back to the subject in hand....


does anyone feel there would be a use, somewhere on the net (not here!!) for a "name and shame" facility of those who abuse the online chat boxes

does anyone think that has mileage?


Meanwhile, it was bloody cold and windy out today!

There should be something in place becuse what this one guy said to me was so bad there would have been a serious turn out if it had been at a table.I was so angry that this dougnut was able to use the system thus to say things that he would otherwise never be forwarded the opportunity to do.

Circumlocution. No one's a bigger fan of it than myself but 'net forums work better if we're all as concise as possible.

would you not agree then that in accentuating the content of my post as opposed to concentrating on grammatical proficiancy i have upheld the aforementioned practise of being concise?

etymology?

good stuff mate 

Now then, repeat after me:


1. All sentences need to begin with capital letters.

2. I will use full stops, commas and all other appropriate forms of punctuation where necessary.

3. Paragraphs are not just something army types draw in maths lessons.


100 times please, after school

If you follow these three easy rules I can enjoy the etymology of the text in your posts much more! cheers

i'm trying but everyones picking on me!!! is there no safe place for a person with an amazingly high iQ of 98!!!

Keep it coming bolt.

Its all about the etymology m8, go on the bolt!!!!

IT ' S     FFS!!!   sheesh

well if you want to be pedantic: IT'S    FFS!!!    sheesh'  is a sentence fragment without the correct punctuation to denote pauses and a conclusion; sheesh is an onomatopoeic phrase not recognised in modern English writing and the word its without a commer is a commenly used adjective used to imply ownership. ty gl

Keep it coming bolt.

Its all about the etymology m8, go on the bolt!!!!

I was going to ask if he/she had swallowed a dictionary, until I saw the spelling!!  lol


Must say this thread has cracked me up and put a smile on my face!


Thanks guys.

xx

i'm glad your amused but am eager to find out if you have an opinion about the content of my piece,
i would furthermore like to know what exactly it is that induced you to unequivocal incredulity over the validity of it?

lol i love it!! am i sane?  when i take my pills......which they force me to do-)

if its your contention that i used a thesaurus all well and good, but i find your underlying condersention dissparaging. furthermore had i used a thesaurus i would have constucted an assertion with a far greater array of obscure and extravegant synonyms!!!!!!

'it's'
'condescension'
'disparaging'
'extravagant'

Hope this helps. I await your next display of linguistic gymnastics with bated breath.

thanks for your corrections they're REALLY helpful, as it was an on going joke the errors featured in the sbsequent post were intentional; i think only heid got it!
as for the piece its self i am alittle supprised at the extent to which the digressive comments exceeded that of the piece itself;never mind. thanks to those who participated as it was a topical subject for me that i felt was of significant importance. the joke in writing the piece was that i spent longer trying to wake my girlfriend up to type than i did on the piece itself(i'm horribly inept at a key board) The response could have been so different if hadnt drunkenly ushered her straight into the spare tv!!! that was the end of that she was none to pleased.let me furthermore dispell the increasingly prevalent falacy that i'm a ringer. if i wasnt as drunk as i was last night i may have wished i had been in light of the proficiantly articulated derision i recieved.(mickeyt and scottish dave) dont stop digging me out lads i may return to gcse education yet!!! there was a 19th century auther and playwright who was the most appalling speller and his work when written by himself was barely legible, but it was his contention that the content and communication of his work far exceeded something as trivial as grammar. the playwright being oscar wilde was of course correct.I shall continue to formulate the most exasparatingly  poorly constructed pieces when a tad drunk and hope that in such an informal format for communication you all will develop a countenence my interminable but insightful opinions!! I'm eager to know how many of you that were so benevolant in ignominiously correcting my spelling had to consult a dictionary-) i suspect heid as being the only one who didnt (to astute for that time in the morning) lol

do you listen to music whilst playin online indoors? if so what is your prefered genre?
i go through five oasis albums usually whilst being a rock in a cash game(or trying to!!)
multi table action will see me kick off with a bit of potishead or scissor sisters but quickly switches to placebo when i crash out and get in the hot for a single table tourney!!!!
horses for courses or is there a discernable correlation between our online performance and the music we listen to?

Why is it that the annonimity that accompanies playing online induces the most deplorably reprehensible language and abuse from seemingly the preponderance of players.
insults that are nothing short of egreadious and would provoke substantial reaction if done in the bricks and mortar game are insouciantly conveyed at the drop of a hat precipitated by nothing more than a bad beat.a multitude of players are abusing the system thus, with compunction and impunity.
Are poker players inherintly contemptable and just very good at duplicitously fiegning humility and magnanomy in the real world only to asuage there anger and frustration by imparting the most pernicious inviduous insults when they get home and play online.
should there be a code of practice that precludes such behaviour and admonishes the perpertraitors with exclusion or suspension depending on the extent to which they have transgressed it?
the nefarious and cowardly element who i would propose never act thus offline, in fear of reprisal, should be filtered out so that human decency, prevalent decorum,and a propensity for reverence can flourish over individual site profit!

Spot the english teacher trying to impress!!

This is what you call an advert of an online thesaurus

But if you use a thesaurus... you should be able to copy the words correctly

oh did he spell some of them wrong?

if its your contention that i used a thesaurus all well and good, but i find your underlying condersention dissparaging. furthermore had i used a thesaurus i would have constucted an assertion with a far greater array of obscure and extravegant synonyms!!!!!!

Hey dont you swear at me, im a hero member lol

jesus lighten up dude lol

lol ok must have left my sense of humour at the cash game!!!

Why is it that the annonimity that accompanies playing online induces the most deplorably reprehensible language and abuse from seemingly the preponderance of players.
insults that are nothing short of egreadious and would provoke substantial reaction if done in the bricks and mortar game are insouciantly conveyed at the drop of a hat precipitated by nothing more than a bad beat.a multitude of players are abusing the system thus, with compunction and impunity.
Are poker players inherintly contemptable and just very good at duplicitously fiegning humility and magnanomy in the real world only to asuage there anger and frustration by imparting the most pernicious inviduous insults when they get home and play online.
should there be a code of practice that precludes such behaviour and admonishes the perpertraitors with exclusion or suspension depending on the extent to which they have transgressed it?
the nefarious and cowardly element who i would propose never act thus offline, in fear of reprisal, should be filtered out so that human decency, prevalent decorum,and a propensity for reverence can flourish over individual site profit!

Spot the english teacher trying to impress!!

This is what you call an advert of an online thesaurus

But if you use a thesaurus... you should be able to copy the words correctly

oh did he spell some of them wrong?

if its your contention that i used a thesaurus all well and good, but i find your underlying condersention dissparaging. furthermore had i used a thesaurus i would have constucted an assertion with a far greater array of obscure and extravegant synonyms!!!!!!

I have played in clubs where the starting stack is 10 big blinds, 50 seems fine to me, but I would not refuse more.

we all have but they are rebuys and the low starting stack is to encourage people to rebuy and build a pot

for a freezeout such blind to stack ratios make for a crap shoot unless people loosen up and seeing as its on tv and everyone wants to get as much airtime as possible people are alot tighter than normal even jac arama and gus hansen

channel 5 have an obligation to obtain viewers, the best way to do so pertaining to partypoker's tourney is to make it as exciting as possible. how much of channel influence dictate the blind structure? a sizable amount!1

i understand that those are the most commen situations to be shown on a televised event but the blinds start too high and force all ins to make exciting tv which disallows for any real poker to take place.
600'000 chips on table, still early doors with 5 guys left and the blinds are 7500/15000, tad large no?

the blind structure of this tourney is appalling. everyweek the play descends into a series of coin flips.
with the antes so dissproportionate to the chips on the table no poker prowess comes to prominence and although this structure facilitates the traslation to tv it has such a bearing on the game its a joke

can i put myself forward as nominee for poorest grammar!!!