I was suprised at the lack of response to your play on the first hand. Hope it doesnt sound too harsh, of course its always easy after the event.......
Blinds: 150/300/25
Starting Stack: 38,000
UTG+2 with , raise to 650
CO calls, BTN 3bet to 1700
Call call, three way flop
Check check, BTN bets 2100
Call, fold, heads up turn
Check, BTN bets 2100, call
River
Check, BTN bets 4500, I raise to 9200, BTN ships 28,000, I fold
Logic behind this was that his reaction down every street was one of increasing worry, Logic behind check riasing river? Folding? or logic behind passive play until the river raise?
pre he had a tendency to raise really small with monsters (crying call material) so his three bet signalled a strong hand, I went with good implied odds as I didn't believe him capable of folding overpairs, float the flop seems fine to me as I have immediate outs, when they complete and he fires a second time all I put him on are AQ+/10's+, so I'm content to bomb the river expecting to get paid provided I think I'm still ahead. Worst river in the world and more-so when he snap double checked his cards, he looked excited. My raise is purely to find out where I am.
Contradiction? You check raise him on 'worst river in the world' - to find out where you are? With a player giving me action on every street on a board of that texture, I would want to show strength on the river by betting out as this willl also serve to see 'where I am'. However your passive play up til then meant you were always fighting a losing battle on the river. Absolutely would never check/raise as you are going to be left in a spot as you were, or most of the time only getting called by the better hand.
I could probably make it more but I'm worried of over committing on a paired board. His ship was almost instant, at which point what am I really beating? Correct me if im wrong but this shows a lack of having thought through this move... If im making a check raise on the river (Which but for your passive play prior is a very strong move), then Ive got to think ahead to his likely response... what if he shoves?
I don't think he 3's pre with KQ, that's not his style. So all I can reasonably have him on is AQ/AA/QQ/JJ. He could have KK, I'm not too sure on that one. But I just think calling off is terrible, not sure though.
IMO You played the hand too passively, absolutely should have raised his turn bet... this is when you need to find out how strong he is. Also perhaps you didnt think through how your passive play would influence his thoughts on the hand and his ability to get you to fold...
-----
Blinds: 250/500/50
Starting Stack: 22,500
Four limpers (UTG, CO, BTN, SB) I'm BB with , raise to 2400
UTG flats, CO folds, BTN shoves for 91,000, SB folds, I fold
Probably fairly standard but I want clarification. One important thing to note is that the button has been fairly reckless all tournament, but never like this, his standard play would have probably been a 7k 3bet, I just thought that it could be an insane play with the top of his range trying to look spewy or that it was the standard over shove. Either way I considered myself good enough not to risk everything in this spot.
Always a shove here, there are numerous spots where AK should be folded pre, this isnt one of them. You can't win tournaments by waiting for the very best spots, as they may never come....
-----