reminder to all insomniacs Dolphins @ Jets is on tonight at 1.30.Gonna have a dabble on a defense/special teams td

You're the Bengals fan. Not that other guy!
Yes fearing the worst tomorrow unless 55 gets Atkins and co fired up and ready to play.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 23, 2016, 12:43:02 PM
cheers to the Philadelphia Eagles for winning last night. Even Nelson "look no hands" Aglohor caught a touchdown pass.

good luck next season  ;)

(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/15590090_1236204463084014_1510591064674119507_n.jpg?oh=22ef423dc80d3d7d593fabf60c59dfe6&oe=58E5B313)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on December 24, 2016, 10:56:35 AM
Vikings preparations for game today hasn't been great as they have been stuck on plane for 3 hours after it slid off the runway on landing. Might of be good time to oppose them in the handicap


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on December 24, 2016, 10:56:55 AM
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2682031-tyreek-hill-has-the-makings-of-a-star-but-also-an-ugly-past-none-should-forget


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 24, 2016, 11:03:12 AM
there is one in this year's draft too, Joe Mixon. very talented running back. punched his pregnant girlfriend and could well go undrafted.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bergeroo on December 25, 2016, 12:37:40 AM
Oh no! Derek Carr :(


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on December 25, 2016, 01:35:41 AM
Oh no! Derek Carr :(

Confirmed broken fibula. I actually feel like crying right now, so, so gutted.

Him and Mariota done by the same injury in the same week.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on December 25, 2016, 02:56:14 AM
Oh no! Derek Carr :(

Confirmed broken fibula, ffs :(

At least we have a top end backup (IMO) in McGloin who I think is capable of winning games in the playoffs with this O-Line and running game. I'd be surprised if he's not a stopgap starter somewhere else next season as he's out of contract, the QB draft class doesn't have an Andrew Luck type player, and we drafted Connor Cook who'll be cheaper on the salary cap to back up Carr next year. He's not talked about as a potential starter next year like Garoppolo and Glennon, because he's an undrafted free agent who lost games playing on a poor team as a rookie before we drafted Carr, nor does he have the upside that those guys have, plus recency bias. But the guy is really well liked by Raider fans for his character, can do a solid job, and has the motivation of a potential big payday with another team if he plays well. He won't be able to win a shootout like Carr though, and our secondary has struggled all season. If we have to play the Patriots at some point, they probably slaughter us by throwing the ball 50 times and making McGloin play catchup.

I'd definitely take him over a few of the worse starters in the league at present (RG3, Kaepernick, Goff, 2016 Bortles) for a playoff run though.

We're still favourites to get a first round bye IMO, and with one of Houston/Tennessee and Miami in the playoffs, that game could potentially be in Oakland against another non playoff calibre QB for a spot in the Championship game. I don't see how we beat New England at Foxborough, or a Superbowl against an Atlanta/Green Bay type team that can put up points for fun, with McGloin at QB.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on December 25, 2016, 11:15:17 AM
Oh no! Derek Carr :(

Confirmed broken fibula, ffs :(

At least we have a top end backup (IMO) in McGloin who I think is capable of winning games in the playoffs with this O-Line and running game. I'd be surprised if he's not a stopgap starter somewhere else next season as he's out of contract, the QB draft class doesn't have an Andrew Luck type player, and we drafted Connor Cook who'll be cheaper on the salary cap to back up Carr next year. He's not talked about as a potential starter next year like Garoppolo and Glennon, because he's an undrafted free agent who lost games playing on a poor team as a rookie before we drafted Carr, nor does he have the upside that those guys have, plus recency bias. But the guy is really well liked by Raider fans for his character, can do a solid job, and has the motivation of a potential big payday with another team if he plays well. He won't be able to win a shootout like Carr though, and our secondary has struggled all season. If we have to play the Patriots at some point, they probably slaughter us by throwing the ball 50 times and making McGloin play catchup.

I'd definitely take him over a few of the worse starters in the league at present (RG3, Kaepernick, Goff, 2016 Bortles) for a playoff run though.

We're still favourites to get a first round bye IMO, and with one of Houston/Tennessee and Miami in the playoffs, that game could potentially be in Oakland against another non playoff calibre QB for a spot in the Championship game. I don't see how we beat New England at Foxborough, or a Superbowl against an Atlanta/Green Bay type team that can put up points for fun, with McGloin at QB.

As a fellow Raider, we can dream, but I think even if we get that first round bye, we're getting the Steelers in the divisional round, which will be a shootout, and I don't think McGloin can keep up with Big Ben, Antonio and Le'Veon Bell.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on December 25, 2016, 06:02:10 PM
As a fellow Raider, we can dream, but I think even if we get that first round bye, we're getting the Steelers in the divisional round, which will be a shootout, and I don't think McGloin can keep up with Big Ben, Antonio and Le'Veon Bell.

Thinking about it, yeah Steelers seem like the most likely opponent after the bye. And if we get past that, we probably have to play the Patriots in Foxborough :( Might actually have to cheer for the Chiefs if they play the Patriots in the divisional round. Ugh.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on December 26, 2016, 03:02:04 AM
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2682031-tyreek-hill-has-the-makings-of-a-star-but-also-an-ugly-past-none-should-forget

I just came to this thread to ask why Tyreek Hill didn't get drafted until R5.

I should have googled the scumbag.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on December 26, 2016, 07:14:10 AM
Week 17 fixtures don't look that exciting with much of the play off picture being decided only game in the 6pm window that has anything riding on it is panthers at the buccs

With the tames all being divisional will the teams be starting the best teams or will they give the stars an early end of season knowing losing will get them a better draft or resting stars for the play offs where applicable



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on December 27, 2016, 12:10:57 AM
Jay Ajayi is about to go on the game-winning 60 yard run in overtime.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C0eU_1NUAAAJNPs.jpg)

Some commentators are suggesting the reason he managed this feature in a high pressure situation was because the Bills inexplicably only had 10 men on the field.

In two games against us, Ajayi has gone 216 and 196 yards. I don't think this was the deciding factor somehow.

Rex called it "the most ridiculous thing" he's ever seen. So that's above signing his brother from the worst defensive shambles in recorded history, sacking a successful offensive coordinator, promising playoff success but promoting mediocrity, celebrating beating the Jets when we were long out of contention...talking like we are going to get rid of the best QB we have had since Jim Kelly (ok, that isn't hard but come on), right up to Saturday night, being 3rd and 2 in a must-win game when dominating on the ground, and calling a pass and a punt.

I really think the most ridiculous thing about the Bills is Rex Ryan. And I was a fan of his recruitment. It hasn't worked. It's time for the Bills to move on. I can see Anthony Lynn getting the gig. I really hope we draft some receivers to help Sammy Watkins.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 27, 2016, 12:36:46 AM
The bills did worse. Its overtime, you've rushed for 232 yards in the game. 3rd and 2 outside field goal range. Run it? Nah, quarterback goes into shotgun, pass, incomplete, punt. Defense then parts like the red sea for ajayi. Couldn't understand the play call at all


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on December 27, 2016, 12:38:57 AM
The bills did worse. Its overtime, you've rushed for 232 yards in the game. 3rd and 2 outside field goal range. Run it? Nah, quarterback goes into shotgun, pass, incomplete, punt. Defense then parts like the red sea for ajayi. Couldn't understand the play call at all

I referenced that one in the list. Infinitely more annoying.

It was such a classic Bills game. Made complete because of the stupid petulant handbags between the sides. Why do that when the clock is stopped and then go "after you" when the game is on?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on December 27, 2016, 05:09:31 AM
I could watch this Cowboys offense all day long. Didn't know Dez was left handed :P


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 27, 2016, 11:09:18 AM
i doubt the Broncos will forget this, but quite a moment

Poe becomes the heaviest player to throw a touchdown pass by over 100lbs

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C0nRlTNUQAEg70d.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 27, 2016, 11:09:42 AM
Cowboys are the 1st team in NFL history to have a rookie quarterback with 20 TD passes AND a rookie running back with 15 rushing TD


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: ForthThistle on December 27, 2016, 03:35:42 PM
Cowboys are the 1st team in NFL history to have a rookie quarterback with 20 TD passes AND a rookie running back with 15 rushing TD

I think they could win the lot.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on December 30, 2016, 09:02:02 AM
For Christmas, you've been given a direct line to an NFL franchise. Which team would you speak to and what would you tell them? It needn't be your own team.

Example:

Dear Cleveland Browns,

Lose against Pittsburgh, get the number one pick, but don't draft a quarterback (it's too big a reach). Trade the pick to a team that really needs an elite pass rusher in Miles Garrett, maybe to someone like New Orleans if they trade Sean Payton away, and let Hue Jackson build a franchise. Look at Tennessee: get an offensive line, a corps of run stuffers, some line backer support for Collins and, heck, some people you can coach. Play with Cody Kessler for a year and bide your time, because you're not turning this creaky oil tanker of an organisation around in a season.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on December 30, 2016, 03:01:01 PM
i'll play

please stop me doing 31 teams


Dear Buffalo Bills

its been 21 years since you won a play-off game and 17 years since you made the play offs. part of that is the Patriots dynasty, part of that is your own ineptitude.

Blow it up in terms of the organisation. This has to start with your GM Doug Whaley, he has fallen out with every head coach he has worked with and is a major part of the dysfunctional environment that exists top to bottom in the club. Recruit a talented (and user friendly) player personnel guru to fill the position. Will McClay of the Cowboys would do.

Your new coach needs to inspire his players and be respected. An end to the empty boasts that are never delivered on. It will be tempting to go for an old school disciplinarian like Tom Coughlin but go a generation younger with a defensive minded coach that is in touch with the players. Maybe Teryl Austin the Lions DC.  Keep Anthony Lynn as OC.

On offense you have most of a good OL, one of the best running backs in the league (with good back ups), an outside playmaker in Watkins and the basis of an above average league offense. You seem to want to part ways with Tyrod Taylor, but this doesn't make too much sense to me. He's a dual threat, you've invested a few years in him and whilst he may or may not be a franchise quarterback your chances of drafting one picking in the middle of the first round are remote. Veteran alternatives are a risk as well.

A couple of 2nd to 4th round draft picks on the right complementary players (wide receiver 2, young tight end, OL depth) here and you are good to go

On defense you need more major surgery. The draft is stuffed full of defensive front seven playmakers, and to win the AFC East you have to stop Brady/Gronk/Blount and Jay Ajayi. Take that first round draft pick and choose the biggest impact maker on defense you can get when its your pick. Stop the run, invest front to back in young talent and most important of all get them playing as a team and for their coach. Get the defense to do what it should have been doing if the game was played on paper.

give it time. currently a perpetual 6-8 win team in a division where the wild card is the most feasible option until New England has to rebuild, give it a couple of drafts with young players in the same system, with patience and let it develop.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: LeKnave on December 30, 2016, 03:47:12 PM
Dear New England Patriots

Great work lads, keep doing that.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on December 30, 2016, 06:19:54 PM
i'll play

please stop me doing 31 teams


Dear Buffalo Bills

its been 21 years since you won a play-off game and 17 years since you made the play offs. part of that is the Patriots dynasty, part of that is your own ineptitude.

Blow it up in terms of the organisation. This has to start with your GM Doug Whaley, he has fallen out with every head coach he has worked with and is a major part of the dysfunctional environment that exists top to bottom in the club. Recruit a talented (and user friendly) player personnel guru to fill the position. Will McClay of the Cowboys would do.

Your new coach needs to inspire his players and be respected. An end to the empty boasts that are never delivered on. It will be tempting to go for an old school disciplinarian like Tom Coughlin but go a generation younger with a defensive minded coach that is in touch with the players. Maybe Teryl Austin the Lions DC.  Keep Anthony Lynn as OC.

On offense you have most of a good OL, one of the best running backs in the league (with good back ups), an outside playmaker in Watkins and the basis of an above average league offense. You seem to want to part ways with Tyrod Taylor, but this doesn't make too much sense to me. He's a dual threat, you've invested a few years in him and whilst he may or may not be a franchise quarterback your chances of drafting one picking in the middle of the first round are remote. Veteran alternatives are a risk as well.

A couple of 2nd to 4th round draft picks on the right complementary players (wide receiver 2, young tight end, OL depth) here and you are good to go

On defense you need more major surgery. The draft is stuffed full of defensive front seven playmakers, and to win the AFC East you have to stop Brady/Gronk/Blount and Jay Ajayi. Take that first round draft pick and choose the biggest impact maker on defense you can get when its your pick. Stop the run, invest front to back in young talent and most important of all get them playing as a team and for their coach. Get the defense to do what it should have been doing if the game was played on paper.

give it time. currently a perpetual 6-8 win team in a division where the wild card is the most feasible option until New England has to rebuild, give it a couple of drafts with young players in the same system, with patience and let it develop.

That all sounds sensible.

Or there could be news stories like this about:

http://thecomeback.com/nfl/marv-levy-91-years-old-would-coach-buffalo-bills-again-if-team-asked-him.html


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on January 01, 2017, 07:19:52 PM
Is the late NFL game tonight GB v DET more likely to end in a tie AFTER overtime than normal?  Some punter wants a pony at 150/1 on it on betfair which is usually shorter than the normal price it is.  Will both teams be uninterested in OT potentially if it goes to OT because neither team might have nothing to play for given they go last and know all the other teams results?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on January 02, 2017, 06:19:27 AM
Is the late NFL game tonight GB v DET more likely to end in a tie AFTER overtime than normal?  Some punter wants a pony at 150/1 on it on betfair which is usually shorter than the normal price it is.  Will both teams be uninterested in OT potentially if it goes to OT because neither team might have nothing to play for given they go last and know all the other teams results?

A bit late, but there was a situation where if the Redskins won and the Packers/Lions game went to OT, the only way that both teams made the playoffs was with a tie, and Washington would be knocked out.

All irrelevant as the Skins lost.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 02, 2017, 10:52:46 AM
who do you like to make it all the way now?

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1I-0JlVEAAcrsP.jpg:large)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 02, 2017, 10:54:11 AM
tv schedule for next weekend. +5 hours for us

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1I9TU4UAAAIcgJ.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 02, 2017, 10:56:01 AM
Here's a list of NFL assistants who could get interest as head coaching candidates.

lots of vacancies this year...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1GS9PfUoAAxGUx.jpg)



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on January 02, 2017, 04:01:15 PM
Can someone explain why the last second Giants run back TD stood when the ball hit the deck when the guy who threw it after time expired?  It cost me a small fortune on the deriv markets on betfair across various markets.  To say i was fuming was an understatement as it went from the best possible result to the worst result.  I have no idea about the advanced rules in the NFL so i assume the ball was live because it was passed backwards rather than forwards right?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on January 02, 2017, 04:03:47 PM
Can someone explain why the last second Giants run back TD stood when the ball hit the deck when the guy who threw it after time expired?  It cost me a small fortune on the deriv markets on betfair across various markets.  To say i was fuming was an understatement as it went from the best possible result to the worst result.  I have no idea about the advanced rules in the NFL so i assume the ball was live because it was passed backwards rather than forwards right?

Right.

Forwards = incomplete pass (dead ball)
Backwards = fumble (live ball)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: arbboy on January 02, 2017, 04:05:39 PM
Can someone explain why the last second Giants run back TD stood when the ball hit the deck when the guy who threw it after time expired?  It cost me a small fortune on the deriv markets on betfair across various markets.  To say i was fuming was an understatement as it went from the best possible result to the worst result.  I have no idea about the advanced rules in the NFL so i assume the ball was live because it was passed backwards rather than forwards right?

Right.

Forwards = incomplete pass (dead ball)
Backwards = fumble (live ball)


So given the clock had expired when he made the backwards throw and the ball hit the deck when does the game actually finish then?  What has to happen for the game to finish other than a TD?  The defending team tackle a guy with the ball and ground him?  Could it potentially go on for another minute before the game is over if they keep throwing the ball around backwards even though time has expired?

I had laid a punter over 17.5 giants points and gians 7-12 on the winning margin market amongst other smaller bets.  Just catch the ball and kneel you fecker!  No need for the ego TD to kill me!  Happy new year!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Tal on January 02, 2017, 04:28:26 PM
Can someone explain why the last second Giants run back TD stood when the ball hit the deck when the guy who threw it after time expired?  It cost me a small fortune on the deriv markets on betfair across various markets.  To say i was fuming was an understatement as it went from the best possible result to the worst result.  I have no idea about the advanced rules in the NFL so i assume the ball was live because it was passed backwards rather than forwards right?

Right.

Forwards = incomplete pass (dead ball)
Backwards = fumble (live ball)


So given the clock had expired when he made the backwards throw and the ball hit the deck when does the game actually finish then?  What has to happen for the game to finish other than a TD?  The defending team tackle a guy with the ball and ground him?  Could it potentially go on for another minute before the game is over if they keep throwing the ball around backwards even though time has expired?

I had laid a punter over 17.5 giants points and gians 7-12 on the winning margin market amongst other smaller bets.  Just catch the ball and kneel you fecker!  No need for the ego TD to kill me!  Happy new year!

Basically yes to all that.  

The ball is still live until a player gets tackled to the ground, takes a knee, the ball goes out of play or is thrown forward and hits the ground. Like in rugby union.

Grim luck, arb. I can empathise, albeit on likely a much smaller scale.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 09, 2017, 10:52:46 AM
what a performance that was

hail mary sixty yards dropped into a bucket

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1r222UXcAEO-2Z.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1rzsZvUoAAToVM.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1r2RFZXAAA-37F.jpg)

Packers QB Aaron Rodgers during the 7-game win streak: 167-240 (69.6%), 2029 yards, 19 TDs, 0 INTs, 121.7 rating.

Randall Cobb is the 1st player w/ 100 receiving yds & 3 TD in a postseason game since Rob Gronkowski (2011 Divisional Playoffs vs Broncos)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1sGh0ZXUAIi4IE.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on January 09, 2017, 06:05:31 PM
Not sure you could describe a Hail Mary as landing it in a bucket as he's just getting it into the end zone and hoping his guys get there.

Some really interesting match ups next week tho, the Dallas game could be great and unusual in a way with probably the main match up being can the Dallas O keep the ball away from the Green Bay O to limit the opportunities Rodgers has to beat them. Elliott could get 30 carries there if Dallas lead.

Can Seattle arrest their poor away splits against a dynamite O in Atlanta?  Badly missing Earl Tomas and Sherman likely to shadow Jones they seem likely to attack the soft middle of the Seattle D with crossing routes,TE's or Passes to RB's.

Seattle's O could win them the game tho against that Atlanta D but Wilson going to have to have a big game.

The one game I am really looking forward to is the Kansas v Pitts game, Pitts fans are renowned travellers for their away games but home advantage in Kansas is probably only 2nd to Seattle and that crowd will be worth a point or two. Add that to Pittsburghs poorer away splits and Ben nicking his ankle last night Kansas deffo look the right favs to me now.

Is Brock Oswieler really that bad? Most of his interceptions are when he's trying to force the ball to Hopkins in marginal spots. One thing we know Pats will do is try to take away the oppos best player so Brock prob not going to be looking for Hopkins downfield much in this game. The two TE's and Milker look the way forward. If Pats get into a big lead their D could then have a field day but if Houston can get Miller going early and get some early points on the board could their D do enough for them to cover the Hcap. The good thing about getting 16 start is you need to be 25 points behind before your bet is in real trouble and play off games don't feature many bad teams. Pats will almost certainly choose to kick off if they win the toss too so If Houston can put a scoring drive together or even a good field position drive early on we might see a low scoring start.

The great thing about getting 16 start is if your team start a drive on their own 20' get it to the halfway line and then punt it away inside their oppos 15 yard line and take 3-4 minutes off the clock that's a good drive for your bet. Will the Pats just blow them away tho?

I can't wait.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on January 09, 2017, 06:11:34 PM
He's hit a few

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_xTf_RAKsA


NFL is the greatest sport, ever!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 09, 2017, 06:18:22 PM
Not sure you could describe a Hail Mary as landing it in a bucket as he's just getting it into the end zone and hoping his guys get there.

Some really interesting match ups next week tho, the Dallas game could be great and unusual in a way with probably the main match up being can the Dallas O keep the ball away from the Green Bay O to limit the opportunities Rodgers has to beat them. Elliott could get 30 carries there if Dallas lead.

Can Seattle arrest their poor away splits against a dynamite O in Atlanta?  Badly missing Earl Tomas and Sherman likely to shadow Jones they seem likely to attack the soft middle of the Seattle D with crossing routes,TE's or Passes to RB's.

Seattle's O could win them the game tho against that Atlanta D but Wilson going to have to have a big game.

The one game I am really looking forward to is the Kansas v Pitts game, Pitts fans are renowned travellers for their away games but home advantage in Kansas is probably only 2nd to Seattle and that crowd will be worth a point or two. Add that to Pittsburghs poorer away splits and Ben nicking his ankle last night Kansas deffo look the right favs to me now.

Is Brock Oswieler really that bad? Most of his interceptions are when he's trying to force the ball to Hopkins in marginal spots. One thing we know Pats will do is try to take away the oppos best player so Brock prob not going to be looking for Hopkins downfield much in this game. The two TE's and Milker look the way forward. If Pats get into a big lead their D could then have a field day but if Houston can get Miller going early and get some early points on the board could their D do enough for them to cover the Hcap. The good thing about getting 16 start is you need to be 25 points behind before your bet is in real trouble and play off games don't feature many bad teams. Pats will almost certainly choose to kick off if they win the toss too so If Houston can put a scoring drive together or even a good field position drive early on we might see a low scoring start.

The great thing about getting 16 start is if your team start a drive on their own 20' get it to the halfway line and then punt it away inside their oppos 15 yard line and take 3-4 minutes off the clock that's a good drive for your bet. Will the Pats just blow them away tho?

I can't wait.

Rodgers, he's thrown it right to the edge of the end zone. give him the benefit of the doubt that he's positioned it a touch. no one else gets the trajectory on hail mary's that he does. of course the DBs got it wrong, got to have all the offensive players n front of them

how do you think the Seattle OL holds up against Vic Beasley? OL protection has been markedly worse on the road than it has been in Seattle. set against that, Wilson is more mobile than he was for much of the season with the knee brace.

really looking forward to KC/Pitt too

that Houston D is wonderful. quite funny that Bill O'Brien was at risk of being fired when the owners gave him Osweiler and he built that D. Think they need Lamar Miller (not quite fully fit v the raiders) to be at 100% at the Pats so they can run some clock and churn some yards. if he is then +16 has a shot.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on January 09, 2017, 06:49:42 PM
Seattle O line just going to struggle again, George Fant looks abs lost on some plays. GM is pretty good and obviously decided his QB was so mobile he could avoid pass rushers and cause havoc on the ground so took a conscious decision not to spend heavily on the O line. Think bringing Marcel Reece in a few weeks ago to play full back was a good thing in protection and creating some holes for the run game.

If Atlanta score 20-24 then Seattle probably win, if it's 30-34 then it's going to be tough. Prob I see is as mentioned in match comms last few weeks teams have worked out that getting the ball out early negates the Seattle pass rush and with Chancellor still iffy against TE's and that middle area the softer part of the D it just looks like Atlanta will just avoid the strength and attack the weak part of the D.

That Atlanta D is weak tho, I guess it's down to who do you like to score the most points if Sherman takes Jones out of the game on enough plays.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on January 09, 2017, 08:26:52 PM
You going out if the Hawks make it, Phil?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on January 09, 2017, 08:56:51 PM
Seattle O line just going to struggle again, George Fant looks abs lost on some plays. GM is pretty good and obviously decided his QB was so mobile he could avoid pass rushers and cause havoc on the ground so took a conscious decision not to spend heavily on the O line. Think bringing Marcel Reece in a few weeks ago to play full back was a good thing in protection and creating some holes for the run game.

If Atlanta score 20-24 then Seattle probably win, if it's 30-34 then it's going to be tough. Prob I see is as mentioned in match comms last few weeks teams have worked out that getting the ball out early negates the Seattle pass rush and with Chancellor still iffy against TE's and that middle area the softer part of the D it just looks like Atlanta will just avoid the strength and attack the weak part of the D.

That Atlanta D is weak tho, I guess it's down to who do you like to score the most points if Sherman takes Jones out of the game on enough plays.

Stat wise. They've actually done well vs the tight end this year. Only given up 3 TDs to them and 5th fewest yards to TE


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on January 09, 2017, 09:22:05 PM
Seattle O line just going to struggle again, George Fant looks abs lost on some plays. GM is pretty good and obviously decided his QB was so mobile he could avoid pass rushers and cause havoc on the ground so took a conscious decision not to spend heavily on the O line. Think bringing Marcel Reece in a few weeks ago to play full back was a good thing in protection and creating some holes for the run game.

If Atlanta score 20-24 then Seattle probably win, if it's 30-34 then it's going to be tough. Prob I see is as mentioned in match comms last few weeks teams have worked out that getting the ball out early negates the Seattle pass rush and with Chancellor still iffy against TE's and that middle area the softer part of the D it just looks like Atlanta will just avoid the strength and attack the weak part of the D.

That Atlanta D is weak tho, I guess it's down to who do you like to score the most points if Sherman takes Jones out of the game on enough plays.

Stat wise. They've actually done well vs the tight end this year. Only given up 3 TDs to them and 5th fewest yards to TE

You have to mine those stats tho bud.

They have played 6 Div games against Zona, Rams and 49ers. Gresham, Kendricks and the 49ers pair are amongst the worst in the league. The out of Div games featured Miami, Jets, Atlanta, Buffalo, Tampa. That's 11 games where the best TE they have faced is Cameron Brate and most of those games where before Earl Thomas got injured too.

After 3 weeks of the season the stats and analysts were marvelling that Philly had the best D in the league (and they had played Cleveland, Chicago and Pitts at home In a game that Pitts struggled) and were 3 point favs away at Detroit.



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on January 09, 2017, 09:25:41 PM
You going out if the Hawks make it, Phil?

Very doubtful mate, the exchange rate is so bad it's just so expensive now and you are already paying well over the odds for SB tickets too.  I might go to the Conference final if it's Seattle v Green Bay but prob not if its in Dallas.

You booked your Vegas trip yet?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on January 09, 2017, 09:26:40 PM
Seattle O line just going to struggle again, George Fant looks abs lost on some plays. GM is pretty good and obviously decided his QB was so mobile he could avoid pass rushers and cause havoc on the ground so took a conscious decision not to spend heavily on the O line. Think bringing Marcel Reece in a few weeks ago to play full back was a good thing in protection and creating some holes for the run game.

If Atlanta score 20-24 then Seattle probably win, if it's 30-34 then it's going to be tough. Prob I see is as mentioned in match comms last few weeks teams have worked out that getting the ball out early negates the Seattle pass rush and with Chancellor still iffy against TE's and that middle area the softer part of the D it just looks like Atlanta will just avoid the strength and attack the weak part of the D.

That Atlanta D is weak tho, I guess it's down to who do you like to score the most points if Sherman takes Jones out of the game on enough plays.

Stat wise. They've actually done well vs the tight end this year. Only given up 3 TDs to them and 5th fewest yards to TE

You have to mine those stats tho bud.

They have played 6 Div games against Zona, Rams and 49ers. Gresham, Kendricks and the 49ers pair are amongst the worst in the league. The out of Div games featured Miami, Jets, Atlanta, Buffalo, Tampa. That's 11 games where the best TE they have faced is Cameron Brate and most of those games where before Earl Thomas got injured too.

After 3 weeks of the season the stats and analysts were marvelling that Philly had the best D in the league (and they had played Cleveland, Chicago and Pitts at home In a game that Pitts struggled) and were 3 point favs away at Detroit.



That's a very fair point. The joy of stats! Atlanta do love to get their tight ends involved too no matter which one of the 4 or 5 it is. Ryan has thrown TD s to 13 different players. 10 of them have multiple TDs over the season. First player to ever do that (I think those numbers are correct. Heard it a few times last week)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on January 09, 2017, 09:41:25 PM
You going out if the Hawks make it, Phil?

Very doubtful mate, the exchange rate is so bad it's just so expensive now and you are already paying well over the odds for SB tickets too.  I might go to the Conference final if it's Seattle v Green Bay but prob not if its in Dallas.

You booked your Vegas trip yet?

It's definitely a painful exchange rate. I bought some $ on my FairFX account, and had a look through it to see past rates. I wish I hadn't as we've lost 45c against the dollar since 2014.

Yeah, I'll going out in June/July, but slumming it downtown again, and spending more time in the food court this year.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: MattyHollis on January 09, 2017, 10:43:01 PM
Not sure you could describe a Hail Mary as landing it in a bucket as he's just getting it into the end zone and hoping his guys get there.



Completely agree with this statement.

DB's and Cobb are to be congratulated for the hail mary score.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on January 10, 2017, 04:56:28 PM
Over the last 2 seasons Rodgers is 3/5, and the rest of the NFL is 6/32

#ABomb ;)

(https://media.giphy.com/media/qEbTkiv6ljxbq/giphy.gif)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on January 11, 2017, 12:50:41 AM
Just seen this from the official Cowboys Twitter:

https://twitter.com/dallascowboys/status/818935714905735169/


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 12, 2017, 06:18:49 PM
It is now the LA Chargers

playing in the 27000 stub hub centre for 2 years, then sharing with the Rams

a shame really. neither the owners, league or city of san diego come out with much credit

looks like the Vegas Raiders is happening too


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on January 12, 2017, 09:38:50 PM
It is now the LA Chargers

playing in the 27000 stub hub centre for 2 years, then sharing with the Rams

There goes our annual road game home advantage for the next two years, even the Chargers can just about sell out 27k.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on January 13, 2017, 05:08:44 AM
Wade Phillips to the Rams as Defensive Coordinator  has to be a fantastic hire doesn't it?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on January 13, 2017, 09:35:43 AM
Wade Phillips to the Rams as Defensive Coordinator  has to be a fantastic hire doesn't it?

With the Redskins oc as their head coach too. They should have the right men in place. In theory. And providing a 30 yr old can make it as head coach and sort someone to do the job at OC or get their current guy to sort it. That's where they need the work most


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on January 13, 2017, 09:12:35 PM
Flipping poop. Chiefs vs Steelers moved to a 120am start for us over the pond folk.

Apparently chance of a small ice storm in the area so public safety concerns means they've delayed it 7 frickin hours. Won't be watching that one now then :(


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on January 15, 2017, 04:50:24 PM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_V2D5xN4Tc

Enjoyed this


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on January 16, 2017, 01:11:43 AM
What a game!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on January 16, 2017, 02:02:51 AM
wow


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on January 16, 2017, 03:09:53 AM
Got to feel bad for Dak & Elliott, as that was an incredible game.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Newportlad on January 16, 2017, 09:11:33 AM
Does anyone else think it strange when Dallas spiked the ball on 1st down with 50 seconds left?  They still had a time out to use up.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 16, 2017, 10:32:35 AM
Does anyone else think it strange when Dallas spiked the ball on 1st down with 50 seconds left?  They still had a time out to use up.

I thought this at the time too. it ended up giving Rodgers one more play, which ended up being crucial.

Garrett said after that they were saving time to try to score a touchdown to win it (using the time out later on), but if you don't convert on 3rd and 3 thereafter you leave Rodgers 30 seconds to get into field goal range. the way he did it, rolling left throwing into his body and 36 yards on 3rd and 20 just in bounds was something only a very small number of quarterbacks can do.

bit of a sickener really, great game that was simply decided by who had the ball last (without second guessing stuff that went on through the game which you can always do)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on January 16, 2017, 11:24:51 AM
Does anyone else think it strange when Dallas spiked the ball on 1st down with 50 seconds left?  They still had a time out to use up.

I thought this at the time too. it ended up giving Rodgers one more play, which ended up being crucial.

Garrett said after that they were saving time to try to score a touchdown to win it (using the time out later on), but if you don't convert on 3rd and 3 thereafter you leave Rodgers 30 seconds to get into field goal range. the way he did it, rolling left throwing into his body and 36 yards on 3rd and 20 just in bounds was something only a very small number of quarterbacks can do.

bit of a sickener really, great game that was simply decided by who had the ball last (without second guessing stuff that went on through the game which you can always do)

Rodgers holding onto the ball after the sack with ~20seconds left was amazing.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 16, 2017, 11:29:35 AM
it was. pass rushers are trained to go for the strip sack, defensive backs aren't/don't have the instinct.

Rodgers has massive hands too.

as you say, incredible play to hold onto it as the db tried to kill him


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on January 16, 2017, 11:40:30 AM
it was. pass rushers are trained to go for the strip sack, defensive backs aren't/don't have the instinct.

Rodgers has massive hands too.

as you say, incredible play to hold onto it as the db tried to kill him

I think McCarthy is a pretty terrible coach, but it's impossible not to give him credit in that situation.

99% of coaches would have sat on the ball and gone to OT with 33 seconds left and the ball at their own 25.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 16, 2017, 11:52:34 AM
^ part great play, part terrible prevent defense

if you decide to bring no pressure on 3rd and 20 (they rushed 3) then you have to prevent better than allowing a 36 yard reception down a sideline. 15 or 20 yards fine still out of field goal range.

anyway, roll on the draft.


meanwhile, stat alert

Pittsburgh - 1st team in NFL history to win a playoff game despite their opponent scoring at least 2 more TD's. Teams were 0-245 all-time.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 18, 2017, 11:30:53 AM
Vegas sportsbooks suffer big losses on divisional weekend

http://www.espn.co.uk/chalk/story/_/id/18487333/william-hill-says-sunday-was-worst-day-ever



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: the sicilian on January 19, 2017, 04:59:41 PM
it was. pass rushers are trained to go for the strip sack, defensive backs aren't/don't have the instinct.

Rodgers has massive hands too.

as you say, incredible play to hold onto it as the db tried to kill him

I think McCarthy is a pretty terrible coach, but it's impossible not to give him credit in that situation.

99% of coaches would have sat on the ball and gone to OT with 33 seconds left and the ball at their own 25.

Why do you think McCarthy is a terrible coach.. i know he has Rodgers but his record would dictate otherwise


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on January 19, 2017, 05:01:46 PM
it was. pass rushers are trained to go for the strip sack, defensive backs aren't/don't have the instinct.

Rodgers has massive hands too.

as you say, incredible play to hold onto it as the db tried to kill him

I think McCarthy is a pretty terrible coach, but it's impossible not to give him credit in that situation.

99% of coaches would have sat on the ball and gone to OT with 33 seconds left and the ball at their own 25.

Why do you think McCarthy is a terrible coach.. i know he has Rodgers but his record would dictate otherwise

Makes fundamental game theory mistakes time after time and never learns his lesson.

If it wasn't for Aaron Rodgers he would have been out of a job years ago.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: LeKnave on January 19, 2017, 05:38:31 PM
it was. pass rushers are trained to go for the strip sack, defensive backs aren't/don't have the instinct.

Rodgers has massive hands too.

as you say, incredible play to hold onto it as the db tried to kill him

I think McCarthy is a pretty terrible coach, but it's impossible not to give him credit in that situation.

99% of coaches would have sat on the ball and gone to OT with 33 seconds left and the ball at their own 25.

Why do you think McCarthy is a terrible coach.. i know he has Rodgers but his record would dictate otherwise

Makes fundamental game theory mistakes time after time and never learns his lesson.

If it wasn't for Aaron Rodgers he would have been out of a job years ago.

Still blows my mind that teams don't have a game theory expert on the sidelines or in the booth.  It surely has to happen soon.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on January 19, 2017, 05:42:16 PM
it was. pass rushers are trained to go for the strip sack, defensive backs aren't/don't have the instinct.

Rodgers has massive hands too.

as you say, incredible play to hold onto it as the db tried to kill him

I think McCarthy is a pretty terrible coach, but it's impossible not to give him credit in that situation.

99% of coaches would have sat on the ball and gone to OT with 33 seconds left and the ball at their own 25.

Why do you think McCarthy is a terrible coach.. i know he has Rodgers but his record would dictate otherwise

Makes fundamental game theory mistakes time after time and never learns his lesson.

If it wasn't for Aaron Rodgers he would have been out of a job years ago.

Still blows my mind that teams don't have a game theory expert on the sidelines or in the booth.  It surely has to happen soon.

Belichek is by far the best, but I get the feeling he does by instinct, not maths.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on January 20, 2017, 11:03:12 AM
Oakland Raiders file paperwork to move to Las Vegas

New stadium in Las Vegas would cost $1.9bn, including $750m from tax
Relocation would have to be approved by NFL owners

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/jan/19/oakland-raiders-las-vegas-move-nfl?CMP=share_btn_tw



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on January 20, 2017, 03:34:49 PM
Wow the stadium costs are crazy...Rams building a 2.6bn dollar stadium


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bergeroo on January 20, 2017, 04:50:01 PM
Sad day for sport in Oakland. Warriors will be moving to San Francisco in a couple of seasons too...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: vegaslover on January 20, 2017, 06:22:38 PM
Oakland Raiders file paperwork to move to Las Vegas

New stadium in Las Vegas would cost $1.9bn, including $750m from tax
Relocation would have to be approved by NFL owners

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/jan/19/oakland-raiders-las-vegas-move-nfl?CMP=share_btn_tw



Tourists basically gonna pay for much of the stadium


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on January 29, 2017, 01:03:48 PM
Little one I found in my look at Superbowl pricing. Austin Hoopers yards are set significantly lower at one place than the others. So much so he could do them in one go. Not bothered putting it in TFT as it's one they definitely can't use


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on January 29, 2017, 06:21:02 PM
Little one I found in my look at Superbowl pricing. Austin Hoopers yards are set significantly lower at one place than the others. So much so he could do them in one go. Not bothered putting it in TFT as it's one they definitely can't use

Was 11.5 yesterday. Now apparently at 15.5. Still a. It lower than the 22.5 at PP and 24.5 at 365


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: bobby1 on February 06, 2017, 05:06:50 AM
wow.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on February 06, 2017, 09:25:54 AM

^^^^

Just about sums the whole thing up.

It all seemed to hinge on this. Another inch, or miss this, & it's all over baby.  







Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on February 06, 2017, 02:52:52 PM
Just finished my review of the game on here https://touchdowntips.com/2017/02/06/wow-just-wow-superbowl-review/
if anyone fancies a read of it. Had nothing better to do after dropping off the littlun at school so thought I'd relive the game and do a little review... That turned into a long review.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Marky147 on February 06, 2017, 06:34:52 PM
Will have a read of it with my morning coffee tomorrow, Cavey.



Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: nuros on February 06, 2017, 06:37:32 PM
Just finished my review of the game on here https://touchdowntips.com/2017/02/06/wow-just-wow-superbowl-review/
if anyone fancies a read of it. Had nothing better to do after dropping off the littlun at school so thought I'd relive the game and do a little review... That turned into a long review.

I've been reading your website for the last few weeks, enjoyable write ups with a lot of effort put in, good work!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on February 06, 2017, 08:16:21 PM
Just finished my review of the game on here https://touchdowntips.com/2017/02/06/wow-just-wow-superbowl-review/
if anyone fancies a read of it. Had nothing better to do after dropping off the littlun at school so thought I'd relive the game and do a little review... That turned into a long review.

I've been reading your website for the last few weeks, enjoyable write ups with a lot of effort put in, good work!

Thank you! Me and Jay both enjoy doing it so I figured we'd try and win some money with it. Been a good few months and there's been quite a few games we've absolutely nailed down the coverage and game plans which is satisfying! Had 400 views on the Superbowl thread yesterday which is out record. For saying its our first season doing anything like this. I'm pretty chuffed with it all! And glad that people appreciate it


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on February 13, 2017, 05:18:25 PM
Looks like the bookies seem to think that Jimmy G could be heading to Chicago...

http://www.sportsline.com/insiders/25773626/chicago-bears-favored-to-land-qb-jimmy-garoppolo/

The Bears could be a half decent team if they sort out a QB. Although they're in a rough division so never going to to be easy for them. Their draft this year was sneakily quite good


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on February 13, 2017, 07:53:33 PM
Giants have released Cruz and Jennings already this off season. Freeing up a lot of cap space.

Time for the Bengals to start shedding some dead weight hopefully. But probably not


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on February 13, 2017, 08:33:50 PM
Giants have released Cruz and Jennings already this off season. Freeing up a lot of cap space.

Time for the Bengals to start shedding some dead weight hopefully. But probably not
Be amazed if the giants didn't make a play to sign Andrew Whitworth or a decent pass protecting tackle.Hope we cut Jones,Peko and malaluaga.Rumour is Zeitler has near zero chance of being a bengal next season.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on February 13, 2017, 09:44:32 PM
Giants have released Cruz and Jennings already this off season. Freeing up a lot of cap space.

Time for the Bengals to start shedding some dead weight hopefully. But probably not
Be amazed if the giants didn't make a play to sign Andrew Whitworth or a decent pass protecting tackle.Hope we cut Jones,Peko and malaluaga.Rumour is Zeitler has near zero chance of being a bengal next season.

We should be giving Whit whatever he wants for a season. Pacman get rid. Especially after his 'brush with the law' and we're surprisingly loaded at corner. Would mean paying up for Kirkpatrick though who I think is also a FA, but with WJ3, a first rounder hopefully coming back he should be able to help out there, and definitely don't need Jones returning kicks with Erikson there. I still like Peko although he can't play anywhere near a full match. Malaluaga meh. I've seen the same about Zeitler too.

In fact. If you want common sense on the Bengals then follow @JoeGoodberry on Twitter if you don't already


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on February 14, 2017, 11:03:13 AM
A breakdown of each NFL Team's 3 Biggest Offseason Needs: http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/69238/59/nfl-


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Evilpengwinz on March 03, 2017, 08:30:44 AM
For anyone who is interested, the combine is on NFL.com today until Monday, from 2pm UK time every day.

RBs, OL and "specialists" today.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on March 03, 2017, 08:24:10 PM
For anyone who is interested, the combine is on NFL.com today until Monday, from 2pm UK time every day.

RBs, OL and "specialists" today.
Love having the combine on in the background.Think Fournette out of LSU could be some back if he's over the injuries.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 03, 2017, 08:39:19 PM
He can't jump, but 4.51 at 240lbs is ridiculous. You wouldn't want to get in his way.

The top OL guy in the 40 was 295lb... And 4.81... That's just plain crazy. http://www.nfl.com/combine/tracker?campaign=tw-nf-sf59960493-sf59960493#day=friday that's a website I'll be looking at a lot.

I'm really interested in Joe Mixon. He's not at the combine because of something that happened 3 years ago, but so far I've heard Evan Silva compare him to Lev Bell and DJ (Daniel Jeremiah) compare him to David Johnson. So he'll probably slip quite far in the draft given lack of exposure and his past... Come on Cinci... You don't mind a "troubled" player...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on March 03, 2017, 09:35:18 PM
He can't jump, but 4.51 at 240lbs is ridiculous. You wouldn't want to get in his way.

The top OL guy in the 40 was 295lb... And 4.81... That's just plain crazy. http://www.nfl.com/combine/tracker?campaign=tw-nf-sf59960493-sf59960493#day=friday that's a website I'll be looking at a lot.

I'm really interested in Joe Mixon. He's not at the combine because of something that happened 3 years ago, but so far I've heard Evan Silva compare him to Lev Bell and DJ (Daniel Jeremiah) compare him to David Johnson. So he'll probably slip quite far in the draft given lack of exposure and his past... Come on Cinci... You don't mind a "troubled" player...
After Ray Rice I'd be surprised if Mixon gets a team.PR disaster for whoever takes him on.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 03, 2017, 10:06:27 PM
He can't jump, but 4.51 at 240lbs is ridiculous. You wouldn't want to get in his way.

The top OL guy in the 40 was 295lb... And 4.81... That's just plain crazy. http://www.nfl.com/combine/tracker?campaign=tw-nf-sf59960493-sf59960493#day=friday that's a website I'll be looking at a lot.

I'm really interested in Joe Mixon. He's not at the combine because of something that happened 3 years ago, but so far I've heard Evan Silva compare him to Lev Bell and DJ (Daniel Jeremiah) compare him to David Johnson. So he'll probably slip quite far in the draft given lack of exposure and his past... Come on Cinci... You don't mind a "troubled" player...
After Ray Rice I'd be surprised if Mixon gets a team.PR disaster for whoever takes him on.

I know. But in fairness to him. It was 3 years ago. And he apologised to the girl once his lawyers let him, and apparently has been a golden boy ever since. I'd like to see the Bengals have a dabble on him late on, if he gets there, they don't care about history (see Adam Jones and Vontaze Burfict) so worth a shot at someone to help Hill and Gio. Not going to lie and say I've watched him or anything. But the guys in the know seem to think he's pretty good.

But it's America and they're a lot more sensitive over these types of things than over here, so wouldn't be surprised to see him go undrafted either.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 03, 2017, 10:59:49 PM
Safe to say the Christian McCaffrey won today at the combine. Some impressive stats. 2nd fastest 3 cone drill by an RB since 2003. 5th quickest on the 40. Apparently catches the ball like a WR too


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on March 08, 2017, 08:25:07 PM
wow not holding out for a trade

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000791446/article/cowboys-inform-tony-romo-he-will-be-released


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 09, 2017, 11:06:47 AM
wow not holding out for a trade

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000791446/article/cowboys-inform-tony-romo-he-will-be-released

too difficult to trade him with the contract and the dead money

two teams interested, and both could wait it out for a release rather than trade

Jerry then did the right thing by the player

Texans or Broncos next

a criminally under-rated player, hopefully he can have some time without injury and have a great end to a really good career

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6a2SluUYAEc2gl.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on March 09, 2017, 04:32:01 PM
Cavey it appears Whitworth is joining the Rams on a 3 year deal.Zeitler being offered over 10 mill a year so it's goodbye to him as well.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 09, 2017, 04:35:55 PM
the Bengals have lots of cap space and are about to lose their two top OL and kirkpatrick

its almost as if the owner doesn't want to compete


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on March 09, 2017, 04:49:55 PM
the Bengals have lots of cap space and are about to lose their two top OL and kirkpatrick

its almost as if the owner doesn't want to compete
Lots of bewildered fans who believed the draft and keep our own line.We need a miracle draft now which will have to include trading some of our 11 picks.McCarron better be ready cos Dalton's gonna get killed by week 5


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 09, 2017, 05:05:09 PM
DeSean Jackson to the Bucs, nice number 2 to Evans for Winston and gives them a deep threat

Brandin Cooks to Pats trade for Malcolm Butler.so thats cooks and gronk (back) into an offense that averaged 35ppg last season

gilmore to the Pats

Britt to the Browns (presumably haven't been able to keep terrelle pryor)

Glennon at an amazing $15m per to the Bears.

Awaiting Cousins to the 49ers,they've signed hoyer presumably as back up

the bills resigned tyrod having interviewed head coaches 7 weeks ago on the basis they were replacing him!

 

and many more deals coming later today...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on March 09, 2017, 05:34:55 PM
DeSean Jackson to the Bucs, nice number 2 to Evans for Winston and gives them a deep threat

Brandin Cooks to Pats trade for Malcolm Butler.so thats cooks and gronk (back) into an offense that averaged 35ppg last season

gilmore to the Pats

Britt to the Browns (presumably haven't been able to keep terrelle pryor)

Glennon at an amazing $15m per to the Bears.

Awaiting Cousins to the 49ers,they've signed hoyer presumably as back up

the bills resigned tyrod having interviewed head coaches 7 weeks ago on the basis they were replacing him!

 

and many more deals coming later today...
Exciting day for the fans.Players can start signing contracts from 4pm ET I think


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 09, 2017, 07:27:55 PM
the Bengals have lots of cap space and are about to lose their two top OL and kirkpatrick

its almost as if the owner doesn't want to compete

Yup to say I'm fuming would be a bit on an overstatement. But complete ineptitude seems fairly apt about now. It's a fucking joke. They had 40m in cap space I believe. Whit would have cost by the look of it around 12m a year, they were willing to offer 11.. I mean come on. He's a pro bowl LT on and already shit offensive line. If they now go on and sign Zeitler I'll be a little happier but it looks like he's going too. So now up to over 50m cap space. If you want to know more follow @JoeGoodberry on Twitter. He's not a happy man.

Apparently Dre is the one they want to keep so surely they just pay him. Supposedly the Steelers were willing to offer him 10m a year. I can see the Browns stealing a couple of them.

But hey, we did sign LaFell for another 2 years.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 09, 2017, 07:32:35 PM
DeSean Jackson to the Bucs, nice number 2 to Evans for Winston and gives them a deep threat

Brandin Cooks to Pats trade for Malcolm Butler.so thats cooks and gronk (back) into an offense that averaged 35ppg last season

gilmore to the Pats

Britt to the Browns (presumably haven't been able to keep terrelle pryor)

Glennon at an amazing $15m per to the Bears.

Awaiting Cousins to the 49ers,they've signed hoyer presumably as back up

the bills resigned tyrod having interviewed head coaches 7 weeks ago on the basis they were replacing him!

 

and many more deals coming later today...
Exciting day for the fans.Players can start signing contracts from 4pm ET I think

D jack's is a great signing for the Buccs.

If the Cooks deal goes through that's a good one for the Saints. If Thomas does what he did last year they'll be well chuffed with significantly upgrading their defence.

I don't believe Cousins will go to the niners. Not this season anyway. They have so much work to do over there I think they'll strengthen elsewhere and keep with Hoyer (and maybe bring back Kap for cheap as backup) and get some decent support elsewhere in FA and draft.

Pryor is a weird one too. 100m in cap space and they're not paying him?! Unless you're being gents and letting him go because he's too good for them. God knows


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 09, 2017, 08:49:41 PM
Ah... There we go...

Browns look like they're getting Zeitler making him the highest paid guard in the league. Knew they'd get at least one Bengal in.

Calais Campbell to Jags as well as Bouye adding to an already decent young defence... Just need to get their QB fixed. Draft Fournette or Cook at 4 ... And win the South... All aboard the Jags hype train!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on March 09, 2017, 09:12:24 PM
Torey Smith to the eagles a veteran deep threat could be a good fit


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on March 09, 2017, 09:51:33 PM
 Texans trade osweiler to Browns and a 2018 2nd round pick to clear cap space


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 09, 2017, 09:52:04 PM
Woah Texans deal osweiler and a 2nd round pick to Cleveland. We are going to trade romo! Creative stuff


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 09, 2017, 09:53:56 PM
Actually really clever by the Browns!

Paying Osweiler contract for a 2nd round pick.

Romo to Houston then, supposedly making them instantly Superbowl contenders (for 3 games until he falls apart and they have Tom Savage (he's real) at QB


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 09, 2017, 09:55:05 PM
Torey Smith to the eagles a veteran deep threat could be a good fit

Apparently Phillie looks (looked) most likely for Jeffrey too, Colts and Vikings also interested


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on March 09, 2017, 09:59:13 PM
Belichick just does it over and over again.

Outside Brady and maybe Gronk I thought Butler was the best player on the Superbowl winning squad.

But just as he done before with Mankins, Collins, Seymour and other Pro Bowl players, BB proves no one is sacred.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on March 09, 2017, 10:07:08 PM
Belichick just does it over and over again.

Outside Brady and maybe Gronk I thought Butler was the best player on the Superbowl winning squad.

But just as he done before with Mankins, Collins, Seymour and other Pro Bowl players, BB proves no one is sacred.
BB has got balls of steel, like you said I thought Butler was in the top3/5 on the roster.Would love to have Hightower in a bengal uniform.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on March 09, 2017, 10:08:59 PM
the Bengals have lots of cap space and are about to lose their two top OL and kirkpatrick

its almost as if the owner doesn't want to compete

Yup to say I'm fuming would be a bit on an overstatement. But complete ineptitude seems fairly apt about now. It's a fucking joke. They had 40m in cap space I believe. Whit would have cost by the look of it around 12m a year, they were willing to offer 11.. I mean come on. He's a pro bowl LT on and already shit offensive line. If they now go on and sign Zeitler I'll be a little happier but it looks like he's going too. So now up to over 50m cap space. If you want to know more follow @JoeGoodberry on Twitter. He's not a happy man.

Apparently Dre is the one they want to keep so surely they just pay him. Supposedly the Steelers were willing to offer him 10m a year. I can see the Browns stealing a couple of them.

But hey, we did sign LaFell for another 2 years.
Kirkpatrick staying according to rapoport


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 09, 2017, 10:11:24 PM
Yeah Kirkpatrick has signed for 5 years.

Jeffrey gone to the Eagles for 14m for 1 year


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 09, 2017, 10:12:15 PM
Alshon to eagles. Sounds like Brown's are insta cutting brock. NBA type trade, cash for draft pick and dump player


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Ironside on March 09, 2017, 10:12:41 PM
Torey Smith to the eagles a veteran deep threat could be a good fit

Apparently Phillie looks (looked) most likely for Jeffrey too, Colts and Vikings also interested

signed on a 1 year deal

WR corp at the eagles looking good for a change will give Wentz a few targets


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 09, 2017, 10:15:04 PM
Alshon to eagles. Sounds like Brown's are insta cutting brock. NBA type trade, cash for draft pick and dump player

Almost makes me feel sorry for the useless giant bastard


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on March 09, 2017, 10:19:07 PM
Alshon to eagles. Sounds like Brown's are insta cutting brock. NBA type trade, cash for draft pick and dump player

Almost makes me feel sorry for the useless giant bastard

He's got a Superbowl ring and about $50 million dollars in the bank.

I don't feel too sorry for him.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 09, 2017, 10:20:00 PM
Alshon to eagles. Sounds like Brown's are insta cutting brock. NBA type trade, cash for draft pick and dump player

Almost makes me feel sorry for the useless giant bastard

He's got a Superbowl ring and about $50 million dollars in the bank.

I don't feel too sorry for him.

I said almost ;)

Eagles were seriously in need of WRs so two good moves for them, if Wentz carries on the progression then who know. They also signed a Guard I think too, suppose they had to after giving up quite a few picks to the Browns for Wentz


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on March 09, 2017, 10:29:39 PM
Alshon to eagles. Sounds like Brown's are insta cutting brock. NBA type trade, cash for draft pick and dump player

I'm assuming the guaranteed money on Osweiler's contract counts against the Browns salary cap?

Have they really got enough room to squander that much?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 09, 2017, 10:31:47 PM
Alshon to eagles. Sounds like Brown's are insta cutting brock. NBA type trade, cash for draft pick and dump player

I'm assuming the guaranteed money on Osweiler's contract counts against the Browns salary cap?

Have they really got enough room to squander that much?

They had almost 100m. They've got enough. He's on 17m this year think he's pretty much cutable after that


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 09, 2017, 10:56:04 PM
Belicheck is going to pull off the herschel walker? Get the browns to give him multiple picks for jimmy g? The browns are apparent ly trading brock on!


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on March 09, 2017, 11:25:56 PM
Belicheck is going to pull off the herschel walker? Get the browns to give him multiple picks for jimmy g? The browns are apparent ly trading brock on!

Garapolo can nix it.

If he refuses to sign a long term contract with a new team, his trade value is very low.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: The Camel on March 10, 2017, 12:02:05 AM
I don't know much about college football, but it seems like there isn't a gold plated QB prospect in this years draft.

If the Browns don't get Garapolo, it would make some sense for them to give Brock a shot for a year, and if he fails, get a QB in the 2018 draft.

It's not like they are ready to compete yet anyways.


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 10, 2017, 09:33:54 AM
Supposedly there is no real standout at QB this year. The browns certainly won't take one at 1. They'd be stupid to go anywhere other than Garrett. They may take one at 12 if they fancy one of the top 3 or 4. But I wouldn't be shocked to see them go for Jimmy G as suggested.

Tbf I think they'd be better off going for AJ Mccarron, Hue knows him and I would assume he'd know the system, also more proven in the league and would be cheaper. But who knows.

Great list here of all the happenings in FA so far. http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/68498/309/2017-nfl-free-agent-list?ls=roto:nfl:gnav it's the year of the Full back!

Buffalo in particular going for a thunder and thunder and thunder and thunder running game by the look of it.

San Fran had money and spent it. They've done pretty well but it's cost them. Hoyer, Barklay (who I thought did pretty well at the end of the season) Garçon, Goodwin and Aldrick Robinson at WR, Juice at RB/RB one of the top 10 highest paid the in the league now :/ That's all the skill players anyway then a couple on defence as well.

I'm sure my Bengals will start making moves in a week or so, wouldn't want to spend all that 50m cap space in one day would they...


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: tikay on March 10, 2017, 10:02:02 AM

Why all the activity this week - is it a sort of NFL Transfer Window?


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 10, 2017, 10:45:03 AM

Why all the activity this week - is it a sort of NFL Transfer Window?

free agency,and the new league year, opens on 9th March

teams cannot do deals before then.

then onto the draft, off season mini camps,taining camps and the season


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 10, 2017, 11:14:03 AM
always makes me smile

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6gQNCZVUAEM6Zn.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 10, 2017, 11:16:24 AM
Jaguars defense is LOADED post free agency

M Jackson - A Jones
Campbell - Fowler
Poz- Smith - Jack
Ramsey - Bouye - Colvin
Church - Gipson

i mean one of the years they are going to turn round. will probably back them each year except the year they do

(go get Romo and tell Bortles to take a seat...)


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 10, 2017, 11:17:55 AM
Whoever starts at QB for Cleveland, he should be well protected:

Joe Thomas, Joel Bitonio, JC Tretter, Kevin Zeitler, Austin Pasztor is a nice OL

with Garrett to come at 1.

build the trenches,then 37m draft picks to get skill players in the next couple of years

would really like them to build a real powerhouse, so much of the moenyball stuff they are doing is very left field for the NFL


Title: Re: NFL 2016 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 10, 2017, 11:41:35 AM
It's such a strange situation, but they've got a bright future with it...

Update on #Browns draft picks:
2017 - 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6
2018 - 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7

11 picks EACH in next 2 drafts

If they get half right then they're looking good!


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 14, 2017, 11:17:59 AM
one of the greats retired yesterday

Demarcus Ware is 8th on the all-time sack list with 138.5.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C60tCR3U4AAn65-.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 16, 2017, 02:41:24 PM
Incredible stuff

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7CeRYFWgAA6BS-.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 20, 2017, 11:17:28 PM
Any love for the Buccs for next year? I know it's stupidly early and you were keen on them last year with the points bet... They've signed really well, improved both sides of the ball, already had a good defence, and strengthened there as well as D Jacks on the offence which will help Jameis, Brate, Evans. Also think that division will be a little earlier. Falcons i expect to drop off a little without Shanahan there, Panthers, who knows, Saints... 7-9...

Anyway. 40/1 available on the Superbowl or 20/1 on the NFC. Obvs 1/2 Ew on either available too.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: TightEnd on March 21, 2017, 12:17:10 PM
Any love for the Buccs for next year? I know it's stupidly early and you were keen on them last year with the points bet... They've signed really well, improved both sides of the ball, already had a good defence, and strengthened there as well as D Jacks on the offence which will help Jameis, Brate, Evans. Also think that division will be a little earlier. Falcons i expect to drop off a little without Shanahan there, Panthers, who knows, Saints... 7-9...

Anyway. 40/1 available on the Superbowl or 20/1 on the NFC. Obvs 1/2 Ew on either available too.

have a big advantage in that Winston, who i think is going to be really good,is on his rookie deal so they can pump a lot of their salary cap into improving the team elsewhere. getting one of these good young QBs gives the teams a window to get good and compete before you have to give them $120m over 5 years or whatever then suddenly you are up at salary capand losing players to free agency etc

(Titans are another example, should continue to improve rapidly...maybe the Eagles this year too if Wentz takes that next step etc)

no idea if its value or not,but i would expect a winning record/play offs and from there anything is possible i suppose


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on March 21, 2017, 05:14:19 PM
The Titans also have a ton of good draft picks don't they? Made a few little moves in FA to some areas they needed to sort but nothing major.

Regards to the Buccs the price has them at 19th most likely. There's 6 or 7 shorter priced in the betting that I'm fairly confident won't make the SB. 4 of those left are NFC opponents. So again. Not sure whether you'd class it as value at all. But I've had a little Ew on them. I feel they'll go shorter as time goes on.

I'll be honest I'm also tempted to lump on the Pats. They're only 5/1 where I've got money (looks like 11/2 and even 6/1 at Choral is available) but they've strengthened a Superbowl winning roster and imo gone further ahead. I can't see anyone stopping them in the AFC anyway.

(I know there's still a huge amount of time left, just got looking at the markets yesterday with my hunch on the Buccs)


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 04, 2017, 07:08:11 PM
So. Romo didn't join the Texans then. Leaving them supposedly going into the season with Tom Savage (he's real) at QB. He was no worse than Brock so no change on last year with them. I would have expected them to pick up Cutler to be honest, he's probably the best left out there? Around the NFL are suggesting they could move for Fitzpatrick. I don't get that but he does well before he signs longer deals with teams, and apparently he went to a fancy school...

Anyways back to Romo.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000797371/article/dallas-cowboys-quarterback-tony-romo-set-to-retire



Personally i think its the right move for him. He's had a myriad of injuries and he's not getting any younger. He's made a fortune too, and will be paid well by CBS so won't be short of a few bucks. in my eyes he was at risk of taking a final injury that could have affected the rest of his life, he doesn't need that kind of thing any more. "He was also one of the Cowboys' toughest players. During his career, Romo played through broken fingers and ribs, a broken back and a punctured lung. He rushed his recovery from broken clavicles and fingers, often finishing games with a significant limp or hunch."

"Romo will finish his Cowboys career as the franchise leader in passing yards (34,183), touchdowns (248) and, most notably, winning drives. Romo's 30 game-winning drives is seven better than fellow Cowboys legend Roger Staubach and nine more than Troy Aikman."

Worth noting that the Cowboys are keeping hold of his contract and spreading the cap hit over 2 years, so if he does come back anyone wanting him will have to start by talking to the Cowboys

Further numbers here. http://www.espn.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/130843/where-tony-romo-stacks-up-all-time 4th in all time QBR.

Arguably one of the best QBs to have never won a Superbowl ring, and obviously one of the best undrafted free agent in the games history


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 04, 2017, 08:10:30 PM
Apparently now they are going to release him after all.

Romo says he's retiring, signs a "contract" with CBS, gets released by the Cowboys, turns out the CBS deal was fake. Signs for the Texans giving a middle finger to Jerry on his first press conference with the team.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 04, 2017, 08:12:52 PM
Apparently now they are going to release him after all.

Romo says he's retiring, signs a "contract" with CBS, gets released by the Cowboys, turns out the CBS deal was fake. Signs for the Texans giving a middle finger to Jerry on his first press conference with the team.

Are you guessing here?


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Marky147 on April 04, 2017, 08:27:56 PM
Apparently now they are going to release him after all.

Romo says he's retiring, signs a "contract" with CBS, gets released by the Cowboys, turns out the CBS deal was fake. Signs for the Texans giving a middle finger to Jerry on his first press conference with the team.

Are you guessing here?

I guessed the post was just missing -  ;D


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 04, 2017, 09:35:39 PM
Apparently now they are going to release him after all.

Romo says he's retiring, signs a "contract" with CBS, gets released by the Cowboys, turns out the CBS deal was fake. Signs for the Texans giving a middle finger to Jerry on his first press conference with the team.

Are you guessing here?

I guessed the post was just missing -  ;D

Haha, yeah. I missed the ;) sarcasm smiley. Although would be brilliant.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: The Camel on April 04, 2017, 11:17:24 PM
Apparently now they are going to release him after all.

Romo says he's retiring, signs a "contract" with CBS, gets released by the Cowboys, turns out the CBS deal was fake. Signs for the Texans giving a middle finger to Jerry on his first press conference with the team.

Are you guessing here?

I guessed the post was just missing -  ;D

Haha, yeah. I missed the ;) sarcasm smiley. Although would be brilliant.

Spent 10 minutes looking on Twitter to see if this had happened!


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 05, 2017, 10:38:50 AM
Apparently now they are going to release him after all.

Romo says he's retiring, signs a "contract" with CBS, gets released by the Cowboys, turns out the CBS deal was fake. Signs for the Texans giving a middle finger to Jerry on his first press conference with the team.

best remember that smiley next time. almost tore into you for stupidity!

a very under-rated player Romo, think he'll be a very good broadcaster too (and has to be better than Phil Simms who he replaces)


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on April 05, 2017, 11:18:22 PM
Marshawn Lynch to the Raiders.

No, this is not a joke. Lynch is "un-retiring" and headed to the Silver and Black!

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000797978/article/marshanw-lynch-tells-raiders-he-intends-to-unretire


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 10, 2017, 11:51:10 PM
Marshawn Lynch to the Raiders.

No, this is not a joke. Lynch is "un-retiring" and headed to the Silver and Black!

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000797978/article/marshanw-lynch-tells-raiders-he-intends-to-unretire

Hopefully he will go there, I think he'll do well after a year of rest. And hopefully it won't be the damn Patriots which was also floated as an idea today!

Tighty, any interest in Corey Davis being the first WR off the board in the draft at 27/20? Currently second behind Mike Williams. Everything I hear suggests that Davis is just plain better than Williams. I'd expect the Bills to take Williams at 10, but possible that the Titans or Bengals get to a WR first? https://touchdowntips.com/ shameless plug as I've beautified the site and done a little on the draft from things I've been hearing/reading


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 11, 2017, 10:09:48 AM
Marshawn Lynch to the Raiders.

No, this is not a joke. Lynch is "un-retiring" and headed to the Silver and Black!

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000797978/article/marshanw-lynch-tells-raiders-he-intends-to-unretire

Hopefully he will go there, I think he'll do well after a year of rest. And hopefully it won't be the damn Patriots which was also floated as an idea today!

Tighty, any interest in Corey Davis being the first WR off the board in the draft at 27/20? Currently second behind Mike Williams. Everything I hear suggests that Davis is just plain better than Williams. I'd expect the Bills to take Williams at 10, but possible that the Titans or Bengals get to a WR first? https://touchdowntips.com/ shameless plug as I've beautified the site and done a little on the draft from things I've been hearing/reading

yes of those 2,Davis over Williams

Must be a decent shot that John Ross goes over either though.Blisteringly quick,good hands,perfect X-receiver for a team like the Titans/Eagles. Titans have 5 and 18


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: KarmaDope on April 14, 2017, 11:06:52 PM
Marshawn Lynch to the Raiders.

No, this is not a joke. Lynch is "un-retiring" and headed to the Silver and Black!

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000797978/article/marshanw-lynch-tells-raiders-he-intends-to-unretire

Hopefully he will go there, I think he'll do well after a year of rest. And hopefully it won't be the damn Patriots which was also floated as an idea today!

Tighty, any interest in Corey Davis being the first WR off the board in the draft at 27/20? Currently second behind Mike Williams. Everything I hear suggests that Davis is just plain better than Williams. I'd expect the Bills to take Williams at 10, but possible that the Titans or Bengals get to a WR first? https://touchdowntips.com/ shameless plug as I've beautified the site and done a little on the draft from things I've been hearing/reading

He went there, just waiting for the formalities to be completed.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000800202/article/marshawn-lynch-agrees-to-terms-with-raiders

UNLEASH THE BEAST!


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 19, 2017, 12:11:43 PM
Aaron Hernandez killed himself overnight.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 19, 2017, 12:14:26 PM
Aaron Hernandez found hanged in his cell this morning.

Not much else to say, horrible all round. I believe he was acquited for double murder last week but still guilty of a murder and serving a life sentence within it parole so i guess he figured that was it.

Bellichek when asked in a quick fire answers round earlier this week described the whole thing as "tragedy"


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 19, 2017, 01:20:14 PM
On a more cheerful note. Sky will be showing all 3 days of the draft with direct NFL network coverage. Not sure what channel it'll be on though, hopefully sky sports mix for free


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 20, 2017, 10:30:19 AM
The Bucs are a worthy star for the next season of Hard Knocks. Here's why ...

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000800955/article/tampa-bay-buccaneers-on-hard-knocks-giddy-up …

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9ypu0DUMAAMBIq.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: tikay on April 20, 2017, 10:39:26 AM
Aaron Hernandez killed himself overnight.

Painful reading, this.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/ex-new-england-patriots-star-aaron-hernandez-commits-suicide-article-1.3073294

He seemed to navigate the path from hero to zero pretty damn quickly.

Whatever way you look at it, it's all pretty sad. 






Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 20, 2017, 08:00:41 PM
Schedule out at 8pm et if anybody's as sad as me and staying up.Booked hotel in Kentucky for a Bengals home opener so fingers crossed it won't be getting cancelled..


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 20, 2017, 08:50:54 PM
Just saw this on Twitter...

(Expected) NFL Week 1 Schedule

Chiefs @ Patriots (TNF)
Seahawks @ Packers
Giants @ Cowboys
Saints @ Vikings (MNF)

Have no idea if it's even the slightest bit accurate, but the teams have been told the schedule already so could be. Would be a great start to the season.

I'm guessing Bengals @ Browns week 1

I'm not intentionally staying up for the announcement but i may be awake for it anyway. A few retweets from my twitter wouldn't hurt the exposure at all


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 21, 2017, 08:26:51 AM
Schedule out at 8pm et if anybody's as sad as me and staying up.Booked hotel in Kentucky for a Bengals home opener so fingers crossed it won't be getting cancelled..

Cost home opener in 8 years for the Bengals. You lucky man! A division game vs the Ravens who bookend the season for them. Steelers after a bye week has to be a good thing too. Not too bad a schedule for the Bengals, although three road games in a row, Jags, Titans and Broncos at half way is a bit crappy

TV in the UK first week... TNF - Chiefs at Pats, 6pm Sunday is a mystery... Buccs at Dolphins? Eagles at Redskins? Falcons at Bears (they do like going straight for the Superbowl losers) Sunday 925 has to be Seahawks at Packers, Giants at Cowboys at 130 then 2 MNF games for us to end the opening weekend Saints at Vikings and Chargers at Broncos.

The London games haven't gone too badly all early kick offs except the Cards and Rams which isn't exactly a shock given their location. That's the game we were looking at going to. So may well need a hotel around Twickenham as apparently it's not easy to go anywhere at 930 on a Sunday night!


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 21, 2017, 08:54:29 AM
Schedule out at 8pm et if anybody's as sad as me and staying up.Booked hotel in Kentucky for a Bengals home opener so fingers crossed it won't be getting cancelled..

Cost home opener in 8 years for the Bengals. You lucky man! A division game vs the Ravens who bookend the season for them. Steelers after a bye week has to be a good thing too. Not too bad a schedule for the Bengals, although three road games in a row, Jags, Titans and Broncos at half way is a bit crappy

TV in the UK first week... TNF - Chiefs at Pats, 6pm Sunday is a mystery... Buccs at Dolphins? Eagles at Redskins? Falcons at Bears (they do like going straight for the Superbowl losers) Sunday 925 has to be Seahawks at Packers, Giants at Cowboys at 130 then 2 MNF games for us to end the opening weekend Saints at Vikings and Chargers at Broncos.

The London games haven't gone too badly all early kick offs except the Cards and Rams which isn't exactly a shock given their location. That's the game we were looking at going to. So may well need a hotel around Twickenham as apparently it's not easy to go anywhere at 930 on a Sunday night!
Ravens sept 10 Texans sept 14.Currently working on the missus to stay a few days longer.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 21, 2017, 10:12:40 AM
Schedule out at 8pm et if anybody's as sad as me and staying up.Booked hotel in Kentucky for a Bengals home opener so fingers crossed it won't be getting cancelled..

Cost home opener in 8 years for the Bengals. You lucky man! A division game vs the Ravens who bookend the season for them. Steelers after a bye week has to be a good thing too. Not too bad a schedule for the Bengals, although three road games in a row, Jags, Titans and Broncos at half way is a bit crappy

TV in the UK first week... TNF - Chiefs at Pats, 6pm Sunday is a mystery... Buccs at Dolphins? Eagles at Redskins? Falcons at Bears (they do like going straight for the Superbowl losers) Sunday 925 has to be Seahawks at Packers, Giants at Cowboys at 130 then 2 MNF games for us to end the opening weekend Saints at Vikings and Chargers at Broncos.

The London games haven't gone too badly all early kick offs except the Cards and Rams which isn't exactly a shock given their location. That's the game we were looking at going to. So may well need a hotel around Twickenham as apparently it's not easy to go anywhere at 930 on a Sunday night!
Ravens sept 10 Texans sept 14.Currently working on the missus to stay a few days longer.

Was gonna add that we're the first TNF of the season, could work out very well for you! Although our games Vs the Texans are generally awful


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 22, 2017, 09:29:41 PM
No money in it but if any of you guys want to join in my draft comp it would be happily welcomed.

https://touchdowntips.com/2017/04/22/nfldraft-competition-time/


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 23, 2017, 05:30:42 PM
for those that didnt pay for gamepass last season its now free till end of june so you can catch up with games you have missed or any of there latest content


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 24, 2017, 09:22:25 AM
Nice one Ironside. I'll make good use of that for a few weeks.

How much money do you think it takes to move a line on sky? Their request a bet prices are all over the shop and one market has been removed completely now. Is it as volatile as new manager markets?


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 25, 2017, 01:05:25 PM
Adrian Peterson moves to New Orleans


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 25, 2017, 04:00:06 PM
Adrian Peterson moves to New Orleans

What do we think of that? Surely he hasn't gone there to be backup? Ingram had a pretty good season last year though so can't see them abandoning him either? Just increased competition for the team?

(Cheers for the shout on gamepass, can watch the draft in bed at 1am Friday now)


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 25, 2017, 04:53:18 PM
Adrian Peterson moves to New Orleans

What do we think of that? Surely he hasn't gone there to be backup? Ingram had a pretty good season last year though so can't see them abandoning him either? Just increased competition for the team?

(Cheers for the shout on gamepass, can watch the draft in bed at 1am Friday now)

your welcome draft is also on sky sports 2 with likely less adverts


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 25, 2017, 08:42:42 PM
Adrian Peterson moves to New Orleans

What do we think of that? Surely he hasn't gone there to be backup? Ingram had a pretty good season last year though so can't see them abandoning him either? Just increased competition for the team?

(Cheers for the shout on gamepass, can watch the draft in bed at 1am Friday now)

your welcome draft is also on sky sports 2 with likely less adverts

Yeah i ditched sky sports after the Superbowl to save a few pennies. So gamepass it is for me. In fairness sky are using the NFL network feed (which i believe is also free online) so not sure it'll really be less ads!



Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 25, 2017, 08:47:57 PM
Adrian Peterson moves to New Orleans

What do we think of that? Surely he hasn't gone there to be backup? Ingram had a pretty good season last year though so can't see them abandoning him either? Just increased competition for the team?

(Cheers for the shout on gamepass, can watch the draft in bed at 1am Friday now)

your welcome draft is also on sky sports 2 with likely less adverts

Yeah i ditched sky sports after the Superbowl to save a few pennies. So gamepass it is for me. In fairness sky are using the NFL network feed (which i believe is also free online) so not sure it'll really be less ads!


sky aremt allowed by law to have as many ads per hour, so you will get the odd session with the sky experts in the studio


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Ironside on April 27, 2017, 08:25:56 PM
is it 2am first pick tonight? i notice it starts on sky sports at 1 am but cant imagine them jumping straight in
also is it 3 minutes or 5 minutes per pick in the first round?


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 27, 2017, 08:55:43 PM
1am. 10 mins round 1


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 28, 2017, 01:24:16 AM
Bears pay a lot to move from pick 3 to pick 2 and take Mitch Trubisky. Draft boards everywhere in pieces again. Got to love the NFL draft.

Mike Glennon's foot probably goes thru the TV in disgust.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on April 28, 2017, 01:33:27 AM
Bears pay a lot to move from pick 3 to pick 2 and take Mitch Trubisky. Draft boards everywhere in pieces again. Got to love the NFL draft.

Mike Glennon's foot probably goes thru the TV in disgust.

The reaction of their fans said it all.  Fireworks already!


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 28, 2017, 01:39:01 AM
Bears pay a lot to move from pick 3 to pick 2 and take Mitch Trubisky. Draft boards everywhere in pieces again. Got to love the NFL draft.

Mike Glennon's foot probably goes thru the TV in disgust.

The reaction of their fans said it all.  Fireworks already!

I can't believe what they have given up for a guy that's made 13 starts in college.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 28, 2017, 01:44:39 AM
lol wtf is going on?

Tenn make a huge reach and take Corey Davis at 5.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 28, 2017, 01:54:43 AM
Cleveland are trying to trade for Kirk Cousin's. I fancied they might trade the 12 pick plus extra for Jimmy G if they didn't get Trubisky


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: rinswun on April 28, 2017, 02:00:27 AM
Marshawn Lynch to the Raiders.

No, this is not a joke. Lynch is "un-retiring" and headed to the Silver and Black!

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000797978/article/marshanw-lynch-tells-raiders-he-intends-to-unretire

Hopefully he will go there, I think he'll do well after a year of rest. And hopefully it won't be the damn Patriots which was also floated as an idea today!

Tighty, any interest in Corey Davis being the first WR off the board in the draft at 27/20? Currently second behind Mike Williams. Everything I hear suggests that Davis is just plain better than Williams. I'd expect the Bills to take Williams at 10, but possible that the Titans or Bengals get to a WR first? https://touchdowntips.com/ shameless plug as I've beautified the site and done a little on the draft from things I've been hearing/reading

Nice shout. Everything I read said he's the highest upside guy too. WR and CB the obv positions of need.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 28, 2017, 02:10:28 AM
Marshawn Lynch to the Raiders.

No, this is not a joke. Lynch is "un-retiring" and headed to the Silver and Black!

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000797978/article/marshanw-lynch-tells-raiders-he-intends-to-unretire

Hopefully he will go there, I think he'll do well after a year of rest. And hopefully it won't be the damn Patriots which was also floated as an idea today!

Tighty, any interest in Corey Davis being the first WR off the board in the draft at 27/20? Currently second behind Mike Williams. Everything I hear suggests that Davis is just plain better than Williams. I'd expect the Bills to take Williams at 10, but possible that the Titans or Bengals get to a WR first? https://touchdowntips.com/ shameless plug as I've beautified the site and done a little on the draft from things I've been hearing/reading

Nice shout. Everything I read said he's the highest upside guy too. WR and CB the obv positions of need.

Great call Cavey.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 28, 2017, 02:16:32 AM
Davis at 5 set off a run on the top 3 WR's. it's hard to say any of them are clearly in the top 10 available players but they have deffo landed in great spots.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 28, 2017, 02:37:19 AM
Bengals reached for Ross. But they had him in this week and have him a clean bill of health. Should work well opposite AJ Green!

I tipped up o2.5 are at 7/4 on my site. My first RaB was Mahomes inside the top 15. Also suggested Corey Davis first WR on here too. Not a bad night so far for me.

Need 2 tight ends still to make it a very very good night


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 28, 2017, 02:40:00 AM
Saints probably can't believe they got such good value at pick 11.

Top 3 QB's and Top 3 WR's gone in the first 12 picks. Looks like the game has gone O mad.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: bobby1 on April 28, 2017, 02:42:08 AM
Bengals reached for Ross. But they had him in this week and have him a clean bill of health. Should work well opposite AJ Green!

I tipped up o2.5 are at 7/4 on my site. My first RaB was Mahomes inside the top 15. Also suggested Corey Davis first WR on here too. Not a bad night so far for me.

Need 2 tight ends still to make it a very very good night

Well done bud, you called that Davis coup perfectly.

Surely Cleveland are stocking more picks to get Pats to trade them Jimmy G now, just passed on the 3rd best QB available so must have something up their sleeve. Maybe the Cousin's coup is a runner too?

Baltimore must be licking their lips at a chance to get O J Howard with pick 16 too.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 28, 2017, 05:47:21 AM
Bengals reached for Ross. But they had him in this week and have him a clean bill of health. Should work well opposite AJ Green!

I tipped up o2.5 are at 7/4 on my site. My first RaB was Mahomes inside the top 15. Also suggested Corey Davis first WR on here too. Not a bad night so far for me.

Need 2 tight ends still to make it a very very good night

Well done bud, you called that Davis coup perfectly.

Surely Cleveland are stocking more picks to get Pats to trade them Jimmy G now, just passed on the 3rd best QB available so must have something up their sleeve. Maybe the Cousin's coup is a runner too?

Baltimore must be licking their lips at a chance to get O J Howard with pick 16 too.

Finished very well for me. I had the two above. o1.5 tight ends came in. Evan Engram first round at 5/1 and Peppers first round at 13/8. Not too shabby.

Really like what I've read about Engram adds a further weapon to the Giants offence, they just need to sort their future QB later on and a RB (possibly Blount)

The Buccs must have been happy to take Howard so late. Niners have done great business too. Picking up Foster so late was a great deal. I've said the Browns don't need to take a QB this draft so glad they haven't so far. But I think they might be after Peterman. Heard good things and apparently the most pro ready, or Davis Webb.



Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 29, 2017, 07:17:17 AM
Bengals pick up Mixon after trading back a few spots. Obviously big story behind him. But I couldn't be more chuffed with that. Also picked up Jordan Willis in the third round who had a round 1 grade in a lot of the mocks I looked at. So good day for them. Could actually be an exciting offence (if they sort the offensive line)

And I think they've still got 9 picks left to use too.

Browns got their QB in Kizer


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 29, 2017, 08:42:40 AM
So would you have preferred Jared Goff or...

Jack Conklin
Derrick Henry
Austin Johnson
LeShaun Sims
Kalan Reed
Corey Davis
Jonnu Smith

I think the Titans win that trade


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 29, 2017, 09:08:59 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C-hIiFxUwAALhM6.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: TightEnd on April 29, 2017, 09:12:47 AM
On the Chiefs selection of Patrick Mahomes in the NFLDraft reddit thread

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C-ds6okV0AAm-vJ.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 29, 2017, 12:58:44 PM
On the Chiefs selection of Patrick Mahomes in the NFLDraft reddit thread

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C-ds6okV0AAm-vJ.jpg)

I heard that he threw his remote at the TV in anger but it fell 2 yards short


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on April 29, 2017, 08:52:54 PM
Liked this one Cavey 'balanced draft from the bengals, offense defense punchers and kickers'


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on April 29, 2017, 09:42:27 PM
Liked this one Cavey 'balanced draft from the bengals, offense defense punchers and kickers'

Ooof, very true though. I honestly have no issue. It was 3 years ago, and if you believe her she's over it and they've had a chat since then and admit they had the should have handled the whole thing better.

And in fairness it has been a good draft. Although a distinct lack of OL help so farm relying a lot on what they've got which is hugely unproven. Joe goodberry (one of my favourite follows) reckons Mixon will be #1 come season start


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on May 09, 2017, 09:18:15 PM
Liked this one Cavey 'balanced draft from the bengals, offense defense punchers and kickers'

Ooof, very true though. I honestly have no issue. It was 3 years ago, and if you believe her she's over it and they've had a chat since then and admit they had the should have handled the whole thing better.

And in fairness it has been a good draft. Although a distinct lack of OL help so farm relying a lot on what they've got which is hugely unproven. Joe goodberry (one of my favourite follows) reckons Mixon will be #1 come season start

Done my little piece on Mixon... https://touchdowntips.com/2017/05/09/joe-punched-that-girl-mixon-my-take-on-it/


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on May 10, 2017, 02:41:52 PM
Liked this one Cavey 'balanced draft from the bengals, offense defense punchers and kickers'

Ooof, very true though. I honestly have no issue. It was 3 years ago, and if you believe her she's over it and they've had a chat since then and admit they had the should have handled the whole thing better.

And in fairness it has been a good draft. Although a distinct lack of OL help so farm relying a lot on what they've got which is hugely unproven. Joe goodberry (one of my favourite follows) reckons Mixon will be #1 come season start

Done my little piece on Mixon... https://touchdowntips.com/2017/05/09/joe-punched-that-girl-mixon-my-take-on-it/
Pacman in the news again after someone pinged his rolls royce😂 Enjoyed your article just hope zampese uses mixon early and gives him a fullback now and again.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on May 10, 2017, 06:05:32 PM
Liked this one Cavey 'balanced draft from the bengals, offense defense punchers and kickers'

Ooof, very true though. I honestly have no issue. It was 3 years ago, and if you believe her she's over it and they've had a chat since then and admit they had the should have handled the whole thing better.

And in fairness it has been a good draft. Although a distinct lack of OL help so farm relying a lot on what they've got which is hugely unproven. Joe goodberry (one of my favourite follows) reckons Mixon will be #1 come season start

Done my little piece on Mixon... https://touchdowntips.com/2017/05/09/joe-punched-that-girl-mixon-my-take-on-it/
Pacman in the news again after someone pinged his rolls royce😂 Enjoyed your article just hope zampese uses mixon early and gives him a fullback now and again.

It's a tough one with Pacman, can hardly blame him for being annoyed at someone dinging his very expensive car! But he needs to stop doing this stuff on camera! James Rapien is a good listen on the locked on Bengals podcast and a good follow on twitter

It seems most people have Mixon as the starting #1 but the Bengals hate rookies so I am a little worried!


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on May 29, 2017, 06:46:37 PM
https://touchdowntips.com/2017/05/29/offensive-rookie-of-the-year-an-early-look/

My look at OROY


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Marky147 on May 29, 2017, 06:58:10 PM
https://touchdowntips.com/2017/05/29/offensive-rookie-of-the-year-an-early-look/

My look at OROY

My kind of prices  8)

Great write up, and best of luck!


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on May 29, 2017, 09:33:25 PM
https://touchdowntips.com/2017/05/29/offensive-rookie-of-the-year-an-early-look/

My look at OROY

My kind of prices  8)

Great write up, and best of luck!

Thanks, gotta shoot for the moon sometimes!


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Marky147 on May 29, 2017, 09:49:50 PM
https://touchdowntips.com/2017/05/29/offensive-rookie-of-the-year-an-early-look/

My look at OROY

My kind of prices  8)

Great write up, and best of luck!

Thanks, gotta shoot for the moon sometimes!

Everytime ;D


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on June 27, 2017, 01:54:18 PM
Just a reminder All or nothing season 2 drops on amazon prime June 30th.Something to watch while gamepass undergoes it's transformation.Done my usual £200 on the Bengals even without an o-line ( One day the dream will come true )


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Graham C on June 27, 2017, 02:30:59 PM
Be interesting, Hard Knocks was the Rams last time too.

Hard Knocks stars on 8th August and is the Buc's this year.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on June 27, 2017, 04:03:54 PM
Just a reminder All or nothing season 2 drops on amazon prime June 30th.Something to watch while gamepass undergoes it's transformation.Done my usual £200 on the Bengals even without an o-line ( One day the dream will come true )

I regret to inform you were getting 9 wins this year and unfortunately don't even get our annual playoff loss :(

I may partake in all or nothing despite not caring about the Rams at all. It's something to do I guess! Looking forward a lot more to hard knocks with the Buccs.




Side note. Prices are out for OROY and DPOY now. I've listed a few bigger odds guys for Offensive. The defensive player, unsurprisingly they've got JJ as favourite. I've had a little on Vic Beasley at 25/1. Aaron Donald is 10/1


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Graham C on July 05, 2017, 08:22:00 AM
Just a reminder All or nothing season 2 drops on amazon prime June 30th.Something to watch while gamepass undergoes it's transformation.Done my usual £200 on the Bengals even without an o-line ( One day the dream will come true )

Just got one episode to go in this and I've quite enjoyed it.   Got to say that I do like Bones, the guy that took over from Fisher for the rest of the season, he's a funny guy.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on July 05, 2017, 01:01:43 PM
Just a reminder All or nothing season 2 drops on amazon prime June 30th.Something to watch while gamepass undergoes it's transformation.Done my usual £200 on the Bengals even without an o-line ( One day the dream will come true )

Just got one episode to go in this and I've quite enjoyed it.   Got to say that I do like Bones, the guy that took over from Fisher for the rest of the season, he's a funny guy.
Yes bones comes across as a real nice genuine guy.I haven't got a team in the NFC so will be rooting for the rams and Andrew Whitworth..


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 18, 2017, 10:42:01 PM
Time for the 2018 thread?

Few prices out on Top passer and Top receiver.

As usual have to go with Brees for top passing yards, hard to see past him every year. Which means in theory... Michael Thomas is a good bet at 20/1 (EW top 3, 1/4 odds) as top pass catcher? I don't see Julio as the favourite, I'd have money on AB and then a couple of bigger odds, namely Thomas, and er... Thomas... Demaryius, lot of chat that he'll get 100+ receptions this year, and he has "his play" back, the bubble screen, he's good with the ball in his hands, and he's 40/1.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on July 21, 2017, 03:12:17 PM
2nd series of 'last chance u' has dropped on Netflix for anyone needing a gridiron fix.


Title: Re: NFL 2017 thread
Post by: Cavey007 on July 29, 2017, 01:59:32 PM
Not sure if you'll change the title of this thread, or start a new one, so i'll drop these here.

Been looking at the yardage leader bets this morning, as there's more markets by the day at the moment, trying to keep up with it all.

Passing yards, can't see past Brees 4/1 but have gone for an EW on Rivers at 25/1 (3 places) He had a poor year last year by his standards but still finished 5th in total yards with a LOT of INTs. They've improved the OL this year and hopefully Keenan Allen can make it past half a game this time around.

Rushing yards is really tough to call. It will likely be Zeke or Bell, but Zeke will probably miss a game or two and Bell will be run into the ground, so who knows. They're both under 4/1. I've personally gone for McCoy at 20/1 (4 places) he was in the mix for top 3 last year (50 yds separated 3rd and 7th) and is in a run first offence with one of the leagues best full backs now there as well to make some holes for him.

Rec. yards could feasibly be any of 10 or so, so I've had a few shots. AJ Green 18/1 (4 places) - top 3 WR in the league, was on target for 1,500+ last year before injury. Mikey Thomas 20/1 (4 places) - Great rookie year, Cooks has gone, Brees loves to throw. and his brother Demaryius 33/1 (4 places) New OC in Denver who DT has worked with and done well before, expected to have a buttload of targets from whoever is at QB. Longshot, but decent enough price (could have got 40s with 3 places, I chose the extra place) - Also of interest was Keenan Allen at 50s, but injury worries me. Alshon Jeffrey was also available at that price (iirc) but i'm just not sure how he'll work in Phillie.

Gone into more details on my site, but that's the gist of it all.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 07, 2017, 08:28:31 PM
Lol


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2017, 07:53:35 PM
Hard knocks with the buccs starts 10.30pm Thursday, sky sports arena


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 08, 2017, 08:11:21 PM
Hard knocks with the buccs starts 10.30pm Thursday, sky sports arena

Should be a really good season


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 09, 2017, 07:38:03 PM
If you don't have sky, as I don't currently...

You can watch the first episode of Hard knocks on the Buccs website already, it was a good watch

http://www.buccaneers.com/videos/videos/Watch-Hard-Knocks-Episode-1/03791276-3899-48b3-bb0f-064a1767ee1e


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: MattyHollis on August 10, 2017, 11:47:42 AM
If you don't have sky, as I don't currently...

You can watch the first episode of Hard knocks on the Buccs website already, it was a good watch

http://www.buccaneers.com/videos/videos/Watch-Hard-Knocks-Episode-1/03791276-3899-48b3-bb0f-064a1767ee1e

Thanks for the link, great start to the series.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 11, 2017, 03:29:06 PM
Things got a little tasty in training camp for the Rams and Chargers...

Five minutes into 1-on-1's and the "Fight for LA" has begun #RamsCamp https://t.co/GQ4tEP2kat


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Marky147 on August 11, 2017, 03:37:20 PM
Things got a little tasty in training camp for the Rams and Chargers...

Five minutes into 1-on-1's and the "Fight for LA" has begun #RamsCamp https://t.co/GQ4tEP2kat


How thick can you be?

Take your own  helmet off, and then punch someone that still has one on :D


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 11, 2017, 05:23:26 PM
Busy day today.

Zeke banned for 6 matches. Expected to appeal for a pledged domestic violence offences


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 11, 2017, 05:30:14 PM
Busy day today.

Zeke banned for 6 matches. Expected to appeal for a pledged domestic violence offences

contract becomes wholly non guranteed with the announcement of a suspension,which is clever (not that it helps this season, four 2016 top 10 defensesin the first six games)

never charged, let alone found guilty. meanwhile josh brown,giants kicker, admitted spousal abuse, got 1 game

Elliott may have put himself in this spot with some very immatureoff the fieldstuff  but the personal conduct policies inconsistencies are rough


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 11, 2017, 05:32:01 PM
by the way, the players union messed up badly when they gave Goodell pretty much unchecked player discipline power.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 11, 2017, 05:50:35 PM
 Buffalo Bills‏Verified account @buffalobills

We've acquired CB E.J. Gaines and a 2018 2nd round pick from the Rams for WR Sammy Watkins and a 2018 6th round pick.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 11, 2017, 05:55:55 PM


Eagles acquire CB Ronald Darby from Buffalo for WR Jordan Matthews and a 2018 third-round pick.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: MattyHollis on August 11, 2017, 05:58:46 PM
Sammy Watkins gone LA Rams

Jordan Matthews & EJ Gaines gone Bills

Ronald Darby gone Eagles

Bills also got a rnd2 & rnd3 amongst the deals


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 11, 2017, 06:40:54 PM
Busy day today.

Zeke banned for 6 matches. Expected to appeal for a pledged domestic violence offences

contract becomes wholly non guranteed with the announcement of a suspension,which is clever (not that it helps this season, four 2016 top 10 defensesin the first six games)

never charged, let alone found guilty. meanwhile josh brown,giants kicker, admitted spousal abuse, got 1 game

Elliott may have put himself in this spot with some very immatureoff the fieldstuff  but the personal conduct policies inconsistencies are rough

It's a tough one, nfl shouldn't be the law, and players shouldn't be above the law. He may well have done it but wasn't enough to be convicted. But the NFL shouldn't be able to go beyond the law imo.

Good business by the bills. Boldinnwas a good signing too


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 12, 2017, 09:23:05 AM
if i were an nfl draft choice (lol) i think i would associate with my mum,my sister and thats about it.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DG9mx8SXoAASdAq.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: ForthThistle on August 13, 2017, 03:44:16 PM
Genuine Question.

We have already Drafted for the 2017 coming season.
I have Mike Evans and Desean Jackson.
Can i play both in the Same team.
Should i look to trade DeSean?

Whats your Thoughts.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 13, 2017, 03:53:40 PM
Yes you can play both. Normally try to avoid picking 2+ from the same team as it gives bye week problems and variance. If the buccs have a bad match up or a bad week your eggs are all in one basket. Both are too good to drop so maybe try to work a trade. Not the worst one team combo to have though


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: ForthThistle on August 13, 2017, 03:59:27 PM
Yes you can play both. Normally try to avoid picking 2+ from the same team as it gives bye week problems and variance. If the buccs have a bad match up or a bad week your eggs are all in one basket. Both are too good to drop so maybe try to work a trade. Not the worst one team combo to have though

Thanks Tighty.

Got some alternatives but just wanted peoples thoughts.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: ForthThistle on August 14, 2017, 04:40:33 PM
Genuine Question.

We have already Drafted for the 2017 coming season.
I have Mike Evans and Desean Jackson.
Can i play both in the Same team.
Should i look to trade DeSean?

Whats your Thoughts.
Bump. Any other Views.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 14, 2017, 04:42:25 PM
asked on the fantasy thread for you

see http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=54617.3900


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: ForthThistle on August 14, 2017, 04:58:51 PM
cheers


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 18, 2017, 02:51:48 PM
Thought I'd ask for a request a bet today... One I thought was quite outlandish.

Justin Tucker to outscore the Jets offence... One kicker to outscore an entire team. Skybet wouldn't price it up. No reply from paddypower... William Hill gave me a price of.

10/1. I was expecting 50s maybe. I shall not be taking that bet. Tucker scored 150odd last year by himself. I expect him to score a lot of their points this year with what I think is a crappy offence otherwise. Jets scored 275, expect that to be down around 200ish probably but it is very hard to score that little point


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 22, 2017, 02:38:43 AM
Odell Beckham taken a nasty hit in the pre season game v Cleveland. Passed a concussion test but X-rays on his ankle and knee. Looked more like a knee injury but he walked off the pitch but then went down again in the tunnel.

Fingers crossed its not too serious.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 22, 2017, 06:36:37 AM
Apparently looks like its a high ankle sprain, and he's not sure if he'll be out there week 1. But would have been a hell of a lot worse if he'd planted that foot, he got away with that one


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 22, 2017, 11:36:18 AM
Apparently looks like its a high ankle sprain, and he's not sure if he'll be out there week 1. But would have been a hell of a lot worse if he'd planted that foot, he got away with that one

Deffo, was a micro second away from being a season ender that. Was like watching the old James Brown routine, he got up, went down on his knees ,walked off, started hobbling, walked off slowly to the locker room,went down on his knees in the tunnel and then got on up again.



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 22, 2017, 01:09:11 PM
From last night: The OBJ hit was perfectly legal

http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/244687/why-hit-on-odell-beckham-jr-s-leg-was-perfectly-legal


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 22, 2017, 04:48:53 PM
Like the sub-markets write up Tighty.

I'm on Green and the Thomas brothers for Rec. yards myself. (DT and Michael)

Not sure on Cousins personally, especially with how they've been pre-season but can see why the selection was made. Tbf, could say the same with Rivers who was my outside bet on it.

Bosa for Sacks is where i'd be looking, either him on Barnett (Incidentally running with the 1s tomorrow) - Obviously I think that's a good one for DROY. I got 20/1 on Cook a couple of months ago when the prices were released which has looked better and better each game so far. However. CmcC was brilliant the other day, very flashy, white guy, can see him winning it.

Kenny G looked great the other day, and with a lot of red zone targets available since Boldin left, there's no reason he can't have a big effect on that offence and stand out!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on August 22, 2017, 07:08:25 PM
has sky got rights to show thurs 3/4 sunday games and mon games?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 22, 2017, 07:18:33 PM
has sky got rights to show thurs 3/4 sunday games and mon games?

I think so? They do opening weekend according to oddschecker. Thurs, 3 on Sun, 2 on mon


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on August 22, 2017, 07:19:32 PM

There you go;


http://www.skysports.com/watch/nfl-on-sky#


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 22, 2017, 07:50:43 PM

There you go;


http://www.skysports.com/watch/nfl-on-sky#

Is redzone going to be on a pay channel only Tikay? Or sky sports mix again as well?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on August 22, 2017, 08:05:52 PM

There you go;


http://www.skysports.com/watch/nfl-on-sky#

Is redzone going to be on a pay channel only Tikay? Or sky sports mix again as well?

No idea, Redzone is a bit hardcore for me.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 22, 2017, 08:13:21 PM
Ok, guess I'll find out in 19 days or so


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on August 22, 2017, 09:06:47 PM
thanks guys


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 23, 2017, 06:53:45 PM
Jets to go 0-16 is now 25/1 on ladbrokes for anyone who was interested. Tighty had it on his betting emporium write up as any team to lose all games, but was aiming at the Jets.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 26, 2017, 01:00:20 AM
Julian Edelman looks to have done his knee in the first qtr of the Pats game after catching 3 passes. Non contact injury with his knee going under him as he made a cut off balance. Hope it's not too bad but it looked like a bad one.

Pats being the Pats they just went to the next man up and scored on all 4 first qtr drives. Looking scarily good as usual.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 26, 2017, 01:20:55 AM
man alive, Spencer Ware carted off in the Chiefs game with another bad looking knee injury.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 26, 2017, 03:37:48 AM
Looks like a torn ACL for Edelman which is terrible news for him.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 26, 2017, 07:00:53 AM
Looks like a torn ACL for Edelman which is terrible news for him.

Awful news for him. The Pats will cope, as you say next man up, good news for Amendola as there was a chance he'd be cut imo. Burkhead can play slot, Cooks, hogan, Mitchell. They've got the guys there to cover for him but it's a big loss still.

I took a few guys for the first time ever in various fantasy leagues this year. Luck, McCoy in the same dynasty team, Edelman in a ppr. I seem to have been a bit of a jinx on them all.

Did have a tentative look at Kareem Hunt OROY because of the Ware injury, available at 25s so giving it a miss


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 26, 2017, 05:49:26 PM
Complete ACL tear in his right knee for Edelman. With sound rehab should return for 2018 season.

Ware seems to have a sprained knee, likely just 4 weeks off, see how Hunt does in that time, he may not get that job back


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 26, 2017, 11:06:14 PM
Looks like a torn ACL for Edelman which is terrible news for him.

Awful news for him. The Pats will cope, as you say next man up, good news for Amendola as there was a chance he'd be cut imo. Burkhead can play slot, Cooks, hogan, Mitchell. They've got the guys there to cover for him but it's a big loss still.

I took a few guys for the first time ever in various fantasy leagues this year. Luck, McCoy in the same dynasty team, Edelman in a ppr. I seem to have been a bit of a jinx on them all.

Did have a tentative look at Kareem Hunt OROY because of the Ware injury, available at 25s so giving it a miss

I thought the same re Hunt too but it didn't really excite me either. Think Ware will be missed in the short yardage situations with West and Spiller backing up Hunt there isn't a true 'pounder' in there. Could help Kelche's TD numbers near the goal line.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 27, 2017, 06:51:28 PM
Cameron Meredith down with a bad looking injury in the Chicago game too.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on August 27, 2017, 10:14:04 PM
Spencer Ware's knee injury will likely sideline him for the season.

The Kansas City Chiefs confirmed that Ware suffered a torn PCL in addition to other damage in Friday night's loss to the Seahawks. The starting running back is slated to get a second opinion, but the injury is thought to be season-ending, according to the team.


my dynasty league that Sheriff invited me to join 2 seasons back only has 2 IR spots this pre-season long term injuries to
guess i have no depth in my team anymore
Ware
Edelman
Fuller
Enunwa


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 27, 2017, 10:27:59 PM
Spencer Ware's knee injury will likely sideline him for the season.

The Kansas City Chiefs confirmed that Ware suffered a torn PCL in addition to other damage in Friday night's loss to the Seahawks. The starting running back is slated to get a second opinion, but the injury is thought to be season-ending, according to the team.


my dynasty league that Sheriff invited me to join 2 seasons back only has 2 IR spots this pre-season long term injuries to
guess i have no depth in my team anymore
Ware
Edelman
Fuller
Enunwa


Blimey, that's a tough off season for you there bud.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on August 27, 2017, 10:41:43 PM
Spencer Ware's knee injury will likely sideline him for the season.

The Kansas City Chiefs confirmed that Ware suffered a torn PCL in addition to other damage in Friday night's loss to the Seahawks. The starting running back is slated to get a second opinion, but the injury is thought to be season-ending, according to the team.


my dynasty league that Sheriff invited me to join 2 seasons back only has 2 IR spots this pre-season long term injuries to
guess i have no depth in my team anymore
Ware
Edelman
Fuller
Enunwa


Blimey, that's a tough off season for you there bud.

only pluses so far is i inherited david johnson in his rookie year when i started game and just traded next years draft pick for Gronk i thought i had a chance of going deep this year
but lacking WRs cover now


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 27, 2017, 10:58:34 PM
Cameron Meredith down with a bad looking injury in the Chicago game too.

Could be put for 2 years apparently?! Looked awful, but that's blooming crazy, poor guy


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on August 27, 2017, 11:13:18 PM
Cameron Meredith down with a bad looking injury in the Chicago game too.

Could be put for 2 years apparently?! Looked awful, but that's blooming crazy, poor guy
Guess who drafted him tonight in the dynasty league you could of said something after all you took Macca  out of my hands


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 28, 2017, 02:21:00 AM
That was an impressive half from the San Fran O against the Minny starters. Kyle Shanahan working his magic again. D held Minny to  no points too in an all round impressive performance.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 28, 2017, 08:47:45 AM
Cameron Meredith down with a bad looking injury in the Chicago game too.

Could be put for 2 years apparently?! Looked awful, but that's blooming crazy, poor guy
Guess who drafted him tonight in the dynasty league you could of said something after all you took Macca  out of my hands

I said before the draft even started that there had been a serious injury in the Bears game, just didn't mention who!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 28, 2017, 08:54:00 AM
After seeing how good Vontaze Burfict looked last night the league decided to suspend him for 5 games for a legal hit he made during the Chiefs game.
Obviously the guy has a reputation and every Steelers fan in the nation retweeted the hit so it was made public. No other player in the league would have even been noted for it, but social media being what it is, he's now out of the first 5. Absolutely ridiculous.

Gif of it here This is the hit that the NFL is suspending Vontaze Burfict 5 games for. https://t.co/Xiyab0kdrC

I'm not going to say it was needed, and it doesn't look great at all, but leads with the shoulder and blocks the man off.

Schefter says there has been a rule change in the off season which has been implemented.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 29, 2017, 08:15:25 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIVMbgnXUAAEbFw.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 29, 2017, 08:34:41 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIVMbgnXUAAEbFw.jpg)

Haha. I have no reaction to that news. It's just mind blowing.

Matthew (not Matt) Stafford signing the biggest deal ever. Until the next QB comes up for renewal. 5 year $135m. Not surprising and it will keep happening.

Rams +3 still available in places. If you wanted to arb it, the market will be Colts +3 when it reforms at the bookies who suspended it.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on August 29, 2017, 09:19:20 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIVMbgnXUAAEbFw.jpg)

For the NFL ignorati like me, what is significant about it?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on August 29, 2017, 09:21:49 AM

BT Sport showed "Four Falls of Buffalo" over the weekend as part of 30 x 30 or whatever it's called.

Apparently, the Bills were very good in the 90's, & went to Super Bowl 4 times.

Well worth a watch.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on August 29, 2017, 09:52:15 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIVMbgnXUAAEbFw.jpg)

For the NFL ignorati like me, what is significant about it?

nothing,the blue text is ironic


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 30, 2017, 11:08:53 AM
How did you see Cinci's pre season Cavey, the O line looked to hold up ok against Washington. Would you still be worried about that unit and the secondary?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on August 30, 2017, 01:18:12 PM
Joe Haden released by the Browns.Always did a good job on AJ Green.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on August 30, 2017, 01:28:51 PM
How did you see Cinci's pre season Cavey, the O line looked to hold up ok against Washington. Would you still be worried about that unit and the secondary?
Left tackle and centre for Cinci are holding us back big time.Missed assignments is the big problem with Ogbuehi and Bodine can't seem to get any push.Secondary will be fine but the defense as a whole needs Burfict.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 30, 2017, 02:13:14 PM
How did you see Cinci's pre season Cavey, the O line looked to hold up ok against Washington. Would you still be worried about that unit and the secondary?
Left tackle and centre for Cinci are holding us back big time.Missed assignments is the big problem with Ogbuehi and Bodine can't seem to get any push.Secondary will be fine but the defense as a whole needs Burfict.

Pretty much that, they coped well with the weaknesses which were still there. But I would guess the plan in general would be to get the ball away quickly to hide the troubles in front of them. If they can give Mixon the space then he can make the moves. Give Dalton 2 or 3 seconds and Ross can be 30 yards down field if needed! That first drive against the Redskins they looked great though, moved the ball really well


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on August 30, 2017, 05:07:15 PM
Cheers guys. I never thought I would be saying this but that George Fant injury looks to put the left side of Seahawks O line back in big trouble. Good job Wilson looks much fitter this season coz he's going to be on the move a lot.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on August 30, 2017, 05:58:53 PM
They're one of the few O lines that looks worse than the Bengals on paper.

Ross tucker did his O line tiers this week (he's a former Offensive line guy) and he has the Bengals right down there, even below the Colts which was a touch extreme tbh. That Colts line is horrible


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on August 30, 2017, 09:59:44 PM
Haden to the steelers apparently 3yr deal


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: KarmaDope on September 03, 2017, 08:46:07 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/sep/03/jake-olson-blind-college-football-player-long-snapper-usc-trojans

College football is brilliant.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on September 04, 2017, 04:26:59 PM
As expected Scott Tolzien is going to start week 1 for the Colts.

Market has gone from Rams +3 O/U 47, to Rams -3 and O/U 42 points. - 6 point swing for news that was predicted weeks ago, the bookies were really slow on this one, can still get Rams+3 on SportingBet infact


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on September 04, 2017, 04:38:34 PM
This might make me look silly in a few weeks but The Rams might well be 3-0 after the first 3 weeks.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on September 04, 2017, 04:43:08 PM
Washington and San Fran... Probably both winnable! That would be impressive still though


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on September 05, 2017, 09:49:46 PM
TB@MIA wont be played in Miami on sunday


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on September 05, 2017, 09:53:05 PM
Weather looks scary again doesn't it. Can't help thinking the NFL are trying to do what suits them by trying to arrange it as a week 11 game and making both teams play a full season without a bye week. Could just play it on Saturday in Miami or move it to a neutral ground.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on September 06, 2017, 07:29:49 PM
Skybet are the first out with player yard lines.

Kareem Hunt was set at 34.5 for a few mins, now 39.5 - Over
Kelce and Gronk are both at 49.5 - I'm on Overs on Kelce, but can see both going over, it's only 2 catches for Gronk.

I thought Brady was set low at 275 as well, I had expected 310 or so.

Still waiting for other sites to get their act together, but they're all that's about for now


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 08, 2017, 05:34:23 AM
Great start to the season...Gotta love football man!!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on September 08, 2017, 10:30:31 AM
ends talk of a PPS before the rest of the teams start


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on September 08, 2017, 11:32:24 PM
Looks like Zeke may well play the whole season as a judge has granted an injunction stopping the NFL from enacting the ban for the duration of the court case. Apparently likely all season long, although the NFL and NFLPA want clarification by the look of it

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJPE7nHV4AAZoER.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on September 11, 2017, 09:42:23 AM
Man I feel sorry for StopsleyHatter who went to that absolute farce in Cincinnati yesterday, I can't imagine he gets out there every year, so for a trip planned a year or so in advance to end up with your team being shutout, at home is pretty damn gutting!

For what it's worth, I thought the O line did ok, Bengals defence was good, it was just mistake after mistake by the QB - Who put up a QBR of 28.4, the one of the guys helmet was unlucky but throwing into triple coverage is entirely on him, I can only assume he was told to get rid of the ball quickly and wasn't reading the field properly. That Ravens defence is extremely good though. I'm sure he'll do fine against the Texans on Thursday


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 11, 2017, 12:26:59 PM
not much effective offense yesterday around the league. rustiness I suppose....


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on September 11, 2017, 12:57:02 PM
Sad to see so may injuries too, something needs a rethink imo. Either treat the pre season games properly and use them to get into game shape or the CBA needs changing to allow more coaching and game real practice.

I watched every game yesterday and must have been ref to players being tired, or rusty in all of them. Can't help them to stay safe.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 12, 2017, 07:36:17 AM
did anyone stay up for the Vikings? sorted their OL out and looked tremendous. Thielen, Diggs, Dalvin cook and best of all Sam Bradford. Already had a top notch defense and its going to be a great battle for that division with the Packers




Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 12, 2017, 07:37:45 AM
meanwhile in the commentary booth the other day tony romo was magnificent, kept calling out plays before they happened based on formations and looks

last night rex ryan was on chargers/denver. oh man. terrible

also look up sergio dipp on you tuve, the alan partridge of sideline reporters. he was unintentionally hilarious during the game


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 12, 2017, 07:57:36 AM
bill o'brien of the texans and the struggle to find a quarterback

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJeIAfwW0AA5ZvR.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 12, 2017, 09:33:23 AM
why the nfl has so many bad offenses?

Defenses keep getting faster

Offensive lines keep getting worse, (and some stay bad for a long time. seattle? giants? bengals? texans? not many attempts to draft lots of linemen in that lot) and probably talent evaluation out of college at OL isn't very good

good QBs are extremely hard to find. there aren't 20 good enough in the league currently, at least half a dozen teams in quarterback hell winning enough that they can't draft high enough to get the likes or rosen or darnold next year (Jets and 49ers might have a shot at them)

the CBA prevents the volume of practice in pre-season and between games to get offesnese into synch

the salary cap means rosters stay young and experienced players are often moved on. continuity from one season to the next is difficult

discuss (if you like)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on September 12, 2017, 06:08:03 PM
Not much to discuss on that, think you've nailed it tbh. - You have to pay up for an offensive line or you end up with your QB getting sacked 10 times, or throwing 5 Interceptions. - Also agree with the CBA not allowing full practises, or enough practises to get up to speed.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 12, 2017, 06:38:05 PM
Not enough full backs or tight ends cut blocking in pass protection.Top pass rushers get too much respect perfectly legal to low block bull and edge rushers.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: vegaslover on September 13, 2017, 12:25:56 AM
Could add to that the defence coaches catching up to all the rule changes over the years that have helped the offence


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on September 15, 2017, 08:04:46 PM
Unsurprisingly after becoming the first team since 1939 to open with 2 home games and fail to score a TD, the Bengals have fired Ken Zampese, a shame for him as he's been there since 2003, but the offense has so much talent and has looked anemic. Replaced by the QB coach who used to be the OC in Miami

They must have seen my video from this morning saying he's got to go. - https://twitter.com/NFL_Talk_UK/status/908590900456148992


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 16, 2017, 09:05:29 AM
if they had a half competent offense they'd be 2-0 now.

lots of skillposition talent but no OL and a skittish qb.

it beggars belief, see also giants, texans, that they left the OL unimproved in the off-season. Free agency prices high (susprise surprise, demand exceeds supply) so they relied on the youngsters being coached up.

at least the seahawks tried to change theirs, drafted one,recruited one

and the vikings spent $$$$ overhauling their so far so good


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on September 16, 2017, 11:29:43 AM
if they had a half competent offense they'd be 2-0 now.

lots of skillposition talent but no OL and a skittish qb.

it beggars belief, see also giants, texans, that they left the OL unimproved in the off-season. Free agency prices high (susprise surprise, demand exceeds supply) so they relied on the youngsters being coached up.

at least the seahawks tried to change theirs, drafted one,recruited one

and the vikings spent $$$$ overhauling their so far so good

It is genuinely incredible the arrogance of teams who think they can get by with a weak OL. It might well cost AJ Green a Hall of Fame place, as he's borderline at best and the last few years of his career need to be good ones. It can't happen if Dalton is getting clobbered every play.

I'm starting to think Cleveland might finish 2nd in the North now...


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Marky147 on September 20, 2017, 12:00:48 AM
(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/21558664_1631574443555904_2631500684764043327_n.jpg?oh=06a61dd1315e1ed1fa3e39a1a7515d9b&oe=5A5691DB)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 21, 2017, 01:08:21 PM
NFL’s London games have never matched teams with winning records http://dlvr.it/PpTQjR


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 21, 2017, 01:10:12 PM
An interesting response to Richard Sherman's NFL injury report/gambling comments (it only exists so Vegas can get its lines right, shouldn't exist), per The Greek’s Scott Kaminsky

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DKNqxy-U8AYcz6m.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on September 21, 2017, 10:47:09 PM
NFL’s London games have never matched teams with winning records http://dlvr.it/PpTQjR

90% or more of people going to the games don't care.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on September 21, 2017, 10:50:00 PM
Aaron Hernandez had stage 3 CTE when he died.

He had only played 84 college/NFL games.

I don't think American Football as we know it will exist in 20 years time.

I think the rules will be modified in some way to avoid so many head injuries.



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 21, 2017, 11:45:19 PM
Aaron Hernandez had stage 3 CTE when he died.

He had only played 84 college/NFL games.

I don't think American Football as we know it will exist in 20 years time.

I think the rules will be modified in some way to avoid so many head injuries.


It's a tough one as 200-250lb men will always break arm tackles


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on September 22, 2017, 12:39:46 AM
Aaron Hernandez had stage 3 CTE when he died.

He had only played 84 college/NFL games.

I don't think American Football as we know it will exist in 20 years time.

I think the rules will be modified in some way to avoid so many head injuries.


It's a tough one as 200-250lb men will always break arm tackles

Seems like a very high proportion of players are suffering bad side effects.

Once the league has been sued multiple times they will act. No doubt in my mind.

They don't care about the welfare of the players, but they certtainly care about money.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on September 22, 2017, 09:27:27 AM
Aaron Hernandez had stage 3 CTE when he died.

He had only played 84 college/NFL games.

I don't think American Football as we know it will exist in 20 years time.

I think the rules will be modified in some way to avoid so many head injuries.


It's a tough one as 200-250lb men will always break arm tackles

Seems like a very high proportion of players are suffering bad side effects.

Once the league has been sued multiple times they will act. No doubt in my mind.

They don't care about the welfare of the players, but they certtainly care about money.

The players care about the money too, though, surely.

Say to any 18 or 20 year old aspiring NFL player "you could earn up to $10 milly per year for 10 years, but you might end up with brain damage or in a wheelchair", do you really think the lad is gonna turn down the chance to be a Pro football player?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Marky147 on September 23, 2017, 04:29:40 AM
Thought this was very good.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZagPYWFPJms



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 23, 2017, 04:09:23 PM
Thought this was very good.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZagPYWFPJms


Good watch straight from the heart


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on September 25, 2017, 12:33:27 PM

The Bears are gonna get a Touchdown out of this.

You think?


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/american-football/41386209




Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on September 25, 2017, 01:41:38 PM

The Bears are gonna get a Touchdown out of this.

You think?


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/american-football/41386209



Watched it on red zone and couldn't believe what I saw.He's lucky they won players get cut for silliness like that.Great week 3 in the NFL as players are up to match fitness.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Mark_Porter on September 26, 2017, 01:00:27 PM
I am going to the NFL at Wembley next week - Saints v Dolphins.

I watched my first full NFL game this Sunday - the Wembley game. I also watched Redzone the previous week and a long series of YouTube videos so I understand the rules.

What sort of things should I look out for? What should I expect from the teams? Anything I can do to enhance my viewing pleasure? What type of teams are these two?

Really looking forward to it!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 26, 2017, 01:15:46 PM
I am going to the NFL at Wembley next week - Saints v Dolphins.

I watched my first full NFL game this Sunday - the Wembley game. I also watched Redzone the previous week and a long series of YouTube videos so I understand the rules.

What sort of things should I look out for? What should I expect from the teams? Anything I can do to enhance my viewing pleasure? What type of teams are these two?

Really looking forward to it!

should be a good game

the saints have an explosive offense, drew brees at QB has led the league in passing, michael thomas is a number one receiver and there are three running backs including the former league leading rusher adrian peterson.tend to be a poor defensive team too so high scoring games are common for the saints

the dolphins were putrid against the jets at the weekend. they have been buried by a travel schedule that sent them to LA for two weeks to escape a hurricane, then back to hurricane clean up then new york then straight to london

jay cutler the qb is capable of big plays but also boneheaded stuff. look out for the defensive tackle ndamakong suh. a beast

jay ajayi the running back grew up in london, arsenal fan, likely to get some home support

as far as the day itself is concerned, they've expanded the tailgate section a lot. out of wembley park,half way up wembley way turn left and onto the site. stalls,stages, food, drink,merchandise etc. if buying merchandise there allow for long queues.

a trick learnt from Tal, rather than going for food/drink at half time go just before 2 minutes to go in the first half. there is a 2 minute warning in play where play pauses and you can get to the counter while that is on and frequently back before play resumes,missing the half time rush

in the stadium you will see the score/time/down and distance to go on small displays half way up the stadium. worth following so you know what is going on

enjoy. its a great day out. luck of the draw whether you get a good game but this did look the stand out game of the 4 this year to go to on paper


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Mark_Porter on September 26, 2017, 05:53:07 PM
I am going to the NFL at Wembley next week - Saints v Dolphins.

I watched my first full NFL game this Sunday - the Wembley game. I also watched Redzone the previous week and a long series of YouTube videos so I understand the rules.

What sort of things should I look out for? What should I expect from the teams? Anything I can do to enhance my viewing pleasure? What type of teams are these two?

Really looking forward to it!

should be a good game

the saints have an explosive offense, drew brees at QB has led the league in passing, michael thomas is a number one receiver and there are three running backs including the former league leading rusher adrian peterson.tend to be a poor defensive team too so high scoring games are common for the saints

the dolphins were putrid against the jets at the weekend. they have been buried by a travel schedule that sent them to LA for two weeks to escape a hurricane, then back to hurricane clean up then new york then straight to london

jay cutler the qb is capable of big plays but also boneheaded stuff. look out for the defensive tackle ndamakong suh. a beast

jay ajayi the running back grew up in london, arsenal fan, likely to get some home support

as far as the day itself is concerned, they've expanded the tailgate section a lot. out of wembley park,half way up wembley way turn left and onto the site. stalls,stages, food, drink,merchandise etc. if buying merchandise there allow for long queues.

a trick learnt from Tal, rather than going for food/drink at half time go just before 2 minutes to go in the first half. there is a 2 minute warning in play where play pauses and you can get to the counter while that is on and frequently back before play resumes,missing the half time rush

in the stadium you will see the score/time/down and distance to go on small displays half way up the stadium. worth following so you know what is going on

enjoy. its a great day out. luck of the draw whether you get a good game but this did look the stand out game of the 4 this year to go to on paper

Brilliant, thank you


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: vegaslover on September 27, 2017, 12:12:26 AM
I am going to the NFL at Wembley next week - Saints v Dolphins.

I watched my first full NFL game this Sunday - the Wembley game. I also watched Redzone the previous week and a long series of YouTube videos so I understand the rules.

What sort of things should I look out for? What should I expect from the teams? Anything I can do to enhance my viewing pleasure? What type of teams are these two?

Really looking forward to it!

should be a good game

the saints have an explosive offense, drew brees at QB has led the league in passing, michael thomas is a number one receiver and there are three running backs including the former league leading rusher adrian peterson.tend to be a poor defensive team too so high scoring games are common for the saints

the dolphins were putrid against the jets at the weekend. they have been buried by a travel schedule that sent them to LA for two weeks to escape a hurricane, then back to hurricane clean up then new york then straight to london

jay cutler the qb is capable of big plays but also boneheaded stuff. look out for the defensive tackle ndamakong suh. a beast

jay ajayi the running back grew up in london, arsenal fan, likely to get some home support

as far as the day itself is concerned, they've expanded the tailgate section a lot. out of wembley park,half way up wembley way turn left and onto the site. stalls,stages, food, drink,merchandise etc. if buying merchandise there allow for long queues.

a trick learnt from Tal, rather than going for food/drink at half time go just before 2 minutes to go in the first half. there is a 2 minute warning in play where play pauses and you can get to the counter while that is on and frequently back before play resumes,missing the half time rush

in the stadium you will see the score/time/down and distance to go on small displays half way up the stadium. worth following so you know what is going on

enjoy. its a great day out. luck of the draw whether you get a good game but this did look the stand out game of the 4 this year to go to on paper

Tailgate gets very busy and food/drink is expensive both in there and Wembley of course.
The toilets in the stadium can get very busy with long queues. Use the ones opposite near the exits, they are usually pretty empty.








Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 28, 2017, 11:24:56 AM
Donald Trump says the NFL as a business is "going to go to hell" if it does not change: http://skysports.tv/FSkP0j


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on September 28, 2017, 02:56:53 PM
Tonight will be 195th meeting between the Bears and Packers, with series tied 94-94-6 and Green Bay holding a 3,335-3,331 scoring lead.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Marky147 on September 28, 2017, 03:12:42 PM
Tonight will be 195th meeting between the Bears and Packers, with series tied 94-94-6 and Green Bay holding a 3,335-3,331 scoring lead.

Wow, that's some stat.



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on October 01, 2017, 12:51:24 PM
is the London game not on SKY today?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on October 01, 2017, 12:59:30 PM
is the London game not on SKY today?
Doesn't appear to be.Live on BBC 2


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on October 01, 2017, 01:09:57 PM
is the London game not on SKY today?
Doesn't appear to be.Live on BBC 2

cool thought i wa going to have to watch on gamepass


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on October 01, 2017, 02:11:01 PM
Under 52.5 basically even money now.

Anyone else not a Cutler fan?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on October 01, 2017, 02:19:33 PM
Under 52.5 basically even money now.

Anyone else not a Cutler fan?

Yeah, I love the unders today.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on October 01, 2017, 04:13:39 PM
Under 52.5 basically even money now.

Anyone else not a Cutler fan?

Yeah, I love the unders today.

0-0 HT great bet unders but terrible game to watch


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bergeroo on October 02, 2017, 12:49:45 AM
Never usually watch NFL on Sunday as I play online poker, but played less today and watched Red Zone for the first time ever tonight. Wow it is a fantastic thing. Four one-possession games, switching between them, no adverts or stoppages!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: LEXUS on October 02, 2017, 12:51:35 AM
When you bet on the 1st TD scorer & they bring it home in the last play of overtime lol



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on October 03, 2017, 08:29:53 AM
Back up quarterbacks

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLFlmNjVYAAp5tE.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on October 03, 2017, 09:12:03 AM
spot the problem

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLKS_QZXkAA4eND.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: 4KSuited on October 03, 2017, 11:21:20 AM
spot the problem

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLKS_QZXkAA4eND.jpg)

Ouch! He was in even more pain when the team doctor got a hold of his finger to snap it together again.

Looks like he's got a banged up helmet, too.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on October 03, 2017, 06:08:38 PM
Any opinions on taking 10/3 for Deshaun Watson to be OROY? It's shorter than I would have liked, but to me it's basically a 2 horse race between him and Hunt. Now obviously Hunt has a big lead in that so far, but RBs are a lot more prone to injury than QBs and QBs are considered far more attractive in these types of things (See Zeke vs Dak last year)

If you're on Hunt already anyway then I think it's a no brainer to get on Watson as cover, if not... that makes it a little more difficult. Any opinion?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on October 03, 2017, 06:19:41 PM
Any opinions on taking 10/3 for Deshaun Watson to be OROY? It's shorter than I would have liked, but to me it's basically a 2 horse race between him and Hunt. Now obviously Hunt has a big lead in that so far, but RBs are a lot more prone to injury than QBs and QBs are considered far more attractive in these types of things (See Zeke vs Dak last year)

If you're on Hunt already anyway then I think it's a no brainer to get on Watson as cover, if not... that makes it a little more difficult. Any opinion?

Honestly, I still think Houston finish 8-8 or worse. He is flying at the moment but it's rarely that easy and the awards favour the latecomers above the early performers.

You want to back a team you have making the playoffs or dramatically improving a really poor one. Kizer still has time for that and who knows what Trubisky does when he gets his chance on Sunday.

Romo was still in cleats this time last year.

Far rather take a fancy price on a fancied team than a short price on a team that is 50/50 to make the playoffs.

As to your cover point, only cover if the bet is value. Ride the variance otherwise.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on October 03, 2017, 06:34:47 PM
Through four weeks of the 2017 NFL season, no WR has above 400 REC YDs. The first time that's happened since 1987.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 03, 2017, 10:26:13 PM
Any opinions on taking 10/3 for Deshaun Watson to be OROY? It's shorter than I would have liked, but to me it's basically a 2 horse race between him and Hunt. Now obviously Hunt has a big lead in that so far, but RBs are a lot more prone to injury than QBs and QBs are considered far more attractive in these types of things (See Zeke vs Dak last year)

If you're on Hunt already anyway then I think it's a no brainer to get on Watson as cover, if not... that makes it a little more difficult. Any opinion?

I personally wouldn't take that price. Don't think it's true to say it's a 2 horse race, there's still some very solid outsider options.

Fournette doesn't have the yardage totals yet, but if he gets 1000-1200 yards and the Jags make the playoffs, maybe he has a shot. Still not sold on the AFC South as being a particularly good division, so that could work in his favour to help boost his numbers vs division opponents.

The Chiefs have to play the Broncos twice, who have held Lynch and Zeke to a combined 20 rushing yards in the last 2 games. If the Broncos stop Kareem Hunt while Fournette runs over a weak AFC South then it could blow the OPOTY race wide open.

The Chiefs wouldn't be 4-0 without Hunt IMO, but they'd still be a pretty damn good team, so the impact of having weapons around him will definitely be discussed. There's no such debate with Fournette, he pretty much is the entire Jacksonville offense if you look at the names around him. If it's close, then voters might value a guy who pushed an otherwise poor team to 9-7 or 10-6 and broke a playoff drought over a guy who made a playoff team even better. I wouldn't even call Fournette an outsider yet, tbh. Reckon it's a 3 horse race with him still very much in the mix at present, then a couple of guys who can realistically play themselves into contention.

Alvin Kamara has been pretty spectacular and if he continues taking reps off Ingram and they stop feeling like they have to give Adrian Peterson carries because of his name, then his stats will start to reflect that. I doubt he takes the award given the Saints' system and insistence on RB by committee though. Probs needs 1000 yards receiving and a handy contribution running the ball, which means staying healthy for 16 games and some more formations where he's lined up at receiver with Ingram in the backfield, plus taking carries off Ingram as well. It's possible, but tough.

Trubisky starts in Chicago next week. No reason he can't have a shot if he plays well, albeit over 12 weeks. I'd price him up as 4th fave behind Fournette and the other two, or maybe 5th fave behind Kamara given he's got nobody of any note to throw to.

Honourable mention for Ryan Ramczyk as they won't give the award to an O-Lineman in a million years, but the guy deserves some love.

As to your cover point, only cover if the bet is value. Ride the variance otherwise.

^ This.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on October 05, 2017, 08:57:09 AM

Anyone sort of agree with what Cam Newton said?



http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/american-football/41508759


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Graham C on October 05, 2017, 10:22:45 AM

Anyone sort of agree with what Cam Newton said?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/american-football/41508759

Sort of, I don't think it's sexist, just an unusual sort of funny I guess.   I remember a bit back, 5 Live went through a faze of having a Scottish woman commentating on the cricket - that's funny too isn't it?  Similar sort of thing.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on October 05, 2017, 10:24:17 AM

Anyone sort of agree with what Cam Newton said?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/american-football/41508759

Sort of, I don't think it's sexist, just an unusual sort of funny I guess.   I remember a bit back, 5 Live went through a faze of having a Scottish woman commentating on the cricket - that's funny too isn't it?  Similar sort of thing.

Of course it's sexist.

If a white player had made the same "joke" about a black reporter, would you think that was wrong?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on October 05, 2017, 06:31:17 PM
Any opinions on taking 10/3 for Deshaun Watson to be OROY? It's shorter than I would have liked, but to me it's basically a 2 horse race between him and Hunt. Now obviously Hunt has a big lead in that so far, but RBs are a lot more prone to injury than QBs and QBs are considered far more attractive in these types of things (See Zeke vs Dak last year)

If you're on Hunt already anyway then I think it's a no brainer to get on Watson as cover, if not... that makes it a little more difficult. Any opinion?

I personally wouldn't take that price. Don't think it's true to say it's a 2 horse race, there's still some very solid outsider options.

Fournette doesn't have the yardage totals yet, but if he gets 1000-1200 yards and the Jags make the playoffs, maybe he has a shot. Still not sold on the AFC South as being a particularly good division, so that could work in his favour to help boost his numbers vs division opponents.

The Chiefs have to play the Broncos twice, who have held Lynch and Zeke to a combined 20 rushing yards in the last 2 games. If the Broncos stop Kareem Hunt while Fournette runs over a weak AFC South then it could blow the OPOTY race wide open.

The Chiefs wouldn't be 4-0 without Hunt IMO, but they'd still be a pretty damn good team, so the impact of having weapons around him will definitely be discussed. There's no such debate with Fournette, he pretty much is the entire Jacksonville offense if you look at the names around him. If it's close, then voters might value a guy who pushed an otherwise poor team to 9-7 or 10-6 and broke a playoff drought over a guy who made a playoff team even better. I wouldn't even call Fournette an outsider yet, tbh. Reckon it's a 3 horse race with him still very much in the mix at present, then a couple of guys who can realistically play themselves into contention.

Alvin Kamara has been pretty spectacular and if he continues taking reps off Ingram and they stop feeling like they have to give Adrian Peterson carries because of his name, then his stats will start to reflect that. I doubt he takes the award given the Saints' system and insistence on RB by committee though. Probs needs 1000 yards receiving and a handy contribution running the ball, which means staying healthy for 16 games and some more formations where he's lined up at receiver with Ingram in the backfield, plus taking carries off Ingram as well. It's possible, but tough.

Trubisky starts in Chicago next week. No reason he can't have a shot if he plays well, albeit over 12 weeks. I'd price him up as 4th fave behind Fournette and the other two, or maybe 5th fave behind Kamara given he's got nobody of any note to throw to.

Honourable mention for Ryan Ramczyk as they won't give the award to an O-Lineman in a million years, but the guy deserves some love.

As to your cover point, only cover if the bet is value. Ride the variance otherwise.

^ This.

Thanks for the opinions. I had pretty much overlooked Fournette. It would take a miracle for a Blake Bortles team to get the playoffs, whilst Deshaun Watson could lead his team there and QBs always get more credit than other positions.

Kamara has looked very good actually, but again, I just don't think he'll single-handedly get the Saints to the playoffs, but who knows there. He could finish with 500 and 1000 and 10 TDs, that'd be a hell of a rookie season and they quite obviously love him there.

And Great point about the Chiefs having to play the Broncos twice, they've been lights out on run defence this season as stated

Trubisky is an interesting one, he won't get the Bears anywhere, but if he gets them to 8 wins then he'd be hugely successful.

I guess you're right with regards to it being a "whoever is hot near the time of voting" thing as well though, as it happens I actually tipped Watson at 7s, so didn't need to hedge anyway, was a busy summer and missed it from my spreadsheet somehow.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on October 05, 2017, 06:35:29 PM

Anyone sort of agree with what Cam Newton said?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/american-football/41508759

Sort of, I don't think it's sexist, just an unusual sort of funny I guess.   I remember a bit back, 5 Live went through a faze of having a Scottish woman commentating on the cricket - that's funny too isn't it?  Similar sort of thing.

Of course it's sexist.

If a white player had made the same "joke" about a black reporter, would you think that was wrong?

Quite obviously sexist. It's not something that I'm personally offended by, but it is offensive to a lot of people. It's something he might say with his mates for a laugh, but you don't say something like that in public even if it was intended to be a joke. Apparently the lady met up with him afterwards and he said even worse which she didn't want to repeat. Turns out she's posted a few things in her past on twitter saying that her father being racist was hilarious, and her using the N word repeatedly. Everyone makes mistakes. There's quite a few women on NFL Twitter that I follow who know an incredible amount on the sport.

I'm sure losing his main Yogurt sponsor will be killing him though and will lead to a heartfelt sincere apology


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on October 06, 2017, 03:48:33 AM
Can we get Tony Romo to do Premier League football commentary?

He's the Alan McManus or Peter Svidler of NFL commentary.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on October 06, 2017, 09:13:29 AM
"Here comes Folk and he misses again this time from 31 yards. Thats 3 in a row tonight and 5 in a row in his last two games"

camera pans to a dejected Folk,aware he's likely to be cut in the morning

"Over to our Kicking expert in the studio Jay Feely. What went wrong Jay?"

"Well he didn't kick it straight"

"Thanks Jay, so Tony...."

"


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on October 06, 2017, 09:15:10 AM
Can we get Tony Romo to do Premier League football commentary?

He's the Alan McManus or Peter Svidler of NFL commentary.

He's a combination of a kid excited at watching and nostradamus

late last night the Buccs are scrambling to try to win the game

"Plenty of time left,throw it over the middle,run up and spike the ball with 3 seconds left then one shot at the end zone"

throws it over the middle, team hustles up and yes, the ball is spiked at 0.03

Brilliant


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on October 06, 2017, 02:12:31 PM
John Cleese's introduction of yesterday's game is worth a watch:

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/john-cleese-explaining-american-football_us_59d7245ce4b046f5ad9753e2


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on October 06, 2017, 04:06:17 PM
Can we get Tony Romo to do Premier League football commentary?

He's the Alan McManus or Peter Svidler of NFL commentary.

He's a combination of a kid excited at watching and nostradamus

late last night the Buccs are scrambling to try to win the game

"Plenty of time left,throw it over the middle,run up and spike the ball with 3 seconds left then one shot at the end zone"

throws it over the middle, team hustles up and yes, the ball is spiked at 0.03

Brilliant

I'm surprised how good Romo has proven to be, he's not only good at it he is abs superb imo, deffo sounds like he is a fan watching from the settee with a beer and a cigar it comes that naturally. Instances like the one you have noted here among many others have been well above the usual commentaries.

There was a play in one of the games last week where the ball was snapped before the QB looked to be ready. Almost instantly Romo mentioned to keep an eye on the left guard. On the replay there was a slight inflection in the QB's voice which would usually intimate he wants the ball snapped but on this occasion the crowd noise was so loud he thought he had been unheard so he set up to go thru his read again and was pointing out the guy he thought was the likely blitzer on the defence. The problem was the left guard, who's job in some games when noise can be a problem had already tapped the center to snap the ball.

Was impossible to see from the usual side on view of the snap but Romo spotted it in his various replays instantly. That insight made the play a completely different mistake from what looked like a center snapping the ball before the QB was ready. His comments on picking off Cover 4 D's with short range passes and passes to RB's was great last night too.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: AndrewT on October 08, 2017, 04:42:30 PM
Pretty bonkers college football game last night.

Western Michigan and Buffalo were 31-31 at the end of the 4th quarter. They were level at the end of overtime, so had another period of overtime. Then another, then another...

Finally, after 7 (SEVEN) periods of overtime, Western Michigan won 71-68.

http://www.ncaa.com/game/football/fbs/2017/10/07/western-mich-buffalo


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on October 08, 2017, 04:52:30 PM
Pretty bonkers college football game last night.

Western Michigan and Buffalo were 31-31 at the end of the 4th quarter. They were level at the end of overtime, so had another period of overtime. Then another, then another...

Finally, after 7 (SEVEN) periods of overtime, Western Michigan won 71-68.

http://www.ncaa.com/game/football/fbs/2017/10/07/western-mich-buffalo

Best part was a player's sister running onto the pitch to celebrate with her brother when he scored in 1st overtime. She gets escorted out, but not before she goes back to her mom to get the car keys

:D


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 08, 2017, 07:34:09 PM
Meanwhile, in College Football...

https://twitter.com/NFL_Memes/status/916714957823201281


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on October 08, 2017, 10:30:03 PM
Obj broken ankle. That'll be him done for the season. With his team at 0-5 there's no point rushing him back


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: action man on October 09, 2017, 06:56:44 AM
Bookies still have pats 9/2 favs what do we think?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 10, 2017, 06:52:59 PM
The Saints realised they made a mistake signing Adrian Peterson to play in the least Adrian Peterson friendly system in the league, and have now traded him to Arizona for a conditional pick.

Chris Johnson reached 100 rushing yards last week... For the entire season. They're dead last in the league in rushing with David Johnson injured, so this makes a lot of sense, and if he's anywhere near the Adrian Peterson of yesteryear, forcing an extra defender in the box and having to still cover Fitzgerald can only improve the matchups for their other receivers.

They're a team that could very easily be 0-5 due to their lack of running game, having scraped past two of the worst teams in the league in overtime, but they're 2-3 and this could definitely be the move that makes them a playoff contender again this year.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000859508/article/saints-trade-rb-adrian-peterson-to-cardinals



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 10, 2017, 08:28:46 PM
Obj broken ankle. That'll be him done for the season. With his team at 0-5 there's no point rushing him back

Their schedule doesn't get any easier either. They play the AFC West (Minus Chargers) and NFC West, plus 4 divisional games remaining. They've already lost to the Chargers. Tbh, the only winnable games I see there are Arizona and San Francisco, and both of those are road games across several timezones. The 49ers are pretty good for an 0-5 team, and the Cardinals might suddenly become a playoff contender just by picking up Adrian Peterson. Maybe we had the wrong New York team going 0-16 before the start of the season?

It'll be a miracle if Jerry Reese survives the season - For years, he has failed to do anything about the O-Line and lack of running game, and the current injury crisis is going to highlight that worse than ever.

If the Giants get a top pick, which looks very likely, surely they draft Eli's successor with that pick? Pick up some linemen in the next couple of rounds, let the rookie sit for a season while Eli takes a pounding behind a pair of rookies on a still poor OL before shipping him off somewhere else or sending him into retirement, then start the draft pick in 2019 when they've had two draft classes plus free agency to sort the OL out, and a year to get rid of some expensive veterans.


Bookies still have pats 9/2 favs what do we think?

Probably losing home advantage in the AFC to the Chiefs is significant, but it's still Brady and Belichick we're talking about here. As long as they don't go 0-2 vs Buffalo which would mean they have to win 3 games more than Buffalo with tiebreakers, then they'll still win the division. From there, I can't see many wildcard options that would scare New England if they even have to play a Wildcard game - The likes of Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Oakland, who are all probable WC opponents, are too flawed for Belichick to not just exploit their weakness defensively or make them one dimensional on offense - They all look like the kind of teams that get into the playoffs and end up one and done.

It's just having to play the Chiefs that is the big concern, and maybe the Texans if losing Watt doesn't hurt them too much and if nobody's found out how to stop Deshaun Watson by then. I'm not sure I'd have them as favourites over the Chiefs, but I don't think there's a whole lot in it because Belichick - They'll probs at least make their defense half decent by the time the playoffs come around, even if it still ends up being their biggest weakness. They don't need to become the 1985 Bears, just get Brady only needing to put up 28 points rather than 35+ in order to win, and they'll be okay.

The Chiefs are 15/2 with 10bet atm. If I wasn't a Raiders fan I'd be on that for sure :( It's difficult enough having to hate the Chiefs but also reluctantly enjoying Andy Reid being an absolute genius and having such an exciting offense, without putting money on them.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: arbboy on October 11, 2017, 07:32:22 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2017/oct/11/nfl-protests-african-american-players

Money talks as usual in US sports.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on October 11, 2017, 07:37:26 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2017/oct/11/nfl-protests-african-american-players

Money talks as usual in US sports.

DAk, Zeke and Dez whould take the knee this weekend.

Then we'll see how serious JJ is about firing players who don't stand for the anthem.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: arbboy on October 11, 2017, 07:41:51 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2017/oct/11/nfl-protests-african-american-players

Money talks as usual in US sports.

DAk, Zeke and Dez whould take the knee this weekend.

Then we'll see how serious JJ is about firing players who don't stand for the anthem.

I would love to see that happen to JJ and put him in a tough spot.  He just looks such a two faced, results orientated, when it suits him wallet talking cock sucker JJ.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 11, 2017, 08:34:27 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2017/oct/11/nfl-protests-african-american-players

Money talks as usual in US sports.

DAk, Zeke and Dez whould take the knee this weekend.

Then we'll see how serious JJ is about firing players who don't stand for the anthem.

There's a rather sick irony in them being "America's team", and being the ones whose owner has come out and made this statement.

I wouldn't mind seeing a repeat of this right now.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpWPKktFjlo


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on October 11, 2017, 11:57:12 PM
Exactly how I picture it.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrT0qYdTiLY


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on October 12, 2017, 09:14:36 AM
!

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/10/11/upshot/trump-nfl-polarization.html?_r=0

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DL4GzU9WsAATSUm.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on October 12, 2017, 12:31:02 PM

Anyone got any thoughts on tonight's big clash?



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on October 12, 2017, 02:13:10 PM

Anyone got any thoughts on tonight's big clash?



eagles win by 10+


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on October 12, 2017, 07:09:41 PM
No huge odds, but Cam yards seem to be set low, I'm on o252.5 but that's on Skybet. If you're one of the few still allowed to bet with Victor then they've got the yardage set lower. Unfortunately after winning 3/4 NFL bets for a grand total of £40 or so I got my account blocked on there.

Also on Ed Dickson yards 35.5 again on Skybet, RZSports have it 12 yards higher so a nice middle for anyone who fancies that kind of thing.

Should be a cracking match in fairness. I also like the overs, the line has come down from 46.5ish at the start of the week to 45 now, I can't see how these teams don't score over 20 each tonight, both QBs playing very well


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on October 12, 2017, 07:38:15 PM
No huge odds, but Cam yards seem to be set low, I'm on o252.5 but that's on Skybet. If you're one of the few still allowed to bet with Victor then they've got the yardage set lower. Unfortunately after winning 3/4 NFL bets for a grand total of £40 or so I got my account blocked on there.

Also on Ed Dickson yards 35.5 again on Skybet, RZSports have it 12 yards higher so a nice middle for anyone who fancies that kind of thing.

Should be a cracking match in fairness. I also like the overs, the line has come down from 46.5ish at the start of the week to 45 now, I can't see how these teams don't score over 20 each tonight, both QBs playing very well

Thanks Cavey. Might stay up & watch that.

Yeah, Victor is not keen on High Rollers who keep winning.


(http://i.imgur.com/kopI4Mc.png) (https://imgur.com/kopI4Mc)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 12, 2017, 10:12:40 PM
Zeke has been un-unbanned.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000860432/article/ezekiel-elliott-suspension-reinstated-after-court-ruling


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on October 12, 2017, 10:16:54 PM

Anyone got any thoughts on tonight's big clash?



Just one...

(http://www.panthers.com/assets/images/imported/CAR/photos/2017/10-October/171010_tunnel_KP.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on October 12, 2017, 10:24:14 PM

Ha, that's a given.

Really hoping to see the Panthers put on a show tonight. Huge difference between 5-1 and 4-2.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on October 12, 2017, 10:54:04 PM
Yep eagles will fly to 5-1


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on October 13, 2017, 03:11:37 AM
This Philly defense is for real.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on October 13, 2017, 03:44:44 AM
Why don't running backs get more concussions?

They get hit in the head virtually every time they make a straight ahead run, yet seems to get less concuissions than players in other positions.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on October 13, 2017, 03:53:42 AM
This Philly defense is for real.

The offense isn't too bad either.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on October 13, 2017, 06:48:32 AM
Why don't running backs get more concussions?

They get hit in the head virtually every time they make a straight ahead run, yet seems to get less concuissions than players in other positions.

Just on the severity of the impact I think. Running flat out in to linemen is better than Earl Thomas/Ed Reed/Kam Chancellor turning themselves in to human missiles aimed ( more so in past) at your head. I guess we're still fairly early on in our understanding of it though. American Football has done well to take a bit of a lead on it but years of testing to come yet, they must all be damaging their brains really.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on October 13, 2017, 10:09:49 PM
Any neutrals out there that saw last nights game think the eagles were hard done by in penalties 12 penalties last night for 126 yards compared to panthers 1 penalty for 1 yard

eagles were getting called for things that the panthers were getting no calls for,

in the last 2 games with that crew eagles have had 24 pens for 234 yards opponents 3 for 19

and in last 4 games 40 for 396 versus 8 for 72 yards,

are the eagles that dirty a team or has that team got it in for the eagles?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on October 13, 2017, 10:19:46 PM
Any neutrals out there that saw last nights game think the eagles were hard done by in penalties 12 penalties last night for 126 yards compared to panthers 1 penalty for 1 yard

eagles were getting called for things that the panthers were getting no calls for,

in the last 2 games with that crew eagles have had 24 pens for 234 yards opponents 3 for 19

and in last 4 games 40 for 396 versus 8 for 72 yards,

are the eagles that dirty a team or has that team got it in for the eagles?


In amongst lots of good decisions, at times it was an odd game from the Zebras. I thought they missed two late hits on Cam. Other than that Philly were called on a couple of harsh ones (holding). They'll be right there this year I think :-).


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 14, 2017, 03:24:30 AM
Why don't running backs get more concussions?

They get hit in the head virtually every time they make a straight ahead run, yet seems to get less concuissions than players in other positions.

Just on the severity of the impact I think. Running flat out in to linemen is better than Earl Thomas/Ed Reed/Kam Chancellor turning themselves in to human missiles aimed ( more so in past) at your head. I guess we're still fairly early on in our understanding of it though. American Football has done well to take a bit of a lead on it but years of testing to come yet, they must all be damaging their brains really.

Played some running back in UK pre-season for local team, like February/March, so have some experience. Got switched to WR because our team was stacked at RB, and ended up only really playing special teams because the other rookies were better than me. Great fun though, 10/10 would recommend.

Some of it is speed when they make contact - Obviously a WR running over the middle of the field and getting nailed by the free safety who is also running at full speed is a much harder impact. When a collision happens between the running back and a linebacker or the safety who has snuck up into the box, the tackler doesn't start a million miles off the line of scrimmage either. Plus, the defender has to actually read the run play first before they start moving towards the running back, otherwise they're going to screw up in pass protection. Neither player gets close to full speed when a tackle occurs around the line of scrimmage.

On top of that, changing direction at the line of scrimmage is often going to slow a running back down - RBs are coached to avoid sharp direction changes and keep speed up, but you're usually going to have to turn at some point to avoid running into the back of your O-Line, and at least slow down a little bit to do so.  There's sometimes traffic for the opposing player to get through to make the tackle as well, such as a TE or FB.

All of that means that neither player is close to full speed on a standard run play that goes for a gain of like 2-6 yards because there just isn't the time to accelerate fully, so the forces in the collision just aren't as big. Don't get me wrong, you still get hit pretty hard running inside, but it's more accumulation of hits over a game for running backs, rather than a particularly big hit.

Worth nothing that F=MV^2 - if you double the closing speed between two players, you quadruple the forces in the collision. So speed of collision is a huge factor

In addition, as a RB, you're constantly looking where the tacklers are coming from, because you carry the football away from tacklers to minimise the risk of fumbling (Then you put your other arm on the ball as you go into contact). For that reason, you're usually aware of where the hit is coming from, which helps because you can get your head out of the way and prepare for contact by getting yourself in a stronger position. When you're turning your head to catch a ball as a WR, you take your eyes off the defender(s), and you're not in any kind of body position to take a hit. Sometimes, you're either not expecting a hit, or have no idea where you're going to get hit from. From experience, getting blocked as you run down field on kickoffs is the absolute worst for that.

As a RB, you have to get your pad level low (low man wins), and therefore, you run quite low to the ground. As a WR, you run your route, then you might have to reach up to make a catch. If you get hit as you're making a catch, you're off balance, you're definitely hitting the floor, and from a much greater height. You see a lot of WRs getting concussions not from the tackle itself, but from where their helmet hits the ground. You don't see that with run plays all that often.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on October 15, 2017, 10:33:49 PM
Dan Hanzus @DanHanzus

Damn, Tony Romo even strong in analysis of goal post boxing. "A little open on the left side when he threw the right."



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on October 16, 2017, 10:37:14 AM

Just seen this on Twitter;

We are saddened to hear of the passing of our NFL expert Kevin Cadle. Our thoughts are with his family and loved ones at this difficult time

Very sad news, if true, though I've not seen it confirmed yet.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on October 16, 2017, 10:38:59 AM
Confirmed, apparently.

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/us-sport/national-football-league/kevin-cadle-dead-dies-cause-of-death-british-basketball-coach-nfl-presenter-a8002561.html


He was just 62.

RIP.


(http://i.imgur.com/eTwADQT.jpg) (https://imgur.com/eTwADQT)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on October 16, 2017, 01:45:08 PM
Confirmed, apparently.

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/us-sport/national-football-league/kevin-cadle-dead-dies-cause-of-death-british-basketball-coach-nfl-presenter-a8002561.html


He was just 62.

RIP.


(http://i.imgur.com/eTwADQT.jpg) (https://imgur.com/eTwADQT)
RIP. Apparently there will be a tribute at the twickenham game which is an excellent idea..


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: arbboy on October 16, 2017, 02:55:55 PM
Greatest basketball coach in British history (by a mile).  His teams were brutal to their opponents.  Helped build the game in the early days into potentially a huge sport in the glory days of the 1990s when British basketball was live on sky sports every weekend and played in front of 5 figure crowds in the biggest arenas in the UK and players were being attracted from top European leagues to play in the UK.  The TV companies pulled the plug in the early 2000's when ITV digital went skint and UK basketball has never recovered.  Huge factor in the growth of US sports in the UK as well via his presenting role.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on October 16, 2017, 04:01:55 PM
Why did Sky fire him?

Never a word muttered why he left? Apart from his forlorn tweets hoping he'd be back soon.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Nakor on October 16, 2017, 04:15:14 PM
Why did Sky fire him?

Never a word muttered why he left? Apart from his forlorn tweets hoping he'd be back soon.

I was told he was warned about advertising a book and he then did it again.
Have no idea if true but the timings fit.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: arbboy on October 18, 2017, 11:59:01 AM
http://www.nfluk.com/news/specialfeatures/article-1/Getting-Cadled-A-tribute-by-Mike-Carlson/2942277d-53f0-4311-a073-4cb715e2486d


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Pompeynick on October 22, 2017, 07:32:30 PM
I am really shocked and saddened at the death of Kevin Cadle.
I remember the great battles between Portsmouth and his Kingston teams.
Later on watching him on Sky Sports, I always thought he came across as a knowledgeable and fun loving presenter.
I wondered why he was missing from the coverage this year, I will miss seeing him on TV .
R.I.P



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Evilpengwinz on October 23, 2017, 01:37:28 AM
One of the fans has bought a giant banner at Foxborough tonight with the FOX 28-3 score box on it, it's draped over the wall at the back of one of the end zones :D


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on October 24, 2017, 05:37:54 PM
did everyone see this last night?
between wentz and dak the NFC east have a couple of great QBs for the future



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbLca4CvbCk


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on October 31, 2017, 01:26:13 PM
Rumour has it eagles acquire ajayi for a 4th round pick


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on October 31, 2017, 01:29:59 PM
Rumour has it eagles acquire ajayi for a 4th round pick

Trade now confirmed on nfl.com, although details of picks not provided yet.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on October 31, 2017, 03:16:04 PM
Philly given up a 4th round pick for Ajayi.

That feels like a trade Tal would get me to agree to in the fantasy league!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on October 31, 2017, 06:03:33 PM
Philly given up a 4th round pick for Ajayi.

That feels like a trade Tal would get me to agree to in the fantasy league!

(https://consequenceofsound.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/exsqueeze-me.gif?w=806)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on October 31, 2017, 08:13:51 PM
Panthers WR Kelvin Benjamin traded to Buffalo, source tells ESPN.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on October 31, 2017, 08:17:58 PM
Panthers WR Kelvin Benjamin traded to Buffalo, source tells ESPN.

Now that I like!

GM Brandon Beane said we wouldn't be doing any more business just an hour ago.

This is like when Arry had to traipse back from Sandbanks when Spurs signed Rafa van der Vaart.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on October 31, 2017, 08:44:25 PM
Reports suggest we were in talks with Bryant and Landry before pulling the trigger on Benjamin.



Chris Trapasso
@ChrisTrapasso
#Bills top 3 WR heights:

2016: 6'1", 6'0", 5'9"

2017: 6'5", 6'3", 6'2"


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on October 31, 2017, 10:35:12 PM
NFL trade deadline: Browns reportedly fail to approve deal for Bengals QB AJ McCarron https://t.co/NR5qixpM5k


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on November 01, 2017, 08:16:54 AM
here's what the Bills new regime has done since April 27th. It's hard not like what they've done. And they are 5-2.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNfkT2YXUAAWR5M.jpg)

like,i would imagine, when you start rebuilding your dynasty team, but then you keep winning and switch over to go for the win this year.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on November 02, 2017, 08:52:56 PM
Hell's bells

Sources: #Texans QB fear Deshaun Watson suffered a torn ACL in practice today. A non-contact injury. MRI coming to confirm.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on November 02, 2017, 08:54:49 PM
OUCH


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: the sicilian on November 02, 2017, 10:42:56 PM
Hell's bells

Sources: #Texans QB fear Deshaun Watson suffered a torn ACL in practice today. A non-contact injury. MRI coming to confirm.


Such a shame incred player.. oh and i traded for him this morning in one of my fantasy leagues


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on November 03, 2017, 03:46:02 PM
Elliot ban lifted again for this sunday


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on November 05, 2017, 07:37:28 PM
Get aboard the eagles train 13/2 for superbowl or 13/5 for conference

Wentz on fire
Your defence is terrified


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on November 08, 2017, 10:37:35 PM
Bennett cut

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21342712/green-bay-packers-cut-te-martellus-bennett-failure-disclose-physical-condition-designation

The interesting thing about the story is that if he retires the Packers can claim back 2/3rds of his signing bonus.

So why doesn't Bennett just not officially retire, but demand $100m per season to play for the next two years?

Then retire after the two years are up.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on November 09, 2017, 09:14:19 PM
Zeke suspended again




Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on November 10, 2017, 07:36:29 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOOBlnVX0AEllWk?format=jpg)

Great to hear the Mailman is back.

For those who don't listen, the Around the NFL podcast is the NFL's main podcast. It's a good balance of analysis, content and irreverence.

The third man along, Chris Wesseling, recently had the all clear from oesophegal cancer.

Show is broadcast 3 times a week.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on November 10, 2017, 10:17:30 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOOBlnVX0AEllWk?format=jpg)

Great to hear the Mailman is back.

For those who don't listen, the Around the NFL podcast is the NFL's main podcast. It's a good balance of analysis, content and irreverence.

The third man along, Chris Wesseling, recently had the all clear from oesophegal cancer.

Show is broadcast 3 times a week.

Great news isn't it, he's still got Chemo until January I believe but he's said he hopes to be on every week from now on. Probably my favourite podcast as well and one of the few I listen to at normal speed instead of 1.5!

Side note. If you're lucky enough to be able to bet at PP still they have been far bigger with anytime prices than anywhere else recently (I assume it's something to do with joining with bet fair) for example last night they had Gresham at 9/1 the best elsewhere was 9/2. So worth keeping an eye on them over the weekend and seeing if they keep it up. I'm hoping for over evens on Gronk anytime! That'll be the true test!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on November 11, 2017, 09:07:58 AM
An all injured reserve team. Would probably win it all!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on November 18, 2017, 11:10:05 AM
Tighty, what do you make of the Jerry Jones situation with Roger Goodell?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on November 18, 2017, 11:31:12 AM
not really a fan of JJ. A fantastic owner in some ways....negotiated own deals, most popular (and unpopular) franchise, terrifically profitable and valuable business and really helped transform the NFL off the field but not really an NFL GM and that has been reflected on rosters for many a year.

My main ire is reserved for Mara of the Giants though,what a piece of work he appears to be (could say the same about McNair at the texans, Blank at the falcons,Kraft at the Patriots..billionaire white owners and all hypocritical over various stuff)

that said Goodell is in danger of killing the golden goose. the disciplinary process is manifestly unfair. On Zeke he may well have a case to answer (only two people know,after all) but the way the sentence was decided was a joke, this after he said to Jnes that he wouldn't be suspended and then changed his mind (to be fair,Jones crowed publically which was daft). Of course the NFLPA gave the commissioner carte blanche in the 2011 CBA.

then there's declining ratings. handling of the national anthem problem, ray rice, josh brown, deflate-gate,sponsor problems,Kaepernick plus the biggie looming CTE/brain injury research etc

far easier to just watch college football for many fans without all the ancillary crap that Goodell has mishandled

so a tough season, a splintered NFL and a feud at a time when the NFL's long term prosperity looks more difficult



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on November 20, 2017, 10:49:09 AM
According to ESPN's win probability model, the Saints had a 0.2% chance of winning at their lowest point (1st and 10 at their own 45 with 4:42 in the 4th quarter). This was the biggest comeback since last season's Super Bowl.

The Saints are the 1st team to win a game after trailing by 15+ points with less than 3 minutes remaining in the 4th quarter since 2011 (Denver vs. Miami, Oct 23)



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on November 20, 2017, 10:51:06 AM
Bills Season Recap

McDermott: We're tanking. Pass on Watson & Mahomes.

Bills: We can still win with Tyrod.

McDermott: Get rid of his weapons like Woods/Watkins.

Bills: Defense still alright

McDermott: Ditch Dareus/Darby.

Bills: We still good.

McDermott: PUT. IN. PETERMAN.

Bills:


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on November 20, 2017, 07:30:26 PM
Easy to forget we were 5-2.



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on November 21, 2017, 09:14:52 AM
Raiders defense to enter Thanksgiving with zero interceptions. First team in NFL history without a pick after first 10 games. (Or nine. Or eight. Or seven.)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on November 21, 2017, 04:53:55 PM
Rams have scored over 301 points


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bergeroo on November 25, 2017, 05:21:21 PM
Anyone play on Draft Kings? I've won some tickets to the massive $4m guaranteed tournament ($1m for first) tomorrow, so I will be doing some research. You need guys playing well but also low owned to differentiate yourself from 60,000 teams. It is really important to get a unique team, so I'm going to be trying to find sneaky value plays and fading Tom Brady! Who does anyone like to have a good game in a non obvious spot? Will be doing a bunch of research myself, so will post my thoughts tomorrow...



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on November 25, 2017, 05:47:55 PM
Anyone play on Draft Kings? I've won some tickets to the massive $4m guaranteed tournament ($1m for first) tomorrow, so I will be doing some research. You need guys playing well but also low owned to differentiate yourself from 60,000 teams. It is really important to get a unique team, so I'm going to be trying to find sneaky value plays and fading Tom Brady! Who does anyone like to have a good game in a non obvious spot? Will be doing a bunch of research myself, so will post my thoughts tomorrow...



Kareem Hunt for your RB1 - Bills have been poor against the run without Dareus. Plus we should lose the game, so they'll be managing the clock.

Delanie Walker for TE - Colts can defend exactly one receiver per game. That will probably be Matthews. Easily see Davis being a bit indifferent and Mariota using Walker further down the field. Everyone gets yards through the air against Indy.

Hooper an alternative, given he's always on the field and the Falcons are projected to score a lot of points.

Dede Westbrook as a WR flyer against a fairly soft Arizona secondary, after Patrick Peterson. Looked ok last week.

Figuring stacking is the way forward? Never done DFS.

Good luck.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bergeroo on November 25, 2017, 06:31:46 PM
I figure you stack both sides of one match and hope for a high scorer. Try to find a couple of other players who perform well at low ownership. You can afford one or two chalky highly owned players but no more. And take a defence vs a favoured team and hope they shut them down. NFL is massive on DK but I only really play football (soccer)

Thanks for your thoughts, will take a look at the prices later.

Was considering taking Hunt and McCoy and hoping it stays close


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on November 25, 2017, 06:45:33 PM
I think Colts v Indy will be sneaky high scoring.

Brissett/Dalton (scored 4 vs the Browns last time they played) or Wilson (he's a magician)
TY (has big games at home in good match ups, all fits)
Walker/Kroft (scored 2 vs Browns in that game) or Jared Cook (broncos don't do TE)
agree with Dede as a flyer. He won't get P2 and the other person usually scores.
Jags D or Steelers but with it being the late game I don't think they will offer them.

I've got a league setup on DK if you fancy joining a weekly one - Hey! I’m playing in TouchdownTips invitational on DraftKings! Come join the league!
https://dkn.gs/r/XGgfEnV240WIoAaddm6A2g

Also got a friends and family sign up code if anyone wants to join ;)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on November 25, 2017, 06:57:34 PM
I think Colts v Indy will be sneaky high scoring.

Brissett/Dalton (scored 4 vs the Browns last time they played) or Wilson (he's a magician)
TY (has big games at home in good match ups, all fits)
Walker/Kroft (scored 2 vs Browns in that game) or Jared Cook (broncos don't do TE)
agree with Dede as a flyer. He won't get P2 and the other person usually scores.
Jags D or Steelers but with it being the late game I don't think they will offer them.

I've got a league setup on DK if you fancy joining a weekly one - Hey! I’m playing in TouchdownTips invitational on DraftKings! Come join the league!
https://dkn.gs/r/XGgfEnV240WIoAaddm6A2g

Also got a friends and family sign up code if anyone wants to join ;)

Have bet over on Mariota yards.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bergeroo on November 26, 2017, 03:28:33 AM
Cavey I'm in, let's do it.

As for Draft Kings. when I play football, I usually just plug in the keeper last with whatever money I have left. Does the same strategy apply for NFL, or do you target a defence and pick one that you think will have a good week? Isn't it somewhat random?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on November 26, 2017, 09:58:45 AM
Cavey I'm in, let's do it.

As for Draft Kings. when I play football, I usually just plug in the keeper last with whatever money I have left. Does the same strategy apply for NFL, or do you target a defence and pick one that you think will have a good week? Isn't it somewhat random?

I usually just make my way down the list and fill as I go. If there's a defence I want that's a little more than I've got I'll change up my roster slightly. Everything is match up based. If you happen to get a defence going against a new QB (Chargers last week) then it's well worth spending a little more for them. For this week I'd be looking Jags, Steelers, Ravens as my start points but two of them are off the main slate. Bengals vs the Browns is a good bet. Pats vs the Dolphins. They're probably the 9nes I'll be looking at for it.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bergeroo on November 26, 2017, 06:55:40 PM
Josh Reynolds to get some catches tonight for the Rams in a good match up with Saints players out injured?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on November 26, 2017, 06:59:29 PM
Sanu gets back at half time to see he has 5 missed calls from an Ohio number.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on November 27, 2017, 09:14:23 PM
Have been looking at 2018 mock drafts over the last couple of weeks.

Rich in franchise QB talent and one of the best safety drafts for a few years. Also two ProBowl level offensive linemen.

If San Francisco get the number 1 pick, it's a slam dunk they go for Saquon Barkley. They need a running back and he looks the real deal.

Everyone else wants a QB.

Apart from the Colts, who need everything else. And maybe a QB.

If Cleveland pick first, would you trade down with, say, Denver, let Elway have his pick of QBs, then take the stupendous LT Connor Williams at roughly pick 5, plus the Guard Quenton Nelson at 10ish, where they get Houston's pick?

Would be ballsy to use two top ten picks on the O-Line, but Kizer is not the reason this team keeps losing.

I'll be very disappointed if Tighty hasn't stipulated he needs a corner of DTD for his big board


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on November 29, 2017, 09:51:42 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPwci2gV4AAhME4.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on November 29, 2017, 09:58:03 AM
In an SI interview, Browns Josh Gordon admits to selling drugs, stealing many cars, armed robbery, getting shot, gang fighting, carrying his gun into high school - and lying to the SI writer in October about his drug use in the NFL

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2017/11/josh_gordon_opens_up_about_his.html


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Marky147 on November 29, 2017, 07:09:34 PM
In an SI interview, Browns Josh Gordon admits to selling drugs, stealing many cars, armed robbery, getting shot, gang fighting, carrying his gun into high school - and lying to the SI writer in October about his drug use in the NFL

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2017/11/josh_gordon_opens_up_about_his.html

Interesting read, and what a lunatic.

Thanks for posting, Tighty.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on December 02, 2017, 10:11:50 AM
Bill Belichick has the most coaching wins for the Cleveland Browns in the last 30 years

Belichick-34
Crennel- 24
Davis- 24

Carson- 11 Pettine- 10 Scottenheimer- 10 Mangini- 10 Shurmur- 9 Palmer- 5 Chudzinski- 4 Jackson- 1 Robiskie- 1 Shofner- 1


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on December 05, 2017, 06:24:08 PM
Am I the only one who thinks the Giants shouldn't start Eli now?

It's a shame his Giants career ends this way, but better to pull him out in a situation that's awful before they lose the last three games and it's even worse.

Might as well play Webb and see what you've got. If he's terrible, yuou get to pick a better one. If he's competent, you can trade high value or pick smartly.

Not like Eli is saving this season he's been playing in.



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: The Camel on December 05, 2017, 07:15:47 PM
Am I the only one who thinks the Giants shouldn't start Eli now?

It's a shame his Giants career ends this way, but better to pull him out in a situation that's awful before they lose the last three games and it's even worse.

Might as well play Webb and see what you've got. If he's terrible, yuou get to pick a better one. If he's competent, you can trade high value or pick smartly.

Not like Eli is saving this season he's been playing in.



Agree.

I agreed with the decision to bench Eli last week.

But play Geno? WTF? It was all very well carrying Geno as a backup while the Giants were actually playing live games. But playing him in a worthless game? If Geno is the answer, what on earth is the question?

Play Webb for the rest of the season, see what you've got. If it didn't go too well, bring Eli back for a farewell start in week 17.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on December 08, 2017, 09:33:19 AM
Browns

2009: Hire Mangini, fire Kokinis

2010: Hire Heckert

2011: Fire Mangini, hire Shurmur

2013: Fire Shurmur + Heckert, hire Lombardi + Chud

2014: Fire Lombardi + Chud, promote Farmer, hire Pettine

2016: Fire Farmer + Pettine, promote Brown, hire Hue

2017: Fire Brown

and they kept the man who led this

CLE starting QBs:

1 Kizer
2 Kizer, pull him, Hogan (11 att)
3 Kizer
4 Kizer, pull him, Hogan (8 att)
5 Kizer, pull him, Hogan (19 att)
6 Hogan
7 Kizer, pull him, Kessler (19 att)
8 Kizer
bye
10 Kizer, pull him, Kessler (3 att)
11 Kizer, pull him...


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on December 11, 2017, 01:01:51 AM
all the talk is of Wentz being out for season, i am heart broken here


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on December 11, 2017, 08:39:26 AM
Next time you think you are cold at a sporting occasion....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQt34kzV4AA8r5V.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on December 11, 2017, 08:48:35 AM

Astonishing photograph.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Newportlad on December 11, 2017, 09:41:30 AM
Next time you think you are cold at a sporting occasion....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQt34kzV4AA8r5V.jpg)

Considering crowd safety, how do these games go ahead?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: rinswun on December 11, 2017, 11:02:47 AM
all the talk is of Wentz being out for season, i am heart broken here

Absolutely brutal. He was sensational yesterday, even through a TD after taking the hit which has apparently ended his year. Sure fire MVP for me to this point too.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: AndrewT on December 11, 2017, 12:42:32 PM
Next time you think you are cold at a sporting occasion....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQt34kzV4AA8r5V.jpg)

In that kind of weather even a Newcastle fan might consider putting a jumper on.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on December 11, 2017, 01:30:49 PM
all the talk is of Wentz being out for season, i am heart broken here

Absolutely brutal. He was sensational yesterday, even through a TD after taking the hit which has apparently ended his year. Sure fire MVP for me to this point too.

I'm devastated at the news.  I just hope he fully recovers and is able to achieve the same levels again.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Graham C on December 11, 2017, 02:09:28 PM
That snow was incredible.  Do they have undersoil heating over there or was it too bad even for that to cope.   Amazing to watch them playing in it.

Shame about Wentz, any more news?  Deffo out for the rest of the season?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: KarmaDope on December 11, 2017, 04:10:54 PM
That snow was incredible.  Do they have undersoil heating over there or was it too bad even for that to cope.   Amazing to watch them playing in it.

Shame about Wentz, any more news?  Deffo out for the rest of the season?

Waiting for an MRI due today. Apparently the initial scans weren't conclusive. Here's hoping for good news!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on December 11, 2017, 05:52:05 PM
out for season confirmed

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2748659-carson-wentz-knee-injury-revealed-to-be-torn-acl-out-for-season


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on December 11, 2017, 06:13:19 PM
out for season confirmed

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2748659-carson-wentz-knee-injury-revealed-to-be-torn-acl-out-for-season

It's very sad for the young man. fwiw I think Foles will go really well.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on December 11, 2017, 06:57:17 PM
all the talk is of Wentz being out for season, i am heart broken here

Absolutely brutal. He was sensational yesterday, even through a TD after taking the hit which has apparently ended his year. Sure fire MVP for me to this point too.

Sure I'm in the minority, but it's been Brady for me. Belichick coach of the year.

Boring - Lord knows I'm fed up of it, as a Bills fan - but he's the GOAT and having as good a season as I can remember.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on December 11, 2017, 07:12:06 PM
all the talk is of Wentz being out for season, i am heart broken here

Absolutely brutal. He was sensational yesterday, even through a TD after taking the hit which has apparently ended his year. Sure fire MVP for me to this point too.

Sure I'm in the minority, but it's been Brady for me. Belichick coach of the year.

Boring - Lord knows I'm fed up of it, as a Bills fan - but he's the GOAT and having as good a season as I can remember.

Serious question, not having a dig, but what made you become a Bills fan?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on December 11, 2017, 07:16:17 PM
all the talk is of Wentz being out for season, i am heart broken here

Absolutely brutal. He was sensational yesterday, even through a TD after taking the hit which has apparently ended his year. Sure fire MVP for me to this point too.

Sure I'm in the minority, but it's been Brady for me. Belichick coach of the year.

Boring - Lord knows I'm fed up of it, as a Bills fan - but he's the GOAT and having as good a season as I can remember.

Serious question, not having a dig, but what made you become a Bills fan?

I used to watch the NFL in the early/mid nineties when it was on the TV. At the age I was, the name Buffalo Bills was most attractive, so, on hearing they were good, I was stuck with them.

Last got to the playoffs in 1999.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: arbboy on December 11, 2017, 08:05:26 PM
all the talk is of Wentz being out for season, i am heart broken here

Absolutely brutal. He was sensational yesterday, even through a TD after taking the hit which has apparently ended his year. Sure fire MVP for me to this point too.

Sure I'm in the minority, but it's been Brady for me. Belichick coach of the year.

Boring - Lord knows I'm fed up of it, as a Bills fan - but he's the GOAT and having as good a season as I can remember.

Serious question, not having a dig, but what made you become a Bills fan?

I used to watch the NFL in the early/mid nineties when it was on the TV. At the age I was, the name Buffalo Bills was most attractive, so, on hearing they were good, I was stuck with them.

Last got to the playoffs in 1999.

#wantedtobelikekevincadle.  I did as well in the early 90s when he was the greatest basketball coach in the UK.  Probably still is now in history.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on December 11, 2017, 08:10:48 PM
all the talk is of Wentz being out for season, i am heart broken here

Absolutely brutal. He was sensational yesterday, even through a TD after taking the hit which has apparently ended his year. Sure fire MVP for me to this point too.

Sure I'm in the minority, but it's been Brady for me. Belichick coach of the year.

Boring - Lord knows I'm fed up of it, as a Bills fan - but he's the GOAT and having as good a season as I can remember.

Serious question, not having a dig, but what made you become a Bills fan?

I used to watch the NFL in the early/mid nineties when it was on the TV. At the age I was, the name Buffalo Bills was most attractive, so, on hearing they were good, I was stuck with them.

Last got to the playoffs in 1999.

#wantedtobelikekevincadle.  I did as well in the early 90s when he was the greatest basketball coach in the UK.  Probably still is now in history.

http://www.newyorkupstate.com/buffalo-bills/index.ssf/2017/07/the_most_famous_buffalo_bills_fans_chad_michael_murray_wolf_blitzer_more.html


I've seen more impressive lists...


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: arbboy on December 11, 2017, 08:26:08 PM
all the talk is of Wentz being out for season, i am heart broken here

Absolutely brutal. He was sensational yesterday, even through a TD after taking the hit which has apparently ended his year. Sure fire MVP for me to this point too.

Sure I'm in the minority, but it's been Brady for me. Belichick coach of the year.

Boring - Lord knows I'm fed up of it, as a Bills fan - but he's the GOAT and having as good a season as I can remember.

Serious question, not having a dig, but what made you become a Bills fan?

I used to watch the NFL in the early/mid nineties when it was on the TV. At the age I was, the name Buffalo Bills was most attractive, so, on hearing they were good, I was stuck with them.

Last got to the playoffs in 1999.

#wantedtobelikekevincadle.  I did as well in the early 90s when he was the greatest basketball coach in the UK.  Probably still is now in history.

http://www.newyorkupstate.com/buffalo-bills/index.ssf/2017/07/the_most_famous_buffalo_bills_fans_chad_michael_murray_wolf_blitzer_more.html


I've seen more impressive lists...

Congrats on the bet btw.  It really is amazing watching a top level sport take place in such incredible conditions and watching the fans literally covered in snow sitting and watching it.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on December 12, 2017, 09:12:50 AM
Kicking in a blizzard could cost Adam Vinatieri a $500,000 incentive. He needs to hit at least 90% of his field goals this season to get it. He was at 95.7% before the Buffalo game. He's now at 88%.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on December 12, 2017, 12:09:26 PM
Not sure how to post it myself but there was a picture from a game maybe 15 years where Jeff Fisher was coaching on the sideline with icicles hanging from his moustache.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on December 17, 2017, 03:20:18 PM
Marvin Lewis is finally leaving the Bengals!!!!

I don't have a whole lot of bad to say about him unlike most of Bengal nation, he took them from awful to pretty good, I know they haven't won a playoff but at least they got there!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on December 17, 2017, 03:27:12 PM
Marvin Lewis is finally leaving the Bengals!!!!

I don't have a whole lot of bad to say about him unlike most of Bengal nation, he took them from awful to pretty good, I know they haven't won a playoff but at least they got there!

Supposedly an issue over the wages of his coaching staff. That should really help attract his successor!

Back to Dick Lebeau? :)

Who do you want to replace him?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on December 17, 2017, 04:09:21 PM
It's like an offensive based guy. Josh Mcdaniels would be nice but doubt he'll leave his cushy job in NE again. JON Grudin wouldn't be too bad either if WAS get rid of him.

Seems that the ST coach is in the running. They seem to employ from within so wouldn't be shocked if it was him.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on December 18, 2017, 08:51:22 AM

Is this all puff, Daddy?


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/american-football/42392238


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on December 22, 2017, 09:22:35 AM
Vince McMahon sold $100 million worth of WWE stock today to fund Alpha Entertainment, which he created, in part, to fund a pro football venture. Alpha Entertainment filed for 5 trademarks last week to the "XFL."

http://www.espn.co.uk/wwe/story/_/id/21840316/vince-mcmahon-sells-some-wwe-shares-fund-alpha-entertainment-llc


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on December 26, 2017, 07:27:58 PM
Playoff scenarios

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DR8pg5bX4AU0gWS?format=jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DR8qCvMWsAEqT9F?format=jpg)



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on December 27, 2017, 10:17:05 AM
never seen this publically before

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSAlS-7XcAA-ce2.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on December 29, 2017, 06:37:44 AM
League MVP

1. Who should win?
2. Who will win?

- Brady
- Gurley
- Donald
- Wentz
- Brown
- Bell
- Gronk
- Wilson
- Campbell
- Brees

Someone else?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: KarmaDope on December 29, 2017, 07:08:32 PM
1. Gurley.
2. Whoever the QB is in the Superbowl.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on December 29, 2017, 07:14:23 PM
1. Gurley.
2. Whoever the QB is in the Superbowl.

Foles surely not? hasnt played long enough


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: KarmaDope on December 29, 2017, 07:27:39 PM
1. Gurley.
2. Whoever the QB is in the Superbowl.

Foles surely not? hasnt played long enough

Sorry, winning QB.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: rinswun on December 29, 2017, 08:14:22 PM
Genuinely believed it should have been Wentz but tough to give it to a guy who only played 2/3rd of the season and misses the business end. As it is, Gurley would now be my choice.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on December 29, 2017, 08:51:13 PM
1. Gurley.
2. Whoever the QB is in the Superbowl.

Foles surely not? hasnt played long enough

Sorry, winning QB.

i refer the gentleman to the answer i gave previously


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Evilpengwinz on December 30, 2017, 11:31:05 AM
League MVP

1. Who should win?
2. Who will win?

- Brady
- Gurley
- Donald
- Wentz
- Brown
- Bell
- Gronk
- Wilson
- Campbell
- Brees

Someone else?

Brady - Probably between Brady and Gurley IMO.
Wentz - I can't see it happening because of the injury counting against him, but it wouldn't be a total shock either.
Wilson - With the demise of the Legion of Boom, lack of running game and terrible O-Line, I can see the case for Wilson being MVP, because they're probably a 3-13 team this year without him. However, he needs to make the playoffs, and even then it's hard to overlook performances such as the game against Jacksonville.
Brees - Could be argued that he's not even been the MVP of the Saints this year when they've got two backs who will almost certainly reach 3,000 yards from scrimmage between them. He's had a good season, but not an MVP season.
Gurley - Definitely in the conversation, not only for his statistical contribution but for how that also assists the development of Jared Goff. We could potentially look back in fifteen years at Jared Goff's career and wonder where he would've gone if it wasn't for Todd Gurley this season. Last season, Goff looked like a guy who could be out of the league within three years.
Bell - Don't think he's the best player on the team this year. Also don't think he's been better than Gurley.
Gronk - Availability will always be an issue for him, and I think his 1 game suspension will count against him much more than any injury.
Brown - Belongs in the conversation for certain. Like Wentz, injury might cost him.
Donald - DPOTY perhaps. Won't get the love he deserves because he's a defensive tackle for MVP. Maybe in the outside shot group.
Campbell - There's more chance of Jason Campbell winning it. He's had a good season, but so have AJ Bouye and Jalen Ramsay, so how much of their respective performances are down to which player? He's also played against Deshaun Watson Tom Savage, Andrew Luck Jacoby Brissett and Marcus Mariota who hasn't looked the same since his injury last year. 9 out of 14.5 sacks this season were against Houston and Indy in blowouts against poor QBs. No sacks of Rivers in Week 10, Wilson in Week 14 or Garoppolo in Week 16, despite the Jags' secondary. I don't think you can run up big sack numbers against poor teams and poor QBs and be in the MVP discussion because of it. Pro Bowl, yes. MVP, no. I don't think he's even been the best DE this year - IMO that man is Everson Griffen.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on January 01, 2018, 01:04:23 AM
Check out those Bills Tal.

oioi


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 01, 2018, 01:10:18 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSarWy6VwAAiRXn?format=jpg)

19 years out of the playoffs end.

Superb.



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on January 01, 2018, 09:50:53 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSarWy6VwAAiRXn?format=jpg)

19 years out of the playoffs end.

Superb.


Congratulations Tal some great Bills fan/player reaction videos doing the rounds online.I went to the ravens/Bengals home blowout and didn’t think we had a chance yesterday.Kevin Cadle will be smiling up there...


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on January 01, 2018, 10:21:10 AM


Seen on Twitter overnight;

Think about this. The phrase "The Bills are in the playoffs" has never been tweeted, posted on Facebook, or uttered by an Uber driver. It has never been told over satellite radio. It has never been streamed. It has never been blogged or vlogged. It has been faxed, though.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 01, 2018, 12:58:16 PM
Lions fire Jim Caldwell.

Got to be one of the more eyebrow-raising decisions on Black Monday.

The Lions have a good defense, three good wide receivers and a franchise QB, who has made a difficult transition from throwing to Megatron all the time to having to read fields and lead his team.

They're a running back and a couple of additions short of a very good team. Conveniently, this year's draft is rich in good running backs.

Odd decision.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on January 02, 2018, 10:22:23 PM
Marvin Lewis gets two year extension from the bengals.Think I’m going to cry..


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on January 02, 2018, 10:58:04 PM
Carson Palmer retires


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 03, 2018, 06:34:18 AM
Carson Palmer retires

Complete rebuild ahead there. Larry Fitzgerald next?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 03, 2018, 05:33:38 PM
Carson Palmer retires

Been posted before, I'm sure, but I remembered this article today:

https://www.si.com/mmqb/2015/11/17/nfl-carson-palmer-arizona-cardinals-inside-game-plan

Hard to equate these quarterbacks to premiership footballers. The sheer scale of learning for complete familiarity with a guy shouting "Turtle Right 3 A Hold West 7" and knowing what to do against zone, man or blitz.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on January 03, 2018, 05:39:04 PM
Carson Palmer retires

Been posted before, I'm sure, but I remembered this article today:

https://www.si.com/mmqb/2015/11/17/nfl-carson-palmer-arizona-cardinals-inside-game-plan

Hard to equate these quarterbacks to premiership footballers. The sheer scale of learning for complete familiarity with a guy shouting "Turtle Right 3 A Hold West 7" and knowing what to do against zone, man or blitz.


Umm, what exactly are you suggesting, Tal Bloke?


(http://i.imgur.com/btYGu68.jpg) (https://imgur.com/btYGu68)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 03, 2018, 06:04:26 PM
One name does spring to mind.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg0Ud-4Hj5M

In fairness, I'm sure he's made the point himself a number of times that footballers don't want to listen to stats and learn complex drills. They just want to play.

It's a different culture too.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 05, 2018, 06:53:31 AM
The beginning of the end for the Patriots?

http://www.espn.co.uk/nfl/story/_/page/hotread180105/beginning-end-new-england-patriots-robert-kraft-tom-brady-bill-belichick-internal-power-struggle

Feels optimistic.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: KarmaDope on January 06, 2018, 11:42:17 PM
I'm assuming this doesn't happen very often, no? Never mind when you're 21-3 down in the wild card game.

TD   M.Mariota 6 yd. pass from M.Mariota (R.Succop kick is good) Drive: 15 plays, 91 yards in 8:29

The fantasy NFL part of me is laughing...that's 10.84 points in one play.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 07, 2018, 12:11:24 AM
I'm assuming this doesn't happen very often, no? Never mind when you're 21-3 down in the wild card game.

TD   M.Mariota 6 yd. pass from M.Mariota (R.Succop kick is good) Drive: 15 plays, 91 yards in 8:29

The fantasy NFL part of me is laughing...that's 10.84 points in one play.

I'm confused though, he was way in front of the line of scrimmage when he threw it.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: KarmaDope on January 07, 2018, 12:34:07 AM
I'm assuming this doesn't happen very often, no? Never mind when you're 21-3 down in the wild card game.

TD   M.Mariota 6 yd. pass from M.Mariota (R.Succop kick is good) Drive: 15 plays, 91 yards in 8:29

The fantasy NFL part of me is laughing...that's 10.84 points in one play.

I'm confused though, he was way in front of the line of scrimmage when he threw it.

Nah, he was exactly on the line of scrimmage according to the replay.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 07, 2018, 12:37:52 AM
I'm assuming this doesn't happen very often, no? Never mind when you're 21-3 down in the wild card game.

TD   M.Mariota 6 yd. pass from M.Mariota (R.Succop kick is good) Drive: 15 plays, 91 yards in 8:29

The fantasy NFL part of me is laughing...that's 10.84 points in one play.

I'm confused though, he was way in front of the line of scrimmage when he threw it.

Nah, he was exactly on the line of scrimmage according to the replay.

Looked at least a yard ahead to me.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on January 07, 2018, 01:42:18 AM
I'm assuming this doesn't happen very often, no? Never mind when you're 21-3 down in the wild card game.

TD   M.Mariota 6 yd. pass from M.Mariota (R.Succop kick is good) Drive: 15 plays, 91 yards in 8:29

The fantasy NFL part of me is laughing...that's 10.84 points in one play.

Got to love plays like that. Brett Favres first career pass was to himself too.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: LeKnave on January 07, 2018, 11:39:38 AM
I'm assuming this doesn't happen very often, no? Never mind when you're 21-3 down in the wild card game.

TD   M.Mariota 6 yd. pass from M.Mariota (R.Succop kick is good) Drive: 15 plays, 91 yards in 8:29

The fantasy NFL part of me is laughing...that's 10.84 points in one play.

I'm confused though, he was way in front of the line of scrimmage when he threw it.

Nah, he was exactly on the line of scrimmage according to the replay.

Looked at least a yard ahead to me.

You only need part of your body on/behind the LOS, not where the ball is. His back foots easily on the line.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 07, 2018, 12:56:23 PM
I'm assuming this doesn't happen very often, no? Never mind when you're 21-3 down in the wild card game.

TD   M.Mariota 6 yd. pass from M.Mariota (R.Succop kick is good) Drive: 15 plays, 91 yards in 8:29

The fantasy NFL part of me is laughing...that's 10.84 points in one play.

I'm confused though, he was way in front of the line of scrimmage when he threw it.

Nah, he was exactly on the line of scrimmage according to the replay.

Looked at least a yard ahead to me.

You only need part of your body on/behind the LOS, not where the ball is. His back foots easily on the line.


Thanks mate, didn't know that. I had in my head from previous instances (quite a few years back) that it was about ball location. Agreed that it looks fine now.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on January 07, 2018, 01:04:56 PM
So you are 14-0 up after 12 minutes against a team with a sluggish offense, seemingly designed in 1955

You have the NFL rushing champion in your backfield and your all star TE is out with a concussion

You proceed to give your RB 4 carries in the last 3 quarters of the game

I mean,its not difficult is it?

go on to lose by a point at home


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 07, 2018, 01:09:10 PM
So you are 14-0 up after 12 minutes against a team with a sluggish offense, seemingly designed in 1955

You have the NFL rushing champion in your backfield and your all star TE is out with a concussion

You proceed to give your RB 4 carries in the last 3 quarters of the game

I mean,its not difficult is it?

go on to lose by a point at home

Getting outcoached by Mike Mullarkey is a sackable offence.

Jaw-dropping playcalling by both at times.

On the plus side, the road underdogs winning can't be a bad thing...


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 07, 2018, 04:19:27 PM
Looks like there will be a big Buffalo Bills presence in Jacksonville tonight. Huge numbers in the tailgate outside the stadium.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 07, 2018, 04:43:39 PM
Looks like there will be a big Buffalo Bills presence in Jacksonville tonight. Huge numbers in the tailgate outside the stadium.

As our resident Buffalo Bill.....What do you think betting wise? It's one of the few times I'm feeling good about backing the favourite and the unders on total points/point spread double. Both teams will have to stay with the run if it's anything like close, could get ugly late for the Bills if they have to go aerial.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 07, 2018, 07:39:34 PM
Looks like there will be a big Buffalo Bills presence in Jacksonville tonight. Huge numbers in the tailgate outside the stadium.

As our resident Buffalo Bill.....What do you think betting wise? It's one of the few times I'm feeling good about backing the favourite and the unders on total points/point spread double. Both teams will have to stay with the run if it's anything like close, could get ugly late for the Bills if they have to go aerial.

Sorry. Just seen this.

Aftertiming but low scoring and bortles being bortles, given the wind.

Not had a penny on. Draw at half time was 10/1.

Let's go Buffalo!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 07, 2018, 07:48:13 PM
Looks like there will be a big Buffalo Bills presence in Jacksonville tonight. Huge numbers in the tailgate outside the stadium.

As our resident Buffalo Bill.....What do you think betting wise? It's one of the few times I'm feeling good about backing the favourite and the unders on total points/point spread double. Both teams will have to stay with the run if it's anything like close, could get ugly late for the Bills if they have to go aerial.

Sorry. Just seen this.

Aftertiming but low scoring and bortles being bortles, given the wind.

Not had a penny on. Draw at half time was 10/1.

Let's go Buffalo!

Looks like the unders are safe. Good luck for Buffalo!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: bobby1 on January 08, 2018, 04:17:46 AM
Johnny Manziel has been offered a contract to play in the CFL for the Hamilton Tigercats who just traded away their former starting QB to get his contract off their books.

Not sure he would beat out Jeremiah Masoli for the starting job straight away but would be interesting to see if he still has the ability to play QB in a pro league. Will be a good landing spot too given the Ticats have decent WR's in Brandon Banks, Luke Tasker and Jaleen Saunders if they can keep them all in free agency.

 I know he's a knob but it would be great to see him make a comeback at a decent level.





Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on January 10, 2018, 07:38:48 PM
International series games announced tomorrow at 3.45pm..


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: arbboy on January 10, 2018, 07:43:50 PM
International series games announced tomorrow at 3.45pm..

Lot of tweets going around with the games named already.  Are they fake/mythical?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on January 10, 2018, 07:51:43 PM
International series games announced tomorrow at 3.45pm..

Lot of tweets going around with the games named already.  Are they fake/mythical?

Yes they are.

Although pro ably right on at least 2. I don't think we'll be getting 5 despite the hype around that.

I do think the Eagles will be over though and I believed the the Chargers had to have an international series game due to their move, as do the Raiders. With the Rams playing Mexico its likely they'll be home team for 2 of them. (apparently if you take hard knocks it nullifies the London game thing, which could be Chargers)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: arbboy on January 10, 2018, 07:54:28 PM
Pitt never giving up a home game though surely like the mythical tweets have said?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on January 10, 2018, 08:05:11 PM
I'd be surprised if they did!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 10, 2018, 08:07:49 PM
Pitt never giving up a home game though surely like the mythical tweets have said?

I'd be surprised if they do but don't rule it out against likely opponents. Could someone stick up the consensus of the tweet's on here? I'm a bit of a technophobe and don't really do Twitter. Much obliged.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on January 10, 2018, 08:33:12 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSH3YxaWsAAysSI.jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 10, 2018, 08:41:29 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSH3YxaWsAAysSI.jpg)

It just doesn't look realistic, does it. Potential #1 #2 Seeds playing teams as good as them at "home" in London. Raiders/Chargers would be good, the rest look unlikely imo.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 10, 2018, 09:25:01 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSH3YxaWsAAysSI.jpg)

It just doesn't look realistic, does it. Potential #1 #2 Seeds playing teams as good as them at "home" in London. Raiders/Chargers would be good, the rest look unlikely imo.

Agreed. No chance.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 10, 2018, 09:28:56 PM

What price would you want to bet the Packers next year?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 10, 2018, 10:09:48 PM

What price would you want to bet the Packers next year?

Super Bowl? Chunky price would be needed.

They're in a very competitive division, have no offensive line and are entirely reliant on a quarterback who is, granted, a baaaaaaad maaaan, but is also injury prone (see no offensive line). If they dont win enough games, the frozen tundra won't be available to them in the playoffs.

Detroit could be the team to keep an eye on in the North. Depends who they can bring in.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 10, 2018, 10:17:57 PM

What price would you want to bet the Packers next year?

Super Bowl? Chunky price would be needed.

They're in a very competitive division, have no offensive line and are entirely reliant on a quarterback who is, granted, a baaaaaaad maaaan, but is also injury prone (see no offensive line). If they dont win enough games, the frozen tundra won't be available to them in the playoffs.

Detroit could be the team to keep an eye on in the North. Depends who they can bring in.

Yep, agree. Will we get 25's? If The Baad Maaan still really wants it, he's just better, much better than anyone else. What price would tempt you? i think they'll be 14's.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 10, 2018, 10:50:42 PM

What price would you want to bet the Packers next year?

Super Bowl? Chunky price would be needed.

They're in a very competitive division, have no offensive line and are entirely reliant on a quarterback who is, granted, a baaaaaaad maaaan, but is also injury prone (see no offensive line). If they dont win enough games, the frozen tundra won't be available to them in the playoffs.

Detroit could be the team to keep an eye on in the North. Depends who they can bring in.

Yep, agree. Will we get 25's? If The Baad Maaan still really wants it, he's just better, much better than anyone else. What price would tempt you? i think they'll be 14's.

Funnily enough, the Westgate Sportsbook in Vegas opened a market yesterday.

NE 5/1
Pit 8/1
Phi 10/1
Min 10/1
GB 10/1
NO 16/1
Atl 16/1
Dal 18/1
LAR 18/1
Sea 18/1
SF 20/1
Jax 20/1
Hou 20/1
Car 20/1
LAC 30/1
KC 30/1
Oak 30/1
Det 40/1
TB 40/1
Bal 40/1
Ten 40/1
Ind 40/1
Ari 40/1
Den 40/1
NYG 60/1
Wsh 60/1
Mia 60/1

I couldn't touch 10/1 with stolen money. Philly are in a much more winnable division. Rodgers would need 40 touchdowns and 4,700 yards for that team to win the 11 games it would need for a bye.

Tennessee would be backable if they fired Malarkey and brought in a competent coach. I really think Baltimore are overrated. They've just beaten bad teams this year. Luckily they have two in their division.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 10, 2018, 11:00:50 PM

10's is very short, the whole market outside of Minnesota  looks priced on QB's. Looks like a New Orleans double at the prices:-). I'm max on this year and Brees will stil be elite next year. Backing Seattle, SF, LAR is burning money next year, we must be able to find an angle on that?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 10, 2018, 11:02:26 PM

10's is very short, the whole market outside of Minnesota (and Bortles) looks priced on QB's. Looks like a New Orleans double at the prices:-). I'm max on this year and Brees will stil be elite next year. Backing Seattle, SF, LAR is burning money next year, we must be able to find an angle on that?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 10, 2018, 11:06:07 PM
Also, Eli at Jacksonville would be interesting. It won't happen imo but looks an obvious one.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on January 11, 2018, 04:02:43 PM
Missed the start of the announcement, but I think this is the detail.

Week 6 - Seahawks @ Raiders - White Hart Lane

Weeks 7&8 (order TBC, both at Wembley):
Titans @ Chargers
Eagles @ Jaguars (GTFI!!!!)

Yippee!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: kukushkin88 on January 11, 2018, 04:06:06 PM
Missed the start of the announcement, but I think this is the detail.

Week 6 - Seahawks @ Raiders - White Hart Lane

Weeks 7&8 (order TBC, both at Wembley):
Titans @ Chargers
Eagles @ Jaguars (GTFI!!!!)

Yippee!

Sounds great! Good to see the Jags staying loyal to London and I guess the Raiders know next season won't be the one for them. Best line up yet by far.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on January 11, 2018, 04:14:25 PM
Sounds great! Good to see the Jags staying loyal to London and I guess the Raiders know next season won't be the one for them. Best line up yet by far.

Totally agree that it's the best line up.

Who are the other 5 teams again?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 11, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
Missed the start of the announcement, but I think this is the detail.

Week 6 - Seahawks @ Raiders - White Hart Lane

Weeks 7&8 (order TBC, both at Wembley):
Titans @ Chargers
Eagles @ Jaguars (GTFI!!!!)

Yippee!

Sideline reporter extrordinare reacts...


Samantha Quek

Well, the negative “the UK only get the games the US don’t want” crowd are put firmly back in their box! 5 out of 6 teams won at least 9 games this year and the other was the Raiders who the $100 Milion man Mr Gruden will sort out! GREAT LINE-UP #NFLUK #NoBlowOutsIn2018



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on January 11, 2018, 04:24:27 PM
Three good games for once.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: KarmaDope on January 11, 2018, 04:25:58 PM
I'm definitely going to Raiders/Seahawks.

If I can find the cash, also going to Eagles/Jags.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 11, 2018, 04:28:28 PM
Three good games for once.

Agreed, but there's a part of me that is thinking differently.

Titans v Chargers

Phil Rivers is told not to throw the ball for 3 quarters and then has to perform keyhole surgery with throws to what's left of his receivers.

On the other side, Malarkey is telling Mariota to do the opposite of what everyone in the crowd can see he should be doing.  

Could be a classic!

On the other hand, it's a heavily underrated O-line against an underrated front seven. That looks a good battle.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on January 11, 2018, 08:27:43 PM
Should be some cracking games, I'm even pondering a season ticket and driving down from Derby for them, convincing the wife to give me 3 weekends in a row could be a bit of effort though.

If they do season tickets anyway, few rumours they'll only do individual tickets. Worryingly also suggestions that Spurs season ticket holders may get first shot at the tickets there as well which is bullcrap. Hopefully it won't happen.

Obviously the Seahawks is going to be the most popular, and I'll be trying for that, but I love Philip Rivers so that game is my second choice.

Seems we only have 3 year as they want a soft launch on White Hart Lane (and wanted to see how back-to-back-to-back games go) and seems they may well replace our missing game this year without an extra one next year.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 11, 2018, 09:44:18 PM
Should be some cracking games, I'm even pondering a season ticket and driving down from Derby for them, convincing the wife to give me 3 weekends in a row could be a bit of effort though.

If they do season tickets anyway, few rumours they'll only do individual tickets. Worryingly also suggestions that Spurs season ticket holders may get first shot at the tickets there as well which is bullcrap. Hopefully it won't happen.

Obviously the Seahawks is going to be the most popular, and I'll be trying for that, but I love Philip Rivers so that game is my second choice.

Seems we only have 3 year as they want a soft launch on White Hart Lane (and wanted to see how back-to-back-to-back games go) and seems they may well replace our missing game this year without an extra one next year.

Oioi

In before "Has to be one benefit to a spurs season ticket"


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on January 12, 2018, 05:25:04 AM
I am going to see if I can get ticket for eagles game kill 2 bucket lists with one stone


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on January 14, 2018, 12:49:30 AM
2 more wins please


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 14, 2018, 02:39:05 PM
Now that's sarcasm!

Mike Pereira
@MikePereira

Reason for my silence was due to the fact that I left the production room and my computer for the bar and a couple of Titos. Wish I wouldn't have because it is clear the refs cost the Titans the game and they are the better team at least in the minds of those that are tweeting me

4:14 am · 14 Jan 2018



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on January 14, 2018, 08:59:10 PM
great game Jax@pitts


could we get a london rematch of the superbowl in october

PHI@JAX?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 14, 2018, 09:56:03 PM
NFL Research
@NFLResearch
1h

Ben Roethlisberger on 4th-and-1 rush attempts in his career, including playoffs:

19 attempts
18 first downs

Highest success rate (94.7 percent) of any player with over 10 attempts since 2004 (including playoffs)

Steelers on 4th-and-1 today:
0-for-2 (Bell run, Ben pass)



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on January 14, 2018, 10:08:27 PM
He audibles out of 4 4th down called run plays. Not always the coaching, though I thought Haley called an odd game too. Threw early too often


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on January 15, 2018, 01:13:21 AM
what a finish


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 17, 2018, 08:48:22 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DTmlqIyX4AEc80Y?format=jpg)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Doobs on January 17, 2018, 09:11:01 PM
NFL Research
@NFLResearch
1h

Ben Roethlisberger on 4th-and-1 rush attempts in his career, including playoffs:

19 attempts
18 first downs

Highest success rate (94.7 percent) of any player with over 10 attempts since 2004 (including playoffs)

Steelers on 4th-and-1 today:
0-for-2 (Bell run, Ben pass)



The perils of reading too much into some stats and a good example of how variance works.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 17, 2018, 09:12:53 PM
NFL Research
@NFLResearch
1h

Ben Roethlisberger on 4th-and-1 rush attempts in his career, including playoffs:

19 attempts
18 first downs

Highest success rate (94.7 percent) of any player with over 10 attempts since 2004 (including playoffs)

Steelers on 4th-and-1 today:
0-for-2 (Bell run, Ben pass)



The perils of reading too much into some stats and a good example of how variance works.

Well yes.

But also bizarre playcalling in not running it once on 4th down.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Doobs on January 17, 2018, 11:24:48 PM
NFL Research
@NFLResearch
1h

Ben Roethlisberger on 4th-and-1 rush attempts in his career, including playoffs:

19 attempts
18 first downs

Highest success rate (94.7 percent) of any player with over 10 attempts since 2004 (including playoffs)

Steelers on 4th-and-1 today:
0-for-2 (Bell run, Ben pass)



The perils of reading too much into some stats and a good example of how variance works.

Well yes.

But also bizarre playcalling in not running it once on 4th down.

I am not disputing the playcalling.  Just saying that the statistic is likely bad because he just got a bit lucky over the previous 19.  Now he has had a couple of bits of bad luck and he is 18/21; which I guess is still good, just not freakishly good. 

On the playcalls, they are just part of randomness too.  There are probably several bad playcalls by each coach in every game, but you don't notice them so much because teams will run good on some bad playcalls.  If the first one had come off, he'd be 19/20 and I don't think anyone would be saying, "let's call it 90% rather than 95% because the last playcall was bad".   


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: LeKnave on January 18, 2018, 12:04:55 AM
NFL Research
@NFLResearch
1h

Ben Roethlisberger on 4th-and-1 rush attempts in his career, including playoffs:

19 attempts
18 first downs

Highest success rate (94.7 percent) of any player with over 10 attempts since 2004 (including playoffs)

Steelers on 4th-and-1 today:
0-for-2 (Bell run, Ben pass)



The perils of reading too much into some stats and a good example of how variance works.

Well yes.

But also bizarre playcalling in not running it once on 4th down.

I am not disputing the playcalling.  Just saying that the statistic is likely bad because he just got a bit lucky over the previous 19.  Now he has had a couple of bits of bad luck and he is 18/21; which I guess is still good, just not freakishly good. 

On the playcalls, they are just part of randomness too.  There are probably several bad playcalls by each coach in every game, but you don't notice them so much because teams will run good on some bad playcalls.  If the first one had come off, he'd be 19/20 and I don't think anyone would be saying, "let's call it 90% rather than 95% because the last playcall was bad".   

Tal's point was that they didn't choose that high % option on either play, so his record remains at 18/19.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on January 18, 2018, 12:08:16 AM
NFL Research
@NFLResearch
1h

Ben Roethlisberger on 4th-and-1 rush attempts in his career, including playoffs:

19 attempts
18 first downs

Highest success rate (94.7 percent) of any player with over 10 attempts since 2004 (including playoffs)

Steelers on 4th-and-1 today:
0-for-2 (Bell run, Ben pass)



The perils of reading too much into some stats and a good example of how variance works.

Well yes.

But also bizarre playcalling in not running it once on 4th down.

I am not disputing the playcalling.  Just saying that the statistic is likely bad because he just got a bit lucky over the previous 19.  Now he has had a couple of bits of bad luck and he is 18/21; which I guess is still good, just not freakishly good. 

On the playcalls, they are just part of randomness too.  There are probably several bad playcalls by each coach in every game, but you don't notice them so much because teams will run good on some bad playcalls.  If the first one had come off, he'd be 19/20 and I don't think anyone would be saying, "let's call it 90% rather than 95% because the last playcall was bad".   

Oh sure, but it's a comically stark statistic, even if over a tiny sample.

To be clear, Roethlisberger didn't get to add to his 18/19 stat, because, when the situation arose, the demand from the sideline was to throw instead, including one inexplicably sideways. So, his record remains intact.

Big Ben is 6 foot 5 and 240lb. If he and half a dozen burly linemen can't get a yard of momentum, it's probably poor execution.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Doobs on January 18, 2018, 12:17:04 AM
NFL Research
@NFLResearch
1h

Ben Roethlisberger on 4th-and-1 rush attempts in his career, including playoffs:

19 attempts
18 first downs

Highest success rate (94.7 percent) of any player with over 10 attempts since 2004 (including playoffs)

Steelers on 4th-and-1 today:
0-for-2 (Bell run, Ben pass)



The perils of reading too much into some stats and a good example of how variance works.

Well yes.

But also bizarre playcalling in not running it once on 4th down.

I am not disputing the playcalling.  Just saying that the statistic is likely bad because he just got a bit lucky over the previous 19.  Now he has had a couple of bits of bad luck and he is 18/21; which I guess is still good, just not freakishly good. 

On the playcalls, they are just part of randomness too.  There are probably several bad playcalls by each coach in every game, but you don't notice them so much because teams will run good on some bad playcalls.  If the first one had come off, he'd be 19/20 and I don't think anyone would be saying, "let's call it 90% rather than 95% because the last playcall was bad".   

Tal's point was that they didn't choose that high % option on either play, so his record remains at 18/19.

It took me a while...  Got it. 



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on January 27, 2018, 06:05:32 PM
A week to go until Superbowl LII so it's time to have a look around at what's out there. I'm currently halfway through my preview on the big game, 1,500 words on the Eagles at the moment :/ And this is where I'm at so far...

Would you believe that the Pats haven't scored in the first quarter of ANY of their Superbowl wins? And this post-season they've only scored 3 points in the first qtr of the two post-season games this year too. - I think there's two ways to attack this, Eagles +0.5 at 4/5, or if you fancy the Pats to keep it tight... (They've conceded 7 and 0 this post-season, and obviously last SB was 0-0 at the end of the 1st) then u10 points on 365 is at 11/10.

In all of their Tom Brady Superbowl appearances, there has only been one winning margin of more than 4 points, that was last seasons OT win at 6 points. You can get a nice 2/1 on the "Any other result" on the tri-bet market on 365 at the moment (Either team to win by 5 or less, essentially)

Now, I know that, as the away team, the Eagles get to call the toss... I know that the Pats always call Heads and nearly always defer the kick, unfortunately I don't have such knowledge on the Eagles. I would assume they would want to defer as well, most teams these days prefer to receive at the start of the second half.

Obviously there's been a lot of conspiracy theories around the Patriots with regards to the refereeing and lack of penalties against them last week, Paddy seems to be wanting to take advantage of that, there were a few penalty based markets on there - Pats were set at o/u 6.5 penalties against. First team penalised for PI, the Pats were apparently more likely at 8/11, so the 1/1 on the Eagles doesn't seem too bad, I would expect Brady to try a few bombs to Cooks early on and it's usually those types of passes that flags are called on.

Gronk will play, I'd be amazed if he doesn't. You aren't often able to get odds against on him scoring anytime so 11/10 for him on Skybet is probably a decent value.

Think Mack Hollins or Trey Burton will catch a pass? If you do then they'll probably beat their lines of 9.5 and 3.5 respectively, again on PP.

Then, obviously... There's the stupid bets. (Post later in the week about them)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on January 27, 2018, 07:32:53 PM
It's Brent Celek o3.5 not Trey Burton, he's at 11.5, whoops.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on January 29, 2018, 08:21:07 AM
My preview is up now at TDTips.com - A lot in there so I'll forgive anyone who doesn't read through it all


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: KarmaDope on January 31, 2018, 08:27:00 AM
Please, anywhere but the Broncos for Kirk Cousins now that Washington traded for Alex Smith to replace him...


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on February 03, 2018, 06:06:52 PM
Please, anywhere but the Broncos for Kirk Cousins now that Washington traded for Alex Smith to replace him...

Had spent far too long putting together a mock 1st round draft when this broke.

Intention is to start the 18/19 thread with it on Monday, but it needs a major rework now, as I need to decide where Smith ends up.

Best laid plans..!


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on February 04, 2018, 08:05:05 AM
BBC or SKY for watching the eagles lift the super bowl tonight?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on February 04, 2018, 08:41:34 AM

Current temperature in Minneapolis?

Minus 17C

Sheesh.



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on February 04, 2018, 09:55:59 AM
BBC or SKY for watching the eagles lift the super bowl tonight?

Sky might be good this year. Neil Reynolds has been an upgrade as host and Jeff Reinebold explains systems well for the audience. They have good guests too.

I probably flick between the two, as the BBC coverage all year has been excellent.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: TightEnd on February 04, 2018, 09:59:12 AM
Cannot watch Neil Reynolds

BBC for me

in fact, as i don't want either team to win (its like Forest v Derby in the FA Cup final for me,no thanks), it might be the first one i won't stay up for in over 30 years


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on February 04, 2018, 01:01:28 PM
Other option is gamepass but its 2 minutes behind normally and i suspect facebook eagle groups to be sending me notifacations before i see our 7 tds


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: arbboy on February 04, 2018, 06:54:27 PM
http://www.espn.com/chalk/story/_/id/22307633/philadelphia-eagles-four-million-dollar-bets-placed-super-bowl-lii


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: rinswun on February 05, 2018, 01:05:15 AM
Heck of a play there, pulling off the trick play in an unusual spot to go for it on 4th down. Pederson has got some stones.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on February 05, 2018, 03:32:34 AM
OMG, it's finally happened.

What a game.  Hated 90% of it, or at least it felt that way at the time.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on February 05, 2018, 03:34:09 AM
WHAT A GAME, most offensive yards in any NFL game in history

Foles TD has to be one of the most audacious plays i have seen in that position 


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on February 05, 2018, 03:35:54 AM
Congrats gents!

Let's not forget though that this was the year the Bills made the playoffs.



Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Marky147 on February 05, 2018, 03:44:16 AM
Only seen ten, but by far the best.

Tal :D


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on February 05, 2018, 08:22:07 AM

Fabulous game, really enjoyed that.

Thought Belichick was most gracious in defeat, too, all things considered, taking the blame for the loss.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on February 05, 2018, 01:06:01 PM

I just saw a Tweet thing which - I think - suggested that Nick Foles has been traded to the Browns.

Did I read that correctly, or did I get whooshed?

What's that all about?


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Ironside on February 05, 2018, 01:28:40 PM
https://sports.theonion.com/doug-pederson-informs-nick-foles-hes-been-traded-to-bro-1822713684


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on February 05, 2018, 02:07:18 PM

I just saw a Tweet thing which - I think - suggested that Nick Foles has been traded to the Browns.

Did I read that correctly, or did I get whooshed?

What's that all about?

You both read it correctly and been whooshed.

It's a satirical news site, so not real.

The Eagles do have a headache now, though, as Foles is going to want a bit of money for his troubles and will know there are some teams who would like a starting QB. Plenty will be drafting one this spring and having a knowledgeable guy like Foles who probably doesn't have the ego to think, if the rookie turns out to be the franchise guy, he will be anything other than backup.

Wentz is under center in September. So, Foles either gets $10m to be number two or he leaves to start somewhere else for $15m


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Stopsleyhatter on February 05, 2018, 03:37:20 PM
Really enjoyed last night but was anybody else really disappointed in both teams defenses and special teams.Missus always says I’m a miserable bastard but other than offensively both teams were way below championship standard.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: tikay on February 05, 2018, 03:45:22 PM

I just saw a Tweet thing which - I think - suggested that Nick Foles has been traded to the Browns.

Did I read that correctly, or did I get whooshed?

What's that all about?

You both read it correctly and been whooshed.

It's a satirical news site, so not real.

The Eagles do have a headache now, though, as Foles is going to want a bit of money for his troubles and will know there are some teams who would like a starting QB. Plenty will be drafting one this spring and having a knowledgeable guy like Foles who probably doesn't have the ego to think, if the rookie turns out to be the franchise guy, he will be anything other than backup.

Wentz is under center in September. So, Foles either gets $10m to be number two or he leaves to start somewhere else for $15m

Ahh, thanks Tal Bloke.

So one way or another, Foles is gonna get the lot?

Good luck to him. He had one chance (since the playoffs began?) & seized it with both hands.

Got to admire that. 


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on February 05, 2018, 03:48:37 PM

I just saw a Tweet thing which - I think - suggested that Nick Foles has been traded to the Browns.

Did I read that correctly, or did I get whooshed?

What's that all about?

You both read it correctly and been whooshed.

It's a satirical news site, so not real.

The Eagles do have a headache now, though, as Foles is going to want a bit of money for his troubles and will know there are some teams who would like a starting QB. Plenty will be drafting one this spring and having a knowledgeable guy like Foles who probably doesn't have the ego to think, if the rookie turns out to be the franchise guy, he will be anything other than backup.

Wentz is under center in September. So, Foles either gets $10m to be number two or he leaves to start somewhere else for $15m

Ahh, thanks Tal Bloke.

So one way or another, Foles is gonna get the lot?

Good luck to him. He had one chance (since the playoffs began?) & seized it with both hands.

Got to admire that.  

It'd be a good time for the Eagles to sell, from a purely business standpoint. Foles has gelled well with the coaches and has been blessed by solid weapons and a superb offensive line.

He's unlikely to find that sort of home anywhere else, but that won't stop someone from overpaying.

For Foles personally, it's impossible not to be full of delight. He's been called a no hoper, cast aside by a long list of teams, coaches and general managers. Whatever else happens in his life, he will always be a Super Bowl MVP.


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Cavey007 on February 05, 2018, 04:10:04 PM
Really enjoyed last night but was anybody else really disappointed in both teams defenses and special teams.Missus always says I’m a miserable bastard but other than offensively both teams were way below championship standard.

I didn't actually enjoy the game with more total offense than any other in history. It was probably because I had money on the Pats from preseason that would have been nice, and I was probably just annoyed they couldn't stop a single pass. But the lack of any kind of defence from either team was shocking and very surprising given the seasons they'd had.

It was a great game, I just couldn't really get into it for some reason. Well played to the Eagles, was a lot of hype from the sharps at the start of the season that I didn't really get... I'll pay attention to that next off season!

Foles is in a weird situation as Tal said, either way he's going to be making decent money somewhere even if he does revert to being a bridge QB with the plan of bringing on a rookie. All depends on Wentz recovery to whether they keep him I guess. If he looks like he'll make training camp I guess they'll see what they can get for him, either way he'll be making 15+ (I'm sure Glennon was on 17m this year and he was garbage)


Title: Re: NFL 2017-18 season
Post by: Tal on February 05, 2018, 11:05:39 PM
2018/19 thread is up, starting with a first round mock draft:

http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=68046.0