there is a unspoken(except in private) feeling amongst a lot of her doctors that there may well be a link but they cannot voice their concern as there is at present no real large study that has found a link
Doctors putting 'feelings' ahead of 'evidence' - WTF are they teaching at medical school these days?
Andrew...shame on you sir for the sarcasm....i believ some of the best research and diagnosis can be based on a hunch or feeling intially..and i believe is the first rule of medicine is first do no harm
what i believe i was trying to impart is that there are a few doctors who having seen pre and post mmr babies/kids are uncomfortable with the position at present that there is no link(but voicing it seems to be a dangerous route). if that is at a local level what is the national position
the fact(and i acknowledge on the basis of study to date) that there seems to be no link does not make it 100% there is not...facts change over time.....as does medicine and medical fact
i would hate to be in the position similar to thalidomide was it? where it was safe - no problem - until it wasn't
so i believe what i am saying is surely there is room for choice for parents until we have had a wide spread wide ranging study into mmr.
i would not be of a mind to say hey ho hindsight is a wonderful thing if my or another child was to end up with aspergers or serious autism for the want of a choice and and exhaustive study.
open minded i am both ways but i believe in choice

now i`m at work so need to be on here sparingly so will return