For him to have a good 6 and snap me off, think that's pretty reasonable given he raise-called flop

Villain seems solid->strong and a little movey, don't think he respects me too much

PokerStars Hand #118419399562:  5 Card Omaha Pot Limit ($1/$2 USD) - 2014/07/06 20:13:47 WET [2014/07/06 15:13:47 ET]
Table 'Mancunia III' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 2: cluelessiam ($222.18 in chips)
Seat 3: Gabin007as ($120 in chips)
Seat 4: BabyGrand ($785.06 in chips)
Seat 5: wazzbot ($1100.34 in chips)
wazzbot: posts small blind $1
cluelessiam: posts big blind $2
Gabin007as: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to wazzbot [ Ah ]
Gabin007as: raises $5 to $7
BabyGrand: calls $7
wazzbot: raises $23 to $30
cluelessiam: folds
Gabin007as: calls $23
BabyGrand: calls $23
*** FLOP *** [ ]
wazzbot: bets $44
Gabin007as: folds
BabyGrand: raises $78 to $122
wazzbot: raises $160 to $282
BabyGrand: calls $160
*** TURN *** [ ] []
wazzbot: bets $654.50

Any other suggestions for how to play it?

I'm happily c-betting flop and c-folding turn

Excellent episode, stuff moving very fast!

Quite amusing to see them get from borough market to liverpool street station in seconds.

Jack never remembers to touch in with his oyster card, gonna rack up lots of fines.

375bb deep tho

Have the following notes on villain: 'full psb bluff otr with no blockers, missed draw
check back top set no extras on drawy board, 3b pot'

Flat or raise? I can see him folding a bare set but at least calling with a bunch of other stuff and possibly jamming it in with a big combo draw.

PokerStars Hand #118014511283:  5 Card Omaha Pot Limit ($1/$2 USD) - 2014/06/26 20:40:44 WET [2014/06/26 15:40:44 ET]
Table 'Ebella IV' 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: UziStuNNa ($225.11 in chips)
Seat 2: ShiFtYFiNGeR ($197 in chips)
Seat 3: wazzbot ($1062.23 in chips)
Seat 4: Quanster ($160 in chips)
Seat 5: Satorin7 ($200 in chips)
Seat 6: K0Ku$@iGinK0 ($750.16 in chips)
K0Ku$@iGinK0: posts small blind $1
UziStuNNa: posts big blind $2
Quanster: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to wazzbot [ ]
ShiFtYFiNGeR: folds
wazzbot: raises $7 to $9
Quanster: folds
Satorin7: calls $9
K0Ku$@iGinK0: calls $8
UziStuNNa: folds
*** FLOP *** [ ]
K0Ku$@iGinK0: bets $29.60
wazzbot: raises $70.40 to $100

I torrent it

Good episode today

Really enjoyed freeze-framing the zoom in on dalston to find out where exactly it was, not far from me and a pub i go to semi-regularly

€190 i think?

I would lead flop here expecting not to get raised wide - sets of and are unlikely and we block , and only hands like nutty wraps + pairs will raise, and perhaps OP+oesd+bdfds, and even then a lot of them will probably flat.

I would then be barrelling any 2/3/4/6/J/Q/K of clubs or hearts, I think, depending on who calls and how quick.

She's Chloe O'FuckingBrian, man, she can do anything from that Alienware.

Don't think we have much of a bluffing range and as such think the range of hands he's betting when checked to is wider than that he's calling with. Really wouldn't feel comfortable bet-calling here either.

What range would you shove here following a flat from the sb? 66+, ATo+, KQs?

I'm 100% flatting here, doubt we get many light crams 30bb deep and the bb has a decent reshoving stack.

FWIW I knew before I posted the hand that this should be a raise pre at this stack depth - I've been experimenting with limping some of the time and this isn't the right spot to do it in. I was more interested in whether I should have played the hand differently postflop at all.

and the biggest mistake you will see any fish, reg, bad reg, good reg, best reg, worst reg, cash game player etc make will be stacking off too light/playing too aggressive/ playing too fps/ trying too many things. Almost none of their leaks is playing too tight.

I've got a relatively small sample size but I've tried playing tight and I end up chipping down heavily. My strategy is obviously never as simplistic as that - I open up my game according to conditions - and I do certainly spew sometimes, but the only times I've ever had good results - Int Freeroll, EPT San Remo, party highroller, 2nd in party sunday major a couple of years back (all within six weeks of each other) - had nothing to do with playing tight or playing loose, I played well and ran hot at the right times. Since then I might be down $80k in MTTs overall. 'Just' playing tight, never getting it in light, rarely bluffing, not trying anything new, appears to be a losing strategy for me. Again, I understand that variance is high and especially so in a lot of the MTTs I've played being massive fields, and it's certainly easy to have run awful over this period and have that account for my losses, but just to say 'keep it simple, value-bet hard, don't spew' etc isn't enough.