The latest of the 30 for 30 podcasts is about the Ivey edge sorting cases.

It focuses more on the Chinese accomplice but she has quite an interesting story.

30for30podcasts.com

Incredible listen.... ty for posting

Iheanacho  is going to be a great signing and one that could be " we missed out there "  could be top goalscorer punt whether he ends up  ..I think they will pay him and Vardy together

defense looks suspect without Huth and an aging King...who is Maguire ? the guy from Hull ?

One thing I notice ...Vardy, Ozaki,Mahrez,Gray, Iheanacho  are all very light weight ? what do you think not much muscle in the squad ?

its Made the BBC

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-humber-40659199#

1.01 Helmuth trying to muscle in on a" coaching fee "

this is quite interesting

Polk goes through big hands from day 6

It's so weird, Polk has every single one of the characteristics I usually dislike intensely in people.

Yet, somehow, for some reason, I like him.

Does he vote Tory  ?

Wow...

very good work mate  3 x big scores  really pleased for you , now get your shit together with your diary

See you soon

F  x

 pm sir

Isn't Stoke @ 7-1 the ideal trading spot?

Start badly, Hughes comes under pressure, gets the sack, is replaced by Alan Pardew. Lay back for freeroll...

If no objections think we should bang in £200 @ 7-1. Not my bet though. Worst-case scenario we should be able to close it out for a small loss.

Tightly, would you like me to do this for Fred ?

errr. tikay to say yay/nay please.

(i understand its with a view to buying it back with the aim of freerolling)

     you started this madness   

1-11 and formation next season Rich ?

I think I am going to create a tulip ICO - must be in the valuation range of this:

[img width=600 height=415]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DE-cuLQVoAAmE0M?format=jpg&name=large[/img

His twitter feed was incredible yesterday. BTC to 500k within 3 years, Jesse Slyvia and a few other poker players were talking about bets.

https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/887012614131372032

mcaffee is legit mentally insane   

Titty wins the thread

Corals Strange outfit for sure ..I got on Sinclair and Ott at 25s and 33s respectively but I went into a shop 

Funny Corals  story ...Last season I went into a shop to put a decent bet on the football premiership where they were joint best price with 7 others.

Of course this is a highly visible market but they still asked the stupid" is he a regular "questions etc etc and then they asked me if I was paying by card and then told the girl behind the counter to ask me for the card so they could read the name ...just so lol .

I refused and I asked if they wanted the bet or not they said " yes " .I then went to place the bet and paid with the card and then after reading my name they offered me half at the price and half at .. xxxx whatever.  "Quite incredible they would do that       I walked out they shop without the bet on and they cut the price.

Next day  Hills went stand out price and took all my bet without and questions. WP Hills as it was Man city to win the premiership. 

WSOP " Sorry, this market has been suspended " Coral

let me know if it goes back up please

Back up. Sinclair into 18/1, Ott 25/1.

Pokershares will let you back Ott not to win at 1.07 which is about 1/14 if I understand their odds correctly.  Someone also looking to back Ott at 23/1 on betfair.  Suspect the 14/1 buy price on the exchange is likely closer to correct than the lay price.  So Ott must still be a bet, and Sinclair is getting more borderline.  Think you still get +ev on both.

Wow, just managed to use the coeal website and backed both again without anything going wrong. 

explain  ?

Haha, good old Coral.

Hard to split Coral, Betway, Sky, VC, 365 and Paddy Power these days when it comes to be utterly tez.

Have £40 on Plymouth to beat Posh on the opening day. General 5-2 fine if we can't get the 11-4 with Sporting. More on why in due course.

Nothing wrong with companies offering 33/1 about 14/1 chances. 

Sitting here hoping the ban hammer isn't going to fall.

Corals have lost touch with reality , part of me wants to say great when you get on a mistake but generally  its hard work  . Im not sure who to blame   the lol traders or directors  ? either way they seem clueless.

On The WSOP its quite interesting that Corals and Ladbrokes prices are now identical ... coincidence  ?  no chance  ! , even though I appreciate its the same generic formula every year for card odds & red or black etc it does make me wonder how these "multi million " betting companies are structured 

https://sports.ladbrokes.com/en-gb/betting/poker/nternational/world-series-of-poker/2017-world-series-of-poker/225341410/

I wrote this last year and suggested a bet for the winning main event hand to be a pocket pair at 7/1.
http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=67250.0

"I've gone through the stats of winning hole cards from Wikipedia from no limit holdem tournaments where it shows the winning hand. I've excluded mixed games/Pot Limit/Limit and ante up.

Here is my data: (pocket pairs/total tournaments)

WSOP Mains 13/44
12/35 WSOP 2016
9/34 WSOP 2015
5/33 WSOP 2014
6/36 WSOP 2013
10/45 EPT first five seasons (doesn't show hole cards on wikipedia after that)
16/38 WSOPE and Australia all time

Total 71/265 tournies where the winning hand was a pocket pair."


This year at WSOP I've just done a quick count of the NLH tournaments and winning hands at WSOP and I have got 11/40, a similar ratio. Giving us 82/306 once I've added last years ME too.

Again it is priced up at 7/1 with Choral in their WSOP section and I've bet again because I think it is value.

What do people think?

Agree with you Phil , Corals office junior prices again


Any Two Unsuited, Unpaired Cards   1/2
    
Any Two Suited Cards                     2/1
    
Any Pocket Pair                              7/1


In a heads up match its likely to be an all in pre flop scenario especially with a short stack and in that case the pocket pair is a flip . of course it could be pair versus pair or AK V AQ

If i was betting to Corals margins and based on my experience I would have it

Any Two Unsuited, Unpaired Cards   4/7
  
Any Pocket Pair                              7/4

Any Two Suited Cards                      7/1
    
Hence 7 -1 is too big  imo  , calling Doobs


Edit  7 - 1 still there on this market Rich......  25-1 & 33-1 on individual market gone

http://sports.coral.co.uk//?action=AddSelection&ev_oc_id=578861428&id=N&member=incomeaccess&profile=1sbxml0000&creferer=BTAG:a_554b_2066&seo_uri=/poker-events/world-series-of-poker/2017-world-series-of-poker-7462103.html
    

    

    

WSOP final table

Corals look like they have let the office junior price up

https://www.oddschecker.com/poker/world-series-of-poker/winner?selectionName=ben-lamb

History has taught us unpredictable results so 33-1  Ott and 25-1 Sinclair is way too big

Sinclair has got the game and balls to win it , one double up & back in it etc

WSOP final table

Corals look like they have let the office junior price up

https://www.oddschecker.com/poker/world-series-of-poker/winner?selectionName=ben-lamb

History has taught us unpredictable results so 33-1  Ott and 25-1 Sinclair is way too big

Sinclair has got the game and balls to win it , one double up & back in it