|
121
|
Poker Forums / The Rail / Re: Brian Hastings
|
on: June 29, 2015, 11:24:56 PM
|
Really good article, and makes some very important points on other issues too. Hi Stu,
Your OP had me gasping - "how can Stu be so wrong?" was my initial reaction - but it now appears you were not fully up to date, so that's fair enough.
Yeah I definitely was not fully aware of what had happened. After reading this thread, and doing some more reading online about it - including the article linked above - it is clear that he went WAY further than just playing a couple of SCOOPs.
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
Poker Forums / The Rail / Re: Brian Hastings
|
on: June 29, 2015, 07:58:25 PM
|
The account started off playing smaller stakes and played a lot worse. I thought it was a fish until a few days later I saw he'd 10xed the stakes and the games werent full anymore. Even if he didnt set out to cheat his opponents by hiding his name, the advantage he did from doing so was simply huge. The account played a bunch of plo against people who might not have played Hastings and he only contacted a few friends to tell them. David Baker who pointed it out had played thousands of hands with the account before being told it was Stinger. Berri Sweet posted 2 hands he would have almost certainly played very differently if he knew it was Hastings on the account, one where he 3bet bluffed a flop and one where he checked back a pretty slam dunk valuebet vs a reg. Stingers name change cost Berri probably 30k across those two pots and a pretty large amount in "ev" too if you'd rather not be results orientated. Hastings has offered a bunch of his friends friends some equity back. I think this shows that he knows it was extremely unethical. I do kinda feel for him, and if he someone had got it out much wider in the community to the extent where he was just vpning I wouldn't particularly have a problem even though it is extremely harsh on the other american grinders that have had to significantly change their lifestyle to move out of the US to play on stars. He certainly exploited playing under a fresh account to get action. He even got to play isildur, a privilege the Hastings account probably doesn't enjoy too much. http://calvinayre.com/2015/06/29/poker/brian-hastings-scandal-a-view-the-poker-world-doesnt-want-to-hear-by-obst/The above link is the best summary/opinion I've seen. Okay fair enough, that does sound pretty shady then. I was under the impression after just a quick google search that all he had done was play some of the SCOOPs. If he has played loads of cash games using this different account then it is obviously very unethical - unless he told EVERYONE that he played against that it was him playing (in which case I have no problem with it), which he obviously did not.
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
Poker Forums / The Rail / Brian Hastings
|
on: June 29, 2015, 07:17:20 PM
|
|
Saw some vitriol towards him on twitter etc and so googled to find out what he had done.
Turns out he was playing online from the USA using a VPN and someone else's pokerstars account.
It seems to me that this is not exactly the worst crime in the world. He was not multi-accounting in order to cheat (by having his opponents not know it was him), he was only doing it so that he could play some online tourneys whilst in the USA. And from what I gather he contacted as many of his opponents as he could to tell them it was him playing on the account.
What do you guys reckon? Was he really all that out of order/unethical? I realise ofc that by the letter of the law what he did was wrong, since it break the T&Cs etc. But it just does not seem that bad to me.
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: Chess thread
|
on: June 25, 2015, 06:41:42 PM
|
Played a miniature this afternoon with a nice (if 'standard') sacrifice.
1 e4 e5 2 f4 exf4 3 Nf3 d6 4 d4 Bg4 5 Bxf4 Nd7 6 Bc4 f6 7 Nc3 g5
Black's weird (bad) last two moves allow a cool move, winning the game immediately. If you already know it then you'll be like "big deal, standard" (and no need to make a 'guess' since this quiz is aimed at beginners). But if you have not seen this idea before then try to work out what White should play from the diagrammed position below. It's pretty when you see it.
For anyone who has looked at the position, the move is 8 Nxg5! Point is that after 8...Bxd1 White mates in two with Bf7+ and Nd5 mate.
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: Chess thread
|
on: June 23, 2015, 04:21:33 PM
|
|
Played a miniature this afternoon with a nice (if 'standard') sacrifice.
1 e4 e5 2 f4 exf4 3 Nf3 d6 4 d4 Bg4 5 Bxf4 Nd7 6 Bc4 f6 7 Nc3 g5
Black's weird (bad) last two moves allow a cool move, winning the game immediately. If you already know it then you'll be like "big deal, standard" (and no need to make a 'guess' since this quiz is aimed at beginners). But if you have not seen this idea before then try to work out what White should play from the diagrammed position below. It's pretty when you see it.
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
Poker Forums / The Rail / Re: Percentage situation
|
on: June 09, 2015, 06:10:21 PM
|
|
Player A is one of those 'EV boys' I guess. Like the guys who cash big in Vegas and try to sell their dollars to friends for a vig etc.
I am pretty sure he will never be convinced that he is wrong. As far as he is concerned it was never discussed and so 'by the letter of the law' he is not obliged to give up the 10%. Short-sighted and completely classless, but there are a lot out there in the gambling world just like him unfortunately.
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
Poker Forums / The Rail / Re: Percentage situation
|
on: June 09, 2015, 05:57:29 PM
|
Player A should insist that PLayer B gets 10% of Copenhagen.
Player B should insist that Player A gets 10% of travel/hotel covered.
That's how friends do it.
Spot on.
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: Windows 10
|
on: June 08, 2015, 11:55:16 PM
|
|
Okay cool, I've registered for it now. Says it will be out near end of this month. Should I back up files etc before installing it? Just in case... or is it likely to just install over top of my current OS without losing anything?
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: Windows 10
|
on: June 08, 2015, 10:01:32 PM
|
|
Hmmm, well it seems consensus is to just sign up for Windows 10 then. One additional reason that I am sort of loath to do so though is that I have this little add-on the Windows 8 that I bought called 'startisback' - it brings back the start button on bottom left of screen and makes Windows 8 work like the older and better Windows. I presume it will no longer work on Windows 10. But then again, maybe I should not even be using this startisback thing?
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
Community Forums / The Lounge / Windows 10
|
on: June 07, 2015, 02:53:34 AM
|
|
Just noticed a little notification thing at bottom of my screen and when I click on it it is saying I can sign up for a free upgrade to Windows 10 when it is released. Is this something they are offering to everyone? Should I take up the option? I currently have Windows 8 (or is it 8.1? I don't know tbh... I bought it a few months ago so presumably it is up to date) and it seems fine for me. Don't especially want to be one of the first to have the new operating system since I gather there are always a ton of bugs etc in the first few months. But on the other hand, I do not want to 'miss out' on getting it for free and then have to pay for it later on.
Advice from those less technically challenged than me please...
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |