Genting Casino. There in control of the game and the environment.
So a judge asks
Who Supplied the cards, dealers, inspectors, management and security, Everything was down to the house it's private property and they took the chance to take him on.
What are they moaning about!
I really can't see how Genting will win this. They dropped the ball V the wrong punter.
Although it's a bit shady from Ivey, surely blame lies within the casino? They should have changed the dealer/ deck of cards etc, to control the conditions. Don't let him keep playing to the point of winning millions and then refuse to pay out.
I agree with what you say apart from "Although it's a bit shady from Ivey"
You say you made the add on break with your initial stack so just buy in tonight at the add on break (which you should be doing anyway when there is a triple add-on as its easily the most optimal sat strategy) then have your add on and you will be in exactly the same situation as last night with no financial hardship incurred and you will have the same chance tonight of winning a seat as you would have last night. I think the £25 token is fair.