blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 28, 2024, 11:29:33 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272618 Posts in 66755 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 ... 57
676  Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: Would you trust a jury with your life? on: January 13, 2016, 03:14:10 PM
EV wise we're serving 6 months in prison for £990,000
677  Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: Would you trust a jury with your life? on: January 13, 2016, 02:42:30 PM
Most people would have to run ridiculously bad to not have an alibi with at least one witness.
678  Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story on: January 12, 2016, 11:43:02 PM
Funny to see all the people in Twitter saying they'd rather lose an entertaining game than win a dull 1-0 complaining tonight.
679  Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story on: January 12, 2016, 09:28:16 PM
Nailed on pen for both teams. Fellaini a liability as ever, nice assist though.
680  Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story on: January 12, 2016, 08:26:56 PM
8 out of the 11 are playing in non preferred positions.
681  Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story on: January 12, 2016, 07:38:20 PM
#MUFC XI to play #NUFC: De Gea, Young, Smalling, Blind, Darmian, Schneiderlin, Fellaini, Lingard, Herrera, Martial, Rooney.

0-0 incoming
682  Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: Manchester United FC, a sad and expensive story on: January 11, 2016, 06:38:52 PM
"The players are bored, fans are bored, everyone's bored. You look across at the bench and Van Gaal looks bored as well." Scholes yesterday on BT Sport

without changing manager, what are the tactical solutions to this, if ineed they are needed?

Adapting tactics to the opposition would be a start. We play the same formation vs everyone. Playing 2 defensive mids, 2 number 10's and no wingers vs a team that is going to come and put 11 men behind the ball is just asking for what happened on Saturday. The rigidity in formation is killing the team.
683  Poker Forums / The Rail / Re: When prop bets goes wrong. Splashing the pot? on: January 11, 2016, 02:41:22 PM
$50k allegedly.
684  Poker Forums / Diaries and Blogs / Re: Prose from a Poshboy on: January 10, 2016, 11:58:20 PM
Andrew Hulme imo. There's some dead money in there.
685  Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: Things that piss you off! on: January 10, 2016, 01:54:39 AM
She's a couple of years too late unless she wants to get really messy.
686  Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: Lip Sync Battle on: January 10, 2016, 01:52:01 AM
Utter cringey tripe.
687  Poker Forums / Diaries and Blogs / Re: The Best In The Business on: January 10, 2016, 01:38:59 AM
I'd be playing a mix strat of c/c and c/r although I'm not sure how to go about working out frequencies (don't own a bit of paid for GTO software). I'd assume they would be based on villains cbet and barrel frequencies. Also how much weighting we put behind our pre flop 3bet strat. I feel c/r becomes a much more desirable option when we have a less than 100% 3bet with the top 7%~ of our range. As we'd now have more pure value hands and every suited combo the board slides closer to a neutral range advantage.

The non fd version of the hand I think is just a fold. Q9bdfd,A/2/3/5bdfd gets interesting.
688  Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: Ironside in hospital on: January 08, 2016, 03:58:17 PM
All the best Iron
689  Poker Forums / Diaries and Blogs / Re: The Best In The Business on: January 08, 2016, 03:17:40 PM
The tighter you make his range, the bigger his range advantage becomes.
690  Poker Forums / Diaries and Blogs / Re: The Best In The Business on: January 08, 2016, 01:25:36 PM

Cut off raises 2.5x off 40bbs, we defend bb. We call 54dd
Flop is KJ4fd he cbets 3.2bbs, we call, we raise or we fold? And why?

Same scenario but KJ4r (no bdfd) we call, we raise or we fold? And why?

I'm by no means a pro as you well know, so thought I'd provide you with the thought process of someone who isn't. Not many of us round anymore though so probably useless to you but w/e :p

Both scenario's are completely dependant on villains competentcy, but assuming it's a reasonably dece reg...

Scenario 1 I would c/c flop. I feel like we have too much equity and too much of a range advantage to risk folding out the low equity parts of his range that he doubles with

Scenario 2, is lots more difficult, I would probably fold vs most in the current climate

I hardly play NL 6-10 handed but assuming players open co 30%ish(no idea if this is accurate anymore) obv depending on the btn, and we are defending 65%ish (guessing) co has a pretty significant range vs range advantage and a small range vs specific hand (4d5d) advantage on this board.
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 ... 57
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.127 seconds with 19 queries.