blonde poker forum

Community Forums => The Lounge => Topic started by: neeko on February 22, 2020, 04:06:22 PM



Title: COVID19
Post by: neeko on February 22, 2020, 04:06:22 PM
So this virus will either kill half a million people in the uk or will be the biggest amount of hype since Corbyn election victory.

Does anyone have any interesting links to either the basic science or infection rates in different  countries?

The Chinese raw data is here

http://garnetcdn.migu.cn/lovebridge.html (http://garnetcdn.migu.cn/lovebridge.html)

Chinese data is of course impressionistic, linked to the truth but not exactly reflective of reality.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bergeroo on February 24, 2020, 11:17:16 AM
Very difficult to know how much is being hidden here with two of the hotspots being China and now Iran.

I have a trip booked to Asia on March 11th. Most of the poker festivals have been cancelled for the trip already. Was planning to go to Taiwan, South Korea, Vietnam and Japan.

Not actually worried about getting the virus, but seems like it might not be such a fun trip. Lots of events cancelled, travel between countries maybe further restricted in the future. Certainly could be further outbreaks, developments in these countries over the next two months. May end up having to be in quarantine on my return or getting stranded?

Seems like I should knock the trip on the head at this point and go a different time there or travel somewhere else now.

Any opinions. I am submitting to fearmongering and hysteria?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on February 24, 2020, 12:28:05 PM
Very difficult to know how much is being hidden here with two of the hotspots being China and now Iran.

I have a trip booked to Asia on March 11th. Most of the poker festivals have been cancelled for the trip already. Was planning to go to Taiwan, South Korea, Vietnam and Japan.

Not actually worried about getting the virus, but seems like it might not be such a fun trip. Lots of events cancelled, travel between countries maybe further restricted in the future. Certainly could be further outbreaks, developments in these countries over the next two months. May end up having to be in quarantine on my return or getting stranded?

Seems like I should knock the trip on the head at this point and go a different time there or travel somewhere else now.

Any opinions. I am submitting to fearmongering and hysteria?

I think life is rather good fun and so I'd err on the side of over caution and not take any risk by travelling to parts of Asia at the moment.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on February 24, 2020, 12:45:43 PM
Coronavirus is an anagram of carnivorous.

Not quite up there with Colin Wanker but just thought I'd put it out there.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: 4KSuited on February 24, 2020, 12:50:53 PM
With significant outbreaks in South Korea (who knows what’s happening in the North?), Iran and now Italy, it seems likely that Covid19 will achieve official pandemic status in the very near future.

From everything I’ve read, it seems the fatalities are almost exclusively among the elderly, and in particular those with pre-existing health conditions. Symptoms for those under aged 45 are relatively mild. However, if there is a major infection rate here in the UK, the consequences will be yet more draining of already stretched NHS resources. So, if you’re not a victim of Covid, but in need of an NHS bed for an equally or more serious condition, you could be in trouble.

As for travel to the Far East, I think I’d make use of my travel insurance and cancel it until we’re on the other side of this.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on February 24, 2020, 01:13:31 PM
With significant outbreaks in South Korea (who knows what’s happening in the North?), Iran and now Italy, it seems likely that Covid19 will achieve official pandemic status in the very near future.

From everything I’ve read, it seems the fatalities are almost exclusively among the elderly, and in particular those with pre-existing health conditions. Symptoms for those under aged 45 are relatively mild. However, if there is a major infection rate here in the UK, the consequences will be yet more draining of already stretched NHS resources. So, if you’re not a victim of Covid, but in need of an NHS bed for an equally or more serious condition, you could be in trouble.

As for travel to the Far East, I think I’d make use of my travel insurance and cancel it until we’re on the other side of this.


I have trips booked to Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam leaving on March 13th. I doubt the insurance would shell out unless the Government advise against travel.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bergeroo on February 24, 2020, 03:34:56 PM
With significant outbreaks in South Korea (who knows what’s happening in the North?), Iran and now Italy, it seems likely that Covid19 will achieve official pandemic status in the very near future.

From everything I’ve read, it seems the fatalities are almost exclusively among the elderly, and in particular those with pre-existing health conditions. Symptoms for those under aged 45 are relatively mild. However, if there is a major infection rate here in the UK, the consequences will be yet more draining of already stretched NHS resources. So, if you’re not a victim of Covid, but in need of an NHS bed for an equally or more serious condition, you could be in trouble.

As for travel to the Far East, I think I’d make use of my travel insurance and cancel it until we’re on the other side of this.


I have trips booked to Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam leaving on March 13th. I doubt the insurance would shell out unless the Government advise against travel.

Yeah I also doubt the insurance will shell out at this stage unfortunately. Depending on your airline you may be able to reschedule or even cancel your flights. For myself I have nothing else booked so being a last minute planner has advantages in this case. But I am sure you will have lots of other things arranged.

I guess it all depends on how you think it might impact on the enjoyment of your trip. Obviously the problem is that things could escalate quickly, we just don't know what will happen.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 24, 2020, 04:04:28 PM
Given the spread of the disease already I don't think there will be many places you could go to and avoid the disease in a month or two.  So I think it must be a preference to go places with good medical treatment that you are covered for.  If you are going for a week or two I don't think it matters too much if you are young and can get back on the plane.   If you haven't got travel insurance, I'd get it sooner rather than later (either for cancellations or medical/evacuation bils).


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on February 24, 2020, 04:16:21 PM
Given the spread of the disease already I don't think there will be many places you could go to and avoid the disease in a month or two.  So I think it must be a preference to go places with good medical treatment that you are covered for.  If you are going for a week or two I don't think it matters too much if you are young and can get back on the plane.   If you haven't got travel insurance, I'd get it sooner rather than later (either for cancellations or medical/evacuation bils).


I always buy insurance immediately after booking the trip. No point in buying it after things go pear-shaped.

I booked my trip a few days before the COVID 19 story broke.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on February 24, 2020, 05:48:54 PM
Why does this feel more worthy of concern than say Flu which picks off loads of old and people with pre-existing conditions year after year.

Is it as simple as 'we don't have a vaccine' so we worry more or does it transmit more readily, or are there more reasons why we should be more concerned than we are about flu (I mean zillions of people don't bother with flu jabs despite the evidence all around that it can be quite serious).


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 24, 2020, 05:55:51 PM
Why does this feel more worthy of concern than say Flu which picks off loads of old and people with pre-existing conditions year after year.

Is it as simple as 'we don't have a vaccine' so we worry more or does it transmit more readily, or are there more reasons why we should be more concerned than we are about flu (I mean zillions of people don't bother with flu jabs despite the evidence all around that it can be quite serious).

Even though it's only the very young, the very old and the people with underlying health conditions that are at risk, the death rate of this is almost certainly quite a bit worse than flu.  What the actual real death rate is at the moment we don't know because all the figures are highly manipulated.  You don't die immediately from it, it takes a certain amount of time so you have to measure deaths today vs infections from say 7 days ago? 10 days ago? 14 days ago?.  The longer it takes to kill you the worse the rate in reality is.  This is clearly also contagious, much more so than something like Ebola. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on February 24, 2020, 06:00:12 PM
Why does this feel more worthy of concern than say Flu which picks off loads of old and people with pre-existing conditions year after year.

Is it as simple as 'we don't have a vaccine' so we worry more or does it transmit more readily, or are there more reasons why we should be more concerned than we are about flu (I mean zillions of people don't bother with flu jabs despite the evidence all around that it can be quite serious).

Hard to believe.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on February 24, 2020, 06:16:50 PM
Why does this feel more worthy of concern than say Flu which picks off loads of old and people with pre-existing conditions year after year.

Is it as simple as 'we don't have a vaccine' so we worry more or does it transmit more readily, or are there more reasons why we should be more concerned than we are about flu (I mean zillions of people don't bother with flu jabs despite the evidence all around that it can be quite serious).

Even though it's only the very young, the very old and the people with underlying health conditions that are at risk, the death rate of this is almost certainly quite a bit worse than flu.  What the actual real death rate is at the moment we don't know because all the figures are highly manipulated.  You don't die immediately from it, it takes a certain amount of time so you have to measure deaths today vs infections from say 7 days ago? 10 days ago? 14 days ago?.  The longer it takes to kill you the worse the rate in reality is.  This is clearly also contagious, much more so than something like Ebola. 

Of course, yes & thanks. Flu death rate stats are far far lower than this virus, that'll do it.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 24, 2020, 07:02:36 PM
Why does this feel more worthy of concern than say Flu which picks off loads of old and people with pre-existing conditions year after year.

Is it as simple as 'we don't have a vaccine' so we worry more or does it transmit more readily, or are there more reasons why we should be more concerned than we are about flu (I mean zillions of people don't bother with flu jabs despite the evidence all around that it can be quite serious).

Even though it's only the very young, the very old and the people with underlying health conditions that are at risk, the death rate of this is almost certainly quite a bit worse than flu.  What the actual real death rate is at the moment we don't know because all the figures are highly manipulated.  You don't die immediately from it, it takes a certain amount of time so you have to measure deaths today vs infections from say 7 days ago? 10 days ago? 14 days ago?.  The longer it takes to kill you the worse the rate in reality is.  This is clearly also contagious, much more so than something like Ebola. 

I thought this, but saw a respected source saying that the number of infections is also likely to be significantly understated as lots of young people won't think they had it or won't report as symptoms can be mild/zero.

And of course there will always be people who realise that they have it but will think keeping quiet is the best option... 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 24, 2020, 07:26:09 PM
I thought this, but saw a respected source saying that the number of infections is also likely to be significantly understated as lots of young people won't think they had it or won't report as symptoms can be mild/zero.

And of course there will always be people who realise that they have it but will think keeping quiet is the best option...  

Yes, that is fair.  We don't know the true figures and can't be sure either way.   I read the figures in China were being heavily manipulated to keep reported deaths down by not marking them as Coronavirus deaths unless a lengthy and complex test had come back as positive before the person died.  I cannot even put that down to a "respected" source though.

It appears to be a fact that Italy are now attributing 7 deaths to Coronavirus https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-news-uk-china-italy-outbreak-death-toll/.  All were either elderly or had health problems.  What does that mean for the death rate?  How many people were infected in Italy a week ago or 10 days ago?  How long does it take to die from this thing? I have no idea of the real answers to those questions.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 24, 2020, 07:36:32 PM
As long as nobody in the medical day unit has it where I go for my infusion Weds afternoon, I'm not too worried down here in dark Dorchester.

I never get the flu jab, as it's a pain in the ass loading my wheelchair in/out of the car and going to sit in the Dr's surgery for an hour of an evening where there are probably more germs than I'll come into contact with the whole winter.

Worst flu I've ever had was colombian, anyway.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on February 24, 2020, 08:26:30 PM
Why does this feel more worthy of concern than say Flu which picks off loads of old and people with pre-existing conditions year after year.

Is it as simple as 'we don't have a vaccine' so we worry more or does it transmit more readily, or are there more reasons why we should be more concerned than we are about flu (I mean zillions of people don't bother with flu jabs despite the evidence all around that it can be quite serious).

Even though it's only the very young, the very old and the people with underlying health conditions that are at risk, the death rate of this is almost certainly quite a bit worse than flu.  What the actual real death rate is at the moment we don't know because all the figures are highly manipulated.  You don't die immediately from it, it takes a certain amount of time so you have to measure deaths today vs infections from say 7 days ago? 10 days ago? 14 days ago?.  The longer it takes to kill you the worse the rate in reality is.  This is clearly also contagious, much more so than something like Ebola. 

Of course, yes & thanks. Flu death rate stats are far far lower than this virus, that'll do it.

To give numbers - flu is usually about 0.05% death rate, and the Wuhan Virus is about 2 or 3%

In terms of infectiousness a person with flu usually infects about 1 other person, but with the Wuhan Virus it's more like 3 or 4 people.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on February 24, 2020, 09:14:38 PM
Why does this feel more worthy of concern than say Flu which picks off loads of old and people with pre-existing conditions year after year.

Is it as simple as 'we don't have a vaccine' so we worry more or does it transmit more readily, or are there more reasons why we should be more concerned than we are about flu (I mean zillions of people don't bother with flu jabs despite the evidence all around that it can be quite serious).

Even though it's only the very young, the very old and the people with underlying health conditions that are at risk, the death rate of this is almost certainly quite a bit worse than flu.  What the actual real death rate is at the moment we don't know because all the figures are highly manipulated.  You don't die immediately from it, it takes a certain amount of time so you have to measure deaths today vs infections from say 7 days ago? 10 days ago? 14 days ago?.  The longer it takes to kill you the worse the rate in reality is.  This is clearly also contagious, much more so than something like Ebola. 

Of course, yes & thanks. Flu death rate stats are far far lower than this virus, that'll do it.

To give numbers - flu is usually about 0.05% death rate, and the Wuhan Virus is about 2 or 3%

In terms of infectiousness a person with flu usually infects about 1 other person, but with the Wuhan Virus it's more like 3 or 4 people.

Cheers, sometimes the obvious just doesn't smack you in the face - looked up death rates and could see the %  was way lower than the 2% that stuck in my mind for this one.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 24, 2020, 09:22:51 PM
The mortality rate looks to be about the same as Spanish Flu, which was seriously bad for the World back in the day.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu)

I think we should expect a lower mortality rate here because our health service is still pretty good despite the recent issues with funding and staffing. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 25, 2020, 02:25:12 PM
Is this study or source reputable? (I don't know the answer to that, I saw it linked on another forum)

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.18.20024539v1

Published recently.  It says the death rate is 4.8% "the mortality rate of patients with 2019-nCoV infection was 4.8%".


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Royal Flush on February 25, 2020, 02:46:44 PM
The problem with using mortality rates and confirmed cases is we ignore as yet unknown but suspected to be huge % of people who have covid and never know.

Personally i've taken the not worrying approach, i may get it, if i do i'm fortunate enough to be healthy and so suspect i may have flu like symptons for a few days.

In terms of event organisers etc its a nightmare, i've also had a trip to Korea cancelled, they are trying to re arrange for mid April but given the escalating situation in Korea this seems unlikely. Again they are not to worried about the health situation but more the travel restrictions people would be under both going and returning.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 25, 2020, 03:00:35 PM
Personally i've taken the not worrying approach, i may get it, if i do i'm fortunate enough to be healthy and so suspect i may have flu like symptons for a few days.

That's the approach I've taken, and I'm not healthy :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on February 25, 2020, 08:20:54 PM
Science wife has been very excited by this virus - her very favourite parts of her degree were the things that kill people and how they are spread.

Is this study or source reputable? (I don't know the answer to that, I saw it linked on another forum)

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.18.20024539v1

Published recently.  It says the death rate is 4.8% "the mortality rate of patients with 2019-nCoV infection was 4.8%".

She says that it's basically as good as it gets. With an outbreak like this there hasn't been enough time to do thorough peer reviewed papers and get them published so papers like this will be rushed out and the good and bad sorted out later.
(That isn't a slight on the authors - the emphasis is to get as much information out as quickly as possible to help - the one's that get things wrong will often publish their own redactions when it's time to do so; for now it's about getting information out).

If it's right then that is a bit higher than others current estimates - but it would still mean that over 95% of people who get infected will recover. From a statistical point of view I also noticed that the meta-analysis they did covered about 50k patients and that they were nearly all Chinese. That would be a very significant proportion of all the Chinese patients, given they extracted this data from other papers that have already been published I would have thought it was more likely that some of these studies had over-lapping samples. If those samples had unusually high mortality rates then it would have affected the overall average.

The problem with using mortality rates and confirmed cases is we ignore as yet unknown but suspected to be huge % of people who have covid and never know....

She also says they do take this in to account. With every disease there is never an exact number of infections and deaths, there are always just estimates and they will just keep on revising the estimates to make it as accurate as possible.

Additionally - the most likely cause for under reporting is that the symptoms were mild and recovery was straightforward. i.e. the most likely result of under reporting would mean that the infection rate was higher and the fatality rate was lower.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 26, 2020, 02:50:15 PM
Ireland v Italy six nations due for next weekend has now been postponed.  100% a pandemic now.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-news-latest-italy-uk-china-tenerife-death-toll/


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 26, 2020, 04:11:21 PM
Ireland v Italy six nations due for next weekend has now been postponed.  100% a pandemic now.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-news-latest-italy-uk-china-tenerife-death-toll/

Feels a bit of an overeaction, though guess the 6 nations is knackered now?  They can't play Italy/England after this?   Cheltenham cancellation is about 3/1 now according to the Guardian (can't be arsed checking betfair as it will just make me grumpy).

The parents at my kids school are flapping as there was a school trip to a non quarantined part of Italy at half term.  There are thousands of kids there and some could have been to worse parts of Italy, Tenerife, Hong Kong etc.   You can't close every school in the country because of this.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 26, 2020, 04:18:45 PM
Ireland v Italy six nations due for next weekend has now been postponed.  100% a pandemic now.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-news-latest-italy-uk-china-tenerife-death-toll/

Feels a bit of an overeaction, though guess the 6 nations is knackered now?  They can't play Italy/England after this?   Cheltenham cancellation is about 3/1 now according to the Guardian (can't be arsed checking betfair as it will just make me grumpy).

The parents at my kids school are flapping as there was a school trip to a non quarantined part of Italy at half term.  There are thousands of kids there and some could have been to worse parts of Italy, Tenerife, Hong Kong etc.   You can't close every school in the country because of this.

Knew I shouldn't have looked, Cheltenham cancellation is 2/1 on betfair now.   Looks a lay to me.  Surely it can't get so bad in 2 weeks?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 26, 2020, 04:35:10 PM
Ireland v Italy six nations due for next weekend has now been postponed.  100% a pandemic now.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-news-latest-italy-uk-china-tenerife-death-toll/

Feels a bit of an overeaction, though guess the 6 nations is knackered now?  They can't play Italy/England after this?   Cheltenham cancellation is about 3/1 now according to the Guardian (can't be arsed checking betfair as it will just make me grumpy).

The parents at my kids school are flapping as there was a school trip to a non quarantined part of Italy at half term.  There are thousands of kids there and some could have been to worse parts of Italy, Tenerife, Hong Kong etc.   You can't close every school in the country because of this.

Knew I shouldn't have looked, Cheltenham cancellation is 2/1 on betfair now.   Looks a lay to me.  Surely it can't get so bad in 2 weeks?

Somebody with flu infects 1 other person on average, for Covid-19 it's about 4-5 other people on average.  As another poster pointed out a death rate of 4-5% is not going to be the end of the world but it is nasty and imo Cheltenham and the Grand National are likely to be called off.  The cat is definitely out of the bag now.  Football fans in Manchester are probably wondering if this thing can stop Liverpool winning the league 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 26, 2020, 04:38:21 PM
Ireland v Italy six nations due for next weekend has now been postponed.  100% a pandemic now.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-news-latest-italy-uk-china-tenerife-death-toll/

Feels a bit of an overeaction, though guess the 6 nations is knackered now?  They can't play Italy/England after this?   Cheltenham cancellation is about 3/1 now according to the Guardian (can't be arsed checking betfair as it will just make me grumpy).

The parents at my kids school are flapping as there was a school trip to a non quarantined part of Italy at half term.  There are thousands of kids there and some could have been to worse parts of Italy, Tenerife, Hong Kong etc.   You can't close every school in the country because of this.

Knew I shouldn't have looked, Cheltenham cancellation is 2/1 on betfair now.   Looks a lay to me.  Surely it can't get so bad in 2 weeks?

Somebody with flu infects 1 other person on average, for Covid-19 it's about 4-5 other people on average.  As another poster pointed out a death rate of 4-5% is not going to be the end of the world but it is nasty and imo Cheltenham and the Grand National are likely to be called off.  The cat is definitely out of the bag now.  Football fans in Manchester are probably wondering if this thing can stop Liverpool winning the league 

Get backing Cheltenham cancellation on betfair please.   

The mortality rate is very unlikely to be 4-5% on known figures. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 26, 2020, 04:53:44 PM
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/horse-racing/market/1.169321914

Quite a liquid market already, yes putting on here.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on February 26, 2020, 05:26:57 PM
Just spent the last 2 and a half weeks in the Philippines (landed back this morning), everything was fine.

I'd say to anyone with trips to Asia on the horizon to crack on and enjoy it, take advantage of fewer tourists with the Chinese essentially currently unable to travel.

Had a 100m stretch of beach in Boracay all to myself most days, absolute bliss.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 26, 2020, 06:42:34 PM
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/horse-racing/market/1.169321914

Quite a liquid market already, yes putting on here.

Should have kept my trap shut.   Has gone in from 1.5 to 1.4 and not a cent laid by me.  Now I just have to sweat the official announcement and some thief coming along to steal my money...


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 26, 2020, 06:56:11 PM
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/horse-racing/market/1.169321914

Quite a liquid market already, yes putting on here.

Should have kept my trap shut.   Has gone in from 1.5 to 1.4 and not a cent laid by me.  Now I just have to sweat the official announcement and some thief coming along to steal my money...

:D

Prob 'anti-tilt' punters firing off?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 26, 2020, 06:59:40 PM
Interview given by Ian Renton saying it will be on

https://twitter.com/AtTheRaces/status/1232643814172635138


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 26, 2020, 07:58:23 PM
(https://assets.thaivisa.com/forum/uploads/monthly_2020_01/received_189629492433302.jpeg.dbbc3d0cf25ada8c69b74ad6e30c14fe.jpeg)

Stay thirst, my friends!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: I KNOW IT on February 26, 2020, 09:30:54 PM
Life in China during Covid 19.   
I will get around to writing my account at some point . 
Here we have been dealing with it for approximately a month and I believe what China has done to contain it is exemplary and I doubt any other county in the world could have put the whole place in lockdown to contain it as China has done

Someone mentioned that that the UK couldn’t close down all the schools in the country  to help contain it , but  that’s exactly what China has done.  At this time schools are due to reopen on March 16th but that could be extended as it has been on 2 previous occasions


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on February 26, 2020, 09:38:58 PM
Life in China during Covid 19.   
I will get around to writing my account at some point . 
Here we have been dealing with it for approximately a month and I believe what China has done to contain it is exemplary and I doubt any other county in the world could have put the whole place in lockdown to contain it as China has done

Someone mentioned that that the UK couldn’t close down all the schools in the country  to help contain it , but  that’s exactly what China has done.  At this time schools are due to reopen on March 16th but that could be extended as it has been on 2 previous occasions


Good man Craig. I've been waiting to get the inside story from from our China correspondent.


 ;popcorn;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 26, 2020, 11:06:47 PM
"It's only the old and ill who will die" - Long term complications of getting Covid 19 include 35% chance of irreversible pulmonary fibrosis.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.18.20024539v1.full.pdf


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 26, 2020, 11:15:09 PM
Get backing Cheltenham cancellation on betfair please.  

I did at 3.70.  No doubt there is a good chance it goes ahead but those thinking there is almost no chance this gets cancelled have their head in the sand.  This is already a pandemic but strong containment is working in China.  The same will have to happen everywhere, if cases continue to rise then strong containment in the UK is incoming.

(https://i.postimg.cc/Zqh80hsC/cheltgoahead.jpg)



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 27, 2020, 01:16:11 AM
"It's only the old and ill who will die" - Long term complications of getting Covid 19 include 35% chance of irreversible pulmonary fibrosis.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.18.20024539v1.full.pdf

It doesn't say that anywhere in your link, and it seems a bold claim so early in the lifetime of this virus.

 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 27, 2020, 01:18:03 AM
"It's only the old and ill who will die" - Long term complications of getting Covid 19 include 35% chance of irreversible pulmonary fibrosis.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.18.20024539v1.full.pdf

It doesn't say that anywhere in your link, and it seems a bold claim so early in the lifetime of this virus.

 

Gaohong Sheng et al. [20] have shown that viral infection can increase the risk of pulmonary fibrosis.Xie et al. [21] found that 45% of patients
showed signs of pulmonary fibrosis within one month after being infected with SARS-CoV.Hui et al. [22] found that 36% and 30% of patients
infected with SARS-CoV developed pulmonary fibrosis at 3 and 6 months after infection


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 27, 2020, 01:35:08 AM
"It's only the old and ill who will die" - Long term complications of getting Covid 19 include 35% chance of irreversible pulmonary fibrosis.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.18.20024539v1.full.pdf

It doesn't say that anywhere in your link, and it seems a bold claim so early in the lifetime of this virus.

 

Gaohong Sheng et al. [20] have shown that viral infection can increase the risk of pulmonary fibrosis.Xie et al. [21] found that 45% of patients
showed signs of pulmonary fibrosis within one month after being infected with SARS-CoV.Hui et al. [22] found that 36% and 30% of patients
infected with SARS-CoV developed pulmonary fibrosis at 3 and 6 months after infection

Those are the results from SARS and not from COVID19. 

This is what the latest article in Lancet says on COVID19

A reticular pattern associated with bronchiolectasis and irregular interlobular or septal thickening were also noted to increase progressively from the second week. These findings indicated the appearance of interstitial changes, suggesting the development of fibrosis. However, since the natural history of COVID-19 pneumonia is yet to be fully explored, it is too early to label these lung changes as irreversible fibrosis

https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S1473-3099%2820%2930086-4 (https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S1473-3099%2820%2930086-4)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 27, 2020, 04:50:22 AM
Can this really now be stopped?  Hospitalization rates even of 15% are going to overwhelm services.  Stockmarkets in Asia currently getting smashed, for the fourth day in a row.  This is here until a vaccine is widely available, probably in a years time.

(https://i.postimg.cc/KvmRYzvC/coronavirus.png)



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on February 27, 2020, 09:18:16 AM
Can this really now be stopped?  Hospitalization rates even of 15% are going to overwhelm services.  Stockmarkets in Asia currently getting smashed, for the fourth day in a row.  This is here until a vaccine is widely available, probably in a years time.

(https://i.postimg.cc/KvmRYzvC/coronavirus.png)



It started in the Wuhan province - so far less than 1% of people who live in the Wuhan province got it and over 80% of people who do get it don't suffer any serious issues; so a bit of perspective maybe.


If you really want to have fun seeing how it could develop then I (and my wife) would recommend watching Contagion (2011) (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1598778/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1); Hollywood is always going to Hollywood but when my wife was studying epidemiology in her degree their lecturer suggested this film and said it did a pretty good job at showing a realistic pandemic.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 27, 2020, 10:33:49 AM
The WHO are producing daily updates

https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200226-sitrep-37-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=6126c0a4_4 (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200226-sitrep-37-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=6126c0a4_4)

They are publishing research, data and all sorts right now if people are interested.

There is a FAQ here

https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses (https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses)

Turns out snoking is not an effective way to stop the spread of COVID-19.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on February 27, 2020, 11:43:02 AM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on February 27, 2020, 01:50:28 PM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?

What is the travel-agent saying Tom?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on February 27, 2020, 02:05:05 PM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?

What is the travel-agent saying Tom?


There is no travel agent Ralph, we booked it all online.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 27, 2020, 02:28:00 PM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?

It is up to you, but...

https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200226-sitrep-37-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=6126c0a4_4 (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200226-sitrep-37-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=6126c0a4_4)

Number of confirmed cases

Viet Nam 16
Cambodia 1
Thailand 40

There are no confirmed deaths in any of the countries

There is likely to be more under-reporting in those countries than here, but is Thailand today going to be worse than the UK in a week?  It feels like a flip at best that we have 40+ cases by next week.  It is a similar worry I have with all these schools closing now; if they close them now how can they open them when the risk is likely to be much higher in a month's time? 

Having been to Thailand, I think the risk of getting killed on the roads is likely to be still way higher. 

It really is up to you, I'd rather be on a small boat than a cruise liner right now, but don't think anyone will judge you harshly if you change your mind. 

How long is to go now?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on February 27, 2020, 02:30:21 PM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?

What is the travel-agent saying Tom?


There is no travel agent Ralph, we booked it all online.

Tough decision if you have no chance of a refund, although hhyftr the man city fan who just came back from The Phillipines reckons you'll be fine.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on February 27, 2020, 02:45:41 PM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?

It is up to you, but...

https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200226-sitrep-37-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=6126c0a4_4 (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200226-sitrep-37-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=6126c0a4_4)

Number of confirmed cases

Viet Nam 16
Cambodia 1
Thailand 40

There are no confirmed deaths in any of the countries

There is likely to be more under-reporting in those countries than here, but is Thailand today going to be worse than the UK in a week?  It feels like a flip at best that we have 40+ cases by next week.  It is a similar worry I have with all these schools closing now; if they close them now how can they open them when the risk is likely to be much higher in a month's time? 

Having been to Thailand, I think the risk of getting killed on the roads is likely to be still way higher. 

It really is up to you, I'd rather be on a small boat than a cruise liner right now, but don't think anyone will judge you harshly if you change your mind. 

How long is to go now?


About a fortnight, we will be away for 3 weeks though and a lot can happen in that time.

I do have some lung fibrosis already, which I suppose would make me more vulnerable if I did catch anything, but it's not just about the risk of disease, it's about the effect the situation will have on the enjoyability, if that makes sense.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 27, 2020, 02:54:35 PM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?

It is up to you, but...

https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200226-sitrep-37-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=6126c0a4_4 (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200226-sitrep-37-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=6126c0a4_4)

Number of confirmed cases

Viet Nam 16
Cambodia 1
Thailand 40

There are no confirmed deaths in any of the countries

There is likely to be more under-reporting in those countries than here, but is Thailand today going to be worse than the UK in a week?  It feels like a flip at best that we have 40+ cases by next week.  It is a similar worry I have with all these schools closing now; if they close them now how can they open them when the risk is likely to be much higher in a month's time? 

Having been to Thailand, I think the risk of getting killed on the roads is likely to be still way higher. 

It really is up to you, I'd rather be on a small boat than a cruise liner right now, but don't think anyone will judge you harshly if you change your mind. 

How long is to go now?


About a fortnight, we will be away for 3 weeks though and a lot can happen in that time.

I do have some lung fibrosis already, which I suppose would make me more vulnerable if I did catch anything, but it's not just about the risk of disease, it's about the effect the situation will have on the enjoyability, if that makes sense.

I'd say having some lung fibrosis definitely makes a difference to the risks.  I was trying to woek out if sleep apnoea would, but lung issue would worry me.

I would say that people in the tourist trade will be very pleased to see you, though I guess possible shortages and queues balance that.   If I was younger and healthier I'd say fk it and go.   Really is your decision.   Would it be a postponement or a never to be repeated trip given you are likely to lose quite a bit of money?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 27, 2020, 04:24:35 PM
- The WHO are complete clowns and I do not believe a word that they say.  China's puppets.  Specifically for one, the WHO director, who was paid off and pressured by China to advise against the trade and travel bans that any sane person would have done.

- Trump appears to be more concerned about trying to keep the stock market up than truthful advice and competent measures as he directly correlates it with his chance of re-election.  He won't manage and stocks will be crap until a vaccine comes along.  Everything went up so much last year anyway.  

- IMO Cheltenham is probably 50/50 to actually go ahead now.  However I cannot see how the WSOP, the Olympics and Euro 2020 have any chance of going ahead at this point without a vaccine.  It's incredible that there are Europa League matches going ahead tonight with Italian teams when this is now a pandemic.

- More cases in the UK today (as expected) but this is the strange (and worrying?) part that I don't understand.

Quote
Recovered patients testing positive again
Celia Hatton

BBC Asia Pacific Regional Editor

Chinese health officials say that about 14% of people who had the coronavirus but recovered and were discharged from hospital have tested positive for the virus again.

Health officials admit they're still learning about the new coronavirus and how it operates within the human body.

The same phenomenon has been reported in Japan, when a woman in her 40s who had recovered and tested negative for the virus then tested positive more than three weeks later.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bergeroo on February 27, 2020, 04:31:13 PM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?

I would say you are probably about as likely to get the virus in those countries as in the UK right now. So if you aren't going to get any money back from your trip then you probably should go. However I guess the most important thing is will you enjoy it or will you be stressed and tense?

Is it a motorcycle trip? Or are you travelling on buses/trains? Traveling on public transport will put you in close contact with lots of people, but on the bike seems pretty safe.

One problem you might encounter is that if things progress then one of these countries might close its borders to another one of these countries or enforce a quarantine.

All of the poker I was going to play in Vietnam and Taiwan was cancelled but I was still probably going to go. However now if you travel from Japan or Korea to Taiwan then you have to go in quarantine, so that is the tourism part of my trip messed up aswell. I was able to cancel my flight and get credit with the airline so I just decided to do that in the end.

For you it seems right now you can still do all of your trip, and yes maybe it will be even better because it is less busy.

The problem of course is the uncertainty, how will things change over the next 4-5 weeks? I can understand why you are worried. In times of global uncertainty it is natural to kind of shut up shop a bit, stay with your families and stay at home.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 27, 2020, 05:54:17 PM
Nick Rust has said this about possible cancellation of Cheltenham

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/horseracing/1247559/Cheltenham-2020-Cheltenham-Festival-cancelled-coronavirus-racing-news

"In terms of potential ramifications for the Festival, any decision that impacts on it taking place will not be a decision that racing makes, but rather the Government"

Regarding the Governments position, Matt Hancock said today

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/coronavirus-news-live-covid19-europe-uk-latest-a4372836.html

"We do want to minimise social and economic disruption subject to keeping people safe.

“Of course that is always going to be a balance. We’re going to be led by the scientific advice into what works.”"


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 27, 2020, 06:07:14 PM
About a fortnight, we will be away for 3 weeks though and a lot can happen in that time.

I do have some lung fibrosis already, which I suppose would make me more vulnerable if I did catch anything, but it's not just about the risk of disease, it's about the effect the situation will have on the enjoyability, if that makes sense.

I'd go, and my IS is shot.

Disclaimer - I'm not known for making smart decisions ;D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on February 27, 2020, 07:20:34 PM
This is a pretty tough decision. Think I'd probably canvas all my immediate family and go with the consensus if there was one.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 27, 2020, 07:42:48 PM
UK cases now up to 16, first one confirmed in Northern Ireland.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51667483


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: I KNOW IT on February 27, 2020, 07:44:54 PM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?

What is the travel-agent saying Tom?
Hi Tom
At this moment I. Time I would say 100% go. I have friends who live there and say a no problem at all at this moment. They actually say it’s great as nice and quiet to get around .
As you know I live in China and we have dealt with this for the last 6 weeks .
I’d invite you here in Shenzhen but it would be a terrible time due to restrictions of  outdoor activities, nothing else .
That’s your only worry in visiting those places is that the major attractions may be closed to the public . The main concern in Asia is group gathering, so they close certain amenities like cinemas  , sports grounds, tourist attractions. etc

Just so you know 2 days ago Hong Kong has extended the closure of schools until 20th April . I expect where iO live in Shenzhen to follow suit. At the moment here, schools are supposed to return on March 16th .

There is going to be so many businesses that will have to  close due to the restrictions which consequently has resulted in no income for most
businesses throughout China . Staff are being asked to take pay cuts, landlords are asking to give rent relief.  Government properties are helping but private landlords don’t give a shit.   
These are sad times for such a beautiful country 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: I KNOW IT on February 27, 2020, 07:51:53 PM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?

What is the travel-agent saying Tom?
Hi Tom
At this moment I. Time I would say 100% go. I have friends who live there and say a no problem at all at this moment. They actually say it’s great as nice and quiet to get around .
As you know I live in China and we have dealt with this for the last 6 weeks .
I’d invite you here in Shenzhen but it would be a terrible time due to restrictions of  outdoor activities, nothing else .
That’s your only worry in visiting those places is that the major attractions may be closed to the public . The main concern in Asia is group gathering, so they close certain amenities like cinemas  , sports grounds, tourist attractions. etc

Just so you know 2 days ago Hong Kong has extended the closure of schools until 20th April . I expect where iO live in Shenzhen to follow suit. At the moment here, schools are supposed to return on March 16th .

There is going to be so many businesses that will have to  close due to the restrictions which consequently has resulted in no income for most
businesses throughout China . Staff are being asked to take pay cuts, landlords are asking to give rent relief.  Government properties are helping but private landlords don’t give a shit.   
These are sad times for such a beautiful country 

Like bergaroo correctly said , a worry can be quarantine rules by certain countries which can change at any time.
I live I. Possibly the closest Chinese  city to  Hong Kong.  All borders except one  here have been closed and if I go to Hong Kong now from mainland China . I have to do a 14 day quarantine by law.   Even flying from abroad now into China you have to do self imposed 7-14 day quarantine in your own home .   
These will be risks Tom


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on February 27, 2020, 08:56:12 PM
Thanks Craig. Plenty to think about.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: I KNOW IT on February 27, 2020, 09:38:27 PM
Thanks Craig. Plenty to think about.
My pleasure Tom
I would wait and see nearer the date.  and the main thing I’d look at is the inter- country quarantine .
If that’s ok I would say go for it.   Asia really is the best place on earth and you and your wife deserve to see it


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 28, 2020, 02:32:00 AM
Japan has closed all schools until April https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-51663182

Nikkei getting absolutely pummeled again.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2020, 03:03:11 AM
Saw this earlier and it made me chuckle

'I can recall one time during WSOP where Men the master caught the Corona Virus and flipped over a 150/300 O8 table'


(https://pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video_thumb/ERwqe-rVAAAaaRS?format=jpg&name=900x900)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 28, 2020, 08:14:08 AM
Stocks are getting THRASHED


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on February 28, 2020, 08:39:28 AM
Stocks are getting THRASHED

My pension pot has taken a battering this week!  :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on February 28, 2020, 09:49:47 AM
Took flight yesterday and sold every equity I had. Feel better now

This is an interesting site re the virus

https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 28, 2020, 11:33:59 AM
Took flight yesterday and sold every equity I had. Feel better now

This is an interesting site re the virus

https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

Just spent all the cash in my SIPP  ;nana;

I have emptied my betfair account doubling down on my Cheltenham festival bet, after all I won't need any money on betfair if Cheltenham is abandoned.  Am gambling that Dom Cummings puts looking hard above public safety.

Switzerland has banned public gatherings of more than 1,000 people in response to 15 cases. 



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on February 28, 2020, 11:53:50 AM
Took flight yesterday and sold every equity I had. Feel better now

This is an interesting site re the virus

https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

Just spent all the cash in my SIPP  ;nana;

I have emptied my betfair account doubling down on my Cheltenham festival bet, after all I won't need any money on betfair if Cheltenham is abandoned.  Am gambling that Dom Cummings puts looking hard above public safety.

Switzerland has banned public gatherings of more than 1,000 people in response to 15 cases. 



Wow seems like an overreaction in Switzerland and many places. My Italian colleagues are amazed by the reaction in Italy.

You're a braver man than me. I'd made some good gains and couldn't stand the thought of another few percent dribblage for another day :) and potentially for another few hysterical days. Truth is I have no clue where any of this is going and suits my mentality to not be worrying about it and miss a few gains from any bounce


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on February 28, 2020, 12:04:15 PM
Took flight yesterday and sold every equity I had. Feel better now

This is an interesting site re the virus

https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

Just spent all the cash in my SIPP  ;nana;

I have emptied my betfair account doubling down on my Cheltenham festival bet, after all I won't need any money on betfair if Cheltenham is abandoned.  Am gambling that Dom Cummings puts looking hard above public safety.

Switzerland has banned public gatherings of more than 1,000 people in response to 15 cases. 



Wow seems like an overreaction in Switzerland and many places. My Italian colleagues are amazed by the reaction in Italy.
...

Not just an over reaction but possibly pointless if you don't also shut the airports and train stations.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 28, 2020, 12:24:47 PM
Took flight yesterday and sold every equity I had. Feel better now

This is an interesting site re the virus

https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

Just spent all the cash in my SIPP  ;nana;

I have emptied my betfair account doubling down on my Cheltenham festival bet, after all I won't need any money on betfair if Cheltenham is abandoned.  Am gambling that Dom Cummings puts looking hard above public safety.

Switzerland has banned public gatherings of more than 1,000 people in response to 15 cases. 



Wow seems like an overreaction in Switzerland and many places. My Italian colleagues are amazed by the reaction in Italy.
...

Not just an over reaction but possibly pointless if you don't also shut the airports and train stations.

Tighty is loving his cupboards full of tinned peaches right now.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2020, 12:28:30 PM
:D :D

Prefer pears, myself.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on February 28, 2020, 12:55:04 PM
Stocks are getting THRASHED

My pension pot has taken a battering this week!  :D

You will be retiring at 75 at this rate Woodsey.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2020, 01:14:36 PM
Stocks are getting THRASHED

My pension pot has taken a battering this week!  :D

You will be retiring at 75 at this rate Woodsey.


None of us are reaching 75, by the sounds of it  ::) :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 28, 2020, 01:15:53 PM
Stocks are getting THRASHED

My pension pot has taken a battering this week!  :D

You will be retiring at 75 at this rate Woodsey.
v good


None of us are reaching 75, by the sounds of it  ::) :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bookiebasher on February 28, 2020, 01:53:08 PM
Stocks are getting THRASHED

My pension pot has taken a battering this week!  :D

You will be retiring at 75 at this rate Woodsey.
v good


None of us are reaching 75, by the sounds of it  ::) :D

 ;hattip;

Tikay already there .


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on February 28, 2020, 02:31:36 PM

FFS, knew that was incoming.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2020, 02:56:54 PM

FFS, knew that was incoming.

You'd better not leave the house.

Everyone that has a runny nose thinks they're brown bread. Just com.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 28, 2020, 03:18:54 PM
Just appeared on my Facebook

https://www.lazada.sg/products/virus-shut-out-card-from-japan-i582750022-s1674302773.html (https://www.lazada.sg/products/virus-shut-out-card-from-japan-i582750022-s1674302773.html)

Somebody has ordered 4 ffs. 

This magic card does all this

Viral bacteria is raging. In addition to wearing masks to washing your hands and pay attention to personal hygiene, if you want to step up protection, you can try the virus shut out air and sterilization protection plates in Japan!!

✅ strong ability to inhibit viruses and bacteria
✅ Effectively Block Microparticles and bacteria in the air, as well as all kinds of epidemic viruses
✅ Sodium Chlorate has strong oxidant, with antibacterial or antibacterial effect in a short
✅ Antibacterial effects are not affected by water ph
✅ help eliminate viruses such as phytoplankton, flu and reduce the chances of being infected or contagion to others
✅ #Suitable for all, especially suitable for patients / less immune / BB Children / children / pregnant women / elderly / long-term access to hospitals and clinics with more bacteria
✅ it can remove the odor of floating, like smoke, add sweat

📍 Use: Neck / put in chest bag
📍 One Pack valid for 1 months
📍 Japanese original entrance
📍 please use it immediately after opening to ensure quality effect

Glad to see Facebook is helping save us all.   



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 28, 2020, 05:58:51 PM
I have emptied my betfair account doubling down on my Cheltenham festival bet, after all I won't need any money on betfair if Cheltenham is abandoned.  Am gambling that Dom Cummings puts looking hard above public safety.

I also doubled down yesterday on it not going ahead when the price flicked back out to 3.35 briefly.  Clearly there is a chance both ways but the market was comically mispriced when it opened and is only now starting to reflect reality as people have wised up.  As much as that was a good bet., I am not liking the situation that is unfolding.  A lot of people have and are going to die/get ill plus my equities have taken a brutal hammering this week, far more than the monkey I might profit from this lol market.

The virus could well struggle in warm weather.  Perhaps we will get some good data on that now countries with tropical climates are infected.  Cold Europe with our mass crowds is not in a good spot right now.  If you believe the Chinese data then infections are falling there and the population are being highly controlled.  You can't even go into a shop without a mask on apparently.  That level of control is not possible here but the strategy of control the spread until a vaccine arrives is all that can be done.   Hospitalisation rates of 15-20% would be crippling for the NHS if it keeps spreading.  How far into the outbreak did China go on lockdown?  We are already infected and have not even bothered yet so brace yourselves.  I saw Moody's rated this as 40% chance of pandemic yesterday.  Complete clowns.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on February 28, 2020, 06:25:31 PM
Thinking of cancelling my Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia trip.

What does everyone think?

Go.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 28, 2020, 06:34:30 PM
The football world and Coronavirus

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51673076

"Newcastle and West Ham have banned handshakes at their training grounds in an attempt to stop the virus' spread."


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 28, 2020, 07:41:03 PM
Major E-Sports event cancelled for the public in Poland (still going ahead as a stream).  The Government ordered it off, they don't even have a confirmed case in Poland yet.

https://win.gg/news/3944/all-iem-katowice-tickets-cancelled-amid-coronavirus-concerns

Amazon tells employees to pause nonessential travel in U.S. due to coronavirus

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/28/amazon-pauses-non-essential-travel-in-us-due-to-coronavirus.html

Given the long latency period reported for Covid 19 this is looking bad now.  It won't be a horse racing decision regarding Cheltenham, it will be a Government one.  They cannot take the risk of upping the spread of this thing.

https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/news/coronavirus-study-incubation-period/.

"A study by Chinese researchers found that the Wuhan coronavirus incubation period can be up to 24 days, contrary to the previously believed 14 days."


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2020, 07:49:24 PM
You have less hobbies than me, Jez ;D

The racing decision was a given, no? We always knew they weren't going to call it off, and it would be on the government to if pressurised.

You better get onto them :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2020, 07:51:47 PM
Would imagine they have a few e-sports teams in Asia?

Amazon don't want to be coughing up that sick pay.

Aintree, end of the PL, and the World Cup goners, then.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 28, 2020, 07:54:02 PM
You have less hobbies than me, Jez ;D


We do share one, smashing casinos.   I think I very briefly met you or your father on Ladbrokes poker cruise 1 or 2.  2 I think it was, a long time ago.   Do you get cashout values for antepost Cheltenham bets?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on February 28, 2020, 07:56:16 PM
Stocks are getting THRASHED

My pension pot has taken a battering this week!  :D

You will be retiring at 75 at this rate Woodsey.

Fooks sake battered again today...... done over  20k this week  rotflmfao


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2020, 07:59:05 PM
You have less hobbies than me, Jez ;D


We do share one, smashing casinos.   I think I very briefly met you or your father on Ladbrokes poker cruise 1 or 2.  2 I think it was, a long time ago.   Do you get cashout values for antepost Cheltenham bets?

That was definitely one, while the slots were good. Had a nice 3 year run, but had to retire from that unfortunately. Juice not worth the squeeze with all the tightening up on bonuses/wagering.

Would have been my old man on 1, I only went on the Caribbean cruise that was a Laddies only ship. We were both on the 2nd one, though.

I've got no idea, to be honest. Would imagine they'll void everything, or some firms would. Hills might not, trying to claw back all the money they've knocked in on fines this year :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on February 28, 2020, 08:02:29 PM
...✅ help eliminate viruses such as phytoplankton,...

of all the things that the magic card claims this is the only thing that really annoys Science Wife.

The rest is just clearly nuts but claiming that phytoplankton are a virus is just stupid is how she put it :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 28, 2020, 08:09:06 PM
I don't know the finances, but isn't running Cheltenham behind closed doors as likely as cancelling?  Presumably levy + sponsorship + TV > prize money. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 28, 2020, 08:11:12 PM
I don't know the finances, but isn't running Cheltenham behind closed doors as likely as cancelling?  Presumably levy + sponsorship + TV > prize money.  

I see that as the reason racing going ahead is still a favourite at this point tbh.  

It's what they did in the Europa League on Thursday with the Italian teams for one.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2020, 08:15:53 PM
Think weather obv factors into not going ahead, too.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 28, 2020, 09:04:07 PM
More cases in the UK, including one which was contracted here and not abroad.  A GP might test positive in Surrey who has been seeing patients all week. https://news.sky.com/story/first-case-of-coronavirus-confirmed-in-wales-and-two-more-in-england-11945201

Cobra meeting on Monday.  The fates of various sporting events could well be decided then. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/health-and-care/illnesstreatments/news/110192/boris-johnson-chair-emergency-cobra-meeting


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 28, 2020, 09:33:39 PM
After his weekend off, of course :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: I KNOW IT on February 28, 2020, 10:45:24 PM
I have emptied my betfair account doubling down on my Cheltenham festival bet, after all I won't need any money on betfair if Cheltenham is abandoned.  Am gambling that Dom Cummings puts looking hard above public safety.

I also doubled down yesterday on it not going ahead when the price flicked back out to 3.35 briefly.  Clearly there is a chance both ways but the market was comically mispriced when it opened and is only now starting to reflect reality as people have wised up.  As much as that was a good bet., I am not liking the situation that is unfolding.  A lot of people have and are going to die/get ill plus my equities have taken a brutal hammering this week, far more than the monkey I might profit from this lol market.

The virus could well struggle in warm weather.  Perhaps we will get some good data on that now countries with tropical climates are infected.  Cold Europe with our mass crowds is not in a good spot right now.  If you believe the Chinese data then infections are falling there and the population are being highly controlled.  You can't even go into a shop without a mask on apparently.  That level of control is not possible here but the strategy of control the spread until a vaccine arrives is all that can be done.   Hospitalisation rates of 15-20% would be crippling for the NHS if it keeps spreading.  How far into the outbreak did China go on lockdown?  We are already infected and have not even bothered yet so brace yourselves.  I saw Moody's rated this as 40% chance of pandemic yesterday.  Complete clowns.
Read my posts. I actually live  in China.   It’s not you cannot go into a shop without a mask , you cannot be in public without a mask .  I wish I could find the time to say how it is here .  China will become the safest place due to the restrictions they put in place earlier when they were being ignored by the west .  I repeat only China could have contained this virus how they did with total lockdown

You talk about warm weather killing the virus.  It is actually said it takes heat , sunlight and humidity to kill it .  For us in China that is usually May  for that to happen .   I honestly think  the sign when the government will announce its over officially over  it will be when schools are allowed to open . Currently here is 16 th March.  Hong Kong & J.apan is 20th April . Go figure


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: 4KSuited on February 28, 2020, 11:26:22 PM
This may be of interest; it’s the latest advice from BA senior management to airline staff in various customer facing roles:-

“Airport protection measures

We continue to work with the requirements of Port Health and Heathrow Airport to protect our airline and the airport. As a precaution, additional public health measures are now being seen at Heathrow on flights to and from Thailand, Japan, Republic of Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia or Macau.

We appreciate that the sight of Port Health staff in full personal protective equipment meeting aircraft may be unsettling. But rest assured that these measures are only precautionary, and the risk to individuals in the UK remains low.

The most effective form of prevention at our airport is good hand washing techniques, as advised by WHO.

Masks

Many of you have asked about the effectiveness of masks. Despite what you may see in the media, all expert international authorities still advise that are not effective. Some organisations have found masks to be potentially more hazardous, due to the need to touch your face.

As we’ve mentioned, the best form of prevention is good and regular hand washing techniques.

Contamination

Unlike other coronaviruses, with COVID-19 it’s believed that direct airborne spread is not significant. The main risk is from contamination of surfaces by droplets containing the virus that have been spread by an infected person. To get the disease a person has to spread this to lining tissue in the eyes, nose or mouth. Getting virus onto the skin is no risk provided it doesn’t contact the eyes, nose or mouth. It’s believed that close contact (probably less than 2m distance and more than 15 minutes) is needed.

This is why, consistent with all international expert authorities, we’re continuing to remind you that excellent hand hygiene is vital and the most effective form prevention.”

There’s more, but I think this is the most relevant.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: booder on February 28, 2020, 11:28:23 PM
Just heard a rumor that John Lennon Airport in Liverpool has been closed due to the Corona virus. That's tough on everyone. Imagine all the people?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 29, 2020, 02:53:35 AM
Read my posts. I actually live  in China.   It’s not you cannot go into a shop without a mask , you cannot be in public without a mask .  I wish I could find the time to say how it is here .  China will become the safest place due to the restrictions they put in place earlier when they were being ignored by the west .  I repeat only China could have contained this virus how they did with total lockdown

Yes and it appears to be working.  There is no chance somewhere like the UK or the USA could carry out such restrictions though.

Quote
You talk about warm weather killing the virus.  It is actually said it takes heat , sunlight and humidity to kill it .  For us in China that is usually May  for that to happen .   I honestly think  the sign when the government will announce its over officially over  it will be when schools are allowed to open . Currently here is 16 th March.  Hong Kong & J.apan is 20th April . Go figure

I read some discussion earlier suggesting it's definitely struggling in the hot countries.  It does not appear to be spreading strongly in Singapore and Thailand for two.  Whenever the vaccine comes it will be dead but the Summer could make it much much less of a problem first.  Global warming might have a use after all!

Some guy in America here who thinks he has it (and has travelled to a high risk country).  Doctors agreed but officials refuse to test him and sent him away to do what he wants

https://www.reddit.com/r/nyc/comments/fayko1/my_covid19_story_brooklyn/


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on February 29, 2020, 08:08:28 AM
Just heard a rumor that John Lennon Airport in Liverpool has been closed due to the Corona virus. That's tough on everyone. Imagine all the people?

 :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on February 29, 2020, 08:13:07 AM
If there cancelling Cheltenham then they should be closing the London Underground?

I would suggest the odds of them closing the underground are a lot lower than the current betfair price for the festival to go ahead.

I'm on the festival goes ahead for a Cheltenham budget boost, the expectation for the week has increased exponentially.

Plus paper headlines are lol out of control about this!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on February 29, 2020, 09:15:08 AM
I have emptied my betfair account doubling down on my Cheltenham festival bet, after all I won't need any money on betfair if Cheltenham is abandoned.  Am gambling that Dom Cummings puts looking hard above public safety.

I also doubled down yesterday on it not going ahead when the price flicked back out to 3.35 briefly.  Clearly there is a chance both ways but the market was comically mispriced when it opened and is only now starting to reflect reality as people have wised up.  As much as that was a good bet., I am not liking the situation that is unfolding.  A lot of people have and are going to die/get ill plus my equities have taken a brutal hammering this week, far more than the monkey I might profit from this lol market.

The virus could well struggle in warm weather.  Perhaps we will get some good data on that now countries with tropical climates are infected.  Cold Europe with our mass crowds is not in a good spot right now.  If you believe the Chinese data then infections are falling there and the population are being highly controlled.  You can't even go into a shop without a mask on apparently.  That level of control is not possible here but the strategy of control the spread until a vaccine arrives is all that can be done.   Hospitalisation rates of 15-20% would be crippling for the NHS if it keeps spreading.  How far into the outbreak did China go on lockdown?  We are already infected and have not even bothered yet so brace yourselves.  I saw Moody's rated this as 40% chance of pandemic yesterday.  Complete clowns.
Read my posts. I actually live  in China.   It’s not you cannot go into a shop without a mask , you cannot be in public without a mask .  I wish I could find the time to say how it is here .  China will become the safest place due to the restrictions they put in place earlier when they were being ignored by the west .  I repeat only China could have contained this virus how they did with total lockdown

You talk about warm weather killing the virus.  It is actually said it takes heat , sunlight and humidity to kill it .  For us in China that is usually May  for that to happen .   I honestly think  the sign when the government will announce its over officially over  it will be when schools are allowed to open . Currently here is 16 th March.  Hong Kong & J.apan is 20th April . Go figure

You might be right about getting it under control now with the restrictions etc. But there has to be a question mark about whether they would even be in this spot now if they hadn’t tried to sweep if under the carpet at the very start including shutting up the people that were raising it as an issue. If it was in the Uk they would have been on top of the issue way earlier because it would have been out in the open very quickly. Ultimately it’s hard to say how much of a difference it would make, but the question mark is there nonetheless.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on February 29, 2020, 10:26:31 AM
Read my posts. I actually live  in China.   It’s not you cannot go into a shop without a mask , you cannot be in public without a mask .  I wish I could find the time to say how it is here .  China will become the safest place due to the restrictions they put in place earlier when they were being ignored by the west .  I repeat only China could have contained this virus how they did with total lockdown

Yes and it appears to be working.  There is no chance somewhere like the UK or the USA could carry out such restrictions though.

Quote
You talk about warm weather killing the virus.  It is actually said it takes heat , sunlight and humidity to kill it .  For us in China that is usually May  for that to happen .   I honestly think  the sign when the government will announce its over officially over  it will be when schools are allowed to open . Currently here is 16 th March.  Hong Kong & J.apan is 20th April . Go figure

I read some discussion earlier suggesting it's definitely struggling in the hot countries.  It does not appear to be spreading strongly in Singapore and Thailand for two.  Whenever the vaccine comes it will be dead but the Summer could make it much much less of a problem first.  Global warming might have a use after all!

Some guy in America here who thinks he has it (and has travelled to a high risk country).  Doctors agreed but officials refuse to test him and sent him away to do what he wants

https://www.reddit.com/r/nyc/comments/fayko1/my_covid19_story_brooklyn/

Wow. that reddit guys experience is mad, but I read the first lot of testing kits in the US didn't work anyway.  Must have sourced them from that magic card guy.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on February 29, 2020, 10:57:17 AM
If there cancelling Cheltenham then they should be closing the London Underground?

I would suggest the odds of them closing the underground are a lot lower than the current betfair price for the festival to go ahead.

I'm on the festival goes ahead for a Cheltenham budget boost, the expectation for the week has increased exponentially.

Plus paper headlines are lol out of control about this!

You might as well lump the entire roll on Cheltenham going ahead Stu as if it doesn't you won't need it :)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on February 29, 2020, 11:25:04 AM
If there cancelling Cheltenham then they should be closing the London Underground?

I would suggest the odds of them closing the underground are a lot lower than the current betfair price for the festival to go ahead.

I'm on the festival goes ahead for a Cheltenham budget boost, the expectation for the week has increased exponentially.

Plus paper headlines are lol out of control about this!

You might as well lump the entire roll on Cheltenham going ahead Stu as if it doesn't you won't need it :)

I was thinking half of it so its win/win!

Beer on Friday Ralph if it's not on?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on February 29, 2020, 11:54:20 AM
If there cancelling Cheltenham then they should be closing the London Underground?

I would suggest the odds of them closing the underground are a lot lower than the current betfair price for the festival to go ahead.

I'm on the festival goes ahead for a Cheltenham budget boost, the expectation for the week has increased exponentially.

Plus paper headlines are lol out of control about this!

You might as well lump the entire roll on Cheltenham going ahead Stu as if it doesn't you won't need it :)

I was thinking half of it so its win/win!

Beer on Friday Ralph if it's not on?

Sounds good.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 29, 2020, 07:53:27 PM
France has banned indoor gatherings of more than 5000 people.  This includes the half-marathon coming on Sunday.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-51690657


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on February 29, 2020, 08:03:06 PM
Makes some sense if Paris is where most of the cases are.

Been a while since I've been to Cheltenham, but most of it was outdoors when I did ;D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on February 29, 2020, 08:04:20 PM
All these actions while trains, planes, offices, cafes, restaurants etc etc are open just seem too stupid - is there another point I've missed ?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on February 29, 2020, 09:20:01 PM
Imagine if it got so bad that they had to cancel the football season.

Imagine if Liverpool hadn't yet mathematically won the league should this happen.

Imagine if the only outcome is to declare the season null and void.

Imagine all the people in Liverpool going apeshit over that.

Imagine....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on February 29, 2020, 10:14:33 PM
All these actions while trains, planes, offices, cafes, restaurants etc etc are open just seem too stupid - is there another point I've missed ?

It’s much less disruption to call off a sporting event than to close the underground so they do that as a starting point.

Malaysia, Vietnam, Macau all showing no growth in Coronavirus cases.  They are places that “should” be but are warm temp so I take it as logical that covid 19 might well be neutralised by the spring/summer in Europe. Just about keeping the spread down until then.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on February 29, 2020, 10:34:24 PM
To be fair Boris knows how to change the headlines!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 01, 2020, 03:30:10 PM
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-government-wont-rule-out-banning-large-gatherings-says-health-secretary-11946939

Given the way he's talking there, I'm more inclined to worry about Aintree. However, we don't know what will happen this week, obviously.

12 more today....Only 1 that's odd, though.

Someone in Essex they don't know how contracted. 3 who had been in contact with someone that had it. 6 just back from Italy, and 2 from Iran.





Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 01, 2020, 09:11:25 PM
It appears very likely the virus is widespread to a much larger degree than reported in Washington

https://twitter.com/trvrb/status/1233970271318503426

"The team at the
@seattleflustudy
 have sequenced the genome the #COVID19 community case reported yesterday from Snohomish County, WA, and have posted the sequence publicly to http://gisaid.org. There are some enormous implications here.

This case, WA2, is on a branch in the evolutionary tree that descends directly from WA1, the first reported case in the USA sampled Jan 19, also from Snohomish County, viewable here

This strongly suggests that there has been cryptic transmission in Washington State for the past 6 weeks. 3/9"

The growth in the UK is now explosive and uncontrolled.   The comparison with the flu which I read in the Racing Post article is irresponsible and laughably wide of the mark Wuhan data linked earlier ITT disproves any death and hospitalization rate remotely similar to the flu.  less than 1 in 100,000 adults under 40 die of the flu, Coronavirus data has deaths in that group of 200 in 100,000.  An overall death rate of 4.3% and Hospitilisation of 17% is nasty and and potentially crippling for the NHS.

The good news is that growth in hot countries continues to be extremely slow.  Countries which had a lot of inbound from China and received early transmission.  Strong containment is also working.  I fully expect strong containment measures from the Cobra meeting tomorrow.  Keep the load on the NHS as low as possible until Summer arrives and we can get to a vaccine.  Allowing mass gatherings of people at this point is irresponsible and incompetent and I believe we will see similar measures to other counties here. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 01, 2020, 10:04:02 PM
It appears very likely the virus is widespread to a much larger degree than reported in Washington

https://twitter.com/trvrb/status/1233970271318503426

"The team at the
@seattleflustudy
 have sequenced the genome the #COVID19 community case reported yesterday from Snohomish County, WA, and have posted the sequence publicly to http://gisaid.org. There are some enormous implications here.

This case, WA2, is on a branch in the evolutionary tree that descends directly from WA1, the first reported case in the USA sampled Jan 19, also from Snohomish County, viewable here

This strongly suggests that there has been cryptic transmission in Washington State for the past 6 weeks. 3/9"

The growth in the UK is now explosive and uncontrolled.   The comparison with the flu which I read in the Racing Post article is irresponsible and laughably wide of the mark Wuhan data linked earlier ITT disproves any death and hospitalization rate remotely similar to the flu.  less than 1 in 100,000 adults under 40 die of the flu, Coronavirus data has deaths in that group of 200 in 100,000.  An overall death rate of 4.3% and Hospitilisation of 17% is nasty and and potentially crippling for the NHS.

The good news is that growth in hot countries continues to be extremely slow.  Countries which had a lot of inbound from China and received early transmission.  Strong containment is also working.  I fully expect strong containment measures from the Cobra meeting tomorrow.  Keep the load on the NHS as low as possible until Summer arrives and we can get to a vaccine.  Allowing mass gatherings of people at this point is irresponsible and incompetent and I believe we will see similar measures to other counties here. 

Try and be a little more dramatic if you can, Jez.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 01, 2020, 10:05:19 PM
Those ones who have been picking up £450 worth of gear at a time are laughing last. Especially when we're all on house arrest until summer.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bergeroo on March 01, 2020, 11:47:10 PM
Numbers down in the side events at Unibet Open Dublin this year. Lots of locals stayed away and specifically said it was because of the virus. 1 case in Ireland I believe currently!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 02, 2020, 12:21:26 AM
Might not have to play 10 handed at WSOP this summer.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 02, 2020, 07:47:23 AM
It appears very likely the virus is widespread to a much larger degree than reported in Washington

https://twitter.com/trvrb/status/1233970271318503426

"The team at the
@seattleflustudy
 have sequenced the genome the #COVID19 community case reported yesterday from Snohomish County, WA, and have posted the sequence publicly to http://gisaid.org. There are some enormous implications here.

This case, WA2, is on a branch in the evolutionary tree that descends directly from WA1, the first reported case in the USA sampled Jan 19, also from Snohomish County, viewable here

This strongly suggests that there has been cryptic transmission in Washington State for the past 6 weeks. 3/9"

The growth in the UK is now explosive and uncontrolled.   The comparison with the flu which I read in the Racing Post article is irresponsible and laughably wide of the mark Wuhan data linked earlier ITT disproves any death and hospitalization rate remotely similar to the flu.  less than 1 in 100,000 adults under 40 die of the flu, Coronavirus data has deaths in that group of 200 in 100,000.  An overall death rate of 4.3% and Hospitilisation of 17% is nasty and and potentially crippling for the NHS.

The good news is that growth in hot countries continues to be extremely slow.  Countries which had a lot of inbound from China and received early transmission.  Strong containment is also working.  I fully expect strong containment measures from the Cobra meeting tomorrow.  Keep the load on the NHS as low as possible until Summer arrives and we can get to a vaccine.  Allowing mass gatherings of people at this point is irresponsible and incompetent and I believe we will see similar measures to other counties here. 

Try and be a little more dramatic if you can, Jez.


Obvs works for the Daily Mail


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 02, 2020, 08:17:19 AM
Might not have to play 10 handed at WSOP this summer.

Might not be a WSOP this year  8)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 02, 2020, 09:24:18 AM
Take all the precuations you like.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1233890663759958016


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 02, 2020, 09:25:26 AM
I saw a letter in the Metro today, it said something along the lines of - to all the people who keep saying to not worry because it only has a fatality rate of 2%, in the town where I live that would mean 2000 people!

Reminder
if needed
Unless there's specifically a modifier like 'of the total population', then percentage needing hospital treatment or percentage fatality means percentage of those infected.

Given that the original Chinese province still has less than 1% infected that means that persons letter should be "20 people" rather than "2000 people".

I honestly don't know how obvious that is. From a maths background a percentage amount always carries the question 'Percentage of what?', but I thought it might be worth pointing out in case other people have the same issue that this letter writer has :)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 02, 2020, 10:58:21 AM
Take all the precuations you like.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1233890663759958016

WTF?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 02, 2020, 11:59:43 AM
The sort of behaviour you'd expect from someone who goes out in public wearing tracky bottoms and beaten-up trainers.

Is that a loaf of bread in he's left hand? Missed opportunity if so.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 02, 2020, 01:36:21 PM
Might not have to play 10 handed at WSOP this summer.

Might not be a WSOP this year  8)

If there’s no WSOP, then we’ve got more to worry about than no Poker 😂


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 02, 2020, 11:17:30 PM
Now 6 deaths in Washington.  https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/02/coronavirus-live-updates/ That proves it has been spreading for a lot longer in the USA than we knew about.   Financial markets wont like that imo when they catch up with it shortly, they boomed up today over there.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 02, 2020, 11:47:15 PM
Might not have to play 10 handed at WSOP this summer.

Might not be a WSOP this year  8)

If there’s no WSOP, then we’ve got more to worry about than no Poker 😂

Yeah no holiday probably  ;grr;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 03, 2020, 12:03:13 AM
Might not have to play 10 handed at WSOP this summer.

Might not be a WSOP this year  8)

If there’s no WSOP, then we’ve got more to worry about than no Poker 😂

Yeah no holiday probably  ;grr;

Get that pension spent, Woodsey :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 03, 2020, 06:22:29 AM
nm


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 03, 2020, 09:00:08 AM
lol now betfair have made a market on the olympic opening ceremony happening on the currently scheduled date

https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/en/special-bets-betting-10

Time to chase my inevitable Cheltenham losses


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 03, 2020, 12:14:39 PM
lol now betfair have made a market on the olympic opening ceremony happening on the currently scheduled date

https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/en/special-bets-betting-10

Time to chase my inevitable Cheltenham losses

I have no idea on this one.   

It seems certain that it is going to get much bigger, but by then won't we all have given up and just run it anyway?  Given the spread it looks like everybody else is grasping.   Pretty surprised they have taken 5k in bets with that spread; it is like the old days of flutter.com.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 03, 2020, 12:28:33 PM
lol now betfair have made a market on the olympic opening ceremony happening on the currently scheduled date

https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/en/special-bets-betting-10

Time to chase my inevitable Cheltenham losses

I have no idea on this one.   

It seems certain that it is going to get much bigger, but by then won't we all have given up and just run it anyway?  Given the spread it looks like everybody else is grasping.   Pretty surprised they have taken 5k in bets with that spread; it is like the old days of flutter.com.



For those thinking of betting; it seems they are actively considering postponing.  Hence that sould be factored in.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/olympics/51717839 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/olympics/51717839)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 03, 2020, 11:57:20 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ESNiBCoWkAEyLOJ?format=jpg&name=small)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 04, 2020, 02:33:06 AM
https://nypost.com/2020/02/27/americans-are-avoiding-corona-beer-amid-coronavirus-outbreak-survey-finds/?utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=NYPTwitter

Not sure if this has already been posted but it just shows how dumb yanks are generally.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 04, 2020, 02:20:28 PM
UK cases up 34 in a day to a total of 85.  That really is explosive growth like other countries with similar climates are experiencing.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51741001?

I couldn't give a toss about if I personally get it or not, although I don't want to spread it to anyone...but the NHS is going to be crippled by this.

It's not about any stupid bet, the competent thing would be to try and slow the spread right now and get it to hotter temperatures with as low an amount of cases as we can.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 04, 2020, 02:28:43 PM
UK cases up 34 in a day to a total of 85.  That really is explosive growth like other countries with similar climates are experiencing.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51741001?

I couldn't give a toss about if I personally get it or not, although I don't want to spread it to anyone...but the NHS is going to be crippled by this.

It's not about any stupid bet, the competent thing would be to try and slow the spread right now and get it to hotter temperatures with as low an amount of cases as we can.

Realistically its not possible though is it? What ever you do, it only takes one person to start it all off again?

There is something really strange about the numbers in China now, they seem to have it under control, yet the majority of areas are back at work.
Surely it only takes one person in one of those areas to start the chain reaction again?

What am I missing?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 04, 2020, 02:43:46 PM
UK cases up 34 in a day to a total of 85.  That really is explosive growth like other countries with similar climates are experiencing.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51741001?

I couldn't give a toss about if I personally get it or not, although I don't want to spread it to anyone...but the NHS is going to be crippled by this.

It's not about any stupid bet, the competent thing would be to try and slow the spread right now and get it to hotter temperatures with as low an amount of cases as we can.

Realistically its not possible though is it? What ever you do, it only takes one person to start it all off again?

There is something really strange about the numbers in China now, they seem to have it under control, yet the majority of areas are back at work.
Surely it only takes one person in one of those areas to start the chain reaction again?

What am I missing?

China completely shut down cities (you don't shut down cities and kill your economy for the flu).  That is what it took to get it under control there.  No way people in this country would stand for that.  Even still the spread can still be slowed with containment measures.  Large gatherings, schools, public transport whatever can be curtailed.   Even the fit and healthy catching it is a nightmare as they have to stay off work and they spread it around until they realise.  The more containment you do the slower it spreads.  China shows what can be done at the maximum level.  Italy is shutting down specific areas now also.  A lot can change if we create time, not only could summer give a respite but vaccines or treatments could be given time to arrive.

The problem is the hospitilsation rate of this thing.  China data said 17% hospitalised but they have a lot of smokers and dodgy numbers.  Even if it is only 10% hospital rates here we are absolutely crippled with any significant amount of cases.

The NHS have 5900 critical care beds for the entire country https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/nhs-hospital-bed-numbers.   The Guardian suggested yesterday if the police end up with lots off work sick they won't investigate even murders.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 04, 2020, 03:03:22 PM
I laid it to nick a grand when it got really short, so makes no odds to me, either.

3 cases of unknown origin, and 29 returning from holidays. Who are the other 2?

2 - Scotland


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 04, 2020, 03:07:05 PM
UK cases up 34 in a day to a total of 85.  That really is explosive growth like other countries with similar climates are experiencing.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51741001?

I couldn't give a toss about if I personally get it or not, although I don't want to spread it to anyone...but the NHS is going to be crippled by this.

It's not about any stupid bet, the competent thing would be to try and slow the spread right now and get it to hotter temperatures with as low an amount of cases as we can.

Realistically its not possible though is it? What ever you do, it only takes one person to start it all off again?

There is something really strange about the numbers in China now, they seem to have it under control, yet the majority of areas are back at work.
Surely it only takes one person in one of those areas to start the chain reaction again?

What am I missing?

China completely shut down cities (you don't shut down cities and kill your economy for the flu).  That is what it took to get it under control there.  No way people in this country would stand for that.  Even still the spread can still be slowed with containment measures.  Large gatherings, schools, public transport whatever can be curtailed.   Even the fit and healthy catching it is a nightmare as they have to stay off work and they spread it around until they realise.  The more containment you do the slower it spreads.  China shows what can be done at the maximum level.  Italy is shutting down specific areas now also.  A lot can change if we create time, not only could summer give a respite but vaccines or treatments could be given time to arrive.

The problem is the hospitilsation rate of this thing.  China data said 17% hospitalised but they have a lot of smokers and dodgy numbers.  Even if it is only 10% hospital rates here we are absolutely crippled with any significant amount of cases.

The NHS have 5900 critical care beds for the entire country https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/nhs-hospital-bed-numbers.   The Guardian suggested yesterday if the police end up with lots off work sick they won't investigate even murders.


But most of China is now back at work so what is stopping it starting again?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 04, 2020, 03:15:50 PM
Quote
But most of China is now back at work so what is stopping it starting again?

The infected regions are still on lock down as far as I know (I dont know).   Hopefully I KNOW IT could say what it's like in his region now.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 04, 2020, 04:27:56 PM
Quote
But most of China is now back at work so what is stopping it starting again?

The infected regions are still on lock down as far as I know (I dont know).   Hopefully I KNOW IT could say what it's like in his region now.

We buy a lot in China from various provinces and have our own plant there too. All our suppliers are back at work  and you need to be approved by the authorities to re-open. Not all are back with full work forces as a staggered return to work over a few weeks has generally been imposed


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 04, 2020, 05:39:16 PM
https://metro.co.uk/2020/03/03/student-beaten-racist-saying-dont-want-coronavirus-country-12341106/

Lolcountry.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 04, 2020, 05:51:40 PM
Braindead mugs.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: HutchGF on March 04, 2020, 06:28:43 PM
I work in a school and Coronavirus preparations are well under way.

We have plans in place for remote teaching and we are fairly confident we will be closed at some point.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 04, 2020, 06:49:24 PM
https://metro.co.uk/2020/03/03/student-beaten-racist-saying-dont-want-coronavirus-country-12341106/

Lolcountry.

my favourite bit was that if he did have coronavirus you wouldn't really want to splatter his blood over you.  Not that much logic was part if this attack.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 04, 2020, 08:05:47 PM
Chief Medical Officer  supposedly said this on Radio 4 -

Did not see much benefit in banning large gatherings such as footy  matches as...

"An infected person could infect a few people sat near them" 

"If people went to the pub instead to watch a match - then the risk of transmission and infection would be much higher in such a tightly-packed confined space"

As opposed to outside in the fresh air in a stadium.


Any fact-checkers corroborate or is the guy posting nonsense??


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 04, 2020, 08:16:14 PM
Chief Medical Officer  supposedly said this on Radio 4 -

Did not see much benefit in banning large gatherings such as footy  matches as...

"An infected person could infect a few people sat near them" 

"If people went to the pub instead to watch a match - then the risk of transmission and infection would be much higher in such a tightly-packed confined space"

As opposed to outside in the fresh air in a stadium.


Any fact-checkers corroborate or is the guy posting nonsense??

No facts from me!

But my understanding is that the main way people are getting it is people touching contaminated surfaces and then touching their mouths eyes?

So what he is saying partly makes sense but then at a football match everyone is touching the seats, the bar and the door handles etc same as they would in a pub?

Unless they are cancelling everything I still cant see how it makes a big difference.

Roll on Tuesday!



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 04, 2020, 08:21:49 PM
Chief Medical Officer  supposedly said this on Radio 4 -

Did not see much benefit in banning large gatherings such as footy  matches as...

"An infected person could infect a few people sat near them" 

"If people went to the pub instead to watch a match - then the risk of transmission and infection would be much higher in such a tightly-packed confined space"

As opposed to outside in the fresh air in a stadium.


Any fact-checkers corroborate or is the guy posting nonsense??

No FACTS from me!

But my understanding is that the main way people are getting it is people touching contaminated surfaces and then touching their mouths eyes?

So what he is saying partly makes sense but then at a football match everyone is touching the seats, the bar and the door handles etc same as they would in a pub?

Unless they are cancelling everything I still cant see how it makes a big difference.

Roll on Tuesday!



FYP


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 05:17:09 AM
Chief Medical Officer  supposedly said this on Radio 4 -

Did not see much benefit in banning large gatherings such as footy  matches as...

"An infected person could infect a few people sat near them"  

"If people went to the pub instead to watch a match - then the risk of transmission and infection would be much higher in such a tightly-packed confined space"

As opposed to outside in the fresh air in a stadium.


Any fact-checkers corroborate or is the guy posting nonsense??

I did read that quote a day or two ago also.  Came after the first Cobra meeting decided we are not at the stage to start bringing in restrictions yet.  Betfair marked surged yes shorter around that time.  

For those who love a good conspiracy theory...(gotta love a good conspiracy theory).  There is a research facility close to the Seafood market in Wuhan where the outbreak is alleged to have really started.

"as Botao Xiao of the South China University of Technology notes, the market was just 918 feet from a Wuhan level-4 biolab conducting experiments on bat coronavirus."

https://www.zerohedge.com/health/wuhan-seafood-market-ground-zero-coronavirus-outbreak-demolished

There are many reports and acknowledgements that Patient 0 of Covid 19 had nothing to do with the seafood market, although it did spread rapidly inside there.

"However, a study, by Chinese researchers published in the Lancet medical journal, claimed the first person to be diagnosed with Covid-19, was on 1 December 2019 (a lot of earlier) and that person had "no contact" with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market"  

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200221-coronavirus-the-harmful-hunt-for-covid-19s-patient-zero

Patient 0 has also mysteriously vanished with no information about them to be found.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 06:02:27 AM
Lol, now we are only allowed the infection data once a week, and no specifics about locations will be given.

https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1235207174407802880

"As of today, due to the number of new cases, we will no longer be tweeting information on the location of each new case.

Instead, this information will be released centrally in a consolidated format online, once a week. We are working on this now and plan to share on Friday."


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 05, 2020, 10:37:51 AM
Lol, now we are only allowed the infection data once a week, and no specifics about locations will be given.

https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1235207174407802880

"As of today, due to the number of new cases, we will no longer be tweeting information on the location of each new case.

Instead, this information will be released centrally in a consolidated format online, once a week. We are working on this now and plan to share on Friday."

Oh gawd, see all the replies from people pulling their kids from school.  They are going to keep them in a sealed bubble for 6 months?  I have some sympathy for those with underlying health conditions; but cranks and underlying health conditions are not a perfect fit on venn diagrams.

Giving people no inoformation is clearly going to lead to a whole bunch of nutters filling the gap.  The school facebook page was already full of people pushing crazy theories on each side (it is not correct to extrapolate from last week's low infection figures to assume that you have more chance of winning the lottery; 300 cases in Italy doesn't mean that every person who has been there is gong to have contracted Coronavirus and so on). 

FWIW The chinese lab theory has been pretty well debunked too.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 11:03:13 AM
Lol, now we are only allowed the infection data once a week, and no specifics about locations will be given.

https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1235207174407802880

"As of today, due to the number of new cases, we will no longer be tweeting information on the location of each new case.

Instead, this information will be released centrally in a consolidated format online, once a week. We are working on this now and plan to share on Friday."

Oh gawd, see all the replies from people pulling their kids from school.  They are going to keep them in a sealed bubble for 6 months?  I have some sympathy for those with underlying health conditions; but cranks and underlying health conditions are not a perfect fit on venn diagrams.

Giving people no inoformation is clearly going to lead to a whole bunch of nutters filling the gap.  The school facebook page was already full of people pushing crazy theories on each side (it is not correct to extrapolate from last week's low infection figures to assume that you have more chance of winning the lottery; 300 cases in Italy doesn't mean that every person who has been there is gong to have contracted Coronavirus and so on). 

FWIW The chinese lab theory has been pretty well debunked too.



Agreed, I am not even sure what the statement means exactly with regards to information.  It can be interpreted a number of ways.  Are we still going to get daily numbers just no location info?  But we will get location info on Fridays?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 05, 2020, 11:13:22 AM
Lol, now we are only allowed the infection data once a week, and no specifics about locations will be given.

https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1235207174407802880

"As of today, due to the number of new cases, we will no longer be tweeting information on the location of each new case.

Instead, this information will be released centrally in a consolidated format online, once a week. We are working on this now and plan to share on Friday."

Oh gawd, see all the replies from people pulling their kids from school.  They are going to keep them in a sealed bubble for 6 months?  I have some sympathy for those with underlying health conditions; but cranks and underlying health conditions are not a perfect fit on venn diagrams.

Giving people no inoformation is clearly going to lead to a whole bunch of nutters filling the gap.  The school facebook page was already full of people pushing crazy theories on each side (it is not correct to extrapolate from last week's low infection figures to assume that you have more chance of winning the lottery; 300 cases in Italy doesn't mean that every person who has been there is gong to have contracted Coronavirus and so on). 

FWIW The chinese lab theory has been pretty well debunked too.



Agreed, I am not even sure what the statement means exactly with regards to information.  It can be interpreted a number of ways.  Are we still going to get daily numbers just no location info?  But we will get location info on Fridays?

I agree the statement is kind of ambiguous but if they 'mean' the exact words they state then doesn't it just mean they're going to release a weekly file of exactly the same information that they were already doing?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 05, 2020, 11:16:20 AM
Looks like there is going to be a fun 3 weeks at some indeterminate date in the future. 

https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1235501769007992832 (https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1235501769007992832)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 11:27:38 AM
Rumours house of lords to be closed for 5 months.  Otherwise they would all probably be turning up in full hazmat suits.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 01:01:45 PM
Regarding banning large gatherings and the possible effect on Cheltenham, Boris Johnson himself appeared on This Morning and said the following

"Prime Minister Boris Johnson said measures such as closing schools and banning big events "don't work as well perhaps as people think".

He told ITV's This Morning programme another way of responding to the virus would be to "take it on the chin" and allow it to "move through the population without really taking as many draconian measures"."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51749352

Ok if they are not going to take measures at the moment then that's up to them but the way he phrased it is really quite rough and heartless towards the elderly and vulnerable imo.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 05, 2020, 01:03:14 PM
The Government is moving to phase 2 of the the virus plan.  This could include some restrictions on mass gatherings. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51749352 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51749352)

I have taken half my bets off the table for Cheltnham, though it seems really late to cancel. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 01:04:40 PM
Wow the quote I lifted is from the same article, there is so much conflicting info and statements from people with authority out there regarding what is going to happen in the UK.

Edit : And now the BBC have changed the quote slightly in the article.  What I pasted before was word for word as it was 30 mins ago.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 05, 2020, 01:47:03 PM
Why do we think there are (relatively) so few cases in North America, South America, & in particular, Africa?

I get that healthcare & reliable government data in large parts of Africa is somewhat rudimentary, but South Africa, with a population not much smaller than the UK, has zero reported cases.  

Australia, which has strong links with Asia, seems under-represented too.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 05, 2020, 02:02:57 PM
Why do we think there are (relatively) so few cases in North America, South America, & in particular, Africa?

I get that healthcare & reliable government data in large parts of Africa is somewhat rudimentary, but South Africa, with a population not much smaller than the UK, has zero reported cases.  

Australia, which has strong links with Asia, seems under-represented too.

I have read some horror stories from the States.  Even people who want testing don't seem to be able to get tested.  Given the lack of universal health care, cost of healthcare, low rates of sick pay/employment protection and a buffoon running the show at the top, then it will be no surprise if the cases explode there.

There is likely to be less direct routes to South America, so it is just going to be slower to get there.

On Africa, it is a mix of poor health care, so cases are not recognised and lower rates of international travel amongst the population than we experience.  It has been speculated that the virus might not do so well in warm weather, like flu, so transmission rates are going to be lower in warm weather countries all other things been equal.  This is part of the reason that people are hoping that much of the spread can be delayed until summer.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 05, 2020, 02:19:00 PM
Bet it doesn't thrive in 100 degree heat ;D

Viva Las Vegas!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 05, 2020, 02:22:07 PM
Bet it doesn't thrive in 100 degree heat ;D

Viva Las Vegas!

Ah, but think how well it will spread in the amazon room at 40 degrees  ;nana;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 05, 2020, 02:24:13 PM
Bet it doesn't thrive in 100 degree heat ;D

Viva Las Vegas!

Ah, but think how well it will spread in the amazon room at 40 degrees  ;nana;

I'm never normally there very long :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 02:34:09 PM
Did they release numbers today?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 05, 2020, 02:41:52 PM
Did they release numbers today?

I don't know, but they have reversed their earlier stance and are planning to release daily updates again.

FWIW There was a case reported in South Africa earlier Tikay


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 02:44:40 PM
Did they release numbers today?

I don't know, but they have reversed their earlier stance and are planning to release daily updates again.

FWIW There was a case reported in South Africa earlier Tikay

That is really good, where did you see they had reversed it?

Nice and hot in South Africa, interesting to see if it spreads quickly there.  India imported a load from Italy so data there seems skewed to start with but should watch both these countries now.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 05, 2020, 02:47:11 PM
Did they release numbers today?

They have been delayed apparently....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 05, 2020, 02:59:09 PM
Did they release numbers today?

I don't know, but they have reversed their earlier stance and are planning to release daily updates again.

FWIW There was a case reported in South Africa earlier Tikay

Pleased to see my bokking powers remain intact.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Tal on March 05, 2020, 03:03:05 PM
Did they release numbers today?

I don't know, but they have reversed their earlier stance and are planning to release daily updates again.

FWIW There was a case reported in South Africa earlier Tikay

Pleased to see my bokking powers remain intact.

 ;applause;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 05, 2020, 03:04:02 PM

^^^^

Ha, thought that might be wholly wasted.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 03:24:08 PM
Betfair market still managing to go wild in all directions on a delay in getting the numbers

It's like when they call out "no more bets" at a roulette table


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 05, 2020, 03:29:42 PM
Broken the 2.5m mark today, too.

If it drifts again I'm completely greening out as I can't see it getting cancelled now.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 04:04:57 PM
115 cases now in the UK, smaller jump than anticipated.

Yes is surging shorter on betfair.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 09:18:39 PM
Boris Johnson and the Tories appear to be taking a position of let the virus take its course through the population.  I wonder how many of their pensioner voters realise now how important the NHS and caring for other people is.

I couldn't give a shit if I personally get infected, I am not in a vulnerable group and I can easily self isolate for 1 month.  I just don't want to infect my loved ones or anyone else.

If I was a rich man or woman over the age of 70 I would definitely **** off right now to a hot climate.  It's not been given as advice anywhere but everything I have analysed says to me that is the smart thing to do.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 05, 2020, 10:03:38 PM
Boris Johnson and the Tories appear to be taking a position of let the virus take its course through the population.  I wonder how many of their pensioner voters realise now how important the NHS and caring for other people is.

I couldn't give a shit if I personally get infected, I am not in a vulnerable group and I can easily self isolate for 1 month.  I just don't want to infect my loved ones or anyone else.

If I was a rich man or woman over the age of 70 I would definitely **** off right now to a hot climate.  It's not been given as advice anywhere but everything I have analysed says to me that is the smart thing to do.

Jayzuuuz effing C.....drama queen much? Do you work for the Daily Mail or something? The disease WILL take its course regardless of government intervention whether tory or labour....it is what it is. Don’t think any govt would be better that another....they wouldn’t.

My mum is 86 and pretty well off and she isn’t going anywhere so stop spouting bollox mate....  ;tracet;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: SuperJez on March 05, 2020, 11:04:53 PM
Boris Johnson and the Tories appear to be taking a position of let the virus take its course through the population.  I wonder how many of their pensioner voters realise now how important the NHS and caring for other people is.

I couldn't give a shit if I personally get infected, I am not in a vulnerable group and I can easily self isolate for 1 month.  I just don't want to infect my loved ones or anyone else.

If I was a rich man or woman over the age of 70 I would definitely **** off right now to a hot climate.  It's not been given as advice anywhere but everything I have analysed says to me that is the smart thing to do.

Jayzuuuz effing C.....drama queen much? Do you work for the Daily Mail or something? The disease WILL take its course regardless of government intervention whether tory or labour....it is what it is. Don’t think any govt would be better that another....they wouldn’t.

My mum is 86 and pretty well off and she isn’t going anywhere so stop spouting bollox mate....  ;tracet;

Look at the WHO data on infection rates. Countries with high temperatures are not spreading this virus.  It it prospering in colder climates.  I take that as solid evidence it has a problem with the higher temps.

If you took offence at the suggestion the Tories are considering a harder line on this thing then I point you to Boris Johnsons comments today on This Morning

"He told ITV's This Morning programme: "One of the theories is perhaps you could take it on the chin, take it all in one go and allow the disease to move through the population without really taking as many draconian measures. I think we need to strike a balance.""

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51749352

You cannot state as a fact that all Governments would have an identical response or that this virus situation would play out identically to every different response.  What would a Corbyn government have done in this situation?  Nobody knows.  He was big on funding the NHS and looking after people though, and lots of other countrys in Europe that have a problem with infections have taken restrictions to slow the spread of the virus.  


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 05, 2020, 11:18:57 PM
Boris Johnson and the Tories appear to be taking a position of let the virus take its course through the population.  I wonder how many of their pensioner voters realise now how important the NHS and caring for other people is.

I couldn't give a shit if I personally get infected, I am not in a vulnerable group and I can easily self isolate for 1 month.  I just don't want to infect my loved ones or anyone else.

If I was a rich man or woman over the age of 70 I would definitely **** off right now to a hot climate.  It's not been given as advice anywhere but everything I have analysed says to me that is the smart thing to do.

Jayzuuuz effing C.....drama queen much? Do you work for the Daily Mail or something? The disease WILL take its course regardless of government intervention whether tory or labour....it is what it is. Don’t think any govt would be better that another....they wouldn’t.

My mum is 86 and pretty well off and she isn’t going anywhere so stop spouting bollox mate....  ;tracet;

Look at the WHO data on infection rates. Countries with high temperatures are not spreading this virus.  It it prospering in colder climates.  I take that as solid evidence it has a problem with the higher temps.

If you took offence at the suggestion the Tories are considering a harder line on this thing then I point you to Boris Johnsons comments today on This Morning

"He told ITV's This Morning programme: "One of the theories is perhaps you could take it on the chin, take it all in one go and allow the disease to move through the population without really taking as many draconian measures. I think we need to strike a balance.""

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51749352

You cannot state as a fact that all Governments would have an identical response or that this virus situation would play out identically to every different response.  What would a Corbyn government have done in this situation?  Nobody knows.  He was big on funding the NHS and looking after people though, and lots of other countrys in Europe that have a problem with infections have taken restrictions to slow the spread of the virus.
 

No, you're spouting bollocks.

FYP






Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Skippy on March 05, 2020, 11:36:17 PM
All this talk of don't worry, it'll only kill the old and vulnerable doesn't do much for me really. Everyone else will just be laid up for weeks and nearly dying, but escaping. That sounds like something I'd quite like to avoid too if possible.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 06, 2020, 02:24:03 AM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiqFnKXf3do

Be funny if it wasn't so mental.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 06, 2020, 09:56:01 AM
All this talk of don't worry, it'll only kill the old and vulnerable doesn't do much for me really. Everyone else will just be laid up for weeks and nearly dying, but escaping. That sounds like something I'd quite like to avoid too if possible.

Everyone else won't be nearly dying, most young people should just get flu like symptoms.

If 5% of the population with the virus will need intensive care (current estimate), how does the NHS cope when we have a million new cases a week?  At current growth rates that could be as early as May/June. 

We have 4,000 intensive care beds and many of those will be out of action through staff sickness and maybe patients from the week before.

The UK chief medical officer has stated this morning that they think mortality is under 1%, and Trump has that hunch too :/

1% may well be curently true, but is it going to be 1% in June and July?  I think we really have to hope the hot weather does slow it down/kill the virus.  I think there is good evidence it does, and it isn't somebody spouting bollocks, as the spread seems slower in the likes of Singapore.   




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 06, 2020, 01:15:44 PM
First case reported in Nottingham! Batten down the hatches, defcon 5 and bring the army in!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 06, 2020, 01:21:22 PM
i have taken precautions and taken my PC offline till norton comes up with protect against this virus


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: youthnkzR on March 07, 2020, 01:51:59 AM
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1236029449042198528


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 07, 2020, 02:00:38 AM
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1236029449042198528

https://mobile.twitter.com/lktproductions?lang=en (https://mobile.twitter.com/lktproductions?lang=en)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 07, 2020, 02:30:56 PM

Relax guys, Trump understands this stuff.



https://twitter.com/ddiamond/status/1236059773231079430


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 07, 2020, 02:45:28 PM

Relax guys, Trump understands this stuff.



https://twitter.com/ddiamond/status/1236059773231079430

That's to good "maybe I have a natural ability"


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 08, 2020, 09:51:54 AM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1236441095568945152

https://twitter.com/i/status/1236289649737371648

Lovely country.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 08, 2020, 10:04:06 AM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1236441095568945152

https://twitter.com/i/status/1236289649737371648

Lovely country.

News to me that it gives you the shits...... ::)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 08, 2020, 10:11:26 AM
If I'm stuck in my house with running water and loads of materials I think I can keep myself clean without loo roll - mad scenes.

I think Jon MW mentioned the film Contagion from 2011 - amazing how similar it is to the current situ..fun watch


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 08, 2020, 10:25:29 AM
The latest developments in Italy have done it for the cruise a group of us had booked.

4 nighter departing from Genoa, but we were all flying into Milan from various airports and travelling together to Genoa from there.
Party of 5, one has had to drop out anyway cos of the virus, and 2 were warned by their work they'd be put into self isolation for 2 weeks on their return.

So instead we're making use of the flight back we all had booked from Majorca (where the cruise is due to finish) and just going there for a few nights instead.

Fingers crossed MSC cancel the cruise and then we can claw back some £££. If not then I'll be badgering our rep for some credit towards a future booking :)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 08, 2020, 10:31:47 AM
Wait till this hits.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1249990/Asteroid-warning-NASA-tracks-4KM-killer-asteroid-hit-Earth-end-civilisation-asteroid-news

Andrex will be very hard to come by. Quilted will be totally out of the equation.

Fortunately the earth is flat, so it'll probably miss the edge, but just imagine.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 08, 2020, 07:11:12 PM
The 2071 one looks more likely, and I'll be long gone by then, luckily :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 09, 2020, 09:39:09 AM
1.09/1.1 the Cheltenham cancellation the day before.  Think the Aintree cancellation is better value. 

I was thinking this through, and I don't think the spread now matters too much, it is the spread when the intensive care beds are getting full that matters.  You have 20,000 cases needing an intensive care bed, and 1,500 new beds coming online each week the mortality rate isn't going to be 1%.   It appears Northern Italy is already getting to the point where services are overwhelmed already and they don't look to be close to peak demand.  I don't know how many beds that they can convert to intensive care substitutes, but I hope it is a fair few.   Though having spent some recent time observing intensive care and high dependency units, it is going to be pretty hard to convert other wards.  You'd be rushing through visas for every nurse and doctor in this country right now, wouldn't you?   

There seems to be good news coming out of China, but I struggle with believing the numbers. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 09, 2020, 09:57:29 AM
The Chinese numbers make no sense at all to me. If they have almost completely got control of the situation it would be great to share the solution!





Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 09, 2020, 10:10:54 AM
The Chinese numbers make no sense at all to me. If they have almost completely got control of the situation it would be great to share the solution!





They have the ability to lock down cities or even bigger areas which we do not.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 09, 2020, 11:00:26 AM
The Chinese numbers make no sense at all to me. If they have almost completely got control of the situation it would be great to share the solution!





They have the ability to lock down cities or even bigger areas which we do not.

I was going to say - it's not really a surprise it it? Apart from trying to suppress it right at the start the Chinese have pretty much told us everything they've been doing.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 09, 2020, 11:08:17 AM
The Chinese numbers make no sense at all to me. If they have almost completely got control of the situation it would be great to share the solution!

They have the ability to lock down cities or even bigger areas which we do not.

But they are not locked down.

I deal with factories in Ningbo and Shenzhen and both of those and all their related sub factories and suppliers are back at work and have been for a couple of weeks.

My understanding is that the majority of China is back at work. That would mean it only takes one person to mix back into those groups and it all starts again?



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 09, 2020, 11:21:02 AM
The Chinese numbers make no sense at all to me. If they have almost completely got control of the situation it would be great to share the solution!





They have the ability to lock down cities or even bigger areas which we do not.

I was going to say - it's not really a surprise it it? Apart from trying to suppress it right at the start the Chinese have pretty much told us everything they've been doing.

I am sure it has some significant effect, but I struggle to believe some of the news.  This morning the only cases they reported outside Wuhan were imported from Iran.   A lot of the country has the right temperature to encourage spread and in a lot of areas people live in such close proximity to each other.  People are still treating thousands in hospital, there has been talk of equipment shortages, yet there are no locally transmitted cases outside Wuhan.  




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bergeroo on March 09, 2020, 11:33:49 AM
So my girlfriend still wants to book a trip for the month of April. Seems to be a bad idea at this point to me. Not from the perspective of getting the virus but more from borders being closed. Flights cancelled. Having to go in quarantine. Germans and British getting travel banned as happened in Vietnam and Israel. And just general possible disruption to the trip and stress.

What do people think? We have nothing booked at this point and no money invested.

At this stage i can see in a few weeks time a lot more restrictions for people from Germany and the UK both within the country and for non essential travel


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 09, 2020, 11:48:06 AM
So my girlfriend still wants to book a trip for the month of April. Seems to be a bad idea at this point to me. Not from the perspective of getting the virus but more from borders being closed. Flights cancelled. Having to go in quarantine. Germans and British getting travel banned as happened in Vietnam and Israel. And just general possible disruption to the trip and stress.

What do people think? We have nothing booked at this point and no money invested.

At this stage i can see in a few weeks time a lot more restrictions for people from Germany and the UK both within the country and for non essential travel

I assume this is International.  I'd just leave it for now.  There seems a more than reasonable chance you just burn money and cannot go.  If uou leave it a couple fo weeks and it does improve, there will still be lots of capacity, as I have heard of many people cancelling trips. 

My working assumption is it is going to get a lot worse before it gets better.  I'd love to believe the figures coming out of China and see a bit more hope.

If it is more local, try and get as much of it on rates where you can cancel.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 09, 2020, 12:13:59 PM
Woodsey getting used to knocking out big five figures a day on the pension at the minute.   Better cash it in woodsey and get the remainer spent.  In happier news petrol will be sub £1 a litre at this rate soon


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 09, 2020, 12:17:23 PM
Woodsey getting used to knocking out big five figures a day on the pension at the minute.   Better cash it in woodsey and get the remainer spent.  In happier news petrol will be sub £1 a litre at this rate soon

:D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 09, 2020, 04:52:22 PM
Woodsey getting used to knocking out big five figures a day on the pension at the minute.   Better cash it in woodsey and get the remainer spent.  In happier news petrol will be sub £1 a litre at this rate soon

Fk that actually thinking of doubling down if it keeps getting battered!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 09, 2020, 07:01:31 PM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1237058315940777984


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 09, 2020, 08:30:07 PM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1237058315940777984

Who needs experts when we can get the view of TV personalities...

https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1237027356314869761 (https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1237027356314869761)

FWIW Flu is way more serious than people realise too.

I am very much in the "this is likely to be really shit" camp.  I still reserve the right to snigger at those with trolleys full of bogroll and hand gel.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 09, 2020, 09:18:09 PM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1237058315940777984

Who needs experts when we can get the view of TV personalities...

https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1237027356314869761 (https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1237027356314869761)

FWIW Flu is way more serious than people realise too.

I am very much in the "this is likely to be really shit" camp.  I still reserve the right to snigger at those with trolleys full of bogroll and hand gel.




 (http://i.imgur.com/z91Fxs0.jpg) (https://imgur.com/z91Fxs0)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 10, 2020, 09:14:10 AM
...

I think Jon MW mentioned the film Contagion from 2011 - amazing how similar it is to the current situ..fun watch

That's kind of why my wife's epidemiology lecturer recommended it for them - it's not that it's just similar to the current situation - what's happening now is basically what happens for every epidemic; it just doesn't normally happen on this wide a scale.

All of the things like travel restrictions and quarantines and closing down sporting events and schools happened with the SARs virus (for example) - but only in parts of Asia.

Which leads on to:

The Chinese numbers make no sense at all to me. If they have almost completely got control of the situation it would be great to share the solution!





They have the ability to lock down cities or even bigger areas which we do not.

I was going to say - it's not really a surprise it it? Apart from trying to suppress it right at the start the Chinese have pretty much told us everything they've been doing.

I am sure it has some significant effect, but I struggle to believe some of the news.  This morning the only cases they reported outside Wuhan were imported from Iran.   A lot of the country has the right temperature to encourage spread and in a lot of areas people live in such close proximity to each other.  People are still treating thousands in hospital, there has been talk of equipment shortages, yet there are no locally transmitted cases outside Wuhan. 



This is what happened to the SARs virus. It got spread by lots of people - control measures were put in place - it got spread by less people.

Eventually you reach a point where a lot of the population left just aren't susceptible to the virus and anybody who does get the virus is easily isolated and treated before they  have a chance to infect other people.

This virus is a lot more like seasonal flu then it is like SARs - that is why it's become such a big deal; but the epidemiology of it is likely to be pretty similar.

Long term: the best case scenario is that this control suppresses it as much as possible until a vaccine is found then it's going to be largely wiped out; worst case scenario is probably that the control measures will get the epidemic under control but no vaccine will be found so there will be periodic outbreaks in the future.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 10, 2020, 07:38:11 PM
spare a thought for the workers at Andrex who will likely find themselves on 12 months unpaid leave after the summer as people stop buying toilet roll and use up the stuff they have been panic buying this week.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 10, 2020, 08:37:41 PM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1b_QS4e31c8

Would be funny normally.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 11, 2020, 07:03:56 PM
Blimey ch4 news reporting 196 deaths in one day in Italy.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 11, 2020, 07:07:04 PM
NBA game on the West Coast tonight behind closed doors.  First one i think in USA.

https://www.espn.co.uk/nba/story/_/id/28884486/warriors-play-home-games-fans-following-san-francisco-order


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 11, 2020, 07:33:35 PM
NBA game on the West Coast tonight behind closed doors.  First one i think in USA.

https://www.espn.co.uk/nba/story/_/id/28884486/warriors-play-home-games-fans-following-san-francisco-order

Did you see that Getafe are refusing to travel to Milan tomorrow? 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 11, 2020, 08:08:03 PM
We are starting to get restrictions at work now, no flights at all including internal ones, got a lot going on in Ireland at the moment so that’s a pain. They want to monitor where people are planning on going on holiday in the coming months. Pretty sure it’s only a matter of time until they start restricting access into hospitals which largely stalls the day job until until they see fit to allow access again.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: HutchGF on March 11, 2020, 09:16:23 PM
I've been told no casinos, pubs, football matches, cinemas etc by my work.

I'd rather get it and fight it off then give up all that!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AlbusFawkes on March 11, 2020, 10:34:04 PM
I've been told no casinos, pubs, football matches, cinemas etc by my work.

I'd rather get it and fight it off then give up all that!

My work don't know about my 'hobby' yet. Neither do they know I am flying to Edinburgh on Friday :D



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Pokerpops on March 11, 2020, 10:49:11 PM
I've been told no casinos, pubs, football matches, cinemas etc by my work.

I'd rather get it and fight it off then give up all that!

Where do you work, Porton Down?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 11, 2020, 10:56:58 PM
Another trophyless season for the scousers when the EPL gets scrapped for the virus.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 11, 2020, 11:06:39 PM
This voices my fears of the worst case scenario better than I have done previously.

https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 11, 2020, 11:31:39 PM
I've been told no casinos, pubs, football matches, cinemas etc by my work.

I'd rather get it and fight it off then give up all that!

I’d be more worried they highlighted casinos to you, they’ve got your number  :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 12, 2020, 02:05:58 AM
NBA player tested positiive tonight before his game and the league is now suspended indefinitely after completion of tonights games.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 12, 2020, 02:50:51 AM
Trump has introduced a travel (and trade) ban from the EU.  Looks very political given the UK is excluded.  Apparently the EU hasn't introduced the strong measures the US has??

Will read the rest in the morning.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 12, 2020, 02:55:39 AM
Trump has introduced a travel (and trade) ban from the EU.  Looks very political given the UK is excluded.  Apparently the EU hasn't introduced the strong measures the US has??

Will read the rest in the morning.

Apparently it isn't trade, Trump just got confused in his speach.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: HutchGF on March 12, 2020, 06:43:41 AM
I've been told no casinos, pubs, football matches, cinemas etc by my work.

I'd rather get it and fight it off then give up all that!

Where do you work, Porton Down?

Close.....

A boarding school


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Pokerpops on March 12, 2020, 07:04:38 AM
I've been told no casinos, pubs, football matches, cinemas etc by my work.

I'd rather get it and fight it off then give up all that!

Where do you work, Porton Down?

Close.....

A boarding school

Ahhh. I can understand their desire to keep the school isolated, but it still feels overly controlling. Did they add Churches to the banned list?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 12, 2020, 08:08:17 AM
BBC News - Tom Hanks coronavirus: Actor and wife Rita Wilson test positive
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-51847198


You never know what your gonna get...


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bookiebasher on March 12, 2020, 08:39:34 AM
This voices my fears of the worst case scenario better than I have done previously.

https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca



Thanks Doobs , great article.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 12, 2020, 11:01:20 AM
Woodsey getting used to knocking out big five figures a day on the pension at the minute.   Better cash it in woodsey and get the remainer spent.  In happier news petrol will be sub £1 a litre at this rate soon

Fk that actually thinking of doubling down if it keeps getting battered!

 :hello:

Definitely getting battered right now.

I have nothing left to double down with.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 12, 2020, 11:27:33 AM
BBC News - Tom Hanks coronavirus: Actor and wife Rita Wilson test positive
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-51847198


You never know what your gonna get...

thought the summer was supposed to stop the spread of this, He is in Australia where it is summer and a lot warmer than a British summer 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 12, 2020, 11:49:20 AM
BBC News - Tom Hanks coronavirus: Actor and wife Rita Wilson test positive
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-51847198


You never know what your gonna get...

thought the summer was supposed to stop the spread of this, He is in Australia where it is summer and a lot warmer than a British summer 

Stop isn't the right word, the temperature should slow down the spread if it is like flu.  Looking at the numbers, this seems to be the case, but given it is new, we don't really know for sure.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 12, 2020, 11:57:31 AM
Woodsey getting used to knocking out big five figures a day on the pension at the minute.   Better cash it in woodsey and get the remainer spent.  In happier news petrol will be sub £1 a litre at this rate soon

Fk that actually thinking of doubling down if it keeps getting battered!

 :hello:

Definitely getting battered right now.

I have nothing left to double down with.

Same here actually but if I did I would!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: neeko on March 12, 2020, 03:29:45 PM
This best fits my current view, from Andrew Lillico on Twitter,

“If the govt thinks a) almost everyone getting CV eventually is near-inevitable; & b) containment will be v successful the 1st time used, an obvious drawback of too early containment cld be the risk of acting before enough people had it. You'd want lots to get it, but not too many”

We have to flatten the curve so hospitals cope as well as possible, keep the death rate to 1% not 3-5%.

There won’t be a vaccine for 7 billion people for at least 2 years if not longer.

The virus will pass through the population over 3 to 4 months rather than 1 month and hope that gives us immunity until a vaccine can be made.

Otherwise we all stay inside like China, hide from the virus but can’t get out until 2 years time when a vaccine is ready.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Mark_Porter on March 12, 2020, 03:58:52 PM
All sent home from work today. Plan is for all non essential staff to work from home until further notice.

Bloody hate working from home, go stir crazy.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 12, 2020, 04:24:43 PM
So the Government says if you feel ill you should self-isolate. Well if people are doing that how are they confirming new cases.
I feel rough today, so if I self-isolate and I'm lucky enough to recover, I won't know if I had it or not.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: DaveShoelace on March 12, 2020, 04:27:05 PM
All sent home from work today. Plan is for all non essential staff to work from home until further notice.

Bloody hate working from home, go stir crazy.

Next month I'll be celebrating year 13 of working from home

Yeah, it gets worse


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: 4KSuited on March 12, 2020, 04:57:07 PM
Came into London on British Rail & Tube today. A lot less busy than usual, overlaid with a subdued atmosphere. Read the article that Doobs linked on the way in, and began to think this might be my last trip to the smoke for awhile. In fact there may not be a choice, since I heard a rumor that the Tube’s going to be shut down (possibly fake news, ofc).

Met a mate at a pub near Victoria station for beers & lunch: earily quiet. Now I’m in the Hippodrome playing cash, and they’ve only just opened a third table: very slow. Never seen anything quite like it, tbh. Hate to concede defeat to this thing, but nothing other than restricted contact makes any sense till it’s over.

Good luck to all Blondes.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 12, 2020, 05:20:58 PM
another 8% off the pensions today.   Everyone will be skint this time next week.  betfair lost 15% of its value today which is pretty brutal.  Betway got a lot to answer for.  Don't think it's just the virus causing this today.  Online poker/casinos are goiing to boom this summer.  Bookies should prefer that as the income is gtd and has no swings or variance like pricing sporting events.   Really surprised the shares have fallen this far.  People are going to be bored shitless sitting at home for weeks on end on their machines.

https://www.racingpost.com/news/bookmaker-shares-in-freefall-amid-unprecedented-concern-caused-by-coronavirus/427689

Hills are now worth £800m market cap wise as a company.  How the mighty have fallen.  Denise nearly paid herself that in the last 2 years in salary and divi's.  Quite amazing.

https://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/w/william-hill-plc-ordinary-10-pence


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 12, 2020, 05:29:42 PM
So the Government says if you feel ill you should self-isolate. Well if people are doing that how are they confirming new cases.
I feel rough today, so if I self-isolate and I'm lucky enough to recover, I won't know if I had it or not.

It's if you have a fever or a persistent cough - so not exactly just if you feel ill.

There will be many, many people who don't get counted in the official figures because they just had mild symptoms (or no symptoms) and didn't even necessarily think it wasn't just  a cold.

But if you feel ill enough to think you might need a doctor then you need to call 111 and if they think it's necessary they will refer you for a test.

Self isolating by itself doesn't really make a difference - if you were ill enough to phone 111 then it wouldn't matter if you were at work or not, and if you were they'd tell you to self isolate.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 12, 2020, 07:12:58 PM
NBA player tested positiive tonight before his game and the league is now suspended indefinitely after completion of tonights games.

Doubt this helped much...

https://twitter.com/JesseLehrich/status/1237918168032653313


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 12, 2020, 08:14:43 PM
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/12/trump-coronavirus-travel-europe-resorts-126808


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 12, 2020, 10:11:28 PM
‘Kinell......done over 40k now!   ;yippee; ;yippee; ;yippee;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 12, 2020, 10:27:44 PM
Three Leicester players got it. Arteta got it.

Be surprised if there's much footy this weekend.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 12, 2020, 11:37:56 PM
Jason Burt
@JBurtTelegraph
·
1h
In light of Mikel Arteta being tested positive for coronavirus the Premier League is expected to be suspended tomorrow.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bunnydas8888 on March 13, 2020, 04:49:09 AM
Jason Burt
@JBurtTelegraph
·
1h
In light of Mikel Arteta being tested positive for coronavirus the Premier League is expected to be suspended tomorrow.

Hudson-odoi also positive and entire Chelsea squad into self isolation!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bookiebasher on March 13, 2020, 04:54:04 AM
Think Boris is bungling this.

Events moving faster than him.

Asking people to self isolate for 7 days isn’t going to wash. 😏


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 13, 2020, 07:07:13 AM
This illustrates what broadly annoys me about journalism.

Coronavirus: UK's approach 'concerning', says Jeremy Hunt (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51865915)

This article contains the opinion of 3 people.

1. Keith Neal, emeritus professor in the epidemiology of infectious diseases at the University of Nottingham - who thinks that the UK plan is sensible
2. Susan Michie, professor of health psychology at University College London - who pretty much says you kind of guess what to do in an epidemic because everyone knows 'what' to do but not 'when' to do it (a lot of this is inferred because she only gets about a sentence in the article)

and
3. Jeremy Hunt - as an ex-minister, he no longer has access to all the advisors; in terms of qualifications and experience he is basically - some bloke.

The BBC is actually good journalism because they include all 3 of these opinions - but it's still annoying how the actual experts get a sentence or a paragraph and 'some bloke' gets the headline and the emphasis of the article.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 13, 2020, 07:51:24 AM
This illustrates what broadly annoys me about journalism.

Coronavirus: UK's approach 'concerning', says Jeremy Hunt (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51865915)

This article contains the opinion of 3 people.

1. Keith Neal, emeritus professor in the epidemiology of infectious diseases at the University of Nottingham - who thinks that the UK plan is sensible
2. Susan Michie, professor of health psychology at University College London - who pretty much says you kind of guess what to do in an epidemic because everyone knows 'what' to do but not 'when' to do it (a lot of this is inferred because she only gets about a sentence in the article)

and
3. Jeremy Hunt - as an ex-minister, he no longer has access to all the advisors; in terms of qualifications and experience he is basically - some bloke.

The BBC is actually good journalism because they include all 3 of these opinions - but it's still annoying how the actual experts get a sentence or a paragraph and 'some bloke' gets the headline and the emphasis of the article.

He was health secretary for 6 years and us chair of the health and social.care committee.   Think that makes him more than "some bloke".


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 13, 2020, 09:04:07 AM
This illustrates what broadly annoys me about journalism.

Coronavirus: UK's approach 'concerning', says Jeremy Hunt (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51865915)

This article contains the opinion of 3 people.

1. Keith Neal, emeritus professor in the epidemiology of infectious diseases at the University of Nottingham - who thinks that the UK plan is sensible
2. Susan Michie, professor of health psychology at University College London - who pretty much says you kind of guess what to do in an epidemic because everyone knows 'what' to do but not 'when' to do it (a lot of this is inferred because she only gets about a sentence in the article)

and
3. Jeremy Hunt - as an ex-minister, he no longer has access to all the advisors; in terms of qualifications and experience he is basically - some bloke.

The BBC is actually good journalism because they include all 3 of these opinions - but it's still annoying how the actual experts get a sentence or a paragraph and 'some bloke' gets the headline and the emphasis of the article.

He was health secretary for 6 years and us chair of the health and social.care committee.   Think that makes him more than "some bloke".

If he has based his opinion on expert testimony to the Health and Social Care Committee then I still don't like journalists but I'd give some sort of retraction - but, as far as I know they've only had a single preliminary meeting about coronavirus and that was a while ago: so I don't think it's likely.

Government ministers aren't experts - they're managers.

Being Health Secretary is irrelevant unless he's also dealt with the same situation and learned all the expertise from it.

The epidemics he was around for were Zika - but that pretty much came to nothing over here; and H1N1.

H1N1 was qualititatively different to this outbreak and if he is using that experience to inform his judgement here then that is not a good thing.

H1N1 was much more infectious in the open air then this coronavirus - so closing public events becomes a different decision making tree, and
H1N1 had much more of an impact on children and adolescents - so closing schools becomes a different decision making tree.

Basically if he is using his experience as Health Secretary to inform his current decisions he could arguably be doing worse than the average person.


That's not to say that his opinion is necessarily wrong and the government opinion is right - there's still a whole bunch of judgement involved; but without his ministerial briefings he's not in as good a position to make that judgement. Unless, and until, he gets extra advice from experts his judgement is about the same as the ... maybe not average.. but at least the well read man on the street.


It's not like they couldn't still have the same article with the same headline - I just think it would be more accurate to portray it as; experts advising the government think this is a rational course of action - other experts agree with them - but the former Health Secretary disagrees.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bergeroo on March 13, 2020, 09:35:25 AM
experts advising the government think this is a rational course of action - other experts agree with them - but the former Health Secretary disagrees.

I would say unfortunately you aren't going to get a job as a sub editor with headlines like that. Needs to be snappy, concise and to the point!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 13, 2020, 09:59:03 AM
Came into London on British Rail & Tube today. A lot less busy than usual, overlaid with a subdued atmosphere. Read the article that Doobs linked on the way in, and began to think this might be my last trip to the smoke for awhile. In fact there may not be a choice, since I heard a rumor that the Tube’s going to be shut down (possibly fake news, ofc).

Met a mate at a pub near Victoria station for beers & lunch: earily quiet. Now I’m in the Hippodrome playing cash, and they’ve only just opened a third table: very slow. Never seen anything quite like it, tbh. Hate to concede defeat to this thing, but nothing other than restricted contact makes any sense till it’s over.

Good luck tows all Blondes.

Into London this morning. Like travelling on a Sunday morning. Obvs a lot of companies and individuals actively distancing already. Think this is what the government wants without having to mandate it too soon. Pretty smart imo


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 13, 2020, 10:02:04 AM
Don't know if I read this here or somewhere else but the number of 'names' getting this would seem to imply zillions more have already got this. How's my science JonMW or am I spouting blx as usual


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 13, 2020, 10:02:42 AM
Came into London on British Rail & Tube today. A lot less busy than usual, overlaid with a subdued atmosphere. Read the article that Doobs linked on the way in, and began to think this might be my last trip to the smoke for awhile. In fact there may not be a choice, since I heard a rumor that the Tube’s going to be shut down (possibly fake news, ofc).

Met a mate at a pub near Victoria station for beers & lunch: earily quiet. Now I’m in the Hippodrome playing cash, and they’ve only just opened a third table: very slow. Never seen anything quite like it, tbh. Hate to concede defeat to this thing, but nothing other than restricted contact makes any sense till it’s over.

Good luck tows all Blondes.

Into London this morning. Like travelling on a Sunday morning. Obvs a lot of companies and individuals actively distancing already. Think this is what the government wants without having to mandate it too soon. Pretty smart imo

Yep, when I first heard it I thought he had lost his mind but reading more into it last night it actually seems a very measured approach.

All the people screwing about closing schools don't seem to have taken into account the choice of zero pay while they look after the kids, or sending them off to infect the vulnerable grandparents who have to take them out to play somewhere as they cant handle them in the house for 2 weeks so they still all infect each other and the elderly population too.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 13, 2020, 10:06:33 AM
Came into London on British Rail & Tube today. A lot less busy than usual, overlaid with a subdued atmosphere. Read the article that Doobs linked on the way in, and began to think this might be my last trip to the smoke for awhile. In fact there may not be a choice, since I heard a rumor that the Tube’s going to be shut down (possibly fake news, ofc).

Met a mate at a pub near Victoria station for beers & lunch: earily quiet. Now I’m in the Hippodrome playing cash, and they’ve only just opened a third table: very slow. Never seen anything quite like it, tbh. Hate to concede defeat to this thing, but nothing other than restricted contact makes any sense till it’s over.

Good luck tows all Blondes.

Into London this morning. Like travelling on a Sunday morning. Obvs a lot of companies and individuals actively distancing already. Think this is what the government wants without having to mandate it too soon. Pretty smart imo

Yep, when I first heard it I thought he had lost his mind but reading more into it last night it actually seems a very measured approach.

All the people screwing about closing schools don't seem to have taken into account the choice of zero pay while they look after the kids, or sending them off to infect the vulnerable grandparents who have to take them out to play somewhere as they cant handle them in the house for 2 weeks so they still all infect each other and the elderly population too.


I
People are hysterical. Soon have all anti government types begging the government to be more fascistic


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 13, 2020, 10:28:41 AM
Don't know if I read this here or somewhere else but the number of 'names' getting this would seem to imply zillions more have already got this. How's my science JonMW or am I spouting blx as usual


Think that's already been covered under a slightly different question :D

So the Government says if you feel ill you should self-isolate. Well if people are doing that how are they confirming new cases.
I feel rough today, so if I self-isolate and I'm lucky enough to recover, I won't know if I had it or not.

It's if you have a fever or a persistent cough - so not exactly just if you feel ill.

There will be many, many people who don't get counted in the official figures because they just had mild symptoms (or no symptoms) and didn't even necessarily think it wasn't just  a cold.

But if you feel ill enough to think you might need a doctor then you need to call 111 and if they think it's necessary they will refer you for a test.

Self isolating by itself doesn't really make a difference - if you were ill enough to phone 111 then it wouldn't matter if you were at work or not, and if you were they'd tell you to self isolate.


To add - it's a bit odd seeing so many people saying the UK is an outlier because we're "doing nothing"

This was the change from trying to get everyone with the virus in hospital to explicitly admitting that was no longer possible and hospital was now more about whether you actually need hospital treatment.

We've been taking measures to slow down it's spread - we just haven't been taking all the same measures, at the same time, as everyone else.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Cf on March 13, 2020, 11:20:53 AM

We've been taking measures to slow down it's spread - we just haven't been taking all the same measures, at the same time, as everyone else.

Have we? Can't say I've noticed.

(Also blue is my colour)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 13, 2020, 11:36:04 AM

We've been taking measures to slow down it's spread - we just haven't been taking all the same measures, at the same time, as everyone else.

Have we? Can't say I've noticed.

(Also blue is my colour)


One author uses blue text and Cf posts again. Nice to hear from you :-)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 13, 2020, 12:47:44 PM
Wonder if we will get discounted sports packages for next month or 2 with no live sport?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bergeroo on March 13, 2020, 12:53:07 PM
Wonder if we will get discounted sports packages for next month or 2 with no live sport?

They are showing all Bundesliga matches for free on German TV this weekend!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 13, 2020, 12:59:57 PM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0z1pWExSQg

Perkins a really smart guy, and this a good listen.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 13, 2020, 01:21:44 PM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kas0tIxDvrg

And this.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 13, 2020, 05:42:41 PM
Thats it, we’re working from home for at least the next month, can’t see it for being less than 2 months if I’m honest......


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 13, 2020, 05:59:57 PM
Italy's figures are getting worse.

Quite a few countries banning UK nationals for the time being.

Hearing that BA are under severe financial pressure.

This is one big clusterfuck for the world.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 13, 2020, 06:40:36 PM
.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3URhJx0NSw


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 13, 2020, 07:30:20 PM
Quite funny parts of that -Rogan desperate to believe that Sauna is gonna protect him


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 14, 2020, 08:58:54 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/EBPxVge.jpg)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Supernova on March 14, 2020, 09:34:04 AM
I was told in my local supermarket yesterday morning that they hadn't had any hand sanitizer in stock or delivered now for over a week.

I also had an email from Ebay saying sellers selling items like sanitizer found to be well over the normal selling price would be severely reprimanded, so I went to have a look and found many tiny bottles of 49p Aldi hand sanitizer up for sale at £24.00


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 14, 2020, 09:58:58 AM
Europe is closing ranks.

Poland stopping UK nationals.
Flights to Canary Islands not being allowed to take off today.

The worst is yet to come....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 14, 2020, 10:21:17 AM
Europe is closing ranks.

Poland stopping UK nationals.
Flights to Canary Islands not being allowed to take off today.

The worst is yet to come....

Mass redundancies & even bankruptcies in the Airline industry alone are going to be off the chart.

 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 14, 2020, 10:29:29 AM
Europe is closing ranks.

Poland stopping UK nationals.
Flights to Canary Islands not being allowed to take off today.

The worst is yet to come....

Mass redundancies & even bankruptcies in the Airline industry alone are going to be off the chart.

 

The whole travel/tourism industry is gonna fall apart at this rate.

Airlines
Tour Operators
Agencies
Hotels
Airports

Which will then trickle down to the local businesses across Europe that rely on the tourism cash.

The travel industry as we know it has probably changed forever in these last 2 weeks.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 14, 2020, 10:36:51 AM
Europe is closing ranks.

Poland stopping UK nationals.
Flights to Canary Islands not being allowed to take off today.

The worst is yet to come....

Mass redundancies & even bankruptcies in the Airline industry alone are going to be off the chart.

 

The whole travel/tourism industry is gonna fall apart at this rate.

Airlines
Tour Operators
Agencies
Hotels
Airports

Which will then trickle down to the local businesses across Europe that rely on the tourism cash.

The travel industry as we know it has probably changed forever in these last 2 weeks.

Add the Cruise Liner business to that list.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 14, 2020, 10:47:51 AM
Europe is closing ranks.

Poland stopping UK nationals.
Flights to Canary Islands not being allowed to take off today.

The worst is yet to come....

Mass redundancies & even bankruptcies in the Airline industry alone are going to be off the chart.

 

The whole travel/tourism industry is gonna fall apart at this rate.

Airlines
Tour Operators
Agencies
Hotels
Airports

Which will then trickle down to the local businesses across Europe that rely on the tourism cash.

The travel industry as we know it has probably changed forever in these last 2 weeks.

Add the Cruise Liner business to that list.

Don't know how I missed them off, probably gonna be the most immediately impacted of the lot. Pretty much all major cruise lines have suspended operations for at least a month.

We have some clients on a round the world voyage at the moment, left UK early January and not due back until early May.
The cruise operator, Cruise & Maritime, yesterday announced cancellations across their entire fleet and all ships to return to their home docks in UK/Germany. All impacted customers to receive a full refund.
So our couple, who are probably somewhere over towards Australia at present, will be due a refund of £26,000 on their return, and essentially will have had a 10 week cruise for free.

There are not gonna be many winners in all this mess, but I think they will view that as a result.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 14, 2020, 10:51:49 AM
Yes, the Cruise industry is in for a real bad time, but I fancy the Airlines will be even harder hit.

Delta Airlines alone have grounded 300 jets. Three hundred. And overnight, since they announced that, more countries announced travel bans.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 14, 2020, 02:10:03 PM
Read an interesting piece earlier alluding to the fact that if this had happened pre the digital age.

Some people would have coughs and colds, some old people would have died of respiratory or other illnesses. No-one would know it was happening, life would go on, economies wouldn't be trashed.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 14, 2020, 02:30:42 PM
Read an interesting piece earlier alluding to the fact that if this had happened pre the digital age.

Some people would have coughs and colds, some old people would have died of respiratory or other illnesses. No-one would know it was happening, life would go on, economies wouldn't be trashed.



1918-1920 Spanish flu case in point


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 14, 2020, 03:04:23 PM
Read an interesting piece earlier alluding to the fact that if this had happened pre the digital age.

Some people would have coughs and colds, some old people would have died of respiratory or other illnesses. No-one would know it was happening, life would go on, economies wouldn't be trashed.



The press would still be reporting on it.  For instance AIDS was all over the TV and newspapers in the 80s and only a few hundred people a year were dying of it.  I don't think The Sun of the 80s would have missed the chance to produce lots of scare stories about some new illness that could kill 5% of people who got it.   

Maybe we would all have been too busy playing cricket on village greens and eating cream teas to notice?




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 14, 2020, 04:17:15 PM
Read an interesting piece earlier alluding to the fact that if this had happened pre the digital age.

Some people would have coughs and colds, some old people would have died of respiratory or other illnesses. No-one would know it was happening, life would go on, economies wouldn't be trashed.



The press would still be reporting on it.  For instance AIDS was all over the TV and newspapers in the 80s and only a few hundred people a year were dying of it.  I don't think The Sun of the 80s would have missed the chance to produce lots of scare stories about some new illness that could kill 5% of people who got it.   

Maybe we would all have been too busy playing cricket on village greens and eating cream teas to notice?




Haha, I know I would have been. Hal-e-con days as one of my friends says


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 14, 2020, 04:20:07 PM
Read an interesting piece earlier alluding to the fact that if this had happened pre the digital age.

Some people would have coughs and colds, some old people would have died of respiratory or other illnesses. No-one would know it was happening, life would go on, economies wouldn't be trashed.



The press would still be reporting on it.  For instance AIDS was all over the TV and newspapers in the 80s and only a few hundred people a year were dying of it.  I don't think The Sun of the 80s would have missed the chance to produce lots of scare stories about some new illness that could kill 5% of people who got it.   

Maybe we would all have been too busy playing cricket on village greens and eating cream teas to notice?


AIDS has killed 32 million people so far.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 14, 2020, 04:36:44 PM
No-one getting into the States from Monday. At least from Europe anyway, including us.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 14, 2020, 04:58:15 PM
Suprised we weren't on the list at the start, anyway.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9vIUtXa9ug


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 14, 2020, 05:05:25 PM
No-one getting into the States from Monday. At least from Europe anyway, including us.

Good to see Donald got himself tested, hence proving that tests are available for multimillionaires throught the States.

Those laying WSOP cancellation at 20/1 are having a shocker, though it could follow in the footsteps of other World Series and limit itself to locals only?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 14, 2020, 06:24:43 PM
That Amash Adalja interview is quite interesting.

Now going to finish the Rogan one.

Gives me an excuse to not go back to the gym for a few more weeks ;D

Guess I'll have to throw my dumbbells around at home for the timebeing.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 15, 2020, 12:30:56 AM
http://nautil.us/issue/83/intelligence/the-man-who-saw-the-pandemic-coming

Interesting read.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: MintTrav on March 15, 2020, 12:55:22 AM
The US government has really changed its position.

President Trump committed $2Bn for the fight against coronavirus just over a week ago and the Democrats castigated him, saying $8Bn was needed. He relented and Congress approved the $8Bn.

Now he has declared a National Emergency and is making $50Bn available. That's a lot of dosh.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 15, 2020, 02:27:22 AM
Looks like most of Vegas is shutting down as we speak.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 15, 2020, 06:33:20 AM
Oops posted this on the wrong thread

Looks like I could be getting locked up for 4 months

https://www.itv.com/news/2020-03-14/elderly-to-be-quarantined-for-four-months-in-wartime-style-mobilisation-to-combat-coronavirus/?fbclid=IwAR3Ab4M2wmPnWheobBPyRFdzuhj_NzG1QAQU8fXixiUabd6KLmexadbtB-g


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 15, 2020, 12:04:21 PM
I know how to avoid Corona virus. Move to Albert Square.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 15, 2020, 12:29:55 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/H514WPM.jpg)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 15, 2020, 01:55:22 PM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1239102590719332354


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 15, 2020, 01:56:49 PM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1239102590719332354

Ha, hard to imagine a better way of spreading the virus.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 15, 2020, 01:59:23 PM

Blimey.


Coronavirus: Isolation for over-70s 'within weeks'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51895873


Surely that can only be an "advisory"? They can't force folk to do it can they?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 15, 2020, 02:26:45 PM
Says it's advice, and 'reduce social contact', so not quite imprisonment.

I'm 39 and I already do all of that, so no problem for me :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 15, 2020, 03:06:36 PM

Blimey.


Coronavirus: Isolation for over-70s 'within weeks'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51895873


Surely that can only be an "advisory"? They can't force folk to do it can they?

posted that story on the itv site earlier its happening in italy spain and france already but its everyone there not just the over 70s

its not law but its highly recomended
 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 15, 2020, 04:47:07 PM
Stupidest question of the day.


Sophie Ridge asks Matt Hancock: "Can you guarantee that everyone who needs a respirator will get one?"



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 15, 2020, 07:02:42 PM
Some guys ITT doing some maths on it.

https://twitter.com/murtaman/status/1239216046973861888


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: booder on March 15, 2020, 07:11:05 PM
.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 15, 2020, 07:14:44 PM
Every pub/bar in Ireland has been ordered to close until March 29th.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bookiebasher on March 16, 2020, 08:18:12 AM
https://womensagenda.com.au/latest/speed-trumps-perfection-who-executive-director-on-stemming-the-spread-of-disease/

He should be doing the daily briefings , not lame duck Boris.

By far the best speech I have seen on this crisis so far.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 16, 2020, 10:07:01 AM
For those that need it, the NHS advice is here

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/ (https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/)

I am not sure how old people are going to be able to get good advice on this; it isn't even that clear to me, and I have got google.  Imagine how it must be if you are in your 80s and your source of news is the Daily Express?

My youngest has a cough, it isn't even a bad one and she hasn't had a temperature, but it has been hanging round since last week.  Given she is young, she would get mild symptoms, so the cautious thing to do would be to keep her off school?  So I ring the school and they don't seem clear either.  So I think there should be a flowchart for what the government wants us to do, and I just can't find one.  She is at home right now, but is there much point if 80% of the other parents whose kids have a cough are sending them in?  and given the end reult of the Government plans, even if not the intention, is that most people get it, shouldn't I be just getting her as much schooling as possible?

 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 16, 2020, 10:55:24 AM
FFS newspapers cant make there minds up

some are reporting that ibuprofen could make the virus worse
others are saying its fake news

seemingly started by a tweet by french health minister but reports his twitter was hacked


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 16, 2020, 11:03:26 AM
FFS newspapers cant make there minds up

some are reporting that ibuprofen could make the virus worse
others are saying its fake news

seemingly started by a tweet by french health minister but reports his twitter was hacked

This seems solid and is written by a doctor

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/doctor-note-ibuprofen-coronavirus-worse-200316045046677.html (https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/doctor-note-ibuprofen-coronavirus-worse-200316045046677.html)

So use paracetamol if you can.

Which newspapers are saying it is fake news?

edit.  FWIW The french minister's tweet is still there.  You'd think it would br taken down if wrong.

If you have to take ibuprofen and think you have covid19 speak to a doctor. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 16, 2020, 11:13:18 AM
FFS newspapers cant make there minds up

some are reporting that ibuprofen could make the virus worse
others are saying its fake news

seemingly started by a tweet by french health minister but reports his twitter was hacked

This seems solid and is written by a doctor

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/doctor-note-ibuprofen-coronavirus-worse-200316045046677.html (https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/doctor-note-ibuprofen-coronavirus-worse-200316045046677.html)

So use paracetamol if you can.

Which newspapers are saying it is fake news?




there was half a dozen when i googled it over night but can only see a English version of a Bulgarian newspaper now
rest have gone missing

https://www.novinite.com/articles/203622/Fake+News%3A+Ibuprofen+and+Cortisone+may+Worsen+your+Condition+if+you+are+Infected+with+COVID-19


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 16, 2020, 11:22:10 AM
will be interesting to see how many from cheltenham contract the virus.. they were packed in nice and tight..

or was it allowed to go ahead as an experiment to see if mass gatherings contracted on a large scale ?

love a conspiracy me  ;D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 16, 2020, 11:59:59 AM
(https://s19.directupload.net/images/200316/o5otgo5m.jpg) (https://www.directupload.net)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 16, 2020, 01:11:13 PM
i am getting worried about the panic buying can't get my hands on any sanitizer now, as a wheelchair user i use it all the time.
everywhere is sold out and any time some comes in people are walking out with a dozen bottles


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 16, 2020, 01:16:11 PM
i am getting worried about the panic buying can't get my hands on any sanitizer now, as a wheelchair user i use it all the time.
everywhere is sold out and any time some comes in people are walking out with a dozen bottles

Think online is probably your best option mate....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 16, 2020, 01:18:35 PM
i am getting worried about the panic buying can't get my hands on any sanitizer now, as a wheelchair user i use it all the time.
everywhere is sold out and any time some comes in people are walking out with a dozen bottles

Keep us posted on how this goes, if things get desperate, I’d be happy to send you a bottle or two next time I’m able to get hold of some.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 16, 2020, 01:35:13 PM
i am getting worried about the panic buying can't get my hands on any sanitizer now, as a wheelchair user i use it all the time.
everywhere is sold out and any time some comes in people are walking out with a dozen bottles

Keep us posted on how this goes, if things get desperate, I’d be happy to send you a bottle or two next time I’m able to get hold of some.

Great gesture sir.. and what makes this kind of forum great... if a few more people demonstrated some common sense and thoughtfulness then we might not be losing our minds out there fuelled by a media with no scruples


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 16, 2020, 02:02:45 PM
Not on the same level but needed a face mask for a genuine reason. Farkin impossible and yet you don't see a zillion people wearing them. People must be buying them just to admire their hoard - complete wallopers.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 16, 2020, 02:11:03 PM
Andrew Neil
@afneil
Unconfirmed reports that President Macron about to announce total lockdown with confinement to homes for five weeks, starting Wednesday.

Sur le portetape. L'incred.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 16, 2020, 02:22:52 PM
will be interesting to see how many from cheltenham contract the virus.. they were packed in nice and tight..

or was it allowed to go ahead as an experiment to see if mass gatherings contracted on a large scale ?

love a conspiracy me  ;D

Well they hadn't really cancelled anything over here when that started, so gave it a mastermind pass, and football was still going ahead.

Take your cap off, Alex Jones :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 16, 2020, 02:23:50 PM
Not on the same level but needed a face mask for a genuine reason. Farkin impossible and yet you don't see a zillion people wearing them. People must be buying them just to admire their hoard - complete wallopers.

Kids need a fright now and again, so don't always need one ;D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bookiebasher on March 16, 2020, 02:45:00 PM
i am getting worried about the panic buying can't get my hands on any sanitizer now, as a wheelchair user i use it all the time.
everywhere is sold out and any time some comes in people are walking out with a dozen bottles

I know a manager at Aldi and he will get you some and I will post it to you .

PM me how many you want and your address if you want.

Trumpets have sold out though .



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 16, 2020, 03:49:59 PM
thanks everyone, friend managed to find me 2 bottles in a store today and picked them up for me.

hand washing is something i do but is kinda pointless for me first thing i touch after washing hands is the last thing i touched before i washed

i normally go through a bottle or 2 a week, thought after the first rush of panic buyers that stocks would return to normal so i didn't stock up extra (and add to the low stocks)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 16, 2020, 04:11:28 PM
thanks everyone, friend managed to find me 2 bottles in a store today and picked them up for me.

hand washing is something i do but is kinda pointless for me first thing i touch after washing hands is the last thing i touched before i washed

i normally go through a bottle or 2 a week, thought after the first rush of panic buyers that stocks would return to normal so i didn't stock up extra (and add to the low stocks)

I asked in tesco for you.   They said they had some today but it went quickly.  They also said that the pharmacy should be able to order it in for you as it is for medical reasons.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 16, 2020, 04:17:13 PM
W.H.O Director-General gives a 20 minute speech on how the people of the world should protect themselves during the Corona virus outbreak then opens the phone lines for waiting journos to ask questions.

After some trouble with her connection a reporter from Mexico gets her turn.


"Hi, I'm What's her face from Mexico. What advice do you have for Mexican citizens?"


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 16, 2020, 04:25:55 PM
thanks everyone, friend managed to find me 2 bottles in a store today and picked them up for me.

hand washing is something i do but is kinda pointless for me first thing i touch after washing hands is the last thing i touched before i washed

i normally go through a bottle or 2 a week, thought after the first rush of panic buyers that stocks would return to normal so i didn't stock up extra (and add to the low stocks)

I asked in tesco for you.   They said they had some today but it went quickly.  They also said that the pharmacy should be able to order it in for you as it is for medical reasons.

yeah every time some gets delivered people are phoning friends to get there quick panic buying will hopefully end soon


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 16, 2020, 04:41:04 PM
W.H.O Bloke says we must test. Boris says we're not testing.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 16, 2020, 04:44:11 PM
Apparently we are only testing people who are already in hospital with respiratory problems. All others who suspect they might have it are told to self isolate.


If that's true there could be 10 of thousands of cases we don't know about.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 16, 2020, 04:47:22 PM
Apparently we are only testing people who are already in hospital with respiratory problems. All others who suspect they might have it are told to self isolate.


If that's true there could be 10 of thousands of cases we don't know about.

Withholding the information on the number of deaths is scandalous as well.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 16, 2020, 04:50:26 PM
Apparently we are only testing people who are already in hospital with respiratory problems. All others who suspect they might have it are told to self isolate.


If that's true there could be 10 of thousands of cases we don't know about.

Withholding the information on the number of deaths is scandalous as well.

 https://mobile.twitter.com/DHSCgovuk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1239202990369705984&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fglobal-health%2Fscience-and-disease%2Fcoronavirus-latest-news-uk-covid-19-spain-deaths-cases%2F (https://mobile.twitter.com/DHSCgovuk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1239202990369705984&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fglobal-health%2Fscience-and-disease%2Fcoronavirus-latest-news-uk-covid-19-spain-deaths-cases%2F)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 16, 2020, 05:28:34 PM
Department of health and social care 6 hours ago

The most common symptoms of #coronavirus are: New continuous cough OR High temperature (37.8 degrees or higher) If you have these symptoms, it’s important that you stay at home for 7 days to help protect your friends and neighbours.

Boris has just announced that anyone living with anyone coughing should stay at home for 14 days.

That escalated quickly.  Do they know how frequently these ankle biters are coughing?  Can't even go to the pub. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 16, 2020, 05:31:48 PM
Apparently we are only testing people who are already in hospital with respiratory problems. All others who suspect they might have it are told to self isolate.


If that's true there could be 10 of thousands of cases we don't know about.

The Government estimated 5-10000 last week and more by now


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 16, 2020, 05:50:44 PM
Apparently we are only testing people who are already in hospital with respiratory problems. All others who suspect they might have it are told to self isolate.


If that's true there could be 10 of thousands of cases we don't know about.

The Government estimated 5-10000 last week and more by now

They are doubling every 2 or 3 days, though the Dom Cummings will have us believe it is every 5 or 6 days.  I suppose if you spend your working hours with Tory ministers you may start to belive everybody is an imbicile who can't use a spreadsheet.   I suppose we can pretend it is every 5 or 6 days if we don't test.




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 16, 2020, 06:22:58 PM
What does "Self isolate" actually mean for your average family?

Do you keep your teenagers off work or your kids off school?

How do you get provisions?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 16, 2020, 06:23:52 PM
How do the elderly self isolate for 3 months?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 16, 2020, 06:37:35 PM
How do the elderly self isolate for 3 months?

Gill's Dad is quite elderly, so he tried to order his groceries from Ocado on Sunday. The first delivery "slot" they could offer him was April 3rd.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 16, 2020, 06:49:58 PM
How do the elderly self isolate for 3 months?

My mum is quite lucky in that there's quite a few of us who can visit to deliver food and essentials. I'll leave it to her to decide if she would rather take her chances with us visiting or prefer us not to come in and be in close proximity for any extended time.

Those people that don't have a number of friends and family close by are going to need support from somewhere I would have thought. Perhaps this is the time where I can find my active charitable vocation - happy to go deliver stuff in the evenings to people without the trial of chatting and trying to be any kind of emotional support.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 16, 2020, 07:08:33 PM
Apparently we are only testing people who are already in hospital with respiratory problems. All others who suspect they might have it are told to self isolate.


If that's true there could be 10 of thousands of cases we don't know about.

The Government estimated 5-10000 last week and more by now

They are doubling every 2 or 3 days, though the Dom Cummings will have us believe it is every 5 or 6 days.  I suppose if you spend your working hours with Tory ministers you may start to belive everybody is an imbicile who can't use a spreadsheet.   I suppose we can pretend it is every 5 or 6 days if we don't test.


"...They are doubling every 2 or 3 days..." source? What spreadsheet?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 16, 2020, 07:41:08 PM
I miss Brexit.......


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 16, 2020, 07:43:03 PM

Where's MANTIS when we most need him?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 16, 2020, 07:48:19 PM

Where's MANTIS when we most need him?

Working for Brad.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 16, 2020, 07:49:35 PM

Where's MANTIS when we most need him?


Self isolating?


Praying?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 16, 2020, 07:51:36 PM

Where's MANTIS when we most need him?


Self isolating?


Praying?

Wherever he is, he is probably telling people that it is no different to the millennium bug.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 16, 2020, 07:59:46 PM

Nah, bet he's got it sorted.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bookiebasher on March 16, 2020, 08:06:18 PM
Press conference question ...

On a scale of 1-10 how have you Mr President handled this crisis.

Did anyone expect him not to say 10  ;D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 16, 2020, 08:09:19 PM
Press conference question ...

On a scale of 1-10 how have you Mr President handled this crisis.

Did anyone expect him not to say 10  ;D


I expected him to say "Very tremendous".


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bookiebasher on March 16, 2020, 08:13:45 PM
 :D

Nobody in the world has a 10 like we have.

Our 10 is admired throughout the world .

It’s a tremendous 10.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 16, 2020, 08:31:01 PM
anyone remember this series?


https://www.amazon.co.uk/Survivors-Episode-1/dp/B00FZRL4JY/ref=sr_1_1?crid=393WVBTY18JZ0&keywords=survivors+bbc&qid=1584390578&s=instant-video&sprefix=survi%2Cprime-instant-video%2C234&sr=1-1-catcorr


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 16, 2020, 08:31:21 PM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: booder on March 16, 2020, 08:39:23 PM

Where's MANTIS when we most need him?


Self isolating?


Praying?

 ;applause;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 16, 2020, 08:48:01 PM

Ha, that whooshed me first time. Can't believe Boo of all people got it.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 16, 2020, 08:49:04 PM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 16, 2020, 08:51:46 PM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 16, 2020, 09:07:38 PM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 16, 2020, 09:09:08 PM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;

:D :D :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 16, 2020, 09:42:42 PM
Apparently we are only testing people who are already in hospital with respiratory problems. All others who suspect they might have it are told to self isolate.


If that's true there could be 10 of thousands of cases we don't know about.

The Government estimated 5-10000 last week and more by now

They are doubling every 2 or 3 days, though the Dom Cummings will have us believe it is every 5 or 6 days.  I suppose if you spend your working hours with Tory ministers you may start to belive everybody is an imbicile who can't use a spreadsheet.   I suppose we can pretend it is every 5 or 6 days if we don't test.


"...They are doubling every 2 or 3 days..." source? What spreadsheet?

89 UK cases on 5/3/2020*,
1543 as of today 16/3/2020

https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor (https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor)

The reported cases have doubled four times in 11 days, which is pretty much doubling every 2 or 3 days.

I wrote a spreadsheet on the 6 March with some rough estimates based on Italian and French growth rates at the time.  I though we'd do better and that they would "only" increase 5 fold for the first couple of weeks.  The number of reported cases is spreading quicker than I assumed in my projections.

You can see a post I made on the 6 March here:

http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=68630.msg2274225#msg2274225 (http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=68630.msg2274225#msg2274225)

I didn't assume 5 fold increases til June, I assumed it would reduce and would only be doubling each week from Mid April.

I haven't seen the Government projections, but they did say that they expected the bulk of cases over a 3 week period, and that would be consistent with what I did.  This is why they have to take such severe actions right now, the NHS could be overwhelmed by this time next month.   I assume their projections aren't getting released as they are genuinely scary. 

Have a nice evening.

* FWIW It was 13 the week before.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 16, 2020, 09:56:45 PM
.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 16, 2020, 10:01:26 PM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;

get corona one


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 16, 2020, 10:42:07 PM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;

Was thinking, nah it is going to be so difficult to get a positive result but...

along comes Jezza to score one last own goal  before the final whistle.

 Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70. (http://Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70.)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 16, 2020, 10:52:17 PM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;

Was thinking, nah it is going to be so difficult to get a positive result but...

along comes Jezza to score one last own goal  before the final whistle.

 Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70. (http://Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70.)


Would love him to stick around as long as possible but it’s not in labours interests, fingers crossed RLB is next in line to secure Boris’ legacy.....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: MintTrav on March 17, 2020, 07:47:10 AM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;

Was thinking, nah it is going to be so difficult to get a positive result but...

along comes Jezza to score one last own goal  before the final whistle.

 Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70. (http://Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70.)


Would love him to stick around as long as possible but it’s not in labours interests, fingers crossed RLB is next in line to secure Boris’ legacy.....

It should be the end for.him, if the public ever comes to understand how badly the UK government screwed up.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/u-k-realized-its-coronavirus-plan-could-kill-over-100-000.html


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 17, 2020, 08:50:00 AM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;

Was thinking, nah it is going to be so difficult to get a positive result but...

along comes Jezza to score one last own goal  before the final whistle.

 Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70. (http://Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70.)


Would love him to stick around as long as possible but it’s not in labours interests, fingers crossed RLB is next in line to secure Boris’ legacy.....

It should be the end for.him, if the public ever comes to understand how badly the UK government screwed up.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/u-k-realized-its-coronavirus-plan-could-kill-over-100-000.html

I think you probably mean you want it to be the end for him as most tory haters do......in reality we’ll only know if their strategy has worked later in the year when  it’s all come out in the wash.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 17, 2020, 09:04:41 AM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;

Was thinking, nah it is going to be so difficult to get a positive result but...

along comes Jezza to score one last own goal  before the final whistle.

 Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70. (http://Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70.)


Would love him to stick around as long as possible but it’s not in labours interests, fingers crossed RLB is next in line to secure Boris’ legacy.....

It should be the end for.him, if the public ever comes to understand how badly the UK government screwed up.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/u-k-realized-its-coronavirus-plan-could-kill-over-100-000.html

I think you probably mean you want it to be the end for him as most tory haters do......in reality we’ll only know if their strategy has worked later in the year when  it’s all come out in the wash.

"strategy".  Is that the one from yesterday evening, yesterday lunch time or the day before?   

Suprised they are still odds on.   But voters have short memories and it is still a long way to the next election. 

You'd delay Brexit, wouldn't you?  If it was a rational decision, not a political one, anyway.   I am not talking forever, but 12 months or so til this is fixed, or blows over.   Though maybe it is too far progressed?  In that case, you'd delay what is difficult and absolutely doesn't need to happen.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 17, 2020, 09:08:43 AM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;

Was thinking, nah it is going to be so difficult to get a positive result but...

along comes Jezza to score one last own goal  before the final whistle.

 Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70. (http://Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70.)


Would love him to stick around as long as possible but it’s not in labours interests, fingers crossed RLB is next in line to secure Boris’ legacy.....

It should be the end for.him, if the public ever comes to understand how badly the UK government screwed up.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/u-k-realized-its-coronavirus-plan-could-kill-over-100-000.html

I think you probably mean you want it to be the end for him as most tory haters do......in reality we’ll only know if their strategy has worked later in the year when  it’s all come out in the wash.

"strategy".  Is that the one from yesterday evening, yesterday lunch time or the day before?   

Suprised they are still odds on.   But voters have short memories and it is still a long way to the next election. 

You'd delay Brexit, wouldn't you?  If it was a rational decision, not a political one, anyway.   I am not talking forever, but 12 months or so til this is fixed, or blows over.   Though maybe it is too far progressed?  In that case, you'd delay what is difficult and absolutely doesn't need to happen.



The strategy will probably change a bit nearly every day as the situation changes, it’s no surprise to me anyway........I don’t expect any different from tory haters to have a whine up when it suits them.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 17, 2020, 09:32:00 AM
Apparently we are only testing people who are already in hospital with respiratory problems. All others who suspect they might have it are told to self isolate.


If that's true there could be 10 of thousands of cases we don't know about.

The Government estimated 5-10000 last week and more by now

They are doubling every 2 or 3 days, though the Dom Cummings will have us believe it is every 5 or 6 days.  I suppose if you spend your working hours with Tory ministers you may start to belive everybody is an imbicile who can't use a spreadsheet.   I suppose we can pretend it is every 5 or 6 days if we don't test.


"...They are doubling every 2 or 3 days..." source? What spreadsheet?

89 UK cases on 5/3/2020*,
1543 as of today 16/3/2020

https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor (https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor)

The reported cases have doubled four times in 11 days, which is pretty much doubling every 2 or 3 days.

I wrote a spreadsheet on the 6 March with some rough estimates based on Italian and French growth rates at the time.  I though we'd do better and that they would "only" increase 5 fold for the first couple of weeks.  The number of reported cases is spreading quicker than I assumed in my projections.

You can see a post I made on the 6 March here:

http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=68630.msg2274225#msg2274225 (http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=68630.msg2274225#msg2274225)

I didn't assume 5 fold increases til June, I assumed it would reduce and would only be doubling each week from Mid April.

I haven't seen the Government projections, but they did say that they expected the bulk of cases over a 3 week period, and that would be consistent with what I did.  This is why they have to take such severe actions right now, the NHS could be overwhelmed by this time next month.   I assume their projections aren't getting released as they are genuinely scary. 

Have a nice evening.

* FWIW It was 13 the week before.

Seems sound but the reason the government will say 5 or 6 is because the statistical model they're working on assumes it will double every 5 days (and they just can't help themselves adding the 'or 6' to hedge).

It kind of highlights a big issue: Statistical models are not real life (and they are never meant to be).

The every 5 days assumption could be because that's what's expected over the longer term (it could be they just made the wrong assumption) - but anyway that's where the government gets it's figures from.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 17, 2020, 09:33:25 AM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;

Was thinking, nah it is going to be so difficult to get a positive result but...

along comes Jezza to score one last own goal  before the final whistle.

 Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70. (http://Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70.)


Would love him to stick around as long as possible but it’s not in labours interests, fingers crossed RLB is next in line to secure Boris’ legacy.....

It should be the end for.him, if the public ever comes to understand how badly the UK government screwed up.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/u-k-realized-its-coronavirus-plan-could-kill-over-100-000.html

I think you probably mean you want it to be the end for him as most tory haters do......in reality we’ll only know if their strategy has worked later in the year when  it’s all come out in the wash.

"strategy".  Is that the one from yesterday evening, yesterday lunch time or the day before?   

Suprised they are still odds on.   But voters have short memories and it is still a long way to the next election. 

You'd delay Brexit, wouldn't you?  If it was a rational decision, not a political one, anyway.   I am not talking forever, but 12 months or so til this is fixed, or blows over.   Though maybe it is too far progressed?  In that case, you'd delay what is difficult and absolutely doesn't need to happen.



The strategy will probably change a bit nearly every day as the situation changes, it’s no surprise to me anyway........I don’t expect any different from tory haters to have a whine up when it suits them.

Speaking of which - the statistical model they're basing it on, which was published yesterday states in it that they had to change their assumptions in the last couple of days (and it was by quite a lot).

The reason why the government has changed tack is because their advice has changed.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: MintTrav on March 17, 2020, 11:41:54 AM
Probably the only positive to this is that this utter shitshow should be the end of Trump and Johnson.

Of course it won’t, Boris will emerge as the hero at the end of this  ;cheerleader;

For Boris, this is the equivalent of the Falklands for Lady Thatcher.

I can see it now, his arms held high with the adulation of having defeated the virus, with the additional halo effect of holding a newborn baby on the doorstep of number 10. Bigger majority than last time at the next election, stuff of legends  ;tightend;

Was thinking, nah it is going to be so difficult to get a positive result but...

along comes Jezza to score one last own goal  before the final whistle.

 Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70. (http://Corbyn, who stands down next month, also said he would not be self-isolating even though he’s over 70.)


Would love him to stick around as long as possible but it’s not in labours interests, fingers crossed RLB is next in line to secure Boris’ legacy.....

It should be the end for.him, if the public ever comes to understand how badly the UK government screwed up.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/u-k-realized-its-coronavirus-plan-could-kill-over-100-000.html

I think you probably mean you want it to be the end for him as most tory haters do......in reality we’ll only know if their strategy has worked later in the year when  it’s all come out in the wash.

"strategy".  Is that the one from yesterday evening, yesterday lunch time or the day before?   

Suprised they are still odds on.   But voters have short memories and it is still a long way to the next election. 

You'd delay Brexit, wouldn't you?  If it was a rational decision, not a political one, anyway.   I am not talking forever, but 12 months or so til this is fixed, or blows over.   Though maybe it is too far progressed?  In that case, you'd delay what is difficult and absolutely doesn't need to happen.



The strategy will probably change a bit nearly every day as the situation changes, it’s no surprise to me anyway........I don’t expect any different from tory haters to have a whine up when it suits them.

Speaking of which - the statistical model they're basing it on, which was published yesterday states in it that they had to change their assumptions in the last couple of days (and it was by quite a lot).

The reason why the government has changed tack is because their advice has changed.

When you're doing something differently to everyone else, it could be that they are right. The 'herd immunity' strategy is bonkers. It works by vaccinating children, not by allowing a population to catch something, especially something as dangerous as this. If they don't really know what they're doing, it would have been a lot safer to do the same as everywhere else instead of gambling with people's lives. We have lost a week, but now they are toeing the line to some extent, though they still haven't closed the schools.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/15/epidemiologist-britain-herd-immunity-coronavirus-covid-19


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 17, 2020, 11:51:19 AM
...

When you're doing something differently to everyone else, it could be that they are right. The 'herd immunity' strategy is bonkers. It works by vaccinating children, not by allowing a population to catch something, especially something as dangerous as this. If they don't really know what they're doing, it would have been a lot safer to do the same as everywhere else instead of gambling with people's lives. We have lost a week, but now they are toeing the line to some extent, though they still haven't closed the schools.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/15/epidemiologist-britain-herd-immunity-coronavirus-covid-19

It was never a herd immunity strategy. That article the person quotes "The stated aim has been to achieve “herd immunity” in order to manage the outbreak" - that wasn't the stated aim, that was mentioned as an effect of the strategy.

The analysis is on this page https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/news--wuhan-coronavirus/
report 9

They were looking at the mitigation strategy as used successfully for 4 pandemics previously (most recently 2009) - rather than the suppression strategy.

Neither of these is a 'herd immunity' strategy.

That's not to say that the gist of that article is wrong or the gist of your post is wrong - but language matters and makes a difference.

NB: some epidemiologists classify herd immunity as 'only' what happens from vaccination - others take it to mean the proportion of the population not susceptible. Even definitions vary, let alone their idea of the right strategy.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 17, 2020, 11:54:38 AM
It’s a little surprising this is dividing down political lines but since it has....

I think a good way to try and understand how slow and pathetic our governments response is, is to think what countries like Italy would do if they could wind back the clock and act decisively two weeks earlier. We have very few respirators relative to equivalent European nations *. How did we think we would be different? Catastrophic for Boris to come up against an enemy that can’t be influenced by his bullshit and rhetoric laden clown act. Certainly seems likely we’ll top the death totals at some stage.

*  https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8/figures/1 (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8/figures/1)

A good time to revisit the excellent article Doobs linked:

 https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca (https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca)

When I was in for my kidney surgery at the beginning of December, there were already onco-urology wards so over stretched that the patients who’d been there the longest were looking after the newer patients, as well as having to provide guidance to agency nursing staff, it’s nearly impossible to overstate how badly this will go for the U.K and it’s decimated health service.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 17, 2020, 12:36:00 PM
It’s a little surprising this is dividing down political lines but since it has....

I think a good way to try and understand how slow and pathetic our governments response is, is to think what countries like Italy would do if they could wind back the clock and act decisively two weeks earlier. We have very few respirators relative to equivalent European nations *. How did we think we would be different? Catastrophic for Boris to come up against an enemy that can’t be influenced by his bullshit and rhetoric laden clown act. Certainly seems likely we’ll top the death totals at some stage.

*  https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8/figures/1 (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8/figures/1)

A good time to revisit the excellent article Doobs linked:

 https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca (https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca)

When I was in for my kidney surgery at the beginning of December, there were already onco-urology wards so over stretched that the patients who’d been there the longest were looking after the newer patients, as well as having to provide guidance to agency nursing staff, it’s nearly impossible to overstate how badly this will go for the U.K and it’s decimated health service.

Tbf. You literally know nothing but are talking as though you are an authority. It's just so pointless


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 17, 2020, 12:38:20 PM
Businesses who are insured against being unable to trade still can't claim even if forced to close by the Government unless they have specific cover against pandemic say insurers.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 17, 2020, 12:46:11 PM
It’s a little surprising this is dividing down political lines but since it has....

I think a good way to try and understand how slow and pathetic our governments response is, is to think what countries like Italy would do if they could wind back the clock and act decisively two weeks earlier. We have very few respirators relative to equivalent European nations *. How did we think we would be different? Catastrophic for Boris to come up against an enemy that can’t be influenced by his bullshit and rhetoric laden clown act. Certainly seems likely we’ll top the death totals at some stage.

*  https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8/figures/1 (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8/figures/1)

A good time to revisit the excellent article Doobs linked:

 https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca (https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca)

When I was in for my kidney surgery at the beginning of December, there were already onco-urology wards so over stretched that the patients who’d been there the longest were looking after the newer patients, as well as having to provide guidance to agency nursing staff, it’s nearly impossible to overstate how badly this will go for the U.K and it’s decimated health service.

Tbf. You literally know nothing but are talking as though you are an authority. It's just so pointless

Completely true, the thing is we won’t know until we’ve got through this whether we did the right thing or not so opinions from the lay public is literally a waste of hot air. I can tell you from working with doctors for over 25 years that is it is completely standard for even top experts in their fields to have different opinions on certain issues and that’s what you are seeing here, so people posting links with certain views and presenting them as gold standard is once again a waste of time really, even if it is an interesting read as other experts will often disagree with them. I go back to we won’t know if the right thing was done until it’s done and dusted, and even if they did a decent job you can be sure they will find things they could do even better in future.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 17, 2020, 12:49:31 PM
...

The analysis is on this page https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/news--wuhan-coronavirus/
report 9
...

It might be report 8 not 9 but the reports don't seem to download the right report from the right link :s

But there are other links direct to the pdf around


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: neeko on March 17, 2020, 12:54:12 PM
I suspect the Brexit thing will become irrelevant as the EU will implode / explode and therefore we won’t have any EU institution to deal with.

Now is the time to help other countries, if the UK can make 10/100/1000 ventilators each day, it should give 10 % to other counties that can’t make their own. This export of ventilators would kill people in the UK(because they are not in use here) but should still be done.

What is the end game for this pandemic in the UK and the world, lock down everyone, no physical meeting of anyone at all. Do this for 2- 4 years while they look for a vaccine that is effective and is safe. This will kill 10”s of thousands of people in the UK from medical complications that can’t be solved, and domestic violence in addition to CV19 deaths, which should petter out as people stop passing the virus to each other. The economic contraction will kill many too as the country won’t be able to afford the health care we once had.

The alternative is that the country locks up the over 70s so they are cocooned and then tries to get the virus to pass through the population as rapidly as we can cope with the hospitalisation rates to help the pneumonia cases recover. There will be ventilators setup in lines in village halls to help those affected. Death rates will be huge, but better than doing nothing.

I fear 1 won’t happen as there is not the discipline to keep this in place long enough. 2 won’t happen as people won’t accept the deaths. I suspect that we will go in waves from one to the other, lockdown > get bored > cases escalate and too many die > lockdown and loop.

We will end up with an app on your phone giving your CV19 status, if you have had the virus then you will be free to move around, these people will be the workers for the next few months / years.

Oops that went a bit TL/DR



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 17, 2020, 01:07:59 PM
It’s a little surprising this is dividing down political lines but since it has....

I think a good way to try and understand how slow and pathetic our governments response is, is to think what countries like Italy would do if they could wind back the clock and act decisively two weeks earlier. We have very few respirators relative to equivalent European nations *. How did we think we would be different? Catastrophic for Boris to come up against an enemy that can’t be influenced by his bullshit and rhetoric laden clown act. Certainly seems likely we’ll top the death totals at some stage.

*  https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8/figures/1 (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8/figures/1)

A good time to revisit the excellent article Doobs linked:

 https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca (https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca)

When I was in for my kidney surgery at the beginning of December, there were already onco-urology wards so over stretched that the patients who’d been there the longest were looking after the newer patients, as well as having to provide guidance to agency nursing staff, it’s nearly impossible to overstate how badly this will go for the U.K and it’s decimated health service.

Tbf. You literally know nothing but are talking as though you are an authority. It's just so pointless

I don’t quite know “nothing”, I have two science based degrees and have worked in a scientific field for most of the last 17 years, it’s almost irrelevant but not totally, I’d reckon it puts me slightly in front of a lay person for understanding the situation. More than that though, I am unable to work due to the immunotherapy and so I can spend nearly all my time trying to learn from people much more better informed and knowledgeable* than I am. Woodsey is right that we won’t know for certain for a very long time but the U.K. is clearly going to fall in line with everyone quickly, there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 17, 2020, 01:25:13 PM
.. there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yes to the respirator bit - and yes to the NHS 'could' be better equipped (although that obviously has the proviso that if the NHS had been kept at full post-Blair operational capacity - what would have been sacrificed to pay for it?)

But - closing the schools was always part of the plan.

Things move fast in an epidemic - what isn't appropriate to do one day. might be the appropriate thing to do a couple of days later.

In terms of party politics - the government seem to be pretty much following expert advice; you can get your expert advice elsewhere - but their action all along have seemed to pretty closely tie in with the modelling that's been shown (and the implication of what the modelling was before they refined it).

I'm not defending the politics - I'm defending the science and maths.


If you wanted to add politics to it. The modelling specifically states that it is not looking at any moral implications - that's for the public policy makers to introduce after they interpret the advice. It could be argued that the government are being guided too much by the science and maybe should apply a bit more humanity to it.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 17, 2020, 01:40:08 PM
Biggest event in our lifetime?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 17, 2020, 01:44:41 PM
.. there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yes to the respirator bit - and yes to the NHS 'could' be better equipped (although that obviously has the proviso that if the NHS had been kept at full post-Blair operational capacity - what would have been sacrificed to pay for it?)

But - closing the schools was always part of the plan.

Things move fast in an epidemic - what isn't appropriate to do one day. might be the appropriate thing to do a couple of days later.

In terms of party politics - the government seem to be pretty much following expert advice; you can get your expert advice elsewhere - but their action all along have seemed to pretty closely tie in with the modelling that's been shown (and the implication of what the modelling was before they refined it).

I'm not defending the politics - I'm defending the science and maths.


If you wanted to add politics to it. The modelling specifically states that it is not looking at any moral implications - that's for the public policy makers to introduce after they interpret the advice. It could be argued that the government are being guided too much by the science and maybe should apply a bit more humanity to it.

The last paragraph certainly makes a good point. I’m also keen not to try and appear wise after the event, it’s just as much of a dick move here as in gambling. On Thursday last week Vallance said we were “4 weeks” behind Italy, yesterday 3. I think my point remains valid to ask what Italy would do if could wind back the clock, we have that opportunity and we still aren’t taking it, we have far fewer respirators per capita than Italy.

In terms of the science and the maths, this document has it covered better than most I think:

 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf)




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 17, 2020, 01:47:04 PM
.. there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yes to the respirator bit - and yes to the NHS 'could' be better equipped (although that obviously has the proviso that if the NHS had been kept at full post-Blair operational capacity - what would have been sacrificed to pay for it?)

But - closing the schools was always part of the plan.

Things move fast in an epidemic - what isn't appropriate to do one day. might be the appropriate thing to do a couple of days later.

In terms of party politics - the government seem to be pretty much following expert advice; you can get your expert advice elsewhere - but their action all along have seemed to pretty closely tie in with the modelling that's been shown (and the implication of what the modelling was before they refined it).

I'm not defending the politics - I'm defending the science and maths.


If you wanted to add politics to it. The modelling specifically states that it is not looking at any moral implications - that's for the public policy makers to introduce after they interpret the advice. It could be argued that the government are being guided too much by the science and maybe should apply a bit more humanity to it.

The last paragraph certainly makes a good point. I’m also keen not to try and appear wise after the event, it’s just as much of a dick move here as in gambling. On Thursday last week Vallance said we were “4 weeks” behind Italy, yesterday 3. I think my point remains valid to ask what Italy would do if could wind back the clock, we have that opportunity and we still aren’t taking it, we have far fewer respirators per capita than Italy.

In terms of the science and the maths, this document has it covered better than most I think:

 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf)




That's the research paper I've been talking about - it should be on the page I linked to but didn't quite work.

But didn't Italy put lockdown measures in place after 20 cases were confirmed?

What more do you think they could have done?

EDIT: having re-read it from your link, what they exactly state is, "We do not consider the ethical or economic implications of either strategy here, except to note that there is no easy policy decision to be made", I might have assumed they meant - it's up to the politicians to decide that.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 17, 2020, 01:48:53 PM
Biggest event in our lifetime?

Yes.

And the financial/economic slump that will follow, right across the globe, will be even bigger.

Trying to stay upbeat, but it all looks pretty gloomy right now. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: MintTrav on March 17, 2020, 01:52:41 PM
.. there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yes to the respirator bit - and yes to the NHS 'could' be better equipped (although that obviously has the proviso that if the NHS had been kept at full post-Blair operational capacity - what would have been sacrificed to pay for it?)

But - closing the schools was always part of the plan.

Things move fast in an epidemic - what isn't appropriate to do one day. might be the appropriate thing to do a couple of days later.

In terms of party politics - the government seem to be pretty much following expert advice; you can get your expert advice elsewhere - but their action all along have seemed to pretty closely tie in with the modelling that's been shown (and the implication of what the modelling was before they refined it).

I'm not defending the politics - I'm defending the science and maths.


If you wanted to add politics to it. The modelling specifically states that it is not looking at any moral implications - that's for the public policy makers to introduce after they interpret the advice. It could be argued that the government are being guided too much by the science and maybe should apply a bit more humanity to it.

The last paragraph certainly makes a good point. I’m also keen not to try and appear wise after the event, it’s just as much of a dick move here as in gambling. On Thursday last week Vallance said we were “4 weeks” behind Italy, yesterday 3. I think my point remains valid to ask what Italy would do if could wind back the clock, we have that opportunity and we still aren’t taking it, we have far fewer respirators per capita than Italy.

In terms of the science and the maths, this document has it covered better than most I think:

 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf)




That's the research paper I've been talking about - it should be on the page I linked to but didn't quite work.

But didn't Italy put lockdown measures in place after 20 cases were confirmed?

What more do you think they could have done?

EDIT: having re-read it from your link, what they exactly state is, "We do not consider the ethical or economic implications of either strategy here, except to note that there is no easy policy decision to be made", I might have assumed they meant - it's up to the politicians to decide that.

Funny that their science was different to that of so many other countries.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 17, 2020, 01:59:21 PM
...
Funny that their science was different to that of so many other countries.

a. the science isn't different - the maths might be;
bi. the maths might be because they are other countries;
bii. for example, they use Intensive Care capacity as a very key variable to inform their results - this is all going to be different everywhere.
c. I haven't seen any similar analysis to compare it to. If the WHO have a similar paper then I could look at the differences for example.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 17, 2020, 02:00:44 PM
...
Funny that their science was different to that of so many other countries.

a. the science isn't different - the maths might be;
bi. the maths might be because they are other countries;
bii. for example, they use Intensive Care capacity as a very key variable to inform their results - this is all going to be different everywhere.
c. I haven't seen any similar analysis to compare it to. If the WHO have a similar paper then I could look at the differences for example.

And even with all that considered you will still get different opinions anyway.......


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 17, 2020, 02:02:49 PM
It’s a little surprising this is dividing down political lines but since it has....

I think a good way to try and understand how slow and pathetic our governments response is, is to think what countries like Italy would do if they could wind back the clock and act decisively two weeks earlier. We have very few respirators relative to equivalent European nations *. How did we think we would be different? Catastrophic for Boris to come up against an enemy that can’t be influenced by his bullshit and rhetoric laden clown act. Certainly seems likely we’ll top the death totals at some stage.

*  https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8/figures/1 (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8/figures/1)

A good time to revisit the excellent article Doobs linked:

 https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca (https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca)

When I was in for my kidney surgery at the beginning of December, there were already onco-urology wards so over stretched that the patients who’d been there the longest were looking after the newer patients, as well as having to provide guidance to agency nursing staff, it’s nearly impossible to overstate how badly this will go for the U.K and it’s decimated health service.

Tbf. You literally know nothing but are talking as though you are an authority. It's just so pointless

I don’t quite know “nothing”, I have two science based degrees and have worked in a scientific field for most of the last 17 years, it’s almost irrelevant but not totally, I’d reckon it puts me slightly in front of a lay person for understanding the situation. More than that though, I am unable to work due to the immunotherapy and so I can spend nearly all my time trying to learn from people much more better informed and knowledgeable* than I am. Woodsey is right that we won’t know for certain for a very long time but the U.K. is clearly going to fall in line with everyone quickly, there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yeh but 'certainly seems likely we'll top the death totals' doesn't sound like someone learning much however clever they are and however much they've read.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 17, 2020, 02:05:22 PM
.. there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yes to the respirator bit - and yes to the NHS 'could' be better equipped (although that obviously has the proviso that if the NHS had been kept at full post-Blair operational capacity - what would have been sacrificed to pay for it?)

But - closing the schools was always part of the plan.

Things move fast in an epidemic - what isn't appropriate to do one day. might be the appropriate thing to do a couple of days later.

In terms of party politics - the government seem to be pretty much following expert advice; you can get your expert advice elsewhere - but their action all along have seemed to pretty closely tie in with the modelling that's been shown (and the implication of what the modelling was before they refined it).

I'm not defending the politics - I'm defending the science and maths.


If you wanted to add politics to it. The modelling specifically states that it is not looking at any moral implications - that's for the public policy makers to introduce after they interpret the advice. It could be argued that the government are being guided too much by the science and maybe should apply a bit more humanity to it.

The last paragraph certainly makes a good point. I’m also keen not to try and appear wise after the event, it’s just as much of a dick move here as in gambling. On Thursday last week Vallance said we were “4 weeks” behind Italy, yesterday 3. I think my point remains valid to ask what Italy would do if could wind back the clock, we have that opportunity and we still aren’t taking it, we have far fewer respirators per capita than Italy.

In terms of the science and the maths, this document has it covered better than most I think:

 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf)




What was labour's pledge on respirator numbers before this happened.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 17, 2020, 02:07:13 PM
...
Funny that their science was different to that of so many other countries.

a. the science isn't different - the maths might be;
bi. the maths might be because they are other countries;
bii. for example, they use Intensive Care capacity as a very key variable to inform their results - this is all going to be different everywhere.
c. I haven't seen any similar analysis to compare it to. If the WHO have a similar paper then I could look at the differences for example.

I don't think the science and maths was different, the reaction to it was different in some counties than others.  

We do have an advantage vs some countries, as we have effectively conducted our actions earlier in our epidemic than others have in theirs.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 17, 2020, 02:13:54 PM
.. there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yes to the respirator bit - and yes to the NHS 'could' be better equipped (although that obviously has the proviso that if the NHS had been kept at full post-Blair operational capacity - what would have been sacrificed to pay for it?)

But - closing the schools was always part of the plan.

Things move fast in an epidemic - what isn't appropriate to do one day. might be the appropriate thing to do a couple of days later.

In terms of party politics - the government seem to be pretty much following expert advice; you can get your expert advice elsewhere - but their action all along have seemed to pretty closely tie in with the modelling that's been shown (and the implication of what the modelling was before they refined it).

I'm not defending the politics - I'm defending the science and maths.


If you wanted to add politics to it. The modelling specifically states that it is not looking at any moral implications - that's for the public policy makers to introduce after they interpret the advice. It could be argued that the government are being guided too much by the science and maybe should apply a bit more humanity to it.

The last paragraph certainly makes a good point. I’m also keen not to try and appear wise after the event, it’s just as much of a dick move here as in gambling. On Thursday last week Vallance said we were “4 weeks” behind Italy, yesterday 3. I think my point remains valid to ask what Italy would do if could wind back the clock, we have that opportunity and we still aren’t taking it, we have far fewer respirators per capita than Italy.

In terms of the science and the maths, this document has it covered better than most I think:

 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf)




What was labour's pledge on respirator numbers before this happened.

Given Jezza's view on his own social distancing, I think it is optimistic to suggest a labour government would have acted quicker. 

They would likely have had a few more nurses, but it is hard to see how any significant changes would happen in 3 months.  If they'd got in the time before, it is reasonable to assume there would be more doctors and nurses.  Though keeping the critically sick numbers below intensive care beds would be pretty much as hard as it is now.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: MintTrav on March 17, 2020, 02:23:06 PM
...
Funny that their science was different to that of so many other countries.

a. the science isn't different - the maths might be;
bi. the maths might be because they are other countries;
bii. for example, they use Intensive Care capacity as a very key variable to inform their results - this is all going to be different everywhere.
c. I haven't seen any similar analysis to compare it to. If the WHO have a similar paper then I could look at the differences for example.

I don't think the science and maths was different, the reaction to it was different in some counties than others.  

We do have an advantage vs some countries, as we have effectively conducted our actions earlier in our epidemic than others have in theirs.


d. It could be a disastrous miscalculation based on arrogantly thinking they know better than the conventional wisdom.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 17, 2020, 02:27:26 PM
.. there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yes to the respirator bit - and yes to the NHS 'could' be better equipped (although that obviously has the proviso that if the NHS had been kept at full post-Blair operational capacity - what would have been sacrificed to pay for it?)

But - closing the schools was always part of the plan.

Things move fast in an epidemic - what isn't appropriate to do one day. might be the appropriate thing to do a couple of days later.

In terms of party politics - the government seem to be pretty much following expert advice; you can get your expert advice elsewhere - but their action all along have seemed to pretty closely tie in with the modelling that's been shown (and the implication of what the modelling was before they refined it).

I'm not defending the politics - I'm defending the science and maths.


If you wanted to add politics to it. The modelling specifically states that it is not looking at any moral implications - that's for the public policy makers to introduce after they interpret the advice. It could be argued that the government are being guided too much by the science and maybe should apply a bit more humanity to it.

The last paragraph certainly makes a good point. I’m also keen not to try and appear wise after the event, it’s just as much of a dick move here as in gambling. On Thursday last week Vallance said we were “4 weeks” behind Italy, yesterday 3. I think my point remains valid to ask what Italy would do if could wind back the clock, we have that opportunity and we still aren’t taking it, we have far fewer respirators per capita than Italy.

In terms of the science and the maths, this document has it covered better than most I think:

 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf)




That's the research paper I've been talking about - it should be on the page I linked to but didn't quite work.

But didn't Italy put lockdown measures in place after 20 cases were confirmed?

What more do you think they could have done?

EDIT: having re-read it from your link, what they exactly state is, "We do not consider the ethical or economic implications of either strategy here, except to note that there is no easy policy decision to be made", I might have assumed they meant - it's up to the politicians to decide that.

Italy locked down on March 12th, there were 15,113 cases confirmed and 1016 dead at that time.

 https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/ (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 17, 2020, 02:37:02 PM
.. there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yes to the respirator bit - and yes to the NHS 'could' be better equipped (although that obviously has the proviso that if the NHS had been kept at full post-Blair operational capacity - what would have been sacrificed to pay for it?)

But - closing the schools was always part of the plan.

Things move fast in an epidemic - what isn't appropriate to do one day. might be the appropriate thing to do a couple of days later.

In terms of party politics - the government seem to be pretty much following expert advice; you can get your expert advice elsewhere - but their action all along have seemed to pretty closely tie in with the modelling that's been shown (and the implication of what the modelling was before they refined it).

I'm not defending the politics - I'm defending the science and maths.


If you wanted to add politics to it. The modelling specifically states that it is not looking at any moral implications - that's for the public policy makers to introduce after they interpret the advice. It could be argued that the government are being guided too much by the science and maybe should apply a bit more humanity to it.

The last paragraph certainly makes a good point. I’m also keen not to try and appear wise after the event, it’s just as much of a dick move here as in gambling. On Thursday last week Vallance said we were “4 weeks” behind Italy, yesterday 3. I think my point remains valid to ask what Italy would do if could wind back the clock, we have that opportunity and we still aren’t taking it, we have far fewer respirators per capita than Italy.

In terms of the science and the maths, this document has it covered better than most I think:

 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf)




That's the research paper I've been talking about - it should be on the page I linked to but didn't quite work.

But didn't Italy put lockdown measures in place after 20 cases were confirmed?

What more do you think they could have done?

EDIT: having re-read it from your link, what they exactly state is, "We do not consider the ethical or economic implications of either strategy here, except to note that there is no easy policy decision to be made", I might have assumed they meant - it's up to the politicians to decide that.

Italy locked down on March 12th, there were 15,113 cases confirmed and 1016 dead at that time.

 https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/ (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/)


"On 22 February, the government announced a new decree imposing the quarantine of more than 50,000 people from 11 different municipalities in Northern Italy."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_Italy

It should be remembered that the Italy outbreak was much more regionally confined than the UK one.

Yes - they could have gone straight to a national lockdown - but there are consquences to every decision like that.

Given the regional lockdown (where the cases mainly were) didn't work, it's not entirely clear whether going straight to the national lockdown would make a difference.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 17, 2020, 02:49:20 PM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1239584711346769920


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 17, 2020, 02:53:48 PM
.. there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yes to the respirator bit - and yes to the NHS 'could' be better equipped (although that obviously has the proviso that if the NHS had been kept at full post-Blair operational capacity - what would have been sacrificed to pay for it?)

But - closing the schools was always part of the plan.

Things move fast in an epidemic - what isn't appropriate to do one day. might be the appropriate thing to do a couple of days later.

In terms of party politics - the government seem to be pretty much following expert advice; you can get your expert advice elsewhere - but their action all along have seemed to pretty closely tie in with the modelling that's been shown (and the implication of what the modelling was before they refined it).

I'm not defending the politics - I'm defending the science and maths.


If you wanted to add politics to it. The modelling specifically states that it is not looking at any moral implications - that's for the public policy makers to introduce after they interpret the advice. It could be argued that the government are being guided too much by the science and maybe should apply a bit more humanity to it.

The last paragraph certainly makes a good point. I’m also keen not to try and appear wise after the event, it’s just as much of a dick move here as in gambling. On Thursday last week Vallance said we were “4 weeks” behind Italy, yesterday 3. I think my point remains valid to ask what Italy would do if could wind back the clock, we have that opportunity and we still aren’t taking it, we have far fewer respirators per capita than Italy.

In terms of the science and the maths, this document has it covered better than most I think:

 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf)




That's the research paper I've been talking about - it should be on the page I linked to but didn't quite work.

But didn't Italy put lockdown measures in place after 20 cases were confirmed?

What more do you think they could have done?

EDIT: having re-read it from your link, what they exactly state is, "We do not consider the ethical or economic implications of either strategy here, except to note that there is no easy policy decision to be made", I might have assumed they meant - it's up to the politicians to decide that.

Italy locked down on March 12th, there were 15,113 cases confirmed and 1016 dead at that time.

 https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/ (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/)


"On 22 February, the government announced a new decree imposing the quarantine of more than 50,000 people from 11 different municipalities in Northern Italy."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_Italy

It should be remembered that the Italy outbreak was much more regionally confined than the UK one.

Yes - they could have gone straight to a national lockdown - but there are consquences to every decision like that.

Given the regional lockdown (where the cases mainly were) didn't work, it's not entirely clear whether going straight to the national lockdown would make a difference.

They initially locked down 50,000 in a population of about 60.5million. That’s ~0.08% of the population. We should have learnt quickly from that.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 17, 2020, 03:37:35 PM
Businesses who are insured against being unable to trade still can't claim even if forced to close by the Government unless they have specific cover against pandemic say insurers.

I spoke to our brokers today, and he stated they arrange business interruption insurance for a lot of bars and restaurants with Aviva (not our insurer) and Aviva have a clause that clearly excludes Government or Police forcing closures to suppress infectious diseases so they wont be paying a penny to anyone.

My response was 'wow'


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: roshambo on March 17, 2020, 03:55:14 PM
Ive had this off a few providers today whilst on a call out, luckily i mainly deal in investments and we are finding people have lost in area of 16% of their investment since start of situation, but in reality the boat has sailed and people need to weather the storm


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 17, 2020, 04:28:37 PM
It's just so surreal. I can't drag myself away from the telly.

I can't imaging what the world will be like when it's over.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Skippy on March 17, 2020, 04:34:22 PM
Talking of spreadsheets, here is one I "like" with case numbers for the UK and graphs:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 17, 2020, 04:41:55 PM
Talking of spreadsheets, here is one I "like" with case numbers for the UK and graphs:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY

This guy has been a bit of a legend on the stats front on the DHSC twitter feed.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Skippy on March 17, 2020, 04:43:42 PM
Talking of spreadsheets, here is one I "like" with case numbers for the UK and graphs:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY

This guy has been a bit of a legend on the stats front on the DHSC twitter feed.

He has some views, that's for certain. I like his facts.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 17, 2020, 05:23:42 PM
Company I work for now doing all broker appts via FT/Phone for the forseeable.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 17, 2020, 05:28:42 PM
Who’s gonna be first to have a moan up after all that support offered by the government? Come on don’t let me down!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 17, 2020, 06:22:23 PM
.. there’ll be another panicked change of direction once todays deaths are announced. School closures incoming.

* The fact that we are very short respirator wise for example is just a number that can’t be disputed.

Yes to the respirator bit - and yes to the NHS 'could' be better equipped (although that obviously has the proviso that if the NHS had been kept at full post-Blair operational capacity - what would have been sacrificed to pay for it?)

But - closing the schools was always part of the plan.

Things move fast in an epidemic - what isn't appropriate to do one day. might be the appropriate thing to do a couple of days later.

In terms of party politics - the government seem to be pretty much following expert advice; you can get your expert advice elsewhere - but their action all along have seemed to pretty closely tie in with the modelling that's been shown (and the implication of what the modelling was before they refined it).

I'm not defending the politics - I'm defending the science and maths.


If you wanted to add politics to it. The modelling specifically states that it is not looking at any moral implications - that's for the public policy makers to introduce after they interpret the advice. It could be argued that the government are being guided too much by the science and maybe should apply a bit more humanity to it.

The last paragraph certainly makes a good point. I’m also keen not to try and appear wise after the event, it’s just as much of a dick move here as in gambling. On Thursday last week Vallance said we were “4 weeks” behind Italy, yesterday 3. I think my point remains valid to ask what Italy would do if could wind back the clock, we have that opportunity and we still aren’t taking it, we have far fewer respirators per capita than Italy.

In terms of the science and the maths, this document has it covered better than most I think:

 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf)




What was labour's pledge on respirator numbers before this happened.

Given Jezza's view on his own social distancing, I think it is optimistic to suggest a labour government would have acted quicker. 

They would likely have had a few more nurses, but it is hard to see how any significant changes would happen in 3 months.  If they'd got in the time before, it is reasonable to assume there would be more doctors and nurses.  Though keeping the critically sick numbers below intensive care beds would be pretty much as hard as it is now.



Agree that if winning in 2015 or 2017 there would be more doctors and nurses. This would be good per se but unlikely to help massively in the critical care situation we'll face soon where respirators most likely to be the limiting factor rather than absolute numbers of nurses. Pretty unlikely that Labour would have examined the NHS in such a granular way a couple of years ago and determined a massive uplift in per capita respirators would be a key priority - maybe they would have moved in a more draconian fashion but given they were agreeing with Govt conclusions until about 5/6 days ago, that's pretty unlikely.

Even if Government has acted later than may later prove to have been optimal I can forgive that rather than climb all over them because this is so different to anything a Govt has faced in a number of generations and worse they have to do it in the post Diana era where people spout specious shiz like 'one life lost is one too many' and people love to blame someone, anyone, for every bad thing that happens.

To me it's pretty basic, loads of people will die, not one of the deaths will be the 'fault' of Government per se and to blame them is ridiculous, petty and pointless - not to say different voices shouldn't express explicitly counter perspectives as that could steer things in a better direction but when people (just normal people) are facing a once in a lifetime scenario and, as said before, make less than optimal decisions this is just a learning curve and I couldn't really give a monkeys if a few more people died because of that - it's still not their 'fault'.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: dakky on March 17, 2020, 08:00:57 PM
Who’s gonna be first to have a moan up after all that support offered by the government? Come on don’t let me down!

No support for freelancers/self-employed/gig-economy types, renters etc. Guess some can get JSA/universal credit & housing benefit but others might not be able to.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 17, 2020, 08:28:26 PM
Who’s gonna be first to have a moan up after all that support offered by the government? Come on don’t let me down!

"Momentum" moaned on Twitter almost immediately.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: MintTrav on March 17, 2020, 09:42:19 PM
Who’s gonna be first to have a moan up after all that support offered by the government? Come on don’t let me down!

What a case you are - never failing to demonstrate your lack of self-awareness.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 04:15:35 AM
Who’s gonna be first to have a moan up after all that support offered by the government? Come on don’t let me down!

What a case you are - never failing to demonstrate your lack of self-awareness.

Button it trappy.....for some people including you even giving the world away wouldn’t be good enough if it was done by a conservative government which brings into question your self awareness.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 18, 2020, 07:39:03 AM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/51929628


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Cf on March 18, 2020, 09:06:01 AM
Who’s gonna be first to have a moan up after all that support offered by the government? Come on don’t let me down!

No support for freelancers/self-employed/gig-economy types, renters etc. Guess some can get JSA/universal credit & housing benefit but others might not be able to.

This basically.

Rent a house? Get paying as normal. Own said rented house? Enjoy your rent and mortgage holiday.

Own a small business? Sucks to be you with no income for the coming months. But here have a loan so that if and when things are back to normal you have more debt to pay off.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 09:18:51 AM
Who’s gonna be first to have a moan up after all that support offered by the government? Come on don’t let me down!

No support for freelancers/self-employed/gig-economy types, renters etc. Guess some can get JSA/universal credit & housing benefit but others might not be able to.

This basically.

Rent a house? Get paying as normal. Own said rented house? Enjoy your rent and mortgage holiday.

Own a small business? Sucks to be you with no income for the coming months. But here have a loan so that if and when things are back to normal you have more debt to pay off.

It’s on the cards I reckon, you can see they are adjusting as needs be, plus I think govts just like to stagger decisions rather than fire all their bullets in one go. Not sure about the second point really, it’s tricky to just give out free money everywhere as there is a balance to be had between helping people and bankrupting the country.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 09:27:54 AM
.
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAhO1rQN8N8


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 18, 2020, 09:29:45 AM
Who’s gonna be first to have a moan up after all that support offered by the government? Come on don’t let me down!

No support for freelancers/self-employed/gig-economy types, renters etc. Guess some can get JSA/universal credit & housing benefit but others might not be able to.

This basically.

Rent a house? Get paying as normal. Own said rented house? Enjoy your rent and mortgage holiday.

Own a small business? Sucks to be you with no income for the coming months. But here have a loan so that if and when things are back to normal you have more debt to pay off.

Lol

He obviously needs to do something for renters who lose their jobs, but the mortgage holidays are for those who need it.
I can't see the banks offering it on BTL mortgages with out proof of hardship.

Its a lot easier and quicker for them to arrange the mortgage holiday offer with the banks than arrangements for the payments to the 2.5 million UK landlords.
Don't forget the overall principle here is to keep the money moving, lend companies money, to try and minimise layoffs.

Own a small business? What would you prefer no business or a chance to keep it running? Not many moaners do well with small businesses anyway.

Don't forget people, this is just the start!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 09:31:47 AM
.
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujhnCibbDMU


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Cf on March 18, 2020, 09:56:43 AM
Who’s gonna be first to have a moan up after all that support offered by the government? Come on don’t let me down!

No support for freelancers/self-employed/gig-economy types, renters etc. Guess some can get JSA/universal credit & housing benefit but others might not be able to.

This basically.

Rent a house? Get paying as normal. Own said rented house? Enjoy your rent and mortgage holiday.

Own a small business? Sucks to be you with no income for the coming months. But here have a loan so that if and when things are back to normal you have more debt to pay off.

Lol

He obviously needs to do something for renters who lose their jobs, but the mortgage holidays are for those who need it.
I can't see the banks offering it on BTL mortgages with out proof of hardship.

Its a lot easier and quicker for them to arrange the mortgage holiday offer with the banks than arrangements for the payments to the 2.5 million UK landlords.
Don't forget the overall principle here is to keep the money moving, lend companies money, to try and minimise layoffs.

Own a small business? What would you prefer no business or a chance to keep it running? Not many moaners do well with small businesses anyway.

Don't forget people, this is just the start!

Hopefully there is more to come. And I'm not saying what we've got isn't a start. But at the same time I think it fair to call out some of the things currently missing.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 18, 2020, 09:58:44 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 18, 2020, 10:11:24 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life

As who say?

The transmission rate is the r naught value if you want to look up what 'they' say :)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 18, 2020, 10:17:05 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life

I think part of the problem is they don't know how many people have it as they effect it has on people varies massively.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 18, 2020, 10:18:41 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life
deaths are doubling every 2-3 days the spread is real
the number of people with this virus is way over the number of confirmed cases because people are not getting tested unless they are patient in hospital


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 18, 2020, 10:31:47 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life
deaths are doubling every 2-3 days the spread is real
the number of people with this virus is way over the number of confirmed cases because people are not getting tested unless they are patient in hospital


So we are guessing at numbers ? if you say is true and say 100,000 people have it with a 2% mortality rate that should be 2000 dead.. we have 70 odd.. need to get some context..


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 18, 2020, 10:33:36 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life

I think part of the problem is they don't know how many people have it as they effect it has on people varies massively.

varies massively ?? the majority have flu like symptoms for a few days and are fine.. we know exactly how it affects people


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 18, 2020, 10:37:04 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life

As who say?

The transmission rate is the r naught value if you want to look up what 'they' say :)

'they' are the establishment and the doctors.. with a r naught value of 2 the question remains.. why are not more of us sick then ?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 18, 2020, 10:45:28 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life

As who say?

The transmission rate is the r naught value if you want to look up what 'they' say :)

'they' are the establishment and the doctors.. with a r naught value of 2 the question remains.. why are not more of us sick then ?

I would advise rereading the Tomas Pueyo article. In terms of the recovery rate, it’s not necessarily of value because of all the unknowns that we have atm but the known recovery rate in the U.K. so far is 3.33%.

 https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca (https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca)



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 18, 2020, 10:56:00 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life
deaths are doubling every 2-3 days the spread is real
the number of people with this virus is way over the number of confirmed cases because people are not getting tested unless they are patient in hospital


So we are guessing at numbers ? if you say is true and say 100,000 people have it with a 2% mortality rate that should be 2000 dead.. we have 70 odd.. need to get some context..

They haven't died yet.

The cases have been doubling every 2 or 3 days.  I think the average time to death is about 17 days amongst the deaths (I am not checking this, but its is in that order).  Most of these deaths you are seeing now will be people who caught it at least a week ago.

A week ago there were 373 confirmed cases, a week earlier just 51.  

Also the mortality rate is only going to be under 2% if the NHS isn't overwhlemed.  People who need intensive care and a respirator are not going to be as likely to live when those things are no longer available.  

This is not scaremongering, these are facts. 

And it isn't just the huge numbers of potential deaths that matter, we do not know the long term prognosis of the survivors.  Given the virus damages the lungs and organs, many people who survive are likely to develop conditions that need long term support of some kind.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 18, 2020, 11:00:41 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life

I think part of the problem is they don't know how many people have it as they effect it has on people varies massively.

varies massively ?? the majority have flu like symptoms for a few days and are fine.. we know exactly how it affects people

Well yes then, i would say that is a massive variance no?
Between flu like symptoms for a couple of days and in a box.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 18, 2020, 11:03:50 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life
deaths are doubling every 2-3 days the spread is real
the number of people with this virus is way over the number of confirmed cases because people are not getting tested unless they are patient in hospital


So we are guessing at numbers ? if you say is true and say 100,000 people have it with a 2% mortality rate that should be 2000 dead.. we have 70 odd.. need to get some context..

They haven't died yet.

The cases have been doubling every 2 or 3 days.  I think the average time to death is about 17 days amongst the deaths (I am not checking this, but its is in that order).  Most of these deaths you are seeing now will be people who caught it at least a week ago.

A week ago there were 373 confirmed cases, a week earlier just 51.  

Also the mortality rate is only going to be under 2% if the NHS isn't overwhlemed.  People who need intensive care and a respirator are not going to be as likely to live when those things are no longer available.  

This is not scaremongering, these are facts. 

And it isn't just the huge numbers of potential deaths that matter, we do not know the long term prognosis of the survivors.  Given the virus damages the lungs and organs, many people who survive are likely to develop conditions that need long term support of some kind.


The first sentence is key. The only explanation for the current situation is that there people who all are intubated and are only being kept alive by respirators, once this capacity is overwhelmed then the increase will be dramatic. We have less respirators per person than all comparable nations and that is why there is a feeling that we should be acting sooner not ‘at the same time on the curve’ or later than a country like Italy.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 18, 2020, 11:07:34 AM
.
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujhnCibbDMU

This is a good explanation of how I understand it, seems like the Aussies are in a relatively good spot, the densely populated parts of the U.K. and US are going to have it worse than most in the short to medium term.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 18, 2020, 11:35:42 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life
deaths are doubling every 2-3 days the spread is real
the number of people with this virus is way over the number of confirmed cases because people are not getting tested unless they are patient in hospital


So we are guessing at numbers ? if you say is true and say 100,000 people have it with a 2% mortality rate that should be 2000 dead.. we have 70 odd.. need to get some context..

They haven't died yet.

The cases have been doubling every 2 or 3 days.  I think the average time to death is about 17 days amongst the deaths (I am not checking this, but its is in that order).  Most of these deaths you are seeing now will be people who caught it at least a week ago.

A week ago there were 373 confirmed cases, a week earlier just 51.  

Also the mortality rate is only going to be under 2% if the NHS isn't overwhlemed.  People who need intensive care and a respirator are not going to be as likely to live when those things are no longer available.  

This is not scaremongering, these are facts. 

And it isn't just the huge numbers of potential deaths that matter, we do not know the long term prognosis of the survivors.  Given the virus damages the lungs and organs, many people who survive are likely to develop conditions that need long term support of some kind.



large scale quarentine and then all emerging two weeks later to catch it anyway will overun the nhs..and that will cause deaths not the actual disease.. you cant just hide from this


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 18, 2020, 11:39:39 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life

I think part of the problem is they don't know how many people have it as they effect it has on people varies massively.

varies massively ?? the majority have flu like symptoms for a few days and are fine.. we know exactly how it affects people

You still training?  how busy has your david lloyd been this week?   Numbers at my place were pretty solid compared to usual last two days although the manager said numbers had fallen it didn't seem like that on my two visits.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 18, 2020, 11:48:07 AM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life

I think part of the problem is they don't know how many people have it as they effect it has on people varies massively.

varies massively ?? the majority have flu like symptoms for a few days and are fine.. we know exactly how it affects people

You still training?  how busy has your david lloyd been this week?   Numbers at my place were pretty solid compared to usual last two days although the manager said numbers had fallen it didn't seem like that on my two visits.

yeah still training..is a drop off but still quite a few there..they have cut the classes in half for more spacing.. but business as usual ..although there were murmours of shutdown


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 18, 2020, 12:09:30 PM
Shit just got real.



https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-51943592


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 18, 2020, 01:31:45 PM

It’s Friday for the school closures, Wales confirmed and Scotland about to do the same.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 18, 2020, 01:31:50 PM
schools closed in wales and scotland as of friday


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 18, 2020, 01:34:53 PM
So hardly any UK schools have closed from day 1 that's over 8 million sticky kids, younger ones know for spreading bugs like wild fire.. add associated parents..add people who are going about their business as normal.. lets say 20 million people arguments sake..

Question : with an incubation period of 4 days and 20 million people wandering around, why has there not been a huge explosion of cases ? tens of thousands should be affected by now..dropping like flies.. yet 0.003% of the population have been diagnosed for a virus with a 98% recovery rate

Either its not easily as communicable as they say or the media have panicked us into its like the end of the world

How about we take a moment look at the actual facts and not the scaremongering reports.. take sensible precautions and resume normal life
deaths are doubling every 2-3 days the spread is real
the number of people with this virus is way over the number of confirmed cases because people are not getting tested unless they are patient in hospital


So we are guessing at numbers ? if you say is true and say 100,000 people have it with a 2% mortality rate that should be 2000 dead.. we have 70 odd.. need to get some context..

They haven't died yet.

The cases have been doubling every 2 or 3 days.  I think the average time to death is about 17 days amongst the deaths (I am not checking this, but its is in that order).  Most of these deaths you are seeing now will be people who caught it at least a week ago.

A week ago there were 373 confirmed cases, a week earlier just 51.  

Also the mortality rate is only going to be under 2% if the NHS isn't overwhlemed.  People who need intensive care and a respirator are not going to be as likely to live when those things are no longer available.  

This is not scaremongering, these are facts. 

And it isn't just the huge numbers of potential deaths that matter, we do not know the long term prognosis of the survivors.  Given the virus damages the lungs and organs, many people who survive are likely to develop conditions that need long term support of some kind.



large scale quarentine and then all emerging two weeks later to catch it anyway will overun the nhs..and that will cause deaths not the actual disease.. you cant just hide from this

You are wrong.  Social distances will reduce the rate of transmission.   I might get it from my kids but I won't spread it to the gym or my mum.

How can everybody going about normal business in 2 weeks have a worse effect than everybody going about normal business today?  And there is f all chance it will be normal business in 2 weeks anyway.

My kids are going to be missing a significant chunk of their education so old people don't die.  Old people need to do their bit too.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 18, 2020, 01:39:18 PM
Science Wife had to cover a geography lesson!

Doesn't get more serious than that  :D


She also predicted (pretty much) all along that they would close the schools about a fortnight before Easter to minimise the disruption.

Bit of a question as to whether they re-open after Easter; my hunch would be an extra week after Easter then re-opening (unless the figures get horrific).


EDIT: it will be very surprising if the rest of the UK doesn't officially close the schools like Wales and Scotland have done - but her school will be closed anyway; they reached the capacity they could cover for yesterday so they've got very little chance of staying open next week either way.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 18, 2020, 01:48:08 PM

The wording of the announcements looks like they are saying all schools can close at their discretion now but all must be closed by Friday. It would be a big surprise if England and NI don’t confirm the same after COBRA.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 18, 2020, 02:00:19 PM
some of the schools locally to me have been partially closed last 2 days as teachers have had to isolate


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 18, 2020, 02:34:18 PM
My daughter's school is shut for 2 complete years at a time.  It does not matter as my youngest got a cold last week, which means both aren't in anyway.   My wife has had to isolate as she is on the at risk.     This means I have to try and keep her apart from coughing child. My daughter who has nothing wrong right now is ready to kill her sister ("its the rules, not your sister").   

Inevitable that the schools closd completely just as my sick daughter is ready to return.

I don't even go to the pub much, but would happily spend a week there right now.




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 18, 2020, 03:00:28 PM
My daughter's school is shut for 2 complete years at a time.  It does not matter as my youngest got a cold last week, which means both aren't in anyway.   My wife has had to isolate as she is on the at risk.     This means I have to try and keep her apart from coughing child. My daughter who has nothing wrong right now is ready to kill her sister ("its the rules, not your sister").   

Inevitable that the schools closd completely just as my sick daughter is ready to return.

I don't even go to the pub much, but would happily spend a week there right now.


All the best with this, it’s going to be a difficult year. I hope it goes well for you + family.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 18, 2020, 03:05:43 PM

They are backing themselves in to a corner by not announcing the number of fatalities. It’s 30 hours since the period that they released data for. If the plan is to avoid panic, then storing up a big number will surely be counterproductive in the end.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 18, 2020, 03:14:48 PM

They are backing themselves in to a corner by not announcing the number of fatalities. It’s 30 hours since the period that they released data for. If the plan is to avoid panic, then storing up a big number will surely be counterproductive in the end.

They've released those numbers every day so far - why do you think it's not just delayed?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 18, 2020, 03:18:15 PM
My daughter's school is shut for 2 complete years at a time.  It does not matter as my youngest got a cold last week, which means both aren't in anyway.   My wife has had to isolate as she is on the at risk.     This means I have to try and keep her apart from coughing child. My daughter who has nothing wrong right now is ready to kill her sister ("its the rules, not your sister").   

Inevitable that the schools closd completely just as my sick daughter is ready to return.

I don't even go to the pub much, but would happily spend a week there right now.


All the best with this, it’s going to be a difficult year. I hope it goes well for you + family.

From what you have said, you probably have at least as much to worry about.  we'll be fine.

I can still hide in a corner of the house and am still going to tesco every few days to stare at the empty shelves.   I know we aren't supposed to but I was following an old cougher and a sniffler in the queue last visit.  

Good luck to you.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 18, 2020, 03:21:51 PM

They are backing themselves in to a corner by not announcing the number of fatalities. It’s 30 hours since the period that they released data for. If the plan is to avoid panic, then storing up a big number will surely be counterproductive in the end.

They've released those numbers every day so far - why do you think it's not just delayed?

They already announced they weren"t going to update a few days ago and then backed down.   I assume he is talking yesterday's numbers that didn't appear at all.   Surely they can just produce an eatimate if there is an issue, or just say there was an issue, normal service will resume soon. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 18, 2020, 03:26:25 PM

They are backing themselves in to a corner by not announcing the number of fatalities. It’s 30 hours since the period that they released data for. If the plan is to avoid panic, then storing up a big number will surely be counterproductive in the end.

They've released those numbers every day so far - why do you think it's not just delayed?

So yesterday evening they only released the numbers up to 09:00 of that day. That was a departure from the previous day, when they released them in real time in the evening. If they move to only announcing 09:00 to 09:00 from now on, then that seems sensible but storing up long periods like this could be troublesome going forward. Let’s see what they do, it’s a horrible situation and I have lots of sympathy for the people making the call.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 18, 2020, 03:27:52 PM

They are backing themselves in to a corner by not announcing the number of fatalities. It’s 30 hours since the period that they released data for. If the plan is to avoid panic, then storing up a big number will surely be counterproductive in the end.

They've released those numbers every day so far - why do you think it's not just delayed?

So yesterday evening they only released the numbers up to 09:00 of that day. That was a departure from the previous day, when they released them in real time in the evening. If they move to only announcing 09:00 to 09:00 from now on, then that seems sensible but storing up long periods like this could be troublesome going forward. Let’s see what they do, it’s a horrible situation and I have lots of sympathy for the people making the call.

I am talking only about the fatalities on this.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 18, 2020, 03:28:48 PM

They are backing themselves in to a corner by not announcing the number of fatalities. It’s 30 hours since the period that they released data for. If the plan is to avoid panic, then storing up a big number will surely be counterproductive in the end.

They've released those numbers every day so far - why do you think it's not just delayed?

They already announced they weren"t going to update a few days ago and then backed down.   I assume he is talking yesterday's numbers that didn't appear at all.   Surely they can just produce an eatimate if there is an issue, or just say there was an issue, normal service will resume soon. 

Wasn't their 16 yesterday?

And I always interpreted the announcement they backed down on as that they were only going to give weekly numbers for everything rather than daily (not that they weren't going to give them at all). But as they u-turned it's hard to be sure which interpretation is right.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 18, 2020, 03:39:16 PM

They are backing themselves in to a corner by not announcing the number of fatalities. It’s 30 hours since the period that they released data for. If the plan is to avoid panic, then storing up a big number will surely be counterproductive in the end.

They've released those numbers every day so far - why do you think it's not just delayed?

They already announced they weren"t going to update a few days ago and then backed down.   I assume he is talking yesterday's numbers that didn't appear at all.   Surely they can just produce an eatimate if there is an issue, or just say there was an issue, normal service will resume soon. 

Wasn't their 16 yesterday?

And I always interpreted the announcement they backed down on as that they were only going to give weekly numbers for everything rather than daily (not that they weren't going to give them at all). But as they u-turned it's hard to be sure which interpretation is right.

There were 16, up to 09:00 yesterday morning, they haven’t released data on fatalities for the period since. They surely knew they wouldn’t get away with being the only country not to update daily. As I say, if they move to 09:00 to 09:00 reporting then that seems sensible enough.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 03:55:21 PM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kas0tIxDvrg

This is good, for a donut like me.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 18, 2020, 05:07:54 PM
Imagine if we tracked every death from a specific thing minute in minute out.

Should have a counter for cancer deaths on the front of every paper every day



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 05:17:25 PM
Imagine if we tracked every death from a specific thing minute in minute out.

Should have a counter for cancer deaths on the front of every paper every day

Think this is a pretty crap post, Glenn. I'd like to say you make loads, but unfortunately can't :D

You not think it's quite important to track something that is spreading rapidly, which we're trying to contain, and don't have any kind of treatment for at present?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 05:21:12 PM
Imagine if we tracked every death from a specific thing minute in minute out.

Should have a counter for cancer deaths on the front of every paper every day

Think this is a pretty crap post, Glenn. I'd like to say you make loads, but unfortunately can't :D

You not think it's quite important to track something that is spreading rapidly, which we're trying to contain, and don't have any kind of treatment for at present?

Of course they are tracking it, whether it’s it’s communicated at 9am or 5pm makes no difference to the public,  it’s just the same people that look to pick at the Tories are doing at every opportunity, you must be used to it by now....I am.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 18, 2020, 05:22:49 PM
Imagine if we tracked every death from a specific thing minute in minute out.

Should have a counter for cancer deaths on the front of every paper every day




You can't catch cancer.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 18, 2020, 05:31:07 PM
All schools to shut on Friday, deaths near doubled in 2 days.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 18, 2020, 05:34:00 PM
Imagine if we tracked every death from a specific thing minute in minute out.

Should have a counter for cancer deaths on the front of every paper every day




You can't catch cancer.


My post was too flippant for this subject. It wouldn't hurt to have a cancer counter.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 05:35:58 PM
Imagine if we tracked every death from a specific thing minute in minute out.

Should have a counter for cancer deaths on the front of every paper every day

Think this is a pretty crap post, Glenn. I'd like to say you make loads, but unfortunately can't :D

You not think it's quite important to track something that is spreading rapidly, which we're trying to contain, and don't have any kind of treatment for at present?

Of course they are tracking it, whether it’s it’s communicated at 9am or 5pm makes no difference to the public,  it’s just the same people that look to pick at the Tories are doing at every opportunity, you must be used to it by now....I am.

I obviously meant to communicate as well, given this is a rather unique situation.

Wasn't viewing it from any party angle, as all of them are the same when it concerns the other side doing something, lol.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 18, 2020, 05:36:39 PM
All schools to shut on Friday, deaths near doubled in 2 days.



FML


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 05:39:40 PM
Imagine if we tracked every death from a specific thing minute in minute out.

Should have a counter for cancer deaths on the front of every paper every day

Think this is a pretty crap post, Glenn. I'd like to say you make loads, but unfortunately can't :D

You not think it's quite important to track something that is spreading rapidly, which we're trying to contain, and don't have any kind of treatment for at present?

Of course they are tracking it, whether it’s it’s communicated at 9am or 5pm makes no difference to the public,  it’s just the same people that look to pick at the Tories are doing at every opportunity, you must be used to it by now....I am.

I obviously meant to communicate as well, given this is a rather unique situation.

Wasn't viewing it from any party angle, as all of them are the same when it concerns the other side doing something, lol.

I wasn’t talking about you picking at the govt  ;)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 18, 2020, 05:50:17 PM
All schools to shut on Friday, deaths near doubled in 2 days.



FML

Looks like my kids aren't going back.  At least the trampoline is getting used and I don't have to kick them out of bed at 7.30am.  I'd recommend leaving them there all day.  Maybe the missus too.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 18, 2020, 06:24:05 PM
Imagine if we tracked every death from a specific thing minute in minute out.

Should have a counter for cancer deaths on the front of every paper every day

Think this is a pretty crap post, Glenn. I'd like to say you make loads, but unfortunately can't :D

You not think it's quite important to track something that is spreading rapidly, which we're trying to contain, and don't have any kind of treatment for at present?

I can't answer this honestly because I'll seem like an uncaring brute. I know my views on this are heavily influenced by the demographic dying and if it was predominantly say sub 35 year olds I'd have a different perspective.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 06:42:58 PM
Imagine if we tracked every death from a specific thing minute in minute out.

Should have a counter for cancer deaths on the front of every paper every day

Think this is a pretty crap post, Glenn. I'd like to say you make loads, but unfortunately can't :D

You not think it's quite important to track something that is spreading rapidly, which we're trying to contain, and don't have any kind of treatment for at present?

I can't answer this honestly because I'll seem like an uncaring brute. I know my views on this are heavily influenced by the demographic dying and if it was predominantly say sub 35 year olds I'd have a different perspective.

I was in the 'only flu' brigade and lets crack on, until I did a bit of listening to some experts and seeing how bad it might get, I've done a 180.

We know you're an uncaring brute anyway, so wouldn't worry too much ;)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 06:45:06 PM
Imagine if we tracked every death from a specific thing minute in minute out.

Should have a counter for cancer deaths on the front of every paper every day

Think this is a pretty crap post, Glenn. I'd like to say you make loads, but unfortunately can't :D

You not think it's quite important to track something that is spreading rapidly, which we're trying to contain, and don't have any kind of treatment for at present?

Of course they are tracking it, whether it’s it’s communicated at 9am or 5pm makes no difference to the public,  it’s just the same people that look to pick at the Tories are doing at every opportunity, you must be used to it by now....I am.

I obviously meant to communicate as well, given this is a rather unique situation.

Wasn't viewing it from any party angle, as all of them are the same when it concerns the other side doing something, lol.

I wasn’t talking about you picking at the govt  ;)

I knew that :)

I might need a second job, though. Just had a convo with one of the brokers I do some work for and he's talking about waiting to see how much they're getting commissions for cases cut, and I might need to take a 50% paycut until this all dies down.

I'll be off to Glas Vegas next holiday by the sounds of it :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AndrewT on March 18, 2020, 07:04:52 PM
475 deaths in Italy yesterday - those who died would have been infected about 2 weeks ago and the UK is 2 weeks behind Italy in terms of number of cases, so that shows you what is coming.

This morning Westminster coroner's court started building a temporary extension to their mortuary in order to handle the expected increase in cases.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 18, 2020, 08:17:45 PM
I think the USA where only those that can afford it see doctors or get any kind of healthcare is an impending disaster-area.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: HutchGF on March 18, 2020, 08:50:57 PM
We have isolated the boarders at our school for a week now and closing to day students Friday.

We are teaching remotely via Google Classroom and Google Meet.

Business as usual (ish) but we have been preparing and training staff for well over a month.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 18, 2020, 08:53:50 PM
https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/influenza-epidemic/


Between 50-100 million were killed by this.
With today's population  that would be around 200-400 million and it came in 2 waves the 2nd being felt by the young and healthy as well as the old and infirmed


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: aaron1867 on March 18, 2020, 08:56:26 PM
Me and my Dad are on both the "at risk list" and its been difficult to self-isolate. We are still humans that need to go out, need to shop and a need to socialise (him, more than me).

Throughout all of this, the government response has been so iffy-jiffy and feel sorry for those that are elf employed and renters.

Let's look after EVERYONE, not the chosen few.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 08:59:27 PM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6IgMdsZHbM

Osterholm's skit on it.

Saved me watching it all again, though I probably will at some point, now they've stopped filming Eastenders :)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 18, 2020, 09:29:19 PM
Me and my Dad are on both the "at risk list" and its been difficult to self-isolate. We are still humans that need to go out, need to shop and a need to socialise (him, more than me).

Throughout all of this, the government response has been so iffy-jiffy and feel sorry for those that are elf employed and renters.

Let's look after EVERYONE, not the chosen few.

Look after everyone by going out and socialising?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 18, 2020, 10:34:31 PM
Americans are panic buying guns.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 18, 2020, 10:41:39 PM
Imagine trying to wipe your arse with a sniper rifle.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 10:42:40 PM
Nobody can nick your bog roll, so there is that :D

https://twitter.com/danajaybein/status/1240307541491494912

This is very good - Covid:19 Rhapsody


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 18, 2020, 10:48:42 PM
Our office has around 40 people - we had just one person self isolate because he is married to a chinese lady and she had recently been home. Saw a news story of a school with 12 teachers and 7 are self isolating.

Incred how this thing works in really tight clusters.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 10:55:09 PM
Our office has around 40 people - we had just one person self isolate because he is married to a chinese lady and she had recently been home. Saw a news story of a school with 12 teachers and 7 are self isolating.

Incred how this thing works in really tight clusters.

U still going into the office?  ;surrender;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 18, 2020, 10:56:52 PM
Our office has around 40 people - we had just one person self isolate because he is married to a chinese lady and she had recently been home. Saw a news story of a school with 12 teachers and 7 are self isolating.

Incred how this thing works in really tight clusters.

People who have asthma and all kinds of ailmemts have been told to self isolaate.   People whose kids have coughs have been told to self isolate.  Given 5 million Brits have asthma, you are lucky to have none in your office.  I have a house of 4 people and I can self isolate for 2 reasons.

Variance?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 18, 2020, 11:18:26 PM
Our office has around 40 people - we had just one person self isolate because he is married to a chinese lady and she had recently been home. Saw a news story of a school with 12 teachers and 7 are self isolating.

Incred how this thing works in really tight clusters.

U still going into the office?  ;surrender;

No, I'm in the extremely privileged position where it's easy for me to work from home and same goes for pretty much everyone at my place of work bar one person.

From tomorrow, he'll be there every day and a bunch of people will rotate so there are at least 2 people on site each day.

I've always felt extremely lucky that I have the kind of job I have and I feel desperately sorry for the people who have the kinds of jobs that make this situation pretty terrible either though financial insecurity or risk/exposure to infection.




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 11:18:46 PM
And for a pleasing interlude......

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUMaELE-UrY


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 11:30:40 PM
Can't got wrong with a bit of Boyzone.

Saw them in 2001 at Butlins :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 11:36:37 PM
Can't got wrong with a bit of Boyzone.

Saw them in 2001 at Butlins :D

I saw Ronan Keating playing solo in Sun City a couple of days after millenium new year in Cape Town.. Good times as I remember shipping a few grand at black jack and having my entire drink bill while gambling comped in Sun City, didn’t expect it and probably close to my best comp ever!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 11:39:44 PM
Can't got wrong with a bit of Boyzone.

Saw them in 2001 at Butlins :D

I saw Ronan Keating playing solo in Sun City a couple of days after millenium new year in Cape Town.. Good times as I remember shipping a few grand at black jack and having my entire drink bill while gambling comped in Sun City, didn’t expect it and probably close to my best comp ever!

Charmed life, Woodsey!

Not quite Sun City, but close... I was still in the Navy, and wangled a long weekend for my 21st. Half a dozen of us went down to Minehead for 3 days of carnage :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 11:43:49 PM
Can't got wrong with a bit of Boyzone.

Saw them in 2001 at Butlins :D

I saw Ronan Keating playing solo in Sun City a couple of days after millenium new year in Cape Town.. Good times as I remember shipping a few grand at black jack and having my entire drink bill while gambling comped in Sun City, didn’t expect it and probably close to my best comp ever!

Charmed life, Woodsey!

Not quite Sun City, but close... I was still in the Navy, and wangled a long weekend for my 21st. Half a dozen of us went down to Minehead for 3 days of carnage :D

Actually just checked my pics, was a few days in Sun City on the back of a holiday in Namibia......who cares a piss up is a piss up doesn’t matter where it is or whether it’s with with mates/family.... :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 11:46:33 PM
Agree 100%

I'll be glad of a few days in Glas Vegas this summer, nevermind Las Vegas or anywhere else.

Might dip off to Antalya and get my gnashers sorted instead. Now it looks like we're going nowhere until much later in the year.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 18, 2020, 11:52:55 PM
Agree 100%

I'll be glad of a few days in Glas Vegas this summer, nevermind Las Vegas or anywhere else.

Might dip off to Antalya and get my gnashers sorted instead. Now it looks like we're going nowhere until much later in the year.

I’m not expecting any holidays this year now........if it happens it happens otherwise c’est la vie........


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 18, 2020, 11:53:58 PM
Agree 100%

I'll be glad of a few days in Glas Vegas this summer, nevermind Las Vegas or anywhere else.

Might dip off to Antalya and get my gnashers sorted instead. Now it looks like we're going nowhere until much later in the year.

I’m not expecting any holidays this year now........if it happens it happens otherwise c’est la vie........

Exactly what I said to the old dear. If you get Xmas, lovely. Plan for 2021 and 3 weeks of Loose Women this June/July.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: shipitgood on March 18, 2020, 11:55:17 PM
On a positive note, no Eurovision this year.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 01:22:33 AM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AndrewT on March 19, 2020, 01:39:34 AM
Here in Dublin it's a bit of a ghost town. Offices that could have employees work from home all shut down on Friday. Pubs are closed, as are most restaurants. Schools have also all been shut for a week. This is all with us still only having 2 deaths.

Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

Who is it that starts these stupid Whatsapp/Facebook stories? Surely by now everyone knows they are bullshit. We had the same thing in Ireland last week - 'the Army will be on the streets by the weekend' etc.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tonytats on March 19, 2020, 04:28:49 AM
 Isn’t isolation not to prevent us getting it
But to prevent being overrun with dead folk ?
It’s merely delaying it to a more manageable level
We are nearly all going to get the virus
Indeed some think that bad cough cold in December - January was it ?
It’s the old folk most at risk
My dad -85 and Denise’s mum same age are “ staying in “ though dad thinks going to the garden centre for plug plants  for something to do ,then going to the bank for a bit of cash n transferring money to pay his credit card by cheque don’t count
Denise's mum thinks walking to the local nisa is fine too as it wasn’t very busy
Sunday lunches at ours don’t count either
So it’s not easy convincing them the oldies to stay in


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 19, 2020, 06:36:29 AM
All schools to shut on Friday, deaths near doubled in 2 days.



FML

Looks like my kids aren't going back.  At least the trampoline is getting used and I don't have to kick them out of bed at 7.30am.  I'd recommend leaving them there all day.  Maybe the missus too.

Can just about manage the kids, it's the fact my business is furniture for schools.

Fingers crossed they keep some staff in for deliveries and ordering but I think it's unlikely.

Already spoken to the bank. Good news is they expect to be shovelling money out the door to people, bad news is they aren't ready yet.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: 4KSuited on March 19, 2020, 10:26:13 AM
Isn’t isolation not to prevent us getting it
But to prevent being overrun with dead folk ?
It’s merely delaying it to a more manageable level
We are nearly all going to get the virus
Indeed some think that bad cough cold in December - January was it ?
It’s the old folk most at risk
My dad -85 and Denise’s mum same age are “ staying in “ though dad thinks going to the garden centre for plug plants  for something to do ,then going to the bank for a bit of cash n transferring money to pay his credit card by cheque don’t count
Denise's mum thinks walking to the local nisa is fine too as it wasn’t very busy
Sunday lunches at ours don’t count either
So it’s not easy convincing them the oldies to stay in


I really hope you’re right about this tony. A lot of people had it, including me.
I work for an airline, and I’m expecting to hear whether I still have a job by the end of play tomorrow. The job is customer facing, and you wouldn’t believe the behaviour of some people over the last few days (passports in their mouths on the one hand, and dressed up in full hazmat suits on the other), but of course we’re all expected to show up for work unless we’re suffering symptoms. Since everybody’s worried about losing their job, we all keep showing up.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 19, 2020, 10:30:22 AM
Isn’t isolation not to prevent us getting it
But to prevent being overrun with dead folk ?
It’s merely delaying it to a more manageable level
We are nearly all going to get the virus
Indeed some think that bad cough cold in December - January was it ?
It’s the old folk most at risk
My dad -85 and Denise’s mum same age are “ staying in “ though dad thinks going to the garden centre for plug plants  for something to do ,then going to the bank for a bit of cash n transferring money to pay his credit card by cheque don’t count
Denise's mum thinks walking to the local nisa is fine too as it wasn’t very busy
Sunday lunches at ours don’t count either
So it’s not easy convincing them the oldies to stay in


I really hope you’re right about this tony. A lot of people had it, including me.
I work for an airline, and I’m expecting to hear whether I still have a job by the end of play tomorrow. The job is customer facing, and you wouldn’t believe the behaviour of some people over the last few days (passports in their mouths on the one hand, and dressed up in full hazmat suits on the other), but of course we’re all expected to show up for work unless we’re suffering symptoms. Since everybody’s worried about losing their job, we all keep showing up.

One of the guys at work has been wondering if him and his girlfriend both had it earlier in the year. They were both ridiculously ill and have said all the symptoms sound the same.

Let's hope it was and that there's already a few immune


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 19, 2020, 10:31:55 AM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

It's bullshit like this that gets people panicking.

Please just stop.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 19, 2020, 10:39:29 AM
Everyone says "don't panic buy food" but it's getting really difficult to get even basics.

The earliest available slots for online supermarket shopping are 2 to 3 weeks away.

Habitually, I go to my local Tesco at 8am each morning & get when I need. This week the queue awaiting opening time at 8am has been round the block, & once inside the shelves are, quite literally, empty. Standing in a queue outside a supermarket every morning is not exactly good social-distancing either.

I've been fairly laid back about the whole thing, & as I live alone I'm used to self isolating, it's my normal lifestyle & I'm completely fine with it. The enormity of it all is dawning on me now & it's seriously scary. And that's before we start worrying about the economic Armageddon that is waiting in the wings.

And if you can manage a "heavy" read, here's a report by Imperial College which scares the life out of me. In the absence of MANTIS I need someone solid & sensible like The Evil Pie,  Dooobs, JonMW or Science Wife to poo poo it to make me feel better.


 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 19, 2020, 10:45:36 AM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

It's bullshit like this that gets people panicking.

Please just stop.




That seems like a fairly well balanced post to me Iron.

Matt is just panicking about people panicking  :P

Please continue.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 19, 2020, 10:56:07 AM
I've just realised I described Evil Pie as "sensible".

That's how bad things are.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 19, 2020, 11:04:08 AM
Everyone says "don't panic buy food" but it's getting really difficult to get even basics.

The earliest available slots for online supermarket shopping are 2 to 3 weeks away.

Habitually, I go to my local Tesco at 8am each morning & get when I need. This week the queue awaiting opening time at 8am has been round the block, & once inside the shelves are, quite literally, empty. Standing in a queue outside a supermarket every morning is not exactly good social-distancing either.

I've been fairly laid back about the whole thing, & as I live alone I'm used to self isolating, it's my normal lifestyle & I'm completely fine with it. The enormity of it all is dawning on me now & it's seriously scary. And that's before we start worrying about the economic Armageddon that is waiting in the wings.

And if you can manage a "heavy" read, here's a report by Imperial College which scares the life out of me. In the absence of MANTIS I need someone solid & sensible like The Evil Pie,  Dooobs, JonMW or Science Wife to poo poo it to make me feel better.


 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

I sm not going to poo poo that report.  It seems absolutely clear that the NHS would be overwhelmed if we carry on as before.   People need to change habits and change them now.  If everyone outside hospitals is meeting significantly less people then transmission will slow down.  

On Tesco, I am aiming to go once every 4 days or so as everyone has to eat.  I am hoping delivery slots will open but not counting on it. I assume the cupboards of the panic buyers will get full and they will just stop.  I have already told the kids they are going to have to get used to eating whatever is in the shop and cupboards.   They are getting victories (only white bread), and losses (only skimmed milk).  I am trying to give them stuff to do learning wise, and they seem keen enough.  Both schools are promising to send through stuff from next week, but the eldest is getting homework already.  

Meanwhile walking and running seems fine, so long as I don't go near others, but pretty much everything else that involves meeting people has gone.  Trying to increase my good mornings.

I don't know if you have noticed, but as the park had got quieter, you see more wildlife.  See the small positives.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: teddybloat on March 19, 2020, 11:09:31 AM
If we allowed prices to rise without social media mobs shaming people we'd be a lot better off.

Somone is currently directing a hate mob at a corner shop for raising prices. Tenner for toilet roll. If you needed toilet roll that badly you're prepared to pay a tenner, you'd want someone to be charging a tenner in a world where anything less leads to empty shelves.

Let the prices float, and everyone has enough


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 19, 2020, 11:14:59 AM
Schools demand urgent clarification regarding exam results.


Piss off schools, we're trying to prevent people from dying ATM.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 19, 2020, 11:31:11 AM
If we allowed prices to rise without social media mobs shaming people we'd be a lot better off.

Somone is currently directing a hate mob at a corner shop for raising prices. Tenner for toilet roll. If you needed toilet roll that badly you're prepared to pay a tenner, you'd want someone to be charging a tenner in a world where anything less leads to empty shelves.

Let the prices float, and everyone has enough

That's not how the free market works and it's not how the free market is meant to work.

It's been a long time since I did A level economics but iirc, this would be called an externality.

It's an external shock to the market that blows the free market off course - it's the kind of thing that governments should intervene in to 'correct' the pricing mechanism.

A lot of people (particularly Americans) seem to think that the free market means the government don't do anything to interfere but it's things like this (and to prevent monopolies for example) that highlight that the free market doesn't work alone; sometimes it needs help to work properly.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 19, 2020, 12:00:45 PM

I agree with EP about scaremongering but it’s at least as important not to underestimate the enormity of this. If people are in a position to help someone in a high risk grouping, it would be great if people did what they can to help. It also seems we have an opportunity on this forum to coordinate assistance for forum members if they need it, we have areas of the country with quite close geographical groupings, especially in the East Midlands, with a wide spectrum from very high risk to very low. It’s going to be difficult for a very long time, let’s all do what we can for each other.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Archer on March 19, 2020, 12:09:10 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

Laura Kuenssberg: "No 10 says there is 'zero prospect' of a big lockdown of London - as we've been reporting there might be tightening of restrictions but remember that is VERY different from other suggestions of travel bans or the kind of total lockdowns some other countries have pursued"

Guess it's happening then.......




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 19, 2020, 12:11:16 PM
Popped over to see my neighbours in their mid seventies, they are however very active people and i started by apologising ( how British is that loool ) as i didnt want to offend them by asking if they were ok and if they needed anything to give me a shout as i know they are very capable and able bodied but I felt it was the right thing to do .. they were genuinly touched and thanked me... im deffo going to heaven NAP :)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 12:22:13 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

It's bullshit like this that gets people panicking.

Please just stop.


https://www.wibc.com/news/international/uk-considers-partial-lockdown-in-london-and-the-army-may-be-deployed-to-help-enforce-it/


sky and bbc news channels showing troops getting ready to help out

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-zero-prospect-of-restrictions-on-travel-in-and-out-of-london-downing-street-11960212

so they have obviously been reports of a london lock down otherwise reporters wouldnt not be asking officials



my post said there was reports of it and i didn't know how much truth was in the reports 

i think it was a balanced post

do i think the world is about to end NO
do i think alot of people are going to die YES
i am scared YES

will i always post my opinions YES

just because they might be different opinions to other people doesn't make them less valid







Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 19, 2020, 12:31:00 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

Laura Kuenssberg: "No 10 says there is 'zero prospect' of a big lockdown of London - as we've been reporting there might be tightening of restrictions but remember that is VERY different from other suggestions of travel bans or the kind of total lockdowns some other countries have pursued"

Guess it's happening then.......


I think it’s certain there will be an almost complete lockdown in London. Let’s think population densities in London vs Lombardy, they have a similar number of people. Lombardy is 24,000 km squared, London is 1600 km squared. Italy has way better respirator provision than we do and far better air quality in that part of Italy vs London. The only positive I can think is average age. I know it annoyed Nirvana but there is good reason to think we will be the worst of any country soon.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 19, 2020, 12:36:32 PM
Everyone says "don't panic buy food" but it's getting really difficult to get even basics.

The earliest available slots for online supermarket shopping are 2 to 3 weeks away.

Habitually, I go to my local Tesco at 8am each morning & get when I need. This week the queue awaiting opening time at 8am has been round the block, & once inside the shelves are, quite literally, empty. Standing in a queue outside a supermarket every morning is not exactly good social-distancing either.

I've been fairly laid back about the whole thing, & as I live alone I'm used to self isolating, it's my normal lifestyle & I'm completely fine with it. The enormity of it all is dawning on me now & it's seriously scary. And that's before we start worrying about the economic Armageddon that is waiting in the wings.

And if you can manage a "heavy" read, here's a report by Imperial College which scares the life out of me. In the absence of MANTIS I need someone solid & sensible like The Evil Pie,  Dooobs, JonMW or Science Wife to poo poo it to make me feel better.


 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

I wandered down to my local Asda yesterday afternoon just to see what it was like - didn't really need much but had in mind to get a paper and buy a few ingredients to make fish cakes.

Loads of shelves empty - most fresh fruit and veg gone, not a potato in site, but you could get Leeks Apples - no problem with Parsley so I got some of that.

Nearly all fresh meat gone bar their more expensive steaks but plenty of sausages, bacon, black pudding - just along from there are pies and stuff - quite a few of those and, having switched to comfort eating mode based on the scenes before me I picked up a couple of scotch eggs.

Kipling cakes and biscuits seemed quite plentiful so I picked up a few of those. Got breadcrumbs, frozen mushy peas, frozen fish, frozen prawns. Fortunately I still have a few potatoes here so fishcakes can be made

Most tea and coffee had gone, eggs gone and quite a few other aisles looked pretty empty but tbf, because I can cook a bit, unless they are absolutely empty of everything, like Doobs, we may have to vary what we eat but feels like we'll be alright.

No way am I joining a queue to go to a supermarket at any point (could be famous last words) - I don't have young kids at home so this takes a lot of pressure off the feeling of having to have stuff to provide your family.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 19, 2020, 12:37:24 PM
Popped over to see my neighbours in their mid seventies, they are however very active people and i started by apologising ( how British is that loool ) as i didnt want to offend them by asking if they were ok and if they needed anything to give me a shout as i know they are very capable and able bodied but I felt it was the right thing to do .. they were genuinly touched and thanked me... im deffo going to heaven NAP :)

Nice job 👍


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ledders on March 19, 2020, 12:38:43 PM
Unfortunately I don't see shop shelves getting better for at least a week.

Most people are well stocked up but everyone is going in again to keep 'prepared'.

It has taken me quite a while to convince relatives to eat the meals in their freezer rather than nip out to see what's available and interacting with others.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 19, 2020, 12:40:21 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

It's bullshit like this that gets people panicking.

Please just stop.


https://www.wibc.com/news/international/uk-considers-partial-lockdown-in-london-and-the-army-may-be-deployed-to-help-enforce-it/


sky and bbc news channels showing troops getting ready to help out

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-zero-prospect-of-restrictions-on-travel-in-and-out-of-london-downing-street-11960212

so they have obviously been reports of a london lock down otherwise reporters wouldnt not be asking officials



my post said there was reports of it and i didn't know how much truth was in the reports 

i think it was a balanced post

do i think the world is about to end NO
do i think alot of people are going to die YES
i am scared YES

will i always post my opinions YES

just because they might be different opinions to other people doesn't make them less valid


I wouldn't respond in quite the same way but when you say there have been reports - reports from where?

Or was it people on twitter saying there have been reports of it?

The journalists will ask a question if people are talking about it on social media.

My guess is some people saw military people on the roads and jumped to the conclusion (but if there was anything in the slightest bit official let us know)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 19, 2020, 12:40:40 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

Laura Kuenssberg: "No 10 says there is 'zero prospect' of a big lockdown of London - as we've been reporting there might be tightening of restrictions but remember that is VERY different from other suggestions of travel bans or the kind of total lockdowns some other countries have pursued"

Guess it's happening then.......


I think it’s certain there will be an almost complete lockdown in London. Let’s think population densities in London vs Lombardy, they have a similar number of people. Lombardy is 24,000 km squared, London is 1600 km squared. Italy has way better respirator provision than we do and far better air quality in that part of Italy vs London. The only positive I can think is average age. I know it annoyed Nirvana but there is good reason to think we will be the worst of any country soon.

Doesn't annoy me and even if it did, I'm glad you keep posting your thoughts - hare brained or otherwise :-)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 19, 2020, 12:43:02 PM
Think I'll pop to Asda every 3 days and try to make incred meals from whatever leftovers are in the shop at 6pm, will post meal pics to bring happiness to the forum.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 19, 2020, 12:50:05 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

Laura Kuenssberg: "No 10 says there is 'zero prospect' of a big lockdown of London - as we've been reporting there might be tightening of restrictions but remember that is VERY different from other suggestions of travel bans or the kind of total lockdowns some other countries have pursued"

Guess it's happening then.......


I think it’s certain there will be an almost complete lockdown in London. Let’s think population densities in London vs Lombardy, they have a similar number of people. Lombardy is 24,000 km squared, London is 1600 km squared. Italy has way better respirator provision than we do and far better air quality in that part of Italy vs London. The only positive I can think is average age. I know it annoyed Nirvana but there is good reason to think we will be the worst of any country soon.

Doesn't annoy me and even if it did, I'm glad you keep posting your thoughts - hare brained or otherwise :-)

That’s cool, I assumed any annoyance would be very low level. The great thing about economics and science compared to politics is that we’ll get much better evidence of whether or not ideas are indeed ‘hare brained’ 😊.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 12:50:19 PM
Unfortunately I don't see shop shelves getting better for at least a week.

Most people are well stocked up but everyone is going in again to keep 'prepared'.

It has taken me quite a while to convince relatives to eat the meals in their freezer rather than nip out to see what's available and interacting with others.


i get my weekly delivery on a thursday normally 1 or maybe 2 items unavailable, this week there is about 15 itesm missing. we normally get 6 tins of soup every 2 weeks as it comes 6 for £4 deal, this week its reduced to 3 items so thats cool. things are going to different and difficult for some people. Social distancing is a pain in ass but if keeps me safe then its worthwhile.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 12:55:01 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

It's bullshit like this that gets people panicking.

Please just stop.


https://www.wibc.com/news/international/uk-considers-partial-lockdown-in-london-and-the-army-may-be-deployed-to-help-enforce-it/


sky and bbc news channels showing troops getting ready to help out

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-zero-prospect-of-restrictions-on-travel-in-and-out-of-london-downing-street-11960212

so they have obviously been reports of a london lock down otherwise reporters wouldnt not be asking officials



my post said there was reports of it and i didn't know how much truth was in the reports 

i think it was a balanced post

do i think the world is about to end NO
do i think alot of people are going to die YES
i am scared YES

will i always post my opinions YES

just because they might be different opinions to other people doesn't make them less valid


I wouldn't respond in quite the same way but when you say there have been reports - reports from where?

Or was it people on twitter saying there have been reports of it?

The journalists will ask a question if people are talking about it on social media.

My guess is some people saw military people on the roads and jumped to the conclusion (but if there was anything in the slightest bit official let us know)

https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2020/03/18/breaking-military-sources-say-uk-to-go-into-lockdown-from-friday-amidst-virus-fear/#.XnNq7Kj7SUk

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/03/16/uks-coronavirus-lockdown-has-already-begun-unofficially-northern/

https://kvia.com/news/us-world/2020/03/19/uk-considering-partial-lockdown-in-london/

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-london-superspreader-city-facing-strict-lockdown-measures/news-story/36b431c64cb21e0735772b7e298bc94b

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11205235/army-preparing-troops-coronavirus-fight/





Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 12:57:05 PM
sorry JonMW i thought most people using this forum could use google

i dont know how reliable these sources are


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 19, 2020, 12:58:54 PM
Pretty much everything that's been mooted so far has happened in the following day or two, so get ready for Laardon to be locked. Followed by the rest of the country early next week. Imo.

I've not left the house since last Thursday off the back of an email from my rheumatoid arthritis consultant. I'm on biologics and prednisalone, so am considered high risk within the vulnerable rofflers, and I have asthma and bronchiecstasis on top.

The first Tesco home delivery order I did online was last Thursday. The first available slot was Monday (four days). The next one I did was Saturday, when the first slot was this coming Saturday (seven days).

Then it got totally snarled up over the weekend. I did another one on Sunday, when the first delivery slot was a week on Saturday (13 days). So I'm sorted for a few weeks, probably.

Monday's order was pretty much complete aside from a couple of cleaning products. Fk knows what'll be turning up on Saturday though.

I don't believe for a second all these slots have been taken by OAPs and vulnerables, which is pretty shameful.

As of yesterday Italy had seen 20x the number of deaths we've had so far and there's no sign of any panic buying at all over there. Says a lot about our fine country.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 19, 2020, 12:59:50 PM
Everyone says "don't panic buy food" but it's getting really difficult to get even basics.

The earliest available slots for online supermarket shopping are 2 to 3 weeks away.

Habitually, I go to my local Tesco at 8am each morning & get when I need. This week the queue awaiting opening time at 8am has been round the block, & once inside the shelves are, quite literally, empty. Standing in a queue outside a supermarket every morning is not exactly good social-distancing either.

I've been fairly laid back about the whole thing, & as I live alone I'm used to self isolating, it's my normal lifestyle & I'm completely fine with it. The enormity of it all is dawning on me now & it's seriously scary. And that's before we start worrying about the economic Armageddon that is waiting in the wings.

And if you can manage a "heavy" read, here's a report by Imperial College which scares the life out of me. In the absence of MANTIS I need someone solid & sensible like The Evil Pie,  Dooobs, JonMW or Science Wife to poo poo it to make me feel better.


 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

I wandered down to my local Asda yesterday afternoon just to see what it was like - didn't really need much but had in mind to get a paper and buy a few ingredients to make fish cakes.

Loads of shelves empty - most fresh fruit and veg gone, not a potato in site, but you could get Leeks Apples - no problem with Parsley so I got some of that.

Nearly all fresh meat gone bar their more expensive steaks but plenty of sausages, bacon, black pudding - just along from there are pies and stuff - quite a few of those and, having switched to comfort eating mode based on the scenes before me I picked up a couple of scotch eggs.

Kipling cakes and biscuits seemed quite plentiful so I picked up a few of those. Got breadcrumbs, frozen mushy peas, frozen fish, frozen prawns. Fortunately I still have a few potatoes here so fishcakes can be made

Most tea and coffee had gone, eggs gone and quite a few other aisles looked pretty empty but tbf, because I can cook a bit, unless they are absolutely empty of everything, like Doobs, we may have to vary what we eat but feels like we'll be alright.

No way am I joining a queue to go to a supermarket at any point (could be famous last words) - I don't have young kids at home so this takes a lot of pressure off the feeling of having to have stuff to provide your family.

All the little local independent shops around me still have plenty of everything no problem, everyone seems to be hitting the supermarket......


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 19, 2020, 01:15:45 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

It's bullshit like this that gets people panicking.

Please just stop.


https://www.wibc.com/news/international/uk-considers-partial-lockdown-in-london-and-the-army-may-be-deployed-to-help-enforce-it/


sky and bbc news channels showing troops getting ready to help out

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-zero-prospect-of-restrictions-on-travel-in-and-out-of-london-downing-street-11960212

so they have obviously been reports of a london lock down otherwise reporters wouldnt not be asking officials



my post said there was reports of it and i didn't know how much truth was in the reports 

i think it was a balanced post

do i think the world is about to end NO
do i think alot of people are going to die YES
i am scared YES

will i always post my opinions YES

just because they might be different opinions to other people doesn't make them less valid


I wouldn't respond in quite the same way but when you say there have been reports - reports from where?

Or was it people on twitter saying there have been reports of it?

The journalists will ask a question if people are talking about it on social media.

My guess is some people saw military people on the roads and jumped to the conclusion (but if there was anything in the slightest bit official let us know)

https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2020/03/18/breaking-military-sources-say-uk-to-go-into-lockdown-from-friday-amidst-virus-fear/#.XnNq7Kj7SUk

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/03/16/uks-coronavirus-lockdown-has-already-begun-unofficially-northern/

https://kvia.com/news/us-world/2020/03/19/uk-considering-partial-lockdown-in-london/

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-london-superspreader-city-facing-strict-lockdown-measures/news-story/36b431c64cb21e0735772b7e298bc94b

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11205235/army-preparing-troops-coronavirus-fight/



Fair enough it's actual news sources although the last two links specifically mention it's not a military lockdown just that the military are being used to help, and the one before specifically mentioned there isn't a lockdown immediately planned.

I couldn't be bothered with the free trial link on the Telegraph so it's only really the euroweekly one - and that conspicuously says it comes from 'military sources'. But yes - still actual news sources rather than hearsay I give you that.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 19, 2020, 01:17:41 PM
Nigel Ward
Diane Abbott has called for the BBC to stop filming casualty and holby city so the staff can help out with the corona virus outbreak.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 19, 2020, 01:18:53 PM
can you be a carrier ( infectious ) without being ill for an extended period ? could i have it..never be ill but infectious for the next 6 months ?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 19, 2020, 01:26:14 PM
can you be a carrier ( infectious ) without being ill for an extended period ? could i have it..never be ill but infectious for the next 6 months ?

You know the morbidly obese are part of the vulnerable crew right?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 19, 2020, 01:27:54 PM
can you be a carrier ( infectious ) without being ill for an extended period ? could i have it..never be ill but infectious for the next 6 months ?

If it is similar to other viruses and they seem to believe it is from this point of view, then no. The asymptomatic people would be contagious for the same period as those exhibiting symptoms (there is a case for less) but call it ~five days.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 19, 2020, 01:33:18 PM
can you be a carrier ( infectious ) without being ill for an extended period ? could i have it..never be ill but infectious for the next 6 months ?

If it is similar to other viruses and they seem to believe it is from this point of view, then no. The asymptomatic people would be contagious for the same period as those exhibiting symptoms (there is a case for less) but call it ~five days.

cheers


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 19, 2020, 01:33:56 PM
can you be a carrier ( infectious ) without being ill for an extended period ? could i have it..never be ill but infectious for the next 6 months ?

You know the morbidly obese are part of the vulnerable crew right?

lets hope being a knob isnt a high risk group otherwise you really are in trouble looooool


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 19, 2020, 01:35:23 PM
...
And if you can manage a "heavy" read, here's a report by Imperial College which scares the life out of me. In the absence of MANTIS I need someone solid & sensible like The Evil Pie,  Dooobs, JonMW or Science Wife to poo poo it to make me feel better.


 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

If you want to make it easier to read just skip past all the numbers and tables and the like.

If you just stick to the narrative that's in fairly standard English then (I think) it's fairly easy to 'get'.

You might not like it after you 'get' it - but there's not much we can do about that.

The 'normal' way of dealing with flu pandemics will overwhelm critical care and lots of people die.
The 'other' way of dealing with pandemics will probably overwhelm critical care and lots of people die.
The 'best' way of dealing with this pandemic is to alternate the other two ways and critical care might not get overwhelmed. Lots of people will still die though - just not as many.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 19, 2020, 01:40:41 PM
can you be a carrier ( infectious ) without being ill for an extended period ? could i have it..never be ill but infectious for the next 6 months ?

You know the morbidly obese are part of the vulnerable crew right?

lets hope being a knob isnt a high risk group otherwise you really are in trouble looooool

:)

Doesn't this all seem a bit much though? Basically overhyped sniffles?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 19, 2020, 01:42:10 PM
can you be a carrier ( infectious ) without being ill for an extended period ? could i have it..never be ill but infectious for the next 6 months ?

If it is similar to other viruses and they seem to believe it is from this point of view, then no. The asymptomatic people would be contagious for the same period as those exhibiting symptoms (there is a case for less) but call it ~five days.

Think this is pretty accurate; I think it is likely to be days rather than months.   We won't really know for sure how long right now.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 19, 2020, 01:49:14 PM
can you be a carrier ( infectious ) without being ill for an extended period ? could i have it..never be ill but infectious for the next 6 months ?

You know the morbidly obese are part of the vulnerable crew right?

lets hope being a knob isnt a high risk group otherwise you really are in trouble looooool

:)

Doesn't this all seem a bit much though? Basically overhyped sniffles?

glad to see ur pet Gavin is keeping u up on other convos


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 01:55:30 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

It's bullshit like this that gets people panicking.

Please just stop.


https://www.wibc.com/news/international/uk-considers-partial-lockdown-in-london-and-the-army-may-be-deployed-to-help-enforce-it/


sky and bbc news channels showing troops getting ready to help out

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-zero-prospect-of-restrictions-on-travel-in-and-out-of-london-downing-street-11960212

so they have obviously been reports of a london lock down otherwise reporters wouldnt not be asking officials



my post said there was reports of it and i didn't know how much truth was in the reports 

i think it was a balanced post

do i think the world is about to end NO
do i think alot of people are going to die YES
i am scared YES

will i always post my opinions YES

just because they might be different opinions to other people doesn't make them less valid


I wouldn't respond in quite the same way but when you say there have been reports - reports from where?

Or was it people on twitter saying there have been reports of it?

The journalists will ask a question if people are talking about it on social media.

My guess is some people saw military people on the roads and jumped to the conclusion (but if there was anything in the slightest bit official let us know)

https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2020/03/18/breaking-military-sources-say-uk-to-go-into-lockdown-from-friday-amidst-virus-fear/#.XnNq7Kj7SUk

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/03/16/uks-coronavirus-lockdown-has-already-begun-unofficially-northern/

https://kvia.com/news/us-world/2020/03/19/uk-considering-partial-lockdown-in-london/

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-london-superspreader-city-facing-strict-lockdown-measures/news-story/36b431c64cb21e0735772b7e298bc94b

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11205235/army-preparing-troops-coronavirus-fight/



Fair enough it's actual news sources although the last two links specifically mention it's not a military lockdown just that the military are being used to help, and the one before specifically mentioned there isn't a lockdown immediately planned.

I couldn't be bothered with the free trial link on the Telegraph so it's only really the euroweekly one - and that conspicuously says it comes from 'military sources'. But yes - still actual news sources rather than hearsay I give you that.

JonMW i always put the headlines through google news before i post as there is so much crap out there
if there are a number of publications stating the same thing i will say reports
if there is just one outlet i will put the link in


a couple of days ago i posted reports about ibuprofen and i was questioned about it
now its across most media sources no avoid it and take paracetamol instead.
https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=ibuprofen&FORM=HDRSC6
people are free to take what i say with a pinch of salt

people are going to a local nightclub on saturday that is advertising they are staying open

information for them is out there they for everyone to take advantage of its up to them to believe what they want




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 19, 2020, 01:57:02 PM
Lovely stuff

https://twitter.com/DanielMays9/status/1240039145248079875


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 19, 2020, 02:48:00 PM
Good stuff from Gary Neville.

Closing their 2 hotels, and no staff being laid off or asked to take unpaid leave.

Letting the NHS use all the beds.

https://twitter.com/StockExHotel/status/1240314212112531457


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 03:01:17 PM
from the bbc live reporting

"Two prisoners at HMP Kilmarnock have tested positive for Covid-19.

The Scottish Prison Service (SPS) said the two inmates have not required hospital treatment.

Any prisoners showing symptoms are required to self-isolate within their cells for seven days.

An SPS spokeswoman said the current policy is that visits to the prison continue as normal.

Another 28 prisoners across Scotland have tested negative but are showing symptoms."


we don't have enough testing kits to test NHS workers surely they should get first priority
this goes for all the sportsmen and actors getting tested. Use the testing to keep the country running


JMHO


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 19, 2020, 03:14:19 PM
I've just realised I described Evil Pie as "sensible".

That's how bad things are.

Sorry have I hurt some feelings? Aren't I sensible any more?

My seemingly harsh response to Iron's post was toward the report itself, not Iron personally. He said he wasn't sure how much truth there was so I told him in a concise manner.

I didn't have time to post anything thorough as I was busy calming down my entire workforce. They had heard 'reports' that they were all going to be told on Friday that they wouldn't have a job on Monday. They have mortgages and other such things apparently so were a bit concerned about surviving etc. The reports as it happens were bullshit.

I read Irons post which said "Reports coming in of..blah blah blah......" and responded accordingly.

For future reference if anybody isn't sure how much truth there is: Basically if it's something major (such as closing schools or bringing in the army) then ignore it if it hasn't come from Boris' daily update. If it's something minor then make a judgement and pass it on because ultimately it won't cause any harm.

There's a big difference between stating "Reports coming in" and stating "I read some unsubstantiated gossip".......

Not digging at Iron, I don't want to get in to a to and fro about that. My dig is at people spreading bullshit across social media in general. Most people on Blonde have a brain that can separate the truth from the shit so it's unlikely to cause widespread panic. The general populous don't have such luxuries so will unfortunately get very scared and understandably so.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 19, 2020, 03:21:06 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

It's bullshit like this that gets people panicking.

Please just stop.


https://www.wibc.com/news/international/uk-considers-partial-lockdown-in-london-and-the-army-may-be-deployed-to-help-enforce-it/


sky and bbc news channels showing troops getting ready to help out

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-zero-prospect-of-restrictions-on-travel-in-and-out-of-london-downing-street-11960212

so they have obviously been reports of a london lock down otherwise reporters wouldnt not be asking officials



my post said there was reports of it and i didn't know how much truth was in the reports 

i think it was a balanced post

do i think the world is about to end NO
do i think alot of people are going to die YES
i am scared YES

will i always post my opinions YES

just because they might be different opinions to other people doesn't make them less valid


I wouldn't respond in quite the same way but when you say there have been reports - reports from where?

Or was it people on twitter saying there have been reports of it?

The journalists will ask a question if people are talking about it on social media.

My guess is some people saw military people on the roads and jumped to the conclusion (but if there was anything in the slightest bit official let us know)

https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2020/03/18/breaking-military-sources-say-uk-to-go-into-lockdown-from-friday-amidst-virus-fear/#.XnNq7Kj7SUk

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/03/16/uks-coronavirus-lockdown-has-already-begun-unofficially-northern/

https://kvia.com/news/us-world/2020/03/19/uk-considering-partial-lockdown-in-london/

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-london-superspreader-city-facing-strict-lockdown-measures/news-story/36b431c64cb21e0735772b7e298bc94b

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11205235/army-preparing-troops-coronavirus-fight/



Fair enough it's actual news sources although the last two links specifically mention it's not a military lockdown just that the military are being used to help, and the one before specifically mentioned there isn't a lockdown immediately planned.

I couldn't be bothered with the free trial link on the Telegraph so it's only really the euroweekly one - and that conspicuously says it comes from 'military sources'. But yes - still actual news sources rather than hearsay I give you that.

JonMW i always put the headlines through google news before i post as there is so much crap out there
if there are a number of publications stating the same thing i will say reports
if there is just one outlet i will put the link in


a couple of days ago i posted reports about ibuprofen and i was questioned about it
now its across most media sources no avoid it and take paracetamol instead.
https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=ibuprofen&FORM=HDRSC6
people are free to take what i say with a pinch of salt

people are going to a local nightclub on saturday that is advertising they are staying open

information for them is out there they for everyone to take advantage of its up to them to believe what they want




FWIW by the way I would be amazed if we don't see the military in the streets very soon.

It's bound to happen at some point but more likely protecting delivery vans than "locking down" at least initially.

You'll get some idiots who will refuse to stay at home of course so they need to be 'locked down' ideally with a big stick. We'll see it all over the internet though with reports of brutality and our new 'military state' so we'll have plenty to chat about.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 19, 2020, 03:23:01 PM
Hope there is some brutality.

Plenty of these muppets need a good walloping.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 19, 2020, 03:24:32 PM
Hope there is some brutality.

Plenty of these muppets need a good walloping.

Did you see the woman in Spain getting dragged out of a swimming pool and carted off in cuffs?

Spanish police got undressed and dived in after her. It was awesome :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 19, 2020, 03:26:23 PM
I've just realised I described Evil Pie as "sensible".

That's how bad things are.

Sorry have I hurt some feelings? Aren't I sensible any more?

My seemingly harsh response to Iron's post was toward the report itself, not Iron personally. He said he wasn't sure how much truth there was so I told him in a concise manner.

I didn't have time to post anything thorough as I was busy calming down my entire workforce. They had heard 'reports' that they were all going to be told on Friday that they wouldn't have a job on Monday. They have mortgages and other such things apparently so were a bit concerned about surviving etc. The reports as it happens were bullshit.

I read Irons post which said "Reports coming in of..blah blah blah......" and responded accordingly.

For future reference if anybody isn't sure how much truth there is: Basically if it's something major (such as closing schools or bringing in the army) then ignore it if it hasn't come from Boris' daily update. If it's something minor then make a judgement and pass it on because ultimately it won't cause any harm.

There's a big difference between stating "Reports coming in" and stating "I read some unsubstantiated gossip".......

Not digging at Iron, I don't want to get in to a to and fro about that. My dig is at people spreading bullshit across social media in general. Most people on Blonde have a brain that can separate the truth from the shit so it's unlikely to cause widespread panic. The general populous don't have such luxuries so will unfortunately get very scared and understandably so.


Sorry if I caught you on a bad day Mr R, it was just bants, & was completely unrelated to your comments to Iron. It was The Bopkin that told me you were not sensible, & his judgement is impeccable.

My love for you is immense, & if I had to choose between you & a Melton Mowbray Pork Pie, you'd probably get the nod. That's how much I care.

x


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 19, 2020, 03:32:22 PM

Just seen this on BBC News;



Death toll in England rises to 128

The number of people who have died from Covid-19 in England has risen to 128.

The 29 latest patients to have died were aged between 47 and 96 years old and had underlying health conditions, NHS England said.



Is that in line with expectations, better, or worse?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 03:33:49 PM


You'll get some idiots who will refuse to stay at home of course so they need to be 'locked down' ideally with a big stick. We'll see it all over the internet though with reports of brutality and our new 'military state' so we'll have plenty to chat about.


yeah too many idiots out there that aren't worried because they will be ok and have no regards for the people they might pass it onto.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 03:35:34 PM

Just seen this on BBC News;



Death toll in England rises to 128

The number of people who have died from Covid-19 in England has risen to 128.

The 29 latest patients to have died were aged between 47 and 96 years old and had underlying health conditions, NHS England said.



Is that in line with expectations, better, or worse?

about the level expected if death toll is doubling every 3 days


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 03:41:00 PM
.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on March 19, 2020, 03:42:12 PM
One example of the sort of avoidable attitude people are taking to this is with regard to parkrun, which have all been cancelled worldwide with effect from this Saturday (the UK and a few other countries had runs last weekend).

Despite requests not to organise unofficial versions of the same events, there seem to be quite a number of ill-considered social media posts along the lines of meeting up at the usual place and running on Saturday.  Some of them have become abusive to the parkrun staff and volunteers requesting them not to do this.

There's no reason for anyone to stop running in the short-term, if that's their interest, but the social distancing applies equally to this too, so surely it's not difficult for people to do solo runs for the time being.  Large scale, unofficial gatherings to replace parkrun events that have been cancelled at the same time/place fundamentally misses the point of why they've been cancelled in the first place.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 19, 2020, 03:57:38 PM
Hope there is some brutality.

Plenty of these muppets need a good walloping.

Did you see the woman in Spain getting dragged out of a swimming pool and carted off in cuffs?

Spanish police got undressed and dived in after her. It was awesome :D

Haha! I haven't, but I'm sure it's on Twitter somewhere.

Saw a load of American mugs on their spring break 'We're not letting them stop us, we've been waiting... MONTHS for this'  ::)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 19, 2020, 03:57:56 PM
.

Stealing that :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 19, 2020, 04:21:41 PM

Just seen this on BBC News;



Death toll in England rises to 128

The number of people who have died from Covid-19 in England has risen to 128.

The 29 latest patients to have died were aged between 47 and 96 years old and had underlying health conditions, NHS England said.



Is that in line with expectations, better, or worse?

It is pretty much in line.  People need to understand that the increase is going to carry on for the next week or two.  It will be after that we start to see the extent the measures are working or not.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 19, 2020, 04:53:43 PM
I've just realised I described Evil Pie as "sensible".

That's how bad things are.

Sorry have I hurt some feelings? Aren't I sensible any more?

My seemingly harsh response to Iron's post was toward the report itself, not Iron personally. He said he wasn't sure how much truth there was so I told him in a concise manner.

I didn't have time to post anything thorough as I was busy calming down my entire workforce. They had heard 'reports' that they were all going to be told on Friday that they wouldn't have a job on Monday. They have mortgages and other such things apparently so were a bit concerned about surviving etc. The reports as it happens were bullshit.

I read Irons post which said "Reports coming in of..blah blah blah......" and responded accordingly.

For future reference if anybody isn't sure how much truth there is: Basically if it's something major (such as closing schools or bringing in the army) then ignore it if it hasn't come from Boris' daily update. If it's something minor then make a judgement and pass it on because ultimately it won't cause any harm.

There's a big difference between stating "Reports coming in" and stating "I read some unsubstantiated gossip".......

Not digging at Iron, I don't want to get in to a to and fro about that. My dig is at people spreading bullshit across social media in general. Most people on Blonde have a brain that can separate the truth from the shit so it's unlikely to cause widespread panic. The general populous don't have such luxuries so will unfortunately get very scared and understandably so.


Sorry if I caught you on a bad day Mr R, it was just bants, & was completely unrelated to your comments to Iron. It was The Bopkin that told me you were not sensible, & his judgement is impeccable.

My love for you is immense, & if I had to choose between you & a Melton Mowbray Pork Pie, you'd probably get the nod. That's how much I care.

x

I stand by my statement!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: 4KSuited on March 19, 2020, 04:53:49 PM
If the boffins can succeed in producing the antibody test, then this will be a major turning point. Once we can start clearing a significant chunk of the populations (everywhere) to work and travel, business can begin to get back to normal, and the general population can start panicking less.

I fear that the impact of the economic costs will soon dwarf the impact of the virus.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Supernova on March 19, 2020, 04:59:13 PM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

It's bullshit like this that gets people panicking.

Please just stop.



At the local supermarket 10 deep in a queue and the Chinese lady in front of me with her husband with 2 trolleys of stuff between them, both wearing masks turns around to tell me that the Supermarket is shutting at 5pm every night from now on  (not true) and the military will be on the streets from 7pm every night enforcing a curfew!!!!

The only thing to make me feel slightly happy about the human race today is Gary Neville. Not the first time either, he's done it for the homeless at Xmas.

Meanwhile the powers that be could learn from Singapore. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-51866102
 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 19, 2020, 05:16:56 PM
One example of the sort of avoidable attitude people are taking to this is with regard to parkrun, which have all been cancelled worldwide with effect from this Saturday (the UK and a few other countries had runs last weekend).

Despite requests not to organise unofficial versions of the same events, there seem to be quite a number of ill-considered social media posts along the lines of meeting up at the usual place and running on Saturday.  Some of them have become abusive to the parkrun staff and volunteers requesting them not to do this.

There's no reason for anyone to stop running in the short-term, if that's their interest, but the social distancing applies equally to this too, so surely it's not difficult for people to do solo runs for the time being.  Large scale, unofficial gatherings to replace parkrun events that have been cancelled at the same time/place fundamentally misses the point of why they've been cancelled in the first place.

We had this discussion on our parkrun group.  Luckily people seemed to have taken it on board.   I went out at 11am this morning and ran much of the parkrun course.  I didn't see another runner, and though I did see one group of 6 people together it was easy enough to avoid them in a big park.  It is perfectly possible to run safely in most open spaces, but maybe not at 9am on Saturday morning. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 19, 2020, 06:04:41 PM
If the boffins can succeed in producing the antibody test, then this will be a major turning point. Once we can start clearing a significant chunk of the populations (everywhere) to work and travel, business can begin to get back to normal, and the general population can start panicking less.

I fear that the impact of the economic costs will soon dwarf the impact of the virus.


Who knows, maybe one of the existing drugs they're testing at the moment, a Chloroquine or similar, will wipe it out. Gotta be optimistic in these spots.

End of the problem and society given the massive wake-up call it needed. Win win.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: BangBang on March 19, 2020, 06:33:13 PM
Hey Fellas,

I’ve got nothing of substance to add to this thread. Just wanted to come on and wish the blonde community & your families well...


Peace...


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 19, 2020, 06:57:32 PM
Italy now has more fatalities(~3500) than China who reported today was their first day with no new cases.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 19, 2020, 07:45:32 PM
https://www.gentingcasino.com/casinos/page/coronavirus-covid-19-response/

Genting casinos closing 6am Saturday.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 09:21:14 PM
an absolute disgrace workers sacked and kicked out of the staff accommodation on the same day, many are EU nationals with no where to go.

 https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeenshire/2087710/sacked-staff-left-homeless-after-north-hotel-orders-them-to-vacate-immediately/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 09:53:54 PM
been seeing people posting about blood groups for a couple of days now but didn't know much about the sources
but today seen a few UK main stream papers reporting on it
not sure if they have checked the facts or maybe just scraped news from other outlets unchecked

for more sources just use your preferred search engines news feature



https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pandemic-blood-type-susceptible-infection-china-study-a9409331.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/18/people-blood-type-may-greater-risk-coronavirus-say-scientists/

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/lifestyle/health/coronavirus-people-with-blood-type-a-may-be-more-vulnerable-to-covid-19-study-claims/18/03/


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 19, 2020, 10:01:18 PM
an absolute disgrace workers sacked and kicked out of the staff accommodation on the same day, many are EU nationals with no where to go.

 https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeenshire/2087710/sacked-staff-left-homeless-after-north-hotel-orders-them-to-vacate-immediately/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Britianna hotel group.  I woouldn't expect anything different.   Awful cost cutting hotel chain.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 19, 2020, 10:06:47 PM
an absolute disgrace workers sacked and kicked out of the staff accommodation on the same day, many are EU nationals with no where to go.

 https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeenshire/2087710/sacked-staff-left-homeless-after-north-hotel-orders-them-to-vacate-immediately/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Britianna hotel group.  I woouldn't expect anything different.   Awful cost cutting hotel chain.
never used them and don't think i will now


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RickBFA on March 19, 2020, 10:11:51 PM
Took the dog out for a walk early. Down Eccy Road in Sheffield - lots of bars and restaurants there.

Whilst odd ones were shut, 90% plus open and reasonably busy with groups happily drinking as if all was well in the world.

Counted a group of seven young lads, obviously invincible.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 19, 2020, 10:52:39 PM
an absolute disgrace workers sacked and kicked out of the staff accommodation on the same day, many are EU nationals with no where to go.

 https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeenshire/2087710/sacked-staff-left-homeless-after-north-hotel-orders-them-to-vacate-immediately/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Britianna hotel group.  I woouldn't expect anything different.   Awful cost cutting hotel chain.

The 2 worst Hotels I've ever used in the UK are the Britannia's in Manchester & Nottingham. Dreadful places. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 19, 2020, 11:00:31 PM
an absolute disgrace workers sacked and kicked out of the staff accommodation on the same day, many are EU nationals with no where to go.

 https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeenshire/2087710/sacked-staff-left-homeless-after-north-hotel-orders-them-to-vacate-immediately/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Britianna hotel group.  I woouldn't expect anything different.   Awful cost cutting hotel chain.

The 2 worst Hotels I've ever used in the UK are the Britannia's in Manchester & Nottingham. Dreadful places. 

THE worst selection of hotels you could possibly put together.  It is like their business plan is to buy the worst hotel possible in every town and city.   Stoke/Bham/Brighton all shocking as well.   Pretty sure they own the hotel opposite the pier in Brighton on the corner.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: youthnkzR on March 19, 2020, 11:54:00 PM
Everyone says "don't panic buy food" but it's getting really difficult to get even basics.

The earliest available slots for online supermarket shopping are 2 to 3 weeks away.

Habitually, I go to my local Tesco at 8am each morning & get when I need. This week the queue awaiting opening time at 8am has been round the block, & once inside the shelves are, quite literally, empty. Standing in a queue outside a supermarket every morning is not exactly good social-distancing either.

I've been fairly laid back about the whole thing, & as I live alone I'm used to self isolating, it's my normal lifestyle & I'm completely fine with it. The enormity of it all is dawning on me now & it's seriously scary. And that's before we start worrying about the economic Armageddon that is waiting in the wings.

And if you can manage a "heavy" read, here's a report by Imperial College which scares the life out of me. In the absence of MANTIS I need someone solid & sensible like The Evil Pie,  Dooobs, JonMW or Science Wife to poo poo it to make me feel better.


 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

I wandered down to my local Asda yesterday afternoon just to see what it was like - didn't really need much but had in mind to get a paper and buy a few ingredients to make fish cakes.

Loads of shelves empty - most fresh fruit and veg gone, not a potato in site, but you could get Leeks Apples - no problem with Parsley so I got some of that.

Nearly all fresh meat gone bar their more expensive steaks but plenty of sausages, bacon, black pudding - just along from there are pies and stuff - quite a few of those and, having switched to comfort eating mode based on the scenes before me I picked up a couple of scotch eggs.

Kipling cakes and biscuits seemed quite plentiful so I picked up a few of those. Got breadcrumbs, frozen mushy peas, frozen fish, frozen prawns. Fortunately I still have a few potatoes here so fishcakes can be made

Most tea and coffee had gone, eggs gone and quite a few other aisles looked pretty empty but tbf, because I can cook a bit, unless they are absolutely empty of everything, like Doobs, we may have to vary what we eat but feels like we'll be alright.

No way am I joining a queue to go to a supermarket at any point (could be famous last words) - I don't have young kids at home so this takes a lot of pressure off the feeling of having to have stuff to provide your family.

All the little local independent shops around me still have plenty of everything no problem, everyone seems to be hitting the supermarket......

This. Today I've been to a Texaco (Spar) garage and a local shop.

Spar had everything (including a near full shelf of loo roll) minus bread. Local store had everything.

It's funny how daft people seem to be in general. Crowding into supermarkets where everything is in short supply yet completely forgetting about smaller stores.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 20, 2020, 12:58:06 AM

Just seen this on BBC News;



Death toll in England rises to 128

The number of people who have died from Covid-19 in England has risen to 128.

The 29 latest patients to have died were aged between 47 and 96 years old and had underlying health conditions, NHS England said.



Is that in line with expectations, better, or worse?

DHSC announced 144, which was 40% up on the day before.  I don't think you can read much into these increases, as it is a small total, it might just be getting a bit distorted by some people dying relatively quickly?

A more optimistic picture is emerging from Italy where he increases seeem to be a slowing down.  There are some lower increases coming from Scandanavia too.  Sweden was on a par with us for new cases a week ago.   https://www.statista.com/statistics/1102193/coronavirus-cases-development-in-sweden/ (https://www.statista.com/statistics/1102193/coronavirus-cases-development-in-sweden/).   Of course, many South East Asian countires have done a much better job too.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jamier-Host on March 20, 2020, 02:20:08 AM
...
And if you can manage a "heavy" read, here's a report by Imperial College which scares the life out of me. In the absence of MANTIS I need someone solid & sensible like The Evil Pie,  Dooobs, JonMW or Science Wife to poo poo it to make me feel better.


 https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

If you want to make it easier to read just skip past all the numbers and tables and the like.

If you just stick to the narrative that's in fairly standard English then (I think) it's fairly easy to 'get'.

You might not like it after you 'get' it - but there's not much we can do about that.

The 'normal' way of dealing with flu pandemics will overwhelm critical care and lots of people die.
The 'other' way of dealing with pandemics will probably overwhelm critical care and lots of people die.
The 'best' way of dealing with this pandemic is to alternate the other two ways and critical care might not get overwhelmed. Lots of people will still die though - just not as many.

What i couldn't work out here is what they think the incremental is going to be.

500k deaths sounds massive, but a quick google suggests the usual number for UK is north of 600k. Similar probability increases based on age and health problems too.

Clearly want to keep the numbers as low as possible, but as mentioned elsewhere here, there could also be some brutal short and long term effects of an economic meltdown.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: vegaslover on March 20, 2020, 03:15:30 AM
an absolute disgrace workers sacked and kicked out of the staff accommodation on the same day, many are EU nationals with no where to go.

 https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeenshire/2087710/sacked-staff-left-homeless-after-north-hotel-orders-them-to-vacate-immediately/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Britianna hotel group.  I woouldn't expect anything different.   Awful cost cutting hotel chain.

The 2 worst Hotels I've ever used in the UK are the Britannia's in Manchester & Nottingham. Dreadful places. 

THE worst selection of hotels you could possibly put together.  It is like their business plan is to buy the worst hotel possible in every town and city.   Stoke/Bham/Brighton all shocking as well.   Pretty sure they own the hotel opposite the pier in Brighton on the corner.

Yep, they own the hotel opposite the pier. They also own several around Gatwick airport, rooms sold primarily on the basis of cheap parking for holiday makers.
Couple of years ago I spent time sub-contracting on one near Gatwick replacing/updating lighting and bathroom fans. The old fans just pumped the moisture into the space above the false ceiling, mould and damp everywhere. Very poor quality fittings in the bathroom.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bunnydas8888 on March 20, 2020, 06:20:21 AM
Took the dog out for a walk early. Down Eccy Road in Sheffield - lots of bars and restaurants there.

Whilst odd ones were shut, 90% plus open and reasonably busy with groups happily drinking as if all was well in the world.

Counted a group of seven young lads, obviously invincible.



I popped into my local pub on Wednesday night as I had to drop something off to someone who worked in there.

I counted just under 20 customers in there, roughly half of them were regulars who are all over 70 or would be in the at risk category due to health problems.

So it's not just the young people still going to the pubs!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 20, 2020, 07:56:25 AM
an absolute disgrace workers sacked and kicked out of the staff accommodation on the same day, many are EU nationals with no where to go.

 https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeenshire/2087710/sacked-staff-left-homeless-after-north-hotel-orders-them-to-vacate-immediately/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Britianna hotel group.  I woouldn't expect anything different.   Awful cost cutting hotel chain.

The 2 worst Hotels I've ever used in the UK are the Britannia's in Manchester & Nottingham. Dreadful places. 

THE worst selection of hotels you could possibly put together.  It is like their business plan is to buy the worst hotel possible in every town and city.   Stoke/Bham/Brighton all shocking as well.   Pretty sure they own the hotel opposite the pier in Brighton on the corner.

Yep, they own the hotel opposite the pier. They also own several around Gatwick airport, rooms sold primarily on the basis of cheap parking for holiday makers.
Couple of years ago I spent time sub-contracting on one near Gatwick replacing/updating lighting and bathroom fans. The old fans just pumped the moisture into the space above the false ceiling, mould and damp everywhere. Very poor quality fittings in the bathroom.

I can't remember which hotels it was, but quite a while ago I made a mental note to never book with them because the times I had they were pretty awful.

It might have coincidentally been just the two places I stayed but they were both very grand buildings - but with very poor maintenance and poor service. It was like a 5 star building but 2 star service. My guess is they snapped up a whole load of big, old hotels that had to shut down but made them economically feasible by just cutting all the costs and corners.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 20, 2020, 07:58:47 AM
It's been reported on the BBC and still is nowhere near official, but Science Wife concurs that all the senior management at her school think the schools are going to be closed until September.

It kind of makes sense. The really important part after Easter are the exams, without the exams it should be relatively easy to catch every one else up when they start a new year.

EDIT: that was from an educational point of view. From an epidemiological point of view closing the schools will cut the net infection rate, the worry was that with key workers being sidelined the net reduction would be trivial whereas the ICU capacity would be non-trivially damaged. Now they think they've worked their way around that then there's no reason to not keep the schools closed as long as there needed. That might be until July or August - but the school year's ending then anway, so hence closed til September.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 20, 2020, 08:32:28 AM
an absolute disgrace workers sacked and kicked out of the staff accommodation on the same day, many are EU nationals with no where to go.

 https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeenshire/2087710/sacked-staff-left-homeless-after-north-hotel-orders-them-to-vacate-immediately/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Britianna hotel group.  I woouldn't expect anything different.   Awful cost cutting hotel chain.

The 2 worst Hotels I've ever used in the UK are the Britannia's in Manchester & Nottingham. Dreadful places.  

THE worst selection of hotels you could possibly put together.  It is like their business plan is to buy the worst hotel possible in every town and city.   Stoke/Bham/Brighton all shocking as well.   Pretty sure they own the hotel opposite the pier in Brighton on the corner.

Yep, they own the hotel opposite the pier. They also own several around Gatwick airport, rooms sold primarily on the basis of cheap parking for holiday makers.
Couple of years ago I spent time sub-contracting on one near Gatwick replacing/updating lighting and bathroom fans. The old fans just pumped the moisture into the space above the false ceiling, mould and damp everywhere. Very poor quality fittings in the bathroom.

I can't remember which hotels it was, but quite a while ago I made a mental note to never book with them because the times I had they were pretty awful.

It might have coincidentally been just the two places I stayed but they were both very grand buildings - but with very poor maintenance and poor service. It was like a 5 star building but 2 star service. My guess is they snapped up a whole load of big, old hotels that had to shut down but made them economically feasible by just cutting all the costs and corners.


Mostly, yes, beautiful looking Victorian buildings with grand foyers. But dilapidated, & with awful rooms. Their one saving grace is that the buffet brekkie includes that rarest of delicacies to find in a hotel these days - fried bread. Smother it with plum tomatoes, & that's 5 star grub.


 (http://i.imgur.com/mDfDuFz.jpg) (https://imgur.com/mDfDuFz)




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 20, 2020, 08:34:03 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/camilateleSUR/status/1240474928333414401 (https://mobile.twitter.com/camilateleSUR/status/1240474928333414401)

Imagine flying thousands of miles and seeing this


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 20, 2020, 10:13:28 AM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

Laura Kuenssberg: "No 10 says there is 'zero prospect' of a big lockdown of London - as we've been reporting there might be tightening of restrictions but remember that is VERY different from other suggestions of travel bans or the kind of total lockdowns some other countries have pursued"

Guess it's happening then.......


I think it’s certain there will be an almost complete lockdown in London. Let’s think population densities in London vs Lombardy, they have a similar number of people. Lombardy is 24,000 km squared, London is 1600 km squared. Italy has way better respirator provision than we do and far better air quality in that part of Italy vs London. The only positive I can think is average age. I know it annoyed Nirvana but there is good reason to think we will be the worst of any country soon.

Doesn't annoy me and even if it did, I'm glad you keep posting your thoughts - hare brained or otherwise :-)

That’s cool, I assumed any annoyance would be very low level. The great thing about economics and science compared to politics is that we’ll get much better evidence of whether or not ideas are indeed ‘hare brained’ 😊.

Appreciating the entente - but I think the idea you'll get in anyway a clear answer because it's science or (particularly) economics seems ambitious

Ronald Reagan allegedly once said that if trivial pursuit were designed by economists, it would have 100 questions and 3,000 answers; see also how do you get 100 economic opinions? Ask 100 economists

:D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 20, 2020, 10:20:05 AM
an absolute disgrace workers sacked and kicked out of the staff accommodation on the same day, many are EU nationals with no where to go.

 https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeenshire/2087710/sacked-staff-left-homeless-after-north-hotel-orders-them-to-vacate-immediately/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Britianna hotel group.  I woouldn't expect anything different.   Awful cost cutting hotel chain.

The 2 worst Hotels I've ever used in the UK are the Britannia's in Manchester & Nottingham. Dreadful places. 

THE worst selection of hotels you could possibly put together.  It is like their business plan is to buy the worst hotel possible in every town and city.   Stoke/Bham/Brighton all shocking as well.   Pretty sure they own the hotel opposite the pier in Brighton on the corner.

The one in Canary Wharf, the Britannia International i think, used to be okay, not the nicest hotel but the main hotel bar and sports bar were incredible!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 20, 2020, 10:20:19 AM
Reports coming in of London being under military lockdown by the weekend troops are already being deployed not sure how much truth in this

Laura Kuenssberg: "No 10 says there is 'zero prospect' of a big lockdown of London - as we've been reporting there might be tightening of restrictions but remember that is VERY different from other suggestions of travel bans or the kind of total lockdowns some other countries have pursued"

Guess it's happening then.......


I think it’s certain there will be an almost complete lockdown in London. Let’s think population densities in London vs Lombardy, they have a similar number of people. Lombardy is 24,000 km squared, London is 1600 km squared. Italy has way better respirator provision than we do and far better air quality in that part of Italy vs London. The only positive I can think is average age. I know it annoyed Nirvana but there is good reason to think we will be the worst of any country soon.

Doesn't annoy me and even if it did, I'm glad you keep posting your thoughts - hare brained or otherwise :-)

That’s cool, I assumed any annoyance would be very low level. The great thing about economics and science compared to politics is that we’ll get much better evidence of whether or not ideas are indeed ‘hare brained’ 😊.

Appreciating the entente - but I think the idea you'll get in anyway a clear answer because it's science or (particularly) economics seems ambitious

Ronald Reagan allegedly once said that if trivial pursuit were designed by economists, it would have 100 questions and 3,000 answers; see also how do you get 100 economic opinions? Ask 100 economists

:D


Good morning

I agree in terms of there being few absolutes of certainty in economics or science either. Both of them are less easily corrupted by the lies of Johnson/Cummings/the propaganda type news outlets than politics though.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 20, 2020, 10:22:13 AM
It's been reported on the BBC and still is nowhere near official, but Science Wife concurs that all the senior management at her school think the schools are going to be closed until September.

It kind of makes sense. The really important part after Easter are the exams, without the exams it should be relatively easy to catch every one else up when they start a new year.

EDIT: that was from an educational point of view. From an epidemiological point of view closing the schools will cut the net infection rate, the worry was that with key workers being sidelined the net reduction would be trivial whereas the ICU capacity would be non-trivially damaged. Now they think they've worked their way around that then there's no reason to not keep the schools closed as long as there needed. That might be until July or August - but the school year's ending then anway, so hence closed til September.

I think we all know you have a wife now Jon  :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 20, 2020, 10:35:08 AM
It's been reported on the BBC and still is nowhere near official, but Science Wife concurs that all the senior management at her school think the schools are going to be closed until September.

It kind of makes sense. The really important part after Easter are the exams, without the exams it should be relatively easy to catch every one else up when they start a new year.

EDIT: that was from an educational point of view. From an epidemiological point of view closing the schools will cut the net infection rate, the worry was that with key workers being sidelined the net reduction would be trivial whereas the ICU capacity would be non-trivially damaged. Now they think they've worked their way around that then there's no reason to not keep the schools closed as long as there needed. That might be until July or August - but the school year's ending then anway, so hence closed til September.

I think we all know you have a wife now Jon  :D

Trying to keep sources clear :) Particularly for the science.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 20, 2020, 10:40:47 AM
It's been reported on the BBC and still is nowhere near official, but Science Wife concurs that all the senior management at her school think the schools are going to be closed until September.

It kind of makes sense. The really important part after Easter are the exams, without the exams it should be relatively easy to catch every one else up when they start a new year.

EDIT: that was from an educational point of view. From an epidemiological point of view closing the schools will cut the net infection rate, the worry was that with key workers being sidelined the net reduction would be trivial whereas the ICU capacity would be non-trivially damaged. Now they think they've worked their way around that then there's no reason to not keep the schools closed as long as there needed. That might be until July or August - but the school year's ending then anway, so hence closed til September.

I think we all know you have a wife now Jon  :D

He still hasn't told us or presented pictorial evidence as to whether he wore his hat for the wedding.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 20, 2020, 10:42:29 AM
It's been reported on the BBC and still is nowhere near official, but Science Wife concurs that all the senior management at her school think the schools are going to be closed until September.

It kind of makes sense. The really important part after Easter are the exams, without the exams it should be relatively easy to catch every one else up when they start a new year.

EDIT: that was from an educational point of view. From an epidemiological point of view closing the schools will cut the net infection rate, the worry was that with key workers being sidelined the net reduction would be trivial whereas the ICU capacity would be non-trivially damaged. Now they think they've worked their way around that then there's no reason to not keep the schools closed as long as there needed. That might be until July or August - but the school year's ending then anway, so hence closed til September.

I think we all know you have a wife now Jon  :D

He might have more than 1 wife
a cooking/cleaning wife
A sexy wife
A  poker wife
A wife to go walking with (because he can)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 20, 2020, 10:45:43 AM
It's been reported on the BBC and still is nowhere near official, but Science Wife concurs that all the senior management at her school think the schools are going to be closed until September.

It kind of makes sense. The really important part after Easter are the exams, without the exams it should be relatively easy to catch every one else up when they start a new year.

EDIT: that was from an educational point of view. From an epidemiological point of view closing the schools will cut the net infection rate, the worry was that with key workers being sidelined the net reduction would be trivial whereas the ICU capacity would be non-trivially damaged. Now they think they've worked their way around that then there's no reason to not keep the schools closed as long as there needed. That might be until July or August - but the school year's ending then anway, so hence closed til September.

I think we all know you have a wife now Jon  :D

He still hasn't told us or presented pictorial evidence as to whether he wore his hat for the wedding.

It has been reported that the hat was retired following the wedding day.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 20, 2020, 10:45:54 AM
It's been reported on the BBC and still is nowhere near official, but Science Wife concurs that all the senior management at her school think the schools are going to be closed until September.

It kind of makes sense. The really important part after Easter are the exams, without the exams it should be relatively easy to catch every one else up when they start a new year.

EDIT: that was from an educational point of view. From an epidemiological point of view closing the schools will cut the net infection rate, the worry was that with key workers being sidelined the net reduction would be trivial whereas the ICU capacity would be non-trivially damaged. Now they think they've worked their way around that then there's no reason to not keep the schools closed as long as there needed. That might be until July or August - but the school year's ending then anway, so hence closed til September.

I think we all know you have a wife now Jon  :D

Trying to keep sources clear :) Particularly for the science.


I'm a big Science Wife fan, in fact I like all the readers wives.

Please continue to pass on her input.


(https://www.weirdworm.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/sexy.jpg)



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 20, 2020, 11:12:58 AM
Gentlemen of a ceartain age will remember withe fondness the 'Readers Wives' section of their adult magazines.


Please listen carefully, the lyrics are brilliant.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHG91g3A1aI


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: marcro on March 20, 2020, 11:13:11 AM
It's been reported on the BBC and still is nowhere near official, but Science Wife concurs that all the senior management at her school think the schools are going to be closed until September.

It kind of makes sense. The really important part after Easter are the exams, without the exams it should be relatively easy to catch every one else up when they start a new year.

EDIT: that was from an educational point of view. From an epidemiological point of view closing the schools will cut the net infection rate, the worry was that with key workers being sidelined the net reduction would be trivial whereas the ICU capacity would be non-trivially damaged. Now they think they've worked their way around that then there's no reason to not keep the schools closed as long as there needed. That might be until July or August - but the school year's ending then anway, so hence closed til September.

I think we all know you have a wife now Jon  :D

Trying to keep sources clear :) Particularly for the science.


I'm a big Science Wife fan, in fact I like all the readers wives.

Please continue to pass on her input.


(https://www.weirdworm.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/sexy.jpg)



I am now also a big fan of Science Wife!!!!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 20, 2020, 11:13:30 AM
It's been reported on the BBC and still is nowhere near official, but Science Wife concurs that all the senior management at her school think the schools are going to be closed until September.

It kind of makes sense. The really important part after Easter are the exams, without the exams it should be relatively easy to catch every one else up when they start a new year.

EDIT: that was from an educational point of view. From an epidemiological point of view closing the schools will cut the net infection rate, the worry was that with key workers being sidelined the net reduction would be trivial whereas the ICU capacity would be non-trivially damaged. Now they think they've worked their way around that then there's no reason to not keep the schools closed as long as there needed. That might be until July or August - but the school year's ending then anway, so hence closed til September.

If people read the imperial college report, they are suggesting they can push the peak back to June/July, with cases falling off to September.  I think this gives a pretty good estimate of when schools will reopen.  I can't see them reopening schools if 50,000 people are dying a week at peak.  We then need to hope for a vaccine, and better controls in place before a possible second wave

The dates and casualties depend a lot on how well people adhere to the Government advice.   If it does spiral out of control then things could be over sooner with a lot more casualties.  But even then I can't see schools reopening for a few weeks of the summer term.   There are optmistic scenarios where cases flatten and then start falling, but if the restrictions are working...

It is definitely better to assume months rather than weeks.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 20, 2020, 11:36:50 AM
For anyone who is interested in this from a business point of view, still no news on how to actually access the Business Interruption Loan's promised by the Government.

It is all good making these announcements, but if the actual money isn't available soon it is going to be too late for some companies.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 20, 2020, 11:46:33 AM
How long did china lock down for ?.. true they are out the other side of it already ?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: roshambo on March 20, 2020, 11:51:18 AM
For anyone who is interested in this from a business point of view, still no news on how to actually access the Business Interruption Loan's promised by the Government.

It is all good making these announcements, but if the actual money isn't available soon it is going to be too late for some companies.

Gets released on Monday


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 20, 2020, 11:53:23 AM
How long did china lock down for ?.. true they are out the other side of it already ?

Middle of January roughly. It’s great that there are no new domestic cases but there’s a long list of reasons why it’s still only the beginning. Less than 1% of their population have been infected. They can enforce a lockdown and cover the economic fall out far better than any other nation. As soon as they lift the lockdown no one well placed to understand seems in any doubt that it will start again exactly as before. All of the Osterholm stuff had this pretty much covered.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 20, 2020, 11:57:31 AM
How long did china lock down for ?.. true they are out the other side of it already ?

Middle of January roughly. It’s great that there are no new domestic cases but there’s a long list of reasons why it’s still only the beginning. Less than 1% of their population have been infected. They can enforce a lockdown and cover the economic fall out far better than any other nation. As soon as they lift the lockdown no one well placed to understand seems in any doubt that it will start again exactly as before. All of the Osterholm stuff had this pretty much covered.

This article seems decent enough. I think it’s a fair prediction that China will lose the smallest percentage of it’s population of any large country.

[url] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/03/18/world/asia/china-coronavirus-zero-infections.amp.html[url]


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 20, 2020, 01:04:51 PM

 https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1240723388336877569?s=21 (https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1240723388336877569?s=21)

This is concerning.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 20, 2020, 01:07:16 PM
BBC live news feed

12:56
BREAKING
Restriction to continue ‘most of a year’
Policies to limit the spread of coronavirus would need to be in place for "at least most of a year" to prevent intensive care units being overwhelmed, according to official scientific advice to the government.

The documents, prepared by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), said alternating between more and less strict measures could "plausibly be effective at keeping the number of critical care cases within capacity".


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 20, 2020, 01:08:27 PM

 https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1240723388336877569?s=21 (https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1240723388336877569?s=21)

This is concerning.

Also following Dean’s question, 35 days from China being 10 deaths to the high point of their first peak.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 20, 2020, 01:35:11 PM
whilst sorting out my cupboards, to see what is fit to eat and what isn't, I found this in the tea section.

https://www.thefoodmarket.com/products/organic-turmeric-superfood-latte-powder-drink-sachets-7-x-1g (https://www.thefoodmarket.com/products/organic-turmeric-superfood-latte-powder-drink-sachets-7-x-1g)

I thought wtf is this?   The ingredients are listed as tumeric.  You can literally buy 7 grams of tumeric for a fiver.  Ten pound bog roll man missed a trick.

I hope my missus got it as a freebie...


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: marcro on March 20, 2020, 01:37:59 PM
An interesting viewpoint that goes against the flow:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/stanford-professor-data-indicates-were-overreacting-to-coronavirus/?fbclid=IwAR0NMARZF63CreC6xKe4Meqy2t-CJLylgrmTAu2wW_qGTBGpaFRU1vvbSgM


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: cish n fhips on March 20, 2020, 01:55:27 PM
First dog dies of virus second case confirmed...


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 20, 2020, 01:59:30 PM
An interesting viewpoint that goes against the flow:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/stanford-professor-data-indicates-were-overreacting-to-coronavirus/?fbclid=IwAR0NMARZF63CreC6xKe4Meqy2t-CJLylgrmTAu2wW_qGTBGpaFRU1vvbSgM


I think it’s acknowledged that he was being contrarian to promote discussion.

 https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/18/we-know-enough-now-to-act-decisively-against-covid-19/ (https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/18/we-know-enough-now-to-act-decisively-against-covid-19/)



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 20, 2020, 02:33:29 PM
An interesting viewpoint that goes against the flow:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/stanford-professor-data-indicates-were-overreacting-to-coronavirus/?fbclid=IwAR0NMARZF63CreC6xKe4Meqy2t-CJLylgrmTAu2wW_qGTBGpaFRU1vvbSgM


Presumably if a lion walked into his front room, he'll wait for some strong evidence it was hungry before making his exit? 



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 20, 2020, 02:58:02 PM
so with social distancing does that mean i have to stop getting lap dances?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 20, 2020, 03:12:41 PM
First dog dies of virus second case confirmed...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8134865/Second-dog-tests-positive-coronavirus-Hong-Kong.html

From what I'm reading a dog died that happened to have the virus. It doesn't say that the virus was the direct cause.

"The AFCD said the dog's owner wasn't willing to allow an autopsy to determine the cause of death but some have suggested the stress of quarantine and the separation from its owner may have contributed."

It had the virus and was understandably quarantined. It was a 17 year old Pomeranian, these have an average lifespan of 12 to 16 years.

Looks like something to be taken seriously but certainly not worry about until more research has been carried out.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 20, 2020, 03:16:48 PM



"From what I'm reading a dog died that happened to have the virus. It doesn't say that the virus was the direct cause".

I think that's the case with a great number of the human fatalities too, they had the virus but did not necessarily die from it. Doubtless C-19 contributes to their demise, but does not necessarily cause it.  I suspect they all go down in the stats a C-19 deaths though.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 20, 2020, 03:20:56 PM



"From what I'm reading a dog died that happened to have the virus. It doesn't say that the virus was the direct cause".

I think that's the case with a great number of the human fatalities too, they had the virus but did not necessarily die from it. Doubtless C-19 contributes to their demise, but does not necessarily cause it.  I suspect they all go down in the stats a C-19 deaths though.


yeah  alot would of recovered from there ills if it hadn't been for covid19 but it was the other illnesses that killed them


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 20, 2020, 03:22:51 PM



"From what I'm reading a dog died that happened to have the virus. It doesn't say that the virus was the direct cause".

I think that's the case with a great number of the human fatalities too, they had the virus but did not necessarily die from it. Doubtless C-19 contributes to their demise, but does not necessarily cause it.  I suspect they all go down in the stats a C-19 deaths though.


Definitely agree with this.

"94 year old becomes latest victim of Covid19" isn't the scariest headline you'll ever read.

It's possibly the final straw but 'being 94' was probably more of a contributory factor.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 20, 2020, 03:36:10 PM



"From what I'm reading a dog died that happened to have the virus. It doesn't say that the virus was the direct cause".

I think that's the case with a great number of the human fatalities too, they had the virus but did not necessarily die from it. Doubtless C-19 contributes to their demise, but does not necessarily cause it.  I suspect they all go down in the stats a C-19 deaths though.


Definitely agree with this.

"94 year old becomes latest victim of Covid19" isn't the scariest headline you'll ever read.

It's possibly the final straw but 'being 94' was probably more of a contributory factor.


That may well be the case for one 94 year old, but I'd still take the overs on the real number of Covid19 deaths. 




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ledders on March 20, 2020, 03:40:46 PM
What are employee rights regarding home office and travelling to work in a pandemic? The government is saying don't make unnecessary travel.

My employer hasn't made any real effort to facilitate WFH for staff. The boss says we are a key service (we aren't)

I'm fairly certain a P45 is coming for a lot of staff regardless but am I in breach of contract (typical off the shelf contract) If I were to say I can't come into work on the tube to Central London?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 20, 2020, 05:01:46 PM
What are employee rights regarding home office and travelling to work in a pandemic? The government is saying don't make unnecessary travel.

My employer hasn't made any real effort to facilitate WFH for staff. The boss says we are a key service (we aren't)

I'm fairly certain a P45 is coming for a lot of staff regardless but am I in breach of contract (typical off the shelf contract) If I were to say I can't come into work on the tube to Central London?


I think you probably are now, but if the title of this livestream is accurate

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNkCuotL2TM


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 20, 2020, 05:10:43 PM
What are employee rights regarding home office and travelling to work in a pandemic? The government is saying don't make unnecessary travel.

My employer hasn't made any real effort to facilitate WFH for staff. The boss says we are a key service (we aren't)

I'm fairly certain a P45 is coming for a lot of staff regardless but am I in breach of contract (typical off the shelf contract) If I were to say I can't come into work on the tube to Central London?


I think you probably are now, but if the title of this livestream is accurate

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNkCuotL2TM

Cafes, bars, pubs, restaurants, gyms and leisure centres must close tonight

edit.  Government paying 80% of people's wages up to £2.5k a month.  


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 20, 2020, 05:41:32 PM
FINALLY!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AndrewT on March 20, 2020, 05:45:20 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 20, 2020, 05:47:35 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

 rotflmfao Honestly, can’t you just find it within yourself to say well done Boris rather than looking for something to criticise?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AndrewT on March 20, 2020, 05:49:49 PM
There'll no doubt be lots of 'the sky is falling' comments tonight from people, but the UK is a week behind Ireland in terms of pubs/restaurants closing and it's been fine here.

Went to the supermarket earlier today and there was a one-in, one-out policy - people queuing up outside a few feet apart from each other. Whilst a lot of restaurants have closed completely, others have switched to a takeaway service - kitchen still open, with customers collecting from the front door.

If Ireland can close pubs in St Patrick's week then anything is possible.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AndrewT on March 20, 2020, 05:53:16 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

 rotflmfao Honestly, can’t you just find it within yourself to say well done Boris rather than looking for something to criticise?

Because he's shit - he was shown up last week by Leo Varadkar in Ireland, someone who's only an acting leader as he lost the election but still was able to make the tough decisions when needed.

Boris is not, in any meaningful way, leading the country - he is completely out of his depth and was even just shown up by Rishi Sunak - someone who's been a top-level politician for about 5 minutes.

This week's delay of inaction will lead to many extra deaths.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RickBFA on March 20, 2020, 05:54:59 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

If you are focussing on his deliver right now, you need to have a word with yourself.

These are massive commitments for a government of any colour, I think it was along the lines of what John McDonnell was asking for.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 20, 2020, 06:00:12 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

 rotflmfao Honestly, can’t you just find it within yourself to say well done Boris rather than looking for something to criticise?

Because he's shit - he was shown up last week by Leo Varadkar in Ireland, someone who's only an acting leader as he lost the election but still was able to make the tough decisions when needed.

Boris is not, in any meaningful way, leading the country - he is completely out of his depth and was even just shown up by Rishi Sunak - someone who's been a top-level politician for about 5 minutes.

This week's delay of inaction will lead to many extra deaths.

Honestly I’m knew there would be some clowns that would have nothing good to say despite him announcing an unprecedented level of support. If labour were doing it you would be singing their praises. You honestly need to give yourself a good slapping with a wet fish.....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: 4KSuited on March 20, 2020, 06:04:45 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

And you’re a moderator?

God help Blonde


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 20, 2020, 06:05:39 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

 rotflmfao Honestly, can’t you just find it within yourself to say well done Boris rather than looking for something to criticise?

Because he's shit - he was shown up last week by Leo Varadkar in Ireland, someone who's only an acting leader as he lost the election but still was able to make the tough decisions when needed.

Boris is not, in any meaningful way, leading the country - he is completely out of his depth and was even just shown up by Rishi Sunak - someone who's been a top-level politician for about 5 minutes.

This week's delay of inaction will lead to many extra deaths.

Honestly I’m knew there would be some clowns that would have nothing good to say despite him announcing an unprecedented level of support. If labour were doing it you would be singing their praises. You honestly need to give yourself a good slapping with a wet fish.....

...and you'd be the first one on here praising Jezza?

There has been a lot of people on the left praising Rishi Sunak, so it isn't easy to just claim it is a left/right thing.   At least Boris isn't Trump...  I do think Johnson and Sunak are doing a lot of the right things now FWIW.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 20, 2020, 06:08:52 PM
Stick anyone up there, and I imagine they'd not be too lively. Boris is always going to be like that, whatever he's talking about, imo.

Plot Donald up next to him and Boris would look a good few rungs better, lol.

Donald dangerous when they let him talk about drugs :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AndrewT on March 20, 2020, 06:10:51 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

If you are focussing on his deliver right now, you need to have a word with yourself.

These are massive commitments for a government of any colour, I think it was along the lines of what John McDonnell was asking for.

He is the PM - one of his key responsibilities in a time of national crisis is to act as an inspiration for people - be someone who calms the nation and makes people think 'everything's going to be ok, because this guy is calling the shots'

Being his usual bumbling self does not do this, giving the impression of someone who is making decisions eventually, after a week of being told that not enough is being done - he is failing a key part of the job.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 20, 2020, 06:14:40 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

 rotflmfao Honestly, can’t you just find it within yourself to say well done Boris rather than looking for something to criticise?

Because he's shit - he was shown up last week by Leo Varadkar in Ireland, someone who's only an acting leader as he lost the election but still was able to make the tough decisions when needed.

Boris is not, in any meaningful way, leading the country - he is completely out of his depth and was even just shown up by Rishi Sunak - someone who's been a top-level politician for about 5 minutes.

This week's delay of inaction will lead to many extra deaths.

Honestly I’m knew there would be some clowns that would have nothing good to say despite him announcing an unprecedented level of support. If labour were doing it you would be singing their praises. You honestly need to give yourself a good slapping with a wet fish.....

...and you'd be the first one on here praising Jezza?

There has been a lot of people on the left praising Rishi Sunak, so it isn't easy to just claim it is a left/right thing.   At least Boris isn't Trump...  I do think Johnson and Sunak are doing a lot of the right things now FWIW.

Not sure how I can praise someone who can’t even get elected........in reality I probably wouldn’t say very much. It certainly is a left/right thing when you have the usual idiots that can’t find a single good thing to say about Boris, sure Sunak made the announcement but to think Boris wasn’t heavily involved in that decision of support is completely insane, the buck stops with him so of course he was.....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AndrewT on March 20, 2020, 06:16:15 PM
Compare Boris' performance to that of Rishi Sunak - someone who is, rightly, getting a lot of praise from people for the way in which he is communicating important decisions.

The absolute gold standard of a person in a position of power and responsibility providing clear, calming and reassuring leadership at a time of huge national uncertainty was the governor of the Bank of England speaking just after the Brexit referendum result - compare and contrast this with Boris.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IK3By6uQ8gU


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 20, 2020, 06:17:31 PM
Don't know a lot about him, but that Sunak seems a pretty sharp character, or is that because he's up there with present company?

Call on Woodsey not saying much ;D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 20, 2020, 06:22:36 PM
Compare Boris' performance to that of Rishi Sunak - someone who is, rightly, getting a lot of praise from people for the way in which he is communicating important decisions.

The absolute gold standard of a person in a position of power and responsibility providing clear, calming and reassuring leadership at a time of huge national uncertainty was the governor of the Bank of England speaking just after the Brexit referendum result - compare and contrast this with Boris.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IK3By6uQ8gU

You have honestly lost the plot and are out of bullets to criticise Boris with if that is all you can come up with......


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RickBFA on March 20, 2020, 06:31:49 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

If you are focussing on his deliver right now, you need to have a word with yourself.

These are massive commitments for a government of any colour, I think it was along the lines of what John McDonnell was asking for.

He is the PM - one of his key responsibilities in a time of national crisis is to act as an inspiration for people - be someone who calms the nation and makes people think 'everything's going to be ok, because this guy is calling the shots'

Being his usual bumbling self does not do this, giving the impression of someone who is making decisions eventually, after a week of being told that not enough is being done - he is failing a key part of the job.

I watched the press conference. His style can often look like he is playing the clown but he looked pretty sober and serious to me.

Whether you like him or not, he does have charisma that is lacking in previous leaders like May.

I don’t think anyone (other than the likes of you and momentum nut jobs) can criticise him today.

I notice that you didn’t criticise the policy announcement which was a massive financial commitment to help ordinary workers.

Your comments look petty and ill judged at a time like this.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 20, 2020, 06:35:50 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

If you are focussing on his deliver right now, you need to have a word with yourself.

These are massive commitments for a government of any colour, I think it was along the lines of what John McDonnell was asking for.

He is the PM - one of his key responsibilities in a time of national crisis is to act as an inspiration for people - be someone who calms the nation and makes people think 'everything's going to be ok, because this guy is calling the shots'

Being his usual bumbling self does not do this, giving the impression of someone who is making decisions eventually, after a week of being told that not enough is being done - he is failing a key part of the job.

I watched the press conference. His style can often look like he is playing the clown but he looked pretty sober and serious to me.

Whether you like him or not, he does have charisma that is lacking in previous leaders like May.

I don’t think anyone (other than the likes of you and momentum nut jobs) can criticise him today.

I notice that you didn’t criticise the policy announcement which was a massive financial commitment to help ordinary workers.

Your comments look petty and ill judged at a time like this.


Spot on! Truth is we all knew there would be those nut jobs that couldn’t help themselves!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bookiebasher on March 20, 2020, 06:48:19 PM
Rishi comes across as confident and a very effect orator which is what you
need in a crisis.

Boris is Boris . He maybe a week or two behind policy wise but again his
positivity is what is required to reassure the public.

You contrast the calm manner of our press conferences with Boris ticking
off each reporter for a question to the fiasco of a scrum of shouting press
in America trying to get answers from a completely corrupt leadership.

Think Rishi might be destined for greater things.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bookiebasher on March 20, 2020, 06:56:39 PM
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/20/media/trump-rant-at-nbc-news-peter-alexander/index.html

When the USA wants reassurance his response is to attack the guy asking a perfectly
reasonable question.

He is really irritating me , really .


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AndrewT on March 20, 2020, 06:59:07 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

If you are focussing on his deliver right now, you need to have a word with yourself.

These are massive commitments for a government of any colour, I think it was along the lines of what John McDonnell was asking for.

He is the PM - one of his key responsibilities in a time of national crisis is to act as an inspiration for people - be someone who calms the nation and makes people think 'everything's going to be ok, because this guy is calling the shots'

Being his usual bumbling self does not do this, giving the impression of someone who is making decisions eventually, after a week of being told that not enough is being done - he is failing a key part of the job.

I watched the press conference. His style can often look like he is playing the clown but he looked pretty sober and serious to me.

Whether you like him or not, he does have charisma that is lacking in previous leaders like May.

I don’t think anyone (other than the likes of you and momentum nut jobs) can criticise him today.

I notice that you didn’t criticise the policy announcement which was a massive financial commitment to help ordinary workers.

Your comments look petty and ill judged at a time like this.

'He has more charisma than Theresa May' is not the strongest of endorsements for Boris.

The financial policy announcements as they are are fine - they still don't do much for people who are self-employed or for people who are renting - but are a good start. They are also far more in line with an economic policy that would be suggested by a chancellor who was a 'momentum nut job'. Glad to hear you're seeing the light Rick - keep the red flag flying high.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 20, 2020, 07:07:36 PM
hey i no fan of boris, jezza or nicola but when i hear nicola in her conference agreeing with how boris is handling things then i am happy
can't get them to agree on anything normally


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 20, 2020, 07:10:41 PM
This is a re-run of old arguments.

Can't find fault with Boris' handling of this crisis in terms of the overall arc - it's good that he's flexible and able to move quickly with changing circs rather than get hung up on 'process'. It's to his credit that he's promoted someone who appears as competent as Sunak to work and present alongside him.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 20, 2020, 07:11:03 PM
hey i no fan of boris, jezza or nicola but when i hear nicola in her conference agreeing with how boris is handling things then i am happy
can't get them to agree on anything normally

What’s more worrying is that you are a Jimmy Krankie supporter!  rotflmfao


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: tikay on March 20, 2020, 07:18:04 PM
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/20/media/trump-rant-at-nbc-news-peter-alexander/index.html

When the USA wants reassurance his response is to attack the guy asking a perfectly
reasonable question.

He is really irritating me , really .

Jeez, the man is deranged. I genuinely think he is mentally unwell.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 20, 2020, 07:21:57 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

If you are focussing on his deliver right now, you need to have a word with yourself.

These are massive commitments for a government of any colour, I think it was along the lines of what John McDonnell was asking for.

He is the PM - one of his key responsibilities in a time of national crisis is to act as an inspiration for people - be someone who calms the nation and makes people think 'everything's going to be ok, because this guy is calling the shots'

Being his usual bumbling self does not do this, giving the impression of someone who is making decisions eventually, after a week of being told that not enough is being done - he is failing a key part of the job.

I watched the press conference. His style can often look like he is playing the clown but he looked pretty sober and serious to me.

Whether you like him or not, he does have charisma that is lacking in previous leaders like May.

I don’t think anyone (other than the likes of you and momentum nut jobs) can criticise him today.

I notice that you didn’t criticise the policy announcement which was a massive financial commitment to help ordinary workers.

Your comments look petty and ill judged at a time like this.


I've seen a few comments about Boris's delivery and demeanour in these press conferences - I've generally just waited for text updates, but if this is typical of them I really don't understand what the criticism is about.

Boris isn't going to suddenly change his diction, style, stance and delivery; he might not be the orator he'd want to be but he seems like a perfectly capable leader in these press conferences to me (if this is typical of the other ones).


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 20, 2020, 07:27:15 PM
First dog dies of virus second case confirmed...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8134865/Second-dog-tests-positive-coronavirus-Hong-Kong.html

From what I'm reading a dog died that happened to have the virus. It doesn't say that the virus was the direct cause.

"The AFCD said the dog's owner wasn't willing to allow an autopsy to determine the cause of death but some have suggested the stress of quarantine and the separation from its owner may have contributed."

It had the virus and was understandably quarantined. It was a 17 year old Pomeranian, these have an average lifespan of 12 to 16 years.

Looks like something to be taken seriously but certainly not worry about until more research has been carried out.


All the medical vet people have clearly said that it's a coincidence and it's not connected.

It is very hard for a virus to infect more than one species - that's why these zoonotic diseases happen occasionally, but not frequently. The chances of a virus being able to infect a bat, a human and a dog aren't zero but it's pretty small.

In terms of the test - if the owner sneezed and the dog ingested some of the virus, it could test positive for the virus in it's blood - that's not the same as it being infected with the virus.

It's not impossible - but the probability is pretty one sided.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 20, 2020, 07:32:06 PM
New announcement.....

All British Citizens will be entitled to £100 pound a day to stay at home to avoid spread of COVID-19 starting from March 23, 2020. The Government grant pay is accessible to all no matter employment status. Read full article here on how to claim:


https://external-preview.redd.it/vxPXEGgL4v8mCGw06IFGsmJNtqWQg-z60xQQ79dHKPY.jpg?auto=webp&s=db7685262e9b352a4888e547f52a244e2ea2cb9f


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 20, 2020, 07:32:55 PM
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/20/media/trump-rant-at-nbc-news-peter-alexander/index.html

When the USA wants reassurance his response is to attack the guy asking a perfectly
reasonable question.

He is really irritating me , really .

Jeez, the man is deranged. I genuinely think he is mentally unwell.

Awful to see this go unchallenged by the other people present


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RickBFA on March 20, 2020, 07:49:50 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

If you are focussing on his deliver right now, you need to have a word with yourself.

These are massive commitments for a government of any colour, I think it was along the lines of what John McDonnell was asking for.

He is the PM - one of his key responsibilities in a time of national crisis is to act as an inspiration for people - be someone who calms the nation and makes people think 'everything's going to be ok, because this guy is calling the shots'

Being his usual bumbling self does not do this, giving the impression of someone who is making decisions eventually, after a week of being told that not enough is being done - he is failing a key part of the job.

I watched the press conference. His style can often look like he is playing the clown but he looked pretty sober and serious to me.

Whether you like him or not, he does have charisma that is lacking in previous leaders like May.

I don’t think anyone (other than the likes of you and momentum nut jobs) can criticise him today.

I notice that you didn’t criticise the policy announcement which was a massive financial commitment to help ordinary workers.

Your comments look petty and ill judged at a time like this.

'He has more charisma than Theresa May' is not the strongest of endorsements for Boris.

The financial policy announcements as they are are fine - they still don't do much for people who are self-employed or for people who are renting - but are a good start. They are also far more in line with an economic policy that would be suggested by a chancellor who was a 'momentum nut job'. Glad to hear you're seeing the light Rick - keep the red flag flying high.

Well I did smile.

I suppose extreme circumstances need extreme actions, unfortunately McDonnell thinks extreme actions in normal economic times are acceptable.

I saw McDonnell suggesting this policy this morning, so I thought he’d be happy.

A friend just texted me to say McDonnell is now moaning that it’s not enough and they should be doing more to stimulate the economy (haven’t seen it personally). It’s pretty hard to do that when everyone is sat at home ffs.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 20, 2020, 08:11:54 PM
I'm not a Boris fan but I think he's done a very decent job of leading despite the odd "err and umm", which seem to be part of his character.

I did actually Tweet some words to this effect a few days ago and my opinion hasn't changed.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 20, 2020, 08:15:03 PM
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/20/media/trump-rant-at-nbc-news-peter-alexander/index.html

When the USA wants reassurance his response is to attack the guy asking a perfectly
reasonable question.

He is really irritating me , really .

Jeez, the man is deranged. I genuinely think he is mentally unwell.

Awful to see this go unchallenged by the other people present

Trump is the ultimate yes man loving guesser.   Anyone that stands behind him is highly skilled at smiling when they shouldn't and constant head nodding.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 20, 2020, 08:23:49 PM
I think Johnson has been fine in the press conferences, in a very difficult spot. The idea that they are handling it well is ridiculous though. We had the most warning of any of the large western nations and our graph looks for sure that we’ll top the death numbers given the current trajectory and the  timing of the limited measures that we have put in place. We keep hearing it’s a balance between the economy and preserving life, we seem perfectly placed to be worst on both.

 https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441 (https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441)

Check the pound against the euro/dollar in the last month, it’s a massacre. It’s hard for the pound and the FTSE to fall of a cliff at the same time but we’re managing it.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp)




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AndrewT on March 20, 2020, 08:24:17 PM
It's interesting watching Boris here - this is the most serious announcement he's had to make in his political career, yet he is still utterly incapable of gravitas - still bumbling, lots of 'er, er, look here now'.

If you are focussing on his deliver right now, you need to have a word with yourself.

These are massive commitments for a government of any colour, I think it was along the lines of what John McDonnell was asking for.

He is the PM - one of his key responsibilities in a time of national crisis is to act as an inspiration for people - be someone who calms the nation and makes people think 'everything's going to be ok, because this guy is calling the shots'

Being his usual bumbling self does not do this, giving the impression of someone who is making decisions eventually, after a week of being told that not enough is being done - he is failing a key part of the job.

I watched the press conference. His style can often look like he is playing the clown but he looked pretty sober and serious to me.

Whether you like him or not, he does have charisma that is lacking in previous leaders like May.

I don’t think anyone (other than the likes of you and momentum nut jobs) can criticise him today.

I notice that you didn’t criticise the policy announcement which was a massive financial commitment to help ordinary workers.

Your comments look petty and ill judged at a time like this.

'He has more charisma than Theresa May' is not the strongest of endorsements for Boris.

The financial policy announcements as they are are fine - they still don't do much for people who are self-employed or for people who are renting - but are a good start. They are also far more in line with an economic policy that would be suggested by a chancellor who was a 'momentum nut job'. Glad to hear you're seeing the light Rick - keep the red flag flying high.

Well I did smile.

I suppose extreme circumstances need extreme actions, unfortunately McDonnell thinks extreme actions in normal economic times are acceptable.

I saw McDonnell suggesting this policy this morning, so I thought he’d be happy.

A friend just texted me to say McDonnell is now moaning that it’s not enough and they should be doing more to stimulate the economy (haven’t seen it personally). It’s pretty hard to do that when everyone is sat at home ffs.

As you say, the reason extreme measures are needed is because it’s a very serious situation for everyone. However, even in normal economic times, it’s a very serious, life or death situation for many people every day, and the purposes of a McDonnell budget would be to help alleviate things for those people, in the same way that Sunak has tried to do for everyone today.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 20, 2020, 08:26:04 PM
hey i no fan of boris, jezza or nicola but when i hear nicola in her conference agreeing with how boris is handling things then i am happy
can't get them to agree on anything normally

What’s more worrying is that you are a Jimmy Krankie supporter!  rotflmfao

i hate all 3


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 20, 2020, 08:34:04 PM
I think Johnson has been fine in the press conferences, in a very difficult spot. The idea that they are handling it well is ridiculous though. We had the most warning of any of the large western nations and our graph looks for sure that we’ll top the death numbers given the current trajectory and the  timing of the limited measures that we have put in place. We keep hearing it’s a balance between the economy and preserving life, we seem perfectly placed to be worst on both.

 https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441 (https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441)

Check the pound against the euro/dollar in the last month, it’s a massacre. It’s hard for the pound and the FTSE to fall of a cliff at the same time but we’re managing it.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp)


 https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-markets/stocks/indices/summary/summary-indices-chart.html?index=UKX (https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-markets/stocks/indices/summary/summary-indices-chart.html?index=UKX)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 20, 2020, 08:37:55 PM
I think Johnson has been fine in the press conferences, in a very difficult spot. The idea that they are handling it well is ridiculous though. We had the most warning of any of the large western nations and our graph looks for sure that we’ll top the death numbers given the current trajectory and the  timing of the limited measures that we have put in place. We keep hearing it’s a balance between the economy and preserving life, we seem perfectly placed to be worst on both.

 https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441 (https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441)

Check the pound against the euro/dollar in the last month, it’s a massacre. It’s hard for the pound and the FTSE to fall of a cliff at the same time but we’re managing it.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp)


 https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-markets/stocks/indices/summary/summary-indices-chart.html?index=UKX (https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-markets/stocks/indices/summary/summary-indices-chart.html?index=UKX)

Check out the stock exchanges of those countries you think have done a better job at managing COVID....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 20, 2020, 08:40:31 PM
I saw dollar dropped about 15c in a week, but wasn't sure why as everyone is under it.

Any reason why we took such a hammering there?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 20, 2020, 08:54:35 PM
I saw dollar dropped about 15c in a week, but wasn't sure why as everyone is under it.

Any reason why we took such a hammering there?

My guess would be Brexit.

We could have another 10 year recession and we're the only big country not in a safe trading group I think we're going to keep getting hammered for a long time


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 20, 2020, 09:19:33 PM
I saw dollar dropped about 15c in a week, but wasn't sure why as everyone is under it.

Any reason why we took such a hammering there?

My guess would be Brexit.

We could have another 10 year recession and we're the only big country not in a safe trading group I think we're going to keep getting hammered for a long time

Marv...


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 20, 2020, 09:29:37 PM
I think Johnson has been fine in the press conferences, in a very difficult spot. The idea that they are handling it well is ridiculous though. We had the most warning of any of the large western nations and our graph looks for sure that we’ll top the death numbers given the current trajectory and the  timing of the limited measures that we have put in place. We keep hearing it’s a balance between the economy and preserving life, we seem perfectly placed to be worst on both.

 https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441 (https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441)

Check the pound against the euro/dollar in the last month, it’s a massacre. It’s hard for the pound and the FTSE to fall of a cliff at the same time but we’re managing it.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp)


Maybe we have had a bad strategy and maybe we will do comparatively badly.

But it's way, way too early to have any idea at all about either.

Economically we're in a terrible position because of the weakness we have because of Brexit (I think, doesn't seem too much of a stretch) - that's the fault of the current government but has nothing to do with their handling of this epidemic.

Medically we're not going to have a decent amount of data to analyse for about 5 years. If we do badly in a first wave then better in subsequent waves the overall effect could be that we have the fewest casualties.

But even the longer term data won't be clearcut; even if you use the absolutely perfect strategy to deal with the epidemic but you have a much higher proportion of vulnerable patients and/or a much lower ICU capacity your figures are going to be worse than a country using a sub-optimal strategy but with better variables.

The latter of these might still be the responsibility of the current government - but again, still isn't anything to do with the quality of their strategy.

The differing variables vary so wildly between countries that the optimal strategy is probably (at least slightly) different for every country, there are so many input and output variables that it's almost certainly impossible to know for certain how much better or worse any country could have done apart from in the very broadest of terms; and certainly not for quite a while.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 20, 2020, 09:40:14 PM
I'm hoping the government's medical strategy isn't too bad though because, apart from cancelling exams, they've done everything Science Wife said they should do and they've done them at the time she said they should.

She predicted the schools would close from next week until after Easter well over a month ago for example.

Cancelling exams just didn't seem possible because it's basically such a big deal, but it unlocks the whole strategy. Without that it isn't really worth making an exception for only key workers (key workers children plus those taking exams is so high you might as well just let everybody back).  Once key workers are the only exceptions it lets you keep the schools closed up to and over the peak so she thinks it was a bold move to cancel exams, but a good one.

On the other hand she does prefer pathogens to people so maybe her end goal would be viral armageddon anyway :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 20, 2020, 09:42:04 PM
Superb!

Think Science Wife might just be my blonde of the decade, and we're only 3 months in ;D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 20, 2020, 09:50:39 PM
I saw dollar dropped about 15c in a week, but wasn't sure why as everyone is under it.

Any reason why we took such a hammering there?

My guess would be Brexit.

We could have another 10 year recession and we're the only big country not in a safe trading group I think we're going to keep getting hammered for a long time

I really agree with this and it seems a perfect storm with brexit happening just before this once in a century carnage.  I don't see a logical bounce back economically from this because the economy has been living on borrowed money and bullshiit for well over a decade.   It's amazing no one at the daily mail has mentioned substantial house price falls which 'finally' will happen even though they should have happened 15 years ago everyone wiill have an excuse now when they are not as rich as they thought they were.  Blame the virus.   i think long term for the economy we needed something like this to sort the economy out and make us realise most people were no where near as rich as they thought they were.   Red and blue governments for thirty years have been obsessed wtth house prices and the key swing seat votes they win.

ps when was the last 10 year recession in our lifetimes?   Govt's have made sure recessions never hurt which is why everyone thiinks they were much richer than they actually are.  All joking aside with Woodsey and his pension but when a medical sales rep in his 40's is probably a millionaire through his overvalued pension fund and house prices from cheap money and nearly negative interest rates you know the world is about to go pop.   This iisn't a pop at Woodsey directly but millions of relatively normal working folk like him that think they are minted on borrowed money and mythical share prices and house priices.

i am convinced the last twenty years will be looked on in history in two hundred years and they all say 'wtf were these guessers thinking?'  To confirm i am not aftertiming i said in 2002 house prices were stupidly overvalued relative to wages.  I still stand by this now.  The economy is bonkers because governementts of both colours only care about daily mail reading swing voters who win elections and pleasing their desire for house prices to rise.   The political class are ultimately to blame for this crisis not this virus.  This virus has just made everyone wake up.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 20, 2020, 10:02:37 PM
I think Johnson has been fine in the press conferences, in a very difficult spot. The idea that they are handling it well is ridiculous though. We had the most warning of any of the large western nations and our graph looks for sure that we’ll top the death numbers given the current trajectory and the  timing of the limited measures that we have put in place. We keep hearing it’s a balance between the economy and preserving life, we seem perfectly placed to be worst on both.

 https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441 (https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441)

Check the pound against the euro/dollar in the last month, it’s a massacre. It’s hard for the pound and the FTSE to fall of a cliff at the same time but we’re managing it.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp)


Maybe we have had a bad strategy and maybe we will do comparatively badly.

But it's way, way too early to have any idea at all about either.

Economically we're in a terrible position because of the weakness we have because of Brexit (I think, doesn't seem too much of a stretch) - that's the fault of the current government but has nothing to do with their handling of this epidemic.

Medically we're not going to have a decent amount of data to analyse for about 5 years. If we do badly in a first wave then better in subsequent waves the overall effect could be that we have the fewest casualties.

But even the longer term data won't be clearcut; even if you use the absolutely perfect strategy to deal with the epidemic but you have a much higher proportion of vulnerable patients and/or a much lower ICU capacity your figures are going to be worse than a country using a sub-optimal strategy but with better variables.

The latter of these might still be the responsibility of the current government - but again, still isn't anything to do with the quality of their strategy.

The differing variables vary so wildly between countries that the optimal strategy is probably (at least slightly) different for every country, there are so many input and output variables that it's almost certainly impossible to know for certain how much better or worse any country could have done apart from in the very broadest of terms; and certainly not for quite a while.

I think this is a good post and I agree with lots of it, especially how long it will take to play out. The key point for us though is the considerable lack of ICU/respirator capacity compared to all the comparable nations. That is why many (including me) think we should have gone harder earlier on the lockdown and spent that window doing all we could to increase the critical care capacity.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 20, 2020, 10:10:19 PM
I think Johnson has been fine in the press conferences, in a very difficult spot. The idea that they are handling it well is ridiculous though. We had the most warning of any of the large western nations and our graph looks for sure that we’ll top the death numbers given the current trajectory and the  timing of the limited measures that we have put in place. We keep hearing it’s a balance between the economy and preserving life, we seem perfectly placed to be worst on both.

 https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441 (https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441)

Check the pound against the euro/dollar in the last month, it’s a massacre. It’s hard for the pound and the FTSE to fall of a cliff at the same time but we’re managing it.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp)


Maybe we have had a bad strategy and maybe we will do comparatively badly.

But it's way, way too early to have any idea at all about either.

Economically we're in a terrible position because of the weakness we have because of Brexit (I think, doesn't seem too much of a stretch) - that's the fault of the current government but has nothing to do with their handling of this epidemic.

Medically we're not going to have a decent amount of data to analyse for about 5 years. If we do badly in a first wave then better in subsequent waves the overall effect could be that we have the fewest casualties.

But even the longer term data won't be clearcut; even if you use the absolutely perfect strategy to deal with the epidemic but you have a much higher proportion of vulnerable patients and/or a much lower ICU capacity your figures are going to be worse than a country using a sub-optimal strategy but with better variables.

The latter of these might still be the responsibility of the current government - but again, still isn't anything to do with the quality of their strategy.

The differing variables vary so wildly between countries that the optimal strategy is probably (at least slightly) different for every country, there are so many input and output variables that it's almost certainly impossible to know for certain how much better or worse any country could have done apart from in the very broadest of terms; and certainly not for quite a while.

I think this is a good post and I agree with lots of it, especially how long it will take to play out. The key point for us though is the considerable lack of ICU/respirator capacity compared to all the comparable nations. That is why many (including me) think we should have gone harder earlier on the lockdown and spent that window doing all we could to increase the critical care capacity.

Despite what you may think you are not an expert......leave it to them.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 21, 2020, 12:14:19 AM
I think Johnson has been fine in the press conferences, in a very difficult spot. The idea that they are handling it well is ridiculous though. We had the most warning of any of the large western nations and our graph looks for sure that we’ll top the death numbers given the current trajectory and the  timing of the limited measures that we have put in place. We keep hearing it’s a balance between the economy and preserving life, we seem perfectly placed to be worst on both.

 https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441 (https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441)

Check the pound against the euro/dollar in the last month, it’s a massacre. It’s hard for the pound and the FTSE to fall of a cliff at the same time but we’re managing it.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp)


Maybe we have had a bad strategy and maybe we will do comparatively badly.

But it's way, way too early to have any idea at all about either.

Economically we're in a terrible position because of the weakness we have because of Brexit (I think, doesn't seem too much of a stretch) - that's the fault of the current government but has nothing to do with their handling of this epidemic.

Medically we're not going to have a decent amount of data to analyse for about 5 years. If we do badly in a first wave then better in subsequent waves the overall effect could be that we have the fewest casualties.

But even the longer term data won't be clearcut; even if you use the absolutely perfect strategy to deal with the epidemic but you have a much higher proportion of vulnerable patients and/or a much lower ICU capacity your figures are going to be worse than a country using a sub-optimal strategy but with better variables.

The latter of these might still be the responsibility of the current government - but again, still isn't anything to do with the quality of their strategy.

The differing variables vary so wildly between countries that the optimal strategy is probably (at least slightly) different for every country, there are so many input and output variables that it's almost certainly impossible to know for certain how much better or worse any country could have done apart from in the very broadest of terms; and certainly not for quite a while.

I don't think your conclusion is correct.  I don't think there is much point in slamming Boris Johnson because tackling a fast moving virus in real time is clearly very difficult.  I think we agree there.  I am not going to knock the fiscal response either because they could have done other things, but they have had to put together something in very short order.  I also agree on Brexit, as with hindsight we wouln't have started from there, but so what?

But it is clear already that the likes of Singapore, South Korea and Hong Kong have tackled this better so far, and I think it is equally clear that the USA have performed worse until now (how useful was that GBP:USD chart as an indicator of this?).  

I think South Korea gives us all hope because they got in a really bad situation very quickly,and have got back to a stable position impressively.  China have done remarkably well given they had far less information about an appropriate response than the rest of us.  That needs an asterisk because of the original supression, but that seems a bit of hindsight thinking, as they aren't the first country to hide something unpleasant.

I don't think a lot of the variables make that much difference.  The amount of people infected grows so quickly that every country's health system will be overwhelmed without taking the appropriate short term actions.  So the benefit of having twice as many ICU beds or doctors won't make a lot of diffference if you let the virus runaway.  If you have five times as many intensive care patients than you have beds in ICUs then the end result is much the same as having ten times as many; ie many of your patients will die).  

If you are a Country with a very good health system, but act 3 days later, then in the short term aren't you in the same situation as a country that has half as many beds? (because you have doubled your potential patients).  You can apply the same logic to numbers of doctors, nurses and ventilators.

Away from all that I am hugely impressed with what coughing child's school have done for her.  They have given them all a pack which tells them what they have to do daily, weekly and monthly for maths, english, spelling, projects etc. and 3 books for her to read which are all ones she would have chosen herself.  They must have put these together at very short notice.  Each pack also contains an easter egg, which is just such a nice touch.   I am sure they won't be perfect, but I don't think that matters too much.  They are also going to be updating us by email of anything additional they need to do.  I was genuinely worried we'd have to put much more effort into filling their days, but she must have weeks of schoolwork already.  

In some of the private sector frims I have worked for, given the same timescale, we'd still be trying to arrange a meeting time where all of us could attend.

Anyway good night, best get to bed.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: DropTheHammer on March 21, 2020, 12:47:20 AM
My cousin and her husband are both key workers with primary school age kids. They are telling the school that one of them isn’t a key worker in order to keep the kids at hone. I bet there are parents doing the exact opposite  ;)

My wife is an administrator for the local hospital and they are banning all leave for the next two months and cancelling all non-essential things and moving everyone to front-line services ready for the influx. They are looking to utilize all buildings that will therefore not be used by Turning them into wards soon. They seemed to be getting well prepared so let’s hope enough retired workers risk their lives to come back and help, and there is enough equipment and PPE too.

Stay safe and sensible everyone, let’s hope the greed buying stops soon Ebay etc need to stamp out all this profiteering.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: vegaslover on March 21, 2020, 02:19:47 AM
My cousin and her husband are both key workers with primary school age kids. They are telling the school that one of them isn’t a key worker in order to keep the kids at hone. I bet there are parents doing the exact opposite  ;)

My wife is an administrator for the local hospital and they are banning all leave for the next two months and cancelling all non-essential things and moving everyone to front-line services ready for the influx. They are looking to utilize all buildings that will therefore not be used by Turning them into wards soon. They seemed to be getting well prepared so let’s hope enough retired workers risk their lives to come back and help, and there is enough equipment and PPE too.

Stay safe and sensible everyone, let’s hope the greed buying stops soon Ebay etc need to stamp out all this profiteering.

NHS are not even close to having the required PPE, most wards in my Trust do not have enough to last a day.
Absolutely fk all for staff either, other than self isolate at the first sign of a sniffle. The recently retired staff I know have all said 'sod that' to coming back to work. Most people seem to not realise that 40yrs of working shifts has left most NHS workers bodies/health fucked.
NHS should be fast tracking temp staff, particularly aiming at those who currently have no work due to so much getting shut down


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: DropTheHammer on March 21, 2020, 06:32:26 AM
At least the government have been quick to fast track almost qualified doctors and nurses to shove them into action. I can see that being extended out to second year under grad nurses, and not just doctors who are In their final year. Their quals/graduation will have to be paused as we need these professionals at the front line.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 21, 2020, 06:47:24 AM
I think Johnson has been fine in the press conferences, in a very difficult spot. The idea that they are handling it well is ridiculous though. We had the most warning of any of the large western nations and our graph looks for sure that we’ll top the death numbers given the current trajectory and the  timing of the limited measures that we have put in place. We keep hearing it’s a balance between the economy and preserving life, we seem perfectly placed to be worst on both.

 https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441 (https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441)

Check the pound against the euro/dollar in the last month, it’s a massacre. It’s hard for the pound and the FTSE to fall of a cliff at the same time but we’re managing it.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp)


Maybe we have had a bad strategy and maybe we will do comparatively badly.

But it's way, way too early to have any idea at all about either.

Economically we're in a terrible position because of the weakness we have because of Brexit (I think, doesn't seem too much of a stretch) - that's the fault of the current government but has nothing to do with their handling of this epidemic.

Medically we're not going to have a decent amount of data to analyse for about 5 years. If we do badly in a first wave then better in subsequent waves the overall effect could be that we have the fewest casualties.

But even the longer term data won't be clearcut; even if you use the absolutely perfect strategy to deal with the epidemic but you have a much higher proportion of vulnerable patients and/or a much lower ICU capacity your figures are going to be worse than a country using a sub-optimal strategy but with better variables.

The latter of these might still be the responsibility of the current government - but again, still isn't anything to do with the quality of their strategy.

The differing variables vary so wildly between countries that the optimal strategy is probably (at least slightly) different for every country, there are so many input and output variables that it's almost certainly impossible to know for certain how much better or worse any country could have done apart from in the very broadest of terms; and certainly not for quite a while.

I don't think your conclusion is correct.  I don't think there is much point in slamming Boris Johnson because tackling a fast moving virus in real time is clearly very difficult.  I think we agree there.  I am not going to knock the fiscal response either because they could have done other things, but they have had to put together something in very short order.  I also agree on Brexit, as with hindsight we wouln't have started from there, but so what?

But it is clear already that the likes of Singapore, South Korea and Hong Kong have tackled this better so far, and I think it is equally clear that the USA have performed worse until now (how useful was that GBP:USD chart as an indicator of this?).  

I think South Korea gives us all hope because they got in a really bad situation very quickly,and have got back to a stable position impressively.  China have done remarkably well given they had far less information about an appropriate response than the rest of us.  That needs an asterisk because of the original supression, but that seems a bit of hindsight thinking, as they aren't the first country to hide something unpleasant.

I don't think a lot of the variables make that much difference.  The amount of people infected grows so quickly that every country's health system will be overwhelmed without taking the appropriate short term actions.  So the benefit of having twice as many ICU beds or doctors won't make a lot of diffference if you let the virus runaway.  If you have five times as many intensive care patients than you have beds in ICUs then the end result is much the same as having ten times as many; ie many of your patients will die).  

If you are a Country with a very good health system, but act 3 days later, then in the short term aren't you in the same situation as a country that has half as many beds? (because you have doubled your potential patients).  You can apply the same logic to numbers of doctors, nurses and ventilators.

Away from all that I am hugely impressed with what coughing child's school have done for her.  They have given them all a pack which tells them what they have to do daily, weekly and monthly for maths, english, spelling, projects etc. and 3 books for her to read which are all ones she would have chosen herself.  They must have put these together at very short notice.  Each pack also contains an easter egg, which is just such a nice touch.   I am sure they won't be perfect, but I don't think that matters too much.  They are also going to be updating us by email of anything additional they need to do.  I was genuinely worried we'd have to put much more effort into filling their days, but she must have weeks of schoolwork already.  

In some of the private sector frims I have worked for, given the same timescale, we'd still be trying to arrange a meeting time where all of us could attend.

Anyway good night, best get to bed.

"...But it is clear already that the likes of Singapore, South Korea and Hong Kong have tackled this better so far,..." It is not 100% clear that they have because we don't know how well or badly they will be hit by any resurgence - you should also add Japan to this list.

And even if they are qualititavely doing better it's not necessarily something other countries can replicate - they are all small islands (S Korea has such a tight border with the North that it might as well be an island) - they also have experience of dealing with pandemics at this level and, for example, Japan in particular already has a culture of non contact and high health and hygiene standards - plus a whole lot more; there are too many input variables and many of them are not applicable to every other country, and not all of them are possible for every other country.

"The amount of people infected grows so quickly that every country's health system will be overwhelmed without taking the appropriate short term actions.  So the benefit of having twice as many ICU beds or doctors won't make a lot of diffference if you let the virus runaway"

No, that's the point of the mitigation strategy - that's why the mitigation strategy was used to combat every flu pandemic for the last 100 years. Absolutely zero countries have taken no short term actions and let the virus runaway; we tried to isolate every person who got the infection and trace and isolate/test/quarantine those they had been in contact with (for example) - this is where the Asian countries have an advantage, their experience in having done it before means they could do it better than we could. To reiterate; acknowledging people are going to get infected and to some extent letting (non-vulnerable) people get infected is not the same as letting the virus runaway. It's the ultimate in human hubris to imagine that we can just super lockdown from day 1 and stop a microsopic particle from spreading.

"If you are a Country with a very good health system, but act 3 days later, then in the short term aren't you in the same situation as a country that has half as many beds? (because you have doubled your potential patients).  You can apply the same logic to numbers of doctors, nurses and ventilators."

To reinforce - no government (deliberately) did nothing; the actions they have taken are aimed at getting those 'extra' patients as being ones who will not need ICU treatement. The entire strategy evinced in the Imperial paper is how to keep demand for ICU under the available level of supply - and sometimes that means letting the infection spread more. China can feasibly lock down an entire region for an extended period because they are an authoritarian superpower but what they did was not even a full lockdown for the entire period; and they are the only place where they can feasibly just repeat it under future outbreaks - we cannot do that. We have to let a certain amount of people get infected, the only question is 'who' gets infected and 'when'.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 21, 2020, 08:18:12 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/Pepys_Diaries (https://mobile.twitter.com/Pepys_Diaries)

Not sure how long he can keep this up, but a promising start


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 21, 2020, 08:21:32 AM
Lots of scientific evidence the Government has been using has been published here.

https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/scientific-advisory-group-for-emergencies-sage-coronavirus-covid-19-response (https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/scientific-advisory-group-for-emergencies-sage-coronavirus-covid-19-response)

I haven't read it all yet, but if people have a spare few hours...


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 21, 2020, 08:33:42 AM
I think Johnson has been fine in the press conferences, in a very difficult spot. The idea that they are handling it well is ridiculous though. We had the most warning of any of the large western nations and our graph looks for sure that we’ll top the death numbers given the current trajectory and the  timing of the limited measures that we have put in place. We keep hearing it’s a balance between the economy and preserving life, we seem perfectly placed to be worst on both.

 https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441 (https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441)

Check the pound against the euro/dollar in the last month, it’s a massacre. It’s hard for the pound and the FTSE to fall of a cliff at the same time but we’re managing it.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cx250jmk4e7t/pound-sterling-gbp)


Maybe we have had a bad strategy and maybe we will do comparatively badly.

But it's way, way too early to have any idea at all about either.

Economically we're in a terrible position because of the weakness we have because of Brexit (I think, doesn't seem too much of a stretch) - that's the fault of the current government but has nothing to do with their handling of this epidemic.

Medically we're not going to have a decent amount of data to analyse for about 5 years. If we do badly in a first wave then better in subsequent waves the overall effect could be that we have the fewest casualties.

But even the longer term data won't be clearcut; even if you use the absolutely perfect strategy to deal with the epidemic but you have a much higher proportion of vulnerable patients and/or a much lower ICU capacity your figures are going to be worse than a country using a sub-optimal strategy but with better variables.

The latter of these might still be the responsibility of the current government - but again, still isn't anything to do with the quality of their strategy.

The differing variables vary so wildly between countries that the optimal strategy is probably (at least slightly) different for every country, there are so many input and output variables that it's almost certainly impossible to know for certain how much better or worse any country could have done apart from in the very broadest of terms; and certainly not for quite a while.

I don't think your conclusion is correct.  I don't think there is much point in slamming Boris Johnson because tackling a fast moving virus in real time is clearly very difficult.  I think we agree there.  I am not going to knock the fiscal response either because they could have done other things, but they have had to put together something in very short order.  I also agree on Brexit, as with hindsight we wouln't have started from there, but so what?

But it is clear already that the likes of Singapore, South Korea and Hong Kong have tackled this better so far, and I think it is equally clear that the USA have performed worse until now (how useful was that GBP:USD chart as an indicator of this?).  

I think South Korea gives us all hope because they got in a really bad situation very quickly,and have got back to a stable position impressively.  China have done remarkably well given they had far less information about an appropriate response than the rest of us.  That needs an asterisk because of the original supression, but that seems a bit of hindsight thinking, as they aren't the first country to hide something unpleasant.

I don't think a lot of the variables make that much difference.  The amount of people infected grows so quickly that every country's health system will be overwhelmed without taking the appropriate short term actions.  So the benefit of having twice as many ICU beds or doctors won't make a lot of diffference if you let the virus runaway.  If you have five times as many intensive care patients than you have beds in ICUs then the end result is much the same as having ten times as many; ie many of your patients will die).  

If you are a Country with a very good health system, but act 3 days later, then in the short term aren't you in the same situation as a country that has half as many beds? (because you have doubled your potential patients).  You can apply the same logic to numbers of doctors, nurses and ventilators.

Away from all that I am hugely impressed with what coughing child's school have done for her.  They have given them all a pack which tells them what they have to do daily, weekly and monthly for maths, english, spelling, projects etc. and 3 books for her to read which are all ones she would have chosen herself.  They must have put these together at very short notice.  Each pack also contains an easter egg, which is just such a nice touch.   I am sure they won't be perfect, but I don't think that matters too much.  They are also going to be updating us by email of anything additional they need to do.  I was genuinely worried we'd have to put much more effort into filling their days, but she must have weeks of schoolwork already.  

In some of the private sector frims I have worked for, given the same timescale, we'd still be trying to arrange a meeting time where all of us could attend.

Anyway good night, best get to bed.

"...But it is clear already that the likes of Singapore, South Korea and Hong Kong have tackled this better so far,..." It is not 100% clear that they have because we don't know how well or badly they will be hit by any resurgence - you should also add Japan to this list.

And even if they are qualititavely doing better it's not necessarily something other countries can replicate - they are all small islands (S Korea has such a tight border with the North that it might as well be an island) - they also have experience of dealing with pandemics at this level and, for example, Japan in particular already has a culture of non contact and high health and hygiene standards - plus a whole lot more; there are too many input variables and many of them are not applicable to every other country, and not all of them are possible for every other country.

"The amount of people infected grows so quickly that every country's health system will be overwhelmed without taking the appropriate short term actions.  So the benefit of having twice as many ICU beds or doctors won't make a lot of diffference if you let the virus runaway"

No, that's the point of the mitigation strategy - that's why the mitigation strategy was used to combat every flu pandemic for the last 100 years. Absolutely zero countries have taken no short term actions and let the virus runaway; we tried to isolate every person who got the infection and trace and isolate/test/quarantine those they had been in contact with (for example) - this is where the Asian countries have an advantage, their experience in having done it before means they could do it better than we could. To reiterate; acknowledging people are going to get infected and to some extent letting (non-vulnerable) people get infected is not the same as letting the virus runaway. It's the ultimate in human hubris to imagine that we can just super lockdown from day 1 and stop a microsopic particle from spreading.

"If you are a Country with a very good health system, but act 3 days later, then in the short term aren't you in the same situation as a country that has half as many beds? (because you have doubled your potential patients).  You can apply the same logic to numbers of doctors, nurses and ventilators."

To reinforce - no government (deliberately) did nothing; the actions they have taken are aimed at getting those 'extra' patients as being ones who will not need ICU treatement. The entire strategy evinced in the Imperial paper is how to keep demand for ICU under the available level of supply - and sometimes that means letting the infection spread more. China can feasibly lock down an entire region for an extended period because they are an authoritarian superpower but what they did was not even a full lockdown for the entire period; and they are the only place where they can feasibly just repeat it under future outbreaks - we cannot do that. We have to let a certain amount of people get infected, the only question is 'who' gets infected and 'when'.

You lost me at South Korea is a small island.  They have a population in the same ballpark as us and are about half our size.  They clearly did better than us.  A lot will do worse.  

And nowhere have I ever advocated shutting everything down on day 1 or say nobody did nothing.  Just saying if you do the same things three days later you have twice the problem you had.

I think the phase 2 strategy isn't to let a certain amount of people get infected.    If they get to a
small number of people infected, they will try and be more like South Korea.  So improve contract tracing, and make better use of testing (they will have a lot more availability).  That and having more ICUs and many more ventilators.  Meantime push for a vaccine or a cure.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 21, 2020, 08:39:03 AM
There will be more headlines like this going forward

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/mar/20/london-hospitals-struggle-to-cope-with-coronavirus-surge (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/mar/20/london-hospitals-struggle-to-cope-with-coronavirus-surge)

The extend of the treatment and the use of ventilators is particularly worrying. 

Even under the Government's forecasts for the effects of their more stringent methods, the NHS will be overwhelmed for a period.  It us a question of keeping those excess deaths as low as they can and as spread out as they can.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 21, 2020, 10:06:53 AM
https://time.com/5806837/coronavirus-new-jersey-family/

Did a search to check  this didnt believe it at first. Devastating


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 21, 2020, 11:09:15 AM
https://time.com/5806837/coronavirus-new-jersey-family/

Did a search to check  this didnt believe it at first. Devastating

I am pretty sure it is accurate, as I have seen it linked to elsewhere.

I saw this linked to another paper yesterday and the amount of people who quickly piped up that they already had pre-existing conditions was a bit scary.  I tried finding evidence they had pre-existing conditions and couldn't.  They may well have done, but even if they did, they would have died over a significant number of years, and wouldn't all die in a few days.

This gets to the nub of the often quoted it is all down to the frequent pre existing conditions argument (even the BBC was on it this morning).  Even if many of these people would have died within a few years, having half a million of them all die in a very short period in the summer would not be anything close to normal.  It would be horrendous for the NHS, but also for relatives, and those who will have to dispose of the bodies.   

 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 21, 2020, 02:01:04 PM
Wetherspoons have said their pubs will stay open for a further 3 weeks to give anyone who went to the toilet time to get back to the bar!




ps this may or may not be factual


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 21, 2020, 02:03:53 PM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 21, 2020, 02:07:20 PM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)

It’s all Boris’ fault......


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 21, 2020, 04:24:54 PM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)

I'm not his biggest fan, but didn't the govt say they would aim to get to 25,000 tests eventually and wasn't that over an extended period?

Doing exactly what most politicians do, in picking parts that suit the point you're trying to make, lol.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 21, 2020, 04:37:22 PM
It is a bit weird that the number of tests dropped so much after steadily rising.

It might have been better if the announcement had been that they were aiming to test 10k a day and aiming to test 25k a day rather than saying they were 'going' to be; particularly as when Boris Johnson said we're increasing the number of tests from 10 to 25 - we hadn't even got to 10.

I dont' think there's anything manipulative or sinister going on though, I think it's just sub-standard choice of words.

My guess for the numbers is that there's some periodic technical bottleneck they reached and the numbers will go back up again (interesting if they don't though).


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 21, 2020, 06:23:13 PM
Perhaps we could just carry on as if nothing happened and pay the families a large settlement if a family member dies from the virus.

80+      100k
70-79    150k
60-69    250k
50-59    375k
40-49    600k
< 40     1 millball

20% reduction if any pre existing conditions



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 21, 2020, 06:35:26 PM
Perhaps we could just carry on as if nothing happened and pay the families a large settlement if a family member dies from the virus.

80+      100k
70-79    150k
60-69    250k
50-59    375k
40-49    600k
< 40     1 millball

20% reduction if any pre existing conditions

My folks would nick 800 grand if I jogged on before November :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 21, 2020, 06:48:42 PM
Perhaps we could just carry on as if nothing happened and pay the families a large settlement if a family member dies from the virus.

80+      100k
70-79    150k
60-69    250k
50-59    375k
40-49    600k
< 40     1 millball

20% reduction if any pre existing conditions

My folks would nick 800 grand if I jogged on before November :D

Might have to re-calc - they deserve more for your sacrifice :-)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 21, 2020, 06:52:28 PM
Could add a free funeral  for 70+

Free funeral and electric car for 60-69

Free funeral, electric car and conversion away from Gas in their home for anyone sub 59

Solve climate change at the same time


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 21, 2020, 06:55:15 PM
Jncentives to not go on a ventialtor and take up an ICU bed - available to over 70s = + 25%


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 21, 2020, 06:59:15 PM
N inheritance tax  due for anyone who dies of the virus


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 21, 2020, 07:10:19 PM
Perhaps we could just carry on as if nothing happened and pay the families a large settlement if a family member dies from the virus.

80+      100k
70-79    150k
60-69    250k
50-59    375k
40-49    600k
< 40     1 millball

20% reduction if any pre existing conditions

My folks would nick 800 grand if I jogged on before November :D

Might have to re-calc - they deserve more for your sacrifice :-)


Old dear be trying to get a trolly to strap to the front of my chair, so I can get out shopping... Big diff between 800 and 480 ;D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 21, 2020, 07:11:34 PM
Could add a free funeral  for 70+

Free funeral and electric car for 60-69

Free funeral, electric car and conversion away from Gas in their home for anyone sub 59

Solve climate change at the same time

The funerals are going to be by video-link only - they'll be frightful.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 21, 2020, 07:45:19 PM
It is a bit weird that the number of tests dropped so much after steadily rising.

It might have been better if the announcement had been that they were aiming to test 10k a day and aiming to test 25k a day rather than saying they were 'going' to be; particularly as when Boris Johnson said we're increasing the number of tests from 10 to 25 - we hadn't even got to 10.

I dont' think there's anything manipulative or sinister going on though, I think it's just sub-standard choice of words.

My guess for the numbers is that there's some periodic technical bottleneck they reached and the numbers will go back up again (interesting if they don't though).

I have a feeling the tests will ramp up pretty soon. We've been working on an "assessment pod" in Nottingham that is almost complete and I assume will go in to action as soon as it's ready.

The specification for the unit which came direct from NHS England has drawings in it dated early Feb and was clearly a document sent out to all trusts so they've been working on this for some time.

They're just portacabins adapted for specific use obviously with segregation zones etc. There are a few modular building suppliers who will have been doing their bit delivering the buildings to trusts all over the country and then the contractors have to weigh in to get services to them.

They'll all take a similar amount of time to complete but it'll be a rolling programme. Once the first ones come on line expect the ramp up to be incredibly rapid.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 21, 2020, 07:51:49 PM
It is a bit weird that the number of tests dropped so much after steadily rising.

It might have been better if the announcement had been that they were aiming to test 10k a day and aiming to test 25k a day rather than saying they were 'going' to be; particularly as when Boris Johnson said we're increasing the number of tests from 10 to 25 - we hadn't even got to 10.

I dont' think there's anything manipulative or sinister going on though, I think it's just sub-standard choice of words.

My guess for the numbers is that there's some periodic technical bottleneck they reached and the numbers will go back up again (interesting if they don't though).

I have a feeling the tests will ramp up pretty soon. We've been working on an "assessment pod" in Nottingham that is almost complete and I assume will go in to action as soon as it's ready.

The specification for the unit which came direct from NHS England has drawings in it dated early Feb and was clearly a document sent out to all trusts so they've been working on this for some time.

They're just portacabins adapted for specific use obviously with segregation zones etc. There are a few modular building suppliers who will have been doing their bit delivering the buildings to trusts all over the country and then the contractors have to weigh in to get services to them.

They'll all take a similar amount of time to complete but it'll be a rolling programme. Once the first ones come on line expect the ramp up to be incredibly rapid.


There are already some up and running, I saw at least 3 the week before last on my journey around various hospitals.....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 21, 2020, 07:59:54 PM
It is a bit weird that the number of tests dropped so much after steadily rising.

It might have been better if the announcement had been that they were aiming to test 10k a day and aiming to test 25k a day rather than saying they were 'going' to be; particularly as when Boris Johnson said we're increasing the number of tests from 10 to 25 - we hadn't even got to 10.

I dont' think there's anything manipulative or sinister going on though, I think it's just sub-standard choice of words.

My guess for the numbers is that there's some periodic technical bottleneck they reached and the numbers will go back up again (interesting if they don't though).

I have a feeling the tests will ramp up pretty soon. We've been working on an "assessment pod" in Nottingham that is almost complete and I assume will go in to action as soon as it's ready.

The specification for the unit which came direct from NHS England has drawings in it dated early Feb and was clearly a document sent out to all trusts so they've been working on this for some time.

They're just portacabins adapted for specific use obviously with segregation zones etc. There are a few modular building suppliers who will have been doing their bit delivering the buildings to trusts all over the country and then the contractors have to weigh in to get services to them.

They'll all take a similar amount of time to complete but it'll be a rolling programme. Once the first ones come on line expect the ramp up to be incredibly rapid.


There are already some up and running, I saw at least 3 the week before last on my journey around various hospitals.....

Can confirm this.  My mum was going on about them at her local hospital earlier in the week.  They also starting to offer telephone consultations with consultants rather than face to face if it is possible.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: MintTrav on March 22, 2020, 02:36:36 AM
...
Funny that their science was different to that of so many other countries.

a. the science isn't different - the maths might be;
bi. the maths might be because they are other countries;
bii. for example, they use Intensive Care capacity as a very key variable to inform their results - this is all going to be different everywhere.
c. I haven't seen any similar analysis to compare it to. If the WHO have a similar paper then I could look at the differences for example.

I don't think the science and maths was different, the reaction to it was different in some counties than others.  

We do have an advantage vs some countries, as we have effectively conducted our actions earlier in our epidemic than others have in theirs.


d. It could be a disastrous miscalculation based on arrogantly thinking they know better than the conventional wisdom.


So it seems that there was actually an arm-wrestling match going on behind the scenes between differing scientific views, while they pretended they were basing their different-to-all-other-countries policies on 'science', and we followed the non-standard view until they realised that it was disastrous, at which point they belatedly came in line.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/10-days-that-changed-britains-coronavirus-approach



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 22, 2020, 08:39:59 AM
...
Funny that their science was different to that of so many other countries.

a. the science isn't different - the maths might be;
bi. the maths might be because they are other countries;
bii. for example, they use Intensive Care capacity as a very key variable to inform their results - this is all going to be different everywhere.
c. I haven't seen any similar analysis to compare it to. If the WHO have a similar paper then I could look at the differences for example.

I don't think the science and maths was different, the reaction to it was different in some counties than others.  

We do have an advantage vs some countries, as we have effectively conducted our actions earlier in our epidemic than others have in theirs.


d. It could be a disastrous miscalculation based on arrogantly thinking they know better than the conventional wisdom.


So it seems that there was actually an arm-wrestling match going on behind the scenes between differing scientific views, while they pretended they were basing their different-to-all-other-countries policies on 'science', and we followed the non-standard view until they realised that it was disastrous, at which point they belatedly came in line.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/10-days-that-changed-britains-coronavirus-approach



Are the underlying facts in the story a surprise?

I think it's been repeated a few times that in the response to an epidemic 'what' you have to do is always known, the only question is 'when'.

Just recently in response to Kush saying we'll be able to see the efficay of the strategies followed after the event I highlighted that even with the data available this won't necessarily be the case as there are so many factors inolved, and even the same data and the same factors can be interpreted differently.

I've read some of the details of those disagreements, they primarily seem to be about starting assumptions. For example some strategies you might assume 75% will comply with, but other experts might only think 50% will comply - another disagreement was about what age you use as the cutoff for being vulnerable - they ended up going for 70 but some wanted younger. When you change the starting assumptions it makes the modelled progress of the epidemic different which can change drastically the most appropriate timing for your action.

It sounds like there was also disagreement with the final interpretation but the main gist is that if you got a whole bunch of infectious disease experts together and they all agreed on all these points it would be pretty bizarre; it's incredibly unlikely.

Fundamentally I don't see any difference to what they've reported going on here to what I would expect to be happening in other countries - the difference is that we've been told about it and have access to this information - I still haven't seen any government level data on what other countries are/were basing their strategies on for example - would absolutely love this to see where it diverged from the Imperial model.

The question of whether individual experts are controlling the policy too much is an interesting one. Science Wife strongly believes any government ministers for Science should have scientific expertise whereas I have always argued that the role of government ministers isn't to be an expert but to be a manager who organises the data and decides on the best course of action from this. This epidemic response is that but on a larger scale. On an abstract level I'd be wanting the expert advice to be given to the Prime Minister detailing the range of responses and the arguments for and against them with the Prime Minister making the final decision. But.... specifically, with this Prime Minister I'd have my doubts.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 22, 2020, 08:41:24 AM
Also, to reiterate - I'm not saying that the UK's response is definitely right; more that the conclusion that it is definitely wrong is a little rash.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 22, 2020, 09:39:58 AM
Also, to reiterate - I'm not saying that the UK's response is definitely right; more that the conclusion that it is definitely wrong is a little rash.

Thanks to Jon and Doobs for the excellent posts on this thread, I definitely feel that they have helped me get to grips with this faster than I would have done otherwise.

It's always an odd situation on a forum like this because we are to large extent taking each other's knowledge/ignorance on trust. I probably get marked down on that front for the aggressive way I have criticised Woodsey/Mantis/Adz in the past, fair enough if people want to make that assessment. I also have that annoying condescending posting style that I can't seem to shake but I'm still working on it. I have contributed Local Resilience Forums (basically one level below COBRA) for London for major incidents and have represented my employer at Silver Command and been a major contributor to Gold Command for large scale pollution incidents.

The UK had an extraordinary opportunity to act sooner and didn't take it. It still can go harder sooner. We are still projecting at least as badly as Italy atm (early days yet). Of course it's easy to be wise after event but from the moment anyone reads and fully understands the Tomas Pueyo article it was clear we were in a lot of trouble. I fully accept Doobs point about the rate of growth overwhelming respirator rapidly on an exponential increase, twice to four times as many which seems to be the European norm will still be reached very quickly. Having more though will allow more flexibility for the people making incredibly difficult decisions. If we could have delayed the time taken to reach our ICU capacity by say 5-7 days and spent that time ensuring only that all front line staff had appropriate PPE and that there was sufficient testing capacity for them then we would be in a much more robust position than we are now. As always Taleb has relevant wisdom, we can predict the near future far better than the distant future and we should have chosen to take maximum control early, the reasons why we didn't are largely political. It didn't take long for the all the scientists agree nonsense to unravel.

It is a bit like linking the Express or Mail but this interview is interesting:

[urlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOHiaPwtGl4&feature=youtu.be][/url]


 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 22, 2020, 09:56:38 AM
... but from the moment anyone reads and fully understands the Tomas Pueyo article it was clear we were in a lot of trouble....

This isn't entirely critical
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanhatesthis/im-not-an-epidemiologist-but-the-rise-of-the-corona
but it does highlight about still being careful about the information you read and just how 'correct' the information in it is.

Pueyo's most recent article for example contains incorrect statements (like the Imperial analysis didn't even look at the effect of banning large gatherings); and some of the underlying understanding does lead to a differing outcome to what his general conclusion is.

For example many people are talking about the mitigation and suppression strategies in terms of what you do and their effect; but the fundamental difference is whether you're trying to keep the  R naught value below 1 or just trying to keep it as low as possible. Pueyo talks about the R naught value (he just calls it R but same difference) and those strategies in completely difference sections - and it does have an effect on your action to realise that it's basically the definition of those strategies. He basically comes to the conclusion that a complete lockdown would result in it all being controlled in a few weeks - but that's using the assumption that a whole load of measures will have a lot bigger effect then it seems like they would.

There's some good analysis included in what he writes but if actual experts can come to different conclusions based on the same information, then how much more different could the opinions of non-experts become?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 22, 2020, 10:51:03 AM
... but from the moment anyone reads and fully understands the Tomas Pueyo article it was clear we were in a lot of trouble....

This isn't entirely critical
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanhatesthis/im-not-an-epidemiologist-but-the-rise-of-the-corona
but it does highlight about still being careful about the information you read and just how 'correct' the information in it is.

Pueyo's most recent article for example contains incorrect statements (like the Imperial analysis didn't even look at the effect of banning large gatherings); and some of the underlying understanding does lead to a differing outcome to what his general conclusion is.

For example many people are talking about the mitigation and suppression strategies in terms of what you do and their effect; but the fundamental difference is whether you're trying to keep the  R naught value below 1 or just trying to keep it as low as possible. Pueyo talks about the R naught value (he just calls it R but same difference) and those strategies in completely difference sections - and it does have an effect on your action to realise that it's basically the definition of those strategies. He basically comes to the conclusion that a complete lockdown would result in it all being controlled in a few weeks - but that's using the assumption that a whole load of measures will have a lot bigger effect then it seems like they would.

There's some good analysis included in what he writes but if actual experts can come to different conclusions based on the same information, then how much more different could the opinions of non-experts become?

The divide between the scientific experts on the government payroll and a vast number other scientific experts (including most of the rest of the world) has been significant for a while:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-51892402 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-51892402)

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/world/europe/coronavirus-britain-boris-johnson.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/world/europe/coronavirus-britain-boris-johnson.html)

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/world/europe/coronavirus-britain-boris-johnson.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/world/europe/coronavirus-britain-boris-johnson.html)

https://twitter.com/mymindthought4/status/1241428320354361345/photo/1 (https://twitter.com/mymindthought4/status/1241428320354361345/photo/1)

For the NYT articles best to focus only on the direct quotes from people with scientific expertise.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 22, 2020, 10:53:00 AM

and now for something a bit different..does anyone have insight on whether this supposedly Sunday Times article is legit?

https://twitter.com/johnharris1969/status/1241632642581303296/photo/1 (https://twitter.com/johnharris1969/status/1241632642581303296/photo/1)



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 22, 2020, 02:46:22 PM

and now for something a bit different..does anyone have insight on whether this supposedly Sunday Times article is legit?

https://twitter.com/johnharris1969/status/1241632642581303296/photo/1 (https://twitter.com/johnharris1969/status/1241632642581303296/photo/1)


It does seem to be legit but hard to corroborate atm. It’ll be interesting to see how it develops.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 22, 2020, 02:54:48 PM

 https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1241465632589254656?s=21 (https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1241465632589254656?s=21)

With no U.K. lockdown in sight.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 22, 2020, 03:33:00 PM
So many people completely ignoring guidelines and going to parks etc. in large close groups. Apparently even the beaches are busy.

Basically they see what the rules are and then figure out a way around them. Numerous reports of street parties as well because aren't allowed to the pub on such a lovely day.

I can see a complete lock down coming very soon as the defiant public really leave no choice. Obviously means the army will be out at some point to help which people will moan about but what option have they given?

Will be interesting to see if they still allow people to go to work or if it's a complete closure.

We've been looking at projects that we can carry out whilst maintaining the social distancing guidelines and there's plenty in our line of work.

The longer they can SAFELY keep people working the better. The fewer people that have to be paid the 80% out of government coffers the longer it will last and the easier it will be for us all to pay back one day......



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 22, 2020, 03:49:50 PM

and now for something a bit different..does anyone have insight on whether this supposedly Sunday Times article is legit?

https://twitter.com/johnharris1969/status/1241632642581303296/photo/1 (https://twitter.com/johnharris1969/status/1241632642581303296/photo/1)


It does seem to be legit but hard to corroborate atm. It’ll be interesting to see how it develops.

It doesnt seem legit, but even if it was said who cares.
Pretty sure there will have been many theories, suggestions and morally questionable ideas as there should be in this situation to work out what they believe is best.
People love to demonize that guy though!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 22, 2020, 04:16:03 PM

and now for something a bit different..does anyone have insight on whether this supposedly Sunday Times article is legit?

https://twitter.com/johnharris1969/status/1241632642581303296/photo/1 (https://twitter.com/johnharris1969/status/1241632642581303296/photo/1)


It does seem to be legit but hard to corroborate atm. It’ll be interesting to see how it develops.

It’s almost like you are hoping it to be true so you can find another reason to pile in on the Tories...


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 22, 2020, 04:18:34 PM

and now for something a bit different..does anyone have insight on whether this supposedly Sunday Times article is legit?

https://twitter.com/johnharris1969/status/1241632642581303296/photo/1 (https://twitter.com/johnharris1969/status/1241632642581303296/photo/1)


It does seem to be legit but hard to corroborate atm. It’ll be interesting to see how it develops.

It doesnt seem legit, but even if it was said who cares.
Pretty sure there will have been many theories, suggestions and morally questionable ideas as there should be in this situation to work out what they believe is best.
People love to demonize that guy though!

There doesn’t seem to be any real doubt that it’s legit, it’s written by a massive Tory fanboy, who is backtracking fast.

 https://twitter.com/paddybriggs/status/1241651746486857729?s=21 (https://twitter.com/paddybriggs/status/1241651746486857729?s=21)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 22, 2020, 04:47:20 PM
So many people completely ignoring guidelines and going to parks etc. in large close groups. Apparently even the beaches are busy.

Basically they see what the rules are and then figure out a way around them. Numerous reports of street parties as well because aren't allowed to the pub on such a lovely day.

I can see a complete lock down coming very soon as the defiant public really leave no choice. Obviously means the army will be out at some point to help which people will moan about but what option have they given?

Will be interesting to see if they still allow people to go to work or if it's a complete closure.

We've been looking at projects that we can carry out whilst maintaining the social distancing guidelines and there's plenty in our line of work.

The longer they can SAFELY keep people working the better. The fewer people that have to be paid the 80% out of government coffers the longer it will last and the easier it will be for us all to pay back one day......



I went for a run in the park late morning, and it was very quiet for a Sunday morning on a nice day.   There were a handful of idiots walking 3 abreast on a path that can fit 3 abreast, but the vast majority were keeping away from each other.

I went to Tesco this afternoon and it was also very quiet for a Sunday afternoon.  Guess all the hoarders were queueing outside at 9.30.

I haven't seen any street parties or seen reports of any.

Did see a couple of weapons racing motorbikes and doing wheelies yesterday.  I thought you want to go to an A&E at this time?

I don't know how common this is, but my niece is a hospital dentist and  is retraing to work in A&E.   I expect there is quite a bit of commonality as  they do have to do stitches etc.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 22, 2020, 05:41:14 PM
I went up to Wollaton Park GC and played nine holes with a mate but it was pretty quiet on the course with only 15/20 cars in the car park.

I expected it to be far busier as one of the few places where you can safely get excercise and play your favourite spot/hobby.

The bar and catering are obviously closed but as long as none of the greens staff get sick hopefully things will be okay for a while.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 22, 2020, 06:03:35 PM
28 year old football player and some of these younger people thinking its only effects the elderly


https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51995137


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 22, 2020, 06:05:44 PM
Surprised Fellaini has caught it, when he has been greeting people with his elbows for years.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 22, 2020, 06:06:02 PM
It's kind of endearing the amount of faith Boris has in the great British public doing the right thing.

It's completely misplaced of course.

Piers Morgan for PM!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 22, 2020, 06:35:28 PM
I went up to Wollaton Park GC and played nine holes with a mate but it was pretty quiet on the course with only 15/20 cars in the car park.

I expected it to be far busier as one of the few places where you can safely get excercise and play your favourite spot/hobby.

The bar and catering are obviously closed but as long as none of the greens staff get sick hopefully things will be okay for a while.

I only heard it through a friend but apparently wollaton park was packed yesterday especially the kids play park area.

It wasn't as bad today because they've closed off the car parks to try to keep numbers down and also posted signs about social distancing.

If people can just obey that 2m rule there's probably no need for a complete lock down. Golf is a great example of a sport that is perfectly safe if played sensibly as you can go above and beyond the 2m rule very easily.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 22, 2020, 06:37:02 PM
I went up to Wollaton Park GC and played nine holes with a mate but it was pretty quiet on the course with only 15/20 cars in the car park.

I expected it to be far busier as one of the few places where you can safely get excercise and play your favourite spot/hobby.

The bar and catering are obviously closed but as long as none of the greens staff get sick hopefully things will be okay for a while.

I only heard it through a friend but apparently wollaton park was packed yesterday especially the kids play park area.

It wasn't as bad today because they've closed off the car parks to try to keep numbers down and also posted signs about social distancing.

If people can just obey that 2m rule there's probably no need for a complete lock down. Golf is a great example of a sport that is perfectly safe if played sensibly as you can go above and beyond the 2m rule very easily.



Confirmed, a pic popped up on a local FB group showing exactly that there.....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 22, 2020, 06:39:30 PM
So many people completely ignoring guidelines and going to parks etc. in large close groups. Apparently even the beaches are busy.

Basically they see what the rules are and then figure out a way around them. Numerous reports of street parties as well because aren't allowed to the pub on such a lovely day.

I can see a complete lock down coming very soon as the defiant public really leave no choice. Obviously means the army will be out at some point to help which people will moan about but what option have they given?

Will be interesting to see if they still allow people to go to work or if it's a complete closure.

We've been looking at projects that we can carry out whilst maintaining the social distancing guidelines and there's plenty in our line of work.

The longer they can SAFELY keep people working the better. The fewer people that have to be paid the 80% out of government coffers the longer it will last and the easier it will be for us all to pay back one day......



I went for a run in the park late morning, and it was very quiet for a Sunday morning on a nice day.   There were a handful of idiots walking 3 abreast on a path that can fit 3 abreast, but the vast majority were keeping away from each other.

I went to Tesco this afternoon and it was also very quiet for a Sunday afternoon.  Guess all the hoarders were queueing outside at 9.30.

I haven't seen any street parties or seen reports of any.

Did see a couple of weapons racing motorbikes and doing wheelies yesterday.  I thought you want to go to an A&E at this time?

I don't know how common this is, but my niece is a hospital dentist and  is retraing to work in A&E.   I expect there is quite a bit of commonality as  they do have to do stitches etc.

Street gatherings rather than parties. They didn't have the balloons and banners out :)

Just people who would normally go to the pub on a glorious day like today has been. First chance to sit outside and get a few beers down.

Alternative is to get a few mates together, stick a few tables out and crack open a couple of 24 packs from Tesco


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 22, 2020, 06:49:46 PM
Boris is leading the most right wing fascist Government in our history. Disgraceful.

Ooh there's a virus.

We want curfews


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Pokerpops on March 22, 2020, 06:50:42 PM
I went up to Wollaton Park GC and played nine holes with a mate but it was pretty quiet on the course with only 15/20 cars in the car park.

I expected it to be far busier as one of the few places where you can safely get excercise and play your favourite spot/hobby.

The bar and catering are obviously closed but as long as none of the greens staff get sick hopefully things will be okay for a while.

I only heard it through a friend but apparently wollaton park was packed yesterday especially the kids play park area.

It wasn't as bad today because they've closed off the car parks to try to keep numbers down and also posted signs about social distancing.

If people can just obey that 2m rule there's probably no need for a complete lock down. Golf is a great example of a sport that is perfectly safe if played sensibly as you can go above and beyond the 2m rule very easily.



Golf, the game where friends walk together with only the width of the fairway between them...


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 22, 2020, 07:16:29 PM
I went up to Wollaton Park GC and played nine holes with a mate but it was pretty quiet on the course with only 15/20 cars in the car park.

I expected it to be far busier as one of the few places where you can safely get excercise and play your favourite spot/hobby.

The bar and catering are obviously closed but as long as none of the greens staff get sick hopefully things will be okay for a while.

I only heard it through a friend but apparently wollaton park was packed yesterday especially the kids play park area.

It wasn't as bad today because they've closed off the car parks to try to keep numbers down and also posted signs about social distancing.

If people can just obey that 2m rule there's probably no need for a complete lock down. Golf is a great example of a sport that is perfectly safe if played sensibly as you can go above and beyond the 2m rule very easily.



Golf, the game where friends walk together with only the width of the fairway between them...

One of my absolute best golfing mates who I've been playing with for over twenty years today texted me re. golf this week to say that he's "knocking golf on the head until this crisis comes to an end". He only lives a mile or so from the golf club but he is a haemophiliac, and at 78 just a little older than the rest of our gang so I'm not going to try and convince the obstinate old bugger to change his mind.

I'll miss his company on the course though.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RED-DOG on March 22, 2020, 07:17:06 PM
Surprised Fellaini has caught it, when he has been greeting people with his elbows for years.


Deserves more love.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 22, 2020, 08:03:28 PM
I went up to Wollaton Park GC and played nine holes with a mate but it was pretty quiet on the course with only 15/20 cars in the car park.

I expected it to be far busier as one of the few places where you can safely get excercise and play your favourite spot/hobby.

The bar and catering are obviously closed but as long as none of the greens staff get sick hopefully things will be okay for a while.

I only heard it through a friend but apparently wollaton park was packed yesterday especially the kids play park area.

It wasn't as bad today because they've closed off the car parks to try to keep numbers down and also posted signs about social distancing.

If people can just obey that 2m rule there's probably no need for a complete lock down. Golf is a great example of a sport that is perfectly safe if played sensibly as you can go above and beyond the 2m rule very easily.



Golf, the game where friends walk together with only the width of the fairway between them...

One of my absolute best golfing mates who I've been playing with for over twenty years today texted me re. golf this week to say that he's "knocking golf on the head until this crisis comes to an end". He only lives a mile or so from the golf club but he is a haemophiliac, and at 78 just a little older than the rest of our gang so I'm not going to try and convince the obstinate old bugger to change his mind.

I'll miss his company on the course though.

Given the new rules being talked about today I don't think he's going to have a choice. I assume that he will fall in to the 1.5M most vulnerable so he's about to get a letter saying to stay at home.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 22, 2020, 08:17:10 PM
I went up to Wollaton Park GC and played nine holes with a mate but it was pretty quiet on the course with only 15/20 cars in the car park.

I expected it to be far busier as one of the few places where you can safely get excercise and play your favourite spot/hobby.

The bar and catering are obviously closed but as long as none of the greens staff get sick hopefully things will be okay for a while.

I only heard it through a friend but apparently wollaton park was packed yesterday especially the kids play park area.

It wasn't as bad today because they've closed off the car parks to try to keep numbers down and also posted signs about social distancing.

If people can just obey that 2m rule there's probably no need for a complete lock down. Golf is a great example of a sport that is perfectly safe if played sensibly as you can go above and beyond the 2m rule very easily.



Golf, the game where friends walk together with only the width of the fairway between them...

One of my absolute best golfing mates who I've been playing with for over twenty years today texted me re. golf this week to say that he's "knocking golf on the head until this crisis comes to an end". He only lives a mile or so from the golf club but he is a haemophiliac, and at 78 just a little older than the rest of our gang so I'm not going to try and convince the obstinate old bugger to change his mind.

I'll miss his company on the course though.

Given the new rules being talked about today I don't think he's going to have a choice. I assume that he will fall in to the 1.5M most vulnerable so he's about to get a letter saying to stay at home.



i have funny feeling if i was in England i would be in that 1.5m. I dont want to have to rely on others to pick up a loaf of bread when there is a limit on items people can buy from certain shops they can only pick up so many loafs and pints etc. And the local houses round me the majority of people have the elderly in them many one their own without broadband and smart phones


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: jakally on March 22, 2020, 08:18:00 PM

If people can just obey that 2m rule there's probably no need for a complete lock down. Golf is a great example of a sport that is perfectly safe if played sensibly as you can go above and beyond the 2m rule very easily.


If a family who live in the same house go out for the day, there's no sense in them applying the 2m rule between themselves. Therefore at least a chunk of the people out on walks / at the beach etc.. , even though they are seemingly ignoring social distancing, are not really doing anything risky.
Problem is, no real way of knowing who that applies to & who it doesn't.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 22, 2020, 08:33:34 PM

If people can just obey that 2m rule there's probably no need for a complete lock down. Golf is a great example of a sport that is perfectly safe if played sensibly as you can go above and beyond the 2m rule very easily.


If a family who live in the same house go out for the day, there's no sense in them applying the 2m rule between themselves. Therefore at least a chunk of the people out on walks / at the beach etc.. , even though they are seemingly ignoring social distancing, are not really doing anything risky.
Problem is, no real way of knowing who that applies to & who it doesn't.

Good point. I've seen quite a few couples walking round arm in arm and there clearly isn't any issue with that at all.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: aaron1867 on March 22, 2020, 08:38:20 PM
It's somewhat amusing to see folk who didn't chose not to vote Labour because of Corbyn beg for a socialist Britain. Even amusing to see those Pub and Club owners who told us how prices would go down because of leaving the EU, see their business go to the wall.

Weirdly, Boris hasn't deal with this all as bad as I thought he would. But the problem is that he's always a couple of days beind with the measures the government announce and they really should some sort of higher allowance for self employed. But the self employed can't have their cake and eat it, but £94 isn't acceptable for anyone to live on.

But the grants and loans system is open to abuse, sadly.

PS - It's time for total shutdown (apart from the supermarkets).


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RickBFA on March 22, 2020, 09:13:08 PM
It's somewhat amusing to see folk who didn't chose not to vote Labour because of Corbyn beg for a socialist Britain. Even amusing to see those Pub and Club owners who told us how prices would go down because of leaving the EU, see their business go to the wall.

Weirdly, Boris hasn't deal with this all as bad as I thought he would. But the problem is that he's always a couple of days beind with the measures the government announce and they really should some sort of higher allowance for self employed. But the self employed can't have their cake and eat it, but £94 isn't acceptable for anyone to live on.

But the grants and loans system is open to abuse, sadly.

PS - It's time for total shutdown (apart from the supermarkets).

Why would businesses going bust be amusing?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 22, 2020, 09:19:35 PM
It's somewhat amusing to see folk who didn't chose not to vote Labour because of Corbyn beg for a socialist Britain. ...

Also wouldn't a socialist Britain be the Government buying the companies and running them rather than getting grants, loans and tax relief so they could keep them in private hands?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: aaron1867 on March 22, 2020, 09:34:50 PM
It's somewhat amusing to see folk who didn't chose not to vote Labour because of Corbyn beg for a socialist Britain. Even amusing to see those Pub and Club owners who told us how prices would go down because of leaving the EU, see their business go to the wall.

Weirdly, Boris hasn't deal with this all as bad as I thought he would. But the problem is that he's always a couple of days beind with the measures the government announce and they really should some sort of higher allowance for self employed. But the self employed can't have their cake and eat it, but £94 isn't acceptable for anyone to live on.

But the grants and loans system is open to abuse, sadly.

PS - It's time for total shutdown (apart from the supermarkets).

Why would businesses going bust be amusing?

Those who do wrong things.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: booder on March 22, 2020, 09:40:52 PM
Surprised Fellaini has caught it, when he has been greeting people with his elbows for years.


Deserves more love.

Made me lol


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: DungBeetle on March 22, 2020, 09:41:07 PM
It's somewhat amusing to see folk who didn't chose not to vote Labour because of Corbyn beg for a socialist Britain. Even amusing to see those Pub and Club owners who told us how prices would go down because of leaving the EU, see their business go to the wall.

Weirdly, Boris hasn't deal with this all as bad as I thought he would. But the problem is that he's always a couple of days beind with the measures the government announce and they really should some sort of higher allowance for self employed. But the self employed can't have their cake and eat it, but £94 isn't acceptable for anyone to live on.

But the grants and loans system is open to abuse, sadly.

PS - It's time for total shutdown (apart from the supermarkets).

Why would businesses going bust be amusing?

Those who do wrong things.

Wrong things as in not voting Labour?   What a strange outlook you have.   Still have a good laugh about people losing their livelihood.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 23, 2020, 09:39:58 AM
For anyone who is interested in this from a business point of view, still no news on how to actually access the Business Interruption Loan's promised by the Government.

It is all good making these announcements, but if the actual money isn't available soon it is going to be too late for some companies.

Gets released on Monday

Still no news on this, and you best not furlough anyone..... as it doesn't exist in UK Law.

 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 23, 2020, 10:09:23 AM
For anyone who is interested in this from a business point of view, still no news on how to actually access the Business Interruption Loan's promised by the Government.

It is all good making these announcements, but if the actual money isn't available soon it is going to be too late for some companies.

Gets released on Monday

Still no news on this, and you best not furlough anyone..... as it doesn't exist in UK Law.


Good luck getting this resolved. I understand legal action will soon be instigated directly applicable to people in your situation, it might lead to something actually being done rather than impressive sounding talk 🤞



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 23, 2020, 11:10:03 AM
For anyone who is interested in this from a business point of view, still no news on how to actually access the Business Interruption Loan's promised by the Government.

It is all good making these announcements, but if the actual money isn't available soon it is going to be too late for some companies.

Gets released on Monday

Still no news on this, and you best not furlough anyone..... as it doesn't exist in UK Law.


Good luck getting this resolved. I understand legal action will soon be instigated directly applicable to people in your situation, it might lead to something actually being done rather than impressive sounding talk 🤞



.. but aren't we having real issues keeping courts open right now?  Don't we give them until the end of Monday at least?  Surely these things can't be banged out in 5 minutes, and if they are there are going to be gaps/mistakes?

 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 23, 2020, 11:19:19 AM
For anyone who is interested in this from a business point of view, still no news on how to actually access the Business Interruption Loan's promised by the Government.

It is all good making these announcements, but if the actual money isn't available soon it is going to be too late for some companies.

Gets released on Monday

Still no news on this, and you best not furlough anyone..... as it doesn't exist in UK Law.


Good luck getting this resolved. I understand legal action will soon be instigated directly applicable to people in your situation, it might lead to something actually being done rather than impressive sounding talk 🤞



.. but aren't we having real issues keeping courts open right now?  Don't we give them until the end of Monday at least?  Surely these things can't be banged out in 5 minutes, and if they are there are going to be gaps/mistakes?
 

I can see both sides of it and I wouldn’t doubt it’s more sabre rattling than anything which of course in itself if questionable atm. Business owners are desperate though and the government should be held to their own deadlines/commitments, if you can’t do it, don’t say it. Anything that promotes action on this has some upside imo.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Pokerpops on March 23, 2020, 11:57:50 AM
For anyone who is interested in this from a business point of view, still no news on how to actually access the Business Interruption Loan's promised by the Government.

It is all good making these announcements, but if the actual money isn't available soon it is going to be too late for some companies.

Gets released on Monday

Still no news on this, and you best not furlough anyone..... as it doesn't exist in UK Law.


Good luck getting this resolved. I understand legal action will soon be instigated directly applicable to people in your situation, it might lead to something actually being done rather than impressive sounding talk 🤞



.. but aren't we having real issues keeping courts open right now?  Don't we give them until the end of Monday at least?  Surely these things can't be banged out in 5 minutes, and if they are there are going to be gaps/mistakes?
 

I can see both sides of it and I wouldn’t doubt it’s more sabre rattling than anything which of course in itself if questionable atm. Business owners are desperate though and the government should be held to their own deadlines/commitments, if you can’t do it, don’t say it. Anything that promotes action on this has some upside imo.

I don’t think you can see both sides of any argument.

The measures on SSP and on wage subsidy that have been introduced are substantial and far-reaching. It has to take time to establish a framework for approving applications and paying out money. Announcing it as soon as you have committed to it makes people feel better about the overall situation. Waiting the extra days till it is fully embedded loses that factor.

The loans, business rates and tax deferral schemes are all in place.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-to-employers-and-businesses-about-covid-19/covid-19-support-for-businesses#support-for-businesses-through-the-coronavirus-business-interruption-loan-scheme


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 23, 2020, 12:17:46 PM
For anyone who is interested in this from a business point of view, still no news on how to actually access the Business Interruption Loan's promised by the Government.

It is all good making these announcements, but if the actual money isn't available soon it is going to be too late for some companies.

Gets released on Monday

Still no news on this, and you best not furlough anyone..... as it doesn't exist in UK Law.


Good luck getting this resolved. I understand legal action will soon be instigated directly applicable to people in your situation, it might lead to something actually being done rather than impressive sounding talk 🤞



.. but aren't we having real issues keeping courts open right now?  Don't we give them until the end of Monday at least?  Surely these things can't be banged out in 5 minutes, and if they are there are going to be gaps/mistakes?

 

I understand that these things take time.
I just think they could be a little more transparent with the operational side of these things.

I have to talk to 90 people at 2pm who all think that we have loans and grants ready to go.
We're lucky that we have about another 10 days before we run out of money so I can keep them all calm and reassured.

Realistically we have nothing confirmed and if it doesn't happen soon then I wont be able to continue my part in this ensuring that my workforce are not in a dire situation.

It just a difficult balance.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 23, 2020, 12:19:54 PM
For anyone who is interested in this from a business point of view, still no news on how to actually access the Business Interruption Loan's promised by the Government.

It is all good making these announcements, but if the actual money isn't available soon it is going to be too late for some companies.

Gets released on Monday

Still no news on this, and you best not furlough anyone..... as it doesn't exist in UK Law.


Good luck getting this resolved. I understand legal action will soon be instigated directly applicable to people in your situation, it might lead to something actually being done rather than impressive sounding talk 🤞



.. but aren't we having real issues keeping courts open right now?  Don't we give them until the end of Monday at least?  Surely these things can't be banged out in 5 minutes, and if they are there are going to be gaps/mistakes?
 

I can see both sides of it and I wouldn’t doubt it’s more sabre rattling than anything which of course in itself if questionable atm. Business owners are desperate though and the government should be held to their own deadlines/commitments, if you can’t do it, don’t say it. Anything that promotes action on this has some upside imo.

I don’t think you can see both sides of any argument.

The measures on SSP and on wage subsidy that have been introduced are substantial and far-reaching. It has to take time to establish a framework for approving applications and paying out money. Announcing it as soon as you have committed to it makes people feel better about the overall situation. Waiting the extra days till it is fully embedded loses that factor.

The loans, business rates and tax deferral schemes are all in place.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-to-employers-and-businesses-about-covid-19/covid-19-support-for-businesses#support-for-businesses-through-the-coronavirus-business-interruption-loan-scheme


The loan framework may be in place at Government level, but at Relationship Director level in Corporate Banking they have no indication of how it will work or when they can accept applications.
Speaking to both customers and suppliers this is across the board still this morning.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 23, 2020, 12:43:10 PM
For anyone who is interested in this from a business point of view, still no news on how to actually access the Business Interruption Loan's promised by the Government.

It is all good making these announcements, but if the actual money isn't available soon it is going to be too late for some companies.

Gets released on Monday

Still no news on this, and you best not furlough anyone..... as it doesn't exist in UK Law.


Good luck getting this resolved. I understand legal action will soon be instigated directly applicable to people in your situation, it might lead to something actually being done rather than impressive sounding talk 🤞



.. but aren't we having real issues keeping courts open right now?  Don't we give them until the end of Monday at least?  Surely these things can't be banged out in 5 minutes, and if they are there are going to be gaps/mistakes?
 

I can see both sides of it and I wouldn’t doubt it’s more sabre rattling than anything which of course in itself if questionable atm. Business owners are desperate though and the government should be held to their own deadlines/commitments, if you can’t do it, don’t say it. Anything that promotes action on this has some upside imo.

I don’t think you can see both sides of any argument.

The measures on SSP and on wage subsidy that have been introduced are substantial and far-reaching. It has to take time to establish a framework for approving applications and paying out money. Announcing it as soon as you have committed to it makes people feel better about the overall situation. Waiting the extra days till it is fully embedded loses that factor.

The loans, business rates and tax deferral schemes are all in place.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-to-employers-and-businesses-about-covid-19/covid-19-support-for-businesses#support-for-businesses-through-the-coronavirus-business-interruption-loan-scheme


I would feel under qualified to ever comment on anything unless I felt confidently I could see both sides (or more), it’s like a basic level of properly understanding anything, understanding it from as many perspectives as possible.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 23, 2020, 05:06:42 PM
.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 23, 2020, 06:23:46 PM
PM addressing the nation at 8.30pm, lockdown imminent......


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 23, 2020, 06:39:31 PM
PM addressing the nation at 8.30pm, lockdown imminent......


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/23/this-is-not-a-film-italian-mayors-rage-coronavirus-lockdown-dodgers (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/23/this-is-not-a-film-italian-mayors-rage-coronavirus-lockdown-dodgers)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 23, 2020, 06:46:41 PM
italian cops not messing about

https://www.facebook.com/alanbuctowtruck/videos/3647576721951663/?__tn__=%2CdCH-R-R&eid=ARC7oBmLLXSN40RIrdHfdYflEMp4LAQCrccWTsKSmkB78JSvU82CryAElBehA94wLlth8dQSokbQ0qp_&hc_ref=ARTUU-ak7QGwgRRAj0AfiqIeACG5OySpFew2KdXkcD8FkiJZg8JgYY54eazR9xd4fwo&fref=nf


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 23, 2020, 06:59:48 PM
italian cops not messing about

https://www.facebook.com/alanbuctowtruck/videos/3647576721951663/?__tn__=%2CdCH-R-R&eid=ARC7oBmLLXSN40RIrdHfdYflEMp4LAQCrccWTsKSmkB78JSvU82CryAElBehA94wLlth8dQSokbQ0qp_&hc_ref=ARTUU-ak7QGwgRRAj0AfiqIeACG5OySpFew2KdXkcD8FkiJZg8JgYY54eazR9xd4fwo&fref=nf

Read somewhere that's from Brazil two years ago, but no idea if that's correct.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 23, 2020, 07:05:12 PM
PM addressing the nation at 8.30pm, lockdown imminent......

Going to be a serious lock down i think given the cobra meeting overrun so long.  Must have been some lively discussions in the cabinet about how hard the hammer has to be dropped on the British public.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 23, 2020, 07:17:16 PM
Can we not have videos from Facebook in here, Iron. I get enough of that in my whatsapp and messenger :D

PM addressing the nation at 8.30pm, lockdown imminent......

Going to be a serious lock down i think given the cobra meeting overrun so long.  Must have been some lively discussions in the cabinet about how hard the hammer has to be dropped on the British public.

Very hard, because most of them are fucking idiots.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 23, 2020, 08:16:00 PM
italian cops not messing about

https://www.facebook.com/alanbuctowtruck/videos/3647576721951663/?__tn__=%2CdCH-R-R&eid=ARC7oBmLLXSN40RIrdHfdYflEMp4LAQCrccWTsKSmkB78JSvU82CryAElBehA94wLlth8dQSokbQ0qp_&hc_ref=ARTUU-ak7QGwgRRAj0AfiqIeACG5OySpFew2KdXkcD8FkiJZg8JgYY54eazR9xd4fwo&fref=nf

Read somewhere that's from Brazil two years ago, but no idea if that's correct.

you are probably right


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 23, 2020, 08:30:11 PM
This is quite fun

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feGHmv_eDcw


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 23, 2020, 09:40:59 PM
.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RickBFA on March 23, 2020, 10:49:56 PM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51963486

This seems a very good summary of why there are no easy ways out of this in short term.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: bagel on March 23, 2020, 11:37:09 PM

    finally some good news for the self employed, which is a relief

80% of net  monthly earnings to be paid , taken as an average from last 3 years

or £2947 whichever is lower




Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 24, 2020, 12:16:48 AM
That's handy to know, as I've had to take a 50% paycut on what I invoice my brokers for cases.

That's if I'm as busy as I have been so far this year, which is unknown territory...


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 24, 2020, 12:20:07 AM
Damn. Wollaton Park golf club is closed until further notice after the PM's statement earlier.

Shit just got real(er).



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 24, 2020, 12:23:20 AM
All this stuff is the right thing to do, but if you thought austerity was bad we as a country are going to be skint as fk for a decade at least..........anyone bitching about that in a couple of years and blaming it on the Tories is straight up a fking arsehole because there will be those usual pricks doing that.....


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 24, 2020, 12:30:32 AM
All this stuff is the right thing to do, but if you thought austerity was bad we as a country are going to be skint as fk for a decade at least..........anyone bitching about that in a couple of years and blaming it on the Tories is straight up a fking arsehole because there will be those usual pricks doing that.....

Anyone moaning once we get out the otherside of this, wants whipping with a wet towel.

Think there should be some scales for the handouts. I can probably scrape by on 1/2 salary for a few months, and won't hopefully won't need to bother asking for them.

Just sack Vegas off and my 40th trip. Shit happens, and not worth worrying about in the scheme of things.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: aaron1867 on March 24, 2020, 12:42:37 AM
This lockdown has come just too late and probably see supermarkets have their busiest day tomorrow. There still needs more to be done because there are still people not getting the message.

I had nipped into town today to get the essentials, the mission to get there and get straight back. Jumped on a almost empty bus and only two people on the lower deck, I didn't want to risk it so I sat upstairs where there was one more person. I sat in the middle, probably 6-8m away. Two women get on, they get on the upper deck too. They get to the top and I assume they're going to sit inbetween the front and the middle, probably 3m+ away from me and the other bloke. Nope, they going and plonk themselves on the sits beside the other bloke.

You get through town and still people don't listen. People are still queuing within 1m or even close of each other.

Shopping completed, back on the bus.

Here we are again, individuals putting themselve in danger. A woman sat bang on the front about 1.5m-2m away from the driver instead of out of harms way in other parts an almost empty bus. 10 people get on and off that bus and all have to walk past her. Stupidity.

Look at over countries, they aren't stockpiling. They are queuing and distancing like heroes. We are not.

I think there is every chance we will face it just as bad, if not worse, as Italy.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 24, 2020, 12:43:21 AM
All this stuff is the right thing to do, but if you thought austerity was bad we as a country are going to be skint as fk for a decade at least..........anyone bitching about that in a couple of years and blaming it on the Tories is straight up a fking arsehole because there will be those usual pricks doing that.....

Anyone moaning once we get out the otherside of this, wants whipping with a wet towel.

Think there should be some scales for the handouts. I can probably scrape by on 1/2 salary for a few months, and won't hopefully won't need to bother asking for them.

Just sack Vegas off and my 40th trip. Shit happens, and not worth worrying about in the scheme of things.

They will be there spouting their usual bollox mate......I’ll join your towel whipping army, no danger there, can you reserve Kuku’s arse for me to personally whip please?  rotflmfao

40? Call!  rotflmfao


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 24, 2020, 12:46:28 AM
This lockdown has come just too late and probably see supermarkets have their busiest day tomorrow. There still needs more to be done because there are still people not getting the message.

I had nipped into town today to get the essentials, the mission to get there and get straight back. Jumped on a almost empty bus and only two people on the lower deck, I didn't want to risk it so I sat upstairs where there was one more person. I sat in the middle, probably 6-8m away. Two women get on, they get on the upper deck too. They get to the top and I assume they're going to sit inbetween the front and the middle, probably 3m+ away from me and the other bloke. Nope, they going and plonk themselves on the sits beside the other bloke.

You get through town and still people don't listen. People are still queuing within 1m or even close of each other.

Shopping completed, back on the bus.

Here we are again, individuals putting themselve in danger. A woman sat bang on the front about 1.5m-2m away from the driver instead of out of harms way in other parts an almost empty bus. 10 people get on and off that bus and all have to walk past her. Stupidity.

Look at over countries, they aren't stockpiling. They are queuing and distancing like heroes. We are not.

I think there is every chance we will face it just as bad, if not worse, as Italy.

Another expert who knows the future...... rotflmfao

I do however acknowledge some people being irresponsible pricks.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: aaron1867 on March 24, 2020, 12:48:53 AM
This lockdown has come just too late and probably see supermarkets have their busiest day tomorrow. There still needs more to be done because there are still people not getting the message.

I had nipped into town today to get the essentials, the mission to get there and get straight back. Jumped on a almost empty bus and only two people on the lower deck, I didn't want to risk it so I sat upstairs where there was one more person. I sat in the middle, probably 6-8m away. Two women get on, they get on the upper deck too. They get to the top and I assume they're going to sit inbetween the front and the middle, probably 3m+ away from me and the other bloke. Nope, they going and plonk themselves on the sits beside the other bloke.

You get through town and still people don't listen. People are still queuing within 1m or even close of each other.

Shopping completed, back on the bus.

Here we are again, individuals putting themselve in danger. A woman sat bang on the front about 1.5m-2m away from the driver instead of out of harms way in other parts an almost empty bus. 10 people get on and off that bus and all have to walk past her. Stupidity.

Look at over countries, they aren't stockpiling. They are queuing and distancing like heroes. We are not.

I think there is every chance we will face it just as bad, if not worse, as Italy.

Another expert who knows the future...... rotflmfao

I do however acknowledge some people being irresponsible pricks.

Hardly. I like some of the stuff Boris has done. But this lockdown should have been implemented at the weekend. That would surely have been the best idea?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 24, 2020, 12:50:36 AM
He gave the public a chance to try doing things sensibly without draconian measures. They had a couple days, and it didn't work. Not going to give him a black mark for that.


All this stuff is the right thing to do, but if you thought austerity was bad we as a country are going to be skint as fk for a decade at least..........anyone bitching about that in a couple of years and blaming it on the Tories is straight up a fking arsehole because there will be those usual pricks doing that.....

Anyone moaning once we get out the otherside of this, wants whipping with a wet towel.

Think there should be some scales for the handouts. I can probably scrape by on 1/2 salary for a few months, and won't hopefully won't need to bother asking for them.

Just sack Vegas off and my 40th trip. Shit happens, and not worth worrying about in the scheme of things.

They will be there spouting their usual bollox mate......I’ll join your towel whipping army, no danger there, can you reserve Kuku’s arse for me to personally whip please?  rotflmfao

40? Call!  rotflmfao

I was bald not long after I left the forces at ~23, lol... What can I say, I had a tough paper round ;D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: aaron1867 on March 24, 2020, 01:05:21 AM
Mark, we probably don't know what sensible is until after aall this has finished. But he's seen the figures from around the world and we still had thousands of cases then, add on we are a country of weekenders, he probably should have closed the nation down on Friday imo.

As I said in a previous post, I'm actually impressed with what Boris has done and I despise him. Impressive what he has done with financial support, NHS help and cre for the most vulnerable. Some of the measures are just too slow out of the blocks. The lockdown should, imo, should have come on Friday and we still await help for the self employed

Basically good ideas - Just a little too slow.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 24, 2020, 01:08:03 AM
This lockdown has come just too late and probably see supermarkets have their busiest day tomorrow. There still needs more to be done because there are still people not getting the message.

I had nipped into town today to get the essentials, the mission to get there and get straight back. Jumped on a almost empty bus and only two people on the lower deck, I didn't want to risk it so I sat upstairs where there was one more person. I sat in the middle, probably 6-8m away. Two women get on, they get on the upper deck too. They get to the top and I assume they're going to sit inbetween the front and the middle, probably 3m+ away from me and the other bloke. Nope, they going and plonk themselves on the sits beside the other bloke.

You get through town and still people don't listen. People are still queuing within 1m or even close of each other.

Shopping completed, back on the bus.

Here we are again, individuals putting themselve in danger. A woman sat bang on the front about 1.5m-2m away from the driver instead of out of harms way in other parts an almost empty bus. 10 people get on and off that bus and all have to walk past her. Stupidity.

Look at over countries, they aren't stockpiling. They are queuing and distancing like heroes. We are not.

I think there is every chance we will face it just as bad, if not worse, as Italy.

Another expert who knows the future...... rotflmfao

I do however acknowledge some people being irresponsible pricks.

Hardly. I like some of the stuff Boris has done. But this lockdown should have been implemented at the weekend. That would surely have been the best idea?

You know shit......this was clearly advised by experts in  this field at this specific time......stop pretending you know better you don’t.......


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 24, 2020, 01:12:33 AM
Mark, we probably don't know what sensible is until after aall this has finished. But he's seen the figures from around the world and we still had thousands of cases then, add on we are a country of weekenders, he probably should have closed the nation down on Friday imo.

As I said in a previous post, I'm actually impressed with what Boris has done and I despise him. Impressive what he has done with financial support, NHS help and cre for the most vulnerable. Some of the measures are just too slow out of the blocks. The lockdown should, imo, should have come on Friday and we still await help for the self employed

Basically good ideas - Just a little too slow.

We don't, but they are better placed to than us. They thought they could try implementing measures without full lockdown.

After a couple days, that wasn't working, and they have switched to implementing full lockdown. All well and good saying 'should have done that from the start'.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 24, 2020, 06:49:53 AM

    finally some good news for the self employed, which is a relief

80% of net  monthly earnings to be paid , taken as an average from last 3 years

or £2947 whichever is lower




Is this confirmed?

Any links as would like to share if true.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 24, 2020, 06:52:46 AM
Mark, we probably don't know what sensible is until after aall this has finished. But he's seen the figures from around the world and we still had thousands of cases then, add on we are a country of weekenders, he probably should have closed the nation down on Friday imo.

As I said in a previous post, I'm actually impressed with what Boris has done and I despise him. Impressive what he has done with financial support, NHS help and cre for the most vulnerable. Some of the measures are just too slow out of the blocks. The lockdown should, imo, should have come on Friday and we still await help for the self employed

Basically good ideas - Just a little too slow.

We don't, but they are better placed to than us. They thought they could try implementing measures without full lockdown.

After a couple days, that wasn't working, and they have switched to implementing full lockdown. All well and good saying 'should have done that from the start'.



One thing we did know was that people were going to go to the pub and people were going to be stupid at the weekend.

Brits are going to Brit  :D



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 24, 2020, 07:02:13 AM
This lockdown has come just too late and probably see supermarkets have their busiest day tomorrow. There still needs more to be done because there are still people not getting the message.

...

You get through town and still people don't listen. People are still queuing within 1m or even close of each other.

...

Look at over countries, they aren't stockpiling. They are queuing and distancing like heroes. We are not.

I think there is every chance we will face it just as bad, if not worse, as Italy.

Yes but, the end of your statement is a bit iffy.

Just yesterday there was an article about how every country in Europe is struggling to enforce lockdown measures.

On Sunday just in Brussels they gave out 288 fines for not complying, in France they're using drones to try and get to grips with it; when Italy was in an earlier stage of compulsory lockdown there were many stories of how it was being flouted and pictures of supermarkets with massive crowds just outside the entrance.

Yes they are doing better at not stockpiling but part of the reason why a compulsory lockdown is not something you should jump too quickly into is that the general view is that even if it results in a higher compliance rate it doesn't necessarily give you a statistically significant higher rate.

This does possibly start with the assumption that a higher level of compliance to the requested version than was pretty certainly the case here but, unless you already have an authoritarian state with the means to absolutely control everything, the idea that a lockdown fixes the issue is optimistic at best.

So basically, fingers crossed that this does make a difference and that the gap between request and command in the UK is higher than they would usually expect.

NB: should also note that the non-compliance in Europe is even more stark given they have a stricter form of lockdown as well (such as needing an exemption certificate to show the police if you're outside).


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Cf on March 24, 2020, 07:48:15 AM
Mark, we probably don't know what sensible is until after aall this has finished. But he's seen the figures from around the world and we still had thousands of cases then, add on we are a country of weekenders, he probably should have closed the nation down on Friday imo.

As I said in a previous post, I'm actually impressed with what Boris has done and I despise him. Impressive what he has done with financial support, NHS help and cre for the most vulnerable. Some of the measures are just too slow out of the blocks. The lockdown should, imo, should have come on Friday and we still await help for the self employed

Basically good ideas - Just a little too slow.

We don't, but they are better placed to than us. They thought they could try implementing measures without full lockdown.

After a couple days, that wasn't working, and they have switched to implementing full lockdown. All well and good saying 'should have done that from the start'.



One thing we did know was that people were going to go to the pub and people were going to be stupid at the weekend.

Brits are going to Brit  :D



The pub thing was stupid. Ask us not to go but allow the pubs to stay open. What possible reason is there for a pub to be open if not for people to visit.

Another thing we should be careful of is to not fall for/build the narrative that these measures have come in because people weren't following the advice. They'll have happened regardless. The plan (and realistically only way it can work) is to stagger these things.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: DungBeetle on March 24, 2020, 08:26:45 AM

    finally some good news for the self employed, which is a relief

80% of net  monthly earnings to be paid , taken as an average from last 3 years

or £2947 whichever is lower




Source please?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ledders on March 24, 2020, 08:48:24 AM
I've been offered furlough by my employer for 2-3 months until business resumes. I will get the 80% of wages that government is guaranteeing. Interestingly the employer doesn't have to top the rest up to your wages and I don't imagine many are!

I'm in hospitality industry and was 100% getting the tin-tack so snapcalled.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 24, 2020, 09:12:25 AM
Just very obvious that tightening measures over time is better than instant lock down in terms of getting people to comply. Really got no time for people clamouring for police on the streets, strict enforcement, army, whiffling on about a few days either way.

Easy potential for mass unrest if govt had swiftly locked down in a matter of days. Unlike a lot of Europe and the world we don't have a living memory of living under an authoritarian regime.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: booder on March 24, 2020, 09:44:37 AM
 “On hearing ill rumour that Londoners may soon be urged into their lodgings by Her Majesty’s men, I looked upon the street to see a gaggle of striplings making fair merry, and no doubt spreading the plague well about. Not a care had these rogues for the health of their elders!”

Samuel Pepys Diaries - London 1664

No real change in 2020! We haven’t learnt any lessons from history - when will we ever learn?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Longines on March 24, 2020, 09:47:12 AM

    finally some good news for the self employed, which is a relief

80% of net  monthly earnings to be paid , taken as an average from last 3 years

or £2947 whichever is lower




Source please?

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0122/amend/coronavirus_daily_cwh_0320rev.14-18.html

It's just a proposed amenment at this stage.

https://twitter.com/MartinSLewis/status/1242245581910704132


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Longines on March 24, 2020, 09:50:25 AM
“On hearing ill rumour that Londoners may soon be urged into their lodgings by Her Majesty’s men, I looked upon the street to see a gaggle of striplings making fair merry, and no doubt spreading the plague well about. Not a care had these rogues for the health of their elders!”

Samuel Pepys Diaries - London 1664

No real change in 2020! We haven’t learnt any lessons from history - when will we ever learn?

I've got a feeling someone has found the Twitter link that Doobs posted earlier in the thread and with great effort attached thyself to the improper end of thy sticke.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Longines on March 24, 2020, 09:52:58 AM
https://twitter.com/MartinSLewis/status/1242385553452150785

Are you self employed and need financial support for to Coronavirus? I've bashed out a rough and ready quick video briefing...
 
Feel free to share with anyone who needs.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 24, 2020, 10:11:19 AM
I've been offered furlough by my employer for 2-3 months until business resumes. I will get the 80% of wages that government is guaranteeing. Interestingly the employer doesn't have to top the rest up to your wages and I don't imagine many are!

I'm in hospitality industry and was 100% getting the tin-tack so snapcalled.



Do you mind me asking if they are paying you as normal or not until they receive the funds from HMRC?

Thanks

Bank meeting at 3pm for me.

Leggo!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Longines on March 24, 2020, 10:16:52 AM

Do you mind me asking if they are paying you as normal or not until they receive the funds from HMRC?


Wetherspoons' approach:


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ET3WjRTX0AAibly?format=jpg&name=large)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Longines on March 24, 2020, 11:59:02 AM

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0122/amend/coronavirus_daily_cwh_0320rev.14-18.html

It's just a proposed amenment at this stage.

https://twitter.com/MartinSLewis/status/1242245581910704132

Ed Davey is putting an urgent question to the Chancellor at 12:30 today regarding support for the self-employed.

https://twitter.com/HouseofCommons/status/1242412806105899009


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ledders on March 24, 2020, 12:12:02 PM
I've been offered furlough by my employer for 2-3 months until business resumes. I will get the 80% of wages that government is guaranteeing. Interestingly the employer doesn't have to top the rest up to your wages and I don't imagine many are!

I'm in hospitality industry and was 100% getting the tin-tack so snapcalled.



Do you mind me asking if they are paying you as normal or not until they receive the funds from HMRC?

Thanks

Bank meeting at 3pm for me.

Leggo!

Sure no problem.

Yes I am being paid as usual, my company is in a position to cover until they get the money back. I know a lot of small companies aren't able to, and others won't. Wetherspoons are acting fucking outrageously given their size as they are waiving commercial rents for the next quarter as a landlord!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Cf on March 24, 2020, 12:52:00 PM

Do you mind me asking if they are paying you as normal or not until they receive the funds from HMRC?


Wetherspoons' approach:


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ET3WjRTX0AAibly?format=jpg&name=large)

Shock!

Guy is an utter twat.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 24, 2020, 01:07:22 PM
Seems crazy for spoons to lose all this pr and their place in the top 100 employers list everyyear over what is effectvely a £1500 loan to 40000 workers interest free for 6 weeks before the government ships it straght back to their bank risk free?  am i missing something?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 24, 2020, 01:21:15 PM
I've been offered furlough by my employer for 2-3 months until business resumes. I will get the 80% of wages that government is guaranteeing. Interestingly the employer doesn't have to top the rest up to your wages and I don't imagine many are!

I'm in hospitality industry and was 100% getting the tin-tack so snapcalled.



I don't imagine many can....

I employ 20 people of which 12 are permanently based on sites carrying out installation work. As of right now there are 3 remaining on site carrying out essential work and myself plus one other on the office supporting them.

The furlough payment is great for the employees but not so great for the employer. Lots of people are crying for the self-employed (myself included) but Company owners are in the same position but on a larger scale.

My Company isn't huge but our weekly outgoings are around £3k per week if we are totally closed and everyone is furloughed.

Our payroll is in the region of £10k per week but let's drop that to £8k as we're all furloughed.

That's £11k going out per week of which £3k is pure loss and £8k can be claimed back at an undefined time possibly end of April.

Drag this out to the end of April and that's £55k I have to find before I get anything back

We're in the fortunate position that we have reasonably strong cash reserves but many won't be. Even as a strong Company I have my concerns if this goes on for long and we have zero income so others will be having an absolutely terrible time.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 24, 2020, 01:40:33 PM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1242364536365211648


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 24, 2020, 01:45:14 PM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1242364536365211648

Dopey old mare.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 24, 2020, 01:53:30 PM
I've been offered furlough by my employer for 2-3 months until business resumes. I will get the 80% of wages that government is guaranteeing. Interestingly the employer doesn't have to top the rest up to your wages and I don't imagine many are!

I'm in hospitality industry and was 100% getting the tin-tack so snapcalled.



I don't imagine many can....

I employ 20 people of which 12 are permanently based on sites carrying out installation work. As of right now there are 3 remaining on site carrying out essential work and myself plus one other on the office supporting them.

The furlough payment is great for the employees but not so great for the employer. Lots of people are crying for the self-employed (myself included) but Company owners are in the same position but on a larger scale.

My Company isn't huge but our weekly outgoings are around £3k per week if we are totally closed and everyone is furloughed.

Our payroll is in the region of £10k per week but let's drop that to £8k as we're all furloughed.

That's £11k going out per week of which £3k is pure loss and £8k can be claimed back at an undefined time possibly end of April.

Drag this out to the end of April and that's £55k I have to find before I get anything back

We're in the fortunate position that we have reasonably strong cash reserves but many won't be. Even as a strong Company I have my concerns if this goes on for long and we have zero income so others will be having an absolutely terrible time.



I hear your point with smaller businesses but long term market leaders like spoons in huge volume low margin businesses are going to have it riight off long term out of this virus.  They got the cash flow and banking facilities to get whatever cash they need to pay their staff then claim it back.   Once its all over they will be mopping up customers from all over tthe place from other pubs which went skint and/or buying these locations up themselves.  I just don't get the short sightedness of spoons here for what is effectviely a 6 week risk free advancement of wages.   There is 0% chance of them not getting t back froom boris so any lender will happily lend them the money even if they didn't have it on hand to pay their staff.   Never mind the huge cost of them recruitting new staff after thousands have left.  Maybe Tim Martin is a lot more dumb than i ever thought.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: the sicilian on March 24, 2020, 02:07:38 PM
has the gov set up the furloughed workers scheme cant find the application anywhere


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Pokerpops on March 24, 2020, 02:32:57 PM
I've been offered furlough by my employer for 2-3 months until business resumes. I will get the 80% of wages that government is guaranteeing. Interestingly the employer doesn't have to top the rest up to your wages and I don't imagine many are!

I'm in hospitality industry and was 100% getting the tin-tack so snapcalled.



I don't imagine many can....

I employ 20 people of which 12 are permanently based on sites carrying out installation work. As of right now there are 3 remaining on site carrying out essential work and myself plus one other on the office supporting them.

The furlough payment is great for the employees but not so great for the employer. Lots of people are crying for the self-employed (myself included) but Company owners are in the same position but on a larger scale.

My Company isn't huge but our weekly outgoings are around £3k per week if we are totally closed and everyone is furloughed.

Our payroll is in the region of £10k per week but let's drop that to £8k as we're all furloughed.

That's £11k going out per week of which £3k is pure loss and £8k can be claimed back at an undefined time possibly end of April.

Drag this out to the end of April and that's £55k I have to find before I get anything back

We're in the fortunate position that we have reasonably strong cash reserves but many won't be. Even as a strong Company I have my concerns if this goes on for long and we have zero income so others will be having an absolutely terrible time.



I hear your point with smaller businesses but long term market leaders like spoons in huge volume low margin businesses are going to have it riight off long term out of this virus.  They got the cash flow and banking facilities to get whatever cash they need to pay their staff then claim it back.   Once its all over they will be mopping up customers from all over tthe place from other pubs which went skint and/or buying these locations up themselves.  I just don't get the short sightedness of spoons here for what is effectviely a 6 week risk free advancement of wages.   There is 0% chance of them not getting t back froom boris so any lender will happily lend them the money even if they didn't have it on hand to pay their staff.   Never mind the huge cost of them recruitting new staff after thousands have left.  Maybe Tim Martin is a lot more dumb than i ever thought.

Be fair, ‘spoons only made £102,500,000 last year.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 24, 2020, 03:46:50 PM
No matter who we support, what our political allegiances are, how we like our bread buttered etc

I'm sure we can all agree that Tim Martin is an utter cockwomble and a shitstain on society.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RickBFA on March 24, 2020, 04:50:27 PM
Tim Martin is being a short sighted fool.

We have four admin staff, one being furloughed but we'll top up to give her 100% of salary.

Only the decent thing to do if you have the financially ability to pay it.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: dakky on March 24, 2020, 06:00:23 PM

    finally some good news for the self employed, which is a relief

80% of net  monthly earnings to be paid , taken as an average from last 3 years

or £2947 whichever is lower




Is this confirmed?

Any links as would like to share if true.

No. This was an amendment to the bill that passed but it didn't get voted on.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 24, 2020, 08:06:24 PM
has the gov set up the furloughed workers scheme cant find the application anywhere

No details available on this yet.
It would appear that no applications are needed.
Once the HMRC portal is set up, HMRC arent known for their speed or efficiency, then the employer enters the details of all furloughed staff and the payment is then made to them.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 24, 2020, 08:10:20 PM
Bank meeting today re CBIL

It wasnt a negative meeting but they made it clear they dont want us to top up peoples wages, slow down payments to all suppliers etc

I get it but it feels like your going against the spirit of keeping everything flowing.

Overloaded with applications so 2 weeks minimum before anything is approved. Normal credit processes adhered to. That's not to say they wont help along the way if they are reasonably happy with the proposal.

Still not sure this is going to work for a lot of people.

Fun times
 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 24, 2020, 10:27:04 PM
time to panic buy

https://twitter.com/STVNews/status/1242569881398185985?s=09&fbclid=IwAR23d8gIykmyL7omYl4809kaSw6rZFz9PtSvkQC3sKE-KT_HxpM-H6W2r3s


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 24, 2020, 10:41:03 PM
time to panic buy

https://twitter.com/STVNews/status/1242569881398185985?s=09&fbclid=IwAR23d8gIykmyL7omYl4809kaSw6rZFz9PtSvkQC3sKE-KT_HxpM-H6W2r3s


Pòl Gallchnó
Replying to
@STVNews
I've never met anybody who drank this stuff who wasn't somebody you would try to avoid.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: aaron1867 on March 24, 2020, 10:46:06 PM
In March I had declined an opportunity to go to a 3/4+ day festival. The travel and hotels had become too much and the Coronavirus had started to become a thing in the UK and in Belgum (where the festival was) had, I think, a dozen or so cases. The festival is somewhat intimate, full of the normal boozy antics too.

At the start of the week running up to it I had decided to post on Instagram that I believed it would not be inthe best interest for this event to happen, and if it did happen, then to avoid. Especially for those vulnerable.

Of course, despite the concern of the whole world, it went ahead. They had simply posted they would put more hand wash in. That without doubt was the go-ahead for many to go. They had paid there money and the majority forced themselves to go.

Of course 5000+ attendees in a intimate and boozy atmosphere - The inevitable happens. If there was 5 confirmed cases of it, then what's the likely real number of cases? And of course to add to the number of cases, 1 person had died, suspect at picking it up at that event.

It's just an example of greed - It shouldn't have happened. Should you hold those responsible to account? They could have cancelled and/or postphoned. I think it has played on my mind a little, that it could have been me or any of my friends. All for the sake of a small loss, if any, due to insurance.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 25, 2020, 03:16:26 PM
Lee Mack picked up the virus after attending cheltenham last week

https://www.ok.co.uk/celebrity-news/coronavirus-lee-mack-prince-charles-21753118


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Ironside on March 25, 2020, 03:18:09 PM
i have opened a book on who will be the first to come up with a not going out joke


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Pokerpops on March 25, 2020, 03:59:47 PM
i have opened a book on who will be the first to come up with a not going out joke

You win


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: I KNOW IT on March 25, 2020, 07:06:40 PM
China is finally relaxing restrictions after 2 months.  Nightclubs , KTV bars and live music venues are allowed to Reopen .
This does not mean people are rushing to come out and party ,most Chinese are still very concerned and worried about large groups but it is a start of us hopefully seeing some normality restored

 I really don’t know how most businesses  will survive as the only real relief available  is rent relief by government owned buildings.  Private landlords unfortunately don’t want to give any rent relief.  

Also border restrictions are really tightened up and the fear of foreigners now spreading the virus has heightened. A lot of hotels and and golf courses are refusing foreign guests.

That being said I feel China is possibly the safest place in the world now  and understand the new measures been taken to contain any new outbreaks  


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 25, 2020, 07:29:19 PM
China is finally relaxing restrictions after 2 months.  Nightclubs , KTV bars and live music venues are allowed to Reopen .
This does not mean people are rushing to come out and party ,most Chinese are still very concerned and worried about large groups but it is a start of us hopefully seeing some normality restored

 I really don’t know how most businesses  will survive as the only real relief available  is rent relief by government owned buildings.  Private landlords unfortunately don’t want to give any rent relief.  

Also border restrictions are really tightened up and the fear of foreigners now spreading the virus has heightened. A lot of hotels and and golf courses are refusing foreign guests.

That being said I feel China is possibly the safest place in the world now  and understand the new measures been taken to contain any new outbreaks  

Thanks for the update Craig, from both the other side of the world and hopefully the other side of the coronavirus too.

No golf here :(





Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: booder on March 25, 2020, 09:45:56 PM
Day 4 of social distancing: Struck up a conversation with a spider today. Seems nice. He's a web designer.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 25, 2020, 09:57:56 PM
Day 4 of social distancing: Struck up a conversation with a spider today. Seems nice. He's a web designer.

That’s not been doing the rounds much today.....honestly  ;)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 25, 2020, 09:59:58 PM
Just ordered a lump from a takeaway with as much precaution as possible getting the food in, do we think the risk is reasonable if we are avoiding touching the external packaging?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: aaron1867 on March 26, 2020, 12:41:34 AM
Just ordered a lump from a takeaway with as much precaution as possible getting the food in, do we think the risk is reasonable if we are avoiding touching the external packaging?

I have read in many outlets that the maximum time that the virus can survive on an object is 48 hours. Not helpful in your case, but maybe for people receiving items through the post. But this is a worry when shopping too, how many times has someone touched the item you're going to pick up?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: aaron1867 on March 26, 2020, 12:47:59 AM
The last week has pretty much seen the very best in business and the absolute worst. Is anyone thinking of boycotting any business?

Wetherspoons *DID* say they won't pay staff for a period of time, but they seem to have now changed that after the outrage. But I personally will try and avoid the place and I must eat there a couple of dozen times a year.

EasyJet/Virgin said they wouldn't pay staff for 8 weeks+

Many food outlets gave free food to NHS workers - Mcdonalds, Greggs, Starbucks, Care Nero etc

Hotel football (Gary Neville) - Full pay for staff and Hotel used for public services

Add your own


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: aaron1867 on March 26, 2020, 12:51:22 AM
Does anyone else have a holiday booked for within the next 3 months?

We are booked for Gran Canaria in May and the total for us was around £1500. It was booked through TUI and they haven't been great about the holiday (when we booked). They are apparently offering refunds or vouchers, but should they be willing to add more onto the voucher (if needed) for another holiday. The alternative holiday in November was like £175 more.

In other news hotels being pretty decent about bookings and Airport lounges we booked have been fully refunded.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 26, 2020, 02:43:07 AM
Does anyone else have a holiday booked for within the next 3 months?

We are booked for Gran Canaria in May and the total for us was around £1500. It was booked through TUI and they haven't been great about the holiday (when we booked). They are apparently offering refunds or vouchers, but should they be willing to add more onto the voucher (if needed) for another holiday. The alternative holiday in November was like £175 more.

In other news hotels being pretty decent about bookings and Airport lounges we booked have been fully refunded.

I think I'd be happy to get my money back and use it towards another holiday, I wouldn't even ask for any compensation, would just pull the £175 out of my pocket and just enjoy the holiday.

I've got flights & hotels booked for Vegas in June, but even if we can travel, I'm thinking of paying to change my flight to December when we're hopefully well on the other side of things.

One room I have booked through holidayusa, and have to pay an admin fee to change, so will just do that if I can. The rest I can all cancel, and just have to hope the deals I can get will be as good for Cosmo/Wynn in Dec.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 26, 2020, 03:27:56 AM
Ashley Young's take on things in Italy - https://twitter.com/youngy18/status/1242531398826811393


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: StuartHopkin on March 26, 2020, 07:11:55 AM
Does anyone else have a holiday booked for within the next 3 months?

We are booked for Gran Canaria in May and the total for us was around £1500. It was booked through TUI and they haven't been great about the holiday (when we booked). They are apparently offering refunds or vouchers, but should they be willing to add more onto the voucher (if needed) for another holiday. The alternative holiday in November was like £175 more.

In other news hotels being pretty decent about bookings and Airport lounges we booked have been fully refunded.

No they shouldnt have to add to the voucher!


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 26, 2020, 09:49:06 AM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)

Yesterday we went full North Korea on the numbers. Started briefing their preferred media outlets that England had 28 deaths in the last 24 hours at the end of the press conference. Waited until midnight for the DHSC to announce these numbers are not for 24 hours, no indication of what period they did cover. What are they expecting people to think happened for the numbers to drop like that?



[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20 (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url)



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 26, 2020, 09:58:14 AM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)

Yesterday we went full North Korea on the numbers. Started briefing their preferred media outlets that England had 28 deaths in the last 24 hours at the end of the press conference. Waited until midnight for the DHSC to announce these numbers are not for 24 hours, no indication of what period they did cover. What are they expecting people to think happened for the numbers to drop like that?

 https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20 (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url)


The point being that if they want people to take instruction to lockdown seriously, then misrepresenting deaths will not help. Twitter/FB indicates that plenty of people think yesterday’s numbers mean the measures have worked and we have seen it off. We hadn’t take any measures in the relevant period other than “sing happy birthday while you wash your hands”.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 26, 2020, 10:03:42 AM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)

Yesterday we went full North Korea on the numbers. Started briefing their preferred media outlets that England had 28 deaths in the last 24 hours at the end of the press conference. Waited until midnight for the DHSC to announce these numbers are not for 24 hours, no indication of what period they did cover. What are they expecting people to think happened for the numbers to drop like that?

 https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20 (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url=https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20)


The point being that if they want people to take instruction to lockdown seriously, then misrepresenting deaths will not help. Twitter/FB indicates that plenty of people think yesterday’s numbers mean the measures have worked and we have seen it off. We hadn’t take any measures in the relevant period other than “sing happy birthday while you wash your hands”.

Any good news?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 26, 2020, 10:10:15 AM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)

Yesterday we went full North Korea on the numbers. Started briefing their preferred media outlets that England had 28 deaths in the last 24 hours at the end of the press conference. Waited until midnight for the DHSC to announce these numbers are not for 24 hours, no indication of what period they did cover. What are they expecting people to think happened for the numbers to drop like that?

 https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20 (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url=https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20)


The point being that if they want people to take instruction to lockdown seriously, then misrepresenting deaths will not help. Twitter/FB indicates that plenty of people think yesterday’s numbers mean the measures have worked and we have seen it off. We hadn’t take any measures in the relevant period other than “sing happy birthday while you wash your hands”.

Any good news?

I definitely screwed up the quoting, revealing my incompetence once again, some may view that as good news 😊. Only the top two links are still relevant, apologies for any confusion. I’m other news, my treatment will be delayed until the far side of the first C19 peak, a blow to morale but has to be the right call.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 26, 2020, 10:14:43 AM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)

Yesterday we went full North Korea on the numbers. Started briefing their preferred media outlets that England had 28 deaths in the last 24 hours at the end of the press conference. Waited until midnight for the DHSC to announce these numbers are not for 24 hours, no indication of what period they did cover. What are they expecting people to think happened for the numbers to drop like that?

 https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url=https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20 (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url=https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20)


The point being that if they want people to take instruction to lockdown seriously, then misrepresenting deaths will not help. Twitter/FB indicates that plenty of people think yesterday’s numbers mean the measures have worked and we have seen it off. We hadn’t take any measures in the relevant period other than “sing happy birthday while you wash your hands”.

Any good news?

I definitely screwed up the quoting, revealing my incompetence once again, some may view that as good news 😊. Only the top two links are still relevant, apologies for any confusion. I’m other news, my treatment will be delayed until the far side of the first C19 peak, a blow to morale but has to be the right call.

Yeah, fingers crossed with that, one of my elderly relatives has had a bad knee op cancelled, bad news for her because of lack of mobility but was always going to happen  :(


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 10:17:05 AM
Just ordered a lump from a takeaway with as much precaution as possible getting the food in, do we think the risk is reasonable if we are avoiding touching the external packaging?

I have read in many outlets that the maximum time that the virus can survive on an object is 48 hours. Not helpful in your case, but maybe for people receiving items through the post. But this is a worry when shopping too, how many times has someone touched the item you're going to pick up?

It is different to say that they can pick up the virus from a hard object 48 hours later in a lab than to say they can pick it up from a takeaway bag.

In countries like Singapore and South Korea, where contract tracing is more prevalent they can account for most of the cases are from human to human transmission.   In Wuhan people were still eating and they stopped, or near stopped, the spread.   So I think it is safe to say very few people are getting COVID from objects.

I'd just practice good hygiene.  Wash your hands with soap before dishing out the food and get rid of the packaging, and wash them again before eating.  

My missus is insisting on wiping everything that comes through the door, but I suspect this is going too far, and probably isn't that great anyway.  If it makes her happy, I don't really care.  I think we'd be better not getting all the stuff she is having delivered, but ho hum.  The kids really don't need anymore educational toys to ignore, and they really don't need them in the next few weeks.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 26, 2020, 10:20:22 AM
Just ordered a lump from a takeaway with as much precaution as possible getting the food in, do we think the risk is reasonable if we are avoiding touching the external packaging?

I have read in many outlets that the maximum time that the virus can survive on an object is 48 hours. Not helpful in your case, but maybe for people receiving items through the post. But this is a worry when shopping too, how many times has someone touched the item you're going to pick up?

It is different to say that they can pick up the virus from a hard object 48 hours later in a lab than to say they can pick it up from a takeaway bag.

In countries like Singapore and South Korea, where contract tracing is more prevalent they can account for most of the cases are from human to human transmission.   In Wuhan people were still eating and they stopped, or near stopped, the spread.   So I think it is safe to say very few people are getting COVID from objects.

I'd just practice good hygiene.  Wash your hands with soap before dishing out the food and get rid of the packaging, and wash them again before eating.  

My missus is insisting on wiping everything that comes through the door, but I suspect this is going too far, and probably isn't that great anyway.  If it makes her happy, I don't really care.  I think we'd be better not getting all the stuff she is having delivered, but ho hum.  The kids really don't need anymore educational toys to ignore, and they really don't need them in the next few weeks.

Actually we didn’t even touch the packaging, and the packaging didn’t even touch a surface in the house, we just emptied the food out and slung the boxes.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 26, 2020, 10:23:38 AM
Does anyone else have a holiday booked for within the next 3 months?

We are booked for Gran Canaria in May and the total for us was around £1500. It was booked through TUI and they haven't been great about the holiday (when we booked). They are apparently offering refunds or vouchers, but should they be willing to add more onto the voucher (if needed) for another holiday. The alternative holiday in November was like £175 more.

In other news hotels being pretty decent about bookings and Airport lounges we booked have been fully refunded.

Also going Gran Canaria but not until mid June (should have been going to Vegas  :'( :'( ), think it's a flip if mine goes ahead or not.

TUI have no obligation to top up your voucher, they are allowing free amendments for anyone booked to travel before June 30th but naturally you'll have to pay the difference in cost between original and new booking. £175 for peace of mind doesn't seem like too much to pay.

You could always wait it out and make a late decision on it, on the off chance Spain really improves in April.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 26, 2020, 10:27:12 AM
Does anyone else have a holiday booked for within the next 3 months?

We are booked for Gran Canaria in May and the total for us was around £1500. It was booked through TUI and they haven't been great about the holiday (when we booked). They are apparently offering refunds or vouchers, but should they be willing to add more onto the voucher (if needed) for another holiday. The alternative holiday in November was like £175 more.

In other news hotels being pretty decent about bookings and Airport lounges we booked have been fully refunded.

Also going Gran Canaria but not until mid June (should have been going to Vegas  :'( :'( ), think it's a flip if mine goes ahead or not.

TUI have no obligation to top up your voucher, they are allowing free amendments for anyone booked to travel before June 30th but naturally you'll have to pay the difference in cost between original and new booking. £175 for peace of mind doesn't seem like too much to pay.

You could always wait it out and make a late decision on it, on the off chance Spain really improves in April.

Flip? I think your chances are at best 10% and that’s being generous.....I’ve pretty much written off holidays for this year, if something does open up at the back end of the year then so be it.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 10:27:47 AM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)

Yesterday we went full North Korea on the numbers. Started briefing their preferred media outlets that England had 28 deaths in the last 24 hours at the end of the press conference. Waited until midnight for the DHSC to announce these numbers are not for 24 hours, no indication of what period they did cover. What are they expecting people to think happened for the numbers to drop like that?

 https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20 (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url=https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20)


The point being that if they want people to take instruction to lockdown seriously, then misrepresenting deaths will not help. Twitter/FB indicates that plenty of people think yesterday’s numbers mean the measures have worked and we have seen it off. We hadn’t take any measures in the relevant period other than “sing happy birthday while you wash your hands”.

It seems a stretch that they are deliverately misrepresenting stats.   The DHSC said it wasn't the full 24 hours in their twitter release.  It is easy for others to miss and accidentally misrepresent it.

If it carries on, then worry about it, it is more likely that something broke in their reporting process and they didn't have time to fix it.

I am not saying that Dom doesn't like to misrepresent things, he clearly does, but right now I don't think there is much evidence that they are trying to underplay the seriousness of this.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 10:32:30 AM
Does anyone else have a holiday booked for within the next 3 months?

We are booked for Gran Canaria in May and the total for us was around £1500. It was booked through TUI and they haven't been great about the holiday (when we booked). They are apparently offering refunds or vouchers, but should they be willing to add more onto the voucher (if needed) for another holiday. The alternative holiday in November was like £175 more.

In other news hotels being pretty decent about bookings and Airport lounges we booked have been fully refunded.

Also going Gran Canaria but not until mid June (should have been going to Vegas  :'( :'( ), think it's a flip if mine goes ahead or not.

TUI have no obligation to top up your voucher, they are allowing free amendments for anyone booked to travel before June 30th but naturally you'll have to pay the difference in cost between original and new booking. £175 for peace of mind doesn't seem like too much to pay.

You could always wait it out and make a late decision on it, on the off chance Spain really improves in April.

Flip? I think your chances are at best 10% and that’s being generous.....I’ve pretty much written off holidays for this year, if something does open up at the back end of the year then so be it. Cheers

I am booked for August and struggle to get to 50%.  I'd go about 10% at best for June.  My eldest had a school trip planned for April, they have rescheduled it for October half term and they want to know ASAP if she is going.   Cheers for that.  She is already grumpy that the first one went, but how the heck can we decide that now?  
  
edit.  The trip is to the Netherlands by coach and not to the local park


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: hhyftrftdr on March 26, 2020, 10:51:08 AM
Yeah if pushed I'd say its more unlikely than likely but with almost 12 weeks to go a lot can change (good or bad).

The problem is it's 2 countries that can throw a spanner in the works....Spain might be tentatively open by then but the UK could still be in bad shape and not permitting travel, or the opposite of course.

I work in the industry and the general consensus is that by June is when things will have improved enough for people to start commencing travel and other normal activities.
Most airlines are grounding flights until 31st May (Jet2 only until 1st May at present)

Watch this space but hoping for the best.

Sadly if these knob heads keep treating this as an extended bank holiday then we'll never get out of our homes.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 26, 2020, 11:20:38 AM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)

Yesterday we went full North Korea on the numbers. Started briefing their preferred media outlets that England had 28 deaths in the last 24 hours at the end of the press conference. Waited until midnight for the DHSC to announce these numbers are not for 24 hours, no indication of what period they did cover. What are they expecting people to think happened for the numbers to drop like that?

 https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20 (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url=https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20)


The point being that if they want people to take instruction to lockdown seriously, then misrepresenting deaths will not help. Twitter/FB indicates that plenty of people think yesterday’s numbers mean the measures have worked and we have seen it off. We hadn’t take any measures in the relevant period other than “sing happy birthday while you wash your hands”.

It seems a stretch that they are deliverately misrepresenting stats.   The DHSC said it wasn't the full 24 hours in their twitter release.  It is easy for others to miss and accidentally misrepresent it.

If it carries on, then worry about it, it is more likely that something broke in their reporting process and they didn't have time to fix it.

I am not saying that Dom doesn't like to misrepresent things, he clearly does, but right now I don't think there is much evidence that they are trying to underplay the seriousness of this.

I rate your judgement, I hope you’re right. The problem is they’ve been indulged by the electorate to believe they can exist in a completely post truth world, it’s a luxury they won’t give up lightly. I usually hate a conspiracy theory even more than I hate a Conservative government, this is a suspicious though and they clearly won’t want to be reporting huge numbers while there is nothing remotely resembling a lockdown in place. Just for a bit more detail on yesterday, the DHSC said they’d update the dashboard at 14:00, they then updated to say they would be late but no new time given. The government briefed a small number of the press that it is was 28, so everyone went on the DHSC Twitter and said ‘why haven’t you updated and why has an obviously untrue number been informally briefed to the press’. Nothing from the DHSC until just before midnight when they said the numbers
were not for a 24 hour period, at the very least they should say the period it was for.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 26, 2020, 11:34:02 AM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

Good piece I found.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 26, 2020, 11:45:25 AM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

Good piece I found.

Best article I’ve read making the case against drastic action at this point, thanks for finding it.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 11:45:50 AM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

piece I found.

FYP


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 12:19:30 PM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

piece I found.

FYP

I am an actuary and have been mathematically modelling for 30 years.  I am not Woodsey's bloke down the pub.

These type of articles are thouroughly misleading.   There are some scenarios where the death rate is kept to a few thousand and mortality is just like a bad flu epidemic.   If that happens great, and we went too far.  We lost a lot of jobs because we were too cautious.  That isn't so good, but we can celebrate most of us have our health and can resume our lives.

There are a lot of scenarios where this does not happen.   500,000 deaths in a few weeks wasn't some extreme scenario, I looked through the paper and you wouldn't really argue with any of it.  In these scenarios we lose hundreds of thousands of people we didn't need to.    We lose a lot of jobs too as we were too reckless.  We will get on with our lives too, but we lose a lot of people and the economy is trashed anyway.  

It isn't the fact it is new that has caused the reaction, it is the fact it will leave huge numbers of bodies piled up in a very short period.  We can cope with 500,000 deaths over the year, we can't cope with 500,000 extra ones in a month.  

I could go through the article and criticise a lot of it, but am home schooling so don't have the time right now.  But focussing on current death rates is idiotic, really idiotic.  We know what is likely to happen in 2 weeks with inadequate action, we can see Italy and Spain.  We know people don't die the second they are infected, they die 17 days later on average.  We know this lag is there.  We know cases were doubling every 2 or 3 days and it will take a couple of weeks until we can see the effect of the new measures.  

If in a month or so there is a really good outcome, and our NHS isn't overwhelmed, and we discover half the population already has immunity.  We overeacted and we can all go back to booking our holidays and reopening our pubs.  Some businesses that were on the brink already will be lost.  I can look for work again, and my hope to retire a bit before pension age may be tralistic again.   I think that would be a good result in the circumstances, and will be happy we avoided the really bad results.

Some of the assumptions will be shown to be wrong, so what?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 26, 2020, 12:36:21 PM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

piece I found.

FYP

I am an actuary and have been mathematically modelling for 30 years.  I am not Woodsey's bloke down the pub.

These type of articles are thouroughly misleading.   There are some scenarios where the death rate is kept to a few thousand and mortality is just like a bad flu epidemic.   If that happens great, and we went too far.  We lost a lot of jobs because we were too cautious.  That isn't so good, but we can celebrate most of us have our health and can resume our lives.

There are a lot of scenarios where this does not happen.   500,000 deaths in a few weeks wasn't some extreme scenario, I looked through the paper and you wouldn't really argue with any of it.  In these scenarios we lose hundreds of thousands of people we didn't need to.    We lose a lot of jobs too as we were too reckless.  We will get on with our lives too, but we lose a lot of people and the economy is trashed anyway. 

It isn't the fact it is new that has caused the reaction, it is the fact it will leave huge numbers of bodies piled up in a very short period.  We can cope with 500,000 deaths over the year, we can't cope with 500,000 extra ones in a month. 

I could go through the article and criticise a lot of it, but am home schooling so don't have the time right now.  But focussing on current death rates is idiotic, really idiotic.  We know what is likely to happen in 2 weeks with inadequate action, we can see Italy and Spain.  We know people don't die the second they are infected, they die 17 days later on average.  We know this lag is there.  We know cases were increasing every 2 or 3 days and it will take a couple of weeks until we can see the effect of the new measures. 

If in a month or so there is a really good outcome, and our NHS isn't overwhelmed, and we discover half the population already has immunity.  We overeacted and we can all go back to booking our holidays and reopening our pubs.  Some businesses that were on the brink already will be lost.  I can look for work again, and my hope to retire a bit before pension age may be tralistic again.   I think that would be a good result in the circumstances, and will be happy we avoided the really bad results.

Some of the assumptions will be shown to be wrong, so what?
I'm totes sold on we're overreacting but tbf, I don't believe there's a climate emergency either


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Jon MW on March 26, 2020, 12:54:40 PM
It’s hard to believe that they only did 2355 tests yesterday. The attempts to manipulate the numbers continue to go unchallenged. They do hardly any tests, it’s pointed out to them, so Boris says we’ll do “10,000” tests every day. They keep doing hardly any tests so Boris says we’ll “25,000” tests every day, a very Trumpesque approach.

 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eTKeK9vRxgw0KhvKxPCaDrfaHnxQP-n9TsLzsEymviY/htmlview)

Yesterday we went full North Korea on the numbers. Started briefing their preferred media outlets that England had 28 deaths in the last 24 hours at the end of the press conference. Waited until midnight for the DHSC to announce these numbers are not for 24 hours, no indication of what period they did cover. What are they expecting people to think happened for the numbers to drop like that?

 https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url=https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20] https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url]

[url] https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20 (https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-uk-death-toll-reaches-435-after-rise-in-scotland-and-wales-11963431[url=http://[url=https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1242950122981470208?s=20)


The point being that if they want people to take instruction to lockdown seriously, then misrepresenting deaths will not help. Twitter/FB indicates that plenty of people think yesterday’s numbers mean the measures have worked and we have seen it off. We hadn’t take any measures in the relevant period other than “sing happy birthday while you wash your hands”.

It seems a stretch that they are deliverately misrepresenting stats.   The DHSC said it wasn't the full 24 hours in their twitter release.  It is easy for others to miss and accidentally misrepresent it.

If it carries on, then worry about it, it is more likely that something broke in their reporting process and they didn't have time to fix it.

I am not saying that Dom doesn't like to misrepresent things, he clearly does, but right now I don't think there is much evidence that they are trying to underplay the seriousness of this.

I rate your judgement, I hope you’re right. The problem is they’ve been indulged by the electorate to believe they can exist in a completely post truth world, it’s a luxury they won’t give up lightly. I usually hate a conspiracy theory even more than I hate a Conservative government, this is a suspicious though and they clearly won’t want to be reporting huge numbers while there is nothing remotely resembling a lockdown in place. Just for a bit more detail on yesterday, the DHSC said they’d update the dashboard at 14:00, they then updated to say they would be late but no new time given. The government briefed a small number of the press that it is was 28, so everyone went on the DHSC Twitter and said ‘why haven’t you updated and why has an obviously untrue number been informally briefed to the press’. Nothing from the DHSC until just before midnight when they said the numbers
were not for a 24 hour period, at the very least they should say the period it was for.

I'm pretty sure the DHSC have had to put out a tweet every day for a while saying they're going to post the numbers late.

My guess would be that they get all the numbers from the different health authorities - and they get it all from their constituent parts; and the DHSC aggregates them to release the figure.

Without any explanation I would assume that some of these places are being a bit slow. If it's London that's basically holding up the process - that's a big difference.

Given the time that DHSC actually posted their tweet I'm guessing they decided that no matter what they could not go a whole day without posting an update even though they knew it was incomplete.

As they said that this doesn't represent a whole day, I'd revise that to say it probably works like that but they get updates throughout the day.

If they had a problem receiving the 1am to 9am data, for example, or even just that data from London that would also fit in with the process I assume they do and the numbers could still make sense if that's the kind of level that's missing.

If it was a technical problem then it should get fixed, but London having so much data coming in that the data is difficult to compile is very feasibly an issue and we might get longer delays for a while.

This could be part of the reason why they were keen to change the updated figures being released weekly instead of daily, they might have anticipated that the process could be difficult to keep up.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 12:56:49 PM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

piece I found.

FYP

I am an actuary and have been mathematically modelling for 30 years.  I am not Woodsey's bloke down the pub.

These type of articles are thouroughly misleading.   There are some scenarios where the death rate is kept to a few thousand and mortality is just like a bad flu epidemic.   If that happens great, and we went too far.  We lost a lot of jobs because we were too cautious.  That isn't so good, but we can celebrate most of us have our health and can resume our lives.

There are a lot of scenarios where this does not happen.   500,000 deaths in a few weeks wasn't some extreme scenario, I looked through the paper and you wouldn't really argue with any of it.  In these scenarios we lose hundreds of thousands of people we didn't need to.    We lose a lot of jobs too as we were too reckless.  We will get on with our lives too, but we lose a lot of people and the economy is trashed anyway. 

It isn't the fact it is new that has caused the reaction, it is the fact it will leave huge numbers of bodies piled up in a very short period.  We can cope with 500,000 deaths over the year, we can't cope with 500,000 extra ones in a month. 

I could go through the article and criticise a lot of it, but am home schooling so don't have the time right now.  But focussing on current death rates is idiotic, really idiotic.  We know what is likely to happen in 2 weeks with inadequate action, we can see Italy and Spain.  We know people don't die the second they are infected, they die 17 days later on average.  We know this lag is there.  We know cases were increasing every 2 or 3 days and it will take a couple of weeks until we can see the effect of the new measures. 

If in a month or so there is a really good outcome, and our NHS isn't overwhelmed, and we discover half the population already has immunity.  We overeacted and we can all go back to booking our holidays and reopening our pubs.  Some businesses that were on the brink already will be lost.  I can look for work again, and my hope to retire a bit before pension age may be tralistic again.   I think that would be a good result in the circumstances, and will be happy we avoided the really bad results.

Some of the assumptions will be shown to be wrong, so what?
I'm totes sold on we're overreacting but tbf, I don't believe there's a climate emergency either

It is a similar thinking.

If you think there is an element of doubt, so there is only a 90% chance that the climate warming had been caused by human action.  

Do you
a) stop burning coal or

b) write an article in the Spectator saying there is a 10% chance this isn't down to us, and tell people assumptions can be wrong, so go build loads of coal powrler stations and go buy yourself big V8 cockmobiles.

Different ways of looking at the same thing, but I'd be firmly trying to do something rather than do nothing.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: mondatoo on March 26, 2020, 01:08:03 PM
Potentially positive news from what I assume is classed as a reputable source:

https://youtu.be/6bTF0_GUsRg

Thanks to all for their contributions itt and stay safe everyone.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 01:13:17 PM
Potentially positive news from what I assume is classed as a reputable source:

https://youtu.be/6bTF0_GUsRg

Thanks to all for their contributions itt and stay safe everyone.

oh ffs. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 26, 2020, 01:15:35 PM
Potentially positive news from what I assume is classed as a reputable source:

https://youtu.be/6bTF0_GUsRg

Thanks to all for their contributions itt and stay safe everyone.

That’s it, off out on the piss tonight!  :D


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: arbboy on March 26, 2020, 01:31:09 PM
Fingers crossed the report is right.   


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Chompy on March 26, 2020, 01:42:50 PM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

Good piece I found.

Best article I’ve read making the case against drastic action at this point, thanks for finding it.

Sure thing. Took some finding but glad I made the effort.

Tbh I'm with nirvana at the moment in leaning towards this being overhyped sniffles but we're all still guessing of course.

The neighbour's made at least three essential journeys in her Range Rover already today but I Will NOT be going out.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 26, 2020, 02:10:58 PM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

Good piece I found.

Best article I’ve read making the case against drastic action at this point, thanks for finding it.

Sure thing. Took some finding but glad I made the effort.

Tbh I'm with nirvana at the moment in leaning towards this being overhyped sniffles but we're all still guessing of course.

The neighbour's made at least three essential journeys in her Range Rover already today but I Will NOT be going out.

I‘m still leaning heavily towards our reaction has been late and is woefully inadequate. The guy in your article made a few points that were of more interest to me than most of the rest of the counter arguments that I’ve come across.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Karabiner on March 26, 2020, 02:27:28 PM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

Good piece I found.

Best article I’ve read making the case against drastic action at this point, thanks for finding it.



The neighbour's made at least three essential journeys in her Range Rover already today but I Will NOT be going out.

My name is Michael Pain..


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 03:06:28 PM
Fingers crossed the report is right.   

It isn't.  It misrepresents what was a fairly poor piece of "research."

https://www.livescience.com/half-the-uk-infected-coronavirus-covid19.html (https://www.livescience.com/half-the-uk-infected-coronavirus-covid19.html)

Basically they ran a few scenarios, one of which was pretty damn optimistic, added a few unrealistic assumptions and concluded it was possible half the population was already infected.   That scenario does not even fit to known data.  The press has ignored the less favourable outcomes in the "research" and presented it as "Oxford University says 50% of the population has already been infected."

It is possible that 50% of the population has been infected, but it is pretty unlikely and shouldn't be the basis of public policy. 


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: EvilPie on March 26, 2020, 03:09:21 PM

Actually we didn’t even touch the packaging, and the packaging didn’t even touch a surface in the house, we just emptied the food out and slung the boxes.

Does heat kill it? If so how hot does it have to be?

I was thinking about takeaway food the other day as I fancied a bag of chips. I was thinking of maybe sticking it in the microwave for a minute to kill anything that may be lingering but don't know if it would help.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 26, 2020, 03:24:48 PM

Actually we didn’t even touch the packaging, and the packaging didn’t even touch a surface in the house, we just emptied the food out and slung the boxes.

Does heat kill it? If so how hot does it have to be?

I was thinking about takeaway food the other day as I fancied a bag of chips. I was thinking of maybe sticking it in the microwave for a minute to kill anything that may be lingering but don't know if it would help.


This would kill it, certainly at high power. Anything upwards of 60C would do it, with a safety margin.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: AdamM on March 26, 2020, 03:31:27 PM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvEWOBAzHf4.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 26, 2020, 04:22:45 PM

The 15:08 update appears to confirm that they are going to manipulate our figures in a way to ensure we can’t assess success/failure of government inaction and that we can’t be compared in a meaningful way to other nations. Not exactly helpful in tackling the problem.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 26, 2020, 04:54:55 PM
I'm sure it is at the forefront of their mind to manipulate public perception, and not to try getting the country through this.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 26, 2020, 05:09:37 PM

The 15:08 update appears to confirm that they are going to manipulate our figures in a way to ensure we can’t assess success/failure of government inaction and that we can’t be compared in a meaningful way to other nations. Not exactly helpful in tackling the problem.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452)

The fuller story, if accurate on PM with Super Evan, is that yesterday's numbers covered 12 hours with the intention of transitioning to a regular report at 2pm each day for deaths to midnight the prior day. Today's numbers are expected to reflect 36 hours and from tomorrow a regular 24 hour number

So expect a big jump today - take an approx average for a 24 hour period or do what you like with the number and then from tomorrow should be a regular thing.

Just been to B & Q click and collect, confirmed that tinfoil hats in very short supply currently


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 26, 2020, 05:15:16 PM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

piece I found.

FYP

I am an actuary and have been mathematically modelling for 30 years.  I am not Woodsey's bloke down the pub.

These type of articles are thouroughly misleading.   There are some scenarios where the death rate is kept to a few thousand and mortality is just like a bad flu epidemic.   If that happens great, and we went too far.  We lost a lot of jobs because we were too cautious.  That isn't so good, but we can celebrate most of us have our health and can resume our lives.

There are a lot of scenarios where this does not happen.   500,000 deaths in a few weeks wasn't some extreme scenario, I looked through the paper and you wouldn't really argue with any of it.  In these scenarios we lose hundreds of thousands of people we didn't need to.    We lose a lot of jobs too as we were too reckless.  We will get on with our lives too, but we lose a lot of people and the economy is trashed anyway. 

It isn't the fact it is new that has caused the reaction, it is the fact it will leave huge numbers of bodies piled up in a very short period.  We can cope with 500,000 deaths over the year, we can't cope with 500,000 extra ones in a month. 

I could go through the article and criticise a lot of it, but am home schooling so don't have the time right now.  But focussing on current death rates is idiotic, really idiotic.  We know what is likely to happen in 2 weeks with inadequate action, we can see Italy and Spain.  We know people don't die the second they are infected, they die 17 days later on average.  We know this lag is there.  We know cases were increasing every 2 or 3 days and it will take a couple of weeks until we can see the effect of the new measures. 

If in a month or so there is a really good outcome, and our NHS isn't overwhelmed, and we discover half the population already has immunity.  We overeacted and we can all go back to booking our holidays and reopening our pubs.  Some businesses that were on the brink already will be lost.  I can look for work again, and my hope to retire a bit before pension age may be tralistic again.   I think that would be a good result in the circumstances, and will be happy we avoided the really bad results.

Some of the assumptions will be shown to be wrong, so what?
I'm totes sold on we're overreacting but tbf, I don't believe there's a climate emergency either

It is a similar thinking.

If you think there is an element of doubt, so there is only a 90% chance that the climate warming had been caused by human action.  

Do you
a) stop burning coal or

b) write an article in the Spectator saying there is a 10% chance this isn't down to us, and tell people assumptions can be wrong, so go build loads of coal powrler stations and go buy yourself big V8 cockmobiles.

Different ways of looking at the same thing, but I'd be firmly trying to do something rather than do nothing.


Is it b) ?



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 26, 2020, 05:19:55 PM

The 15:08 update appears to confirm that they are going to manipulate our figures in a way to ensure we can’t assess success/failure of government inaction and that we can’t be compared in a meaningful way to other nations. Not exactly helpful in tackling the problem.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452)

The fuller story, if accurate on PM with Super Evan, is that yesterday's numbers covered 12 hours with the intention of transitioning to a regular report at 2pm each day for deaths to midnight the prior day. Today's numbers are expected to reflect 36 hours and from tomorrow a regular 24 hour number

So expect a big jump today - take an approx average for a 24 hour period or do what you like with the number and then from tomorrow should be a regular thing.

Just been to B & Q click and collect, confirmed that tinfoil hats in very short supply currently

Thanks for the info. I’m aware I’m closer than I’ve ever been before to needing a tinfoil hat (and a cat in a tinfoil hat) on this. Let’s wait and see the next numbers.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: nirvana on March 26, 2020, 05:25:15 PM

The 15:08 update appears to confirm that they are going to manipulate our figures in a way to ensure we can’t assess success/failure of government inaction and that we can’t be compared in a meaningful way to other nations. Not exactly helpful in tackling the problem.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452)

The fuller story, if accurate on PM with Super Evan, is that yesterday's numbers covered 12 hours with the intention of transitioning to a regular report at 2pm each day for deaths to midnight the prior day. Today's numbers are expected to reflect 36 hours and from tomorrow a regular 24 hour number

So expect a big jump today - take an approx average for a 24 hour period or do what you like with the number and then from tomorrow should be a regular thing.

Just been to B & Q click and collect, confirmed that tinfoil hats in very short supply currently

Thanks for the info. I’m aware I’m closer than I’ve ever been before to needing a tinfoil hat (and a cat in a tinfoil hat) on this. Let’s wait and see the next numbers.

Nick Watt of Newsnight was on as well backtracking a little on his assertion that the NHS can't release death stats until they get permission from the family. They do aim to inform families before including the fact of a death in the stats, which can cause a 'very slight delay'. They also ask families if they are happy to release other data, eg age, other conditions and so some will decline and they just report the fact of a death from the virus or at least that the person had the virus when they died.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: kukushkin88 on March 26, 2020, 05:27:56 PM

The 15:08 update appears to confirm that they are going to manipulate our figures in a way to ensure we can’t assess success/failure of government inaction and that we can’t be compared in a meaningful way to other nations. Not exactly helpful in tackling the problem.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452)

The fuller story, if accurate on PM with Super Evan, is that yesterday's numbers covered 12 hours with the intention of transitioning to a regular report at 2pm each day for deaths to midnight the prior day. Today's numbers are expected to reflect 36 hours and from tomorrow a regular 24 hour number

So expect a big jump today - take an approx average for a 24 hour period or do what you like with the number and then from tomorrow should be a regular thing.

Just been to B & Q click and collect, confirmed that tinfoil hats in very short supply currently

Thanks for the info. I’m aware I’m closer than I’ve ever been before to needing a tinfoil hat (and a cat in a tinfoil hat) on this. Let’s wait and see the next numbers.

Nick Watt of Newsnight was on as well backtracking a little on his assertion that the NHS can't release death stats until they get permission from the family. They do aim to inform families before including the fact of a death in the stats, which can cause a 'very slight delay'. They also ask families if they are happy to release other data, eg age, other conditions and so some will decline and they just report the fact of a death from the virus or at least that the person had the virus when they died.

Thank you, that all makes sense.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 05:54:04 PM
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

piece I found.

FYP

I am an actuary and have been mathematically modelling for 30 years.  I am not Woodsey's bloke down the pub.

These type of articles are thouroughly misleading.   There are some scenarios where the death rate is kept to a few thousand and mortality is just like a bad flu epidemic.   If that happens great, and we went too far.  We lost a lot of jobs because we were too cautious.  That isn't so good, but we can celebrate most of us have our health and can resume our lives.

There are a lot of scenarios where this does not happen.   500,000 deaths in a few weeks wasn't some extreme scenario, I looked through the paper and you wouldn't really argue with any of it.  In these scenarios we lose hundreds of thousands of people we didn't need to.    We lose a lot of jobs too as we were too reckless.  We will get on with our lives too, but we lose a lot of people and the economy is trashed anyway. 

It isn't the fact it is new that has caused the reaction, it is the fact it will leave huge numbers of bodies piled up in a very short period.  We can cope with 500,000 deaths over the year, we can't cope with 500,000 extra ones in a month. 

I could go through the article and criticise a lot of it, but am home schooling so don't have the time right now.  But focussing on current death rates is idiotic, really idiotic.  We know what is likely to happen in 2 weeks with inadequate action, we can see Italy and Spain.  We know people don't die the second they are infected, they die 17 days later on average.  We know this lag is there.  We know cases were increasing every 2 or 3 days and it will take a couple of weeks until we can see the effect of the new measures. 

If in a month or so there is a really good outcome, and our NHS isn't overwhelmed, and we discover half the population already has immunity.  We overeacted and we can all go back to booking our holidays and reopening our pubs.  Some businesses that were on the brink already will be lost.  I can look for work again, and my hope to retire a bit before pension age may be tralistic again.   I think that would be a good result in the circumstances, and will be happy we avoided the really bad results.

Some of the assumptions will be shown to be wrong, so what?
I'm totes sold on we're overreacting but tbf, I don't believe there's a climate emergency either

It is a similar thinking.

If you think there is an element of doubt, so there is only a 90% chance that the climate warming had been caused by human action.  

Do you
a) stop burning coal or

b) write an article in the Spectator saying there is a 10% chance this isn't down to us, and tell people assumptions can be wrong, so go build loads of coal powrler stations and go buy yourself big V8 cockmobiles.

Different ways of looking at the same thing, but I'd be firmly trying to do something rather than do nothing.


Is it b) ?



For some


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 06:11:52 PM
I didn't mention earlier, but on my way back from my run in the park there was a police car in the car park.   It may just have been coincidence, but he appeared to tail me most of the way home.  I accept he may just have been looking for someone else, but imagine if that is the future?


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 26, 2020, 06:14:26 PM
I didn't mention earlier, but on my way back from my run in the park there was a police car in the car park.   It may just have been coincidence, but he appeared to tail me most of the way home.  I accept he may just have been looking for someone else, but imagine if that is the future?

Not likely to be the future, but it is the present.



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: RickBFA on March 26, 2020, 07:18:22 PM
A significant percentage of the public still don't see to get the social distancing message. They are either ignorant, don't give a damn or just thick as pig shit.

I take the dog out every day and avoid our local park but do walk around the perimeter of it. A lot of people walking way closer than 2 metres past each other there (passing very close to each other), people sat on the grass as if its a bank holiday. I saw 8 groups of builders doing work on houses and at least half were within a metre of each other as I walked past. Heard there was a group playing cricket together not far from us.

I generally try to walk on the back streets in the suburbs to stay away from these lunatics. I have had occasional runners that are quite happy to run towards you passing at very close distance unless I stepped to one side.

Its fucking weird.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Marky147 on March 26, 2020, 07:58:53 PM
Thick as pig shit and ignorant, would be my guess.

My brother is a self-employed builder, and he has put all his work off for 3 weeks. He had to finish one little job as a favour for the client on Tuesday, but told his labourer not to come.

Only person he saw was the neighbour, who craned his neck over the fence and asked what he thought he was doing.


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Doobs on March 26, 2020, 08:16:46 PM

The 15:08 update appears to confirm that they are going to manipulate our figures in a way to ensure we can’t assess success/failure of government inaction and that we can’t be compared in a meaningful way to other nations. Not exactly helpful in tackling the problem.

 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52044452)

The fuller story, if accurate on PM with Super Evan, is that yesterday's numbers covered 12 hours with the intention of transitioning to a regular report at 2pm each day for deaths to midnight the prior day. Today's numbers are expected to reflect 36 hours and from tomorrow a regular 24 hour number

So expect a big jump today - take an approx average for a 24 hour period or do what you like with the number and then from tomorrow should be a regular thing.

Just been to B & Q click and collect, confirmed that tinfoil hats in very short supply currently

Thanks for the info. I’m aware I’m closer than I’ve ever been before to needing a tinfoil hat (and a cat in a tinfoil hat) on this. Let’s wait and see the next numbers.

New numbers are below.  Deaths up over 100 a day.  The reason for yesterday's result (based on 8 hours) was because the methodology changed.  You can put your tinfoil hat away and stand down.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52056534 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52056534)



Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: I KNOW IT on March 26, 2020, 09:42:38 PM
Here is a post I made on FB . Maybe the grammar is shite but a lot of people have shared and got the message. 

Please don’t get caught up in political BS but realise the seriousness of this situation and spread the word on your wall .
 Try and persuade people to stay home if possible in anyway you can as it’s the only way to contain it.  Say what you want about China but we have contained it and now enjoying a reasonable normal lifestyle

Hi everyone I know these are difficult times .

But can I tell you if you didn’t know , I have lived in China for the last 7 years and I want to share my experience

I was made were made aware this coronavirus on Late January. Immediately restrictions were put into place ,  as this terrible virus spread tighter restrictions were put into place.   

Let me tell you , these restrictions were tight but we all had to follow them as we knew it was the only way to control this outbreak.

My family and friends messaged and called regularly to see how I were but no one understood the  magnitude of this situation including me .
I won’t go into the economics of this problem because that’s still the unknown  but it’s damn scary

What I want to say is, China first experienced this horrific virus now classed as a pandemic and they put into place so many strict regulations which were followed by the people
 
Now we ( China ) have it under control and are possibly the safest place on the world to be at this time

I love China in what they did and as my home. They protected the masses and I truly pray the rest of the world follow their example to contain this nightmare

For all of you out there , please stay home for a few weeks and save lives , especially your loved ones

If you keep going out and ignoring the lockdown, then I’m sorry you deserve to be locked up in prison or worse.

Take care and God bless and it’s going to be alright eventually. 
Miss my family & friends from England

I should probably add , after all these tight restrictions for a while , we are all now enjoying our normal lives. Going out to bars and clubs .
It’s only a small sacrifice for a lifetime of fun  xx


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 26, 2020, 09:58:14 PM
I got a round of applause for putting the bins out earlier, it’s not that hard is it?  ;carlocitrone;


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: I KNOW IT on March 26, 2020, 09:59:39 PM
For you guys worrying about holidays , get a grip.
I have both parents in their 80’s and a sister in her 60’s at high risk .  
I am looking that I could potentially have my whole family wiped out by this virus . We should really try to pursued  friends , family  to stay  home . The. It is containable.  

I appreciate the economic loss of businesses around the world and China will experience their 1st recession for sure , but the sacrifice was saving millions of lives.  I will possibly experience the loss of my job but I will always state the measures China took were worth it


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: I KNOW IT on March 26, 2020, 10:01:31 PM
I got a round of applause for putting the bins out earlier, it’s not that hard is it?  ;carlocitrone;
Not sure if you are replying to me or not . But WTF are you on about you plum


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 26, 2020, 10:03:10 PM
I got a round of applause for putting the bins out earlier, it’s not that hard is it?  ;carlocitrone;
Not sure if you are replying to me or not . But WTF are you on about you plum

Sigh....not replying to or referring to you in anyway, ‘twas a joke mate, people here will will get it  :)


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: I KNOW IT on March 26, 2020, 10:08:08 PM
It’s probably for 3-4 weeks but even less if idiots in the UK would follow the rules.  I’m so glad I left that place


Title: Re: COVID19
Post by: Woodsey on March 26, 2020, 10:12:38 PM
It’s probably for 3-4 weeks but even less if idiots in the UK would follow the rules.  I’m so glad I left that place

Our restrictions aren’t as tight as China, they reckon we are talking more like 10-12 weeks before we turn the corner.