Yeah I think the number of poker sites that haven't leaked data is very small and that's just the ones I have knowledge of (i.e. unique email for each site). Some the emails even have my full name...
i know bongo is not a twat but i was getting annoyed with the keyboard warrior snipes. He still hasn't answered my question....
Taxing you more will motivate you to be more succesful to earn more money to cover the amount you're losing, win win?
WEEE!
I think your question was based on a faulty premise, I was talking about 2 different things really... 1) The coalition's plan (and how I don't think it's good, just I don't see any better ones). 2) How talk of taxing the rich more never takes into account things like the Laffer Curve
You still haven't answered the question of what would you do differently?
I imagine that enough data exists for the experts to have an educated guess... My point is more the argument over the 50p tax rate seems to ignore this entirely.
I think that's hilarious, I happened to see it and he was asked about the strikes and he said something positive and then said "as this is the BBC and we have to be balanced I'd better give the opposite side too" and made the comments (in jest).
Now it's being taken out of context to create a story.
Or, to quote JFK: "It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now ... Cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus."
Now I can't be sure that applies now but it seems, politically, discussion about whether or not we could increase revenues by cutting taxes is unpalatable.
The money they save from pensions will be used to pay off the country's debts not stay in the pension pot? Also more people wont bother taking a pension in the public sector workforce and just get more off the state when they retire.
I think there are a few things wrong there: 1) It won't pay off the debt, no one has any clue how we'll do that 2) There isn't really a pension pot 3) Bit of a gamble to assume the state will give them anything when they retire.
i certainly didn't like the tone of the postings on this thread, it sounded childish, some one took some of my sweets away, i'm happy they're taking yours now.
Anyway, you're going to wheel out the same old tired right wing bollocks and i'm going to wheel out the same old left wing bollocks. we'll take it all as read from here because i can't be arsed.
It seems rather odd that the left wing view is the people who have lost something should ensure the people who haven't don't.