Tiger is definitely an exception in the fact he was/hopefully is/probably always will be, such a good front runner and win machine, hence his skewed stats on win to place ratio compared to other golfers. Which is why I could definitely listen to anyone suggesting markets overestimating x and underestimating y when it comes to Tiger. I think he is a real anomoly and therefore a lot harder to price up to win events than any other golfer and maybe sports person or team, especially at the moment
exactly i would say he could be the only golfer in history to have such a skewed record well maybe Byron Nelson in the 40's but i knew without looking that he had so many more 1st's than 2nd's etc that i just had to look it up i know Nickluas had 18 major wins but 19 seconds woods has 14 wins and only 6 seconds in majors and i was surprised it was that many tbh.
Gonzo to be honest i dont know 3/1 seems fair but you have to assume he will really suffer on those quick slopey greens then again 4/11 Garcia does not exactly set the pulse racing either will Castano beat Garcia more than 25% of the time meh probably.