As adrian just asked my hand where I lost a load was I opened to 400 with kq and got a call in one spot...

Flop was k66 with two clubs and I Cbet 750. He generally plays face up so when he calls I'm confident I'm ahead.

Turn Q completing flush, I still confident I'm good v him so lead for 1525 and hd dwells for ages before calling.

River offsuiy brick so o went for max value and lead 3500 , he calls with AT clubs for nut flush, wp me.

Ok, I went to post in the thread last week when I saw this, but it got locked moments before I got the chance. As this thread is going down the same path as that one, I will post this here instead. Just for you to draw your own conclusions to.

Greekstein in last weeks thread :

"I haven't posted on the matter because I will prob be questioned shortly by the police and didn't want to say anything which may interfere with any investigation so in keeping with this whole thread I'll be somewhat vague.

However, I was on the night out with everyone (including the parties involved) the night before the incident took place and the video was subsequently sent to me after. People can know because I'm not hiding from the fact I'm one of those it was sent to.

I'm not proud of the fact I didn't say anything but from a personal standpoint, and I think I speak on behalf of most/all of those it was sent to - I think some of us who were sent the video were shocked by it and just didn't know how to react. It's the first time I'd ever seen something of it's nature and as stupid as it sounds, I thought it was maybe best forgotten."


Greekstein in this thread http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=47546.msg1161862#msg1161862 on April 09, 2010. A good 6 months after "the video" (and Laxie didn't know about it at this time).

"LOL Laxie - Shieldsy's the biggest nutter I've ever met. Absolutely hilarious, but no boundaries. Just cos he was a gentleman to you doesn't mean he's not capable of writing those posts. In fact I doubt there's much that guy isn't capable of! I've seen some of the stuff he's done by video to my phone - nutter!"

Sorry I got really annoyed by Cos' post on the matter and had to make that point.

Need some help, all my card graphics have gone - all  I see is white boxes with an x in the middle which makes reading hhs rather difficult.

Anyone got a clue as to why this would be and what I can do to change it?

Thanks in advance.

A

Chip count on Rooks please

Ty guys!

Pics of Rookie's "crazy" hair please.

Many thanks

A

Or the spreadsheet has been amended before it was given out.

Has the new one requested come through yet?

Nope.... not certain it will tbh, not now that BF are looking into it for themselves...

Did I miss Blatch's detailed post that was meant to be forthcoming?

I just saw Greekstein's post above, have you and other people gone completely f****** insane?

The guy is lying to you every step of the way. He's trying to buy time and as somebody else said the only thing he's sorry about
is the fact he got caught. Don't believe a word he says. It's just another part of the con.

Lurker seems to have got this spot on. Time to take some action and stop letting emotional ties cloud judgement.

His family will want to try and help him - investors you need to start helping yourselves!

ha, i found that he put up £5000 at 1.01 osullivan vs selby frame betting on 17/01/2010, but it was cancelled.... maybe he does have a conscience.

I did try and move money between accounts but this wasnt to steal money out of the account it was simply so I could try to trade in my other account.

What difference did it make if you lost it on one account or the other?

I have looked over this spreadsheet for about 15 minutes, and can see already that the total won from the Pool Stoke game in question was actually £22088.65 judging by the spreadsheet.

I can also see two bets on the 21/01/2010 line number 3033 and 3034.... £5000 each time backing Raquibul Hasan in Bangladesh vs India first test @1.01. and the second time backing Niclas Fasth in Group B of the Abu Dhabi Champs.

Both bets in my opinion Blatch new had barely no chance of winning, and are low volume markets. It certainly looks to me like he has put up £5000 to lay at 1.01 on his own betfair account (knowing nobody would take that bet), and logged in on the trading account and backed it for £5k. Both times, within 6 hours of each other. Obviously both bets lost as they are more like 1000 than 1.01 and Blatch makes £10k just like that.

I know this can be done btw as I have done it from one of my betfair accounts to another......

this was my next question

how do we know the bets werent "against" his own personal account? so basically he is just transferring money by betting with himself (kinda where i was going with my other post)

if it wasnt with his own account he is a worse punter than scottish dave! its sick

I have looked over this spreadsheet for about 15 minutes, and can see already that the total won from the Pool Stoke game in question was actually £22088.65 judging by the spreadsheet.

I can also see two bets on the 21/01/2010 line number 3033 and 3034.... £5000 each time backing Raquibul Hasan in Bangladesh vs India first test @1.01. and the second time backing Niclas Fasth in Group B of the Abu Dhabi Champs.

Both bets in my opinion Blatch new had barely no chance of winning, and are low volume markets. It certainly looks to me like he has put up £5000 to lay at 1.01 on his own betfair account (knowing nobody would take that bet), and logged in on the trading account and backed it for £5k. Both times, within 6 hours of each other. Obviously both bets lost as they are more like 1000 than 1.01 and Blatch makes £10k just like that.

I know this can be done btw as I have done it from one of my betfair accounts to another......

I've been asked to make this post and to point out a couple of facts:

Rooks did not start this thread nor did he ask Cos to; In fact Rooks was happy to take the punishment for what he had done.

There was no contention on the punishment for the Olsen twin pics etc only on the fact that he was blamed for posting inappropriate remarks using the "Shieldsy" account.

Much has been made by some of the facts - and by that i do not mean the mods - I refer directly to diceman who clearly believes from his recent posts that he knows more than those involved. I also call into question the logic that links recent events and Rook's ban - to be quite frank you seem to talk a lot of tosh on matters you are not privy to. I did try to advise you of this personally - and yet you continue in your public efforts.

The fact is - that plenty of posts on this thread state certain things as "facts" which are actually incorrect -For example - the "faeces" photo. If in doubt ask the mods to confirm that Rooks was not responsible for it: I'm sure if asked they will and yet he is the one being blamed publicly for said material.

Furthermore, Rooks was happy to serve his time for admittedly a stupid high jinx moment, however - how many of you would serve a punishment for something you didn't do without appealing the decision?

Rooks appreciates the efforts of the moderating team - especially those who are reviewing the evidence. In all honesty he'd prefer this thread died a death as whilst the rumblings and conspiracies continue, it detracts from the truth.

Ironside, I've pm'd you - can you look into it for me?

Many thanks

Aisling