|
Indestructable
|
 |
« on: December 04, 2007, 07:33:55 PM » |
|
If poker is a game of odds, why do players take part in tournaments where they are 90% to lose their money?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Colchester Kev
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2007, 07:36:42 PM » |
|
If poker is a game of odds, why do players take part in tournaments where they are 90% to lose their money? You MUG Ego ... you just cost me a fortune, i was offered 1/66 that your post would contain "Sky Poker" .. and 1/100 that it would be a self promoting post ... FFS i have done the money for a new car ... NEVERENDS. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bhoywonder
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2007, 07:37:20 PM » |
|
dunno
good question
im also 90 % to lose in any HU game
im used to the odds
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
may your god go with you
Scottish Open Apat online gold medal winner 2008
|
|
|
|
bolt pp
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2007, 07:45:59 PM » |
|
dunno
good question
im also 90 % to lose in any HU game
im used to the odds
lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Indestructable
|
|
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2007, 08:04:37 PM » |
|
If poker is a game of odds, why do players take part in tournaments where they are 90% to lose their money? You MUG Ego ... you just cost me a fortune, i was offered 1/66 that your post would contain " Sky Poker" .. and 1/100 that it would be a self promoting post ... FFS i have done the money for a new car ... NEVERENDS. I will try better next time, but no TV shows planned until the New Year so posts for the rest of the month are safe.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
cia260895
|
|
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2007, 09:11:20 PM » |
|
in the hope that they become better players and bring the odds down???
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dry em
|
|
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2007, 09:32:33 PM » |
|
If poker is a game of odds, why do players take part in tournaments where they are 90% to lose their money? Are all players 90% to do their money in every tournament? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Indestructable
|
|
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2007, 09:40:41 PM » |
|
Well 90% of players are allways going to lose if pay outs are for 10% only, but I guess an argument will be that some are more likely to lose than others.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RED-DOG
|
|
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2007, 09:55:43 PM » |
|
Good players are a lot better than 90/1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The older I get, the better I was.
|
|
|
|
Karabiner
|
|
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2007, 12:23:56 AM » |
|
Good players are a lot better than 90/1
And they have indestructible egos  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time maddening and rewarding and it is without a doubt the greatest game that mankind has ever invented.\" - Arnold Palmer aka The King.
|
|
|
|
RichEO
|
|
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2007, 07:37:44 AM » |
|
Good players are a lot better than 90/1
You mean 9/1 ? And more importantly, you can cash more more than 10 times you buy in. So you don't need to be better than 9/1 to cash if you place high enough. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AlexMartin
|
|
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2007, 08:26:22 AM » |
|
Good players are a lot better than 90/1
pmsl. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RED-DOG
|
|
« Reply #12 on: December 05, 2007, 12:57:11 PM » |
|
Good players are a lot better than 90/1
pmsl. Oops.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The older I get, the better I was.
|
|
|
|
Author