blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 29, 2024, 10:02:22 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272619 Posts in 66756 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  MTT final table hand
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: MTT final table hand  (Read 2601 times)
totalise
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2620


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: October 04, 2006, 11:30:52 PM »

I agree with Wellchief entirely


Logged
SupaMonkey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 985


Allin!


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 04, 2006, 11:31:47 PM »

Sorry Wellchief, i didn't mean it in a bad way.


Edit, I meant that usually in these situations dale/totalise can offer a pretty good mathematical solution that can't be argued with, that's all (not to say that others can't, but these are just two people who spring to mind).
« Last Edit: October 04, 2006, 11:40:29 PM by SupaMonkey » Logged
kingkev
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: October 04, 2006, 11:46:58 PM »

nice attempt at a re-steal bertpup but i'd rather make this play with 2 live cards than a raggy ace since your table image didn't sound too good and opps are more likely to start calling you with hands like A-Q A-J and mid PP's
Logged

there can be only one
SupaMonkey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 985


Allin!


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2006, 12:25:24 AM »

Bertpup, what was your plan if your oppo had checked behind you?
Logged
Bertpup
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 202


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: October 05, 2006, 12:56:10 AM »

I wouldnt have minded a check behind. If i didnt hit any of the flop and it was a pretty uncoordinated board,  i would either bet 55000 or check call a bet up the the same size and then fire a 75-90k bet regardless of what the turn brought.
Logged
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22416


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: October 05, 2006, 10:30:43 AM »

I don't get people who said to fold the 9's

the 99 was a good call. in a position where there isn't a lot of difference between the prizemoney yet, you have to assume your pocket 9's are good against a player like that. It's a call every single time in a top heavy tourney.

You can ofcourse also justify the push with the ace rag (because of the position of player nr 5 and his dead chips you could have made it with any two cards really..as the people who told you to fold the hand when they thought you had pocket 9's show) but if I have pocket 9's here I call every single time.

Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
SupaMonkey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 985


Allin!


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: October 05, 2006, 06:07:24 PM »

Right, i used an icm to do this.

Pos Payout Additional %

1st   1206   927   60%
2nd  728    449    29%
3rd   402    123    8%
4th   324    45     3%
5th   279    0       0%

From the original question the chips counts are

Person Chips Equity
LS      659039   0.2356
Bert   502486   0.1917
Dan    896661   0.2926
WPT  690678   0.2439
POP   83136     0.0362

If the 9-9 folds

Person Chips Equity
LS      759239   0.2631
Bert   396286   0.1602
Dan    895661   0.2945
WPT   689678  0.2456
POP    82136    0.0366

If the 9-9 loses

Person Chips Equity
LS      1158525   0.3620
Bert    0             0.0
Dan    895661     0.3121
WPT   689678    0.2640
POP    82136      0.0619

If the 9-9 wins

Person Chips Equity
LS      156553    0.0779
Bert   1007972   0.3251
Dan    895661    0.3020
WPT   689678   0.2533
POP    82136     0.0417

Soooooooooooooooooo  (that's the closest emoticon to a drumroll we have)

If P is the probability of winning the hand,

0.3251* P + (1 - P) * 0.0 > 0.1602

Gives P as 49.2% which means that the 9-9 should call if it has more than a 49.2% chance of winning the hand. Pokerstove gives this hand range as 77+,A9s+,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,ATo+,KJo+ and equates to the top 12.5% of hands. Now, because he is obviously doing it with a larger range than that the 9-9 should call. (it was luck boldie  Smiley)

 

ps, can someone check these pls cos i've probably made a mistake somewhere.




Ok, so now a new question. How do you play the A-3 in that position and with those stack sizes.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2006, 06:09:53 PM by SupaMonkey » Logged
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22416


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: October 05, 2006, 06:40:57 PM »

like i said both plays can be justified. I quite like the push with the A3...but i would call with the 9's.

I would have folded the A3 but that's cus I'm a tight git.
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
SupaMonkey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 985


Allin!


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: October 05, 2006, 08:20:43 PM »

You would have folded preflop? Do you mean you wouldn't have made it up in the first place or you would fold to the raise?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.18 seconds with 21 queries.