blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 28, 2015, 12:35:15 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1991299 Posts in 62763 Topics by 18503 Members
Latest Member: alexcougar
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
Dusk Till Dawn Poker
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10

 41 
 on: Today at 09:52:08 AM 
Started by The Camel - Last post by DungBeetle
Someone who I discuss tennis with says the following:
Since you're into value, you should be well into Berdych odds to win the open
Into the semis now, 2.3 vs Murray and would be no worse than 2.8 vs djokovic in final
That's a double well under 6.5, but his odds are 10.5
And there's still a chance Novak loses in the QF or SF, which would slash his odds and make Berdych favourite in the final

The problem here is 2.3 is a redic short price for him  to beat murray.  I have had a max bet at 8/11 on muzza to beat Berd fwiw.  If you put the 'correct' price in for berd for the semis then the 10.5 looks 'right'.

I would also happily lay him at 15/8 to beat djork should they make the final. 

There is no way Berdych would be 15/8 against Djokovic imo?  Djokovic would be a 1.25 shot. 

 42 
 on: Today at 09:51:50 AM 
Started by leethefish - Last post by marcro
Waze is by far the best.  Real time traffic updates too.

I just checked this out.  The traffic info it provides is very impressive!  Also, if you check for the nearest petrol stations it gives you a list with the price of a gallon.

I can see why Google paid $1.3B to buy them.

 43 
 on: Today at 09:44:02 AM 
Started by AdamM - Last post by tikay


Quite interesting how this thread developed.

It was quickly established that the player had erred, & his hand - according to the rules - should be declared dead.

But then it changed direction, & 4 or 5 players blamed the Dealer.

We don't know at what venue this arose, so we have no idea if the dealing standard is good, bad, or indifferent.

The original ERROR was by the player, not the Dealer. No question about that. And it's possible that the Dealer should have spotted it, though the OP says "it all happened VERY quickly".

How do we end up pointing fingers at the dealer? The original error was not by the dealer, it was by the player.

Even Matt The Hoople Russell chimed in, "it tilts the shit out of me". How would he ever know, he rarely lasts more than an orbit. Is that the dealers fault, too?




 44 
 on: Today at 09:32:25 AM 
Started by leethefish - Last post by leethefish
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2924838/Thirteen-former-SAS-soldiers-face-trial-shoot-kill-deaths-IRA-suspects-series-covert-operations-30-years-ago.html

Extremely controversial !

 45 
 on: Today at 08:45:01 AM 
Started by bagel - Last post by tikay
Unlucky Adam, & slightly less so, Dan, too.

Here's Dan in action.

I'm not entirely sure, but this photo may have been taken when Dan was younger. The other guy got the cake on this occasion.


 Click to see full-size image.

 46 
 on: Today at 08:30:50 AM 
Started by Tractor - Last post by Tractor
Just wondering did any one go to this?

A bit of a gamble’ isn’t usually considered an endorsement for a restaurant, but there’s a Hackney pop-up that may be an exception. All-In Kitchen is dishing up in the converted Haggerston railway arch Trip Space Kitchen. It offers a three-course menu from Stoke Newington chefs Jones & Sons, which would normally set you back £50. But there’s a gimmick. All-In is run by PokerStars, and if you play your cards right, you can eat for nothing.

http://now-here-this.timeout.com/2015/01/20/chips-with-everything-at-londons-first-pay-by-poker-restaurant/

 47 
 on: Today at 08:24:48 AM 
Started by bagel - Last post by Dewi_cool
Nice one Dan.

 48 
 on: Today at 08:19:22 AM 
Started by MereNovice - Last post by chelseaboy
In!

Can you please PM bank details

Thanks

 49 
 on: Today at 07:53:35 AM 
Started by MereNovice - Last post by tikay
Question clarifications:

6. This is the team to score the first field goal.
7. This is the yardage for the longest successful field goal.
9. This is the nett total offensive yardage, i.e. yards lost due to sacks are subtracted from the total
15 & 16. These figures for passing yards do not include yards lost due to sacks.

Ahh, that makes more sense now, thank you.

I've been up all night worrying about those questions, my algo was struggling with them.

 50 
 on: Today at 07:44:02 AM 
Started by MereNovice - Last post by MereNovice
Question clarifications:

6. This is the team to score the first field goal.
7. This is the yardage for the longest successful field goal.
9. This is the nett total offensive yardage, i.e. yards lost due to sacks are subtracted from the total
15 & 16. These figures for passing yards do not include yards lost due to sacks.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
Dusk Till Dawn Poker
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.212 seconds with 16 queries.